DOCSLIB.ORG

ENERGY STAR Certified Homes County-Level Design Temperature Reference Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ENERGY STAR Certified Homes County-Level Design Temperature Reference Guide Introduction One requirement of the ENERGY STAR Certified Homes program is to use outdoor design temperatures that do not exceed the maximum cooling season temperature and minimum heating season temperature listed in this reference guide for the state and county in which the home is to be certified. Only two exceptions apply: 1. Jurisdiction-Specified Temperatures: If the outdoor design temperatures to be used in load calculations are specified by the jurisdiction where the home will be certified, then these specified temperatures shall be used. 2. Temperature Exception Request: In rare cases, the designer may believe that an exception to the limits in the reference guide are warranted for a particular state and county. If so, the designer must complete and submit a Design Temperature Exception Request, including a justification for the exception, to [email protected] for review and approval prior to the home’s certification. To obtain the most accurate load calculations, EPA recommends that designers always use the ACCA Manual J, 8th edition, 1% cooling season design temperature and 99% heating season design temperature for the weather location that is geographically closest to the home to be certified. How to Use this Reference Guide 1. Determine the state and county in which the home is to be certified. 2. Locate the state and county in Exhibit 1 of this document. 3. Utilize the corresponding design temperatures in the load calculations, as follows, and document the values in Item 3.3 of the HVAC Design Report: a. Use a cooling season outdoor design temperature less than or equal to the 1% Cooling Temperature. b. Use a heating season outdoor design temperature equal to or greater than the 99% Heating Temperature. 4. If a Condition B Climate will be used to select the cooling sizing limit, then utilize the corresponding HDD/CDD Ratio and document the value in Item 4.14.2 of the HVAC Design Report. Example A home will be certified in Travis County, TX. By consulting the reference guide, we find that the cooling season outdoor design temperature limit is 98 F and the heating season outdoor design temperature limit is 30 F. This means that the designer must: Use a cooling season design temperature that is less than or equal to 98 F. Use a heating season design temperature that is equal to or greater than 30 F. Not use the cooling sizing limit for a Condition B Climate because the HDD/CDD Ratio is 0.2, which is < 2.0. Methodology The temperatures in this reference guide utilize the 1% cooling and 99% heating design temperatures in the ASHRAE 2013 Handbook of Fundamentals and Manual J Design Conditions 8th Edition. Individual counties were assigned the design values in this document using the following logic: One weather station within the county. If only one weather station was present within the county’s boundaries, then the cooling and heating design temperatures for that weather station were assigned to the entire county. Multiple weather stations within the county. If more than one weather station was present within the county’s boundary, then the highest cooling and lowest heating design temperatures among the weather stations in the county were assigned to the entire county. No weather stations within the county. If no weather stations were present within the county’s boundary, then the cooling and heating design temperatures for the closest weather station were assigned to the entire county. To determine the closest weather station, only the weather stations assigned to other counties were considered. The closest station was determined by assessing the distance between the geographic center of the county and the location of the applicable weather stations. ENERGY STAR Certified Homes County-Level Design Temperature Reference Guide Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1 How to Use this Reference Guide .................................................................................................................................. 1 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Design Temperatures by State & County ....................................................................................................................... 1 Alaska ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Alabama ..................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Arkansas .................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Arizona ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7 California .................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Colorado ................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Connecticut .............................................................................................................................................................. 12 District of Columbia .................................................................................................................................................. 13 Delaware .................................................................................................................................................................. 13 Florida ...................................................................................................................................................................... 13 Georgia ..................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Hawaii ....................................................................................................................................................................... 21 Iowa .......................................................................................................................................................................... 21 Idaho ........................................................................................................................................................................ 25 Illinois ....................................................................................................................................................................... 26 Indiana ...................................................................................................................................................................... 30 Kansas ..................................................................................................................................................................... 33 Kentucky................................................................................................................................................................... 37 Louisiana .................................................................................................................................................................. 41 Massachusetts ......................................................................................................................................................... 44 Maryland................................................................................................................................................................... 44 Maine ........................................................................................................................................................................ 45 Michigan ................................................................................................................................................................... 46 Minnesota ................................................................................................................................................................. 49 Missouri .................................................................................................................................................................... 52 Mississippi ................................................................................................................................................................ 56 Montana ................................................................................................................................................................... 59 North Carolina .......................................................................................................................................................... 61 North Dakota ...........................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Groton-New London Airport (GON)

