Community Building Sourcebook Land Use and Transportation Initiatives in Portland, Oregon

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Community Building Sourcebook Land Use and Transportation Initiatives in Portland, Oregon Community Building Sourcebook Land use and transportation initiatives in Portland, Oregon December 2007 Community Building Sourcebook, Portland, Oregon December 2007 Dear Colleague: TriMet is pleased to provide this Community Building Sourcebook, which highlights the many land use and transportation accomplishments of the Portland, Oregon, region. This document is intended to provide snapshots of the innovative projects, plans and programs that shape our region’s growth. As you will see, Portland’s successes have depended upon partnerships among neighborhoods, local municipalities, regional interests, state agencies, environmental groups, developers and private fi nancial institutions. These partnerships are key to our successes. This document was a collaborative effort among TriMet, Metro and 1000 Friends of Oregon, originally published in 1999. Now in 2007 we are proud to present a revised edition of the Community Building Sourcebook to include new projects, programs and up-to- date information. A new chapter includes two transit-oriented development tours. We hope you fi nd the information and contacts helpful in your own work. Please feel free to call any of the listed representatives for more information. Sincerely, Fred Hansen General Manager Community Building Sourcebook, Portland, Oregon Acknowledgments The 1999 edition of this report was a collaborative effort among 1000 Friends of Oregon, Metro and TriMet. The following individuals helped prepare and edit the 1999 Community Building Sourcebook: GB Arrington, Rob Bennett, Amy Carlsen-Kohnstamm, Phil Harris, Michael Kiser, Kim Knox, Barbara Linssen, Carlo Markewitz, Amy Norway, Lynn Peterson, Rhonda Ringering and Darcie White. TriMet led the 2005 update of the Community Building Sourcebook. Jillian Detweiler was the project manager. Leah Wyatt and LeAnne Brown were responsible for fact-checking and creating new electronic fi les. Sine Adams researched new transit-oriented development projects. TriMet initiated a third revision of the Community Building Sourcebook in 2007. Jillian Detweiler was the project manager. Arianna Chadwick-Saund was responsible for updating information, researching TODs and creating new electronic fi les. Production assistance was provided by Diane Goodwin, Patricia Williams and Monika Lackey. Geena Min designed the 2007 edition. Thanks to all project participants for working to achieve transit-oriented development ideals and to many others who provided assistance in compiling information for this Sourcebook. Capital Projects & Facilities 710 NE Holladay Street Portland, OR 97232 Tel: 503-962-2100 Community Building Sourcebook, Portland, Oregon Community Building Sourcebook, Portland, Oregon Table of Contents Chapter One–Transit Projects 1-1 The Total Transit Experience 1-2 MAX Blue Line (Gresham - Hillsboro) 1-4 MAX Red Line (Airport) 1-5 MAX Yellow Line (Expo - Portland City Center) 1-6 Portland Streetcar 1-7 Portland Aerial Tram 1-8 Washington County Commuter Rail 1-9 I-205 Light Rail 1-10 Portland Mall Light Rail 1-11 Portland-Milwaukie Light Rail 1-12 Lake Oswego to Portland Transit Alternatives (Previously called Willamette Shore Line) 1-13 Columbia River Crossing (Previously called I-5 Partnership) 1-14 Chapter Two–Plans and Policies 2-1 Oregon Land Use Planning Program 2-2 Urban Growth Boundaries 2-3 Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan 2-4 Transportation Planning Rule 2-5 Urban Growth Management 2-6 Regional Transportation Plan 2-7 Transit Investment Plan 2-8 Livable Streets 2-9 Central City Transportation Management Plan 2-10 Gresham Civic Neighborhood Plan 2-11 Gateway Regional Center 2-12 Westside Station Area Planning 2-13 Goose Hollow Station Plan 2-14 Hillsboro Station Community Planning 2-15 Washington County Station Area Planning 2-16 Interstate MAX Station Area Revitalization Strategy 2-17 Chapter Three–Transit-Oriented Developments 3-1 The Allegro 3-2 Arbor Vista Condominiums 3-3 Belmont Dairy 3-4 Buckman Heights, Buckman Terrace 3-5 Central Point, The Béranger 3-6 City Life 3-7 Collins Circle 3-8 County Library Mixed-Use Buildings 3-9 The Crossings 3-10 Crown Motel Redevelopment 3-11 Fairview Village 3-12 Gresham Central Apartments 3-13 LaSalle Apartments 3-14 