DOCSLIB.ORG

ABSTRACT Editing Closet Memories: Theory and Methodology Grant M. Hall, M.A. Advisor: Christopher J. Hansen, M.F.A. Editing Is

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ABSTRACT Editing Closet Memories: Theory and Methodology Grant M. Hall, M.A. Advisor: Christopher J. Hansen, M.F.A. Editing Is ABSTRACT Editing Closet Memories: Theory and Methodology Grant M. Hall, M.A. Advisor: Christopher J. Hansen, M.F.A. Editing is a unique aspect of the filmmaking process that involves crafting production footage and audio into a cohesive story. The editor must also approach the film with an objective eye in order to craft the best narrative possible. This study examines the creative editing process of Closet Memories, a short film, from preproduction through post-production as well as the relationship between the editor and director and how the vision of each shaped the film from the rough cut to the final cut. Editing Closet Memories: Theory and Methodology by Grant M. Hall, B.A. A Thesis Approved by the Department of Communication David W. Schlueter, Ph.D., Chairperson Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Baylor University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Approved by the Thesis Committee Christopher J. Hansen, M.F.A., Chairperson James Kendrick, Ph.D. DeAnna M. Toten Beard, Ph.D. Accepted by the Graduate School May 2013 J. Larry Lyon, Ph.D., Dean Page bearing signatures is kept on file in the Graduate School. Copyright © 2013 by Grant M. Hall All rights reserved TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Storytelling and Professional Goals ..................................................................1 Chapter 2: Literature Review ...............................................................................................5 Film Literature .........................................................................................................5 Memoirs ...................................................................................................................8 Films ........................................................................................................................8 Unhelpful Sources ..................................................................................................11 Conclusion .............................................................................................................13 Chapter 3: Methodology ....................................................................................................14 Scenes 1 & 2 ..........................................................................................................14 Scene 3 ...................................................................................................................14 Scene 4 ...................................................................................................................15 Scene 5 ...................................................................................................................15 Scene 6 ...................................................................................................................16 Scene 7 ...................................................................................................................16 Scene 8 ...................................................................................................................16 Scene 9 ...................................................................................................................17 Scene 10 .................................................................................................................17 Scenes 11-14 ..........................................................................................................17 Scene 15 .................................................................................................................18 Scene 16 .................................................................................................................18 Scenes 17-19 ..........................................................................................................19 Scene 20 .................................................................................................................19 Scene 21 .................................................................................................................19 Scene 22 .................................................................................................................20 Scenes 23-25 ..........................................................................................................20 Scenes 26-30 ..........................................................................................................20 Scene 31 .................................................................................................................21 Conclusion .............................................................................................................21 Chapter 4: Final Project ....................................................................................................22 Chapter 5: Project Analysis ..............................................................................................23 Opening Monologue ..............................................................................................23 Planning Scene .......................................................................................................24 Transitioning from the Hallucination to Austin’s Room .......................................29 iv Custodian Closet Scene ..........................................................................................31 Climactic Gym Scene ............................................................................................34 Director and Editor Relationship ...........................................................................36 