    Groton-New London Airport (GON)

    DECEMBER 2017 FINAL Environmental Assessment (EA) & Environmental Impact Evaluation (EIE) for Obstruction Removal Groton-New London Airport (GON) Prepared for: Prepared by: FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) FOR OBSTRUCTION REMOVAL GROTON‐NEW LONDON AIRPORT (GON) FAA AIP NO. 3‐09‐0900‐010‐2014 CAA CONTRACT NO. 2014‐02 CHA CONTRACT NO. 29067 June 2017 Prepared for: Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) Prepared BY: CHA Consulting, Inc. Groton‐New London Airport (GON) Obstruction Analysis ‐Tree Removal FEDERAL FINDING After careful and thorough consideration of the facts contained herein, the undersigned finds that the proposed federal action is consistent with existing national policies and objectives as set forth in Section 101 of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and other applicable environmental requirements and will not significantly affect the quality of the human environment or otherwise include any condition requiring consultation pursuant to Section 101 (2) (c) of the NEPA. Approved: 6/9/17 Richard Doucette Date Manager, Environmental Programs RECORD OF DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT EVALUATION (EIE) FOR OBSTRUCTION REMOVAL GROTON‐NEW LONDON AIRPORT (GON) FAA AIP NO. 3‐09‐0900‐010‐2014 CAA CONTRACT NO. 2014‐02 CHA CONTRACT NO. 29067 December 2017 Prepared for: Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) Prepared BY: CHA Consulting, Inc. Notice: On November 11, 2017, the State of Connecticut, Office of Policy and Management (OPM) determined that the Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) “shall not be construed to be a department, institution or agency of the state”, and that the Connecticut Environmental Policy Act (CEPA) is not applicable to CAA actions. See CT OPM notice included in Appendix B.
  • (Asos) Implementation Plan

    (Asos) Implementation Plan

    AUTOMATED SURFACE OBSERVING SYSTEM (ASOS) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN VAISALA CEILOMETER - CL31 November 14, 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service / Office of Operational Systems/Observing Systems Branch National Weather Service / Office of Science and Technology/Development Branch Table of Contents Section Page Executive Summary............................................................................ iii 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................... 1 1.1 Background.......................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose................................................................................. 2 1.3 Scope.................................................................................... 2 1.4 Applicable Documents......................................................... 2 1.5 Points of Contact.................................................................. 4 2.0 Pre-Operational Implementation Activities ............................ 6 3.0 Operational Implementation Planning Activities ................... 6 3.1 Planning/Decision Activities ............................................... 7 3.2 Logistic Support Activities .................................................. 11 3.3 Configuration Management (CM) Activities....................... 12 3.4 Operational Support Activities ............................................ 12 4.0 Operational Implementation (OI) Activities .........................
  • Arapahoe County Public Airport Authority (A Component Unit of Arapahoe County, Colorado) Financial Statements Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

    Arapahoe County Public Airport Authority (A Component Unit of Arapahoe County, Colorado) Financial Statements Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

    Arapahoe County Public Airport Authority (A Component Unit of Arapahoe County, Colorado) Financial Statements Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 Table of Contents PAGE Independent Auditor’s Report 1 Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Unaudited) 3 BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Statements of Net Position 14 Statements of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position 16 Statements of Cash Flows 18 Notes to the Financial Statements 20 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Funds Available - Budget and Actual (Non-GAAP Budgetary Basis) - 2016 36 Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Budgetary Basis (Actual) to Statements of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position - 2016 37 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Funds Available - Budget and Actual (Non-GAAP Budgetary Basis) - 2015 38 Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Budgetary Basis (Actual) to Statements of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position - 2015 39 Independent Auditor’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of the Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards 40 Independent Auditor’s Report Board of Commissioners Arapahoe County Public Airport Authority Englewood, Colorado Report on the Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Arapahoe County Public Airport Authority (the Authority), a component unit of Arapahoe County, Colorado as of and for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related
  • Table of Contents

