FTSE Global All Cap Ex US
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Mexican Supermarkets & Grocery Stores Industry Report
Mexican Supermarkets & Grocery Stores Industry Report July 2018 Food Retail Report Mexico 2018Washington, D.C. Mexico City Monterrey Overview of the Mexican Food Retail Industry • The Mexican food retail industry consists in the distribution and sale of products to third parties; it also generates income from developing and leasing the real estate where its stores are located • Stores are ranked according to size (e.g. megamarkets, hypermarkets, supermarkets, clubs, warehouses, and other) • According to ANTAD (National Association of Food Retail and Department Stores by its Spanish acronym), there are 34 supermarket chains with 5,567 stores and 15 million sq. mts. of sales floor in Mexico • Estimates industry size (as of 2017) of MXN$872 billion • Industry is expected to grow 8% during 2018 with an expected investment of US$3.1 billion • ANTAD members approximately invested US$2.6 billion and created 418,187 jobs in 2017 • 7 states account for 50% of supermarket stores: Estado de Mexico, Nuevo Leon, Mexico City, Jalisco, Baja California, Sonora and Sinaloa • Key players in the industry include, Wal-Mart de Mexico, Soriana, Chedraui and La Comer. Other regional competitors include, Casa Ley, Merza, Calimax, Alsuper, HEB and others • Wal-Mart de México has 5.8 million of m² of sales floor, Soriana 4.3 m², Chedraui 1.2 m² and La Cómer 0.2 m² • Wal-Mart de México has a sales CAGR (2013-2017) of 8.73%, Soriana 9.98% and Chedraui 9.26% • Wal-Mart de México has a stores growth CAGR (2013-2017) of 3.30%, Soriana 5.75% and Chedraui 5.82% Number -
Small Offices and Mixed Use in CAZ
Small Offices and Mixed Use in CAZ Prepared for The GLA 1 By RAMIDUS CONSULTING LIMITED August 2015 Small Offices and Mixed Use in CAZ Contents Page No. Management summary ii 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 Project background 1.2 Project brief 1.3 Method statement 1.4 Acknowledgements 2.0 Context 6 2.1 Spatial planning 2.2 Commercial office market 2.3 Defining CAZ 2.4 Defining small offices 3.0 Drivers of change 15 3.1 Growth in self-employed businesses 3.2 Change in the occupier market 3.3 A changing business geography 3.4 Small offices and the flexible space market 3.5 Office-to-residential conversion activity 4.0 Occupied stock of small offices 27 4.1 Stock of offices 4.2 Spatial distribution of small units 4.3 The role of multi-let buildings 4.4 Small offices by sector 4.5 Summary 5.0 Trends in demand and supply of small offices 38 5.1 Take-up 5.2 Availability 5.3 Rents 5.4 Summary 6.0 Strategic and local implications of Policy 4.3Bc 48 6.1 Issues and policies for protecting small offices 6.2 Summary 7.0 Implementation of Policy 4.3Aa 53 7.1 Thresholds 7.2 The extent to which housing has been delivered 7.3 Land swaps or packages involving offices and housing 7.4 Mixed use housing credits 7.5 Analysis of development decisions 8.0 The impact of viability on development activity 61 8.1 Overview 8.2 Factors influencing development viability 8.3 Summary 9.0 Conclusions and recommendations 68 9.1 Context 9.2 Providing for small offices 9.3 The distribution of small offices 9.4 Policy issues 9.5 Policy recommendations Prepared for The GLA i By RAMIDUS CONSULTING LIMITED August 2015 Small Offices and Mixed Use in CAZ Management Summary This study examines London’s Central Activities Zone (CAZ) in terms of the supply of, and demand for, small offices and mixed use development, specifically the balance between office and residential development. -
Japanese Manufacturing Affiliates in Europe and Turkey
06-ORD 70H-002AA 7 Japanese Manufacturing Affiliates in Europe and Turkey - 2005 Survey - September 2006 Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO) Preface The survey on “Japanese manufacturing affiliates in Europe and Turkey” has been conducted 22 times since the first survey in 1983*. The latest survey, carried out from January 2006 to February 2006 targeting 16 countries in Western Europe, 8 countries in Central and Eastern Europe, and Turkey, focused on business trends and future prospects in each country, procurement of materials, production, sales, and management problems, effects of EU environmental regulations, etc. The survey