DOCSLIB.ORG

Lynn MA 1956

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lynn MA 1956 LYNN LYNNFIELD MAR'BLEHEAD NAHANT - >J . :< 7 , - :. SAUGUS ?, '-"*i -. --. 1. - . ;. ;. - 7 x.. ->. .-,I - .. - ,, ,I -*, i 5: .* . I.. -- ,I- : 1 8. SWAMPSCOTT !PHI3 mISH POPULATION OF GREATER LYNN, MASSACHUSETTS (Lynn, Lynnf ield , Marblehead, Saws, ~wampscott) A DENOGRAPHIC STUDY - 1956 TRE JEWISH CmmJZDERATION OF GREATER LYNN 45 Market Street Lynn, Mass. - OF GREATER LYNN, Inc. 45 MARKET STREET, LYNN, MASS. Telephone Lynn 5-5648 SERVING LYNN, LYNNFIELD, MARBLEHEAD, NAHANT, SAUGUS AND SWAMPSCOm Harold 0. Zimman, President Jewish Community Federa.tion 45 Market Street Lynn, Mass. Dear Harold: We are indeed pleased to submit the completed report on the study of the Jewish P3pulation of Greater Lynn, Mass. We have included herewith an analysis of the major demographic characteristics of our Jewish community together with a compilation of supporting tables and statistics. This completes phase one of a two-fold study of the Jewish population of r Grea.ter Lynn, which includes Lynn, Lynnfield, Swampscott, Marblehead, Nahant and Sa.ugus. The second section of the study dealing with the needs of our older citizens will get under way this Fall. The success of our survey was due primarily to the work of our committees, especially the technical sub-cormnittee, which had direct overall responsibility for the project. We wish at this time to express our appreciation to the more than 150 volunteer interviewers whose telephone and home visit contacts accom- plished the phenomenal job of securing valuable information from our 3,000 local Jewish families. We also wish to thank the Executive Director and staff of the Federation for its competent handling of the many details of this very large study project. Finally, we wish to acknowledge the assistance of Martin Greenberg, Regional Director and Alvin Chenkin, Technical C.,nsultant of the Council of Jewish Federations and Welfare Funds. Our efforts have already borne fruit. Lists of all types have now been dis- tributed to our agencies, congregations, schools and organizations. This is indeed a demonstration of how Federation ca.n provide valuable help to those who are planning a.nd carryin3 out vital Jewish community programs. Sincerely yours, DR. E7m. V. SAUL DAVID L. WINER Chairman Cho imlan Technical Sub-Co~unittee Social Planning Committee SOCIAL PLANNING COMYII'ITEE David L. \liner, Chairman hlrs. Harry Abrams Dr. Ellis hlichelson Zelman Berdichevsky Mrs. Bernard Miller Benjamin Bockser Maurice 0. Rain Mrs. David Chaletsky Mrs. Joseph Risman Rabbi Meyer Finkelstein Dr. Harold Rubin Rabbi Samuel J. Fox Dr. Ezra V. Saul Kenne t h Ganek Irving School Mrs. Harold Giller Mrs. Jacob Shactman Harold Goodman Henry Stark Mrs. Herman Goodwin Dr. Meyer Weiner Bruce Hamlin Mrs. Harold W. Young h!r s. Frank Levine Rabbi Samuel' Zaitchik Dr. Daniel Lipman Walter Zand Sidney Lipman Mrs. Harold Zimnan Murray Lichtenstein Study Director - Albert M. Stein Studv Coordinator - Mrs. Frances Tobin Dr. Ezra V. Saul, Chairman Zelman Berdichevsky Dr. Meyer Weiner Rrs. Herman &odwin David L. Winer l rving School Walter Zand Mrs. Jacob Shactman TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Map of Greater Lynn Showing Distribution of Jewish Population Follows I11 Analysis Population Number VII Geographical Distribution VII Sex-Rat io VII Age Structure VIII Marital Status =:'. Household Size XI1 't Employment Status XV Place of Employment XVI Current Jewish Education XVII Jewish Education Plans Congregational Membership XM Congregational Preferences XX Area Moved Frcan XXI Borne Ownership XXII Characteristics of Aged XXIII Appendix A Major Tables (For detailed listing see following page) Appendix B Background Materials Technical Note 81 General Instructions to Interviewers 83 Special Instructions - Worksheet 84 Suwested Interview Statement 86 Introductory Letter Mailed to Residents Follows Above Study Questionnaire Follows Above List of Volunteer Interviewers Inside of Back Cover List of Swmnary Tables and Figures in Text Figures 1-5 Age-Sex Pyramids Follows VIII Wble A Geographical Distribution of Jewish Population VII B Sex Ratios VIII C Percentage Distribution of Marital Status by Sex and Age X D Percentage Distribution of Marital Status by Area XI E Average busehold Size by Area XI1 F Percentage Distribution of Households by Size and Area XI11 G Average Size of Jewish Households in Other Communities Xrv H Percentage Distribution of Employed by Areas of IiZnployment XVI I Percentage Employed Heads of Eouseholds to All mployed by Area and Sex XVII (continued) List of Summarg