DOCSLIB.ORG

In Cinema): See Katz Billing: See Katz

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Copyright © 2009 by y. g-m. lulat. All rights reserved. This document, either in whole or in part, may NOT be copied, reproduced, republished, uploaded, posted, transmitted, or distributed in any way, except that you may download one copy of it on any single computer for your personal, non-commercial home use only, provided you keep intact this copyright notice. Glossary of Key Cinematic Terms Academy Awards: see Katz Best boy: The person who assists the gaffer. Acting (in cinema): see Katz Billing: see Katz Actual sound: Sound recording made on location to Blaxploitation films: see Katz add authenticity to the sound track. Usually the sound recordist will ask everybody to remain Blue screen process: see Katz absolutely quiet for a short time while the recording is made. Boom: see Katz Adaptation: The use of literary material (novels, short Boom shot: see Katz stories, etc) in the making of a film. The adaptation process involves obtaining the rights to the material B grade film: Films of a general poor quality made from its owners, and hiring someone to write the quickly and cheaply. In the past when double screenplay. features were common at film theatres these films were used as fillers for the second half of the Ambient light: Existing or natural light that surrounds a double bill. subject. Bridging shot: A shot used to bridge a sudden Anamorphic lens: see Katz transition in time, place, etc. Animation: see Katz Casting director: see Katz Answer print: see Katz Character actor: see “character role” in Katz Art director: see Katz Cineaste: see Katz Artifact music: Appropriate music that accompanies a Cinema: see Katz source seen or suggested in the film. (E.g. a radio in a scene may be accompanied on the sound-track by Cinematographer: see director of photography appropriate music to suggest that that is the music the subject in the scene is listening to.) Cinematography: film photography. Aspect ratio: see Katz Cinéma vérité: see Katz. Assistant cameraman: see Katz Clapper board: see “clapsticks” in Katz Assistant director: see Katz Close shot: see Katz Assistant producer: see Katz Close-up: see Katz Associative editing: The splicing together of shots of Composer: composes the original music that is to similar events. Also called relational editing. accompany the film; works closely with the Example: scenes of people being killed inter-cut director. with scenes of animals being slaughtered. Continuity: see Katz Auteur (theory of): see Katz Continuity clerk: see Katz Background noise: see Katz Continuity title: see Katz Back lighting: see Katz Costume house: A business company that specializes in Back projection: see Katz costumes for films. The usually practice is that a Page 1 of 6 filmmaker will rent, rather than buy, whatever costume • cinematographer is needed for the film from the large stock of costumes • composer kept by the costume house. • director • editor Credits: It is not uncommon to see audiences in film • producer theatres immediately get up and leave upon the • production designer conclusion of the image part of the film, instead of • writer (screenplay) staying a little longer in their seats and read the on- • writer (book—if relevant) screen film credits: that is, the listing of the personnel who were responsible for making the Crane shot: An areal shot taken from a crane. film (as well as names of all the members of the film cast). Why is it so important to stay and read Cross-cutting: Also called parallel editing where shots the credits? Because not doing so is like reading a are intermingled to suggest parallel action. book without wishing to know who the author is; or listening to music without being concerned Cue cards: see Katz about who made the music, or appreciating a painting without bothering to find out who the Cut: see Katz painter is. There is, here, the following assertion being made: that the viewer/listener has an ethical Cutaway: see Katz responsibility, in terms of decency and courtesy, to know the name of the artist behind the art (even if Dailies: see Katz only for a brief moment) that he/she is enjoying. (How would you feel if you were the artist and Deep focus: See Katz. everyone enjoyed your art: whatever it may be, music, films, paintings, etc.: but refused to Detail shot: A close-up shot, but even more magnified. acknowledge your existence.) It is absolute A closeup of the eyes alone, for example, would be arrogance, based on crass ignorance, to refuse to a detail shot. know the artist behind the art. Now, talking specifically about films, there is no Dialogue editor: The person responsible for ensuring, single person who wears the hat of the after film shooting is completed, that all speech in “filmmaker,” but rather there are many persons the films is fully audible and there are no unwanted