Alessandro Scarlatti, Lucretia Romana: Introduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Alessandro Scarlatti, Lucretia Romana: Introduction Alessandro Scarlatti, Lucretia Romana, ed. Rosalind Halton, May 2006 Introduction, p. i INTRODUCTION Alessandro Scarlatti's setting of Lucretia Alessandro Melani, Francesco Gasparini, Romana (Hanley 377) has been dated to 16 Bernardo Pasquini, and Flavio Lanciani. September, 1688.1 The following detail is Lucretia is the only setting by Scarlatti, and given by Edwin Hanley: “On the basis of its tragic theme from Roman antiquity documents in the Doria-Pamfili archives, further sets it apart from the other works in Montalto…reports that Benedetto Pamfili is the manuscript. the author of the text of this cantata and that a copy was presented to Cardinal Giovanni Source B Francesco Maria de’ Medici in the winter of Naples, Biblioteca del Conservatorio, MS 33.2.4, 1690.”2 ff. 128-138v (Nc) Cardinal Benedetto Pamphili, author of No heading or attribution. Ornamental the text, was one of the principal ecclesiasti- capital. cal patrons of music in late seventeenth- century Rome, and his poetry was set on Source C numerous occasions by Alessandro Scarlatti. London, British Library, MS Add. 31488, A manuscript in the Vatican Library, Rome, ff. 166-185 (Lbl) of cantata and other texts for musical Watermark: 3 mountains in double circle; settings by Pamphili (I-Rvat Vat. lat. 10206) fleur de lys in double circle r gives an idea of the range and involvement Heading: La Lucretia Romana / del Sig . of the cardinal's literary interests as librettist. Scarlatti. Scribe: Roman hand Contents: cantatas by Cola, Bononcini, Sources Scarlatti, Carissimi Carissimi, Stradella. (list of composers in Source A English hand). The volume bears the name Münster, Santini Collection, MS 862, “R.J. Stevenson, Charterhouse 1817.” The ff. 1-12 (MÜs) name “Savage” also appears. Watermark: fleur de lys in double circle Heading: Lucretia Romana / del S. Alesso There is a close correspondence between Scarlatti. the readings of sources A (MÜs) and B (Nc), Scribe: Roman hand.3 and considerable variance of those with the Contents: cantatas with instruments by readings and markings of C (Lbl). In Nc the title character’s name is variously spelled as “Lugrezia” and “Lugretia,” whereas MÜs and Lbl give “Lucretia.” 1 Malcolm Boyd, s.v. “Alessandro Scarlatti,” The New Some of the aspects in which Lbl differs Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, 2nd ed., from the first two sources are: bass figures, 22: 392. No source is given for the date. of which many more appear; slurs in the 2 Hanley, Edwin, “Alessandro Scarlatti's Cantate da Camera: a Bibliographical Study, ” Ph.D. vocal part, of which many more are given Dissertation, Yale University, 1963, pp. 291-292. over 3- and 4-note groups; and tempo 3 The hand of MÜs 862 has similarities to that of MÜs markings (see below). Lbl also has a number 3933, Scarlatti’s opera La Rosmene, performed in of textual errors, such as incorrect numbers Rome, Palazzo Doria Pamphili, Carnival 1686 (Boyd, of beats for the time signature, e.g. in the “Scarlatti,” 22: 384). WEB LIBRARY OF SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY MUSIC (www.sscm-wlscm.org), WLSCM No. 7 Alessandro Scarlatti, Lucretia Romana, ed. Rosalind Halton, May 2006 Introduction, p. ii opening recitative (m. 26) and in the arioso which Lucretia confronts the inevitable sui- “Ma che farai mio cor?” (m. 160). In “Ma cide demanded by her situation. crudel dove n’andrai,” (m. 75) an ornament None of the arias is a da capo form, a sign not typical of Scarlatti's copyists common situation in Scarlatti's work of this (similar to the French tremblement), time. The most frequent poetic form used by indicating a cadential shake in the voice, Pamphili is that of a verse which returns to appears several times. These readings are the first line through a preceding line that not adopted in this edition, though the tempo rhymes with it, e.g. first aria (m. 44): line 1 markings are noted in the Editorial Notes. and last line, “Barbaro hai vinto”; penultimate line, “ch’ai reso estinto”. In the second aria (m.7 5), this is extended to a Style and structure scheme of matching rhymes to the first two lines: “Ma crudel dove n’andrai / per fuggir The work makes highly virtuosic demands le mie vendette?” and “…'e s’al ciel giunger on the singer and has a wider range than saprai / ti rispinghin le saette.” usual for Scarlatti's cantatas with continuo: This form builds in an element of musi- from d′ to b″-flat. It calls for a dramatic