DOCSLIB.ORG

Support and Mistreatment by Public School Principals As Experienced by Teachers: a Statewide Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Support and Mistreatment by Public School Principals As Experienced by Teachers: a Statewide Survey MIAMI UNIVERSITY The Graduate School Certificate for Approving the Dissertation We hereby approve the Dissertation of Diane Sue Burnside Huffman Candidate for the Degree: Doctor of Philosophy ___________________________________________ Director Dr. Thomas S. Poetter ___________________________________________ Reader Dr. William J. Boone ___________________________________________ Reader Dr. Kathleen Knight Abowitz ___________________________________________ Reader Dr. Andrew M. Saultz ABSTRACT SUPPORT AND MISTREATMENT BY PUBLIC SCHOOL PRINCIPALS AS EXPERIENCED BY TEACHERS: A STATEWIDE SURVEY by Diane Sue Burnside Huffman Skillful teachers are key to developing good schools. Because of this, understanding the school as a workplace is necessary to investigate why teachers leave and what encourages them to stay. The relationship between the principal, as the boss, and the teacher, as the employee, is one under- researched component of the school workplace which is important for developing a broad understanding of teacher turnover. This cross-sectional study uses a definition of principal mistreatment behaviors from the literature in the development of an original mixed method survey and a random sample of teachers from public schools in the State of Ohio to investigate how often principal mistreatment behaviors are experienced by a random sample of teachers in K-12 public schools. Mistreatment behaviors were paired with an opposite principal support behavior using Likert-style response options and were specifically focused on the 2012-2013 school year. Open- ended questions were included which asked for more general experience with principal mistreatment behaviors, effects on the teachers health, opinions about school culture and student bullying, and the effects of principal treatment behaviors on the teachers sense of efficacy and job satisfaction. The result of the study suggests that principal mistreatment and lack of support behaviors are widely experienced by teachers in the sample; however, these behaviors occur at a low frequency. Almost half of the teacher experienced severe level principal mistreatment behaviors, as defined by past research, during the school year. Mistreatment behaviors experienced by teachers resulted in a variety of teacher’s health concerns. A majority of teachers considered the principal-teacher relationship as an important factor in their sense of efficacy and job satisfaction. It is recommended that the education of future teachers and principals include a model of administration leadership which is developed by actual teacher experience. Further research is warranted. SUPPORT AND MISTREATMENT BY PUBLIC SCHOOL PRINCIPALS AS EXPERIENCED BY TEACHERS: A STATEWIDE SURVEY A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Educational Leadership by Diane Sue Burnside Huffman Miami University Oxford, Ohio 2015 Director: Dr. Thomas S. Poetter © Diane Sue Burnside Huffman 2015 List of Tables .......................................................................................................................................... vi List of Figures ....................................................................................................................................... vii Dedication ............................................................................................................................................. viii Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................ ix Chapter 1: Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2: Literature Review ............................................................................................................... 6 The Researchers .............................................................................................................. 6 Workplace Bullying: Factors .......................................................................................... 7 The bully boss ............................................................................................................. 7 The target. ................................................................................................................... 9 The on-lookers ............................................................................................................ 9 Teacher Mistreatment.................................................................................................... 10 The Micropolitics of Educational Leadership .............................................................. 12 Laws and Policies ......................................................................................................... 14 Importance of This Study.............................................................................................. 15 Chapter 3: Methodology and Methods ............................................................................................... 17 Deweyan Pragmatism ................................................................................................... 17 Deweyan pragmatism as a research discourse .......................................................... 19 The current study ...................................................................................................... 21 Methods ........................................................................................................................ 24 Research study ethics ................................................................................................ 25 Population ................................................................................................................. 26 Sample ....................................................................................................................... 27 Instrument ................................................................................................................. 28 Procedure .................................................................................................................. 31 Internal Validity ......................................................................................................... 31 iii External validity ........................................................................................................ 32 Reliability .................................................................................................................. 