who wear that hat. In other words: today, more noises on the sound track. If an actor's lines are than ever before, all feature films are truly the found to be inaudible then he/she will be called to product of a joint effort involving scores of people re-record the speech at a sound studio. (besides the actors); more than any other art medium the film is the physical incarnation of a Dialogue track: see Katz massive collaborative effort. (Even films produced by independent film-makers are rarely immune Direct cinema: The preferred style of making from this fact.) In light of the foregoing you must documentaries today in the U.S. where the film- know the film credits of films (not documentaries) maker avoids any participation in the ongoing screened in this class. However, in order to make action; even avoiding, if possible, narration. this requirement less onerous, you must know only the names of the people who traditionally receive, Director: see Katz what I call, principal credits (see below). I also want you to pay close attention to the placement of the Director of photography: See Katz principal credits in the film, because even that is an artistic decision. For example, some filmmakers will Discovery shot: Using a pan or a dolly shot to provide place the principal credits at the very beginning of new information in a scene to the viewer. the film before any image has been projected, while others will start rolling the principal credits Dissolve: The fading out of an image as a new one is simultaneously with the projection of the images. faded in. Some film makers will allow the story to unfold for a while (this initial part of the film is called a Docudrama: A dramatization of a true story. “teaser”) and then begin to slowly flash the credits one at a time. (Personally, I like this approach Documentary: see Katz (read only the first six because it reminds audiences in a dramatic way that paragraphs of this long entry) there are actual people who are responsible for making the film they are, presumably, enjoying.) Dolby Laboratories Inc.: see Katz Recently, some filmmakers have been rolling the principal credits at the end of the film. Dolly: see Katz For the purposes of this class, the following film personnel, listed alphabetically, make up the Dolly shot: see Katz. principal credits: • casting director Double: see Katz Page 2 of 6 a film and who are usually listed in the principal Double system: see Katz credits. Dramatization: An actual event reproduced fictionally Filmography: see Katz in film or theatre (or in novels). Film noir: see Katz Dubbing: see Katz Film theory: see Katz Editing: see Katz Film time: Length of time as portrayed by a events in a Editor: see Katz story rather than actual playing time of the film. Environmental sound: see wild sound. Film rating: see rating. Episode: see Katz Final cut: The film that is finally released for public viewing (from the filmmaker's point of view the Establishing shot: see Katz final version that the producer cannot temper with). Event films: these are films produced with the aim of First cut: The first edited version of a film (which may rendering their release into media and business also be called a rough cut. (See also Final cut.) events in themselves. Their releases will become part of the daily evening news broadcast on radio First run: see Katz and television, not to mention subjects of the talk- show circuit. In addition to the millions spent on Flashback: see Katz production and marketing of the actual films, event films are accompanied by the production and Flashforward: see Katz marketing of ancillary merchandise ranging from T- shirts and toys through to books and school Focus: see Katz supplies on to shoes and cereals; that is almost anything on which the film logo or title can be Focus puller: see Katz printed. Another important characteristic of event films is that they are produced for the widest Foley artist: see Katz segment of the population possible, more so than in the case of ordinary Hollywood releases, with the Follow shot: see Katz result that incredible amounts of resources and talent is expended in the making of a film that in Frame: see Katz terms of actual substance is, to the intelligent mind, nauseatingly bland. (James Bond films are an Freeze frame: see Katz example of event films.) Event movies are designed to exploit the gullibility of the ignorantsia to the Front projection: see Katz fullest. Full shot: A full length shot of a subject in which the Executive producer: see Katz subject dominates. Exploitation films: see Katz Gaffer: see Katz Expressionism: see Katz General release: see Katz Extra: see Katz Genre: A category of films that share similar styles, story types, character-types, etc.
Recommended publications
  • Filmography 1963 Through 2018 Greg Macgillivray (Right) with His Friend and Filmmaking Partner of Eleven Years, Jim Freeman in 1976