cal recapitulation, and also facilitates a rendition, like other solo cantatas based on varied treatment of the intervening text, in ancient Roman history (including Scarlatti's which the music follows freely the affect of Il Coriolano). These follow the tradition of the lines––rather than portraying a single similarly virtuosic works on ancient histori- dominant affect within a section of music. cal subjects by Stradella, for example An example is the aria “Barbaro, hai vinto,” Nerone and Medea (“Già languiva la in which the music to the first (and last) notte”). All of these works appear in the lines is downward moving and dejected, but British Library manuscript Add. 31488, takes on a defiant quality through the moto along with the famous trio cantata of perpetuo bass line and the recitando vocal Carissimi, I Naviganti. part. In each of the Roman historical pieces, The second aria follows the first without the subject is a character for whom death is intervening recitative, an occasional feature the only release from dishonor and despair. of Scarlatti’s works in the 1690s. Moving The well-known subject of the rape of from the A-minor pathos of “Barbaro, hai Lucretia provided Scarlatti––as many other vinto,” the voice opens unaccompanied onto composers after him, including Handel and a virtuoso aria in D major, in which Lucretia Montéclair––with the dramatic ingredients calls for revenge––a family vendetta from of defiance, fury, and pathos. which her attacker Sesto will seek escape in Tonally as well as emotionally, Scar- vain. latti's Lucretia covers a wide trajectory, In the third, equally vehement aria in E from A minor (first recitative and aria), to D flat, Lucretia turns her anger on herself, major (m. 75, second aria: Lucretia calling blaming her own beauty for Sesto’s attack. down curses upon Sesto, her attacker), E flat Then comes the thought of suicide, with (m. 122: continuation of the curse), D minor more deliberate movements (several marked / G minor (m. 137, fourth aria with arioso: Largo or Adagio––see Tempo Markings, be- Lucretia's sorrow and pathos) before return- low), in contrast to the rapid pace of the ing to A minor for Lucretia's farewell (m. preceding arias. 244). Another original feature of the structure A number of structural features are nota- from this point is the intertwining of the ble in this journey, from rapid virtuoso arias arioso “Ma che farai mio cor?” (mm. 160, and extravagant recitative to the obsessive 184, 221) with the two strophes of a mourn- circling of the slow 3/8 strophic aria in ful aria in 3/8––a standard form for the WEB LIBRARY OF SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY MUSIC (www.sscm-wlscm.org), WLSCM No. 7 Alessandro Scarlatti, Lucretia Romana, ed. Rosalind Halton, May 2006 Introduction, p. iii cantata of the 1690s, though rarely used with final aria in D minor (mm. 164-183 and 201- such psychological intensity. The device 220). enables Pamphili and Scarlatti to present Lucretia as a complex character torn be- Accidentals tween duty (the repetitive patterns of the The usage of accidentals by Scarlatti and by 3/8) and a more personal response “But contemporary copyists differs from modern what will my heart do?” usage in several ways. In general, the com- Her final path to death is presented in poser uses an accidental to apply for the the form of a decisive recitative, and the duration of one note only, or for consecutive work ends with the gasped out “I faint, I fall, notes on a repeated pitch. Modern conven- I die, I breathe: Farewell.” tion regards as redundant the repetition of accidentals applied to the same pitch within a measure; but they often serve as a useful Editorial Notes reminder for performers, especially within a highly inflected chromatic style such as The vocal part is notated in the soprano clef Scarlatti’s. (lowest line = c′) in all sources. The use of the natural sign to cancel an MÜs has been followed as the principal accidental earlier in the bar thus appears text. It presents a high standard of accuracy rarely in these manuscripts, whereas modern and clarity with regard to the poetic and usage requires it routinely. Here the modern musical text and the textual underlay. Some convention has been adopted, so as to avoid performance markings from Nc have been needless ambiguity. In nearly every case added, such as the Largo at m. 11. Lbl has a Scarlatti’s notation leaves no room for larger number of scribal inaccuracies than doubt, when we consider together his use of the first two texts, such as incorrect barring key signatures, bass figures, and principles in the arioso, “Ma che farai mio cor?” The of using accidentals. tempo marking Presto for the second and third arias (mm. 75 and 122), found only in Slurs and other variant readings this source, have not been adopted. Throughout the aria “Barbaro ha vinto,” Nc and MÜs agree in the treatment of the Bass figuring ultimate syllable of each phrase, going from In the arias, figures that appear in one the final leading-note sixteenth to the tonic strophe but not in the other have been resolution on the following downbeat (e.g., adopted for each strophe.
