Gaps in Food Access DURING the COVID-19 PANDEMIC in MASSACHUSETTS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gaps in Food Access DURING the COVID-19 PANDEMIC in MASSACHUSETTS Gaps in Food Access DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN MASSACHUSETTS A REPORT BY IN COLLABORATION WITH GENEROUSLY SUPPORTED BY MAY 2021 Food Insecurity on the Rise in Massachusetts About this Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, food insecurity in Massachusetts increased 55% from 2019 to 2020. At the time of our survey, 30% or 1.6 million adults were experiencing survey food insecurity. Similar to national data, food insecurity rates during the pandemic were highest among adults with children and people of color: From October 2020 to January 2021, The Greater Boston Food • 42% of households with children Bank (GBFB),+55% using an online • 58% of Latinx adults survey company, surveyed over • 45% of Black adults 3,000 Massachusetts adults to obtain timely data on food • 26% of Asian adults insecurity during the COVID-19 • White adults had the lowest level of food insecurity at 24% +55% pandemic. We oversampled low-income adults in order to 12 months before COVID-19 During COVID-19 hear from those most likely in FIGURE 1. need of food assistance and Food insecurity rates among Massachusetts adults, overall and by race/ethnicity used statistical methods to obtain and adults with children (measured using the 6-item USDA Household Food Security estimates representative of the Survey module). Massachusetts population. 12 months before COVID-19 During COVID-19 Figure 1. The survey, funded by the 19% Hunger to Health Collaboratory Overall and Stop & Shop, conducted 30% Figure 1. by GBFB in collaboration with the National Food Access 44% 19% Latinx and COVID Research Team Overall 58% (NFACT, nfactresearch.org), was 30% undertaken to: 31% 44% Black Latinx 45% 1. Identify the prevalence of food 58% insecurity 16% 31% Asian Black 26% 2. Identify gaps and disparities in 45% food assistance use 16% 31% Asian Other/Multiracial 26% 54% 3. Develop data-driven recommendations to ensure 31% 15% Other/Multiracial White that all have adequate access 54% 24% to food 15% White 24% Households 27% with children 42% Households 27% with children 42% Households 14% without children 22% Households 14% without children 22% Figure 3. Figure 3. 9% 9% Overall Overall 12% 12% 21% 21% Latinx Latinx 28% 28% 20% 1 Black 20% 26% Black 26% 6% Asian 6% 9% Asian 9% 17% Other/Multiracial 19% 17% Other/Multiracial 6% 19% White 9% 6% White 9% Households 12% with children 18% Households 12% Households 6% with children 18% without children 8% Households 6% without children 8% Figure 4. 12% Overall 20% Figure 4. 27% 12% Latinx Overall 40% 20% 22% Black 39% 27% Latinx 7% 40% Asian 16% 22% Black 13% Other/Multiracial 39% 38% 7% 9% Asian White 16% 15% 13% Other/Multiracial Households 16% 38% with children 29% 9% 9% White Households 15% without children 14% Households 16% with children 29% Households 9% without children 14% Gaps in Food Assistance Use +55% Roughly half of adults experiencing food insecurity were using either Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) or food pantries during the pandemic. Among the food insecure, those who used food pantries were more likely to also be using other forms of food assistance; 72% reported using SNAP, 55% of those with children under 5 reported using WIC, and 61% with children under 18 reported +55% using school meals. Even those who were using multiple food assistance programs often times still felt that their food needs were not fully met. 12 months before COVID-19 During COVID-19 FIGURE 2. Food assistance use among adults experiencing food insecurity. Figure 2. 12 months before COVID-19 During COVID-19 27% Adults using food pantries 32% 32% Figure 2. Adults using SNAP 46% 27% Adults using food pantries 32% 46% Adults using either food pantries or SNAP 32% 55% Adults using SNAP 46% 33% Adults with children under 5 receiving WIC 46% 35% Adults using either food pantries or SNAP 55% Adults with children receiving free 30% 33% Adults with children under 5 receiving WIC or reduced-priced school meals 37% 35% Adults with children receiving free 30% or reduced-priced school meals 37% “Along with max SNAP benefits and Pandemic-EBT at least for a couple of months we felt food secure. Without both, we still struggle toward the end of the month. We have both been out of work during the pandemic with three children at home. It has been a very hard year.” – Mother, Hampden County 2 +55% 12 months before COVID-19 During COVID-19 Figure 1. 19% Overall 30% 44% Latinx 58% 31% Black 45% 16% Asian 26% 31% Other/Multiracial 54% 15% White 24% 27% +55% Households with children 42% Households 14% without children 22% 12 months before COVID-19 During COVID-19 Figure 1. Figure 3. 