    Filmography 1963 Through 2018 Greg Macgillivray (Right) with His Friend and Filmmaking Partner of Eleven Years, Jim Freeman in 1976

    MacGillivray Freeman Films Filmography 1963 through 2018 Greg MacGillivray (right) with his friend and filmmaking partner of eleven years, Jim Freeman in 1976. The two made their first IMAX Theatre film together, the seminal To Fly!, which premiered at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum on July 1, 1976, one day after Jim’s untimely death in a helicopter crash. “Jim and I cared only that a film be beautiful and expressive, not that it make a lot of money. But in the end the films did make a profit because they were unique, which expanded the audience by a factor of five.” —Greg MacGillivray 2 MacGillivray Freeman Films Filmography Greg MacGillivray: Cinema’s First Billion Dollar Box Office Documentarian he billion dollar box office benchmark was never on Greg MacGillivray’s bucket list, in fact he describes being “a little embarrassed about it,” but even the entertainment industry’s trade journal TDaily Variety found the achievement worth a six-page spread late last summer. As the first documentary filmmaker to earn $1 billion in worldwide ticket sales, giant-screen film producer/director Greg MacGillivray joined an elite club—approximately 100 filmmakers—who have attained this level of success. Daily Variety’s Iain Blair writes, “The film business is full of showy sprinters: filmmakers and movies that flash by as they ring up impressive box office numbers, only to leave little of substance in their wake. Then there are the dedicated long-distance specialists, like Greg MacGillivray, whose thought-provoking documentaries —including EVEREST, TO THE ARCTIC, TO FLY! and THE LIVING Sea—play for years, even decades at a time.
  • After the Shooting Period the Editor Made a First Rough Cut of the Movie on His Own Only Guided by the Script and Some General Discussions with the Directors

    After the Shooting Period the Editor Made a First Rough Cut of the Movie on His Own Only Guided by the Script and Some General Discussions with the Directors

    After the shooting period the editor made a first rough cut of the movie on his own only guided by the script and some general discussions with the directors. This first rough cut was 2 hrs 40 min long. (the final film is near to an hour shorter) Below follows the director’s reactions to the first rough cut London/Amsterdam 22 april 2015 Ok Antonio below some notes please take them as a guidance not as a verdict, use them, abuse them and let them broaden your thinking instead of limiting the possibilities. Sc 1/2 – opening scenes The original plan was to not see Arthur and Vida together until they emerge on the rooftop sc 4 where they’re still partially disguised in their weird outfits. The underlying thought was that they were still hiding their souls towards each other and the audience’s journey was piggy bagging on their journey. The rave material does not support the above thought. We see them –I think—quite clearly and very often together. We should investigate your suggestion to ‘mix’ the intro shots of awakening London, the pigeons, the skin details and the rave, while hearing the voice-overs apres l’amour. The script –at the moment—does not challenge time concept, all is linear, but that shouldn’t stop us from trying. Sc 4 – Rooftop The intention is to capture that short moment in love where you don’t want to see each others demons yet, where the adrenaline rush of believing love is possible still rules. Goofing is the expression of that belief.
  • Directors Guild of America Creative Rights Handbook 2011 - 2014

    Directors Guild of America Creative Rights Handbook 2011 - 2014

    DIRECTORS GUILD OF AMERICA CREATIVE RIGHTS HANDBOOK 2011 - 2014 Los Angeles, CA (310) 289-2000 New York, NY (212) 581-0370 Chicago, IL (312) 644-5050 www.dga.org Taylor Hackford, President • Jay D. Roth, National Executive Director Dear Colleague, As Co-Chairs of the DGA Creative Rights Committee, we spend a lot of time talking to Directors about their Theatrical Creative Rights work problems. Often we nd that trouble begins with Committee TABLE OF CONTENTS those who are unclear about or unaware of creative Jonathan Mostow Steven Soderbergh rights protections they already have as members of the Co-Chair Co-Chair Directors Guild of America. David Ayer Taylor Hackford Donald Petrie CREATIVE RIGHTS CHECKLISTS Some DGA Directors have voiced frustration over Michael Bay John Lee Hancock Sam Raimi Checklists of DGA Directors’ creative rights, practices in the editing room; they did not know John Carpenter Curtis Hanson Brett Ratner codied in this handbook that the DGA Basic Agreement protects them from .…..................….…….…….…….…….….3 interference when they are preparing their cut. Some omas Carter Mary Lambert Jay Roach television Directors have expressed concern about being Martha Coolidge Jonathan Lynn Tom Shadyac excluded from the looping and dubbing process; they Wes Craven Michael Mann Brad Silberling were unaware that they, like feature Directors, have SUMMARY OF CREATIVE RIGHTS Andy Davis Frank Marshall Penelope Spheeris the right to participate in both. And many Directors A summary of a Director’s creative rights did not realize that, because they are Guild members, Roger Donaldson McG Betty omas under the Directors Guild of America Basic they have a right to additional cutting time if necessary David Fincher E.
  • Prelude CC Help