Recommended publications
  • Contrapuntally Crafted, Harmonically Eloquent : Corelli's Sonatas and the Compositional Process in the Late 17Th Century
    Contrapuntally crafted, harmonically eloquent : Corelli's sonatas and the compositional process in the late 17th century Autor(en): Sanna, Alberto Objekttyp: Article Zeitschrift: Basler Jahrbuch für historische Musikpraxis : eine Veröffentlichung der Schola Cantorum Basiliensis, Lehr- und Forschungsinstitut für Alte Musik an der Musik-Akademie der Stadt Basel Band (Jahr): 37 (2013) PDF erstellt am: 10.10.2021 Persistenter Link: http://doi.org/10.5169/seals-868876 Nutzungsbedingungen Die ETH-Bibliothek ist Anbieterin der digitalisierten Zeitschriften. Sie besitzt keine Urheberrechte an den Inhalten der Zeitschriften. Die Rechte liegen in der Regel bei den Herausgebern. Die auf der Plattform e-periodica veröffentlichten Dokumente stehen für nicht-kommerzielle Zwecke in Lehre und Forschung sowie für die private Nutzung frei zur Verfügung. Einzelne Dateien oder Ausdrucke aus diesem Angebot können zusammen mit diesen Nutzungsbedingungen und den korrekten Herkunftsbezeichnungen weitergegeben werden. Das Veröffentlichen von Bildern in Print- und Online-Publikationen ist nur mit vorheriger Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber erlaubt. Die systematische Speicherung von Teilen des elektronischen Angebots auf anderen Servern bedarf ebenfalls des schriftlichen Einverständnisses der Rechteinhaber. Haftungsausschluss Alle Angaben erfolgen ohne Gewähr für Vollständigkeit oder Richtigkeit. Es wird keine Haftung übernommen für Schäden durch die Verwendung von Informationen aus diesem Online-Angebot oder durch das Fehlen von Informationen. Dies gilt auch für Inhalte
    [Show full text]
  • Harry White: Johann Joseph Fux and the Imperative of Italy Schriftenreihe Analecta Musicologica
    Harry White: Johann Joseph Fux and the Imperative of Italy Schriftenreihe Analecta musicologica. Veröffentlichungen der Musikgeschichtlichen Abteilung des Deutschen Historischen Instituts in Rom Band 52 (2015) Herausgegeben vom Deutschen Historischen Institut Rom Copyright Das Digitalisat wird Ihnen von perspectivia.net, der Online-Publikationsplattform der Max Weber Stiftung – Deutsche Geisteswissenschaftliche Institute im Ausland, zur Verfügung gestellt. Bitte beachten Sie, dass das Digitalisat der Creative- Commons-Lizenz Namensnennung-Keine kommerzielle Nutzung-Keine Bearbeitung (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) unterliegt. Erlaubt ist aber das Lesen, das Ausdrucken des Textes, das Herunterladen, das Speichern der Daten auf einem eigenen Datenträger soweit die vorgenannten Handlungen ausschließlich zu privaten und nicht-kommerziellen Zwecken erfolgen. Den Text der Lizenz erreichen Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode Johann Joseph Fux and the Imperative of Italy Harry White The formative influence of Italian musical culture on the Austrian High Baroque is so extensive and so widely acknowledged that we could be forgiven for taking it for granted.1 Even if we seek to characterise the practice of music at the imperial court in Vienna between c. 1690 and 1740 as an astonishing combination of Italian savoir faire and Germanic purposefulness, it is not always easy to maintain a balance between the almost instinctive reliance on Italian musical thought which the Hof- musikkapelle maintained, and the doctrinaire tendencies
    [Show full text]
  • Music for the Cimbalo Cromatico and the Split-Keyed Instruments in Seventeenth-Century Italy," Performance Practice Review: Vol