Tables and Figures in Text (continued) Table J Current Jewish School Enrollment XVII K Plans for Future Jewish School Enrollment XVII L Fall 1955 Jewish Education Enrollment Rates by Ages 5-13 XVIII M Congregational Affiliation by Area XLX N Distribution of Congre@;ational bmberships by Area XM 0 Distribution of Congregational Memberships by Selected Age Grouping of Head of Household Households With Congregational Affiliations Compared With Preferences of Unaffiliated Households . XX Mobility Within Greater Ignn XXI Movement Within Greater Lynn 1951-1955 XXII Home Ownership Status for Households Moved in 1951-1955 XXIII Percentage Distribution of Households With Aged Members XXIV Distribution of Greater Lynn's Aged Population by Area XXIV Percentage Distribution of Older hhabitants by Marital Status and Size of Household Proportion of Owned Hames by Size of Household List of Major Tables in Appendix A Table I Age Distribution by Sex and Area 1 I1 Marital Status by Sex and Area 3 I11 Size of Eousehold by Age of Head and Area 11 N Employment Status by Age, Sex, and Area 19 V Number of Households With Employed Members by Number Employed, Size of Household, and Area 27 VI Place of Employment by Age, Sex, and Area 28 VII Place of Employment of Employed Heads of Households by Age, Sex, and Area 36 VIII Current Jewish School Attendence by Type and Sex 44 M Jewish Education Plans by Sex, Type, and Area 45 X Congregational ~embership(s)by Age of Head of Household and Area 53 XI Congregational Preferences of Bouseholds by Age of Head of Household and Area 56 XI1 Town of Iast Previous Residence and Number of Years Since Last Move 58 XI11 Home Ownership Status by Area 62 XIV Number of Households With One or More Aged Members by Size of Household and Area 63 XIV A Proportion of Households With Aged Members to Total Number of Households by Size of Household and Area 63 IN Aged Individuals by Age, Size of Household, Sex, and Area 64 XVI Relationship to Head of Household of Persons Aged 65 and Over, by Sex, Area, and Age 70 XVII Congregational ~embership(s)of Households With Aged Member(s) by Area 73 XVII A Congregational Pmference (s) of Households With Aged Member (s ) by Area 73 XVIII Home Ownership Status of Households With One or More Aged Members by Size of Household and Area 74 XIX Date of Last Move Made by Households With Aged Members by Area and Town Moved Fram 75 JmJISH CmFEDERATION OF GREATW LYNN, INC. 45 Market Street, Lynn, Mass. INTRODUCTION The decision to embark on a Population Study stemmed from the remarlcable changes in the character, size and location of the Jewish population of Greater Lynn following the end of World War 11. As a re- sult it was seen as important to understand effects of these chawes on the planning of programs by local congregations, Jewish schools and social agencies. Greater Lynn is located on the North Shore, fifteen miles above Boston. It includes the city of Lynn and the towns of -field, Saugus, Nahant, Marblehead and Swampscott. As part of the suburban movement noted throughout the country, many Jews were known to be moving from sections of Greater Boston to the seashore communities with the largest movement into the resort towns of Swampscott and Marblehead. These people were coming from Boston proper, from Chelsea, Everett, Malden, Newton and Brookline - in other words the major congested areas of Jewish population in Greater Boston. In addition Jews were moving from West Lynn and East Liynn to Swampscott and Marblehead. Local Jewish residents were cognizant of this movement but they didn't know specific all^ how many had moved in, where they came from, what were their interests and identifications, and thus didn't knaw how to assess or plan for the changes in programs which all organizations must make to met the needs of this new situation. At meetings of our Federation Social Planning Connnittee, lay and professional leaders of congregations, schools and social agencies asked that a way be found to get "the facts": They wanted to knaw: How many people have moved in the newer residential areas and who are they? Where did they come from? Are they affiliating with schools, synagogues, centers? How can these newcomers be reached and woven into the fabric of a community which must serve their needs as Jews? What does the "new look" of our community mean for the future location of our schools and synagogues? Do we need new and increased services and facilities for our aged? Should the Jewish Community Center be relocated? I?lese and many other very real questions led to the decision of the Social Planning Committee to sponsor a population study. TBE FEDEFUiTION DECISION In June 1955, after 6 months of committee discussion, the deci- sion to carry out a population study was made by the Executive Committee of the Federation and the sum of $3,900.00 was voted to cover the costs of this project. STUDY ORGANIZATION Although the primary responsibility for the study was in the hands of the Full Social Planning Committee, under the chairmanship of David L. Winer, the actual manageaent of the study froan the development of the questionnaire through the recrul-tment of volunteers, the inter- viewing, the compilation and analysis of the fiadings, was hsndled by a &1 technical committee headed by Dr.