CEU eTD Collection

In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the ofdegree of partialfulfillment the In requirements E MBODIED A

C Department of Sociology and SocialAnthropology and Department Sociology of OGNITIVE Supervisors: U Central European University Central European RBAN

Budapest, Hungary Budapest, G AND Reka Holman

EOGRAPHY OF

Submitted to E XPERIENCE IN 2015 B

By

ERLIN

Daniel Monterescu Andreas Dafinger Andreas

R UNNING B UDAPEST Master Arts of

:

CEU eTD Collection practices. problem a through emerges that knowledge of production non a considered be can running that argument the concludeswith thesis The cities. two these in places to relationship the on discussion the and Budapest and Berlin experiences spatial the by illustrated are claims Theseown. its of politics spatial no has also it vision utopian a following are cities way the transform to aim not does activity running. of on moves then It water. or wind ground, the like elements physical basic with conflicts on focusing body the va the examines it First experience. spatial a as running defining city the in running to approach autoethnographic an provides thesis The

It argues It to running as an urban exp urban an as running to

that running is not a form of traveling to a given destination and as the as and destination given a to traveling of form a not is running that

Abstract erience defining the unique event unique the defining erience rious forms of interaction between the space and and space the between interaction of forms rious i

atic process of recognition in spatial in recognition of process atic - narrative form of the the of form narrative - like temporality like of running in in running of CEU eTD Collection References Implications Cha running 2 RunningChapter experience: urban as the body the elements and 1 RunningChapter experience: spatial the as interaction between physical WhatIthink when IthinkMethodology running about about Introduction Abstract Table of Contents Running de Social, physical and mental extremes: the temperature, air and rain Confronting social euphoria: crowd the Tactile conflicts and the spaces of interaction between solid surfaces The productionThe of knowledge 3: spatio productionThe of knowledge 2: space productionThe of knowledge 1: the body Leaving elitethe ghetto behind: running routes urbanand development Budapest in Infrastructural developments as conflict zones in Budapest and Berlin democratizationThe of space and spatialthe politics of running Moving without travelling: uniquethe temporality of running Approaching the question: why run cities? in Technologically mediated spatial experience pter 3 body The pter and revisited:ofknowledge the space production

......

......

...... -

......

contextualized: the treadmill ......

......

...... -

...... temporality ......

...... ii ......

......

unique spatio ......

...... -

...... temporality of city city of temporality ......

......

......

......

......

......

.

...

21 47 44 38 32 29 26 25 23 18 16 13 12 41 40 39

9 6 1 9

i

CEU eTD Collection the and like. madness runningis 1 accommodates urban 55). (2010: itselfenvironment” tothe McCormack & Latham following meantime the at experience, embodied an into city the in running turn that elements urban essentially of incorporation the and experience spatial this of characteristics fundamental the health the and body. space between interaction of levels elementary the from starting possible details t to examined be will experience this of elements constitutive the and experience spatial a is running that answer will thesis this is running what of question basic very the To running ofits loses never some training of seriousness The social. essentially thro regimen training is that activity physical disciplinary t movement physical This pr interaction of layers contextualized always is movement execution precise the aggravate details mental and physical techn a is Running

This definition also implies that I will not be able to deal with heuristic claims like running is happiness, happiness, is running like claims heuristic with deal to able be not will I that implies also definition This ugh 1 -

lifestyle, a body project or a signifier of class or soc or class of signifier a or project body a lifestyle, ht hs omlto as sget i wa rnig s o t ti suy i i nt a not is it study: this to not is running what is suggests also formulation this What

routines can be can routines sre of series a .

The activity The ique of the body (Mauss 1973) that consists of a consciousness of consciousness a of consists that 1973) (Mauss body the of ique

pta interaction spatial

vd itrrtv faeok fr understanding for frameworks interpretive ovide overcome

hrough space is something that is often perceived as a rigorous rigorous a as perceived often is that something is space hrough –

an awareness of awareness an nonetheless involves a playful element, an element that unfolds unfolds that element an element, playful a involves nonetheless

playful characteristics.

– to some extent by a spatial performance spatial a by extent some to of

saying something important about how “the human body body human “the how about important something saying

ihnasail environment spatial a within

made possible by consistently following an inexorable inexorable an following consistently by possible made a a te enie iutn te ciiy s something as activity the situating meantime the at s The movements. determination Introduction 1 all

individual parts individual

characteristic of extremely of characteristic

individual’s

ial status. What I will focus on are are on focus will I What status. ial

of the body that support or support that body the of and body performing this this performing body analyzing

, thus long thus , h patc itself. practice the

monotonous monotonous the various various the - he finest finest he distance

small –

CEU eTD Collection methods these on elaborate applied of thethesis. inthe methodssection further will I sources. primary consider I which running on t refer also will I text this In Berlin. and Budapest notably most Europe, across cities different in running active of years 5 by up summed be can experience This runner. a as experiences factor constraining with a be to trainedappeared meeting these during collected data using only but and runners of groups various runners other with interact to observation participant used I period this t the to exclusively down narrowed becannot but Budapest in mostly materialized were experiences These running. of culture the of logic the understand to experiences spatial and bodily personal of integration the implies which id be essentially can that approach an use will I runner a As growth. of dynamics of histories unique the within races marathon of organization the through cities big of rejuvenation the interpret to or economy, world the within running mass of phenomena th position to cities, global of confines the within running urban of understanding an provide to formulated be not will questions these to answers The body. individual the of scale the answ be will questions city? the in run why fumes: car in breathing continuously while again and time lights traffic by halted being pavements, on crowd the in zigzagging of up made struggle social techn this all? of idea the connect at to Finally, run why basics: to back going while others all synthesizing questions, these all of to where ask: can we perspective urban the of significance how ask: can we body the of technique the of perspective the From follows: as formulated be can answer to aims study this questions of series The o experiences described by other athletes and to written accounts of writers or philosophers or writers of accounts written to and athletes other by described experiences o

. To eliminate these constraints I decided to draw from my complete complete my from draw to decided I constraints these eliminate To . ered reflecting the scale of the research which implies a reduction to reduction a implies which research the of scale the reflecting ered ique of the body to urban performance; a spatial and spatial a performance; urban to body the of ique

imeframe of the fieldwork or to the city itself. In cityitself. the to or fieldwork the of imeframe 2

run? And perhaps most intriguing most perhaps And run?

o u? o hd ih o the on light shed To run? to niid s autoethnographic as entified

These e

CEU eTD Collection complexity ofthe spatio discus by start experience runners senses. the how of reduction and reveal extension the or sensations and different space of sense the determine interactions of forms misse image structured this from R running. on (2000) Nádas Triathlon of Philosophy F space. and body the between interaction of forms basic the with deal that frameworks theoretical the using by interpreted and understood becan of something the of some be to considered are which cities, this characteristics extent what un left often is What in involved lives ordinary “displaying extraordinary &447). events”(Nettleton Hardey 2006: while city” the of governance the maintain and both marathon city “the how maratho urban how or analyze citizen” active the of image the not reinforces and symbolizes also will I practices running individual on considere be be will focus my can As 68). 1993: Neckel & marathon (Berking phenomenon modern late quintessentially urban the why or 2000) (Roche city the of image the global transforming are races marathon how 93), 1989: (Harvey theatricality” and spectacle b how o and theorysubcultural the Running hoeia faeok o sca pyhlg, history psychology, social of frameworks theoretical ig cities around the world are competing to create an image around the “organization of “organization the around image an create to competing are world the around cities ig in the citythe in running can be considered be can running a contradiction a sing the most elementary forms of interaction and then move on to the the to on move then and interaction of forms elementary most the sing

eiiin mle. T implies. definition can be app be can mention - f course urban theory as well. In my thesis I will not go into details of of details gointo not will I thesis In my well. as theory urban course f

temporalityrunning. of by Tamás Seregi (2014) and the texts of the Hungarian writer Péter Péter writer Hungarian the of texts the and (2014) Seregi Tamás by unning itself is conceived as a unified whole but whole unified a as conceived is itself unning . I will argue that the essentials of running as an urban activity urban an as running of essentials the that argue will I . di teapoce o h icpie eerdt aoei to is above to referred disciplines the of approaches the in ed roached from many different angles and can be discussed using discussed be can and angles different many from roached s out on the details that constitute the discipline. the constitute that details the on out s

an essentially urban experience with all the subjective subjective the all with experience urban essentially an he whole idea of practicing a health a practicing of idea whole he 3 unhealth

or this part of the analysis I will use will I analysis the of part this or

iest places on Earth, s Earth, on places iest ,

economics,

This is why I am going to going am I why is This

network eems to suggest to eems -

lifestyl approaching it approaching - co theory, actor ns “confirm “confirm ns

The basic The e in big big in e d a a d A

CEU eTD Collection conflictsdiffer stemming from non and runners between interactions social the that mean not does however, This, own. its of politics spatial no has running that argue and discipline runn of temporality unique the of characteristics the definingAfter attention. myof focus the in be will city the of image the and gaze runner’s expl the vision, urban power of characteristics the section and this In cities. money big in runners time, of concentration space, like resources basic of presence the how discuss briefly will I but research my to central not are running urban enabling factors economic The rhythmanalysis. of concept (2004) Lefebvre’s following city the in spent time non a to running links This time. same the at experience body/space the narrowing and extending running urban of question the addresses section second The conflictinggranted.relationships for si space, city in situated being already body runner’s the with begin just cannot experience urban an as running of discussion thorough a that is section this of contribution and argument main The experience. corporeal this of components pr the between distinction the with conclude will I which interaction this of mediation technological the of aspects some includes also section This interactions. these core The runners. un all for experience spatial embodied an these of that aspects is key temperature are interactions or rain wind, air, with body the of relationship conflicting the of abou significance detail in writing The matter. trivial a not is elements various with interactions conflicting the and space in body the of situatedness basic The running. while conceived and perceived a body the and space between interaction an as running conceptualizes section first The sections. major threeof comprised is thesis The derstanding of what space means for the body while running derives from the meaning of of meaning the from derives running while body the for means space what of derstanding t the interaction with the ground, the quality of the surface of running, running, of surface the of quality the ground, the with interaction the t ent modes of movingent modesthrough space. of urban

d rvds elcin o hw hs neato is interaction this how on reflections provides nd 4

n I un o h sail oiis f the of politics spatial the to turn I ing mply taking all of the above mentioned above the of all taking mply - runners in the city are void of of void are city the in runners - linear comprehension o comprehension linear

imer and secondary secondary and imer i te high the ain f CEU eTD Collection http://labs.strava.com/heatmap/#15/20.24651/46.64953/yellow/run 2 are.discipline reflection intellectual also with deal experience will I sections This two first goals. the in thesis: its the of to structure the determines central 220) 2000: (Nádas ataraxia or indifference con and meditation the not is reality of sense a losing and thoughts own our in lost completely Getting predisposed. thi not to is running of goal central the as content, material no haverunning while conceived impressions and thoughts Thenarrative. narrativizing of process the involve says (1998) Certeau what to opposed As city. the and body the about and of knowledge of production the as formulated be can running that section third the in introduced concept the to lead logically quite will space and body the on discussions These of a appear donot spatial experience that instatistics. essentials the but running of maps heat the on highlighted is what not is here interested am I city. What this in running for available spacesurban of variety the typologize Budapestand in long of consequences the discuss will I section visit not likely most would we places visiting and behind o stepping of way spatio unique same this but travelling of spatial characteristics the lacking space of through movement a as framework the using case comparative Berlin. and Budapest in democratization a through illustrate will I which zones conflict as themselves present often developments infrastructural how out point will I

ee rfr t refer I Here

main target of this spatial experience. Running implies the simultaneous presence of of presence simultaneous the implies Running experience. spatial this of target main - temporality is also something that enables running to be conceived as an exploration, a exploration, an as conceived be to running enables that something also is temporality ad hn r t gap ht h esnily non essentially the what grasp to try then and s

a a pbihd y h cetr f rnig n ccig plcto, Strava. application, cycling and running a of creator the by published map a o ut of our comfort zone, leaving the spatial constraints of our class relations relations class our of constraints spatial the leaving zone, comfort our of ut

centration (Seregi 2014/2: 603) which makes reaching a state of of state a reaching makes which 603) 2014/2: (Seregi centration

–

I suggest that the runner’s experience is essentially non essentially is experience runner’s the that Isuggest nk about anything and especially to not be emotionally be not to especially and anything about nk