revealed that as of the end of 2005 there were a total of 1,008 Japanese manufacturing affiliates operating in the surveyed region --- 818 in Western Europe, 174 in Central and Eastern Europe, and 16 in Turkey. Of this total, 291 affiliates --- 284 in Western Europe, 6 in Central and Eastern Europe, and 1 in Turkey --- also operate R & D or design centers. Also, the number of Japanese affiliates who operate only R & D or design centers in the surveyed region (no manufacturing operations) totaled 129 affiliates --- 125 in Western Europe and 4 in Central and Eastern Europe. In this survey we put emphasis on the effects of EU environmental regulations on Japanese manufacturing affiliates. We would like to express our great appreciation to the affiliates concerned for their kind cooperation, which have enabled us over the years to constantly improve the survey and report on the results. We hope that the affiliates and those who are interested in business development in Europe and/or Turkey will find this report useful. -
Defendants and Auto Parts List
Defendants and Parts List PARTS DEFENDANTS 1. Wire Harness American Furukawa, Inc. Asti Corporation Chiyoda Manufacturing Corporation Chiyoda USA Corporation Denso Corporation Denso International America Inc. Fujikura America, Inc. Fujikura Automotive America, LLC Fujikura Ltd. Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd. G.S. Electech, Inc. G.S. Wiring Systems Inc. G.S.W. Manufacturing Inc. K&S Wiring Systems, Inc. Kyungshin-Lear Sales And Engineering LLC Lear Corp. Leoni Wiring Systems, Inc. Leonische Holding, Inc. Mitsubishi Electric Automotive America, Inc. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation Mitsubishi Electric Us Holdings, Inc. Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. Sumitomo Electric Wintec America, Inc. Sumitomo Electric Wiring Systems, Inc. Sumitomo Wiring Systems (U.S.A.) Inc. Sumitomo Wiring Systems, Ltd. S-Y Systems Technologies Europe GmbH Tokai Rika Co., Ltd. Tram, Inc. D/B/A Tokai Rika U.S.A. Inc. Yazaki Corp. Yazaki North America Inc. 2. Instrument Panel Clusters Continental Automotive Electronics LLC Continental Automotive Korea Ltd. Continental Automotive Systems, Inc. Denso Corp. Denso International America, Inc. New Sabina Industries, Inc. Nippon Seiki Co., Ltd. Ns International, Ltd. Yazaki Corporation Yazaki North America, Inc. Defendants and Parts List 3. Fuel Senders Denso Corporation Denso International America, Inc. Yazaki Corporation Yazaki North America, Inc. 4. Heater Control Panels Alps Automotive Inc. Alps Electric (North America), Inc. Alps Electric Co., Ltd Denso Corporation Denso International America, Inc. K&S Wiring Systems, Inc. Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. Sumitomo Electric Wintec America, Inc. Sumitomo Electric Wiring Systems, Inc. Sumitomo Wiring Systems (U.S.A.) Inc. Sumitomo Wiring Systems, Ltd. Tokai Rika Co., Ltd. Tram, Inc. 5. Bearings Ab SKF JTEKT Corporation Koyo Corporation Of U.S.A. -
Consultation Statement Publication Draft (Regulation 19) Mixed Use Revision
Consultation Statement Publication Draft (Regulation 19) Mixed Use Revision Revision to Westminster's City Plan July 2015 1.0 Introduction 1.1 This Consultation Statement has been prepared to meet the requirements of Regulation 22 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Development) (England) Regulations 2012 (“The Regulations”), and forms part of the proposed submission documents. 1.2 The Statement details the consultation undertaken by Westminster City Council (‘the council’) during the Regulation 18 and informal consultations on the Mixed Use Revision to Westminster’s City Plan, referred to as the “Mixed Use Revision”. 1.3 It details who was consulted, for how long, and how they were invited to make representations. A summary of the main issues raised by the responses is provided, and details as to how these representations have been taken into account in the Publication Draft Mixed Use Revision subject to the Regulation 19 consultation. 1.4 Consultation was carried out in compliance with the council’s Statement of Community Involvement (SCI, adopted June 2014), thus meeting Section 19 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 (as amended). 1.5 All contacts on the council’s LDF database were consulted, together with all specific consultees in accordance with the Regulations, all ward councillors, and all neighbouring boroughs. The council’s LDF database was created in April 2007 and was initially populated with contact information from the Unitary Development Plan (UDP) database. However it was significantly revised in 2013 to ensure all data was up‐to‐date. Since the creation of the database, consultee contact information has been updated on a continual basis, with contacts being added, removed or amended on request. -
