The Soviet Invasion V

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Soviet Invasion V V The Soviet Invasion “Article 2. Accordingly, the aggressor in an international conflict shall, subject to the agreements in force between the parties to the dispute, be considered to be that State which is the first to commit any of the following actions:.... (2) Invasion by its armed forces, with or without a declaration of war, of the territory of another State.... Article 3. No political, military, economic or other considerations may serve as an excuse or justification for the aggression referred to in Article 2.” —From the Convention for the Definition of Aggression between Lithuania and the USSR, signed in London, July 5, 1933 “We are sure that disappearances of Soviet soldiers were brought about by persons under the protection of the Lithuanian authorities. These persons give them drink, involve them in criminal activities, and after that, prepare the way for their desertion or destroy them.” —From the Soviet note to the Lithuanian government, May 25, 1940 “The Soviet Union considers it necessary and urgent: … 3. That free entry into the territory of Lithuania be immediately assured for units of the army of the Soviet Union which will be stationed in the most important centers of Lithuania and which will be sufficiently numerous to assure the assure the enforcement of the Treaty of Mutual Assistance between the Soviet Union and Lithuania.... The Soviet Government will wait for the answer of the Lithuanian Government until 10 a.m. of June 15.” —Soviet ultimatum of June 14 Just before midnight on June 14, 1940, Viacheslav Molotov delivered an ultimatum to the Lithuanian foreign minister, Juozas Urbšys, who was then in Moscow for talks. Charging that the Lithuanian government was conspiring against the USSR, the Soviet government posed three demands: 1. that the Minister of the Interior, Kazys Skučas, and the Director of the Saugumas, Augustinas Povilaitis, be arrested and tried as “guilty of acts of provocation committed against” Soviet troops in Lithuania; 2. that the Lithuanians form a government that would “assure the proper fulfillment of the Treaty of Mutual Assistance between the Soviet Union and Lithuania”; and 3. that Lithuania afford free entry for Red Army units “which will be stationed in the most important centers of Lithuania.”150 If the Lithuanian government did not agree by 10 a.m. on June 15, “this will be considered a refusal to satisfy the demands of the Soviet Union.” In any case, Soviet troops would enter Lithuania regardless of how the Lithuanians would respond. After an intense debate, the Lithuanian government agreed to the 86 Alfred Erich Senn Soviet demands, and at three p.m. when the Red Army crossed the frontier, the Smetona regime in Lithuania disintegrated. Seven weeks later Lithuania was a constituent republic in the USSR, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. In an English-language publication in 1982, Antanas Barkauskas, a participant in the Soviet administration in 1940 and later chairman of the Lithuanian Supreme Soviet, summarized the fundamental Soviet interpretation of 1940. His account is more simplistic that a professional historian would produce in his or her own name, but we can presume that a historian prepared it for him: The restoration of Lithuania of its old capital Vilnius and the obligation of the USSR in guaranteeing protection to Lithuania from Nazi aggression provided the progressive forces with a new impetus in the struggle for their vital interests. The [Lithuanian] state authorities, on the other hand, adhered to their clandestine policy directed against the Soviet Union. The intelligence agencies collected secret information about the Red Army regiments stationed on the territory of Lithuania and were initiators of various provocative actions. The military coalition of the Baltic states was gaining strength. Though Nazi Germany waged aggressive war on many countries, Lithuania concluded with it a new trade agreement…. To all evidence the President and his associates were linking their activities with the policy of Nazi Germany. ... The people realized that Lithuania was on the threshold of a new era, and the absolute majority of the population were anticipating changes in the country’s life. The ruling clique was going through a deep crisis. President Antanas Smetona made one more move in his adventurist policy. He suggested the government provoked [sic]a military conflict with the Red Army... ... Quite a number of problems required a prompt solution but the old state institutions could not control the existing situation any longer. On June 17, 1940, the People’s Government was formed.151 In this account the invasion by the Red Army and the political change in Lithuania constituted separate narratives. In addition, the reader might take note of the use of the passive voice—“the People’s Government was formed”; the repeated use of the passive voice in such Soviet accounts avoided the problem of identifying the forces making and enforcing decisions. Soviet spokespersons always insisted that the Lithuanians had deliberately provoked Moscow, that Lithuanian officials had systematically conspired to undermine the two country’s mutual assistance pact..