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Greater Boston and Massachusetts PHILANTHROPIC LANDSCAPE
    Greater Boston and Massachusetts PHILANTHROPIC LANDSCAPE JUNE 2020 Introduction Every June, Giving USA provides its report on philanthropy from the previous year to the nonprofit community. While reviewing the findings from 2019 will be informative, we know that the current pandemic, social unrest, and economic upheaval are presenting real-time and frequently changing demands on nonprofits across all sectors. In recent years, charitable giving in the United States has reached record-breaking numbers in contributions reported from individuals, foundations, and charitable bequests. The last significant dip in giving was during the financial crisis in 2009, when an estimated 14 million fewer US households reported making charitable gifts. We know that the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted nonprofit programming and finances. All insights point to continued unpredictability. The sector would be wise to make plans now to mitigate a potential dip in fundraising in 2020. While we can’t forecast the future, we do know that it’s critical that organizations stay connected to the communities that they serve, despite economic contraction and our inability to gather as usual. Our valid concerns about the impact of COVID-19 and the societal climate underscore the nonprofit sector’s vital leadership role in the welfare of our communities. More than one million nonprofit organizations are registered in the United States. How well institutions can pivot in response to the monumental events of 2020 will affect their philanthropy and income, and as a result, their programming and impact, well into the future. With this in mind, CCS has endeavored to consolidate many insightful reports on giving and current trends during these uncertain times into this regional philanthropic landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hub's Metropolis: a Glimpse Into Greater Boston's Development
    James C. O’Connell, “The Hub’s Metropolis: Greater Boston’s Development” Historical Journal of Massachusetts Volume 42, No. 1 (Winter 2014). Published by: Institute for Massachusetts Studies and Westfield State University You may use content in this archive for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the Historical Journal of Massachusetts regarding any further use of this work: [email protected] Funding for digitization of issues was provided through a generous grant from MassHumanities. Some digitized versions of the articles have been reformatted from their original, published appearance. When citing, please give the original print source (volume/ number/ date) but add "retrieved from HJM's online archive at http://www.wsc.ma.edu/mhj. 26 Historical Journal of Massachusetts • Winter 2014 Published by The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 7x9 hardcover, 326 pp., $34.95. To order visit http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/hubs-metropolis 27 EDITor’s choicE The Hub’s Metropolis: A Glimpse into Greater Boston’s Development JAMES C. O’CONNELL Editor’s Introduction: Our Editor’s Choice selection for this issue is excerpted from the book, The Hub’s Metropolis: Greater Boston’s Development from Railroad Suburbs to Smart Growth (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2013). All who live in Massachusetts are familiar with the compact city of Boston, yet the history of the larger, sprawling metropolitan area has rarely been approached as a comprehensive whole. As one reviewer writes, “Comprehensive and readable, James O’Connell’s account takes care to orient the reader in what is often a disorienting landscape.” Another describes the book as a “riveting history of one of the nation’s most livable places—and a roadmap for how to keep it that way.” James O’Connell, the author, is intimately familiar with his topic through his work as a planner at the National Park Service, Northeast Region, in Boston.
