"The New Guinea Highlands" Region, Culture Area, Or Fuzzy Set?
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Rhode Island College Digital Commons @ RIC Faculty Publications Spring 4-1993 "The ewN Guinea Highlands" Region, Culture Area, or Fuzzy Set? Terence E. Hays Rhode Island College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.ric.edu/facultypublications Part of the Other Anthropology Commons, and the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Citation Hays, T. E., Brown, P., Harrison, S., Hauser-Schäublin, B., Hayano, D. M., Hirsch, E., ... & Westermark, G. D. (1993). " The eN w Guinea Highlands": Region, culture area, or fuzzy set? Current Anthropology, 34(2), 141-164. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ RIC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ RIC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "The New Guinea Highlands": Region, Culture Area, or Fuzzy Set? [and Comments and Reply] Author(s): Terence E. Hays, Paula Brown, Simon Harrison, Brigitta Hauser-Schäublin, David M. Hayano, Eric Hirsch, Dan Jorgensen, Bruce M. Knauft, Rena Lederman, Edward Lipuma, Eugene Ogan, Andrew Strathern, James F. Weiner, George D. Westermark Source: Current Anthropology, Vol. 34, No. 2 (Apr., 1993), pp. 141-164 Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2743972 Accessed: 06/12/2010 09:23 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=ucpress. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press and Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Current Anthropology. http://www.jstor.org CURRENT ANTHROPOLOGY Volume 34, Number 2, April I993 ? I993 byThe Wenner-GrenFoundation for Anthropological Research. All rightsreserved OOII-3204/93/3402-0002$2.50 Accordingto Mandeville (I980:549) "studentsagree on two things about New Guinea Highlanders: they ex- changepigs and theydo not conformto Africanmodels. "The New Guinea A good start,but clearlymore is needed." Whatevermay be the limits of agreementamong students,since the Highlands" ig5os anthropologistshave made a cottageindustry out of demarcatinga "region" called "the New Guinea Highlands" and tryingto identifyways in which "the Highlands" can be contrastedwith "the Lowlands" and Region,Culture Area, or what is to be found "there." For example, numerous Fuzzy Set?' differencesin religion and cosmology have been pro- posed as points of contrastbetween "Highlands" and "Seaboard" societies (Lawrence and Meggitt I965). More recently,Lindenbaum (I984:34I) tells us that by Terence E. Hays "from[a] larger,Melanesia-wide perspective,the New Guinea Highlands emerges as a region in which ritualized male homosexual experience is notably ab- sent"-indeed, "the broadest contrasts among Mel- anesian cultures emerge . from a comparison be- The criteriafor delineating "the New Guinea Highlands,"a fun- damentalcategory in Melanesiananthropology, are variable, tween the so-called semen groups of the Lowlands vague,and inconsistentlyapplied, with the result that there is lit- and the Highland cultures in which semen is not tle clarityor agreementwith regard to its characteristicsand its the ritualized stuffof life" (p. 342). Whitehead (I986) membership.So faras the literatureis concerned,"the New contends that in "the lowlands" a "manhood empha- GuineaHighlands" is a fuzzyset. The commonresort to notions of "cores,""margins," or "fringes"is an attemptto preservean sis" is to be found in fertilitycults while in "the essentialistapproach but inevitablyleads to the same confusion. highlands""clanhood" is emphasized. The list of char- The continueduse of "the Highlands"as an analyticor theoreti- acterizationsand contrastscould be extended through cal constructcarries the costs ofmisleadingly implied homoge- social and political organization (e.g., Harrison I989) neity,with marginalization of "exceptions,"ahistorical reifica- tionof social and cultural"traits," and deemphasison linkages to warfare(Knauft I990). amongcommunities. A plea is made herefor a shiftfrom studies These few examples are perhaps the kind of "more" ofmorphology to studiesof process-from concerns with what that Mandeville feels is needed, and presumablythey peopleare