The unique spatio unique The

5 -

term urban development projects for r for projects development urban term 2

(Retrieved: 3.6.2015. (Retrieved: - – temporality of running defines it it defines running of temporality - elcie hrceitc o the of characteristics reflective

was it not for running. In this this In running. for not it was –

tha t urban practices always always practices urban t

unning unning - 2

CEU eTD Collection valid interpretations cases. ofthese provide couldn’t simply I and me to inexplicable seemed thoughts and actions their of many in an as me for obstacle an became soon observation Participant space. to urban specifically space, relationship their on was focus my runners, of identity the or background social the of inste beginning, very the From bikers. of behalf remarkson sexist and tourists from runners events interesting some excursion Half Berlin the run to just time, short a for Berlin visited also I period spring the During Island. like spots Budapest, running across popular all visiting runs collective in participated also I milder became weather the As take carehowthey and ofthisbody construct abodyfor image running. suitable see runners how about lot a quite saying running of technique the supports it runners; for work background is training of type This injuries. prevent to posture better a and stability providing muscles core the strengthening Core occasions. more few a quite by followed then was which indoor an was subjects my with meeting first My Budapest. in runners with trainings of forms various in participated and 2015, January f began I runners. other of thoughts and activities the interpret and understand in an as communities running to access good with me provide tool. methodological main my as observation participant chose initially I myself, runner a Being - ru rsace. unr fr a ey eeoeeu cletv an collective heterogeneous very a form Runners researcher. group - Having the physical preparedness and personal history as a runner I assumed this would this assumed I runner a as history personal and preparedness physical the Having aahn n 29 on marathon I ran toget ran I her with different groups a groups different with her W th

hat I think about running when Ithink Ithinkabout hat and interactions with out with interactions and March –

finishing with a personal record. Apart from this brief brief this from Apart record. personal a with finishing

aá, ihra’ Bsin Ct Pr, n Margaret and Park, City Bastion, Fisherman’s Tabán, Methodology

themselves as physical bodies, how they intend to intend they how bodies, physical as themselves 6 c

ore t various places in Budapest in places various t - group members. I witnessed admiration for for admiration witnessed I members. group - training session on a cold day in January, January, in day cold a on session training

- - group member, allowing me to to me allowing member, group t raining is essentially aimed at aimed essentially is raining I a t amt that admit to had I d

and experienced and

edok in ieldwork ad ad CEU eTD Collection thinking about running. of way a process, thought a rather is it stories; personal of collection a of presentation the research of 2011). Bochner aspects and Adams (Ellis, canonical above described the challenging product a and process a as running about practice that suggest to seem might This years. five past the in experienced have I what about thinking started and spatio course t although project, my of theme main the as autoethnography so these using runners other of geography cognitive the or experience spatial the map to Trying representedamadness. asform of or happiness of source a as conceived is running how of exclamations superficial and images u are and itself running of nature the about of little very say pictures posting and results, online present their runners fronts different the terminology, (1990) about Goffman’s Using themselves. bragging groups larger of members few runner not is discourse dominant the misleadingbecause networks social in that is on early noticed I what but 199 (Wenger interest of communities and practice of communities both as served groups These groups. Facebook in mostly platforms, online various on runners of groups different Discourse runners. of activities online the analyze to tried I when striking quite became obstacles These re poe t b a ed n fr e s rne. t hs on I eie t tr to turn to decided I point this At runner. a as me for end dead a be to proved urces - temporal fram temporal also . But auto But .

nlss a as pr o te eerh rcs a I olwd h dsusos of discussions the followed I as process research the of part also was analysis related to related running ethnography becoming the dominant theme dominant the becoming ethnography Ti mas that means This . ework proved to be to proved ework

– the concrete materiality of a of materiality concrete the

n tu tikn aot running about thinking thus and

there is nothing running nothing is there

h dsusos n hs gop cn e extremely be can groups these in discussions the

constraining 7

fieldwork T

so I turned to my own story as a runner runner a as story own my to turned I so his approach doesn’t necessarily imply imply necessarily doesn’t approach his - specific. They us They specific. -

specific in running themed groups themed running in specific sually centered round narcissistic round centered sually –

simply I have just describe just have I e snily ean a solitary a remains ssentially e ae icse hr i of is here discussed case he

means that I that means ually include only a a only uallyinclude d. But this this But d. will think think will 8) 8) CEU eTD Collection and live runningas an experienceeveryday urban in life. and Adams to relate runner a as I (Ellis, how process thought a through expressing 2011), Bochner epiphanies personal my into insight an provide will I process writing the non this on reflecting sources primary as (2000), Nádas Péter writers, fiction Hungarian greatest the of one by running on writings or (2014/3) not is reflected. that intellectually something essentially is running how with conclude finally will I running on reflections intellectual of series a After elements. the with interactions various of significance sp a as running of practice the theorize to aim ofsections The that theactivity goal either. consist ofthe thesiswill form not is ofarticulation this but philosophy peripatetic with common in nothing has Running physical. essentially running of essence the grasp still can discussions These instance smoking. whiledrinking and health a as running of concept often discussions these and running of realm physical the from far occur usually that dialogues involves also running about Talking itself. performance the from distance considerable requires experience mental and physical running, of realm the outside articulated always are activity their on thoughts Runners’ substantial. more nothing but run morning a on like day a things planning in help practical little only provides usually running thoughts; those lost they tha run a during thoughts their in little lost were they claim runners When information. very produces running, while reflect to trying or running about Thinking reflective. activi physical the with do to nothing almost has which process social a is running about Thinking oretical frameworks. As I decided to integrate my whole world view as a runner into the into runner a as view world whole my integrate to decided I As frameworks. oretical y f unn isl. unn isl i a iet xeine smtig ht s non is that something experience, direct a is itself Running itself. running of ty wl ue et like texts use will I - ietl ad h event the and lifestyle

unfold in an environment that seems to contradict the contradict to seems that environment an in unfold 8 Piooh o Triat of Philosophy A

- reflective nature of running while providing providing while running of nature reflective atial experience and point out the social social the out point and experience atial

– - ie eprlt o running of temporality like

which is itself a itself is which

because processing the concrete concrete the processing because h lon

lso not something not lso by Tamás Seregi Seregi Tamás by spatial issues spatial t also means also t

–

for for - CEU eTD Collection very dif approach it so runners 3 indire an into transformed hig is but are ground the touching feet My space. surrounding my is this because indifferent be never can ground my become feet my running, While the form of experiences. sensual the in only abstract are that experiences abstract discuss will I here 605) (2014/2: Seregi Following as use to insufficient it makes I but runners for elements well as mediation space. urban in body the situating already by andunderstand spatial analyze getting way toknow, of fundamental spatial a is a elements spatial as with interacts running body my of how about nature Thinking experience. the understanding for necessary is process thought this i movement particular a performing while body the to do elements each of factors determining how to attention draw will I so doing by described; be can interactions o nature the how on focus and space in body the situate will I section first this In

Running as spatial experience: asspatial Running the between interaction Th

is is a very popular theme verypopular a is is in most cases, it is cases,it most in hly contested among runners. My runners. among contested hly sense that they are not concrete; but they are still encounters with the material world in in world material the with encounters still are they but concrete; not are they that sense

cannot be completely overlooked completely be cannot Tactile conflicts and theTactile and conflicts interaction spacessurfaces of between solid ferent from what from ferent ,

onig u sm o is ot important most its of some out pointing technologicallymediate

and can basically be considered a central issue in most online discussions between between discussions online most inissue central a considered be basically can and ct connection where the where connection ct argue

I have chosen. have I unn experience running

an interpretive framework of framework interpretive an

that mediation implies a implies mediation that

ot import most

but I will not go into too many details many too into go not will I but

direct relatio direct

Chapter 1 I will briefly examine the topic of technological of topic the examine briefly will I 9 d and the quality and quantity of this mediation this of quantity and quality the and d

Dsusn wa te id wtr r other or water wind, the what Discussing .

degree of mediation of degree orga tactile ant

nship between the ground and my and ground the between nship

lmnay f elementary

is bsc ee o conn of level basic first relations and this process cannot begin and process relations this physical elements thebody physical and further

unn s pta experience spatial as running ieaig n constraining and liberating s My ns. orms of tactile interaction tactile of orms degree of abstraction that abstraction of degree s not a trivial matter trivial a not

because it would imply an an imply would it because determines the spatial spatial the determines

small details become details small

relat osi t the to ionship ection to the the to ection

f various various f

feet is feet

and and .

3

CEU eTD Collection (Bordwell 4 T 602). (2014/2: ground the and air the between relationship the about of interaction the as running identifies Seregi sensations. primer other masking mediation technological of degree highest the to referring running, ground. the and feet the between erasi and experience running the of characteristics tactile so is descr often experience this ground; the and feet the between connection pace runner: the of speed the details the of awareness simultan experience tactile direct more of movement the of sensation clear a and running of technique the shoes. of awareness more for wearing allow shoes cushioned when lightly or Minimalist than connection tactile this to paid attention more much requiring i ground the and feet the between relationship the whichrun barefoot actuallyturns runnersrunning argue and Some primordial for of nature the shoes c running d long for options healthy providing of idea The ideologies. and experiences bodily different radically into manufacturers shoe between wars commercial distill and executed experience

The invisible style is a concept used in film theory to describe the describe to theory film in used concept a is style invisible The

strong that they basically take basically they that strong n ot f h cases the of most in entral this to

masks 1988). Te variou The . 4 ibed as runn as ibed

primary

body project.body ing on air or running on clouds. H clouds. on running or air on ing

forms s , concerns for profit and makes the question of choosing “the right” right” “the choosing of question the makes and profit for concerns

oemdae oto oe h et lo mle a implies also feet the over control mediated more making running a more unified experience while also determining also while experience unified more a running making .

Extremely cushioned shoes basically eliminate the tactile tactile the eliminate basically shoes cushioned Extremely f uhoig n he ifune h way the influence shoes in cushioning of

This experience could be defined as the invisible style of style invisible the as defined be could experience This

control over over control osy Mr saie he erase shoes stabile More eously.

individual parts of the feet; providing safety and a a and safety providing feet; the of parts individual 10

w sld ufcs hc i as essentially also is which surfaces solid two the movement of movement the t te rmr xeine f running, of experience primer the nto

style of style ere the mediating force of the shoes shoes the of force mediating the ere ng the sensation of a of sensation the ng –

classical Hollyw classical

favored by ultra by favored

the feet the he indirect relationship indirect he

; ood narrative fiction fiction narrative ood

this fragmented fragmented this

movements are are movements minimizing the the minimizing slightly confrontation - runners runners

istance istance slower slower –

is

CEU eTD Collection there because runner the for advantageous considerable disadvantages without situation (2000:221). handle to impossible is this and disproportionate becomes Running respiration. of rhythm the up speeds also up speeding that realized then this explains He downhill. running than better is uphill running that claims instance, for Nádas, breaking others by over taken or behind running: while relations spatial and the within runners body; the 601). (2014/2: form complete a in reached be never can that motion the of continuity the maintain and establish to running. of aspect fundamental another is the for Reaching short more challengingmore neutralsurfaces. or cross to orientationbetween the essentiallydifferentiates that factor determining the also is surface to relationship the but issues health on focus run porridge as mocked is Island Margaret the at because runners most for runners: for question neutral a never is running for Thi 216). (2000: engineer an of precision the with surface the of unevenness the measures gaze runner’s the of rigorousness the how about writes Nádasinteraction. of surfaces the qualityof the examine re already motion on elements the ground, the and body runner’s the between

by writing about how, at first he thought by running downhill he cannot lose energy but energy lose cannot he downhill running by thought he first at how, about writing by

the even flow and rhythm of running of rhythm and flow even the

oe unr ae od pil hl others while uphill good are runners some s is a very accurate observation as the quality of the particular surface used used surface particular the of quality the as observation accurate very a is s continuity

competitive collectivity of running of collectivity competitive Running uphill or downhill require downhill or uphill Running

no amount of cushioning can even that surface that even can cushioning of amount no

of the motion but always ending up in some state of state some in up ending always but motion the of .