    [Show full text]
  • Lifeworks Expands Autism Services Across Boston Region, Establishes Support Center for Adults Nonprofit Agency to Observe National Autism Acceptance Month in April
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Alex Villanueva, Ball Consulting Group, LLC Phone: 617-243-9950; Email: [email protected] Lifeworks Expands Autism Services Across Boston Region, Establishes Support Center for Adults Nonprofit Agency to Observe National Autism Acceptance Month in April WESTWOOD, Mass. (April 1, 2021) – Lifeworks, a nonprofit human services provider that supports people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, announced today – the first day of National Autism Acceptance Month – that it is expanding its community-based autism services to include adult autism support in 40 communities in the Department of Developmental Services (DDS) Boston Metro Region, in addition to its existing youth and family autism services in Newton and parts of Norfolk county. Lifeworks will establish an Adult Autism Support Center within its West Roxbury office that will help individuals and families navigate available autism-related services, provide workshops and caregiver training, and participate in enriching social and recreational activities. “It’s a privilege to expand our autism support services in the DDS Metro Boston Region,” said Daniel Sullivan, Vice President of Quality and Community Services at Lifeworks. “We look forward to providing our comprehensive supports and services as we establish new community connections and partnerships.” As part of this effort, Lifeworks will appoint an Assistant Director of Adult Services, add two new adult autism support specialists, and form new collaborations with advocacy organizations, employers, law enforcement and other community partners. Lifeworks has a long history of providing autism supports and its Family Autism Center based at its headquarters in Westwood has grown to serve nearly 1,000 individuals in the Newton/South Norfolk area.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Organizations Receiving Donations of $1,000 Or More
    2016 Organizations Receiving Donations of $1,000 or More Organization Name City State Amount 2020 Women on Boards Jamaica Plain MA $2,020 826 Boston Roxbury MA $1,500 A Better Chance of Andover Andover MA $2,500 ACCION Cambridge MA $5,000 ACLU Foundation of Massachusetts Boston MA $35,000 ACT Lawrence Lawrence MA $2,500 Adolescent Consultation Services Cambridge MA $10,000 Adopt-A-Student Program Worcester MA $2,500 Agassiz Baldwin Community Cambridge MA $1,000 Agassiz Village Lexington MA $1,500 Agway of Cape Cod Charitable Foundation South Dennis MA $1,000 AIDS Action Committee of MA Boston MA $10,000 Alex's Team Foundation Newburyport MA $2,500 Alice's House Marshfield MA $2,500 Allston Brighton Community Development Corporation Allston MA $7,000 ALS Family Charitable Foundation Bourne MA $1,000 ALS Knights Whitman MA $13,500 ALSAC/St. Jude Children's Research Hospital Newton MA $5,000 American Cancer Society Acton MA $2,050 American Heart Association Waltham MA $2,600 American Heart Association - NH Manchester NH $5,000 American Red Cross Cape Cod, Islands and Southeast MA Hyannis MA $1,000 American Red Cross NH & VT Concord NH $1,000 American Red Cross of Northeast Massachusetts Peabody MA $1,100 American Training Andover MA $2,500 AmeriCares Stamford CT $2,500 Amos House Providence RI $12,750 Andover High School Baseball Boosters Andover MA $1,000 Animal Rescue League of Boston Boston MA $2,500 Animal Rescue League of NH Bedford NH $3,500 Anne Kenneally Hynes Scholarship East Bridgewater MA $1,500 Anti-Defamation League Boston MA
    [Show full text]