    Prelude CC Help

    ADOBE® PRELUDETM Help and tutorials October 2013 Contents What's new................................................................................................................................................... 1 What's new in Prelude CC......................................................................................................................................................2 What's New in Adobe Media Encoder CC............................................................................................................................ 10 What's New in Adobe Premiere Pro CC June 2013 release (version 7.0)........................................................................... 16 Getting Started tutorials.............................................................................................................................. 28 About Prelude.......................................................................................................................................................................29 Working with Adobe Prelude................................................................................................................................................ 31 Workspace and workflow............................................................................................................................32 Linking Adobe Story scripts with movie clips in Prelude.......................................................................................................33 The Prelude Workspace......................................................................................................................................................
  • 7503184.Pdf (6.85

    7503184.Pdf (6.85

    INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
  • Promotional Websites in the Film Industry. the Case of the Spanish Cinema Las Páginas Webs Promocionales En La Industria Cinematográfica

    Promotional Websites in the Film Industry. the Case of the Spanish Cinema Las Páginas Webs Promocionales En La Industria Cinematográfica

    Promotional websites in the film industry. The case of the Spanish cinema Las páginas webs promocionales en la industria cinematográfica. El caso del cine español Sergio Jesús Villén Higueras holds a PhD in Audiovisual Communication and Advertising from the University of Malaga, receiving the European mention. He is a member of various research groups in which he analyses the promotional strategies of the cultural industries on websites and social networks; the ecosystem of Chinese social media and, particularly, the impact of Wechat on young Chinese students; and the cultural and technological transformations that the contemporary Chinese film industry has experimented. University of Málaga, Spain [email protected] ORCID: 0000-0002-6813-3614 Francisco Javier Ruiz del Olmo is a full professor at the University of Malaga. He develops his teaching and research work in the Faculty of Communication Sciences and the Faculty of Fine Arts. He has investigated the communicative models of audio-visual media and the representation of contemporary audio-visual forms, as well as the technical and social uses of them; a second research line is related to communication and new media. Both work lines have in common a significant interest in the qualitative methodologies. University of Málaga, Spain [email protected] ORCID: 0000-0002-1953-1798 ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978 Received: 09/06/2018 - Accepted: 18/09/2018 Recibido: 09/06/2018 - Aceptado: 18/09/2018 Abstract: Resumen: The development of web languages and the new communicative El desarrollo de los lenguajes web y las nuevas necesidades comuni- needs of the film industry have fostered the evolution of official cativas de la industria cinematográfica han favorecido la evolución movie websites.
  • Editing 2: Final Cut Pro X Basics

    Editing 2: Final Cut Pro X Basics

    Editing 2: Final Cut Pro X Basics Battle Creek Area Community Television 70 West Michigan Ave., Suite 112 • Battle Creek, MI 49017 • (269) 968-3633 • www.accessvision.tv What is editing? Editing is the post-production process, or anything that you do to a video after recording. Raw pieces are assembled into a coherent whole, by arranging them into a context that tells a story. Editing is referred to as the “invisible art”, because when it is done well, the viewer can become so engaged that they’re not even aware of the editor’s work. What can you do in the process of editing? The majority of editing work consists of trimming clips to remove unwanted sections and arranging the order of scenes. You can also remove/add sound, add narration and music and change the volume and sound mix. You can swap audio for video, apply special effects, add transitions between clips and add titles. Digital or “non-linear” editing is non-destructive; edits are easy to revise and you can assemble a program out of order. What CAN’T you do in the process of editing? No amount of editing can make bad footage good. Blurry or under-/over-exposed video and audio that is poorly-recorded cannot be fixed. Process Overview and Terms Final Cut Pro X is Apple’s professional non-linear editor. The editing workflow usually consists of these steps: 1. Collect source material: Import media (raw footage and any other source files) into Final Cut. 2. Organize media: Rename, tag and trim clips in preparation for editing into project.
  • Filmography 1963 Through 2017 Greg Macgillivray (Right) with His Friend and Filmmaking Partner of Eleven Years, Jim Freeman in 1976

