DOCSLIB.ORG

C-1 SPECIAL ELECTION October 15, 1991 STATE QUESTION NO. 639

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
C-1 SPECIAL ELECTION October 15, 1991 STATE QUESTION NO. 639 SPECIAL ELECTION October 15, 1991 STATE QUESTION NO. 639 INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 347 This measure replaces newly enacted House Bill 1017 with the laws existing before the Bill's passage. It repeals minimum standards for school accreditation and curriculum, but restores power to the State Board of Education to set those standards. It repeals certain programs for teacher training and certification, and for parent education. It changes formulas for state assistance to consolidated schools and repeals severance pay for their employees. It raises the age for attending school from five to seven. It repeals the requirement to attend kindergarten. It restores student transfer fees and prior procedures for suspending or firing teachers. County Superintendent of Schools positions and the prior formula for school state aid are restored. Class size limits are raised and limits on how many students teachers may teach are removed. It repeals all taxes enacted to fund House Bill 1017. Teachers' minimum salaries are lowered. The measure repeals many other changes. Vote---Yes........................................360,318 No.........................................428,680 AMENDMENT REJECTED. C-1 PRIMARY ELECTIONS March 10, 1992 DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENTIAL PRIMARY ELECTION PRESIDENT Charles Woods................................................16,828 4.0% J. Louis McAlpine.............................................2,670 .6% Tom Harkin...................................................14,015 3.4% Bob Kerrey...................................................13,252 3.2% Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr........................................6,474 1.6% Edmund G. Brown Jr...........................................69,624 16.7% Bill Clinton................................................293,266 70.5% Totals.................................................416,129 Results by United States Congressional District District 1. Charles Woods.......................................1,221 2.6% J. Louis McAlpine.....................................273 0.6% Tom Harkin..........................................1,351 2.8% Bob Kerrey..........................................1,506 3.2% Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr................................593 1.2% Edmund G. Brown Jr.................................10,262 21.6% Bill Clinton.......................................32,316 68.0% Totals........................................47,522 2. Charles Woods.......................................1,893 2.4% J. Louis McAlpine.....................................470 0.6% Tom Harkin..........................................1,988 2.5% Bob Kerrey..........................................1,973 2.5% Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr..............................1,167 1.5% Edmund G. Brown Jr.................................11,126 14.1% Bill Clinton.......................................60,468 76.4% Totals........................................79,085 3. Charles Woods.......................................5,459 6.2% J. Louis McAlpine.....................................514 0.6% Tom Harkin..........................................2,608 2.9% Bob Kerrey..........................................2,480 2.8% Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr..............................1,324 1.5% Edmund G. Brown Jr.................................11,819 13.3% Bill Clinton.......................................64,593 72.7% Totals........................................88,797 C-2 Elections of 1992 4. Charles Woods.......................................3,508 4.8% J. Louis McAlpine.....................................578 0.8% Tom Harkin..........................................2,877 3.9% Bob Kerrey..........................................2,547 3.5% Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr..............................1,125 1.5% Edmund G. Brown Jr.................................12,488 17.0% Bill Clinton.......................................50,161 68.5% Totals........................................73,284 5. Charles Woods.......................................1,904 3.3% J. Louis McAlpine.....................................378 0.7% Tom Harkin..........................................2,450 4.3% Bob Kerrey..........................................2,346 