Incline is dragging and pulling the bodies of the runners, it is is it runners, the of bodies the pulling and dragging is Incline present a conflict that becomes more apparent when we we when apparent more becomes that conflict a present oe unr cth p n tes pil hn r left are then uphill others on up catch runners some

Seregi even defines running as a as running defines even Seregi

11 by many of its users. Most debates on where to to where on debates Most users. its of many by , changing the stride, the pace and respiration. respiration. and pace the stride, the changing ,

cobble feet, the shoes and the effects of these these of effects the and shoes the feet, . Incline dictates the dynamism of social of dynamism the dictates Incline .

do - s country running or urban running;in urbanor running country stone can be considered a nightmare nightmare a considered be canstone

nil n these and wnhill completely d completely

ifferent techniques of of techniques ifferent

and the tar the and

hopeless struggle struggle hopeless relations

discontinuity tan track tan identify identify

is no no is

CEU eTD Collection office even http://www.runnersworld.com/boston and phenomenal” felt „breathing herit. for explanation overall no had while she disconnect this of elements weight” individual the identify clearly could she though dead like felt just „legs her said Flanagan Shalane 5 and spectatorsfaster!” “run always case scream: inthis slower!” means “run to euphoria, collective resist to is runnerbysurprise. the take alwaysbodythat the parts of inrandom pains aches little and catastrophesvarious 604), local (Seregi small 2014/2: an distributed always is itself disintegration This run. the of end the induce can It dangerous. the extremely by body my of disintegration complete the in be result and capabilities my of overestimation can pace own my find to trying of instead of beginning the at crowd the with Running pacing. and distance time, of terms in distributed be to has race the whole: a as conceived be cannot marathon a like run distance requirem long in goal important most the Perhaps another andathe runner. conflict for source ofdisintegration has crowd The crowd. a of part as or alone running when result different a with end surely almost R t side bright the run. particular the of characteristics the determine can which euphoria collective induces runners of pace the running. influence can that factors of number a are there before, mentioned have I As

lt rcr ae o xetos rm hs sal aatohs ihr Atr dsponig eut n Bos in result disappointing a After either. catastrophes small these from exceptions no are racers Elite unning the same distance with the same physical preparedness physical same the with distance same the unning a positive pulling effect, especially at the beginning of a race but this can turn into yet into turn can this but race a of beginning the at especially effect, pulling positive a

(Retrieved: 23.5.2015.) (Retrieved:

mle a ey ifrn sail xeine o te niiul oy Rnig race a Running body. individual the for experience spatial different very a implies ent of saving up energy for the final stages of the distance to be covered. A long A covered. be to distance the of stages final the for energy up saving of ent Needless to say, to Needless e crowd he

C

running alone, with alone, running s suc o pyia ad scia mtvto ad inspirat and motivation psychical and physical of source a is onfronting socialeuphoria:onfronting the c

- marathon/shalane

hold back the pace and interpret correctly what supporters what correctly interpret and pace the back hold - itne unn i ee pcn ta cud i the fit could that pacing even is running distance 12

- run flanagan

5

The biggest challenge of running in a crowda in running of biggestchallengeThe ning partner ning - on - her - boston

s rowd

or as part of a large crowd of of crowd large a of part as or by the same individual same bythe d it emerges in the form of of form the in emerges it d - marathon

- a

- bad - day - at h race, the - the

would -

ion. On On ton ton - CEU eTD Collection upc madethefor predictions 7 hard 6 atten pay must I experience. everyday our with resonates that something enough, drink to forget to instance, for easy, quite is It level. mental and physical a on both running of challenges greatest the of run a of end the at Water body. part of our W by action irrational an outsiders isactuallyrooted incoldest fo as perceived is what run; a during wear to what regarding made, decisions rational completely and planning careful of process the implies actually conditions months winter consistently throughout the running of requirement the so barrier mental ca conditions extreme with copehaving to of idea the and run for goout to decisionThe onawarm are cold why hands onlymy race exhaustingsomethinga afteran or fever like have I why know never will I me; to mystery a remain always will temperature body own t regarding consequences serious most the have canoverheating coolingor itself: body the of temperature the e and unpleasant challenging, the of activities R

This still remains one oft one still remains This This can be illustrated by how very often runners’ attention turns to weather forecasts and an awareness of the the of awareness an and forecasts weather to turns attention runners’ often very how by illustrated be can This unning in the winter, in a snowstorm or even in t in even or snowstorm a in winter, the in unning ater - fet f eprtr o te unrs body runner’s the on temperature of effect core runner’s identity. runner’s core is also a basic element that is always present, especially since it also constitutes a large a constitutes also it since especially present, always is that element basic a also is a ta pyia eprec. o ms runners most For experience. physical ctual ; but what is what but ; he general health conditions of a runner. For instance, the feedback I get from my from get I feedback the instance, For runner. a of conditions health general he Social, physical and mental physical Social, extremes:t the tion to the balance of water in my body at all times and must make efforts to to efforts make must and times all at body my in water of balance the to tion .

The simultaneous exter simultaneous The

perceived as socially as perceived he greatest challenges in running, making this a constitutive element of a so a of element constitutive a makingthis running, in challenges greatest he

oming days becomes a habit. a becomes omingdays can come come can

ven dangerous than running in the cold. The understanding of of understanding The cold. the in running than dangerous ven from outside or inside thebody; or from outside

keeping up mental up keeping rm of rationality. nal and internal presence of water constitutes one constitutes water of presence internal and nal extreme usually implies nothing extreme in terms in extreme nothing implies usually extreme 13

. lo mle tkn it cnieain the consideration into taking implies also he rain in the summer, are seen as extreme as seen are summer, the in rain he 6

However

xrm ha i mc mr physically more much is heat extreme

not physical strength is essential to be to essential is strength physical not emperature 7

, running under extreme weather extreme running under ,

either way either , air and rain and , air

Iam

always wet always wet - called called n be abe n

day. day.

CEU eTD Collection of B of terms in injuries for runners. elements the with interaction the of aspects dangerous most the of one is ice has basically truly Snow characteristics. rep hostile snow of softness the to compared element rigid hard, very Also a ice, weather, cold with associated snow. of blanket a in covered being of phrase the by expressed nicely linguistically characteristi the implies snow pace: slower a with operating snow be in to appears covered city whole the because disturbing considered be pace really slower this cannot but obtained pace regular a for allow don’t snow of characteristics material The diffi more becomes ground the from off taking as slower, running of pace the makes it that extent the to element, unpleasant an indeed is It misleading. quite also is conception this basicallyis a Snow a of gradual processoftransformation. part as motion, in constituted are particles specific all how of awareness perfect has that liquid from emerging form, solid a sculpture, a as almost constructed being me of feeling b can sensation this Instead, body. my on force dragging no exerts but running while body my of surface whole the covers rain interaction; the of result a as shape taking do from body my with interacting starts also it slippery ground the makes it as soon as but above, up from coming clearly is it rain of form the in direction: distinct very a has water sight first At even running can inthe rain lead todehydration. gain never lost, is that something always is water because threat serious a is granted for water Taking intake. fluid sufficient a maintaining by water of equilibrium the up keep reathing in air in reathing breath is only related to the choice of pacing and has nothing to do with the quality and and quality the with do to nothing has and pacing of choice the to related only is breath wn below. Rain falling on my body constitutes it as a three dimensional object slowly slowly object dimensional three a as it constitutes body my on falling Rain below. wn

and the rhythm of respiration is a basic sensation for runners but running out running but runners for sensation basic a is respiration of rhythm the and nother form of water that usually makes running seem socially extreme but but sociallyextreme seemrunning usually water that makes of form nother

14

resents harm no tothe body butslipping on cs of sleepiness, sleepiness, of cs e likened to a to likened e ed and ed cult. cult. CEU eTD Collection ex sea at 8 by exemplified tu be can wind the of work the through existence into coming only surfaces flat of constellation a of up made being body my of sensation This wind. the confronting vertically surface plain one the for oth except bracketed all interaction this During wind. the against facing always is surface flat out singled my and the wind the with interaction of the by constructed only is flattening surface This side. single a to reduced then is which polygon a of sides different resemble that surfaces plain of set a into abstracted be to seems body my Instead, water. of case the in like directions, all from body my surround actually doesn’t wind instances these can it but surface solid a not course of is Wind stronger. be to proves always wind the of effect exhausting negative, the equilibrium: in never are backwards body my pushing front, the from coming wind and that claimed be can it rule general a As water horizontallya isalmost hitting bodygiven my from direction. like feel I storm a in running while instance, for water, of trajectory the change and perceived e water with contact the of sensation the resemble doesn’t wind the with interactionThe ground. the with interaction the of conflict horizontal the to opposed as conflict vertical essentially an represents confronted wind the also is body my meantime the In 216). (2000: body runner’s the into flowing is world more outside the soulless and run, cold the otherwise of the rhythm sensually and pace the for required air the in breathing is runner the t that says he when beautifully experience this formulates also He respiration. available. air of quantity

I will not discuss this aspect in detail but training on a high altitude where the air is thinner and then competing competing then and thinner is air the where altitude high a on training but detail in aspect this discuss willnot I perience of most runners I belie I most runners of perience - level can be a considerable advantage for long distance runners. Because this is not part of the every the of part not is this Because runners. distance long for advantage considerable a be can level

induce a sensation that resembles pushing against something solid. In solid. something against pushing resembles that sensation a induce 8 ve it can be neglected for the most part. thefor neglected be veit can áa cam ta te unr s o crid y es u by but legs by carried not is runner the that claims Nádas

wind coming from behind, pushing my body forward forward body my pushing behind, from coming wind is water way the modify actually can it but ither 15 rning our face away in the wind: at this moment this at wind: the awayin faceour rning generating fricti generating

on by passing through air through passing by on r at o m bd are body my of parts er

he more evenly more he

and the the day CEU eTD Collection forward 11 breakingfor records. invaluable by pacemakers provided help thewhy explains which 10 the with interaction of surface the of running. for aspects itsarea significant windhas the minimizing but true entirely not course of is provid This body with. her interact because wind the of effect the decreases thin extremely 9 discussing am I world, artificial an and natural a between treadmill a on running material,essentially is that space a context general the was far so Idiscussed What the signif taken otherwise and invisible the wind the in running While there. situated often are spots running favorite their because more spaces to confronted often speed higher a implies Running cases. extreme very in except instance, for walkers, by noticed is that something in day windy a of awareness their by illustrated be can runners of perception heightened The Marathon. and Athens between course the or Marathon Boston the like destination, given a to direction one in headed point, starting the to returning field. the in running than exhausting and difficult more always is front up running that implies also which extent some small in running of functions social important most the of one is wind the against protection Seeking non almost is wind the from away turning side the and relevant is wind the facing side the only

rstn Papp Krisztina

This also has to do with the difficulty of setting the pa the setting of difficulty the with do to has also This cy A - existing. c

is mo is e de mv truh pc wt a ihr ae hn rne bt h pstoig f th of positioning the but runner a than pace higher a with space through move does ler er groups. During races following other runners can provide shelter from the wind to to wind the from shelter provide can runners other following races During groups. er icance of aicancebe rarelycan substance of understood. noticed re aerodynamic, especially in the case of road bikes. ofroad the case especiallyin aerodynamic, re 9 ,

poesoa Hnain long Hungarian professional a

. Even though I am not trying to frame this interaction as the opposition opposition the as interaction this frame to trying not am I though Even . 11

which intensifies the effects of the interaction; runners are also more also are runners interaction; the of effects the intensifies which Running de Running 10

This is even more important in the case of maratho of case the in important more even is This

- for open to the wind, like a riverbank or a larger plain surface surface plain larger a or riverbank a like wind, the to open -

granted characteristics of the environment are ceased and and ceased are environment the of characteristics granted so when Imention when so

- contextualized: the treadmill - distance runner would sometimes joke about how her being being her how about joke sometimes would runner distance 16 ce as opposed to following a pace set by someone else else someone by set pace a following to opposed as ce

and situatedness and

running

general. Most of the time this is not is this time the of Most general.

this es a smaller surface for the wind to to wind the for surface smaller a es context without

of the body while running while body the of

de

- contextualized

,

I n courses not courses n

simply e body bent bent body e

fo

m of rm mean mean

in CEU eTD Collection de running regarding here important t useful a remains still it and outside run not to excuses all eliminates it becausewinter the in treadmill the use still would I environment the onlyrunningrunnergaincan from a thing ona treadmill. of illusion the activity. physical for ideal be to considered is gym outside running when in results friction of lack This run. long a after holds de this things annoying most the of one sweating, of amount still which trajectory no has movement the another, to point the all of First physicalelement T interacti the about thinking makes and feet the and shoes the temperatures, extreme constraining or liberating either less much is there that implies incline and speed provided. is control of illusion minimized radically are body my and space between interaction of forms all be in running and running of the in running because briefly running i de his the only r only the ,

eliminating the positive effects of the of effects positive the eliminating

for runners and I will inevitably end up literally standing in a pond of my own sweat sweat own my of pond a in standing literally up end inevitably will I and runners for - otxulzd om f unn hs oe motn ipiain i trs of terms in implications important some has running of form contextualized

in elevant form of running by the majority of runners of majority the by running of form elevant

the streets of a busy city busy a of streets the

a given spatial surrounding, spatial given a control body is not travelling not is body s as well

on mkn te incr the making , allows for and even pacing, even and for allows

. an extremely warm summer day summer warm extremely an

A o fr pe o hl wrot i te itr Wa i more is What winter. the in workouts hill or speed for ool Uig h treadmill the Using . much higher degree of control over the elements, the over control of degree higher much - contextualized is that it raises awareness to the taken for for taken the to awareness raises it that is contextualized

. T . in any way any in non ae tlrne f oooy n de a in monotony of tolerance eased he elements elements he

