57804 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

REGULATORY INFORMATION selected for periodic review under Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation SERVICE CENTER section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Small Business Administration Act. Social Security Administration Introduction to the Unified Agenda of The complete fall 2018 Unified Independent Regulatory Agencies Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Agenda contains the Regulatory Plans of Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Actions—Fall 2018 28 Federal agencies and 66 Federal Consumer Product Safety Commission agency regulatory agendas. Federal Trade Commission AGENCY: Regulatory Information Service ADDRESSES: National Indian Gaming Commission Center. Regulatory Information Service Center (MVE), General Services Nuclear Regulatory Commission ACTION: Introduction to the Regulatory Administration, 1800 F Street NW, Agency Agendas Plan and the Unified Agenda of Federal 2219F, Washington, DC 20405. Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions. Cabinet Departments FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information about specific Department of Agriculture SUMMARY: Publication of the Unified Department of Commerce Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory regulatory actions, please refer to the Department of Energy Actions and the Regulatory Plan agency contact listed for each entry. Department of Health and Human Services represent key components of the To provide comment on or to obtain Department of Homeland Security regulatory planning mechanism further information about this Department of the Interior prescribed in 12866, publication, contact: John C. Thomas, Department of Justice ‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review,’’ Executive Director, Regulatory Department of Labor , ‘‘Reducing Information Service Center (MVE), U.S. Department of Transportation Department of the Treasury Regulation and Controlling Regulatory General Services Administration, 1800 F Costs,’’ January 30, 2017, and Executive Street NW, 2219F, Washington, DC Other Executive Agencies Order 13777, ‘‘Enforcing the Regulatory 20405, (202) 482–7340. You may also Architectural and Transportation Barriers Reform Agenda,’’ February 24, 2017. send comments to us by email at: risc@ Compliance Board The fall editions of the Unified Agenda gsa.gov. Committee for Purchase From People Who include the agency regulatory plans SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Are Blind or Severely Disabled Environmental Protection Agency required by E.O. 12866, which identify Table of Contents regulatory priorities and provide General Services Administration Introduction to the Regulatory Plan and the National Aeronautics and Space additional detail about the most Administration important significant regulatory actions Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions Railroad Retirement Board that agencies expect to take in the Small Business Administration coming year. I. What are the Regulatory Plan and the In addition, the Regulatory Flexibility Unified Agenda? Joint Authority Act requires that agencies publish II. Why are the Regulatory Plan and the Department of Defense/General Services Unified Agenda published? Administration/National Aeronautics and semiannual ‘‘regulatory flexibility III. How are the Regulatory Plan and the agendas’’ describing regulatory actions Space Administration (Federal Acquisition Unified Agenda organized? Regulation) they are developing that will have IV. What information appears for each entry? significant effects on small businesses V. Abbreviations Independent Regulatory Agencies and other small entities (5 U.S.C. 602). VI. How can users get copies of the Plan and Commodity Futures Trading Commission The Unified Agenda of Regulatory the Agenda? Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Deregulatory Actions (Unified Introduction to the Fall 2018 Regulatory Plan Consumer Product Safety Commission Agenda), published in the fall and Agency Regulatory Plans Federal Communications Commission spring, helps agencies fulfill all of these Federal Reserve System Cabinet Departments requirements. All federal regulatory National Labor Relations Board agencies have chosen to publish their Department of Agriculture Nuclear Regulatory Commission Securities and Exchange Commission regulatory agendas as part of this Department of Commerce Department of Defense Surface Transportation Board publication. The complete Unified Department of Education Agenda and Regulatory Plan can be Department of Energy Table of Contents found online at http://www.reginfo.gov Department of Health and Human Services Introduction to the Regulatory Plan and the and a reduced print version can be Department of Homeland Security Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and found in the Federal Register. Department of Housing and Urban Deregulatory Actions Development Information regarding obtaining printed I. What are the Regulatory Plan and the Department of the Interior copies can also be found on the Unified Agenda? Department of Justice Reginfo.gov website (or below, VI. How II. Why are the Regulatory Plan and the Department of Labor can users get copies of the Plan and the Unified Agenda published? Department of Transportation III. How are the Regulatory Plan and the Agenda?). Department of the Treasury Unified Agenda organized? The fall 2018 Unified Agenda Department of Veterans Affairs publication appearing in the Federal IV. What information appears for each entry? Register includes the Regulatory Plan Other Executive Agencies V. Abbreviations VI. How can users get copies of the Plan and and agency regulatory flexibility Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board the Agenda? agendas, in accordance with the Introduction to the Fall 2018 Regulatory Plan publication requirements of the Environmental Protection Agency Regulatory Flexibility Act. Agency Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Agency Regulatory Plans General Services Administration regulatory flexibility agendas contain National Aeronautics and Space Cabinet Departments only those Agenda entries for rules that Administration Department of Agriculture are likely to have a significant economic National Archives and Records Department of Commerce impact on a substantial number of small Administration Department of Defense entities and entries that have been Office of Personnel Management Department of Education

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57805

Department of Energy Administration’s regulatory and Other Executive Agencies Department of Health and Human Services deregulatory policies and priorities. The Agency for International Development Department of Homeland Security Plan is part of the fall edition of the Department of Housing and Urban American Battle Monuments Development Unified Agenda. Each participating Commission Department of Interior agency’s regulatory plan contains: (1) A Commission on Civil Rights Department of Justice narrative statement of the agency’s Corporation for National and Department of Labor regulatory and deregulatory priorities, Community Service Department of Transportation and, for the most part, (2) a description Council on Environmental Quality Department of Treasury of the most important significant Department of Veterans Affairs Court Services and Offender regulatory and deregulatory actions that Supervision Agency for the District of Other Executive Agencies the agency reasonably expects to issue Environmental Protection Agency in proposed or final form during the Equal Employment Opportunity Equal Employment Opportunity Commission upcoming fiscal year. This edition Commission * General Services Administration includes the regulatory plans of 30 Federal Mediation Conciliation Service National Aeronautics and Space agencies. Institute of Museum and Library Administration The Unified Agenda provides National Archives and Records Services Administration information about regulations that the National Archives and Records Office of Personnel Management Government is considering or Administration * Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation reviewing. The Unified Agenda has National Endowment for the Arts Small Business Administration appeared in the Federal Register twice National Endowment for the Humanities Social Security Administration each year since 1983 and has been National Mediation Board Federal Acquisition Regulation available online since 1995. The Office of Government Ethics Independent Regulatory Agencies complete Unified Agenda is available to Office of Management and Budget Consumer Product Safety Commission the public at http://www.reginfo.gov. Office of Personnel Management * Federal Trade Commission The online Unified Agenda offers Peace Corps National Indian Gaming Commission flexible search tools and access to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation * Nuclear Regulatory Commission historic Unified Agenda database to Presidio Trust Agency Regulatory Flexibility Agendas 1995. The complete online edition of Social Security Administration * the Unified Agenda includes regulatory Tennessee Valley Authority Cabinet Departments agendas from 65 Federal agencies. Independent Agencies Department of Agriculture Agencies of the Department of Commerce are not included. Council of the Inspectors General on Department of Energy Integrity and Efficiency Department of Health and Human Services The fall 2018 Unified Agenda publication appearing in the Federal Farm Credit Administration Department of Homeland Security Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Department of Interior Register consists of The Regulatory Plan Department of Justice and agency regulatory flexibility Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Department of Labor agendas, in accordance with the Federal Housing Finance Agency Department of Transportation publication requirements of the Federal Maritime Commission Department of Treasury Regulatory Flexibility Act. Agency Federal Trade Commission * Other Executive Agencies regulatory flexibility agendas contain National Commission on Military, only those Agenda entries for rules that National, and Public Service Architectural and Transportation Barriers National Credit Union Administration Compliance Board are likely to have a significant economic Committee for Purchase From the People impact on a substantial number of small National Indian Gaming Commission * Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled entities and entries that have been National Transportation Safety Board Environmental Protection Agency selected for periodic review under Postal Regulatory Commission General Services Administration section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility The Regulatory Information Service National Aeronautics and Space Center compiles the Unified Agenda for Administration Act. Printed entries display only the Railroad Retirement Board fields required by the Regulatory the Office of Information and Regulatory Small Business Administration Flexibility Act. Complete agenda Affairs (OIRA), part of the Office of Federal Acquisition Regulation information for those entries appears, in Management and Budget. OIRA is responsible for overseeing the Federal Independent Agencies a uniform format, in the online Unified Agenda at http://www.reginfo.gov. Government’s regulatory, paperwork, Commodity Futures Trading Commission The following agencies have no and information resource management Consumer Financial Protection Bureau activities, including implementation of Consumer Product Safety Commission entries for inclusion in the printed Federal Communication Commission regulatory flexibility agenda. An asterisk Executive Order 12866 (incorporated in Federal Reserve System (*) indicates agencies that appear in The Executive Order 13563). The Center also National Labor Relations Board Regulatory Plan. The regulatory agendas provides information about Federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission of these agencies are available to the regulatory activity to the President and Securities and Exchange Commission public at http://reginfo.gov. his Executive Office, the Congress, Surface Transportation Board agency officials, and the public. Cabinet Departments Introduction to the Regulatory Plan and The activities included in the Agenda the Unified Agenda of Federal Department of Defense * are, in general, those that will have a regulatory action within the next 12 Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions Department of Education * months. Agencies may choose to I. What are the Regulatory Plan and the Department of Housing and Urban include activities that will have a longer Unified Agenda? Development * timeframe than 12 months. Agency The Regulatory Plan serves as a Department of State agendas also show actions or reviews defining statement of the Department of Veterans Affairs * completed or withdrawn since the last

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57806 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

Unified Agenda. Executive Order 12866 Order 13258 and Executive Order and Budget a federalism summary does not require agencies to include 13422. impact statement for such a regulation, regulations concerning military or which consists of a description of the Executive Order 13771 foreign affairs functions or regulations extent of the agency’s prior consultation related to agency organization, Executive Order 13771, ‘‘Reducing with State and local officials, a management, or personnel matters. Regulation and Controlling Regulatory summary of their concerns and the Agencies prepared entries for this Costs,’’ January 30, 2017 (82 FR 9339) agency’s position supporting the need to publication to give the public notice of requires each agency to identify for issue the regulation, and a statement of their plans to review, propose, and issue elimination two prior regulations for the extent to which those concerns have regulations. They have tried to predict every one new regulation issued, and been met. As part of this effort, agencies their activities over the next 12 months the cost of planned regulations be include in their submissions for the as accurately as possible, but dates and prudently managed and controlled Unified Agenda information on whether schedules are subject to change. through a budgeting process. their regulatory actions may have an Agencies may withdraw some of the Executive Order 13777 effect on the various levels of regulations now under development, government and whether those actions and they may issue or propose other Executive Order 13777, ‘‘Enforcing have federalism implications. regulations not included in their the Regulatory Reform Agenda,’’ Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 agendas. Agency actions in the February 24, 2017 (82 FR 12285) rulemaking process may occur before or requires each agency to designate an The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act after the dates they have listed. The agency official as its Regulatory Reform of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4, title II) requires Regulatory Plan and Unified Agenda do Officer (RRO). Each RRO shall oversee agencies to prepare written assessments not create a legal obligation on agencies the implementation of regulatory reform of the costs and benefits of significant to adhere to schedules in this initiatives and policies to ensure that regulatory actions ‘‘that may result in publication or to confine their agencies effectively carry out regulatory the expenditure by State, local, and regulatory activities to those regulations reforms, consistent with applicable law. tribal governments, in the aggregate, or that appear within it. The Executive Order also directs that by the private sector, of $100,000,000 or each agency designate a regulatory more in any 1 year.’’ The requirement II. Why are the Regulatory Plan and the Reform Task Force. does not apply to independent Unified Agenda published? regulatory agencies, nor does it apply to Executive Order 13563 The Regulatory Plan and the Unified certain subject areas excluded by Agenda helps agencies comply with Executive Order 13563, ‘‘Improving section 4 of the Act. Affected agencies their obligations under the Regulatory Regulation and Regulatory Review,’’ identify in the Unified Agenda those Flexibility Act and various Executive January 18, 2011 (76 FR 3821) regulatory actions they believe are orders and other statutes. supplements and reaffirms the subject to title II of the Act. principles, structures, and definitions Regulatory Flexibility Act governing contemporary regulatory Executive Order 13211 The Regulatory Flexibility Act review that were established in Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions requires agencies to identify those rules Executive Order 12866, which includes Concerning Regulations That that may have a significant economic the general principles of regulation and Significantly Affect Energy Supply, impact on a substantial number of small public participation, and orders Distribution, or Use,’’ May 18, 2001 (66 entities (5 U.S.C. 602). Agencies meet integration and innovation in FR 28355), directs agencies to provide, that requirement by including the coordination across agencies; flexible to the extent possible, information information in their submissions for the approaches where relevant, feasible, and regarding the adverse effects that agency Unified Agenda. Agencies may also consistent with regulatory approaches; actions may have on the supply, indicate those regulations that they are scientific integrity in any scientific or distribution, and use of energy. Under reviewing as part of their periodic technological information and processes the Order, the agency must prepare and review of existing rules under the used to support the agencies’ regulatory submit a Statement of Energy Effects to Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. actions; and retrospective analysis of the Administrator of the Office of 610). Executive Order 13272, ‘‘Proper existing regulations. Information and Regulatory Affairs, Consideration of Small Entities in Office of Management and Budget, for Executive Order 13132 Agency Rulemaking,’’ signed August 13, ‘‘those matters identified as significant 2002 (67 FR 53461), provides additional Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism,’’ energy actions.’’ As part of this effort, guidance on compliance with the Act. August 4, 1999 (64 FR 43255), directs agencies may optionally include in their agencies to have an accountable process submissions for the Unified Agenda Executive Order 12866 to ensure meaningful and timely input information on whether they have Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory by State and local officials in the prepared or plan to prepare a Statement Planning and Review,’’ September 30, development of regulatory policies that of Energy Effects for their regulatory 1993 (58 FR 51735), requires covered have ‘‘federalism implications’’ as actions. agencies to prepare an agenda of all defined in the Order. Under the Order, regulations under development or an agency that is proposing a regulation Small Business Regulatory Enforcement review. The Order also requires that with federalism implications, which Fairness Act certain agencies prepare annually a either preempt State law or impose non- The Small Business Regulatory regulatory plan of their ‘‘most important statutory unfunded substantial direct Enforcement Fairness Act (Pub. L. 104– significant regulatory actions,’’ which compliance costs on State and local 121, title II) established a procedure for appears as part of the fall Unified governments, must consult with State congressional review of rules (5 U.S.C. Agenda. Executive Order 13497, signed and local officials early in the process 801 et seq.), which defers, unless January 30, 2009 (74 FR 6113), revoked of developing the regulation. In exempted, the effective date of a the amendments to Executive Order addition, the agency must provide to the ‘‘major’’ rule for at least 60 days from 12866 that were contained in Executive Director of the Office of Management the publication of the final rule in the

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57807

Federal Register. The Act specifies that specifying any particular characteristics beginning to the end of the publication. a rule is ‘‘major’’ if it has resulted, or is of entries. The sequence number preceding the likely to result, in an annual effect on Each entry in the Agenda is associated title of each entry identifies the location the economy of $100 million or more or with one of five rulemaking stages. The of the entry in this edition. The meets other criteria specified in that rulemaking stages are: sequence number is used as the Act. The Act provides that the 1. Prerule Stage—actions agencies reference in the printed table of Administrator of OIRA will make the will undertake to determine whether or contents. Sequence numbers are not final determination as to whether a rule how to initiate rulemaking. Such actions used in the online Unified Agenda is major. occur prior to a Notice of Proposed because the unique Regulation Identifier Rulemaking (NPRM) and may include Number (RIN) is able to provide this III. How are the Regulatory Plan and Advance Notices of Proposed cross-reference capability. the Unified Agenda organized? Rulemaking (ANPRMs) and reviews of Editions of the Unified Agenda prior The Regulatory Plan appears in part II existing regulations. to fall 2007 contained several indexes, in a daily edition of the Federal 2. Proposed Rule Stage—actions for which identified entries with various Register. The Plan is a single document which agencies plan to publish a Notice characteristics. These included beginning with an introduction, of Proposed Rulemaking as the next step regulatory actions for which agencies followed by a table of contents, followed in their rulemaking process or for which believe that the Regulatory Flexibility by each agency’s section of the Plan. the closing date of the NPRM Comment Act may require a Regulatory Flexibility Following the Plan in the Federal Period is the next step. Analysis, actions selected for periodic Register, as separate parts, are the 3. Final Rule Stage—actions for which review under section 610(c) of the regulatory flexibility agendas for each agencies plan to publish a final rule or Regulatory Flexibility Act, and actions agency whose agenda includes entries an interim final rule or to take other that may have federalism implications for rules which are likely to have a final action as the next step. as defined in Executive Order 13132 or significant economic impact on a 4. Long-Term Actions—items under other effects on levels of government. substantial number of small entities or development but for which the agency These indexes are no longer compiled, rules that have been selected for does not expect to have a regulatory because users of the online Unified periodic review under section 610 of the action within the 12 months after Agenda have the flexibility to search for Regulatory Flexibility Act. Each printed publication of this edition of the Unified entries with any combination of desired agenda appears as a separate part. The Agenda. Some of the entries in this characteristics. The online edition sections of the Plan and the parts of the section may contain abbreviated retains the Unified Agenda’s subject Unified Agenda are organized information. index based on the Federal Register alphabetically in four groups: Cabinet 5. Completed Actions—actions or Thesaurus of Indexing Terms. In departments; other executive agencies; reviews the agency has completed or addition, online users have the option of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, a withdrawn since publishing its last searching Agenda text fields for words joint authority (Agenda only); and agenda. This section also includes items or phrases. independent regulatory agencies. the agency began and completed Agencies may in turn be divided into between issues of the Agenda. IV. What information appears for each subagencies. Each printed agency Long-Term Actions are rulemakings entry? agenda has a table of contents listing the reported during the publication cycle All entries in the online Unified agency’s printed entries that follow. that are outside of the required 12- Agenda contain uniform data elements Each agency’s part of the Agenda month reporting period for which the including, at a minimum, the following contains a preamble providing Agenda was intended. Completed information: information specific to that agency. Actions in the publication cycle are Title of the Regulation—a brief Each printed agency agenda has a table rulemakings that are ending their description of the subject of the of contents listing the agency’s printed lifecycle either by Withdrawal or regulation. In the printed edition, the entries that follow. completion of the rulemaking process. notation ‘‘Section 610 Review’’ Each agency’s section of the Plan Therefore, the Long-Term and following the title indicates that the contains a narrative statement of Completed RINs do not represent the agency has selected the rule for its regulatory priorities and, for most ongoing, forward-looking nature periodic review of existing rules under agencies, a description of the agency’s intended for reporting developing the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. most important significant regulatory rulemakings in the Agenda pursuant to 610(c)). Some agencies have indicated and deregulatory actions. Each agency’s Executive Order 12866, section 4(b) and completions of section 610 reviews or part of the Agenda contains a preamble 4(c). To further differentiate these two rulemaking actions resulting from providing information specific to that stages of rulemaking in the Unified completed section 610 reviews. In the agency plus descriptions of the agency’s Agenda from active rulemakings, Long- online edition, these notations appear in regulatory and deregulatory actions. Term and Completed Actions are a separate field. The online, complete Unified Agenda reported separately from active Priority—an indication of the contains the preambles of all rulemakings, which can be any of the significance of the regulation. Agencies participating agencies. Unlike the first three stages of rulemaking listed assign each entry to one of the following printed edition, the online Agenda has above. A separate search function is five categories of significance. no fixed ordering. In the online Agenda, provided on http://reginfo.gov to search (1) Economically Significant users can select the particular agencies’ for Completed and Long-Term Actions agendas they want to see. Users have apart from each other and active RINs. As defined in Executive Order 12866, broad flexibility to specify the A bullet (•) preceding the title of an a rulemaking action that will have an characteristics of the entries of interest entry indicates that the entry is annual effect on the economy of $100 to them by choosing the desired appearing in the Unified Agenda for the million or more or will adversely affect responses to individual data fields. To first time. in a material way the economy, a sector see a listing of all of an agency’s entries, In the printed edition, all entries are of the economy, productivity, a user can select the agency without numbered sequentially from the competition, jobs, the environment,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57808 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

public health or safety, or State, local, name references to laws in addition to various levels of government.’’ or tribal governments or communities. these citations. Independent regulatory agencies are not The definition of an ‘‘economically CFR Citation—the section(s) of the required to supply this information. significant’’ rule is similar but not Code of Federal Regulations that will be Included in the Regulatory Plan— identical to the definition of a ‘‘major’’ affected by the action. whether the rulemaking was included in rule under 5 U.S.C. 801 (Pub. L. 104– Legal Deadline—whether the action is the agency’s current regulatory plan 121). (See below.) subject to a statutory or judicial published in fall 2017. deadline, the date of that deadline, and Agency Contact—the name and phone (2) Other Significant whether the deadline pertains to an number of at least one person in the A rulemaking that is not NPRM, a Final Action, or some other agency who is knowledgeable about the Economically Significant but is action. rulemaking action. The agency may also considered Significant by the agency. Abstract—a brief description of the provide the title, address, fax number, This category includes rules that the problem the regulation will address; the email address, and TDD for each agency agency anticipates will be reviewed need for a Federal solution; to the extent contact. under Executive Order 12866 or rules available, alternatives that the agency is Some agencies have provided the that are a priority of the agency head. considering to address the problem; and following optional information: These rules may or may not be included potential costs and benefits of the RIN Information URL—the internet in the agency’s regulatory plan. action. address of a site that provides more Timetable—the dates and citations (if information about the entry. (3) Substantive, Nonsignificant available) for all past steps and a Public Comment URL—the internet A rulemaking that has substantive projected date for at least the next step address of a site that will accept public impacts, but is neither Significant, nor for the regulatory action. A date comments on the entry. Alternatively, Routine and Frequent, nor displayed in the form 12/00/19 means timely public comments may be Informational/Administrative/Other. the agency is predicting the month and submitted at the Governmentwide e- year the action will take place but not rulemaking site, http:// (4) Routine and Frequent the day it will occur. In some instances, www.regulations.gov. A rulemaking that is a specific case of agencies may indicate what the next Additional Information—any a multiple recurring application of a action will be, but the date of that action information an agency wishes to include regulatory program in the Code of is ‘‘To Be Determined.’’ ‘‘Next Action that does not have a specific Federal Regulations and that does not Undetermined’’ indicates the agency corresponding data element. alter the body of the regulation. does not know what action it will take Compliance Cost to the Public—the estimated gross compliance cost of the (5) Informational/Administrative/Other next. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis action. A rulemaking that is primarily Required—whether an analysis is Affected Sectors—the industrial informational or pertains to agency required by the Regulatory Flexibility sectors that the action may most affect, matters not central to accomplishing the Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) because the either directly or indirectly. Affected agency’s regulatory mandate but that the rulemaking action is likely to have a sectors are identified by North agency places in the Unified Agenda to significant economic impact on a American Industry Classification inform the public of the activity. substantial number of small entities as System (NAICS) codes. Major—whether the rule is ‘‘major’’ defined by the Act. Energy Effects—an indication of under 5 U.S.C. 801 (Pub. L. 104–121) Small Entities Affected—the types of whether the agency has prepared or because it has resulted or is likely to small entities (businesses, governmental plans to prepare a Statement of Energy result in an annual effect on the jurisdictions, or organizations) on which Effects for the action, as required by economy of $100 million or more or the rulemaking action is likely to have Executive Order 13211 ‘‘Actions meets other criteria specified in that an impact as defined by the Regulatory Concerning Regulations That Act. The Act provides that the Flexibility Act. Some agencies have Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Administrator of the Office of chosen to indicate likely effects on Distribution, or Use,’’ signed May 18, Information and Regulatory Affairs will small entities even though they believe 2001 (66 FR 28355). make the final determination as to that a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Related RINs—one or more past or whether a rule is major. will not be required. current RIN(s) associated with activity Unfunded Mandates—whether the Government Levels Affected—whether related to this action, such as merged rule is covered by section 202 of the the action is expected to affect levels of RINs, split RINs, new activity for Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 government and, if so, whether the previously completed RINs, or duplicate (Pub. L. 104–4). The Act requires that, governments are State, local, tribal, or RINs. before issuing an NPRM likely to result Federal. Statement of Need—a description of in a mandate that may result in International Impacts—whether the the need for the regulatory action. expenditures by State, local, and tribal regulation is expected to have Summary of the Legal Basis—a governments, in the aggregate, or by the international trade and investment description of the legal basis for the private sector of more than $100 million effects, or otherwise may be of interest action, including whether any aspect of in 1 year, agencies, other than to the Nation’s international trading the action is required by statute or court independent regulatory agencies, shall partners. order. prepare a written statement containing Federalism—whether the action has Alternatives—a description of the an assessment of the anticipated costs ‘‘federalism implications’’ as defined in alternatives the agency has considered and benefits of the Federal mandate. Executive Order 13132. This term refers or will consider as required by section Legal Authority—the section(s) of the to actions ‘‘that have substantial direct 4(c)(1)(B) of Executive Order 12866. United States Code (U.S.C.) or Public effects on the States, on the relationship Anticipated Costs and Benefits—a Law (Pub. L.) or the Executive order between the national government and description of preliminary estimates of (E.O.) that authorize(s) the regulatory the States, or on the distribution of the anticipated costs and benefits of the action. Agencies may provide popular power and responsibilities among the action.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57809

Risks—a description of the magnitude PL (or Pub. L.)—A public law is a law 15250–7954. Telephone: (202) 512–1800 of the risk the action addresses, the passed by Congress and signed by the or 1–866–512–1800 (toll-free). amount by which the agency expects the President or enacted over his veto. It has Copies of individual agency materials action to reduce this risk, and the general applicability, unlike a private may be available directly from the relation of the risk and this risk law that applies only to those persons agency or may be found on the agency’s reduction effort to other risks and risk or entities specifically designated. website. Please contact the particular reduction efforts within the agency’s Public laws are numbered in sequence agency for further information. jurisdiction. throughout the 2-year life of each All editions of The Regulatory Plan Congress; for example, Public Law 112– and the Unified Agenda of Federal V. Abbreviations 4 is the fourth public law of the 112th Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions The following abbreviations appear Congress. since fall 1995 are available in throughout this publication: RFA—A Regulatory Flexibility electronic form at http://reginfo.gov, ANPRM—An Advance Notice of Analysis is a description and analysis of along with flexible search tools. Proposed Rulemaking is a preliminary the impact of a rule on small entities, The Government Printing Office’s notice, published in the Federal including small businesses, small GPO FDsys website contains copies of Register, announcing that an agency is governmental jurisdictions, and certain the Agendas and Regulatory Plans that considering a regulatory action. An small not-for-profit organizations. The have been printed in the Federal agency may issue an ANPRM before it Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 Register. These documents are available develops a detailed proposed rule. An et seq.) requires each agency to prepare at http://www.fdsys.gov. ANPRM describes the general area that an initial RFA for public comment when Dated: October 15, 2018. may be subject to regulation and usually it is required to publish an NPRM and John C. Thomas, asks for public comment on the issues to make available a final RFA when the Executive Director. and options being discussed. An final rule is published, unless the ANPRM is issued only when an agency agency head certifies that the rule BILLING CODE 6820–27–P believes it needs to gather more would not have a significant economic Introduction to the Fall 2018 information before proceeding to a impact on a substantial number of small Regulatory Plan notice of proposed rulemaking. entities. CFR—The Code of Federal RIN—The Regulation Identifier Regulatory reform is a cornerstone of Regulations is an annual codification of Number is assigned by the Regulatory President Trump’s agenda for economic the general and permanent regulations Information Service Center to identify growth. This Plan reaffirms the published in the Federal Register by the each regulatory action listed in the principles of individual and agencies of the Federal Government. Regulatory Plan and the Unified limited government essential to reform. The Code is divided into 50 titles, each Agenda, as directed by Executive Order It also highlights the success of ongoing title covering a broad area subject to 12866 (section 4(b)). Additionally, OMB efforts, initiatives for improving Federal regulation. The CFR is keyed to has asked agencies to include RINs in accountability, and the promotion of and kept up to date by the daily issues the headings of their Rule and Proposed good regulatory practices. of the Federal Register. Rule documents when publishing them Across the Trump Administration, E.O.—An Executive order is a in the Federal Register, to make it easier real regulatory reform is underway. As directive from the President to for the public and agency officials to the agency examples throughout the Executive agencies, issued under track the publication history of Plan demonstrate, the benefits of a more constitutional or statutory authority. regulatory actions throughout their rational regulatory system are felt far Executive orders are published in the development. and wide and create opportunities for Federal Register and in title 3 of the Seq. No.—The sequence number economic growth and development. Code of Federal Regulations. identifies the location of an entry in the Farmers can more productively use their FR—The Federal Register is a daily printed edition of the Regulatory Plan land. Small businesses can hire more Federal Government publication that and the Unified Agenda. Note that a workers and provide more affordable provides a uniform system for specific regulatory action will have the healthcare. Innovators will be able to publishing Presidential documents, all same RIN throughout its development pursue advances in autonomous proposed and final regulations, notices but will generally have different vehicles, drones, and commercial space of meetings, and other official sequence numbers if it appears in exploration. Veterans enjoy expanded documents issued by Federal agencies. different printed editions of the Unified access to doctors through a telehealth FY—The Federal fiscal year runs from Agenda. Sequence numbers are not used program. Infrastructure can be improved October 1 to September 30. in the online Unified Agenda. more quickly with streamlined • NPRM—A Notice of Proposed U.S.C.—The United States Code is a permitting requirements. These reforms Rulemaking is the document an agency consolidation and codification of all and many others make life better for all issues and publishes in the Federal general and permanent laws of the Americans through lower consumer Register that describes and solicits United States. The U.S.C. is divided into prices, more jobs, and, in the long run, public comments on a proposed 50 titles, each title covering a broad area improvements in well-being that result regulatory action. Under the of Federal law. from the advance of innovative new Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. products and services. 553), an NPRM must include, at a VI. How can users get copies of the Plan Private choices of individuals and minimum: A statement of the time, and the Agenda? businesses should generally prevail in a place, and nature of the public Copies of the Federal Register issue free society. Yet in modern times, the rulemaking proceeding; containing the printed edition of The expansion of the administrative state • A reference to the legal authority Regulatory Plan and the Unified Agenda has placed undue burdens on the under which the rule is proposed; and (agency regulatory flexibility agendas) public, impeding economic growth, Either the terms or substance of the are available from the Superintendent of technological innovation, and consumer proposed rule or a description of the Documents, U.S. Government Printing choice. This Administration has subjects and issues involved. Office, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA spearheaded an unprecedented effort to

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57810 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

restore appropriate checks on the • Agencies issued 176 deregulatory presidential priorities. Agency heads regulatory state, ensuring that agencies actions (57 of which are significant explain their priorities through the act within the boundaries of the law and deregulatory actions) and 14 significant narrative of the Regulatory Plan and list in a manner that yields the greatest regulatory actions. specific deregulatory and regulatory benefits to the American people while • These results expand and build actions expected to be completed in the imposing the fewest burdens. Our upon the success of the coming year. This process provides an policies focus on restoring political Administration’s first year, for a total important gatekeeping role to ensure accountability and protecting the regulatory cost reduction of $33 billion. agencies pursue only those actions constitutional values of due process and In addition to these impressive consistent with law and that have the fair notice. Government should respect results, the agencies project $18 billion support of the heads of agencies and the private decisions of individuals and in regulatory cost savings for 2019. In ultimately the President. Likewise, businesses unless a compelling need addition, the ‘‘Safer Affordable Fuel- review of draft regulatory actions can be shown for intervention, a Efficient Vehicles Rule’’ revises the through Executive Order 12866 longstanding principle affirmed in greenhouse gas standards and Corporate advances good regulatory policy Executive Order 12866 (‘‘Regulatory Average Fuel Economy standards for consistent with legal requirements, Planning and Review,’’ September 30, passenger cars and light trucks. The sound analysis, and presidential 1993). We approach regulation with Department of Transportation and the priorities. humility, trusting Americans to direct Environmental Protection Agency have Faithful execution of the laws also their energy and capital productively proposed a range of options that are includes respect for the lawmaking and to reap the benefits that result from projected to save between $120 and power of Congress. Although Congress a free exchange of goods and ideas. $340 billion in regulatory costs and often confers substantial discretion on The Administration’s regulatory anticipate completion of the rule in agencies, OIRA works with agencies to agenda involves structural reforms as fiscal year 2019. The momentum for limit expansive interpretations of well as the practical work of eliminating reform continues to accelerate as executive authority and to regulate and revising regulations. Agencies agencies complete substantial within the boundaries of the law. continue to advance the health and deregulatory actions. Carefully examining statutory authority safety mandates that Congress has Promoting the Rule of Law: Political and keeping agencies within the limits entrusted to them and to revamp vital Accountability, Guidance Documents, set by Congress protects against programs to increase their effectiveness. and Respecting Congress’ Lawmaking executive agencies exercising the At the same time, agencies are revising Power legislative power. OIRA also works with or rescinding regulations that fail to agencies to ensure compliance with the address real-world problems, that are The Administration’s regulatory Administrative Procedure Act. The needlessly burdensome, and that reform is committed to the rule of law, requirements of public notice and prevent Americans from advancing understood as respect for the opportunity for comment bolster the innovative solutions. Our reform efforts constitutional structure as well as the legitimacy of agency action and can emphasize the rule of law, respect for specific laws enacted by Congress. The provide refinements that improve the the Constitution’s separation of powers, Constitution establishes a relatively ultimate policy chosen by an agency. and the limits of agency authority. simple framework for regulation. Moreover, OIRA is looking closely at Congress is vested with limited and existing statutory requirements for Reducing Regulatory Burdens enumerated legislative powers, which it limiting administrative excess across At the outset, President Trump set may use to set regulatory policy and federal agencies, including within the forth a general mandate for regulatory establish the authority of agencies to historically independent agencies. reform across the Administration. issue regulations. The President is Under the Paperwork Reduction Act, all Consistent with legal obligations, vested with the executive power, which federal agencies must comply with Executive Order 13771 (‘‘Reducing includes overseeing and directing specific requirements before collecting Regulation and Controlling Regulatory administration of the laws. Within the information from the public. OIRA plays Costs,’’ January 30, 2017) directs a two- framework and directions established by an important role in reviewing forms fold approach to reform: It requires that Congress, political accountability for that collect information, verifying that agencies eliminate two regulations for regulatory policy depends on they have practical utility and are as each new significant regulation and also presidential responsibility and control. minimally burdensome as possible. requires that agencies offset any new As Alexander Hamilton explained, Reduction of paperwork burdens plays regulatory costs. By requiring a ‘‘Energy in the executive is a leading an important role in eliminating reduction in the number of regulations, character of good government. It is unnecessary, duplicative, or conflicting the order incentivizes agencies to essential to the protection of the regulatory requirements. identify regulations and guidance community against foreign attacks: It is The Administration’s commitment to documents that do not provide not less essential to the steady the rule of law finds expression in other sufficient benefits to the public. administration of the laws.’’ The initiatives, such as restoring the proper Agencies have reduced or eliminated Federalist No. 70. use of guidance documents. While unnecessary requirements large and The annual Regulatory Plan has guidance documents may provide small. For the first time in decades, provided a longstanding form of needed clarification of existing legal Federal agencies have decreased new presidential accountability for the obligations, they have sometimes been regulatory costs, while continuing to regulatory policy of federal agencies as stretched to impose new obligations. pursue important regulatory priorities. well as for the specific regulatory OIRA and the White House Counsel’s Agencies have achieved historic and actions planned for the forthcoming Office have repeatedly affirmed the meaningful regulatory reform in the first year. Through the process of reviewing importance of due process and fair two years. the Plan and Unified Agenda of notice in regulatory policy and worked • For fiscal year 2018, agencies Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions, closely with agencies to prevent the achieved $23 billion in net regulatory OIRA helps agencies to direct misuse of guidance documents. cost savings across the government. administrative action consistent with Agencies should not surprise the public

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57811

with new requirements through an For example, OIRA collaborates with and how they should be balanced across informal memo, speech, or blog post. agencies to make the Unified Agenda of the Executive Branch. The review When agencies impose new regulatory Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions a process also allows for coordination in obligations, they must follow the more accurate reflection of what other contexts, such as when one appropriate administrative procedures. agencies plan to pursue in the coming agency’s rule implicates the programs or Through the review process for year. Agencies must make every effort to legal authorities of another. Interagency significant guidance documents, OIRA include actions they plan to pursue, review can ameliorate problems arising has identified proposed agency because if an item is not on the Agenda, from overlapping statutory mandates. guidance that should be undertaken under Executive Order 13771, an agency Review can also strengthen the legal only through notice and comment cannot move forward unless it obtains a foundation and the supporting analysis rulemaking. Some agencies have waiver or the action is required by law. of rules—bolstering their effectiveness withdrawn expansive guidance from the A clear and accurate Agenda helps previous administration and are avoid unfair surprise and achieves and also their ability to survive legal replacing it with rulemaking, rather greater predictability of upcoming challenge. than simply a revised guidance actions. The historically independent agencies document. Rulemaking undoubtedly This Administration has also sometimes participate in the review requires more agency time and published the so-called ‘‘Inactive List,’’ process when a regulation raises issues resources; however, it also provides fair a list of regulations contemplated by that implicate their jurisdiction. notice and allows input from the public, agencies, but previously not made Because these agencies are not generally which ultimately results in more lawful public in the Agenda. Agencies subject to other White House and predictable regulatory policy. continue to review these lists and coordination mechanisms, the review Other agencies are also taking remove actions they no longer plan to process provides an opportunity to important steps. The Department of pursue. Publication of the list promotes ensure greater consistency across all Justice clarified that guidance agency accountability for all regulatory agencies within the Executive Branch. documents would not be used for actions under consideration and a more enforcement purposes. Several agencies accurate picture of regulations in the Finally, cost-benefit analysis must subsequently followed this principle, pipeline. justify the need for regulation. As including a group of historically Furthermore, in the process of Executive Order 12866 recognizes, independent financial regulatory implementing the historic reforms of private choices of individuals and agencies. Other agencies are in the Executive Order 13771, OIRA published businesses are the baseline in the process of revising their guidance detailed information about the cost American system of government. To policies to promote greater allowances, cost savings, and specific warrant departure from this baseline, accountability in the development, actions counted as regulatory and regulatory actions must be consistent promulgation, and access to guidance deregulatory. OIRA issued early with statutory authority and should documents. guidance on how the Executive Order have benefits that substantially exceed Ensuring the proper use of guidance would be implemented. Drawing from costs. documents; eliminating outdated or the successful experience of similar Careful analysis that accurately stale guidance; requiring internal checks deregulatory programs in the United that enhance accountability for Kingdom and Canada, the guidance captures both the benefits and costs of guidance; and providing greater explained that even small deregulatory regulation is essential to achieving good transparency and online access to actions would be counted in order to regulatory policy. Consideration of guidance documents are steps forward incentivize agencies to eliminate alternatives and an assessment of their in promoting sound regulatory policy unnecessary regulatory burdens of all costs and benefits serves an important across the federal government. OIRA sizes. This transparency allows the function by providing transparency for will continue to work with agencies to public to understand the accounting regulatory decisions and information improve and refine their guidance methodology and the choices made to that can inform public comment on the practices. encourage the greatest possible reform impact of regulatory alternatives before efforts from the agencies. a rule is finalized. While anticipating Good Regulatory Practices: Coordination is an important and quantifying the costs and benefits of Transparency, Coordination, and component of the OIRA regulatory regulations pose challenges in some Analysis review process. Coordination facilitates contexts, OIRA will continue to work Regulatory reform in the Trump consistent application of presidential closely with agencies to improve their Administration includes the promotion priorities, legal interpretation, and analyses. and expansion of longstanding good regulatory policy across different One of the practical consequences of regulatory practices such as agencies. Centralized review allows the Executive Order 13771 is that agencies transparency, coordination, and cost- Administration to advance broader have a new and meaningful incentive to benefit analysis. These practices principles, such as concern for the rule improve regulatory outcomes of law, due process, and fair notice, as engage in retrospective review of irrespective of the policy preferences of well as to reduce regulatory costs across regulations, which President Obama an agency or administration. the board. called for in Executive Order 13563 Transparency in the regulatory Through the review process, agencies (‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory process provides one of the most and senior officials within the Executive Review,’’ January 18, 2011). When important checks on administrative Office of the President have an issuing a rule, an agency can only agencies by allowing the public to have opportunity to comment on draft predict the costs and benefits. notice of regulatory actions and regulations. These reviewers flag policy Periodically reviewing the actual costs opportunities for comment in the concerns or problems of duplication, and benefits of regulations allows administrative process. This inconsistency, and inefficiency. Such agencies to modify rules for greater Administration has taken specific steps coordination allows for careful effectiveness or to repeal rules that are to improve transparency. consideration of competing priorities unnecessary or counterproductive.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57812 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

Review of Tax Regulations Under discretion, raise important legal or which to comment on the rule and share Executive Order 12866 policy questions, or impose substantial information about the consequences of Administration-wide regulatory costs on the public. Tax regulations particular regulatory choices. Moreover, reform efforts have been coupled with uniquely impact all Americans and have the review process facilitates targeted reforms in specific high-burden significant consequences for investment, coordination with other agencies to areas. For example, the President issued economic growth, and innovation. The avoid conflict with other administration Executive Order 13789 (‘‘Identifying OIRA review process provides an priorities. and Reducing Tax Regulatory Burdens,’’ important check to ensure that tax The improvement of tax regulations April 21, 2017), directing the regulations are consistent with the demonstrates a specific success in the Department of the Treasury to identify President’s priorities for a ‘‘simple, fair, Administration’s regulatory reform and reduce tax regulatory burdens efficient, and pro-growth’’ tax system. agenda. It also reaffirms the value of the because ’s ‘‘Federal tax system The historic reforms enacted in the OIRA centralized review process for should be simple, fair, efficient, and Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) require promoting presidential priorities and pro-growth.’’ In addition to other Treasury to issue a number of good regulatory practices such as measures, the President called for a regulations. The MOA provides for the transparency, coordination, and robust review of whether tax regulations possibility of expedited review of TCJA cost-benefit analysis. should go through the centralized OIRA regulations in order to provide timely Conclusion regulatory review process. Tax guidance and information to the public. regulations were previously exempt Over the past few months, Treasury and Consistent with its longstanding from this process, in part contributing to OIRA have worked closely together to commitment to the principles of good the problem of burdensome, improve tax regulations, ensuring that regulatory policy, OIRA works closely complicated, and inefficient tax regulations are consistent with law, with agencies to advance regulatory regulatory policy identified by demonstrate benefits that exceed the policy that is consistent with law and Executive Order 13789. costs, and impose the fewest possible the President’s priorities and yields After conducting this review, the burdens on the public. The review substantial net benefits for the public. Office of Management and Budget and process encourages greater transparency The first two years of the the Department of the Treasury signed of the impacts of the regulation, Administration have produced a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA), highlighting where the agency exercises unparalleled reform, and we project ‘‘Review of Tax Regulations under discretion and the anticipated burdens even more significant results in the Executive Order 12866’’ (April 11, placed on the public, including coming year. 2018). The MOA recognizes the paperwork and other compliance Neomi Rao, importance of presidential oversight and burdens. When Treasury provides this Administrator, Office of Information and accountability, particularly where tax information in a proposed rule, the Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and regulations reflect the exercise of public has a more informed basis from Budget

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

1 ...... NOP; Strengthening Organic Enforcement ...... 0581–AD09 Proposed Rule Stage. 2 ...... National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard ...... 0581–AD54 Final Rule Stage. 3 ...... Animal Welfare; Amendments to Licensing Provisions and to Requirements for 0579–AE35 Proposed Rule Stage. Dogs. 4 ...... Importation, Interstate Movement, and Release Into the Environment of Certain 0579–AE47 Proposed Rule Stage. Genetically Engineered Organisms. 5 ...... Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Requirements for Able-Bodied 0584–AE57 Proposed Rule Stage. Adults Without Dependents. 6 ...... Providing Regulatory Flexibility for Retailers in the Supplemental Nutrition Assist- 0584–AE61 Proposed Rule Stage. ance Program (SNAP). 7 ...... Revision of Categorical Eligibility in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Pro- 0584–AE62 Proposed Rule Stage. gram (SNAP). 8 ...... Reform Provisions for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program’s Quality 0584–AE64 Proposed Rule Stage. Control System. 9 ...... Child Nutrition Programs: Flexibilities for Milk, Whole Grains, and Sodium Re- 0584–AE53 Final Rule Stage. quirements. 10 ...... Egg Products Inspection Regulations ...... 0583–AC58 Final Rule Stage. 11 ...... Modernization of Swine Slaughter Inspection ...... 0583–AD62 Final Rule Stage. 12 ...... Update and Clarification of the Locatable Minerals Regulations ...... 0596–AD32 Prerule Stage. 13 ...... Oil and Gas Resource Revision ...... 0596–AD33 Prerule Stage. 14 ...... Servicing Regulation for the Rural Utilities Service (RUS) Telecommunications 0572–AC41 Final Rule Stage. Programs. 15 ...... oneRD Guaranteed Loan Regulation ...... 0572–AC43 Final Rule Stage.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57813

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

16 ...... Revisions to the Export Administration Regulations: Control of Firearms and Re- 0694–AF47 Final Rule Stage. lated Articles the President Determines No Longer Warrant Control Under the United States Munitions List. 17 ...... Magnuson-Stevens Act; Fishery Management Councils; Financial Disclosure and 0648–BH73 Proposed Rule Stage. Recusal. 18 ...... Magnuson-Stevens Fisheries Conservation and Management Act; Traceability In- 0648–BH87 Proposed Rule Stage. formation Program for Seafood. 19 ...... Taking and Importing Marine Mammals: Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to 0648–BB38 Final Rule Stage. Geophysical Surveys Related to Oil and Gas Activities in the Gulf of Mexico. 20 ...... Commerce Trusted Trader Program ...... 0648–BG51 Final Rule Stage. 21 ...... Setting and Adjusting Patent Fees ...... 0651–AD31 Proposed Rule Stage.

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

22 ...... Contractor Purchasing System Review Threshold (DFARS Case 2017–D038) ..... 0750–AJ48 Proposed Rule Stage. 23 ...... Brand Name or Equal (DFARS Case 2017–D040) ...... 0750–AJ50 Proposed Rule Stage. 24 ...... Submission of Summary Subcontract Report (DFARS Case 2017–D005) ...... 0750–AJ42 Final Rule Stage. 25 ...... Regulatory Program of the Army Corps of Engineers Tribal Consultation and Na- 0710–AA75 Prerule Stage. tional Historic Preservation Act compliance. 26 ...... Natural Disaster Procedures: Preparedness, Response, and Recovery Activities 0710–AA78 Proposed Rule Stage. of the Corps of Engineers. 27 ...... Definition of ‘‘Waters of the United States’’ ...... 0710–AA80 Proposed Rule Stage. 28 ...... Compensatory Mitigation for Losses of Aquatic Resources—Review and Ap- 0710–AA83 Proposed Rule Stage. proval of Mitigation Banks and In-Lieu Fee Programs. 29 ...... Modification of Nationwide Permits ...... 0710–AA84 Proposed Rule Stage. 30 ...... Policy for Domestic, Municipal, and Industrial Water Supply Uses of Reservoir 0710–AA72 Final Rule Stage. Projects Operated by the Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engi- neers. 31 ...... Establishment of TRICARE Select and Other TRICARE Reforms ...... 0720–AB70 Final Rule Stage.

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

32 ...... Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities Re- 1870–AA14 Proposed Rule Stage. ceiving Federal Financial Assistance. 33 ...... State Authorization and Related Issues ...... 1840–AD36 Proposed Rule Stage. 34 ...... Accreditation and Related Issues ...... 1840–AD37 Proposed Rule Stage. 35 ...... Ensuring Student Access to High Quality and Innovative Postsecondary Edu- 1840–AD38 Proposed Rule Stage. cational Programs. 36 ...... Eligibility of Faith-Based Entities and Activities-Title IV Programs ...... 1840–AD40 Proposed Rule Stage. 37 ...... TEACH Grants ...... 1840–AD44 Proposed Rule Stage. 38 ...... Institutional Accountability ...... 1840–AD26 Final Rule Stage. 39 ...... Program Integrity; Gainful Employment ...... 1840–AD31 Final Rule Stage.

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

40 ...... Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Conventional Cooking Products .. 1904–AD15 Proposed Rule Stage. 41 ...... Procedures, Interpretations, and Policies for Consideration of New or Revised 1904–AD38 Proposed Rule Stage. Energy Conservation Standards for Consumer Products. 42 ...... Energy Conservation Program: Definition for General Service Lamps ...... 1904–AE26 Proposed Rule Stage.

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

43 ...... HIPAA Privacy: Request for Information on Changes to Support, and Remove 0945–AA00 Prerule Stage. Barriers to, Coordinated Care. 44 ...... HIPAA Privacy Rule: Presumption of Good Faith of Health Care Providers ...... 0945–AA09 Proposed Rule Stage. 45 ...... Protecting Statutory Conscience Rights in Health Care; Delegations of Authority 0945–AA10 Final Rule Stage.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57814 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES—Continued

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

46 ...... Revising Outdated Requirements for Opioid Treatment Providers (OTPS) ...... 0930–AA27 Proposed Rule Stage. 47 ...... Coordinating Care and Information Sharing in the Treatment of Substance Use 0930–AA32 Proposed Rule Stage. Disorders. 48 ...... Food Standards: General Principles and Food Standards Modernization (Re- 0910–AC54 Proposed Rule Stage. opening of Comment Period). 49 ...... Mammography Quality Standards Act; Amendments to Part 900 Regulations ...... 0910–AH04 Proposed Rule Stage. 50 ...... Medical Device De Novo Classification Process ...... 0910–AH53 Proposed Rule Stage. 51 ...... Nonprescription Drug Product With an Additional Condition for Nonprescription 0910–AH62 Proposed Rule Stage. Use. 52 ...... Format and Content of Reports Intended to Demonstrate Substantial Equivalence 0910–AH89 Proposed Rule Stage. 53 ...... Nutrient Content Claims, Definition of Term: Healthy ...... 0910–AI13 Proposed Rule Stage. 54 ...... Compliance With Statutory Program Integrity Requirements ...... 0937–AA07 Final Rule Stage. 55 ...... Requirements for Long-Term Care Facilities: Regulatory Provisions to Promote 0938–AT36 Proposed Rule Stage. Program Efficiency, Transparency, and Burden Reduction (CMS–3347–P). 56 ...... CY 2020 Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters (CMS–9926–P) ...... 0938–AT37 Proposed Rule Stage. 57 ...... Exchange Program Integrity (CMS–9922–P) ...... 0938–AT53 Proposed Rule Stage. 58 ...... Policy and Technical Changes to the Medicare Advantage and the Medicare Pre- 0938–AT59 Proposed Rule Stage. scription Drug Benefit Programs for Contract Year 2020 (CMS–4185–P). 59 ...... Modernizing and Clarifying the Physician Self-Referral Regulations (CMS–1720– 0938–AT64 Proposed Rule Stage. P). 60 ...... Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System ...... 0970–AC72 Proposed Rule Stage.

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

61 ...... EB–5 Immigrant Investor Program Realignment ...... 1615–AC26 Prerule Stage. 62 ...... Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds ...... 1615–AA22 Proposed Rule Stage. 63 ...... Registration Requirement for Petitioners Seeking To File H–1B Petitions on Be- 1615–AB71 Proposed Rule Stage. half of Cap Subject Aliens. 64 ...... EB–5 Immigrant Investor Regional Center Program ...... 1615–AC11 Proposed Rule Stage. 65 ...... Strengthening the H–1B Nonimmigrant Visa Classification Program ...... 1615–AC13 Proposed Rule Stage. 66 ...... U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Biometrics Collection for Consistent, 1615–AC14 Proposed Rule Stage. Efficient, and Effective Operations. 67 ...... Removing H–4 Dependent Spouses from the Class of Aliens Eligible for Employ- 1615–AC15 Proposed Rule Stage. ment Authorization. 68 ...... Electronic Processing of Immigration Benefit Requests ...... 1615–AC20 Proposed Rule Stage. 69 ...... Updating Adjustment of Status Procedures for More Efficient Processing and Im- 1615–AC22 Proposed Rule Stage. migrant Visa Usage. 70 ...... Improvements to the Medical Certification for Disability Exceptions Processing .... 1615–AC23 Proposed Rule Stage. 71 ...... Credible Fear Reform ...... 1615–AC24 Proposed Rule Stage. 72 ...... Employment Authorization Documents for Asylum Applicants ...... 1615–AC27 Proposed Rule Stage. 73 ...... EB–5 Immigrant Investor Program Modernization ...... 1615–AC07 Final Rule Stage. 74 ...... Removal of Certain International Convention on Standards of Training, Certifi- 1625–AC48 Proposed Rule Stage. cation and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978, as Amended (STCW) Training Requirements. 75 ...... TWIC Reader Requirements; Delay of Effective Date ...... 1625–AC47 Final Rule Stage. 76 ...... Collection of Biometric Data From Aliens Upon Entry To and Exit From the 1651–AB12 Final Rule Stage. United States. 77 ...... Implementation of the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) at U.S. 1651–AB14 Final Rule Stage. Land Borders—Automation of CBP Form I–94W. 78 ...... Vetting of Certain Surface Transportation Employees ...... 1652–AA69 Proposed Rule Stage. 79 ...... Amending Vetting Requirements for Employees With Access to a Security Identi- 1652–AA70 Proposed Rule Stage. fication Display Area (SIDA). 80 ...... Protection of Sensitive Security Information ...... 1652–AA08 Final Rule Stage. 81 ...... Flight Training for Aliens and Other Designated Individuals; Security Awareness 1652–AA35 Final Rule Stage. Training for Flight School Employees. 82 ...... Security Training for Surface Transportation Employees ...... 1652–AA55 Final Rule Stage. 83 ...... Apprehension, Processing, Care and Custody of Alien Minors and Unaccom- 1653–AA75 Proposed Rule Stage. panied Alien Children. 84 ...... Establishing a Maximum Period of Authorized Stay for F–1 and Other Non- 1653–AA78 Proposed Rule Stage. immigrants. 85 ...... Adjusting Program Fees for the Student and Exchange Visitor Program ...... 1653–AA74 Final Rule Stage. 86 ...... Factors Considered When Evaluating a Governor’s Request for Individual Assist- 1660–AA83 Final Rule Stage. ance for a Major Disaster. 87 ...... Update to FEMA’s Regulations on Rulemaking Procedures ...... 1660–AA91 Final Rule Stage.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57815

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

88 ...... Enhancing and Streamlining the Implementation of ‘‘Section 3’’ Requirements for 2501–AD87 Proposed Rule Stage. Creating Economic Opportunities for Low- and Very Low-Income Persons and Eligible Businesses. 89 ...... Project Approval for Single Family Condominium (FR–5715) ...... 2502–AJ30 Final Rule Stage. 90 ...... Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Streamlining and Enhancement (FR–6123) 2529–AA97 Prerule Stage.

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage.

91 ...... Revisions to the Requirements for Exploratory Drilling on the Arctic Outer Conti- 1082–AA01 Proposed Rule Stage nental Shelf.

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

92 ...... Bump-Stock-Type Devices ...... 1140–AA52 Final Rule Stage. 93 ...... Implementation of the Provision of the Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery 1117–AB45 Proposed Rule Stage. Act of 2016 Relating to the Partial Filling of Prescriptions for Schedule II Con- trolled Substances. 94 ...... Procedures for Asylum ...... 1125–AA87 Proposed Rule Stage.

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

95 ...... Defining and Delimiting the Exemptions for Executive, Administrative, Profes- 1235–AA20 Proposed Rule Stage. sional, Outside Sales and Computer Employees. 96 ...... Regular and Basic Rates Under the Fair Labor Standards Act ...... 1235–AA24 Proposed Rule Stage. 97 ...... Joint Employment Under the Fair Labor Standards Act ...... 1235–AA26 Proposed Rule Stage. 98 ...... Labor Certification Process for Temporary Agricultural Employment in the United 1205–AB89 Proposed Rule Stage. States (H–2A workers). 99 ...... Health Reimbursement Arrangements and Other Account-Based Group Health 1210–AB87 Proposed Rule Stage. Plans. 100 ...... Definition of an ‘‘Employer’’ Under Section 3(5) of ERISA—Association Retire- 1210–AB88 Proposed Rule Stage. ment Plans and Other Multiple Employer Plans. 101 ...... Standards Improvement Project IV ...... 1218–AC67 Final Rule Stage. 102 ...... Tracking of Workplace Injuries and Illnesses ...... 1218–AD17 Final Rule Stage. 103 ...... Occupational Exposure to Beryllium and Beryllium Compounds in Construction 1218–AD21 Final Rule Stage. and Shipyard Sectors.

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

104 ...... Processing Buy America Waivers Based on Non availability ...... 2105–AE79 Proposed Rule Stage. 105 ...... Registration and Marking Requirements for Small Unmanned Aircraft ...... 2120–AK82 Final Rule Stage. 106 ...... Removing Regulatory Barriers for Automated Driving Systems ...... 2127–AM00 Prerule Stage. 107 ...... The Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles Rule for Model Years 2021– 2127–AL76 Proposed Rule Stage. 2026 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks. 108 ...... Passenger Equipment Safety Standards Amendments ...... 2130–AC46 Final Rule Stage. 109 ...... Pipeline Safety: Class Location Requirements ...... 2137–AF29 Prerule Stage. 110 ...... Hazardous Materials: Enhanced Safety Provisions for Lithium Batteries Trans- 2137–AF20 Proposed Rule Stage. ported by Aircraft. 111 ...... Pipeline Safety: Safety of Hazardous Liquid Pipelines ...... 2137–AE66 Final Rule Stage. 112 ...... Pipeline Safety: Safety of Gas Transmission Pipelines, MAOP Reconfirmation, 2137–AE72 Final Rule Stage. Expansion of Assessment Requirements and Other Related Amendments. 113 ...... Hazardous Materials: Oil Spill Response Plans and Information Sharing for High- 2137–AF08 Final Rule Stage. Hazard Flammable Trains (FAST Act).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57816 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

114 ...... Veterans Community Walk-in Care ...... 2900–AQ47 Proposed Rule Stage. 115 ...... Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (the Act), 2900–AQ42 Final Rule Stage. Public Law 115–174, 132 Stat. 1296. 116 ...... Veterans Health Administration Benefits Claims, Appeals, and Due Process ...... 2900–AQ44 Final Rule Stage. 117 ...... Veterans Care Agreements ...... 2900–AQ45 Final Rule Stage. 118 ...... Veterans Community Care Program ...... 2900–AQ46 Final Rule Stage.

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

119 ...... Reclassification of Major Sources as Area Sources Under Section 112 of the 2060–AM75 Proposed Rule Stage. Clean Air Act. 120 ...... Emission Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Existing Electric Utility 2060–AT67 Proposed Rule Stage. Generating Units; Revisions to Emission Guideline Implementing Regulations; Revisions to New Source Review Program. 121 ...... Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment New Source 2060–AT89 Proposed Rule Stage. Review (NSR): Project Emissions Accounting. 122 ...... Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Emission Standards for New, Reconstructed, and 2060–AT90 Proposed Rule Stage. Modified Sources Review. 123 ...... Mercury and Air Toxics Standards for Power Plants Residual Risk and Tech- 2060–AT99 Proposed Rule Stage. nology Review and Cost Review. 124 ...... The Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles Rule for Model Years 2021– 2060–AU09 Proposed Rule Stage. 2026 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks. 125 ...... Regulation of Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and Toxic Chemicals Under TSCA 2070–AK34 Proposed Rule Stage. Section 6(h). 126 ...... Pesticides; Certification of Pesticide Applicators Rule; Reconsideration of the 2070–AK37 Proposed Rule Stage. Minimum Age Requirements. 127 ...... Pesticides; Agricultural Worker Protection Standard; Reconsideration of Several 2070–AK43 Proposed Rule Stage. Requirements. 128 ...... Increasing Consistency and Transparency in Considering Costs and Benefits in 2010–AA12 Proposed Rule Stage. the Rulemaking Process. 129 ...... Hazardous and Solid Waste Management System: Disposal of Coal Combustion 2050–AG98 Proposed Rule Stage. Residues From Electric Utilities: Amendments to the National Minimum Criteria (Phase 2). 130 ...... National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for Lead and Copper: Regulatory 2040–AF15 Proposed Rule Stage. Revisions. 131 ...... National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Regulation of Perchlorate ...... 2040–AF28 Proposed Rule Stage. 132 ...... Revised Definition of ‘‘Waters of the United States’’ ...... 2040–AF75 Proposed Rule Stage. 133 ...... Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Gen- 2040–AF77 Proposed Rule Stage. erating Point Source Category. 134 ...... Peak Flows Management ...... 2040–AF81 Proposed Rule Stage. 135 ...... Section 404(c) Regulatory Revision ...... 2040–AF88 Proposed Rule Stage. 136 ...... Review of the Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Sulfur Oxides 2060–AT68 Final Rule Stage. 137 ...... Renewable Fuel Volume Standards for 2019 and Biomass-Based Diesel (BBD) 2060–AT93 Final Rule Stage. Volume for 2020. 138 ...... Review of Dust-Lead Hazard Standards and the Definition of Lead-Based Paint .. 2070–AJ82 Final Rule Stage. 139 ...... Service Fees for the Administration of the Toxic Substances Control Act ...... 2070–AK27 Final Rule Stage. 140 ...... Clean Water Act Hazardous Substances Spill Prevention ...... 2050–AG87 Final Rule Stage. 141 ...... Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk Management Programs 2050–AG95 Final Rule Stage. Under the Clean Air Act; Reconsideration of Amendments. 142 ...... Hazardous and Solid Waste Management System: Disposal of Coal Combustion 2050–AH01 Final Rule Stage. Residues From Electric Utilities: Amendments to the National Minimum Criteria (Phase 1, Part 2). 143 ...... Definition of ‘‘Waters of the United States’’—Recodification of Preexisting Rule ... 2040–AF74 Final Rule Stage.

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

144 ...... Amendments to Regulations Under the Americans With Disabilities Act ...... 3046–AB10 Proposed Rule Stage. 145 ...... Amendments to Regulations Under the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination 3046–AB11 Proposed Rule Stage. Act of 2008.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57817

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

146 ...... General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation (GSAR); GSAR Case 3090–AJ64 Proposed Rule Stage. 2015–G506, Adoption of Construction Project Delivery Method Involving Early Industry Engagement. 147 ...... General Services Acquisition Regulation (GSAR); GSAR Case 2016–G511, Con- 3090–AJ84 Proposed Rule Stage. tract Requirements for GSA Information Systems. 148 ...... General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation (GSAR); GSAR Case 3090–AJ85 Proposed Rule Stage. 2016–G515, Cyber Incident Reporting. 149 ...... Federal Permitting Improvement Steering Council (FPISC); FPISC Case 2018– 3090–AJ88 Proposed Rule Stage. 001; Fees for Governance, Oversight, and Processing of Environmental Re- views and Authorizations. 150 ...... GSAR Case 2008–G517, Cooperative Purchasing—Acquisition of Security and 3090–AI68 Final Rule Stage. Law Enforcement Related Goods and Services (Schedule 84) by State and Local Governments Through Federal Supply Schedules. 151 ...... General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation (GSAR); GSAR Case 3090–AJ41 Final Rule Stage. 2013–G502, Federal Supply Schedule Contract Administration. 152 ...... General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation (GSAR); GSAR Case 3090–AK03 Final Rule Stage. 2019–G501, Ordering Procedures for Commercial e-Commerce Portals.

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

153 ...... Detection and Avoidance of Counterfeit Parts ...... 2700–AE38 Proposed Rule Stage.

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

154 ...... of Information Act (FOIA) Regulations ...... 3206–AK53 Proposed Rule Stage. 155 ...... Direct-Hire Authority for Agency Chief Information Officers ...... 3206–AN65 Proposed Rule Stage. 156 ...... Administrative Law Judges ...... 3206–AN72 Final Rule Stage.

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

157 ...... Small Business HUBZone Program and Government Contracting Programs ...... 3245–AG38 Proposed Rule Stage. 158 ...... Women-Owned Small Business and Economically Disadvantaged Women- 3245–AG75 Proposed Rule Stage. Owned Small Business—Certification. 159 ...... Implementation of the Small Business 7(a) Lending Oversight Reform Act of 3245–AH05 Proposed Rule Stage. 2018.

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

160 ...... Revised Medical Criteria for Evaluating Digestive Disorders, Cardiovascular Dis- 0960–AG65 Proposed Rule Stage. orders, and Skin Disorders. 161 ...... Removing Inability to Communicate in English as an Education Category ...... 0960–AH86 Proposed Rule Stage. 162 ...... Newer and Stronger Penalties (Conforming Changes) ...... 0960–AH91 Proposed Rule Stage. 163 ...... Privacy Act Exemption: Personnel Security and Suitability Program Files ...... 0960–AH97 Proposed Rule Stage. 164 ...... References to Social Security and Medicare in Electronic Communications ...... 0960–AI04 Proposed Rule Stage. 165 ...... Availability of Information and Records to the Public ...... 0960–AI07 Proposed Rule Stage. 166 ...... Setting the Manner for the Appearance of Parties and Witnesses at a Hearing .... 0960–AI09 Proposed Rule Stage. 167 ...... Redeterminations When There Is a Reason To Believe Fraud or Similar Fault 0960–AI10 Proposed Rule Stage. Was Involved in an Individual’s Application for Benefits. 168 ...... Hearings Held by Administrative Appeals Judges of the Appeals Council ...... 0960–AI25 Proposed Rule Stage. 169 ...... Rules Regarding the Frequency and Notice of Continuing Disability Reviews ...... 0960–AI27 Proposed Rule Stage. 170 ...... Privacy and Disclosure of Official Records and Information ...... 0960–AI38 Proposed Rule Stage. 171 ...... Revised Medical Criteria for Evaluating Musculoskeletal Disorders (3318P) ...... 0960–AG38 Final Rule Stage. 172 ...... Privacy Act Exemption: Social Security Administration Violence Evaluation and 0960–AI08 Final Rule Stage. Reporting System (SSAvers).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57818 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

173 ...... Regulatory Options for Table Saws ...... 3041–AC31 Final Rule Stage. 174 ...... Portable Generators ...... 3041–AC36 Final Rule Stage.

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Regulation Sequence No. Title Identifier No. Rulemaking stage

175 ...... Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal [NRC–2011–0012] ...... 3150–AI92 Proposed Rule Stage. 176 ...... Regulatory Improvements for Production and Utilization Facilities Transitioning to 3150–AJ59 Proposed Rule Stage. Decommissioning [NRC–2015–0070]. 177 ...... Cyber Security at Fuel Cycle Facilities [NRC–2015–0179] ...... 3150–AJ64 Proposed Rule Stage. 178 ...... American Society of Mechanical Engineers 2015–2017 Code Editions Incorpora- 3150–AJ74 Proposed Rule Stage. tion by Reference [NRC–2016–0082]. 179 ...... Approval of American Society of Mechanical Engineers Code Cases, Revision 38 3150–AJ93 Proposed Rule Stage. [NRC–2017–0024]. 180 ...... Revision of Fee Schedules: Fee Recovery for FY 2019 [NRC–2017–0032] ...... 3150–AJ99 Proposed Rule Stage. 181 ...... Mitigation of Beyond Design Basis Events (MBDBE) [NRC–2014–0240] ...... 3150–AJ49 Final Rule Stage. 182 ...... Advanced Power Reactor 1400 (APR–1400) Design Certification [NRC–2015– 3150–AJ67 Final Rule Stage. 0224].