    Table of Contents

    TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ ES1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Business Plan Process .................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Airport Profile .............................................................................................................. 3 2.0 EXISTING AIRPORT CHARACTERISTICS............................................................................ 5 2.1 Physical Characteristics ............................................................................................... 5 2.2 Existing Airport Tenants .............................................................................................. 6 2.3 Management Structure ............................................................................................... 7 2.4 Historical Airport Data ................................................................................................. 8 2.5 Baseline Financial Data ................................................................................................ 9 3.0 AIRPORT MARKET AREA .............................................................................................. 11 4.0 SWOT ANALYSIS FOR WATERBURY-OXFORD AIRPORT ................................................. 15 4.1 SWOT Components ..................................................................................................
  • Commercial Airline Categories Notes on Tables

    Commercial Airline Categories Notes on Tables

    Safety Half-year Significant non-fatal accidents/incidents: All commercial airline categories Date: 11 Mar ● Carrier: Transcarga International Airways ● Aircraft type/registration: Airbus A300F (YV560T) ● Location: Maiquetia, Venezuela Injuries (crew/pax): 0 ● Occupants (crew/pax): 3 ● Phase: TO The crew aborted take-off when the left GE Aviation CF6 engine suffered detached and hit a workshop at the airport. The aircraft was delivered to an uncontained failure. A disk failure, believed to be a turbine disk, Eastern Airlines in 1983 and began operating with Transcarga in 2014. Date: 12 Mar ● Carrier: Grant Aviation ● Aircraft type/registration: Cessna 208B Caravan (N407GV) ● Location: Chevak airport, Alaska, USA Injuries (crew/pax): 0/0 ● Occupants (crew/pax): 1/3 ● Phase: TO The pilot began the take-off run for a scheduled domestic service, but runway surface and crosswind. The aircraft swerved off the runway and then elected to abandon the attempt because of a combination of an icy rolled onto a wingtip, sustaining considerable damage. Date: 20 Mar ● Carrier: Trigana Air Service ● Aircraft type/registration: Boeing 737-400F (PK-YSF) ● Location: Jakarta International airport, Indonesia ● Injuries (crew/pax): 0 ● Occupants (crew/pax): 4 ● Phase: L The aircraft was operating a cargo flight from Halim Perdanakusuma In- Directional control was lost and the aircraft ground looped off the left ternational airport, Jakarta to Sultan Hasanuddin airport, Makassar. Just side of the runway; coming to rest on the grass beside the runway on its before lift-off or during the initial climb after take-off, the right engine belly. Tyre marks on the runway suggest that the right main wheel may failed.
  • Advertising Opportunity Guide Print

    Advertising Opportunity Guide Print

    AAAE’S AAAE DELIVERS FOR AIRPORT EXECUTIVES NO.1 RATED PRODUCT M AG A Z IN E AAAEAAAE DELIVERSDELIVERS FOR AIRPORTAIRPORT EXECUTIVESEXECUTIVES AAAE DELIVERS FOR AIRPORT EXECUTIVES AAAE DELIVERS FOR AIRPORT EXECUTIVES MMAGAZINE AG A Z IN E MAGAZINE MAGAZINE www.airportmagazine.net | August/September 2015 www.airportmagazine.net | June/July 2015 www.airportmagazine.net | February/March 2015 NEW TECHNOLOGY AIDS AIRPORTS, PASSENGERS NON-AERONAUTICAL REVENUE SECURITYU.S. AIRPORT TRENDS Airport Employee n Beacons Deliver Airport/ Screening Retail Trends Passenger Benefits n Hosting Special Events UAS Security Issues Editorial Board Outlook for 2015 n CEO Interview Airport Diversity Initiatives Risk-Based Security Initiatives ADVERTISING OPPORTUNITY GUIDE PRINT ONLINE DIGITAL MOBILE AIRPORT MAGAZINE AIRPORT MAGAZINE ANDROID APP APPLE APP 2016 | 2016 EDITORIAL MISSION s Airport Magazine enters its 27th year of publication, TO OUR we are proud to state that we continue to produce AVIATION Atop quality articles that fulfill the far-ranging needs of airports, including training information; the lessons airports INDUSTRY have learned on subjects such as ARFF, technology, airfield and FRIENDS terminal improvements; information about the state of the nation’s economy and its impact on air service; news on regulatory and legislative issues; and much more. Further, our magazine continues to make important strides to bring its readers practical and timely information in new ways. In addition to printed copies that are mailed to AAAE members and subscribers, we offer a full digital edition, as well as a free mobile app that can be enjoyed on Apple, Android and Kindle Fire devices. In our app you will discover the same caliber of content you’ve grown to expect, plus mobile-optimized text, embedded rich media, and social media connectivity.
  • S-70 Firehawk® Multi-Role Helicopter