36 Chapter 4: Results ................................................................................................................................ 37 Operationalizing the Principal Support/Mistreatment Construct .................................. 37 Quantitative Results ...................................................................................................... 39 Individual question sets. ............................................................................................ 39 Support recoded Mistreatment scores ....................................................................... 43 Mistreatment Level Scores........................................................................................ 44 Inferential statistics ................................................................................................... 47 Qualitative Results ........................................................................................................ 50 Question 1 ................................................................................................................. 50 Question 2 ................................................................................................................. 56 Question 3 ................................................................................................................. 57 Question 4 ................................................................................................................. 58 Question 5 ................................................................................................................. 59 Chapter 5: Discussion and Conclusion ............................................................................................... 61 Analysis of Quantitative Research Questions ............................................................... 63 Research Question 1 ................................................................................................. 63 Research Question 2 ................................................................................................. 64 Research Questions 3 to 7 ......................................................................................... 66 Analysis of Qualitative Research Questions ................................................................. 67 Research Question 8 ................................................................................................. 67 Research Question 9 ................................................................................................. 68 Research Question 10 ............................................................................................... 70 Research Question 11 ................................................................................................ 73 Research Questions 12 and 13 .................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bullying Prevention Lending Library
    BULLYING PREVENTION LENDING LIBRARY Educator Resources Adina's Deck. Award winning DVD series about the fictional detective club, "Adina's Deck" a group of friends who help solve challenges current to today's young people. Grades 4 – 8. Bully-Book. An electronic book with follow-up questions. Grades K – 3. Bully Busters. Arthur M. Horne, Christi L. Bartolomucci and Dawn Newman-Carlson. Teaching manual for helping bullies, victims and bystanders. Grades K – 5. The Bully Free Classroom by Allan L. Beane, PhD. Grades K – 8. Bully Free Lesson Plans by Allen L. Beane, PhD, Linda Beane and Pam Matlock, MA. Grades K – 8. Bully Proof. Developed by Nan Stein, Emily Gaberman and Lisa Sjostrum. A teacher’s guide on teasing and bullying for use in grades 4 – 5. Bully Safe Schools. DVD Bullying Hurts Everyone. DVD. Bullying K – 5: Introductory Videos for Elementary School Students, Teachers, and Parents from the authors of Olweus Bullying Prevention Program. DVD. Bullying 6 – 8: Introductory Videos for Middle School Students, Teachers, and Parents from the authors of Olweus Bullying Prevention Program. DVD. Bullying: Prevention and Intervention for School Staff. Channing Bete. DVD. Class Meetings That Matter from Olweus Bullying Prevention Program. Grades K – 5 & 6 – 8. Cyber Bullying: A Prevention Curriculum by Susan P. Limber, Ph.D., Robin M. Kowalski, Ph.D., and Patricia W. Agatston, Ph.D. Grades 3 – 5 and 6 – 12. Cyberbullying—Safe to Learn: Embedding nti-bullying work in schools from the Pennsylvania Department for Children, Schools and Families. Deanna’s Fund Bullying Prevention Kit. Kit includes a DVD with segments of the theatrical production Doin’ the Right Thing, teacher’s guide and activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyberbullies on Campus, 37 U. Tol. L. Rev. 51 (2005)
    UIC School of Law UIC Law Open Access Repository UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship 2005 Cyberbullies on Campus, 37 U. Tol. L. Rev. 51 (2005) Darby Dickerson John Marshall Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.uic.edu/facpubs Part of the Education Law Commons, Legal Education Commons, and the Legal Profession Commons Recommended Citation Darby Dickerson, Cyberbullies on Campus, 37 U. Tol. L. Rev. 51 (2005) https://repository.law.uic.edu/facpubs/643 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UIC Law Open Access Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of UIC Law Open Access Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CYBERBULLIES ON CAMPUS Darby Dickerson * I. INTRODUCTION A new challenge facing educators is how to deal with the high-tech incivility that has crept onto our campuses. Technology has changed the way students approach learning, and has spawned new forms of rudeness. Students play computer games, check e-mail, watch DVDs, and participate in chat rooms during class. They answer ringing cell phones and dare to carry on conversations mid-lesson. Dealing with these types of incivilities is difficult enough, but another, more sinister e-culprit-the cyberbully-has also arrived on law school campuses. Cyberbullies exploit technology to control and intimidate others on campus.' They use web sites, blogs, and IMs2 to malign professors and classmates.3 They craft e-mails that are offensive, boorish, and cruel. They blast professors and administrators for grades given and policies passed; and, more often than not, they mix in hateful attacks on our character, motivations, physical attributes, and intellectual abilities.4 They disrupt classes, cause tension on campus, and interfere with our educational mission.