  • Lynn, MA HQ2 Proposal
    CITY OF LYNN MASSACHUSETTS AMAZON HQ2 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction II. Site Overview III. Incentives IV. Labor & Wage Information V. Education VI. Sustainability VII. Proximity/Transportation VIII. Quality of Life IX. Intangibles 3 4 5 I . INTRODUCTION The ideal location for Amazon is s o m e o f t h e w o r l d ’ s b e s t h o s p i t a l s , a 100-acre shovel-ready waterfront universities, museums and private site 10 miles from Downtown and public schools. To the east, Boston. With breathtaking ocean north and south are some of this views, quick proximity to one of country’s best and most storied the nation’s premier international beaches; to the west and north, airports, on-site commuter rail skiing, hiking and lakes within easy and commuter ferry service, the reach in New Hampshire and Maine. Lynn Waterfront Parcel is also only Lynn itself offers affordable housing 12 miles from the Massachusetts stock ranging from refurbished Institute of Technology and triple deckers to new waterfront Massachusetts General Hospital, and condominiums to older homes on within easy reach of North Shore urban streets. Adjacent are suburbs beaches, wooded reservations and that range from high-end waterfront ample housing stock ranging from communities like Marblehead to historic farm homes to inner-city affordable middle class towns like condominiums, brownstones and Swampscott and Lynnfield. Historic multi-family units. Gloucester, Salem and Manchester- by-the-Sea are easy commutes on Lynn, population 93,000, is an major highways.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional System Plan Transmission Projects and Asset Condition March 2018 Update
    MARCH 15, 2018 | MILFORD, MA Regional System Plan Transmission Projects and Asset Condition March 2018 Update Planning Advisory Committee Meeting Brent Oberlin DIRECTOR, TRANSMISSION PLANNING ISO-NE PUBLIC TABLE OF CONTENTS Slide Highlights 3 March 2018 Changes 4 – 16 Status of Major Transmission Projects 17 – 18 October Asset Condition Changes 19 – 28 Appendix 29 – 35 ISO-NE PUBLIC 2 Highlights of the Project List Update • Major cost estimate changes that occurred between the October 2017 and March 2018 Project List: (MA) - Central Western Massachusetts Upgrades – Project 945 - Adams – install two new 115 kV breakers and replace two existing 115 kV breakers and associated line relocations. Project cost increased (cost increase $11.9M) Cost changes are due to an enhanced understanding of the multiple site condition impacts on the construction plan as outlined at the December 2017 PAC meeting. (MA) – Pittsfield/Greenfield – Projects 1662, 1664, 1665, and 1663 cost decreased (cost reduction $12.3M). Cost changes are due to project cost alignments. • No New Projects • 22 Upgrades on the project list have been placed in-service since the October 2017 update: (CT) SWCT- 1 project in-service (CT) GHCC- 4 projects in-service – includes new 115 kV (10.35 mile) line from Frost Bridge - Campville (MA) Central Western MA Upgrades – 1 project in-service (MA) Greater Boston - 6 projects in-service – includes new 345 kV line from Scobie – Tewksbury (MA) Pittsfield/Greenfield - 4 projects in-service (MA) C-181/D-182 Brayton Point – S. Wrentham line refurbishment (NH) Pelham Substation – install 115 kV tap and inline breaker (VT) Y25N Bennington – Harriman + Taps Refurbishment (VT) Connecticut River Valley - 1 project in-service (VT) Replace PV20 submarine cables (VT) Harriman Asset Condition ISO-NE PUBLIC 3 March 2018 Changes No New Projects and Corresponding Need Project Cost Transmission System Upgrades Improvement/Need ID # (in millions $) ISO-NE PUBLIC 4 March 2018 Changes, cont.