    Performance Practice Review Volume 5 Article 8 Number 1 Spring Music for the Cimbalo Cromatico and the Split- Keyed Instruments in Seventeenth-Century Italy Christopher Stembridge Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/ppr Part of the Music Practice Commons Stembridge, Christopher (1992) "Music for the Cimbalo Cromatico and the Split-Keyed Instruments in Seventeenth-Century Italy," Performance Practice Review: Vol. 5: No. 1, Article 8. DOI: 10.5642/perfpr.199205.01.08 Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/ppr/vol5/iss1/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Claremont at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Performance Practice Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Early Baroque Keyboard Instruments Music for the Cimbalo Cromatico and Other Split- Keyed Instruments in Seventeenth-Century Italy* Christopher Stembridge The Concept of the Cimbalo Cromatico Although no example of such an instrument is known to have survived intact, the cimbalo cromatico was a clearly defined type of harpsichord that apparently enjoyed a certain vogue in Italy during the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries.1 The earliest use of the term is found in the titles of two toccatas per il cimbalo cromatico included by Ascanio Mayone in his Secondo Libro di Diversi Capricci per Sonare published in Naples in 1609.2 Subsequently the term was used in publications by This is the first of three related articles. The second and third, to be published in subsequent issues of Performance Practice Review, will deal with the instruments themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pianoforte Sonata
    The Pianoforte Sonata J.S. Shedlock The Pianoforte Sonata Table of Contents The Pianoforte Sonata........................................................................................................................................1 J.S. Shedlock............................................................................................................................................1 PREFACE................................................................................................................................................1 CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTORY...........................................................................................................2 CHAPTER II. JOHANN KUHNAU.....................................................................................................13 CHAPTER III. BERNARDO PASQUINI: A CONTEMPORARY OF J. KUHNAU..........................23 CHAPTER IV. EMANUEL BACH AND SOME OF HIS CONTEMPORARIES..............................26 CHAPTER V. HAYDN AND MOZART.............................................................................................34 CHAPTER VI. PREDECESSORS OF BEETHOVEN.........................................................................40 CHAPTER VII. LUDWIG VAN BEETHOVEN..................................................................................48 CHAPTER VIII. TWO CONTEMPORARIES OF BEETHOVEN......................................................57 CHAPTER IX. SCHUMANN, CHOPIN, BRAHMS, AND LISZT.....................................................62 CHAPTER X. THE SONATA
    [Show full text]
  • Colista Or Corelli? a «Waiting Room» for the Trio Sonata Ahn. 16*
    Philomusica on-line 16 (2017) Colista or Corelli? A «waiting room» for the trio sonata Ahn. 16* Antonella D’Ovidio Università di Firenze [email protected] § Studi recenti sulle fonti, manoscritte e § Recent research on manuscript and a stampa, dei lavori corelliani hanno printed sources of Corelli’s output riaperto la discussione attorno alle have re-opened discussion on doubt- opere dubbie e a quelle ‘senza numero ful works and have led to a new d’opera’ del compositore, portando così revision of Marx’s classification of ad una parziale revisione dei criteri Corelli’s catalogue. utilizzati da Marx nel suo catalogo While the solo sonatas of doubtful corelliano. attribution have already been re- Mentre la trasmissione manoscritta examined, there is still much to be delle sonate per violino è stata profon- done on doubtful trio sonatas. In this damente riesaminata, molto ancora respect, this essay focuses on a spe- resta da fare nel caso delle sonate a tre cific case: the conflicting attribution non attribuibili con certezza a Corelli. A of trio sonata Ahn. 16 classified by tale proposito, l’articolo si focalizza su Marx among Corelli’s doubtful works un caso specifico, ovvero la sonata a tre and attested in a group of English Ahn. 16. Essa è oggi attestata da un sources, only rarely examined by gruppo di testimoni di provenienza Corelli scholars. In some sources inglese, solo raramente esaminati dagli Ahn. 16 is attributed to Corelli, in studiosi corelliani. La sonata presenta others to the Roman lutenist and un’attri-buzione conflittuale: in alcuni composer Lelio Colista, in others no manoscritti è assegnata a Corelli, in ascription is reported.