    S-70 Firehawk® Multi-Role Helicopter

    ™ ® S-70 Firehawk Multi-role Helicopter Colorado Backgrounder In Southern California, a Sikorsky S-70 Firehawk helicopter flies low to drop water on a small wildland fire. The aircraft’s ability to reach remote fires quickly — often before ground firefighters arrive — can prevent a small blaze from spreading out of control. The state of Colorado is looking to acquire several multirole Firehawk aircraft for both firefighting and year-round search and rescue. Background: Governor Jared Polis has added to the proposed budget for 2021-2022 fiscal year an S-70 Firehawk helicopter as a permanent state-owned asset to fight wildfires. The $23.9 The case to own million cost of the aircraft with associated equipment and training is part of a $78 million firefighting assets package for wildfire relief, mitigation and prevention. The budget also indicates a long-term plan to acquire several Firehawk aircraft this decade for aerial firefighting and other roles, such From Colorado’s as search and rescue. proposed 2021-22 budget The Colorado Connection: United Rotorcraft, a division of Air Methods, based at Centennial “These additional resources Airport in Englewood, has developed an aerial firefighting system to convert an S-70 Black enhance the state’s overall Hawk helicopter into a ‘Firehawk.’ The company is the sole installer of the system, which capacity to perform mitigation features a 1,000-gallon (3,785 liter) water tank system and a retractable snorkel — both attached projects, aggressive attack on new fires, and critical support to local to the belly of the aircraft. To give the tank extra clearance from the ground, United Rotorcraft jurisdictions on larger, longer adds an extension to each of the aircraft’s two front wheels (see diagram on page 2.) Optional duration fires.
  • We Impr E Y R J Rney

    We Impr E Y R J Rney

    CONNECTIONS & OPPORTUNITIES 2018 ANNUAL REPORT ® We impre yr jrney E-470 ROUTE Larkridge 160TH Regional Retail Center E-470 ROUTE 25 A-E E-470 MAININE TO PAA YORK ST TO INTERCHANGE NWP NO TO INTERCHANGE U.S. 85 SERVICE CENTER QUEBEC STREET 144TH BRIGHTON 76 THORNTON Barr Lake 120TH 120TH ADAMS COUNTY 112TH COLORADO BLVD 104TH 104TH COMMERCE CITY 96TH Denver International Airport 25 Rocky Mountain Arsenal PENA BLVD National Wildlife Refuge 64TH 56TH TOWER RD TOWER PICADILLY RD PICADILLY Downtown 225 26TH Denver E-470 FACING WEST NEAR 96TH AVENUE COLFAX AVE 70 6TH 6TH PKWY Buckley COLORADO BLVD APPROACHING THREE DECADES AS A TOLLING LEADER MISSISSIPPI AVE Air PARKER RD Force Base AURORA Since its inception in 1991, E-470 has been prominent in tolling services and technology. 25 JEWELL AVE EVANS The Authority’s rollout of All-Electronic Tolling in 2009 marked one of the first implementations of this ILIFF AVE technology in the country. Through ExpressToll, Colorado’s “One Stop Toll Shop”, E-470 has provided GUN CLUB RD CLUB GUN HAMPDEN AVE centralized customer service, billing and back-office support for all of Colorado’s tolling facilities, Cherry Creek QUINCY AVE Reservoir Quincy transforming and expanding tolling in the state. BELLEVIEW AVE Reservoir SMOKY HILL RD ORCHARD RD 25 During 2018, E-470 staff and its Board of Directors realized new opportunities to provide maximum PEORIA ST PEORIA Southlands ARAPAHOE RD Mall benefit to ExpressToll customers of E-470 as well as the larger Colorado community. Leading the charge SANTA FE DR ARAPAHOE COUNTY BROADWAY Centennial COUNTY LINE RD Airport were the E-470 Board of Directors’ unanimous votes to implement a toll rate freeze and to remove the Park Meadows GARTRELL RD Shopping District Vehicle Registration Fee (VRF), which had been in place since the founding of the Authority in 1988.
  • Special Supplement