    [Show full text]
  • SNHPC Draft Congestion Management Process
    Southern New Hampshire ABSTRACT Planning Commission Utilizing travel time data from thousands of drivers, this report identifies varying levels of congestion along roadways, their CONGESTION causes, and recommends strategies to mitigate existing and future MANAGEMENT congested conditions. PROCESS DRAFT October 2020 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................3 1.1 The SNHPC’s Role in Congestion Management ..................................................................................3 1.2 Requirements of a CMP ....................................................................................................................4 2.0 Overview of the CMP Process .......................................................................................................................6 3.0 Regional Objectives for CMP in the SNHPC Region ......................................................................................7 4.0 Definition of the SNHPC Regional CMP Network ...................................................................................... 10 5.0 Definition of Performance Measures ......................................................................................................... 12 6.0 Data and Monitoring of System Performance ........................................................................................... 13 6.1 Travel Time Index (TTI) Thresholds to Quantify Congestion ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Driving Change
    DRIVING CHANGE 2018 Annual Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Leadership Message 1 Overview 3 Financial Highlights 5 Food Waste, Hunger, & Nutrition Facts 7 Program & Impact 11 Beneficiaries 13 Contributors 15 Testimonies 17 In the News 19 Board of Directors 21 Staff 22 LEADERSHIP MESSAGE Dear Friends and Supporters, 2018 brought tremendous growth and outcomes for Lovin’ Spoonfuls. We are proud to share with you that throughout the year, we rescued and distributed more than 3 million pounds of fresh, healthy food. That’s 2.5 million meals we’re keeping out of landfills and placing in the hands of families who need it most. Our passionate team of Food Rescue Coordinators collectively rescue and distribute more than 65,000 pounds of food each week, reaching over 30,000 children, women, men, and seniors who don’t have adequate access to nutrition. Across our 6 routes in Greater Boston and MetroWest, we’ve created a network of partners that includes over 200 vendors and beneficiaries, allowing us to feed veterans, recovering addicts, and folks facing the all-too- common struggle of feeding themselves while keeping up with the rising cost of living. 1 We are always learning more about the impact of our work. Our model is designed to create efficiency and remove barriers that often keep systems from working optimally. Our waiting list continues to grow, with vendors wanting to participate and upcycle their resources, and beneficiaries who desperately need our services. We remain committed to bridging the ever growing gap between abundance and need. Throughout 2019, we are scaling our operations and our team to meet this ever-growing need.
    [Show full text]
  • Median Household Income in Massachusetts, Greater Boston, and the City of Boston (1999- 2006)
    This memorandum is preliminary in nature and subject to revision and review. Any views expressed are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston or of the Federal Reserve System. To: Arthur Blood, Brookline, MA From: Antoniya Owens, Research Associate Date: January 28, 2008 Re: Household income in Massachusetts, Greater Boston, and the city of Boston (1999- 2006) This memo describes the recent trend in real median household income in Massachusetts, Greater Boston, and the city of Boston from 1999 through 2006. Over this period, real median household income in the city of Boston grew 0.1 percent versus declines of 3.9 percent in Greater Boston and 1.8 percent in the Commonwealth. However, there was considerable variation in median incomes over this time period: The 2001 recession appears to have hit some areas harder than others, and certain New England states, including Massachusetts, are still recovering. Prior to the recession, household income grew more rapidly in the city of Boston relative to the surrounding area and the rest of the state. Yet the city also suffered a larger drop in median income during the recession compared to other areas in the Commonwealth. Over the following two years, between 2002 and 2004, median incomes in Greater Boston and Massachusetts continued to decline, while median household income in Boston proper grew by almost 10 percent (although the city still did not reach its pre-recession peak). However, more recently these trends appear to have reversed again: Between 2004 and 2006, median household income in the city of Boston declined by 2.1 percent, whereas in the rest of the Commonwealth it grew, albeit by a barely perceptible 0.9 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • Leaving Massachusetts: Greater Boston Has a People Problem - Boston Business Journal
    2/16/2020 Leaving Massachusetts: Greater Boston has a people problem - Boston Business Journal SELECT A CITY BOSTON CRANE WATCH YOUR ACCOUNT Get the latest on development projects in Greater Boston [email protected] INDUSTRIES & TOPICS NEWS LISTS & LEADS PEOPLE & COMPANIES EVENTS LEADERSHIP TRUST MORE… FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF [email protected] From the Boston Business Journal: https://www.bizjournals.com/boston/news/2020/02/07/leaving-massachusetts-greater-boston-has-a-people.html COVER STORY Leaving Massachusetts: Greater Boston has a people problem Feb 7, 2020, 5:00am EST Ever sit slumped behind your steering wheel, miserable in unmoving gridlock, staring ahead at an exit sign for a town whose real estate you could never afford, and think to yourself: You know what this place needs? More people. No? Understandable. But from an economic perspective, more people is exactly what Massachusetts needs. And unfortunately for Greater Boston and Massachusetts as a whole, it’s losing a lot more residents to other states than it’s bringing in, as people head for warmer and cheaper locales, according to new U.S. Census Bureau data. BOSTON BUSINESS JOURNAL In 2018, looking just at people moving within the U.S., nearly 35,000 more people These are the top states draining Massachusetts of ditched Massachusetts than made a new home here. From 2010 to 2018, the most residents. The following figures represent net migration losses — in other words, how many Massachusetts lost over 184,000 more residents to other parts of the U.S. than it more residents moved to these states from picked up, based on annual estimates.