    [Show full text]
  • Edward J. Olszewski Dynamics of Architecture in Late Baroque Rome
    Edward J. Olszewski Dynamics of Architecture in Late Baroque Rome. Cardinal Pietro Ottoboni at the Cancelleria Edward J. Olszewski Dynamics of Architecture in Late Baroque Rome. Cardinal Pietro Ottoboni at the Cancelleria Managing Editor: Monika Michałowicz Published by De Gruyter Open Ltd, Warsaw/Berlin Part of Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Munich/Boston This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 license, which means that the text may be used for non-commercial purposes, provided credit is given to the author. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/. Copyright © 2015 Edward J. Olszewski ISBN 978-3-11-045245-7 e- ISBN 978-3-11-045246-4 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. Managing Editor: Monika Michałowicz www.degruyteropen.com Cover illustration: © Gabinetto Nazionale delle Stampe, Rome Contents Preface VIII Abbreviation X 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Origins 1 1.2 Papal Patronage 5 2 Architectural Beginnings 17 2.1 The First Architects 17 2.2 Early Theaters 21 2.3 Ottoboni Holdings 25 2.4 G.F. Pellegrini 31 2.5 Nicola Michetti 33 3 Theater Architecture 36 3.1 Ottoboni Theater & Filippo Juvarra 36 3.2 Juvarra’s Theater Drawings 39 3.3 The Lost Theater 40 3.4 Studies of Juvarra’s Theater Drawings 45 3.5 The Fate of Ottoboni’s Theater 53 3.6 Appearance of the Theater 53 4 Other Cancelleria Spaces 73 4.1 The Sala Riaria 73 4.2 Ludovico Rusconi Sassi 73 4.3 The Arcadian Academy 76 4.4 The Bosco Parrasio 78 4.5 San Lorenzo in Damaso 81 5 Architectural Collaboration 87 5.1 The Lateran Façade Competition 87 6 Fugitive Architecture 92 6.1 The Final Decade 92 6.2 Domenico Gregorini 96 6.3 Ottoboni’s Ephemeral Constructions 101 6.4 Alessandro Mauri 111 6.5 G.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Cipc-2021-Program-Notes.Pdf
    PROGRAM NOTES First and Second Rounds Written by musicologists Marissa Glynias Moore, PhD, Executive Director of Piano Cleveland (MGM) and Anna M. O’Connell (AMO) Composer Index BACH 03 LISZT 51 BÁRTOK 07 MESSIAEN 57 BEACH 10 MONK 59 BEETHOVEN 12 MOZART 61 BRAHMS 18 RACHMANINOFF 64 CHOPIN 21 RAMEAU 69 CZERNY 29 RAVEL 71 DEBUSSY 31 PROKOFIEV 74 DOHNÁNYI 34 SAINT-SAËNS 77 FALLA 36 SCARLATTI 79 GRANADOS 38 SCHUBERT 82 GUARNIERI 40 SCRIABIN 84 HAMELIN 42 STRAVINSKY 87 HANDEL 44 TANEYEV 90 HAYDN 46 TCHAIKOVSKY/FEINBERG 92 