Theoretical Application .........................................................................................38 Conclusion .............................................................................................................41 References .............................................................................................................43 v LIST OF FIGURES Fig. 1. Austin’s close-up ...................................................................................................31 Fig. 2. The rough cut .........................................................................................................33 Fig. 3. The final cut ...........................................................................................................34 Fig. 4. The only shot of Elliott’s reveal ............................................................................35 Fig. 5. Elliott’s close-up ....................................................................................................36 Fig. 6. Elliott out-of-focus ................................................................................................36 vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This thesis would not have been possible without the help of many faculty members at Baylor University. I would like to thank my committee chair, Chris Hansen for his guidance, feedback, and funding of this thesis project. His comments and suggestions were invaluable over the course of crafting this thesis and aiding my growth as a filmmaker. To Dr. James Kendrick and Dr. DeAnna Toten Beard, I thank you for participating as thesis committee members. Your input regarding the writing of this thesis has been crucial. I would like to thank my peers, Bob Oei and Ruth Sabin for their close collaboration and companionship as we worked on this project. Finally, I would like to thank my fiancé, Rachel Wrobleske, and my family for their unwavering support as I spent innumerable hours editing Closet Memories and honing the craft I love. vii CHAPTER ONE Storytelling and Professional Goals The ultimate goal of this thesis is to apply various editing theories and genre conventions to the editing of Closet Memories in an attempt to effectively tell a story. It was important to document this short film as it evolved from the rough cut to the final cut during post-production. As an editor, I needed to approach the material objectively and without ego in an attempt to make decisions that best serve the story, which is the ultimate role of the editor. The role of editor, like others in the production of a film, is collaborative, and it was important for this project and my professional development that I documented my experiences with the director as I attempted to enhance the story while honoring her vision. Outlining the role of the editor, Ken Dancyger is quick to point out that “it is an overstatement for any one person involved in filmmaking to claim that his or her role is the exclusive source of creativity in the filmmaking process” (xxi). Before I acquired the footage, my only way of judging the project was through a script reading and my relationship with the director. I was committed to the project and had no knowledge of the performances, coverage, and overall quality of the footage I would be editing. This is the position almost every editor finds himself in when he begins a project. As one can see, this approach presents a clear problem: the editor often has little to no say in the quality of the footage he receives. The same is true in this case study; I was presented with the footage and called upon my research and prior editing experience to sculpt the raw footage and sound into a cohesive whole that has clarity and impact. This brings up 1 a role of the editor that is often overlooked: correcting mistakes made during the filming process. A good editor can make a good film great, but it takes a great editor to make a bad film bearable. Dancyger
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DVD Movie List by Genre – Dec 2020
    Action # Movie Name Year Director Stars Category mins 560 2012 2009 Roland Emmerich John Cusack, Thandie Newton, Chiwetel Ejiofor Action 158 min 356 10'000 BC 2008 Roland Emmerich Steven Strait, Camilla Bella, Cliff Curtis Action 109 min 408 12 Rounds 2009 Renny Harlin John Cena, Ashley Scott, Aidan Gillen Action 108 min 766 13 hours 2016 Michael Bay John Krasinski, Pablo Schreiber, James Badge Dale Action 144 min 231 A Knight's Tale 2001 Brian Helgeland Heath Ledger, Mark Addy, Rufus Sewell Action 132 min 272 Agent Cody Banks 2003 Harald Zwart Frankie Muniz, Hilary Duff, Andrew Francis Action 102 min 761 American Gangster 2007 Ridley Scott Denzel Washington, Russell Crowe, Chiwetel Ejiofor Action 113 min 817 American Sniper 2014 Clint Eastwood Bradley Cooper, Sienna Miller, Kyle Gallner Action 133 min 409 Armageddon 1998 Michael Bay Bruce Willis, Billy Bob Thornton, Ben Affleck Action 151 min 517 Avengers - Infinity War 2018 Anthony & Joe RussoRobert Downey Jr., Chris Hemsworth, Mark Ruffalo Action 149 min 865 Avengers- Endgame 2019 Tony & Joe Russo Robert Downey Jr, Chris Evans, Mark Ruffalo Action 181 mins 592 Bait 2000 Antoine Fuqua Jamie Foxx, David Morse, Robert Pastorelli Action 119 min 478 Battle of Britain 1969 Guy Hamilton Michael Caine, Trevor Howard, Harry Andrews Action 132 min 551 Beowulf 2007 Robert Zemeckis Ray Winstone, Crispin Glover, Angelina Jolie Action 115 min 747 Best of the Best 1989 Robert Radler Eric Roberts, James Earl Jones, Sally Kirkland Action 97 min 518 Black Panther 2018 Ryan Coogler Chadwick Boseman, Michael B. Jordan, Lupita Nyong'o Action 134 min 526 Blade 1998 Stephen Norrington Wesley Snipes, Stephen Dorff, Kris Kristofferson Action 120 min 531 Blade 2 2002 Guillermo del Toro Wesley Snipes, Kris Kristofferson, Ron Perlman Action 117 min 527 Blade Trinity 2004 David S.