    [Show full text]
  • Workplace Bullying; 3
    Sticks, stones and intimidation: How to manage bullying and promote resilience Ellen Fink-Samnick Charlotte Sortedahl Principal Associate Professor, Univ. of Wis. Eau Claire EFS Supervision Strategies, LLC Chair, CCMC Board of Commissioners Proprietary to CCMC® 1 Agenda • Welcome and Introductions • Learning Outcomes • Presentation: • Charlotte Sortedahl, DNP, MPH, MS, RN, CCM Chair, CCMC Board of Commissioners • Ellen Fink-Samnick, MSW, ACSW, LCSW, CCM, CRP Principal, EFS Strategies, LLC • Question and Answer Session 2 Audience Notes • There is no call-in number for today’s event. Audio is by streaming only. Please use your computer speakers, or you may prefer to use headphones. There is a troubleshooting guide in the tab to the left of your screen. Please refresh your screen if slides don’t appear to advance. 3 How to submit a question To submit a question, click on Ask Question to display the Ask Question box. Type your question in the Ask Question box and submit. We will answer as many questions as time permits. 4 Audience Notes • A recording of today’s session will be posted within one week to the Commission’s website, www.ccmcertification.org • One continuing education credit is available for today’s webinar only to those who registered in advance and are participating today. 5 Learning Outcomes Overview After the webinar, participants will be able to: 1. Define common types of bullying across the health care workplace; 2. Explore the incidence and scope of workplace bullying; 3. Discuss the implications for case management practice; and 4. Provide strategies to manage bullying and empower workplace resilience.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Shadow of the Law: the Silence of Workplace Abuse
    IN THE SHADOW OF THE LAW: THE SILENCE OF WORKPLACE ABUSE PhD Candidate: Ms Allison Jean Ballard Supervisors: Professor Patricia Easteal, AM Assistant Professor Bruce Baer Arnold Month and Year of Submission: January 2019 Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Law (941AA) The University of Canberra, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia Acknowledgements Somewhat uncommonly perhaps, I have been fortunate to have had the same two supervisors throughout my PhD journey. It has been a privilege and a huge pleasure to be guided by, and to learn from my primary supervisor (now Emeritus) Professor Patricia Easteal AM and my secondary supervisor, Assistant Professor Bruce Baer Arnold. Patricia in particular has been my rock. Without Patricia’s amazing kindness, guidance, encouragement, and friendship, I would have ‘thrown in the towel’ and left the PhD boxing ring long ago. Without her support, my well-developed ability to procrastinate (God, help me to finish everything I sta….)1 and to be distracted (God, help me to keep my mind on th– … Look a bird – ing at a time)2 would have reigned supreme. So, my immeasurable thanks to the extraordinary Patricia. Bruce, ever pragmatic and focused on the end game, reminded me to stay focused, helping me to tow the academic line, not take off on too many ‘flights of fancy’, and to check my footnotes! It has been a rollercoaster journey that has spanned three different careers across six different sectors. During this time, I have also started a pro bono virtual legal practice, and established, with my dear friend, and fellow academic, traveller, and shoe-shopper, Doris Bozin, one of the first university-based health-justice legal advice clinics.