Recommended publications
  • Security and Sustainability Issues
    (print) ISSN 2029-7017 CONTENTS Vol. 6 No 4 2017 June (online) ISSN 2029-7025 Viera Pechancová. RENEWABLE ENERGY POTENTIAL IN THE AUTOMOTIVE SECTOR: CZECH REGIONAL CASE STUDY 537 Edvīns Šincāns, Jānis Ivančiks. EVALUATIONS OF ENERGY SECURITY MEASURES: EXPERIENCE OF DIFFERENT University of Salford The General Jonas Žemaitis Ministry of National Defence COUNTRIES IN THE FIGHT UNLAWFUL USE OF ELECTRICITY AND COMPARISON A Greater Manchester University Military Academy of Lithuania Republic of Lithuania WITH LATVIA 547 Anton Korauš, Ján Dobrovič, Rastislav Rajnoha, Ivan Brezina. THE SAFETY RISKS RELATED TO BANK CARDS AND CYBER ATTACKS 563 Journal of Angie Fernández, Santiago Calero, Humberto Parra, Raúl Fernández. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE PRODUCTIVE MATRIX FOR ECUADOR SUSTAINABILITY 575 SECURITY AND Vladimir Menshikov, Olga Lavrinenko, Ludmila Sinica, Anastasiia Simakhova. NETWORK CAPITAL PHENOMENON AND ITS POSIBILITIES UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF DEVELOPMENT OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES 585 SUSTAINABILITY Vladas Tumalavičius, Valeriy Nikolayevskyy, Aivars Endziņš. ISSUES OF THE STATE AND SOCIETY SECURITY (Part II): MANAGEMENT OF CONTROL OVER INDIVIDUAL CRIMINAL PROCESSES 605 ISSUES Murman Kvaratskhelia. WORLD CHALLENGES AND ECONOMICS OF GEORGIA 619 International Entrepreneurial Perspectives Vilnius Gediminas Technical University Thi Anh Nhu Nguyen, Jaroslav Belás, Jozef Habánik, Jaroslav Schönfeld. and Innovative Outcomes PRECONDITIONS OF FINANCIAL SAFETY DURING LIFECYCLE: THE FINANCIAL LITERACY AND RETIREMENT PLANNING IN VIETNAM 627 Beata Gavurova, Zuzana Virglerova, Frantisek Janke. TRUST AND A SUSTAINABILITY OF THE MACROECONOMIC GROWTH INSIGHTS FROM DYNAMIC PERSPECTIVE 637 Rita Bendaravičienė. TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE ORGANIZATION: INTEGRATIVE CONCEPTUAL MODEL FOR EMPLOYER BRANDING 649 Nikolajs Jefimovs. TOWARDS CONFLICTS’ SETTLEMENT: DEVELOPMENT OF THE MEANING OF MEDIATION IN THE LEGAL DOCTRINE 665 Vytautas Jokubauskas.
    [Show full text]
  • Sovietinės Represijos Prieš Lietuvos Kariuomenės Karininkus
    SOVIETINĖS REPRESIJOS PRIEŠ LIETUVOS KARIUOMENĖS KARININKUS Ats. plk. Andrius Tekorius Generolo Jono Žemaičio Lietuvos karo akademija Anotacija. Straipsnyje atskleistos sovietinių represijų prieš Lietuvos kariuome- nės karininkus priežastys, pobūdis ir mastas, pateikti duomenys apie represuotus Lietuvos krašto apsaugos ministrus ir karininkus. Pagrindiniai žodžiai: sovietinė okupacija, Lietuvos kariuomenė, Lietuvos ka- riuomenės karininkai, sovietinės represijos, šnipinėjimas, represuoti Lietuvos kari- ninkai ir krašto apsaugos ministrai. ĮVADAS Sovietinės okupacijos metais represijas patyrė didžioji mūsų tautos dalis. Okupantų buvo suimti, kalinti ir ištremti tūkstančiai Lietuvos gy- ventojų. Sovietinių represijų neišvengė ir Lietuvos karininkija. Ji tapo vienu pirmųjų sovietinių okupantų taikinių. Lietuvos karininkų1 sovietinių represijų tema Lietuvos istoriografi- joje nėra nauja. Šią temą įvairiais aspektais yra nagrinėję ir tyrimų re- zultatus skelbę Arvydas Anušauskas, Teresė Birutė Burauskaitė, Jonas Dobrovolskas, Stasys Knezys, Aras Lukšas, Algirdas Markūnas, Antanas Martinionis, Jonas Rudokas, Vytautas Jasulaitis, Gintautas Surgailis, Ro- mualdas Svidinskas, Antanas Tyla, Vytautas Zabielskas, Dalius Žygelis ir kiti. Sovietiniuose kalėjimuose ir lageriuose (priverčiamojo darbo stovy- klose) patirti išgyvenimai aprašyti Lietuvos kariuomenės karininkų Vik- toro Ašmensko, Antano Martinionio, Juozo Palukaičio, Jono Petruičio 1 Šiame straipsnyje Lietuvos karininkai skirstomi į tikrosios tarnybos karininkus, tar- navusius Lietuvos kariuomenėje
    [Show full text]
  • Annexation of Lithuania by USSR in Summer 1940 As Described in Diplomatic Documents and Propaganda Materials