Liberty Centre 3-15 Community Building Sourcebook, Portland, Oregon Museum Place 3-16 The Oregon Clinic 3-17 Orenco Station 3-18 Pearl District 3-19 Richmond Place 3-20 The Round 3-21 Russellville 3-22 South Waterfront 3-23 West Gresham Apartments 3-24 Annotated TOD Bibliography 3-25 Chapter Four–Programs 4-1 Affordable Home Ownership Development Model 4-2 Bike and Pedestrian Programs 4-3 Business Energy Tax Credits 4-4 Employee Commute Options 4-5 Fareless Square 4-6 Flexcar 4-7 Gresham TOD Tax and Fee Exemptions 4-8 Hillsboro Local Improvement District 4-9 Portland Green Building Program 4-10 Portland TOD Tax Exemptions 4-11 TOD Implementation Program 4-12 Transportation and Growth Management Program 4-13 Transportation Demand Management Program 4-14 TriMet Public Art Program 4-15 Chapter Five–Organizations 5-1 1000 Friends of Oregon 5-2 Bicycle Transportation Alliance 5-3 City Club of Portland 5-4 City of Gresham 5-5 City Repair Project 5-6 Coalition for a Livable Future 5-7 Friends of Trees 5-8 Metro 5-9 Oregon Environmental Council 5-10 Portland Development Commission 5-11 ShoreBank Pacifi c 5-12 Chapter Six–Self-Guided Tours 6-1 Pearl District and South Waterfront Tour 6-2 Westside MAX TOD Tour 6-6 Community Building Sourcebook, Portland, Oregon Chapter One Transit Projects Chapter One • Transit Projects Community Building Sourcebook, Portland, Oregon Community Building Sourcebook, Portland, Oregon Carolyn Young Executive Director Programs & Communications The Total Transit Experience TriMet 503-962-7562 trimet.org TriMet provides transportation well as stop locations. This includes rail since the fi rst line opened in 1986. options for thousands of Portland- the walk (or sometimes drive) to the TriMet’s focus on on-street bus stop area residents every day. station or stop and the quality of the amenities and customer information station or stop environment. Transit TriMet operates more than 600 is another aspect of our attention to frequency and ease of transfers are buses on 91 bus routes, with 7,625 the total transit experience. TriMet part of the experience, as is the ride bus stops and 1,100 bus shelters. and Metro prepared an inventory of itself. Then there’s the walk to the The MAX light rail system stretches the sidewalk infrastructure used to set fi nal destination and the ability to 44 miles. TriMet provides 8,112 priorities for sidewalk and crosswalk complete the round-trip with ease. parking spaces in 21 Park & Ride needs. New shelters are installed To meet transit needs as the region lots around the region, with 36 each year. Bus stop maintenance is grows, TriMet is working to address additional lots shared with churches, promoted through an adopt-a-stop all of these elements, in addition to retail businesses and theaters. In program, and new shelter designs the basic job of getting transit service addition to the fi xed route service, help prevent graffi ti. Innovations such on the street. TriMet meets the needs of elderly and as the web-based Trip Planner make disabled individuals with the LIFT and TriMet’s planning is grounded in the planning transit trips easy. Transit medical transportation programs. Region 2040 Framework Plan and Tracker provides real-time information the Regional Transportation Plan. about transit arrivals. Compete to succeed This coordination assures land use and transportation will continue to be Special district During the 1960s and ‘70s, many integrated and mutually supportive, public transit systems were reduced TriMet is a special district of the allowing the region to grow smarter, to an extension of the welfare system. State of Oregon and is governed by to makes best use of its infrastructure The low quality of service refl ected a seven-member Board of Directors investments and to improve the the notion that transit riders had no appointed by the governor. TriMet’s livability for all citizens of this region. other choice. service area covers much of three The region works hard to maximize counties, nearly 600 square miles TriMet’s success is predicated on the the signifi cant transit investments by with a population of 1.4 million. The idea that its riders have other choices, connecting transit with land use. Light Board appointed TriMet General and the agency must compete to rail stations generally have a station Manager Fred Hansen in October succeed. The concept of a “total area zoning overlay. TriMet and 1998. transit experience” refl ects the Metro