    [Show full text]
  • Jesuit Social Services' Understanding of Gender Inequality
    13 December 2019 Public Accounts and Estimates Committee Via email: [email protected] Dear Committee Submission to the Inquiry into Gender Responsive Budgeting Jesuit Social Services welcomes the opportunity to comment on the Inquiry into Gender Responsive Budgeting. Jesuit Social Services’ understanding of gender inequality Gender inequality refers to the way in which narrow, rigid gender norms and stereotypes limit individuals and groups of both men and women, thereby preventing them from living fulfilling and productive lives where they can flourish and reach their full potential. Gender inequality is problematic for both men and women. Gender norms and expectations that have historically limited women’s participation in public life and the workforce, and today see high rates of violence against women perpetrated by men, are also having a detrimental impact on men and boys. Boys and men are over-represented in key indicators of harmful social behaviours and negative social outcomes such as the perpetration of violence and other crimes, in suicide rates, and in incarceration rates. Both women and men are more likely to experience violence at the hands of men, with around 95 per cent of all victims of violence in Australia reporting a male perpetrator. Research has shown that men who conform to dominant masculine norms (that men should be tough, stoic, dominant, daring, and in control) are more likely to engage in risky behaviours and less likely to engage in health promotion behaviours. They are also more likely to use physical violence and sexually harass women. The reasons for these manifestations of systemic dysfunction are complex and multi-faceted but have much to do with the way in which boys and men are acculturated into dominant masculine gender norms.
    [Show full text]
  • PREVENTING and ERADICATING BULLYING “Creating a Psychologically Healthy Workplace”
    PREVENTING and ERADICATING BULLYING “Creating a Psychologically Healthy Workplace” RESOURCE GUIDE And TALKING POINTS for LEADERS AND CHANGE CHAMPIONS March 25, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 2 Section I: Resource Guide 4-18 Working Definition and Example Language Describing Bullying 5 Factors to Consider When Evaluating The Example Language 6 Other Definitions of Bullying 7 Types of Bullying 7 Examples of Bullying Behavior and Its Impact 8 Research Results Related to Bullying: Elementary and Secondary Education 9 Research Related to Bullying: College and Universities 10 Research Related to Bullying: The American Workplace 12 Leading and Best Practices to Prevent and Address Bullying 13 What Not To Do: Misdirection In Bullying Prevention and Response 14 The Namie Blueprint to Prevent and Correct Workplace Bullying 15 History of Workplace Bullying 17 SECTION II: TALKING POINTS 19-35 Presentation Slides 20 Conversations About Bullying: An Activity 31 SECTION III: RESOURCES 36-39 1 INTRODUCTION Awareness of bullying as an undesirable and harmful behavior has increased over the past few years. From grade schools to colleges, from workplaces to professional sports, stories about bullying and its debilitating and sometimes life-threatening impact have become part of everyday communications. Leading print and digital newspapers have dedicated feature articles on the subject. The Internet, through social media sites and blogs, has posted numerous comments about school and workplace bullying. In July of 2010, Parade magazine, a syndicated periodical distributed with Sunday editions of newspapers across the country, asked its readers if “workplace bullying should be illegal?” More than 90 percent of the respondents said yes. As recent as February 2014, USA Today, a major national publication, published an article entitled, “Hurt Can Go On Even After Bullying Stops.” The article indicated that early intervention is key to stop bullying because the health effects can persist even after bullying stops.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Mobbing En Milieu Académique Mieux Comprendre Le Phénomène Pour Mieux L’Enrayer
    OCTOBRE 2018 Rapport de recherche Le mobbing en milieu académique Mieux comprendre le phénomène pour mieux l’enrayer Crédits Recherche et rédaction Véronique Tremblay-Chaput Chercheuse Révision et mise en page Jean-Marie Lafortune Président, FQPPU Maryse Tétreault Professionnelle de recherche, FQPPU Hans Poirier Professionnel de recherche, FQPPU Fédération québécoise des professeures et professeurs d’université 666, rue Sherbrooke Ouest #300 Montréal (Québec) H3A 1E7 1 888 843 5953 / 514 843 5953 www.fqppu.org Dépôt légal : 3e trimestre 2018 Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec ISBN : 978-2-921002-32-5 (br.) ISBN : 978-2-921002-33-2 (PDF) Le mobbing en milieu académique : mieux comprendre le phénomène pour mieux l’enrayer - FQPPU _________________________________________________________________________________________________ Avant-propos Le mobbing au travail est un sujet dont on entend de plus en plus parler dans les couloirs des universités. Il ne fait pas de doute que ce phénomène réfère à une forme particulière de harcèlement, que l’on pourrait associer à du harcèlement moral ou psychologique, mais dont la finalité revêt un caractère plus « total » dans la mesure où elle vise l’expulsion de la victime de son milieu de travail. Le mobbing se distingue toutefois d’autres formes de harcèlement en raison de sa dynamique particulière qui engage tant l’organisation que les collègues des victimes. Rumeurs, commentaires désobligeants et atteintes à la réputation sont autant de manifestations du mobbing susceptibles d’affecter gravement le climat de travail dans nos universités, malgré leur caractère insidieux. À la lumière de ces spécificités, ce rapport n’est donc pas une « autre » ressource sur le harcèlement, mais bien un document qui vise à mieux circonscrire le phénomène singulier et peu étudié qu’est le mobbing en milieu académique.