-

wind place (Augé 1995) of a gym a of 1995) (Augé place also explain also 17

losing more wa more losing

cooling the body the cooling left for the body to do which can be seen as as seen be can which do to body the for left ,

These characteristics erase characteristics These is it provides that

aial eiiae te rbe of problem the eliminates basically why running outside is considered is outside running why not moving moving not also means that the air is completely is air the that means also distinguish running without context without running distinguish –

even though the temperature in a a in temperature the though even an even surface for the soles of of soles the for surface even an on with the ground irrelevant. irrelevant. ground the with on . When running on a treadmill treadmill a on running When . ter - otxulzto o running of contextualization . This leads to an to leads This .

in the form of sweat, of form the in through space space through

is the exact opposite opposite exact the is

- – contextualized contextualized the benefits of benefits the

i n return the return n

i n terms of of terms n increased one from

than

the to

CEU eTD Collection generated data of amount enormous The activities. their share and record to tools these use to lost getting enables location current our mediation. technological the of characteristics ou an thatpoints exploration such end isprecisely outatof it drawn the themap but experience spatial liberating a to lead also can map a on runs follow to ability the Having of rest reality perceived the and space of images abstract between fundamental a make to however, unable, are They runs. visualizing and routes are They covered. objective shoes, to opposed al become do accessories these earlier, from Apart developments technological important various of development and production the Beside conflicts these of number the to add only will space urban of specificities the and conflicts on based s of idea whole The equilibrium. in never also are themselves they effects, their like just domination, for competing be to seem conflicts These losses. of forms various on out while with interacts I elements The running. of context spatial the of characteristics granted ructuring andructuring reducing realitytoanabstract theperceived and world. closed

a run not only provide context, they induce a complex web of conflicts that result in result that conflicts of web complex a induce they context, provide only not run a

– tools for measuring for tools

as we will see in the next chapter. inthe next see aswill we

or navigating to areas we perceive as unfriend as perceive we areas to navigating or h differences the

P watches GPS rati nlzn ad uniyn sail experience spatial quantifying and onalizing Technologically m Technologically

induced by various forms of cushioning in in cushioning of forms various by induced performance strolling and discovering new places without the dangers of of dangers the without places new discovering and strolling

n mbl poe ps r potei dvcs providing devices, prosthetic are apps phone mobile and most part of the body rather than an extension of it. As it. of extension an than rather body the of part most

ht i t cag te ai eprec o running. of experience basic the change to aim that

ediated and documenting the exact amount of the distance distance the of amount exact the documenting and

18

In principle always having a map showing us showing map a having always principle In

spatial experiencespatial

shoes and clothes and shoes ly but in practice people only seem seem only people practice in but ly

as they essentially represent a way way a represent essentially they as

,

y producing by

t here are a number of number a are here patial interaction is is interaction patial shoes t the reductive

connection introduced maps of of

CEU eTD Collection http://dagadtkocsog.hu/frankfurti mind. the and 21.5.2015.) (Retrieved: body the of overus disintegration the the how of to example lead great can a is mediation story His signal. GPS the up pick to failed watch his 12 running in common more be to seem running of aspects technical the on discussions percei always are they run, a of aspects fundamental most the as present always are interactions of forms basic these that means simply quite case this in experience Primer like. be to supposed manythe apparent by quite made actually is this running; about natural nothing is There artificial. the and natural the between distinction a make to want don’t I experience primary a is chapter this in discussed elements claimi By contested. and debated continuously both is which are here discussed body the soc and and intersubjective space between conflicts and interactions The of their coexistence. comp the eliminating sense, single one to them reduce or senses the down turn so doing by and environment the with interactions the to up it opening of instead itself, onto body the tech of forms these However, form. distilled scientifically a in results desired the to leads zone prescribed the functions various for determined are Pu body. the over control and of knowledge to claims positivist suggest control pulse using running of idea the and monitor rate heart a of use The functions. bodily dictate and measure to used be also can mediation Technological knowledge at is, best,the butit of production the of form the take can running of mediation technological the that suggests

In one of his blog posts a runner called DK describes how he completely lost control of a marathon race after after race marathon a of control lost completely he how describes DK called runner a posts blog his of one In e i a non a in ved

nological mediation can also be the source of disintegration as they close close they as disintegration of source the be also can mediation nological

-

articulated form but always allow for further reflection. Even though though Even reflection. further for allow always but form articulated ial, forming a web of networks around the individual’s running body body running individual’s the around networks of web a forming ial,

collection of knowledge. debates on what natural running is or what a natural stride is stride naturala whator runningnaturalis what on debates –

like weight loss or increasing speed speed increasing or loss weight like lse control basically means that heart rate zones zones rate heart that means basically control lse 19

12

ng that the interaction with the the with interaction the that ng –

e of technological technological of e and running in in running and - kesergo/ kesergo/ lexity lexity CEU eTD Collection anddiscussions talkabout the fundamentalsexperience. ofrunning as spatial these of background and foreground the of positioning the change to is aim my communities,

20

CEU eTD Collection broken by or present some also are There run. a of quality the of signifiers important charac rhythmic these of complexity the Other 602). (2014/2: movement the execute to attempt I smoothly how matter no down, falling and flying landing, and off taking of up made characteristics rhythm; this in continuity no is there argues, Seregi as but, rhythms of totality a is It fails. and gravity challenges Running upheld. permanently be cannot phase this flying, of phase a having by walking from distinguished be can running possi not course of is This 602). 2014/2: (Seregi flying of state the establish to attempt an as conceived be can it and rhythms of combination a of up made is Running projectsexperience.urban on t and politics spatial the of question is city the in running of aspect important Another event. or situation a of temporality the and location particular a of spatiality the to related always is that vision of materiality (2000) Lynch by coined city the of image the how to them connect and infrastructure urban of elements basic the of some discuss briefly will I running urban contextualize to chapter, previous the in used more has running the Following zone. conflict a within body the situate as which it to aspects primordial defined experience spatial The city. the in runs one when happens urban of topic the approach runni simply cannot we chapter previous the in seen have we As

interac ng Running as urban experience: asurban Running t :

I might listen to listen might I by presupposing that the body is already situated in urban space and analyze what what analyze and space urban in situated already is body the that presupposing by t with other people. other with t bridges,

and

my theimage be city will distorted by of music –

s osrce. n hs section this In constructed. is

I will almost surely be halted by halted be surely almost will I

– he consequences of authoritarian decisions and development and decisions authoritarian of consequences he

but I don’t because I find this single rhythm too dominant too rhythm single this find I because don’t I but he teristics: heartbeat and heartbeat teristics: Chapter 2

unique spatio unique 21

- t il las ae h sequential the have always will it temporality city of

I will also discuss the concrete concrete the discuss also will I traffic lights, lights, traffic

respiration tunnels

variable rhythms of the body the of rhythms .

are always there as there always are rhythmic continuity will be be will continuity ble: even though even ble:

running

approach approach elements –

a term a add to add –

CEU eTD Collection 13 andallows forof an theconstruction spatial topography invisible exploration of urban space. th in Running 2) (2000: pattern.” coherent a into organized be can and recognized be can parts with its which ease “the or city the of legibility the calls Lynch what construct I how is perception pic bigger a to add they city, a see I how of elements constitutive all are These 3). (2000: landmarks and districts nodes, edges, paths, between distinguishes Lynch space city of elements basic the discussing When I as 120) 1974: (Gould ignorance” of “tube a in not certainly Iam car; a of components essential are that obstacles of kinds all by blocked not 216). (2000: seen is what and sees runner “the writes he when precisely so grasps Nádas that experience fundamental the up make eyes my and body running my of coexistence The of frustration. t and ground the with conflicting relationship this within position my of confidence the lose I aids, visual these lacking am I dark the in running While me. to clear became vision peripheral of significance sam the cover to time more much me pollution light avoid to likely lit poorly quite are streets the instance, for Berlin, In accordingly. stepping by out abou are feet our surface the of unevenness of kind what predict can We feet. our below surface the of quality the about idea clear a have we and it at looking not are we when even ground, the see can we that fact the by exemplified easily be can This runn while orientation of tools helpful most the of one is vision peripheral our on Relying

All translations from a Hungarian fromHungarian a All translations 13

e city is an ideal form of contemplation due to its unique temporality which which temporality unique its to due contemplation of form ideal an is city e Instead of an abstract, tube abstract, an of Instead his will result in a much slower pace of running and in a considerable amount considerable a in and running of pace slower much a in result will his

– o ture of my image of the city. Another visual quality of my my of quality visual Another city. the of image my of ture

riginal are my are own. riginal and when I was running there in the dark I noticed that it took it that noticed I dark the in there running Iwas when and dsac. t a ol a ta mmn, hn the when moment, that at only was It distance. e - like vision I am able to turn my head; my vision is vision my head; my turn to able am I vision like 22

ol b wie rvlig n n airplane. an on travelling while be would t to touch and we can even it it even can we and touch to t is also moving” also is –

most most ing. ing.

CEU eTD Collection arever cross regarding 218) (2000: me of instead run my about decisions make to enough running the of most as aremore cities in surfaces important, that not is surface the controlling running urban For running. while perceived is space way the regarding implications some have does it because mo slightly is nature like don’t city I the because in run I that Arguing running. urban behind motivation personal own my justify to enough be might to, want I because here live I and here live I because city big a in run I cross not why ask: first must we context urban the specify To them becomesa challenge, less my ofthus pace decreases. no am I streets zigzagging narrow, in Running motion. the down slows space, of in closing and down narrowing the spirit, same the In something. approaching at targeted always is space for pulling aexerting by remaining running of pace the up speeds shortest space extended More itself. infinity as perceived the is distance when stages, final the in goal the approaching actually I’m when Long running. for implications have does it driving, about written originally was this Although (1965). city” the and man the between size in disparity the neutralize to “begins interaction and element liberating a implies space large with confronted Being 13). (1965: space” of mastery personal of sense “the from derives that adequacy of feeling a implies space vast a by confronted being that claiming sensation, visual strongest the as define Myer andLynch Appleyard, longer trying to approach infinity and as the objects surrounding me come closer, reaching reaching closer, come me surrounding objects the as and infinity approach to trying longer - distance running extends space into inf into space extends running distance y rarely flooded. Orientation in a city we know can be a lot easier than finding our way way our finding than easier lot a be can know we city a in Orientation flooded. yrarely ce on the body. This can be explained by the fact that movement through movement that fact bythe explained be can This body.the on ce Approaching thequestion:run cities?Approaching why in

even than the ones in nature. Weather conditions are rarelyextreme nature. conditions Weatherin ones the than even - country running. City streets are usually cleaned from snow and snow from cleaned usually are streets City running. country the relation between the observer and a largeenvir a and observer the between relation the e uiu bt wl nt r t hd ti factor this hide to try not will I but dubious re inity. I can never see the end of the run the of end the see never can I inity. 23

–

an important experience for Nádas for experience important an - country running? country

the authors add that this that add authors the

Claiming that Claiming – onment onment

except CEU eTD Collection city a to projected were events al This event. urban an as marathon the reconfigure to way a became marathon city big the 1970s, the in Beginning running tospatial sphere butless vital experience inasocial itself. To activity. urban an proces as this understand emerged historically running how explain not does however, approach, simplified radically This activity. urban essentially an became running cities, big in as And do. professionals educatedhighly that something be to considered is running why explains which insufficient are alone factors three these of each out, points (2000) Serravallo As time. free of use the regarding decisions to needed is status social or Power extent. great a to vary can equipment on spent money the and training with spent time the though even equipment, and activity the perform run to able be to need people What not sufficient itself. in limited extremely is villages under can we this From city. the of lives grandmother my where Szentes, or up discoveries space enough offer cities big that fact the to due above listed dispositions bodily the of characteristics fundamental The Iwhereable orpeople tofindoforientation toask am, points case in be would I because me to alien completely city a in running safer feel even would I nature. in . Quite simply, if I start running in smaller town smaller in running start I if simply, Quite . –

is I hl poie oe itrcl otx wih s ia fr situating for vital is which context historical some provide shall I s so implied a change in scale when these initially small initially these when scale in change a implied so . time, power, time,

Recreational running is essentially an urban activity. This is largely largely is This activity. urban an essentially is running Recreational . However, physical space is a necessary basic resource which is which resource basic necessary a is space physical However, . - ie tg. h ms iprat osqec o ti re this of consequence important most The stage. wide tn that stand and income. Long income. and –

highly educated professionals are often concentrated often are professionals educatedhighly pr fo bsc hscl blte ad the and abilities physical basic from apart – 24

experience of running are running of experience I will very soon find myself outside the border border the outside myself find soon very will I

h etn o epoain n ml tws or towns small in exploration of extent the to run and enough space to make new new make to space enough and run to - distance running consists of training of consists running distance –

like Kecskemét, where I grew I where Kecskemét, like be able to make autonomous make to able be