LIEBERMANN 49 VINE 94 2 2021 CLEVELAND INTERNATIONAL PIANO COMPETITION / PROGRAM NOTES he German composer Johann Sebastian Bach was one of a massive musical family of Bachs whose musical prowess stretched over two Johann Thundred years. J.S. Bach became a musician, earning the coveted role as Thomaskantor (the cantor/music director) for the Lutheran church Sebastian of St. Thomas in Leipzig. At St. Thomas, Bach composed cantatas for just about every major church holiday, featuring a variety of different voice types Bach and instruments, and from which his famed chorales are sung to this day in churches and choral productions. As an organist, he was well known for his ability to improvise extensively on hymn (chorale) tunes, and for reharmonizing (1685-1750) older melodies to fit his Baroque aesthetic. Many of these tunes also remain recognizable in church hymnals. Just as his chorales serve as a basis in composition technique for young musicians today, his collection of keyboard works entitled The Well-Tempered Clavier serves even now as an introduction to preludes and fugues for students of the piano.
    [Show full text]
  • Del Cardinale Accademia Ottoboni Marco Ceccato MENU › Tracklist › Français › ENGLISH › Deutsch
    IL VIOLONCELLO DEL CARDINALE ACCADEMIA OTTOBONI MARCO CECCATO MENU › TRACKLIST › FRANÇAIS › ENGLISH › DEUTSCH IL VIOLONCELLO DEL CARDINALE PIETRO GIUSEppE GAETANO BONI (1686-c.1741) SONATA IN C MaJOR, OP.1 No.8 1 I. LARGO 4’41 2 II. AllEGRO ‘AllA FRANCESE’ 1’54 3 III. LARGO 2’37 4 IV. AllEGRO 0’57 FILIppO AMADEI (1690-1730) SONATA IN D MINOR WD 896/10 5 I. ANDANTE 2’48 6 II. ANDANTE E CANTABilE ASSAI 2’22 NICOLA FRANCESCO HAYM (1678-1729) SONATA No.1 IN A MINOR/E MINOR 7 I. ADAGIO 1’24 8 II. AllEGRO ASSAI 0’37 9 III. ADAGIO 0’55 10 IV. PRESTO 1’01 GIUSEppE MARIA PERRONI (fl. 1699-1737) SONATA No.2 IN D MaJOR 11 I. ADAGIO 1’45 12 II. AllEGRO 2’03 13 III. GRAVE 0’58 14 IV. AllEGRO E STACCATO 1’36 PIETRO GIUSEppE GAETANO BONI SONATA IN G MINOR, OP.1 No.9 15 I. LARGO 3’27 16 II. AllEGRO AllA FRANCESE 1’43 17 III. AllEGRO 2’15 GIOVANNI BATTISTA COSTANZI (1704-1778) SINFONIA A VIOLONCELLO soLO IN D MaJOR WD 551 18 I. ADAGIO ASSAI 2’03 19 II. AllEGRO 3’30 20 III. AMOROSO 1’59 21 IV. AMOROSO 1’43 GIUSEppE MARIA PERRONI SONATA No.1 IN A MaJOR 22 I. ADAGIO ED AFFETTUOSO 1’56 23 II. PRESTO 1’20 24 III. GRAVE 1’15 25 IV. AllEGRO 1’28 GIOVANNI BONONCINI (1670-1747) SONATA IN A MINOR 26 I. ANDANTE 3’38 27 II. AllEGRO 1’41 28 III.