    [Show full text]
  • Bullying in the Workplace Training Manual with Quiz Sheet
    Bullying in the Workplace 1 Bullying in the Workplace Workplace – COVID-19 Training Series WV DOH Training & Development Unit – COVID-19 – Training Manual 04/2020 Bullying in the Workplace 2 Introduction Bullying is called the silent epidemic. Although half of workers have experienced or witnessed bullying, policies and laws dealing with it are far less prevalent. This is, in part, because bullying can be hard to identify and address. People wonder, what does bullying look like? How can we discourage it in our workplace? What can I do to protect my staff and co-workers? All of these questions (and more!) will be answered in this training. Learning Objectives At the end of this workshop, you will be able to: o Define what bullying is and is not o Understand the costs of bullying to people and organizations o Identify bullying behaviors and the reasons behind them o Know some ways to prevent bullying and understand what role you can play o Know some ways to protect yourself from bullying o Know what to do if you are bullied o Identify appropriate solutions for a bullying incident (within and outside the organization) o Assist in creating an anti-bullying policy Session One: Defining Bullying What is Bullying? Let’s make sure that we’re all on the same page when it comes to talking about bullying. American bullying experts Drs. Gary and Ruth Namie give us this definition: “Bullying at work is repeated, health-harming mistreatment of a person by one or more workers that takes the form of verbal abuse; conduct or behaviors that are threatening, intimidating, or humiliating; sabotage that prevents work from getting done; or some combination of the three.” (Source: Page 3, The Bully at Work – Second Edition, Namie and Namie, 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Employee/Management Sabotage Effects on Organizational Output
    http://jms.sciedupress.com Journal of Management and Strategy Vol. 10, No. 3; 2019 Employee/Management Sabotage Effects on Organizational Output Etebong Attah Umana1 & L. C. Okafor1 1 Department of Business Management, Faculty of Management Sciences, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria Correspondence: Etebong Attah Umana, Department of Business Management, Faculty of Management Sciences, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria. Received: March 11, 2019 Accepted: April 30, 2019 Online Published: May 12, 2019 doi:10.5430/jms.v10n3p37 URL: https://doi.org/10.5430/jms.v10n3p37 Abstract This study examines how employee sabotage affects organizational output in First Bank Plc, Calabar. The purpose was to identify the causes of employee sabotage, to examine how employee sabotage destroys the image and reputation of the organization, to examine how employee insubordination thwart the achievement of team work accomplishment and organizational effectiveness, to examine how employee refusal to produce product/service affect organizational output and to determine how employee sabotage reduce the security strength of the organization. The study employed survey design and used questionnaire to gather data from sampled respondents. Data was analyzed using simple percentage method. Based on the findings, it was revealed that sabotage at workplace by employee can damage the property, image and reputation of an organization. It was also revealed that employee insubordination thwart the achievement of team work accomplishment and organizational effectiveness. It was equally shown that employee sabotage reduces the security strength of the organization, thus expose the organization to competitive thread and that sabotage by employee leads to waste of resources in the organization, thus low organizational output.