Grupo Comercial Chedraui, S.A.B. De C.V
GRUPO COMERCIAL CHEDRAUI, S.A.B. DE C.V. Av. Constituyentes No. 1150, Lomas Altas Delegación Miguel Hidalgo C.P. 11950 México, D. F. www.chedraui.com.mx Características de las acciones representativas del capital social de GRUPO COMERCIAL CHEDRAUI, S.A.B. DE C.V. Nominativas Sin valor nominal Íntegramente suscritas y pagadas Serie B Clase I Capital mínimo fijo sin derecho a retiro. Clave de Cotización en la Bolsa Mexicana de Valores, S.A.B. de C.V.: CHDRAUI Los valores emitidos por Grupo Comercial Chedraui, S.A.B. de C.V. se encuentran inscritos en el Registro Nacional de Valores y se cotizan en la Bolsa Mexicana de Valores, S.A.B. de C.V. La inscripción en el Registro Nacional de Valores no implica certificación sobre la bondad de los valores, la solvencia de la emisora o la exactitud o veracidad de la información contenida en el reporte anual, ni convalida los actos que, en su caso, se hubieren realizado en contravención de las leyes. Reporte anual que se presenta de acuerdo con las disposiciones de carácter general aplicables a las Emisoras de valores y a otros participantes del mercado, por el año terminado el 31 de diciembre de 2015. México, D.F. a 30 de abril de 2016 ÍNDICE 1. INFORMACIÓN GENERAL ........................................................................................... 4 a) Glosario de Términos y Definiciones ......................................................................... 4 b) Resumen Ejecutivo ................................................................................................. 6 c) Factores -
Organization Sector Report Title Publication Year Report Type
GRI Reports List 2012(Japan) last updated: April 2013 Organization Sector Report Title Publication Year Report type Application Level Status Adeka Chemicals CSR Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Advantest Technology Hardware Corporate Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced AEON Retailers Environmental and Social Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Aeon Retailers Environmental & Social Initiatives 2012 2012 Non - GRI Aishin Seiki Equipment Aisin Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Ajinomoto Food and Beverage Products Sustainability Report 2012 2012 Non - GRI All Nippon Airways Coompany Limited Aviation Annual Report 2012 Non - GRI Asahi Glass Company Chemicals AGC Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Asahi Group Holdings Food and Beverage Products CSR Communication Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Asahi Kasei Chemicals CSR Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Astellas Pharma Health Care Products Annual Report 2012 2012 GRI - G3.1 B Self-declared azbil Conglomerates azbil Report 2012 2012 Non - GRI Benesse Holdings, Inc. Other Benesse Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Bridgestone Chemicals CSR Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Brother Technology Hardware CSR Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Canon Technology Hardware Sustainability Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Casio Consumer Durables Sustainability Report 2012 2012 GRI - G3.1 B Self-declared Chiyoda Corporation Construction CSR Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Chubu Electric Power Energy Annual Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced Citizen Holdings Conglomerates CSR Report 2012 2012 GRI - Referenced -
Retirement Strategy Fund 2060 Description Plan 3S DCP & JRA