    [Show full text]
  • The General Idea Behind Editing in Narrative Film Is the Coordination of One Shot with Another in Order to Create a Coherent, Artistically Pleasing, Meaningful Whole
    Chapter 4: Editing Film 125: The Textbook © Lynne Lerych The general idea behind editing in narrative film is the coordination of one shot with another in order to create a coherent, artistically pleasing, meaningful whole. The system of editing employed in narrative film is called continuity editing – its purpose is to create and provide efficient, functional transitions. Sounds simple enough, right?1 Yeah, no. It’s not really that simple. These three desired qualities of narrative film editing – coherence, artistry, and meaning – are not easy to achieve, especially when you consider what the film editor begins with. The typical shooting phase of a typical two-hour narrative feature film lasts about eight weeks. During that time, the cinematography team may record anywhere from 20 or 30 hours of film on the relatively low end – up to the 240 hours of film that James Cameron and his cinematographer, Russell Carpenter, shot for Titanic – which eventually weighed in at 3 hours and 14 minutes by the time it reached theatres. Most filmmakers will shoot somewhere in between these extremes. No matter how you look at it, though, the editor knows from the outset that in all likelihood less than ten percent of the film shot will make its way into the final product. As if the sheer weight of the available footage weren’t enough, there is the reality that most scenes in feature films are shot out of sequence – in other words, they are typically shot in neither the chronological order of the story nor the temporal order of the film.
    [Show full text]
  • A French Impressionist Critical Approach to Terrence Malick's
    Life in Movement: A French Impressionist Critical Approach to Terrence Malick’s Films By Matthew Sellers Johnson A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree Master of Arts in Film Victoria University of Wellington 2021 i ii Abstract Terrence Malick’s films from Badlands (1973) to The Tree of Life (2011) have generally received critical praise, as well as being the focus of detailed scholarly work. By contrast, his more recent films, what Robert Sinnerbrink refers to as the “Weightless trilogy” with To the Wonder (2012), Knight of Cups (2015) and Song to Song (2017), have been widely criticised and have been largely neglected academically. This thesis endeavours to situate the aesthetic features of these three films within a conceptual framework based in French Impressionist film theory and criticism. I will argue the ways in which these three films use natural light, gestures, close- ups, kinetic images and complex editing in relation to Germaine Dulac’s notions of pure cinema and Jean Epstein’s concept of photogénie. Moreover, these ideas can also be applied to films such as Days of Heaven (1978), The Thin Red Line (1998) and The Tree of Life. Thus, it is my contention that despite the significant changes to his filmmaking style evident in the Weightless trilogy, he remains a highly poetic director interested in the interior lives of his characters and the rhythms of life. iii Acknowledgements The following thesis would not be possible without the academic and personal support of the following people. First and foremost, I would like to thank Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • TFM 327 / 627 Syllabus V2.0
    TFM 327 / 627 Syllabus v2.0 TFM 327 - FILM AND VIDEO EDITING / AUDIO PRODUCTION Instructor: Greg Penetrante OFFICE HOURS: By appointment – I’m almost always around in the evenings. E-MAIL: [email protected] (recommended) or www.facebook.com/gregpen PHONE : (619) 985-7715 TEXT: Modern Post Workflows and Techniques – Scott Arundale & Tashi Trieu – Focal Press Highly Recommended but Not Required: The Film Editing Room Handbook, Hollyn, Norman, Peachpit Press COURSE PREREQUISITES: TFM 314 or similar COURSE OBJECTIVES: You will study classical examples of editing techniques by means of video clips as well as selected readings and active lab assignments. You will also will be able to describe and demonstrate modern post-production practices which consist of the Digital Loader/Digital Imaging Technician (DIT), data management and digital dailies. You will comprehend, analyze and apply advanced practices in offline editing, online/conforming and color grading. You will be able to demonstrate proficiency in using non-linear editing software by editing individually assigned commercials, short narrative scenes and skill-based exercises. You will identify and analyze past, present and future trends in post-production. Students will also learn how to identify historically significant figures and their techniques as related to defining techniques and trends in post-production practices of television and film and distill your accumulated knowledge of post-production techniques by assembling a final master project. COURSE DESCRIPTION: Film editing evolved from the process of physically cutting and taping together pieces of film, using a viewer such as a Moviola or Steenbeck to look at the results. This course approaches the concept of editing holistically as a process of artistic synthesis rather than strictly as a specialized technical skill.