each manage transit-oriented elements of a transit trip that must be A regional payroll tax provided 57 development programs, with TriMet’s addressed in order to attract riders to percent of 2006 TriMet operating largely tied to the use of excess transit. revenue. The tax is $6.52 per $1,000 rights of way, joint use conversion of on gross payroll. Passenger revenue The transit patron’s “total transit transit facilities or review of signifi cant accounted for 21percent of the experience” begins when planning a projects in consultation with partner budget; state/federal operating trip. A potential transit rider may need jurisdictions. More than $6 billion in grants 13 percent; and other sources schedule and route information as development has occurred along light 9 percent. HISTORY 1969: TriMet formed after Rose City Transit bankruptcy. 1976-1977: The 22-block Portland Transit Mall is built — one of the fi rst of its kind in the nation. 1982-1986: The 15-mile Eastside MAX light rail line is built between downtown Portland and Gresham. 1989: TriMet named “America’s Best Large Transit Agency” by the American Public Transit Association. 1994: Transit Mall extended to Union Station. 1998: The 18-mile Westside MAX extension begins service to Beaverton and Hillsboro.
Recommended publications
  • Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study
    Portland Union Station Multimodal Conceptual Engineering Study Submitted to Portland Bureau of Transportation by IBI Group with LTK Engineering June 2009 This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. IBI GROUP PORtlAND UNION STATION MultIMODAL CONceptuAL ENGINeeRING StuDY IBI Group is a multi-disciplinary consulting organization offering services in four areas of practice: Urban Land, Facilities, Transportation and Systems. We provide services from offices located strategically across the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. JUNE 2009 www.ibigroup.com ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................1 Introduction 1 Study Purpose 2 Previous Planning Efforts 2 Study Participants 2 Study Methodology 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .........................................................................6 History and Character 6 Uses and Layout 7 Physical Conditions 9 Neighborhood 10 Transportation Conditions 14 Street Classification 24 Chapter 3: Future Transportation Conditions .................................................25 Introduction 25 Intercity Rail Requirements 26 Freight Railroad Requirements 28 Future Track Utilization at Portland Union Station 29 Terminal Capacity Requirements 31 Penetration of Local Transit into Union Station 37 Transit on Union Station Tracks
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 2: Existing Conditions
    CHAPTER 2: Existing conditions Overview This chapter presents an inventory and assessment of existing conditions that impact and are related to Gresham’s transportation facilities and programs. 1. Study Area Gresham’s city limits and the Springwater, Pleasant Valley and Kelley Creek Headwaters Plan Areas are considered the study area for this TSP (Map 2). Pleasant Valley and its future development is part of Gresham’s Map 2: Study Area Location Map study area for the TSP update. 10 CITY OF GRESHAM TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN 2. Community Development Plan City of Gresham Gresham’s Community Development Plan is the guide for the City’s development over the next 20 years and beyond. The TSP supports Gresham as it builds out to the Community Plan’s ultimate vision and respects the city’s natural features through sustainable design. As shown on the City’s Community Plan Map (Map 3) and Graphic 1, 60% of the city, Pleasant Valley and Springwater lands are zoned as low density residential development. Low density residential lands are located throughout the city and Pleasant Valley and are clustered in Springwater’s western half. Medium and high density residential lands comprise 10% of the City’s land uses. They are located primarily north of Powell Boulevard. Mixed-use and centers districts also have residential components. They are located along transit streets and within the City, Pleasant Valley and Springwater centers as discussed below. While commercial lands comprise only 4% of the City’s land use districts, mixed-use and centers districts have a strong commercial component and make up 9% of these land use districts.