19% 9% Overall Overall 30% 12% 44% Latinx 21% Latinx 58% 28% 31% 20% Black Black 45% 26% 16% 6% Asian Asian 26% 9% Only 1 out of 3 Adults31% Only 1 out of 2 Adults Other/Multiracial 17% experiencing Food Insecurity Other/Multiracial 54% experiencing Food 19%Insecurity are Using Food Pantries15% are Enrolled in SNAP White 6% Pantry use increased among all racial/ethnic groups during Use of SNAP wasWhite highest among adults with children, 24% 9% the pandemic; 30% of those who used a pantry during the with 29% using SNAP during the pandemic, nearly pandemic did so for the first time. double the rate from 2019. SNAP use increased among Households 27% all racial/ethnicHouseholds groups. 12% Most pantry userswith children(77%) learned42% about the pantry from with children 18% friends, family, or online searches, with very few being The majority (89%) of those enrolled in SNAP found it Households 14% referred by formal outreach programs. On average, they helpful. However,Households many found6% it insufficient, with 54% without children 22% visited a pantry once or twice per month and 47% said at reportingwithout they had children to seek8% additional food assistance, least half of their groceries came from a pantry during such as going to a food pantry. +55% the+55% pandemic. FIGURE 3. FIGURE 4. Food pantry use among Massachusetts adults, overall SNAP use among Massachusetts adults, overall and and by race/ethnicity and adults with children. by race/ethnicity and adults with children. 12 months before COVID-19 During COVID-19 12 months before COVID-19 During COVID-19 Figure 3. Figure 4. 9% 12% Overall Overall 12% 20% Figure 1. Figure 1. 21% 27% 19% Latinx 19% Latinx Overall 28% Overall 40% 30% 30% 20% 22% Black Black 44% 44% Latinx 26% Latinx 39% 58% 58% 6% 7% 31% Asian 31% Asian Black 9% Black 16% 45% 45% 17% 16% 16% 13% Asian Other/Multiracial Asian Other/Multiracial 26% 19% 26% 38% 31% 6% 31% 9% Other/Multiracial White Other/Multiracial White 54% 9% 54% 15% 15% 15% White White 24% Households 12% 24% Households 16% with children 18% with children 29% Households 27% Households 27% 6% 9% with children 42% Households with children 42% Households without children 8% without children 14% Households 14% Households 14% without children 22% without children 22% “I never realized food pantries supplied “Extremely grateful for the extra pandemic fresh fruit and vegetables. Now that assistance. My SNAP feeds me one meal a comes in handy more than ever! day for about two weeks, give or take. Figure 4. 12% ” Figure 3. Figure 3. 9% – First-timeOverall food pantry user, Worcester 9% I have to ask friends and family for food Overall 20% Overall 12% 12%assistance because SNAP just doesn’t give 27% 21% Latinx 21%enough, ever, to survive on. I just can’t Latinx 40% Latinx 28% 28% survive without the help of others.” 20% 22% 20% Black Black Black – Single mom, Salem 26% 39% 26% 6% 7% 6% Asian Asian Asian 9% 16% 9% 3 17% 17% Other/Multiracial 13% Other/Multiracial 19% Other/Multiracial 19% 38% 6% 6% White 9% White 9% White 9% 15% Households 12% Households 12% with children 18% Households 16% with children 18% with children Households 6% 29% Households 6% without children without children 8% Households 9% 8% without children 14% Figure 4. Figure 12%4. 12% Overall Overall 20% 20% 27% 27% Latinx Latinx 40% 40% 22% 22% Black Black 39% 39% 7% 7% Asian Asian 16% 16% 13% 13% Other/Multiracial Other/Multiracial 38% 38% 9% 9% White White 15% 15% Households 16% Households 16% with children 29% with children 29% Households 9% Households 9% without children 14% without children 14% Key Barriers to Food Pantry Use: Self-Reliance, Stigma, and Awareness The most commonly reported barriers to using pantries included a desire for self-reliance, lack of FIGURE 5. knowledge about pantry hours, stigma, and concern FoodKey Barriers pantry to Using barriersFood Pantries reported by adults experiencing food over having too many assets to use a food pantry. insecurity who have not used a food pantry during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, those that were able to overcome these Key Barriers to SNAP barriers and use food pantries were satisfied with their experience: 89% felt welcome, 89% would 74% I want to support myself instead recommend pantries to others, 80% felt the food aligned with their cultural beliefs, 77% said it was 62% I don’t know when they are open I’m worried that I’m not eligible what they liked to eat, and 75% felt the food was of I want to support myself instead good quality. I feel embarrassed to use 58% 78% I’m worried about paperwork I need to share 73% I’m worried people will find out I use 57% I’m worried I have too many personal assets I’d feel embarrassed to use 54% The hours and locations are not convenient I don’t know how to apply I have been using food pantries I don’t have time to apply “ 51% since I was young.