    res historica 48, 2019 DOI: 10.17951/rh.2019.48.241-273 Juliusz Dworacki (adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań) https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1067-1943 ‘it is all the fault of Lithuanian provocateurs…’. annexation of Lithuania by Ussr in summer 1940 as Described in Diplomatic Documents and Propaganda Materials ‘Wszystkiemu winni są litewscy prowokatorzy…’. Aneksja Litwy przez ZSRR latem 1940 r. w świetle dokumentów dyplomatycznych i materiałów propagandowych abstract The research problem addressed in this paper is the issue of the process of the accession of the Republic of Lithuania to the Soviet Union in the summer of 1940 and the political context of this event. There is much historical and political controversy nowadays around the history of Kremlin politics in 1939–1941, but recently the subject of annexation of Lithuania has not been discussed, and the issue of relations and diplomatic relations between the two countries has not been described in detail in Polish historiography so far. The research question was formulated as follows: why, in spite of the October 1939 Mutual Assistance Treaty, did Moscow decide to change the status quo and directly annex the neighbouring country, disregarding the considerable number of alternative scenarios and extensive possibilities of controlling Lithuania’s policy? The research was conducted by analysing the documents of the diplomatic services of both countries (among which diplomatic correspondence occupies a special place), the then Soviet press from the point of view of the propaganda message used, as well as using memoiristic sources. As a result of the conducted research, no definite reasons for initiating the process of annexation of Lithuania by the USSR were defined, but a number of factors that may have a significant impact on the Kremlin’s move were revealed.
    [Show full text]
  • 0X0a I Don't Know Gregor Weichbrodt FROHMANN
    0x0a I Don’t Know Gregor Weichbrodt FROHMANN I Don’t Know Gregor Weichbrodt 0x0a Contents I Don’t Know .................................................................4 About This Book .......................................................353 Imprint ........................................................................354 I Don’t Know I’m not well-versed in Literature. Sensibility – what is that? What in God’s name is An Afterword? I haven’t the faintest idea. And concerning Book design, I am fully ignorant. What is ‘A Slipcase’ supposed to mean again, and what the heck is Boriswood? The Canons of page construction – I don’t know what that is. I haven’t got a clue. How am I supposed to make sense of Traditional Chinese bookbinding, and what the hell is an Initial? Containers are a mystery to me. And what about A Post box, and what on earth is The Hollow Nickel Case? An Ammunition box – dunno. Couldn’t tell you. I’m not well-versed in Postal systems. And I don’t know what Bulk mail is or what is supposed to be special about A Catcher pouch. I don’t know what people mean by ‘Bags’. What’s the deal with The Arhuaca mochila, and what is the mystery about A Bin bag? Am I supposed to be familiar with A Carpet bag? How should I know? Cradleboard? Come again? Never heard of it. I have no idea. A Changing bag – never heard of it. I’ve never heard of Carriages. A Dogcart – what does that mean? A Ralli car? Doesn’t ring a bell. I have absolutely no idea. And what the hell is Tandem, and what is the deal with the Mail coach? 4 I don’t know the first thing about Postal system of the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Under the Shadow of Stalin and Hitler (World War Ii and the Fate of the European Nations, 1939-1941)
    UNDER THE SHADOW OF STALIN AND HITLER (WORLD WAR II AND THE FATE OF THE EUROPEAN NATIONS, 1939-1941) Summary INTRODUCTION And further by these, my son, be admonished: of making many books there is no end; and much study is a weariness of the flesh. (Eccl. 12: 12) What was exactly the Second World War? When did it start? These questions appear simple at first sight, but they have an astonishingly great variety of answers. Unlike the First World War, the second one has raised much more irreconcilable assessments both among the public and among scholars. Seven decades since the end of the Second World War are obviously not enough for reaching a generally accepted viewpoint. There is no unanimity even about the start of World War II. In Chinese and Japanese eyes it broke out on July 7, 1937, when Japan launched a large-scale invasion of China. For their part, Europeans associate the beginning of the conflict with the German assault on Poland on September 1, 1939. For the Americans the Second World War started with the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, perpetrated on December 7, 1941. There is some truth in each of these interpretations, but there is also too much distortion, subjectivity and deliberate concealment of crucial facts. Practically everybody agrees that the First World War started with the war declaration of Austria-Hungary on Serbia on July 28, 1914, and the bombardment of Belgrade by the Austro-Hungarians on the following day and that it ended with the surrender of Germany under the Compiegne Armistice on November 11, 1918.