    [Show full text]
  • After the Shooting Period the Editor Made a First Rough Cut of the Movie on His Own Only Guided by the Script and Some General Discussions with the Directors
    After the shooting period the editor made a first rough cut of the movie on his own only guided by the script and some general discussions with the directors. This first rough cut was 2 hrs 40 min long. (the final film is near to an hour shorter) Below follows the director’s reactions to the first rough cut London/Amsterdam 22 april 2015 Ok Antonio below some notes please take them as a guidance not as a verdict, use them, abuse them and let them broaden your thinking instead of limiting the possibilities. Sc 1/2 – opening scenes The original plan was to not see Arthur and Vida together until they emerge on the rooftop sc 4 where they’re still partially disguised in their weird outfits. The underlying thought was that they were still hiding their souls towards each other and the audience’s journey was piggy bagging on their journey. The rave material does not support the above thought. We see them –I think—quite clearly and very often together. We should investigate your suggestion to ‘mix’ the intro shots of awakening London, the pigeons, the skin details and the rave, while hearing the voice-overs apres l’amour. The script –at the moment—does not challenge time concept, all is linear, but that shouldn’t stop us from trying. Sc 4 – Rooftop The intention is to capture that short moment in love where you don’t want to see each others demons yet, where the adrenaline rush of believing love is possible still rules. Goofing is the expression of that belief.
    [Show full text]
  • Film Production Technology AS
    Film Production Technology AS - 2510 Career Pathway: Arts, Humanities, Communication & Design (AHCD) Location(s): General education courses are available at all BC locations. Program specific courses for this program are offered at the A. Hugh Adams Central Campus Program Entrance Requirements: HS Diploma or GED Program Description: The Associate of Science degree in Film Production Technology is for students who seek entry-level employment in the field of film and video production and desire advancement. Some careers, to which this sequence may lead, are camera operator, video editor, film production crew, sound editor, film and video producer, director and cinematographer. Visit program’s website for additional information. Build Your Education Motion Picture Film Production Motion Picture Motion Picture Film Production Production Bachelor of Fundamentals Production Post Production Technology Management Applied Science (TC2) 6343 (TC3) 6344 (TC4) 6345 AS 2510 (TC1) 6346 Recommended Course Sequence Full Time Part Time Course ID Description Credits TC1 TC2 TC3 TC4 FIL1420C Introduction to Filmmaking 3 X X X X Term 1 FIL1552C Film Editing Fundamentals 3 X X X X Term 1 ENC1101 English Composition 3 Term 2 FIL1030 Film History 3 MGF1106 Foundations of Mathematical Reasoning 3 Term 3 FIL1100C Screenwriting Fundamentals 3 X X Term 2 FIL2438C Nonfiction Filmmaking 3 X X Term 4 FIL2537C Sound Design Fundamentals 3 X X Elective* Elective Course 3 FIL2680 Film Producing & Production 3 Term 3 Term 5 Management X X ARH2051 Art History: Renaissance
    [Show full text]
  • Wmc Investigation: 10-Year Analysis of Gender & Oscar
    WMC INVESTIGATION: 10-YEAR ANALYSIS OF GENDER & OSCAR NOMINATIONS womensmediacenter.com @womensmediacntr WOMEN’S MEDIA CENTER ABOUT THE WOMEN’S MEDIA CENTER In 2005, Jane Fonda, Robin Morgan, and Gloria Steinem founded the Women’s Media Center (WMC), a progressive, nonpartisan, nonproft organization endeav- oring to raise the visibility, viability, and decision-making power of women and girls in media and thereby ensuring that their stories get told and their voices are heard. To reach those necessary goals, we strategically use an array of interconnected channels and platforms to transform not only the media landscape but also a cul- ture in which women’s and girls’ voices, stories, experiences, and images are nei- ther suffciently amplifed nor placed on par with the voices, stories, experiences, and images of men and boys. Our strategic tools include monitoring the media; commissioning and conducting research; and undertaking other special initiatives to spotlight gender and racial bias in news coverage, entertainment flm and television, social media, and other key sectors. Our publications include the book “Unspinning the Spin: The Women’s Media Center Guide to Fair and Accurate Language”; “The Women’s Media Center’s Media Guide to Gender Neutral Coverage of Women Candidates + Politicians”; “The Women’s Media Center Media Guide to Covering Reproductive Issues”; “WMC Media Watch: The Gender Gap in Coverage of Reproductive Issues”; “Writing Rape: How U.S. Media Cover Campus Rape and Sexual Assault”; “WMC Investigation: 10-Year Review of Gender & Emmy Nominations”; and the Women’s Media Center’s annual WMC Status of Women in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • American Vandal Episode