Recommended publications
  • Greater Boston and Massachusetts PHILANTHROPIC LANDSCAPE
    Greater Boston and Massachusetts PHILANTHROPIC LANDSCAPE JUNE 2020 Introduction Every June, Giving USA provides its report on philanthropy from the previous year to the nonprofit community. While reviewing the findings from 2019 will be informative, we know that the current pandemic, social unrest, and economic upheaval are presenting real-time and frequently changing demands on nonprofits across all sectors. In recent years, charitable giving in the United States has reached record-breaking numbers in contributions reported from individuals, foundations, and charitable bequests. The last significant dip in giving was during the financial crisis in 2009, when an estimated 14 million fewer US households reported making charitable gifts. We know that the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted nonprofit programming and finances. All insights point to continued unpredictability. The sector would be wise to make plans now to mitigate a potential dip in fundraising in 2020. While we can’t forecast the future, we do know that it’s critical that organizations stay connected to the communities that they serve, despite economic contraction and our inability to gather as usual. Our valid concerns about the impact of COVID-19 and the societal climate underscore the nonprofit sector’s vital leadership role in the welfare of our communities. More than one million nonprofit organizations are registered in the United States. How well institutions can pivot in response to the monumental events of 2020 will affect their philanthropy and income, and as a result, their programming and impact, well into the future. With this in mind, CCS has endeavored to consolidate many insightful reports on giving and current trends during these uncertain times into this regional philanthropic landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hub's Metropolis: a Glimpse Into Greater Boston's Development
    James C. O’Connell, “The Hub’s Metropolis: Greater Boston’s Development” Historical Journal of Massachusetts Volume 42, No. 1 (Winter 2014). Published by: Institute for Massachusetts Studies and Westfield State University You may use content in this archive for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the Historical Journal of Massachusetts regarding any further use of this work: [email protected] Funding for digitization of issues was provided through a generous grant from MassHumanities. Some digitized versions of the articles have been reformatted from their original, published appearance. When citing, please give the original print source (volume/ number/ date) but add "retrieved from HJM's online archive at http://www.wsc.ma.edu/mhj. 26 Historical Journal of Massachusetts • Winter 2014 Published by The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 7x9 hardcover, 326 pp., $34.95. To order visit http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/hubs-metropolis 27 EDITor’s choicE The Hub’s Metropolis: A Glimpse into Greater Boston’s Development JAMES C. O’CONNELL Editor’s Introduction: Our Editor’s Choice selection for this issue is excerpted from the book, The Hub’s Metropolis: Greater Boston’s Development from Railroad Suburbs to Smart Growth (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2013). All who live in Massachusetts are familiar with the compact city of Boston, yet the history of the larger, sprawling metropolitan area has rarely been approached as a comprehensive whole. As one reviewer writes, “Comprehensive and readable, James O’Connell’s account takes care to orient the reader in what is often a disorienting landscape.” Another describes the book as a “riveting history of one of the nation’s most livable places—and a roadmap for how to keep it that way.” James O’Connell, the author, is intimately familiar with his topic through his work as a planner at the National Park Service, Northeast Region, in Boston.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston Produced in 2012
    BioMap2 CONSERVING THE BIODIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS IN A CHANGING WORLD Boston Produced in 2012 This report and associated map provide information about important sites for biodiversity conservation in your area. This information is intended for conservation planning, and is not intended for use in state regulations. BioMap2 Conserving the Biodiversity of Massachusetts in a Changing World Table of Contents Introduction What is BioMap2 – Purpose and applications One plan, two components Understanding Core Habitat and its components Understanding Critical Natural Landscape and its components Understanding Core Habitat and Critical Natural Landscape Summaries Sources of Additional Information Boston Overview Core Habitat and Critical Natural Landscape Summaries Elements of BioMap2 Cores Core Habitat Summaries Elements of BioMap2 Critical Natural Landscapes Critical Natural Landscape Summaries Natural Heritage Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife 1 Rabbit Hill Road, Westborough, MA 01581 & Endangered phone: 508‐389‐6360 fax: 508‐389‐7890 Species Program For more information on rare species and natural communities, please see our fact sheets online at www.mass.gov/nhesp. BioMap2 Conserving the Biodiversity of Massachusetts in a Changing World Introduction The Massachusetts Department of Fish & Game, through the Division of Fisheries and Wildlife’s Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), and The Nature Conservancy’s Massachusetts Program developed BioMap2 to protect the state’s biodiversity in the context of climate change. BioMap2 combines NHESP’s 30 years of rigorously documented rare species and natural community data with spatial data identifying wildlife species and habitats that were the focus of the Division of Fisheries and Wildlife’s 2005 State Wildlife Action Plan (SWAP).