[FR Doc. ??–????? Filed ??–??–??; 8:45 am] regulatory burden on the public, the Farm Bill Implementation: Legislation BILLING CODE 6820–27–P Department has established an internal covering major commodity support RRTF to identify outdated regulations programs and crop insurance, trade, for elimination and administrative conservation, rural development, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE processes for streamlining. The USDA nutrition assistance and other programs RRTF is comprised of senior agency (the Farm Bill) expires at the end of Fall 2018 Statement of Regulatory managers representing all the major fiscal year 2018. Plans for Priorities missions of the Department. USDA is implementation to any new or modified programs reauthorized in the new Farm The Department of Agriculture’s also soliciting public comments on Bill will be considered upon enactment (USDA) ongoing regulatory reform recommended reforms through July and regulatory agenda priorities strategy remains one of the cornerstones 2019. adjusted accordingly. USDA notes that for creating a culture of consistent, ➢ Organizational Reform: To ensure Farm Bill implementation will allow us efficient service to our customers, while that USDA’s programs, agencies, and the opportunity to modify existing reducing burdens and improving offices best serve the Department’s regulations while introducing program efficiency. Accordingly, USDA’s fall customers, USDA is implementing reforms to ease the burden on our 2018 Regulatory Agenda reflects these organizational changes that are targeted customers and improve program priorities, including those at improving customer service like outcomes. administrative efficiencies such as seeking direct public feedback through streamlining and one-stop shopping. our Tell Sonny initiative. Through these Executive Order 13777—Enforcing the Moreover, these USDA regulatory reforms, USDA is breaking down Regulatory Reform Agenda reform efforts, combined with other organizational barriers that have Executive Order 13777 establishes a reform efforts, will make it easier to impeded the Department’s ability to Federal policy to lower regulatory invest, produce, and build in rural most effectively and efficiently support burdens on the American people by America, which will lead to the creation its customers across the Nation. implementing and enforcing regulatory of jobs and enhanced economic Moreover, reforms like the reform. The RRTF reviewed proposed, prosperity. To achieve results, USDA is consolidation of administrative pending and existing regulations to guided by the following comprehensive functions at the mission area level determine the deregulatory and set of priorities through which the eliminate inefficiencies and allow the regulatory actions to include in the 2018 Department, its employees, and external Department to best support the needs of fall Regulatory Agenda. These actions partners will work to identify and our customers. Through the were further evaluated to determine eliminate regulatory and administrative implementation of these improvements, which rules should be made a priority barriers and improve business processes USDA will be better positioned to based on the impact of their proposals to enhance program delivery and reduce remove obstacles, and give agricultural and the Department’s ability to finalize burdens on program participants. These producers every opportunity to prosper the action in FY 2019. Executive Order priorities include: and feed a growing world population. 13777 also directed the Department to ➢ Regulatory Reform Task Force These improvements support the seek input from entities significantly (RRTF): In response to Executive Order accomplishment of USDA’s mission to affected by Federal regulations. To 13777—Enforcing the Regulatory provide leadership on agriculture, food, satisfy this requirement, the Department Reform Agenda and Executive Order natural resources, rural prosperity, published a Request for Information 13771—Reducing Regulation and nutrition, and related issues through (RFI) in the Federal Register on July 17, Controlling Regulatory Costs, which set fact-based, data-driven, and customer- 2017, seeking public input on forth expectations for reducing the focused decisions. identifying regulatory reform initiatives

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57819

(82 FR 32649). The RFI asked the public The Department will promote ➢ Improve effectiveness and to identify regulations, guidance American agricultural products and efficiency of helping individuals move documents, or any other policy exports that benefit and grow the U.S. into work: The Food and Nutrition Act documents or administrative processes agricultural economy and rural of 2008 (FNA) establishes a time limit that need reform, as well as ideas on America: To achieve this, USDA will for participation in SNAP of three how to modify, streamline, expand, or expand international marketing months in three years for able-bodied repeal such items. Through the end of opportunities through promotion adults without children who are not June 2018, USDA had received and activities, development of international working. FNA allows states to waive the reviewed over 4,000 public comments standards, removal of trade barriers to time limit under certain circumstances. on recommended reforms, including U.S. exports, and negotiation of new The proposed action would modify requests from stakeholders to extend the trade agreements. USDA will also SNAP requirements and services for public comment period past its one-year partner with developing countries to able-bodied adults without children in time period. Accordingly, USDA has assist them with movement along the response to public input provided extended the public comment period agricultural market continuum from through an advance notice of proposed through July 18, 2019. While comments developing economies to developed rulemaking published on February 23, to the notice do not bind USDA to any economies with promising demand 2018. For more information about this further actions, all submissions are potential. rule, see RIN 0584–AE57. ➢ ➢ reviewed and inform actions to repeal, Agricultural Trade Promotion Revision of categorical eligibility in replace, or modify existing regulations. Program: This action will assist U.S. the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance agricultural industries to conduct Program (SNAP): The Food and Executive Order 13771—Reducing market promotion activities that Nutrition Act of 2008 allows households Regulation and Controlling Regulatory promote U.S. agricultural commodities in which all members receiving benefits Costs in foreign markets, including activities under a State program funded by the Executive Order 13771 directs that address existing or potential non- Temporary Assistance for Needy agencies to eliminate two existing tariff barriers to trade. For more Families (TANF) program are regulations for every new regulation information about this rule, see RIN categorically eligible to participate in while limiting the total costs associated 0551–AA92. SNAP. States have the option of with an agency’s regulations. The Department will ensure that adopting a policy in which households Specifically, it requires a regulatory programs are delivered efficiently, may become categorically eligible for two-for-one wherein an agency must effectively, with integrity, and a focus on SNAP because they receive a non-cash propose the elimination of two existing customer service: To achieve this, USDA or in-kind benefit or service funded by is working to leverage the strength and regulations for every new regulation it TANF. FNS will issue a proposed rule talent of USDA employees with publishes. Moreover, the costs to amend the regulations pertaining to continued dedication to data-driven associated with the new regulation must categorically eligible TANF households enterprise solutions through be completely offset by cost savings by limiting categorical eligibility to collaborative governance and human brought about by deregulation. households that received cash TANF or capital management strategies centered other substantial assistance from TANF. The Department’s 2018 fall Regulatory on accountability and professional For more information about this rule, Agenda reflects the Department’s development. USDA will reduce see RIN 0584–AE62. commitment to regulatory reform and regulatory and administrative burdens ➢ Reform provisions for the continues USDA’s rigorous hindering agencies from reaching the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance implementation of Executive Order greatest number of stakeholders. Program’s Quality Control System: FNS 13771. The Regulatory Agenda Improved customer service and will propose revisions to reform and identifies 72 rules, of which 34 rules are employee engagement within USDA strengthen its SNAP Quality Control not subject to the offsetting or will create a more effective and system based on stakeholder input deregulatory requirements of Executive accessible organization for all received from its June 1, 2018, request Order 13771. Of the remaining 38 rules, stakeholders. for State government and stakeholder 32 are deregulatory and six are ➢ Implement the National input as to how to best proceed with regulatory. Of the 32 deregulatory Bioengineered Food Disclosure reforming the SNAP Quality Control actions, USDA has identified 16 final Standard: This action was mandated by system. For more information about this rules that will be completed in FY 2019 the National Bioengineered Food rule, see RIN 0584–AE64. resulting in either a cost savings or Disclosure Standard (Law), which ➢ Simplifying Rural Development’s meeting the direction that an agency required USDA to develop a national Guaranteed Loan Regulations issue twice as many Executive Order standard and the procedures for its Combining Rural Development 13771 deregulatory actions as Executive implementation within two years of the Guaranteed Loan Regulations into a Order 13771 regulatory actions. Law’s enactment. Pursuant to the law, single regulation: Rural Development USDA’s 2018 fall Statement of AMS has proposed requirements that, if proposes to combine its four existing Regulatory Priorities was developed to finalized, will serve as a national guaranteed loan regulations: (1) Water lower regulatory burdens on the mandatory bioengineered food and Waste Disposal; (2) Community American people by implementing and disclosure standard for bioengineered Facilities; (3) Business and Industry; enforcing regulatory reform. These food and food that may be and (4) Rural Energy for America, into regulatory priorities will contribute to bioengineered. The proposed rule a single regulation. The proposed action the mission of the Department, and the published on May 4, 2018, and the will enable Rural Development to achievement of the long-term goals the deadline for public comment was July 3, simplify, improve, and enhance the Department aims to accomplish. 2018. AMS reviewed over 14,000 delivery of these four guaranteed loan Highlights of how the Department’s comments that will be analyzed and programs, and better manage the risks regulatory reform efforts contribute to addressed in the final rule. For more inherent with making and servicing the accomplishment of the Department’s information about this rule, see RIN guaranteed loans and will result in an strategic goals include the following: 0581–AD54. improved customer experience for

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57820 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

lenders trying to access these programs. proposed rulemaking published on ➢ National Organic Program; For more information about this rule, August 24, 2017, that solicited comment Strengthening Organic Enforcement: see RIN 0572–AC43. from the public to aid in the The Agricultural Marketing Service will ➢ Servicing Regulation for the Rural development of these revisions. APHIS propose changes to the USDA organic Utilities Service (RUS) received and analyzed approximately regulations to strengthen the oversight Telecommunications Programs: The 47,000 public comments. For more of organic products, improve RUS Telecommunications Programs information about this rule, see RIN enforcement of organic standards, and provide loan funding to build and 0579–AE35. protect organic integrity. The proposal expand broadband service into unserved The Department is making it a will address gaps in the organic and underserved rural communities, priority to maximize the ability of standards to deter fraud, and enhance along with limited funding to support American agricultural producers to enforcement. In addition, this proposal the costs to acquire equipment to prosper by feeding and clothing the will support consumer trust and provide distance learning and world: A strong and prosperous continued industry growth. For more telemedicine service. RUS will propose agricultural sector is essential to the information about this rule, see RIN to modify the program to give RUS well-being of the overall U.S. economy. 0581–AD09. ➢ greater authority to address servicing America’s farmers and ranchers ensure Establishing a performance actions associated with distressed loans a safe and reliable food and fuel supply standard for authorizing the employing only limited coordination and support job growth and economic importation and interstate movement of with the Department of Justice. This development. To maintain a strong fruits and vegetables: APHIS would will streamline and expedite servicing agricultural economy, USDA will broaden the existing performance actions, improve the government’s support farmers in starting and standard to provide for consideration of recovery on such loans, and improve maintaining profitable farm and ranch all new fruits and vegetables for overall customer service. For more businesses, as well as offer support to importation into the United States using information about this rule, see RIN producers affected by natural disasters. a notice-based process rather than 0572–AC41. through proposed and final rules. ➢ The Department will continue to work Amendments to Rural Development to create new markets and support a Likewise, APHIS would propose an (RD) environmental reviews for rural competitive agricultural system by equivalent revision of the performance infrastructure projects: USDA’s RD reducing barriers that inhibit standard governing the interstate programs provide loans, grants and loan agricultural opportunities and economic movements of fruits and vegetables from guarantees to support investment in growth. Hawaii and the U.S. territories (Guam, rural infrastructure to spur economic Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, ➢ Seed Cotton Changes to Agriculture development, create jobs, improve the and the U.S. Virgin Islands) and the Risk Coverage (ARC) and Price Loss quality of life, and address the health removal of commodity-specific Coverage (PLC) Programs: This final and safety needs of rural residents. The phytosanitary requirements from those action, as authorized by the Bipartisan current regulation requires that the regulations. This action will allow Budget Act of 2018, will revise the ARC environmental review under the APHIS to consider requests to authorize and PLC Programs to add seed cotton to National Environmental Policy Act the importation or interstate movement the list of covered commodities and (NEPA) be completed prior to the of new fruits and vegetables in a manner completion of the obligation of funds. establish a loan rate for the purposes of that is more flexible and responsive to The proposal will allow RD some calculating an ARC or PLC payment. For evolving pest situations in both the flexibility with the authority to move more information about this rule, see United States and exporting countries, forward with the obligation of funds RIN 560–AI40. ➢ while maintaining the science-based conditioned upon the completion of Market Facilitation Program: This process for making risk evaluations. For environmental review for infrastructure action will assist agricultural producers more information about this rule, see projects. For more information about with respect to commodities, livestock, RIN 0579–AD71. this rule, see RIN 0572–AC44. or livestock products that have been Providing all Americans access to a ➢ Animal Welfare; Amendments to significantly impacted by actions of safe, nutritious, and secure food supply Licensing Provisions and to foreign governments resulting in the is USDA’s most important Requirements for Dogs: The Animal and loss of traditional exports. For more responsibility, and it is one undertaken Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) information about this rule, see RIN with great seriousness. USDA has will issue a proposal that would amend 0560–AI42. critical roles in preventing foodborne the regulations governing the issuance ➢ Importation, Interstate Movement, illness and protecting public health, and renewal of licenses under the and Release Into the Environment of while ensuring Americans have access Animal Welfare Act (AWA) to better Certain Genetically Engineered to food and healthful diet. The promote sustained compliance under Organisms (Part 340): APHIS is Department will continue to prevent the AWA by (1) reducing licensing fees proposing to revise its regulations contamination and limit foodborne and (2) strengthening existing regarding the importation, interstate illness by expanding its modernization safeguards that prevent an individual movement, and environmental release of food inspection systems, and USDA’s whose license has been suspended or of certain genetically engineered research, education, and extension revoked, or who has a history of organisms in order to update the programs will continue to provide noncompliance, from obtaining a regulations in response to advances in information, tools, and technologies license or working with regulated genetic engineering and APHIS’ about the causes of foodborne illness animals. This rulemaking would also understanding of the plant health risk and its prevention. USDA will continue strengthen the veterinary care and posed by genetically engineered to develop partnerships that support watering standards for regulated dogs to organisms, thereby reducing burden for best practices in implementing effective better align the regulations with the regulated entities whose organisms pose nutrition assistance programs that humane care and treatment standards no plant health risks. For more ensure eligible populations have access set by the Animal Welfare Act. The information about this rule, see RIN to programs that support their food proposal follows an advance notice of 0579–AE47. needs.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57821

➢ Increase flexibilities provided to plans to seek public input to determine Summary of Legal Basis: The Organic school lunch program operators in whether its assessment of the need for Foods Production Act of 1990 (OFPA), meeting nutrition requirements: The these changes is shared by the public. 7 U.S.C. 6501 et seq., requires that the Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) plans For more information about this rule, Secretary establish an expedited to issue a final rule that provides see RIN 0596–AD32. administrative appeals procedure for flexibilities to Program operators ➢ Oil and Gas Resource Revisions: appealing an action of the Secretary or participating in the Child Nutrition The Forest Service plans to seek public certifying agent (section 6520). The NOP Programs effective School Year 2019– input as it evaluates its regulations regulations describe how appeals of 2020. For more information about this concerning its responsibility for proposed adverse action concerning rule, see RIN 0584–AE53. authorizing and regulating access to certification and accreditation are ➢ Provide regulatory flexibility for federal oil and natural gas resources. initiated and further contested (sections retailers in the Supplemental Nutrition Updating the regulations will afford an 205.680, 205.681). Assistance Program (SNAP): FNS will opportunity to modernize and Alternatives: The program considered issue a proposed rule to provide streamline analytical and procedural maintaining the status quo and hiring retailers with more flexibility in meeting requirements, reduce the paperwork additional support for the NOP appeals the enhanced SNAP eligibility burden on industry, reduce permitting team. This rulemaking was determined requirements of the 2016 final rule and times for leasing NFS lands, and help to be preferable because it will reduce meet the requirements expressed in the provide a more consistent approach to redundancy in the appeals process, Consolidated Appropriation Act of oil and gas management across the NFS. where an appellant can more quickly 2017. For more information about this In addition, USDA recommended appeal the administrator’s decision to rule, see RIN 0584–AE61. revising the regulation as part of the an administrative law judge. ➢ Modernize swine slaughter USDA Final Report Pursuant to Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This inspection: The Food Safety and Executive Order 13783 on Promoting action will affect certified operations Inspection Service (FSIS) plans to Energy Independence and Economic and accredited certifying agents. The finalize a proposal published on Growth. The regulation revision will primary impact is expected to be February 1, 2018, to establish a also make updates in response to expedited enforcement action, which voluntary New Swine Inspection legislative actions such as the Energy may benefit the organic community System (NSIS) for market-hog slaughter Policy Act of 2005. For more through deterrence and increased establishments, and mandatory information about this rule, see RIN consumer confidence in the organic provisions for all swine slaughtering 0596–AD33. label. It is not expected to have a establishments. NSIS will provide for significant cost burden upon affected increased offline inspection activities entities beyond any monetary penalty or that are more directly related to food suspension or revocation of certification safety resulting in greater compliance USDA—AGRICULTURAL MARKETING or accreditation, to which these entities with sanitation and Hazard Analysis SERVICE (AMS) are already subject to under current and Critical Control Point (HACCP) Proposed Rule Stage regulations. regulations and reduce the risk of Risks: No risks have been identified. foodborne illness. FSIS received over 1. NOP; Strengthening Organic Timetable: 83,500 comments. Many of the Enforcement comments requested that FSIS withdraw Priority: Other Significant. Action Date FR Cite the proposal to remove limits on line E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory. NPRM ...... 03/00/19 speeds due to the negative effect on Legal Authority: 7 U.S.C. 6501 animal welfare and worker safety. These CFR Citation: 7 CFR 205. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis comments will be analyzed and further Legal Deadline: None. Abstract: The rule supports a broader Required: No. addressed in the final rule. For more Government Levels Affected: None. information about this rule, see RIN strategy to strengthen oversight of Agency Contact: Jennifer Tucker, 0583–AD62. organic imports and the organic supply Deputy Administrator, USDA National The Department will ensure chain. AMS intends this rule to deter Organic Program, Department of productive and sustainable use of our fraud, enhance enforcement and protect Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing National Forest System Lands: To organic integrity. Service, 1400 Independence Avenue Statement of Need: The March 2010 ensure that America’s forests and SW, Washington, DC 20250, Phone: 202 Office of Inspector General (OIG) audit grasslands are healthy and sustainable, 260–8077. USDA manages approximately 193 of the National Organic Program (NOP) RIN: 0581–AD09 million acres of public land, much of it raised issues related to the program’s rural and remote. Land management progress for imposing enforcement activities can influence rural economies, actions. One concern was that organic and USDA can help enable economic producers and handlers facing USDA—AMS growth and recovery. revocation or suspension of their Final Rule Stage ➢ Update and Clarification of the certification are able to market their Locatable Mineral Regulations: The products as organic during what can be 2. National Bioengineered Food Forest Service plans to seek public a lengthy appeals process. As a result, Disclosure Standard input as it evaluates its management of AMS expects to publish a proposed rule Priority: Economically Significant. the activities associated with mining to revise language in section 205.681 of Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. ‘‘locatable minerals’’ that have an the NOP regulations, which pertains to Unfunded Mandates: This action may impact on the surface resources adverse action appeals. It is expected affect the private sector under Pub. L. including expediting Forest Service that this rule will streamline the NOP 104–4. review and approval of certain proposed appeals process such that appeals are E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. mineral operations on National Forest reviewed and responded to in a more Legal Authority: Pub. L. 114–216; 7 System (NFS) lands. The Forest Service timely manner. U.S.C. 1621 to 1627

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57822 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

CFR Citation: 7 CFR 1285. Marketing, Department of Agriculture, Agriculture is authorized to promulgate Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, July Agricultural Marketing Service, standards and other requirements 29, 2018. Washington, DC 20250, Phone: 202 692– governing the humane handling, care, Abstract: Abstract: On July 29, 2016, 1300. treatment, and transportation of certain the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 RIN: 0581–AD54 animals by dealers, exhibitors, operators was amended to establish a National of auction sales, research facilities, and Bioengineered Food Disclosure carriers and intermediate handlers. Standard (Law) (Pub. L. 114–216). The Definitions, regulations, and standards USDA—ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH provisions of this rule, pursuant to the established under the AWA are INSPECTION SERVICE (APHIS) law, will serve as a national mandatory contained in the Code of Federal bioengineered food disclosure standard Proposed Rule Stage Regulations (CFR) in 9 CFR parts 1, 2, for bioengineered food and food that and 3 (referred to below as the 3. Animal Welfare; Amendments to may be bioengineered. regulations). Part 2 provides Statement of Need: This rule would Licensing Provisions and to administrative requirements and sets establish a single, national standard to Requirements for Dogs forth institutional responsibilities for supersede a patchwork of similar Priority: Other Significant. regulated parties, including licensing standards implemented or planned by E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. requirements for dealers, exhibitors, and individual States. The rule may be Legal Authority: 7 U.S.C. 2131 to 2159 operators of auction sales. considered a regulatory reduction in CFR Citation: 9 CFR 1 to 3. Alternatives: APHIS considered that affected entities would be regulated Legal Deadline: None. several alternatives in developing by a uniform standard recognized in Abstract: This rulemaking would various aspects of the proposed rule. both interstate commerce and amend the licensing requirements under Regarding the types of animals that international trade. Consumers would the Animal Welfare Act regulations to would trigger the need for a new benefit from a single standard for promote compliance, reduce licensing license, APHIS considered requiring a consistent messaging about fees, and strengthen existing safeguards new license for all exotic or wild animal bioengineered food in the market. that prevent individuals and businesses changes, but rejected this in favor of Summary of Legal Basis: The who have a history of noncompliance requiring a new license for types of authority for this action is provided by from obtaining a license or working animals that are dangerous and have the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 with regulated animals. This action unique regulatory and care needs. With as amended by Pub. L. 114–216. would reduce regulatory burden with respect to license termination following Alternatives: The proposed rule respect to licensing and more efficiently two or more attempted inspections evaluated alternative thresholds for ensure licensees’ sustained compliance during the period of licensure, APHIS which disclosure would be required and with the Act. This rulemaking would considered requiring immediate alternative definitions for the term ‘‘very also strengthen the veterinary care and termination but decided in favor of small food manufacturer.’’ watering standards for regulated dogs to allowing the licensee the opportunity to Anticipated Cost and Benefits: better align the regulations with the first present evidence in defense. APHIS Implementation of the standard is humane care and treatment standards also considered different time frames for intended to coincide with that of the set by the Animal Welfare Act. the fixed-term license (e.g., four or five Food and Drug Administration’s Statement of Need: Although an years) and settled on three years based updated food labeling requirements. applicant for a license renewal must on our experience administering the Such coordination would reduce also certify that he or she is in AWA. expenses for affected food compliance with all regulations, the Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This manufactures, who would otherwise current regulations do not require the rule would result in cost savings for bear twice the cost of changing food applicant to show compliance before both APHIS and licensees by labels to comply with each regulation. APHIS renews his or her license. As a simplifying the licensing process and Risks: No risks have been identified at result, licensees can currently renew reducing fees, while enhancing the this time. their licenses indefinitely without protection of covered animals. Total Timetable: undergoing a thorough compliance cost reductions for affected entities are inspection. This proposal would require expected to range between $600,000 and Action Date FR Cite persons to seek a new license every $2.1 million per year. In accordance three years and demonstrate compliance with guidance on complying with E.O. NPRM ...... 05/04/18 83 FR 19860 with the AWA regulations as part of the 13771, the single primary estimate of Comment Period 07/03/18 application process. Further, the current End. cost savings for this proposed rule is Final Action ...... 11/00/18 regulations do not require a licensee to $1.37 million, the midpoint estimate of show compliance when the licensee savings annualized in perpetuity using Regulatory Flexibility Analysis makes any subsequent changes to his or a 7 percent discount rate. Required: Yes. her animals or facilities, including Risks: This proposed rule would Small Entities Affected: Businesses. noteworthy changes in the number or address two existing areas of concern. Government Levels Affected: Federal. type of animals used in regulated As noted, it is possible for licensees to Federalism: This action may have activity. Based on our experience with renew their licenses without undergoing federalism implications as defined in enforcing the AWA and regulations, we a thorough compliance inspection and E.O. 13132. are concerned that many licensees for licensees to make noteworthy International Impacts: This regulatory struggle to achieve and maintain changes in the number or type of action will be likely to have compliance after making such changes animals used in regulated activity. This international trade and investment to their animals used in regulated rulemaking would address those effects, or otherwise be of international activity. concerns by requiring licensees to interest. Summary of Legal Basis: Under the affirmatively demonstrate compliance Agency Contact: Arthur Neal, Deputy Animal Welfare Act (AWA or the Act, with the AWA regulations and Administrator, Transportation and 7 U.S.C. 2131 et seq.), the Secretary of standards and to obtain a new license

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57823

when making noteworthy changes determine whether APHIS has USDA—FOOD AND NUTRITION subsequent to the issuance of a license jurisdiction under the Plant Protection SERVICE (FNS) in regard to the number, type, or Act to regulate specific GE organisms Proposed Rule Stage location of animals used in regulated under Part 340, and to respond to two activities. Office of Inspector General audits 5. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Timetable: regarding APHIS’ regulation of Program: Requirements for Able-Bodied genetically engineered organisms, as Adults Without Dependents Action Date FR Cite well as the requirements of the 2008 Priority: Economically Significant. ANPRM ...... 08/24/17 82 FR 40077 Farm Bill. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. ANPRM Comment 10/23/17 E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory. Summary of Legal Basis: The Plant Legal Authority: Sec. 6(o)(4) of the Period End. Protection Act, as amended (7 U.S.C. ANPRM Comment 10/23/17 82 FR 48938 Food and Nutrition Act of 2008, as Period Ex- 7701 et seq.). amended, 7 U.S.C. 2011 to 2036 tended. Alternatives: Alternatives that we CFR Citation: 7 CFR 273.24(f). ANPRM Comment 11/02/17 considered were (1) to leave the Legal Deadline: None. Period Ex- regulations unchanged and (2) to Abstract: The Food and Nutrition Act tended End. regulate all GE organisms as presenting of 2008, as amended (the Act), NPRM ...... 11/00/18 a possible plant pest or noxious weed establishes a time limit for SNAP risk, without exception, and with no participation of three months in three Regulatory Flexibility Analysis years for able-bodied adults without means of granting nonregulated status. Required: No. dependents (ABAWDs) who are not Government Levels Affected: Federal, Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Not yet working. The Act provides State Local, State. determined. flexibility by allowing State agencies to Additional Information: Additional Risks: Unless we issue this proposal, request to waive the time limit if an area information about APHIS and its that an individual resides in has an programs is available on the internet at we will not be able to respond to the products of future technologies and not unemployment rate of over 10 percent http://www.aphis.usda.gov. or does not have a sufficient number of Agency Contact: Christine Jones, be able to provide appropriate oversight of GE organisms that pose a plant pest jobs to provide employment for Chief of Staff, Animal Care, Department individuals. This rule will propose risk. Additionally, as noted above, the of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health modifications to the Supplemental current regulations do not incorporate Inspection Service, 4700 River Road, Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Unit 84, Riverdale, MD 20737–1231, recommendations of two OIG audits, requirements and services for Able- Phone: 301 851–3730. and do not respond to the requirements Bodied Adults Without Dependents RIN: 0579–AE35 of the 2008 Farm Bill, particularly (ABAWDs) in response to public input regarding APHIS oversight of field trials provided through the advanced notice and environmental releases of of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM). USDA—APHIS genetically engineered organisms. Statement of Need: SNAP offers • Timetable: nutrition assistance to millions of 4. Importation, Interstate Movement, eligible, low-income individuals and and Release Into the Environment of Action Date FR Cite families; this nutrition assistance also Certain Genetically Engineered provides economic benefits to Organisms NPRM ...... 04/00/19 communities. It is important that SNAP Priority: Other Significant. support self-sufficiency and reduce the E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis need for government assistance for its Legal Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701 to Required: Undetermined. program participants. The Department 7772; 7 U.S.C. 7781–to 786 recognizes that a well-paying job CFR Citation: 7 CFR 340. Government Levels Affected: Federal, provides the best path to self-sufficiency Legal Deadline: None. State. for those who are able to work. To that Abstract: APHIS is proposing to revise International Impacts: This regulatory end, the Department aims to create its regulations regarding the action will be likely to have conditions that incentivize SNAP importation, interstate movement, and international trade and investment program participants to find environmental release of certain effects, or otherwise be of international employment. genetically engineered organisms in interest. Summary of Legal Basis: Currently order to update the regulations in unavailable. response to advances in genetic Additional Information: Additional Alternatives: Currently unavailable. engineering and APHIS’ understanding information about APHIS and its Anticipated Cost and Benefits: of the plant health risk posed by programs is available on the internet at Currently unavailable. genetically engineered organisms, http://www.aphis.usda.gov. Risks: Currently unavailable. Timetable: thereby reducing the burden for Agency Contact: Gwendolyn Burnett, regulated entities whose organisms pose Agriculturalist, BRS, Department of Action Date FR Cite no plant health risks. Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Statement of Need: This rule is Inspection Service, 4700 River Road, ANPRM ...... 02/23/18 83 FR 8013 necessary in order to respond to Unit 147, Riverdale, MD 20737–1236, NPRM ...... 10/00/18 advances in genetic engineering and Phone: 301 851–3893. APHIS’ understanding of the pest risks Regulatory Flexibility Analysis posed by genetically engineered (GE) RIN: 0579–AE47 Required: No. organisms, to assess such organisms for Small Entities Affected: Businesses. plant pest risks in light of those Government Levels Affected: Local, advances and establish a process to State.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57824 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

Agency Contact: Charles H. Watford, these provisions of the 2016 final rule, E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory. Regulatory Review Specialist, the Omnibus required USDA to first Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 601; Pub. L. Department of Agriculture, Food and amend the Definition of Variety 113–79 Nutrition Service, 3101 Park Center provision so that the number of CFR Citation: 7 CFR 273.2(j)(2). Drive, Alexandria, VA 22302, Phone: qualifying food varieties in each staple Legal Deadline: None. 703 605–0800, Email: charles.watford@ food category increased. Abstract: Under section 5(a) of the fns.usda.gov. Summary of Legal Basis: On May 5, Food and Nutrition Act of 2008, RIN: 0584–AE57 2017, the Consolidated Appropriation households in which all members Act of 2017 (the Omnibus) was signed receive benefits under a State program into law. Section 765 of the Omnibus funded by the Temporary Assistance to prohibited the USDA from Needy Families (TANF) program are USDA—FNS implementing the Definition of ‘‘Staple categorically eligible to participate in 6. Providing Regulatory Flexibility for Food’’ Acceptable Varieties in the Four the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Retailers in the Supplemental Nutrition Staple Food Categories provision (7 CFR Program (SNAP). This proposal would Assistance Program (SNAP) 271.2 and 7 CFR 278.1(b)(1)(ii)(C)) and change the regulations at 7 CFR Priority: Other Significant. variety as applied in the definition of 273.2(j)(2) pertaining to categorically E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. the term staple food as defined at 7 CFR eligible TANF households by limiting Legal Authority: Pub. L. 113–79; 7 271.2 to increase the number of items categorical eligibility to households that U.S.C. 2011 to 2036 that qualify as acceptable varieties in receive cash TANF or other substantial CFR Citation: 7 CFR 271.2; 7 CFR each staple food category from the assistance from TANF. Categorical 278.1. number of items that qualified as eligibility conferred by any non-cash Legal Deadline: None. acceptable varieties under the 2016 final assistance would be limited to Abstract: The Agricultural Act of 2014 rule. substantial ongoing assistance or amended the Food and Nutrition Act of Alternatives: Currently unavailable. services, such as child care, that have an 2008 to increase the requirement that Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The eligibility determination process similar certain Supplemental Nutrition Department has estimated that the to cash TANF. This rule would not alter Assistance Program (SNAP) authorized proposed rule will save approximately categorical eligibility for Supplemental retail food stores have available on a $16.1 million in fiscal year (FY) 2018 Security Income (SSI) households or continuous basis at least three varieties and approximately $22.5 million over General Assistance (GA) households. of items in each of four staple food five years, FY 2018 through FY 2022. Statement of Need: This proposal categories, to a mandatory minimum of Under the 2016 final rule, the cost to would change current regulations by seven varieties. The Food and Nutrition currently authorized small retailers was limiting categorical eligibility to Service (FNS) codified these mandatory estimated to average approximately households that receive cash assistance requirements. This change will provide $245 per store in the first year and about or other ongoing or substantial some retailers participating in SNAP as $620 over five years (including ongoing assistance from TANF, such as child authorized food stores with more costs of less than $100 per year for years care, and that have an eligibility flexibility in meeting the enhanced after the first). The proposed rule would determination process similar to cash SNAP eligibility requirements. reduce those costs to about $160 per TANF. These stricter requirements Statement of Need: The United States store in the first year and $500 over five would ensure that categorical eligibility Department of Agriculture (USDA, or years. is appropriately targeted toward low- the Department) Food and Nutrition Risks: NA. income households most in need while Timetable: Service (FNS, or the Agency) is maintaining administrative streamlining across Federal benefits programs. proposing changes to regulations in Action Date FR Cite Sections 271 and 278 which modify the Summary of Legal Basis: Currently unavailable. definition of variety as it pertains to the NPRM ...... 11/00/18 stocking requirements that certain retail Alternatives: Currently unavailable. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: food stores must meet to be eligible to Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Currently unavailable. participate in the Supplemental Required: No. Risks: Currently unavailable. Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Small Entities Affected: No. Timetable: On December 15, 2016, FNS published Government Levels Affected: None. Agency Contact: Charles H. Watford, a final rule that amended SNAP Action Date FR Cite regulations at 7 CFR parts 271 and 278 Regulatory Review Specialist, to clarify and enhance current SNAP Department of Agriculture, Food and NPRM ...... 01/00/19 regulations governing the eligibility of Nutrition Service, 3101 Park Center certain firms to participate in SNAP. On Drive, Alexandria, VA 22302, Phone: Regulatory Flexibility Analysis May 5, 2017, appropriations legislation 703 605–0800, Email: charles.watford@ Required: No. (the Consolidated Appropriation Act of fns.usda.gov. Small Entities Affected: Governmental 2017, or the Omnibus) suspended Related RIN: Related to 0584–AE27 Jurisdictions. implementation of two provisions in the RIN: 0584–AE61 Government Levels Affected: Federal, 2016 final rule: (1) The Definition of Local, State. ‘Staple Food’ Acceptable Varieties in Agency Contact: Charles H. Watford, the Four Staple Food Categories USDA—FNS Regulatory Review Specialist, provision and (2) the Definition of Department of Agriculture, Food and ‘Retail Food Store’ Breadth of Stock 7. Revision of Categorical Eligibility in Nutrition Service, 3101 Park Center provision (known as the Definition of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Drive, Alexandria, VA 22302, Phone: ‘‘Variety’’ provision and the Breadth of Program (SNAP) 703 605–0800, Email: charles.watford@ Stock provision, respectively). In order Priority: Economically Significant. fns.usda.gov. to move forward with implementing Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. RIN: 0584–AE62

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57825

USDA—FNS Nutrition Service, 3101 Park Center Action Date FR Cite 8. • Reform Provisions for the Drive, Alexandria, VA 22302, Phone: 703 605–0800, Email: charles.watford@ Interim Final Rule 07/01/18 Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Effective. Program’s Quality Control System fns.usda.gov. RIN: 0584–AE64 Final Action ...... 12/00/18 Priority: Other Significant. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is Regulatory Flexibility Analysis undetermined. Required: No. Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. USDA—FNS Government Levels Affected: None. E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. Final Rule Stage Additional Information: School Legal Authority: 7 U.S.C. 2011 to 2036 Lunch—NSLA Section 9(a)(1)—42 CFR Citation: 7 CFR 275. 9. Child Nutrition Programs: U.S.C. 1758(a)(1). Child and Adult Care Legal Deadline: None. Flexibilities for Milk, Whole Grains, Food Program—NSLA Section 17(g)—42 Abstract: The Department proposes to and Sodium Requirements U.S.C. 1766(g) Special Milk Program— revise its regulations for various Quality Priority: Other Significant. Child Nutrition Act Section 3(a)(1)—42 Control (QC) provisions in subpart C of E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. U.S.C. 1772(a)(1). School Breakfast 7 CFR part 275 to reflect numerous Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1758; 42 Program—Child Nutrition Act Section changes to the Supplemental Nutrition U.S.C. 1766; 42 U.S.C. 1772; 42 U.S.C. 4(e)(1)(A)—42 U.S.C. 1773(e)(1)(A). Assistance Program’s (SNAP) Quality 1773; 42 U.S.C. 1779 Smart Snacks in Schools—Child Control system. There have been CFR Citation: 7 CFR 210.10; 7 CFR Nutrition Act Section 10(b)—42 U.S.C. concerns about the SNAP QC process by 210.11; 7 CFR 215.7a; 7 CFR 220.8; 7 1779(b). not only its stakeholders, but FNS as CFR 226.20 Agency Contact: Charles H. Watford, well, primarily due to questions Legal Deadline: None. Regulatory Review Specialist, regarding the integrity of State collected Abstract: This final rule will increase Department of Agriculture, Food and error rate data that is used to develop flexibility in the Child Nutrition Nutrition Service, 3101 Park Center SNAP’s national error rates. SNAP has Program requirements related to milk, Drive, Alexandria, VA 22302, Phone: been working diligently for several years grains, and sodium effective School 703 605–0800, Email: charles.watford@ to address these concerns and plans to Year (SY) 2019–2020, which begins July fns.usda.gov. move forward to reform components of 1, 2019. This rule is the culmination of RIN: 0584–AE53 its QC process to ensure the integrity of an efficient rulemaking process initiated state-reported error rates. by the Department of Agriculture Statement of Need: The Department (USDA) following the Secretary’s May 1, USDA—FOOD SAFETY AND proposes to revise regulations for 2017, Proclamation affirming USDA’s INSPECTION SERVICE (FSIS) Quality Control (QC) provisions in commitment to assist schools in subpart C of 7 CFR part 275 to reflect overcoming operational challenges Final Rule Stage numerous changes to the Supplemental related to the school meals regulations 10. Egg Product Inspection Regulations Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) implemented in 2012. Priority: Other Significant. QC system to improve QC integrity. OIG Statement of Need: This final rule highlighted need for changes to SNAP E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. will codify, with some modifications, Legal Authority: 21 U.S.C. 1031 et seq. QC procedures in a recent audit. These three menu planning flexibilities changes can only be made through CFR Citation: 9 CFR 590.570; 9 CFR established by the interim final rule of 590.575; 9 CFR 590.146; 9 CFR 590.10; regulation, not just policy. SNAP has the same title published November 30, issued an RFI to gather ideas from 9 CFR 590.411; 9 CFR 590.502; 9 CFR 2017. By codifying these changes, USDA 590.504; 9 CFR 590.580; 9 CFR 591. stakeholders on potential regulation acknowledges the persistent menu changes to improve integrity and Legal Deadline: None. planning challenges experienced by Abstract: The Food Safety and improper payment management. some schools, and affirms its Inspection Service (FSIS) is proposing Summary of Legal Basis: FNA Section commitment to give schools more to require official egg products plants to 16(c). control over the food service decisions develop and implement Hazard Alternatives: None. Regulations and greater ability to offer wholesome Analysis and Critical Control Point needed to make significant change to and appealing meals that reflect local (HACCP) Systems and Sanitation SNAP quality control procedures. preferences. Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Costs: Summary of Legal Basis: The Currently unavailable. Benefits: consistent with HACCP and Sanitation authority for this action is provided by SOP requirements in the meat and Improved integrity and accuracy of the Richard B. Russell National School SNAP improper payment measurement. poultry products inspection regulations. Lunch Act, 42 U.S.C. 1758(a)(4), FSIS also is proposing to require egg Risks: NA. requiring that school meals reflect the Timetable: products plants to produce egg products latest Dietary Guidelines for Americans. using a process that will eliminate Alternatives: NA. Action Date FR Cite detectable pathogens from the finished Anticipated Cost and Benefits: product. Plants would be expected to NPRM ...... 03/00/19 Currently unavailable. develop HACCP systems that ensure Risks: NA. that pathogens cannot be detected in Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Timetable: finished egg products. Required: No. In addition, FSIS is proposing to Action Date FR Cite Small Entities Affected: No. amend the egg products inspection Government Levels Affected: None. Interim Final Rule 11/30/17 82 FR 56703 regulations by removing the current Agency Contact: Charles H. Watford, Interim Final Rule 01/29/18 requirements for prior approval by FSIS Regulatory Review Specialist, Comment Pe- of egg products plant drawings, Department of Agriculture, Food and riod End. specifications, and equipment prior to

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57826 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

their use in official plants; providing for savings from the elimination of outdated establishments demonstrated to provide the generic labeling of egg products; regulations. The regulatory greater public health protection than the requiring safe handling labels on shell requirements in the current system may existing inspection system. The Agency eggs and egg products; and changing the inefficiently use industry resources. is also proposing several changes to the Agency’s interpretation of the HACCP gives egg products plants the regulations that would affect all requirement for continuous inspection flexibility to decide how they wish to establishments that slaughter swine, in official plants. produce product in the manner that is regardless of the inspection system Statement of Need: The actions being most efficient to them, so that no under which they operate. proposed are part of FSIS’s regulatory detectable pathogens remain in the Statement of Need: The proposed reform effort to better define the roles of finished product. action is necessary to improve food Government and the regulated industry, Under the current command-and- safety, improve compliance with the encourage innovations that will improve control based system, FSIS personnel Humane Methods of Slaughter Act, food safety, remove unnecessary must approve waivers and no objection improve the effectiveness of market hog regulatory burdens on inspected egg letters for certain plant activities outside slaughter inspection, make better use of products plants, and make the egg the current regulations and inspection the Agency’s resources, and remove products regulations as consistent as program, personnel assume unnecessary regulatory obstacles to possible with the Agency’s meat and responsibility for ‘‘approving’’ innovation. poultry products regulations. production-associated decisions. Under Summary of Legal Basis: The Summary of Legal Basis: The HACCP, industry would assume full authority for this action is provided by authority for this action is provided by responsibility for production decisions the Federal Meat Inspection Act (21 the Egg Product Inspection Act (21 and execution. FSIS would monitor U.S.C. 601 et seq.). U.S.C. 1031 et seq.). plants’ compliance with the Alternatives: The Agency is Alternatives: The Agency considered requirement that finished egg products considering alternatives such as: (1) A the following regulatory alternatives for not contain detectable pathogens and mandatory New Swine Slaughter the implementation of government within HACCP requirements. This Inspection System (NSIS) for market hog standards (HACCP) and related allows industry and the Agency to slaughter establishments and (2) a requirements for the egg products reduce costs for approving activities and voluntary NSIS for market hog industry: (1) Status quo; (2) Intensify allows for better use of resources. establishments, under which FSIS present inspection; (3) Voluntary Risks: None. would conduct the same offline HACCP regulatory program; (4) Timetable: inspection activities as traditional Mandatory HACCP regulation with inspection. exemption for small businesses; (5) Action Date FR Cite Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Modified HACCP recording deviations proposed regulations are expected to and responses only; (6) Mandatory NPRM ...... 02/13/18 83 FR 6314 benefit establishments by removing HACCP, Sanitation SOPs, and lethality NPRM Comment 06/13/18 unnecessary regulatory obstacles to performance standards adoption; and Period End. innovation and allowing establishments implementation of the sixth of these Final Action ...... 05/00/19 more flexibility in line configuration. regulatory alternatives, mandatory The proposed changes are also expected HACCP, Sanitation SOPS, and lethality Regulatory Flexibility Analysis to reduce establishments’ sampling performance standards, should achieve Required: No. costs. Additionally, the proposed immediate reductions in, and an Small Entities Affected: Businesses. eventual minimization of, foodborne Government Levels Affected: None. regulations are expected to improve the hazards. Agency Contact: Matthew Michael, effectiveness of market hog slaughter Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Costs Director, Issuances Staff, Department of inspection, leading to a reduction in the to the egg products industry come from Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection number of human illnesses attributed to the development of Sanitation SOPs and Service, Office of Policy and Program products derived from market hogs. The HACCP plans and compliance with the Development, 1400 Independence proposed actions make better use of the proposed HACCP requirements. FSIS Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250– Agency’s resources, which is expected will incur costs to train egg products 3700, Phone: 202 720–0345, Fax: 202 to reduce the Agency’s personnel and inspectors (EPIs) to ensure that they can 690–0486, Email: matthew.michael@ training budgetary requirements. competently perform inspection duties fsis.usda.gov. Establishments are expected to incur associated with HACCP and Sanitation RIN: 0583–AC58 increased labor and recordkeeping costs. SOPs at the 77 federally-inspected egg Risks: None. products plants. While EPIs are in Timetable: training, FSIS will also incur costs to USDA—FSIS Action Date FR Cite pay for replacement inspectors so that egg products plants can continue to 11. Modernization of Swine Slaughter Inspection NPRM ...... 02/01/18 83 FR 4780 operate. NPRM Comment 04/02/18 Potential industry cost reductions Priority: Other Significant. Period End. from the proposed rule come from E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. Final Rule ...... 04/00/19 generic labeling, and the elimination of Legal Authority: 21 U.S.C. 601 et seq. certain regulations, waivers, and no CFR Citation: 9 CFR 301; 9 CFR 309; Regulatory Flexibility Analysis objection letters. Under generic labeling, 9 CFR 310; 9 CFR 314. Required: No. plants do not have to submit certain Legal Deadline: None. Small Entities Affected: Businesses. labels to FSIS for small changes, Abstract: The Food Safety and Government Levels Affected: None. allowing plants to avoid a 60-day Inspection Service (FSIS) is proposing Agency Contact: Matthew Michael, approval process and documentation of to amend the Federal meat inspection Director, Issuances Staff, Department of submissions for the approval of new regulations to establish a new Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection labels. In addition, plants receive cost inspection system for swine slaughter Service, Office of Policy and Program

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57827

Development, 1400 Independence Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Not done as a result of the Onshore Oil and Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250– applicable. Gas Leasing Reform Act of 1987. 3700, Phone: 202 720–0345, Fax: 202 Risks: Not applicable. Alternatives: Forest Service 36 CFR 690–0486, Email: matthew.michael@ Timetable: 228(e) regulations are done as a result of fsis.usda.gov. Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Reform RIN: 0583–AD62 Action Date FR Cite Act of 1987. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Not ANPRM ...... 09/13/18 83 FR 46451 applicable. ANPRM Comment 10/15/18 Risks: Not applicable. USDA—FOREST SERVICE (FS) Period End. Timetable: Prerule Stage Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Action Date FR Cite 12. Update and Clarification of the Required: Undetermined. Locatable Minerals Regulations Government Levels Affected: Federal. ANPRM ...... 09/13/18 83 FR 46458 Agency Contact: Ann Goode, ANPRM Comment 10/15/18 Priority: Other Significant. Department of Agriculture, Forest Period End. E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. Service, 1400 Independence Avenue Legal Authority: 30 U.S.C. 612 SW, Washington, DC 20250, Phone: 202 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis CFR Citation: 36 CFR 228(A). 720–7123, Email: [email protected]. Required: Undetermined. Legal Deadline: None. RIN: 0596–AD32 Government Levels Affected: Federal. Abstract: The Forest Service proposes Agency Contact: Nicholas Diprofio, the amendment of its locatable mineral Department of Agriculture, Forest regulations that better reflect the needs USDA—FS Service, 1400 Independence Avenue of both the Forest Service and mining SW, Washington, DC 20250, Phone: 202 industry. By addressing recent issues 13. Oil and Gas Resource Revision 205–1082, Email: [email protected]. and remedying existing weakness in Priority: Other Significant. RIN: 0596–AD33 current regulations that have been E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. identified, the Forest Service will be in Legal Authority: 30 U.S.C. 612; 30 a better position to better implement its U.S.C. 181; 30 U.S.C. 351; 30 U.S.C. 21 USDA—RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE mining regulations. The goals of the CFR Citation: 36 CFR 228(E). (RUS) regulatory revision are (1) to expedite Legal Deadline: None. Forest Service review and approval of Abstract: The Forest Service plays a Final Rule Stage certain proposed mineral operations role in the leasing and development of authorized by the United States mining Federally owned oil and natural gas 14. Servicing Regulation for the Rural laws; (2) to increase consistency with found on National Forest System lands Utilities Service (RUS) the United States Department of the in partnership with the Bureau of Land Telecommunications Programs Interior, Bureau of Land Management Management. Updating the regulations Priority: Other Significant. (BLM) surface management regulations will afford an opportunity to modernize E.O. 13771 Designation: Fully or governing operations authorized by the and streamline analytical and Partially Exempt. United States mining laws to assist procedural requirements and help Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 7 U.S.C. those who conduct these operations on provide a more consist approach to oil 1981; 16 U.S.C. 1005 lands managed by each agency; and (3) and gas management across the National CFR Citation: 7 CFR 1782. to increase the Forest Service’s Forest System. The potential changes to Legal Deadline: None. nationwide consistency in regulating the existing regulation permitting Abstract: The regulation will cover mineral operations authorized by the sections include eliminating language servicing actions associated with the United States mining laws. that is redundant with the NEPA Telecommunications Infrastructure Statement of Need: The Forest Service process, removing confusing options, Loan Program, Broadband Access Loan proposes the amendment of its locatable and ensuring better alignment with the and Loan Guarantee Program, Distance mineral regulations to better reflect the BLM regulations. The intent of these Learning and Telemedicine Program, needs of both the Forest Service and potential changes would be to decrease and Broadband Initiatives Program mining industry. By addressing recent permitting times by removing regulatory (hereinafter collectively referred to as issues and remedying existing weakness burdens that unnecessarily encumber the ‘‘RUS Telecommunications in current regulations that have been energy production across the National Programs’’). identified, the Forest Service will be in Forest System. Statement of Need: The RUS a better position to implement its Statement of Need: The Forest Service Telecommunications Programs provide mining regulations, thus reducing plays a role in the leasing and loan funding to build and expand processing timelines and redundancies. development of federally owned oil and broadband service into unserved and Summary of Legal Basis: The Mining natural gas found on National Forest underserved rural communities, along Law of 1872, as amended, confers a System lands in partnership with the with very limited funding to support the statutory right to enter upon certain Bureau of Land Management. Updating costs to acquire equipment to provide National Forest System lands to search the regulations will afford an distance learning and telemedicine for locatable minerals. These rules opportunity to modernize and service. This action will provide govern prospecting, exploration, streamline analytical and procedural servicing actions available for the loan development, mining, and processing requirements and help provide a more portofolio and will enable the Agency to operations conducted on National consist approach to oil and gas quickly and consistently address Forest System lands. management across the National Forest servicing actions and improve customer Alternatives: A no action alternative System. service. would leave the regulations unchanged, Summary of Legal Basis: Forest Summary of Legal Basis: This action thus maintaining the status-quo. Service 36 CFR 228(e) regulations are is required by statute, the Agricultural

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57828 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

Act of 2014 amendment to section 601 and better manage the risks inherent servicing to improve portfolio of the Rural Electrification Act of 1936 with making and servicing guaranteed management (7 U.S.C. 950bb). This section requires loans and will result in an improved Risks: N/A. the Secretary to establish written customer experience for lenders trying Timetable: procedures for all broadband programs to access these programs. This new to recover funds from loan defaults. structure will also make it more efficient Action Date FR Cite Alternatives: The agency considered and faster to promulgate regulations using other existing RD agency associated with amending existing Final Rule ...... 05/00/19 regulations and decided upon programs or incorporating newly combining Telecommunications authorized programs in the future. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis servicing requirements with the Water Statement of Need: Rural Required: Undetermined. Programs servicing regulation. These Development is combining its four Government Levels Affected: None. types of RUS loans are more similar guaranteed loan programs: (1) Water and Agency Contact: Thomas P. Dickson, than other RD loan programs. Waste Disposal; (2) Community Department of Agriculture, Rural Anticipated Cost and Benefits: There Facilities; (3) Business and Industry; Utilities Service, 1400 Independence are no anticipated costs. The rule will and (4) Rural Energy for America into a Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250, ensure recipients comply with the single regulation. The new regulation Phone: 202 690–4492, Email: established objectives and requirements will encompass the policies and [email protected]. for loans, repaying loans on schedule procedures for guaranteed loan making RIN: 0572–AC43 and acting in accordance with any and servicing, lender reporting, and BILLING CODE 3410–90–P necessary agreements, ensure serving program monitoring. The proposed actions are handled consistently, and action is expected to involve a few substantive policy changes in order to protect the financial interest of the DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE (DOC) Agency. achieve consistency across the included Risks: N/A. programs and better customer Statement of Regulatory and Timetable: experience for lenders trying to access Deregulatory Priorities these programs. Established in 1903, the Department Action Date FR Cite Summary of Legal Basis: This of Commerce (Commerce) is one of the regulatory action is not required by Final Rule ...... 06/00/19 oldest Cabinet-level agencies in the statute or court order; however, the Federal Government. Commerce’s underlying statutes authorizing these Regulatory Flexibility Analysis mission is to create the conditions for policies are the Consolidated Farm and economic growth and opportunity by Required: No. Rural Development Act, 7 U.S.C. 1921 Government Levels Affected: None. promoting innovation, Establishing a Performance Standard for Agency Contact: Thomas P. Dickson, entrepreneurship, competitiveness, and Authorizing the Importation and Department of Agriculture, Rural environmental stewardship. Commerce Interstate Movement of Fruits and Utilities Service, 1400 Independence has 12 operating units, which are Vegetables (0579–AD71); Concluded 8/ Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250, responsible for managing a diverse 24/2018 and 9007 of the 2002 Farm Bill Phone: 202 690–4492, Email: portfolio of programs and services, as amended, 7 U.S.C. 8107. [email protected]. ranging from trade promotion and Alternatives: The alternative is to RIN: 0572–AC41 economic development assistance to continue operating under the current broadband and the National Weather existing four regulations for these Service. programs. Commerce touches Americans daily, USDA—RUS Anticipated Cost and Benefits: At this time an estimated cost is not known. in many ways—making possible the 15. • OnerD Guaranteed Loan The proposed action is expected to daily weather reports and survey Regulation reflect current program policy and research; facilitating technology that all Priority: Other Significant. Major produce the same policy results, but in of us use in the workplace and in the status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is a more effective manner. Anticipated home each day; supporting the undetermined. benefits include: development, gathering, and E.O. 13771 Designation: Fully or • Improve quality customer transmission of information essential to Partially Exempt. experience by streamlining and competitive business; enabling the Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined consolidating similar guaranteed loan diversity of companies and goods found CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined. programs into a client-driven in America’s and the world’s Legal Deadline: None. consolidated regulation. marketplace; and supporting Abstract: Rural Development • Advance economic development environmental and economic health for proposes to combine into a single and access to capital by reducing the communities in which Americans regulation its four guaranteed loan regulatory complexities and live. programs: (1) Water and Waste Disposal, redundancies. Commerce has a clear and compelling (2) Community Facilities, (3) Business • Improve operational efficiencies vision for itself, for its role in the and Industry, and (4) Rural Energy for and cross-program coordination (oneRD) Federal Government, and for its roles America. The new regulation will by enabling staff to learn all RD supporting the American people, now encompass the policies and procedures guaranteed loan programs using one and in the future. To achieve this vision, for guaranteed loan making and regulation Commerce works in partnership with servicing, lender reporting, and program • Enable RD to integrate innovation businesses, universities, communities, monitoring. The proposed action will in the delivery of loan guarantees and and workers to: enable Rural Development to simplify, align with industry lending practices b Innovate by creating new ideas improve, and enhance the delivery of • Create a regulation that paves the through cutting-edge science and these four guaranteed loan programs, way for modern processing and technology from advances in

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57829

nanotechnology, to ocean exploration, rulemakings, even where public growth. Commerce is where business to broadband deployment, and by participation is not required by law. and environmental interests intersect, protecting American innovations Commerce has implemented and the classic debate on the use of through the patent and trademark Executive Order 13771 working through natural resources is transformed into a system; its Regulatory Reform Task Force ‘‘win-win’’ situation for the b Support entrepreneurship and established under Executive Order environment and the economy. commercialization by enabling 13777 to identify and prioritize Three of NOAA’s major components, community development and deregulatory actions that each bureau the National Marine Fisheries Services strengthening minority businesses and within the Department can take to (NMFS), the National Ocean Service small manufacturers; reduce and remove regulatory burdens (NOS), and the National Environmental b Maintain U.S. economic on stakeholders. Satellite, Data, and Information Service competitiveness in the global In Fiscal Year 2019, Commerce (NESDIS), exercise regulatory authority. marketplace by promoting exports, expects to publish [7] regulatory actions NMFS oversees the management and ensuring a level playing field for U.S. and [59] deregulatory actions, far conservation of the Nation’s marine businesses, and ensuring that exceeding the requirement under fisheries; protects marine mammals and technology transfer is consistent with Executive Order 13771 to publish two Endangered Species Act-listed marine our nation’s economic and security deregulatory actions for every one and anadromous species; and promotes interests; regulatory action. To that end, economic development of the U.S. Commerce may have other deregulatory fishing industry. NOS assists the coastal b Provide effective management and actions to implement that do not States in their management of land and stewardship of our nation’s resources currently appear in the agenda. ocean resources in their coastal zones, and assets to ensure sustainable including estuarine research reserves; economic opportunities; and National Oceanic and Atmospheric manages the national marine b Administration Make informed policy decisions sanctuaries; monitors marine pollution; and enable better understanding of the Commerce, through NOAA, has a and directs the national program for economy by providing accurate unique role in promoting stewardship of deep-seabed minerals and ocean economic and demographic data. the global environment through thermal energy. NESDIS administers the Commerce is a vital resource base, a effective management of the Nation’s civilian weather satellite program and tireless advocate, and Cabinet-level marine and coastal resources and in licenses private organizations to operate voice for job creation. The Regulatory monitoring and predicting changes in commercial land-remote sensing Plan tracks the most important the Earth’s environment, thus linking satellite systems. regulations that implement these policy trade, development, and technology In the environmental stewardship and program priorities, as well as new with environmental issues. NOAA has area, NOAA’s goals include: Rebuilding efforts by the Department to remove the primary Federal responsibility for and maintaining strong U.S. fisheries by unnecessary regulatory burdens on providing sound scientific observations, using market-based tools and ecosystem external stakeholders. assessments, and forecasts of approaches to management; conserving, Responding to the Administration’s environmental phenomena on which protecting, and recovering marine Regulatory Philosophy and Principles resource management, adaptation, and mammals and Endangered Species Act- other societal decisions can be made. listed marine and anadromous species The vast majority of Commerce’s NOAA establishes and administers while still allowing for economic and programs and activities do not involve Federal policy for the conservation and recreational opportunities; promoting regulation. Of Commerce’s 12 primary management of the Nation’s oceanic, healthy coastal ecosystems by ensuring operating units, only three bureaus will coastal, and atmospheric resources. It that economic development is managed be planning actions that are considered provides a variety of essential in ways that maintain biodiversity and the ‘‘most important’’ significant pre- environmental and climate services vital long-term productivity for sustained regulatory or regulatory actions for FY to public safety and to the Nation’s use; and modernizing navigation and 2019. During the next year, the National economy, such as weather forecasts, positioning services. In the Oceanic and Atmospheric drought forecasts, and storm warnings. environmental assessment and Administration (NOAA) plans to It is a source of objective information on prediction area, goals include: publish five rulemaking actions that are the state of the environment. NOAA Understanding the impacts of a designated as Regulatory Plan actions. plays the lead role in achieving changing climate and communicating The Bureau of Industry and Security Commerce’s goal of promoting that understanding to government and (BIS) and the United States Patent and stewardship by providing assessments private sector stakeholders enabling Trademark Office will each publish one of the global environment. them to adapt; continually improving rulemaking action designated as Recognizing that economic growth the National Weather Service; Regulatory Plan actions. Further must go hand-in-hand with implementing reliable seasonal and information on these actions is provided environmental stewardship, Commerce, interannual climate forecasts to guide below. through NOAA, conducts programs economic planning; providing science- Commerce has a long-standing policy designed to provide a better based policy advice on options to deal to prohibit the issuance of any understanding of the connections with very long-term (decadal to regulation that discriminates on the between environmental health, centennial) changes in the environment; basis of race, religion, gender, or any economics, and national security. and advancing and improving short- other suspect category and requires that Commerce’s emphasis on ‘‘sustainable term warning and forecast services for all regulations be written so as to be fisheries’’ is designed to boost long-term the entire environment. understandable to those affected by economic growth in a vital sector of the them. The Secretary also requires that U.S. economy while conserving the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation Commerce afford the public the resources in the public trust and and Management Act maximum possible opportunity to minimizing any economic dislocation Magnuson-Stevens Fishery participate in Departmental necessary to ensure long-term economic Conservation and Management Act

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57830 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

(Magnuson-Stevens Act) rulemakings rebuild. Other measures include listed species found in part or entirely concern the conservation and staggering fishing seasons or limiting in the United States and its waters, management of fishery resources in the gear types to avoid gear conflicts on the NMFS has jurisdiction over nearly 100 U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone fishing grounds and establishing species. NMFS’ rulemaking actions are (generally 3–200 nautical miles). Among seasonal and area closures to protect focused on determining whether any the several hundred rulemakings that fishery stocks. species under its responsibility is an NOAA plans to issue in FY 2019, a endangered or threatened species and Marine Mammal Protection Act number of the regulatory and whether those species must be added to deregulatory actions will be significant. The Marine Mammal Protection Act the list of protected species. NMFS is The exact number of such rulemakings of 1972 (MMPA) provides the authority also responsible for designating, is unknown, since they are usually for the conservation and management of reviewing, and revising critical habitat initiated by the actions of eight regional marine mammals under U.S. for any listed species. In addition, under Fishery Management Councils (FMCs) jurisdiction. It expressly prohibits, with the ESA, Federal agencies consult with that are responsible for preparing certain exceptions, the intentional take NMFS on any proposed action fishery management plans (FMPs) and of marine mammals. The MMPA allows, authorized, funded, or carried out by FMP amendments, and for drafting upon request, the incidental take of that agency that may affect listed implementing regulations for each marine mammals by U.S. citizens who species or designated critical habitat, or managed fishery. NOAA issues engage in a specified activity (e.g., oil that may affect proposed species or regulations to implement FMPs and and gas development, pile driving) critical habitat. These interagency FMP amendments. Once a rulemaking is within a specified geographic region. consultations are designed to assist triggered by an FMC, the Magnuson- NMFS authorizes incidental take under Federal agencies in fulfilling their duty Stevens Act places stringent deadlines the MMPA if we find that the taking to ensure Federal actions do not upon NOAA by which it must exercise would be of small numbers, have no jeopardize the continued existence of a its rulemaking responsibilities. FMPs more than a ‘‘negligible impact’’ on species or destroy or adversely modify and FMP amendments for Atlantic those marine mammal species or stock, critical habitat, while still allowing highly migratory species, such as and would not have an ‘‘unmitigable Federal agencies to fulfill their bluefin tuna, swordfish, and sharks, are adverse impact’’ on the availability of respective missions (e.g., permitting developed directly by NOAA, not by the species or stock for ‘‘subsistence’’ infrastructure projects or oil and gas FMCs. uses. NMFS also initiates rulemakings exploration, conducting military The FMCs provide a forum for public under the MMPA to establish a readiness activities). debate and, using the best scientific management regime to reduce marine information available, make the mammal mortalities and injuries as a NOAA’s Regulatory Plan Actions judgments needed to determine result of interactions with fisheries. In While most of the rulemakings optimum yield on a fishery-by-fishery addition, the MMPA allows NMFS to undertaken by NOAA do not rise to the basis. Optional management measures permit the collection of wild animals for level necessary to be included in are examined and selected in scientific research or public display or Commerce’s regulatory plan, NMFS is accordance with the national standards to enhance the survival of a species or undertaking five actions that rise to the set forth in the Magnuson-Stevens Act. stock, and established the Marine level of ‘‘most important’’ of This process, including the selection of Mammal Commission, which makes Commerce’s significant regulatory the preferred management measures, recommendations to the Secretaries of actions and thus are included in this constitutes the development, in the Departments of Commerce and the year’s regulatory plan. A description of simplified form, of an FMP. The FMP, Interior and other Federal officials on the five regulatory plan actions is together with draft implementing protecting and conserving marine provided below. regulations and supporting mammals. The Act underwent Additionally, NMFS is undertaking a documentation, is submitted to NMFS significant changes in 1994 to allow for series of rulemakings that are for review against the national standards takings incidental to commercial fishing considered deregulatory, as defined by set forth in the Magnuson-Stevens Act, operations, to provide certain Executive Order 13771. Such actions in other provisions of the Act, and other exemptions for subsistence and directly benefit the regulated applicable laws. The same process scientific uses, and to require the community by increasing access, applies to amending an existing preparation of stock assessments for all providing more economic opportunity, approved FMP. marine mammal stocks in waters under reducing costs, and/or increasing FMPs address a variety of issues U.S. jurisdiction. flexibility. Specific examples of such including maximizing fishing actions are the Commerce Trusted Endangered Species Act opportunities on healthy stocks, Trader Program and modifications to the rebuilding overfished stocks, and The Endangered Species Act of 1973 Fisheries Finance Program, as described addressing gear conflicts. One of the (ESA) provides for the conservation of below. Other examples include problems that FMPs may address is species that are determined to be rulemakings implementing regional preventing overcapitalization ‘‘endangered’’ or ‘‘threatened,’’ and the Fishery Management Council actions (preventing excess fishing capacity) of conservation of the ecosystems on that alleviate or reduce previous fisheries. This may be resolved by which these species depend. The ESA requirements. market-based systems such as catch authorizes both NMFS and the Fish and 1. Commerce Trusted Trader Program shares, which permit shareholders to Wildlife Service (FWS) to jointly (0648–BG51): Under the Magnuson- harvest a quantity of fish and which can administer the provisions of the ESA. Stevens Fishery Conservation and be traded on the open market. Harvest NMFS manages marine and Management Act, importation of fish limits based on the best available ‘‘anadromous’’ species, and FWS products taken in violation of foreign scientific information, whether as a total manages land and freshwater species. law and regulation is prohibited. To fishing limit for a species in a fishery or Together, NMFS and FWS work to enforce this prohibition, NMFS has as a share assigned to each vessel protect critically imperiled species from implemented the Seafood Import participant, enable stressed stocks to extinction. Of the approximately 720 Monitoring Program (81 FR 88975,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57831

December 9, 2016) which requires U.S. mammals—as is the case for certain Council member’s financial interests; (2) importers to report on the origin of fish methods of geophysical exploration, determining whether a close causal link products and to keep supply chain including the use of airgun arrays (i.e., exists between a Council decision and a records. The Commerce Trusted Trader ‘‘seismic surveys’’)—action proponents benefit to a Council member’s financial Program will establish a voluntary must ensure that take occurs in a lawful interest; and (3) establishing regional program for certified seafood importers manner. However, there has not procedures for preparing and issuing that provides benefits such as reduced previously been any analysis of industry recusal determinations. This proposed targeting and inspections, and enhanced survey activities in the Gulf of Mexico rule is intended to improve regulations streamlined entry into the United States. conducted pursuant to requirements of implementing the statutory The program will require that a MMPA, and industry operators have requirements governing disclosure of Commerce Trusted Trader establish a been, and currently are, conducting financial interests and voting recusal at secure supply chain and maintain the their work without MMPA incidental section 302(j) of the Magnuson-Stevens records necessary to verify the legality take authorizations. In support of the oil Fishery Conservation and Management of all designated product entering into and gas industry, the Bureau of Ocean Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act). U.S. commerce, but it will excuse the Energy Management has requested 5- Bureau of Industry and Security Commerce Trusted Trader from entering year incidental take regulations, which that data into the International Trade would provide a regulatory framework The Bureau of Industry and Security Data System prior to entry, as required under which individual companies (BIS) advances U.S. national security, by Seafood Import Monitoring Program. could apply for project-specific Letters foreign policy, and economic objectives This program is deregulatory in nature of Authorization. Providing for industry by maintaining and strengthening because it reduces reporting costs at compliance with the MMPA through the adaptable, efficient, and effective export entry and reduces recordkeeping costs requested regulatory framework, versus control and treaty compliance systems due to flexibility in archiving. companies pursuing individual as well as by administering programs to 2. Magnuson-Stevens Fisheries authorizations, would be the most prioritize certain contracts to promote Conservation and Management Act; efficient way to achieve such the national defense and to protect and Traceability Information Program for compliance for both industry and for enhance the defense industrial base. Seafood (0648–BH87): Section 539 of NMFS, and would provide regulatory Major Programs and Activities the Commerce, Justice, Science, and certainty for industry operators. Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 4. Modify the Fisheries Financing BIS administers four sets of 2018 (2018 Appropriations Act) directed Program To Allow the Financing of New regulations. The Export Administration the Secretary of Commerce to ‘‘. . . Replacement Fishing Vessel Regulations (EAR) regulate exports and establish a traceability program for Construction in Limited Access reexports to protect national security, United States inland, coastal, and Fisheries (0648–BH82): In 2016, foreign policy, and short supply marine aquaculture of shrimp and Congress passed section 302 of the Coast interests. The EAR also regulates U.S. abalone . . .’’ and by December 31, Guard Authorization Act of 2015 which persons’ participation in certain 2018 to ‘‘. . . promulgate such included specific authority for the boycotts administered by foreign regulations as are necessary and Fisheries Finance Program to finance governments. The National Security appropriate to establish and implement the construction of fishing vessels in a Industrial Base Regulations provide for the program.’’ The proposed fishery that is federally managed under prioritization of certain contracts and Traceability Information Program for a limited access system. Replacement of allocations of resources to promote the Seafood (TIPS) would establish aged fishing vessels in managed national defense, require reporting of registration, reporting and fisheries will result in more efficient use foreign Government-imposed offsets in recordkeeping requirements for of fisheries, promote safety at sea, and defense sales, provide for surveys to domestic, commercial aquaculture improve environmental operations of assess the capabilities of the industrial producers of shrimp and abalone the fishing industry. This rule will base to support the national defense and species and products containing those provide a source of funding to address the effect of imports on the species from the point of production to recapitalize and modernize an aged defense industrial base. The Chemical entry into U.S. commerce. TIPS would fishing fleet that will help ensure the Weapons Convention Regulations close the domestic reporting and continuation of the economic benefits implement declaration, reporting, and recordkeeping gap and enable NOAA to provided by the nation’s commercial on-site inspection requirements in the add imported shrimp and abalone to the fishing fleet. private sector necessary to meet United Seafood Import Monitoring Program 5. Magnuson-Stevens Act; Fishery States treaty obligations under the (SIMP), which was mandated under the Management Councils; Financial Chemical Weapons Convention treaty. 2018 Appropriations Act and finalized Disclosure and Recusal (0648–BH73): The Additional Protocol Regulations under 50 CFR 300.324 in a Final Rule NMFS received input from regional implement similar requirements with (0648–BH89; 83 FR 17762) published Fishery Management Councils calling respect to an agreement between the April 24, 2018. for further guidance and clarification of United States and the International 3. Taking Marine Mammals Incidental financial disclosure requirements of Atomic Energy Agency. to Geophysical Surveys Related to Oil Council members and the regulatory BIS also has an enforcement and Gas Activities in the Gulf of Mexico procedures to make determinations on component with nine offices covering (0648–BB38): The Marine Mammal voting recusals of Council members. the United States. BIS export control Protection Act (MMPA) prohibits the This rule proposes changes to the officers are also stationed at several U.S. ‘‘take’’ (e.g., behavioral harassment, regulations that address disclosure of embassies and consulates abroad. BIS injury, or mortality) of marine mammals financial interests by, and voting recusal works with other U.S. Government with certain exceptions, including of, Council members appointed by the agencies to promote coordinated U.S. through the issuance of incidental take Secretary of Commerce. The regulatory Government efforts in export controls authorizations. Where there is a changes are needed to provide the and other programs. BIS participates in reasonable likelihood of an activity guidance for (1) consistency and U.S. Government efforts to strengthen resulting in the take of marine transparency in the calculation of a multilateral export control regimes and

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57832 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

to promote effective export controls items in the final rule. BIS would international agreements. It also through cooperation with other require licenses to export or reexport to provides training, education, and Governments any country a firearm or other weapon capacity building programs designed to that would be added to the CCL. Rather foster respect for IP and encourage the BIS’ Regulatory Plan Action than decontrolling firearms and other development of strong IP enforcement BIS maintains the EAR, including the items, BIS, working with the regimes by U.S. trading partners. Commerce Control List (CCL). The CCL Departments of Defense and State, is USPTO administers regulations located describes commodities, software, and trying to reduce the procedural burdens at title 37 of the Code of Federal technology that are subject to licensing and costs of export compliance on the Regulations concerning its patent and requirements for specific reasons for U.S. firearms industry while allowing trademark services, and the other control. The Department of State, the U.S. Government to control firearms functions it performs. Directorate of Defense Trade Controls appropriately and to make better use of USPTO’s Regulatory Plan Action (DDTC), maintains the International its export control resources. Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), NPRM: Setting and Adjusting Patent including the United States Munitions United States Patent Trademark Office Fees (RIN 0651–AD31): The Leahy- List (USML), which describes defense The United States Patent and Smith America Invents Act (AIA), articles subject to State’s licensing Trademark Office’s (USPTO) mission is enacted in 2011, provided USPTO with jurisdiction. to foster innovation, competitiveness the authority to set and adjust its fees In Fiscal Year 2019, BIS plans to and economic growth, domestically and for patent and trademark services. Since publish a final rule describing how abroad by delivering high quality and then, USPTO has conducted an internal articles the President has determined no timely examination of patent and biennial fee review, in which it longer warrant control under USML trademark applications, guiding undertook internal consideration of the Category I (Firearms, Close Assault domestic and international intellectual current fee structure, and considered Weapons and Combat Shotguns), property policy, and delivering ways that the structure might be Category II (Guns and Armament), and intellectual property information and improved, including rulemaking Category III (Ammunition/Ordnance) education worldwide. pursuant to the USPTO’s fee setting would be controlled on the CCL and by authority. This fee review process Major Programs and Activities the EAR. This final rule will be involves public outreach, including, as published in conjunction with a DDTC USPTO is the Federal agency for required by the Act, public hearings final rule that would amend the list of granting U.S. patents and registering held by the USPTO’s Public Advisory articles controlled by those USML trademarks. In doing this, the USPTO Committees, as well as public comment Categories to describe more precisely fulfills the mandate of Article I, Section and other outreach to the user items warranting continued control on 8, Clause 8, of the Constitution that the community and public in general. In that list. legislative branch ‘‘promote the Progress 2019, the USPTO anticipates publishing The changes described in these final of Science and useful Arts, by securing an NPRM proposing the setting and rules will be based on a review of those for limited Times to Authors and adjusting of patent fees. The USPTO categories by the Department of Defense, Inventors the exclusive Right to their will set and adjust Patent fee amounts which worked with the Departments of respective Writings and Discoveries.’’ to provide the Office with a sufficient State and Commerce in preparing the The USPTO registers trademarks based amount of aggregate revenue to recover amendments. As with the proposed on the commerce clause of the its aggregate cost of operations while rules that were published in Fiscal Year Constitution (Article I, Section 8, Clause helping the Office maintain a 2018, the review for the final rule will 3). Under this system of protection, sustainable funding model, reduce the be focused on ensuring that the agencies American industry has flourished. New current patent application backlog, have identified the types of articles that products have been invented, new uses decrease patent pendency, improve are now controlled on the USML that for old ones discovered, and quality, and upgrade the Office’s are either (i) inherently military and employment opportunities created for business information technology otherwise warrant control on the USML millions of Americans. The strength and capability and infrastructure. or (ii) if of a type common to non- vitality of the U.S. economy depends military firearms applications, possess directly on effective mechanisms that parameters or characteristics that protect new ideas and investments in provide a critical military or intelligence innovation and creativity. The DOC—BUREAU OF INDUSTRY AND advantage to the United States, and are continued demand for patents and SECURITY (BIS) almost exclusively available from the trademarks underscores the ingenuity of Final Rule Stage United States. If an article satisfies one American inventors and entrepreneurs. or both of those criteria, the article will The USPTO is at the cutting edge of the 16. Revisions to the Export remain on the USML. If an article does nation’s technological progress and Administration Regulations: Control of not satisfy either criterion, it will be achievement. Firearms and Related Articles the identified in the new Export Control The USPTO advises the President of President Determines No Longer Classification Numbers (ECCNs) the United States, the Secretary of Warrant Control Under the United included in the BIS proposed rule. Commerce, and U.S. government States Munitions List Thus, the scope of the items that will be agencies on intellectual property (IP) Priority: Other Significant. described in the final rule will policy, protection, and enforcement; E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. essentially be commercial items widely and promotes the stronger and more Legal Authority: 10 U.S.C. 7420; 10 available in retail outlets and less effective IP protection around the world. U.S.C. 7430(e); 15 U.S.C. 1824a; 22 sensitive military items. The USPTO furthers effective IP U.S.C. 2151 note; 22 U.S.C. 287c; 22 The firearms and other items protection for U.S. innovators and U.S.C. 3201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6004; 22 described in the proposed rule are entrepreneurs worldwide by working U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; 30 widely used for sporting applications, with other agencies to secure strong IP U.S.C. 185(s); 30 U.S.C. 185(u); 42 and BIS will not ‘‘de-control’’ these provisions in free trade and other U.S.C. 2139a; 42 U.S.C. 6212; 43 U.S.C.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57833

1354; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. Defense, which worked with the Processing System (control number 4601 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. app 2401 et seq.; Departments of State and Commerce in 0694–0088), which includes, among 50 U.S.C. app 5; E.O. 12058; E.O. 12851; preparing the amendments. The review other things, license applications; E.O. 12854; E.O. 12918; E.O. 12938; E.O. was focused on identifying the types of License Exceptions and Exclusions 12947; E.O. 13020; E.O. 13026; E.O. articles that are now controlled on the (control number 0694–0137); Import 13099; E.O. 13222; E.O. 13224; E.O. USML that are either (i) inherently Certificates and End-User Certificates 13338; E.O. 13637; Pub. L. 108–11 military and otherwise warrant control (control number 0694–0093); Five Year CFR Citation: 15 CFR 740; 15 CFR on the USML or (ii) if of a type common Records Retention Period (control 742; 15 CFR 774; 15 CFR 736; 15 CFR to non-military firearms applications, number 0694–0096); and the U.S. 743; 15 CFR 744; 15 CFR 746; 15 CFR possess parameters or characteristics Census Bureau collection for the 748; 15 CFR 758; 15 CFR 762; 15 CFR that provide a critical military or Automated Export System (AES) 772. intelligence advantage to the United Program (control number 0607–0152). Legal Deadline: None. States, and are almost exclusively This final rule would affect the Abstract: This rule describes how available from the United States. If an information collection, under control articles the President determines no article satisfies one or both of those number 0694–0088, associated with the longer warrant control under United criteria, the article remains on the multi-purpose application for export States Munitions List (USML) Category USML. If an article does not satisfy licenses. This collection carries a I-Firearms, Close Assault Weapons and either criterion, it has been identified in Combat Shotguns; Category II-Guns and burden estimate of 43.8 minutes for a the new Export Control Classification manual or electronic submission for a Armament; and Category III- Numbers (ECCNs) included in this Ammunition/Ordnance would be burden of 31,833 hours. BIS believes proposed rule. Thus, the scope of the that the combined effect of all rules to controlled on the Commerce Control items described in this proposed rule is List (CCL). This rule will be published be published adding items removed essentially commercial items widely from the ITAR to the EAR that would simultaneously with a proposed rule by available in retail outlets and less the Department of State that would increase the number of license sensitive military items. applications to be submitted by revise Categories I, II, and III of the Summary of Legal Basis: This action approximately 30,000 annually, USML to describe more precisely the is taken pursuant to BIS’ authority resulting in an increase in burden hours articles warranting continued control on under the Export Administration of 21,900 (30,000 transactions at 43.8 that list. This rule also would reorganize Regulations (EAR), which regulate and renumber entries currently on the exports and reexports to protect national minutes each) under this control CCL that control shotguns and certain security, foreign policy, and short number. For those items in USML firearms related items to place all supply interests. BIS maintains the EAR, Categories I, II and III that would move firearms related entries close to each which includes the Commerce Control by this rule to the CCL, the State other that list. List (CCL), which describes Department estimates that 10,000 Statement of Need: This final rule is commodities, software, and technology applicants annually will move from the needed to ensure appropriate controls that are subject to licensing USML to the CCL. BIS estimates that would be in place on firearms and requirements for specific reasons for 6,000 of the 10,000 applicants would related items determined to no longer control. require licenses under the EAR, warrant control under the United States Alternatives: Take no action in order resulting in a burden of 4,380 hours Munitions List that would be moved to to maintain the status quo by not under this control number. Those the Commerce Control List (CCL). This revising USML Categories I, II, and III companies are currently using the State final rule describes how articles the and not making the needed conforming Department’s forms associated with President determines no longer warrant changes under the EAR. This alternative OMB Control No. 1405–0003 for which control under United States Munitions was mentioned by some of the public the burden estimate is 1 hour per List (USML) Category I Firearms, Close commenters in response to the proposed submission, which for 10,000 Assault Weapons and Combat Shotguns; rule published by BIS on May 24, 2018 applications results in a burden of Category II Guns and Armament; and (83 FR 24166). BIS will evaluate this 10,000 hours. Thus, subtracting the BIS Category III Ammunition/Ordnance, (take no action) alternative suggested by burden hours of 4,380 from the State would be controlled on the Commerce some of the commenters, as well as all Department burden hours of 10,000, the Control List (CCL) and by the Export other comments received on the May 24 burden would be reduced by 5,620 Administration Regulations (EAR). This proposed rule, when drafting the final hours. For purposes of E.O. 13771 of rule is being published in conjunction rule. The rationale provided in the May January 30, 2017 (82 FR 9339), the with a proposed rule from the 24 proposed rule already addressed why Department of State and Department of Department of State, Directorate of maintaining the status quo was not Commerce final rules are expected to be Defense Trade Controls, which would warranted, but BIS will further address net deregulatory actions. The amend the list of articles controlled by these comments in the final rule. BIS Departments of State and Commerce for USML Category I (Firearms, Close will also address the comments that purposes of E.O. 13771 have agreed to Assault Weapons and Combat were supportive of the May 24 proposed equally share the cost burden reductions Shotguns), Category II (Guns and rule that agreed with the Departments of that would result from the publication Armament), and Category III Commerce and State that the items of these two integral regulatory actions. (Ammunition/Ordnance) of the USML described in the two rules reflected The Department of State would receive to describe more precisely items what items should be retained on the 50% and the Department of Commerce warranting continued control on that USML and what items should be moved would receive 50% for purposes of list. to the CCL. calculating the deregulatory benefit of The changes described in this rule Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This these two integral regulatory actions. and in the State Department’s final rule involves four collections For purposes of the Department of companion rule on Categories I, II, and currently approved by OMB under these Commerce, the net deregulatory actions III of the USML are based on a review BIS collections and control numbers: would result in a permanent and of those categories by the Department of Simplified Network Application recurring cost savings of $1,250,000 per