    Filmography 1963 Through 2017 Greg Macgillivray (Right) with His Friend and Filmmaking Partner of Eleven Years, Jim Freeman in 1976

    MacGillivray Freeman Films Filmography 1963 through 2017 Greg MacGillivray (right) with his friend and filmmaking partner of eleven years, Jim Freeman in 1976. The two made their first IMAX Theatre film together, the seminal To Fly!, which premiered at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum on July 1, 1976, one day after Jim’s untimely death in a helicopter crash. “Jim and I cared only that a film be beautiful and expressive, not that it make a lot of money. But in the end the films did make a profit because they were unique, which expanded the audience by a factor of five.” —Greg MacGillivray 2 MacGillivray Freeman Films Filmography Greg MacGillivray: Cinema’s First Billion Dollar Box Office Documentarian he billion dollar box office benchmark was never on Greg MacGillivray’s bucket list, in fact he describes being “a little embarrassed about it,” but even the entertainment industry’s trade journal TDaily Variety found the achievement worth a six-page spread late last summer. As the first documentary filmmaker to earn $1 billion in worldwide ticket sales, giant-screen film producer/director Greg MacGillivray joined an elite club—approximately 100 filmmakers—who have attained this level of success. Daily Variety’s Iain Blair writes, “The film business is full of showy sprinters: filmmakers and movies that flash by as they ring up impressive box office numbers, only to leave little of substance in their wake. Then there are the dedicated long-distance specialists, like Greg MacGillivray, whose thought-provoking documentaries —including EVEREST, TO THE ARCTIC, TO FLY! and THE LIVING Sea—play for years, even decades at a time.
  • Videographic Scholarship And/As Digital Humanities

    Videographic Scholarship And/As Digital Humanities

    Videographic Scholarship and/as Digital Humanities Steve F. Anderson For cinema and media studies scholars, the emergence of two areas of scholarly practice—namely videographic scholarship and the Digital Humanities (DH)—has created opportunities for new forms of argumentation, analysis and research, as well as new venues for the dissemination of scholarly output related to the study of the moving image. While videographic scholarship and DH overlap in many ways, they also remain distinct, with few scholar-practitioners actively working in both realms. How can we understand this separation and begin to imagine a more productive relationship between them? Key to our understanding of both videographic scholarship and DH is the ongoing cultural contestation between images and data, bearing important implications for the ways each practice stakes claims about its access to new ways of knowing, researching and presenting information. I explore here some of those distinctions and overlaps, and suggest that the primarily image-based practice of videographic scholarship would benefit from adapting a process of serial review and revision derived from early experiments with data-based digital scholarship. Adapting these protocols to the specific needs of videographic scholarship would better support the scholarly benefits of process, evaluation and collaboration. The center of gravity in today’s understanding of DH lies with large-scale, computational analysis of machine-readable data (think of text-encoding initiatives in which vast collections of literary works are converted into searchable data). The “digital” in this understanding of DH offers one way 2 to bring computation into partnership with humanistic inquiry. However, this is not the only possible framework for recognizing the potential contributions of computation to the humanities.
  • DOCUMENT RESUME CE 056 758 Central Florida Film Production Technology Training Program. Curriculum. Universal Studios Florida, O

    DOCUMENT RESUME CE 056 758 Central Florida Film Production Technology Training Program. Curriculum. Universal Studios Florida, O