    [Show full text]
  • 495/Metrowest Profile Prepared for the 495/Metrowest Suburban Edge Community Commission
    495/MetroWest Profile Prepared for the 495/MetroWest Suburban Edge Community Commission 495/MetroWest Suburban Edge Community Commission The 495/ MetroWest Suburban Edge Community Commission was established by the Legislature in Section 233 of Chapter 119 of the Session Laws of 2015. The commission will study development challenges experienced by edge communities, including transportation, water, cellular, and energy infrastructure, transit services, residential development, reuse of former industrial facilities and historic mills, brownfields reclamation, downtown redevelopment and other such constraints. The commission will then develop policy responses and recommendations to ensure that edge communities can participate in state development initiatives and benefit from state resources. The commission will focus its investigation and study on the 35 municipalities served by the 495/MetroWest Corridor Partnership, Inc. and develop a pilot program to address the issues to be studied and investigated by the commission. Our Mission The mission of the Public Policy Center (PPC) at UMass Dartmouth is to: Inform evidence-based policy making. Improve public understanding of critical policy issues. Provide educational and research opportunities to our faculty and students. Connect the resources of the University of Massachusetts to the communities we serve. The PPC's primary goal is to inform public policy discussions by providing policy makers with university quality research, technical assistance, and analytical services designed to help make our state, region, and communities better places to live, work, and do business. We do this by leveraging the substantial skills of our students and faculty partners, and enhancing the connections between the University and the communities it serves. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 The 495/MetroWest Region ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lifeworks Expands Autism Services Across Boston Region, Establishes Support Center for Adults Nonprofit Agency to Observe National Autism Acceptance Month in April
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Alex Villanueva, Ball Consulting Group, LLC Phone: 617-243-9950; Email: [email protected] Lifeworks Expands Autism Services Across Boston Region, Establishes Support Center for Adults Nonprofit Agency to Observe National Autism Acceptance Month in April WESTWOOD, Mass. (April 1, 2021) – Lifeworks, a nonprofit human services provider that supports people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, announced today – the first day of National Autism Acceptance Month – that it is expanding its community-based autism services to include adult autism support in 40 communities in the Department of Developmental Services (DDS) Boston Metro Region, in addition to its existing youth and family autism services in Newton and parts of Norfolk county. Lifeworks will establish an Adult Autism Support Center within its West Roxbury office that will help individuals and families navigate available autism-related services, provide workshops and caregiver training, and participate in enriching social and recreational activities. “It’s a privilege to expand our autism support services in the DDS Metro Boston Region,” said Daniel Sullivan, Vice President of Quality and Community Services at Lifeworks. “We look forward to providing our comprehensive supports and services as we establish new community connections and partnerships.” As part of this effort, Lifeworks will appoint an Assistant Director of Adult Services, add two new adult autism support specialists, and form new collaborations with advocacy organizations, employers, law enforcement and other community partners. Lifeworks has a long history of providing autism supports and its Family Autism Center based at its headquarters in Westwood has grown to serve nearly 1,000 individuals in the Newton/South Norfolk area.