    [Show full text]
  • NS Streetcar Line Portland, Oregon
    Portland State University PDXScholar Urban Studies and Planning Faculty Nohad A. Toulan School of Urban Studies and Publications and Presentations Planning 6-24-2014 Do TODs Make a Difference? NS Streetcar Line Portland, Oregon Jenny H. Liu Portland State University, [email protected] Zakari Mumuni Portland State University Matt Berggren Portland State University Matt Miller University of Utah Arthur C. Nelson University of Utah SeeFollow next this page and for additional additional works authors at: https:/ /pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/usp_fac Part of the Transportation Commons, Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Liu, Jenny H.; Mumuni, Zakari; Berggren, Matt; Miller, Matt; Nelson, Arthur C.; and Ewing, Reid, "Do TODs Make a Difference? NS Streetcar Line Portland, Oregon" (2014). Urban Studies and Planning Faculty Publications and Presentations. 124. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/usp_fac/124 This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Urban Studies and Planning Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Authors Jenny H. Liu, Zakari Mumuni, Matt Berggren, Matt Miller, Arthur C. Nelson, and Reid Ewing This report is available at PDXScholar: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/usp_fac/124 NS Streetcar Line Portland, Oregon Do TODs Make a Difference? Jenny H. Liu, Zakari Mumuni, Matt Berggren, Matt Miller, Arthur C. Nelson & Reid Ewing Portland State University 6/24/2014 ______________________________________________________________________________ DO TODs MAKE A DIFFERENCE? 1 of 35 Section 1-INTRODUCTION 2 of 35 ______________________________________________________________________________ Table of Contents 1-INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • HIO Landing, Hillsboro, Oregon, NAIOP Workshop Project
    Portland State University PDXScholar Real Estate Development Workshop Projects Center for Real Estate Summer 2018 HIO Landing, Hillsboro, Oregon, NAIOP Workshop Project Alex Annand Portland State University Melissa Beh Portland State University Marcus Bush Portland State University Marcela Harden Portland State University Kelly Redden Portland State University See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/realestate_workshop Part of the Real Estate Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Annand, Alex; Beh, Melissa; Bush, Marcus; Harden, Marcela; Redden, Kelly; and Winterberg-Lipp, Ryan, "HIO Landing, Hillsboro, Oregon, NAIOP Workshop Project" (2018). Real Estate Development Workshop Projects. 23. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/realestate_workshop/23 This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Real Estate Development Workshop Projects by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Authors Alex Annand, Melissa Beh, Marcus Bush, Marcela Harden, Kelly Redden, and Ryan Winterberg-Lipp This report is available at PDXScholar: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/realestate_workshop/23 HIO LANDING HILLSBORO AIRPORT REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY SUMMER 2018 WORKSHOP THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 TEAM PROFILE 8 STAKEHOLDERS 10 THE SITE 18 COMMUNITY CONTEXT 25 MARKET ANALYSIS 35 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL 55 FINANCING PLAN 76 IMPLEMENATION PLAN 90 RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS 98 WORKS CITED 102 INTRODUCTION The Master of Real Estate Development (MRED) program at the Portland State University School of Business is a gradu- ate program that combines disciplines that include urban planning, environmental studies, finance, and real es- tate.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transit a History of Public Transit in Portland
    Hilary Pfeifer Meredith Dittmar PUBLIC TRANSIT A history of public transit in Portland Melody Owen Mark Richardson Smith Kristin Mitsu Shiga Chandra Bocci trimet.org/history Traveling through time Dear Reader, Transit plays a critical role in providing options for traveling throughout the region. It connects people to work, school, recreational destinations and essential services. It’s not just a commuter service. It’s a community asset. And the benefits extend far beyond those who ride. TriMet’s transit system is recognized as a national leader for its connection to land use. By linking land-use planning and transit, we have helped create livable communities, vibrant neighborhoods and provide alternatives to driving. Transit is also a catalyst for economic