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57834 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

year, and a reduction in burden hours Abstract: Current regulations require Fishery Conservation and Management by 2,810 hours. The reduction in burden that fishery management council Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act). hours by 2,810 would result in an members disclose any financial interest Summary of Legal Basis: Magnuson- additional cost savings of $126,281 to in harvesting, processing, lobbying, Stevens Fishery Conservation and the exporting public. Therefore, the total advocacy, or marketing activity that is Management Act. dollar cost savings would be $1,376,281 being, or will be, undertaken within any Alternatives: The alternatives are (1) for purposes of E.O. 13771 for the fishery over which the Fishery the status quo (keep the regulatory Department of Commerce. Management Council (Council) scheme as it currently is) and (2) update Risks: This final rule must be concerned has jurisdiction. the regulations to provide consistency, published concurrently with the Furthermore, current implementing transparency, and clarity in the Department of State final rule that regulations also require the voting regulations and to establish regional would revise USML Categories I, II, and recusal of an appointed Council member procedures for preparing and issuing II, to provide for appropriate controls on when a Council decision would have a recusal determinations. firearms and related items determined significant and predictable effect on the to no longer warrant control under the member’s financial interests. NMFS Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This United States Munitions List (USML) received input from the Fishery rule is administrative in nature. It does that would be moved to the Commerce Management Council Coordination not directly regulate a particular fishery. Control List (CCL) under the Export Committee, the North Pacific Fishery Instead, it provides guidance and Administration Regulations (EAR). If Management Council, the Western improved clarity about implementing this rule were not published, entities Pacific Fishery Management Council, existing requirements. Because the would not benefit from simpler license and the New England Fishery proposed rule will not directly alter the application procedures and reduced (or Management Council all calling for behavior of any entities that operate in eliminated) registration fees based on further guidance and clarification of federally managed fisheries, no direct the transfer of jurisdiction of the items financial disclosure requirements of economic effects are expected to result described in the rule. Thus, entities Council members and the regulatory from this action. This action may would not benefit from reduced procedures to make determinations on indirectly result in positive net administrative costs associated with voting recusals of Council members. economic benefits in the long-term by EAR jurisdiction. This proposed action would articulate improving transparency and providing Timetable: the guidance necessary to: Provide increased predictability about the voting consistency and transparency in the procedures of the Councils. This Action Date FR Cite calculation of a Council member’s increased transparency provides a net financial interests; provide clarity benefit to the nation. NPRM ...... 05/24/18 83 FR 24166 consistent with statutory language to Risks: Because the regulations lack NPRM Comment 07/09/18 83 FR 24166 Period End. ensure that any recusal is based on a guidance on several key aspects of Final Action ...... 04/00/19 close causal link between a Council reaching a recusal determination, and decision and a benefit to a Council provide little guidance on the Regulatory Flexibility Analysis member’s financial interest; and procedures to be followed when Required: No. establish regional procedures for preparing and issuing a recusal Small Entities Affected: No. preparing and issuing recusal determination, designated officials have Government Levels Affected: None. determinations. developed differing practices over time Agency Contact: Timothy Mooney, Statement of Need: NMFS received to fill in these regulatory gaps and to Export Policy Analyst, Department of input from regional Fishery address new factual circumstances that Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Management Councils calling for further have arisen. The risk in not updating the Security, 14th Street and Pennsylvania guidance and clarification of financial regulations would be a continuation of Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230, disclosure requirements of Council the lack of clarity and consistency in the Phone: 202 482–3371, Fax: 202 482– members and the regulatory procedures implementation of the current 3355, Email: timothy.mooney@ to make determinations on voting regulations. bis.doc.gov. recusals of Council members. This Timetable: Related RIN: Related to 0694–AF17, proposed rule makes changes to the Merged with 0694–AF48, Merged with regulations that address disclosure of Action Date FR Cite 0694–AF49 financial interests by, and voting recusal RIN: 0694–AF47 of, Council members appointed by the NPRM ...... 10/00/18 Secretary of Commerce. The regulatory changes are needed to provide the Regulatory Flexibility Analysis guidance for (1) consistency and Required: No. DOC—NATIONAL OCEANIC AND transparency in the calculation of a ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION Small Entities Affected: No. Council member’s financial interests; (2) (NOAA) Government Levels Affected: Federal. determining whether a close causal link Proposed Rule Stage exists between a Council decision and a Agency Contact: Alan Risenhoover, benefit to a Council members financial Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, 17. Magnuson-Stevens Act; Fishery interest; and (3) establishing regional Department of Commerce, National Management Councils; Financial procedures for preparing and issuing Oceanic and Atmospheric Disclosure and Recusal recusal determinations. This proposed Administration, 1315 East-West Priority: Other Significant. rule is intended to improve regulations Highway, Room 13362, Silver Spring, E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. implementing the statutory MD 20910, Phone: 301 713–2334, Fax: Legal Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. requirements governing disclosure of 301 713–0596, Email: alan.risenhoover@ CFR Citation: 50 CFR 600. financial interests and voting recusal at noaa.gov. Legal Deadline: None. section 302(j) of the Magnuson-Stevens RIN: 0648–BH73

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57835

DOC—NOAA recordkeeping requirements for Action Date FR Cite 18. Magnuson-Stevens Fisheries domestic, commercial aquaculture NPRM ...... 10/00/18 Conservation and Management Act; producers of shrimp and abalone Traceability Information Program for species and products containing those Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Seafood species from the point of production to entry into U.S. commerce. TIPS would Required: Yes. Priority: Other Significant. close the domestic reporting and Small Entities Affected: Businesses. E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. recordkeeping gap and enable NOAA to Government Levels Affected: Federal. Legal Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et add imported shrimp and abalone to the International Impacts: This regulatory seq.; Pub. L. 115–141 action will be likely to have CFR Citation: 50 CFR 698. Seafood Import Monitoring Program (SIMP), which was mandated under the international trade and investment Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, effects, or otherwise be of international December 31, 2018, Sec 539 of H.R. 2018 Appropriations Act and finalized under 50 CFR 300.324 in a final rule interest. 1625—Consolidated Appropriations Agency Contact: John Henderschedt, (0648–BH89; 83 FR 17762) published Act, 2018. Director, Office for International Affairs April 24, 2018. Abstract: On December 9, 2016, and Seafood Inspection, Department of NMFS issued a final rule that Summary of Legal Basis: Magnuson- Commerce, National Oceanic and established a risk-based traceability Stevens Fishery Conservation and Atmospheric Administration, 1315 East- program to track seafood from harvest to Management Act; Commerce, Justice, West Highway, Room 10362, Silver entry into U.S. commerce. The final rule Science, and Related Agencies Spring, MD 20910, Phone: 301 427– included, for designated priority fish Appropriations Act, 2018. 8314, Email: john.henderschedt@ species, import permitting and reporting Alternatives: Coextensive with the noaa.gov. requirements to provide for traceability scope of SIMP, the Traceability Related RIN: Related to 0648–BF09 of seafood products offered for entry RIN: 0648–BH87 into the U.S. supply chain, and to Information Program for Seafood would ensure that these products were establish a domestic traceability lawfully acquired and are properly program for aquaculture shrimp and represented. Shrimp and abalone abalone traces fish and fish products DOC—NOAA from production to entry into U.S. products were included in the final rule Final Rule Stage to implement the Seafood Import commerce. NMFS will solicit public Monitoring Program, but compliance input on alternatives to the registration, 19. Taking and Importing Marine with Seafood Import Monitoring reporting and recordkeeping Mammals: Taking Marine Mammals Program requirements for those species requirements for U.S. shrimp and Incidental to Geophysical Surveys was stayed indefinitely due to the abalone aquaculture producers in the Related to Oil and Gas Activities in the disparity between Federal reporting proposed rule. Gulf of Mexico programs for domestic aquaculture of Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Priority: Other Significant. shrimp and abalone products relative to costs of the Traceability Information E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory. the requirements that would apply to Program for Seafood, as proposed, Legal Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq. imports under Seafood Import would include a small registration fee CFR Citation: 50 CFR 217. Monitoring Program. In Section 539 of and labor associated with reporting Legal Deadline: None. the Consolidated Appropriations Act, harvest information to NMFS as well as Abstract: The National Marine 2018, Congress mandated lifting the stay compliance with any requests for audit Fisheries Service is taking this action in on inclusion of shrimp and abalone in or inspection. The Traceability response to an October 17, 2016 petition Seafood Import Monitoring Program and Information Program for Seafood would from the U.S. Department of Interior authorized the Secretary of Commerce enable NMFS to determine the origin of (DOI), Bureau of Ocean Energy to require comparable reporting and the domestic aquaculture shrimp and Management (BOEM), to promulgate recordkeeping requirements for abalone products and confirm that they regulations governing the authorization domestic aquaculture of shrimp and were lawfully produced. The of take of marine mammals incidental to abalone. This rulemaking would Traceability Information Program for oil and gas industry geophysical surveys establish permitting, reporting and Seafood will close the domestic conducted in support of hydrocarbon recordkeeping requirements for reporting and recordkeeping gap and exploration and development on the domestic producers of shrimp and enable NMFS to add imported shrimp Outer Continental Shelf in the Gulf of abalone from the point of production to and abalone to the Seafood Import Mexico from approximately 2018 entry into commerce. Monitoring Program, which will prevent through 2023. Statement of Need: Section 539 of the illegally harvested or misrepresented Statement of Need: The Marine Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related seafood products from entering U.S. Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) Agencies Appropriations Act, 2018 commerce, thereby leveling the playing prohibits the ‘‘take’’ (e.g., behavioral (2018 Appropriations Act) directed the field for law abiding shrimp and harassment, injury, or mortality) of Secretary of Commerce to ‘‘establish a abalone producers in the U.S. and marine mammals with certain traceability program for United States around the world. exceptions, including through the inland, coastal, and marine aquaculture issuance of incidental take of shrimp and abalone’’ and by Risks: Failure to implement the authorizations. Where there is a December 31, 2018 to ‘‘promulgate such Traceability Information Program for reasonable likelihood of an activity regulations as are necessary and Seafood would violate Section 539 of resulting in the take of marine appropriate to establish and implement the 2018 Appropriations Act and likely mammals—as is the case for certain the program.’’ The proposed provoke challenges to the Seafood methods of geophysical exploration, Traceability Information Program for Import Monitoring Program in including the use of airgun arrays (i.e., Seafood (TIPS) would establish international trade fora. ‘‘seismic surveys’’)—action proponents registration, reporting and Timetable: must ensure that take occurs in a lawful

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57836 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

manner. However, there has not regulated industry by providing an provide benefits such as reduced previously been any analysis of industry efficient framework within which targeting and inspections and enhanced survey activities in the Gulf of Mexico compliance with the MMPA, and the streamlined entry into the United States conducted pursuant to requirements of attendant regulatory certainty, may be for certified importers. Specifically, this MMPA, and industry operators have achieved. Cost savings may be generated rule would establish the criteria been, and currently are, conducting in particular by the reduced required of a Commerce Trusted Trader, their work without MMPA incidental administrative effort required to obtain and identify specifically how the take authorizations. In support of the oil an LOA under the framework program will be monitored and by and gas industry, the Bureau of Ocean established by a rule compared to what whom. It will require that a Commerce Energy Management has requested 5- would be required to obtain an Trusted Trader establish a secure supply year incidental take regulations, which incidental harassment authorization chain and maintain the records would provide a regulatory framework (IHA) under section 101(a)(5)(D) of the necessary to verify the legality of all under which individual companies MMPA. Absent the rule, survey designated product entering into U.S. could apply for project-specific Letters operators in the GOM would likely be commerce, but will excuse the of Authorization. Providing for industry required to apply for an IHA. Although Commerce Trusted Trader from entering compliance with the MMPA through the not monetized, NMFSs analysis that data into the International Trade requested regulatory framework, versus indicates that the upfront work Data System prior to entry, as required companies pursuing individual associated with the rule (e.g., analyses, by Seafood Import Monitoring Program authorizations, would be the most modeling, process for obtaining LOA) (finalized on December 9, 2016). The efficient way to achieve such would likely save significant time and rule will identify the benefits available compliance for both industry and for money for operators. to a Commerce Trusted Trader, detail NMFS, and would provide regulatory Risks: Absent the rule, oil and gas the application process, and specify certainty for industry operators. industry operators would face a highly how the Commerce Trusted Trader will Summary of Legal Basis: Marine uncertain regulatory environment due to be audited by third-party entities while Mammal Protection Act. the imminent threat of litigation. BOEM the overall program will be monitored Alternatives: The regulatory impact currently issues permits under a stay of by the National Marine Fisheries analysis considers several alternatives ongoing litigation; in the absence of the Service. with varying amounts of required rule, the litigation would continue. The Statement of Need: Under the mitigation by industry authorization- IHA application process that would be Magnuson-Stevens Fishery holders. The proposed rule seeks available to companies would be more Conservation and Management Act, comment on the extent to which certain expensive and time-consuming. importation of fish products taken in areas should be closed to geophysical Timetable: violation of foreign law and regulation activity, the distance at which operators is prohibited. To enforce this must shut down upon detection of Action Date FR Cite prohibition, NMFS has implemented the specified species of whales, and the Seafood Import Monitoring Program mitigation requirements concerning NPRM ...... 06/22/18 83 FR 29212 (SIMP) (81 FR 88975, December 9, 2016) large dolphins. NPRM Comment 08/21/18 which requires U.S. importers to report Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Period End. on the origin of fish products and to rule would include mitigation, Final Action ...... 02/00/19 keep supply chain records. The monitoring, and reporting requirements, Commerce Trusted Trader Program was as required by the MMPA. The rule Regulatory Flexibility Analysis recommended by an interagency analyzes the impacts against two Required: No. working group to reduce the burden of baselines—the current mitigation Small Entities Affected: Businesses. SIMP compliance for importers with requirements as stipulated in a Government Levels Affected: Federal. secure supply chains by reducing settlement agreement currently in effect Energy Effects: Statement of Energy reporting requirements for entry into until November 1, 2018, and the Effects planned as required by Executive U.S. commerce and allowing more requirements prior to the settlement Order 13211. flexible approaches to retaining supply agreement. Compared to the settlement Agency Contact: Donna Wieting, chain records. agreement, the annualized impacts of Director, Office of Protected Resources, Summary of Legal Basis: Magnuson- the proposed rule are estimated to Department of Commerce, National Stevens Fishery Conservation and achieve a cost savings of $11 million to Oceanic and Atmospheric Management Act. $147 million. Compared to the pre- Administration, National Marine Alternatives: SIMP is aimed at settlement agreement baseline the Fisheries Service, 1315 East-West preventing the infiltration of illegal fish annualized costs are estimated to range Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910, products into the U.S. market. from $49 million to $182 million. The Phone: 301 427–8400. Alternatives to reduce the reporting and rule would also result in certain non- RIN: 0648–BB38 recordkeeping burden for U.S. importers monetized benefits. The lessened risk of were considered during the course of harm to marine mammals afforded by that rulemaking. Collecting less this rule (pursuant to the requirements DOC—NOAA information at import about the origin of of the MMPA) would benefit the products would increase the likelihood regional economic value of marine 20. Commerce Trusted Trader Program of illegal products entering the supply mammals via tourism and recreation to Priority: Other Significant. chain. However, working with some extent, as mitigation measures E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. individual traders to secure the supply applied to geophysical survey activities Legal Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. chain will be an economical approach to in the Gulf of Mexico (GOM) region are CFR Citation: 50 CFR 300. ensure that illegal products are expected to benefit the marine mammal Legal Deadline: None. precluded and records will be kept as populations that support this economic Abstract: This rule will establish a needed for post-entry audits. The activity in the GOM. The rule would voluntary Commerce Trusted Trader Commerce Trusted Trader Program is also afford significant benefit to the Program for importers, aiming to designed to allow those entities who

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57837

demonstrate a robust traceability and DOC—PATENT AND TRADEMARK improve quality, and upgrade the internal control system, and submit to OFFICE (PTO) Office’s business information technology capability and annual third-party audits of their Proposed Rule Stage system, to benefit from reduced infrastructure. Therefore, one risk of reporting requirements of SIMP species 21. Setting and Adjusting Patent Fees taking no action could be that USPTO at the time of entry as well as flexibility Priority: Economically Significant. might not be able to recover its aggregate in how they maintain the complete Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is costs of operations in the long run. chain of custody records within their undetermined. Timetable: secure supply chain. E.O. 13771 Designation: Fully or Action Date FR Cite Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Partially Exempt. Commerce Trusted Trader Program, as Legal Authority: Pub. L. 112–29 NPRM ...... 09/00/19 proposed, will result in an estimated CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined. NPRM Comment 11/00/19 Legal Deadline: None. industry-wide savings between $0.50 Period End. Abstract: The USPTO operates like a Final Action ...... 08/00/20 and $1.21 million annually. Anticipated business in that it fulfills requests for Final Action Effec- 10/00/20 costs are minimal and include a one- intellectual property products and tive. time application fee of $30.00 and services that are paid for by users of associated labor costs of developing those services. The USPTO takes this Regulatory Flexibility Analysis application materials. Commerce action to set and adjusts patent fee Required: Undetermined. Trusted Traders will benefit from the amounts to provide sufficient aggregate Government Levels Affected: None. reduced reporting costs at entry and revenue to cover aggregate cost of Agency Contact: Brendan Hourigan, reduced recordkeeping costs due to operations. Director, Office of Planning and Budget, flexibility in archiving chain of custody Statement of Need: The purpose of Department of Commerce, Patent and records, but incur costs to perform an this rule is to set and adjust patent fee Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, annual third-party audit of adherence to amounts to provide sufficient aggregate Alexandria, VA 22313–1450, Phone: 571 their Compliance Plan. revenue to cover the agency’s aggregate 272–8966, Fax: 571 273–8966, Email: [email protected]. Risks: While there is no risk of not cost of operations. To this end, this rule RIN: 0651–AD31 implementing a Commerce Trusted creates new or changes existing fees for Trader Program, not doing so would patent services, and does so without BILLING CODE 3510–12–P deprive industry of potentially imposing any new costs. Summary of Legal Basis: The Leahy- significant cost savings for an existing Smith America Invents Act (AIA), regulatory program. enacted in 2011, provided USPTO with DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Timetable: the authority to set and adjust its fees Statement of Regulatory Priorities for patent and trademark services. Since Background Action Date FR Cite then, USPTO has conducted an internal biennial fee review, in which it The Department of Defense (DoD) is NPRM ...... 01/17/18 83 FR 2412 undertook internal consideration of the the largest Federal department, NPRM Comment 03/19/18 current fee structure, and considered employing over 1.3 million military Period End. ways that the structure might be personnel and 742,000 civilians with Final Action ...... 11/00/18 improved, including rulemaking operations all over the world. DoD’s pursuant to the USPTO’s fee setting enduring mission is to provide combat- Regulatory Flexibility Analysis authority. This fee review process credible military forces needed to deter Required: Yes. involves public outreach, including, as war and protect the security of our Small Entities Affected: Businesses. required by the Act, public hearings nation. In support of this mission, DoD adheres to a strategy where a more Government Levels Affected: None. held by the USPTO’s Public Advisory Committees, as well as public comment lethal force, strong alliances and International Impacts: This regulatory and other outreach to the user partnerships, American technological action will be likely to have community and public in general. innovation, and a culture of international trade and investment Alternatives: This rulemaking action performance will generate a decisive effects, or otherwise be of international is currently in development and and sustained United States military interest. alternatives have not yet been advantage. Because of this expansive Agency Contact: John Henderschedt, determined. and diversified mission and reach, DoD Director, Office for International Affairs Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This regulations can address a broad range of and Seafood Inspection, Department of rulemaking action is currently in matters and have an impact on varied Commerce, National Oceanic and development and aggregate annual members of the public, as well as a multitude of other federal agencies. Atmospheric Administration, 1315 East- economic impacts have not yet been determined. It is anticipated that the The regulatory and deregulatory West Highway, Room 10362, Silver final rule would become effective with actions identified in this Regulatory Spring, MD 20910, Phone: 301 427– the new fee schedule in 2020. Plan embody the core of DoD’s 8314, Email: john.henderschedt@ Risks: The USPTO will set and adjust regulatory priorities for Fiscal Year (FY) noaa.gov. Patent fee amounts to provide the Office 2019 and help support or impact the Related RIN: Related to 0648–BF09 with a sufficient amount of aggregate Secretary’s three lines of efforts to: (1) RIN: 0648–BG51 revenue to recover its aggregate cost of Build a more lethal force; (2) strengthen operations while helping the Office alliances and attract new partners; and maintain a sustainable funding model, (3) reform the Department for greater reduce the current patent application performance and affordability. These backlog, decrease patent pendency, actions originate within three of DoD’s

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57838 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

main regulatory components—the Office Acquisition Regulation Supplement significant DoD regulatory actions for of the Under Secretary of Defense for (DFARS). The Task Force will present FY 2019. During the next year, these Acquisition and Sustainment recommendations for the repeal, DoD Components plan to publish 15 (OUSD(A&S)), which is responsible for replacement, or modification to the rulemaking actions that are designated contracting and procurement policy, the Secretary of Defense on a quarterly basis as significant actions. Further Office of the Under Secretary of Defense through the end of December 2018. information on these actions is provided for Personnel and Readiness • Phase II: Implementing the below. (OUSD(P&R)), which supports troop approved recommendations. readiness and health affairs, and the Implementation requires drafting, OUSD (A&S)/Defense Pricing and Department of the Army through the internal coordination, review by the Contracting (DPC) United States Army Corps of Engineers Office of Management and Budget, and DPC is responsible for all contracting (USACE), which provides engineering providing for notice and comment, as and procurement policy matters in the services to support the national interest. required by law. Department and uses the Defense The missions of these offices are • Phase III: Incorporating into its Acquisition Regulations System (DARS) discussed more fully below. policies a requirement for components to develop and maintain acquisition to sustain review of both new regulatory rules and to facilitate the acquisition DoD’s Regulatory Philosophy and actions and existing regulations. workforce as they acquire goods and Principles In FY 2019, based primarily on the services. For this component, DoD is The Department’s regulatory program ongoing work of the Task Force, DoD highlighting the following rules: strives to be responsive, efficient, and expects to publish more deregulatory Rulemakings that are expected to transparent. DoD adheres to the general actions than regulatory actions. Exact have high net benefits well in excess of principles set forth in Executive Order figures are not yet available as the costs. (E.O.) 12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and regulations reported in this edition of Rulemakings that promote Open Review,’’ dated October 4, 1993, by the Unified Agenda are still under Government and use disclosure as a promulgating only those regulations that evaluation for classification under regulatory tool. are required by law, necessary to Executive Order 13771. Additionally, interpret the law, or are made necessary the Task Force will continue working to Brand Name or Equal (DFARS Case by compelling public need. By execute directives under Executive 2017–D040). RIN: 0750–AJ50 following this regulatory philosophy, Orders 13783 and 13807 to streamline This rule proposes to amend the the Department’s regulatory program its regulatory process and permitting DFARS to implement section 888 of the also compliments and advances the reviews. NDAA for FY 2017. Section 888 requires Secretary’s third line of effort—to In addition to reform efforts, DoD is DoD to justify when a solicitation reform the Department for greater also mindful of the importance of includes ‘‘brand name or equal’’ performance and affordability. international regulatory cooperation, specifications, which could limit The Department is also fully consistent with domestic law and trade competition by unnecessarily restricting committed to implementing and policy, as described in Executive Order offerors to a limited set of specifications. sustaining regulatory reform in 13609, ‘‘Promoting International Currently, if the Government intends to accordance with Executive Order 13771, Regulatory Cooperation’’ (May 1, 2012). procure specific ‘‘brand name’’ ‘‘Reducing Regulation and Controlling For example, DoD, along with the products, the contracting officer must Regulatory Costs,’’ dated January 30, Departments of State and Commerce, prepare a justification and obtain the 2017, and Executive Order 13777, engages with other countries in the appropriate approval based on the ‘‘Enforcing the Regulatory Reform Wassenaar Arrangement, Nuclear estimated dollar value of the contracts. Agenda,’’ dated February 24, 2017. Suppliers Group, Group, and However, a justification is not required These reform efforts support DoD’s goals Missile Technology Control Regime to use ‘‘brand name or equal’’ to eliminate outdated, unnecessary, or through which the international descriptions in a solicitation. To ineffective regulations; account for the community develops a common list of implement section 888, this rule currency and legitimacy of each of the items that should be subject to export proposes to amend the DFARS to Department’s regulations; and controls. DoD has been a key participant require contracting officers to obtain an ultimately reduce regulatory burden and in the Administration’s Export Control approval of a justification for use of costs placed on the American people. Reform effort that resulted in a complete ‘‘brand name or equal’’ descriptions, Specifically in support of DoD’s reform overhaul of the U.S. Munitions List and which would then be posted with the efforts, DoD appointed a Regulatory fundamental changes to the Commerce covered solicitation. It is expected that Reform Officer to oversee the Control List. New controls have this rule will both promote transparency implementation of regulatory reform facilitated transfers of goods and with industry by disclosing the basis for initiatives and policies. DoD also technologies to allies and partners while the Government’s decision to limit established a Regulatory Reform Task helping prevent transfers to countries of competition and, in turn, present an Force (Task Force) to review and national security and proliferation opportunity to increase competition. evaluate existing regulations and make concern. In this context, DoD will Rulemakings that streamline recommendations to the Agency head continue to assess new and emerging regulations and reduce unjustified regarding their repeal, replacement, or technologies to ensure items that burdens. modification, consistent with applicable provide critical military and intelligence Contractor Purchasing System Review law. capabilities are properly controlled on Threshold (DFARS Case 2017–D038). DoD is implementing its reform efforts international export control regime lists. in three general phases: RIN: 0750–AJ48 • Phase I: Utilizing the Task Force, DoD Priority Regulatory Actions This rule proposes to amend the assess all 716 existing, codified DoD As stated above, OUSD (A&S), OUSD DFARS to raise the threshold for regulations to include 350 solicitation (P&R), and the Department of the Army determining when a contractor provisions and contract clauses will be planning actions that are purchasing system review (CPSR) is contained in the Defense Federal considered the most important required. The Government will conduct

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57839

a CPRS in order to evaluate the Corps of the U.S. Public Health Service services and specialty care referrals, and efficiency and effectiveness with which and the Commissioned Corps of the promotion of high value services and a prime contractor spends Government National Oceanic and Atmospheric medications. The goal of better health is funds and complies with Government Association and their families around advanced by expanding TRICARE policy when subcontracting. Currently, the world. It serves 9.5 million coverage of preventive care services, if a prime contractor’s sales to the individuals worldwide. It continues to treatment of obesity, high-value care, Government are expected to exceed $25 offer an increasingly integrated and and telehealth. Finally, the aim of lower million during the next 12 months, then comprehensive health care plan, cost is furthered by refining cost-benefit the administrative contracting officer refining and enhancing both benefits assessments for TRICARE plan (ACO) will determine whether there is and programs in a manner consistent specifications that remain under DoD’s a need for a CPSR. This rule proposes with the law, industry standard of care, discretion and adding flexibilities to to amend the DFARS to raise the dollar and best practices, to meet the changing incentivize high-value health care threshold at which an ACO makes the needs of its beneficiaries. The program’s services. determination to conduct a CPSR to $50 goal is to increase access to health care USACE million for DoD contracts. It is expected services, improve health care quality, that this rule may reduce the number of and control health care costs. The United States Army Corps of CPSRs conducted by DoD and, in turn, For this component, DoD is Engineers (USACE), is a major Army alleviate the burden on contractors highlighting the following rule: command made up of some 37,000 civilian and military personnel, making associated with participating in the Establishment of TRICARE Select and it one of the world’s largest public CPSR. Other TRICARE Reforms. RIN: 0720– Rules modifying, streamlining, engineering, design, and construction AB70 expanding, or repealing regulations management agencies. Although making DoD’s regulatory program more This final rule implements the generally associated with flood and effective or less burdensome in primary features of section 701 and coastal storm damage reduction, achieving regulatory objectives. partially implements several other commercial navigation, and aquatic sections of the National Defense ecosystem restoration in the United Submission of Summary Subcontract Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 States, USACE is involved in a wide Reports (DFARS Case 2017–D005). RIN: (NDAA–17). The rule makes significant 0750–AJ42 range of public works throughout the changes to the TRICARE program, world. This rule proposes to amend the especially to the health maintenance The USACE’s mission is to ‘‘Deliver DFARS to clarify the entity to which organization (HMO)-like health plan vital public and military engineering contractors submit Summary known as TRICARE Prime; to the services; partnering in peace and war to Subcontract Reports in the Electronic preferred provider organization (PPO) strengthen our Nation’s security, Subcontracting Reporting System (eSRS) health plan previously known as energize the economy and reduce risks and to clarify the entity that TRICARE Extra and replaced by from disasters.’’ The most visible acknowledges receipt of, or rejects, the TRICARE Select; and to the third health missions include: reports in eSRS. This rule streamlines care option known as TRICARE • Water resources development the submission and review of Summary Standard, which was terminated activities including flood risk Subcontract Reports (SSRs) for DoD December 31, 2017, and is also replaced management, navigation, aquatic contractors and brings the DFARS into by TRICARE Select. ecosystem restoration, recreation, compliance with changes in the Federal The statute also adopts a new health emergency response, and environmental Acquisition Regulation. Instead of plan enrollment system under TRICARE stewardship submitting multiple SSRs to various and new provisions for access to care, • Design and construction departments and agencies within DoD, high value services, preventive care, and management of military facilities for the contractors with individual healthy lifestyles. In implementing Army, Air Force, Army Reserve and Air subcontracting plans will submit a section 701 and partially implementing Force Reserve and other Defense and single, consolidated SSR in eSRS at the several other sections of NDAA–17, this Federal agencies. DoD level. The consolidated SSR will be rule advances all four components of For this component, DoD is acknowledged or rejected in eSRS at the the Military Health System’s quadruple highlighting the following rules. DoD level. aim of improved readiness, better care, better health, and lower cost. The aim Waters of the United States. RINs: 0710– OUSD (P&R)/Assistance Secretary of of improved readiness is served by AA79, 0710–AA80 Defense for Health Affairs reinforcing the vital role of the In 2015, the Environmental Protection The mission of DoD’s health program TRICARE Prime health plan to refer Agency and the Department of the Army is to enhance the Department of Defense patients, particularly those needing (‘‘the agencies’’) published the ‘‘Clean and our Nation’s security by providing specialty care, to military medical Water Rule: Definition of ‘Waters of the health support for the full range of treatment facilities (MTFs) in order to United States’ ’’ (80 FR 37054, June 29, military operations and sustaining the ensure that military health care 2015). On October 9, 2015, the U.S. health of all those entrusted to our care providers maintain clinical currency Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit by creating a world-class health care and proficiency in their professional stayed the 2015 rule nationwide system that supports the military fields. pending further action of the court. On mission by fostering, protecting, The objective of better care is February 28, 2017, the President signed sustaining and restoring health. enhanced by a number of improvements Executive Order 13778, ‘‘Restoring the TRICARE is the health care program in beneficiary access to health care Rule of Law, Federalism, and Economic for uniformed service members services, including increased Growth by Reviewing the ‘Waters of the including active duty and retired geographical coverage for the TRICARE United States’ Rule’’ which instructed members of the U.S. Army, U.S. Air Select provider network, reduced the agencies to review the 2015 rule and Force, U.S. Navy, U.S. Marine Corps, administrative hurdles for TRICARE rescind or replace it as appropriate and U.S. Coast Guard, the Commissioned Prime enrollees to obtain urgent care consistent with law. On July 27, 2017,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57840 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

the agencies published a Federal NHPA and revisions to Advisory Flood Control Works (FCW) and Coastal Register notice proposing to repeal Council on Historic Preservation’s Storm Risk Management Projects (STEP 1 of a comprehensive 2-STEP (ACHP) regulations at 36 CFR part 800 (formerly referred to as Hurricane and process) the 2015 Clean Water Rule subpart B, addressing, among other Shore Protection Projects); and the (2015 Rule) and recodify the pre- things, tribal consultation requirements. authority to implement nonstructural existing regulations; the initial 30-day In response, the USACE issued interim alternatives to rehabilitation, if comment period was extended an guidance until rulemaking could be requested by the non-federal sponsor. additional 30 days to September 28, completed in order to ensure full Other significant changes under 2017. The agencies signed a compliance with the NHPA and ACHP’s consideration include revisions to the supplemental notice of proposed regulations. The USACE seeks to revise eligibility criteria for rehabilitation rulemaking on June 29, 2018, clarifying its regulations to conform to these assistance for FCW, an increase to the and seeking additional comment on the requirements. minimum repair cost for FCW projects, proposal. Policy for Domestic, Municipal, and revised policies to address endangered In Step 2 (Revised Definition of species and vegetation management ‘Waters of the United States’), the Industrial Water Supply Uses of Reservoir Projects Operated by the during rehabilitation, and a change in agencies plan to propose a new the cost share for emergency measures definition that would replace the prior Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. RIN: 0710–AA72 constructed using permanent regulations and the approach in the construction standards. CWR2015 Rule. In determining the The USACE is updating and clarifying possible new approach, the agencies are its policies governing the use of its Compensatory Mitigation for Losses of considering defining ‘‘navigable waters’’ reservoir projects for domestic, Aquatic Resources—Review and in a manner consistent with the municipal and industrial water supply Approval of Mitigation Banks and In- plurality opinion of Justice Antonin pursuant to Section 6 of the Flood Lieu Fee Programs. RIN: 0710–AA83 Scalia in the Rapanos decision, as Control Act of 1944 and the Water This rule proposes to amend the instructed by Executive Order 13778, Supply Act of 1958 (WSA). The USACE regulations governing the review and ‘‘Restoring the Rule of Law, Federalism, intends through this rulemaking to approval process for mitigation banks and Economic Growth by Reviewing the explain and improve its interpretations and in-lieu fee programs, which are ‘Waters of the United States’ Rule.’’ and practices under these statutes. The On February 6, 2018, the agencies rule is intended to enhance the used to provide compensatory issued a final rule adding an USACE’s ability to cooperate with State mitigation that offsets losses of applicability date to the CWR2015 Rule and local interests in the development jurisdictional waters and wetlands of February 6, 2020, to provide of water supplies in connection with the authorized by Department of the Army continuity and certainty for regulated operation of its reservoirs for federal permits. Those regulations also include entities, the States and Tribes, and the purposes as authorized by Congress, to time frames for certain steps in the public while the agencies conduct STEP facilitate water supply uses of USACE mitigation bank and in-lieu fee program 2 of the rulemaking. Until the new reservoirs by others as contemplated review and approval process. The definition is finalized, the agencies will under applicable law, and to avoid review and approval process for continue to implement the regulatory interfering with lawful uses of water by mitigation banks and in-lieu fee definition in place prior to the CWR any entity when the USACE exercises programs includes an opportunity for consistent with Supreme Court its discretionary authority under either public and agency review and comment, decisions and practice, and as informed section 6 or the WSA. The rule would as well as a second review by an by applicable agency guidance apply only to reservoir projects operated interagency review team. The documents. by the USACE, not to projects operated interagency review team consists of by other federal or non-federal entities, federal, tribal, state, and local agencies Regulatory Program of the Army Corps and it would not impose requirements that review documentation and provide of Engineers Tribal Consultation and on any other entity, alter existing the United States Army Corps of National Historic Preservation Act contractual arrangements at USACE Engineers (USACE) with advice on the Compliance. RIN: 0710–AA75 reservoirs, or require operational establishment and management of The USACE recognizes the changes at any Corps reservoir. mitigation banks and in-lieu fee status of Indian tribes (as defined by programs. The USACE is reviewing the Executive Order 13175) and our Natural Disaster Procedures: review and approval process and the obligation for pre-decisional Preparedness, Response, and Recovery interagency review team process in government-to-government Activities of the Corps of Engineers. particular to determine whether and consultation, as established through and RIN: 0710–AA78 how it can enhance the efficiency of confirmed by the U.S. Constitution, The USACE is proposing to update its those processes. An increase in treaties, statutes, executive orders, regulations for USACE’s natural disaster efficiency could result in savings to the judicial decisions, and Presidential procedures pursuant to Section 5 of the public if it results in similar or documents and policies, on proposed Flood Control Act of 1941, as amended improved outcomes with shorter review regulatory actions (e.g., individual (33 U.S.C. 701n), commonly referred to times and thereby reduce risk and permit decisions and general permit as Public Law 84–99. The revisions are uncertainty for mitigation bank and in- verifications). The USACE Regulatory necessary to incorporate elements of the lieu fee program sponsors and the costs Program’s regulations for considering Water Resources and Reform they incur in obtaining mitigation the effects of its actions on historic Development Act of 2014 (WRRDA banking or in-lieu fee program properties as required under Section 2014), and update procedures instruments. An increase in review 106 of the National Historic concerning USACE authority to address efficiency could also decrease the Preservation Act (NHPA) are outlined at disaster preparedness, response, and resources other federal, tribal, state, and 33 CFR 325 Appendix C. Since these recovery activities. The revisions local agencies expend in reviewing regulations were promulgated in 1990, relating to WRRDA 2014 include the these activities, attending meetings, there have been amendments to the authority to implement modifications to participating in site visits, and

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57841

providing their comments to the expected to exceed $50 million during Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, USACE. the next 12 months. December 23, 2016, Effective upon Statement of Need: There is a need to enactment. Modification of Nationwide Permits. increase the threshold for a contractor Abstract: DoD is proposing to amend RIN: 0710–AA84 purchasing system review from $25 to the Defense Federal Acquisition The USACE issues nationwide $50 million to reduce the administrative Regulation Supplement to implement permits to authorize specific categories burden on contractors and the section 888 of the National Defense of activities in jurisdictional waters and Government for maintaining and Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal wetlands that have no more than reviewing an approved contractor Year (FY) 2017, which requires that minimal individual and cumulative purchasing system. competition not be limited through the adverse environmental effects. The Summary of Legal Basis: This rule is use of specifying brand names or brand issuance and reissuance of nationwide proposed under the authority at 41 name or equivalent descriptions, or permits must be done every five years U.S.C. 1303, Functions and authority, proprietary specifications and to continue the Nationwide Permit which provides the authority to issue standards, unless a justification for such Program. The nationwide permits were and maintain the Federal Acquisition specifications is provided and approved last issued on December 21, 2016, and Regulation and executive agency in accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2304(f). expire on March 18, 2022. On October implementing regulations. Statement of Need: This case is 25, 2017, the USACE issued a report to Alternatives: No alternatives to this necessary to ensure contracting officers meet the requirements of Executive action are being considered at this time. comply with section 888 of the NDAA Order 13783, Promoting Energy Anticipated Cost and Benefits: for FY 2015 (Pub. L. 113–291). Independence and Economic Growth. In Implementing this rule provides a net Specifically, it will ensure contracting that report, the USACE recommended annualized savings of approximately officers properly justify for the use of changes to nine nationwide permits that $12 million. This estimate is based on brand name and brand name or authorize activities related to domestic data available in the Federal equivalent descriptions, or proprietary energy production and use, including Procurement Data System (FPDS) data specifications or standards. oil, natural gas, coal, and nuclear energy for fiscal year 2016, which indicates that Summary of Legal Basis: This rule is sources, as well as renewable energy 958 unique vendors received awards proposed under the authority at 41 sources such as flowing water, wind, valued at $25 million or more, but less U.S.C. 1303, Functions and authority, and solar energy. This rulemaking than $50 million, that were subject to which provides the authority to issue action would seek to review and, if the purchasing system review. and maintain the Federal Acquisition appropriate, modify those nine Removing this requirement would Regulation and executive agency nationwide permits in accordance with relieve these contractors from the time implementing regulations. In addition, the opportunities identified in the and cost burden required to establish, this rule is necessary to implement the report in order to reduce burdens on the maintain, audit, document, and train for statutory amendments made by section public. In addition, the Corps is an approved purchasing system. 888 of the NDAA for FY 2017. considering modifying an additional 23 Risks: If this rule is not finalized, the Alternatives: There are no viable nationwide permits to allow federal public will continue to experience alternatives that are consistent with the agencies to select and use nationwide additional costs to comply with this rule stated objectives of the statute. permits without additional USACE at the current threshold. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The review. This rulemaking action would Timetable: Department does not expect this help simplify the nationwide permit proposed rule to have any cost impact authorization process. Action Date FR Cite on contractors or offerors. Rather, preparing a justification for the use of NPRM ...... 01/00/19 brand name descriptions or specifications provides increased DOD—DEFENSE ACQUISITION Regulatory Flexibility Analysis transparency into the acquisition REGULATIONS COUNCIL (DARC) Required: No. planning and source selection strategy Proposed Rule Stage Government Levels Affected: Federal. process for department goods and Agency Contact: Jennifer Hawes, services. 22. Contractor Purchasing System Defense Acquisition Regulations Risks: If this rule is not finalized, the Review Threshold (DFARS CASE 2017– System, Department of Defense, 3060 department will not be in compliance D038) Defense Pentagon, Room 3B941, with section 888 of the NDAA for FY Priority: Other Significant. Washington, DC 20301–3060, Phone: 2017, therefore losing an opportunity to E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. 571 372–6115, Email: increase competition, expand the Legal Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 [email protected]. defense industrial base and secure CFR Citation: 48 CFR 244. RIN: 0750–AJ48 reduced pricing. Legal Deadline: None. Timetable: Abstract: DoD is proposing to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition Action Date FR Cite Regulation Supplement to establish a DOD—DARC higher dollar threshold for conducting 23. Brand Name or Equal (DFARS NPRM ...... 10/00/18 contractor purchasing system reviews. CASE 2017–D040) This rule proposes, in lieu of the Regulatory Flexibility Analysis threshold at Federal Acquisition Priority: Other Significant. Required: No. Regulation 44.302(a) of $25 million, the E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. Government Levels Affected: Federal. administrative contracting officer shall Legal Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303; Pub. Agency Contact: Jennifer Hawes, determine the need for a contractors L. 113–291, sec. 888; 10 U.S.C. 2304(f) Defense Acquisition Regulations purchasing system review if a CFR Citation: 48 CFR 206; 48 CFR System, Department of Defense, 3060 contractor’s sales to the Government are 211. Defense Pentagon, Room 3B941,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57842 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

Washington, DC 20301–3060, Phone: subcontracting plans will submit one 571 372–6115, Email: 571 372–6115, Email: consolidated SSR at the DoD level in the [email protected]. [email protected]. Electronic Subcontracting Reporting RIN: 0750–AJ42 RIN: 0750–AJ50 System (eSRS). The consolidated SSR will be acknowledged or rejected in eSRS at the DoD level. Large business DOD—U.S. ARMY CORPS OF DOD—DARC contractors currently submit SSRs to the ENGINEERS (COE) department or agency within DoD that Final Rule Stage administers the majority of the Prerule Stage 24. Submission of Summary contractor’s individual subcontracting 25. Regulatory Program of the Army Subcontract Report (DFARS CASE plans, and these contractors frequently Corps of Engineers Tribal Consultation 2017–D005) must submit SSRs to each department or and National Historic Preservation Act agency within DoD with which they Compliance Priority: Other Significant. have contracts. This results in extra E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. work for the contractors and creates Priority: Other Significant. Major Legal Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is CFR Citation: 48 CFR 252. problems with duplicate subcontracting data. By requiring submission and undetermined. Legal Deadline: None. Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. Abstract: DoD is issuing a final rule to review of SSRs at the DoD level, this rule identifies a solution for these E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. amend the Defense Federal Acquisition Legal Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1344; 33 issues. Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to U.S.C. 401; 33 U.S.C. 403; 33 U.S.C. Summary of Legal Basis: This rule is clarify the entity to which Summary 1413 Subcontract Reports (SSRs) are to be issued under the authority at 41 U.S.C. CFR Citation: 33 CFR 325. submitted and the entity that 1303, functions and authority, which Legal Deadline: None. acknowledges receipt of, or rejects, SSRs provides the authority to issue and Abstract: The U.S. Army Corps of in the Electronic Subcontracting maintain the Federal Acquisition Engineers (USACE) recognizes the Reporting System (eSRS). The SSR is Regulation and executive agency sovereign status of Indian tribes (as used to collect prime contractors’ and implementing regulations. defined by Executive Order 13175) and subcontractors’ subcontract award data Alternatives: There are no known our obligation for pre-decisional for a specific Federal Government alternatives that would achieve the government-to-government agency when the prime or efficiencies expected from this rule. The consultation, as established through and subcontractor: (a) Holds one or more current submission requirements result confirmed by the U.S. Constitution, contracts over $700,000 (over in extra work for contractors and create treaties, statutes, executive orders, $1,500,000 for construction of a public problems with duplicate subcontracting judicial decisions, and Presidential facility); and (b) is required to report data being reported. documents and policies, on proposed subcontracts awarded to various types Anticipated Cost and Benefits: By regulatory actions (e.g., individual of small business under an individual requiring submission and review of permit decisions and general permit subcontracting plan with the Federal SSRs at the DoD level, this rule solves verifications). In addition, the USACE Government. Currently, the contractors these issues. The following is a must also consider the effects of its submit the SSR to the various summary of the estimated anticipated actions on historic properties pursuant individual DoD components (i.e., public cost savings calculated in 2016 to section 106 of the National Historic departments and agencies within DoD) dollars at a 7-percent discount rate and Preservation Act. The USACE with which they have contracts. As a in perpetuity: Regulatory Program’s regulations for ¥ result of this rule, contractors with Annualized Cost Savings: $25,514. complying with the NHPA are outlined individual subcontracting plans will Present Value Cost Savings: at 33 CFR 325 appendix C. Since these ¥ submit a single, consolidated SSR in $364,492. regulations were promulgated in 1990, eSRS at the DoD-level, which will be Risks: There are no identified risks there have been amendments to the acknowledged or rejected in eSRS at the associated with this rule. The rule NHPA and revisions to the Advisory DoD-level. These revisions will bring should serve to eliminate the potential Council on Historic Preservation’s DFARS into compliance with the for duplicative reporting of (ACHP) regulations at 36 CFR part 800 requirement for a consolidated SSR in subcontracting data to DoD. subpart B, addressing, among other the clause at Federal Acquisition Timetable: things, tribal consultation requirements. Regulation 52.219–9, Small Business In response, the USACE issued interim Subcontracting Plan. This rule will also Action Date FR Cite guidance until rulemaking could be have a positive impact on contractors, NPRM ...... 06/29/18 83 FR 30666 completed in order to ensure full because they will be able to submit a NPRM Comment 08/28/18 compliance with the NHPA and ACHP’s single consolidated SSR to DoD, instead Period End. regulations. The USACE seeks to revise of multiple SSRs to DoD components. Final Action ...... 12/00/18 its regulations to conform to these Statement of Need: The purpose of Final Action Effec- 12/00/18 requirements. Consequently, the USACE the rule change is to amend the Defense tive. intends to publish an advance notice of Federal Acquisition Regulation proposed rulemaking to solicit the Supplement (DFARS) to implement a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis public’s input and inform its drafting of policy that streamlines the submission Required: No. any future rulemaking. and review of Summary Subcontract Government Levels Affected: Federal. Statement of Need: Since the USACE Reports (SSRs) for DoD contractors. Agency Contact: Jennifer Hawes, Regulatory Program’s regulations for Instead of the current practice of Defense Acquisition Regulations section 106 of the National Historic submitting multiple SSRs to various System, Department of Defense, 3060 Preservation Act (NHPA) were departments or agencies within DoD, Defense Pentagon, Room 3B941, promulgated in 1990, there have been contractors with individual Washington, DC 20301–3060, Phone: amendments to the NHPA and revisions

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57843

to Advisory Council on Historic DOD—COE Hurricane Sandy (2012), flooding on the Preservation’s (ACHP) regulations at 36 Mississippi and Missouri Rivers (2008, Proposed Rule Stage CFR part 800 subpart B. The ACHP’s 2011, and 2013), and Hurricanes regulations address, among other things, 26. Natural Disaster Procedures: Harvey, Irma and Maria (2017) have tribal consultation requirements. The Preparedness, Response, and Recovery provided a more detailed understanding Corps seeks to revise its regulations to Activities of the Corps of Engineers of the nature and severity of risk conform to these requirements, and to Priority: Other Significant. Major associated with flood control projects. develop regulations governing status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is Additionally, the maturation of risk- consultation with Indian tribes. undetermined. informed decision making approaches and technological advancements have Summary of Legal Basis: For historic E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. Legal Authority: 33 U.S.C. 701n influenced the outlook on how Public properties: Section 106 of the National Law 84–99 activities should be Historic Preservation Act. The USACE’s CFR Citation: 33 CFR 203. Legal Deadline: None. implemented, with a shift towards obligations to consult with Indian tribes Abstract: The Corps is proposing to better alignment with Corps Levee are derived from the U.S. Constitution, update the Federal regulation for its Safety and National Flood Risk treaties, statutes, executive orders, natural disaster procedures currently Management Programs, as well as the judicial decisions, and Presidential promulgated in 33 CFR part 203. This National Preparedness and Response documents and policies. proposed rule continues the rulemaking Frameworks. Through these programs, Alternatives: Various alternatives are process to revise 33 CFR part 203, the Corps works with non-federal expected to be developed from the input which implements section 5 of the sponsors and stakeholders to assess, received from the advance notice of Flood Control Act of 1941, as amended, communicate, and manage the risks to proposed rulemaking, and further (33 U.S.C. 701n), commonly referred to people, property, and the environment explored during the development of the as Public Law 84–99. The Corps associated with levee systems and flood proposed and final rules. initiated this process through advanced risks. Revisions to part 203 are notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) necessary to implement statutes that Anticipated Cost and Benefits: on February 13, 2015. The revisions amended or otherwise affected Public Anticipated costs and benefits will be under consideration would respond to Law 84–99, as explained in the next estimated as rule options are developed the comments to the ANPR. The section. after comments received in response to revisions address statutory changes to Summary of Legal Basis: Public Law the advance notice of proposed the program enacted in section 3011 and 84–99 authorizes an emergency fund to rulemaking are evaluated. 3029 of the Water Resources and Reform be expended at the discretion of the Risks: The regulation is expected to Development Act of 2014 (WRRDA Chief of Engineers for preparation for reduce risks to the environment, 2014) regarding the System Wide natural disasters, flood fighting, rescue specifically historic properties, Improvement Framework (SWIF), operations, repairing or restoring flood properties of traditional religious and modifications to Flood Control Works control works, emergency protection of cultural importance to tribes, and (FCW) and Coastal Storm Risk federally authorized hurricane or shore natural resources that are subject to Management Projects (formerly referred protection projects, and the repair and restoration of federally authorized tribal treaty rights. Other potential risks to as Hurricane and Shore Protection hurricane and shore protection projects will likely be identified through the Projects); and nonstructural alternatives damaged or destroyed by wind, wave, or advance notice of proposed rulemaking to rehabilitation, if requested by the water of other than ordinary nature. and those risks will be evaluated during non-Federal sponsor. Additional revisions address statutory changes from 1. Subsection 3029(a) of the Water the rulemaking process. section 1176 of the Water Resources Resources Reform and Development Act Timetable: Development Act of 2016 (WRDA) of 2014 (WRRDA) (Pub. L. 113–121) which provided an express definition of granted the Chief of Engineers authority, Action Date FR Cite nonstructural alternatives,’’ as that term under certain circumstances, to make is used in Public Law 84–99, and modifications to flood control and ANPRM ...... 02/00/19 authorized the Chief of Engineers, under hurricane or shore protections works ANPRM Comment 05/00/19 damaged during flood or coastal storms Period End. certain circumstances, to increase the level of protection of flood control or events, as well as the authority to hurricane or shore protection works implement nonstructural alternatives in Regulatory Flexibility Analysis when conducting repair or restoration the repair and restoration of hurricane Required: Undetermined. activities to such works under Public or shore protection works. Government Levels Affected: Law 84–99. Other significant changes 2. Subsection 3029(b) of WRRDA 2014 Undetermined. under consideration include revisions to directed the Secretary of the Army to undertake a review of implementation Federalism: Undetermined. the eligibility criteria for rehabilitation assistance for flood control works of Public Law 84–99 to ensure the safety Agency Contact: Amy Klein, (FCW), an increase to the minimum of affected communities to future Regulatory Program Manager, repair cost for FCW projects, revised flooding and storm events; the Department of Defense, U.S. Army policies to address endangered species resiliency of water resources Corps of Engineers, 441 G Street NW, and vegetation management during development projects to future flooding Washington, DC 20314, Phone: 202 761– rehabilitation, and a change in the cost and storm events; the long-term cost- 4559, Email: amy.s.klein@ share for emergency measures effectiveness of water resources usace.army.mil. constructed using permanent development projects that provide flood RIN: 0710–AA75 construction standards. control and hurricane and storm damage Statement of Need: Since the last reduction benefits; and the policy goals revision in 2003, significant disasters, and objectives that were outlined by the including Hurricane Katrina (2005), President as a response to recent

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57844 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

extreme weather events at that time are is expected to perform to a focus on a 29, 2015). On October 9, 2015, the U.S. met. broader set of actions to reduce risk to Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit 3. Section 3011 of WRRDA 2014 life, including operations, maintenance, stayed the 2015 rule nationwide mandated that a levee system shall planning, and execution actions to pending further action of the court. On remain eligible for rehabilitation improve emergency warning and February 28, 2017, the President signed assistance under Public Law 84–99 as evacuation and other activities to Executive Order 13778, ‘‘Restoring the long as the system sponsor continues to improve the ability of communities and Rule of Law, Federalism, and Economic make satisfactory progress, as individuals to understand and manage Growth by Reviewing the ‘Waters of the determined by the Secretary of the project-related risks. Informed by more United States Rule’,’’ which instructed Army, on an approved system wide detailed understanding of risk for levee the agencies to review the 2015 Rule improvement framework or letter of projects, the federal government and and rescind or replace it as appropriate intent. non-federal sponsors are able to apply and consistent with law. The agencies 4. Section 1176 of the Water limited resources to the risk are publishing this proposed rule to Resources Development Act of 2016 management activities that most follow the first step, which sought to (WRDA) (Pub. L. 114–322, title I) effectively reduce riverine flood risk recodify the definition of ‘‘waters of the provided an express definition of and avoid expenditures that have little United States’’ that existed prior to the nonstructural alternatives, as that term risk reduction benefit. 2015 Rule. In this second step, the is used in Public Law 84–99, and Risks: The rule will is expected to agencies are conducting a substantive authorized the Chief of Engineers, under reduce risks to public health and safety reevaluation and revision of the certain circumstances, to increase the by improving the Corps’ ability to definition of ‘‘waters of the United level of protection of flood control or prepare for national response framework States’’ in accordance with the hurricane or shore protection works missions that contribute to the Executive order. when conducting repair or restoration restoration of critical lifelines that are Statement of Need: Please see EPA’s activities to such works under Public necessary for life sustaining activities statement of need for RIN 2040–AF75, Law 84–99. and economic recovery. The rule is also because EPA is the lead for this Alternatives: expected to encourage broader rulemaking action. 1. No rule update: Implement all community flood risk management Summary of Legal Basis: The Clean changes through agency discretion. activities, as enacted by non-federal Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.). Alternative not selected because the project sponsors. Alternatives: Please see EPA’s Public Law 84–99 amendments are very Timetable: alternatives for RIN 2040–AF75, because prescriptive and it is inappropriate for EPA is the lead for this rulemaking those conflicts to exist. Action Date FR Cite action. 2. Modify: Evaluate required changes Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Please and determine which require ANPRM ...... 02/13/15 80 FR 8014 see EPA’s statement of anticipated costs implementation via agency discretion ANPRM Comment 04/14/15 and benefits for RIN 2040–AF75, and those requiring an update to the Period End. because EPA is the lead for this NPRM ...... 12/00/18 rule, thereby only updating the rule rulemaking action. where necessary. Alternative not NPRM Comment 02/00/19 Period End. Risks: Please see EPA’s statement of selected because of inconsistencies risks for RIN 2040–AF75, because EPA resulting from a lack of comprehensive Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is the lead for this rulemaking action. consideration and a mix of policies. It Timetable: would result in misunderstandings of Required: No. Small Entities Affected: No. program activities and inhibit Action Date FR Cite transparency. Government Levels Affected: None. 3. Repeal and replace (Selected Agency Contact: Willem Helms, NPRM ...... 12/00/18 Alternative): Incorporate and integrate Department of Defense, U.S. Army the current state of the practice of flood Corps of Engineers, 441 G Street NW, Regulatory Flexibility Analysis risk management principles and Washington, DC 20314, Phone: 202 761– Required: Undetermined. concepts through the provision of 5909. Government Levels Affected: agency policy codified in a federal rule. RIN: 0710–AA78 Undetermined. The intended benefit is to encourage Federalism: Undetermined. broader community flood risk Agency Contact: Stacey Jensen, management activities, as enacted by DOD—COE Department of Defense, U.S. Army non-federal project sponsors. The rule Corps of Engineers, 441 G Street NW, alternative also consolidates recent 27. Definition of ‘‘Waters of the United Washington, DC 20314, Phone: 202 761– Public Law 84–99 amendments into one States’’ 5856. comprehensive rule, ensuring the Public Priority: Other Significant. Major Related RIN: Related to 2040–AF75 has a clear understanding of the status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is RIN: 0710–AA80 responsibilities and requirements. undetermined. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. Overall, the changes to this regulation E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. DOD—COE provide greater flexibility to the federal Legal Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. government and non-Federal sponsors CFR Citation: 33 CFR 328. 28. Compensatory Mitigation for Losses and improve the effectiveness of federal Legal Deadline: None. of Aquatic Resources—Review and and local investments in riverine and Abstract: In 2015, the Environmental Approval of Mitigation Banks and In- coastal projects. These proposed Protection Agency and the Department Lieu Fee Programs changes take advantage of our increased of the Army (the agencies) published the Priority: Other Significant. Major understanding of project risks, moving ‘‘Clean Water Rule: Definition of Waters status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is from an assessment of how the project of the United States’’ (80 FR 37054, June undetermined.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57845

E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. program review process by participating Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Legal Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1344; 33 in the public notice and comment Required: Undetermined. U.S.C. 403; 33 U.S.C. 1413 process along with the general public. Government Levels Affected: CFR Citation: 33 CFR 332. Summary of Legal Basis: The Corps’ Undetermined. Legal Deadline: None. legal authority for conducting this Agency Contact: David B. Olson, Abstract: In 2008, the U.S. Army rulemaking is section 404 of the Clean Regulatory Program Manager, Corps of Engineers (Corps) issued a final Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) and section Department of Defense, U.S. Army rule governing compensatory mitigation 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 Corps of Engineers, 441 G Street NW, for losses of aquatic resources (73 FR (33 U.S.C. 403). CECW–CO, Washington, DC 20314– 19593). The regulation prescribes a Alternatives: Alternatives that may be 1000, Phone: 202 761–4922, Email: review and approval process for the considered during the rulemaking [email protected]. establishment and management of process might include, but are not RIN: 0710–AA83 mitigation banks and in-lieu fee limited to, conducting the rulemaking to programs. The regulation also includes remove the interagency review team time frames for certain steps in the process from the regulation, using other mitigation bank and in-lieu fee program approaches to increase efficiency in the DOD—COE review and approval process. The mitigation bank and in-lieu fee program 29. Modification of Nationwide Permits review and approval process for review and approval process, or making mitigation banks and in-lieu fee no changes to the regulation. Priority: Other Significant. Major programs includes an opportunity for Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is public and agency review and comment, proposed rule change is anticipated to undetermined. as well as a second review by an reduce costs for sponsors of mitigation E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. interagency review team. The banks and in-lieu fee programs, by Legal Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1344(e); 33 interagency review team consists of reducing the amount of time it takes to U.S.C. 403 Federal, Tribal, State, and local agencies review and approve their mitigation CFR Citation: None. that review documentation and provide banks and in-lieu fee programs, and Legal Deadline: None. the USACE with advice on the oversee their operation. The proposed Abstract: The U.S. Army Corps of establishment and management of rule change is also anticipated to reduce Engineers (Corps) issues nationwide mitigation banks and in-lieu fee costs to the Corps and other Federal, permits to authorize specific categories programs. The Corps is reviewing the Tribal, State, and local government of activities in jurisdictional waters and review and approval process and the agencies by eliminating costs associated wetlands that have no more than interagency review team process in with the current interagency review minimal individual and cumulative particular to enhance the efficiency of team processes, including staff time for adverse environmental effects. This the mitigation bank and in-lieu fee review of documentation for mitigation action would be a deregulatory action program approval time frames. An banks and in-lieu fee programs, site because it proposes to remove specific increase in efficiency would likely visits, travel, and participation in terms of nationwide permits that impose result in savings to the public because meetings. A regulatory impact analysis costs on prospective permittees, and it it is expected to result in shorter review will be prepared for the proposed rule, would help simplify the nationwide times for proposed mitigation banks, in- to fully evaluate anticipated costs and permit authorization process. Since the lieu fee programs, and instrument benefits. submission and review of such modifications, as well as credit release Risks: The proposed rule is not nationwide permits can take requests, and decreases in the resources anticipated to increase risks to public significantly less time than individual other federal, state, and local agencies health, safety, or the environment permits, any changes to the program expend in reviewing these activities, because the Corps would retain its that increase the conditions under attending meetings, participating in site authority to review and approve which the nationwide permits can be visits, and providing their comments to mitigation banks and in-lieu fee used could result in significant cost the Corps. programs, as well as modification of savings for the public. The issuance and Statement of Need: This proposed mitigation banking instruments and in- reissuance of nationwide permits must rule would propose executing execute of lieu fee program instruments. It might be done every five years to continue the one of the legislative principles in the only alter how Federal, Tribal, State, Nationwide Permit Program. The Administration’s framework for and local government agencies provide nationwide permits were last issued on rebuilding infrastructure in the United their views on proposed mitigation December 21, 2016, and expire on States, by removing duplication in the banks and in-lieu fee programs, and March 18, 2022. On October 25, 2017, review process for mitigation banks and modifications to approved mitigation the Corps issued a report to meet the in-lieu fee programs that offset losses of banks and in-lieu fee programs. requirements of Executive Order 13783, jurisdictional waters and wetlands Mitigation banks and in-lieu fee Promoting Energy Independence and authorized by Department of the Army programs would continue to be required Economic Growth. In that report, the permits issued under section 404 of the to provide ecologically successful Corps recommended changes to nine Clean Water Act and section 10 of the aquatic resource compensatory nationwide permits that authorize Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. It could mitigation projects to offset permitted activities related to domestic energy reduce duplication, increase efficiency, impacts to jurisdictional waters and production and use, including oil, and lower costs by providing one review wetlands. natural gas, coal, and nuclear energy process for proposed mitigation banks Timetable: sources, as well as renewable energy and in-lieu fee programs, instead of two sources such as flowing water, wind, processes. Depending on the outcome of Action Date FR Cite and solar energy. This rulemaking this rulemaking, Federal, tribal, state, action would seek to review and, if and local agencies could end up using NPRM ...... 03/00/19 appropriate, modify those nine NPRM Comment 05/00/19 a different approach to provide input Period End. nationwide permits in accordance with into the mitigation bank and in-lieu fee the opportunities identified in the

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57846 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

report in order to reduce burden on the by removing or changing certain terms Legal Deadline: None. public. In addition, the Corps is of those nationwide permits to make Abstract: The Department of the considering modifying an additional 23 them easier to use. According to the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers nationwide permits to allow federal regulatory impact analysis prepared for (Corps) is updating and clarifying the agencies to select and use nationwide the 2017 nationwide permits, a typical policies governing the use of its permits without additional Corps nationwide permit verification costs reservoir projects for domestic, review. This rulemaking action would $4,308 to $14,358 to obtain, whereas a municipal, and industrial water supply help simplify the nationwide permit typical individual permit costs $17,230 pursuant to the Flood Control Act of authorization process. to $34,460 to obtain. A more detailed 1944 section 6, 33 U.S.C. 708 (section Statement of Need: This proposed cost/benefit analysis will be prepared 6), and the Water Supply Act of 1958, rule would propose executing the when the proposed rule is developed. 43 U.S.C. 390(b) (WSA). The proposed recommendations the Corps made in the Risks: The nationwide permits reduce rules for the use of storage space in report dated October 25, 2017, that it risks to public health, safety, and the Corps reservoir projects for water wrote in response to Executive Order environment by providing streamlined supply are being developed to 13783, Promoting Energy Independence authorization for categories of activities implement section 6 of the Flood and Economic Growth, as well as one of that require Department of the Army Control Act of 1944 and the Water the legislative principles in the authorization and result in no more than Supply Act of 1958. Administration’s framework for minimal individual and cumulative Statement of Need: The Corps is rebuilding infrastructure in the United adverse environmental effects. The updating and clarifying its policies States. For Executive Order 13783, the nationwide permits authorize the governing the use of its reservoir Corps may propose to modify 9 construction and maintenance of projects for domestic, municipal and nationwide permits that authorize infrastructure that supports public industrial water supply pursuant to activities association with energy health and safety. The streamlined Section 6 of the Flood Control Act of production and distribution. For the authorization process provided by the 1944 and the Water Supply Act of 1958. framework for rebuilding infrastructure nationwide permits reduces risks to the The Corps intends through this in the United States, the Corps may environment by giving incentives to rulemaking to explain and improve its propose to modify an additional 23 project proponents to design their interpretations and practices under nationwide permits so that federal projects to reduce adverse these statutes. The rule is intended to agencies that want to use these environmental effects so that they are no enhance the Corps’ ability to cooperate nationwide permits do not have to more than minimal. Many of the with state and local interests in the submit pre-construction notifications. nationwide permits have acreage and development of water supplies in Summary of Legal Basis: The Corps other terms that help regulated entities connection with the operation of its has authority to issue nationwide design their projects to qualify for reservoirs for federal purposes as permits under the following statutes: nationwide permit authorization. authorized by Congress, to facilitate Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 Timetable: water supply uses of Corps reservoirs by U.S.C. 1344) and Section 10 of the others as contemplated under applicable Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 Action Date FR Cite law, and to avoid interfering with lawful U.S.C. 403). uses of water by any entity when the Alternatives: Potential alternatives NPRM ...... 06/00/19 Corps exercises its discretionary consist of: (1) Conducting the NPRM Comment 08/00/19 authority under either Section 6 or the rulemaking necessary to make the Period End. Water Supply Act. proposed modifications or other Summary of Legal Basis: Section 6 of modifications to these 32 nationwide Regulatory Flexibility Analysis the Flood Control Act of 1944 permits prior to the expiration of the Required: No. authorizes the Secretary of the Army to current nationwide permits, (2) Government Levels Affected: None. make contracts with states, conducting rulemaking to modify a Agency Contact: David B. Olson, municipalities, private concerns, or smaller number of the current Regulatory Program Manager, individuals, at such prices and on such nationwide permits prior to the Department of Defense, U.S. Army terms as [the Secretary] may deem expiration of the current nationwide Corps of Engineers, 441 G Street NW, reasonable, for domestic and industrial permits, and (3) taking no action until CECW–CO, Washington, DC 20314– uses for surplus water that may be the next scheduled rulemaking. The 1000, Phone: 202 761–4922, Email: available at any reservoir under the current nationwide permits went into [email protected]. control of the [Department of the Army]. effect on March 19, 2017, and expire on RIN: 0710–AA84 33 U.S.C. 708. The Water Supply Act March 18, 2022. If the nationwide provides that storage may be included permits are not reissued before March in any reservoir project surveyed, 18, 2022, the nationwide permits will DOD—COE planned, constructed or to be planned, automatically expire and project surveyed and/or constructed by the proponents would be required to obtain Final Rule Stage Corps to impound water for present or individual permits to conduct regulated 30. Policy for Domestic, Municipal, and anticipated future demand or need for activities under section 404 of the Clean Industrial Water Supply Uses of municipal or industrial water, 43 U.S.C. Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Reservoir Projects Operated by the 390b(b). Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899, unless Alternatives: The Army anticipates Department of the Army, U.S. Army the applicable Corps district has considering two alternatives: (1) A no Corps of Engineers regional general permits available to action alternative and (2) revising the authorize similar categories of activities. Priority: Other Significant. Corps’ policies implementing section 6 Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. and the Water Supply Act. proposed changes to these 32 Legal Authority: 33 U.S.C. 708; 43 Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The nationwide permits would reduce U.S.C. 390b proposed rule is not expected to have a compliance costs for regulated entities CFR Citation: 33 CFR 209. significant economic impact. It would

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57847

not change the methodology by which sections of the National Defense The aim of stronger readiness is served the cost of Water Supply Act storage Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 by reinforcing the vital role of the agreements is determined. It would (NDAA–17). The law makes significant TRICARE Prime health plan to refer establish a new pricing methodology for changes to the TRICARE program, patients, particularly those needing surplus water contracts, under which especially to the health maintenance specialty care, to military medical users would be charged only for costs, organization (HMO) like health plan, treatment facilities in order to ensure if any, incurred by the Corps in making known as TRICARE Prime; to the that military health care providers surplus water available. The costs preferred provider organization health maintain clinical currency and incurred by the Government and the plan, previously called TRICARE Extra proficiency in their professional fields. costs charged to users for surplus water and now to be called TRICARE Select; The objective of better care is enhanced withdrawals are not expected to be and to the third health care option, by a number of improvements in significant. known as TRICARE Standard, which beneficiary access to health care Risks: This rule is expected to reduce was terminated as of December 31, services, including geographical risks to public health and the 2017, and replaced by TRICARE Select. coverage for the TRICARE Select environment by facilitating water The statute also adopts a new health provider network, reduced supply uses of Corps reservoirs by plan enrollment system under TRICARE administrative hurdles for TRICARE others as contemplated under applicable and new provisions for access to care, Prime enrollees to obtain urgent care law, and to avoid interfering with lawful high value services, preventive care, and services and specialty care referrals, and uses of water by any entity. This rule is healthy lifestyles. In implementing the promotion of high-value services and also expected to reduce risk by statutory changes, this finalizes a medications and telehealth services. clarifying existing policies of non- number of improvements to TRICARE. The goal of healthier people is advanced interference with water rights issued by Specifically, this rule will enhance by expanding TRICARE coverage of the states or other permitting beneficiary access to health care preventive care services and prevention authorities. services, including increased geographic and treatment of obesity. And the aim Timetable: coverage for the TRICARE Select of smarter spending is furthered by provider network, reduced sharpening cost-benefit assessments for Action Date FR Cite administrative hurdles for TRICARE TRICARE plan specifications that Prime enrollees to obtain urgent care remain under the DoD’s discretion. NPRM ...... 12/16/16 81 FR 91556 services and specialty care referrals, and NPRM Comment 11/16/17 Summary of Legal Basis: This rule is promotes high value services and required to implement or partially Period End. medications and telehealth services. It Final Action ...... 08/00/19 implement several sections of NDAA– Final Action Effec- 10/00/19 also expanded TRICARE coverage of 17, including 701, 706, 715, 718, and tive. preventive care services and prevention 729. The legal authority for this rule and treatment of obesity and refining also includes chapter 55 of title 10, Regulatory Flexibility Analysis cost-benefit assessments for TRICARE United States Code. Required: No. plan specifications that remain under Alternatives: None. Government Levels Affected: None. DoD’s discretion. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This Agency Contact: Joseph Redican, Statement of Need: This rule rule is not anticipated to have an annual Deputy Chief, Planning and Policy implements the primary features of effect on the economy of $100M or Division, Department of Defense, U.S. section 701 and partially implements more, thus it is not an economically Army Corps of Engineers, 441 G Street several other sections of the National significant rule under the Executive NW, Washington, DC 20314, Phone: 202 Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Order and the Congressional Review 761–4523, Email: joseph.h.redican@ Year 2017 (NDAA–17). The law makes Act. The rule includes estimated usace.army.mil. significant changes to the TRICARE program costs associated with RIN: 0710–AA72 program, especially to the health implementation that include maintenance organization (HMO)-like administrative startup costs ($11M) health plan, known as TRICARE Prime; information systems changes ($10M). to the preferred provider organization DOD—OFFICE OF ASSISTANT Executive Order 13771, Reducing health plan, previously called TRICARE Regulation and Controlling Regulatory SECRETARY FOR HEALTH AFFAIRS Extra and now to be called TRICARE Costs, seeks to control costs associated (DODOASHA) Select; and to the third health care with the government imposition of option, known as TRICARE Standard, Final Rule Stage private expenditures required to comply which will be terminated as of with Federal regulations and to reduce 31. Establishment of Tricare Select and December 31, 2017, and replaced by regulations that impose such costs. Other Tricare Reforms TRICARE Select. The statute also adopts Consistent with the analysis of transfer a new health plan enrollment system Priority: Other Significant. payments under OMB Circular A–4, this E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. under TRICARE and new provisions for rule does not involve regulatory costs Legal Authority: 10 U.S.C. ch. 55; access to care, high-value services, subject to Executive Order 13771. NDAA–17 sec. 701; NDAA–17 sec. 706; preventive care, and healthy lifestyles. Risks: The rule does not impose any NDAA–17 sec. 715; NDAA–17 sec. 718; In implementing the statutory changes, risks. The risks lie in not implementing NDAA–17 sec. 729 this rule makes a number of statutorily required changes. CFR Citation: 32 CFR 199. improvements to TRICARE. Legal Deadline: Other, Statutory, June In implementing section 701 and Timetable: 23, 2017, NDAA 17 section 718. Other, partially implementing several other Action Date FR Cite Statutory, January 1, 2018, NDAA 17 sections of NDAA–17, this interim final section 729. rule advances all four components of Interim Final Rule 09/29/17 82 FR 45438 Abstract: This final rule implements the Military Health System’s quadruple Interim Final Rule 11/28/17 the primary features of section 701 and aim of stronger readiness, better care, Comment Pe- partially implements several other healthier people, and smarter spending. riod End.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57848 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

Action Date FR Cite secondary schools in approximately as read and print any supporting 13,600 districts, and about 20 million regulatory documents. Final Action ...... 01/00/19 students will enroll in degree-granting We are committed to reducing burden postsecondary schools. All of these with regard to regulations, guidance, Regulatory Flexibility Analysis students may benefit from some degree and information collections, reducing Required: No. of financial assistance or support from the burden on information providers Small Entities Affected: No. the Department. involved in our programs, and making Government Levels Affected: None. In developing and implementing information easily accessible to the Agency Contact: Mark Ellis, regulations, guidance, technical public. To that end and consistent with Department of Defense, Office of assistance, evaluations, data gathering Executive Order 13777 (‘‘Enforcing the Assistant Secretary for Health Affairs, and reporting, and monitoring related to Regulatory Reform Agenda’’), we are in 5111 Leesburg Pike, Suite 810A, Falls our programs, we are committed to the process of reviewing all of our Church, VA 22041, Phone: 703 681– working closely with affected persons regulations and guidance to modify and 0039. rescind items that: (1) Eliminate jobs, or RIN: 0720–AB70 and groups. We know that improving education starts with allowing greater inhibit job creation; (2) are outdated, BILLING CODE 5001–06–P decision-making authority at the State unnecessary, or ineffective; (3) impose and local levels while also recognizing costs that exceed benefits; (4) create a that the ultimate form of local control serious inconsistency or otherwise DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION occurs when parents and students are interfere with regulatory reform empowered to choose their own initiatives and policies; (5) are Statement of Regulatory Priorities educational paths forward. Our core inconsistent with the requirements of I. Introduction mission includes this empowerment of section 515 of the Treasury and General The U.S. Department of Education local education, serving the most Government Appropriations Act, 2001 (Department) supports States, local vulnerable, and facilitating equal access (44 U.S.C. 3516 note), or the guidance communities, institutions of higher for all, to ensure all students receive a issued pursuant to that provision, in education, and families in improving high-quality education, and complete it particular those regulations that rely in education and other services nationwide with a well-considered and attainable whole or in part on data, information, or in order to ensure that all Americans, path to a sustainable career. methods that are not publicly available including those with disabilities, Toward these ends, we work with a or that are insufficiently transparent to receive a high-quality education and are broad range of interested parties and the meet the standard for reproducibility; or prepared for high-quality employment. general public, including families, (6) derive from or implement Executive We provide leadership and financial students, and educators; State, local, orders or other Presidential directives assistance pertaining to education and and Tribal governments; other Federal that have been subsequently rescinded related services at all levels to a wide agencies; and neighborhood groups, or substantially modified. range of stakeholders and individuals, community-based early learning II. Regulatory and Deregulatory including State educational and other programs, elementary and secondary Priorities agencies, local school districts, schools, colleges, rehabilitation service providers of early learning programs, providers, adult education providers, Proposed Rulemakings elementary and secondary schools, professional associations, advocacy The following are the key regulatory institutions of higher education, career organizations, businesses, and labor and deregulatory rulemaking actions the and technical schools, nonprofit organizations. Department is planning for the coming organizations, postsecondary students, If we determine that it is necessary to year. We provide below information members of the public, families, and develop regulations, we seek public about the potential costs and benefits for many others. These efforts are helping participation at the key stages in the several of these rulemaking actions, to ensure that all children and students rulemaking process. We invite the including whether they would be from pre-kindergarten through grade 12 public to submit comments on all considered regulatory or deregulatory will be ready for, and succeed in, proposed regulations through the actions under Executive Order 13771. postsecondary education or internet or by regular mail. We also For rulemakings that we are just employment, and that students continue to seek greater public beginning now, we have limited attending postsecondary institutions are participation in our rulemaking information about their potential costs prepared for a profession or career. activities through the use of transparent and benefits and cannot estimate at this We also vigorously monitor and and interactive rulemaking procedures time whether they would be considered enforce the implementation of Federal and new technologies. regulatory or deregulatory actions. civil rights laws in educational To facilitate the public’s involvement, programs and activities that receive we participate in the Federal Docket Postsecondary Education/Federal Federal financial assistance, and Management System (FDMS), an Student Aid support innovative programs, research electronic single Government-wide The Department will continue its and evaluation activities, technical access point (www.regulations.gov) that work to complete two rulemakings in assistance, and the dissemination of enables the public to submit comments the area of higher education and Federal data, research, and evaluation findings on different types of Federal regulatory Student Aid under the Higher Education to improve the quality of education. documents and read and respond to Act of 1965, as amended (HEA). The Overall, the laws, regulations, and comments submitted by other members Department has completed negotiated programs that the Department of the public during the public comment rulemaking for these two rulemakings, administers will affect nearly every period. This system provides the public described below, and we are revisiting American during his or her life. Indeed, with the opportunity to submit these regulations with the goals of in the 2018–19 school year, about 57 comments electronically on any notice alleviating unnecessary regulatory million students will attend an of proposed rulemaking or interim final burdens and ensuring appropriate estimated 133,000 elementary and regulations open for comment, as well protections for students, institutions,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57849

taxpayers, and the Federal government. other State authorization issues; the We are currently working to discontinue Through the use of the negotiated definitions of a number of terms in the these. rulemaking process, we have received regulations governing institutional and III. Regulatory Review input from a diverse range of interests programmatic eligibility; requirements and affected parties. of the Teacher Education Assistance for As stated previously, the Department The Department recently published College and Higher Education Grant is continuing its comprehensive new proposed regulations that would (TEACH Grant) program, in an effort to regulatory reform efforts pursuant to govern the William D. Ford Federal minimize inadvertent grant-to-loan Executive Order 13777, focusing on Direct Loan (Direct Loan) Program conversions and improve outcomes for rescinding and modifying all outdated, regarding the standard and the process TEACH Grant recipients; direct unnecessary, or ineffective regulations, for determining whether a borrower has assessment programs and competency- guidance, and information collections. a defense to repayment on a loan based based education; and regulations Section 3(e) of the Executive order on an act or omission of a school. We regarding the eligibility of faith-based requires the Department, as part of this also have proposed to amend other entities to participate in the Title IV, effort, to ‘‘seek input and other sections of the Direct Loan Program HEA programs. assistance, as permitted by law, from regulations, including those that codify entities significantly affected by Federal Civil Rights/Title IX our current policy regarding the impact regulations, including State, local, and that discharges have on the 150 percent The Secretary is planning a new tribal governments, small businesses, Direct Subsidized Loan Limit and the rulemaking to address issues under Title consumers, non-governmental Student Assistance General Provisions IX of the Education Amendments of organizations, and trade associations’’ regulations providing the financial 1972, as amended. In this action, we on regulations that meet some or all of responsibility standards and disclosure seek to clarify schools’ obligations in the criteria above. The Department will requirements for schools. In addition, redressing sex discrimination, including continue to consider public input and we proposed to amend the discharge complaints of sexual misconduct, and feedback as part of these efforts. provisions in the Federal Perkins Loan, the procedures by which they must do Direct Loan, and Federal Family so. IV. Principles for Regulating Education Loan programs. These Over the next year, we may need to Special Education proposed regulations would replace issue other regulations because of new those promulgated by the Department in The Department will continue its legislation or programmatic changes. In 2016. work to complete its rulemaking in the doing so, we will follow the Principles The Department recently proposed area of significant disproportionality for Regulating, which determine when regulations that would rescind the under section 618(d) of the Individuals and how we will regulate. Through Gainful Employment (GE) regulations with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). consistent application of those and remove them from subparts Q and In July 2018, the Department published principles, we have eliminated R of the Student Assistance and General a final rule extending the compliance unnecessary regulations and identified Provisions in 34 CFR part 668. Under date for States until July 1, 2020. We are situations in which major programs the proposed rescission, the Department revisiting the significant could be implemented without would remove the provisions providing disproportionality regulations with the regulations or with limited regulatory for a debt-to-earnings (D/E) rates goal of better serving children with action. measure to determine a gainful disabilities. In deciding when to regulate, we employment program’s continuing Deregulatory Actions consider the following: eligibility for participation in the • Whether regulations are essential to programs authorized by title IV of the The Department anticipates issuing a promote quality and equality of HEA as well as certain disclosure and number of deregulatory actions in the opportunity in education. reporting requirements. upcoming fiscal year. We have thus far • Whether a demonstrated problem Additionally, the Secretary plans to been focusing our deregulatory efforts cannot be resolved without regulation. initiate a new rulemaking to revise on eliminating outdated regulations. In • Whether regulations are necessary regulations related to the Secretary’s many instances, our deregulatory to provide a legally binding recognition of accrediting agencies, actions are being taken because interpretation to resolve ambiguity. including specific topics such as: The legislation has superseded our • Whether entities or situations requirements of accrediting agencies in regulations. For example, we are subject to regulation are similar enough their oversight of member institutions; planning to rescind a number of that a uniform approach through requirements for accrediting agencies to sections from our Office of Career, regulation would be meaningful and do honor institutional mission; criteria Technical, and Adult Education more good than harm. used by the Secretary to recognize regulations to remove outdated, • Whether regulations are needed to accrediting agencies, emphasizing superseded regulations for programs no protect the Federal interest, that is, to criteria that focus on educational longer administered by the Department. ensure that Federal funds are used for quality; developing a single definition This deregulatory action will clarify for their intended purpose and to eliminate for purposes of measuring and reporting our stakeholders and the general public fraud, waste, and abuse. job placement rates; and simplifying the which of our regulations are still in In deciding how to regulate, we are process for recognition and review of effect. The unified agenda identifies mindful of the following principles: accrediting agencies. The rulemaking other deregulatory actions that will • Regulate no more than necessary. will also cover issues such as: State provide cost savings and clarity. • Minimize burden to the extent authorization, to address the Additionally, during the course of its possible, and promote multiple requirements related to programs Executive Order 13777 review, the approaches to meeting statutory offered through distance education or Department’s Regulatory Reform Task requirements if possible. correspondence courses, including Force has identified a number of • Encourage coordination of federally disclosures about such programs to information collections (ICRs) as being funded activities with State and local enrolled and prospective students, and outdated, unnecessary, or ineffective. reform activities.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57850 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