    Special Supplement

    SPECIAL SUPPLEMENT WeSTORIES OF FLIGHT All IN EVERY KIND OF AIRCRAFTFly AIRSPACEMAG.COM AIR & SPACE We All Fly Reader’s Stories Fun for the whole family: In October 2020, airshow star John Mohr lent his famous Stearman to his son Ryan, who treated his son Haak and wife Tory to Haak’s first airplane ride, taking off from New Richmond airfield in Wisconsin. (Leonardo Correa Luna) Happy Times in The Air We noticed as we read these wonderful stories, sent to us by the readers of Air & Space, that they are filled with longing. As you read them, you’ll notice these common themes: “All too soon, the flight was over” and “All good things must end, and so did our flight” and “I’ll always remember…” and “I’ll never forget.” There are certainly a few experi- ences included that the writers wish had not happened, but the majority of these stories recount happy times in the air. Reading them made us happy, and we hope you enjoy them as much as we did. Happy reading. Happy flying. —The editors 2 August/September 2021 AIR & SPACE We All Fly Reader’s Stories Directory PLEASE TAP ON NAME TO JUMP TO STORY DICIANO, ANN MOYER, ROBERT SOARE, MALCOLM A A DIXON, JOHN I MOYER, ROBERT SPANJER, BILL ABEL, GLENN DOMINY, ALAN ICKLER, GLENN MOYER, ROBERT F. SQUIERS, BRUCE ABLETT, KENNETH DUNLOP, PHIL MUELLER, ROBERT C. STAATS, BERNEY V. ACKERMAN, ALBERT J MUNKS, JEFFREY STAFFORD, WAYNE JOHN, KEN ALEXANDER, PETE E STALLBAUMER, STAN JONAS, DICK ALVAREZ, ALEX EASTEP, LES N STEINBREUGGE, DAVE JONES, KEITH AMES, JERRY EIMSTAD, BILL STOLZBERG, MARK ANDRÉ, GEORGE M.
  • AAAE Delivers for Airport Executives

    AAAE Delivers for Airport Executives

    AAAE DELIVERS FOR AIRPORT EXECUTIVES MEDIAKIT 1 Industry Friends and Colleagues: As we prepare for 2010, Airport Magazine is developing articles that will address industry concerns about the nation’s economic recovery; share lessons learned from the recession and the price of fuel and its impact on air service; provide timely information on regulatory and legislative issues; fulfill the far-ranging needs of airports for training information; describe the lessons airports have learned on subjects that include ARFF, technology and airfield and terminal improvements; and much more. Every feature and department in Airport Magazine is designed to deliver relevant, timely and insightful information to our readers. We have crafted our 2010 editorial calendar with these goals in mind. The 2010 lineup combines familiar topics — such as baggage screening, concessions and winter operations — with emerging ones that include NextGen and green airports. Our format will be as varied as our selection of articles: we’ll have roundtables with industry experts; articles written by airport officials; interviews with government and industry officials; and photo features to highlight aspects of our industry. Our ambitious plans for 2010 would not be possible, however, without the faithful support of Airport Magazine’s advertisers. For more than 20 years, companies that advertise to the airport community have trusted Airport Magazine to deliver their message to this audience. For potential advertisers, please consider this: by choosing our magazine to communicate your message, you are supporting not just an advertiser-funded magazine, but an entire association — the American Association of Airport Executives. All of us at Airport Magazine look forward to working with you in 2010 and beyond.
  • BDL Brochure.Pdf