Retirement Strategy Fund 2060 June 30, 2020 Note: Numbers may not always add up due to rounding. % Invested For Each Plan Description Plan 3s DCP & JRA ACTIVIA PROPERTIES INC REIT 0.0137% 0.0137% AEON REIT INVESTMENT CORP REIT 0.0195% 0.0195% ALEXANDER + BALDWIN INC REIT 0.0118% 0.0118% ALEXANDRIA REAL ESTATE EQUIT REIT USD.01 0.0585% 0.0585% ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN GOVT STIF SSC FUND 64BA AGIS 587 0.0329% 0.0329% ALLIED PROPERTIES REAL ESTAT REIT 0.0219% 0.0219% AMERICAN CAMPUS COMMUNITIES REIT USD.01 0.0277% 0.0277% AMERICAN HOMES 4 RENT A REIT USD.01 0.0396% 0.0396% AMERICOLD REALTY TRUST REIT USD.01 0.0427% 0.0427% ARMADA HOFFLER PROPERTIES IN REIT USD.01 0.0124% 0.0124% AROUNDTOWN SA COMMON STOCK EUR.01 0.0248% 0.0248% ASSURA PLC REIT GBP.1 0.0319% 0.0319% AUSTRALIAN DOLLAR 0.0061% 0.0061% AZRIELI GROUP LTD COMMON STOCK ILS.1 0.0101% 0.0101% BLUEROCK RESIDENTIAL GROWTH REIT USD.01 0.0102% 0.0102% BOSTON PROPERTIES INC REIT USD.01 0.0580% 0.0580% BRAZILIAN REAL 0.0000% 0.0000% BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUP INC REIT USD.01 0.0418% 0.0418% CA IMMOBILIEN ANLAGEN AG COMMON STOCK 0.0191% 0.0191% CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST REIT USD.01 0.0394% 0.0394% CANADIAN DOLLAR 0.0005% 0.0005% CAPITALAND COMMERCIAL TRUST REIT 0.0228% 0.0228% CIFI HOLDINGS GROUP CO LTD COMMON STOCK HKD.1 0.0105% 0.0105% CITY DEVELOPMENTS LTD COMMON STOCK 0.0129% 0.0129% CK ASSET HOLDINGS LTD COMMON STOCK HKD1.0 0.0378% 0.0378% COMFORIA RESIDENTIAL REIT IN REIT 0.0328% 0.0328% COUSINS PROPERTIES INC REIT USD1.0 0.0403% 0.0403% CUBESMART REIT USD.01 0.0359% 0.0359% DAIWA OFFICE INVESTMENT -
Automotive Parts Industry SHAPING a BETTER FUTURE
Special Feature: Automotive Parts Industry SHAPING A BETTER FUTURE SHAPING A BETTER FUTURE JTEKT’s evolving solutions Linkless Steer-by-Wire*1 4WD Driveline Systems A steering mechanism that has eliminated the mechanical linkage between the steering wheel and the tires Becoming a system supplier by adding a dierential*3 unit (Yutaka Seimitsu product) to our lineup • Providing system solutions for peace of Peace of mind, safety, and comfort by optimal Propeller shaft*6 • Drivers’ safety in the event of a collision has been enhanced by removing the shaft previous in the vehicle’s interior. Peace of Mind Mind & Safety proposals for total systems & Safety Comfort Driveshaft 4WD driveline system solutions • Optimal tire control is calculated instantaneously from the driver’s steering wheel operation and various vehicle information, thus providing passengers with a comfortable driving experience. • Enhances the degrees of freedom in the driving space (the steering wheel can be stored away during autonomous Comfort driving mode) Dierential unit TORSEN*4 Steering actuator *3 A mechanism that absorbs the difference between the right and left wheel rotation for smooth turning. *4 A type of LSD (Limited Slip Differential) that optimally distributes torque on Yutaka Seimitsu products the lateral or longitudinal axles when the vehicle is turning. ITCC*5 Became a JTEKT subsidiary in January 2020 *5 Intelligent Torque Controlled Coupling: A mechanism that detects the difference between front and rear wheel rotation and achieves optimal During normal driving During autonomous driving In January 2020, JTEKT acquired all front and rear wheel torque distribution by electronic control shares of Yutaka Seimitsu Kogyo, Ltd. -
Análisis Carteras Modelo Españolas
4-jul-14 Análisis Carteras modelo españolas La siguiente tabla ofrece la evolución de las carteras modelo Evol. C.M. 20-Ibex35 (ene.'96/jul.'14) comparadas con el Ibex 35 del 3-jun-14 al 2-jul-14: 1000% Var. Mes Var. Año Dif año Ibex35 800% CARTERA 20 VALORES Ibex35 C.Mod. Ampliada 2,9% 9,2% 1,7% C.Mod. Media 3,6% 9,1% 1,6% 600% C.Mod. Simplificada 4,2% 10,8% 3,4% 400% IBEX 35 2,2% 7,4% n/a 200% Las tablas siguientes muestran la evolución de los valores que integran las carteras modelo españolas durante el pasado mes: 0% Cartera modelo ampliada 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 junio julio CM 20 valores: Cambios julio C. ampliada Peso % Rbd. x div C. ampliada Peso Beta Rbd. x div Entran Salen Cambian Peso (1) (1) Telefonica 6 Var.Mes2,87% 5,9% Telefonica 6 0,91 5,9% Acerinox +4 DIA -4 Santander +2 Santander 5 2,83% 7,7% Santander 7 1,204 7,8% Tubos R. -1 NH Hoteles 3 -1,24% 0,0% NH Hoteles 3 1,026 0,0% BBVA +2 ACS 3 2,01% 3,6% ACS 3 1,093 3,6% Técnicas R. -2 Tubos Reunidos 5 4,96% 0,7% Tubos Reunidos 4 1,323 0,7% Amadeus -3 BBVA 5 1,22% 3,6% BBVA 7 1,319 3,6% Tubacex -1 Cie Automotive -1 