I getlost.

determined by all the all by determined -

scale minority minority scale

il to will - CEU eTD Collection trainings their and workout their of components differentiate quantitative to and way qualitative systematized the between and sophisticated a have runners this, to opposed As school, runerrands, goal absolutely as seen is walking perspective this From somewhere. get actually to space conquering of terms in pointless completely look route running time the of Most destination. no has it because travelling not is it but space through moving of form a is it activity;oriented goal a not is running believe I runner I As conflict. of source a as seen also is runner the spe the between difference the and walking to compared flexible less it making activity, the of goal the is forward Moving pace. and route the of optimization the on of I was re was running urban Thus 61). (2010: practice” to cities big elite mass of a as particular, in marathon the and general, in centers running of practice the “reconfigure busy the in living of desirability general the emphasizing races, successful the of ideals class the This and 61). (2010: running professional” of practice the between affinities of series a “suggesting Marathon City York New the transform to geography subtle a used Lebow, Fred ci organizing figures prominent most the of One 60). (2010: projection” this of part essential an was places iconic more city’s a of backdrop the against it placing and streets main and visible highly a of members became gradually runners that was running of conceptualization argue that runni that argue ten contested. Non contested. ten - conceptualized as a signifier ofconceptualized as social status. stream group. As Latham and McCormack argue, “taking the marathon out on to the the to on out marathon the “taking argue, McCormack andLatham As group. stream Moving without travelling: without Moving t ng has a unique temporality the most the temporality unique a has ng

do grocerydo shopping. - runners would argue that running is goal is running that argue would runners - eae apoc bcm te i the became approach related

s returns to their starting point which makes them makes which point starting their to returns s he 25 - unique unique oriented: people usually walk to get to work, work, to get to walk usually people oriented: upgraded within the framework of class and class of framework the within upgraded

temporality running of important characteristics important - oriented because it is focused is it because oriented el eid organizing behind deal ed of the walker and and walker the of ed

ty marathons, marathons, ty of which are are which of - CEU eTD Collection 4.6.2015. Retrieved: http://www.copenhagenize.com/ 14 w the determine to power the has issues specific to given name the that argues Landry city creative the of tools conceptual important most the discussing When space friendly more terms a infrastructure. in little issufficient ofbuilt pedestrian m to attempts some least at makes that city any respect this in cities; of livability general the regarding definition precise very a need don’t we like be should or would running any to applied walker a of characteristics general the that is suggest running for ideal are cities all that mean not does This nonsensical. thi and transportation of form a not is it destination, given a with space through movement a not is running that is argument running. Copenhagenize cannot you simply: that argue I section this In be likened flaneur tothose ofthe 1999). (Benjamin t makes elementsgiven Even thedifference atathough ofthese moment. between activities thespeeds the with interaction the and body my about feel I how to according lengthened, or shortened for and itself in is running of goal the But body. the of state and mind of state different a in point starting the to returns runner the that argued be well very can it and indeed, journey, a is It travelling. s be can running Thus variability. of degree high a imply

oehgnz.o i a est pooig „Bi promoting website a is Copenhagenize.com his connection seem less self less seem connection his The democratizationThe of t space and - tef I as a also It itself.

pleasant running environment. To have a rough idea of what a city ideal for for ideal city a what of idea rough a have To environment. running pleasant

running has no spatia no has running llows for spontaneous alterations of the route, the run can be be can run the route, the of alterations spontaneous for llows

mks h cnet f h runner the of concept the makes s - evident, these elements of urban strolling by runners can runners by strolling urban of elements these evident,

26 14 cycle Urbanism for Modern Cities. Since 2007” 2007” Since Cities. Modern for Urbanism cycle

l politics l y ot motn cam o upr this support to claim important most My he spatial politics running he spatial of

- redy r biker or friendly

of its own, or to formulate it quite quite it formulate to or own, its of ummarized as moving without without moving as ummarized – ay they are treated in in treated are they ay -

friendly city almost almost city friendly - what I am trying to to trying am I what friendly city can be be can city friendly

ake urban urban ake - CEU eTD Collection 16 itself). concept vague very the fits idea general the a of 15 confines the within place take only could automobility of subversion temporary the and event formalized a is race The 572). (2014: entails” normally transgression that risks tra being of pleasure “the with participants provides which 575) (2014: mobility “the where mobility, event unique a is race road a that argues Cidell I case,Mass, particular Bike orinthis event. Budapest the cy a and running in race road a of characteristics the of some compare briefly will I this illustrate To running. about sectarian slightly something is there that admit to have even I lines. these along typified be cannot runners and either generalized real no be cannot motivations its can run, to decision the rationalize cannot there you As running. for activism that implies also which decision, individual an and issue personal spectato a being after running started who anyone of heard even or met never have I least At running. start to anyone convince cannot you but running behind ideology profound a is definitely There Ias shortly will space of democratization the of terms in planning urban and development urban to specific running nothing is there that implies This planning. urban of 164) (2000: consequences” infras ‘hard’ and of rule engineers authoritative the positioning whole, a as space urban to approach creative a 164), (2000: domain” “humane the of assessment the calls he what is here for argues Landry What thu issue the of aspect one only into turned be could transport public and cars of movement the accessibility or connections communication, 164). (2000: practice

Watching a race on tv might be a different issue but the image presented there is essentially about elite racing. racing. elite about essentially is there presented image but the different a issue be mighttvon race a Watching because here deliberately it using I’m but necessary is city creative the of concept the to approach critical A

point out in thecomparative outin point caseof the upcoming section. r in a road race, for instance. for race, road a in r

15

He suggests that by calling the transport department the department of department the department transport the calling by that suggests He tructure issues as only the “important secondary technical technical secondary “important the only as issues tructure

f h runner the of 27 16 s prioritizing walking, talking and networking. networking. and talking walking, prioritizing s

The decision to run always remains a deeply a remains always run to decision The - friendly city (the creative city being a vague idea idea vague a being city creative (the city friendly

ln eet lk te Critical the like event, cling nsgressive without the without nsgressive

is

the event” the

be – -

CEU eTD Collection this connection. emphasize to colors national wearing were also runners of the Many flags. national of waving by the signaled runn of names the by indicated was This runners. particular some to least or at running, with relationship intimate an had of spectators the all almost that impression the had still but I experience memorable a was be cannot 17 run a that implies element utopian of lack The run. each of uniqueness the and 579), (2014: races” event road the stressing to element utopian deliberately no is “there that argues Cidell strangelyto customized, rundown or mutant even ones. technica the mind BP and Bike people, elderly I children, small city. families, were the there task: in this in succeeded bikes their use to people encourage to and subculture cycler the important most Its assemblage. biker a of case the in nature subversive a have does really 1996) (Bakhtin element carnivalesque and race roada bit: a for celebration word the to cling To celebration. a as rather conceived was it demonstration; a be to meant wasn’t Budapest Bike I that year this emphasized organizers the example: an as case Hungarian the take To community. a into demonstrationbiker a this to Compared remains only topic a therunning relevantwithin community. discussion only The race. p a during reaffirmed finally then contested, and renegotiated is that status social this precisely is It 139). (2000: status” social a is runner a being effort, individual an is imp more even is What runners. other with competition fierce round centered not is it that extent the to least at true; is which 138) (1980: experience” alienating than rather integrating socially a is “racing that emphasize discussin When 581). (2014: transgression” “sanctioned roblem with projecting this status is that it is not oriented toward the outside world, as it it as world, outside the toward oriented not is it that is status this projecting with roblem

The cheering of thousands of people by the roadside while I w I while roadside the by people of of thousands cheering The of

taking over the city; the Critical Mass is a celebration aiming celebration a is Mass Critical the city; the over taking ers the spectators had written on posters and by the broader context of national identity national of context broader the and by posters on written had spectators the ers l aspects of cycling of aspects l - ie character like

ortant, however, is what the authors later add: “while running “while add: later authors the what is however, ortant, sis f rc, h non the race, a of istics

goal is to draw in people who are otherwise not part of of part not otherwise are who people in draw to is goal –

people riding a great variety of bikes; from high from bikes; of variety great a riding people –

like a Critical Mass Critical a like 2 8

as running a half a running as - eurn tmoaiy f h event the of temporality recurring g road races Altheide and Pfuhl Pfuhl and Altheide races road g –

is all aboutp integrating all is

is the celebration the is to

- 17 take over the city. The The city. the over take marathon race in Berlin race Berlin in marathon

–

to keep in in keep to of

running eople eople - tech tech ,

CEU eTD Collection of number the on statistics by underpinned be can claims These relations. hierarchic these of semi the at somewhere positioned be best at can Budapest hierarchy, urban global While arguewill an for integrated approach. I and Berlin and Budapest cities, two in work spaces segregated and integrated functionally di urban join to opportunity the and possible made is interaction where spaces of establishment the to compared factors secondary are investments or design aesthetics, sense this In 268). (2000: experience” day a against participatory and h consultativeincomprehensible”“technocratic anddiscipline, more is that planning urban for argues Landry communication. and exchange for place a space, discursive a essentially also is it setting; does space Public 119) (2000: milieu.” innovative the of heart “multi the as Landry by defined sphere, or space public of realm the within them situate first must we running, for developments infrastructural contextualize To IIn approach. section the next trywhat tospecify will I exactly by that. mean holistic a and integration of primacy the implies and running to specific not is mostly which space are runners a think is need I does running but leisurely everyday them What this. know with comfortable we as cities transform to ability the have doesn’t running that is races road by highlighted is What event. an just be an to is want doesn’t It event. single a to tied be cannot essentially that something life, urban event impact the and space of occupation permanent the signalcan lanes bike like space in codified or repeated - specific but it has a more global aim which is to make cycling a fundamental part of part fundamental a cycling make to is which aim global more a has it but specific eln s an is Berlin I nfrastructural zones developments asconflict of the transformation made to the city. I Bike Budapest or Critical Mass itself is itself Mass Critical or Budapest Bike I city. the to made transformation the of absolutely central city to running among the ve the among running to city central absolutely lge i cetd I te et eto I il ics how discuss will I section next the In created. is alogues

29

aving very “little meaning in terms of day of termsto in meaning aving “little very

in

Budapest and ’ ol poie physical a provide only n’t ry few at the top of the the of top the at few ry - faceted concept at the the at concept faceted

eortzto of democratization

Berlin - event that that event

periphery periphery CEU eTD Collection c frequented the implies place that argues Cresswell most ghetto. elite an basically is Budapest in the space running Island, Margaret purpose, on using am I framework radicalized the are segregated Creating framing and runninga routine. as monotonousness increasing discovery, of possibilities the limiting running it making 3). 1996: (Cresswell, “ “a where markers, authoritative but nothing are po a with in born was I town small country, whole the to extended Bikás Pa around track long km 5.3 the Island Margaret is these of representative most The country. the over all area designated of creation the is Hungary in runners targeting developments the of specificity peculiar A both urban space and running. of understanding deeper a lacks activism of kind this but run to motivation initial the with p provide can running for space a of development infrastructural spectacular A running. to applies also this extent some to and 142) (1998: things do and believe people make can i developments infrastructural the all despite city friendly runner more much a be to Berlin consider I why by well. as experience personal ann events running biggest the in participants ombination of the spatial with the social, transforming it into social space but space social into it transforming social, the with spatial the of ombination expectations rk, Óhegy as clearly visible as possible as visible clearly as

f eair ht eae psto i a oil tutr t atos n space in actions to structure social a in position a relate that behavior of n Budapest. Certeau writes that urban narratives are powerful instruments that instruments powerful are narratives urban that writes Certeau Budapest. n s spatially and symbo and spatially s –

but shorter tracks can be found scattered all over Budapest: there is one in one is there Budapest: over all scattered found be can tracks shorter but

Park,

These places mark places These as for runners contradicts the idea of a runner a of idea the contradicts runners for as

Kopaszi Dam, After running for several months in both cities both in months several for running After

there is an 800m tarta 800m an is there pulation of no more than 30,000. I argue that these space these that argue I 30,000. than more no of pulation lically manifested by the by manifested lically

. This also implies an official production of space for for space of production official an implies also This . Városmajor the separation of spaces bas spaces of separation the 30 ually held in these two cities and by individual individual by and cities two these in held ually

sense of the proper the of sense

and to illustrate how the conceptand howhasbeen toillustrate the n running track even in Szentes in even track running n tartan running tracks running tartan ” ed on different functions different on ed

- is im is friendly city and within within and city friendly plied and there are there and plied