• Ensure that the benefits justify the Action Date FR Cite students and taxpayers from costs of regulating. unreasonable risk. • To the extent possible, establish NPRM ...... 11/00/18 Summary of Legal Basis: The performance objectives rather than Department has the authority to specify the behavior or manner of Regulatory Flexibility Analysis establish a negotiated rulemaking compliance a regulated entity must Required: Undetermined. committee with the purpose of creating, adopt. Government Levels Affected: amending or rescinding regulations in • Encourage flexibility, to the extent Undetermined. the Code of Federal Regulations. possible and as needed to enable Federalism: Undetermined. Alternatives: One alternative is not to URL For Public Comments: institutional forces to achieve desired negotiate on the proposed topic and www.regulations.gov. results. instead work on sub-regulatory Agency Contact: Alejandro Reyes, guidance to ease burden and clarify Department of Education, Office for current regulations for postsecondary Civil Rights, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, institutions and accreditors. ED—OFFICE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS (OCR) Room 4E213, Washington, DC 20202, Note that, the intent to establish a Phone: 202 453–7100, Email: Proposed Rule Stage negotiated rulemaking committee has [email protected]. already been published; the topics 32. Nondiscrimination on the Basis of RIN: 1870–AA14 proposed for negotiation have been Sex in Education Programs or Activities added to the Agency Agenda Report/ Receiving Federal Financial Assistance Unified Agenda. Further, the Priority: Other Significant. Major ED—OFFICE OF POSTSECONDARY Department has already conducted one status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is EDUCATION (OPE) of three public hearings inviting undetermined. comment on our Federal Register notice Proposed Rule Stage Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. outlining our intent to negotiate. After E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. 33. State Authorization and Related reviewing feedback from comments received, the Department may choose to Legal Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq. Issues modify the topics proposed for Priority: Economically Significant. CFR Citation: 34 CFR 106. negotiation and at that time we can Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. Legal Deadline: None. more thoughtfully provide alternatives. Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. Abstract: The Secretary plans to issue Anticipated Cost and Benefits: We a notice of proposed rulemaking to E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. Legal Authority: 20 U.S.C. 3474; 20 have limited information about the clarify the obligations of recipients of potential cost and benefits and cannot Federal financial assistance in U.S.C. 1221e–3; 20 U.S.C. 1011 et seq. CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined. estimate at this time. redressing sex discrimination, including Risks: By negotiating on a wide range complaints of sexual misconduct, and Legal Deadline: None. Abstract: The Department is of topics in one negotiated rulemaking the procedures by which they must do proposing to amend, through negotiated panel there is an increased risk on not so. rulemaking, the regulations governing reaching consensus. To account for this, Statement of Need: Based on its the legal authorization of institutions by the Department will provide draft extensive review of the critical issues States. The Department is also language prior to the first session of addressed in this rulemaking, the proposing to amend regulations for the three sessions (each session is three Department has determined that current State authorization of distance days long) of negotiated rulemaking. regulations and subregulatory guidance education providers and Historically, the first session has been do not provide a sufficiently clear correspondence education providers as used as a listening session to get definition of what conduct constitutes a component of institutional eligibility feedback from the rulemaking sexual harassment or sufficiently clear for participation in Federal student committee and the Department provides standards for how recipients must financial aid under title IV of the Higher more specific proposals to the respond to incidents of sexual Education Act of 1965, as amended. rulemaking committee between the first harassment. To address this concern, we Statement of Need: As required by and second session. propose this regulatory action to address Executive Order 13771 and 13777, the Further, there is no prohibition in the sexual harassment under Title IX for the Department must identify regulations rulemaking process for the main central purpose of ensuring that Federal that are among other things outdated, committee to break-off before, during or financial recipients understand their unnecessary, or ineffective and create a after a session to discussion topics legal obligations under title IX. serious inconsistency or otherwise within their areas of expertise to Summary of Legal Basis: We are interfere with regulatory reform propose language to the main issuing a notice of proposed rulemaking, initiative and policies. committee. and subsequently final regulations, to Update and revision to the regulations Timetable: implement Title IX. on State Authorization is necessary so Alternatives: This will be discussed in that the Department does not inhibit Action Date FR Cite the notice of proposed rulemaking innovation and competition in (NPRM) and final regulations. Notice of Intention 07/31/18 83 FR 36814 postsecondary education. Institutions to Commence Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This need the regulatory flexibility to Negotiated will be discussed in the notice of innovate and the Department is Rulemaking. proposed rulemaking (NPRM) and final committed to ensuring program integrity NPRM ...... 06/00/19 regulations. with appropriate guardrails to protect Risks: This will be discussed in the students and taxpayer dollars. The focus Regulatory Flexibility Analysis notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) of this rulemaking is on breaking down Required: Undetermined. and final regulations. barriers to innovation and reducing Government Levels Affected: Timetable: regulatory burden while protecting Undetermined.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57851

Federalism: Undetermined. proposed for negotiation have been rulemaking, regulations relating to Agency Contact: Lynn Mahaffie, added to the Agency Agenda Report/ institutional eligibility and operations Department of Education, Office of Unified Agenda. Further, the for participation in Federal student Postsecondary Education, 400 Maryland Department has already conducted one financial aid under title IV of the Higher Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20202, of three public hearings inviting Education Act of 1965, as amended, Phone: 202 453–6914. comment on our Federal Register notice including those relating to credit hour, RIN: 1840–AD36 outlining our intent to negotiate. After competency-based education, direct reviewing feedback from comments assessment programs, and regular and received, the Department may choose to substantive interaction between faculty and students in the delivery of distance ED—OPE modify the topics proposed for negotiation and at that time we can education programs, in order to promote 34. Accreditation and Related Issues more thoughtfully provide alternatives. greater access for students to high- Priority: Economically Significant. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: We quality, innovative programs of Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. have limited information about the postsecondary education. Statement of Need: As required by Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. potential cost and benefits and cannot Executive Order 13771 and 13777, the E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. estimate at this time. Department must identify regulations Legal Authority: 20 U.S.C. 3474; 20 Risks: By negotiating on a wide range that are among other things outdated, U.S.C. 1221e–3; 20 U.S.C. 1011 et seq. of topics in one negotiated rulemaking unnecessary, or ineffective and create a CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined. panel there is an increased risk on not serious inconsistency or otherwise Legal Deadline: None. reaching consensus. To account for this, interfere with regulatory reform Abstract: The Department is the Department will provide draft language prior to the first session of initiative and policies. proposing to amend, through negotiated Update and revision to the outlined rulemaking, the regulations relating to three sessions (each session is three days long) of negotiated rulemaking. regulations is necessary so that the the Secretary’s recognition of Department does not inhibit innovation accrediting agencies and accreditation Historically, the first session has been used as a listening session to get and competition in postsecondary procedures as a component of education. For example, regulations institutional eligibility for participation feedback from the rulemaking committee and the Department provides implemented regarding the credit-hour, in Federal student financial aid under regular and substantive interaction and title IV of the Higher Education Act of more specific proposals to the rulemaking committee between the first institutional partnerships in 1965, as amended. instructional programs may limit Statement of Need: As required by and second session. Timetable: innovation and inhibit student Executive Order 13771 and 13777, the completion and graduation in the Department must identify regulations Action Date FR Cite rapidly evolving postsecondary that are among other things outdated, education landscape. Institutions need unnecessary, or ineffective and create a Notice of Intention 07/31/18 83 FR 36814 the regulatory flexibility to innovate and serious inconsistency or otherwise to Commence the Department is committed to interfere with regulatory reform Negotiated ensuring program integrity with initiative and policies. Rulemaking. appropriate guardrails to protect We believe that a revision to the NPRM ...... 06/00/19 students and taxpayer dollars. The focus accreditation regulations is necessary to of this rulemaking is on breaking down restore the separation of duties in Regulatory Flexibility Analysis barriers to innovation and reducing responsibilities in the triad: The State Required: Undetermined. regulatory burden while protecting Authorization, Accreditation, and the Government Levels Affected: students and taxpayers from U.S. Department of Education. We Undetermined. unreasonable risk. believe that the accreditation Federalism: Undetermined. Summary of Legal Basis: The regulations may contain redundancy, Agency Contact: Lynn Mahaffie, Department has the authority to unnecessary duplication of oversight, Department of Education, Office of establish a negotiated rulemaking and pose broad Federal overreach in Postsecondary Education, 400 Maryland committee with the purpose of creating, measuring program quality. We also Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20202, amending or rescinding regulations in want to ensure that accreditors while Phone: 202 453–6914. the Code of Federal Regulations. measuring institutional quality do not RIN: 1840–AD37 Alternatives: One alternative is not to infringe on autonomy of institutions in negotiate on the proposed topics and their missions. instead work on sub-regulatory Summary of Legal Basis: The ED—OPE guidance to ease burden and clarify Department has the authority to current regulations for postsecondary establish a negotiated rulemaking 35. Ensuring Student Access to High institutions and accreditors. Another committee with the purpose of creating, Quality and Innovative Postsecondary alternative is to only negotiate on one or amending or rescinding regulations in Educational Programs a smaller number of the topics the the Code of Federal Regulations. Priority: Economically Significant. Department has proposed. Alternatives: One alternative is not to Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is Note that, the intent to establish a negotiate on the proposed topic and undetermined. negotiated rulemaking committee has instead work on sub-regulatory E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. already been published; the topics guidance to ease burden and clarify Legal Authority: 20 U.S.C. 3474; 20 proposed for negotiation have been current regulations for postsecondary U.S.C. 1221e–3; 20 U.S.C. 1011 et seq. added to the Agency Agenda Report/ institutions and accreditors. CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined. Unified Agenda. Further, the Note that, the intent to establish a Legal Deadline: None. Department has already conducted one negotiated rulemaking committee has Abstract: The Department proposes to of three public hearings inviting already been published; the topics create and amend, through negotiated comment on our FR Notice outlining

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57852 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

our intent to negotiate. After reviewing ED—OPE reviewing feedback from comments feedback from comments received, the 36. Eligibility of Faith-Based Entities received, the Department may choose to Department may choose to modify the and Activities—Title IV Programs modify the topics proposed for topics proposed for negotiation and at negotiation and at that time we can that time we can more thoughtfully Priority: Other Significant. Major more thoughtfully provide alternatives. provide alternatives. status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is Anticipated Cost and Benefits: We undetermined. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: We have limited information about the E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. potential cost and benefits and cannot have limited information about the Legal Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1001 and potential cost and benefits and cannot estimate at this time. 1002; 20 U.S.C. 1099b; 20 U.S.C. Risks: By negotiating on a wide range estimate at this time. 1087aa, 1087dd, and 1091 of topics in one negotiated rulemaking Risks: By negotiating on a wide range CFR Citation: 34 CFR 600.9; 34 CFR panel there is an increased risk on not of topics in one negotiated rulemaking 600.11; 34 CFR 674.9. reaching consensus. To account for this panel there is an increased risk on not Legal Deadline: None. the Department will provide draft reaching consensus. To account for this, Abstract: Various provisions of the language prior to the first session of the Department will provide draft Department’s regulations regarding the three sessions (each session is three language prior to the first session of eligibility of faith-based entities to days long) of negotiated rulemaking. three sessions (each session is three participate in the Department’s higher Historically, the first session has been days long) of negotiated rulemaking. education and student aid programs, used as a listening session to get Historically, the first session has been and the eligibility of students to feedback from the rulemaking used as a listening session to get participate in student aid programs and committee and the Department provides feedback from the rulemaking obtain certain benefits under those more specific proposals to the committee and the Department provides programs, unnecessarily restrict rulemaking committee between the first more specific proposals to the participation by religious entities. For and second session. rulemaking committee between the first example, some provisions may be overly Also, the Department will form two and second session. broad in their prohibition of activities or subcommittees, one specifically for services that relate to sectarian Also, by negotiating a wide range of faith-based entities. These committees instruction or religious worship. Other topics the Department risks not having will report back to the main rulemaking provisions may be overly broad in the expertise necessary on the committee with their reports. prohibiting the benefits a borrower may rulemaking committee to fully explore Timetable: receive based on faith-based activity. the nuances of each of the proposed The Department is proposing to review topics. To account for this the Action Date FR Cite and amend, through negotiated Department will form two rulemaking, such regulations in order to Notice of Intention 07/31/18 83 FR 36814 subcommittees, one directly related to be consistent with current law, and to to Commence direct assessment programs and reduce or eliminate unnecessary Negotiated competency-based education. These burdens and restrictions on religious Rulemaking. committees will report back to the main NPRM ...... 06/00/19 entities and activities. rulemaking committee with their Statement of Need: Rulemaking is reports. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis necessary in light of the recent United Further, there is no prohibition in the Required: Undetermined. States Supreme Court decision in Government Levels Affected: Federal, rulemaking process for the main Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Local, State. committee to break-off before, during or Inc. v. Comer, 137 S. Ct. 2012 (2017), Federalism: Undetermined. after a session to discussion topics and the October 6, 2017, Memorandum URL For More Information: within their areas of expertise to for All Executive Agencies issued by the www.regulations.gov. propose language to the main Attorney General of the United States URL For Public Comments: committee. pursuant to Executive Order No. 13798. www.regulations.gov. Timetable: Summary of Legal Basis: The Agency Contact: Lynn Mahaffie, Department has the authority to Department of Education, Office of Action Date FR Cite establish a negotiated rulemaking Postsecondary Education, 400 Maryland committee with the purpose of creating, Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20202, Notice of Intention 07/31/18 83 FR 36814 amending or rescinding regulations in Phone: 202 453–6914. to Commence the Code of Federal Regulations. RIN: 1840–AD40 Negotiated Alternatives: One alternative is not to Rulemaking. negotiate on the proposed topic and NPRM ...... 06/00/19 instead work on sub-regulatory guidance to ease burden and clarify ED—OPE Regulatory Flexibility Analysis current regulations for postsecondary 37. • Teach Grants Required: Undetermined. institutions and accreditors. Priority: Other Significant. Major Government Levels Affected: Note that, the intent to establish a status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is Undetermined. negotiated rulemaking committee has undetermined. Federalism: Undetermined. already been published; the topics Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. proposed for negotiation have been Agency Contact: Lynn Mahaffie, E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. added to the Agency Agenda Report/ Legal Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070g, et Department of Education, Office of Unified Agenda. Further, the seq. Postsecondary Education, 400 Maryland Department has already conducted one CFR Citation: 34 CFR 686. Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20202, of three public hearings inviting Legal Deadline: None. Phone: 202 453–6914. comment on our Federal Register notice Abstract: The Department is RIN: 1840–AD38 outlining our intent to negotiate. After proposing to amend, through negotiated

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57853

rulemaking, the regulations relating to after a session to discussion topics Statement of Need: The Secretary the Teacher Education Assistance for within their areas of expertise to initiated negotiated rulemaking to revise College and Higher Education (TEACH) propose language to the main current regulations governing borrower Grant. Our goal is to simplify and clarify committee. defenses to loan repayment. program requirements, minimize Timetable: Summary of Legal Basis: Section 492 inadvertent grant-to-loan conversions, of the HEA requires that, before and improve outcomes for TEACH Grant Action Date FR Cite publishing any proposed regulations to recipients. Notice of Intention 07/31/18 83 FR 36814 implement programs authorized under Statement of Need: As required by title IV of the HEA, the Secretary obtain Executive Order 13771 and 13777, the to Commence Negotiated public involvement in the development Department must identify regulations Rulemaking. of the proposed regulations. After that are among other things outdated, NPRM ...... 06/00/19 obtaining advice and recommendations unnecessary, or ineffective and create a from the public, the Secretary conducts serious inconsistency or otherwise Regulatory Flexibility Analysis negotiated rulemaking to develop the interfere with regulatory reform Required: Undetermined. proposed regulations. Section 431 of the initiatives and policies. Our goal is to Government Levels Affected: Federal, Department of Education Organization simplify and clarify program Local, State. Act provides authority to the Secretary, requirements, minimize inadvertent Federalism: Undetermined. in relevant part, to inform the public grant-to-loan conversions, and improve URL For More Information: regarding federally supported education outcomes for TEACH Grant recipients. www.regulations.gov. programs; and collect data and Summary of Legal Basis: The URL For Public Comments: information on applicable programs for Department has the authority to www.regulations.gov. the purpose of obtaining objective establish a negotiated rulemaking Agency Contact: Sophia McArdle, measurements of the effectiveness of committee with the purpose of creating, Department of Education, Office of such programs in achieving the amending or rescinding regulations in Postsecondary Education, 400 Maryland intended purposes of such programs. 20 the Code of Federal Regulations. Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20202, U.S.C. 1231a. Alternatives: One alternative is not to Phone: 202 453–6318. negotiate on the proposed topic and RIN: 1840–AD44 Alternatives: These are identified instead work on sub-regulatory through the negotiated rulemaking guidance to ease burden and clarify process and presented in the Notice of current regulations to the loan servicer Proposed Rulemaking. that overseas TEACH grant servicing. ED—OPE Anticipated Cost and Benefits: These Note that, the intent to establish a Final Rule Stage are identified through the negotiated negotiated rulemaking committee has rulemaking process and presented in the already been published; the topics 38. Institutional Accountability Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. proposed for negotiation have been Priority: Economically Significant. Risks: These are identified through added to the Agency Agenda Report/ Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. the negotiated rulemaking process and Unified Agenda. Further, the E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. presented in the Notice of Proposed Department has already conducted one Legal Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1082(a)(5), Rulemaking. of three public hearings inviting (a)(6); 20 U.S.C. 1087(a); 20 U.S.C. Timetable: comment on our Federal Register notice 1087e(h); 20 U.S.C. 1221e–3; 20 U.S.C. outlining our intent to negotiate. After 1226a–1; 20 U.S.C. 1234(a); 31 U.S.C. Action Date FR Cite reviewing feedback from comments 3711 received, the Department may choose to CFR Citation: 34 CFR 668; 34 CFR Notice of Intention 06/16/17 82 FR 27640 modify the topics proposed for 674; 34 CFR 682; 34 CFR 685; and other to Commence sections as applicable. Negotiated negotiation and at that time we can Rulemaking. more thoughtfully provide alternatives. Legal Deadline: None. Abstract: The Secretary plans to NPRM ...... 07/31/18 83 FR 37242 Anticipated Cost and Benefits: We NPRM Comment 08/30/18 have limited information about the establish new regulations governing the Period End. potential cost and benefits and cannot William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Final Action ...... 01/00/19 estimate at this time. (Direct Loan) Program regarding the Risks: By negotiating on a wide range standard and the process for Regulatory Flexibility Analysis of topics in one negotiated rulemaking determining whether a borrower has a Required: Undetermined. defense to repayment on a loan based on panel there is an increased risk on not Small Entities Affected: Businesses, an act or omission of a school. We also reaching consensus. To account for this, Governmental Jurisdictions. the Department will provide draft may amend other sections of the Direct Government Levels Affected: Federal, language prior to the first session of Loan Program regulations, including Local, State. three sessions (each session is three those that codify our current policy days long) of negotiated rulemaking. regarding the impact that discharges URL For More Information: Historically, the first session has been have on the 150 percent Direct www.regulations.gov. used as a listening session to get Subsidized Loan Limit; and the Student URL For Public Comments: feedback from the rulemaking Assistance General Provisions www.regulations.gov. committee and the Department provides regulations providing the financial Agency Contact: Annmarie Weisman, more specific proposals to the responsibility standards and disclosure Department of Education, Office of rulemaking committee between the first requirements for schools. In addition, Postsecondary Education, 400 Maryland and second session. we may amend the discharge provisions Avenue SW, Room 287–25, Washington, Further, there is no prohibition in the in the Federal Perkins Loan, Direct Loan DC 20202, Phone: 202 453–6712, Email: rulemaking process for the main and Federal Family Education Loan [email protected]. committee to break-off before, during or program regulations. RIN: 1840–AD26

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57854 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

ED—OPE Action Date FR Cite Regulatory and Deregulatory Priorities 39. Program Integrity; Gainful DOE’s regulatory and deregulatory Notice of Intention 06/16/17 82 FR 27640 Employment to Commence priorities reflect the Department’s efforts Priority: Economically Significant. Negotiated to achieve meaningful burden reduction Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. Rulemaking. while continuing to achieve the E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. NPRM ...... 08/14/18 83 FR 40167 Department’s statutory obligations. Legal Authority: 20 U.S.C. 3474; 20 NPRM Comment 09/13/18 DOE is engaged in a number of U.S.C. 1221e–3 Period End. deregulatory activities aimed at CFR Citation: 34 CFR 668. Final Action ...... 12/00/18 reducing regulatory costs and burdens. Legal Deadline: None. These activities include amending Abstract: The Secretary plans to Regulatory Flexibility Analysis regulations to expedite the preparation amend regulations on institutional Required: Undetermined. of and simplify the content of Notices of eligibility under the Higher Education Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Sale for the price competitive sale of Act of 1965, as amended (HEA), and the Governmental Jurisdictions. petroleum from the Strategic Petroleum Student Assistance General Provisions, Government Levels Affected: Federal, Reserve (SPR), which in turn will including the regulations governing Local, State. reduce the administrative burden placed on prospective bidders. Another whether certain postsecondary URL For Public Comments: important deregulatory action concerns educational programs prepare students www.regulations.gov. for gainful employment in a recognized modernizing the procedures for Agency Contact: Annmarie Weisman, occupation, and the conditions under establishing energy conservation Department of Education, Office of which these educational programs standards and test procedures as part of Postsecondary Education, 400 Maryland remain eligible under the Federal DOE’s Appliance Program. Also, DOE Avenue SW, Room 287–25, Washington, Student Aid programs authorized under published a final rule that will provide DC 20202, Phone: 202 453–6712, Email: title IV of the HEA. for faster approval of applications for Statement of Need: The Secretary [email protected]. small-scale exports of natural gas, initiated negotiated rulemaking to revise RIN: 1840–AD31 including liquefied natural gas (LNG), the gainful employment regulations BILLING CODE 4000–01–P from U.S. export facilities. published by the Department on Retrospective Analyses of Existing Rules October 31, 2014 (79 FR 64889). The negotiated rulemaking committee did On January 30, 2017, the President DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY not reach consensus and the Department issued E.O. 13771, ‘‘Reducing proposed new regulations to rescind the Statement of Regulatory and Regulation and Controlling Regulatory gainful employment regulations. Deregulatory Priorities Costs.’’ That Order stated the policy of Summary of Legal Basis: Section 492 the executive branch is to be prudent of the HEA requires that, before The Department of Energy (DOE or and financially responsible in the publishing any proposed regulations to the Department) makes vital expenditure of funds, from both public implement programs authorized under contributions to the Nation’s welfare and private sources. The Order stated it title IV of the HEA, the Secretary obtain through its activities focused on is essential to manage the costs public involvement in the development improving national security, energy associated with the governmental of the proposed regulations. After supply, energy efficiency, imposition of private expenditures obtaining advice and recommendations environmental remediation, and energy required to comply with Federal from the public, the Secretary conducts research. The Department’s mission is to regulations. Toward that end, E.O. negotiated rulemaking to develop the ensure America’s security and 13771 requires, among other things, that proposed regulations. Section 431 of the prosperity by addressing its energy, whenever an agency proposes for notice Department of Education Organization environmental, and nuclear challenges and comment or otherwise promulgates Act provides authority to the Secretary, through transformative science and a new regulation, the agency must in relevant part, to inform the public technology solutions. identify at least two existing regulations regarding federally supported education Through its regulatory and to be repealed. E.O. 13771 also provides programs; and collect data and deregulatory activities, the Department for the establishment of agency information on applicable programs for works to ensure it both achieves its regulatory cost budgets, as identified by the purpose of obtaining objective critical mission, and implements the the Office of Management and Budget. measurements of the effectiveness of administration’s initiative to reduce Additionally, on February 24, 2017, such programs in achieving the regulation and control regulatory costs the President issued E.O. 13777, intended purposes of such programs. 20 as outlined in Executive Order (E.O.) ‘‘Enforcing the Regulatory Reform U.S.C. 1231a. 13771, ‘‘Reducing Regulation and Agenda.’’ That Order required that the Alternatives: These are identified Controlling Regulatory Costs.’’ As such, head of each agency designate an agency through the negotiated rulemaking the Department strives to act in a official as its Regulatory Reform Officer process and presented in the Notice of prudent and financially responsible (RRO). Each RRO oversees the Proposed Rulemaking. manner in the expenditure of funds, implementation of regulatory reform Anticipated Cost and Benefits: These from both public and private sources, initiatives and policies to ensure that are identified through the negotiated and manages appropriately the costs agencies effectively carry out regulatory rulemaking process and presented in the associated with private expenditures reforms, consistent with applicable law. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. required for compliance with DOE Further, E.O. 13777 required the Risks: These are identified through regulations. Ultimately, DOE aims to establishment of a regulatory reform the negotiated rulemaking process and promote meaningful regulatory burden task force at each agency. The regulatory presented in the Notice of Proposed reduction, while also achieving its reform task force makes Rulemaking. regulatory objectives and meeting its recommendations to the agency head Timetable: statutory obligations. regarding the repeal, replacement, or

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57855

modification of existing regulations, Lastly, DOE is placing one action in specifically conventional cooking tops consistent with applicable law. its Regulatory Plan: Energy and conventional ovens. In implementation of both Orders, on Conservation Standards for Residential Summary of Legal Basis: EPCA May 30, 2017, DOE published in the Conventional Cooking Products (1904– provides that not later than 6 years after Federal Register a Request for AD15), even though it does not meet the issuance of any final rule establishing or Information (RFI), seeking input and Regulatory Plan criterion of ‘‘most amending a standard, DOE must publish other assistance from entities important significant regulatory either a notice of determination that significantly affected by regulations of actions’’ of the agency. DOE has standards for the product do not need to the DOE, including State, local, and included this regulatory action for the be amended, or a notice of proposed Tribal governments, small businesses, purpose of transparency and due to the rulemaking including new proposed consumers, non-governmental non-trivial costs of the proposed action. energy conservation standards (42 organizations, and manufacturers and At the 7% and 3% discount rate the U.S.C. 6295(m)(1)). their trade associations. DOE’s goal in primary annualized cost of this rule Alternatives: Additional compliance publishing the RFI was to ‘‘create a could be as much as 42.6 million and flexibilities may be available through systematic method for identifying those 42.3 million dollars, respectively. The other means. EPCA provides that a existing DOE rules that are obsolete, primary annualized benefits at the 7% manufacturer whose annual gross unnecessary, unjustified, or simply no and 3% discount rate have been revenue from all of its operations does longer make sense.’’ DOE solicited projected to be 126 million and 178 not exceed $8 million may apply for an views on: (a) How DOE could best million dollars, respectively. exemption from all or part of an energy conduct its analysis of existing agency conservation standard for a period not actions, and (b) insights on specific longer than 24 months after the effective rules or Department-imposed date of a final rule establishing the DOE—ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND standard (42 U.S.C. 6295(t)). obligations that should be altered or RENEWABLE ENERGY (EE) eliminated. DOE received 132 separate Additionally, section 504 of the Department of Energy Organization Act, public comments from decision-makers, Proposed Rule Stage 42 U.S.C. 7194, provides authority for stakeholders, and the public on rules 40. Energy Conservation Standards for the Secretary to adjust a rule issued promulgated by DOE and the burdens Residential Conventional Cooking under EPCA in order to prevent special some of those rules have imposed. Products hardship, inequity, or unfair In response to the May 30, 2017, RFI, distribution of burdens that may be DOE received many comments Priority: Other Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. imposed on that manufacturer. recommending that DOE update and Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Using Unfunded Mandates: This action may modernize its procedures for a 7-percent discount rate for benefits affect the private sector under Pub. L. establishing energy conservation and costs, the estimated cost of the 104–4. standards and test procedures for the proposed standards for consumer DOE Appliance Program, otherwise E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory. conventional cooking products is $42.6 known as the ‘‘Process Rule.’’ The Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6295(m)(1); million per year in increased equipment current Process Rule can be found in 42 U.S.C. 6292(a)(10); 42 U.S.C. 6295(h). costs, while the estimated annual Appendix A to Subpart C of part 430 of CFR Citation: 10 CFR 429; 10 CFR benefits are $120.3 million in reduced the Code of Federal Regulations, 430. equipment operating costs. published on July 15, 1996. In response Legal Deadline: Other, Statutory, Using a 3-percent discount rate for all to stakeholder input, DOE published a Subject to 6-year-look-back at 6295(m). benefits and costs, the estimated cost of RFI on December 18, 2017 (82 FR Abstract: EPCA, as amended by EISA the proposed standards for consumer 59992), seeking comments and 2007, requires the Secretary to conventional cooking products is $42.3 information from interested parties to determine whether updating the million per year in increased equipment assist DOE in identifying potential statutory energy conservation standards costs, while the estimated annual modifications to its ‘‘Process Rule.’’ for residential conventional cooking benefits are $163.3 million in reduced DOE conducted a public meeting and products would yield a significant operating costs. webinar on January 9, 2018, that was savings in energy use and is technically In determining whether a standard is widely attended by a broad spectrum of feasible and economically justified. DOE economically justified, DOE must stakeholders. DOE is currently is reviewing to make such consider whether the benefits of the preparing a Notice of Proposed determination. standard exceed the burdens by, to the Rulemaking (NOPR), taking into account Statement of Need: The Energy Policy greatest extent practicable, considering the many suggestions from stakeholders, and Conservation Act of 1975 (EPCA), 7 enumerated factors, including the and is including this proposed rule as as amended, prescribes energy economic impact of the standard on part of its 2018 Regulatory Plan. DOE conservation standards for various manufacturers. DOE uses industry net has characterized this action as consumer products and certain present value (INPV) is the sum of the deregulatory. commercial and industrial equipment, discounted cash flows to the industry The second deregulatory action that is including residential conventional from the reference year through the end part of DOE’s 2018 Regulatory Plan is a cooking products. EPCA also requires of the analysis period (2017 to 2049), to rule that proposes to withdraw the the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to determine manufacturer impact. Using a revised definitions of general service determine whether more-stringent, real discount rate of 9.1 percent, DOE lamps (GSL) and general service amended standards would be estimates that the INPV for incandescent lamps (GSIL) that would technologically feasible and manufacturers of consumer otherwise take effect on January 1, 2020. economically justified, and would save conventional cooking products is This proposal would maintain the a significant amount of energy. DOE is $1,241.6 million in 2016 dollars. Under existing statutory definitions of GSL and proposing new and amended energy the proposed standards, DOE expects GSIL currently found in the conservation standards for residential that manufacturers may experience a Department’s regulations. conventional cooking products, reduction of up to 4.7 percent of their

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57856 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

INPV, which is approximately $58.4 DOE—EE Action Date FR Cite million in 2016. 41. Procedures, Interpretations, and NPRM ...... 10/00/18 The cumulative net present value Policies for Consideration of New or (NPV) of total consumer benefits of the Revised Energy Conservation Standards Regulatory Flexibility Analysis standards for consumer conventional for Consumer Products cooking products ranges from $1.08 Required: No. Priority: Other Significant. Major Government Levels Affected: None. billion (at a 7-percent discount rate) to status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is URL For More Information: $2.63 billion (at a 3-percent discount undetermined. energy.gov/eere/buildings/standards- rate). This NPV expresses the estimated Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. and-test-procedures. total value of future operating-cost E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. Agency Contact: John Cymbalsky, savings minus the estimated increased Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 553(d) Building Technologies Office, EE–5B, product costs for consumer CFR Citation: 10 CFR 430. Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency conventional cooking products Legal Deadline: None. and Renewable Energy, 1000 purchased in 2020–2049. Abstract: DOE is considering a notice- Independence Avenue SW, Washington, Risks: and-comment rulemaking to amend its DC 20585, Phone: 202 287–1692, Email: Timetable: Process Improvement Rule (‘‘Process [email protected]. Rule’’) to reflect statutory changes as RIN: 1904–AD38 Action Date FR Cite well as innovative, collaborative approaches that DOE has been using to Request for Infor- 02/12/14 79 FR 8337 reflect more efficient appliance mation (RFI). standards rulemaking. DOE—EE RFI Comment Pe- 03/14/14 Statement of Need: DOE is proposing 42. • Energy Conservation Program: riod End. to update and modernize its procedures Definition for General Service Lamps RFI Comment Pe- 03/03/14 79 FR 11714 for establishing energy conservation Priority: Other Significant. riod Extended. standards and test procedures for the RFI Comment Pe- 04/14/14 E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. riod Extended DOE Appliance Program, otherwise Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. End. known as the ‘‘Process Rule.’’ This 6295(i)(6)(A) NPRM and Public 06/10/15 80 FR 33030 proposed rule would reduce burdens on CFR Citation: 10 CFR 430. Meeting. all stakeholders when engaging in the Legal Deadline: None. NPRM Comment 07/30/15 80 FR 45452 rulemaking process. Abstract: The Department proposes to Period Ex- Summary of Legal Basis: On July 15, withdraw the revised definitions of tended. 1996, DOE published a final rule titled, general service lamp (GSL) and general NPRM Comment 09/09/15 ‘‘Procedures, Interpretations and service incandescent lamp (GSIL) that Period Ex- Policies for Consideration of New or take effect on January 1, 2020. This tended End. Revised Energy Conservation Standards Supplemental 09/02/16 81 FR 60784 proposal would maintain the existing NPRM. for Consumer Products.’’ This document statutory definitions of GSL and GSIL SNPRM Comment 09/30/16 81 FR 67219 was codified at 10 CFR part 430, subpart currently found in the Department’s Period Ex- C, appendix A. As explained in the final regulations. tended. rule for the Process Rule, this rule came Statement of Need: DOE is proposing SNPRM Comment 11/02/16 within the scope of the Administrative to withdraw the revised definitions of Period Ex- Procedure Act’s exemption from notice- General Service Lamps (GSL) and tended End. and-comment rulemaking for procedural general service incandescent lamps Supplemental 02/00/19 rules at 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(A). Although (GSIL) that would otherwise take effect NPRM. DOE’s current rulemaking to consider on January 1, 2020, to reduce the potential revisions to the Process Rule regulatory burdens on stakeholders. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis might similarly warrant exemption from Summary of Legal Basis: On August Required: Yes. notice-and-comment requirements, DOE 15, 2017, DOE published a notice of Small Entities Affected: Businesses. nonetheless seeks input from interested data availability and request for Government Levels Affected: parties regarding potential avenues to information (NODA) seeking data for Undetermined. improve DOE’s procedures. GSILs and other incandescent lamps. Alternatives: The purpose of this NODA was to assist URL For More Information: Anticipated Cost and Benefits: DOE in making a determination www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/ Risks: regarding amending standards for appliance_standards/ Timetable: GSILs. Comments submitted in response rulemaking.aspx?ruleid=85. to the NODA lead DOE to re-consider URL For Public Comments: Action Date FR Cite the decisions it had already made with www.regulations.gov/ respect to the definitions for GSLs and #!docketDetail;D=EERE-2014-BT-STD- Request for Infor- 10/31/14 79 FR 64705 mation (RFI). GSILs. 0005. RFI Comment Pe- 12/30/14 Alternatives: Agency Contact: Stephanie Johnson, riod End. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: General Engineer, Department of Request for Infor- 12/18/17 82 FR 59992 Risks: Energy, Energy Efficiency and mation (RFI) Timetable: Renewable Energy, 1000 Independence and Notice of Avenue SW, Building Technologies Public Meeting. Action Date FR Cite Office, EE5B, Washington, DC 20002, RFI Comment Pe- 02/07/18 83 FR 5374 riod Extended. NPRM ...... 10/00/18 Phone: 202 287–1943, Email: RFI Comment Pe- 03/02/18 [email protected]. riod Extended Regulatory Flexibility Analysis RIN: 1904–AD15 End. Required: No.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57857

Government Levels Affected: None. accessibility of individual health or others best positioned to help Agency Contact: Celia Sher, Attorney– insurance; tackling the high cost of individuals suffering with a substance Advisor, Department of Energy, 1000 prescription drugs; and moving to a use disorder or serious mental illness. Independence Avenue SW, Washington, value-based healthcare system—renew Strengthening Individual Health DC 20002, Phone: 202 287–6122. the substantial efforts made by the Insurance Programs RIN: 1904–AE26 Department in these areas over the past In addition, strengthening program BILLING CODE 6450–01–P year and a half and have the potential to deliver lasting change across integrity with respect to subsidy America’s healthcare system. payments in the individual markets is a top priority of this Administration. In DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND Combatting the Opioid Crisis furtherance of that goal, the Centers for HUMAN SERVICES One of the most pressing public Medicare & Services (CMS) Statement of Regulatory Priorities for health problems of our time, the opioid will publish an Exchange Program Fiscal Year 2019 crisis has steadily grown over the past Integrity rule focusing on ensuring that several decades and is now impacting eligible enrollees receive the correct The Department of Health and Human communities across the country. In advanced payments of the premium tax Services (HHS) carries out a wide array addition to providing unprecedented credit, conducting effective and efficient of activities in order to fulfill its mission levels of support for states, local oversight of State-Based Exchanges, and of protecting and promoting the health governments, and community protecting the interests of taxpayers, and well-being of the American people. organizations working to combat this consumers, and the financial integrity of From supporting cutting-edge research crisis, HHS is exploring ways to Federally Facilitated Exchanges. CMS, and disease surveillance, to regulating enhance our nation’s response through through its annual Payment Notice for products and facilities, to administering critically examining its regulations. To the Exchanges, will also emphasize programs that help our citizens most in reduce opioid misuse without deregulation and increasing flexibility need of access to healthcare and social restricting access to legitimate services, for states and issuers. CMS will services, HHS’s work has a clear impact Medicaid programs can utilize several continue to work with the Tri- on the daily life of all Americans. As the medical management techniques, Departments to explore allowing more federal agency most deeply involved in including quantity limits of short-acting flexibility in the availability of health more than one-sixth of the US economy, and long-acting opioids. The President’s plans in the individual and small group it is imperative that HHS be attentive to FY 2019 Budget includes a proposal that markets, as well as carrying out the the costs of over-regulation. Building on would establish minimum standards for instructions in the President’s October the progress that HHS has made in Medicaid Drug Utilization Review 12, 2017, Executive Order to consider Fiscal Year 2018, the Department will programs. Currently, CMS does not set expanding the use of health continue to find ways to clarify its minimum requirements for these reimbursement arrangements (HRAs). regulations to ease the burden of public programs, and there is substantial HHS’ forthcoming report on compliance, or to remove them where variation in how states approach this promoting competition and choice will feasible to avoid unnecessarily diverting issue. Establishing minimum standards also inform HHS’ efforts in this area and resources from the private sector while would not only help increase oversight help drive positive change. simultaneously ensuring the integrity of of opioid prescriptions and dispensing These initiatives will help restore HHS programs. in Medicaid, but would save the market forces to ensure consumers have HHS is committed to a regulatory program an estimated $245 million over plans to choose from that meet their agenda that is focused on better meeting 10 years. needs. the needs of the individuals served by Additionally, the Substance Abuse Tackling the High Cost of Prescription its programs, informed by an and Mental Health Services Drugs understanding that excess and unclear Administration (SAMHSA) is federal regulation not only imposes considering updating its regulations In May 2018, Secretary Azar unveiled serious burdens on job creation and the governing medication-assisted treatment the President’s blueprint to tackle the economy as a whole, but also that the for opioid use disorders (OUD) by high cost of prescription drugs, opportunity costs from overregulation deleting outdated provisions and American Patients First. HHS is dampen provider productivity and revising reporting requirements for aggressively working on actions the medical product innovation, which providers with waivers to treat up to President may direct HHS to take undermines HHS’s own ultimate core 275 patients with OUD. SAMHSA will immediately as well as the mission. Through its rulemakings in the also provide guidance and consider consideration of actions on which coming fiscal year, HHS will take additional changes to 42 CFR part 2 that feedback was solicited in the blueprint. concrete steps towards reducing and can foster further alignment with the As a part of this ongoing effort, the Food streamlining its regulations and Health Insurance Portability and and Drug Administration (FDA) plans to improving the transparency, flexibility, Accountability Act (HIPAA). propose regulations to facilitate access and accountability of its regulatory Furthermore, although many covered to more treatments for common processes. entities believe that the HIPAA Privacy conditions and potentially some chronic Rule precludes such disclosures, the conditions by using innovative I. Advancing Secretary Azar’s Priorities Office for Civil Rights (OCR) plans to approaches, including new Through Rulemaking propose a rule clarifying the Privacy technologies, to assist consumers in self- Since his confirmation as the twenty- Rule provisions most applicable to selection and use of drug products that fourth Secretary of Health and Human information sharing with family have previously been available only by Services in January 2018, Secretary Alex members or others when patients are prescription. If finalized, FDA believes Azar has focused the Department’s incapacitated. This would reduce this rule will improve public health and efforts on four priorities. These uncertainties about the ability of lower costs by increasing the number initiatives—combatting the opioid covered entities to disclose patient and types of medications that are crisis; increasing the affordability and information to family members, friends, available without a prescription.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57858 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

Changes CMS plans to make in its programs place on states, territories, market that may save lives or reduce annual Part C and D rules, and tribes, local governments, industry, health risks. FDA intends to continue potentially other mechanisms, are providers and facilities, caseworkers, rulemaking this fiscal year to fill these likewise seeking to improve health and grant recipients, and individuals. HHS regulatory gaps so that these processes lower costs for American patients. plans to actively engage stakeholders in become more fair, efficient, and transparent, deliberative processes to predictable. Transforming Our Healthcare System ensure that the Department reduces Into One That Pays for Value Protecting the Exercise of Conscience burden while continuing to administer Rights Over the years, it has become high-quality programs. For example, the increasingly apparent that the United Administration for Children and Religious and faith-based States’ fee-for-service payment system Families (ACF) plans to issue a Notice organizations and individuals have does not incentivize innovative of Proposed Rulemaking seeking public historically played an important role in therapies and intelligent treatment plans comment on its proposal to streamline providing needed health care and for patients. Previous Congresses and the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis human services. However, regulatory administrations have attempted to and Reporting System (AFCARS), which and other burdens on religious freedom alleviate these problems through doubled reporting requirements for and conscience that discourage such patchwork attempts at introducing states and tribes. Through careful organizations and individuals from innovative payment models. Now, consideration of all comments participating in HHS programs have under Secretary Azar’s leadership, HHS submitted by the public to its Advanced been often overlooked in recent years. will undertake efforts to Notice of Proposed Rulemaking issued HHS has taken a number of steps to comprehensively address this issue and in March 2018, ACF believes it can rectify the situation in the past year and attempt to rebuild our healthcare system streamline the 2016 Rule so that state plans to continue work to ensure that into one that truly incentivizes effective, and tribal IV–E agencies are able to HHS’s programs respect religious liberty efficient patient care by paying for devote less time and fewer resources to and conscience—and to relieve burden value. As an early step in this effort, administrative work and to redirect on the exercise of religion and CMS plans to propose regulatory those efforts to the children they serve. conscience. In order to adequately revisions to address the impact of the In addition to minimizing regulatory protect these First Amendment and physician self-referral (commonly burden, HHS realizes that many of its statutory rights, HHS plans to complete known as ‘‘Stark’’) law and encourage regulations may contain provisions that a rulemaking to implement and enforce coordinated care. Additionally, OCR are outdated, obsolete, or otherwise not a number of HHS-specific conscience will be examining the HIPAA rules for applicable to the current environment. laws and protections, in order to help obstacles that may limit or discourage HHS has resolved to reform its ensure that individuals participating in coordinated care or otherwise impose processes so that those providing care HHS-funded health programs are aware regulatory burdens that may impede the and other services to Americans are able of their conscience rights, that transformation to value-based to thrive within the state and federal recipients of HHS funds comply with healthcare, without providing regulatory environment. As an early their obligations to respect such rights, commensurate privacy or security step in this broader effort, CMS plans to and that there are enforcement protections for patients’ protected issue a proposed rule that will remove procedures for such conscience health information (PHI). HHS’ unnecessary and outdated requirements protections that are comparable to other forthcoming report on promoting from the conditions of participation for civil rights. Additionally, in finalizing competition and choice will also inform the Medicare and Medicaid programs its update to the Title X family planning HHS’ efforts in this area and help drive for Long-Term Care facilities. Currently, regulations, HHS plans to ensure that positive change. these requirements often impede the the conscience rights of Title X delivery of quality care and divert providers are respected. II. Empowering the American People resources away from facility residents. Through Reducing Regulatory Burden III. Harnessing Regulatory Reform To and Clarifying Regulation Providing Necessary Regulatory Clarity Encourage Innovation In addition to these four priorities, to Industry Stakeholders In addition to reducing burden, an HHS has been comprehensively As part of efforts to streamline important outcome of regulatory reform reviewing its regulations to find ways to regulation, in some cases, regulation is efforts is the proliferation of innovative reduce burdens on states, grantees, necessary in order to make HHS’s solutions and programs structured to industries, and individuals. Regulatory processes transparent and predictable. suit the needs of unique problems and burden can result from a variety of This year, FDA plans to continue work populations. HHS is committed to sources, including reporting on needed implementing regulations for promoting innovation through a variety requirements, outdated restrictions, its tobacco program. Rulemaking is of mechanisms, including deregulatory requirements and/or conditions not needed to clarify for industry the actions. required by the authorizing statutes, and submission and review processes for Promoting Flexibility for States, a lack of clear regulatory guidelines. various review pathways as part of a Grantees, and Regulated Entities HHS is committed to streamlining and comprehensive framework to regulate clarifying its regulations to reduce nicotine and tobacco and advance the HHS intends to enhance regulatory unnecessary burden while continuing to public health. In addition, FDA is flexibility so that its state and protect the public health and to meet updating important rules for medical community partners are able to better the human services needs of the device applications so the rules reflect tailor their programs to meet the needs American people. risk-based and least burdensome of the people they serve. Over the past pathways to market for devices, year and a half, the Department has Minimizing Duplicative Requirements including new and innovative devices. been looking seriously at its programs to and Eliminating Obsolete Regulations These rules will fill gaps to ensure that see how it can maximize the number of The Department recognizes the manufacturers in these sectors know people reached through amending its burden that requirements for many of its how to bring innovative products to regulations to remove or change

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57859

regulatory limitations on grantees and providers, States, tribes, faith-based and information without a patient’s regulated entities. For example, ACF community organizations, and other authorization for treatment, payment, plans to consider revising minimum stakeholders are appropriately and health care operations; (5) the service duration requirements for Head considered. By working with its minimum necessary standard/ Start center-based programs to allow partners in bringing better healthcare requirement. This RFI would subsume these programs to serve more children and human services to the American the previous 0945–AA08 entry in the or better meet the needs and daily people, and understanding the Regulatory Agenda. schedules of local families. Rulemaking challenges that they face under HHS’s Statement of Need: The HHS Deputy carried out in 2016 nearly doubled the current regulatory structures, the Secretary recently launched an initiative current minimum. Department will continue to modernize called the Regulatory Sprint to Coordinated Care. The goal of the Keeping Pace With 21st Century Science its role in this critical sector of the national economy, assuring its vitality Regulatory Sprint is to remove In order to best respond to the needs and the increased wellbeing of those it regulatory barriers that impede of patients, it is crucial that HHS serves. coordinated, value-based health care. regulations and programs reflect current This RFI is being produced to support science. HHS is fulfilling this need by the Regulatory Sprint. updating regulations so that the Summary of Legal Basis: The HIPAA Department can utilize the full spectrum HHS—OFFICE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS statute and its amendments. of current scientific thinking when (OCR) Alternatives: None were considered as carrying out program activities. Prerule Stage this RFI is intended to solicit various Specifically, HRSA plans to revise the policies for improving HIPAA. Vaccine Injury Table to include 43. HIPAA Privacy: Request for Anticipated Cost and Benefits: No vaccines that the Centers for Disease Information on Changes To Support, anticipated costs as this is not Control and Prevention (CDC) and Remove Barriers To, Coordinated regulatory. Benefits include receiving recommends for administration to Care public feedback on potential policies to pregnant women. This revision will Priority: Other Significant. Major pursue in rulemaking. allow injuries related to these vaccines status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is Risks: None known. to be eligible for the National Vaccine undetermined. Timetable: Injury Compensation Program. Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. Additionally, FDA intends to propose a E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. Action Date FR Cite new rule that will modernize Legal Authority: Pub. L. 115–5, sec. mammography quality by recognizing 13405(c) NPRM ...... 05/31/11 76 FR 31426 new technologies, making CFR Citation: 45 CFR 164. NPRM Comment 08/01/11 Period End. improvements in facility processes, and Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, June 1, 2010, The statutory deadline to issue NPRM Withdrawal 11/00/18 updating reporting requirements. FDA RFI ...... 11/00/18 believes that these changes will improve a rule on accounting of disclosures was the delivery of mammography services 06/01/2010. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required by the HITECH Act. and allow for more informed decision- Required: Undetermined. making by strengthening the Statutory deadline contingent on further Government Levels Affected: communication of health care regulatory action. Undetermined. Abstract: This Request for Information information. URL For More Information: (RFI) would solicit the public’s views on FDA is also taking action to facilitate www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy. food innovations that can give whether there are provisions of the Agency Contact: Andra Wicks, Health consumers more choices and enable HIPAA Rules which present barriers Information Privacy Specialist, better nutrition. Diet is a powerful tool that limit or discourage coordinated care Department of Health and Human for reducing chronic disease and its and case management among hospitals, Services, Office for Civil Rights, 200 impact on the healthcare system. physicians (and other providers), Independence Avenue SW, Washington, Modernizing the outdated framework payors, and patients, or otherwise DC 20201, Phone: 202 774–3081, TDD for food standards will allow industry impose regulatory burdens that may Phone: 800 537–7697, Email: flexibility for innovation to produce impede the transformation to value- [email protected]. more healthful foods while maintaining based health care without providing RIN: 0945–AA00 the basic nature and nutritional integrity commensurate privacy or security of key food products. FDA will reopen protections for patients’ protected the comment period on its earlier health information and while proposed rule soliciting updated maintaining patients’ ability to control HHS—OCR information to guide development of a the use or disclosure of their PHI and to Proposed Rule Stage modern approach to regulating food access PHI. In addition to a general standards and related labeling. request for information, the RFI would 44. HIPAA Privacy Rule: Presumption specifically seek comment on a number of Good Faith of Health Care Providers Summary of particular issues, including: (1) Priority: Other Significant. In the coming fiscal year, HHS plans Methods of accounting of all disclosures E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. to consider a number of deregulatory of a patient’s protected health Legal Authority: Health Insurance actions, accompanied by regulatory information; (2) patients’ Portability and Accountability (HIPAA) changes intended to make its processes acknowledgment of receipt of a Act of 1996, Pub. L. 104–191 more flexible, efficient, and transparent. providers’ notice of privacy practices; CFR Citation: 45 CFR 164.510. In order to fully realize the potential of (3) creation of a safeharbor for good faith Legal Deadline: None. these efforts, HHS recognizes the need disclosures of PHI for purposes of care Abstract: In an effort to address the for a collaborative rulemaking process coordination or case management; (4) opioid epidemic, the proposed rule where the concerns of patients, disclosures of protected health would make a number of changes to

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00057 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57860 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

provisions of the HIPAA Privacy Rule involved in the patients’ care can get the address unlawful discrimination, regarding uses and disclosures of information they need to help their coercion and hostility, which has been protected health information to ease the loved ones obtain appropriate care and the subject of a rising number of burden on and potential risks to covered support. It will also provide additional complaints before OCR and in Federal entities that may want to disclose PHI protections to health care providers courts and raised questions from in such circumstances. exercising their professional judgment Congressional oversight. Clarity about Statement of Need: With over 60,000 when making disclosures of protected existing conscience protections is individuals dying of opioid overdoses in health information to further the needed to reduce confusion about the 2016 and others suffering from interests of patients. law. Furthermore, the Department lacks addiction to the opiates, HHS issued a Risks: While we do not anticipate strategic coordination across its declaration of emergency to recognize a significant risks to privacy associated components and enforcement tools that nationwide opioid epidemic. HIPAA with this proposal, the NPRM requests are available to remedy invidious permits providers and other covered public input on whether the impact of discrimination under other protected entities to disclose protected health these amendments, taken together, bases. information about an individual to could be expected to discourage Summary of Legal Basis: The rule families, caregivers and other relevant individuals from seeking care based on would enforce and implement health parties in circumstances related to concerns that their PHI may be care conscience and associated anti- opioid overdose and addiction. Despite disclosed against their wishes. discrimination statutes that protect this permission and HHS guidance Timetable: health care providers and patients in clarifying HIPAA, HHS continues to these areas as prescribed by Congress: receive anecdotal evidence that Action Date FR Cite (1) Conscience protections related to providers and other covered entities are abortion, sterilization, and certain other reluctant to share an opioid patient’s NPRM ...... 01/00/19 health services to participants in health information with family or other programs and their personnel funded by caregivers.This proposal seeks to Regulatory Flexibility Analysis the Department; (2) conscience encourage covered entities to share Required: No. protections for health care entities protected health information with Government Levels Affected: None. related to abortion provision or training, family members, caregivers, and others Agency Contact: Andra Wicks, Health referral for such abortion or training, or in a position to avert threats of harm to Information Privacy Specialist, accreditation standards related to health and safety when necessary to Department of Health and Human abortion; (3) protections from promote the health and recovery of Services, Office for Civil Rights, 200 discrimination for health care entities those struggling with opioid addiction. Independence Avenue SW, Washington, and individuals who object to furthering Summary of Legal Basis: OCR has DC 20201, Phone: 202 774–3081, TDD or participating in abortion under broad authority under the HIPAA Phone: 800 537–7697, Email: programs funded by the Department’s statute to make modifications to the [email protected]. yearly appropriations acts; (4) Privacy Rule, within the statutory RIN: 0945–AA09 conscience protections under the constraints of HIPAA, the HITECH Act, Patient Protection and Affordable Care and other applicable law (e.g., the Act related to assisted suicide, Administrative Procedures Act). OCR, HHS—OCR individual mandate, and other matters by delegation from the Secretary, has of conscience; (5) conscience broad authority under HIPAA to make Final Rule Stage protections for objections to counseling modifications to the Privacy Rule, as 45. Protecting Statutory Conscience and referral for certain services in provided by section 264 of HIPAA Rights in Health Care; Delegations of Medicaid or Medicare Advantage; (6) (codified at 42 U.S.C. 1320d–2(note)). Authority conscience protections related to the Alternatives: OCR may issue performance of advanced directives; (7) additional guidance as an alternative to Priority: Economically Significant. conscience protections related to Global the proposed rule. However, HIPAA Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. Health Programs to the extent continues to be cited as a barrier to E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory. administered by the Secretary; (8) sharing protected health information in Legal Authority: Pub. L. 115–31; 22 exemptions from compulsory health crisis situations, despite extensive U.S.C. 7631(d); 26 U.S.C. 5000A(d)(2); care or services generally and under existing guidance and outreach efforts. 29 U.S.C. 669(a)(5); 42 U.S.C. 300a–7; 42 specific programs for hearing Without regulatory changes, it is not U.S.C. 238n; secs. 1553, 280g–1(d), screenings, occupational illness testing, clear that additional guidance would be 290bb–36(f), 1320a–1, 1320c–11, vaccination, and mental health effective in clarifying the ability to share 1395cc(f), 1395i–5, 1395w–22(j)(3)(B), treatment; and (9) protections for protected health information in such 1395x(e), 1395x(y)(1); 1396a(a), religious nonmedical health care. situations. Revising the Privacy Rule 1396a(w)(3), 1396f, 1396s(c)(2)(B)(ii), Alternatives: Maintaining the status would be a more effective and 1396u–2(b)(3)(B), 1397j–1(b), 1553, quo by enforcing 45 CFR part 88 as it permanent vehicle for achieving the 5106i(a); 18113s, 18023(c)(2)(A)(i)–(iii), currently exists creates a significant risk desired policy, and would provide 18023(b)(1)(A), 18023(b)(4), 18113; . . . of unaddressed violations of conscience additional Good Samaritan safe harbor CFR Citation: 45 CFR 88. laws, and leaves few remedies available protections to health care providers who Legal Deadline: None. due to OCR’s administrative share protected health information Abstract: This final rule would enforcement scheme and court when trying to help patients. provide for the implementation and decisions holding that Congress did not Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The enforcement of the Federal health care incorporate into its conscience statutes proposed rule will not create any new conscience and associated anti- for parties to file private rights of action requirements or costs for regulated discrimination laws. in the courts. entities or the public. It will benefit Statement of Need: Revision of the Anticipated Cost and Benefits: patients and families by helping to current conscience rule is necessary to Protection of religious beliefs and moral ensure that family members and others provide proper enforcement tools to convictions is a broad qualitative benefit

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00058 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57861

that serves individual rights and society regulation less confusing by removing a Action Date FR Cite as a whole, and protection of conscience provision that no longer applies. reduces barriers to entry, combats Second, SAMSHA may alter NPRM ...... 09/00/19 attrition, and increases diversity of requirements pertaining to interim providers in the health care field. Costs maintenance treatment program Regulatory Flexibility Analysis of $311 million in the first year and approval. Required: Undetermined. $124.6 million per year in years 2 Statement of Need: SAMHSA plans to Government Levels Affected: Local, through 5 are estimated to be incurred promulgate a rule to remove the State, Tribal. for familiarization with the law, transitional certification provisions that Agency Contact: Chris Carroll, preparation of notices and assurances of are now outdated. Additionally, Director of Health Care Financing and compliance, compliance procedures and updating language to permit private, for- Systems Integration, Department of voluntary remedial efforts. Costs for profit entities to serve as opioid Health and Human Services, Substance OCR enforcement are $1 million in the treatment programs could improve Abuse and Mental Health Services first year and $1 million per year in patient access to this treatment. Administration, 1 Choke Cherry Road, years 2 through 5. This planned deregulatory action Rockville, MD 20857, Phone: 240 276– Risks: Enforcement of these would revise 42 CFR part 8 to reduce 1765, Email: christopher.carroll@ conscience laws could risk reduction in outmoded requirements. First, samhsa.hhs.gov. access to health care services in low SAMSHA may streamline the regulation RIN: 0930–AA27 provider populated areas. by deleting now outdated requirements Timetable: pertaining to transitional certification for opioid treatment programs (OTPs). HHS—SAMHSA Action Date FR Cite This change will help make the • regulation less confusing by removing a 47. Coordinating Care and NPRM ...... 01/26/18 83 FR 3880 provision that no longer applies. Information Sharing in the Treatment NPRM Comment 03/27/18 of Substance Use Disorders Period End. Second, SAMSHA may alter Final Action ...... 11/00/18 requirements pertaining to interim Priority: Other Significant. Major maintenance treatment program under 5 U.S.C. 801. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis approval. E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. Required: No. Summary of Legal Basis: Section Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 290dd–2 Small Entities Affected: No. 303(g) of the Controlled Substances Act CFR Citation: 42 CFR 2. Government Levels Affected: Federal, (CSA) (21 U.S.C. 823(g) establishes Legal Deadline: None. Local, State. procedures for determining whether a Abstract: SAMHSA is proposing Agency Contact: Sarah Bayko- healthcare practitioner can dispense broad changes to Confidentiality of Albrecht, Supervisory Analyst, opioid drugs for the purpose of treating Alcohol and Drug Abuse Patient Department of Health and Human opioid use disorders. HHS has adopted Records, 42 Code of Federal Regulations Services, Office for Civil Rights, 200 regulations at 42 CFR part 8 to provide (CFR) 2, also known as 42 CFR part 2 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, additional details. These regulations to remove barriers to coordinated care DC 20201, Phone: 800 368–1019, TDD were most recently substantively and permit additional sharing of Phone: 800 537–7697, Email: ocrmail@ revised in July 2016 (81 FR 44712). information among providers and part 2 hhs.gov. Alternatives: The alternatives include programs assisting patients with RIN: 0945–AA10 not making these changes or making substance use disorders (SUDs). only one of the above changes rather Statement of Need: SAMHSA is than both. proposing broad changes to Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Confidentiality of Alcohol and Drug HHS—SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND Eliminating outmoded transition Abuse Patient Records, 42 Code of MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES regulations will make the regulations Federal Regulations (CFR) 2, also known ADMINISTRATION (SAMHSA) less confusing. In addition, permitting as 42 CFR part 2 to remove barriers to Proposed Rule Stage private, for-profit entities to qualify for coordinated care and permit additional certification potentially will broaden sharing of information among providers 46. Revising Outdated Requirements for access to opioid treatment programs. and part 2 programs assisting patients Opioid Treatment Providers (OTPS) SAMHSA is unsure how to quantify with substance use disorders (SUDs). Priority: Other Significant. Major costs and benefits for these changes. Summary of Legal Basis: To be status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is Risks: The transition provisions are determined. undetermined. outdated and no longer apply. SAMSHA Alternatives: The alternatives include E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. anticipates most stakeholders will not making these changes or making Legal Authority: sec. 303(g) of the support permitting private, for-profit changes to part 2 more limited in scope Controlled Substances Act (CSA); 21 entities to serve as OTPs but some may (i.e., only in one or two sections). U.S.C. 823(g) be skeptical of these entities as Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The CFR Citation: 42 CFR 8. compared to nonprofits. Rescinding the rule is not expected to be economically Legal Deadline: None. reporting requirements for providers significant. As we move toward Abstract: This planned deregulatory treating up to 275 patients should hold publication, estimates of the cost and action would revise 42 CFR part 8 to minimal risk since these providers still benefits of these provisions will be reduce outmoded requirements. First, are bound by other certification included in the rule. SAMSHA may streamline the regulation requirements such as recordkeeping, Risks: SAMHSA believes the many by deleting now outdated requirements etc. These reporting requirements stakeholders will support efforts to pertaining to transitional certification initially were added in July 2016 (81 FR make it easier for patients and providers for opioid treatment programs (OTPs). 66191). to share information under part 2. This change will help make the Timetable: However, some commenters may

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57862 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

believe these changes will further expenditures on food for the military, food depending on the form, packing undermine privacy protection under for WIC (women, infants, and children) medium, and optional ingredients used. part 2 and lead individuals who may programs, and in school feeding Alternatives: FDA is proposing to seek treatment to not seek treatment for programs. However, questions have reopen the comment period on the 2005 fear of disclosure of their SUD. been raised about whether the proposal, to allow for us to update the Timetable: regulations concerning standards of record and inform decisionmaking on identity should be revised in light of Action Date FR Cite standards of identity. The only changing consumer expectations and alternative would be to open a docket subsequent developments in food and request comments and data on the NPRM ...... 03/00/19 technology, and global trade. In 1996, issue generally, which would be a step FDA and USDA established a task force Regulatory Flexibility Analysis backward. FDA does not believe it is in to discuss the current and future role of Required: No. a position to develop a new proposed food standards. The task force Government Levels Affected: Local, rule without affording stakeholders and determined there were several State, Tribal. regulatory options including making no the public a chance to comment and Agency Contact: Chris Carroll, change to the food standards, provide new data and information. After Director of Health Care Financing and eliminating all food standards, or using we have reviewed this information, we Systems Integration, Department of resources to review and revise the food will be in a position to either publish a Health and Human Services, Substance standards to protect consumers without new proposed rule or to issue a final Abuse and Mental Health Services inhibiting technological advances in rule based on the full record. Administration, 1 Choke Cherry Road, food preparation and marketing. FDA Anticipated Cost and Benefits: There Rockville, MD 20857, Phone: 240 276– and FSIS ultimately decided to propose is no cost/benefit analysis associated 1765, Email: christopher.carroll@ amending the petition process so the with reopening a proposed rule to samhsa.hhs.gov. RIN: 0930–AA32 standards of identity would be more solicit updated comments and internally consistent, flexible for information. The preliminary regulatory manufacturers, and easier to administer impact analysis in the proposed rule while ensuring product quality and evaluated various options and HHS—FOOD AND DRUG uniformity to consumers, and did so in concluded that taking the action ADMINISTRATION (FDA) 2005. covered in the proposed rule will Proposed Rule Stage Summary of Legal Basis: FDA has generate net social benefits, and established over 280 food standards of concluded that the social costs of taking 48. Food Standards: General Principles identity, in addition to standards of the proposed action are likely to be and Food Standards Modernization quality and fill of container, under the small. The analysis found that most of (Reopening of Comment Period) authority set forth in section 401 of the the other options were likely to have Priority: Other Significant. Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act lower net benefits because they had E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 341). This lower benefits, higher costs, or both. section provides in part: Legal Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321; 21 Risks: U.S.C. 336; 21 U.S.C. 341; 21 U.S.C. 343; Whenever in the judgment of the 21 U.S.C. 371 Secretary (of Health and Human Timetable: CFR Citation: 21 CFR 130.5. Services) such action will promote Legal Deadline: None. honesty and fair dealing in the interest Action Date FR Cite Abstract: FDA is reopening the of consumers, he shall promulgate ANPRM ...... 12/29/95 60 FR 67492 comment period on a proposed rule, regulations fixing and establishing for ANPRM Comment 04/29/96 issued jointly with USDA/FSIS in 2005, any food, under its common or usual Period End. that proposed to establish general name so far as practicable, a reasonable NPRM ...... 05/20/05 70 FR 29214 principles that would be the first step in definition and standard of identity, a NPRM Comment 08/18/05 modernizing and updating the reasonable standard of quality, or Period End. framework for food standards (also reasonable standards of fill of container. NPRM Comment 06/00/19 known as standards of identity). We are The standards of identity, quality, and Period Re- reopening the comment period because fill of container for foods regulated by opened. of the time that has elapsed since the FDA are codified in title 21, parts 130 publication of the proposed rule during to 169 (21 CFR parts 130 to 169). FDA Regulatory Flexibility Analysis which time there have been additional food standards are established under the Required: No. technological advances and other common or usual name of a food and changes in the food industry which often specify the content of the food, Small Entities Affected: No. could help inform the development of a generally in terms of the types of Government Levels Affected: modernized food standards framework. ingredients that it must contain (i.e., Undetermined. Statement of Need: Standards of mandatory ingredients), and that it may Agency Contact: Andrea Krause, identity for foods are regulations contain (i.e., optional ingredients). FDA Department of Health and Human Congress authorized FDA to issue to food standards may specify minimum Services, Food and Drug promote honesty and fair dealing in the and maximum levels of constituents. Administration, Center for Food Safety interest of consumers. FDA’s standards They also may describe the and Applied Nutrition, 5001 Campus of identity have proved valuable in manufacturing process when that Drive, College Park, MD 20740, Phone: assuring that food products are process has a bearing on the identity of 240 402–2371, Fax: 301 436–2636, consistent across different the finished food. Finally, FDA food Email: [email protected]. manufacturers. They are important for standards may also include provisions international trade as well as domestic related to label declaration of Related RIN: Related to 0583–AC72 trade and are critical to government ingredients and nomenclature of the RIN: 0910–AC54

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57863

HHS—FDA Risks: for which reasonable assurance of safety Timetable: 49. Mammography Quality Standards and effectiveness could be established through the De Novo process. FDASIA Act; Amendments to Part 900 Action Date FR Cite Regulations and cures expanded and modified this process. Priority: Economically Significant. NPRM ...... 11/00/18 Alternatives: The De Novo Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. classification process is based on Regulatory Flexibility Analysis E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory. authority from the FD&C Act. The De Required: Yes. Legal Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360i; 21 Novo classification program must Small Entities Affected: Businesses. U.S.C. 360nn; 21 U.S.C. 374(e); 42 continue because it is required by U.S.C. 263b Government Levels Affected: None. Agency Contact: Erica Payne, statute. If the proposed rule is not CFR Citation: 21 CFR 900. finalized, then procedures and details Legal Deadline: None. Regulatory Counsel, Department of about the application process and Abstract: FDA is proposing to amend Health and Human Services, Food and handling of De Novo applications might its regulations governing Drug Administration, Center for Devices be unclear to potential applicants, and mammography. The amendments would and Radiological Health, 10903 New the program may not be as efficient as update the regulations issued under the Hampshire Avenue, WO 66, Room 5522, it might be. Mammography Quality Standards Act of Silver Spring, MD 20993, Phone: 301 Anticipated Cost and Benefits: By 1992 (MQSA). FDA is taking this action 796–3999, Fax: 301 847–8145, Email: clarifying the requirements for the De to address changes in mammography [email protected]. Novo classification process. FDA technology and mammography RIN: 0910–AH04 expects that the rule would reduce the processes that have occurred since the time and costs associated with regulations were published in 1997 and preparing and reviewing De Novo to address breast density reporting to HHS—FDA requests, and would generate net patient and health care providers. benefits in the form of cost savings for Statement of Need: FDA is proposing 50. Medical Device De Novo both private and government sectors. to update the mammography regulations Classification Process Risks: that were issued under the Priority: Other Significant. Major Timetable: Mammography Quality Standards Act of status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is 1992 (MQSA) and the Federal Food, undetermined. Action Date FR Cite Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act). E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. FDA is taking this action to address Legal Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(h); 21 NPRM ...... 10/00/18 changes in mammography technology U.S.C. 360c, 360i–360j; 21 U.S.C. 371; and mammography processes. 21 U.S.C. 374 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis FDA is also proposing updates to CFR Citation: 21 CFR 860. Required: No. modernize the regulations by Legal Deadline: None. Small Entities Affected: No. incorporating current science and Abstract: De novo classification Government Levels Affected: None. mammography best practices, including decreases regulatory burdens because Agency Contact: Jean M. Olson, addressing breast density reporting to manufacturers can use a less Regulatory Counsel, Department of patients and health care providers. burdensome application pathway under Health and Human Services, Food and These updates are intended to improve the FD&C Act to market their devices. Drug Administration, 10903 New the delivery of mammography services. The proposed rule would establish Hampshire Avenue, Building 66, Room Summary of Legal Basis: procedures and criteria for the de novo 5508, Silver Spring, MD 20993, Phone: Mammography is an X-ray imaging process and would make it more 301 796–6579, Email: jean.olson@ examination device that is regulated transparent and predictable for fda.hhs.gov. under the authority of the FD&C Act. manufacturers. RIN: 0910–AH53 FDA is proposing these amendments to Statement of Need: FDA is taking this the mammography regulations (set forth action to implement amendments to the in 21 CFR part 900) under section 354 De Novo classification process in the HHS—FDA of the Public Health Service Act (42 FD&C Act that were enacted by the Food U.S.C. 263b), and sections 519, 537, and and Drug Administration Modernization 51. Nonprescription Drug Product With 704(e) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360i, Act of 1997 (FDAMA), and the Food and an Additional Condition for 360nn, and 374(e)). Drug Administration Safety and Nonprescription Use Alternatives: The Agency will Innovation Act of 2012 (FDASIA), and Priority: Other Significant. Major consider different options so that the the 21st Century Cures Act of 2016 status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is health benefits to patients are (Cures). undetermined. maximized and the economic burdens Summary of Legal Basis: The FD&C Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. to mammography facilities are Act (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.), as amended, E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. minimized. establishes a comprehensive system for Legal Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321; 21 Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The the regulation of medical devices U.S.C. 352; 21 U.S.C. 355; 21 U.S.C. 371; primary public health benefits of the intended for human use. Section 513 of 42 U.S.C. 262; 42 U.S.C. 264; . . . rule will come from the potential for the FD&C Act established three CFR Citation: 21 CFR 314.56; 21 CFR earlier breast cancer detection, categories (classes) of medical devices 201.67. improved morbidity and mortality, based on the regulatory controls Legal Deadline: None. resulting in reductions in cancer sufficient to provide reasonable Abstract: The proposed rule is treatment costs. The primary costs of the assurance of safety and effectiveness of intended to increase access to rule will come from industry labor costs the device. In 1997, Congress enacted nonprescription drug products. The and costs associated with supplemental section 513()(2) to include a De Novo proposed rule would establish testing and biopsies. classification process for some devices requirements for a drug product that