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 326 663 CE 056 758 TITLE Central Florida Film Production Technology Training Program. Curriculum. INSTITUTION Universal Studios Florida, Orlando.; Valencia Community Coll., Orlando, Fla. SPONS AGENCY Office of Vocational and Adult Education (ED), Washington, DC. PUB DATE 90 CONTRACT V199A90113 NOTE 182p.; For a related final report, see CE 056 759. PUB TYPE Guides - Classroom Use - Teaching Guides (For Teacher) (052) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC08 Plus PoQtage. DESCRIPTORS Associate Degrees, Career Choice; *College Programs; Community Colleges; Cooperative Programs; Course Content; Curriculun; *Entry Workers; Film Industry; Film Production; *Film Production Specialists; Films; Institutional Cooperation; *Job Skills; *Occupational Information; On the Job Training; Photographic Equipment; *School TAisiness Relationship; Technical Education; Two Year Colleges IDENTIFIERS *Valencia Community College FL ABSTRACT The Central Florida Film Production Technology Training program provided training to prepare 134 persons for employment in the motion picture industry. Students were trained in stagecraft, sound, set construction, camera/editing, and post production. The project also developed a curriculum model that could be used for establishing an Associate in Science degree in film production technology, unique in the country. The project was conducted by a partnership of Universal Studios Florida and Valencia Community College. The course combined hands-on classroom instruction with participation in the production of a feature-length film. Curriculum development involved seminars with working professionals in the five subject areas, using the Developing a Curriculum (DACUM) process. This curriculum guide for the 15-week course outlines the course and provides information on film production careers. It is organized in three parts. Part 1 includes brief job summaries ofmany technical positions within the film industry.
  • 1 INTRODUCTION This Dissertation Will Discuss the Perception of Polish

    1 INTRODUCTION This Dissertation Will Discuss the Perception of Polish

    Cut off by the 'Iron Curtain' Item Type Thesis Authors Draniewicz, Anna B. Rights <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by- nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />The University of Bradford theses are licenced under a <a rel="license" href="http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Licence</a>. Download date 24/09/2021 13:59:05 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10454/4927 INTRODUCTION This dissertation will discuss the perception of Polish Cinema in English- language literature. During the collection of my secondary data, which concentrated mainly on English-language books but also includes newspapers and Internet resources, I encountered many interesting issues. These are divided here into three categories discussed in three chapters: ‘Stereotypes and Errors’ that result from the lack of knowledge thus causing misunderstandings, ‘Deficiencies’ about the absence of some films and directors in the English-speaking world and ‘Different Perspectives’ that reveal some interesting comparisons. The judgements applied to define these sections are respectively: accuracy (correctness of the facts), novelty (unknown trends) and originality of ideas (absent in Polish film criticism). During my research I have discovered the main factors distorting the perception of Polish cinema. I talked about them during my presentation entitled ‘English-Language Critical Engagements with Polish Cinema’ during the ‘Polish Cinema in an International Context’ conference held in Manchester in December 2009. Most of these issues are addressed in Chapter One, which outlines the problems that English-language authors seem to have with the Polish language, the background political issues and the lack of knowledge about some of the periods of Polish cinema.
  • Cinematography AME 5 CIN

    Cinematography AME 5 CIN

    Cinematography AME_5_CIN Electronic Module Guide available from Blackboard Faculty of Arts and Human Sciences 2013/2014 Level 5 — Semester 1 Table of Contents 1. MODULE DETAILS .................................................................................................. 3 2. SHORT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................. 3 3. AIMS OF THE MODULE ............................................................................................ 3 4. LEARNING OUTCOMES ........................................................................................... 4 4.1 Knowledge and Understanding ............................................................................ 4 4.2 Intellectual Skills .................................................................................................. 4 4.3 Practical Skills ...................................................................................................... 4 4.4 Transferable Skills ............................................................................................... 4 5. ASSESSMENT OF THE MODULE ................................................................................ 5 th 5.1 Portfolio of Assessment – Weighting 100% [Due December 10 ] ....................... 5 6. FEEDBACK ............................................................................................................ 5 7. INTRODUCTION TO STUDYING THE MODULE .............................................................. 5 7.1 Overview of the