    [Show full text]
  • Threats and Challenges to the Security and Stability of the State of Lithuania: Historical Perspective*
    University of Salford The General A Greater Manchester Jonas Žemaitis Ministry University Military Academy of National Defence of Lithuania Republic of Lithuania NATO Energy Vilnius Gediminas Security Technical University Centre of Excellence JOURNAL OF SECURITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES ISSN 2029-7017 print/ISSN 2029-7025 online 2017 June Volume 6 Number 4 http://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2017.6.4(12) THREATS AND CHALLENGES TO THE SECURITY AND STABILITY OF THE STATE OF LITHUANIA: HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE* Vytautas Jokubauskas The Institute of Baltic Region History and Archaeology, Klaipėda University Herkaus Manto Str. 84, LT-92294 Klaipėda, Lithuania E-mail: [email protected] Received 10 January 2017; accepted 25 March 2017 Abstract. Ensuring security is one of the main functions of the state, therefore, in that area one has to deal with a wide range of threats and challenges. In the analysis of the changing security environment issues in the 21st century, it is reasonable to look at historical events and to do appropriate case studies. Lithuania in the interwar period can be considered as a very valuable case in the context of the analysis of threats to national security. Over two decades, Lithuania acquired the experience of the conventional warfare, encountered analogues of little green men, and went through military coups, civil unrest, and the consequences of economic sanctions (economic warfare); it was exposed to external intelligence and agents of influence of other states operating underground who spread subversive rumours and distributed underground newspapers and leaflets. The present paper focuses on the range of those issues. Keywords: Lithuania, economic sanctions,war refugees, military coup, civil unrest, uprising, non-state military formations, warfare, rumours.
    [Show full text]
  • Simonas JAZAVITA KAZIO ŠKIRPOS GEOPOLITINĖ LIETUVOS VIZIJA IR
    VYTAUTO DIDŽIOJO UNIVERSITETAS KLAIPĖDOS UNIVERSITETAS Simonas JAZAVITA KAZIO ŠKIRPOS GEOPOLITINĖ LIETUVOS VIZIJA IR PASTANGOS JĄ ĮGYVENDINTI 1938–1945 M. Mokslo daktaro disertacija Humanitariniai mokslai, Istorija ir archeologija (H 005) Kaunas, 2020 Mokslo daktaro disertacija rengta 2015–2019 metais Vytauto Didžiojo universitete pagal Vytauto Didžiojo universitetui kartu su Klaipėdos universitetu Lietuvos Respublikos švietimo ir mokslo ministro 2011 m. birželio 8 d. įsakymu Nr. V-1019 ir pagal Vytauto Didžiojo universitetui kartu su Klaipėdos universitetu Lietuvos Respublikos švietimo, mokslo ir sporto ministro 2019 m. vasario 22 d. įsakymu Nr. V-160 suteiktą doktorantūros teisę. Mokslinis vadovas: Doc. dr. Giedrius Janauskas (Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas, Humanitariniai mokslai, Istorija ir archeologija, H 005). TURINYS ĮVADAS ......................................................................................................................................... 4 1. K. ŠKIRPOS VEIKLA LIETUVOS VALSTYBINGUMO KRIZĖS AKIVAIZDOJE ......... 33 1.1. Geopolitiniai pokyčiai XX a. 4 deš. pabaigoje ................................................................. 33 1.2. K. Škirpos diplomatinis paskyrimas į Vokietiją ............................................................... 44 1.3. Klaipėdos praradimas ir K. Škirpos geopolitinės vizijos pokyčiai ................................... 50 1.4. Antrojo pasaulinio karo pradžia ir K. Škirpos planas žygiuoti į Vilnių ........................... 62 1.5. Lietuvos patekimas į SSRS interesų sferą
    [Show full text]
  • Cahiers Du Monde Russe, 42/2-4 | 2001, « La Police Politique En Union Soviétique, 1918-1953 » [Online], Online Since 16 January 2007, Connection on 19 July 2020