development. More than $10 billion in transit-oriented development has occurred within walking distance of MAX light rail stations since the decision to build in 1980. Developers like the permanence of rail when investing in projects. Transit is also valued by the community. Most of our riders— 81 percent—are choice riders. They have a car available or choose not to own one so they can ride TriMet. With more than 325,000 trips taken each weekday on our buses, MAX Light Rail and WES Commuter Rail, we eliminate 66 million annual car trips. That eases traffic congestion and helps keep our air clean. TriMet carries more people than any other U.S. transit system our size. Our many innovations have drawn the attention of government leaders, planners, transit providers and transit users from around the world. We didn’t start out that way.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2010 Updates
    Updates Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation 155 North First Avenue - Suite 350 Hillsboro, Oregon 97124-3072 We are REACHing for excellence in customer service. A Community Newsletter Updates Winter 2010 of Washington County’s Department of Land Use and Transportation To find the Updates newsletter on the county web site, go to http://www.co.washington.or.us/News/Newsletters Si a usted le interesa recibir este boletín de noticias en español, comuníquese To subscribe to this newsletter electronically, go to con Angie Aguilar al 503-846-7819, o http://washtech.co.washington.or.us/subscriptions/ via correo electrónico: angie_aguilar@ co.washington.or.us. Gracias. You may also follow county road news on Twitter http://twitter.com/washcoroads Night Time Crews Ready to Roll You have been asking… about north/south infrastructure – Rather than calling folks to come in early we need more of it! when winter weather threatens the morn- ing commute, would it be more efficient to It is a fact that 70% of the traffic in Washington County stays within the county, much of have a road maintenance night crew on duty, it traveling north and south, and Highway 217 is often over capacity. Washington County ready to de-ice and sand roads? began as a farming community; roads were farm to market - east/west, connecting our towns and farms with Portland. Fewer north/south connections were built. Also eastern Washing- ton County is quite hilly, which does not make for an easy grid system. And since the 1970’s the county has not allowed the “undergrounding” of streams (burying them in long culverts).
    [Show full text]
  • State of the River 2006-07
    State of the River 2006–07 iver Renaissance is the City of Portland’s initiative to reclaim the Willamette River as a community centerpiece, and sustain our connection with the Columbia River. The Willamette is the heart of Portland’s landscape, history, and culture. The Columbia is our economic and ecologic lifeline to the Pacific. River Renaissance Rpromotes and celebrates these waters as living emblems of Portland’s identity. Portland lives its river values every day in ways big and small. Together these actions are reconnecting citizens and businesses with a healthier river. The State of the River Report profiles yearly accomplishments and identifi es future actions needed to assure a clean and healthy river, a prosperous harbor, and vibrant riverfronts. Just a few of the actions detailed in this report are illustrated on this page to give some idea of how deeply Portland believes in caring for—and being cared for by—our rivers. 2006–07 State of the River Report Contents River Renaissance is a Leadership . 2 community-wide initiative to Message from the River Renaissance Directors . 3 reclaim the Willamette River Introduction . 4 as Portland’s centerpiece, and sustain our connection with the How the City that Works Works on the River . 5 Columbia River. The initiative Accomplishments and Key Actions . 7 promotes and celebrates Portland’s Progress Measures . 23 waters as our chief environmental, 2007–2008 Action Agenda . 35 economic and urban asset. Up and Down the Willamette . 55 Partners . 61 Recommended Readings . 63 The 2006–07 State of the River Report summarizes the achievements made by the City of Portland and a network of community partners to revitalize our rivers and identifies next steps needed to continue progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Amberglen Community Plan