    American Vandal Episode 101: The Crime Vandalism, Vulgarity and Destruction on March 15, 2016 written by Tony Yacenda and Dan Perrault TEASER EXT. THE HOME OF DYLAN MAXWELL - ESTABLISHING - DAY A modest southern California house with a patchy yard and a 2001 Acura parked in front of a one car garage. SUPER: April 2, 2016 INT. THE HOME OF DYLAN MAXWELL - KITCHEN - DAY DYLAN MAXWELL, 17, sits in a chair facing the camera. The framing is awkward; we see a light at the top of the frame as PETER ANDERHOLM, 15, slips a lav mic down Dylan’s Etnies T- shirt. PETER (O.C.) (PRELAP) Tell us your name and who you are. JUMP CUT: INT. KITCHEN - MOMENTS LATER A well composed interview setup. Dylan looks right into the camera. DYLAN My name is Dylan Maxwell. And I’m... I don’t know. I’m Dylan. What do you mean who am I? PETER It’s okay. You can look at me and not the camera. Dylan, why am I here interviewing you? DYLAN Because I didn’t fucking do it. PETER Didn’t do what? DYLAN The dicks. Cue music. Begin montage: 2. LOCAL NEWS REPORT - EXT. STAFF PARKING LOT - DAY The camera pans across the staff parking lot at Hanover High School. We see graffiti on dozens of cars. It’s all blurred. FEMALE REPORTER (V.O.) It was supposed to be a quiet “Administrative Day” at Hanover High - a day off for students as teachers took part in a series of mandatory faculty meetings. But there was one student activity that did, in fact, take place: vandalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Motion-Based Video Synchronization
    ActionSnapping: Motion-based Video Synchronization Jean-Charles Bazin and Alexander Sorkine-Hornung Disney Research Abstract. Video synchronization is a fundamental step for many appli- cations in computer vision, ranging from video morphing to motion anal- ysis. We present a novel method for synchronizing action videos where a similar action is performed by different people at different times and different locations with different local speed changes, e.g., as in sports like weightlifting, baseball pitch, or dance. Our approach extends the popular \snapping" tool of video editing software and allows users to automatically snap action videos together in a timeline based on their content. Since the action can take place at different locations, exist- ing appearance-based methods are not appropriate. Our approach lever- ages motion information, and computes a nonlinear synchronization of the input videos to establish frame-to-frame temporal correspondences. We demonstrate our approach can be applied for video synchronization, video annotation, and action snapshots. Our approach has been success- fully evaluated with ground truth data and a user study. 1 Introduction Video synchronization aims to temporally align a set of input videos. It is at the core of a wide range of applications such as 3D reconstruction from multi- ple cameras [20], video morphing [27], facial performance manipulation [6, 10], and spatial compositing [44]. When several cameras are simultaneously used to acquire multiple viewpoint shots of a scene, synchronization can be trivially achieved using timecode information or camera triggers. However this approach is usually only available in professional settings. Alternatively, videos can be synchronized by computing a (fixed) time offset from the recorded audio sig- nals [20].
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,778,252 B2 Moulton Et Al