4.1% Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr..............................1,005 1.8% Edmund G. Brown Jr.................................12,426 21.7% Bill Clinton.......................................36,641 64.1% Totals........................................57,150 6. Charles Woods.......................................2,843 4.0% J. Louis McAlpine.....................................457 0.7% Tom Harkin..........................................2,741 3.9% Bob Kerrey..........................................2,400 3.4% Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr..............................1,260 1.8% Edmund G. Brown Jr.................................11,503 16.4% Bill Clinton.......................................49,087 69.8% Totals........................................70,291 C-3 Elections of 1992 REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENTIAL PRIMARY ELECTION PRESIDENT George Bush.................................................151,612 69.6% David Duke....................................................5,672 2.6% Patrick J. Buchanan..........................................57,933 26.6% Tennie B. Rogers................................................674 0.3% Isabell Masters...............................................1,830 0.9% Totals.................................................217,721 Results by United States Congressional District District 1. George Bush........................................34,796 68.2% David Duke..........................................1,267 2.5% Patrick J. Buchanan................................14,427 28.3% Tennie B. Rogers......................................132 0.2% Isabell Masters.......................................421 0.8% Totals........................................51,043 2. George Bush........................................15,160 69.3% David Duke............................................728 3.3% Patrick J. Buchanan.................................5,746 26.3% Tennie B. Rogers.......................................84 0.4% Isabell Masters.......................................167 0.7% Totals........................................21,885 3. George Bush........................................12,360 71.4% David Duke............................................489 2.8% Patrick J. Buchanan.................................4,243 24.5% Tennie B. Rogers.......................................60 0.4% Isabell Masters.......................................151 0.9% Totals........................................17,303 4. George Bush........................................18,954 68.8% David Duke............................................768 2.8% Patrick J. Buchanan.................................7,494 27.2% Tennie B. Rogers.......................................77 0.3% Isabell Masters.......................................254 0.9% Totals........................................27,547 C-4 Elections of 1992 5. George Bush........................................44,309 71.4% David Duke..........................................1,310 2.1% Patrick J. Buchanan................................15,743 25.4% Tennie B. Rogers......................................167 0.3% Isabell Masters.......................................499 0.8% Totals........................................62,028 6. George Bush........................................26,033 68.7% David Duke..........................................1,110 2.9% Patrick J. Buchanan................................10,280 27.1% Tennie B. Rogers......................................154 0.4% Isabell Masters.......................................338 0.9% Totals........................................37,915 C-5 Elections of 1992 STATE QUESTION STATE QUESTION NO. 640 INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 348 This measure amends the State Constitution. It adds new provisions to Section 33 of Article 5. These would change the method by which state government makes laws that raise revenue. The measure requires that a bill to raise revenue be voted upon by the people at the next general election. A bill would not be effective until it was approved by a majority of the voters. The measure also provides a way that a revenue bill could become law without a vote of the people. A bill would have to be approved by a 3/4 vote of each house of the legislature and go to the governor for proper action. A revenue bill approved by a 3/4 vote of each house of the legislature would not become effective until ninety days after the approval date. Such a bill would not be subject to the emergency measure provision. Vote---Yes........................................373,143 