    Create a vibrant regional activity center enlivened with high-quality pedestrian and environmental amenities, taking advantage of the region’s light rail system. AmberGlen Community Plan CITY OF HILLSBORO, OREGON Adopted by Ordinance No. 5933, January 19, 2010 AmberGlen Community Plan Adopted by Ordinance No. 5933, January 19, 2010 Prepared by the City of Hillsboro with Cardno WRG David Evans and Associates, Inc. Johnson Reid Land Use Economics 2007 OHSU/AmberGlen Concept Plan Prepared for the City of Hillsboro by PB PlaceMaking Leland Consulting Group Kittelson & Associates, Inc. SWCA Environmental Consultants Cover Illustration Credit: Sabrina Henkhaus, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 2 Purpose..........................................................................................................................2 Plan Organization .........................................................................................................3 BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................... 4 Context...........................................................................................................................4 Planning Process ..........................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • STAFF REPORT To: Daniel L. Dias, Economic and Community Development Director From: Gregg Snyder, Transportation Planning Superv
    STAFF REPORT To: Daniel L. Dias, Economic and Community Development Director From: Gregg Snyder, Transportation Planning Supervisor Don Odermott, Transportation Planning Engineer Date: April 16, 2019 Subject: Letters of Support and Required Mitigation for TriMet’s Red Line Extension and Operational Improvements Project Requested City Council Action: Consider Transportation Committee’s recommendation to City Council to authorize the Mayor to execute two letters to TriMet regarding the Red Line Extension and Operational Improvements Project; one which confers full support of the project and one which requires mitigation of the Red Line Project’s significant impact to multi-modal mobility and safety at the 185th Avenue at-grade crossing. Background/Project Overview: TriMet is currently planning to extend the MAX Red Line from its current terminus at the Beaverton Transit Center out to the Fairplex Station in Hillsboro. According to the analysis completed to date, staff have concerns that the at-grade railroad crossing at 185th Avenue will be significantly affected by the increase in light rail train frequencies. Current traffic analysis is showing an unmitigated double digit increase in vehicle, bus and pedestrian delays and queues in the corridor. At the February 2019 Transportation Committee meeting staff presented the findings of the traffic analysis and discussed next steps which included sending two letters to TriMet. The first letter would confer full support of the project and the second would require mitigation of the Red Line’s significant impact to multi-modal mobility at the grade crossing. Exhibit 1 and Exhibit 2 are the proposed letters that the Transportation Committee is recommending be executed by the Mayor and delivered to TriMet.
    [Show full text]
  • Service Alerts – Digital Displays
    Service Alerts – Digital Displays TriMet has digital displays at most MAX Light Rail stations to provide real-time arrival information as well as service disruption/delay messaging. Some of the displays are flat screens as shown to the right. Others are reader boards. Due to space, the messages need to be as condensed as possible. While we regularly post the same alert at stations along a line, during the Rose Quarter MAX Improvements we provided more specific alerts by geographical locations and even individual stations. This was because the service plan, while best for the majority of riders, was complex and posed communications challenges. MAX Blue Line only displays MAX Blue Line disrupted and frequency reduced. Shuttle buses running between Interstate/Rose Quarter and Lloyd Center stations. trimet.org/rq MAX Blue and Red Line displays page 1 – Beaverton Transit Center to Old Town MAX Blue/Red lines disrupted and frequency reduced. Red Line detoured. Shuttle buses running between Interstate/RQ and Lloyd Center. trimet.org/rq MAX Blue and Red Line displays page 2 – Beaverton Transit Center to Old Town Direct shuttle buses running between Kenton/N Denver Station, being served by Red Line, and PDX. trimet.org/rq MAC Red and Yellow displays – N Albina to Expo Center Red, Yellow lines serving stations btwn Interstate/RQ and Expo Center. trimet.org/rq. Connect with PDX shuttle buses at Kenton. MAX Red display – Parkrose Red Line disrupted, this segment running btwn Gateway and PDX. Use Blue/Green btwn Lloyd Center and Gateway, shuttles btwn Interstate/RQ and Lloyd Center.