    USOO6778252B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,778,252 B2 Moulton et al. (45) Date of Patent: Aug. 17, 2004 (54) FILM LANGUAGE 5,880,788 A 3/1999 Bregler 5,884.267 A 3/1999 Goldenthal et al. (75) Inventors: William Scott Moulton, Kentfield, CA 6,097,381 A 8/2000 Scott et al. (US); Steven Wolff, Woodacre, CA OTHER PUBLICATIONS (US); Rod Schumacher, Los Angeles, CA (US); Andrew Bryant, San Diego, Bregler et al., “Video Rewrite: Driving Visual Speech with CA (US); Marcy Hamilton, Los Audio,” ACM Siggraph 97, Interval Research Corporation, Angeles, CA (US); Strath Hamilton, No.97, (Mar. 8, 1997). Los Angeles, CA (US); Dana Taschner, Ezzat et al., “Mike Talk: A talking Facial Display Based on Sunset Beach, CA (US) Morphing Techniques,” Proceedings of Computer Anima tion Conference, (Jun. 8, 1998). (73) Assignee: Film Language, Los Angeles, CA (US) Ezzat et al., “Visual Speech Synthesis by Morphing Visemes.” A.I.Memo, MIT, No. 165, (Mar. 8, 1999). (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this Brand et al., “Voice-Driven animation.” TR-98-20, Mitsub patent is extended or adjusted under 35 ishi Electric Research Laboratory, (Mar. 8, 1998). U.S.C. 154(b) by 53 days. Burnett et al., “Direct and Indirect Measures of Speech Articulator Motions. Using Low Power EM SEnsors,” XIV (21) Appl. No.: 10/027,191 International CongreSS of Phoenetic Sciences, Lawrence (22) Filed: Dec. 20, 2001 Livermore National Laboratory, (Mar. 8, 1999). e a Vs (65) Prior Publication Data (List continued on next page.) Primary Examiner Rodney Fuller US 2002/0097380 A1 Jul.• 4-225, 2002 74Y A ttorney,y, AgAgent, or Firm-SanfordFirm-Sanfor AstO Related U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • SETDECOR Magazine – Online 2015 Nominations
    SETDECOR Magazine – Online 2015 Nominations NOMINATIONS FOR THE 20th ANNUAL CRITICS’ CHOICE MOVIE AWARDS BEST PICTURE BEST YOUNG ACTOR/ACTRESS Birdman Ellar Coltrane – Boyhood Boyhood Ansel Elgort – The Fault in Our Stars Gone Girl Mackenzie Foy – Interstellar The Grand Budapest Hotel Jaeden Lieberher – St. Vincent The Imitation Game Tony Revolori – The Grand Budapest Hotel Nightcrawler Quvenzhane Wallis – Annie Selma Noah Wiseman – The Babadook The Theory of Everything Unbroken BEST ACTING ENSEMBLE Whiplash Birdman Boyhood BEST ACTOR The Grand Budapest Hotel Benedict Cumberbatch – The Imitation The Imitation Game Game Into the Woods Ralph Fiennes – The Grand Budapest Hotel Selma Jake Gyllenhaal – Nightcrawler Michael Keaton – Birdman BEST DIRECTOR David Oyelowo – Selma Wes Anderson – The Grand Budapest Hotel Eddie Redmayne – The Theory of Ava DuVernay – Selma Everything David Fincher – Gone Girl Alejandro G. Inarritu – Birdman BEST ACTRESS Angelina Jolie – Unbroken Jennifer Aniston – Cake Richard Linklater – Boyhood Marion Cotillard – Two Days, One Night Felicity Jones – The Theory of Everything BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY Julianne Moore – Still Alice Birdman – Alejandro G. Inarritu, Nicolas Rosamund Pike – Gone Girl Giacobone, Alexander Dinelaris, Jr., Reese Witherspoon – Wild Armando Bo Boyhood – Richard Linklater BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR The Grand Budapest Hotel – Wes Josh Brolin – Inherent Vice Anderson, Hugo Guinness Robert Duvall – The Judge Nightcrawler – Dan Gilroy Ethan Hawke – Boyhood Whiplash – Damien Chazelle Edward Norton – Birdman
    [Show full text]
  • Virtual Video Editing in Interactive Multimedia Applications
    SPECIAL SECTION Edward A. Fox Guest Editor Virtual Video Editing in Interactive Multimedia Applications Drawing examples from four interrelated sets of multimedia tools and applications under development at MIT, the authors examine the role of digitized video in the areas of entertainment, learning, research, and communication. Wendy E. Mackay and Glorianna Davenport Early experiments in interactive video included surro- video data format might affect these kinds of informa- gate travel, trainin);, electronic books, point-of-purchase tion environments in the future. sales, and arcade g;tme scenarios. Granularity, inter- ruptability, and lixrited look ahead were quickly identi- ANALOG VIDEO EDITING fied as generic attributes of the medium [l]. Most early One of the most salient aspects of interactive video applications restric:ed the user’s interaction with the applications is the ability of the programmer or the video to traveling along paths predetermined by the viewer to reconfigure [lo] video playback, preferably author of the program. Recent work has favored a more in real time. The user must be able to order video constructivist approach, increasing the level of interac- sequences and the system must be able to remember tivity ‘by allowing L.sers to build, annotate, and modify and display them, even if they are not physically adja- their own environnlents. cent to each other. It is useful to briefly review the Tod.ay’s multitasl:ing workstations can digitize and process of traditional analog video editing in order to display video in reel-time in one or more windows on understand both its influence on computer-based video the screen.
    [Show full text]