    [Show full text]
  • Note D'archivio
    NOTE D'ARCHIVIO PER LA STORIA MUSICALE nuovasene ANNO II,1984, SUPPLEMENTO EDIZIONI FONDAZIONE LEVI VENEZIA 1984 EFL.V.B.2 John Burke MUSICIANS OF S. MARIA MAGGIORE ROME, 1600-1700 A SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC STUDY EDIZIONI FONDAZIONE LEVI VENEZIA 1984 COMITATO DIRETTIVO ALBERTO BASSO, FRANCESCO LUISI OSCAR MISCHIATI, GIANCARLO ROSTIROLLA Direttore responsabile Francesco Luisi Rivista annuale con supplemento semestrale per l'Italia (escluso supplemento) L. 18.000 per l'estero (escluso supplemento) L. 26.000 Supplemento Anno I per l'Italia L. 20.000 Supplemento Anno I per l'estero L. 28.000 Supplemento Anno II per l'Italia L. 10.000 Supplemento Anno II per l'estero L. 15.000 Direzione, redazione e amministrazione: FONDAZIONE UGO E OLGA LEVI, Palazzo Giustinian-Lolin, S. Vidal 2893, Venezia (c.a.p. 30124). Tel. (041) 24264 I 703161 clc postale n. 11084308 In redazione: Marcella Ilari Autorizzazione del Tribunale di Venezia n. 736/1983 © 1984 by FONDAZIONE LEVI, Venezia Tutti i diritti riservati per tutti i Paesi Acknowledgements I wish to express my gratitude to the following individuals: Fr. Jean Coste, archivist; Professor Denis Arnold, who offered criticism of an earlier stage of the Introduction; Jean Lionnet, who made available to me material for his forthcoming article on the cappella musicale of S. Luigi de' Francesi (1981) and his current work on the Sistine Chapel. Thanks are also due to the Canons of S. Maria Maggiore for allowing me to consult their archives, and to the staff of Archivio di Stato, Rome. Ci scusiamo con i lettori per il ritardo con cui il lavoro vede la luce: si è reso neces­ sario un minuzioso lavoro di controllo redazionale che ha imposto il ricorso alla do­ cumentazione originale.
    [Show full text]
  • BERNARDO PASQUINI Sonatas for Two Organs Con / with / Avec / Mit Hadrien Jourdan (Brilliant Classics, 94347, 2013)
    BERNARDO PASQUINI Sonatas for two organs con / with / avec / mit Hadrien Jourdan (Brilliant Classics, 94347, 2013) - Concerto – Das Magazin für Alte Musik, 251, September/October 2013 Was bedeutet eigentlich ›Partimento‹? Vereinfacht gesagt nichts anderes als Sololiteratur für den Basso continuo. Die Partimento-Praxis eröffnet somit ein weites musikalisches Feld, in dem der Generalbass seine dienende Funktion des Begleitens abwirft und selbstbewusst in die Rolle einer ungewohnten musikalischen Dominanz schlüpft. Doch diese erweiterte ästhetische Gestalt wird in der vorliegenden Produktion mit vierzehn als bezifferter Generalbass überlieferten Sonaten von Bernardo Pasquini übertroffen von einer formalen Disposition, bei der der Partimento auf zwei Generalbassinstrumente erweitert wird. Letztendlich bleibt nun im musikalischen Dialog zwischen den Continuo-Instrumenten immer sowohl ein didaktischer als auch ein künstlerisch-ästhetischer Ansatz sichtbar. Der Lehrer inszeniert in der Partimento-Praxis einen musikalischen Austausch mit seinem Schüler, der aus dem pädagogischen Ansatz heraus jederzeit in ästhetisch autonome Artefakte übergehen kann. Ganz wunderbar, wie farbig und reich an idiomatischen Manieren die Organisten hier einen musikalischen Wettstreit evozieren. Dabei ist das Aufregende an dieser Produktion: Scandali und Jourdan überführen den bezifferten Generalbass Pasquinis mit technischer Brillanz stilsicher und variantenreich in einen musikalischen Kosmos, in dem sich jederzeit ein lebendiger und geistreicher Dialog zwischen zwei