I was still puzzled puzzled still I was

if these spaces these if emerging emerging eople eople –

the ” s ,

CEU eTD Collection 18 in skateboarders, windsurfers, their grilling people a 269) make (2000: to happy” desire community a by “driven essentially is but Budapest, in place “free” fancy, a Dam, alon constructed not is Tempelhof spatial segregation. freedom, of area messag the large this of anything build to investors want not did Berlin of people the that and referendumwas stake The essentially spaces. democratized is of that creation the 142) for 1998: responsible (Certeau, credibility” urban of management democratic park public a now Berlin, Tempelhof of use future the over referendum The Island. Margaret of case the in seen have we like it, maximizing of instead 269); 2000: (Landry implementation” process active an “requires planning urban why understood I that Berlin in also was It was. there running of experience spatial the flowing freely how relaxing, and smooth how noticed I framework this all about think to started only I use a public transportation, carfavored a running spot. or biketotravel betweenfunctional andnon pat unified a following of instead that implies this point runners the From users. and uses between clashes to reduced also is practices non and (1996: ideological.” “ ev te neet o toe t h tp f oil hierarchies social of top the at those of interests the serve

The park is simply referred to in Ger to is simply park referred The - unr t te iiu, hs h udrtnig ewe tee ifrn spatial different these between understanding the thus minimum, the to runners

of participation to develop consensus by minimizing or resolving conflict over over conflict resolving or minimizing by consensus develop to participation of 18

not even cultural facilities like libraries like facilities cultural even not

3) sausages in the rain. There is no sign of conflict here between bikers, bikers, between here conflict of sign no is There rain. the in sausages

Margaret Island reduces the possibility of int of possibility the reduces Island Margaret - – functional areas. This division also explains why alsoexplains functionaldivision runners areas. This so many

provides a perfect example for how public spaces “require a a “require spaces public how for example perfect a provides - line skater, walkers, dogs, children and people just having a a having just people and children dogs, walkers, skater, line man as “Tempelhofer Freiheit”. “Tempelhofer manas – g the demarcation lines of consumerism either, like Kopaszi likeeither, consumerism of lines demarcation gthe

when I started running in Berlin and within this relational this within and Berlin in running started I when oehn ta i vr wl vsbe hn o rn past run you when visible well very is that something 31

h during urban exploration space is divided divided is space exploration urban during h

–

also conceived as signifiers of signifiers as conceived also ,

they eraction between runners runners between eraction

a b dsrbd as described be can –

a former airpo former a

e of this this of e - of view view of rt in rt CEU eTD Collection 2000 leg the Budapest of case the In runners. for has this consequences this In I routes. section running of terms in variety greater a for allows distances longer Running but the attempts made can todoso result inarewarding experience. explora urbanof form the inunknown the I into thatventure do to capabilities physicalhaving the and status social my and relations class my embeddedness, social my behind leave deliberately m discoveries of extent the limit habits running and workout one during runner a by covered be can that distance the limit abilities physical limitations: major two essentially are there cases these In running. middle their of out move really don’t they and constraining) as it perceive even don’t probably (they Island Margaret on track running constraining the from free break to want really don’t runners community.Most running whole likely most is here with dealing am I what so runners of majority the constitute actually might people These regularly. activity the practice do they though even Therearea few quite right thecity to the for fight a implies also This like. be to supposed are spaces public what of vision strong only can politics spatial specific having not but own; its of politics spatial no has truly running sense this In interactions. informal and mingling for allowing th from Berlin in spaces “running” differentiates what up, sum To music. playing or picnic ose in Budapest; is that they are not running spaces at all. They are essentially integrated, essentially are They all. at spaces running not are they that is Budapest; in ose Leaving the elite ghetto behind: running theelite routesLeaving behind: ghetto : 2) can be considered quite exceptional. This clarity of the cityscape is structured is cityscape the of clarity This exceptional. quite considered be can 2) : tion. Leaving behind social structure social behind Leaving tion. il ics wa Bdps hs o fe i ti rset n wa kn of kind what and respect this in offer to has Budapest what discuss will –

not to infrastructuralnot to development.

runners who don’t run much more than5 whorunners don’t runmuch d drn rn. raig ih ais a atal ma ta I that mean actually can habits with Breaking runs. during ade - cla

completely 32 ss neighborhood to make new discoveries while discoveries new make to neighborhood ss

and urban developmentand

while running is of course impossible course of is running while - 10km during a single workout,10km duringa single

ibility of the city (Lynch city the of ibility not representative of the the of representative not be achieved by having a having by achieved be

in Budapes in by the the by t

CEU eTD Collection occupying while don hill of training Hill workouts. variety great a offer can Buda precisely more Budapest, flat, completely is which the leave to easy so is it because precisely intriguing so was which behind!” city the “leave said that slogan poster a saw once I runs alongareas oftown. intheoutskirts large frequented areas, outer run by mostly in running for places many also are there locality of concept the on up Following dangerous. be to considered often is it and locality particular a to attached by characterized and tourists middle are Park City and Island Margaret While relations. class of spatial distribution however, tothe contribute, green do acity. They global of image to amore but running for venues great are Park People’s or Park City countries European c before, this to alluded have I As spatial experiencerunn of long how examine and opportunities and will I section this In riverside. the and hills to areas Budapest believe Danube. the along organized all are which area central the in Parliament the and Hill Gellért Bridge, Chain the Island, Margaret the like landscapes ex wonderful of a pattern provides related Budapest a 3) as (2000: grasped symbols.” visually recognizable be “can it if legible is city a that claims Lynch well constructing Danube, e onany i nclining surface. I nclining surface. ners from the given district like Óhegy Park in Kőbánya and Rákos Creek that Creek Rákos and Kőbánya in Park Óhegy like district given the from ners

and carving out an alternative space and drawing considerable drawing and space alternative an out carving and also Budapest is still lagging behind in terms of green areas. Margaret Island, Margaret areas. green of terms in behind lagging still is Budapest

fes n xetoa varie exceptional an offers is an important part of every runner’s training regimen and it and regimen training runner’s every of part important an is ing inBudapest. - recognizable images that can be organized into a coherent pattern. coherent a into organized be can that images recognizable n cities running up steps is asteps is greatn cities running up topractice running way hill the dominance of leisure activities, People’s Park is more more is Park People’s activities, leisure of dominance the

city behind in the case of Budapest. As opposed to Berlin to opposed As Budapest. of case the in behind city om - ae t bg iis n ay N many in cities big to pared term urban developmental projects can influence the influence can projects developmental urban term

33

ty

typologize

f pcs o running, for spaces of

Apart from this very clear image, clear very this from Apart

they still can’t contribute enough enough contribute can’t still they

some of some - class areas frequented by by frequented areas class ample of identifiable identifiable of ample

these running spaces spaces running these orthern or Western Western or orthern

rm lt urban flat from

attention to attention

can be be can I ,

CEU eTD Collection goal t tracks, running isolated relatively city. a speed the on depending long, minutes 180 to 90 typically is that run a is This weekend. the for scheduled usually run, long slow, the is these of important most The week. per trainings most what Following allofthesevisit asingle places journey. within would running not anyone that unlikely highly also is it and offer to has Bridge Chain the and si is It area. the in freely around roaming goats of peace the disturb can nothing and 1960s the in somewhere stopped literally time where place a is it but peninsula a only is Island People’s non the from T about. complained have critics hub cultural existing actually an be to appears bridge railway T and Theater National the area this to coll be. can riverbank locate areas different radically how discover and Coast unique absolutely w of closeness The a farther are bit thewithin citybut still outof Hármashatárhegy, and Normafa is there Then quiet. and peace perfect of perspective the from t in the activity. nd current goals of the runner which means it allows for covering quite large areas in the in areas large quite covering for allows it means which runner the of goals current nd mply stunning what the same river characterized by the canonical images of the Parliament Parliament the of images canonical the by characterized river same the what stunning mply he heart of the city the of heart he ection of luxury apartments in t in apartments luxury of ection - retd ucin These function. oriented Even though there are some hard workouts every week, typically interval training in in training interval typically week, every workouts hard some are there though Even

But Buda has so much more than that to offer. to thanthat But somuch more Budahas - lc (A place

in this respect. You can run all along the riverbank from Csepel to Római Római to Csepel from riverbank the along all run can You respect. this in o isac tee s aia os na te oten ala bridge, railway northern the near Coast Marina is there instance For ater riig ln pecie n vrg aaer unr yial hs five has typically runner amateur average an prescribe plans training : you can look down from the top of it and see a bustling city below below city bustling a see and it of top the from down look can you :

g 19) f uuy t h Mrn Cat a opsd o t name its to opposed as Coast: Marina the at luxury of 1995) ugé is also an important factor for runners and t and runners for factor important an also is

are mostly casual workouts with a leisurely pace, where the the where pace, leisurely a with workouts casual mostly are he aspe he he middle of nowhere of middle he he majority of traini of majority he e aae f rs iutd ih nx t yt another yet to next right situated Arts of Palace he cts of time of cts achable distance.achable 34

- travel are also only a f a only also are travel d so close to each other by the same the by other each to close so d ngs on a typical typical a on ngs , overlooking the Danube. Compared Danube.Compared the overlooking , The Gellért The

–

the lack of which so many so which of lack the he Danube is something is Danube he

Hill is Hill week ew minutes away minutes ew

literally situated literallysituated have

no such such no

a

CEU eTD Collection and Budapest of citizens the between relationship pedestrians to over handed be finally can traffic transit of load the carrying side) Pest the on riverbank one only likely (most riverbanks the straightforward and route. single one creating and lines HÉV separate Csepel. to Szentendre from system transportation public to long all of idea central the If the river, a visualsym 169) dev is connections and transportation of improvement The area. in consequences has also will which (2013: 172) riverbank the by launched be can projects building floods against protection of An form efficient intertwined. an is closely developments these are all project of precondition that important in covered goals the all and 2030 by executed ur of axis accentuated an as islands) the and riverbanks (the Danube Long The destruction the outside ofour realms spatial horizon here an provides which wayof amount exceptional the on hills to detours some taking and riverbank the following different the of Many explorations. initiating routes alternating are monotony, break to variation of source only gether with the Danube” the with gether elopment which not only involves only not which elopment

. This is all p all is This . are the in the are

(2013: 180) (2013: - Term Urban Development Plan Development Urban Term . Another important goal is to provide accessibility to the riverbank for pedestrians goal accessibilityriverbankpedestrians important for toprovide . Another tothe is - between areas between art of an integrated approach that could change the relationship of the city to city the of relationship the change could that approach integrated an of art . Once that problem is solved by the the by solved is problem that Once . bol that is already thatis bol Budapest dominating of theimage

variety within a single work single a within variety areas

(2013: 4) will 4) (2013: - , the voids and ruins and voids the ,

term visions of urbanistics regarding Budapest regarding urbanistics of visions term n Budapest in

shipping but transportation on land as well as land on transportation but shipping tlzn te orsi ad erainl oeta o the of potential recreational and touristic the utilizing

be implemented it will provide a fast and efficient and fast a provide will it implemented be (Albrecht and András 2013) András and (Albrecht

a atal be actually can 35

the Danube forever. forever. Danube the , of the city, the remnants of ambition and ambition of remnants the city, the of , Once moving along this this along moving Once . out. What is probably the most the probably is What out.

and pedestrian bridges could be built built be could bridges pedestrian and implementation of a dam system new new system dam a of implementation This can be achieved by linking the the linking by achieved be can This oee drn oe og run long one during covered also

(2013: 165) (2013: ban development to be to development ban

The plan does mention does plan The a central part of this this of part central a defines the area by the the by area the defines .

line becomes easy becomes line ,

„the city living living city „the

changing the the changing

(2013: 166 (2013:

intriguing -

CEU eTD Collection xeine Te ae s motn i ti seai bt t s o eeyhn, o don’t you everything, not is it but scenario this in important is gaze The experience. indirect an into contemplation of process the turning obstacles visual form car the of parts cy a of vision of field restricted more the to compared advantage great a is This way. the like on details observing and parts, head the turning body individual the of mobility considerable for allows runner the of position tha slower obviously and walking than is it faster slow; certainly too nor fast, too neither is running of pace The contemplation. for mode ideal the with us presents running that is implies body the and space urban between relationship Island. Margaret hard and them for designed specifically not spaces occupy to like do they but renegades urban not are Runners abstractby image the provided the from different be can running of geography cognitive a how show to was city the of state runners routes new ignorance the of out venture gone. be also will dear so hold runners some palimpsest urban The forever. disappear also will city als will This well and unified large providing integrated more be will area riverbank the side, bright the On runners. for consequences twofold have plans these of All provides. The integra area the irregularities and peculiarities the of many erasing 171) (2013: environment unified a create to aims also it but areas individual of characteristics the preserving of importance the

y h tm te ln ae opee rnes o’ ko wa hpes hn th when happens what know won’t runners completed are plans the time the By

travelling from one starting point in the city to a given destination. By exploring By destination. given a to city the in point starting one from travelling o mean that empty in empty that mean o . By introducing some alternative running routes running alternative some introducing By .

ht h itrcin ewe sae n te bo the and space between interaction the What - ir can oe unr wl awy rn ih b te ie f h rnig rc on track running the of side the by right run always will runners core

ted approach centralization.city alsoted implies toplanning ae ae ad icvr hns they things discover and haven safe

actually

heat map of a runni mapheat of

preserve - between zones, post zones, between cler leaning forward or a driver, for whom the various various the whom for driver, a or forward leaning cler snapshots in the form of memorie of form the in snapshots 36

ng software - industrial areas and other voids of the of voids other and areas industrial ccig r rvn. h upward The driving. or cycling n

ol nvr e i a ue of tube a in see never would .