    [Show full text]
  • Lynn MA 1956
    LYNN LYNNFIELD MAR'BLEHEAD NAHANT - >J . :< 7 , - :. SAUGUS ?, '-"*i -. --. 1. - . ;. ;. - 7 x.. ->. .-,I - .. - ,, ,I -*, i 5: .* . I.. -- ,I- : 1 8. SWAMPSCOTT !PHI3 mISH POPULATION OF GREATER LYNN, MASSACHUSETTS (Lynn, Lynnf ield , Marblehead, Saws, ~wampscott) A DENOGRAPHIC STUDY - 1956 TRE JEWISH CmmJZDERATION OF GREATER LYNN 45 Market Street Lynn, Mass. - OF GREATER LYNN, Inc. 45 MARKET STREET, LYNN, MASS. Telephone Lynn 5-5648 SERVING LYNN, LYNNFIELD, MARBLEHEAD, NAHANT, SAUGUS AND SWAMPSCOm Harold 0. Zimman, President Jewish Community Federa.tion 45 Market Street Lynn, Mass. Dear Harold: We are indeed pleased to submit the completed report on the study of the Jewish P3pulation of Greater Lynn, Mass. We have included herewith an analysis of the major demographic characteristics of our Jewish community together with a compilation of supporting tables and statistics. This completes phase one of a two-fold study of the Jewish population of r Grea.ter Lynn, which includes Lynn, Lynnfield, Swampscott, Marblehead, Nahant and Sa.ugus. The second section of the study dealing with the needs of our older citizens will get under way this Fall. The success of our survey was due primarily to the work of our committees, especially the technical sub-cormnittee, which had direct overall responsibility for the project. We wish at this time to express our appreciation to the more than 150 volunteer interviewers whose telephone and home visit contacts accom- plished the phenomenal job of securing valuable information from our 3,000 local Jewish families. We also wish to thank the Executive Director and staff of the Federation for its competent handling of the many details of this very large study project.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Organizations Receiving Donations of $1,000 Or More
    2016 Organizations Receiving Donations of $1,000 or More Organization Name City State Amount 2020 Women on Boards Jamaica Plain MA $2,020 826 Boston Roxbury MA $1,500 A Better Chance of Andover Andover MA $2,500 ACCION Cambridge MA $5,000 ACLU Foundation of Massachusetts Boston MA $35,000 ACT Lawrence Lawrence MA $2,500 Adolescent Consultation Services Cambridge MA $10,000 Adopt-A-Student Program Worcester MA $2,500 Agassiz Baldwin Community Cambridge MA $1,000 Agassiz Village Lexington MA $1,500 Agway of Cape Cod Charitable Foundation South Dennis MA $1,000 AIDS Action Committee of MA Boston MA $10,000 Alex's Team Foundation Newburyport MA $2,500 Alice's House Marshfield MA $2,500 Allston Brighton Community Development Corporation Allston MA $7,000 ALS Family Charitable Foundation Bourne MA $1,000 ALS Knights Whitman MA $13,500 ALSAC/St. Jude Children's Research Hospital Newton MA $5,000 American Cancer Society Acton MA $2,050 American Heart Association Waltham MA $2,600 American Heart Association - NH Manchester NH $5,000 American Red Cross Cape Cod, Islands and Southeast MA Hyannis MA $1,000 American Red Cross NH & VT Concord NH $1,000 American Red Cross of Northeast Massachusetts Peabody MA $1,100 American Training Andover MA $2,500 AmeriCares Stamford CT $2,500 Amos House Providence RI $12,750 Andover High School Baseball Boosters Andover MA $1,000 Animal Rescue League of Boston Boston MA $2,500 Animal Rescue League of NH Bedford NH $3,500 Anne Kenneally Hynes Scholarship East Bridgewater MA $1,500 Anti-Defamation League Boston MA
    [Show full text]
  • Lynn, MA HQ2 Proposal
    CITY OF LYNN MASSACHUSETTS AMAZON HQ2 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction II. Site Overview III. Incentives IV. Labor & Wage Information V. Education VI. Sustainability VII. Proximity/Transportation VIII. Quality of Life IX. Intangibles 3 4 5 I . INTRODUCTION The ideal location for Amazon is s o m e o f t h e w o r l d ’ s b e s t h o s p i t a l s , a 100-acre shovel-ready waterfront universities, museums and private site 10 miles from Downtown and public schools. To the east, Boston. With breathtaking ocean north and south are some of this views, quick proximity to one of country’s best and most storied the nation’s premier international beaches; to the west and north, airports, on-site commuter rail skiing, hiking and lakes within easy and commuter ferry service, the reach in New Hampshire and Maine. Lynn Waterfront Parcel is also only Lynn itself offers affordable housing 12 miles from the Massachusetts stock ranging from refurbished Institute of Technology and triple deckers to new waterfront Massachusetts General Hospital, and condominiums to older homes on within easy reach of North Shore urban streets. Adjacent are suburbs beaches, wooded reservations and that range from high-end waterfront ample housing stock ranging from communities like Marblehead to historic farm homes to inner-city affordable middle class towns like condominiums, brownstones and Swampscott and Lynnfield. Historic multi-family units. Gloucester, Salem and Manchester- by-the-Sea are easy commutes on Lynn, population 93,000, is an major highways.