DIA 4 6,38% 2,3% Acerinox 4 1,343 3,5% Red Eléctrica +1 Iberdrola +3 Técnicas Reunidas 4 0,99% 3,1% Técnicas Reunidas 2 0,518 3,1% CM 20 valores vs Ibex en 2014 BME 7 5,15% 4,6% BME 7 1,096 4,7% 10% Ferrovial 6 1,80% 3,6% Ferrovial 6 0,76 3,6% 5% CaixaBank 7 2,34% 4,3% CaixaBank 7 1,194 4,3% Grifols 7 2,53% 0,5% Grifols 7 0,929 0,5% 0% Gamesa 4 2,34% 0,0% Gamesa 4 1,15 0,0% -5% Abertis 2 5,72% 3,6% Abertis 2 0,84 3,7% Cartera Ibex35 Amadeus 7 -2,32% 2,1% Amadeus 4 0,596 2,1% -10% 14 14 14 14 14 14 - - - - - - j Enagas 6 8,43% 5,7% Enagas 6 0,467 5,7% f e a m m CIE Automotive SA 6 11,15% 1,7% CIE Automotive SA 5 0,033 1,7% Iberdrola 2 5,82% 2,9% Iberdrola 5 0,714 2,9% CM 10 valores: Cambios julio Tubacex 6 -6,19% 0,6% Tubacex 5 1,136 0,6% Entran Salen Cambian Peso Red Electrica 5 4,21% 4,0% Red Electrica 6 0,69 4,0% BBVA +11 Amadeus -11 Red Eléctrica +1 100 3,11% 100 3,37% Iberdrolda +11 Tubos R. -
Diapositiva 1
Análisis de la presencia vasca en el ranking EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard (2004-2009) Informe Noviembre2009 0 Comentario al documento La Comisión europea acaba de publicar la última edición del EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard (2009) con un ranking de las 1.000 empresas europeas con mayor inversión en I+D. Este año, hay 21 empresas españolas en el ranking, con una inversión total de 1460 millones de euros. Como es habitual en este ranking, Telefónica lidera el grupo de empresas españolas desde el puesto 40 con una inversión que este año alcanza los 668 millones de euros. Entre las mil empresas que más invierten en I+D este año aparecen 7 empresas vascas: Iberdrola, Fagor, ITP, Gamesa, Cie Automotive, Faes Farma y CAF (que había desaparecido en años anteriores y ha vuelto a aparecer este año). Entre todas ellas suman una inversión total de 239 millones de euros, mejorando sensiblemente los 190 millones de euros de inversión total que aparecían en el ranking para el año anterior. Además, la evolución de la participación de las empresas vascas en este ranking desde el 2003 también es muy positiva, tanto en términos de inversión creciente como en cuanto al porcentaje de inversión de las empresas vascas sobre las empresas españolas. Hemos pasado de 2 empresas en 2003 con una inversión de apenas 80 millones de euros a 7 empresas con una inversión tres veces mayor y un porcentaje sobre el total del Estado sensiblemente superior (16.35%). Naider, noviembre 2009 Pág. 2 1 EU INDUSTRIAL R&D INVESTMENT SCOREBOARD 2004 2 EU INDUSTRIAL R&D INVESTMENT SCOREBOARD 2005 3 EU INDUSTRIAL R&D INVESTMENT SCOREBOARD 2006 4 EU INDUSTRIAL R&D INVESTMENT SCOREBOARD 2007 5 EU INDUSTRIAL R&D INVESTMENT SCOREBOARD 2008 6 EU INDUSTRIAL R&D INVESTMENT SCOREBOARD 2009 7 RESUMEN EUSKADI Pág. -
Applicability of Intrinsic Value Models at the Segmented Chinese Stock
Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Wirtschaftswissenschaften der Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg mit dem Thema Applicability of Intrinsic Value Models at the Segmented Chinese Stock Market vorgelegt von Diplom-Kaufmann Ole Gerdau aus Hamburg Würzburg, den 20. März 2011 Betreuer: Prof. Dr. Hansrudi Lenz Table of Contents I I. Table of Contents I. Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................... I II. Summary of Abbreviations .......................................................................................................... IV III. Summary of Symbols ................................................................................................................ VII IV. List of Figures ........................................................................................................................ IX V. List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... X VI. List of Appendices ................................................................................................................ XII 1 Problem statement ......................................................................................................................... 1 2 Financial asset valuation and pricing .............................................................................................. 7 2.1 Ad-hoc models ........................................................................................................