- accessible areas for runners. runners. for areas accessible the main goal of this section this of goal main the dy and the specific specific the and dy s about s

mainstream and and mainstream

the current the ey

CEU eTD Collection running. together ofaacognitive ofwordsgeography whole, map city as the a inother mental ofurban stitching the implies which exploration urban as defined running to extended was experience t to have necessarily

r yu ha t look to head your urn

37 at

things. In this chapter running as a spatial spatial a as running chapter this In things.

CEU eTD Collection Nádas (2000:217) precisely very observes: no is that something to up add far so discussed interactions the of All activity. the of goal the not also is this but narrative coherent a to up add not will that fragments or snapshots preserve only Runners knowledge. of collection a not run is running of terms in sense no makes 143) (1998: memories” its of all preserving by lives only story, a has only city “the that city, the of preservation the about writes Certeau What a as running conceptualize I when claim important most my and narrativization of process this against argue I 142) (1998: narrativizing.” is Living inhabitable. become they places about stories produc of forms two these and space urban on and body the on knowledge of production the is running that argue I Here formsdiscussed inthe first ofphysical section. losses a transformation un the in transformation this of essence the grasp to like would I Instead like. the and person better a becoming about implications moralizing levels different many on changes induces that something is Running running. of concept this to add can city the in running what and experience spatial complex this from gain can we what is point this at answered self thesubstitutes that interpretation of scheme a implies This blindfolded. it through led was one if even person, a on effect an have still would space beautiful a said once Goethe that recalls I that interacti the on account detailed the With - explanatory for the questionable (Shuetz 1944: (Shuetz questionable the for explanatory don’t attribute a primacy to vision for running as a spatial experience. Wölff experience. spatial a as running for vision to primacy a attribute don’t

rdcin f nweg i ta ti kolde s setal non essentially is knowledge this that is knowledge of production The body and space body The revisited: t nd if it is so, something has to be gained from this process despite the various various the despite process this from gained be to has something so, is it if nd in r isprby netie. eta age ta “through that argues Certeau intertwined. inseparably are tion n epe rciig t u I ol lk t aod all avoid to like would I but it practicing people in Chapter 3 on between body and space I space and body between on

38

he production of knowledge of he production - reflected nature of running. Running is a is Running running. of nature reflected 501). The question that still remains to be to remains still that question The 501).

t narrative but transformative, as as transformative, but narrative t

wished to emphasize to wished

- lin (1886) lin narrative. narrative. ning; ning; CEU eTD Collection of whatworried couldbeare time. totheir body about happening atthesame and it nothing him carried twisted it. to happening of ways new learn also They as shoes their tie to how learning of way new a describe even would and details long a of idea an or exploration an is running saying simply but evolutionist probably This body. the about knowledge of production the of form a clearly is running level, first very the On toamore it link complete state of body and mind. then and with associated be can it knowledge of forms different the from running approach a be still might it but me for running of essence the grasp to seems formulated is this of all way The thinking is not searching for concepts. It is as if he is beyond the world of of world the beyond imagesof concepts. prior but tothose is he if as is It concepts. for searching not is thinking o drawing not are these incentives, ordinary and desires everyday without but memories has He …. him. thinking are mind his of emotions unbiased the simultaneously, things many so feel only can he since associatio passion Without variable runner. the the in away In fades and out things. dies passion elements these the with of relationship all with contact establishing is Running i ankle: his serious had serious little bit far bit little away in their a their in away - term transformation implied here. Runners are usually very attentive to small to attentive very usually are Runners here. implied transformation term

Once while I was training with a group at the Fisherman’s Bastion a man a Bastion Fisherman’s the at group a with training was I while Once all happened - fetched for non for fetched f sde eeyn’ atnin und o i ad he ohr men other three and him to turned attention everyone’s sudden a of sounds The production of production The knowled rms. The rms.

caring for th for caring but the incident was a good indicator of how runners are aware are runners how of indicator good a was incident the but ie something like ns become involuntary. become ns

- next week he was back was he week next runners. To understand the implications of all this I will will I this all of implications the understand To runners. e ir

39 body

ey positivist very

and are and ge 1 ut definitive images, just like his like just images, definitive ut

: the body It is not he, who is thinking, is who he, not is It extremely cautious about cautious extremely

to training which clearly means clearly which training to , developmentalist and even even and developmentalist , detr dent rs the grasp doesn’t adventure

enlightening.

what is what

CEU eTD Collection but acrisis can even breakingflow (1944: arise 502), from theinterpretive framework. this running about thinking G from gift a be to run to ability his considers Csere Gáspár prove 502). soon can 1944: reference (Shuetz of inadequate scheme existing an where stranger, a as space approaches tha something is body the and space between interaction mental and T section. first the in space and body the between interaction the about discussion our bring This of shapes. bodily of characteristics comprised are important ourselves we because be experience only can shapes bodily that is this to answer His us. on made impressions as expressions their for account can something we that and express mood a like can spiritual, shapes architectonic that possible is it how asks (1886) Wölfflin Intimacysuspension from running. knowledgea this signifier of about the is body. ever to overtraining attention paying body, their from monitoring injured being after existed even overtraining this of aware well are experience greater with Runners little. too danger greater a always is overtraining that mind in keep to important is it but silly even or superficial seem might procedures naming These connection. this ( runner right legs his calls runner Another injuries. Vézna wou runners Some

metonimic relationship metonimic fr ntne ad have and instance, for ,

blt t rn is run to ability ld name their different body parts and separately call their legs their call separately and parts body different their name ld , which is framed within a transcendental and discursive space discursive and transcendental a within framed is which , The production of 2 production The knowledge , equating the limb with its function also describes a very intimate intimate very a describes also function its with limb the equating ,

often

icsin wt them with discussions

ecie a a gift a as perceived 40 y little detail to avoid malfunctions and thus and malfunctions avoid to detail little y

d Ti implies This od. –

poesoa Hnain marathoner Hungarian professional a jobb futó jobb

about their malfunctions at times of of times at malfunctions their about t

is not taken for granted for taken not is y unr. hs mle ta the that implies This runners. by : space in term of injuries than training than injuries of term in )

and

cncos n reflected and conscious a left runner ( runner left – –

I only accepted that that accepted only I and are cautiously cautiously are and s us back to the the to back us s bal futó bal . The runner The .

he Buflák and Buflák

physical physical

for him him for ) and and )

–

CEU eTD Collection in the first section butthis discussed elements of web whole the consideration into take judgments These years. two for day every there walking on based was it far how idea no had I but it past leads routes running one because home my from is university first my far how exactly know I pace. my to attention paying by just desert a of middle the in covered have I distance the approximate am I pace what and passed has time much how estimate to able be will I world the in anywhere running start randomly I When body. the and space about knowledge of halo complex very a from w their at look to having without punctually quite pace own their tell usually can runners that is this of consequence immediate the and 599) (2014/2: time of sense best the has runner the that emphasizes Seregi the running following experience inthe parts. on this of implications the explain to try will I space. about of knowledge form of such production no is there but knowledge this behind science of web a and body the about there that is far, so running of experience spatial the about say can we What moments. few a for them on specifically focusing when highlighted be still can runnin of rhythm like just invisible, becomes The nothing.” almost remember I which of kilometers, intense most missing is nothing that sense the in complete small space of sense your of way a is about talking essentially is (2015) Csere what But runners. all by shared unders spiritual very This

eal. hs mle a id f mtns, vi wih parado which void a emptiness, of kind a implies This details. unn wt. ons f retto i cte hl bt wl poal b al to able be probably will I but help cities in orientation of Points with. running The pr The

while moving through it and only paying attention to the orderliness of of orderliness the to attention paying only and it through moving while atches. T atches.

knowledge contradict still can my adn o te pta eprec drn rnig s f ore not course of is running during experience spatial the of tanding oduction of 3:oduction knowledge spatio

space

h became invisible in this process, although individual details individual although process, this in invisible became is

perception of time of perception

41

from it. Csere (2015) writes: “Then came the the came “Then writes: (2015) Csere it. from

–

the knowledge about pace about knowledge the - direct perception. direct perception. temporality exists a positive knowledge knowledge positive a exists

ial sil seems still xically

–

derives derives of my my of losing losing g CEU eTD Collection all, of First knowledge? So converted (2014/2: 604). marketvalue into anti p turns sense this in Running energy. from energy more but value nor products, produce not does Running intake. energy the from energy surplus a surplus, a of production this from derives crea are machines things, transforming only are devices mechanic While operation. of mode mechanic a imply machine has body runner’s The something. producing ex simply not does runner the that argues (2014) Seregi rationalized. be canexperience the which with tools analytical some trying not am I again, Once fall apart, isthebody. which threa organization heterogeneous the on maximallyconcentrate time same the at and runner concentrate aboutanything has and goalthink tonot simultaneously. The is tomeditate t meditation: process that as chaos, psychic of dustbin is instead required is What 603). (2014/2: well as mind the but body the the only not disintegrates empty to tool cleaning a not is running concept the but runners many for desirable running issomething activity. Fighting this while boredom goal of nottherunning is while thoughts our in lost getting running, of attunement mental the regarding misconception ar both They indifference. of state a denoting word Greek the ataraxia, calls (2000) Nádas what to similar quite actually is This concentration. and meditation of combination a as running of attunement mental the describes (2014) Seregi - – capitalist element in running in the form of the scandal of pure production that cannot be be cannot that production pure of scandal the of form the in running in element capitalist

e ih ask might we roduction into the pure form of production. Concluding this argument Seregi finds the the finds Seregi argument this Concluding production. of form pure the into roduction he emptying of the mind. The paradox of the mental side of running is that the that is running of side mental the of paradox The mind. the of emptying he ig rdcs n srls au. h edrne rm nuac sports endurance from endurance The value. surplus and products ting –

o de th does how thi

i nt oiie nweg, t i it knowledge, positive not is s o nepe rnig ihn siiul rmwr a tee are there as framework spiritual a within running interpret to ecute a movement thus reproducing it it reproducing thus movement a ecute of boredom is misleading in itself. As Seregi formulates it, it, formulates Seregi As itself. in misleading is boredom of e pure form of production turn into the production of of production the into turn production of form pure e

42

u ta a opsd o h common the to opposed as that gue - ie hrceitc; hc de not does which characteristics; like ebde knowledge embodied s –

the runner is actually is runner the tening to tening and and CEU eTD Collection post. this in run a during resurrection 19 asdiscipline language. theirnative in for even impossible it making knowledge this of disintegration thr challenge unique a is run Each completely. familiarized be cannot which running in remain always will strangeness of element An experience. spatial this interpret ready a provide not does knowledge this but identity, of moment unique knowledge explicit An 1990). (Goffman self of presentation the with do to nothing has it and knowledge the is running respect this in k and of recognition production of moment a is here described is What that Nádasataraxia: (2000:219) previously describes asmentioned the c the knowing. not passive this with associated be can common most The way. active an in it with deal or d the about knowinganything knowing not of knowing the knowledge, negative very a is it sometimes

Miklós Vörös, an amateur runner and sociologist writes about the stages of confidence, disintegration and and disintegration confidence, of stages the about writes sociologist and runner amateur an Vörös, Miklós onstitutive elements of the discipline are emerges from an impassionate predisposition impassionate an from emerges are discipline the of elements onstitutive have reflections, noself only I …. with. identical am I what feel, even or know, cannot I something from am I that is run good a of experience the of run my how on essence based The experiences. experiential have moment never runs Good …. given me. constitutes a at like am I what of sense a have as arrogant so like. be to going is run my what feel cannot I steps first the After of

the elements (Schuetz 1944) of running only emerges temporarily, signalin temporarily, emerges only running of 1944) (Schuetz elements the olde bu te ef aot dniy Ti i esnily non a essentially is This identity. about self, the about nowledge

to constitute my run as I am at the given moment. …. I can only only can I …. moment. given the at am I as run my constitute to isintegration of the body and the mind, being unable to predict itpredict to unable being mind, the bodyand the isintegration of

- http://suhanj.blog.hu/2012/07/05/cim reflection.