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00061 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57864 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

could be marketed as a nonprescription Department of Health and Human (1) Extending the effective date of the drug product with an additional Services, Food and Drug rule, (2) allowing for more deficiency condition that an applicant must Administration, 10903 New Hampshire letters and review cycles, and (3) implement to ensure appropriate self- Avenue, Building 51, Room 3330, Silver allowing for only one review cycle. selection, appropriate actual use, or Spring, MD 20993, Phone: 301 796– Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The both by consumers. 0151, Email: [email protected]. costs of the rule are compliance costs on Statement of Need: Nonprescription RIN: 0910–AH62 products have traditionally been limited affected entities, e.g., to read and to drugs that can be labeled with understand the rule, to revise internal information for consumers to safely and procedures, and fill out a form for HHS—FDA appropriately self-select and use the substantial equivalence reports. The drug product without supervision of a 52. Format and Content of Reports quantified benefits of the proposed rule health care provider. There are certain Intended To Demonstrate Substantial are cost-savings resulting from shorter prescription medications that may have Equivalence FDA review times and fewer staff to review substantial equivalence reports. comparable risk-benefit profiles to over- Priority: Other Significant. the-counter medications in selected Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. The cost savings to the government is populations. However, appropriate E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. expected to be larger than the consumer selection and use may be Legal Authority: 21 U.S.C. 371; 21 compliance cost for industry and the net difficult to achieve in the U.S.C. 374; 21 U.S.C. 387; 42 U.S.C. result is an overall net positive benefit nonprescription setting based solely on 4332 from this proposed rule. The qualitative information included in labeling. FDA CFR Citation: 21 CFR 1107. benefits of the rule include additional is proposing regulations that would Legal Deadline: None. clarity to industry about the establish the requirement for a drug Abstract: This proposed rule would requirements for the content and format product could be marketed as a establish the format and content of of substantial equivalence reports, as nonprescription drug product with an reports intended to demonstrate well as the establishment of procedures additional condition that an applicant substantial equivalence (SE) in tobacco for substantial equivalence report must implement to ensure appropriate products and would provide review and communication with self-selection or appropriate actual use information as to how the Agency will applicants. These changes make the or both for consumers. review and act on these submissions. substantial equivalence marketing Summary of Legal Basis: FDA’s Statement of Need: The Federal Food, pathway clearer for both FDA and proposed revisions to the regulations Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), as applicants. regarding labeling and applications for amended by the Family Smoking Risks: Premarket submissions for new nonprescription drug products labeling Prevention and Tobacco Control Act are authorized by the FD&C Act (21 (Tobacco Control Act), requires tobacco products are required by the U.S.C. 321 et seq.) and by the Public premarket submissions for new tobacco FD&C Act. But to prepare premarket Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262 and products. Substantial equivalence submissions such as substantial 264). reports are one type of premarket equivalence reports intended to meet Alternatives: FDA evaluated various submission that manufacturers of new those requirements, manufacturers need requirements for new drug applications tobacco products may use to obtain more information about content and to assess flexibility of nonprescription marketing authorization for a new format requirements. This rule provides drug product design through drug tobacco product. This regulation is more information on content and format labeling for appropriate self-selection necessary to provide information to requirements and describes possible and appropriate use. manufacturers to aid them in preparing FDA actions on the substantial Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The and submitting substantial equivalence equivalence report. benefits of the proposed rule would reports. Timetable: include increased consumer access to Summary of Legal Basis: Section drug products which could translate to 905(j) of the FD&C Act, as amended by Action Date FR Cite a reduction in under treatment of the Tobacco Control Act, provides for certain diseases and conditions. Benefits the submission of substantial NPRM ...... 11/00/18 to industry would arise from the equivalence reports and authorizes FDA flexibility in drug product approval. The to prescribe the form and manner of proposed rule would impose costs Regulatory Flexibility Analysis these reports. Section 910 of the FD&C Required: No. arising from the development of an Act mandates the premarket review of innovative approach to assist consumers new tobacco products, establishes Government Levels Affected: None. with nonprescription drug product self- definitions of substantial equivalence Agency Contact: Annette L. Marthaler, selection or use. and characteristics, and requires health Regulatory Counsel, Department of Risks: None. information as part of a submission Timetable: Health and Human Services, Food and under section 905(j) of the FD&C Act. Drug Administration, Center for Action Date FR Cite Section 909 establishes record and Tobacco Products, 10903 New report requirements for tobacco Hampshire Avenue, Document Control NPRM ...... 08/00/19 products. Sections 701 and 704 of the Center, Building 71, Room G335, Silver FD&C Act authorize the promulgation of Spring, MD 20993, Phone: 877 287– Regulatory Flexibility Analysis regulations to implement the FD&C Act 1373, Fax: 877 287–1426, Email: Required: No. and inspections. [email protected]. Small Entities Affected: Businesses. Alternatives: In addition to the Government Levels Affected: None. benefits and costs of the proposed rule, RIN: 0910–AH89 Agency Contact: Chris Wheeler, FDA assessed the benefits and costs of Supervisory Project Manager, several alternatives to the proposed rule:

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57865

HHS—FDA 321(n), 331(a), 343(a), 343(r), and be about $15 million, annualized at 7% 53. • Nutrient Content Claims, 371(a)). These sections authorize the in perpetuity. Definition of Term: Healthy agency to adopt regulations that prohibit Updating the definition of healthy to labeling that bears claims that align with current dietary Priority: Economically Significant. characterize the level of a nutrient recommendations help consumers build Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is which is of a type required to be more healthful diets to reduce their risk undetermined. declared in nutrition labeling unless the of diet-related chronic diseases. We Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. claim is made in accordance with a currently anticipate the monetized E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory. regulatory definition established by benefits to be around $100 million, Legal Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 331, FDA. Pursuant to this authority, FDA annualized at 7% in perpetuity. 343, and 371 issued a regulation defining the healthy There are no cost savings. CFR Citation: 10 CFR 101.65 implied nutrient content claim, which is Risks: (revision). codified at 21 CFR 101.65. This Timetable: Legal Deadline: None. proposed rule would update the existing Abstract: The proposed rule would definition to be consistent with current Action Date FR Cite update the definition for the implied federal dietary guidance. nutrient content claim ‘‘healthy’’ to be Alternatives: Alternative 1: Codify the NPRM ...... 03/00/19 consistent with current nutrition policy in the current enforcement science and federal dietary guidelines. discretion guidance. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis The proposed rule would revise the In 2016, FDA published Use of the Required: Undetermined. requirements for when the claim Term ‘Healthy’ in the Labeling of Government Levels Affected: ‘‘healthy’’ can be voluntarily used in the Human Food Products: Guidance for Undetermined. labeling of human food products so that Industry. This guidance was intended to Federalism: Undetermined. the claim reflects current science and advise food manufacturers of FDA’s Agency Contact: Vincent De Jesus, dietary guidelines and help consumers intent to exercise enforcement Nutritionist, Department of Health and maintain healthy dietary practices. discretion relative to foods that use the Human Services, Food and Drug Statement of Need: FDA is proposing implied nutrient content claim healthy Administration, Center for Food Safety to redefine healthy to make it more on their labels which: (1) Are not low and Applied Nutrition, (HFS–830), consistent with current public health in total fat, but have a fat profile Room 3D–031, 5100 Paint Branch recommendations, including those makeup of predominantly mono and Parkway, College Park, MD 20740, captured in recent changes to the polyunsaturated fats; or (2) contain at Phone: 240 402–1774, Fax: 301 436– Nutrition Facts label. The existing least 10 percent of the Daily Value (DV) 1191, Email: vincent.dejesus@ definition for healthy is based on per reference amount customarily fda.hhs.gov. nutrition recommendations regarding consumed (RACC) of potassium or RIN: 0910–AI13 intake of fat, saturated fat, and vitamin D. cholesterol, and specific nutrients One alternative is to codify the policy Americans were not getting enough of in in the current enforcement discretion. HHS—OFFICE OF ASSISTANT the early 1990s. Nutrition Although guidance is non-binding, we SECRETARY FOR HEALTH (OASH) recommendations have evolved since assume that most packaged food that time; recommended diets now manufacturers are aware of the guidance Final Rule Stage focus on dietary patterns, which and, over the past 2 years, have already 54. • Compliance With Statutory includes getting enough of certain food made any adjustments to their products Program Integrity Requirements groups such as fruits, vegetables, low-fat or product packaging. Therefore, we dairy, and whole grains. Chronic assume that this alternative would have Priority: Other Significant. diseases, such as heart disease, cancer, no costs to industry and no benefits to E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. and stroke, are the leading causes of consumers. Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 300–300a– death and disability in the United States Alternative 2: Extend the compliance 6 and diet is a contributing factor to these date by 1 year. CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined. diseases. Claims on food packages such Extending the anticipated proposed Legal Deadline: None. as healthy can provide quick signals to compliance date on the rule updating Abstract: This action would finalize consumers about the healthfulness of a the definition by 1 year would reduce revisions to the Title X regulations to food or beverage, thereby making it costs to industry as they would have ensure compliance with, and enhance easier for busy consumers to make more time to change products that may the implementation of, various statutory healthy choices. be affected by the rule or potentially program integrity requirements, FDA is proposing to update the coordinate label changes with already including the statutory requirement that existing nutrient content claim scheduled label changes. On the other none of the funds appropriated for Title definition of Healthy based on the food hand, a longer compliance date runs the X may be used in programs where groups recommended by the Dietary risk of confusing consumers that may abortion is a method of family planning. Guidelines for Americans and also not understand whether a packaged Statement of Need: This action should include nutrients to limit to ensure that food product labeled healthy follows the enhance compliance with the statutory foods bearing the claim can help old definition or the updated one. program integrity requirements consumers build more healthful diets to Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Food applicable to, and purpose and goals of, reduce their risk of diet-related chronic products bearing the healthy claim the Title X program (especially those diseases. currently make up a small percentage related to section 1008), the Summary of Legal Basis: FDA is (5%) of total packaged foods. Relabeling appropriations provisos and riders issuing this proposed rule under and reformulating costs can range from addressing the Title X program, and sections 201(n), 301(a), 403(a), 403(r), about $2,000/UPC to relabel, $800,000/ other obligations and requirements and 701(a) of the Federal Food, Drug, formula to reformulate. We currently established under other Federal law. and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. anticipate that total cost to industry will The action should also enhance

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00063 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57866 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

programmatic transparency regarding Public Law 115–141, Div. H, 507(d), 132 sufficient compliance with the statutory the provision of Title X services (with Stat. 348, 764 (2018). program integrity requirements and respect to both the identity of the The Department has legal authority to purpose and goals of the Title X providers and the services being issue and amend regulations to program, the appropriations provisos provided by such entities). implement Title X of the Public Health and riders addressing the Title X Summary of Legal Basis: The Service (PHS) Act (42 U.S.C. 300 300a– program, and other obligations and Department has legal authority to issue 6), in order to establish the requirements requirements established under other and amend regulations to implement applicable to projects for family Federal law, and (2) transparency Title X of the Public Health Service planning services, pursuant to section regarding the provision of services (with (PHS) Act (42 U.S.C. 300 300a–6), in 1006 of the Public Health Service Act, respect to both the identity of the order to establish the requirements 42 U.S.C. 300a–4; section 1006 also providers and the services being applicable to projects for family provides priority for low-income provided by such entities). planning services, pursuant to section families. Section 1001 of the PHS Act Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The 1006 of the Public Health Service Act, establishes certain parameters for changes proposed will improve the 42 U.S.C. 300a–4; section 1006 also voluntary Title X family planning integrity of Title X program, especially provides priority for low-income projects/programs, including the with respect to ensuring that projects families. Section 1001 of the PHS Act offering of a broad range of acceptable and providers do not fund, support, or establishes certain parameters for and effective family planning methods promote abortion as a method of family voluntary Title X family planning and services (including natural family planning, and enhance compliance with projects/programs, including the planning methods, infertility services, statutory requirements and offering of a broad range of acceptable and services for adolescents) and the appropriations riders and provisos. In and effective family planning methods encouragement, to the extent practical, addition, it is expected that the changes and services (including natural family of family participation. Section 1008 of will facilitate the ability of an expanded planning methods, infertility services, the PHS Act, 42 U.S.C. 300a–6, number of entities to participate in Title and services for adolescents) and the establishes the prohibition on the use of X, including by removal of abortion encouragement, to the extent practical, the funds appropriated for Title X ‘‘in counseling and referral requirements of family participation. Section 1008 of programs where abortion is a method of that potentially violate Federal health the PHS Act, 42 U.S.C. 300a–6, family planning.’’ care conscience protections; this should In addition, the annual Labor-HHS establishes the prohibition on the use of serve to expand and enhance patient appropriations act imposes, on an the funds appropriated for Title X ‘‘in service and care. The proposed rule annual basis, certain additional programs where abortion is a method of estimated $13.6 million in annualized requirements with respect to the Title X family planning.’’ costs at a 7% discount rate. program, including that all pregnancy In addition, the annual Labor-HHS Risks: None known. counseling be nondirective; that Title X Timetable: appropriations act imposes, on an funds not be expended for any activity annual basis, certain additional that in any way tends to promote public Action Date FR Cite requirements with respect to the Title X support or opposition to any legislative program, including that all pregnancy proposal or candidate for public office; NPRM ...... 06/01/18 83 FR 25502 counseling be nondirective; that Title X that Title X grant applicants certify to NPRM Comment 07/31/18 funds not be expended for any activity the Secretary that they encourage family Period End. that in any way tends to promote public participation in the decision of minors Final Action ...... 10/00/18 support or opposition to any legislative to seek family planning services and proposal or candidate for public office; provide counseling to minors on how to Regulatory Flexibility Analysis that Title X grant applicants certify to resist attempts to coerce them into Required: Undetermined. the Secretary that they encourage family engaging in sexual activities; and that Government Levels Affected: None. participation in the decision of minors Title X providers comply with State Agency Contact: Valerie Huber, to seek family planning services and laws requiring notification or the Senior Policy Advisor, Department of provide counseling to minors on how to reporting of child abuse, child Health and Human Services, Office of resist attempts to coerce them into molestation, sexual abuse, rape, or Assistant Secretary for Health, 200 engaging in sexual activities; and that incest. See, e.g., Consolidated Independence Avenue SW, Washington, Title X providers comply with State Appropriations Act, 2018, Pub. L. 115– DC 20201, Phone: 202 690–7694, Fax: laws requiring notification or the 141, Div. H, 207–208, Title II, 132 Stat. 202 401–8034, Email: valerie.huber@ reporting of child abuse, child 348, 716–17. hhs.gov. molestation, sexual abuse, rape, or Finally, the action would ensure that Related RIN: Related to 0937–ZA00 incest. See, e.g., Consolidated the Title X program and Title X RIN: 0937–AA07 Appropriations Act, 2018, Pub. L. 115– providers comply with laws that protect 141, Div. H, 207–208, Title II, 132 Stat. the conscience rights of individuals and 348, 716–17. entities who decline to perform, HHS—CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & Finally, the action would ensure that participate in, or refer for abortions, MEDICAID SERVICES (CMS) the Title X program and Title X including the Church Amendments (42 providers comply with laws that protect U.S.C. 300a–7), the Coats-Snowe Proposed Rule Stage the conscience rights of individuals and Amendment (42 U.S.C. 238n), and the 55. Requirements for Long-Term Care entities who decline to perform, Weldon Amendment, see, e.g., Facilities: Regulatory Provisions To participate in, or refer for abortions, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018, Promote Program Efficiency, including the Church Amendments (42 Public Law 115–141, Div. H, 507(d), 132 Transparency, and Burden Reduction U.S.C. 300a–7), the Coats-Snowe Stat. 348, 764 (2018). Amendment (42 U.S.C. 238n), and the Alternatives: The Department (CMS–3347–P) (Section 610 Review) Weldon Amendment, see, e.g., continues to consider alternative Priority: Economically Significant. Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018, approaches that would ensure (1) Major under 5 U.S.C. 801.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:13 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00064 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57867

E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. may also establish ‘‘other right[s]’’ for Statement of Need: This rule will Legal Authority: Secs. 1819 and 1919 residents, in addition to those expressly propose standards related to the risk of the Social Security Act; sec. set forth in the statutes and regulations, adjustment program for the 2020 benefit 1819(d)(4)(B) and 1919(d)(4)(B) of the to ‘‘protect and promote the rights of year, as well as certain modifications Social Security Act; sec. 1819(b)(1)(A) each resident.’’ that will promote state flexibility and and 1919(b)(1)(A) of the Social Security Alternatives: For all of the proposed control over their insurance markets, Act provisions, we considered not making reduce burden on stakeholders, and CFR Citation: 42 CFR 483; 42 CFR these changes. Specifically, we improve program integrity. 488. considered the impact that any revisions Summary of Legal Basis: This rule Legal Deadline: None. would have on the health and safety of addresses multiple sections of the Abstract: This proposed rule would residents in long-term care facilities and Patient Protection and Affordable Care reform the requirements that long-term if such revisions would realistically be Act (Pub. L. 111148) and the Health care facilities must meet to participate burden reducing for facilities. Care and Education Reconciliation Act in the Medicare and Medicaid programs, Ultimately, we believe that the proposed of 2010 (Pub. L. 111152), which that CMS has identified as unnecessary, revisions will be burden reducing and amended and revised several provisions obsolete, or excessively burdensome on do not impede on the health and safety of the Patient Protection and Affordable facilities. This rule would increase the of residents. Care Act. ability of healthcare professionals to Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This Alternatives: We considered slight devote resources to improving resident proposed rule would create ongoing cost variants of the proposed policies related care by eliminating or reducing savings to long-term care facilities in to the risk adjustment program and requirements that impede quality care many areas. In addition, various standards related to the Exchanges. or that divert resources away from proposals would clarify existing policy Anticipated Cost and Benefits: We providing high quality care. and relieve some administrative anticipate that the proposed changes Statement of Need: CMS is committed burdens. will include some initial costs on to transforming the healthcare delivery Risks: stakeholders, but generate savings over system, and the Medicare program, by Timetable: the long term. As we move toward putting an additional focus on patient- publication, estimates of the cost and centered care and working with Action Date FR Cite benefits of these provisions will be providers, physicians, and patients to included in the rule. improve outcomes. We seek to reduce NPRM ...... 11/00/18 Risks: If this regulation is not burdens for long-term care facilities; published timely, issuers in the healthcare professionals and residents; Regulatory Flexibility Analysis individual and small group market will improve the quality of care; decrease Required: Yes. not have important information for rate costs; and, ensure that residents and Small Entities Affected: Businesses. setting for the 2020 plan year, and their providers are making the best Government Levels Affected: Federal. changes applicable to qualified health healthcare choices possible. Agency Contact: Ronisha Blackstone, plans will not be in place in time for the We are therefore proposing revisions Health Insurance Specialist, Department 2020 plan year. to the requirements that long-term care of Health and Human Services, Centers Timetable: facilities must meet to participate in the for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Medicare and Medicaid programs that Center for Clinical Standards and Action Date FR Cite would increase the ability of healthcare Quality, MS: S3–02–01, 7500 Security professionals to devote resources to Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244, NPRM ...... 10/00/18 improving resident care by eliminating Phone: 410 786–6882, Email: Regulatory Flexibility Analysis or reducing requirements that impede [email protected]. RIN: 0938–AT36 Required: Undetermined. quality care or that divert resources Small Entities Affected: Businesses. away from providing high quality care. Government Levels Affected: Summary of Legal Basis: The Undetermined. Secretary has statutory authority to HHS—CMS Federalism: Undetermined. issue these rules under the Nursing Agency Contact: Lindsey Murtagh, Home Reform Act, (part of the Omnibus 56. CY 2020 Notice of Benefit and Senior Policy Advisor, Department of Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 Payment Parameters (CMS–9926–P) Health and Human Services, Centers for (OBRA ’87), Pub. L. 100–203, 101 Stat. Priority: Economically Significant. Medicare & Medicaid Services, Center 1330 (1987)), which added sections Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. for Consumer Information and 1819 and 1919 to the Act; those E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. Insurance Oversight, 7500 Security provisions authorize the Secretary to Legal Authority: Pub. L. 111–148, title Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244, promulgate regulations that are I Phone: 301 492–4106, Email: ‘‘adequate to protect the health, safety, CFR Citation: 45 CFR 149; 45 CFR [email protected]. welfare, and rights of residents and to 153; 45 CFR 155; 45 CFR 156. RIN: 0938–AT37 promote the effective and efficient use Legal Deadline: None. of public moneys.’’ (Sections 1819(f)(1) Abstract: This annual proposed rule and 1919(f)(1) of the Act). In addition, would set forth payment parameters and HHS—CMS the Act authorizes the Secretary to provisions related to the risk adjustment impose ‘‘such other requirements programs; cost-sharing parameters; and 57. Exchange Program Integrity relating to the health and safety [and user fees for issuers offering plans on (CMS–9922–P) well-being] of residents as [he] may find Federally-facilitated Exchanges and Priority: Other Significant. necessary.’’ (Sections 1819(d)(4)(B), State-based Exchanges using the Federal E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory. 1919(d)(4)(B) of the Act). Under platform. It would also provide Legal Authority: Pub. L. 111–148 Sections 1819(c)(1)(A)(xi) and 1919 additional standards for several other CFR Citation: 45 CFR 155; 45 CFR (c)(1)(A)(xi) of the Act, the Secretary programs. 156.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57868 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

Legal Deadline: None. E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. HHS—CMS Abstract: This rule proposes Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1302; 42 59. • Modernizing and Clarifying the improvements to Exchange program U.S.C. 1395hh Physician Self-Referral Regulations integrity, ensuring that eligible enrollees CFR Citation: 42 CFR 417; 42 CFR (CMS–1720–P) receive the correct advanced payments 422; 42 CFR 423. Priority: Other Significant. of the premium tax credit, and Legal Deadline: None. conducting effective and efficient E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. Abstract: This proposed rule would oversight of State-Based Exchanges. Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1395nn Statement of Need: This proposed set forth programmatic and operational CFR Citation: 42 CFR 411. rule would propose changes to changes to the Medicare Advantage Legal Deadline: None. strengthen program integrity related to (MA) and prescription drug benefit Abstract: This rule proposes to oversight of State Exchanges, and the programs for contract year 2020. address any undue regulatory impact operation of Exchanges. Statement of Need: This rule is and burden of the physician self-referral Summary of Legal Basis: This rule necessary to make revisions to the law. addresses multiple sections of the Medicare Advantage (MA) and Statement of Need: This rule is Patient Protection and Affordable Care Prescription Drug Benefit programs to necessary to facilitate the successful Act (Pub. L. 111148) and the Health implement applicable provisions of the transition from volume-based to value- Care and Education Reconciliation Act Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 and based based payment for health care services of 2010 (Pub. L. 111152), which on our continued experience in the and promote care coordination among amended and revised several provisions administration of the programs. health care providers and suppliers who of the Patient Protection and Affordable Summary of Legal Basis: This rule furnish care to Medicare beneficiaries Care Act. addresses multiple sections of the Social and other patients. This rule is also Alternatives: The proposed policies Security Act. It also implements necessary to bring needed clarity and are important for program integrity sections 50323, 50311, and 50354 of the flexibility for parties subject to the reasons. We considered variations on Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018. physician self-referral law’s prohibitions the proposed policies. Alternatives: This rule implements on referrals and Medicare claims Anticipated Cost and Benefits: We do provisions that require public notice submission. not anticipate the proposed rule to be a and comment and are necessary for the Summary of Legal Basis: This rule significant regulatory action, but do upcoming contract year. We will interprets section 1877 of the Social anticipate it would generate costs on continue to explore additional Security Act. stakeholders. We believe these costs alternatives as we develop the rule. Alternatives: We will continue to explore alternatives as we develop the will be offset by improvements in Anticipated Cost and Benefits: program integrity. rule. Preliminary estimates of the anticipated Anticipated Cost and Benefits: We Risks: If this regulation is not costs and benefits of this proposed rule published timely, important program believe that this rule could have a indicate savings and burden reduction positive impact on health outcomes of integrity improvements will be delayed. for the government, MA organizations, Timetable: beneficiaries and other American prescription drug plan sponsors, and patients because providers, suppliers providers. We expect some savings will Action Date FR Cite and physicians will be able to better also be passed onto beneficiaries in the coordinate patient care without running NPRM ...... 10/00/18 form of increased benefit offerings and afoul of the physician self-referral law’s reduced premiums or cost sharing. referral and Medicare claims submission Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Numerical estimates are pending and as prohibitions. We also believe the Required: No. we move toward publication, estimates proposed regulatory reforms may make Government Levels Affected: Federal, of costs and benefits will be included in compliance with the physician self- State. the proposed rule. referral law more straightforward. Federalism: This action may have Risks: Risks: federalism implications as defined in Timetable: Timetable: E.O. 13132. Agency Contact: Jeff Wu, Health Action Date FR Cite Action Date FR Cite Insurance Specialist, Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for NPRM ...... 10/00/18 RFI Notice With 06/25/18 83 FR 29524 Medicare & Medicaid Services, Center Comment Pe- for Consumer Information and Regulatory Flexibility Analysis riod. Insurance Oversight, MS: 733H.02, 7500 Required: Undetermined. RFI Comment Pe- 08/28/18 Small Entities Affected: Businesses, riod End. Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD NPRM ...... 12/00/18 21244, Phone: 301 492–4305, Email: Governmental Jurisdictions, [email protected]. Organizations. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis RIN: 0938–AT53 Government Levels Affected: Federal. Required: Undetermined. Agency Contact: Michael Dibella, Government Levels Affected: None. Director, Division of Policy, Analysis, Agency Contact: Lisa Wilson, HHS—CMS and Planning, Department of Health and Technical Advisor, Department of Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Health and Human Services, Centers for 58. Policy and Technical Changes to the Medicaid Services, Center for Medicare, Medicare & Medicaid Services, Center Medicare Advantage and the Medicare MS: C4–22–18, 7500 Security Blvd., for Medicare, MS: C4–25–02, 7500 Prescription Drug Benefit Programs for Baltimore, MD 21244, Phone: 410 786– Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD Contract Year 2020 (CMS–4185–P) 4480, Email: michael.dibella@ 21244, Phone: 410 786–8852, Email: Priority: Economically Significant. cms.hhs.gov. [email protected]. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. RIN: 0938–AT59 RIN: 0938–AT64

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57869

HHS—ADMINISTRATION FOR RIN: 0970–AC72 unified approach in managing its CHILDREN AND FAMILIES (ACF) BILLING CODE: 4150–03–P regulatory resources. The Office of the General Counsel manages the Proposed Rule Stage Department’s regulatory program, 60. Adoption and Foster Care Analysis including the agenda and regulatory and Reporting System DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND plan. In addition, DHS senior leadership SECURITY (DHS) Priority: Other Significant. reviews each significant regulatory E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. Fall 2018 Statement of Regulatory project in order to ensure that the Legal Authority: Secs. 474(f), 479 and Priorities project fosters and supports the Department’s mission. 1102 of the Social Security Act The Department of Homeland CFR Citation: 45 CFR 1355. The Department is committed to Security (DHS or Department) was Legal Deadline: None. ensuring that all of its regulatory established in 2003 pursuant to the Abstract: This notice of proposed initiatives are aligned with its guiding Homeland Security Act of 2002, Public rulemaking (NPRM) seeks public principles to protect civil rights and Law 107–296. The DHS mission suggestions in particular from State and civil liberties, integrate our actions, statement provides the following: ‘‘With Tribal title IV–E agencies and Indian build coalitions and partnerships, honor and integrity, we will safeguard tribes, Tribal organizations and develop human resources, innovate, and the American people, our homeland, consortiums, for streamlining the be accountable to the American public. Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and and our values.’’ Reporting System (AFCARS) data Fulfilling that mission requires the Executive Order 13771 Requirements dedication of more than 240,000 elements and removing any undue In fiscal year 2019, DHS plans to employees in jobs that range from burden related to reporting AFCARS. finalize the following actions: Statement of Need: The reporting aviation and border security to • emergency response, from cybersecurity 0 Executive Order 13771 regulatory requirements for the Adoption and actions; Foster Care Analysis and Reporting analyst to chemical facility inspector. • Our duties are wide-ranging, but our 18 Executive Order 13771 System (AFCARS) have doubled in the deregulatory actions (including past year. In an effort to ensure that an goal is clear—keeping America safe. Leading a unified national effort, DHS information collections); appropriate balance is achieved between • 4 Executive Order 13771-exempt reporting burden and administering has five core missions: (1) Prevent terrorism and enhance security; (2) regulations; and high-quality programs that provide • 10 regulations for which we are services to children and families. By secure and manage our borders; (3) enforce and administer our immigration unsure of their Executive Order 13771 engaging in this rulemaking process, the designation. (Note: These are public and stakeholders will be afforded laws; (4) safeguard and secure cyberspace; and (5) ensure resilience to regulations that we designated as an opportunity to provide input on what ‘‘other’’ in the newly-created Executive data collections are most useful to the disasters. In addition, we must specifically focus on maturing and Order 13771 designation data field in administration of child welfare the Unified Agenda entries). programs. strengthening the homeland security We provide further information about Summary of Legal Basis: Section 479 enterprise itself. those actions in the DHS Regulatory of the Social Security Act requires HHS In achieving those goals, we are Plan and Unified Agenda. regulate a national data collection continually strengthening our system which provides comprehensive partnerships with communities, first DHS is also committed to the information on adopted and foster responders, law enforcement, and principles described in Executive children and their parents. Government agencies—at the Federal, Orders 13563 and 12866 (as amended). Alternatives: None. This rule State, local, tribal, and international Both Executive Orders direct agencies to implements statutory requirements. levels. We are accelerating the assess the costs and benefits of available Anticipated Cost and Benefits: An deployment of science, technology, and regulatory alternatives and, if regulation estimate of costs to States to modify innovation in order to make America is necessary, to select regulatory their existing data systems is not more secure, and we are becoming approaches that maximize net benefits available at this time. leaner, smarter, and more efficient, (including potential economic, Risks: None. ensuring that every security resource is environmental, public health and safety Timetable: used as effectively as possible. For a effects, distributive impacts, and further discussion of our mission, see equity). Executive Order 13563 Action Date FR Cite the DHS website at http://www.dhs.gov/ emphasizes the importance of our-mission. quantifying both costs and benefits, of ANPRM ...... 03/15/18 83 FR 11449 The regulations we have summarized reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, ANPRM Comment 06/13/18 and of promoting flexibility. Period End. below in the Department’s Fall 2018 NPRM ...... 05/00/19 regulatory plan and agenda support the Finally, the Department values public Department’s authorities. These involvement in the development of its Regulatory Flexibility Analysis regulations will improve the regulatory plan, agenda, and Required: No. Department’s ability to accomplish its regulations, and is particularly Small Entities Affected: No. mission. Also, the regulations we have concerned with the impact its Government Levels Affected: None. identified in this year’s regulatory plan regulations have on small businesses. Agency Contact: Kathleen McHugh, continue to address legislative DHS and its components continue to ACYF/Children’s Bureau, Department of initiatives such as the Implementing emphasize the use of plain language in Health and Human Services, Recommendations of the 9/11 our regulatory documents to promote a Administration for Children and Commission Act of 2007 (9/11 Act), better understanding of regulations and Families, 330 C Street SW, Washington, Public Law 110–53 (Aug. 3, 2007). to promote increased public DC 20201, Phone: 202 401–5789, Email: DHS strives for organizational participation in the Department’s [email protected]. excellence and uses a centralized and regulations.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57870 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

The Fall 2018 regulatory plan for DHS Heightened Screening and Vetting of agencies, to reduce the potential for visa includes regulations from several DHS Immigration Program Regulations. retrogression, to promote efficient usage components, including U.S. Citizenship USCIS will propose regulations guiding of available immigrant visas, and to and Immigration Services (USCIS), the the inadmissibility determination discourage fraudulent and frivolous U.S. Coast Guard (the Coast Guard), U.S. whether an alien is likely at any time to filings. (Updating Adjustment of Status Customs and Border Protection (CBP), become a public charge under section Procedures for More Efficient Processing the U.S. Immigration and Customs 212(a)(4) of the Immigration and and Immigrant Visa Usage). USCIS will Enforcement (ICE), the Federal Nationality Act. (Inadmissibility on also propose updates to its regulations Emergency Management Agency Public Charge Grounds). Additionally, to improve the efficiency of USCIS (FEMA), and the Transportation USCIS will propose to update its processing of the Medical Certification Security Administration (TSA). Below is biometrics regulations to eliminate for Disability Exceptions. a discussion of the regulations that multiple references to specific biometric (Improvements to the Medical comprise the DHS fall 2018 regulatory types, and to allow for the expansion of Certification for Disability Exceptions). plan. the types of biometrics required to Electronic Processing of Immigration establish and verify an identity. The Benefit Requests. USCIS will propose to United States Citizenship and goal of this proposal will be to establish amend its regulations to mandate Immigration Services consistent identity enrollment and electronic submission for all USCIS is the government agency that verification policies and processes, and immigration benefit requests, explain administers the nation’s lawful to provide clear proposals on how the requirements associated with immigration system, safeguarding its biometrics will be used in the electronic processing, and allow end-to- integrity and promise by efficiently and immigration process. (USCIS Biometrics end digital processing. This proposal fairly adjudicating requests for Collection for Collection for Consistent, would enhance efficiency and efficacy immigration benefits while protecting Efficient and Effective Operations). in USCIS operations, and improve the Americans, securing the homeland, and Employment Creation Immigrant experience for those applying for honoring our values. In the coming year, Regulations. USCIS will amend its immigration benefits. USCIS will promulgate several regulations modernizing the United States Coast Guard regulatory actions to support that employment-based, fifth preference mission. (EB–5) immigrant investor category Coast Guard is a military, multi- Removing H–4 Dependent Spouses based on current economic realities and mission, maritime service of the United from the Class of Aliens Eligible for to reflect statutory changes made to the States and the only military Employment Authorization. USCIS will program. (EB–5 Immigrant Investor organization within DHS. It is the propose to rescind the final rule Program Modernization). USCIS will principal Federal agency responsible for published in the Federal Register on also propose to update its regulations the $4.5 trillion maritime transportation February 25, 2015. The 2015 final rule for the EB–5 Immigrant Investor system, including maritime safety, amended DHS regulations by extending Regional Center Program to better reflect security, and stewardship. The Coast eligibility for employment authorization realities for regional centers and EB–5 Guard delivers daily value to the nation to certain H–4 dependent spouses of H– immigrant investors, to increase through multi-mission resources, 1B nonimmigrants who are seeking predictability and transparency in the authorities, and capabilities. employment-based lawful permanent adjudication process, to improve Effective governance in the maritime resident status. operational efficiency, and to enhance domain hinges upon an integrated H–1B Nonimmigrant Program and program integrity. (EB–5 Immigrant approach to safety, security, and Petitioning Process Regulations. In order Investor Regional Center Program). stewardship. The Coast Guard’s policies to improve U.S. worker protections as Lastly, USCIS will publish an advanced and capabilities are integrated and well as to address the requirements of notice of proposed rulemaking to solicit interdependent, delivering results Executive Order 13788, Buy American public input on proposals that would through a network of enduring and Hire American, USCIS will propose increase monitoring and oversight of partnerships with maritime to issue regulations with the focus of EB–5 projects, and encourage stakeholders. Consistent standards of improving the H–1B nonimmigrant investment in rural areas. (EB–5 universal application and enforcement, program and petitioning process. Such Immigrant Investor Program which encourage safe, efficient, and initiatives will include a proposed rule Realignment.) responsible maritime commerce, are that would establish an electronic Asylum Reforms. USCIS will propose vital to the success of the maritime registration program for H–1B petitions regulations aimed at deterring the industry. The Coast Guard’s ability to subject to annual numerical limitations fraudulent filing of asylum applications field versatile capabilities and highly- and would improve the H–1B numerical for the purpose of obtaining trained personnel is one of the U.S. limitation allocation process Employment Authorization Documents. Government’s most significant and (Registration Requirement for (Employment Authorization Documents important strengths in the maritime Petitioners Seeking to File H–1B for Asylum Applicants). USCIS will also environment. Petitions on Behalf of Aliens Subject to propose to amend its regulations to America is a maritime nation, and our Numerical Limitations); and a proposed streamline credible fear screening security, resilience, and economic rule that would revise the definition of determinations in response to the prosperity are intrinsically linked to the specialty occupation to increase focus Southwest Border crises. (Credible Fear oceans. Safety, efficient waterways, and on truly obtaining the best and brightest Reform Regulation). freedom of transit on the high seas are foreign nationals via the H–1B program Adjustment of Status Process essential to our well-being. The Coast and would revise the definition of Improvements. USCIS will propose to Guard is leaning forward, poised to employment and employer-employee update regulatory provisions to improve meet the demands of the modern relationship to help better protect U.S. the efficiency in the processing of maritime environment. The Coast Guard workers and wages. (Strengthening the adjustment of status applications, to creates value for the public through H–1B Nonimmigrant Visa Classification reduce processing times, to improve solid prevention and response efforts. Program). data quality provided to partner Activities involving oversight and

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57871

regulation, enforcement, maritime this delay to allow time to re-evaluate of experience with LODs on presence, and public and private the ‘‘asset categorization’’ methodology uninspected vessels indicates we can partnership foster increased maritime used to determine which facilities were safely provide this option to persons on safety, security, and stewardship. considered high risk. Currently, the rule inspected vessels. Allowing the PIC to The statutory responsibilities of the is scheduled to be implemented after hold an LOD instead of an Merchant Coast Guard include ensuring marine the Department of Homeland Security Mariner Credential would relieve safety and security, preserving maritime submits the report to Congress on the certain personnel from the burden of mobility, protecting the marine effectiveness of the TWIC program, obtaining and renewing an Merchant environment, enforcing U.S. laws and required by the Transportation Worker Mariner Credential every 5 years, and international treaties, and performing Identification Credential Security Card would create flexibility as to who may search and rescue. The Coast Guard Program Improvements and Assessment serve as a PIC of fuel transfers on supports the Department’s overarching Act (Pub. L. 114–278). This rule would inspected vessels. This option would be goals of mobilizing and organizing our delay the effective date for the affected available only for transfers of fuel; the Nation to secure the homeland from facilities until August 23, 2021. PIC requirements for vessels transferring terrorist attacks, natural disasters, and Removal of Certain International cargo would remain unchanged. (Note: other emergencies. Convention on Standards of Training, There is no associated Regulatory Plan In fiscal year 2019, the Coast Guard Certification and Watchkeeping for entry for this rule because this rule is plans to finalize 0 regulatory actions Seafarers, 1978, as Amended (STCW) non-significant under Executive Order and 11 deregulatory actions. The Coast Training Requirements. The Coast 12866. There is an entry, however, in Guard is highlighting the following Guard will propose to remove three the Unified Agenda.) Executive Order 13771 deregulatory Coast Guard merchant mariner training actions: requirements related to STCW officer United States Customs and Border Amendments to the Marine Radar and rating endorsements from its Protection Observer Refresher Training regulations in 46 CFR parts 11 and 12. CBP is the Federal agency principally Regulations. The Coast Guard will The Coast Guard has determined these responsible for the security of our propose removing obsolete portions of training requirements exceed current Nation’s borders, both at and between the radar observer endorsement international certification and training the ports of entry into the United States. requirements and harmonizing the standards of the STCW and cause a CBP must accomplish its border security endorsement with the merchant mariner misalignment between the training of and enforcement mission without credential. Active mariners with radar U.S. mariners and the mariners of other stifling the flow of legitimate trade and observer endorsements having one year countries. The proposed rule would travel. The primary mission of CBP is its of relevant sea service within the remove the following training homeland security mission, that is, to previous five years and having served in requirements: Leadership and prevent terrorists and terrorist weapons a position using radar for navigation and managerial skills training to qualify as from entering the United States. An collision avoidance purposes on board a master of vessels of less than 500 gross important aspect of this priority mission radar-equipped vessel, or who have met tons limited to near-coastal waters; involves improving security at our certain instructor requirements, would bridge resource management training to borders and ports of entry, but it also be able to renew their radar observer qualify as officer in charge of a means extending our zone of security endorsement without completing a navigational watch on vessels of less beyond our physical borders. radar course. This proposed rule would than 500 gross tons limited to near- CBP is also responsible for eliminate the requirement for mariners coastal waters; and computer systems administering laws concerning the to carry a certificate of training if the and maintenance training to qualify as importation into the United States of radar observer endorsement is on the electro-technical rating on vessels goods, and enforcing the laws MMC, and would allow the powered by main propulsion machinery concerning the entry of persons into the endorsement and MMC to expire at the of 750 kW/1,000 HP or more. Removal United States. This includes regulating same time. Elimination of the of these training requirements would and facilitating international trade; requirement to take a radar refresher or reduce the burden on affected mariners collecting import duties; enforcing U.S. re-certification course every five years without affecting safety. trade, immigration and other laws of the would reduce burden on affected Person in Charge of Fuel Transfers. United States at our borders; inspecting mariners without affecting safety. (Note: The Coast Guard will propose an imports, overseeing the activities of There is no associated Regulatory Plan alternative to the existing regulatory persons and businesses engaged in entry for this rule because this rule is requirement that a person in charge importing; enforcing the laws non-significant under Executive Order (PIC) of a fuel transfer on an inspected concerning smuggling and trafficking in 12866. There is an entry, however, in vessel hold a Merchant Mariner contraband; apprehending individuals the Unified Agenda.) Credential with either an officer attempting to enter the United States TWIC Reader Requirements; Delay of endorsement or Tankerman-PIC illegally; protecting our agriculture and Effective Date. The Coast Guard has endorsement. The proposed rule would economic interests from harmful pests proposed to partially delay the effective add the option of designating the PIC and diseases; servicing all people, date of the final rule entitled using a letter of designation (LOD), vehicles, and cargo entering the United ‘‘Transportation Worker Identification which is currently an option for States; maintaining export controls; and Credential (TWIC) Reader uninspected vessels but not inspected protecting U.S. businesses from theft of Requirements,’’ published in the vessels. The LOD designates the holder their intellectual property. Federal Register on August 23, 2016. as a PIC of the transfer of fuel oil and In carrying out its mission, CBP’s goal The rule would delay the requirements states that the holder has received is to facilitate the processing of for facilities that handle bulk CDC, but sufficient formal instruction from the legitimate trade and people efficiently do not transfer it to or from vessels, as operator or agent of the vessel to ensure without compromising security. well as facilities that receive vessels that his or her ability to safely and Consistent with its primary mission of carry CDC, but do not transfer it to the adequately carry out the duties and homeland security, CBP intends to issue facility. The Coast Guard is considering responsibilities of the PIC. Our decades several regulations during the next fiscal

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00069 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57872 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

year that are intended to improve Technical Corrections to Reflect the most cases. This rule is a deregulatory security at our borders and ports of Consolidation of Vessel Repair Unit action under Executive Order 13771. entry. During the upcoming year, CBP Locations. CBP intends to issue a final (Note: There is no associated Regulatory will also be working on various projects rule to update provisions relating to the Plan entry for this rule, because this rule to streamline CBP processing, reduce declaration, entry and dutiable status of is not significant under Executive Order duplicative processes, reduce various repair expenditures made abroad for 12866. There is an entry, however, in burdens on the public, and automate certain vessels to reflect the port of New the Unified Agenda.) various paper forms. Below are Orleans, as the only Vessel In addition to the regulations that CBP descriptions of CBP’s planned Repair Unit (VRU) location. The issues to promote DHS’s mission, CBP regulatory and deregulatory actions for amendment will improve the efficiency also issues regulations related to the fiscal year 2019. of vessel repair entry processing, ensure mission of the Department of the Collection of Biometric Data from the proper assessment and collection of Treasury. Under section 403(1) of the Aliens Upon Entry to and Departure duties, and make the regulations more Homeland Security Act of 2002, the from the United States. DHS is required transparent. This rule is a deregulatory former-U.S. Customs Service, including by statute to develop and implement an action under Executive Order 13771. functions of the Secretary of the integrated, automated entry and exit (Note: There is no associated Regulatory Treasury relating thereto, transferred to data system to match records, including Plan entry for this rule because this rule the Secretary of Homeland Security. As biographic data and biometric is non-significant under Executive part of the initial organization of DHS, identifiers, of aliens entering and Order 12866. There is an entry, the Customs Service inspection and departing the United States. In addition, however, in the Unified Agenda.) trade functions were combined with the , Protecting the Modernization of the Customs Brokers immigration and agricultural inspection Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into Regulations. CBP intends to issue a functions and the Border Patrol and the United States, states that DHS is to proposed rule to amend the transferred into CBP. The Department of expedite the completion and requirements for customs brokers. the Treasury retained certain regulatory implementation of a biometric entry-exit Specifically, CBP will propose to authority of the U.S. Customs Service tracking system. Although the current expand the scope of the national permit relating to customs revenue function. In regulations provide that DHS may authority to allow national permit addition to its plans to continue issuing require certain aliens to provide holders to conduct any type of customs regulations to enhance border security, business throughout the customs biometrics when entering and departing in the coming year, CBP expects to territory of the United States. To the United States, they only authorize continue to issue regulatory documents accomplish this, CBP will propose to DHS to collect biometrics from certain that will facilitate legitimate trade and eliminate broker districts and district aliens upon departure under pilot implement trade benefit programs. For a permits, which also eliminates the need programs at land ports and at up to 15 discussion of CBP regulations regarding for district permit waivers and for airports and seaports. In order to the customs revenue function, see the brokers to maintain district offices. provide the legal framework for DHS to regulatory plan of the Department of the Additionally, CBP will propose to begin a seamless biometric entry-exit Treasury. update the responsible supervision and system, DHS intends to issue an interim control oversight framework to better Federal Emergency Management final rule to amend the regulations to reflect the modern business Agency remove the references to pilot programs environment. This rule is a deregulatory FEMA’s mission is helping people and the port limitation. In addition, to action under Executive Order 13771. before, during, and after disasters. enable CBP to make the process for (Note: There is no associated Regulatory FEMA is working on a deregulatory verifying the identity of alien’s more Plan entry for this rule because this rule action titled Update to FEMA’s efficient, accurate, and secure by using is non-significant under Executive Regulations on Rulemaking Procedures. facial recognition technology, this rule Order 12866. There is an entry, That rule would revise FEMA would also provide that alien travelers however, in the Unified Agenda.) regulations pertaining to rulemaking by may be required to provide photographs Automation of CBP Form I–418 for removing sections that are outdated or upon entry and/or departure. Vessels. CBP intends to issue a rule do not affect the public and update Implementation of the Electronic amending the regulations regarding the provisions that affect the public’s System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) submission of Form I–418, Passenger participation in the rulemaking process. at U.S. Land Borders—Automation of List—Crew List. Currently, the master or FEMA is also working on a regulatory CBP Form I–94W. CBP intends to amend agent of every commercial vessel action titled Factors Considered When DHS regulations to implement the ESTA arriving in the United States, with Evaluating a Governor’s Request for requirements under section 711 of the limited exceptions, must submit a paper Individual Assistance for a Major Implementing Recommendations of the Form I–418, along with certain Disaster. This regulation would address 9/11 Commission Act of 2007, for aliens information regarding longshore work, the Sandy Recovery Improvement Act of who intend to enter the United States to CBP at the port where immigration 2013’s requirement that FEMA review, under the Visa Waiver Program (VWP) inspection is performed. Most update, and revise through rulemaking at land ports of entry. Currently, aliens commercial vessel operators are also the individual assistance factors FEMA from VWP countries must provide required to submit a paper Form I–418 uses to measure the severity, magnitude, certain biographic information to U.S. to CBP at the final U.S. port prior to and impact of a disaster. FEMA CBP officers at land ports of entry on a departing for a foreign port. Under this published a proposed rule on November paper I–94W Nonimmigrant Visa rule, most vessel operators would be 12, 2015, and now plans to issue a final Waiver Arrival/Departure Record (Form required to electronically submit the rule. I–94W). Under this rule, these VWP data elements on Form I–418 to CBP travelers would instead provide this through the National Vessel Movement Federal Law Enforcement Training information to CBP electronically Center in lieu of submitting a paper Center through ESTA prior to application for form. This rule would eliminate the The Federal Law Enforcement admission to the United States. need to file the paper Form I–418 in Training Center (FLETC) does not have

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57873

any significant regulations planned for Through this rule, DHS will create a intelligence-driven, risk-based approach fiscal year 2019. pathway to ensure the humane to all aspects of TSA’s mission. This detention of family units while approach results in layers of security to United States Immigration and Customs satisfying the goals of the FSA. The rule mitigate risks effectively and efficiently. Enforcement will also implement related provisions TSA uses established processes, ICE is the principal criminal of the TVPRA. working with stakeholders, to review investigative arm of DHS and one of the Adjusting Program Fees for the programs, requirements, and procedures three Department components charged Student and Exchange Visitor Program. for appropriate modifications based with the criminal and civil enforcement ICE will finalize a rule to adjust the fees upon changes in the environment, of the Nation’s immigration laws. Its that the Student and Exchange Visitor whether those changes result from an primary mission is to protect national Program (SEVP) charges individuals and evolving threat or enhancements security, public safety, and the integrity organizations. In 2016, SEVP conducted available through new technologies. of our borders through the criminal and a comprehensive fee study and For the coming fiscal year, TSA is civil enforcement of Federal law determined that current fees do not prioritizing deregulatory actions and governing border control, customs, recover the full costs of the services regulatory actions that are required to trade, and immigration. During fiscal provided. ICE has determined that meet statutory mandates and that are year 2019, ICE will focus rulemaking adjusting fees is necessary to fully necessary for national security. Below efforts on three priority regulations: (1) recover the increased costs of SEVP are planned TSA actions for fiscal year A final rule to address the detention, operations, program requirements, and (FY) 2019. processing, and release of alien to provide the necessary funding to Security Training for Surface children; (2) a final rule to increase the sustain initiatives critical to supporting Transportation Employees. TSA will fees paid to the Student and Exchange national security. The rule will adjust finalize a rule requiring higher-risk Visitor Program (SEVP) to recover costs DHS’s fees for individuals and public transportation agencies for services; and (3) a proposed rule to organizations. The SEVP fee schedule (including rail mass transit and bus replace ‘‘duration of status’’ with a was last adjusted in a rule published on systems), railroad carriers (freight and maximum period of stay for certain September 26, 2008. passenger), and over-the-road bus classes of nonimmigrants. Establishing a Maximum Period of owner/operators to conduct security Below are ICE’s significant regulatory Authorized Stay for F–1 and Other training for frontline employees. This actions for the coming fiscal year: Nonimmigrants. ICE will publish a regulation will implement mandates of Apprehension, Processing, Care, and proposed rule that modifies the period the Implementing Regulations of the Custody of Alien Minors and of authorized stay for certain categories 9/11 Commission Act of 2007, (9/11 Unaccompanied Alien Children. ICE, in of nonimmigrants traveling to the Act), which addressed concert with CBP and the Department of United States. The rule would change recommendations of the 9/11 Health and Human Services, will the authorized stay from ‘‘duration of Commission for enhancing the nation’s finalize a rule related to the detention, status’’ and replace it with a maximum security based upon vulnerabilities processing, and release of alien period of authorized stay, and options identified in the aftermath of September children. In 1985, a class-action suit for extensions, for each applicable visa 11, 2001. In compliance with the challenged the policies of the former category. This change will help definition of frontline employees in Immigration and Naturalization Service eliminate confusion over the length of pertinent provisions of the 9/11 Act, the (INS) relating to the detention, authorized period of stay for rule will include identification of which processing, and release of alien nonimmigrants to lawfully remain in employees are required to receive children; the case eventually reached the United States and will assist efforts security training and the content of that the U.S. Supreme Court. The Court to reduce overstay rates. training. The final rule will also propose upheld the constitutionality of the definitions for transportation security- challenged INS regulations on their face National Protection and Programs sensitive materials, as required by and remanded the case for further Directorate section 1501 of the 9/11 Act. proceedings consistent with its opinion. The National Protection and Programs Vetting of Certain Surface In January 1997, the parties reached a Directorate’s (NPPD) vision is a safe, Transportation Employees. TSA will comprehensive settlement agreement, secure, and resilient infrastructure propose a rule requiring security threat referred to as the Flores Settlement where the American way of life can assessments for security coordinators Agreement (FSA). The FSA was to thrive. NPPD leads the national effort to and other frontline employees of certain terminate five years after the date of protect and enhance the resilience of the public transportation agencies final court approval; however, the Nation’s physical and cyber (including rail mass transit and bus termination provisions were modified in infrastructure. Although NPPD does not systems), railroads (freight and 2001, such that the FSA does not plan to finalize any significant passenger), and over-the-road bus terminate until forty-five days after regulations within the next fiscal year, owner/operators. The NPRM will also publication of regulations implementing NPPD will undertake reviews of its propose provisions to implement TSA’s the agreement. Since 1997, intervening existing regulations in accordance with statutory requirement to recover its cost statutory changes, including passage of Executive Order 13771. NPPD is also of vetting through user fees. While many the Homeland Security Act and the working on several future rulemaking stakeholders conduct background William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims projects, as reflected in the Unified checks on their employees, their actions Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 Agenda. are limited based upon the data they can (TVPRA), have significantly changed the access. Through this rule, TSA will be applicability of certain provisions of the Transportation Security Administration able to conduct a more thorough check FSA. The proposed rule will codify the The Transportation Security against terrorist watch-lists of relevant and substantive terms of the Administration (TSA) protects the individuals in security-sensitive FSA and enable the U.S. Government to Nation’s transportation systems to positions. seek termination of the FSA and the ensure freedom of movement for people Amending Vetting Requirements for litigation concerning its enforcement. and commerce. TSA applies an Employees with Access to a Security

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00071 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57874 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

Identification Display Area. The FAA where all flight providers would upload creation under 8 U.S.C. 1153 note Extension, Safety, and Security Act of required student information to a TSA- (Public Law 102–395, sec. 610 (as 2016 mandates that TSA consider managed website. Also at industry’s amended)), for admission to the United modifications to the list of disqualifying request, TSA is considering changing States as lawful permanent residents on criminal offenses and criteria, develop a the interval for security threat a conditional basis. In addition, 8 U.S.C. waiver process for approving the assessments of alien flight students, 1153(b)(5) provides eligibility to aliens issuance of credentials for unescorted eliminating the requirement for a new who invest in new commercial access, and propose an extension of the security threat assessment for each enterprises which will create jobs and 8 look back period for disqualifying ‘‘training event.’’ A related change to the U.S.C. 1186a provides requirements for crimes. Based on these requirements, current information collection request removal of conditions on permanent and current intelligence pertaining to pertaining to the alien flight student resident status, the administration and the ‘‘insider threat,’’ TSA will propose program will be part of this deregulatory interpretation of which is left to DHS. revisions that enhance the eligibility action. Alternatives: requirements and disqualifying criminal Anticipated Cost and Benefits: DHS is offenses for individuals seeking or United States Secret Service currently considering the specific cost having unescorted access to any The United States Secret Service does and benefit impacts of the proposed Security Identification Display Area of not have any significant regulations provisions. an airport. planned for fiscal year 2019. Risks: Protection of Sensitive Security Timetable: Information. Through a joint rulemaking DHS Regulatory Plan for Fiscal Year with the Department of Transportation 2019 Action Date FR Cite (DOT), TSA will streamline existing A more detailed description of the ANPRM ...... 09/00/19 requirements to protect sensitive priority regulations that comprise the security information. This action DHS Fall 2018 regulatory plan follows. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis finalizes an Interim Final Rule for a Required: Undetermined. statutorily-required regulation related to Government Levels Affected: Federal, national security. The rule amends DHS—U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND Local, State, Tribal. TSA’s and DOT’s regulations to provide IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS) Agency Contact: Kevin Cummings, three options for the sensitive security Chief, Business and Foreign Workers information distribution statement, one Prerule Stage Division, Office of Policy and Strategy, significantly abbreviated, to address • Department of Homeland Security, U.S. comments on the IFR that the current 61. EB–5 Immigrant Investor Program Realignment Citizenship and Immigration Services, marking requirements are unduly 20 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Suite burdensome. TSA is considering further Priority: Other Significant. Major 1200, Washington, DC 20529–2200, deregulatory actions, including aligning status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is Phone: 202 272–8377, Fax: 202 272– the requirement for the handling of undetermined. 1480, Email: kevin.j.cummings@ Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. Federal Flight Deck Officer names uscis.dhs.gov. consistent with the handling of Federal E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. RIN: 1615–AC26 Air Marshal names (two names listed Legal Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1153(b)(5); 8 together would be sensitive security U.S.C. 1186(a); 8 U.S.C. 1153 information, not a single Federal Flight CFR Citation: 8 CFR 204.6; 8 CFR Deck Officer name). 216.6. DHS—USCIS Legal Deadline: None. Flight Training for Aliens and Other Proposed Rule Stage Designated Individuals; Security Abstract: The Department of Awareness Training for Flight School Homeland Security (DHS) plans to 62. Inadmissibility on Public Charge Employees. This rule will streamline publish an advanced notice of proposed Grounds regulations and reduce burden for the rulemaking to solicit public input on Priority: Economically Significant. alien flight student program. This action proposals that would increase Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. finalizes an IFR for rule that implements monitoring and oversight of the EB-5 E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. a statutory requirement, as well as program as well as encourage Legal Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101 to addresses comments received in investment in rural areas. DHS would 1103; 8 U.S.C. 1182 and 1183; . . . response to a reopening of the comment solicit feedback on proposals associated CFR Citation: 8 CFR 103; 8 CFR 212 period on the IFR. The alien flight with redefining components of the job to 214; 8 CFR 248. student program requires security threat creation requirement, and defining Legal Deadline: None. assessments for aliens seeking flight conditions for regional center Abstract: The Department of training in the United States and designations and operations. Homeland Security (DHS) will propose imposes additional security measures Statement of Need: DHS will solicit regulatory provisions guiding the on the flight schools training these public input on proposals that would inadmissibility determination on individuals. In response to increase monitoring and oversight, whether an alien is likely at any time to recommendations from industry encourage investment in rural areas, become a public charge under section through the Aviation Security Advisory redefine components of the job creation 212(a)(4) of the Immigration and Committee, TSA is considering revising requirement, and define conditions for Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. these requirements to reduce costs and regional center designations and 1182(a)(4). DHS proposes to add a industry burden. For example, reporting operations. regulatory provision, which would and recordkeeping requirements for the Summary of Legal Basis: This rule is define the term public charge and program are estimated to be overly based on the authority of DHS to would outline DHS’s public charge burdensome due to the requirement for designate regional centers and to permit considerations. paper records. TSA is considering an investors to establish reasonable Statement of Need: To ensure that electronic recordkeeping platform methodologies to demonstrate job foreign nationals coming to the United

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57875

States or adjusting status to permanent DHS—USCIS 112, which vests all of the functions of residence, either temporarily or 63. Registration Requirement for DHS in the Secretary and authorizes the permanently, have adequate means of Petitioners Seeking to File H–1B Secretary to issue regulations. Further support while in the United States, and Petitions on Behalf of Cap Subject authority for the regulatory amendments that foreign nationals do not become Aliens in the proposed rule is found in section dependent on public benefits for 214(a)(1) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1184(a)(1), support. Priority: Other Significant. which authorizes the Secretary to E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. Summary of Legal Basis: INA prescribe by regulation the terms and Legal Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1184(g) conditions of the admission of 212(a)(4). CFR Citation: 8 CFR 214. Alternatives: Legal Deadline: None. nonimmigrants; section 214(c) of the Anticipated Cost and Benefits: DHS is Abstract: The Department of INA, 8 U.S.C. 1184(c), which authorizes currently considering the specific cost Homeland Security proposes to amend the Secretary to prescribe how an and benefit impacts of the proposed its regulations governing petitions filed importing employer may petition for an provisions. In general, DHS anticipates on behalf of H–1B beneficiaries who H–1B nonimmigrant worker, and the that by clarifying the meaning of public may be counted under section information that an importing employer charge some stakeholders would incur 214(g)(1)(A) of the Immigration and must provide in the petition; and costs in terms of potentially not being Nationality Act (INA) (‘‘H–1B regular section 214(g) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. able to adjust status. Other anticipated cap’’) or under section 214(g)(5)(C) of 1184(g), which provides the H–1B costs to individuals requesting the INA (‘‘H–1B master’s cap’’). This numerical limitations and various immigration benefits are associated with rule proposes to establish an electronic exceptions to those limitations. the opportunity cost of time to complete registration program for petitions Alternatives: and file required forms and subject to numerical limitations for the Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The documentation, possible costs H–1B nonimmigrant classification. This proposed rule would aim to result in associated with any additional action is being considered because the better resource management and background checks, and unintended and demand for H–1B specialty occupation predictability for both USCIS and indirect costs associated with the loss of workers by U.S. employers has often petitioning H–1B employers. An public assistance due to disenrollment exceeded the numerical limitation. This electronic registration process could or foregone enrollment in public rule is intended to allow U.S. benefit most of the regulated public by benefits programs for those who are Citizenship and Immigration Services potentially reducing the overall cost and otherwise eligible. DHS anticipates (USCIS) to more efficiently manage the time involved in petitioning for H–1B there will be benefits associated with intake and selection process for these nonimmigrant workers. However, some ensuring that foreign nationals coming H–1B petitions. The Department additional costs may be incurred from to the United States have adequate published a proposed rule on this topic the electronic registration process to means of support and do not become in 2011. The Department intends to some petitioners. dependent on public assistance. publish an additional proposed rule in Risks: Risks: 2018. The proposal may include a Timetable: Timetable: modified selection process, as outlined in section 5(b) of Executive Order Action Date FR Cite Action Date FR Cite 13788, Buy American and Hire American. NPRM ...... 03/03/11 76 FR 11686 NPRM ...... 05/26/99 64 FR 28676 Statement of Need: Consistent with NPRM Comment 05/02/11 NPRM Comment 07/26/99 the Buy American and Hire American, Period End. Period End. E.O. 13788’s direction to suggest NPRM ...... 10/00/18 NPRM ...... 10/10/18 83 FR 51114 NPRM Comment 12/10/18 reforms to help ensure that H–1B visas Period End. are awarded to the most-skilled or Regulatory Flexibility Analysis highest-paid petition beneficiaries, this Required: Yes. regulation would help to streamline the Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Small Entities Affected: Businesses. process for administering the H–1B cap Required: Undetermined. Government Levels Affected: None. Government Levels Affected: Federal, and increase the probability of the total Additional Information: USCIS 2443– Local, State, Tribal. number of petitions selected under the cap filed for H–1B beneficiaries who 08. Includes Retrospective Review Additional Information: CIS No. possess a master’s or higher degree from under E.O. 13563. 2499–10, Transferred from RIN 1115– a U.S. institution of higher education AF45. URL For More Information: each fiscal year. www.regulations.gov. URL For More Information: Summary of Legal Basis: The URL For Public Comments: www.regulations.gov. Secretary of Homeland Security’s www.regulations.gov. URL For Public Comments: authority for these proposed regulatory www.regulations.gov. amendments is found in various Agency Contact: Kevin Cummings, Agency Contact: Mark Phillips, Chief, sections of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1101 et Chief, Business and Foreign Workers Residence and Naturalization Division, seq., and the Homeland Security Act of Division, Office of Policy and Strategy, Department of Homeland Security, U.S. 2002 (HSA), Public Law 107–296, 116 Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Stat. 2135, 6 U.S.C. 101 et seq. General Citizenship and Immigration Services, Office of Policy and Strategy, 20 authority for issuing the proposed rule 20 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Suite Massachusetts Avenue NW, is found in section 103(a) of the INA, 8 1200, Washington, DC 20529–2200, Washington, DC 20529, Phone: 202 272– U.S.C. 1103(a), which authorizes the Phone: 202 272–8377, Fax: 202 272– 8377, Email: mark.phillips@ Secretary to administer and enforce the 1480, Email: kevin.j.cummings@ uscis.dhs.gov. immigration and nationality laws, as uscis.dhs.gov. RIN: 1615–AA22 well as section 102 of the HSA, 6 U.S.C. RIN: 1615–AB71

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57876 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

DHS—USCIS and which will benefit the United States DHS—USCIS 64. EB–5 Immigrant Investor Regional economy and create full-time 65. Strengthening the H–1B Center Program employment for not fewer than 10 U.S. Nonimmigrant Visa Classification workers. Further, section 610 of Public Program Priority: Other Significant. Law 102–395 (8 U.S.C. 1153 note) E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. Priority: Other Significant. Major Legal Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1153(b)(5); created the Immigrant Investor Pilot Program and authorized the Secretary to status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is Pub. L. 102–395, secs. 610 and 601(a); undetermined. set aside visas for individuals who Pub. L. 107–273, sec. 11037; Pub. L. Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. 101–649, sec. 121(a); Pub. L. 105–119, invest in regional centers created for the E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. sec. 116; Pub. L. 106–396, sec. 402; Pub. purpose of concentrating pooled Legal Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1184 L. 108–156, sec. 4; Pub. L. 112–176, sec. investment in defined economic zones, CFR Citation: 8 CFR 214.2(h)(4). 1; Pub. L. 114–113, sec. 575; Pub. L. and was last amended by Public Law Legal Deadline: None. 114–53, sec. 131; Pub. L. 107–273 107–296. Abstract: The Department of CFR Citation: 8 CFR 204; 8 CFR 216. Alternatives: Homeland Security (DHS) will propose Legal Deadline: None. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: DHS is to revise the definition of specialty Abstract: The Department of occupation to increase focus on still in the process of reviewing Homeland Security (DHS) is considering obtaining the best and the brightest potential changes it would propose to making regulatory changes to the EB–5 foreign nationals via the H–1B program, the regional center process. DHS may Immigrant Investor Regional Center and revise the definition of employment Program. DHS issued an Advance propose to implement an exemplar and employer-employee relationship to Notice of Proposed Rulemaking filing requirement for all designated better protect U.S. workers and wages. (ANPRM) to seek comment from all regional centers that would require In addition, DHS will propose interested stakeholders on several regional centers to file exemplar project additional requirements designed to topics, including: (1) The process for requests. An exemplar filing ensure employers pay appropriate initially designating entities as regional requirement could cause some projects wages to H–1B visa holders. centers, (2) a potential requirement for to not go forward, but DHS is still in the Statement of Need: The purpose of regional centers to utilize an exemplar process of assessing the impacts on the these changes is to ensure that H–1B filing process, (3) continued number of projects that may be affected. visas are awarded only to individuals participation requirements for DHS anticipates that any proposed who will be working in a job which maintaining regional center designation, changes to the regional center program meets the statutory definition of and (4) the process for terminating would increase overall program specialty occupation. In addition, these regional center designation. While DHS efficiency, transparency, and changes are intended to ensure that the has gathered some information related predictability for both USCIS and EB–5 H–1B program supplements the U.S. to these topics, the ANPRM sought stakeholders. workforce and strengthens U.S. worker additional information that can help the protections. Risks: Department make operational and Summary of Legal Basis: The security updates to the Regional Center Timetable: Homeland Security Act of 2002, Public Program while minimizing the impact of Law 107–296, section 102, 116 Stat. such changes on regional center Action Date FR Cite 2135 (Nov. 25, 2002), 6 U.S.C. 112, and operations and EB–5 investors. the Immigration and Nationality Act of Statement of Need: Based on decades ANPRM ...... 01/11/17 82 FR 3211 1952 (INA), charge the Secretary of of experience operating the program, ANPRM Comment 04/11/17 Homeland Security (Secretary) with DHS has determined that program Period End. NPRM ...... 03/00/19 administration and enforcement of the changes are needed to better reflect immigration and nationality laws. See business realities for regional centers INA section 103, 8 U.S.C. 1103. This and EB–5 immigrant investors, to Regulatory Flexibility Analysis rule will significantly enhance the increase predictability and transparency Required: Yes. ability of USCIS to effectively manage in the adjudication process for Small Entities Affected: Businesses. and monitor the H–1B program. stakeholders, to improve operational Government Levels Affected: None. Alternatives: efficiency for the agency, and to Anticipated Cost and Benefits: DHS is enhance program integrity. URL For More Information: still considering the cost and benefit Summary of Legal Basis: The www.regulations.gov. impacts of the proposed provisions. Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) URL For Public Comments: Risks: authorizes the Secretary of Homeland Timetable: Security (Secretary) to administer and www.regulations.gov. enforce the immigration and nationality Agency Contact: Kevin Cummings, Action Date FR Cite laws including establishing regulations Chief, Business and Foreign Workers deemed necessary to carry out his Division, Office of Policy and Strategy, NPRM ...... 08/00/19 authority, and section 102 of the Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Homeland Security Act, 6 U.S.C. 112, Citizenship and Immigration Services, Regulatory Flexibility Analysis authorizes the Secretary to issue 20 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Suite Required: Undetermined. regulations. 8 U.S.C. 1103(a), INA 1200, Washington, DC 20529–2200, Government Levels Affected: section 103(a). INA section 203(b)(5), 8 Phone: 202 272–8377, Fax: 202 272– Undetermined. U.S.C. 1153(b)(5), also provides the 1480, Email: kevin.j.cummings@ Federalism: Undetermined. Secretary with authority to make visas uscis.dhs.gov. URL For More Information: available to immigrants seeking to www.regulations.gov. engage in a new commercial enterprise RIN: 1615–AC11 URL For Public Comments: in which the immigrant has invested www.regulations.gov.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57877

Agency Contact: Kevin Cummings, different methods of biometric 1B nonimmigrants who are seeking Chief, Business and Foreign Workers collection beyond fingerprints and to employment-based lawful permanent Division, Office of Policy and Strategy, remove age restrictions. resident (LPR) status. DHS is publishing Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Summary of Legal Basis: this notice of proposed rulemaking to Citizenship and Immigration Services, Alternatives: amend that 2015 final rule. DHS is 20 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Suite Anticipated Cost and Benefits: DHS is proposing to remove from its regulations 1200, Washington, DC 20529–2200, still considering the exact cost and certain H–4 spouses of H–1B Phone: 202 272–8377, Fax: 202 272– benefit impacts of the proposed nonimmigrants as a class of aliens 1480, Email: kevin.j.cummings@ provisions. In general, DHS anticipates eligible for employment authorization. uscis.dhs.gov. that stakeholders will incur costs due to Statement of Need: DHS is reviewing RIN: 1615–AC13 the increased collection of biometrics the 2015 final rule in light of issuance and the expansion of the types of of Executive Order 13788, Buy biometrics required to establish and American and Hire American. verify an identity. The anticipated costs Summary of Legal Basis: The DHS—USCIS to individuals submitting biometrics are Secretary of Homeland Security 66. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration associated with biometric fees and (Secretary) has the authority to amend Services Biometrics Collection for travel costs, and the opportunity cost of this regulation under section 102 of the Consistent, Efficient, and Effective time in completing and filing required Homeland Security Act of 2002, Public Operations forms and the time associated with Law 107–296, 116 Stat. 2135, 6 U.S.C. Priority: Other Significant. Major travel. DHS anticipates benefits of those 112, and section 103(a) of the status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is individuals seeking immigration Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), undetermined. benefits and to the government. 8 U.S.C. 1103(a), which authorize the Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. Risks: Secretary to administer and enforce the Timetable: E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. immigration and nationality laws. In addition, section 214(a)(1) of the INA, 8 Legal Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1103(a); 8. Action Date FR Cite U.S.C. 1444 and 1446; 8 U.S.C. 1365a U.S.C. 1184(a)(1), provides the Secretary with authority to prescribe the time and and 1365b; 8 U.S.C. 1304(a); Pub. L. NPRM ...... 02/00/19 107–56; Pub. L. 107–173; Pub. L. 109– conditions of nonimmigrants’ 248, sec. 402(a) and 402(b) Regulatory Flexibility Analysis admissions to the United States. Alternatives: CFR Citation: 8 CFR 103.2(b)(9); 8 Required: Undetermined. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: DHS CFR 103.7(b)(1)(i)(C); 8 CFR 103.16; 8 Government Levels Affected: anticipates that there would be two CFR 204.2(d)(2)(vi); 8 CFR 204.3(c)(3); 8 Undetermined. CFR 204.5(p)(4); 8 CFR 208.10; 8 CFR Federalism: Undetermined. primary impacts that DHS can estimate 210.2(c)(2)(i); 8 CFR 210.5(b)(2); 8 CFR URL For More Information: and quantify: The cost-savings accruing 214.1(f); 8 CFR 214.11(a); 8 CFR www.regulations.gov. to forgone future filings by certain H–4 214.11(m)(2); 8 CFR 236.5; 8 CFR URL For Public Comments: dependent spouses, and labor turnover 240.68(b); 8 CFR 245.21(b); 8 CFR www.regulations.gov. costs that employers of H–4 workers 245a.2(d); 8 CFR 245a.4(b)(4); 8 CFR Agency Contact: Lee Bowes, Deputy could incur when their employees’ 214.2(w)(15); 8 CFR 215.8; 8 CFR Associate Director, Immigration Records EADs are terminated. Some U.S. 244.17; 8 CFR 245a.12(d); 8 CFR and Identity Services Directorate, workers would benefit from this 264.1(g); 8 CFR 264.2(d); 8 CFR 333.1(a) Department of Homeland Security, U.S. proposed rule by having a better chance to (b); 8 CFR 316.4(a). Citizenship and Immigration Services, at obtaining jobs that some of the Legal Deadline: None. 20 Massachusetts Avenue NW, population of the H–4 workers currently Abstract: The Department of Washington, DC 20529, Phone: 202 272– hold, as the proposed rule would no Homeland Security (DHS) will propose 8377, Email: [email protected]. longer allow H–4 workers to enter the to update its regulations to eliminate RIN: 1615–AC14 labor market early. multiple references to specific biometric Risks: types, and to allow for the expansion of Timetable: the types of biometrics required to DHS—USCIS Action Date FR Cite establish and verify an identity. DHS will also propose to modify age 67. Removing H–4 Dependent Spouses NPRM ...... 11/00/18 restrictions where they exist to detect, From the Class of Aliens Eligible for deter, or prevent human trafficking of Employment Authorization Regulatory Flexibility Analysis children; establish consistent identity Priority: Economically Significant. Required: Yes. enrollment and verification policies and Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. Small Entities Affected: Businesses, processes; and align U.S. Citizenship Unfunded Mandates: This action may Organizations. and Immigration Services (USCIS) affect the private sector under Public Government Levels Affected: None. biometric collection with other Law 104–4. URL For More Information: immigration operations. The DHS E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. www.regulations.gov. proposal will provide a definition to the Legal Authority: 6 U.S.C. 112; 8 U.S.C. URL For Public Comments: public on the term biometric and how 1103(a); 8 U.S.C. 1184(a)(1); 8 U.S.C. www.regulations.gov. biometrics will be used in the 1324a(H)(3)(B) Agency Contact: Kevin Cummings, immigration process. CFR Citation: 8 CFR 214; 8 CFR 274a. Chief, Business and Foreign Workers Statement of Need: As DHS seeks to Legal Deadline: None. Division, Office of Policy and Strategy, better secure the immigration process by Abstract: On February 25, 2015, DHS Department of Homeland Security, U.S. confirming the identity of individuals published a final rule extending Citizenship and Immigration Services, encountered, the use of biometrics eligibility for employment authorization 20 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Suite needs to be expanded to account for to certain H–4 dependent spouses of H– 1200, Washington, DC 20529–2200,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00075 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57878 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