    [Show full text]
  • Download Booklet
    CHAN 0704 Front.qxd 15/9/06 4:04 pm Page 1 CHAN 0704 CHACONNE CHANDOS early music CHAN 0704 BOOK.qxd 15/9/06 4:19 pm Page 2 Bernardo Pasquini (1637–1710) Sonate per gravicembalo 1 Toccata [in sol minore] 4:24 [in G minor • in g-Moll • en sol mineur] 2 Partite diverse di follia 6:41 Lebrecht Collection Lebrecht 3 Toccata con lo scherzo del cucco 4:57 4 Alemanda d’Ongheria* 4:53 5 Partite del salterello 3:20 6 Toccata [in fa maggiore]* 3:27 [in F major • in F-Dur • en fa majeur] 7 Canzon franzèsa* 1:59 8 Passagagli [in do maggiore] 4:00 [in C major • in C-Dur • en ut majeur] 9 Toccata [in sol maggiore]* 2:36 [in G major • in G-Dur • en sol majeur] 10 Bergamasca* 1:16 Bernardo Pasquini 11 Ricercare con la fuga in più modi 13:36 12 Partite di bergamasca 4:03 3 CHAN 0704 BOOK.qxd 15/9/06 4:19 pm Page 4 The Keyboard Music of Bernardo Pasquini: 13 Passagagli [in sol minore]* 3:07 Types of Composition, Analysis of Forms, Evolution of Style [in G minor • in g-Moll • en sol mineur] 14 Variationi capricciose 5:39 Born in Massa Valdinievole near Lucca in Giovanni Pierluigi da Palestrina. He made a December 1637, Bernardo Pasquini received copy in his own hand of the whole of 15 Passagagli per lo scozzese 2:45 his earliest education either at the hands of Frescobaldi’s Primo libro delle fantasie, while Mariotto Bocciantini, the parish priest at throughout his life he never ceased to be 16 Tre arie* 1:27 Uzzano near Pescia, or – according to a absorbed by Palestrina’s style, studying it by manuscript notizia by Padre Martini1 – at writing his compositions out in score.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Booklet
    CONVERSAZIONI II Duelling Cantatas Sounds Baroque Anna Dennis soprano Andrew Radley countertenor Julian Perkins director Noelle Barker OBE (1928–2013) Sounds Baroque was privileged to have had Noelle Barker as its first honorary patron. In addition to being a distinguished soprano, Noelle was a formidable teacher and a refreshingly honest friend. Her indefatigable support was invaluable in launching this series of conversazioni concerts and recordings. Conversazioni II is dedicated to her memory. 2 CONVERSAZIONI II Duelling Cantatas Sounds Baroque Jane Gordon and Jorge Jimenez violins Jonathan Rees cello and viola da gamba James Akers archlute, guitar and theorbo Frances Kelly triple harp Anna Dennis soprano Andrew Radley countertenor Julian Perkins harpsichord, organ and director 3 Francesco Gasparini (1668–1727) Io che dal terzo ciel (Venere e Adone) 24:26 1 Recitativo – Io che dal terzo ciel raggi di gioia (Venere) 1:00 2 Aria – Come infiamma con luce serena (Venere) 2:32 3 Recitativo – Se già nacqui fra l’onde (Venere) 0:49 4 Aria – T’amerò come mortale (Adone) 3:22 5 Recitativo – Non m’adorar, no, no (Venere) 0:23 6 Aria – Tutto il bello in un sol bello (Venere) 2:08 7 Recitativo – È il mio volto mortale (Adone) 0:21 8 Aria – Ove scherza il ruscel col ruscello (Venere e Adone) 1:37 9 Recitativo – Del ruscel dell’augello il canto e’l suono (Venere e Adone) 0:34 10 Aria – La pastorella ove il boschetto ombreggia (Venere e Adone) 4:12 11 Recitativo – Qual farfalletta anch’io (Venere e Adone) 1:03 12 Aria – Meco parte il mio dolore (Venere) 1:49 13 Recitativo – Ecco ti lascio, o caro (Venere e Adone) 0:36 14 Aria – Usignol che nel nido sospira (Venere e Adone) 3:54 Antonio Caldara (c1670–1736) Trio sonata in E minor, op.
    [Show full text]