43

19

Sometimes an explicit knowledge of what of knowledge explicit an Sometimes da

identical: and if I am not different not am I if and identical: ngers of running of ngers - nelkul_12600 - group members to read the the read to members group

–

like deaths at races at deaths like …. I cannot be cannot I ….

(Retrieved: 3.6.2015.) Fr ntne not instance For . - eatening with the with eatening ae cea to schema made - narrative narrative g a a g –

CEU eTD Collection work this of center the T far. so written works quantitative discourse academic the to thesis the of contribution The Berlin. and Budapest in running through experiences urban lived on focusing spaces, urban concrete and experience personal of materiality the to extended then push interactions. and of understanding moves these into inscribed meaning of layers the of throu physicalsignificancemovements socialindividual the of researchon future a for reading possible a providing elements physical various and body the between an aims toprovidegeneralThis thesis aunderstandingofrunning better as experience in a spatial actually is. experience spatial a as running what understanding in help little provide visuals quantifiable centr A conflicts. spatial and anxieties class indicating also practice suggested the follow don’t runners most that signify to seem running hi areas the redraw to have sometimes we this do To before. start actually and behind city given new discovering a of routes running frequented most the leave we spatial a of terms in zone comfort our of out Stepping connotations. physical purely has usually this but zone comfort their of out step to runners encourage often R T he answer to the question of why run in the city can city the in run why of question the to answer he u d running as an urban experience in particular. in experience urban an as running d nning - up , the indicators of indicators the ,

or a hand a or in

the city is city the lcs n u well our in places social significance social - stand, for instance, instance, for stand, quite simply a unique opportunity for exploration. Motivational posters Motivational exploration. for opportunity unique a simply quite

and the application of an autoethnographic approach implies that that implies approach autoethnographic an of application the and

middle is a is - class neighborhoods class he complex relationship between the body and space is at at is space and body the between relationship complex he - qualitative and meaning can be attributed to attributed be can meaning and nw ct ad vn n iis e ae ee be to been never have we cities in even and city known in alternative con alternative in Implications al claim of this thesis was, however, that these these that however, was, thesis this of claim al 44

approach

I first examined the role of the interaction the of role the examined first I

. Statistically speaking these heat maps maps heat these speaking Statistically .

texts of social structure. social of texts actually to

running ghlighted on the on ghlighted

seem extremely sentimental extremely seem

as opposed to the mostly mostly the to opposed as

exploration means that means exploration

a single movement, single a gh an interpretation ghan

A very different different very A

heat maps of maps heat The text was was text The

a .

CEU eTD Collection implications? uncanny its all with g everything still: and road the of side the by blocks lanes eight in by w there and on kilometers highway know you Did lots. parking and hotels architecture, drab by characterized area that something find to way only the is running of middle T Madrid? in airport the to reveal also can considered be can running extent some To detailed spati of formulation the structures social along them organizing and runners quantifying of Instead resources. various of accessibility the and class status, social to activity the behind motivation the on done research previous from different completely something suggests which habits and ties social with breaking of way a as seen be to running opportunityfor an provides experience spatial a as running Discussing un an and roughness but the highlight experience can autoethnography unified a target always will however, projects, developmental Urban running into of direction the in points also approach This embodied experience. here runners ated community looked like at five o’clock in the morning by the highway near Florence near highway the by morning the in o’clock five at like looked community ated

daou on dialogue a might even give ideas to urban planners on how to construct ideal spaces for runners for spaces ideal construct to how on planners urban to ideas give even might utn truh h mdl o a ie oet n aln? Y Tallinn? in forest pine a of middle the through cutting the ugliest district of districtugliest the

alcould analyses emergeas thefuturetrajectory running. ofresearch on r not are

hidden aspects of the city the of aspects hidden , there are strange little villas, run down old houses, huge socialist concrete concrete socialist huge houses, old down run villas, little strange are there ,

ra dvlpet projects development urban

merely ill be not be ill here are lakes, large green spacesgreen large lakes, are here

the city the at o statistics of parts

What it is like to do interval training in the parking lot of a a of lot parking the in training interval do to like is it What hing but the highway and nature. T nature. and highway the but hing . Of course this is very much a middle verya is much this course Of .

oil akrud f runners of background social .

Did you know that there is a huge park park huge a is there that know you Did sightseeing but it but sightseeing how the thoughts of runners could be integrated be could runners of thoughts the how 45

is actually interesting in this extremely dull dull extremely this in interesting actually is

and but are individual representatives of an an of representatives individual are but

smells like pine like smells vnes f h ebdmn o space. of embodiment the of evenness h scin o section the

, little hills little , is also so much more than that. than more much so also is n the spatial politics politics spatial the n . D . u a rn for run can ou

here are cars speeding cars are here and all and

id you know what a a what know you id often reducing the the reducing often - class district but district class

of that there is a a is there that

this quit

is several e

in the in c lose lose

of of It .

CEU eTD Collection the bodyan for holds discipline the what understanding for frameworks valid provide could approaches in for itself situation problematic a and investigation ac the while constellations offers experience war neither is running and fieldtrackand or territory as conceived is space where games, ball to opposed As running. of spaces the of analysis comparative and description thick a for or running for used typolog a offer to aims text this runners of typology a of instead claim w relations spatial writing and w mind and body runner’s the affecting alive, is city the aggression, anger, interaction, action, I say would I experience spatial of terms In Polan in resembles inHungary? own birthplace, my Szentes Suwalki Wajda, Andrzej of birthplace the How Warsaw? in Tesco ith everything ith d for the mind interms of and spatiald for urban liberation themind exploration. urban space has to offer. R offer. to has space urban a way to see the emerging production of knowledge within various various within knowledge of production emerging the see to way a

gymnastics wherespace gymnastics nor an abstract execution abstract an nor iiy tl rmis fed f detr, qetoal tpc of topic questionable a adventure, of field a remains still tivity

hile inscribing the body into urban space. To underline this this underline To space. urban into body the inscribing hile unning is unning run 46

signifies an abstract set of rules and regulationsand rules of abstractset an signifies

of movements. of in

the city because there is contact, conflict, contact, is there because city the not - ru mmes Autoethnographic members. group narrating,

Running interpreted a interpreted Running

to be occupied by opponents by occupied be to but is a form of form a is but y of spaces that can be be can that spaces of y

uncannily d s spatial spatial s reading

CEU eTD Collection Goffman, Erving. 1990. London:Minneapolis, University ofMinnesota Press. 1996. Tim. Cresswell, Geography Cultural Mobilities.” Event Transgressive as Races Road “Running 2014. Julie. Cidell, Minnesota Press. Mich Certeau, Production to1960 1988. David. Bordwell, Event Berking Harvard University Press. B Bakhtin, 1996. Mikhail. Verso. 1995. Marc. Augé, Cambridge, TheMIT Massachusetts: Press. Myer. R. John and Lynch Kevin Donald, Appleyard, Symbolic Interaction “Self 1980. Jr. Pfuhl H. Erdwin and L. David Altheide, enjamin, Walter. 1999. 1999. Walter. enjamin, ”.

, H. , Theory, Culture and Society Theory, Culture

and el de. 1998. 1998. de. el

Neckel

. London:. Routledge. Non . 15(5): 571

3(2): 127 3(2): , S. 1993. “ 1993. S. , - Rebelais and his WorldRebelais andhis The Presentation Self inEveryday of Life places: Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity of Anthropology an to Introduction places: n lc/u o Pae G Place: of Place/Out In

The Arcades Project Arcades The h Cascl olwo Cnm: im tl ad oe of Mode and Style Film Cinema: Hollywood Classical The h Patc o Eeya Life Everyday of Practice The - 144. - 583. Urban Marathon: The Staging of Individual of Staging The Marathon: Urban

10 (4):63

References

47 - . Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press of Press Belknap Massachusetts: Cambridge, . 78. . Bloomington:Indiana. University Press.

orpy Ielg, n Transgression and Ideology, eography,

- Accomplishment Through Running.” Through Accomplishment 1965. . Minneapolis: University of of University Minneapolis: . . London:. PenguinBooks. h Ve fo te Road the from View The ity as an Urban an as ity . London: . oil & Social

. . CEU eTD Collection Seregi triatlon filozófiája.” Tamás. 2014/1.“A Sociology Psychology.” Social in Essay An Stranger: “The 1944. Alfred. Schuetz, Globa 2000. Maurice. Roche, Construction of Charitable Bodies.” the and Marathon Urban The Health: with away “Running Hardey.2006. M. and S. Nettleten, Nádas Péter. 2000. Mauss, Marcel.Body.” 1973.“Techniques of the Lynch,Kevin. 2000. York: Continuum. Rhythman 2004. Henri. Lefebvre, and ThomasAbingdon: Bender. Routledge. Actor How Assemblages: Actor Studies, Urban an Big “Globalization 2010. McCormack. P. Derek and Alan Latham, Publications. Landry, 2000. Charles. Blackwell. Harv Gould, Peter and R. Rodney 1974. White. y Dvd 1989. David. ey, l Culture

49(6): 499

. LondonUK: Routledge.

Évkönyv - The ImageThe oftheCambridge City. 507. - The Creative City: A Toolkit for UrbanInnovators for The AToolkit Creative City: ewr Ter, n Gorpia Sae” p 53 Pp. Scale.” Geographical and Theory, Network Mega h Cniin f Postmodernity of Condition The -

Network Theory Changes Urban Studies Urban Changes Theory Network .

Budapest: Jelenkor. - Events and Modernity: Olympics and Expos in the Growth of Growth the in Expos and Olympics Modernity: and Events alysis: Space, Time, and Everyday Life. London; New New London; Life. Everyday and Time, Space, alysis: Health

Mental Maps Mental

10: 441 48 Holmi

Economy andSociety - 460.

26(4): 453 , Massachusetts:Press. MIT . New Penguin. York:

. Cambridge MA & Oxford UK: UK: Oxford & MA Cambridge . - 467. , edited by Ignacio Farias Farias Ignacio by edited ,

2(1): 70 2(1): American Journal of Journal American . London: . Earthscan d Small. Notes on on Notes Small. d

- - 2 in 72 88.

Urban Urban CEU eTD Collection os egl. 04 “rnfri eeg. Rtivd ue 2015 5 June Retrieved Kesergő.” “Frankfurti 2014. ( Gergely. Moós Retrieved 5,2015(http://www.qualitative June An “Autoethnography: 2010. Bochner. P. Overview.” Arthur and June Adams E. Tony Retrieved Carolyn, Ellis, 2015” Marathon “Hamburg ( 2015. Gáspár. Csere 2007.” Since Cities. Modern Retrieved 5,2015( June for Urbanism “Bicycle 2015. Co. Design Copenhagenize ( Tanulmányterve. Albr Universitäts Buchdruckerei & vonDr. Wolf C. Sohn. 1886. Wölfflin. Cambridge:University Press. Cambridge 1998 Etienne. Wenger, &Gender Class Running.” Marathon Recreational in Gender and “Class 2000. Vincent. Serravallo, Seregi Philosophy Tamás. 2014/3.“A Triathlon” of Seregi triatlon fil Tamás. 2014/2.“A http://d http://cseregaspar.com/hamburg http://www.bkk.hu/apps/docs/duna_ta ct Ue n Adá Itá. 2013. István. András and Ute echt, agadtkocsog.hu/frankfurti Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qua Forum: / Sozialforschung Qualitative Forum

96 7(2): rlgmn z enr scooi dr Architektur der Psychologie einer zu Prolegomena aia Ct o Bdps Mncplt. eree Jn 5 2015 5, June Retrieved Municipality. Budapest of City Capital http://www.copenhagenize.com/ - . 121. omnte o Patc: erig Maig ad Identity and Meaning, Learning, Practice: of Communities

- marathon - kesergo/ ozófiája (II.)” Online Citations Online nulmany.pdf

) - 2015/

uaet ua et Trltie Fejlesztési Területeinek Menti Duna Budapest 49 - research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1589)

)

Holmi

) Pragmatism Today Pragmatism

)

26(5): 595

litative Social Research Social litative - 605. Munich: .

5(2): 101 5(2):

-

g. o & Hof Kgl. 106. , 2015 5,

,

Race, 12 (1) (1)

. CEU eTD Collection 2015 5, June Retrieved Ultrabalatonról.” az Tétel ( “Három 2012. Miklós. Vörös marathon/shalane World Runner’s Office’” the at Day Bad ‘A Marathon: Boston her on Flanagan “Shalane 2015. Erin. Strout, http://suhanj.blog.hu/2012/07/05/cim Arl 2 Rtivd a 2, 05 ( 2015 23, May Retrieved 22. April , - flanagan - on - her - boston - nelkul_12600 - marathon 50

- ) a

- bad http://www.runnersworld.com/boston - day - at - the - office )

-