No.........................................290,978 AMENDMENT ADOPTED. C-6 Elections of 1992 PRIMARY ELECTIONS August 25, 1992 DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY ELECTION CORPORATION COMMISSIONER Roger M. Streetman...........................................20,848 4.9% Larry Gentry.................................................43,434 10.2% Frank Lewis.................................................111,101 26.0% Cleeta John Rogers...........................................64,297 15.1% Cody L. Graves..............................................186,967 43.8% Totals.................................................426,647 UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE District 1. Dan Morrissey......................................24,245 44.0% John Selph.........................................30,884 56.0% Totals........................................55,129 2. Robert W. Bob Blackstock...........................15,446
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Center for American Progress Action Fund
    CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS THE TRAGEDY OF OKLAHOMA CITY 15 YEARS LATER AND THE LESSONS FOR TODAY WELCOME: AL FROM, FOUNDER, DEMOCRATIC LEADERSHIP COUNCIL JOHN PODESTA, PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS ACTION FUND INTRODUCTION: MICHAEL REYES, FORMER EMPLOYEE, ALFRED P. MURRAH FEDERAL BUILDING SPEAKER: PRESIDENT WILLIAM J. CLINTON MODERATOR: RON BROWNSTEIN, POLITICAL DIRECTOR, ATLANTIC MEDIA PANELISTS: REP. KENDRICK MEEK (D-FL) MARVIN “MICKEY” EDWARDS (R-OK), FORMER U.S. REPRESENTATIVE MICHAEL WALDMAN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE, NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL MARK POTOK, DIRECTOR OF INTELLIGENCE PROJECTS, SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER JAMIE GORELICK, CHAIR, DEFENSE, NATIONAL SECURITY AND GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS PRACTICE GROUP, WILMERHALE BRADLEY BUCKLES, FORMER DIRECTOR, U.S. BUREAU OF ALOCHOL, TOBACCO AND FIREARMS FRIDAY, APRIL 16, 2010 WASHINGTON, D.C. Transcript by Federal News Service Washington, D.C. JOHN PODESTA: Good morning, everyone. I’m John Podesta. I’m the president of the Center for American Progress Action Fund. I want to thank you for joining us here today to remember and to reflect on the tragedy that occurred in Oklahoma City nearly 15 years ago. There are days that punctuate all our memories, collectively and as a country, and April 19, 1995 is most certainly one of them. So despite the somberness of this occasion, I’m honored to co-host this important event today and I’m grateful to those who were affected for taking the time to share their experiences, as we look both backwards to remember what happened and forward to draw lessons. We can now see more clearly from today’s vantage point.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix File Anes 1988‐1992 Merged Senate File
    Version 03 Codebook ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ CODEBOOK APPENDIX FILE ANES 1988‐1992 MERGED SENATE FILE USER NOTE: Much of his file has been converted to electronic format via OCR scanning. As a result, the user is advised that some errors in character recognition may have resulted within the text. MASTER CODES: The following master codes follow in this order: PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE CAMPAIGN ISSUES MASTER CODES CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP CODE ELECTIVE OFFICE CODE RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE MASTER CODE SENATOR NAMES CODES CAMPAIGN MANAGERS AND POLLSTERS CAMPAIGN CONTENT CODES HOUSE CANDIDATES CANDIDATE CODES >> VII. MASTER CODES ‐ Survey Variables >> VII.A. Party/Candidate ('Likes/Dislikes') ? PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PEOPLE WITHIN PARTY 0001 Johnson 0002 Kennedy, John; JFK 0003 Kennedy, Robert; RFK 0004 Kennedy, Edward; "Ted" 0005 Kennedy, NA which 0006 Truman 0007 Roosevelt; "FDR" 0008 McGovern 0009 Carter 0010 Mondale 0011 McCarthy, Eugene 0012 Humphrey 0013 Muskie 0014 Dukakis, Michael 0015 Wallace 0016 Jackson, Jesse 0017 Clinton, Bill 0031 Eisenhower; Ike 0032 Nixon 0034 Rockefeller 0035 Reagan 0036 Ford 0037 Bush 0038 Connally 0039 Kissinger 0040 McCarthy, Joseph 0041 Buchanan, Pat 0051 Other national party figures (Senators, Congressman, etc.) 0052 Local party figures (city, state, etc.) 0053 Good/Young/Experienced leaders; like whole ticket 0054 Bad/Old/Inexperienced leaders; dislike whole ticket 0055 Reference to vice‐presidential candidate ? Make 0097 Other people within party reasons Card PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PARTY CHARACTERISTICS 0101 Traditional Democratic voter: always been a Democrat; just a Democrat; never been a Republican; just couldn't vote Republican 0102 Traditional Republican voter: always been a Republican; just a Republican; never been a Democrat; just couldn't vote Democratic 0111 Positive, personal, affective terms applied to party‐‐good/nice people; patriotic; etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement on the Death of Representative Julian C. Dixon The