to concernswith what people do. are the sort of claims that she has in mind in saying that "it makes more than geographicalsense to think TERENCE E. HAYS iS Professorof Anthropology at RhodeIsland about the Highlands as a single area" (ig80:55o). In College(Providence, R.I. o02o8, U.S.A.). Bornin I942, he was ed- any event, they are indicative of how salient "the ucatedat the Universityof Omaha (B.A.,i966), the Universityof Colorado(M.A., i968), and the Universityof Washington (Ph.D., New Guinea Highlands" has become as a fundamental I974). His researchinterests are the ethnographyand ethnology categoryin Melanesian anthropologyas scholars have ofNew Guinea.His publicationsinclude the editedvolumes Eth- tried to develop explanations for social and cultural nographicPresents: Pioneering Anthropologists in thePapua phenomena with referenceto "regions" in which they New Guinea Highlands(Berkeley: University of CaliforniaPress, do or do not occur or in which they take particular i992), Oceania (Boston:G. K. Hall, i99i), and,with others, An- thropologyin theHigh Valleys:Essays on theNew Guinea High- forms. lands in Honorof Kenneth E. Read (Novato:Chandler, i987). My concern here is to examine the categorylabeled The presentpaper was submittedin finalform 2 x 92. "the New Guinea Highlands" as it has been used in several recent studies that offerexplicit comparisons of "the Highlands" with other "regions" (Lindenbaum I984, Whitehead I986, Weiner I988, Knauft I990) or that incorporatemajor surveys of "Highlands" societ- ies (Brown I978, Gelber I986, Feil I987). These works are the result of literaturesurveys from which ethno- graphiccases have been drawn, categorizedas "High- lands" or not, and compared for selected attributes. The criteria employed in these surveys and, conse- quently,their resulting classifications have varied con- i. Thispaper was originallyprepared for a workingseminar entitled "Not in Isolation:Regional Studies in MelanesianAnthropology," siderably,and when their internal inconsistencies are heldin i99I and cosponsoredby theWenner-Gren Foundation for combined with this variation in conceptualizationthe AnthropologicalResearch and the Field Museum of NaturalHis- situation becomes even more muddled. We find our- tory.I am gratefulto thosesponsors and the otherparticipants in selves in a position not only of wonderingwhat we the seminarfor a stimulatingdiscussion of centralissues and to ChrisGosden, Bruce Knauft, Paul Roscoe,Richard Scaglion, Robert know after all about "the Highlands" but of ques- Welsch,and thefour referees for this journal for their very helpful tioningin what sense "the Highlands" is usefullyre- commentson earlierdrafts of the paper. gardedas a "region" at all. I4I I42 CURRENT ANTHROPOLOGY Volume 34, Number 2, April I993 Delineating "the Highlands" ferredto veryselectively [see StrathernI990]), and in Papua New Guinea it stretchessoutheastward well into It mightbe supposed fromits label that a categorysuch Milne Bay Province, including the country's third- as "the New Guinea Highlands" is basically organized highestmountain, Mount Victoria (at 4,072 m) in the around geographic or physical attributes,but which Owen StanleyRange near PortMoresby (King and Ranck "lands" are "high" is not self-evidenton an island whose n.d. [I982]:88-89). Nevertheless,the StricklandGorge relief extends from tide-washed coastline to snow- on the west and the KratkeRange in the east are often capped peaks at approximately4,5 Io m above sea level the effective,if not explicitlystated, east-westbound- in Papua New Guinea and about 4,740 m in Irian Jaya. aries of consideration.Such truncationscannot be un- Nor has there been agreementon the question among derstoodas motivatedby criteriabased on reliefor con- anthropologists. comitantvegetation or climatic patterns(see King and In one of the earliestattempts to delineatethe region, Ranck n.d. [i9821:92-93, 96-97). Thus, Brown's(I978:2) Read (I954:2) proposed that "the Highlands of New claim that"altitude, climate, temperature, and otheren- Guinea forma regionwhich is ... most simplydescribed vironmentalcharacteristics set the highlandsapart from as a chain of valleys lying at