    [Show full text]
  • Praise for the Corporate Whistleblower's Survival Guide
    Praise for The Corporate Whistleblower’s Survival Guide “Blowing the whistle is a life-altering experience. Taking the fi rst step is the hardest, knowing that you can never turn back. Harder yet is not taking the step and allowing the consequences of not blowing the whistle to continue, knowing you could have stopped them. Your life will be forever changed; friends and family will question your ac- tions if not your sanity, your peers will shun you, every relationship you treasure will be strained to the breaking point. This handbook is required reading for anyone considering blowing the whistle.” —Richard and Donna Parks, Three Mile Island cleanup whistleblower and wife “The Corporate Whistleblower’s Survival Guide will be an immense help! For while there are no one-size-fi ts-all ‘right answers,’ the au- thors have effectively translated their decades of actual experience, insights, and resources in this fi eld onto paper. A realistic framework will now exist to help people confronting such diffi cult situations.” —Coleen Rowley, FBI 9/11 whistleblower and a 2002 Time Person of the Year “Lays out exactly what potential corporate whistleblowers must know to help improve their chances of both surviving whistleblowing and stopping the misconduct they set out to expose. My only hope is that we can help spread the word so that all potential corporate whistle- blowers read this book before they take their fi rst steps down that lonely road.” —Danielle Brian, Executive Director, Project on Government Oversight “As commissioner, I relied on whistleblowers like Jeffrey Wigand to learn the inside story about the deceptive practices of the tobacco industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Workplace Bullying and Harassment
    Law and Policy Remedies for Workplace Bullying in Higher Education: An Update and Further Developments in the Law and Policy John Dayton, J.D., Ed. D.* A dark and not so well kept secret lurks the halls of higher education institutions. Even among people who should certainly know better than to tolerate such abuse, personnel misconduct in the form of workplace bullying remains a serious but largely neglected problem.1 A problem so serious it can devastate academic programs and the people in them. If allowed to maraud unchecked, workplace bullies can poison the office culture; shut down progress and productivity; drive off the most promising and productive people; and make the workplace increasingly toxic for everyone who remains in the bully dominated environment.2 A toxic workplace can even turn deadly when stress begins to take its all too predictable toll on victims’ mental and physical health, or interpersonal stress leads to acts of violence.3 Higher education institutions are especially vulnerable to some of the most toxic forms of workplace bullying. When workplace bullies are tenured professors they can become like bullying zombies seemingly invulnerable to efforts to stop them while faculty, staff, students, and even university administrators run for cover apparently unable or unwilling to do anything about the loose-cannons that threaten to sink them all. This article examines the problem of workplace bullying in higher education; reviews possible remedies; and makes suggestions for law and policy reforms to more effectively address this very serious but too often tolerated problem in higher education. * This article is dedicated to the memory of Anne Proffitt Dupre, Co-Director of the Education Law Consortium, Professor of Law, Law Clerk for the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Bullying Or Mobbing: Is It Happening in Your Academic Library? Susan Hubbs Motin St
    St. Cloud State University theRepository at St. Cloud State Library Faculty Publications Library Services 3-2009 Bullying or Mobbing: Is it Happening in Your Academic Library? Susan Hubbs Motin St. Cloud State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/lrs_facpubs Part of the Industrial and Organizational Psychology Commons, and the Library and Information Science Commons Recommended Citation Motin, Susan Hubbs, "Bullying or Mobbing: Is it Happening in Your Academic Library?" (2009). Library Faculty Publications. 28. https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/lrs_facpubs/28 This Conference Proceeding is brought to you for free and open access by the Library Services at theRepository at St. Cloud State. It has been accepted for inclusion in Library Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of theRepository at St. Cloud State. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Bullying or Mobbing: Is it Happening in Your Academic Library? Susan Hubbs Motin The behaviors of bullying and mobbing have only be- excellent service-oriented library can be, or they can gun to rise in the public’s awareness or towards the create a culture of anxiety, stress, and distrust which legal standing of harassment. But, like harassment, hampers providing the best possible service to patrons bullying and mobbing can lead to the same results and inhibits the free flow of ideas and creativity. Until for employees: a loss of dignity, self-confidence and Thomas Hecker’s article on workplace mobbing in li- productivity, as well as an excessive amount of non- braries, which appeared in the 2007 issue of The Jour- work related stress and other related health issues.
    [Show full text]