    Administration of William J. Clinton, 2000 / Dec. 9 So I’m going to try to be a good citizen, good years, but if we build on it instead of and I’m going to try to help work on the things reverse it, it’s just going to get better. that I worked on as President as a private citizen But keep in mind, I will say again: It’s more but to do it in a way that doesn’t get under important that the people be pushing toward foot of the next President. And I have loved tomorrow than who has a particular office. As doing this. But the most important thing is that long as we’re open to the proposition we have people like you stay active in our party and to keep working; and we have to keep working keep pushing us to be thinking about tomorrow. together; everybody counts; everybody deserves Just keep pushing us toward the future, keep a chance; we all do better when we work to- moving, and keep reaching out like a magnet. gether. That’s what the Democrats believe, and And again, I would like to thank Ben. I would if we keep doing it, we’re going to be just fine. like to thank Bob Kerrey for the 8 years that Thank you, and God bless you. we have worked together, President and Sen- ator, and the many years of friendship before that. I want to thank Peter Hoagland, who came down from Washington with us today, for the NOTE: The President spoke at 3:38 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • The DISPATCHER
    the DISPATCHER THE OFFICIAL NEWSLETTER OF THE CENTRAL OKLAHOMA RAILFAN CLUB LTD VOLUME XXV JULY 1993 NUMBER 7 THE NEXT CORC CLUB MEETING TO RI & KATY former agent Jimmy Bounds, and BE HELD JULY 10 Yukon Museum Director Jack Austerman. By Howard Thornton Members are welcome to suggest program ideas as well as assist with refreshments. Just call Ron Clarkson, Union Pacific Manager of Train HOWARD at 732-0566. • Operations for the Oklahoma City area will be the speaker for the Saturday, July 10, Central OK. HOUSE BILL 1078 PASSES BOTH Oklahoma Railfan Club meeting at the HOUSES! OMNIPLEX at 7 pm. He will show a Video Reprinted from Oklahoma Passenger Rail sent by Alex Tice, Union Pacific Director of By Roger Carter, President, OPRA Public Relations outlining the history of the railroad as well as its current operations, and (Friday, June 4, 1993; Chickasha, Oklahoma) then be ready to answer any questions members Yes! You've read the headline correctly! Barring might have. The usual refreshments and draw any negative action by Governor Walters it ap­ prizes will be program features. • pears that H.B. ft 1078 will become state law. This is a significant milestone for the Oklahoma EXCELLENT CORA PROGRAMS Passenger Rail Association as it is the first real PLANNED FOR NEXT SIX MONTHS victory for us in getting Amtrak back to Oklahoma for good. Top-notch programs featuring at least two major speakers monthly as well as refreshments and The battle is not over, however. Amtrak sup­ railroad draw prizes have been planned for the porters are contacting Amtrak and their elected next six months by CORA Program Director, representatives and Senators.
    [Show full text]
  • ("DSCC") Files This Complaint Seeking an Immediate Investigation by the 7
    COMPLAINT BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION CBHMISSIOAl INTRODUCTXON - 1 The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee ("DSCC") 7-_. J _j. c files this complaint seeking an immediate investigation by the 7 c; a > Federal Election Commission into the illegal spending A* practices of the National Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee (WRSCIt). As the public record shows, and an investigation will confirm, the NRSC and a series of ostensibly nonprofit, nonpartisan groups have undertaken a significant and sustained effort to funnel "soft money101 into federal elections in violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended or "the Act"), 2 U.S.C. 5s 431 et seq., and the Federal Election Commission (peFECt)Regulations, 11 C.F.R. 85 100.1 & sea. 