    BDL Brochure.Pdf

    The Connecticut Airport Authority The Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) was established as a quasi-public agency in 2011 to own, improve, and operate Bradley International Airport and the five state-owned general aviation airports (Danielson, Groton-New London, Hartford-Brainard, Waterbury-Oxford, and Windham). The CAA strives to provide excellent customer service and top-quality facilities for its passengers while making Connecticut’s airports more attractive to new airlines, establishing new routes, and supporting Connecticut’s overall economic development and growth strategy. The CAA’s five general aviation airports are also crucial components of the state’s overall transportation system, providing access to corporate aircraft, local pilots, and convenient charter service for regional businesses. Already, the CAA has achieved numerous milestones, including the addition of new Bradley service to Dublin (Ireland), Los Angeles, Pittsburgh, Fort Myers, Houston, Tampa and Washington, D.C. The Airports: Bradley International Airport Bradley International Airport (BDL) is a civil/military airport in Windsor Locks, Connecticut. Owned and operated by the Connecticut Airport Authority, it is the second-largest airport in New England. The airport is about halfway between Hartford and Springfield. It is Connecticut's busiest commercial airport with 93,461 operations for the calendar year ending 2015 and enplanements of 1,465,147 as of June, 2016. Airlines operating at Bradley International Airport include Aer Lingus, Air Canada, American Airlines, Delta, JetBlue, OneJet, Southwest, and United. As a dual-use military facility with the U.S. Air Force, the airport is also home to the 103rd Airlift Wing (103 AW) of the Connecticut Air National Guard.
  • All Small-Sized Cwss That Have Certified Completion of Their RRA (Pdf)

    All Small-Sized Cwss That Have Certified Completion of Their RRA (Pdf)

    Community water systems serving a population of 3,001 to 49,999 that certified completion of a risk and resilience assessment as required by Section 2013 of America's Water Infrastructure Act, as of July 30, 2021. PWSID Community Water System Town/City State ZIP Code 1 001570671 PACE WATER SYSTEM, INC. PACE FL 32571-0750 2 010106001 MPTN Water Treatment Department Mashantucket CT 06338 3 010109005 Mohegan Tribal Utility Authority Uncasville CT 06382 4 020000005 ST. REGIS MOHAWK TRIBE Akwesasne NY 13655 5 043740039 CHEROKEE WATER SYSTEM CHEROKEE NC 28719 6 055293201 MT. PLEASANT Mount Pleasant MI 48858 7 055293603 East Bay Water Works Peshawbestown MI 49682 8 055293611 HANNAHVILLE COMMUNITY WILSON MI 49896-9728 9 055293702 LITTLE RIVER TRIBAL WATER SYSTEM Manistee MI 49660 10 055294502 Prairie Island Indian Community Welch MN 55089 11 055294503 Lower Sioux Indian Community Morton MN 56270 12 055294506 South Water Treatment Plant Prior Lake MN 55372 13 055295003 SOUTH-CENTRAL WATER SYSTEM Bowler WI 54416 14 055295310 Giiwedin Hayward WI 54843 15 055295401 Lac du Flambeau Lac du Flambeau WI 54538 16 055295508 KESHENA KESHENA WI 54135 17 055295703 ONEIDA #1 OR SITE #1 ONEIDA WI 54155 18 061020808 POTTAWATOMIE CO. RWD #3 (DALE PLANT) Shawnee OK 74804 19 061620001 Reservation Water System Eagle Pass TX 78852 20 062004336 Chicksaw Winstar Water System Ada OK 74821 21 063501100 POJOAQUE SOUTH Santa Fe NM 87506 22 063501109 Isleta Eastside Isleta NM 87022 23 063501124 Pueblo of Zuni - Zuni Utility Department Zuni NM 87327 24 063503109 Isleta Shea Whiff Isleta NM 87022 25 063503111 LAGUNA VALLEY LAGUNA, NM 87026 NM 87007 26 063506008 Mescalero Apache Inn of the Mountain Gods Public Water System Mescalero NM 88340 27 070000003 SAC & FOX (MESKWAKI) IN IOWA TAMA IA 52339 28 083090091 TOWN OF BROWNING BROWNING MT 59417 29 083890023 Turtle Mountain Public Utilities Commission Belcourt ND 58316 30 083890025 Spirit Lake Water Management RWS St.