Phone: 202 272–8377, Fax: 202 272– Alternatives: usage of available immigrant visas, and 1480, Email: kevin.j.cummings@ Anticipated Cost and Benefits: DHS is discourage fraudulent or frivolous uscis.dhs.gov. currently considering the specific cost filings. DHS proposes to eliminate the Related RIN: Related to 1615–AB92 and benefit impacts of the proposed concurrent filing of visa petitions and RIN: 1615–AC15 provisions. In general, DHS anticipates Form I–485 for all applicants seeking an that by mandating electronic submission immigrant visa in a preference category, for all immigration benefit requests and and proposes to make further changes to DHS—USCIS making changes to existing regulations the appropriate dates when applicants to allow end-to-end digital processing, can file Form I–485 and for ancillary 68. Electronic Processing of stakeholders will incur some costs benefits. Immigration Benefit Requests associated with transitioning current Statement of Need: The purpose of Priority: Other Significant. Major practices to an electronic process. DHS these changes is to reduce Form I–485 status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is anticipates there will be benefits and processing times, discourage frivolous undetermined. cost savings associated with mandating filings, ensure that ancillary benefits are Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. electronic submission for all connected to the potential for visa E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. immigration benefit requests and end- allocation, provide steady Form I–485 Legal Authority: U.S.C. 112; 8 U.S.C. to-end digital processing. receipts throughout the fiscal year, and 1103; 44 U.S.C. 3504 Risks: improve the quality of USCIS Form I– CFR Citation: 8 CFR 103; 8 CFR 104; Timetable: 485 inventory data. Reduced processing 8 CFR 204. times, steady receipts, and better data Legal Deadline: None. Action Date FR Cite quality will ensure more efficient usage Abstract: The Department of of the available immigrant visas and Homeland Security (DHS) will propose NPRM ...... 04/00/19 reduce visa retrogression. to: (1) Mandate electronic submission Summary of Legal Basis: for all immigration benefit requests and Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Alternatives: explain the requirements associated Required: Undetermined. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: DHS is with electronic processing; and (2) make Government Levels Affected: None. currently considering the specific cost changes to existing regulations to allow URL For More Information: and benefit impacts of the proposed end-to-end digital processing. www.regulations.gov. provisions. Statement of Need: To address the URL For Public Comments: Risks: inefficiency of relying on paper, U.S. www.regulations.gov. Timetable: Citizenship and Immigration Services is Agency Contact: Michael Mayhew, fully transitioning to a digital Chief of Staff, Immigration Records and Action Date FR Cite environment for processing immigration Identity Services Directorate, benefit requests. Agency experience Department of Homeland Security, U.S. NPRM ...... 09/00/19 demonstrates that the electronic Citizenship and Immigration Services, Regulatory Flexibility Analysis processing of benefit requests is more 20 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20529, Phone: 202 272– Required: Undetermined. efficient and effective than the Government Levels Affected: 8377, Email: michael.x.mayhew@ traditional paper processes, during the Undetermined. immediate request, throughout the uscis.dhs.gov. Federalism: Undetermined. immigration life cycle, and beyond. RIN: 1615–AC20 Agency Contact: Mark Phillips, Chief, eProcessing will largely eliminate the Residence and Naturalization Division, enormous cost of paper intake, shipping Department of Homeland Security, U.S. and storage, strengthen information DHS—USCIS Citizenship and Immigration Services, security, and reduce redundancy and Office of Policy and Strategy, 20 69. • Updating Adjustment of Status the potential for error in adjudication Massachusetts Avenue NW, Procedures for More Efficient processes. For applicants, electronic Washington, DC 20529, Phone: 202 272– Processing and Immigrant Visa Usage processing will improve the experience 8377, Email: mark.phillips@ of applying for immigration benefits at Priority: Other Significant. Major uscis.dhs.gov. each stage of the process. status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is RIN: 1615–AC22 Summary of Legal Basis: Authority for undetermined. this proposed regulatory amendment Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. can be found in the Homeland Security E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. Act of 2002, Public Law 107–296, Legal Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1153 to DHS—USCIS section 102, 116 Stat. 2135, 6 U.S.C. 1155; 8 U.S.C. 1255; 8 U.S.C. 1324a 70. • Improvements to the Medical 112, and the Immigration and CFR Citation: 8 CFR 204.5; 8 CFR Certification for Disability Exceptions Nationality Act (INA) section 103, 8 245.2; 8 CFR 245.18; 8 CFR 245.1; 8 CFR Processing U.S.C. 1103, which give the Secretary 274a.12; 8 CFR 205.1. Priority: Other Significant. Major the authority to administer and enforce Legal Deadline: None. status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is Abstract: The Department of the immigration and nationality laws, as undetermined. well as the Government Paperwork Homeland Security (DHS) will propose Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. Elimination Act (GPEA), Public Law regulatory provisions designed to: E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. 105–277, tit. XVII, section 1703, 112 Improve the efficiency in the processing Legal Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1103; 8 Stat. 2681, 2681–749, 44 U.S.C. 3504, of Application to Register Permanent U.S.C. 1423; 8 U.S.C. 1443; 8 U.S.C. which provides that, when practicable, Residence or Adjust Status (Form I– 1448 federal agencies use electronic forms, 485), reduce processing times, improve CFR Citation: 8 CFR 312.3. electronic filing, and electronic the quality of inventory data provided to Legal Deadline: None. submissions to conduct agency business partner agencies, reduce the potential Abstract: The Department of with the public. for visa retrogression, promote efficient Homeland Security (DHS) will propose

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00076 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57879

updates to regulatory provisions screening determinations, and removing Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship designed to improve the efficiency of provisions related to novel or unique and Immigration Services, 20 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration issues that merit consideration in a full Massachusetts Avenue NW, Service processing of Medical hearing before an immigration judge. Washington, DC 20529–2090, Phone: Certification for Disability Exceptions Statement of Need: The reforms that 202 272–8377, Email: john.l.lafferty@ (Form N–648) by improving customer will be proposed by DHS aim to respond uscis.dhs.gov. service and responding to concerns of to the national emergency caused by the RIN: 1615–AC24 possible fraud and abuse. influx of inadmissible aliens along the Statement of Need: The purpose of Southwest Border and reduce the threat these changes is to ensure operational to U.S. national security and public DHS—USCIS efficiency and integrity by addressing safety. Additionally, these provisions issues of potential fraud and other will make the adjudication of credible 72. • Employment Authorization irregularities in the N–648 process. fear claims more efficient while Documents for Asylum Applicants Summary of Legal Basis: upholding U.S. treaty obligations and Priority: Other Significant. Major Alternatives: law that prevent the return of aliens to status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is Anticipated Cost and Benefits: DHS is a country in which they would be undetermined. currently considering the specific cost persecuted or tortured. In combination Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. and benefit impacts of the proposed with other policy, operational, and legal E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. provisions. reforms, the proposed changes will Legal Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1158(d)(2) Risks: reduce the strain on DHS resources by CFR Citation: 8 CFR 208.7; 8 CFR Timetable: deterring illegal migration to the United 274a. States, thereby addressing the Legal Deadline: None. Action Date FR Cite Southwest Border crisis and protecting Abstract: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) plans to NPRM ...... 09/00/19 U.S. national security and public safety. Summary of Legal Basis: The propose regulatory amendments Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) intended to promote greater Required: Undetermined. section 235(b), 8 U.S.C. 1225(b), defines accountability in the application Government Levels Affected: the term credible fear of persecution as process for requesting employment Undetermined. a significant possibility, taking into the authorization and to deter the Federalism: Undetermined. account the credibility of the statements fraudulent filing of asylum applications Agency Contact: Mark Phillips, Chief, made by the alien in support of the for the purpose of obtaining Residence and Naturalization Division, alien’s claim and such other facts as are Employment Authorization Documents Department of Homeland Security, U.S. known to the officer, that the alien (EADs). Citizenship and Immigration Services, could establish eligibility for asylum Statement of Need: This rule aims to Office of Policy and Strategy, 20 under section 8 U.S.C. 1158. Currently, make changes that strengthen eligibility Massachusetts Avenue NW, U.S.Citizenship and Immigration and application requirements for Washington, DC 20529, Phone: 202 272– Services flags any potential bars for the asylum applicants who seek 8377, Email: mark.phillips@ consideration of the immigration judge employment eligibility in the United uscis.dhs.gov. making a final determination on asylum States. RIN: 1615–AC23 eligibility. Since eligibility for asylum Summary of Legal Basis: The includes an applicability of any bars at Immigration and Nationality Act section 208(b)(2) or 241(b)(3) of the INA, DHS 208(d)(2), 8 U.S.C. 1158(d)(2), provides proposes modifications to the regulation the Attorney General with authority to DHS—USCIS to enable USCIS itself to apply the bars provide employment authorization to 71. • Credible Fear Reform when making a credible fear of applicants for asylum by establishing persecution determination. regulations. The statute also states such Priority: Other Significant. Major Alternatives: The alternative to this applicants may not be granted asylum status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is rule would be to continue under the application-based employment undetermined. current process without change. authorization prior to 180 days after Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: DHS is filing of the application for asylum. DHS E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. still considering the exact cost and has created regulations codifying Legal Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1158(b)(2); 8 benefit impacts of the proposed employment authorization application U.S.C. 1224(b)(1)(A)(ii); 8 U.S.C. provisions. In general, DHS anticipates procedures and eligibility, as well as 1224(b)(1)(B) CFR Citation: 8 CFR 208.2(b); 8 CFR that there may be some impacts to the renewal procedures, and is proposing 208.2(c); 8 CFR 208.30(e)(2); 8 CFR adjudication of some credible fear modifications. Alternatives: 208.30(e)(4); 8 CFR 208.30(e)(5); 8 CFR applications. Risks: Anticipated Cost and Benefits: DHS is 208.30(f); 8 CFR 208.30(g); 8 CFR Timetable: still considering the qualitative and 235.6(a). quantitative impacts of the proposed Legal Deadline: None. Action Date FR Cite provisions. Abstract: The Department of Risks: Homeland Security (DHS) will propose NPRM ...... 09/00/19 Timetable: to amend regulatory provisions to streamline credible fear screening Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Action Date FR Cite determinations, in response to the Required: Undetermined. Southwest Border crisis. DHS plans to Government Levels Affected: NPRM ...... 09/00/19 establish various measures, such as Undetermined. applying the mandatory bars to asylum Agency Contact: John L. Lafferty, Regulatory Flexibility Analysis eligibility to certain credible fear Chief, Asylum Division, Department of Required: Undetermined.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00077 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57880 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

Government Levels Affected: revise the existing regulations to Action Date FR Cite Undetermined. modernize key areas of the program. Agency Contact: Brandon B. Prelogar, Summary of Legal Basis: The NPRM ...... 01/13/17 82 FR 4738 Chief, International and Humanitarian Immigration Act (INA) authorizes the NPRM Comment 04/11/17 Affairs Division, Office of Policy and Secretary of Homeland Security Period End. Final Rule ...... 11/00/18 Strategy, Department of Homeland (Secretary) to administer and enforce the immigration and nationality laws Security, U.S. Citizenship and Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Immigration Services, 20 Massachusetts including establishing regulations deemed necessary to carry out her Required: Yes. Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20529, Small Entities Affected: Businesses. Phone: 202 272–8377, Email: authority, and section 102 of the Government Levels Affected: None. [email protected]. Homeland Security Act, 6 U.S.C. 112, URL For More Information: RIN: 1615–AC27 authorizes the Secretary to issue www.regulations.gov. regulations. 8 U.S.C. 1103(a), INA URL For Public Comments: section 103(a). INA section 203(b)(5), 8 www.regulations.gov. U.S.C. 1153(b)(5), also provides the Agency Contact: Edie Pearson, Chief DHS—USCIS Secretary with authority to make visas of Policy, Immigrant Investor Program Final Rule Stage available to immigrants seeking to Office, Department of Homeland engage in a new commercial enterprise Security, U.S. Citizenship and 73. EB–5 Immigrant Investor Program in which the immigrant has invested Immigration Services, 131 M Street NE, Modernization and which will benefit the United States Washington, DC 20529–2200, Phone: Priority: Other Significant. economy and create full-time 202 272–8377. E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. employment for not fewer than 10 U.S. Related RIN: Related to 1205–AB69. Legal Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1153(b)(5) workers. Further, section 610 of Public RIN: 1615–AC07 CFR Citation: 8 CFR 204.6; 8 CFR Law 102–395 (8 U.S.C. 1153 note) 216.6. created the Immigrant Investor Pilot Program and authorized the Secretary to Legal Deadline: None. set aside visas for individuals who DHS—U.S. COAST GUARD (USCG) Abstract: In January 2017, the invest in regional centers created for the Department of Homeland Security Proposed Rule Stage purpose of concentrating pooled (DHS) proposed to amend its regulations • investment in defined economic zones, 74. Removal of Certain International governing the employment-based, fifth and was last amended by Public Law Convention on Standards of Training, preference (EB–5) immigrant investor 107–296. Certification and Watchkeeping for classification. In general, under the EB– Alternatives: Seafarers, 1978, as Amended (STCW) 5 program, individuals are eligible to Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Due to Training Requirements apply for lawful permanent residence in data limitations and the complexity of Priority: Other Significant. the United States if they make the EB–5 investment structures, it is E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. necessary investment in a commercial difficult to quantify and monetize the Legal Authority: 46 U.S.C. 7101(c) enterprise in the United States and costs and benefits of the provisions, CFR Citation: 46 CFR 11.317(a)(3)(iv); create or, in certain circumstances, with the exception of application costs 46 CFR 11.321(a)(3)(iv); 46 CFR preserve 10 permanent full-time jobs for for dependents who would file the 12.611(a)(4)(i). qualified U.S. workers. This rule sought Petition by Entrepreneur to Remove Legal Deadline: None. public comment on a number of Conditions on Permanent Resident Abstract: The Coast Guard proposes to proposed changes to the EB–5 program Status (Form I–829) separately from remove three Coast Guard merchant regulations. Such proposed changes principal investors, and familiarization mariner training requirements related to included: Raising the minimum costs to review the rule. STCW officer and rating endorsements investment amount; allowing certain The raise in the investment amounts from its regulations in 46 CFR parts 11 EB–5 petitioners to retain their original and reform of the targeted employment and 12. The Coast Guard has priority date; changing the designation area (TEA) geography could deter some determined these training requirements process for targeted employment areas; investors from participating in the EB– exceed current international and other miscellaneous changes to 5 program. The increase in investment certification and training standards of filing and interview processes. could reduce the number of investors as the STCW and cause a misalignment Statement of Need: The proposed they may be unable or unwilling to between the training of U.S. mariners regulatory changes are necessary to invest at the higher proposed levels of and the mariners of other countries. reflect statutory changes and codify investment. On the other hand, raising These training requirements are not existing policies, more accurately reflect the investment amounts increases the necessary for the safety of life and existing and future economic realities, amount invested by each investor and property at sea. The rule would remove: improve operational efficiencies to thereby potentially increases the total Leadership and managerial skills provide stakeholders with a higher level economic benefits of U.S. investment training to qualify as master of vessels of predictability and transparency in the under this program. The proposed TEA of less than 500 gross tons limited to adjudication process, and enhance provision would rule out TEA near-coastal waters; bridge resource program integrity by clarifying key configurations that rely on a large management training to qualify as eligibility requirements for program number of census tracts indirectly officer in charge of a navigational watch participation and further detailing the linked to the actual project tract by on vessels of less than 500 gross tons processes required. Given the numerous degrees of separation, and limited to near-coastal waters; and complexities involved in adjudicating may better target investment capital to computer systems and maintenance benefit requests in the EB–5 program, areas where unemployment rates are the training to qualify as electro-technical along with continued program integrity highest. rating on vessels powered by main concerns and increasing adjudication Risks: propulsion machinery of 750 kW/1,000 processing times, DHS has decided to Timetable: HP or more.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00078 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57881

Statement of Need: The Coast Guard (Pub. L. 114–278). This proposed rule Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. determined the three training would further delay the effective date E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. requirements exceed current for certain facilities that handle certain Legal Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1365a; 8 international certification and training dangerous cargoes (CDCs) in bulk or U.S.C. 1365b standards of the STCW and cause a receive vessels carrying CDC in bulk. CFR Citation: 19 CFR 215.8; 19 CFR misalignment between the training of Statement of Need: After the 235.1. U.S. mariners and the mariners of other publication of the Final Rule, the Coast Legal Deadline: None. countries. These training requirements Guard received inquiries from owners of Abstract: The Department of are not necessary for the safety of life facilities and vessels concerning the Homeland Security (DHS) is required by and property at sea. rule’s requirements regarding the statute to develop and implement an Summary of Legal Basis: facilities affected by the final rule and integrated, automated entry and exit Alternatives: several questions related to how the data system to match records, including biographic data and biometrics of aliens Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The final rule addressed Certain Dangerous entering and departing the United total 10-year discounted cost savings of Cargoes. This proposed rule would States. In addition, Executive Order this proposed rule would be provide the Coast Guard time to update 13780, Protecting the Nation from $20,321,360, discounted at 7 percent its security-related databases and Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United and 3 percent, respectively. The consider policy options relating to States, published in the Federal annualized total cost savings would be implementation of TWIC readers while Register at 82 FR 13209, states that DHS $2,032,136, discounted at 7 percent and addressing the inquiries. is to expedite the completion and 3 percent, respectively. Using a Summary of Legal Basis: implementation of a biometric entry-exit perpetual period of analysis, we Alternatives: tracking system. Although the current estimate total annualized discounted Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The regulations provide that DHS may cost savings of the rule would be NPRM estimated annualized cost require certain aliens to provide approximately $1,658,828 in 2016 savings to both industry and biometrics when entering and departing dollars, discounted at 7 percent. government as $1.15 million, using a the United States, they only authorize Risks: seven percent discount rate and a 10- DHS to collect biometrics from certain Timetable: year period of analysis. Using a aliens upon departure under pilot perpetual period of analysis, we Action Date FR Cite programs at land ports and at up to 15 estimated total annualized discounted airports and seaports. To provide the cost savings of the rule would be NPRM ...... 11/00/18 legal framework for CBP to begin a approximately $0.552 million in 2016 comprehensive biometric entry-exit dollars, discounted at 7 percent. The Regulatory Flexibility Analysis system, DHS is amending the benefits for partially delaying the Required: Undetermined. regulations to remove the references to Government Levels Affected: None. effective date of the final rule for an pilot programs and the port limitation. Agency Contact: Cathleen Mauro, additional 3 years are that it would In addition, to enable CBP to make the Department of Homeland Security, U.S. allow the Coast Guard time to conduct process for verifying the identity of Coast Guard, 2703 Martin Luther King additional analysis of the potential aliens more efficient, accurate, and Jr. Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20593– effects of the rule. secure by using facial recognition 7509, Phone: 202 372–1449, Email: Risks: technology, DHS is amending the [email protected]. Timetable: regulations to provide that all aliens RIN: 1625–AC48 may be required to be photographed Action Date FR Cite upon entry and/or departure. NPRM ...... 06/22/18 83 FR 29067 Statement of Need: This rule is necessary to provide the legal DHS—USCG NPRM Comment 07/23/18 Period End. framework for DHS to begin Final Rule Stage Final Rule ...... 10/00/18 implementing a comprehensive biometric entry-exit system. Collecting 75. TWIC Reader Requirements; Delay Regulatory Flexibility Analysis biometrics at departure will allow CBP of Effective Date Required: No. and DHS to know with better accuracy Priority: Other Significant. Government Levels Affected: None. whether aliens are departing the country E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. Agency Contact: LCDR Yamaris Barril, when they are required to depart, Legal Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70105 Department of Homeland Security, U.S. reduce visa fraud, and improve CBP’s CFR Citation: 33 CFR 105. Coast Guard, 2703 Martin Luther King ability to identify criminals and known Legal Deadline: None. Jr. Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20593, or suspected terrorists before they Abstract: This proposed rule would Phone: 202 372–1151, Email: depart the United States. partially delay the effective date for the [email protected]. Summary of Legal Basis: Numerous final rule entitled ‘‘Transportation RIN: 1625–AC47 Federal statutes require DHS to create Worker Identification Credential (TWIC) an integrated, automated biometric Reader Requirements,’’ published in the entry and exit system that records the Federal Register on August 23, 2016. arrival and departure of aliens, DHS—U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER Currently, the final rule is scheduled to compares the biometric data of aliens to PROTECTION (USCBP) be implemented after the Department of verify their identity, and authenticates Homeland Security submits the report Final Rule Stage travel documents presented by such to Congress on the effectiveness of the aliens through the comparison of TWIC program, required by the 76. Collection of Biometric Data From biometric identifiers. See, e.g., Transportation Worker Identification Aliens Upon Entry To and Exit From Immigration and Naturalization Service Credential Security Card Program the United States Data Management Improvement Act of Improvements and Assessment Act Priority: Other Significant. 2002, the Intelligence Reform and

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00079 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57882 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, and Commission Act of 2007, for aliens who DHS—TRANSPORTATION SECURITY the 2016 Consolidated Appropriations intend to enter the United States under ADMINISTRATION (TSA) Act. In addition, Executive Order 13780, the Visa Waiver Program (VWP) at land Proposed Rule Stage Protecting the Nation from Foreign ports of entry. Currently, aliens from Terrorist Entry into the United States, VWP countries must provide certain 78. Vetting of Certain Surface states that DHS is to expedite the biographic information to U.S. Customs Transportation Employees completion and implementation of a and Border Protection (CBP) officers at Priority: Other Significant. Major biometric entry-exit tracking system. land ports of entry on a paper I–94W status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is Alternatives: Nonimmigrant Visa Waiver Arrival/ undetermined. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This Departure Record (Form I–94W). Under Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. rule will allow CBP to know with this rule, these VWP travelers will E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. greater certainty whether foreign visa instead provide this information to CBP Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 114; Pub. L. holders depart the country when electronically through ESTA prior to 110–53, secs. 1411, 1414, 1512, 1520, required. It will also prevent visa fraud application for admission to the United 1522, and 1531 and allow CBP to more easily identify States. DHS has already implemented CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined. criminals or terrorists when they the ESTA requirements for aliens who Legal Deadline: Other, Statutory, attempt to leave the country. The intend to enter the United States under August 3, 2008, Background and technology used to implement this rule the VWP at air or sea ports of entry. immigration status check for all public could also eventually be used to modify Statement of Need: This rule is transportation frontline employees is entry and exit procedures to reduce necessary to implement the Electronic due no later than 12 months after date processing and wait times. This rule System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) of enactment. imposes opportunity and technology under section 711 of the Implementing Other, Statutory, August 3, 2008, acquisition and maintenance costs on Recommendations of the 9/11 Background and immigration status CBP and opportunity costs on the Commission Act of 2007 for aliens who check for all railroad frontline traveling public. intend to enter the United States under employees is due no later than 12 Risks: the Visa Waiver Program at land ports months after date of enactment. Timetable: of entry. ESTA was implemented at air Sections 1411 and 1520 of Public Law and sea ports of entry in 2008. At that 110–53, Implementing Action Date FR Cite time, however, CBP did not have the Recommendations of the 9/11 ability to implement the program at land Interim Final Rule 12/00/18 Commission Act of 2007 (9/11 Act), ports of entry. This rule will ensure that (121 Stat. 266, Aug. 3, 2007), require Regulatory Flexibility Analysis ESTA is now implemented at all ports background checks of frontline public Required: Undetermined. of entry. transportation and railroad employees Government Levels Affected: Summary of Legal Basis: not later than one year from the date of Undetermined. Alternatives: enactment. Requirement will be met Federalism: Undetermined. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: In through regulatory action. Agency Contact: Michael Hardin, addition to fulfilling a statutory Abstract: The 9/11 Act requires Director, Department of Homeland mandate, the ESTA land rule will vetting of certain railroad, public Security, U.S. Customs and Border strengthen national security through transportation, and over-the-road bus Protection, Entry/Exit Policy and enhanced traveler vetting, streamline employees. Through this rulemaking, Planning, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue entry processing through Form I–94W the Transportation Security NW, Office of Field Operations, 5th automation, reduce inadmissible Administration (TSA) intends to Floor, Washington, DC 20229, Phone: traveler arrivals, and produce a propose the mechanisms and 202 325–1053, Email: michael.hardin@ consistent, modern VWP admission procedures to conduct the required cbp.dhs.gov. policy in all U.S. travel environments, vetting. This regulation is related to RIN: 1651–AB12 which will benefit VWP travelers, CBP, 1652–AA55, Security Training for and the public. The rule will also Surface Transportation Employees. introduce time and fee costs to VWP Statement of Need: Employee vetting travelers required to complete an ESTA is an important and effective tool for DHS—USCBP application. averting or mitigating potential attacks 77. Implementation of the Electronic Risks: by those with malicious intent who may System for Travel Authorization Timetable: target surface transportation and plan or (ESTA) at U.S. Land Borders— perpetrate actions that may cause Automation of CBP Form I–94W Action Date FR Cite significant injuries, loss of life, or economic disruption. Interim Final Rule 12/00/18 Priority: Other Significant. Summary of Legal Basis: E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. Alternatives: Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Legal Authority: Pub. L. 110–53 Anticipated Cost and Benefits: TSA is CFR Citation: 8 CFR 212.1; 8 CFR Required: No. in the process of determining the costs 217.2; 8 CFR 217.3; 8 CFR 217.5; 8 CFR Government Levels Affected: None. and benefits of this rulemaking. Agency Contact: Kenneth Sava, 286.9. Risks: Legal Deadline: None. Trusted Traveler Programs, Department Timetable: Abstract: This rule amends of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs Department of Homeland Security and Border Protection, Office of Field Action Date FR Cite (DHS) regulations to implement the Operations, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue Electronic System for Travel NW, Washington, DC 20229, Phone: 202 NPRM ...... 03/00/19 Authorization (ESTA) requirements 344–2589, Email: kenneth.c.sava@ under section 711 of the Implementing cbp.dhs.gov. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Recommendations of the 9/11 RIN: 1651–AB14 Required: Undetermined.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00080 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57883

Government Levels Affected: and intelligence, to enhance the DHS—TSA Undetermined. eligibility requirements and Final Rule Stage URL For More Information: disqualifying criminal offenses for www.regulations.gov. individuals seeking or having 80. Protection of Sensitive Security URL For Public Comments: unescorted access to any SIDA of an Information www.regulations.gov. airport. Consistent with the statutory Priority: Other Significant. Agency Contact: Chandru (Jack) Kalro, mandate, TSA will consider adding to E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. Deputy Director, Surface Division, the list of disqualifying criminal Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 114; 49 Department of Homeland Security, offenses and criteria, develop a waiver U.S.C. 40119; 49 U.S.C. 44905; 49 U.S.C. Transportation Security Administration, process for approving the issuance of 46105 Security Policy and Industry credentials for unescorted access, and CFR Citation: 49 CFR 15; 49 CFR Engagement, 601 South 12th Street, propose an extension of the look back 1520. Arlington, VA 20598–6028, Phone: 571 period for disqualifying crimes. Legal Deadline: None. 227–1145, Email: surfacefrontoffice@ Statement of Need: Employee vetting Abstract: In 2004, the Transportation tsa.dhs.gov. is an important and effective tool for Security Administration (TSA) and Alex Moscoso, Chief Economist, averting or mitigating potential attacks Office of the Secretary of Transportation Economic Analysis Branch—Cross by those with malicious intent who (OST) published an interim final rule Modal Division, Department of wish to target aviation and plan or (IFR) governing the protection of Homeland Security, Transportation perpetrate actions that may cause sensitive security information (SSI). See Security Administration, Security significant injuries, loss of life, or 49 CFR parts 15 (OST) and 1520 (TSA). Policy and Industry Engagement, 601 economic disruption. Enhancing Since that time, requirements for the South 12th Street, Arlington, VA 20598– eligibility standards for airport workers protection of SSI have been modified by 6028, Phone: 571 227–5839, Email: will improve transportation and a subsequent IFR (2005) and regulations [email protected]. national security. promulgated by the Department of Laura Gaudreau, Attorney—Advisor, Summary of Legal Basis: Transportation (DOT), TSA, and Regulations and Security Standards, Alternatives: Department of Homeland Security. Department of Homeland Security, Anticipated Cost and Benefits: TSA is These modifications have resulted in Transportation Security Administration, in the process of determining the costs inconsistencies between TSA and OST Chief Counsel’s Office, 601 South 12th and benefits of this rulemaking. regulations. TSA and OST are issuing a Street, Arlington, VA 20598–6002, Risks: final rule that will harmonize the Timetable: Phone: 571 227–1088, Email: regulations and reduce regulatory [email protected]. Action Date FR Cite burden through streamlining certain Related RIN: Related to 1652–AA55. requirements and eliminating others. RIN: 1652–AA69 NPRM ...... 08/00/19 Statement of Need: TSA’s SSI regulations were promulgated to meet a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis statutory requirement to protect DHS—TSA Required: Undetermined. information obtained or developed to Government Levels Affected: meet TSA’s security requirements. See 79. Amending Vetting Requirements for Undetermined. 49 U.S.C. 114(r). DOT has a Employees With Access to a Security Federalism: Undetermined. corresponding requirement under 49 Identification Display Area (SIDA) Agency Contact: Jason Hull, Aviation U.S.C. 40119(b). Due to amendments Priority: Other Significant. Major Program Manager, Department of made since the joint IFR was published status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is Homeland Security, Transportation in 2004, regulated parties must often undetermined. Security Administration, Intelligence consult multiple regulatory provisions Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. and Analysis, 601 South 12th Street, to determine their responsibilities. E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. Arlington, VA 20598–6010, Phone: 571 Harmonizing these regulations and Legal Authority: Pub. L. 114–190, sec. 227–1175, Email: jason.hull@ creating consistency between them will 3405 tsa.dhs.gov. ease the burden of compliance and CFR Citation: 49 CFR 1542.209; 49 Alex Moscoso, Chief Economist, ensure consistent application of the SSI CFR 1544.229. Economic Analysis Branch—Cross regulations by TSA and DOT. Further, Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, Modal Division, Department of TSA, in consultation with OST, is January 11, 2017, Rule for individuals Homeland Security, Transportation considering aligning the SSI with unescorted access to any Security Security Administration, Security requirements related to the names of Identification Display Area (SIDA) due Policy and Industry Engagement, 601 persons identified as current, past, or 180 days after date of enactment. South 12th Street, Arlington, VA 20598– applicants to be Federal Flight Deck According to section 3405 of title III 6028, Phone: 571 227–5839, Email: Officers (FFDOs) with the handling of of the FAA Extension, Safety, and [email protected]. Federal Air Marshals (FAMs). The Security Act of 2016 (FAA Extension Christine Beyer, Senior Counsel, modification to TSA’s SSI regulations Act), Public Law 114–190 (130 Stat. 615, Regulations and Security Standards, would protect lists of FFDO names, July 15, 2016), a final rule revising the Department of Homeland Security, rather than a single FFDO name, and regulations under 49 U.S.C. 44936 is Transportation Security Administration, reduce the overall number of documents due 180 days after the date of Chief Counsel’s Office, TSA–2, HQ, that are labeled SSI. enactment. E12–336N, 601 South 12th Street, Summary of Legal Basis: Abstract: As required by the FAA Arlington, VA 20598–6002, Phone: 571 Alternatives: Extension Act, the Transportation 227–3653, Email: christine.beyer@ Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Security Administration (TSA) will tsa.dhs.gov. final rule does not impose any new propose a rule to revise its regulations, Related RIN: Related to 1652–AA11 requirements. In addition to clarifying with current knowledge of insider threat RIN: 1652–AA70 and harmonizing requirements, the rule

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00081 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57884 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

reduces regulatory burden by providing URL For Public Comments: interpretations in response to comments options for the SSI distribution www.regulations.gov. on the IFR and questions raised during statement. In addition, should TSA Agency Contact: Holly Dickens, operation of the program since 2004. modify the regulations to handle FFDO Senior Policy Analyst, Sensitive TSA also issued a fee notice on April names consistent with FAM names, it Security Information (SSI) Program, 13, 2009. This regulation requires flight would result in a time savings and Department of Homeland Security, schools to notify TSA when aliens, and corresponding reduction in regulatory Transportation Security Administration, other individuals designated by TSA, burden: Eliminating time that would Security Services & Assessments, LE/ apply for flight training or recurrent otherwise be spent marking these FAMS, 601 South 12th Street, training. TSA is considering a final rule documents SSI (industry) and reviewing Arlington, VA 20598–6018, Phone: 571 that would change the frequency of these documents to ensure they are 227–3723, Email: [email protected]. security threat assessments from a high- appropriately marked (TSA). Alex Moscoso, Chief Economist, frequency event-based interval to a Risks: Economic Analysis Branch—Cross time-based interval, clarify the Timetable: Modal Division, Department of definitions and other provisions of the Homeland Security, Transportation rule, and enable industry to use TSA- Action Date FR Cite Security Administration, Security provided electronic recordkeeping Policy and Industry Engagement, 601 systems for all documents required to Interim Final Rule; 05/18/04 69 FR 28066 South 12th Street, Arlington, VA 20598– demonstrate compliance with the rule. Request for 6028, Phone: 571 227–5839, Email: Statement of Need: In the years since Comments. [email protected]. TSA published the IFR, members of the Interim Final Rule 06/17/04 Laura Gaudreau, Attorney–Advisor, aviation industry, the public, and Effective. Regulations and Security Standards, Federal oversight organizations have Interim Final Rule; 07/19/04 identified areas where the Alien Flight Comment Pe- Department of Homeland Security, riod End. Transportation Security Administration, Student Program (AFSP) could be Final Rule; Tech- 01/07/05 70 FR 1379 Chief Counsel’s Office, 601 South 12th improved. TSA’s internal procedures nical Amend- Street, Arlington, VA 20598–6002, and processes for vetting applicants also ment. Phone: 571 227–1088, Email: have improved and advanced. Final Rule; Tech- 01/07/05 [email protected]. Publishing a final rule that addresses nical Amdt Ef- Related RIN: Related to 1652–AA05, external recommendations and aligns fective. Related to 1652–AA49 with modern TSA vetting practices Notice-Information 11/01/06 71 FR 64288 RIN: 1652–AA08 would streamline the AFSP application, Collection; vetting, and recordkeeping process for Emergency Ap- proval. all parties involved. Summary of Legal Basis: Notice-Information 02/04/07 72 FR 7059 DHS—TSA Collection; 60- Alternatives: Day Renewal. 81. Flight Training for Aliens and Other Anticipated Cost and Benefits: TSA is Notice-Information 06/18/07 72 FR 33511 Designated Individuals; Security considering revising the requirements of Collection; 30- Awareness Training for Flight School the AFSP to reduce costs and industry Day Renewal. Employees burden. One action TSA is considering Notice-Information 08/03/10 75 FR 44974 is an electronic recordkeeping platform Collection; 60- Priority: Other Significant. where all flight providers would upload Day Renewal. E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. certain information to a TSA-managed Notice-Information 10/15/10 75 FR 63499 Legal Authority: 6 U.S.C. 469(b); 49 website. Also at industry’s request, TSA Collection; 30- U.S.C. 114; 49 U.S.C. 44939; 49 U.S.C. is considering changing the interval for Day Renewal. 46105 a security threat assessment of each Notice-Information 08/16/13 78 FR 50076 CFR Citation: 49 CFR 1552. Collection; 60- alien flight student, eliminating the Day Renewal. Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, requirement for a security threat Notice-Information 01/15/14 79 FR 2679 February 10, 2004, sec. 612(a) of Vision assessment for each separate training Collection; 30- 100 requires TSA to issue an interim event. This change would result in an Day Renewal. final rule within 60 days of enactment annual savings, although there may be Notice-Information 11/25/16 81 FR 85243 of Vision 100. additional start-up and record retention Collection; 60- Requires the Transportation Security costs for the agency as a result of these Day Revision. Administration (TSA) to establish a revisions. The benefits of these Notice-Information 06/16/17 82 FR 27852 process to implement the requirements deregulatory actions would be Collection; 30- of section 612(a) of Vision 100—Century Day Revision. immediate cost savings to flight schools Final Rule ...... 12/00/18 of Aviation Reauthorization Act (Pub. L. and alien students without 108–176, 117 Stat. 2490, Dec. 12, 2003), compromising the security profile. including the fee provisions, not later Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Risks: than 60 days after the enactment of the Required: No. Timetable: Act. Small Entities Affected: No. Abstract: The interim final rule (IFR) Action Date FR Cite Government Levels Affected: Federal. was published and effective on Additional Information: Joint September 20, 2004. The IFR created a Interim Final Rule; 09/20/04 69 FR 56324 rulemaking with Department of new part 1552, Flight Schools, in title Request for Transportation, Office of the Secretary Comments. 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations Interim Final Rule 09/20/04 (RIN No. 2105–AD59) Transferred from (CFR). This IFR applies to flight schools Effective. RIN 2110–AA10. and to individuals who apply for or Interim Final Rule; 10/20/04 URL For More Information: receive flight training. TSA Comment Pe- www.regulations.gov. subsequently issued exemptions and riod End.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00082 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57885

Action Date FR Cite Phone: 571 227–2465, Email: transportation systems) to include the [email protected]. bus components of higher-risk public Notice-Information 11/26/04 69 FR 68952 Related RIN: Related to 1652–AA61 transportation systems and higher-risk Collection; 60- RIN: 1652–AA35 OTRB companies. TSA is also adding a Day Renewal. definition for Transportation Security- Notice-Information 03/30/05 70 FR 16298 Sensitive Materials (TSSM). Other Collection; 30- provisions are being amended or added, Day Renewal. DHS—TSA Notice-Information 06/06/08 73 FR 32346 as necessary, to implement these Collection; 60- 82. Security Training for Surface additional requirements. Day Renewal. Transportation Employees Statement of Need: Employee training Notice-Information 08/13/08 73 FR 47203 Priority: Other Significant. Major is an important and effective tool for averting or mitigating potential attacks Collection; 30- under 5 U.S.C. 801. Day Renewal. by those with malicious intent who may E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. Notice-Alien Flight 04/13/09 74 FR 16880 target surface transportation and plan or Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 114; Pub. L. Student Pro- perpetrate actions that may cause 110–53, secs. 1405, 1408, 1501, 1512, gram Recurrent significant injuries, loss of life, or 1517, 1531, and 1534. Training Fees. economic disruption. Notice-Information 09/21/11 76 FR 58531 CFR Citation: 49 CFR 1500; 49 CFR Summary of Legal Basis: 49 U.S.C. Collection; 60- 1520; 49 CFR 1570; 49 CFR 1580; 49 Day Renewal. 114; sections 1402, 1408, 1501, 1517, CFR 1582 (new); 49 CFR 1584 (new). 1531, and 1534 of Public Law 110–53, Notice-Information 01/31/12 77 FR 4822 Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, Collection; 30- Implementing Recommendations of the November 1, 2007, Interim Rule for 9/11 Commission Act of 2007 (121 Stat. Day Renewal. public transportation agencies is due 90 Notice-Information 03/10/15 80 FR 12647 266, Aug. 3, 2007). Collection; 60- days after date of enactment. Alternatives: TSA is required by Day Renewal. Final, Statutory, August 3, 2008, Rule statute to publish regulations requiring Notice-Information 06/18/15 80 FR 34927 for public transportation agencies is due security training programs for these Collection; 30- one year after date of enactment. owner/operators. As part of its notice of Day Renewal. Final, Statutory, February 3, 2008, proposed rulemaking, TSA sought IFR; Comment 05/18/18 83 FR 23238 Rule for railroads and over-the-road public comment on alternatives in Period Re- buses is due 6 months after date of opened. which the final rule could carry out the enactment. requirements of the statute. IFR; Comment 06/18/18 According to sec. 1408 of Public Law Period Re- Anticipated Cost and Benefits: opened End. 110–53, Implementing Owner/operators will incur costs for Notice-Information 07/06/18 83 FR 31561 Recommendations of the 9/11 training their employees, developing a Collection; 60- Commission Act of 2007 (9/11 Act), training plan, maintaining training Day Renewal. (121 Stat. 266, Aug. 3, 2007), interim records, and participating in inspections Final Rule ...... 02/00/19 final regulations for public for compliance. Some owner/operators transportation agencies are due 90 days will also incur additional costs Regulatory Flexibility Analysis after the date of enactment (Nov. 1, associated with assigning security Required: No. 2007), and final regulations are due one coordinators and reporting significant Government Levels Affected: None. year after the date of enactment. security incidents to TSA. TSA will URL For More Information: According to sec. 1517 of the 9/11 Act, incur costs associated with reviewing www.regulations.gov. final regulations for railroads and over- owner/operators’ training plans, URL For Public Comments: the-road buses are due no later than 6 registering owner/operators’ security www.regulations.gov. months after the date of enactment. coordinators, responding to owner/ Agency Contact: Johannes Knudsen, Abstract: The 9/11 Act requires operators’ reported significant security Program Manager, Alien Flight Student security training for employees of incidents, and conducting inspections Program, Department of Homeland higher-risk freight railroad carriers, for compliance with this rule. In the Security, Transportation Security public transportation agencies NPRM, TSA estimated the annualized Administration, Intelligence and (including rail mass transit and bus cost from this regulation to be Analysis, 601 South 12th Street, systems), passenger railroad carriers, approximately $22 million, discounted Arlington, VA 20598–6010, Phone: 571 and over-the-road bus (OTRB) at 7 percent. As part of TSA’s risk-based 227–2188, Email: johannes.knudsen@ companies. This final rule implements security, benefits include mitigating tsa.dhs.gov. the regulatory mandate. Owner/ potential attacks by heightening Alex Moscoso, Chief Economist, operators of these higher-risk railroads, awareness of employees on the Economic Analysis Branch—Cross systems, and companies will be frontline. In addition, by designating Modal Division, Department of required to train employees performing security coordinators and reporting Homeland Security, Transportation security-sensitive functions, using a significant security concerns to TSA, Security Administration, Security curriculum addressing preparedness TSA has a direct line for communicating Policy and Industry Engagement, 601 and how to observe, assess, and respond threats and receiving information South 12th Street, Arlington, VA 20598– to terrorist-related threats and/or necessary to analyze trends and 6028, Phone: 571 227–5839, Email: incidents. As part of this rulemaking, potential threats across all modes of [email protected]. the Transportation Security transportation. David Ross, Attorney-Advisor, Administration (TSA) is expanding its Risks: The Department of Homeland Regulations and Security Standards, current requirements for rail security Security aims to prevent terrorist attacks Department of Homeland Security, coordinators and reporting of significant within the United States and to reduce Transportation Security Administration, security concerns (currently limited to the vulnerability of the United States to Chief Counsel’s Office, 601 South 12th freight railroads, passenger railroads, terrorism. By providing for security Street, Arlington, VA 20598–6002, and the rail operations of public training for personnel, TSA intends in

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00083 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57886 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

this rulemaking to reduce the risk of a Legal Deadline: None. concerning its enforcement. Through terrorist attack on this transportation Abstract: In 1985, a class-action suit this rule, DHS, HHS, and DOJ will sector. challenged the policies of the former create a pathway to ensure the humane Timetable: Immigration and Naturalization Service detention of family units while (INS) relating to the detention, satisfying the goals of the FSA. The rule Action Date FR Cite processing, and release of alien will also implement related provisions children; the case eventually reached of the TVPRA. Notice; Request 06/14/13 78 FR 35945 the U.S. Supreme Court. The Court Summary of Legal Basis: for Comment. upheld the constitutionality of the Notice; Comment 07/15/13 challenged INS regulations on their face Alternatives: Prior to proposing this Period End. rule, DHS considered the alternative to NPRM ...... 12/16/16 81 FR 91336 and remanded the case for further NPRM Comment 03/16/17 proceedings consistent with its opinion. publishing this rule, which was not to Period End. In January 1997, the parties reached a promulgate regulations. This has Final Rule ...... 11/00/18 comprehensive settlement agreement, required the Government to adhere to referred to as the Flores Settlement the terms of the FSA, as interpreted by Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Agreement (FSA). The FSA was to the courts, which also rejected the Required: Yes. terminate five years after the date of Government’s efforts to amend the FSA Small Entities Affected: Businesses. final court approval; however, the to help it better conform to existing legal Government Levels Affected: Local. termination provisions were modified in and operational realities. URL For More Information: 2001, such that the FSA does not The primary source of new costs for www.regulations.gov. terminate until 45 days after publication the proposed rule would be a result of URL For Public Comments: of regulations implementing the the proposed alternative licensing www.regulations.gov. agreement. process, which ICE expects to extend Agency Contact: Chandru (Jack) Kalro, Since 1997, intervening statutory detention of some minors and their Deputy Director, Surface Division, changes, including passage of the accompanying parent or legal guardian Department of Homeland Security, Homeland Security Act (HSA) and the Transportation Security Administration, William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims in FRCs. This may increase variable Security Policy and Industry Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 annual FRC costs paid by ICE. The Engagement, 601 South 12th Street, (TVPRA), have significantly changed the primary benefit of the proposed rule Arlington, VA 20598–6028, Phone: 571 applicability of certain provisions of the would be to ensure that applicable 227–1145, Email: surfacefrontoffice@ FSA. The rule would codify the relevant regulations reflect the Departments’ tsa.dhs.gov. and substantive terms of the FSA and current operations with respect to Alex Moscoso, Chief Economist, enable the U.S. Government to seek minors and UACs in accordance with Economic Analysis Branch—Cross termination of the FSA and litigation the relevant and substantive terms of the Modal Division, Department of concerning its enforcement. Through FSA and the TVPRA. Further, by Homeland Security, Transportation this rule, DHS, HHS, and DOJ will departing from the FSA in limited cases Security Administration, Security create a pathway to ensure the humane to reflect the intervening statutory and Policy and Industry Engagement, 601 detention of family units while operational changes, ICE will ensure South 12th Street, Arlington, VA 20598– satisfying the goals of the FSA. The rule that it retains discretion to detain 6028, Phone: 571 227–5839, Email: will also implement related provisions families, as appropriate, to meet its [email protected]. of the TVPRA. enforcement needs. Traci Klemm, Assistant Chief Statement of Need: In 1985, a class- Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Counsel, Regulations and Security action suit challenged the policies of the primary source of new costs for the Standards, Department of Homeland former INS relating to the detention, proposed rule would be a result of the Security, Transportation Security processing, and release of alien proposed alternative licensing process Administration, Chief Counsel’s Office, children; the case eventually reached which ICE expects to extend detention 601 South 12th Street, Arlington, VA the U.S. Supreme Court. The Court of some minors and their accompanying 20598–6002, Phone: 571 227–3596, upheld the constitutionality of the parent or legal guardian in Family Email: [email protected]. challenged INS regulations on their face Residential Centers (FRCs). This may Related RIN: Related to 1652–AA56, and remanded the case for further increase variable annual FRC costs paid Merged with 1652–AA57, Merged with proceedings consistent with its opinion. by ICE. The primary benefit of the rule 1652–AA59 In January 1997, the parties reached a would be to ensure that applicable RIN: 1652–AA55 comprehensive settlement agreement, regulations reflect the Department’s referred to as the FSA. The FSA was to current operations with respect to terminate 5 years after the date of final minors and Unaccompanied Minor court approval; however, the Children (UACs) in accordance with the DHS—U.S. IMMIGRATION AND termination provisions were modified in CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (USICE) relevant and substantive terms of the 2001, such that the FSA does not Flores Settlement Agreement (FSA) and Proposed Rule Stage terminate until 45 days after publication the Trafficking Victims Protection of regulations implementing the 83. Apprehension, Processing, Care and Reauthorization Act (TVPRA). Further, agreement. by departing from the FSA in limited Custody of Alien Minors and Since 1997, intervening legal changes Unaccompanied Alien Children cases to reflect the intervening statutory including passage of the HSA and and operational changes, ICE will Priority: Other Significant. TVPRA have significantly changed the ensure that it retains discretion to detain E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. applicability of certain provisions of the families, as appropriate, to meet its Legal Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1103; 8 FSA. The rule will codify the relevant enforcement needs. U.S.C. 1182; 8 U.S.C. 1225 to 1227; 8 and substantive terms of the FSA and U.S.C. 1362 enable the U.S. Government to seek Risks: CFR Citation: 8 CFR 236; 8 CFR 208. termination of the FSA and litigation Timetable:

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00084 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57887

Action Date FR Cite student overstays and improve the Summary of Legal Basis: integrity of the nonimmigrant student Alternatives: NPRM ...... 09/07/18 83 FR 45486 visa. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: To NPRM Comment 11/06/18 Risks: recover the full cost of its budget for the Period End. Timetable: services it provides, SEVP has proposed to increase the amounts of its fees for Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Action Date FR Cite SEVP certified schools and for those Required: Yes. NPRM ...... 09/00/19 schools that will seek SEVP Small Entities Affected: Businesses, certification, for F and M nonimmigrant Organizations. students, and for J nonimmigrant Government Levels Affected: None. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis exchange visitors. The fee adjustment Agency Contact: Mark Lawyer, Chief, Required: Undetermined. would allow SEVP to continue to Regulations, Department of Homeland Government Levels Affected: None. maintain and improve SEVIS in order to Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Agency Contact: Mark Lawyer, Chief, uphold the integrity of the U.S. Enforcement, 500 12th Street SW, Mail Regulations, Department of Homeland immigration laws regarding student and Stop 5006, Washington, DC 20536, Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs exchange visitors. Phone: 202 732–5683, Email: Enforcement, 500 12th Street SW, Mail Risks: [email protected]. Stop 5006, Washington, DC 20536, Related RIN: Related to 0970–AC42. Phone: 202 732–5683, Email: Timetable: RIN: 1653–AA75 [email protected]. RIN: 1653–AA78 Action Date FR Cite NPRM ...... 07/17/18 83 FR 33762 DHS—USICE NPRM Comment 09/17/18 DHS—USICE Period End. 84. • Establishing a Maximum Period of Final Rule ...... 03/00/19 Authorized Stay for F–1 and Other Final Rule Stage Nonimmigrants 85. Adjusting Program Fees for the Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Priority: Other Significant. Student and Exchange Visitor Program Required: Yes. Small Entities Affected: Businesses, E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. Priority: Other Significant. Legal Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101; 8 E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. Organizations. U.S.C. 1103; 8 U.S.C. 1182; 8 U.S.C. Legal Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1372; 8 Government Levels Affected: None. 1184 U.S.C. 1762; 8 U.S.C. 1101; 8 U.S.C. URL For More Information: CFR Citation: 8 CFR 214; 8 CFR 274a. 1356; 31 U.S.C 901 to 903; 31 U.S.C. 902 www.regulations.gov. Legal Deadline: None. CFR Citation: 8 CFR 214. URL For Public Comments: Abstract: U.S. Immigration and Legal Deadline: None. www.regulations.gov. Customs Enforcement (ICE) will propose Abstract: ICE will publish a final rule Agency Contact: Sharon Snyder, Unit to modify the period of authorized stay to adjust fees that the Student and Chief, Policy and Response Unit, for certain categories of nonimmigrants Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) Department of Homeland Security, U.S. traveling to the United States from charges individuals and organizations. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, ‘‘duration of status’’ (D/S) and to replace In 2017, SEVP conducted a Potomac Center North STOP 5600, 500 such with a maximum period of comprehensive fee study and 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20536– authorized stay, and options for determined that current fees do not 5600, Phone: 703 603–5600. extensions, for each applicable visa recover the full costs of the services RIN: 1653–AA74 category. provided. ICE has determined that Statement of Need: The failure to adjusting fees is necessary to fully recover the increased costs of SEVP provide certain categories of DHS—FEDERAL EMERGENCY operations, program requirements, and nonimmigrants with specific dates for MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA) their authorized periods of stay can to provide the necessary funding to cause confusion over how long they sustain initiatives critical to supporting Final Rule Stage national security. The final rule will may lawfully remain in the United 86. Factors Considered When adjust fees for individuals and States and has complicated the efforts to Evaluating a Governor’s Request for organizations. The SEVP fee schedule reduce overstay rates for nonimmigrant Individual Assistance for a Major was last adjusted in a rule published on students. The clarity created by date- Disaster certain admissions will help reduce the September 26, 2008. overstay rate. Statement of Need: The Student and Priority: Other Significant. Summary of Legal Basis: Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) E.O. 13771 Designation: Fully or Alternatives: conducted a comprehensive fee study in Partially Exempt. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: ICE is 2017 and determined that current fees, Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 5121 to in the process of assessing the costs and most recently adjusted in 2008, do not 5207 benefits that would be incurred by recover the full costs of the services CFR Citation: 44 CFR 206.48(b). regulated entities and individuals, as provided. ICE has determined that Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, well as the costs and benefits to the adjusting fees is necessary to fully January 29, 2014, sec. 1109 of the Sandy public at large. ICE, SEVP certified recover the increased costs of SEVP Recovery Improvement Act of 2013, schools, nonimmigrant students, and operations, program requirements, and Public Law 113–2. the employers of nonimmigrant students to provide the necessary funding to The Sandy Recovery Improvement who participate in practical training implement and sustain initiatives Act of 2013 (SRIA) requires the would incur costs for increased critical to supporting national security. Administrator of the Federal Emergency requirements. This rule is intended to ICE will publish a final rule to adjust its Management Agency (FEMA), in decrease the incidence of nonimmigrant fees for individuals and organizations. cooperation with representatives of

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00085 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57888 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

State, Tribal, and local emergency factors would have small burden rulemaking. It removes sections that are management agencies, to review, increases associated with obtaining the outdated or do not affect the public, and update, and revise through rulemaking additional information. FEMA does not it updates provisions that affect the the individual assistance factors FEMA anticipate the rule would impact the public’s participation in the rulemaking uses to measure the severity, magnitude, number of major disaster declaration process, such as the submission of and impact of a disaster (not later than requests received that include IA or the public comments, hearings, ex parte 1 year after enactment). amount of IA assistance provided, and communications, the public rulemaking Abstract: FEMA is issuing a final rule therefore there would be no impact to docket, and petitions for rulemaking. to revise its regulations to comply with transfer payments. FEMA also modifies its waiver of the section 1109 of SRIA. SRIA requires FEMA estimated the 10-year present Administrative Procedure Act FEMA, in cooperation with State, local, value total cost of the proposed rule exemption for matters relating to public and Tribal emergency management would be $15,806 and $13,302 if property, loans, grants, benefits, and agencies, to review, update, and revise discounted at 3 and 7 percent, contracts. through rulemaking the Individual respectively. The annualized cost of the Statement of Need: This final rule Assistance (IA) factors FEMA uses to proposed rule would be $1,853 at 3 removes sections of FEMA’s rulemaking measure the severity, magnitude, and percent and $1,894 at 7 percent. (All provisions that are outdated or that do impact of a disaster. FEMA published a amounts in the NPRM are presented in not affect the public, and updates Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on the 2013 dollars.) Benefits of the proposed provisions that affect the public’s matter on November 12, 2015. rule include clarifying FEMA’s existing participation in the rulemaking process. Statement of Need: On January 29, practices, reducing processing time for Summary of Legal Basis: 2013, SRIA was enacted into law (Pub. requests due to clarifications, and Alternatives: L. 113–2). Section 1109 of SRIA requires providing States with notice of the new Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This FEMA, in cooperation with State, local, information FEMA is proposing to rule does not impose additional direct and Tribal emergency management consider as part of the IA declarations costs on the public or government. agencies, to review, update, and revise process. Risks: through rulemaking the factors found at Risks: Timetable: 44 CFR 206.48 that FEMA uses to Timetable: determine whether to recommend Action Date FR Cite provision of Individual Assistance (IA) Action Date FR Cite during a major disaster. These factors NPRM ...... 06/07/17 82 FR 26411 help FEMA measure the severity, NPRM ...... 11/12/15 80 FR 70116 NPRM Comment 08/07/17 magnitude, and impact of a disaster, as NPRM Comment 01/11/16 Period End. well as the capabilities of the affected Period End. Final Rule ...... 12/00/18 jurisdictions. Final Rule ...... 12/00/18 FEMA is issuing this final rule to Regulatory Flexibility Analysis comply with SRIA and to provide Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No. clarity on the IA factors that FEMA Required: No. Small Entities Affected: No. currently considers in support of its Small Entities Affected: No. Government Levels Affected: None. recommendation to the President on Government Levels Affected: Federal, Additional Information: Docket ID whether a major disaster declaration State, Tribal. FEMA–2017–0016. authorizing IA is warranted. The Additional Information: Docket ID URL For More Information: additional clarity may reduce delays in FEMA–2014–0005. www.regulations.gov. the declaration process by decreasing URL For More Information: URL For Public Comments: the back and forth between States and www.regulations.gov. www.regulations.gov. FEMA during the declaration process. URL For Public Comments: Agency Contact: Liza Davis, Associate Summary of Legal Basis: FEMA has www.regulations.gov. Chief Counsel, Regulatory Affairs, authority for this final rule pursuant to Agency Contact: Mark Millican, Department of Homeland Security, the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief Individual Assistance Division, Federal Emergency Management and Emergency Assistance Act (Stafford Department of Homeland Security, Agency, 500 C Street SW, 8th Floor, Act). 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. Section 401 Federal Emergency Management Washington, DC 20472, Phone: 202 646– of the Stafford Act lays out the Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, 4046, Email: [email protected]. procedures for a declaration for FEMA’s DC 20472–3100, Phone: 202 212–3221, RIN: 1660–AA91 Email: fema-ia-regulations@ major disaster assistance programs BILLING CODE: 9110–9B–P when a catastrophe occurs in a State. fema.dhs.gov. The specific changes in this final rule RIN: 1660–AA83 comply with section 1109 of SRIA, Public Law 113–2. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Alternatives: DHS—FEMA Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Fall 2018 Statement of Regulatory 87. Update to FEMA’s Regulations on 2015 NPRM proposed to codify current Priorities for Fiscal Year 2019 declaration considerations and Rulemaking Procedures Introduction introduced new factors that FEMA Priority: Other Significant. would use when reviewing and E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. The Regulatory Plan for the recommending a major disaster Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 553 Department of Housing and Urban declaration request that includes IA. CFR Citation: 44 CFR 1. Development (HUD) for Fiscal Year (FY) Codifying the factors that capture Legal Deadline: None. 2019 highlights the most significant FEMA’s current declaration practice and Abstract: The Federal Emergency regulations and policy initiatives that considerations would not result in Management Agency (FEMA) proposed HUD seeks to complete during the additional costs. However, the new to revise its regulations pertaining to upcoming fiscal year. As the Federal

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57889

agency that serves as the nation’s Streamlining the ‘‘Section 3’’ development assistance provided housing agency, HUD is committed to Requirements for Creating Economic pursuant to section 5 of the U.S. addressing the housing needs of all Opportunities for Low- and Very Low- Housing Act of 1937 (1937 Act) and Americans by creating strong, Income Persons and Eligible operating and capital fund assistance sustainable, inclusive communities, and Businesses: Deregulation provided pursuant to section 9 of the quality affordable homes. As a result, The purpose of Section 3 is to ensure 1937 Act; and (2) Section 3 projects, HUD plays a significant role in the lives that employment, training, contracting, which covers (a) housing rehabilitation, of families and in communities and other economic opportunities housing construction and other public throughout America. generated by certain HUD financial construction projects funded with HUD assistance are directed to low- and very program assistance, when such HUD is currently working to develop cumulative assistance to a jurisdiction an innovative approach that anticipates low-income persons, particularly those who are recipients of government exceeds a $200,000 threshold; and (b) the housing needs of the future while housing rehabilitation or construction assistance for housing, and to addressing current needs. HUD’s 2018– projects that include multiple funding businesses that provide economic 2022 strategic plan focuses on sources, one or more of which is opportunities to low- and very low- rethinking American communities by associated with Section 3 requirements. income persons. HUD’s current refocusing on HUD’s core mission and HUD would also update the $200,000 regulations for Section 3 have not been cumulative assistance threshold for modernizing HUD’s approach, updated in over 20 years. HUD’s Section 3 projects applicability to leveraging private-sector partnerships, experience in administering Section 3 encompass a narrower scope. HUD supporting sustainable homeownership, over time has provided insight as to believes that this change would reduce encouraging affordable housing how HUD could improve the the burden on smaller projects. investments, and redesigning HUD’s effectiveness of its Section 3 regulations. internal processes. HUD’s regulatory In addition, HUD’s proposed rule Additionally, HUD has heard from the would change the process for meeting a plan for FY2019 reflects Secretary public that there is a need for regulatory safe harbor for compliance with the Carson’s strategic plan and HUD’s changes to clarify and simplify the Section 3 requirements and reporting of mission. existing requirements. HUD concluded Section 3 data. HUD’s current In addition to the highlighted rule in that regulatory changes are needed to regulations provide for a safe harbor this plan, Secretary Carson directed streamline Section 3 and more where recipients demonstrate HUD, consistent with Executive Order effectively help recipients of HUD funds compliance with Section 3 by meeting 13771, entitled ‘‘Reducing Regulation achieve the purposes of the Section 3 numerical goals for the percentage of and Controlling Regulatory Costs,’’ to statute. HUD’s proposed rule would their new hires that qualify as Section identify and eliminate or streamline update the regulations implementing 3 residents. In addition to hiring Section Section 3 by aligning the reporting with regulations that are wasteful, inefficient 3 workers generally, the Section 3 standard business practice; amending or unnecessary. The Secretary has also statute directs for recipients of Section the applicability section; updating led HUD’s implementation of Executive 3 covered assistance to target their reporting and adding new outcome Order 13777, entitled ‘‘Enforcing the efforts to provide employment and benchmarks; and integrating Section 3 economic opportunities to specific Regulatory Reform Agenda.’’ Executive into program enforcement. Order 13777 supplements and reaffirms groups of low-income individuals. The new rule generally proposes the HUD’s proposed rule would create two the rulemaking principles of Executive tracking and reporting of labor hours, ‘‘Targeted Section 3 Worker’’ definitions Order 13771 by directing each agency to rather than new hires. HUD believes that would track, according to the type establish a Regulatory Reform Task that this is more consistent with the of funding source, the numbers of Force to evaluate existing regulations to business practices of most HUD Section 3 workers who are (a) reported identify those that merit repeal, recipients, which already track labor by Section 3 business concerns, or (b) replacement, or modification; are hours in their payroll systems because represent the priority categories outdated, unnecessary, or ineffective; they are subject to prevailing wage rates included in the statute and selected by eliminate or inhibit job creation; impose under the Davis-Bacon Act of 1931, or HUD, i.e., housing project residents. The costs that exceed benefits; or derive HUD prevailing wage requirements. A proposed new rule would also require from or implement Executive Orders labor-hours frame-work focuses on the that recipients report the labor hours that have been rescinded or significantly outcome that Section 3 requirements are performed by Section 3 Workers as a modified. As a result of Secretary’s intended to promote, i.e., increasing the percentage of the total labor hours, and Carson’s direction, HUD’s Fall 2019 amount of paid employment and work labor hours performed by Targeted Unified Agenda of Regulatory and experience for low-income persons. Section 3 Workers as a percentage of the Deregulatory Actions lists two Tracking labor hours creates incentives total labor hours. anticipated regulatory actions and for employers to retain and invest in Using the new reporting metrics, HUD twelve deregulatory actions. their low-income workers by removing would set benchmarks for the safe the opportunity for employers to harbor through Federal Register notice, The rules highlighted in HUD’s manipulate HUD’s current regulations so HUD can update the metrics in regulatory plan for FY2019 reflects by hiring the same employee for several response to additional data. It would HUD’s efforts to develop innovative short, temporary jobs over the course of also ensure that recipients hire workers approaches that anticipate the housing a reporting period. from the priority groups, consistent with needs of the future, including the This proposed rule would maintain the statute. As HUD gathers data under removal or revision of regulations that the statutory scope of applicability the new rule, HUD can more easily HUD has determined are outdated, while providing separate subparts revise benchmark figures or tailor unnecessary, or ineffective. relating to the different types of funding different benchmarks for different sources that have associated Section 3 geographies and different funding types. requirements: (1) Public housing If a recipient is complying with the financial assistance, which covers statutory priorities and meeting the

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00087 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57890 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

outcome benchmarks, HUD would costly requirements. The rule retains the authority to intervene in the case of presume they are exerting the statutorily those requirements that are necessary to misconduct or unacceptable prescribed level of effort. Otherwise, the fulfill HUD’s duty to avoid excessive performance. Ensuring that Direct recipients would be required to submit risk to the insurance fund but does so Endorsement mortgagees have staff qualitative reports on their efforts, as in a less prescriptive way. This should members with relevant condominium they are required to do under the result in increasing FHA participation experience helps to mitigate risks to the current rule when they do not meet the in the condominium market and make insurance fund. safe harbor, and HUD may do more in- condominiums more widely available. Aggregate Costs and Benefits depth compliance reviews. PHAs with Condominium units are a valuable fewer than 250 units would only be source of homeownership for moderate Executive Order 12866, as amended, required to report on Section 3 and lower-income families. requires the agency to provide its best qualitative efforts and would not be To provide for flexibility the rule estimate of the combined aggregate costs required to report on whether they have would remove strict numeric and benefits of all regulations included met the reporting benchmarks. requirements in favor of provisions that in the agency’s Regulatory Plan that will Lastly, HUD’s proposal would provide permit HUD to act within ranges. be pursued in FY 2018. HUD expects that program staff would incorporate Specifically, where the Guide currently that the neither the total economic costs Section 3 compliance and oversight into has strict numerical requirements nor the total efficiency gains will exceed regular program oversight and make regarding the allowable percentage of $100 million. Section 3 a more integral part of the FHA-insured projects, the percentage of Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing: program office’s work. As a result, this owner occupants, and the amount of Streamlining and Enhancements proposed rule would streamline the space that can be used for commercial extensive complaint and compliance or nonresidential purposes, the final On July 16, 2015, HUD published in review procedures in the current rule. rule would make these percentages the Federal Register its Affirmatively Relatedly, it would remove the flexible and efficient to change, so that Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) final delegation of authority in the current HUD can adjust to changing market rule. The goal of the regulation was to regulations, as Section 3 requirements, conditions. HUD anticipates providing provide HUD program participants with reporting, and compliance activities for the ability to change these threshold a revised planning approach to assist would be aligned with those of the percentages by notice, rather than them in meeting their statutory applicable HUD program office or regulation, the rule would allow HUD to obligation to affirmatively further the offices. quickly adjust these percentages to be purposes and policies of the Fair HUD envisions this rule being responsive to the market. There is also Housing Act. The principal AFFH completed in FY 2019. a provision for HUD to grant exceptions regulations are codified in 24 CFR part to these percentages on a case-by-case 5, subpart A, with other AFFH related Aggregate Costs and Benefits basis, considering factors relating to the regulations codified in 24 CFR parts 91, Executive Order 12866, as amended, economy for the locality in which the 92, 570, 574, 576, and 903. HUD is requires the agency to provide its best project is located or specific to the committed to its mission of achieving estimate of the combined aggregate costs project. The percentage range limits fair housing opportunity for all, and benefits of all regulations included themselves may be changed by regardless of race, color, religion, in the agency’s Regulatory Plan that will publishing a notice for a brief period of national origin, sex, disability, or be pursued in FY 2019. HUD expects public comment. familial status. However, HUD’s that the neither the total economic costs The final rule would also allow for experience over the three years since the nor the total efficiency gains will exceed single units to be approved for mortgage newly-specified approach was $100 million. insurance outside of the project promulgated demonstrates that the rule approval process. Unlike the Guide that is not fulfilling its purpose to be an Project Approval for Single-Family does not provide a provision for efficient means for guiding meaningful Condominiums insuring mortgages on units other than action by program participants. This rule would codify HUD’s in an approved project, this rule Under the AFFH rule, HUD program program to approve condominium recognizes that there may be situations participants are required to use an projects for FHA insurance pursuant to where a project may not be approved, Assessment Tool to conduct and submit 12 U.S.C. 1707(a), as amended by not because of any significant inherent an Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH) to section 2117 of the Housing and problem with the project that creates HUD. Because of the variations in the Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HERA), risk to the insurance fund (e.g., the HUD program participants subject to the which defines a mortgage eligible for Homeowners’ Association does not AFFH rule, HUD went through a process FHA insurance as a first lien on a one- want to go to the expense of applying to develop three separate assessment family unit along with an undivided for approval). In such cases, the rule tools: one for local governments, one for interest in the common areas and would allow for a percentage of single public housing agencies, and one for facilities which serve the project. This units to be approved for mortgage States and Insular Areas. Due to varying codification would make current insurance outside of the project technical and other issues, only the requirements for the program less strict approval process, under certain Assessment Tool for local governments and prescriptive, giving the guidelines designed to reduce was ever made available for use. condominium industry greater unacceptable risk to the insurance fund. However, HUD withdrew the Local flexibility. The rule would institute front-end Government Assessment Tool in a The FHA Condominium program is standards for mortgagees to qualify to Federal Register notice published on currently administered under the participate as Direct Endorsement May 23, 2018 as a result of its review Condominium Approval and Processing lenders in the DELRAP, or Direct of the initial round of AFH submissions Guide (the Guide). The Guide has a Endorsement Review and Approval that were developed using the tool. This number of ‘‘bright line’’ requirements. Program. Once qualified, these lenders review led HUD to conclude that the This final rule would, on the other have the ability to review and approve tool was unworkable based upon: (1) hand, establish more flexible and less condominium loans, with HUD having The high failure rate from the initial

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00088 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57891

round of submissions; and (2) the level CFR Citation: 24 CFR 5, 14, 75, 91, 92, substantially employ these persons. of technical assistance HUD provided to 93, 135, 266,; 570, 576, 578, 905, 964, However, the Section 3 requirement this initial round of 49 AFHs, which 983, and 1000. itself does not create additional jobs or cannot be scaled up to accommodate the Legal Deadline: None. contracts. Instead, Section 3 redirects increase in the number of local Abstract: This rule revises HUD’s local jobs and contracts created as a government program participants with regulations for Section 3 of the Housing result of the expenditure of HUD funds AFH submission deadlines in 2018 and and Urban Development Act of 1968, as to Section 3 residents and businesses 2019. amended by the Housing and residing and operating in the area in On May 15, 2017, HUD published a Community Development Act of 1992 which the HUD funds are expended. Federal Register notice consistent with (Section 3), which ensures that Currently, Section 3 rules require that a Executive Orders 13771, ‘‘Reducing employment, training, and contracting certain percent of new hires are Section Regulation and Controlling Regulatory opportunities generated by certain HUD 3 residents. HUD has determined that Costs,’’ and 13777, ‘‘Enforcing the financial assistance shall, to the greatest this measure has led to churning, where Regulatory Reform Agenda,’’ inviting extent feasible, and consistent with employers create a series of short-term public comments to assist HUD in existing Federal, State, and local laws jobs and hire and fire an employee in identifying existing regulations that may and regulations, be directed to low- and order to meet their Section 3 numeric be outdated, ineffective, or excessively very low-income persons, particularly goals. The proposed rule will curb these burdensome. HUD received 299 those who are recipients of Government practices by changing the metric to a comments in response to the Notice, assistance for housing and to business percentage of hours worked. HUD and 136 (45% of the total) discussed the concerns that provide economic anticipates that the change will AFFH rule. Most of these comments opportunities to these persons. HUD’s incentivize employers to create long- were critical of the AFFH rule and cited regulations implementing the term employment opportunities as its complexity and the costs associated requirements of Section 3 have not been employers shift their focus to reporting with completing an AFH. updated since 1994 and are not as hours worked, a factor that aligns with effective at promoting economic As HUD begins the process of business practices, rather than on opportunity for low-income persons as developing a new proposed rule, HUD providing employment for a specific HUD believes they could be. This issued an advance notice of proposed number of new hires. HUD also proposed rule would update HUD’s anticipates that the rule’s streamlined rulemaking (ANPR) on August 16, 2018, Section 3 regulations to streamline at 83 FR 40713, which invites public reporting requirements will contribute reporting requirements by aligning the to an increase in the number of comment on amendments to the AFFH reporting with standard business regulations. HUD is also reviewing employment opportunities provided to practice; amending the applicability Section 3 residents and more funds for comments submitted in response to the section; updating reporting and adding Section 3 businesses. HUD estimates withdrawal of the Local Government new outcome benchmarks; and that proposed rule would result in an Assessment Tool and will consider integrating Section 3 into program estimated reporting and recordkeeping those comments during HUD’s enforcement. The purpose of these burden reduction of 25,910 hours or consideration of potential changes to the changes is to reduce regulatory burden, $1.2 million a year. These figures are AFFH regulations. HUD will use these increase compliance with Section 3 preliminary estimates and may be sets of comments in drafting future requirements, and increase Section 3 updated pending OMB review. rulemaking. opportunities for low-income persons. Initial compliance costs are expected Aggregate Costs and Benefits Statement of Need: Over 24 years ago, to be minimal and one-time as HUD’s Section 3 regulations were recipients shift their practices to meet Executive Order 12866, as amended, promulgated through an interim rule the new requirements. For example, requires the agency to provide its best published on June 30, 1994, at 59 FR some recipients may have difficulty estimate of the combined aggregate costs 33880. Since HUD promulgated the determining whether employees live in and benefits of all regulations included current set of Section 3 regulations, a Qualified Census Tract, or whether in the agency’s Regulatory Plan that will significant legislation has been enacted they live within a certain distance of a be pursued in FY 2018. At this pre-rule that affects HUD programs that are worksite. However, HUD plans to create stage, HUD expects that the neither the subject to the requirements of Section 3. tools to assist recipients in making these total economic costs nor the total HUD has also heard from the public that determinations. HUD will pay attention efficiency gains will exceed $100 there is a need for regulatory changes to to public comment on this issue to million. clarify and simplify the existing ensure that compliance costs are indeed requirements. HUD concluded that reduced by this rule change. regulatory changes are needed to Benefits to low-income and very low- HUD—OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY streamline Section 3 and more income persons are difficult to quantify. (HUDSEC) effectively help recipients of HUD funds As described below, the change from achieve the purposes of the Section 3 measuring new hires to measuring labor Proposed Rule Stage statute. hours could not only reduce churn but, 88. Enhancing and Streamlining the Summary of Legal Basis: 12 U.S.C. depending on the initial benchmarks Implementation of ‘‘Section 3’’ 1701u; 42 U.S.C. 1450; 42 U.S.C. 3301; established, could also result in Requirements for Creating Economic 42 U.S.C. 3535(d). employers not needing to add new Opportunities for Low- and Very Low- Alternatives: None. Section 3 workers in the short-term. Income Persons and Eligible Businesses Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The However, tracking the amount of work purpose of Section 3 is to provide jobs, performed by Targeted Section 3 Priority: Other Significant. including apprenticeship opportunities, workers would help ensure that the E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. to public housing residents and other priorities of Section 3 are being Legal Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1701u; 42 specific low- and very low-income considered, consistent with the U.S.C. 1450; 42 U.S.C. 3301; 42 U.S.C. residents of a local area, and contracting statutory requirement, when recipients 3535(d) opportunities for businesses that hire and distribute hours to low-income

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00089 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57892 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

workers. As HUD tracks the new data 451 Seventh Street SW, Washington, DC Summary of Legal Basis: The legal reported by recipients, HUD expects to 20410, Phone: 202 708–0001. basis (in addition to HUD’s general move the benchmarks to ensure that Virginia Sardone, Director, Office of rulemaking authority under 42 U.S.C. recipients are driven to increase their Affordable Housing Programs, Office of 3535(d)) is the definition of mortgage in Section 3 opportunities, consistent with Community Planning and Development, section 201 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1707), the Section 3 statutory intent that Department of Housing and Urban which definition also applies to section Federal financial assistance is, to the Development, Office of the Secretary, 203 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1709). The greatest extent feasible, directed toward 451 Seventh Street SW, Washington, DC definition was revised by the Housing low- and very low-income persons, 20410, Phone: 202 708–2684. and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 particularly those who are recipients of RIN: 2501–AD87 (Pub. L. 110–289, approved July 30, government assistance for housing. The 2008) to include a mortgages on a one- goal is that those recipients of family unit in a multifamily project, and government assistance for housing will an undivided interest in the common HUD—OFFICE OF HOUSING (OH) find Section 3 employment and a path areas and facilities which serve the to financial security that removes the Final Rule Stage project (this is the arrangement that need for long-term government characterizes the large majority of condo assistance. 89. Project Approval for Single Family projects). More recently, the Housing Condominium (FR–5715) The initial benefit of this rule is the Opportunity Through Modernization reduction in administrative costs to both Priority: Other Significant. Act (Pub. L. 114–201, approved July 29, HUD and recipients of HUD financing, E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. 2016), requires HUD to: Streamline the which results from aligning the Section Legal Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1707, 1709 condominium recertification process; 3 requirements with what businesses and 1710; 12 U.S.C. 1715b; 12 U.S.C. issue regulations to amend the already track. HUD believes this change 1715y; 12 U.S.C. 1715z–16; 12 U.S.C. limitations on commercial space to would improve compliance by 1715u; 42 U.S.C. 3535(d) allow such requests to be processed recipients. CFR Citation: 24 CFR 203. under either HUD or lender review; and Risks: A potential risk in switching Legal Deadline: None. to consider factors relating to the from reporting and tracking new hires to Abstract: This final rule implements economy for the locality in which such labor hours is that the number of HUD’s authority under the single-family project is located or specific to project, including the total number of family Section 3 workers being hired might mortgage insurance provisions of the units in the project. HUD will be decrease or remain flat. However, this National Housing Act to insure one- addressing these issues through the would be because employers have a family units in a multifamily project, regulation. financial incentive to retain current including a project in which the Alternatives: None. Section 3 workers rather than hire new dwelling units are attached, or are Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Section 3 workers under this rule. This manufactured housing units, semi- rule will produce cost savings of $1 would be due, in part, to employers detached, or detached, and an million per year by reducing the losing the existing incentive to churn undivided interest in the common areas paperwork required for recertification of workers in order to count new hires. and facilities which serve the project. an approved project. There are some Additionally, if data shows that this rule The rule provides for requirements for costs associated with qualifying to is not increasing employment lenders to obtain approval under the participate in the Direct Endorsement opportunities for Section 3 workers over Direct Endorsement Lender Review and Lender Review and Approval Process time, HUD can adjust the new Section Approval Process (DELRAP) authority (DELRAP). However, HUD anticipates 3 benchmarks to increase the number of for condominiums, and for standards that many provisions of the rule, such labor hours performed by Section 3 that projects must meet to be approved as single-unit approvals, and flexible workers that employers would need to for mortgage insurance on individual standards, would reduce or eliminate meet in order to demonstrate units. The rule provides for flexibility the compliance costs of the rule. compliance with this requirement. with respect to the concentration of Risks: The DELRAP process (which Timetable: FHA-insured units, owner-occupied gives underwriting responsibility to units, and the amount that can be set qualified lenders) and single unit Action Date FR Cite aside for commercial and non- approvals (which allow HUD to insure residential space. This will enable HUD mortgages in unapproved condominium NPRM ...... 12/00/18 to vary these standards, within projects) could increase the risk of parameters, to meet market needs. defaults. However, the rule would add Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Statement of Need: The Housing safeguards to fully mitigate these risks. Required: No. Opportunities through Modernization The participating DELRAP lenders Small Entities Affected: No. Act of 2016 requires HUD to issue would have to meet qualification Government Levels Affected: regulations on the commercial space standards, and HUD would monitor Undetermined. requirements for condominium projects; their performance on an ongoing basis, Agency Contact: Merrie Nichols- these regulations would be codified in and would have authority to take Dixon, Deputy Director, Office of Policy, HUD’s Code of Federal Regulations corrective actions if a lender’s Programs and Legislative Initiatives, (CFR) volume. Having one portion of the performance is deficient. In addition, Department of Housing and Urban basic program rules codified in the CFR single unit approvals would require that Development, Office of the Secretary, and others not codified would be HUD not insure mortgages in an 451 Seventh Street SW, Washington, DC confusing and unfriendly to the public. unapproved project if the percentage of 20410, Phone: 202 402–4673. Additionally, the current program rules such mortgages exceeds an amount Thomas R. Davis, Director, Office of are overly rigid. The rule will add determined by the Commissioner to be Recapitalization, Office of Housing, needed flexibility and logically codify necessary for the protection of the Department of Housing and Urban the basic rules of the program, similar insurance fund. Development, Office of the Secretary, to HUD’s other single-family programs. Timetable:

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00090 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57893

Action Date FR Cite policies of the Fair Housing Act; (2) responsibility of program participants to create a process that is focused ensure that their AIs serve as effective NPRM ...... 09/28/16 81 FR 66565 primarily on accomplishing positive fair housing planning tools. NPRM Comment 11/28/16 results, rather than on performing Timetable: Period End. analysis of community characteristics; Final Action ...... 01/00/19 (3) provide for greater local control and Action Date FR Cite innovation; (4) seek to encourage Regulatory Flexibility Analysis actions that increase housing choice, ANPRM ...... 08/16/18 83 FR 40713 Required: No. including through greater housing Comment Period 10/15/18 Government Levels Affected: None. End. supply; and (5) more efficiently utilize NPRM ...... 09/00/19 URL For Public Comments: HUD resources. HUD is also reviewing www.regulations.gov/ comments submitted in response to the searchResults?rpp=25&po=0&s=FR- Regulatory Flexibility Analysis withdrawal of the Local Government Required: No. 5715&fp=true&ns=true. Assessment Tool and will consider Agency Contact: Elissa Saunders, Small Entities Affected: No. those comments during HUD’s Government Levels Affected: None. Director, Office of Single Family consideration of potential changes to the Program Development, Office of Agency Contact: Krista Mills, Deputy AFFH regulations. Assistant Secretary, Office of Policy, Housing, Department of Housing and Statement of Need: The stated Urban Development, Office of Housing, Legislative Initiatives, and Outreach, purpose of the AFFH regulations is to Department of Housing and Urban 451 Seventh Street SW, Washington, DC provide HUD program participants with Development, Office of Fair Housing 20410, Phone: 202 708–2121. a planning approach to assist them in and Equal Opportunity, 451 Seventh RIN: 2502–AJ30 meeting their legal obligation to Street SW, Washington, DC 20410, affirmatively further the purposes and Phone: 202 402–6577. policies of the Fair Housing Act. RIN: 2529–AA97 HUD—OFFICE OF FAIR HOUSING AND However, HUD has concluded that the EQUAL OPPORTUNITY (FHEO) current regulations are ineffective. The BILLING CODE 4210–67–P highly prescriptive regulations give Prerule Stage participants inadequate autonomy in 90. • Affirmatively Furthering Fair developing fair housing goals as DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Housing Streamlining and suggested by principles of federalism. Regulatory Plan Fall 2018 Enhancement (FR–6123) Additionally, the current regulations do not address the lack of adequate housing Introduction Priority: Other Significant. supply, which has a particular adverse E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. impact on protected classes under the The U.S. Department of the Interior Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 3535(d) Fair Housing Act. Finally, some peer- (‘‘Interior’’ or ‘‘the Department’’) serves and 3601 to 3619 reviewed literature indicates that the American public by managing the CFR Citation: 24 CFR 5, 91, 92, 570, outcomes of policies focused on Nation’s natural resources for the 574, 576, and 903. deconcentrating poverty may vary benefit and enjoyment of the American Legal Deadline: None. across different ages and demographic people, and it honors the United States’ Abstract: This advance notice of groups, and suggests that such policies trust responsibilities or special proposed rulemaking invites public are difficult to implement at scale and commitments to Federally recognized comment on amendments to HUD’s without disrupting local decision tribes, American Indians, Alaska affirmatively furthering fair housing making. Natives, and affiliated insular areas. (AFFH) regulations. The goal of the Summary of Legal Basis: This includes managing approximately regulations is to provide HUD program Alternatives: None. 500 million surface acres of Federal participants with a specific planning Anticipated Cost and Benefits: At this land or about twenty percent of the approach to assist them in meeting their pre-rule stage, HUD expects that the Nation’s land area, approximately 700 statutory obligation to affirmatively neither the total economic costs nor the million subsurface acres of Federal further the purposes and policies of the total efficiency gains will exceed $100 mineral estate, and over a billion acres Fair Housing Act. HUD is committed to million. of submerged lands on the Outer its mission of achieving fair housing Risks: Program participants are Continental Shelf. opportunity for all, regardless of race, reminded that the legal obligation to Hundreds of millions of people visit color, religion, national origin, sex, affirmatively further fair housing Interior-managed lands each year in disability, or familial status. fair remains in effect. The withdrawal of the order to engage in camping, hiking, housing. However, HUD’s experience Local Government Assessment Tool hunting, fishing and various other forms over the three years since the newly- means that a program participant that of outdoor recreation, which supports specified approach was promulgated has not yet submitted an AFH using that local communities and their economies. demonstrates that it is not fulfilling its device that has been accepted by HUD Interior provides access to Federal lands purpose to be an efficient means for must continue to carry out its duty to and offshore areas for the development guiding meaningful action by program affirmatively further fair housing by, of energy, minerals and other natural participants. As HUD begins the process inter alia, continuing to assess fair resources, which generates revenue for of developing a proposed rule to amend housing issues as part of planning for all levels of government, creates jobs the existing AFFH regulations, it is use of housing and community and supports the Nation’s energy and soliciting public comment on changes development block grants in accordance mineral security by promoting the that will: (1) Minimize regulatory with pre-existing requirements. The pre- identification and development of burden while more effectively aiding existing requirements referred to the fair domestic sources of energy, minerals program participants to plan for housing assessment as an analysis of and the associated infrastructure needs. fulfilling their obligation to impediments to fair housing choice (AI). Interior manages these resources under affirmatively further the purposes and HUD places a high priority upon the a legal framework that includes

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00091 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57894 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

regulations that ultimately affect the Regulatory and Deregulatory Priorities framework, on December 21, 2017, lives and livelihoods of many Interior’s regulatory and deregulatory Secretary Zinke signed Secretary’s Americans. priorities focus on: Order (S.O.) No. 3351, ‘‘Critical Mineral Independence and Security,’’ which America’s lands and natural resources • Promoting American energy and hold tremendous job-creating assets. As directed Interior bureaus to identify a critical mineral development list of critical minerals and streamline the steward for a substantial portion of • Improving the effectiveness, permitting to encourage domestic this public trust, Interior manages the transparency and timeliness of Nation’s lands and natural resources for production of those critical minerals. environmental review and permitting In furtherance of these goals, Interior multiple uses. Through this balanced processes for infrastructure projects stewardship of public resources, which • completed the following regulatory Expanding outdoor recreation actions during fiscal year 2018: recognizes the value of both opportunities for all Americans • conservation and development, Interior • BLM published the final rule Enhancing conservation stewardship entitled, ‘‘Oil and Gas: Hydraulic helps drive job opportunities and • Improving management of species and economic growth. Interior supports Fracturing on Federal and Indian Lands; their habitats Rescission of a 2015 Rule’’ (82 FR $254 billion in estimated economic • Upholding trust responsibilities to the benefit, while direct grants and 61924, Dec. 29, 2017); Federally recognized American Indian • BLM publish the final rule entitled, payments to states, tribes, and local and Alaska Native tribes and communities provide an estimated $10 ‘‘Waste Prevention, Production Subject addressing the challenges of economic to Royalties, and Resource billion in economic benefit. In 2017, development Interior collected approximately $9.6 Conservation: Rescission or Revision of billion from energy, mineral, grazing, Promoting American Energy and Certain Requirements’’ (83 FR 49184, and forestry activities on behalf of the Critical Mineral Development Sept. 28, 2018); and • BSEE published the final rule American people. Interior also supports On March 28, 2017, President Trump entitled, ‘‘Oil and Gas and Sulphur the economy by eliminating signed E.O. 13783, ‘‘Promoting Energy Operations on the Outer Continental unnecessary and burdensome Federal Independence and Economic Growth,’’ Shelf—Oil and Gas Production Safety regulatory requirements. which states that ‘‘[i]t is in the national Systems’’ (83 FR 49216, Sept. 28, 2018). Regulatory Reform interest to promote clean and safe In fiscal year 2019, Interior will development of our Nation’s vast energy continue to pursue a regulatory agenda President Trump has made it a resources, while at the same time that seeks to eliminate or minimize priority of his administration to reform avoiding regulatory burdens that regulatory burdens that unnecessarily regulatory requirements that negatively unnecessarily encumber energy encumber energy and mineral impact our economy while maintaining production, constrain economic growth, development, and that promotes environmental standards. Since day and prevent job creation.’’ In accordance efficient, effective and timely processing one, Secretary Zinke has been with E.O. 13783, Interior strives to of energy and mineral permits and other committed to regulatory reform. Interior promote the responsible development of authorizations on Interior-administered is playing a key role in regulatory Federal and Indian energy resources, lands and waters. Some of the reform and, pursuant to Executive Order while seeking to identify and eliminate regulatory actions that Interior is (E.O.) 13777, ‘‘Enforcing the Regulatory regulatory requirements that planning to prioritize in fiscal year 2019 Reform Agenda’’ (signed Feb. 24, 2017), unnecessarily burden the development include the following: has established a Regulatory Reform or use of domestic sources of energy • BSEE is considering a potential Task Force to help make Interior’s beyond the degree necessary to protect regulatory action to revise the final rule regulations work better for the American the public interest or otherwise comply entitled, ‘‘Oil and Gas and Sulfur people. In accordance with E.O. 13777, with the law. In addition to reducing Operations on the Outer Continental as well as E.O. 13771, ‘‘Reducing unnecessary regulatory burdens, Interior Shelf—Blowout Preventer Systems and Regulation and Controlling Regulatory is committed to improving its Well Control’’ (81 FR 25887, Apr. 29, Costs’’ (signed Jan. 30, 2017), Interior management of Federal and Indian 2016); will continue its efforts to identify and energy resources by developing more • BOEM is reviewing and considering repeal, replace or modify regulations efficient and streamlined permitting and a potential regulatory action related to that are unnecessary, ineffective or that review procedures. its Notice to Lessees No. 2016–N01, impose costs, which are not adequately The Department also recognizes that ‘‘Notice to Lessees and Operators of justified by benefits. Interior will also the public lands under its stewardship Federal Oil and Gas, and Sulfur Leases, continue to encourage and seek public are an important source of the Nation’s and Holders of Pipeline Right-of-Way input on these regulatory reform efforts. non-energy mineral resources, some of and Right-of-Use and Easement Grants See 82 FR 28429 (June 22, 2017) and which are critical and strategic, and it in the Outer Continental Shelf’’ (Sep. https://www.doi.gov/regulatory-reform. is committed to ensuring appropriate 12, 2016); In fiscal year 2019, Interior’s access to public lands for the orderly • BOEM is reconsidering the regulatory agenda will continue to and efficient development of important provisions of the proposed rule entitled, reflect a strong commitment to a mineral resources. On December 20, ‘‘Air Quality Control, Reporting, and conservation ethic that also recognizes 2017, President Trump signed E.O. Compliance,’’ (81 FR 19718, Apr. 5, that unnecessary regulations create 13817, ‘‘A Federal Strategy to Ensure 2016); harmful economic consequences on the Secure and Reliable Supplies of Critical • BSEE and BOEM are reviewing and U.S. economy. In doing this, the Minerals,’’ which prioritizes the need to considering a potential regulatory action Department will continue to protect reduce America’s dependence on related to the final rule entitled, ‘‘Oil human health and the environment in a foreign sources for critical mineral and Gas and Sulfur Operations on the responsible and cost-effective manner, supplies, which the U.S. relies upon to Outer Continental Shelf—Requirements but in a way that avoids imposing manufacture everything from batteries for Exploratory Drilling on the Arctic undue process or unnecessary economic and computer chips to the equipment Outer Continental Shelf’’ (81 FR 46478, burdens on the American public. used by our military. Within this Jul. 15, 2016); and

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00092 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57895

• BLM is reviewing and considering a National Environmental Policy Act Æ ‘‘Endangered and Threatened potential regulatory action related to the (NEPA) review processes. Species of Wildlife and Plants; Revision final rules entitled, ‘‘Onshore Oil and In order to ensure that the objectives of the Regulations for Listing Species Gas Operations; Federal and Indian Oil of E.O. 13807 and S.O. 3355 are and Designating Critical Habitat’’; and Gas Leases; Site Security’’ (81 FR effectively implemented, the Æ ‘‘Endangered and Threatened 81356, Nov. 17, 2016), ‘‘Onshore Oil Department has issued numerous Wildlife and Plants; Regulations for and Gas Operations; Federal and Indian guidance documents, including Prohibitions to Threatened Wildlife and Oil and Gas Leases; Measurement of Environmental Review Memorandum Plants; Removal of Blanket Section 4(d) Oil’’ (81 FR 81462, Nov. 17, 2016), and No. ERM 10–11, ‘‘Determining the Rule’’; and ‘‘Onshore Oil and Gas Operations; Applicable Environmental Review Æ ‘‘Endangered Species Act Section Federal and Indian Oil and Gas Leases; Framework for Infrastructure Projects’’ 10 Regulations; Exceptions Regarding Measurement of Gas’’ (81 FR 81516, (August 9, 2018), and the following the Conservation of Endangered and Nov. 17, 2016). memoranda from the Deputy Secretary Threatened Species of Wildlife and Plants.’’ Improving the Efficiency, Transparency of the Interior: • ‘‘Additional Direction for and Timeliness of Environmental Increasing Outdoor Recreation for All Implementing Secretary’s Order 3355’’ Review and Permitting Processes for Americans, Enhancing Conservation (April 27, 2018); Infrastructure Projects • Stewardship, and Improving ‘‘NEPA Document Clearance Management of Species and Their As outlined in E.O. 13807, Process’’ (April 27, 2018); Habitat ‘‘Establishing Discipline and • ‘‘Compiling Contemporaneous Accountability in the Environmental Decision Files’’ (April 27, 2018); On March 2, 2017, Secretary Zinke Review and Permitting Process for • ‘‘Standardized Intra-Department signed S.O. 3347, ‘‘Conservation Infrastructure Projects’’ (signed Aug. 15, Procedures Replacing Individual Stewardship and Outdoor Recreation,’’ 2017), inefficiencies in permitting Memoranda of Understanding for which established a goal to enhance processes, including environmental Bureaus Working as Cooperating conservation stewardship, increase review processes, can delay or prevent Agencies’’ (June 11, 2018); outdoor recreation, and improve the infrastructure investments, increase • ‘‘Questions and Answers Related to management of game species and their project costs, and prevent the American Deputy Secretary Memorandums habitat. people from experiencing infrastructure (Memos) dated April 27, 2018’’ (June 22, With S.O. 3356, ‘‘Hunting, Fishing, improvements that would benefit our 2018); Recreational Shooting, and Wildlife economy, society and environment. • ‘‘Reporting Costs Associated with Conservation Opportunities and With this in mind, E.O. 13807 directs Developing Environmental Impact Coordination with States, Tribes, and Federal agencies to undertake actions in Statements’’ (July 23, 2018); and Territories,’’ which was signed on order to improve the effectiveness, • ‘‘Additional Direction for September 15, 2017, Interior announced efficiency, transparency and Implementing Secretary’s Order 3355 continued efforts to enhance accountability of their environmental Regarding Environmental Assessments’’ conservation stewardship; increase review and permitting processes for (August 6, 2018). outdoor recreation opportunities for all infrastructure projects. In addition, pursuant to S.O. 3358, Americans, including opportunities to The Department is responsible for ‘‘Executive Committee for Expedited hunt and fish; and improve the reviewing and approving permits and Permitting’’ (signed Oct. 25, 2017), management of game species and their other authorizations for various public Interior established an Executive habitats for this generation and beyond. and private infrastructure projects on Committee for Expedited Permitting to On April 18, 2018, Secretary Zinke and across Interior-managed lands help improve the Department’s signed S.O. 3365, ‘‘Establishment of a nationwide, including various forms of permitting processes for energy projects. Senior National Adviser for Recreation,’’ surface transportation, such as roadways This will involve improving the and S.O. 3366, ‘‘Increasing Recreational and railroads, pipelines, transmission permitting processes for energy-related Opportunities on Lands and Waters lines, water resource projects, and projects, as well as the harmonization of Managed by the U.S. Department of the energy production and generation. As appurtenant environmental reviews. Interior.’’ Those Secretary’s Orders such, Interior has an important role in In fiscal year 2019, Interior will provide additional support for Interior’s the overall objective of improving the pursue a regulatory agenda that continuing efforts to increase access to Nation’s infrastructure. continues its efforts to improve the outdoor recreation on public lands for In recognition of the important role Department’s permitting processes, all American. that it plays in the overall efforts to including interagency coordination and In fiscal year 2019, Interior will improve and strengthen the Nation’s environmental review processes, for pursue a regulatory agenda that will infrastructure, Interior has initiated various types of infrastructure projects. help to achieve its goals of expanding actions in order to identify and address Some of the regulatory actions planned opportunities for outdoor recreation, potential impediments to its efficient for 2019 that will help to support those including hunting and fishing, for all and effective review of infrastructure objectives include: Americans; enhancing conservation projects. For example, on August 31, • A Departmental rule that is being stewardship; and improving the 2017, Interior issued S.O. 3355, developed to update and streamline management of species and their ‘‘Streamlining the National Interior’s NEPA processes— habitat. The regulatory actions that Environmental Policy Act Reviews and ‘‘Implementation of the National Interior is planning to pursue in Implementation of Executive Order Environmental Policy Act of 1969’’; and accordance with the aforementioned 13807, ‘Establishing Discipline and • The following U.S. Fish and goals include: Accountability in the Environmental Wildlife Service regulatory actions: • A regulatory action that would align Review and Permitting Process for Æ ‘‘Conservation of Endangered and Federal regulations regarding sport Infrastructure Projects,’ ’’ in order to Threatened Species; Revision of hunting and trapping in national enhance, modernize and improve the Regulations to Address Interagency preserves in Alaska with State of Alaska efficiencies of the Department’s Cooperation’’; laws and regulations; and

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00093 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57896 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

• Regulatory actions that would States for American Indians and Indian surface mineral estate throughout the authorize certain recreational activities, tribes. nation. As stewards, the BLM pursues such as off-road vehicle use, its multiple-use mission, providing Deregulatory and Regulatory Actions snowmobiling and bicycling, within opportunities for economic growth designated areas of certain National In the coming year, BIA’s regulatory through uses such as energy Park System units. agenda will continue to focus on development, ranching, mining and priorities that ease regulatory burdens logging, as well as outdoor recreation Upholding Trust Responsibilities to the on tribes, American Indians and Alaska activities such as camping, hunting and Federally Recognized American Indian Natives, and others subject to BIA fishing, while also supporting and Alaska Native Tribes and regulations, in accordance with E.O. conservation efforts. Public lands Addressing the Challenges of Economic 13771, ‘‘Reducing Regulation and provide valuable, tangible goods and Development Controlling Regulatory Costs,’’ and E.O. materials that we use every day to heat The Department of the Interior and 13777, ‘‘Enforcing the Regulatory our homes, build our roads, and feed the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) are Reform Agenda.’’ In accordance with our families. The BLM strives to be a committed to identifying opportunities this focus, BIA has identified a good neighbor in the communities it to promote economic growth and the provision in the Tribal Transportation serves, and is committed to keeping welfare of the people BIA serves by Program regulation that may be public landscapes healthy and removing barriers to the development of appropriate for revision because it productive. imposes data collection and reporting energy and other resources in Indian Deregulatory and Regulatory Actions country. In fiscal year 2019, Interior will requirements that are potentially continue to pursue a regulatory agenda unnecessary under current law. BIA also BLM has identified the following that supports that commitment. plans to finalize a regulation that would deregulatory actions for the coming streamline the right-of-way process for year: Aggregate Deregulatory and Significant governmental entities seeking a waiver • Non-Energy Solid Leasable Regulatory Actions of the requirement to obtain a bond in Minerals Royalty Rate Reductions (RIN certain cases. To reduce documentary Interior made substantial progress in 1004–AE58); and burden, BIA is planning to finalize a • reducing regulatory burdens upon the Revisions to Oil and Gas Site rule that would allow for the recording American public. Since the issuance of Security, Oil Measurement, and Gas in land title records of a memorandum E.O. 13771 in January 2017, Interior has Measurement Regulations (RIN 1004– of lease, rather than requiring recording finalized deregulatory actions that AE59). of all the lease documents. BLM has no significant regulatory provide a total of over $200 million in Because many of its existing actions subject to E.O. 13771 planned in annualized costs savings. In fiscal year regulations require compliance with the 2019. 2019, Interior expects to complete NEPA, BIA is also working on parallel deregulatory actions that will provide efforts to streamline NEPA Non-Energy Solid Leasable Minerals approximately $50 million in implementation, in accordance with Royalty Rate Reductions annualized costs savings. Interior does E.O. 13807, ‘‘Establishing Discipline The BLM is considering a proposed not currently expect to publish any and Accountability in the rule to streamline the royalty rate significant regulatory actions during the Environmental Review and Permitting reduction process for non-energy solid next year that will be subject to the Process for Infrastructure Projects,’’ and leasable minerals. The proposed rule offset requirements of E.O. 13771. S.O. 3355, ‘‘Streamlining National would address shortcomings with the Throughout this document, the terms Environmental Policy Act Reviews and existing royalty rate reduction ‘‘deregulatory action’’ and ‘‘significant Implementation of Executive Order regulations for non-energy solid leasable regulatory action’’ refer to actions that 13807.’’ minerals at 43 CFR subpart 3513— are subject to E.O. 13771. The BIA has one potentially Waiver, Suspension or Reduction of Bureaus and Offices Within the significant regulatory action on its Rental and Minimum Royalties. Department of the Interior agenda that would revise the existing The current regulations establish the regulations governing off-reservation royalty rate reduction process. However, The following sections give an trust acquisitions to establish new items that process is believed to be overview of some of the major that must be included in an application unnecessarily burdensome and the deregulatory and regulatory priorities of and threshold criteria that must be met standards are higher than the applicable Interior bureaus and offices. for off-reservation acquisitions before statute requires for approval of a royalty Bureau of Indian Affairs NEPA compliance will be required. The rate reduction. The proposed rule would rule would also reinstate the 30-day streamline the royalty rate reduction The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) delay for taking land into trust following process and align the BLM regulations enhances the quality of life, promotes a decision by the Secretary or Assistant more closely with the standards of the economic opportunity, and protects and Secretary. This rule is expected to have Mineral Leasing Act of 1920. improves the trust assets of de minimis economic impacts and Revisions to Oil and Gas Site Security, approximately 1.9 million American therefore likely exempt from the offset Oil Measurement, and Gas Measurement Indians, Indian tribes, and Alaska requirements under E.O. 13771. Natives. BIA also provides quality Regulations education opportunities to students in Bureau of Land Management On November 17, 2016, the BLM Indian schools. BIA maintains a The Bureau of Land Management issued three final rules that updated and government-to-government relationship (BLM) manages more than 245 million replaced the BLM’s existing Onshore Oil with the 573 federally recognized Indian acres of public land, known as the and Gas Orders (Onshore Orders) for tribes. The Bureau also administers and National System of Public Lands, site security (Onshore Order 3), manages 55 million acres of surface land primarily located in 12 Western states, measurement of oil (Onshore Order 4), and 57 million acres of subsurface including Alaska. The Bureau also and measurement of gas (Onshore Order minerals held in trust by the United administers 700 million acres of sub- 5). The three rules were codified in Title

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00094 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57897

43 of the Code of Federal Regulations at Deregulatory and Regulatory Actions not decreasing environmental subparts 3170 (Onshore Oil and Gas E.O. 13795, ‘‘Implementing an safeguards. The rulemaking advances, Production: General), 3173 America-First Offshore Energy and is consistent with, the (Requirements for Site Security and Strategy,’’ specifically addressed certain Administration’s deregulatory and Production Handling), 3174 Interior rules related to offshore energy. energy security policies. (Measurement of Oil), and 3175 To implement E.O. 13795, Interior Compliance With Executive and (Measurement of Gas). These rules were issued S.O. 3350, ‘‘America-First Secretary’s Orders, and Statutory prompted by external and internal Offshore Energy Strategy,’’ which Mandates oversight reviews, which found that enhances opportunities for energy many of the BLM’s production BOEM will continue to be responsive exploration, leasing, and development to the various regulatory reform measurement and accountability on the OCS; establishes regulatory policies were outdated and initiatives, including identifying and certainty for OCS activities; and acting upon any regulations, orders, inconsistently applied. The rules enhances conservation stewardship, addressed some of the Government guidance, policies or any similar actions thereby providing jobs, energy security, that could potentially burden the Accountability Office’s concerns for and revenue for the American people. In areas of high risk with regard to the development or utilization of accordance with S.O. 3350, BOEM has: domestically produced energy sources. Department’s production accountability. • Reconsidered its financial The rulemakings also provide a process assurance policies expressed in Notice Bureau of Safety and Environmental for approving new measurement to Lessees No. 2016–N01 related to Enforcement technology that meets defined offshore oil and gas activities. BOEM is The Bureau of Safety and performance goals. currently working on a proposed rule to Environmental Enforcement’s (BSEE) In accordance with E.O. 13783, protect taxpayers from unnecessary mission is to promote offshore ‘‘Promoting Energy Independence and liabilities while minimizing conservation, development and Economic Growth’’ (March 28, 2017), unnecessary regulatory burdens on production of offshore energy resources and S.O. 3349, ‘‘American Energy industry. while ensuring that offshore operations Independence’’ (March 29, 2017), the • Ceased activities to promulgate the are safe and environmentally BLM has undertaken a review of the ‘‘Offshore Air Quality Control, responsible. BSEE’s priorities in rules to determine if certain provisions Reporting, and Compliance’’ proposed fulfillment of its mission are to: (1) may have added regulatory burdens that rule, which was published on April 5, Promote and regulate offshore energy unnecessarily encumber energy 2016 (81 FR 19717). Following development using the full range of production, constrain economic growth, extensive review, BOEM is now authorities, policies, and tools to ensure and prevent job creation. As a result of completing a more limited final rule safety and environmental responsibility; this review, the BLM is considering a that will implement BOEM’s statutory and (2) build and sustain the proposed rulemaking action that will responsibility to ensure that OCS organizational, technical, and propose to modify certain provisions of operations conducted under a BOEM intellectual capacity within and across 43 CFR subparts 3170, 3173, 3174, and approved plan are in compliance with BSEE’s key functions in order to keep 3175 in order to reduce unnecessary and statutory mandates. pace with offshore industry technology overly burdensome regulatory • Reviewed, in consultation with the improvements, innovate in requirements. Bureau of Safety and Environmental economically sound regulation and Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Enforcement (BSEE), the final rule ‘‘Oil enforcement, and reduce risk through and Gas and Sulfur Operations on the appropriate risk assessment and The Bureau of Ocean Energy Outer Continental Shelf—Requirements regulatory and enforcement actions. Management (BOEM) is committed to for Exploratory Drilling on the Arctic Consistent with the direction in E.O. the Administration proposition that ‘‘A Outer Continental Shelf,’’ which was 13783, ‘‘Promoting Energy brighter future depends on energy published on July 15, 2016 (81 FR Independence and Economic Growth,’’ policies that stimulate our economy, 46478), for consistency with the policy E.O. 13795, ‘‘Implementing an America- ensure our security, and protect our set forth in section 2 of E.O. 13795. As First Offshore Energy Strategy,’’ as well health.’’ In accordance with E.O. 13783, a result of that review, BOEM and BSEE as E.O. 13771, ‘‘Reducing Regulation ‘‘Promoting Energy Independence and are considering deregulatory options for and Controlling Regulatory Costs,’’ Economic Growth,’’ BOEM is committed the rule. BSEE has reviewed and will continue to to the safe and orderly development of BOEM has no economically review its existing regulations to our offshore energy and mineral significant regulatory actions planned determine whether they may resources, with the goal of avoiding for fiscal year 2019. unnecessarily burden the development regulatory burdens that unnecessarily or use of domestically produced energy Streamlining Renewable Energy encumber energy production, constrain resources, constrain economic growth, Regulations economic growth, and prevent job or prevent job creation. BSEE is a well- creation. BOEM is committed to BOEM’s renewable energy program positioned partner ready to help all identifying regulatory and deregulatory has matured over the past 8 years as it stakeholders maintain the Nation’s opportunities and policies that lower has conducted 7 auctions and issued 13 position as a global energy leader and costs and stimulate development. BOEM commercial leases for offshore wind. foster energy independence for the continues to strengthen U.S. energy Through that experience and benefit of the American people, while security and energy independence. stakeholder engagement, BOEM has ensuring that offshore oil and gas BOEM creates jobs, benefits local identified deregulatory opportunities for activity in the Outer Continental Shelf communities, and strengthens the reforming, streamlining, and clarifying is performed in a safe and economy by offering opportunities to its renewable energy regulations. This environmentally responsible manner. develop the conventional and renewable proposed rulemaking contains reforms In the coming year, BSEE plans to energy and mineral resources of the that are intended to facilitate offshore finalize two deregulatory actions and Outer Continental Shelf (OCS). renewable energy development, while three regulatory actions. BSEE has no

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00095 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57898 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

significant regulatory actions that are developed in the wake of and in end of that fiscal year that are either expected to be subject to E.O. 13771 response to the Deepwater Horizon statutorily required or are minor in planned for the coming year. incident, and determined that none of nature: the proposed changes contradicts or Deregulatory Actions Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act; 2019 ignores any of those recommendations, Inflation Adjustments for Civil Penalties BSEE has identified the following or would alter any provision of the 2016 deregulatory actions under E.O. 13771 Well Control Rule in a way that would This rulemaking would adjust the as high priorities for fiscal year 2019: make the result inconsistent with any of level of civil monetary penalties Well Control and Blowout Prevention the recommendations. Among the contained in BSEE’s regulations that are Systems Rule Revision potential changes included in the pursuant to the Outer Continental Shelf proposed rule are: Lands Act. The Federal Civil Penalties In the immediate aftermath of the • Revising the accumulator system Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Deepwater Horizon incident in 2010, 14 requirements and accumulator bottle Act of 2015 (FCPIA) requires Federal external organizations made a total of requirements for Blowout Preventers agencies to make annual adjustments for 424 recommendations, which were (BOPs) to better align with industry inflation to civil penalties contained in expressed through 26 separate reports, standards, particularly API Standard its regulations. in order to improve the safety of 53—Blowout Prevention Equipment offshore oil and gas operations. BSEE Systems for Drilling Wells; Federal Oil and Gas Royalty subsequently issued four rules that • Revising the requirement to shut in Management Act; 2019 Inflation addressed those recommendations, platforms when a lift boat approaches; Adjustments for Civil Penalties • which included the April 2016 final Revising the BOP control station To provide for a more cohesive and rule entitled, ‘‘Oil and Gas and Sulfur and pod testing schedules to ensure streamlined approach for making annual Operations on the Outer Continental component functionality without inflation adjustments to BSEE’s Shelf-Blowout Preventer Systems and inadvertently requiring duplicative FOGRMA-related civil penalties under Well Control’’ (81 FR 25888) (‘‘2016 testing; • the FCPIA, this rulemaking would Well Control Rule’’ or ‘‘2016 rule’’). The Removing certain prescriptive remove the civil monetary amounts 2016 Well Control Rule consolidated the requirements for real-time monitoring; contained in BSEE’s regulations and equipment and operational and • replace them with a cross-reference to requirements for well control into one Replacing the required use of a the Office of Natural Resource part of BSEE’s regulations; enhanced BSEE-approved verification of Revenue’s (ONRR) FOGRMA civil blowout preventer (BOP), well design, organization (BAVO) with the use of an penalty regulations. Pursuant to the and modified well-control requirements; independent third-party for certain FCPIA, ONRR makes inflation and incorporated certain industry certifications and verifications of BOP adjustments to its FOGRMA civil technical standards. systems and components, and removing penalties on an annual basis pursuant to Consistent with the policy direction the requirement to have a BAVO submit the FCPIA. of E.O.s 13771 and 13795 and S.O. 3350, a Mechanical Integrity Assessment BSEE undertook a review of the 2016 report for the BOP stack and system. Privacy Act Regulations; Exemption for Well Control Rule with a view toward the Investigations Case Management Exploratory Drilling on the Arctic Outer System encouraging energy exploration and Continental Shelf Rule production and reducing unnecessary Interior will amend its regulations to regulatory burdens while ensuring that BSEE has reviewed, in consultation with BOEM, the final rule ‘‘Oil and Gas exempt certain records from particular any such activity is safe and provisions of the Privacy Act, which environmentally responsible. After and Sulfur Operations on the Outer Continental Shelf—Requirements for BSEE maintains to conduct and thoroughly reexamining the 2016 Well document incident investigations Control Rule, on May 11, 2018, BSEE Exploratory Drilling on the Arctic Outer Continental Shelf,’’ published on July related to operations on the Outer published a proposed rule entitled, ‘‘Oil Continental Shelf (OCS). and Gas and Sulfur Operations on the 15, 2016 (81 FR 46478), for consistency Outer Continental Shelf-Blowout with the policy set forth in section 2 of Office of Natural Resources Revenue Preventer Systems and Well Control E.O. 13795. As a result of that review, BSEE and BOEM are considering The Office of Natural Resources Revisions’’ (83 FR 22128) (‘‘proposed Revenue (ONRR) will continue to rule’’), to reduce regulatory burdens and deregulatory options for the rule. In addition to the deregulatory actions collect, account for, and disburse encourage job-creating development, revenues from Federal offshore energy while still ensuring safe and previously identified, BSEE will continue to review the remainder of its and mineral leases and from onshore environmentally responsible offshore oil mineral leases on Federal and Indian and gas operations. regulations to identify other requirements that could be modified to lands. The program operates nationwide In developing the proposed rule, and is primarily responsible for timely BSEE carefully analyzed all 342 increase efficiency, streamline processes, reduce industry burden, and and accurate collection, distribution, provisions of the 2016 Well Control and accounting for revenues associated Rule, and identified 59 of those maximize energy resources while ensuring offshore operations are with mineral and energy production. provisions—or less than 18% of the ONRR’s regulatory plan for October 1, 2016 Rule—as appropriate for revision performed in a safe and 1 environmentally sustainable manner. 2018 through September 30, 2019 is as or deletion. During this process, BSEE follows: also compared each of the proposed Regulatory Actions By January 15, 2019, ONRR will draft changes to the 424 recommendations BSEE has no significant regulatory and publish in the Federal Register a arising from the 26 separate reports actions subject to E.O. 13771 planned final rule (1012–AA24) to adjust for inflation ONRR’s daily maximum civil 1 A provision represents a requirement of the for fiscal year 2019. However, BSEE operator that may be comprised of a single citation plans to complete the following three, penalty rates, to be effective for calendar or multiple citations. non-significant rulemakings before the year 2019. This adjustment is required

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00096 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57899

by law (28 U.S.C. 2461) and OMB and their habitats, and allows the public bird hunting regulations, which Guidance. to engage in outdoor recreational establish the frameworks (outside activities. limits) for States to establish season Office of Surface Mining Reclamation lengths, bag limits, and areas for and Enforcement Deregulatory and Regulatory Actions migratory game bird hunting. FWS is The Office of Surface Mining During the next year, the regulatory considering and plans to propose a Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE) priorities of FWS will include: regulatory action to revise and improve was created by the Surface Mining Regulations Under the Endangered the administration of the MBTA. Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 Species Act (ESA) (SMCRA). Under SMCRA, OSMRE has Regulations To Administer the National two principal functions—the regulation The FWS, jointly with the National Wildlife Refuge System (NWRS) of surface coal mining and reclamation Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), will In carrying out its statutory operations, and the reclamation and propose regulatory actions to improve responsibility to provide wildlife- restoration of abandoned coal mine the administration of the ESA, and dependent recreational opportunities on lands. In enacting SMCRA, Congress reduce unnecessary administrative NWRS lands, FWS issues an annual rule directed OSMRE to ‘‘strike a balance burdens. The FWS and NMFS are to update the hunting and fishing between protection of the environment developing regulatory reforms that will regulations on specific refuges. and agricultural productivity and the create efficiencies and streamline the Regulations To Carry Out the Pittman- Nation’s need for coal as an essential ESA consultation process, as well as the Robertson Wildlife Restoration and source of energy.’’ OSMRE seeks to processes for listing and delisting Dingell-Johnson Sport Fish Restoration develop and maintain a regulatory threatened and endangered species. In Acts (Acts) program that provides a safe, cost- addition, FWS is developing a effective, and environmentally sound regulatory action that would remove the Under the Acts, FWS distributes supply of coal to help support the blanket section 4(d) rule applying to annual apportionments to States from Nation’s economy and local species listed as threatened. This change trust funds derived from excise tax communities. will align FWS’s process with NMFS revenues and fuel taxes. FWS continues and result in regulations and to work closely with State fish and Deregulatory and Regulatory Actions prohibitions tailored to the conservation wildlife agencies on how to use these OSMRE is continuing to review needs of specific species. funds to implement conservation additional actions to reduce burdens on The FWS is also considering a projects. To strengthen its partnership energy production, including, for rulemaking action that would improve with State conservation organizations, example, reviewing the state program and clarify its regulations that FWS is working on several rules to amendment process to reduce the time implement section 10 of the ESA and update and clarify its regulations. it takes to formally amend an approved pertain to the issuance of permits for the Planned regulatory revisions will help regulatory program. take of threatened and endangered to reflect several new decisions agreed OSMRE has no significant regulatory species. upon by State conservation actions planned for fiscal year 2019. The FWS also plans to take multiple organizations. regulatory actions under the ESA in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service order to prevent the extinction and Regulations To Carry Out the The mission of the U.S. Fish and facilitate the recovery of both domestic Convention on International Trade in Wildlife Service (FWS) is to work with and foreign animal and plant species. Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and others to conserve, protect, and enhance Accordingly, FWS will add species to, Flora (CITES) and the Lacey Act fish, wildlife, and plants and their remove species from, and reclassify In accordance with section 3(a) of habitats for the continuing benefit of the species on the Lists of Endangered and E.O. 13609, ‘‘Promoting International American people. The FWS also Threatened Wildlife and Plants, and Regulatory Cooperation,’’ FWS will provides opportunities for Americans to designate critical habitat, in accordance update its CITES regulations to enjoy the outdoors and our shared with the National Listing Workplan and incorporate provisions resulting from natural heritage. 3-Year Downlisting and Delisting the 16th and 17th Conference of the The FWS fulfills its responsibilities Workplan. These Workplans enable Parties to CITES. The revisions will help through a diverse array of programs that: FWS to prioritize its workload based on FWS more effectively promote species • Protect and recover endangered and the needs of species, while providing conservation and help U.S. importers threatened species; greater clarity and predictability about and exporters of wildlife products • Monitor and manage migratory the timing of ESA classification understand how to conduct lawful birds; determinations to State wildlife international trade. • Enforce Federal wildlife laws and agencies, nonprofit organizations, and The FWS has no significant regulatory regulate international trade; various other diverse stakeholders and actions that are subject to E.O. 13771 • Conserve and restore wildlife partners. The goals of the Workplans are planned for fiscal year 2019. habitat such as wetlands; to encourage proactive conservation so National Park Service • Help foreign governments conserve that Federal protections are not needed wildlife through international in the first place and to remove The National Park Service (NPS) conservation efforts; regulatory burdens once a listed species’ preserves the natural and cultural • Distribute Federal funds to States, status is improved or the species is resources and values within 417 units of territories, and tribes for fish and recovered. the National Park System encompassing wildlife conservation projects; and nearly 84 million acres of lands and • Manage the more than 150 million Regulations Under the Migratory Bird waters for the enjoyment, education, acres of land and water from the Treaty Act (MBTA) and inspiration of this and future Caribbean to the remote Pacific in the In carrying out its responsibility to generations. The NPS also cooperates National Wildlife Refuge System, which manage migratory bird populations, with partners to extend the benefits of protects and conserves fish and wildlife FWS plans to issue annual migratory resource conservation and outdoor

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00097 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57900 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

recreation throughout the United States • Snowmobiles within Pictured Other Regulatory Actions of the and the world. Rocks National Lakeshore (proposed Department of the Interior The NPS intends to issue a number of rule); Natural Resource Damages and deregulatory actions and no significant • Personal watercraft within Gulf Restoration—Hazardous Substances regulatory actions during the upcoming Islands National Seashore (proposed (RIN: 1090–AB17) year. rule); and The existing regulation (43 CFR 11) Deregulatory Actions • Recreational flying within Death provides procedures that Natural The NPS will undertake deregulatory Valley National Park (proposed rule). Resource Trustees may use to evaluate actions under E.O. 13771, ‘‘Reducing These actions will allow the public to the need for and means of restoring, Regulation and Controlling Regulatory use NPS-administered lands and waters replacing, or acquiring the equivalent of Costs,’’ that will reduce regulatory costs. in a manner that protects the resources public natural resources that are injured Several of these actions also comply and values of the National Park System. or destroyed as a result of releases of with section 6 of E.O. 13563, As outdoor recreation technology, uses, hazardous substances. The Department ‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory and patterns evolve, the NPS regulations is considering a potential rulemaking Review,’’ because they will remove or and management policies will also need action that would provide an modify outdated, unnecessarily to evolve. The NPS is working to opportunity for others (Federal agencies, complicated and burdensome address emerging forms of recreation States, Indian Tribes, and interested regulations. such as electric bicycles (e-bikes). public) to provide input on areas of the The NPS intends to: existing regulations that could be • Issue a final rule to align sport Other Priority Rulemakings of Particular revised to increase effectiveness, hunting regulations in national Interest to Small Business efficiency, and restoration of the injured resources. preserves in Alaska with State of Alaska The NPS intends to issue a proposed regulations and to enhance consistency rule to implement the Visitor Implementation of the National with harvest regulations on surrounding Experience Improvements Authority Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (RIN: non-federal lands and waters. (VEIA) given to the NPS by Congress in 1090–AB18) • Issue a proposed rule that would Title VII of the National Park Service The Department is developing revise existing regulations Centennial Act. This authority allows implementing the Native American regulations to streamline its National the NPS to award and administer Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Graves Protection and Repatriation Act commercial services contracts (and (NAGPRA) to streamline requirements process by increasing the number of related professional services contracts) for museums and Federal agencies. The categorical exclusions and updating its for the operation and expansion of rule would describe the NAGPRA NEPA regulations. process in accessible language with commercial visitor facilities and visitor clear time parameters, eliminate services programs in units of the National Park System. ambiguity, clarify terms, and improve DOI—ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR efficiency. Bureau of Reclamation LAND AND MINERALS MANAGEMENT (ASLM) NPS Response to Secretarial Order 3366: The Bureau of Reclamation’s mission Increasing Recreational Opportunities is to manage, develop, and protect water Proposed Rule Stage on Lands and Waters Managed by the and related resources in an U.S. Department of the Interior 91. Revisions to the Requirements for environmentally and economically Exploratory Drilling on the Arctic Enabling regulations are considered sound manner in the interest of the Outer Continental Shelf deregulatory under guidance to E.O. American public. To accomplish this 13771. The NPS will undertake several mission, we employ management, Priority: Economically Significant. enabling regulatory actions in the engineering, and science to achieve Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. coming year that will provide new effective and environmentally sensitive E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. opportunities for the public to enjoy and solutions. Reclamation projects provide: Legal Authority: 43 U.S.C. 1331 to experience certain areas within the Irrigation water service, municipal and 1356a; 33 U.S.C. 2701 National Park System. These include industrial water supply, hydroelectric CFR Citation: 30 CFR 250; 30 CFR regulations authorizing: power generation, water quality • 254; 30 CFR 550. Off-road vehicle use at Cape improvement, groundwater Legal Deadline: None. Lookout National Seashore (final rule), management, fish and wildlife Glen Canyon National Recreation Area enhancement, outdoor recreation, flood Abstract: This proposed rule would (final rule), Big Cypress National control, navigation, river regulation and revise specific provisions of the Preserve (proposed rule), and Fire control, system optimization, and regulations published in the final Arctic Island National Seashore (proposed related uses. In addition, we continue to Exploratory Drilling Rule, 81 FR 46478 rule); (July 15, 2016), which established a provide increased security at our • regulatory framework for exploratory Bicycling at Pea Ridge National facilities. Military Park (final rule), Hot Springs drilling and related operations within National Park (proposed rule), Buffalo Deregulatory and Regulatory Actions the Beaufort Sea and Chukchi Sea National River (proposed rule), and Planning Areas on the Outer Whiskeytown National Recreation Area The Bureau of Reclamation intends to Continental Shelf of Alaska. The (proposed rule); publish no deregulatory or significant rulemaking for this RIN replaces the • Launching of non-motorized vessels regulatory actions in fiscal year 2019. Bureau of Safety and Environmental from Colonial National Historic Park Enforcement’s RIN 1014–AA40. (proposed rule); Timetable:

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00098 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57901

Action Date FR Cite two prior regulations. Section 3(a) states In addition, ATF plans to update its that starting with fiscal year 2018, ‘‘the regulations requiring notification of NPRM ...... 01/00/19 head of each agency shall identify, for stored explosive materials to require each regulation that increases annual reporting (RIN 1140–AA51). Regulatory Flexibility Analysis incremental cost, the offsetting This regulatory action is intended to Required: Yes. regulations described in section 2(c) of increase safety for emergency first Small Entities Affected: Businesses. [E.O. 13771], and provide the agency’s responders and the public. Government Levels Affected: None. best approximation of the totals costs or ATF also plans to issue regulations to Agency Contact: Bryce Barlan, savings associated with each new finalize the current interim rules Regulatory Analyst, Department of the regulation or repealed regulation.’’ implementing the provisions of the Safe Interior, Bureau of Safety and In addition to the new cost analyses Explosives Act (RIN 1140–AA00). The Environmental Enforcement, 45600 being conducted pursuant to E.O. Department is also planning to finalize Woodland Road, Sterling, VA 20166, 13771, the Department is actively a proposed rule to codify regulations (27 Phone: 703 787–1126, Email: carrying out the provisions of E.O. CFR part 771) governing the procedure [email protected]. 13777, ‘‘Enforcing the Regulatory and practice for proposed denial of Deanna Meyer-Pietruszka, Chief, Reform Agenda,’’ 82 FR 12285 (Mar. 1, applications for explosives licenses or OPRA, Department of the Interior, 2017). The Department’s Regulatory permits and proposed revocation of Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Reform Task Force continues actively such licenses and permits (RIN 1140– 1849 C Street NW, Washington, DC working to evaluate existing Department AA38). As proposed, this rule is a 20240, Phone: 202 208–6352, Email: regulatory actions and to make regulatory action that clarifies the [email protected]. recommendations regarding their repeal, administrative hearing processes for RIN: 1082–AA01 replacement, or modification in order to explosives licenses and permits. This BILLING CODE: 4334–63–P reduce unnecessary burdens. rule promotes open government and The regulatory priorities of the disclosure of ATF’s procedures and Department include initiatives in the practices for administrative actions areas of federal grant programs, criminal involving explosive licensees or DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (DOJ)— law enforcement, immigration, and civil permittees. FALL 2018 rights. These initiatives are summarized ATF also has begun a rulemaking Statement of Regulatory Priorities below. In addition, several other process that amends 27 CFR part 447 to components of the Department carry out update the terminology in the ATF The solemn duty of the Department of important responsibilities through the regulations based on similar Justice is to uphold the Constitution and regulatory process. Although their terminology amendments made by the laws of the United States so that all regulatory efforts are not separately Department of State on the U.S. Americans can live in peace and discussed in this overview of the Munitions List in the International security. As the chief law enforcement regulatory priorities, those components Traffic in Arms Regulations, and the agency of the United States government, have key roles in implementing the Department of Commerce on the the Department of Justice’s fundamental Department’s anti-terrorism and law Commerce Control List in the Export mission is to protect people by enforcement priorities. Administration Regulations (RIN 1140– enforcing the rule of law. To fulfill this AA49). mission, the Department is devoting Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms resources and utilizing the legal and Explosives (ATF) Drug Enforcement Administration authorities available to combat violent ATF issues regulations to enforce the (DEA) crime and terrorism, prosecute drug Federal laws relating to the manufacture DEA is the primary agency traffickers, and enforce immigration and commerce of firearms and responsible for coordinating the drug laws. Because the Department of Justice explosives. ATF’s mission and law enforcement activities of the United is primarily a law enforcement agency regulations are designed, among other States and also assists in the and not a regulatory agency, it carries objectives, (1) to curb illegal traffic in, implementation of the President’s out its principal investigative, and criminal use of, firearms and National Drug Control Strategy. DEA prosecutorial, and other enforcement explosives, and (2) to assist State, local, implements and enforces titles II and III activities through means other than the and other Federal law enforcement of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse regulatory process. agencies in reducing crime and Prevention and Control Act of 1970 and This year, the Department of Justice violence. ATF will continue, as a the Controlled Substances Import and continues to revise and improve its priority during fiscal year 2019, to seek Export Act (21 U.S.C. 801–971), as procedures for evaluating new modifications to its regulations amended, collectively referred to as the regulatory actions and analyzing the governing commerce in firearms and Controlled Substances Act (CSA). DEA’s costs that would be imposed. Executive explosives to fulfill these objectives. mission is to enforce the CSA and its Order 13771 (E.O. 13771), titled As its key regulatory initiative, ATF regulations and bring to the criminal ‘‘Reducing Regulation and Controlling plans to amend its regulations to clarify and civil justice system those Regulatory Costs,’’ 82 FR 9339 (Feb. 3, that ‘‘bump fire’’ stocks, slide-fire organizations and individuals involved 2017), requires an agency, unless devices, and devices with certain in the growing, manufacture, or prohibited by law, that for every one similar characteristics (bump-stock-type distribution of controlled substances new regulation issued, at least two prior devices) are ‘‘machineguns’’ as defined and listed chemicals appearing in or regulations be identified for elimination. by the National Firearms Act of 1934, destined for illicit traffic in the United In furtherance of this requirement, and the Gun Control Act of 1968, States. The CSA and its implementing section 2(c) of E.O. 13771 requires the because such devices allow a shooter of regulations are designed to prevent, new incremental costs associated with a semiautomatic firearm to initiate a detect, and eliminate the diversion of new regulations, to the extent permitted continuous firing cycle with a single controlled substances and listed by law, be offset by the elimination of pull of the trigger. This is one of the chemicals into the illicit market while existing costs associated with at least Department’s Regulatory Plan entries. providing for the legitimate medical,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00099 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57902 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

scientific, research, and industrial needs the faithful and efficient execution of Office of Justice Programs (OJP) of the United States. asylum processes (RIN 1125–AA87). OJP provides innovative leadership to Pursuant to its statutory authority, This is one of the Department’s federal, state, local, and tribal justice DEA plans to update its regulations to Regulatory Plan initiatives. systems by disseminating state-of-the-art implement provisions of the In other pending rulemaking actions, knowledge and practices and providing Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery the Department is working to revise and financial assistance for the Act of 2016 (RIN 1117–AB45) relating to update the regulations relating to implementation of crime fighting the partial filling of prescriptions for immigration proceedings to increase strategies. OJP will continue to review Schedule II controlled substances. This efficiencies and productivity, while also is one of the Department’s Regulatory safeguarding due process. In particular, its existing regulations to streamline Plan initiatives. EOIR is working to expand upon its them, where possible. In fiscal year 2019, DEA anticipates Public Notice of June 25, 2018, by OJP published a notice of proposed issuing a rulemaking action addressing publishing a proposed rule regarding its rulemaking for the OJJDP Formula Grant suspicious orders of controlled new EOIR Case and Appeals System, Program on August 8, 2016, and in early substances (RIN 1117–AB47) . This which provides for greatly expanded 2017 published a final rule addressing proposed rule would remedy the electronic filing and calendaring for some of those provisions. OJP inadequacies of the existing reporting cases before EOIR’s immigration courts anticipates publishing a second final requirements by defining the term and BIA (RIN 1125–AA81). OJJDP Formula Grant Program rule to ‘‘suspicious order’’ and specifying the In addition, EOIR is planning to remove certain provisions of the procedures registrants must follow upon publish a regulation to finalize an regulations that are no longer legally receiving such orders. In addition, DEA interim final rule from 2005 regarding supported (deleting text that plans to publish six deregulatory actions background and security investigation unnecessarily repeats statutory (RINs 1117–AB37, 1117–AB40, 1117– checks (RIN 1125–AA44), and is provisions or has been rendered AB43, 1117–AB44, 1117–AB45, and working to finalize a jurisdiction and obsolete by statutory changes) and to 1117–AB46). Consistent with E.O. venue rule that will provide make technical corrections. After 13771 and E.O. 13777, DEA is clarification regarding an immigration publishing the second final rule, OJJDP continuing to review existing judge’s authority to conduct anticipates publishing a third final rule regulations to identify those that are proceedings, how venue is determined, to finalize the remaining substantive outdated, unnecessary, or ineffective. and what circuit court law EOIR aspects of the proposed rule, and to DEA will solicit public comments adjudicators will apply (RIN 1125– further streamline and improve the during such reviews, as appropriate, to AA52). In particular, EOIR is developing existing regulation by providing or engage with the affected DEA registrant mechanisms in this rule intended to revising definitions for clarity, and by community and members of the public. streamline certain venue changes to deleting text that addresses matters achieve cost savings to the agency and already (or better) addressed in other Executive Office for Immigration increase due process to the parties. In places (e.g., other rules or the program Review (EOIR) addition, in response to Executive Order solicitation). EOIR’s primary mission is to 13563, the Department is retrospectively Bureau of Prisons (BOP) adjudicate immigration cases by fairly, reviewing EOIR’s regulations to expeditiously, and uniformly eliminate regulations that unnecessarily BOP issues regulations to enforce the interpreting and administering the duplicate Department of Homeland Federal laws relating to its mission of Nation’s immigration laws. Under Security regulations and update protecting society by confining delegated authority from the Attorney outdated references to the pre-2003 offenders in the controlled General, EOIR conducts immigration immigration system (RIN 1125–AA71). environments of prisons and court proceedings, appellate reviews, The Department also continues to work community-based facilities that are safe, and administrative hearings. The toward rulemaking that will assist in humane, cost-efficient, and immigration judges adjudicate identifying and sanctioning those appropriately secure, and that provide approximately 150,000 cases each year defraud the system itself and the work and other self-improvement to determine whether aliens should be individuals who appear before EOIR opportunities to assist offenders in ordered removed from the United States (RIN 1125–AA82). becoming law-abiding citizens. During or should be granted some form of the next 12 months, BOP will continue protection or relief from removal. The Civil Rights (CRT) its ongoing efforts to develop regulatory Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) has CRT regulations implement Federal actions aimed at: (1) Streamlining jurisdiction over appeals from the laws relating to discrimination in regulations, eliminating unnecessary decisions of immigration judges, as well employment-related immigration language and improving readability; (2) as other matters. Accordingly, the practices, the coordination of improving inmate disciplinary Attorney General has a continued role enforcement of non-discrimination in procedures and sanctions, improving in the conduct of immigration federally assisted programs, and Federal safety in facilities through the use of proceedings, including removal laws relating to disability less-than-lethal force instead of proceedings and custody determinations discrimination. traditional weapons; and (3) providing regarding the detention of aliens Pursuant to the regulatory reform effective literacy programming which pending completion of removal provisions of Executive Orders 13771 serves both general and specialized proceedings. The Attorney General also and 13777, CRT is undertaking a review inmate needs. is responsible for civil litigation and of its guidance documents to determine Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) criminal prosecutions relating to the whether any of those documents may be immigration laws. outdated, inconsistent, or duplicative, The Federal Bureau of Investigation is In particular, EOIR intends to propose and to ensure compliance with the responsible for protecting and defending revisions to the existing asylum Attorney General’s November 16, 2017 the United States against terrorist and regulations, pursuant to the Attorney Memorandum entitled Prohibition on foreign intelligence threats, upholding General’s statutory authority, to ensure Improper Guidance Documents. and enforcing the criminal laws of the

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00100 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57903

United States, and providing leadership and the Gun Control Act (GCA). The This rule provides significant non- and criminal justice services to Federal, rule will amend 27 CFR 447.11, 478.11, quantifiable benefits to public safety. state, municipal, and international and 479.11 to clarify that bump-stock- Among other things, it clarifies that a agencies and partners. Only in limited type devices are machineguns as bump-stock-type device is a contexts does the FBI rely on defined by the NFA and GCA because machinegun and limits access to them; rulemaking. For example, the FBI is such devices allow a shooter of a prevents usage of bump-stock-type currently drafting a rule that establishes semiautomatic firearm to initiate a devices for criminal purposes; reduces the criteria for use by a designated continuous firing cycle with a single casualties in mass shootings, such as the entity(ies) in making a determination of pull of the trigger. Specifically, these Las Vegas shooting; and helps protect fitness as described under the Child devices convert an otherwise first responders by preventing shooters Protection Improvements Act (CPIA), 34 semiautomatic firearm into a from using a device that allows them to United States Code § 40102, Public Law machinegun by functioning as a self- shoot a semiautomatic firearm 115–141. The CPIA requires that the acting or self-regulating mechanism that automatically. Attorney General shall, by rule, harnesses the recoil energy of the Risks: Without this rule, public safety establish the criteria for use by semiautomatic firearm in a manner that will continue to be threatened by the designated entities in making a allows the trigger to reset and continue widespread availability to the public of determination of fitness described in firing without additional physical bump-stock-devices. subsection (b)(4) of the Act concerning manipulation of the trigger by the Timetable: whether the provider has been shooter. convicted of, or is under pending Summary of Legal Basis: The Attorney Action Date FR Cite indictment for, a crime that bears upon General has express authority pursuant the provider’s fitness to have to 18 U.S.C. 926 to prescribe rules and ANPRM ...... 12/26/17 82 FR 60929 ANPRM Comment 01/25/18 responsibility for the safety and well- regulations necessary to carry out the provisions of Chapter 44, Title 18, Period End. being of children, the elderly, or NPRM ...... 03/29/18 83 FR 13442 individuals with disabilities and shall United States Code. The detailed legal NPRM Comment 06/27/18 convey that determination to the analysis supporting the definition of Period End. qualified entity. Such criteria shall be machinegun proposed for adoption in Final Action ...... 12/00/18 based on the criteria established this rule is expressed in the abstract for pursuant to section 108(a)(3)(G)(i) of the the rule itself. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Prosecutorial Remedies and Other Tools Alternatives: There are no feasible Required: Yes. to end the Exploitation of Children alternatives to the proposed rule that Small Entities Affected: Businesses. Today Act of 2003 (34 U.S.C. 40102 would allow ATF to regulate bump- Government Levels Affected: None. note) and section 658H of the Child Care stock-type devices. Absent Agency Contact: Vivian Chu, and Development Block Grant Act of congressional action, the only feasible Regulations Attorney, Department of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9858f). alternative is to maintain the status quo. Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Firearms, and Explosives, 99 New York rule will be ‘‘economically significant,’’ Avenue NE, Washington, DC 20226, that is, the rule will have an annual Phone: 202 648–7070. DOJ—BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, effect on the economy of $100 million, RIN: 1140–AA52 TOBACCO, FIREARMS, AND or adversely affect in a material way the EXPLOSIVES (ATF) economy, a sector of the economy, the environment, public health or safety or Final Rule Stage State, local or tribal governments or DOJ—DRUG ENFORCEMENT 92. Bump-Stock-Type Devices communities. ATF estimates the total ADMINISTRATION (DEA) Priority: Economically Significant. cost of this rule at $320.9 million over Proposed Rule Stage 10 years. The total 7% discount cost is Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. 93. Implementation of the Provision of E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory. estimated at $234.1 million, and the the Comprehensive Addiction and Legal Authority: 18 U.S.C. 921 et seq.; discounted costs would be $39.6 million Recovery Act of 2016 Relating to the 26 U.S.C. 5841 et seq. and $39.2 million annualized at 3% and CFR Citation: 27 CFR 478; 27 CFR 7% respectively. The estimate includes Partial Filling of Prescriptions for 479. costs to the public for loss of property Schedule II Controlled Substances Legal Deadline: None. ($102,470,977); costs of forgone future Priority: Other Significant. Abstract: The Department of Justice is production and sales ($213,031,753); E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. issuing a rulemaking that would and costs for disposal ($5,448,330). Legal Authority: 21 U.S.C. 821; 21 interpret the statutory definition of Unquantified costs include lost U.S.C. 829; 21 U.S.C. 831; 21 U.S.C. 871; machinegun in the National Firearms employment, notification to bump- Pub. L. 114–198, sec. 702 Act of 1934 and Gun Control Act of stock-type device owners of the need to CFR Citation: 21 CFR 1306. 1968 to clarify whether certain devices, destroy the bump-stock-type devices, Legal Deadline: None. commonly known as bump-fire stocks, and loss of future usage by the owners Abstract: On July 22, 2016, the fall within that definition. of bump-stock-type devices. ATF did Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Statement of Need: This rule is not calculate any cost savings for this Act (CARA) of 2016 became law. One intended to clarify that the statutory final rule. It is anticipated that the rule section of the CARA amended the definition of machinegun includes will cost $129,222,483 million in the Controlled Substances Act to allow a certain devices (i.e., bump-stock-type first year (the year with the highest pharmacist, if certain conditions are devices) that, when affixed to a firearm, costs). This cost includes the first-year met, to partially fill a prescription for a allow that firearm to fire automatically cost to destroy or modify all existing schedule II controlled substance when with a single function of the trigger, bump-stock-type devices, including requested by the prescribing practitioner such that they are subject to regulation unsellable inventory and opportunity or the patient. The Drug Enforcement under the National Firearms Act (NFA) cost of time. Administration is proposing to amend

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00101 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57904 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

its regulations to implement this also ensures accountability and prevents II controlled substances, which was statutory change. diversion of controlled substances. The previously prohibited. Statement of Need: This rule is DEA will request comment on the Risks: If the DEA did not promulgate needed to implement the partial fill proposed rule and will consider all this rule, patients and practitioners provisions of the CARA. The CARA alternatives. Special consideration will would face uncertainty in complying amended the CSA to allow for the be given to flexible approaches that with the requirements for partial fills of partial filling of prescriptions for reduce burdens and maintain freedom prescriptions for schedule II controlled schedule II controlled substances under of choice for the public. substances. While the statute does certain conditions. Specifically, the Some of the provisions in this directly address many aspects of the CARA amended 21 U.S.C. 829 by proposed rule merely restate the general partial fill process, there are a number adding new subsection (f), which allows requirements of the CARA for partial of details left out, which must be a pharmacist to partially fill a filling of prescriptions for schedule II supplied by regulation. Without such prescription for a schedule II controlled controlled substances. Since these clarifying regulations, few practitioners substance where requested by the provisions are mandated by Congress, would take advantage of the partial fill prescribing practitioner or the patient. the DEA is obligated to incorporate provisions for fear of violating federal However, the CARA does not state how them into its regulations, and has no law, thus frustrating the original the prescribing practitioner should discretion to consider alternatives. purposes of the CARA. indicate that a prescription for a Anticipated Cost and Benefits: In Timetable: schedule II controlled substance be order to ensure accountability and partially filled, nor how a pharmacist maintain the closed system of Action Date FR Cite should record the partial filling of such distribution, the proposed rule will NPRM ...... 12/00/18 a prescription. This rule proposes likely impose certain costs on DEA prescribing and recordkeeping registrants. Current projections indicate requirements to provide clear direction Regulatory Flexibility Analysis the primary cost would be the Required: No. to practitioners and patients. additional time needed to be spent by The changes in this rule are also Small Entities Affected: No. pharmacies to fill the remaining important in helping address the Government Levels Affected: None. portions of partially filled prescriptions. URL For Public Comments: ongoing opioid epidemic, by allowing Whereas before the CARA, a pharmacy www.regulations.gov/. practitioners and patients to limit the would fill all of a schedule II Agency Contact: Kathy L. Federico, amount of schedule II opioids left prescription during a single visit by a Acting Section Chief, Regulatory unused after a course of treatment. Drafting and Support Section/Diversion Summary of Legal Basis: While the patient, if the practitioner or the patient Control Division, Department of Justice, CARA laid out the framework for partial requests a partial fill, the pharmacy will Drug Enforcement Administration, 8701 filling of prescriptions for schedule II only fill part of the prescription on the Morrissette Drive, Springfield, VA controlled substances, there were a patient’s first visit, and will need to fill number of issues left unresolved. the remainder of the prescription if the 22152, Phone: 202 598–2596, Fax: 202 Congress granted the DEA authority to patient returns for a second visit. The 307–9536, Email: fill in any gaps in the regulatory scheme DEA currently estimates the total cost of www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov. RIN: 1117–AB45 not addressed by the statute itself; the the proposed rule to be approximately CARA provides that partial filling of $12 million annually. schedule II prescriptions is permitted if The provisions of this rule may also the prescription is written and filled in require prescribers to take additional DOJ—EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR accordance with, among other things, time writing prescriptions, since they IMMIGRATION REVIEW (EOIR) regulations issued by DEA. would need to include partial fill Proposed Rule Stage Additionally, under 21 U.S.C. 871(b), instructions on the prescriptions, and the Attorney General may promulgate pharmacists to take additional time 94. • Procedures for Asylum and enforce any rules, regulations, and tracking the status of partially filled prescriptions, in order to ensure that the Priority: Other Significant. procedures deemed necessary for the E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. efficient execution of the Attorney proper amount of medication is Legal Authority: 8 U.S.C. General’s functions, including general dispensed if a patient returns to fill the 1158(b)(2)(C); 8 U.S.C. 1229a(c)(4) enforcement of the CSA. Consistent remainder of a prescription, but the CFR Citation: 8 CFR 1208.3; 8 CFR with 21 U.S.C. 871(a), the Attorney DEA believes this additional time 1208.13; 8 CFR 1208.16. General has delegated that authority to required would be minimal, and that the Legal Deadline: None. the DEA. cost of such additional time would be Abstract: This rule will amend the Alternatives: This rule would only minimal. regulations related to asylum, including amend the DEA’s regulations to the There is also the potential for benefits bars to asylum eligibility, the form of an extent necessary to fully implement the to patients and society as a result of this alien’s application for asylum, and the partial fill provisions of the CARA, and proposed rule. Patients could request a reconsideration of discretionary denials would be in addition to the existing partial fill of a prescription if they are of such applications. regulations of 21 CFR 1306.13. unlikely to use the full amount, and Statement of Need: The rule seeks to Consistent with 21 U.S.C. 829(f)(3), any save money by not paying for pills they better promote the Attorney General’s circumstances allowing a lawful partial would not use. Furthermore, reducing application of law through his fill prior to the implementation of the the quantity of leftover schedule II discretionary authorities that statute and statute would still be allowed under the controlled substances would reduce the existing regulation provide. The new rules. risk of diversion and the risk of Attorney General seeks to clarify and The proposed rule will include improper disposal and associated expand upon certain provisions related provisions aimed at giving patients and environmental impact. This is an to asylum. practitioners a simple and low-cost way enabling rule because it allows for Summary of Legal Basis: The to request and record partial fills that partial fills of prescriptions for schedule Immigration and Nationality Act

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00102 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57905

provides the Attorney General with the committed to fully and fairly enforcing acquisition of needed skills, and helping broad and general authority to establish, the laws under its jurisdiction. The vast the regulated community to do its part. by regulation, bases for findings of majority of employers work hard to keep The Department’s Regulatory Agenda ineligibility for asylum INA their workplaces safe and to comply is consistent with the requirements of 208(b)(2)(C); 8 U.S.C. 1158(b)(2)(C). with wage and pension laws. Section 1 of Executive Order (E.O.) Alternatives: The alternative to this Acknowledging this, the Department is 13771 ‘‘Reducing Regulation and rulemaking would be to continue to working to provide compliance Controlling Regulatory Costs,’’ 82 FR leave immigration court and BIA assistance, to give employers the 9339 (January 30, 2017) recognizes that adjudicators without clear rules by knowledge and tools they need to ‘‘it is essential to manage costs which they should evaluate applications comply with their obligations in these associated with the governmental for asylum and to further burden the areas. Compliance with the law is, imposition of private expenditures backlogged immigration courts with however, mandatory. Employers that do required to comply with Federal incomplete applications. not comply with the law will continue Regulations.’’ Anticipated Cost and Benefits: There to be subject to enforcement. are no anticipated costs associated with During the past year, the Department The Department’s Regulatory Priorities the DOJ portion of the rule. EOIR will took action to help millions employed The Department’s Employee Benefits benefit from the rule’s promulgation by by small businesses gain access to Security Administration (EBSA) works reducing resources spent processing quality, affordable health coverage to protect the benefit plans of workers, incomplete or invalid asylum claims. through its Association Health Plan retirees, and their families. Risks: EOIR does not anticipate any reform. This reform allows employers, On August 31, 2018, President Trump risks associated with the DOJ portion of including small businesses, and issued an executive order establishing this rulemaking. working owners—many of whom are the policy of the Federal Government to Timetable: facing much higher premiums and fewer expand access to workplace retirement coverage options as a result of plans. Pursuant to the executive order, Action Date FR Cite Obamacare—a greater ability to join EBSA will consider ways to permit together and gain many of the regulatory employees at different businesses to NPRM ...... 12/00/18 advantages enjoyed by large employers, participate in a single workplace plan. NPRM Comment 02/00/19 and thereby offer better health coverage Period End. EBSA intends to consider ways to allow options to their employees. small businesses to sponsor Association In the coming year, the Department Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Retirement Plans for their employees. will build upon its previous work in EBSA also intends to consider ways to Required: No. providing for workforce protections, Small Entities Affected: No. expand access to workplace plans for protecting the jobs of American workers, Government Levels Affected: Federal. sole proprietors, sometimes called and helping the workforce add more Agency Contact: Lauren Alder Reid, working owners. To implement these family-sustaining jobs. Assistant Director, Department of steps, EBSA is considering issuing a Justice, Executive Office for Immigration The Secretary of Labor’s Regulatory notice of proposed rulemaking that Review, 5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2616, Plan for Accomplishing These would clarify when separate businesses Falls Church, VA 20530, Phone: 703 Objectives can elect to jointly sponsor an Association Retirement Plan. 305–0289, Email: [email protected]. In general, the Department will work RIN: 1125–AA87 to assist employees and employers to EBSA, in conjunction with the Department of the Treasury and the BILLING CODE 4410–BP–P meet their needs in a helpful manner, with a minimum of rulemaking. Department of Health and Human The Department will roll back Services will, consistent with Executive regulations that harm American workers Order 13813, consider proposing DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and families—but we will do so while regulations or revising guidance 2018 Regulatory Plan respecting the principles and consistent with law and sound policy to institutions that make us who we are as increase the usability of health Executive Summary: Safe and Family- reimbursement arrangements (HRAs), to Sustaining Jobs Americans. Where regulatory actions are expand employers’ ability to offer HRAs The Department of Labor’s mission is necessary, they will be accomplished in to their employees, and to allow HRAs to foster, promote, and develop the a thoughtful and careful manner. The to be used in conjunction with welfare of the wage earners, job seekers, Department seeks to achieve needed nongroup coverage. and retirees of the United States; employee protections while limiting the The Wage and Hour Division (WHD) improve working conditions; advance burdens regulations place on employers. administers numerous laws that opportunities for profitable The Department’s regulatory actions establish the minimum standards for employment; and assure work-related will provide American employers with wages and working conditions in the benefits and rights. The Department certainty about workforce rules. The United States. WHD will propose an works to hold employers accountable Department’s regulatory plan will make updated salary level for the exemption for their legal obligations to their employers’ obligations under current of executive, administrative, and employees, while recognizing that the law clear, while respecting the rule of professional employees for overtime Department also has a duty to help law. Where Congress is silent, the purposes. In developing the NPRM, the employers understand and comply with Department does not have the authority Department has been informed by the the many laws and regulations affecting to write the law. comments previously received in their workplaces. The proposals that follow are response to its Request for Information. The Secretary of Labor has made common-sense approaches in areas WHD will also propose an update to protecting America’s employees and needing regulatory attention, presenting its regulations concerning joint promoting job creation his top priorities. a balanced plan for protecting employment, i.e., those situations in Under his leadership, the Department is employees, aiding them in the which a worker is considered an

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00103 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57906 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

employee of two or more employers personally identifiable information (PII) Labor Standards Act’s minimum wage jointly. included on Forms 300 and 301 in the and overtime requirements. The Under the Fair Labor Standards Act May 2016 final rule, OSHA has now Department’s NPRM will propose an (FLSA), employers must pay covered determined that it cannot guarantee the updated salary level for exemption and employees at least one and one half non-release of private information. It seek the public’s view on the salary times their regular rate of pay for hours has now proposed requiring submission level and related issues. worked in excess of 40 hours per of only the Form 300A summary data, Summary of Legal Basis: These workweek. WHD will propose to amend which does not include any private regulations are authorized by section its regulations to clarify, update, and information, not the individual, case- 13(a)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, define regular rate requirements under specific data recorded in Forms 300 and 29 U.S.C. 213(a)(1). the FLSA. 301. If finalized, the rule would allow Alternatives: Alternatives will be The Office of Federal Contract OSHA to continue to use the summary developed in considering any proposed Compliance Programs (OFCCP) ensures data to make targeted inspections, while revisions to the current regulations. The that federal contractors and better protecting worker privacy. public will be invited to provide subcontractors take affirmative action OSHA also continues work on its comments on any proposed revisions and do not, among other things, Standards Improvements Projects (SIPs), and possible alternatives. discriminate on the basis of race, color, with the plan to finalize SIP IV next. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, These actions are intended to remove or Department will prepare estimates of religion, national origin, disability, or revise duplicative, unnecessary, and the anticipated costs and benefits status as a protected veteran. OFCCP inconsistent safety and health associated with the proposed rule. plans to update its regulations to standards. OSHA published three earlier Risks: This action does not affect comply with current law regarding final standards to remove unnecessary public health, safety, or the protections for religious organizations. provisions, reducing costs or paperwork environment. The Occupational Safety and Health burden on affected employers, while Timetable: Administration (OSHA) oversee a wide maintaining needed worker protections. range of standards that are designed to Finally, the Employment and Training Action Date FR Cite reduce occupational deaths, injuries, Administration (ETA) administers and illnesses. OSHA is committed to the federal job training and worker Request for Infor- 07/26/17 82 FR 34616 establishment of clear, common-sense dislocation adjustment programs, mation (RFI). RFI Comment Pe- 09/25/17 standards to help accomplish this. The federal grants to states for public OSHA items discussed below are riod End. employment service programs, and NPRM ...... 03/00/19 deregulatory in nature, in that they unemployment insurance benefits. ETA reduce burden, while maintaining and WHD are amending regulations Regulatory Flexibility Analysis needed worker protections. regarding the H–2A non-immigrant visa OSHA continues its work to protect Required: Undetermined. program. This action will include workers from occupational exposures to Government Levels Affected: necessary technical improvements to beryllium. Following the publication of Undetermined. the existing H–2A regulations, a revised beryllium standard in January Agency Contact: Melissa Smith, modernizing and streamlining the 2017, OSHA received evidence that Director, Regulations, Legislation and functionality of the program. exposure in the shipyards and Interpretations, Department of Labor, construction is limited to a few Wage and Hour Division, 200 operations and that requiring the Constitution Avenue NW, Room S– ancillary provisions broadly may not DOL—WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION 3502, Washington, DC 20210, Phone: improve worker protection and may be (WHD) 202 693–0406, Fax: 202 693–1387. redundant with overlapping protections RIN: 1235–AA20 in other standards. Accordingly, OSHA Proposed Rule Stage sought comment on, among other 95. Defining and Delimiting the things, whether existing standards Exemptions for Executive, DOL—WHD covering abrasive blasting in Administrative, Professional, Outside construction, abrasive blasting in Sales and Computer Employees 96. Regular and Basic Rates Under the Fair Labor Standards Act shipyards, and welding in shipyards Priority: Other Significant. provide adequate protection for workers E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. Priority: Other Significant. Major engaged in these operations. The agency Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is is reviewing the public comments and CFR Citation: 29 CFR 541. undetermined. formulating a final rule. Legal Deadline: None. Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. OSHA issued a proposal on July 30, Abstract: The Department intends to E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. 2018, to revise provisions of the May 12, issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Legal Authority: 29 U.S.C. 201 et seq. 2016, Improve Tracking of Workplace (NPRM) to determine the appropriate CFR Citation: 29 CFR 548; 29 CFR Injuries and Illnesses final rule. OSHA salary level for exemption of executive, 778. reviewed the May 2016 final rule as part administrative and professional Legal Deadline: None. of its regulatory reform efforts and employees. In developing the NPRM, Abstract: In this Notice of Proposed proposed changes intended to reduce the Department will be informed by the Rulemaking, the Department will unnecessary burdens while maintaining comments received in response to its propose to amend 29 CFR parts 548 and worker protections. In particular, the Request for Information. 778, to clarify, update, and define basic proposed rule addresses concerns about Statement of Need: WHD is reviewing rate and regular rate requirements under the release of private information in the the regulations at 29 CFR 541, which sections 7(e) and 7(g)(3) of the Fair electronic submission of injury and implement the exemption of bona fide Labor Standards Act. illness reports by employers. Although executive, administrative, and Statement of Need: The majority of 29 OSHA stated its intention not to publish professional employees from the Fair CFR part 778 was promulgated more