    [Show full text]
  • LOCALLY COORDINATED TRANSPORTATION PLAN for the Greater Nashua and Milford Region
    LOCALLY COORDINATED TRANSPORTATION PLAN For the Greater Nashua and Milford Region Locally Coordinated Transportation Plan For the Greater Nashua and Milford Region 2020-2024 Adopted: April 15, 2020 LOCALLY COORDINATED TRANSPORTATION PLAN For the Greater Nashua and Milford Region ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Community Input Participants Bridges: Domestic & Sexual Violence Support Servicelink City of Nashua Welfare/Human Services Department Souhegan Valley Transportation Collaborative Front Door Agency Southern NH HIV/AIDS Task Force Gentle Car Rides, LLC Southern NH Services Granite State Independent Living St. John Neumann Day Away Harbor Homes, Inc St. Joseph’s Community Services, Inc. Interested Public Toward Independent Living and Learning, Inc. Keystone Hall Town of Amherst Welfare/Human Services Department Milford Taxi Town of Brookline Welfare/Human Services Department Nashua Center Town of Hollis Welfare/Human Services Department Nashua Soup Kitchen & Shelter, Inc. Town of Hudson Welfare/Human Services Department Nashua Transit System Town of Litchfield Welfare/Human Services Department Opportunity Networks Town of Mason Welfare/Human Services Department Partnership for Successful Living Town of Merrimack Welfare/Human Services Department Pelham Senior Center Town of Milford Welfare/Human Services Department PLUS Company, Inc. Town of Pelham Welfare/Human Services Department SHARE Outreach Town of Wilton Welfare/Human Services Department Steering Committee Nashua Regional Planning Commission Steve Genest, Southern New Hampshire Services Jay
    [Show full text]
  • Rhode Island Rapid Rail
    RHODE ISLAND RAPID RAIL A Strategy for Economic Growth Concept Paper March 2019 Grow Smart RI Board of Directors Gail E. McCann Wilfrid L. Gates Board Chair Michael S. Hudner Stanley J. Kanter Lloyd Albert Michael F. Ryan William Baldwin Deming E. Sherman Daniel A. Baudouin W. Edward Wood Samuel J. Bradner Kenneth Burnett John Chambers Acknowledgements Sharon D. Conard-Wells Gib Conover Grow Smart RI thanks its pro-bono planning Trudy Coxe and transportation consultants Roger Leaf of Michael A. DeCataldo New York City and Peter Brassard of Dennis DiPrete Newport, RI and New York City for their Maia Farish leadership in concept development, analysis Travis Escobar and research that made this proposal Michael L. Friedman possible. Glenn Gardiner Brian Goldberg Cover images and graphic concepts courtesy Karen Grande of Roger Williams University student intern Dr. William H. Hollinshead Karita N. Lipdo. Jason E. Kelly Xaykham Khamsyvoravong Howard M. Kilguss Purpose Jane S. Long This paper is being submitted to RIPTA and Pat Moran its planning consultants for consideration Jay O'Grady and evaluation as part of Rhode Island’s first- Taino Palermo ever Transit Master Planning process now Donald W. Powers underway. Lucie G. Searle Pamela M. Sherrill Julia Anne M. Slom Grow Smart RI Joseph T. Wanat 1 Empire St, Suite 523 George Watson III Providence, RI 02903 Martha L. Werenfels 401-273-5711 Nancy Parker Wilson www.GrowSmartRI.org Directors Emeritus Arnold "Buff" Chace Louise Durfee, Esq. Grow Smart RI 1 Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................... 2 Rethinking mobility in RI ..................................................................................... 2 Rhode Island Rapid Rail........................................................................................ 3 Better Connecting People with Jobs .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Regional System Plan Transmission Projects and Asset Condition March 2018 Update