    [Show full text]
  • JAPANESE TRAVEL PORTLAND / Mini Guide 2016-2017 TRAVEL PORTLAND / Mini Guide 2016-2017
    Travel Portland ©2016 Travel Portland / Media Surf Communications Inc. www.travelportland.jp ポ ートラ ン ド ・ ミ ニ ガ イ ド Edit : Travel Portland + Media Surf Communications Inc. Art Direction and Design : Shinpei Onishi Design : Aya Kanamori JAPANESE TRAVEL PORTLAND / Mini Guide 2016-2017 TRAVEL PORTLAND / Mini Guide 2016-2017 Why Portland? Profile_ ケリー・ロイ Kelley Roy ADX と Portland Made Collective の創業者兼オーナー。米 国でのものづくり事業支援から、世界中から寄せられるメイカー Owner / founder スペースのつくり方のコンサルティングまで手がける、アメリカ ADX & Portland Made Collective でのメイカームーヴメントの第一人者。地質学の学位と都市計 画学の修士号を持ち、2010 年にはフードカートについての著書 「Cartopia: Portland ’s Food Cart Revolution 」を出版。ク メイカームーブメントの 震 源 地 リエイティブな人々の技術向上を支え、起業を応援し、「自分の WHY 好きなことをして生きる」人々を助けることに情熱を燃やす。 “ WHY PORTLAND? ” 米国北西部「パシフィック・ノースウ エスト」に属するオレゴン州ポートラ ンド。緑にあふれ、独自のカルチャー を育み、「全米No.1住みたい町」に度々 登場する人口60万人の都市。その魅 力はある人にとっては、緑豊かな環境 比較的小さくコンパクトな大きさの街で、そこに ADXは20 11年に始動しました。様々な背景を持っ ときれいな空気、雄大な山と川であり、 住む人は正義感が強く、ちょっと変わったものや実 た人々を一つ屋根の下に集め、場所とツールと知識を Maker community またある人にとっては、インディペン 験的なものが好き。こんな要因がポートランドを「メ 分かち合い、一緒に働くことによって、この街にあふ デント・ミュージックやアートシーン イカームーブメント」の震源地としています。職人 れるクリエイティブなエネルギーをひとつのところに に象徴される「クール」な面であった 的な技術を生かしてものづくりにあたり、起業家精 集めるというアイデアからはじまったのです。エネル りする。ここで出会う豊かな食文化 神にあふれ、より良いものをつくり出そうという信 ギーに形をあたえることによって、新しいビジネスや とクラフトビールやサードウェーブ・ 念に基づき、リスクを厭わない人々を支援する気質 プロダクトが生み出され、アート、デザイン、製造過 Columns Feature PORTコーヒーをはじめとする新しいドリン が、この街にはあるのです。 程を新しい視点から捉えることができるようになり ク文化も人々を惹きつけてやまない。 ポートランドに移住してくる人の多くが、何か新 ました。ADXは、人と地球と経済に利益をもたらし、 比較的小さなこの都市がなぜ、こんな しいことをはじめたいという夢を持っています。そ 高品質かつ手づくりの製品に価値を置く「アーティサ に注目されているのか。まずは現地に して、まわりにインスパイアされて、同好の士とと ナル・エコノミー(職人経済)」のハブ兼サポートシス
    [Show full text]
  • History of Racist Planning Practices in Portland
    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Bureau of Planning and Sustainability (BPS) Primary Author Jena Hughes, Planning Assistant Contributors Tom Armstrong, Supervising Planner Ryan Curren, Management Analyst Eric Engstrom, Principal Planner Love Jonson, Planning Assistant (former) Nick Kobel, Associate Planner Neil Loehlein, GIS Leslie Lum, East District Planner Deborah Stein, Principal Planner (former) Sandra Wood, Principal Planner Joe Zehnder, Chief Planner Communications Eden Dabbs Cover Design Krista Gust, Graphic Designer Bureau Partners Avel Gordly, Former Oregon State Senator Cameron Herrington (Living Cully) Allan Lazo (Fair Housing Council of Oregon) Kim McCarty (Portland Housing Bureau) Felicia Tripp (Portland Leadership Foundation) TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 4 EARLY PLANNING AND THE BEGINNING OF EXCLUSIONARY ZONING ........................................ 5 1900-1930: Early zoning ..................................................................................................................... 5 1930s, 1940s, and 1950s: Expansion of single-family zoning ................................................... 8 1960s and 1970s: Increased neighborhood power in land use decisions ............................ 11 CONTEMPORARY PLANNING, 1980 TO EARLY 2000s ..................................................................... 11 1980 Comprehensive Plan: More single-family zoning ............................................................
    [Show full text]