'The term "aoft money" as ueed in this Complaint means funds,that would not be lawful for use in connection with any federal election (e.g., corporate or labor organization treasury funds, contributions in excess of the relevant contribution limit for federal elections). THE FACTS IN TBIS CABE On November 24, 1992, the state of Georgia held a unique runoff election for the office of United States Senator. Georgia law provided for a runoff if no candidate in the regularly scheduled November 3 general election received in excess of 50 percent of the vote. The 1992 runoff in Georg a was a hotly contested race between the Democratic incumbent Wyche Fowler, and his Republican opponent, Paul Coverdell. The Republicans presented this election as a %ust-win81 election. Exhibit 1. The Republicans were so intent on victory that Senator Dole announced he was willing to give up his seat on the Senate Agriculture Committee for Coverdell, if necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Albuquerque Adva/ Ge
    The Fifth Estate BroadcaÈtij g ii Apr 4 The Albuquerque Adva/ ge KOB -TV In Albuquerque there is one station leading the way in local news. One station exposes consumer rip -offs in "Contact 4" reports; uncovers government fraud with "I- Team" investigations; and digs deeper into New Mexico's problems with "Closer Look" series. Maybe that's why more and more people in Albuquerque are getting the advantage of KOB -TV and Live Eyewitness News. A Division of Hubbard Broadcasting. In Detroit, momthg Ls& AM anymore Dick F'urtan's now on FM95.5. Dick Purtan saw the light at the end of the are joining in the fun. When we offered coffee and Windsor/Detroit tunnel. This end. danish with Dick Purtan, over 2000 people showed up So he crossed under the river to in one week. When we offered free FM converters to join WCZY. FM 95.5. the first 500 FM -less cars, they were gone within the Detroiters now hear the upbeat first few hours when over 1500 people showed Dick Purtan and his offbeat friends up. And when we celebrated the end of every morning on WCZY, Monday winter on March 3 with an outdoor picnic through Saturday, 6 to 10 AM. They and free hot dogs, over a thousand WCZY can also hear Larry Adderley on listeners stopped in to enjoy the festivities. sports, Colleen Burcar with traffic, For the best in popular music, Tom Dean, Dave Prince, Marc lots of laughs -and a few surprises Avery and other highly enter- - Detroiters are switching to taining personalities.
    [Show full text]
  • C-1 PRIMARY ELECTIONS August 26, 1986
    PRIMARY ELECTIONS August 26, 1986 DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY ELECTION GOVERNOR Mike Turpen.................................................207,357 40.0% Billy Joe Clegg...............................................6,523 1.2% Leslie Fisher................................................33,639 6.5% David Walters...............................................238,165 46.0% Virginia Jenner..............................................15,822 3.0% Jack Kelly...................................................15,804 3.0% Totals.................................................517,310 LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR Cleta Deatherage Mitchell...................................152,096 30.0% Roger Streetman..............................................17,271 3.4% Pete Reed....................................................38,185 7.5% Robert S. Kerr III..........................................157,738 31.2% Spencer Bernard.............................................113,844 22.5% Bill Dickerson...............................................26,390 5.2% Totals.................................................505,524 ATTORNEY GENERAL Julian K. Fite..............................................146,873 31.0% Robert Henry................................................325,535 68.9% Totals.................................................472,408 STATE TREASURER James E. Berry...............................................71,160 14.5% Ellis Edwards...............................................197,987 40.4% George Scott.................................................70,585 14.4%
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Members and Their Districts