    MARCH 15, 2018 | MILFORD, MA Regional System Plan Transmission Projects and Asset Condition March 2018 Update Planning Advisory Committee Meeting Brent Oberlin DIRECTOR, TRANSMISSION PLANNING ISO-NE PUBLIC TABLE OF CONTENTS Slide Highlights 3 March 2018 Changes 4 – 16 Status of Major Transmission Projects 17 – 18 October Asset Condition Changes 19 – 28 Appendix 29 – 35 ISO-NE PUBLIC 2 Highlights of the Project List Update • Major cost estimate changes that occurred between the October 2017 and March 2018 Project List: (MA) - Central Western Massachusetts Upgrades – Project 945 - Adams – install two new 115 kV breakers and replace two existing 115 kV breakers and associated line relocations. Project cost increased (cost increase $11.9M) Cost changes are due to an enhanced understanding of the multiple site condition impacts on the construction plan as outlined at the December 2017 PAC meeting. (MA) – Pittsfield/Greenfield – Projects 1662, 1664, 1665, and 1663 cost decreased (cost reduction $12.3M). Cost changes are due to project cost alignments. • No New Projects • 22 Upgrades on the project list have been placed in-service since the October 2017 update: (CT) SWCT- 1 project in-service (CT) GHCC- 4 projects in-service – includes new 115 kV (10.35 mile) line from Frost Bridge - Campville (MA) Central Western MA Upgrades – 1 project in-service (MA) Greater Boston - 6 projects in-service – includes new 345 kV line from Scobie – Tewksbury (MA) Pittsfield/Greenfield - 4 projects in-service (MA) C-181/D-182 Brayton Point – S. Wrentham line refurbishment (NH) Pelham Substation – install 115 kV tap and inline breaker (VT) Y25N Bennington – Harriman + Taps Refurbishment (VT) Connecticut River Valley - 1 project in-service (VT) Replace PV20 submarine cables (VT) Harriman Asset Condition ISO-NE PUBLIC 3 March 2018 Changes No New Projects and Corresponding Need Project Cost Transmission System Upgrades Improvement/Need ID # (in millions $) ISO-NE PUBLIC 4 March 2018 Changes, cont.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhode Island - Massachusettsme Area NH VT
    The Selected Alternative: Connecticut - Rhode Island - MassachusettsME Area NH VT Albany MA Worcester Boston The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) sponsored NY Today’s Springfield the NEC FUTURE program to create a comprehensive Hartford Northeast RI Providence plan for improving the Northeast Corridor (NEC) CT Corridor New London from Washington, D.C., to Boston, MA. Through NEC Bridgeport New London/Mystic FUTURE, the FRA has worked closely with NEC states, Stamford New Haven railroads, stakeholders, and the public to define a Newark common vision for the corridor’s future. NJ 457 Miles PA New York OF TRACK TOOK NEARLY A Harrisburg CENTURY TO BUILD Trenton Selecting the Grow Vision Philadelphia Wilmington 750,000+ The Selected Alternative provides the level of service WV MD NJ Daily Passengers Baltimore necessary to grow the role of rail in the regional MAKES THIS THE BUSIEST RAIL CORRIDOR IN THE NATION transportation system. The Selected Alternative DE Washington, D.C. will improve the reliability, capacity, connectivity, performance, and resiliency of passenger rail services 7 Million Jobs WITHIN 5 MILES OF NEC STATIONS on the NEC to meet future Northeast mobility needs VA for 2040 and beyond. Richmond Existing NEC Relative number of daily passengers Commercial area around stations Area Benefits The Selected Alternative brings the NEC to a state of good repair, eliminates chokepoints that delay trains, IMPROVE RAIL SERVICE and supports significant growth in service, including: Corridor-wide service and performance objectives for frequency, travel time, design speed, and passenger convenience. A new Regional rail station in Pawtucket, RI ୭ improves connectivity to the NEC in northeast MODERNIZE NEC INFRASTRUCTURE Rhode Island Corridor-wide repair, replacement, and rehabilitation of the existing NEC Boston South Station expansion, consistent to bring the corridor into a state of good repair and increase reliability.
    [Show full text]