    [Show full text]
  • CHANGING FACES of GREATER BOSTON a REPORT from BOSTON INDICATORS, the BOSTON FOUNDATION, UMASS BOSTON and the UMASS DONAHUE INSTITUTE the PROJECT TEAM
    CHANGING FACES of GREATER BOSTON A REPORT FROM BOSTON INDICATORS, THE BOSTON FOUNDATION, UMASS BOSTON AND THE UMASS DONAHUE INSTITUTE THE PROJECT TEAM BOSTON INDICATORS is the research center at the UMASS BOSTON (UMB) is one of only two universities in Boston Foundation, which works to advance a thriving Greater the country with free-standing research institutes dedicated to Boston for all residents across all neighborhoods. We do this four major communities of color in the U.S. Working together by analyzing key indicators of well-being and by researching and individually, these institutes offer thought leadership to promising ideas for making our city more prosperous, equitable help shape public understanding of the evolving racial and and just. To ensure that our work informs active efforts to ethnic diversities in Boston, Massachusetts, and beyond. improve our city, we work in deep partnership with community The four research institutes are: groups, civic leaders and Boston’s civic data community to THE INSTITUTE FOR ASIAN AMERICAN produce special reports and host public convenings. STUDIES (IAAS) utilizes resources and expertise from THE BOSTON FOUNDATION is is one of the largest the university and the community to conduct research and oldest community foundations in America, with net assets on Asian Americans; to strengthen and further Asian of $1.3 billion. The Foundation is a partner in philanthropy, with American involvement in political, economic, social, and some 1,100 charitable funds established for the general benefit cultural life; and to improve opportunities and campus of the community or for special purposes. It also serves as a life for Asian American faculty, staff, and students and for major civic leader, think tank and advocacy organization dedi- those interested in Asian Americans.
    [Show full text]
  • Lynn: a Little City with Big Potential a Publication of the New Lynn Coalition
    Lynn: A Little City with Big Potential A Publication of the New Lynn Coalition By Joe Torname Economic & Social Development of Regions Masters Program University of Massachusetts, Lowell 1 Forward and Conclusion by Jeffrey C Crosby, President North Shore Labor Council Carly C McClain, New Lynn Organizer Acknowledgements We would like to thank the University of Massachusetts Lowell Labor Extension Program. This report was funded in part by the Future of Work Research Initiative from the University of Massachusetts President’s office 2 Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................. 3 FOREWARD.......................................................................................................4 LYNN, MASSACHUSETTS RESEARCH REPORT..................................... 7 CONCLUSION: PROSPECTS: WHAT WE CAN DO................................ 28 NOTES………………………………………………………………………… 30 3 Forward The City of Lynn, Massachusetts is rich in many ways. It is bordered on the East by the Atlantic Ocean and, thanks to a grant in the early 1900’s, has a 22 acre protected space called Lynn Shore Reservation. Lynn also has a 2200 acre forest reserve called Lynn Woods which boasts of ponds, trails, wetlands and other similar natural treasures. Along with other notable sightseeing locations –High Rock Tower in the Highlands, Central Square (a soon to be Cultural District Designated Area), and the Lynn Museum- the City of Lynn is rich in history and diversity. Lynn, MA is one of the most racially diverse cities in the State of Massachusetts and is certainly the most diverse in the region. A visitor will note the broad spectrum of nationalities seen in the myriad restaurants and shops in the downtown region. It is possible to walk a block and overhear conversations in multiple languages –Khmer, Russian, Spanish and Portuguese to name a few.
    [Show full text]