    PART II Senate Members and Their Districts Senate Members and Their Districts 79 Senate Members listed by District Number District Senate Page Number Member Party Number Littlefield, Rick (D) 128 2 Taylor, Stratton (D) 164 3 Rozell, Herb (D) 154 4 Dickerson, Larry (D) 'X) 5 Rabon, Jeff (D) 148 6 Mickel, Billy A. (D) 136 7 Stipe, Gene (D) 162 8 Shurden, Frank (D) 156 9 Robinson, Ben H. (D) 152 10 Harrison, J. Berry (D) 108 11 Homer, Maxine (D) 120 12 Fisher, Ted V. (D) 100 13 Wilkerson, Dick (D) 170 14 Roberts, Darryl F. (D) 150 15 Weedn, Trish (D) 166 16 Hobson, Cal (D) 118 17 Hemy ,Brad (D) 114 18 Easley, Kevin Alan (D) % 19 Milacek, Robert V. (R) 138 Xl Muegge, Paul (D) 144 21 Morgan , Mike (D) 142 22 Gustafson, Bill (R) 104 23 Price, Bruce (D) 146 24 Martin , Carol (R) 134 26 Capps, Gilmer N. (D) 88 29 Dunlap, Jim (R) 94 31 Helton, Sam (D) 110 32 Maddox,Jim (D) 132 33 Williams, Penny (D) 172 34 Campbell, Grover (R) 86 35 Williamson, James (R) 174 37 Long, Lewis (D) 130 38 Kerr, Robert M. (D) 122 ?f) Smith, Jerry L. (R) 158 80 The Almanac of Oklahoma Politics District Senate Page Number Member Party Number 40 Douglass, Brooks (R) 92 41 Snyder, Mark (R) lffi 42 Herbert, Dave (D) 116 43 Brown, Ben (D) 82 44 Leftwich, Keith C. (D) 126 45 Wilcoxson , Kathleen (R) 168 46 Cain, Bernest (D) 84 tfl Fair, Mike (R) 98 48 Monson, Angela (D) 140 49 Laughlin, Owen (R) 124 X) Haney, Enoch Kelly (D) 106 51 Ford, Charles R.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY of OKLAHOMA CONGRESSMEN U.S
    HISTORY OF OKLAHOMA CONGRESSMEN u.s. Senate - Thomas Pryor Gore (D) elected 1907; J. W. Harreld (R) elected 1920; Elmer Thomas (D) elected 1926; Mike Monroney (D) elected 1950; Henry Bellmon (R) elected 1968; Don Nickles (R) elected 1980. u.S. Senate - Robert L. Owen (D) elected 1907; W. B. Pine (R) elected 1924; ThomasP. Gore (D) elected 1930; Josh Lee (D) elected 1936; E. H. Moore (R) elected 1942; Robert S. Kerr (D) elected 1948 (died 1963); J. Howard Edmondson (D) appointed 1-6-63 to fill office until General Election, 1964; Fred R. Harris (D) elected 1964 (for unexpired 2-year term) elected full term 1966; Dewey F. Bartlett (R) elected 1972; David Boren (D) elected 1978. u.S. Representatives: District 1-Bird S. McGuire (R) elected 1907; James S. Davenport (D) elected 1914; T. A. Chandler (R) elected 1916; E. B. Howard (D) elected 1918; T. A. Chandler (R) elected 1920; E. B. Howard (D) elected 1922; S. J. Montgomery (R) elected 1924; E. B. Howard (D) elected 1926; Charles O'Connor (R) elected 1928; Wesley E. Disney (D) elected 1930; George R. Schwabe (R) elected 1944; Dixie Gilmer (D) elected 1948; George R. Schwabe (R) elected 1950; Page Belcher (R) elected 1952; James R. Jones (D) elected 1972. District 2 - Elmer L. Fulton (D) elected 1907; Dick T. Morgan (R) elected 1908; W. W. Hastings (D) elected 1914; Alice M. Robertson (R) elected 1920; W. W. Hastings (D) elected 1922; Jack Nichols (D) elected 1934 and resigned 1944; W. G. Stigler (D) elected 3-8-44 to fill unexpired term and elected full term 1944; Ed Edmondson (D) elected 1952; Clem Rogers McSpadden (D) elected 1972; Theodore M.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY 319—THE VIETNAM WARS Fall 2017 Mr
    University of Wisconsin–Madison Department of History HISTORY 319—THE VIETNAM WARS Fall 2017 Mr. McCoy I. COURSE PROCEDURES: Class Meetings: Lectures are given in 1111 Humanities by Mr. McCoy on Tuesdays and Thursdays, from 4:00 to 5:15 p.m. In addition, students will attend a one-hour discussion section each week conducted by the Teaching Assistant (TA) for this course. N.B. Laptops may used only for taking notes and may not be used to access the Internet. Office Hours: —For Marlana Margaria, Humanities Room 4274, on Tuesdays from 1:45 to 3:45 p.m. and other hours by appointment (TEL: 265-9480). Messages may be left in Humanities Mailbox No. 4041, or sent via e-mail to: <[email protected]> —For Alfred McCoy, Humanities Room 5131, Thursdays 12:00 to 2:00 p.m. and other hours by appointment (TEL: 263-1855). Messages may be left in Humanities Mailbox No. 5026, or sent via e-mail to: <[email protected]> Grading: Students shall complete three pieces of written work. On October 19, students shall take a midterm examination. On November 21, students shall submit a 5,000-word research essay with full footnotes and bibliographic references. During examination week on December 16, students shall take a two-hour final examination. Final grades shall be computed as follows: —midterm take-home exam: 20% —research essay: 30% —discussion section mark: 30% —final examination: 20% —extra credit/film viewing: 3% Course Requirements: For each of these assignments, there are different requirements for both the amount and form of work to be done: a.) Midterm take-home examination: Select two questions from a list distributed in the lecture on Thursday, October 19, and turn in two short essays totaling five typed pages, with full endnote citations, at the start of class on Tuesday, October 24.