    Cahiers du monde russe Russie - Empire russe - Union soviétique et États indépendants 42/2-4 | 2001 La police politique en Union soviétique, 1918-1953 Andrea Graziosi, Terry Martin and Jutta Scherrer (dir.) Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/monderusse/1170 DOI: 10.4000/monderusse.1170 ISSN: 1777-5388 Publisher Éditions de l’EHESS Printed version Date of publication: 1 April 2001 ISBN: 2-7132-1398-3 ISSN: 1252-6576 Electronic reference Andrea Graziosi, Terry Martin and Jutta Scherrer (dir.), Cahiers du monde russe, 42/2-4 | 2001, « La police politique en Union soviétique, 1918-1953 » [Online], Online since 16 January 2007, Connection on 19 July 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/monderusse/1170 ; DOI : https://doi.org/ 10.4000/monderusse.1170 This text was automatically generated on 19 July 2020. © École des hautes études en sciences sociales, Paris. 1 La place, le rôle, le fonctionnement de la police politique en Union soviétique sont demeurés longtemps, pour des raisons évidentes, un territoire largement opaque dans l'histoire de ce pays, qui, d’autre part, ne saurait être comprise sans l’étude approfondie de cette institution dont la création date des tout débuts du nouveau régime. Ce volume rassemble les premiers résultats des recherches en cours, menées par des historiens français, russes, ukrainiens, lituanien, américains, allemands, britanniques et néerlandais. Ces études, toutes fondées sur des investigations importantes dans les archives de l'ex-URSS, jettent un éclairage très neuf sur des aspects aussi cruciaux que les relations entre la police politique et le parti de la population, la collecte de l’information, les relations entre la police politique et la police criminelle, les mécanismes de la terreur et la violence d’État.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Sources for Anti-Semitism in Lithuania And
    THE HISTORICAL SOURCES FOR ANTISEMITISM IN LITHUANIA AND JEWISH-LITHUANIAN RELATIONS DURING THE 1930s Saulius Sužiedėlis Millersville University of Pennsylvania Jewish-Lithuanian Relations before the National Movement Before the momentous changes of the nineteenth century, Lithuanian society, predominantly agrarian and “feudal,” was divided into a number of more or less clearly defined communities, each with its social, religious and linguistic peculiarities: Polonized landowners, Muslim Tatars, Lithuanian peasants, petty gentry and, of course, the Jews. While it is true, in Zygmunt Bauman’s expression, that the latter constituted a unique “caste,” it was nonetheless one estate among many: the Jews like the other communities, had their place as social inferiors beholden to the landed aristocracy, but, as a rule, economically occupying a space above the peasantry. Social interaction between the various estates was ritualized and, for the most part, carefully regulated by traditional law and custom.1 As in the rest of Europe, the coming of political, economic and social “modernity,” to utilize Bauman's concept, altered and eventually revolutionized the relationships of Lithuania's various ethno-religious and social castes. However, this modernity, including modern forms of anti-Semitism, came later in Eastern Europe than in the West. Until the late nineteenth century, Jewish interaction with ethnic Lithuanians essentially meant economic contacts with the peasantry since the latter, except for the petty gentry of Samogitia, constituted by then the only significant stratum of Lithuanian speakers. As late as the middle of the last century, the relationship of the Lithuanian peasants and Jews was “pre-modern,” situated within the framework of a stratified semi-feudal society entrenched within a traditional agrarian world.
    [Show full text]