    [Show full text]
  • Note: All Results Are for Rogers County
    Note: All results are for Rogers County. Some numbers may be pre-provisional and may be off by a few votes, but do not affect the overall results in any significant way. Source: Rogers County Election Board Archive 1994 Election Cycle Voter Turnout for Special Election for County Question – February 9, 1993 6,616 Voted/41,639 Registered = 15.89% County Question Approving the Extension of a 1% Sales Tax for the Maintenance and Construction of County Roads until 1998 – February 9, 1993 Yes No 4,531 2,048 Voter Turnout for Special Election for SQ No. 659 – February 8, 1994 3,762 Voted/36,404 Registered = 10.33% SQ No. 659: Makes Local School Millage Levies Permanent until Repealed by Voters– February 8, 1994 Yes No 2,295 1,330 Voter Turnout for Special Election for SQ No. 658 – May 10, 1994 12,566 Voted/36,754 Registered = 34.19% SQ No. 658: Approval of a State Lottery with Specifics on How Funds Would Be Controlled – May 10, 1994 Yes No 5,291 7,272 Voter Turnout for Democratic Primary Election – August 23, 1994 7,678 Voted/23,936 Registered = 32.08% Oklahoma Gubernatorial Democratic Primary Results – August 23, 1994 Jack Mildren Danny Williams Bernice Shedrick Joe Vickers 3,284 646 3,312 305 Oklahoma Lieutenant Gubernatorial Democratic Primary Results – August 23, 1994 Dave McBride Walt Roberts Nance Diamond Bob Cullison 1,130 426 2,685 3,183 Oklahoma State Auditor and Inspector Democratic Primary Results – August 23, 1994 Clifton H. Scott Allen Greeson 4,989 1,956 Oklahoma Attorney General Democratic Primary Results – August 23, 1994 John B.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Maryland's Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016
    A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 Published by: Maryland State Board of Elections Linda H. Lamone, Administrator Project Coordinator: Jared DeMarinis, Director Division of Candidacy and Campaign Finance Published: October 2016 Table of Contents Preface 5 The Electoral College – Introduction 7 Meeting of February 4, 1789 19 Meeting of December 5, 1792 22 Meeting of December 7, 1796 24 Meeting of December 3, 1800 27 Meeting of December 5, 1804 30 Meeting of December 7, 1808 31 Meeting of December 2, 1812 33 Meeting of December 4, 1816 35 Meeting of December 6, 1820 36 Meeting of December 1, 1824 39 Meeting of December 3, 1828 41 Meeting of December 5, 1832 43 Meeting of December 7, 1836 46 Meeting of December 2, 1840 49 Meeting of December 4, 1844 52 Meeting of December 6, 1848 53 Meeting of December 1, 1852 55 Meeting of December 3, 1856 57 Meeting of December 5, 1860 60 Meeting of December 7, 1864 62 Meeting of December 2, 1868 65 Meeting of December 4, 1872 66 Meeting of December 6, 1876 68 Meeting of December 1, 1880 70 Meeting of December 3, 1884 71 Page | 2 Meeting of January 14, 1889 74 Meeting of January 9, 1893 75 Meeting of January 11, 1897 77 Meeting of January 14, 1901 79 Meeting of January 9, 1905 80 Meeting of January 11, 1909 83 Meeting of January 13, 1913 85 Meeting of January 8, 1917 87 Meeting of January 10, 1921 88 Meeting of January 12, 1925 90 Meeting of January 2, 1929 91 Meeting of January 4, 1933 93 Meeting of December 14, 1936
    [Show full text]