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00104 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57907

than sixty years ago. The Department Wage and Hour Division, 200 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis believes that changes in the 21st century Constitution Avenue NW, Room S– Required: Undetermined. workplace are not reflected in its 3502, Washington, DC 20210, Phone: Small Entities Affected: Businesses. current regulatory framework. While the 202 693–0406, Fax: 202 693–1387. Government Levels Affected: Local, Department has periodically updated RIN: 1235–AA24 State, Tribal. various sections of part 778 over the Agency Contact: Melissa Smith, past several decades, they have not Director, Regulations, Legislation and Interpretations, Department of Labor, addressed the changes in compensation DOL—WHD practices and relevant laws. The Wage and Hour Division, 200 • Department is interested in ensuring 97. Joint Employment Under the Fair Constitution Avenue NW, Room S– that its regulations provide appropriate Labor Standards Act 3502, Washington, DC 20210, Phone: guidance to employers offering these Priority: Other Significant. Major 202 693–0406, Fax: 202 693–1387. more modern forms of compensation status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is RIN: 1235–AA26 and benefits regarding their inclusion undetermined. in, or exclusion from, the regular rate. E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. Clarifying this issue will ensure that Legal Authority: Fair Labor Standards DOL—EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING employers have the flexibility to Act, 29 U.S.C. 201 et seq. ADMINISTRATION (ETA) provide such compensation and benefits CFR Citation: 29 CFR 791. to their employees, thereby providing Legal Deadline: None. Proposed Rule Stage Abstract: In this Notice of Proposed employers more flexibility in the 98. • Labor Certification Process for compensation and benefits packages Rulemaking, the Department will propose to clarify the contours of the Temporary Agricultural Employment in they offer to employees. Similarly, the the United States (H–2A Workers) Department believes that the proposed joint employment relationship to assist changes will facilitate compliance with the regulated community in complying Priority: Other Significant. Major the FLSA and lessen litigation regarding with the Fair Labor Standards Act. status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is Statement of Need: The majority of 29 the regular rate. Additionally, the undetermined. CFR part 791 was promulgated sixty Department has not updated part 548 Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. years ago. The Department believes that E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. since 1967. changes in the 21st century workplace Legal Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1188 Summary of Legal Basis: Part 778 are not reflected in its current regulatory CFR Citation: 20 CFR 655, subpart B; constitutes the official interpretation of framework. Consistent with the 29 CFR 501. the Department with respect to the Administration’s priorities to enact Legal Deadline: None. meaning and application of the administrative reforms and provide Abstract: The United States maximum hours and overtime clarity to enhance compliance, the Department of Labor’s (DOL) compensation requirements contained Department is considering changes to its Employment and Training in section 7 of the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. 207, regulations concerning joint Administration and Wage and Hour including calculation of the regular rate. employment under the Fair Labor Division are amending regulations Additionally, part 548 sets out the Standards Act. These proposed changes regarding the H–2A non-immigrant visa requirements for authorized basic rates are intended to provide clarity to the program at 20 CFR part 655, subpart B. under section 7(g)(3) of the FLSA, 29 regulated community and thereby The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking U.S.C. 207(g). enhance compliance. The Department (NPRM) will include necessary Alternatives: Alternatives will be believes the proposed changes will help technical improvements to the existing developed in considering any proposed to provide more uniform standards H–2A regulations which will modernize revisions to the current regulations. The nationwide. and streamline the overall function of public will be invited to provide Summary of Legal Basis: This the program. The NPRM will also make comments on any proposed revisions regulation is authorized by sections necessary legal changes to modernize and possible alternatives. 3(d), (e), and (g) of the Fair Labor the regulation that have arisen since the Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. 203(d), (e), and current H–2A regulation was published Department will prepare estimates of (g). Part 791 constitutes the official in 2010. the anticipated costs and benefits interpretation of the Department with Statement of Need: DOL has associated with the proposed rule. respect to joint employment. identified necessary areas of the Risks: This action does not affect Alternatives: Alternatives will be regulation that should be modernized public health, safety, or the developed in considering any proposed and streamlined so that the agency can environment. revisions to the current regulations. The more effectively carry out its mandate to Timetable: public will be invited to provide protect the wages and working Action Date FR Cite comments on any proposed revisions conditions of U.S. workers while also and possible alternatives. allowing the program to operate NPRM ...... 12/00/18 Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The efficiently. DOL has also identified legal Department will prepare estimates of issues with the current regulation that Regulatory Flexibility Analysis the anticipated costs and benefits must be addressed. Required: Undetermined. associated with the proposed rule. Summary of Legal Basis: ETA is Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Risks: This action does not affect undertaking this rulemaking pursuant to Governmental Jurisdictions, public health, safety, or the its authority under section 218 of the Organizations. environment. Immigration and Nationality Act. In Government Levels Affected: Federal, Timetable: addition, courts have issued decisions Local, State, Tribal. since the publication of the current Agency Contact: Melissa Smith, Action Date FR Cite regulation that have presented legal Director, Regulations, Legislation and NPRM ...... 12/00/18 issues with the regulation that must be Interpretations, Department of Labor, addressed.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00105 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57908 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

Alternatives: Alternatives will be expand employers’ ability to offer HRAs retirement plans, including 401(k)s. provided and open to public comment to their employees, and to allow HRAs Small businesses are particularly in the NPRM. to be used in conjunction with unlikely to offer workplace retirement Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The nongroup coverage. plans because of high costs and estimates of the costs and benefits are Summary of Legal Basis: Current joint regulatory burdens. Regulatory changes still under development. final regulation issued by the are needed to make it easier and less Risks: This action does not affect the Departments prohibited HRA expensive for small businesses to offer public health, safety, or the integration with individual market workplace retirement plans to their environment. policies. See 26 CFR 54.9815.2711, 29 employees. Executive Order 13847, 83 Timetable: CFR 2590.715–2711, and 45 CFR FR 45321, directed the Secretary of 147.126. The Departments are Labor to examine policies that would Action Date FR Cite considering proposing regulations that clarify and expand the circumstances would permit integration and expand under which U.S. employers, especially NPRM ...... 12/00/18 usability of HRAs in certain small and mid-sized businesses, may circumstances. sponsor or participate in a multiple Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Alternatives: To be determined. employer plan or MEP as a workplace Required: Undetermined. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: To be retirement savings option offered to Small Entities Affected: Businesses. determined. their employees, subject to appropriate Government Levels Affected: Risks: To be determined. safeguards. Undetermined. Timetable: Summary of Legal Basis: The proposal Federalism: Undetermined. would clarify the statutory definition of Agency Contact: William W. Action Date FR Cite employer in section 3(5) of the Thompson, II, Administrator, Office of NPRM ...... 10/00/18 Employee Retirement Income Security Foreign Labor Certification, Department Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1002. This of Labor, Employment and Training Regulatory Flexibility Analysis definition includes direct employers Administration, 200 Constitution Required: Undetermined. and any other person acting indirectly Avenue NW, Box #12–200, Washington, Government Levels Affected: in the interest of the employer in DC 20210, Phone: 202 513–7350. Undetermined. relation to an employee benefit plan, RIN: 1205–AB89 Federalism: Undetermined. including a group or association of Agency Contact: Amy J. Turner, employers acting for an employer in Director, Office of Health Plan such capacity. Section 505 of ERISA, 29 DOL—EMPLOYEE BENEFITS Standards and Compliance Assistance, U.S.C. 1135, provides that the Secretary SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (EBSA) Department of Labor, Employee Benefits of Labor may prescribe such regulations Security Administration, 200 as he finds necessary or appropriate to Proposed Rule Stage Constitution Avenue NW, FP Building, carry out the provisions of this title. 99. • Health Reimbursement Room N–5653, Washington, DC 20210, Alternatives: The Department intends Arrangements and Other Account- Phone: 202 693–8335, Fax: 202 219– to conduct an assessment of costs and Based Group Health Plans 1942. benefits of potentially effective and RIN: 1210–AB87 reasonably feasible alternatives to the Priority: Economically Significant. planned regulation, which are identified Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is by the public, in order to conclude why undetermined. the planned regulatory action is DOL—EBSA Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. preferable to the identified potential E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. 100. • Definition of an ‘‘Employer’’ alternatives. Legal Authority: Public Law 111–148 Under Section 3(5) of ERISA— Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined. Association Retirement Plans and Department intends to conduct an Legal Deadline: None. Other Multiple Employer Plans assessment of costs and benefits Abstract: This regulatory action is Priority: Economically Significant. anticipated from the regulatory action being proposed in response to Executive Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is together with, to the extent feasible, a Order 13813, Promoting Healthcare undetermined. quantification of those costs and Choice and Competition Across the Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. benefits. United States, and would increase the E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. Risks: This regulatory action is usability of HRAs, to expand employers’ Legal Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1002(2), intended to reduce the risk that ability to offer HRAs to their employees, 1002(5) and 1135 America’s workers will enter retirement and to allow HRAs to be used in CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined. with inadequate financial resources. conjunction with nongroup coverage. Legal Deadline: None. Too many American workers, including Statement of Need: This regulatory Abstract: This regulatory action one-third of those in the private-sector, action is being proposed in response to would establish criteria under section have no access to workplace retirement , ‘‘Promoting 3(5) of the Employee Retirement Income plans, burdening them with concerns Healthcare Choice and Competition Security Act (ERISA) for purposes of about their financial futures. Polling Across the United States.’’ The being an ‘‘employer’’ able to establish shows that nearly half of all Americans Executive Order directs the Departments and maintain an employee pension are concerned they will not have of Labor, Health and Human Services, benefit plan (as defined in section 3(2) enough money to live on during and the Treasury (collectively, the of ERISA) that is a multiple employer retirement. Departments) to consider proposing retirement savings plan (other than a Timetable: regulations or revising guidance multiemployer plan defined in section consistent with law and sound policy to 3(37) of ERISA). Action Date FR Cite increase the usability of health- Statement of Need: Many Americans NPRM ...... 10/00/18 reimbursement arrangements (HRAs), to do not have access to workplace

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00106 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57909

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis status quo. In each instance, OSHA has Legal Authority: 29 U.S.C. 657; 29 Required: Undetermined. concluded that the benefits of the U.S.C. 673 Government Levels Affected: proposed regulatory change outweigh CFR Citation: 29 CFR 1904. Undetermined. the costs of those changes. In a few of Legal Deadline: None. Federalism: Undetermined. the items, such as the proposed changes Abstract: OSHA published a proposed Agency Contact: Jeffrey J. Turner, to the decompression requirements rule on July 30, 2018, to remove Deputy Director, Office of Regulations applicable to employees working in provisions to the Improve Tracking of and Interpretations, Department of compressed air environments, OSHA Workplace Injuries and Illnesses final Labor, Employee Benefits Security has requested public comment on rule, 81 FR 29624 (May 12, 2016). Administration, 200 Constitution feasible alternatives to the Agency’s OSHA proposed to amend its Avenue NW, FP Building, Room N– proposal. recordkeeping regulation to remove the 5655, Washington, DC 20210, Phone: Anticipated Cost and Benefits: OSHA requirement to electronically submit to 202 693–8500, Email: turner.jeffrey@ has estimated that, at 3 percent discount OSHA information from the OSHA dol.gov. rate over 10 years, there are net annual Form 300 (Log of Work-Related Injuries RIN: 1210–AB88 cost savings of $6.1 million per year for and Illnesses) and OSHA Form 301 this final rule; at a discount rate of 7 (Injury and Illness Incident Report) for percent there are net annual cost savings establishments with 250 or more DOL—OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND at $6.1 million per year. When the employees which are required to HEALTH ADMINISTRATION (OSHA) Department uses a perpetual time routinely keep injury and illness horizon, the annualized cost savings of records. Under the proposed rule, these Final Rule Stage the final rule is $6.1 million with 7 establishments would be required to 101. Standards Improvement Project IV percent discounting. electronically submit only information Risks: SIP rulemakings do not address from the OSHA Form 300A (Summary Priority: Other Significant. Major new significant risks or estimate of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses). status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is benefits and economic impacts of OSHA also proposed to add the undetermined. reducing such risks. Overall, SIP E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. Employer Identification Number (EIN) Legal Authority: 29 U.S.C. 655(b) rulemakings are reasonably necessary to the data collection to increase the CFR Citation: 29 CFR 1926. under the OSH Act because they likelihood that the Bureau of Labor Legal Deadline: None. provide cost savings, or eliminate Statistics (BLS) would be able to match Abstract: OSHA’s Standards unnecessary requirements. OSHA-collected data to BLS Survey of Improvement Projects (SIPs) are Timetable: Occupational Injury and Illness (SOII) intended to remove or revise data and potentially reduce the burden duplicative, unnecessary, and Action Date FR Cite on employers who are required to report inconsistent safety and health injury and illness data both to OSHA Request for Infor- 12/06/12 77 FR 72781 (for the electronic recordkeeping standards. The Agency has published mation (RFI). three earlier final standards to remove RFI Comment Pe- 02/04/13 requirement) and to BLS (for SOII). unnecessary provisions (63 FR 33450, riod End. OSHA is reviewing comments and will 70 FR 1111 and 76 FR 33590), thus NPRM ...... 10/04/16 81 FR 68504 publish a final rule in June 2019. reducing costs or paperwork burden on NPRM Comment 12/02/16 81 FR 86987 Statement of Need: The preamble to affected employers. This latest project Period Ex- the May 2016 final rule pointed to identified revisions to existing tended. publication of the collected data as a standards in OSHA’s recordkeeping, NPRM Comment 01/04/17 method to improve workplace safety Period Ex- general industry, maritime, and and health through the rule’s tended End. requirements. OSHA has preliminarily construction standards, with most of the Final Rule ...... 12/00/18 revisions to its construction standards. determined that the risk of disclosure of the personally identifiable information OSHA also proposed to remove from its Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (PII) on the OSHA Form 300 and 301, standards the requirements that Required: No. the cost to OSHA of collection and employers include an employee’s social Small Entities Affected: Businesses. using the information, and the reporting security number (SSN) on exposure Government Levels Affected: monitoring, medical surveillance, and burden on employers are unjustified Undetermined. given the uncertain benefits of other records in order to protect Agency Contact: Dean McKenzie, employee privacy and prevent identity collecting the information. Director, Directorate of Construction, Summary of Legal Basis: OSHA is fraud. Department of Labor, Occupational Statement of Need: The Agency has issuing this proposed rule pursuant to Safety and Health Administration, 200 proposed a fourth rule that identified authority expressly granted by sections Constitution Avenue NW, FP Building, unnecessary or duplicative provisions 8 and 24 of the Occupational Safety and Room N–3468, Washington, DC 20210, or paperwork requirements. Health Act (the OSH Act or Act) (29 Phone: 202 693–2020, Fax: 202 693– Summary of Legal Basis: OSHA is U.S.C. 657 and 673). 1689, Email: [email protected]. conducting Phase IV of the Standards Alternatives: The alternative for the Improvement Project (SIP–IV) in RIN: 1218–AC67 proposed changes contained in the response to the President’s Executive NPRM is to retain the existing Order 13563, Improving Regulations regulatory language, i.e., retaining the and Regulatory Review (76 FR 38210). DOL—OSHA status quo. OSHA has proposed that the Alternatives: The main alternative benefits of the proposed regulatory 102. Tracking of Workplace Injuries OSHA considered for all of the change outweigh the costs of those and Illnesses proposed changes contained in the SIP– changes. OSHA has requested public IV rulemaking was retaining the existing Priority: Other Significant. comment on feasible alternatives to the regulatory language, i.e., retaining the E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. Agency’s proposal.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00107 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57910 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The significant risk to the maximum extent Summary of Legal Basis: 29 U.S.C. removal of the case specific requirement feasible. After a review of the comments 655(b); 29 U.S.C. 657. reduces costs. OSHA estimates that the received and a review of the Alternatives: OSHA has several rule will have net economic cost savings applicability of existing OSHA potential options. The first is to retain of $8.75 million per year. The Agency standards, OSHA proposed to revoke the original standards promulgated in believes that the loss in annual benefits, ancillary provisions applicable to the 2017 for construction and shipyards, while unquantified, are significantly construction and shipyard sectors on including all ancillary provisions. less than the annual cost savings, hence June 28, 2018 (82 FR 29182), but to there are positive net benefits to this retain the new lower PEL of 0.2 mg/m3 Alternatively, OSHA is evaluating proposed rule. and the STEL of 2.0 mg/m3 for those whether there is benefit to retaining Risks: This rulemaking does not sectors. OSHA has evidence that certain ancillary provisions that were address new significant risks or estimate beryllium exposure in these sectors is proposed for rescission. benefits and economic impacts of limited to the following operations: Anticipated Cost and Benefits: OSHA reducing such risks. Overall, this Abrasive blasting in construction, preliminarily estimated that rescinding rulemaking is reasonably necessary abrasive blasting in shipyards, and the ancillary provisions will result in under the OSH Act because it provides welding in shipyards. OSHA has a cost savings to shipyard and cost savings, or eliminates unnecessary number of standards already specifically construction establishments. For requirements. applicable to these operations, construction, cost savings are $8.8 Timetable: including ventilation (29 CFR 1926.57) million (7% discounting) and $8.6 and mechanical paint removers (29 CFR million (3% discounting). For Action Date FR Cite 1915.34). Because OSHA determined shipyards, cost savings are $3.5 million that there is significant risk of material NPRM ...... 07/03/18 83 FR 36494 (7% discounting) and $3.4 million (3% NPRM Comment 09/28/18 impairment of health at the new lower discounting). OSHA has preliminarily m 3 Period End. PEL of 0.2 g/m , the Agency continues concluded that there are limited to no to believe that it is necessary to protect Final Rule ...... 06/00/19 foregone benefits (i.e., reduced number workers exposed at this level. However, of cases of Chronic Beryllium Disease) Regulatory Flexibility Analysis OSHA is now reconsidering the need for ancillary provisions in the construction as a result of revoking the ancillary Required: No. provisions of the beryllium final Government Levels Affected: State. and shipyards sectors, and is currently standards for construction and Agency Contact: Amanda Edens, reviewing comments received in Director, Directorate of Technical response to the proposal to finalize the shipyards. Support and Emergency Management, rulemaking. Risks: Department of Labor, Occupational Statement of Need: The Occupational Timetable: Safety and Health Administration, 200 Safety and Health Administration Constitution Avenue NW, FP Building, (OSHA) proposed to revoke the Action Date FR Cite Room N–3653, Washington, DC 20210, ancillary provisions for the construction Phone: 202 693–2300, Fax: 202 693– and the shipyard sectors, which OSHA NPRM (Construc- 06/27/17 82 FR 29182 1644, Email: [email protected]. adopted on January 9, 2017 (82 FR tion in Ship- RIN: 1218–AD17 2470), but retain the new lower yards) Pub- permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 0.2 lished as 1218– mg/m3 and the short term exposure limit AB76. (STEL) of 2.0 mg/m3 for each sector. NPRM (Construc- 08/28/17 DOL—OSHA tion in Ship- OSHA will not enforce the January 9, • yards) Com- 103. Occupational Exposure to 2017, shipyard and construction ment Period Beryllium and Beryllium Compounds standards without further notice while End. in Construction and Shipyard Sectors this new rulemaking is underway. Final Rule ...... 06/00/19 Priority: Other Significant. Major OSHA has determined that there is status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is significant risk of material impairment Regulatory Flexibility Analysis undetermined. of health at the new lower PEL of 0.2 mg/ Required: No. Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. m3, the Agency continues to believe that E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. it is necessary to protect workers Government Levels Affected: Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined exposed at this level. However, OSHA Undetermined. CFR Citation: None. has evidence that beryllium exposure in Federalism: Undetermined. Legal Deadline: None. these sectors is limited to the following Agency Contact: William Perry, Abstract: On January 9, 2017, OSHA operations: Abrasive blasting in Director, Directorate of Standards and published its final rule Occupational construction, abrasive blasting in Guidance, Department of Labor, Exposure to Beryllium and Beryllium shipyards, and welding in shipyards. Occupational Safety and Health Compounds in the Federal Register (82 OSHA has a number of standards Administration, 200 Constitution FR 2470). OSHA concluded that already applicable to these operations. employees exposed to beryllium and Based on a review of the comments Avenue NW, FP Building, Room N– beryllium compounds at the preceding received and a review of the 3718, Washington, DC 20210, Phone: permissible exposure limits (PELs) were applicability of existing OSHA 202 693–1950, Fax: 202 693–1678, at significant risk of material standards, OSHA is now reconsidering Email: [email protected]. impairment of health, specifically the need for ancillary provisions in the Related RIN: Related to 1218–AB76 chronic beryllium disease and lung construction and shipyards sectors, and RIN: 1218–AD21 cancer. OSHA also concluded that the is currently reviewing comments new 8-hour time-weighted average received in response to the proposal to BILLING CODE 4510–04–P (TWA) PEL of mg/m3 reduced this finalize the rulemaking.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00108 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57911

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION of different forms. For example, we 1979), Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 (DOT) publish a monthly report on our website (Regulatory Planning and Review), Introduction: Department Overview that provides a summary and the status Executive Order 13563 (Improving for all significant rulemakings that DOT Regulation and Regulatory Review), and DOT has statutory responsibility for a currently has pending or has issued section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility wide range of regulations. For example, recently (https:// Act. The Department follows a repeating DOT regulates safety in the aviation, www.transportation.gov/regulations/ 10-year plan for the review of existing motor carrier, railroad, motor vehicle, report-on-significant-rulemakings). This regulations. Information on the results commercial space, transit, and pipeline report provides the public with easy of these reviews is included in the transportation areas. The Department access to information about the Unified Agenda. also regulates aviation consumer and Department’s regulatory activities that In addition, through three new economic issues, and provides financial can be used to locate other publicly- Executive Orders, President Trump assistance and writes the necessary available information in the directed agencies to further scrutinize implementing rules for programs Department’s regulatory docket at their regulations and other agency involving highways, airports, mass www.regulations.gov, or in the Federal actions. On January 30, 2017, President transit, the maritime industry, railroads, Register. Trump signed Executive Order 13771, and motor transportation and vehicle • We also seek public input through Reducing Regulation and Controlling safety. Finally, DOT has responsibility direct engagement. For example, we Regulatory Costs. Under section 2(a) of for developing policies that implement published a request asking the public to the Executive Order, unless prohibited a wide range of regulations that govern help us identify obstacles to by law, whenever an executive programs such as acquisition and grants infrastructure projects, Transportation department or agency publicly proposes management, access for people with Infrastructure: Notice of Review of for notice and comment or otherwise disabilities, environmental protection, Policy, Guidance, and Regulation, 82 FR promulgates a new regulation, it must energy conservation, information 26734 (June 8, 2017). In response, we identify at least two existing regulations technology, occupational safety and received more than 200 comments to be repealed. On February 24, 2017, health, property asset management, proposing more than 1,000 ideas. We President Trump signed Executive seismic safety, security, and the use of have reviewed these comments and are Order 13777, enforcing the Regulatory aircraft and vehicles. The Department working to implement ideas that Reform Agenda. Under this Executive carries out its responsibilities through streamline approval processes and guide Order, each agency must establish a the Office of the Secretary (OST) and the investment in infrastructure. We also Regulatory Reform Task Force (RRTF) to following operating administrations published another notice requesting the evaluate existing regulations, and make (OAs): Federal Aviation Administration public to help us identify rules that are recommendations for their repeal, (FAA); Federal Highway Administration good candidates for repeal, replacement, replacement, or modification. On March (FHWA); Federal Motor Carrier Safety suspension, or modification, or other 28, 2017, President Trump signed Administration (FMCSA); Federal deregulatory action, 82 FR 45750 Executive Order 13783, Promoting Railroad Administration (FRA); Federal (October 2, 2017). We received over Energy Independence and Economic Transit Administration (FTA); Maritime 2,800 comments in response and are Growth, requiring agencies to review all Administration (MARAD); National currently undertaking a comprehensive existing regulations, orders, guidance Highway Traffic Safety Administration review of these comments. Finally, DOT documents, policies, and other similar (NHTSA); Pipeline and Hazardous has a long history of partnering with agency actions that potentially burden Materials Safety Administration; stakeholders to develop the development or use of domestically (PHMSA); and St. Lawrence Seaway recommendations and consensus produced energy resources, with Development Corporation (SLSDC). standards through advisory committees. particular attention to oil, natural gas, Some committees meet regularly to coal, and nuclear energy resources. The Department’s Regulatory provide advice, while others are In response to the mandate in Philosophy and Initiatives convened on an ad hoc basis to address Executive Order 13777, the Department The Department’s highest priority is specific needs. Each OA, as well as formed an RRTF consisting of senior safety. To achieve our safety goals OST, has at least one standing advisory career and non-career leaders, which responsibly and in accordance with committee. has already conducted extensive principles of good governance, we The Department’s regulatory reviews of existing regulations, and embrace a regulatory philosophy that philosophy also embraces the notion identified a number of rules to be emphasizes transparency, stakeholder that there should be no more regulations repealed, replaced, or modified. As a engagement, and regulatory restraint. than necessary. We emphasize result of the RRTF’s work, since January Our goal is to allow the public to consideration of non-regulatory 2017, the Department has issued understand how we make decisions, solutions and have rigorous processes in deregulatory actions that reduce which necessarily includes being place for continual reassessment of regulatory costs on the public by at least transparent in the way we measure the existing regulations. These processes $882 million (in net present value cost risks, costs, and benefits of engaging provide that regulations and other savings). Even when the costs of in—or deciding not to engage in—a agency actions are periodically significant regulatory actions are particular regulatory action. It is our reviewed and, if appropriate, are revised factored in, the Department’s policy to provide an opportunity for to ensure that they continue to meet the deregulatory actions in FY2018 will still public comment on such actions to all needs for which they were originally result in over $500 million in net cost interested stakeholders. Above all, designed, and that they remain cost- savings (in net present value). With the transparency and meaningful effective and cost-justified. RRTF’s assistance, the Department has engagement mandate that regulations For example, DOT regularly makes a achieved these cost savings in a manner should be straightforward, clear, and conscientious effort to review its rules that is fully consistent with enhancing accessible to any interested stakeholder. in accordance with the Department’s safety. For example, in March 2018, the • At DOT, transparency and 1979 Regulatory Policies and FAA promulgated a rule titled stakeholder engagement take a number Procedures (44 FR 11034, Feb. 26, Rotorcraft Pilot Compartment View,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00109 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57912 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

which will reduce the number of tests new and promising frontiers that will • PHMSA will focus on pipeline for nighttime operations, after the change the way we move on the ground, safety as well as the movement of Agency carefully considered the safety in water, through the air, and into space. hazardous materials across multiple data and determined the tests were Our regulatory plan reflects the modes of transportation. unnecessary. Administration’s commitment to At the same time, all OAs are The Department has also significantly fostering innovation by lifting barriers to prioritizing their regulatory and increased the number of deregulatory entry and enabling innovative and deregulatory actions accordance with actions it is pursuing. Today, DOT is exciting new uses of transportation Executive Orders 13771 and 13563, to pursuing over 120 deregulatory technology. make sure they are providing the rulemakings, up from just 16 in the fall Enabling investment in infrastructure. highest level of safety while eliminating of 2016. The safe and efficient movement of outmoded and ineffective regulations The RRTF continues to conduct goods and passengers requires us not and streamlining other existing monthly reviews across all OAs to just to maintain, but to improve our regulations in an effort to promote identify appropriate deregulatory national transportation infrastructure. economic growth, innovation, actions. The RRTF also works to ensure But that cannot happen without changes competitiveness, and job creation. Since that any new regulatory action is to the way we plan, fund, and approve each OA has its own area of focus, we rigorously vetted and non-regulatory projects. Accordingly, our Regulatory summarize the regulatory priorities of alternatives are considered. Further Plan prioritizes regulatory action that each below. information on the RRTF can be found streamlines the approval process and Office of the Secretary of online at: https:// facilitates more efficient investment in Transportation www.transportation.gov/regulations/ infrastructure. To maintain global regulatory-reform-task-force-report. The leadership and foster economic growth, OST oversees the regulatory process priorities identified below reflect the this must be one of our highest for the Department. OST implements RRTF’s work to implement the priorities. the Department’s regulatory policies and Department’s focus on reducing burdens Reducing unnecessary regulatory procedures and is responsible for and improving the effectiveness of all burdens. Finally, our Regulatory Plan ensuring the involvement of senior regulations. reflects our commitment to reducing officials in regulatory decision making. unnecessary regulatory burdens. Our Through the Office of the General The Department’s Regulatory Priorities priority rules include some deregulatory Counsel, OST is also responsible for Four fundamental principles—safety, actions that we identified after a ensuring that the Department complies innovation, enabling investment in comprehensive review of all of the with the Administrative Procedure Act, infrastructure, and reducing Department’s regulations. The Plan also Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory unnecessary regulatory burdens—are reflects our policy of thoroughly Planning and Review), Executive Order our top priorities. These priorities are considering non-regulatory solutions 13563 (Improving Regulation and grounded in our national interest in before taking regulatory action. When Regulatory Review), Executive Order maintaining U.S. global leadership in regulatory intervention is necessary, 13771 (Reducing Regulation and safety, innovation, and economic however, it is our policy to rely data- Controlling Regulatory Costs), Executive growth. To accomplish our regulatory driven and risk-based analysis to craft Order 13777 (Enforcing the Regulatory goals, we must create a regulatory the most effective and least burdensome Reform Agenda), Executive Order 13873 environment that fosters growth in new solution to the problem. (Promoting Energy Independence and and innovative industries without This Regulatory Plan identifies the 10 Economic Growth), DOT’s Regulatory burdening them with unnecessary pending rulemakings that reflect the Policies and Procedures, and other legal restrictions. At the same time, safety Department’s commitment to safety, and policy requirements affecting remains our highest priority; we must innovation, infrastructure, and reducing rulemaking. In addition, OST has the remain focused on managing safety risks burdens. For example: lead role in matters concerning aviation and be sure that we do not regress from • FAA will focus on regulatory economic rules, the Americans with the successes already achieved. activity to enable, safely and efficiently, Disabilities Act, and rules that affect Accordingly, the regulatory plan laid the integration of unmanned aircraft multiple elements of the Department. out below reflects a careful balance that systems (UAS) into the National OST provides guidance and training emphasizes the Department’s priority in Airspace System (NAS), and to enable regarding compliance with regulatory fostering innovation while at the same expanded commercial space activities. requirements and process for personnel time meeting the challenges of • NHTSA will focus on maintaining throughout the Department. OST also maintaining a safe and reliable, and advancing safety while reducing plays an instrumental role in the transportation system. regulatory barriers to technology Department’s efforts to improve our Safety. The success of our national innovation, including the development economic analyses; risk assessments; transportation system requires us to of autonomous vehicles, and updating regulatory flexibility analyses; other remain focused on safety as our highest regulations on fuel efficiency. related analyses; retrospective reviews priority. Our regulatory plan reflects our • FRA will continue to focus on of rules; and data quality, including commitment to safety through a providing industry members regulatory peer reviews. The Office of the General balanced regulatory approach. Our goals relief through a rulemaking that allows Counsel is the lead office that works are to deliver safety more efficiently and for alternative compliance with FRA’s with the Office of Management and at a lower cost to the public by looking Passenger Equipment Safety Standards Budget’s (OMB) Office of Information to market-driven solutions first. for the operation of Tier III passenger and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) to get Innovation. Every mode of equipment. Administration approval to move transportation is affected by • FTA will continue to focus on its forward with significant rules. transformative technology. Whether we statutorily-mandated efforts to establish OST also leads and coordinates the are talking about automation, unmanned a comprehensive Public Transportation Department’s response to OMB’s vehicles, or other emerging Safety Program to improve the safety of intergovernmental review of other technologies, we are looking forward to public transportation systems. agencies’ significant rulemaking

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00110 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57913

documents and to Administration and of suborbital and orbital expendable and commercial trucks and buses. A strong congressional proposals that concern reusable vehicles, and the reentry of regulatory program is a cornerstone of the regulatory process. The Office of the vehicles. This proposal will FMCSA’s compliance and enforcement General Counsel works closely with significantly streamline and simplify efforts to advance this safety mission. In representatives of other agencies, OMB, licensing of launch and reentry addition to Agency-directed regulations, the White House, and congressional operations and will enable novel FMCSA develops regulations mandated staff to provide information on how operations. by Congress, through legislation such as various proposals would affect the • FAA’s top deregulatory priorities the Moving Ahead for Progress in the ability of the Department to perform its will be to issue three final rules. Use of 21st Century (MAP–21) and the Fixing safety, infrastructure, and other ADS–B in support of Reduced Vertical America’s Surface Transportation missions. Separation Minimum (RVSM), (2120– (FAST) Acts. FMCSA regulations • In Fiscal Year 2019, the Department AK87) would revise the requirement for establish minimum safety standards for will issue an NPRM proposing to an application to operate in RVSM motor carriers, commercial drivers, establish the applicable regulatory airspace. Recognition of Pilot in commercial motor vehicles, and State standard for waivers from the Buy Command (PIC) Experience in the agencies receiving certain motor carrier America requirement on the basis that a Military and in part 121 operations, safety grants and issuing commercial product or item is not manufactured in (2120–AL–03) would allow pilots with drivers’ licenses. the United States meeting the applicable 121 PIC experience prior to July 31, FMCSA’s regulatory efforts for FY Buy America requirement. This 2013, but who were not serving as a PIC 2019 will focus on removing regulatory rulemaking will streamline and on that date, to count that time toward burdens and streamlining the grants coordinate aspects of the Buy America the 1000 hour experience required to program. The Agency will consider process across the Department. serve as a PIC in part 121 today. Severe changes to the hours of service In addition, OST will continue its Weather Detection Equipment regulations that would improve efforts to help coordinate the activities Requirement for Helicopter Air operational flexibilities for motor of several OAs that advance various Ambulance (HAA) Operations, (2120– carriers consistent with safety. In departmental efforts that support the AK94) would allow HAA operator to addition, FMCSA will continue to Administration’s initiatives on conduct instrument flight rules (IFR) coordinate efforts on the development of promoting safety, enabling innovation, departures and approaches procedures autonomous vehicle technologies and investing in infrastructure, and reducing at airports and heliports that do not review existing regulations to identify regulatory burdens. OST will also have an approved weather reporting changes that might be needed. continue to provide significant support source, in HAA aircraft without to the RRTF’s efforts to implement the National Highway Traffic Safety functioning severe weather detection Administration Department’s regulatory reform policies. equipment, when there is no reasonable • The mission of NHTSA is to save Federal Aviation Administration expectation of severe weather at the destination, the alternate, or along the lives, prevent injuries, and reduce FAA is charged with safely and route of flight. economic costs due to roadway crashes. efficiently operating and maintaining • More information about these rules The statutory responsibilities of NHTSA the most complex aviation system in the can be found in the DOT Unified relating to motor vehicles include world. Destination 2025, an FAA Agenda. reducing the number, and mitigating the initiative that captures the agency’s effects of motor vehicle crashes and vision of transforming the Nation’s Federal Highway Administration related fatalities and injuries; providing aviation system by 2025, has proven to FHWA carries out the Federal safety performance information to aid be an effective tool for pushing the highway program in partnership with prospective purchasers of vehicles, agency to think about longer-term State and local agencies to meet the child restraints, and tires; and aspirations; FAA has established a Nation’s transportation needs. FHWA’s improving automotive fuel efficiency vision that defines the agency’s mission is to improve continually the requirements. NHTSA pursues policies priorities for the next five years. quality and performance of our Nation’s that enable safety technologies and During Fiscal Year 2019, FAA’s highway system and its intermodal encourages the development of non- regulatory priorities will be to enable connectors. regulatory approaches when feasible in transformative UAS and commercial Consistent with this mission, in Fiscal meeting its statutory mandates. NHTSA space technologies by publishing two Year 2019, the FHWA will continue issues new standards and regulations or notices of proposed rulemaking with ongoing regulatory initiatives in amendments to existing standards and (Updates to Clarify and Streamline support of its surface transportation regulations when appropriate. It ensures Commercial Space Transportation programs. It will also work to that regulatory alternatives reflect a Regulations, 2120–AL17 and Remote implement legislation in the most cost- careful assessment of the problem and a Identification of Unmanned Aircraft effective way possible. Finally, it will comprehensive analysis of the benefits, Systems, 2120–AL31), publishing an pursue regulatory reform in areas where costs, and other impacts associated with interim final rule on UAS marking project development can be streamlined the proposed regulatory action. Finally, (External Marking Requirement for or accelerated, duplicative requirements NHTSA considers alternatives Small UAS, 2120–AL32), and advancing can be consolidated, recordkeeping consistent with principles in applicable the Small Unmanned Aircraft Over requirements can be reduced or executive orders. People (2120–AK85) rule. The Updates simplified, and the decision-making NHTSA’s regulatory priorities for to Clarify and Streamline Commercial authority of our State and local partners Fiscal Year 2019 include continuing to Space Transportation Regulations can be increased. coordinate efforts on the development of proposal would update and consolidate autonomous vehicles and reducing current regulations contained in four Federal Motor Carrier Safety regulatory barriers to technology separate parts into a single regulatory Administration innovation. NHTSA also plans to issue part which will provide safety The mission of FMCSA is to reduce several rulemakings and other actions objectives to be achieved for the launch crashes, injuries, and fatalities involving that increase safety and reduce

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00111 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57914 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

economic burden. Most prominently, technology and increasing safety following: Maritime Security, Voluntary NHTSA plans to seek comments on benefits. More information about this Intermodal Sealift Agreement, National amendments to existing regulations to rule is in the DOT Unified Agenda. Defense Reserve Fleet and the Ready address barriers to the deployment of Reserve Force, Cargo Preference, Federal Transit Administration automated vehicles, particularly those Maritime Guaranteed Loan Financing, that affect vehicles that may have The mission of FTA is to improve United States Merchant Marine innovative designs. In addition, working public transportation for America’s Academy, Mariner Education and with the Environmental Protection communities. To further that end, FTA Training Support, Deepwater Port Agency, NHTSA plans to finalize fuel provides financial and technical Licensing, and Port and Intermodal efficiency standards for light vehicles assistance to local public transit Development. Additionally, MARAD model years (MYs) 2021 thru 2026 (The systems, including buses, subways, light administers the Small Shipyard Grants Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient (SAFE) rail, commuter rail, trolleys and ferries, Program through which equipment and Vehicles Rule for Model Years 2021– oversees safety measures, and helps technical skills training are provided to 2026 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks, develop next-generation technology America’s maritime workforce, with the RIN 2127–AL76). More information research. FTA’s regulatory activities aim of helping businesses to compete in about these rules can be found in the implement the laws that apply to the global marketplace while creating DOT Unified Agenda. recipients’ uses of Federal funding and well-paying jobs at home. the terms and conditions of FTA grant MARAD’s regulatory priorities for Federal Railroad Administration awards. Fiscal Year 2019 will be to continue to FRA exercises regulatory authority In addition to the Department-wide support the objectives and priorities over all areas of railroad safety and, goals described above, FTA policy described above in addition to where feasible, incorporates flexible regarding regulations is to: identifying new opportunities for performance standards. To foster an • Ensure the safety of public deregulatory action. environment for collaborative transportation systems; Pipeline and Hazardous Materials rulemaking, FRA established the • Provide maximum benefit to the Safety Administration Railroad Safety Advisory Committee Nation’s mobility through the (RSAC). The purpose of RSAC is to connectivity of transportation PHMSA has responsibility for develop consensus recommendations infrastructure; rulemaking under two programs. for regulatory action on issues FRA • Provide maximum local discretion; Through the Associate Administrator for brings to it. Even in situations where • Ensure the most productive use of the Office of Hazardous Materials Safety RSAC consensus is not achieved, FRA limited Federal resources; (OHMS), PHMSA administers regulatory benefits from receiving input from • Protect taxpayer investments in programs under Federal hazardous RSAC. In situations where RSAC public transportation; and materials transportation law. Through participation would not be useful (e.g., • Incorporate principles of sound the Associate Administrator for the a statutory mandate that leaves FRA management into the grant management Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS), PHMSA with no discretion), FRA fulfils its process. administers regulatory programs under regulatory role without RSAC’s input. In furtherance of its mission and the Federal pipeline safety laws. In The RSAC consultation process results consistent with statutory changes, in addition, both offices administer in regulations that are likely to be better Fiscal Year 2019, FTA will focus on programs under the Federal Water understood, more widely accepted, deregulatory actions. Specifically, FTA Pollution Control Act, as amended by more cost-beneficial, and more correctly will streamline the environmental the Oil Pollution Act of 1990. applied, because of stakeholder review process for transit projects, PHMSA will continue to work toward participation. update its Project Management improving safety related to FRA’s current regulatory program Oversight regulation, and remove transportation of hazardous materials by continues to reflect a number of pending duplicative or outdated rules, such as all transportation modes, including proceedings to satisfy mandates the Capital Leases regulation. More pipeline, while promoting economic resulting from the Rail Safety information about these rules can be growth, innovation, competitiveness, Improvement Act of 2008 (RSIA08), the found in the DOT Unified Agenda. and job creation. PHMSA will Passenger Rail Investment and concentrate on the prevention of high- Improvement Act of 2008 (PRIIA), and Maritime Administration risk incidents identified through the FAST Act. These actions support a MARAD administers Federal laws and PHMSA’s evaluation of transportation safe, high-performing passenger rail programs to improve and strengthen the incident data. PHMSA will use all network, address the safe and effective maritime transportation system to meet available Agency tools to assess data; movement of energy products, and the economic, environmental, and evaluate alternative safety strategies, encourage innovation and the adoption security needs of the Nation. To that including regulatory strategies as of new technology in the rail industry end, MARAD’s efforts are focused upon necessary and appropriate; target to improve safety and efficiencies. ensuring a strong American presence in enforcement efforts; and enhance FRA’s regulatory priority for Fiscal Year the domestic and international trades outreach, public education, and training 2019 will be to continue its work on a and to expanding maritime to promote safety outcomes. final rule that will advance high- opportunities for American businesses Further, PHMSA will continue to performing passenger rail by providing and workers. focus on streamlining its regulatory alternative ways to comply with MARAD’s regulatory objectives and system and reducing regulatory passenger rail equipment standards priorities reflect the agency’s burdens. PHMSA will evaluate existing (Passenger Equipment Safety Standards responsibility for ensuring the rules to examine whether they remain for the operation of Tier III passenger availability of water transportation justified; should be modified to account equipment, RIN 2130–AC46). This rule services for American shippers and for changing circumstances and would ease regulatory burdens on consumers and, in times of war or technologies; or should be streamlined certain passenger rail operations, national emergency, for the U.S. armed or even repealed. PHMSA will continue allowing the development of advanced forces. Major program areas include the to evaluate, analyze, and be responsive

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00112 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57915

to petitions for rulemaking. PHMSA will Transmission Pipelines, 2137–AE72). Anticipated Cost and Benefits: TBD. review regulations, letters of PHMSA is considering issuing a notice Risks: TBD. interpretation, and petitions for of proposed rulemaking that would Timetable: rulemaking, special permits, provide regulatory relief to certain enforcement actions, approvals, pipeline operators that experience a Action Date FR Cite international standards, and industry reduction in allowable operating NPRM ...... 06/00/19 standards to identify inconsistencies, pressure due to construction that has outdated provisions, and barriers to occurred in the area (Pipeline Safety: Regulatory Flexibility Analysis regulatory compliance. Class Location Requirements, 2137– Required: Undetermined. In Fiscal Year 2019, OHMS will focus AF29). Small Entities Affected: Businesses, on two priority rulemakings. The first is Governmental Jurisdictions, designed to reduce risks related to the Organizations. transportation of hazardous materials by Government Levels Affected: Local, rail. PHMSA aims to publish the final DOT—OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (OST) State, Tribal. rule ‘‘Hazardous Materials: Oil Spill International Impacts: This regulatory Response Plans and Information Sharing Proposed Rule Stage action will be likely to have for High-Hazard Flammable Trains’’ international trade and investment 104. • +Processing Buy America (2137–AF08), that expands the effects, or otherwise be of international Waivers Based on Non Availability applicability of comprehensive oil spill interest. (Section 610 Review) response plans for crude oil trains and Agency Contact: Analiese requires railroads to share information Priority: Other Significant. Major Marchesseault, Department of about high-hazard flammable train status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is Transportation, 1200 New Jersey operations with State and tribal undetermined. Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, emergency response commissions to E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory. Phone: 202 366–1675, Email: improve community preparedness. The Legal Authority: 23 U.S.C. 313; 49 [email protected]. second rulemaking is designed to U.S.C. 5323(j); 49 U.S.C. 24405(a); 49 RIN: 2105–AE79 reduce the risk of transporting lithium U.S.C. 50101; Consolidated batteries by air by addressing the unique Appropriations Act, 2018, div. L, tit. IV challenges they pose. Specifically, sec. 410; 41 U.S.C. 8301 to 8305; E.O. ‘‘Hazardous Materials: Enhanced Safety 13788, Buy American and Hire DOT—FEDERAL AVIATION Provisions for Lithium Batteries American (Apr. 18, 2017) ADMINISTRATION (FAA) Transported by Aircraft’’ (2137–AF20) CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined. Final Rule Stage contains three amendments: (1) A Legal Deadline: None. prohibition on the transport of lithium Abstract: This rule will establish the 105. +Registration and Marking ion cells and batteries as cargo on applicable regulatory standard for Requirements for Small Unmanned passenger aircraft; (2) a requirement that waivers from the Buy America Aircraft lithium ion cells and batteries be requirement on the basis that a product Priority: Other Significant. shipped at not more than a 30 percent or item is not manufactured in the E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory. state of charge aboard cargo-only United States meeting the applicable Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 49 aircraft; and (3) a limitation on the use Buy America requirement. This U.S.C. 41703, 44101 to 44106, 44110 to of alternative provisions for small standard will require the use of items 44113, and 44701 lithium cell or battery shipments to one and products with the maximum known CFR Citation: 14 CFR 1; 14 CFR 375; package per consignment or overpack. amount of domestic content. The rule 14 CFR 45; 14 CFR 47; 14 CFR 48; 14 OPS will focus on three pipeline will also establish the required CFR 91. rules. The first rulemaking will finalize information the applicants must provide Legal Deadline: None. a proposal to change the regulations in applying for such waivers. Abstract: This rulemaking would covering hazardous liquid onshore Statement of Need: Pursuant to provide an alternative, streamlined and pipelines related to High Consequence Executive Order 13788–Buy American simple, web-based aircraft registration Areas for integrity management and Hire American, which establishes process for the registration of small protections, repair timeframes, and as a policy of the executive branch to unmanned aircraft, including small reporting for all hazardous liquid ‘‘maximize, consistent with law . . . the unmanned aircraft operated as model gathering lines (Pipeline Safety: Safety use of goods, products, and materials aircraft, to facilitate compliance with of Hazardous Liquid Pipelines, 2137– produced in the United States,’’ DOT the statutory requirement that all AE66). The second rulemaking will will be requiring that applicants for aircraft register prior to operation. It finalize the testing and pressure non-availability waivers select products would also provide a simpler method reconfirmation of certain previously that maximize domestic content. In for marking small unmanned aircraft untested gas transmission pipelines and addition, this rule will streamline the that is more appropriate for these certain gas transmission pipelines with Buy America non-availability waiver aircraft. This action responds to public inadequate records, require operators process, and improve coordination comments received regarding the incorporate seismicity into their risk across the Department of proposed registration process in the analysis and data integration, require Transportation. Operation and Certification of Small the reporting of maximum allowable Summary of Legal Basis: 23 U.S.C. Unmanned Aircraft notice of proposed operating pressure exceedances, allow a 313; 49 U.S.C. 5323(j); 49 U.S.C. rulemaking, the request for information 6-month extension of integrity 24405(a); 49 U.S.C. 50101; Consolidated regarding unmanned aircraft system management reassessment intervals Appropriations Act, 2018, div. L, tit. IV registration, and the recommendations with notice, and expand integrity 410; 41 U.S.C. 83018305; Executive from the Unmanned Aircraft System assessments outside of high Order 13788, Buy American and Hire Registration Task Force. consequence areas to other populated American (Apr. 18, 2017). Statement of Need: This interim final areas (Pipeline Safety: Safety of Gas Alternatives: TBD. rule (IFR) provides an alternative

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00113 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57916 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

process that small unmanned aircraft to permit the operation of foreign civil requirements, thereby mitigating the owners may use to comply with the aircraft in the United States. risk associated with the influx of statutory requirements for aircraft Alternatives: Currently, the only operations. In light of the increasing operations. As provided in the registration and aircraft identification reports and incidents of unsafe clarification of these statutory process available to comply with the incidents, rapid proliferation of both requirements and request for further statutory aircraft registration commercial and model aircraft information issued October 19, 2015, 49 requirement for all aircraft owners, operators, and the resulting increased U.S.C. 44102 requires aircraft to be including small unmanned aircraft, is risk, the Department has determined it registered prior to operation. See 80 FR the paper-based system set forth in 14 is contrary to the public interest to 63912 (October 22, 2015). Currently, the CFR parts 45 and 47. As the Secretary proceed with further notice and only registration and aircraft and the Administrator noted in the comment rulemaking regarding aircraft identification process available to clarification issued October 19, 2015, registration for small unmanned aircraft. comply with the statutory aircraft and further analyzed in the regulatory To minimize risk to other users of the evaluation accompanying this registration requirement for all aircraft NAS and people and property on the rulemaking, the Department and the owners, including small unmanned ground, it is critical that the Department FAA have determined that this process aircraft, is the paper-based system set be able to link the expected number of is too onerous for small unmanned forth in 14 CFR parts 45 and 47. As the new unmanned aircraft to their owners aircraft owners and the FAA. and educate these new owners prior to Secretary and the Administrator noted Anticipated Cost and Benefits: In in the clarification issued October 19, commencing operations. order to implement the new Timetable: 2015, and further analyzed in the streamlined, web-based system regulatory evaluation accompanying described in this interim final rule (IFR), Action Date FR Cite this rulemaking, the Department and the the FAA will incur costs to develop, FAA have determined that this process implement, and maintain the system. Interim Final Rule 12/16/15 80 FR 78593 is too onerous for small unmanned Small UAS owners will require time to Interim Final Rule 12/21/15 aircraft owners and the FAA. Thus, after register and mark their aircraft, and that Effective. considering public comments and the OMB Approval of 12/21/15 80 FR 79255 time has a cost. The total of government Information Col- recommendations from the Unmanned and registrant resource cost for small lection. Aircraft System (UAS) Registration Task unmanned aircraft registration and Interim Final Rule 01/15/16 Force, the Department and the FAA marking under this new system is $56 Comment Pe- have developed an alternative process, million ($46 million present value at 7 riod End. provided by this IFR (14 CFR part 48), percent) through 2020. In evaluating the Final Rule ...... 12/00/18 for registration and marking available impact of this interim final rule, we only to small unmanned aircraft owners. compare the costs and benefits of the Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Small unmanned aircraft owners may IFR to a baseline consistent with Required: Yes. use this process to comply with the existing practices: For modelers, the Small Entities Affected: Businesses. statutory requirement to register their exercise of discretion by FAA (not Government Levels Affected: None. International Impacts: This regulatory aircraft prior to operating in the requiring registration) and continued action will be likely to have National Airspace System (NAS). broad public outreach and educational campaign, and for non-modelers, international trade and investment Summary of Legal Basis: The FAA’s registration via part 47 in the paper- effects, or otherwise be of international authority to issue rules on aviation based system. Given the time to register interest. safety is found in Title 49 of the United aircraft under the paper-based system URL For More Information: States Code. Subtitle I, section 106 and the projected number of sUAS www.regulations.gov. describes the authority of the FAA aircraft, the FAA estimates the cost to URL For Public Comments: Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation the government and non-modelers www.regulations.gov. Agency Contact: Sara Mikolop, Programs, describes in more detail the would be about $383 million. The Department of Transportation, Federal scope of the agency’s authority. This resulting cost savings to society from Aviation Administration, 800 rulemaking is promulgated under the this IFR equals the cost of this baseline Independence Ave. SW, Washington, authority described in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), policy ($383 million) minus the cost of DC 20591, Phone: 202–267–7776, Email: which establishes the authority of the this IFR ($56 million), or about $327 [email protected]. Administrator to promulgate regulations million ($259 million in present value at RIN: 2120–AK82 and rules; and 49 U.S.C. 44701(a)(5), a 7 percent discount rate). These cost which requires the Administrator to savings are the net quantified benefits of promote safe flight of civil aircraft in air this IFR. commerce by prescribing regulations Risks: Many of the owners of these DOT—NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC and setting minimum standards for new sUAS may have no prior aviation SAFETY ADMINISTRATION (NHTSA) other practices, methods, and experience and have little or no procedures necessary for safety in air understanding of the NAS, let alone Prerule Stage commerce and national security. This knowledge of the safe operating 106. +Removing Regulatory Barriers for rule is also promulgated pursuant to 49 requirements and additional Automated Driving Systems U.S.C. 44101 to 44106 and 44110 to authorizations required to conduct Priority: Other Significant. 44113 which require aircraft to be certain operations. Aircraft registration E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. registered as a condition of operation provides an immediate and direct Legal Authority: delegation of and establish the requirements for opportunity for the agency to engage authority at 49 CFR 1.95 registration and the registration and educate these new users prior to CFR Citation: 49 CFR 571. processes. Additionally, this rulemaking operating their unmanned aircraft and Legal Deadline: None. is promulgated pursuant to the to hold them accountable for Abstract: This notice seeks comment Secretary’s authority in 49 U.S.C. 41703 noncompliance with safe operating on existing motor vehicle regulatory

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00114 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57917

barriers to the introduction and Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, April Action Date FR Cite certification of automated driving 1, 2020, Publish Final Rule. systems. NHTSA is developing the Abstract: The Department of NPRM ...... 08/24/18 83 FR 42986 appropriate analysis of requirements Transportation’s National Highway NPRM Comment 09/26/18 83 FR 48578 that are necessary to maintain existing Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Period Ex- levels of safety while enabling and the U.S. Environmental Protection tended. NPRM Comment 10/23/18 innovative vehicle designs and Agency (EPA) proposed a rule to adjust the corporate average fuel economy Period End. removing or modifying those NPRM Comment 10/26/18 requirements that would no longer be (CAFE) and greenhouse gas (GHG) Period Ex- appropriate if a human driver will not emissions standards for model years tended End. be operating the vehicle. NHTSA (MYs) 2021 through 2026 light-duty Analyzing Com- 11/00/18 previously published a Federal Register vehicles. EPA established national GHG ments. notice requesting public comment on emissions standards under the Clean Air January 18, 2018. Act that extend through 2025, and Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Statement of Need: This notice seeks NHTSA established augural CAFE Required: Undetermined. comment on existing motor vehicle standards for MY 2022–2025 vehicles Government Levels Affected: regulatory barriers to the introduction under the Energy Policy and Undetermined. and certification of automated driving Conservation Act, as amended by the Federalism: Undetermined. systems. Energy Independence and Security Act International Impacts: This regulatory Summary of Legal Basis: Delegation of (EISA). This joint rulemaking proposes action will be likely to have authority at 49 CFR 1.95. adjustments to those standards, international trade and investment Alternatives: NHTSA will seek following conclusion of the Mid-Term effects, or otherwise be of international regulatory alternatives in the upcoming Evaluation (MTE) process and EPA’s interest. proposal. Final Determination that it is URL For More Information: Anticipated Cost and Benefits: appropriate to adjust the MY 2022–2025 www.regulations.gov. NHTSA will seek cost and benefit GHG emission standards. URL For Public Comments: estimates in the upcoming proposal. Statement of Need: Setting Corporate www.regulations.gov. Risks: The agency believes there are Average Fuel Economy standards for Agency Contact: James Tamm, Fuel no substantial risks to this rulemaking. passenger cars, light trucks and Economy Division Chief, Department of Timetable: medium-duty passenger vehicles will Transportation, National Highway reduce fuel consumption, and will Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Action Date FR Cite thereby improve U.S. energy Jersey Ave SE, Washington, DC 20590, independence and energy security, Phone: 202–493–0515, Email: ANPRM ...... 10/00/18 which has been a national objective [email protected]. RIN: 2127–AL76 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis since the first oil price shocks in the Required: No. 1970s. Transportation accounts for Small Entities Affected: No. about 70 percent of U.S. petroleum Government Levels Affected: None. consumption, and light-duty vehicles DOT—FEDERAL RAILROAD URL For More Information: account for about 60 percent of oil use ADMINISTRATION (FRA) www.regulations.gov. in the U.S. transportation sector. URL For Public Comments: Summary of Legal Basis: This Final Rule Stage rulemaking responds to requirements of www.regulations.gov. 108. +Passenger Equipment Safety the Energy Independence and Security Agency Contact: David Hines, General Standards Amendments Engineer Office of Crash Avoidance Act of 2007 (EISA), title 1, subtitle A, Standards, Department of section 102, as it amends 49 U.S.C. Priority: Economically Significant. Transportation, National Highway 32902, which was signed into law Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New December 19, 2007. The statute requires E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC that corporate average fuel economy Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 20103 20590, Phone: 202–366–2720, Email: standards be prescribed separately for CFR Citation: 49 CFR 238. Legal Deadline: None. [email protected]. passenger automobiles and non- RIN: 2127–AM00. passenger automobiles. For model years Abstract: This rulemaking would 2021 to 2030, the average fuel economy update existing safety standards for required to be attained by each fleet of passenger rail equipment. Specifically, passenger and non-passenger the rulemaking would add a new tier of DOT—NHTSA automobiles shall be the maximum passenger equipment safety standards Proposed Rule Stage feasible for each model year. The law (Tier III) to facilitate the safe requires the standards be set at least 18 implementation of nation-wide, 107. +The Safer Affordable Fuel- months prior to the start of the model interoperable, high-speed passenger rail Efficient (Safe) Vehicles Rule for Model year. service at speeds up to 220 mph. The Years 2021–2026 Passenger Cars and Alternatives: See the accompanying Tier III standards require operations at Light Trucks Regulatory Impact Analysis for the speeds above 125 mph to be in an Priority: Economically Significant. discussion of alternatives. exclusive right-of-way without grade Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: See the crossings. This rule would also establish Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. accompanying Regulatory Impact crashworthiness and occupant E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. Analysis for the discussion of estimated protection performance requirements as Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 32902; costs and benefits. an alternative to those currently delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 Risks: The agency believes there are specified for Tier I passenger train sets. CFR Citation: 49 CFR 531; 49 CFR no substantial risks to this rulemaking. Additionally, the rule would increase 533. Timetable: from 150 to 160 mph the maximum

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00115 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57918 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

speed for passenger equipment that and $11.27 billion at a 3% discount rate, CFR Citation: 49 CFR 192. complies with FRA’s Tier II standards. and between $3.85 and $7.06 billion at Legal Deadline: None. The rule is expected to ease regulatory a 7% discount rate. The annualized Abstract: This rulemaking regards burdens, allow the development of benefits were estimated to be $121.8 to existing class location requirements, advanced technology, and increase 235.8 million at a 7% discount rate and specifically as they pertain to actions safety benefits. $192 to 371.7 million at a 3% discount operators are required to take following Statement of Need: This rulemaking rate. The benefits are derived by class location changes. Operators have would update existing safety standards calculating the difference between the suggested that performing integrity for passenger rail equipment. estimated equipment and infrastructure management measures on pipelines Specifically, the rulemaking would add costs without the rule and the estimated where class locations have changed due a new tier of passenger equipment safety costs of pursuing the same projects with to population increases would be an standards (Tier III) to facilitate the safe the new rule in effect. The majority of equally safe but less costly alternative to implementation of nation-wide, the benefits are due to a rule the current requirements of either interoperable, high-speed passenger rail modification that provides Tier III train reducing pressure, pressure testing, or service at speeds up to 220 mph. The sets the ability to operate on shared replacing pipe. Tier III standards require operations at track rather than build new, Statement of Need: Section 5 of the speeds above 125 mph to be in an independent infrastructure into urban Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty, exclusive right-of-way without grade areas. FRA is currently evaluating the and Job Creation Act of 2011 required crossings. This rule would also establish core assumptions that lead to such large the Secretary of Transportation to crashworthiness and occupant benefits to ensure their accuracy. evaluate and issue a report on whether protection performance requirements as Risks: The risk is regulatory integrity management requirements an alternative to those currently uncertainty for potential Tier III and should be expanded beyond high- specified for Tier I passenger train sets. Tier I alternative operations. Tier III consequence areas and whether such Additionally, the rule would increase operations could still be conducted, but expansion would mitigate the need for from 150 to 160 mph the maximum would require a series of waivers, which class location requirements. PHMSA speed for passenger equipment that are not as permanent as regulatory issued a Notice of Inquiry on this topic complies with FRA’s Tier II standards. approval (and not as certain). Also, Tier on August 1, 2013, and issued a report The rule is expected to ease regulatory I alternative train sets would still to Congress on its evaluation of this burdens, allow the development of require waivers for operation (same issue in April 2016. In that report, advanced technology, and increase regulatory uncertainty as for Tier III). PHMSA decided to retain the existing safety benefits. Timetable: class location requirements but noted it Summary of Legal Basis: 49 U.S.C. would further examine issues related to 20103, 20107, 20133, 20141, 20302 and Action Date FR Cite pipe replacement requirements when 20303, 20306, 20701 and 20702, 21301 class locations change due to population and 21302, 21304; 28 U.S.C. 2461, note; NPRM ...... 12/06/16 81 FR 88006 growth. PHMSA noted that it would and 49 CFR 1.89. NPRM Comment 02/06/17 further evaluate the feasibility and Alternatives: The alternatives FRA Period End. appropriateness of alternatives to considered in establishing the proposed Final Rule ...... 10/00/18 address this issue following publication safety requirements for Tier III train sets of the final rule titled ‘‘Pipeline Safety: are the European and Japanese industry Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Safety of Gas Transmission Pipelines’’ standards. However, as neither of those Required: Yes. (Docket No. PHMSA–2011–0023; RIN Small Entities Affected: Businesses. standards adequately address the safety 2137–AE72). In line with that intent, Government Levels Affected: State. concerns presented in the U.S. rail URL For More Information: section 4 of the Protecting Our environment, FRA rejected adopting www.regulations.gov. Infrastructure of Pipelines and either of them as a regulatory alternative URL For Public Comments: Enhancing Safety Act of 2016 requires suitable for interoperable equipment. www.regulations.gov. PHMSA to provide a report to Congress Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This Agency Contact: Elliott Gillooly, no later than 18 months after the rule would amend passenger equipment Department of Transportation, Federal publication of the Gas Transmission safety regulations. It adds a new Railroad Administration, 1200 New final rule that reviews the types of equipment tier (‘‘Tier III’’) to facilitate Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, DC 20590, benefits, including safety benefits, and the safe implementation of high-speed Phone: 202–366–4000, Email: estimated costs of the legacy class rail (up to 220 mph on dedicated rail [email protected]. location regulations. Therefore, PHMSA lines) and establishes alternative RIN: 2130–AC46 is initiating this rulemaking to crashworthiness performance standards determine whether the performance on to qualify passenger rail equipment for integrity management measures, or Tier I operations. This rule is other safety measures, on pipelines deregulatory in nature. At the proposed DOT—PIPELINE AND HAZARDOUS where class locations have changed due rule stage, FRA estimated the total cost MATERIALS SAFETY to population increases would be an of the proposed rule to be between $4.59 ADMINISTRATION (PHMSA) equally safe but less costly alternative to and $4.62 billion, discounted to Prerule Stage the current class location change between $3.13 and $3.16 billion at a 3% requirements. discount rate, and between $1.94 and 109. +Pipeline Safety: Class Location Summary of Legal Basis: Congress $1.96 billion at a 7% discount rate. The Requirements established the current framework for annualized costs were estimated to be Priority: Other Significant. Major regulating the safety of natural gas $64.6 to 65.1 million at a 7% discount status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is pipelines in the Natural Gas Pipeline rate and $101.9 to 102.6 million at a 3% undetermined. Safety Act of 1968 (NGPSA). The discount rate. FRA estimated the total E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. NGPSA provided the Secretary of benefits to be between $8.66 and $16.75 Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 60101 et Transportation the authority to billion, discounted to between $6.05 seq. prescribe minimum Federal safety

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00116 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57919

standards for natural gas pipeline DOT—PHMSA batteries to be shipped at not more than facilities. That authority, as amended in a 30 percent state of charge on cargo- Proposed Rule Stage subsequent reauthorizations, is only aircraft; and (3) limit the use of currently codified in the Pipeline Safety 110. +Hazardous Materials: Enhanced alternative provisions for small lithium Laws (49 U.S.C. 60101 et seq.). Safety Provisions for Lithium Batteries cell or battery shipments under 49 CFR Alternatives: In this rulemaking, Transported by Aircraft 173.185(c). Summary of Legal Basis: This rule is PHMSA will identify possible Priority: Other Significant. published under the authority of the alternatives to the current class location E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory. Federal Hazardous Materials requirements, specifically those Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 44701; 49 Transportation Law, 49 U.S.C. 5101 et requirements causing operators to U.S.C. 5103(b); 49 U.S.C. 5120(b) seq. Section 5103(b) authorizes the reduce pressure, pressure test, or CFR Citation: 49 CFR 172; 49 CFR Secretary of Transportation to prescribe replace pipe when class locations 173. change in areas due to population Legal Deadline: None. regulations for the safe transportation, increases. One such alternative, as Abstract: This rulemaking action including security, of hazardous suggested by certain members of the would amend the Hazardous Materials material in intrastate, interstate, and industry, could include the performance Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR parts 171 to foreign commerce. This rule revises regulations for the safe transport of of integrity management measures on 180) applicable to the transport of lithium batteries by air and the affected pipelines. lithium cells and batteries by aircraft. protection of aircraft operators and the The rulemaking contains three Anticipated Cost and Benefits: flying public. PHMSA believes there is no cost to this amendments: (1) A prohibition on the Alternatives: In this rulemaking, rulemaking action, but we will solicit transport of lithium ion cells and PHMSA considered the following three further information on the costs and batteries as cargo on passenger aircraft; alternatives: (1) PHMSA adopts all of benefits of the current class location (2) a requirement that lithium ion cells the amendments presented in the rule; requirements as they pertain to class and batteries be shipped at not more (2) a No Action alternative; and (3) a location changes, as well as the costs than a 30 percent state of charge aboard Partial Harmonization alternative. and benefits of any alternatives. cargo-only aircraft; and (3) a limitation Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Risks: PHMSA is evaluating whether on the use of alternative provisions for PHMSA estimates the present value the performance of integrity small lithium cell or battery shipments costs about $46.6 million over 10 years management, or other alternatives, in to one package per consignment or and about $6.6 million annualized at a lieu of the current regulatory overpack. These amendments are 7 percent discount rate and $56.3 requirements for reducing pressure, consistent with three emergency million over 10 years and about $6.6 pressure testing, or replacing pipe when amendments to the 2015–2016 million annualized at a 3 percent class locations change due to population International Civil Aviation discount rate. Based on the estimated growth, will increase, decrease, or Organization Technical Instructions for mean 10-year undiscounted cost of maintain the current level of risk. the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods $65.84 million and the estimated PHMSA notes that while certain by Air (ICAO Technical Instructions). economic consequences of $34.9 million alternatives to the current regulations The amendments in this rulemaking do for a cargo-only flight incident, the might allow for an equivalent level of not restrict passengers or crew members rulemaking would need to prevent 1.9 risk, there is a potential for greater from bringing personal items or incidents over the next 10 years for the consequences in an area where a class electronic devices containing lithium benefits to exceed the quantified costs, location has changed due to population batteries aboard aircraft in carry-on or or approximately one every 5 years. increases along the pipeline. checked baggage, or restrict cargo-only Risks: PHMSA expects the rule will aircraft from transporting lithium ion improve safety for flight crews, air cargo Timetable: batteries at a state of charge exceeding operators, and the public as a result of Action Date FR Cite 30 percent when packed with or the state of charge requirement and the contained in equipment. PHMSA is consignment and overpack restriction ANPRM ...... 07/31/18 83 FR 36861 providing limited relief from the by reducing the possibility of fire on ANPRM Comment 10/01/18 passenger aircraft prohibition and the cargo-only aircraft. Additionally, the Period End. state of charge restriction for small rule will harmonize the prohibition of NPRM ...... 09/00/19 lithium ion batteries transported lithium ion batteries as cargo on entirely within Alaska, Hawaii, and U.S. passenger aircraft and eliminate the Regulatory Flexibility Analysis territories. possibility of a package of lithium ion Required: Undetermined. Statement of Need: This rule is batteries causing or contributing to a fire Government Levels Affected: None. necessary to address an immediate in the cargo hold of a passenger aircraft. Timetable: URL For More Information: safety hazard and harmonize the US www.regulations.gov. HMR with emergency amendments to the 2015–2016 edition of the Action Date FR Cite URL For Public Comments: International Civil Aviation NPRM ...... 10/00/18 www.regulations.gov. Organization’s Technical Instructions Agency Contact: Cameron H. for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Satterthwaite, Transportation Goods by Air (ICAO Technical Regulations Specialist, Department of Required: No. Instructions). FAA research has shown Small Entities Affected: Businesses. Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous that air transportation of lithium ion Government Levels Affected: None. Materials Safety Administration, 1200 batteries poses a safety risk. We are Additional Information: HM–224I. New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC issuing this rulemaking to (1) prohibit URL For More Information: 20590, Phone: 202–366–8553, Email: the transport of lithium ion cells and www.regulations.gov. [email protected]. batteries as cargo on passenger aircraft; URL For Public Comments: RIN: 2137–AF29 (2) require all lithium ion cells and www.regulations.gov.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00117 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57920 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

Agency Contact: Kevin Leary, conditions; (7) increase the use of inline URL For More Information: Transportation Specialist, Department inspection tools by requiring that any www.regulations.gov. of Transportation, Pipeline and pipeline that could affect a high URL For Public Comments: Hazardous Materials Safety consequence area be capable of www.regulations.gov. Administration, 1200 New Jersey accommodating these devices within 20 Agency Contact: Cameron H. Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, years, unless its basic construction will Satterthwaite, Transportation Phone: 202–366–8553, Email: not permit that accommodation; and (8) Regulations Specialist, Department of [email protected]. clarify other regulations to improve Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous RIN: 2137–AF20 compliance and enforcement. The rule Materials Safety Administration, 1200 also requires safety data sheets and New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC inspection of pipelines located at depths 20590, Phone: 202–366–8553, Email: DOT—PHMSA greater than 150 feet under the surface [email protected]. of the water. RIN: 2137–AE66 Final Rule Stage Summary of Legal Basis: Congress 111. +Pipeline Safety: Safety of established the current framework for regulating the safety of hazardous liquid Hazardous Liquid Pipelines DOT—PHMSA pipelines in the Hazardous Liquid Priority: Other Significant. Pipeline Safety Act (HLPSA) of 1979 112. +Pipeline Safety: Safety of Gas E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory. (Pub. L. 96–129). The HLPSA provided Transmission Pipelines, MAOP Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 60101 et the Secretary of Transportation the Reconfirmation, Expansion of seq. authority to prescribe minimum Federal Assessment Requirements and Other CFR Citation: 49 CFR 195. Related Amendments Legal Deadline: None. safety standards for hazardous liquid Abstract: This rulemaking would pipeline facilities. That authority, as Priority: Other Significant. Major amend the Pipeline Safety Regulations amended in subsequent under 5 U.S.C. 801. to improve protection of the public, reauthorizations, is currently codified in E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory. property, and the environment by the Pipeline Safety Laws (49 U.S.C. Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 60101 et closing regulatory gaps where 60101 et seq.). seq. appropriate, and ensuring that operators Alternatives: PHMSA proposed CFR Citation: 49 CFR 192 are increasing the detection and alternatives to include offshore and Legal Deadline: None. remediation of unsafe conditions, and gathering lines in the scope of Abstract: This rulemaking would mitigating the adverse effects of provisions requiring assessments amend the pipeline safety regulations to hazardous liquid pipeline failures. outside of HCAs and leak detection address the testing and pressure Statement of Need: This rulemaking systems, and revise the repair criteria reconfirmation of certain previously addresses Congressional mandates in for pipelines outside HCAs, and untested gas transmission pipelines and the 2011 Pipeline Reauthorization Act evaluated additional regulatory certain gas transmission pipelines with (sections 5, 8, 21, 29, 14) and 2016 alternatives including no action. inadequate records, require operators PIPES Act (sections 14 and 25); NTSB Anticipated Cost and Benefits: incorporate seismicity into their risk recommendations P–12–03 and P–12– Estimated annualized costs are $18 analysis and data integration, require 04; and GAO recommendation 12–388. million. Benefits are presented the reporting of maximum allowable These statutory mandates and qualitatively and in terms of breakeven operating pressure exceedances, allow a recommendations follow a number of analysis based on reported 6-month extension of integrity high profile and high consequence consequences from past incidents. management reassessment intervals accidents (e.g., the 2010 Marshall, MI Risks: These changes will provide with notice, and expand integrity spill of almost one million gallons of PHMSA additional data on pipelines to assessments outside of high crude oil into the Kalamazoo River). inform risk evaluation and reduce the consequence areas to other populated PHMSA is amending the hazardous probability and consequences of failures areas. liquid pipeline safety regulations to: (1) through increased inspections, leak Statement of Need: This rulemaking is Extend reporting requirements to gravity detection, and other changes to in direct response to Congressional lines that do not meet certain managing pipeline risks. mandates in the 2011 Pipeline exceptions; (2) extend certain reporting Timetable: reauthorization act, specifically; section requirements to all hazardous liquid 4(e) (Gas IM plus 6 months), section 5 Action Date FR Cite gathering lines; (3) require inspections (IM), 8 (leak detection), of pipelines in areas affected by extreme ANPRM ...... 10/18/10 75 FR 63774 23(b)(2)(exceedance of MAOP); and weather, natural disasters, and other Comment Period 01/04/11 76 FR 303 section 29 (seismicity). These statutory similar events; (4) require periodic Extended. mandates and recommendations stem assessments of onshore transmission ANPRM Comment 01/18/11 from a number of high profile and high pipelines that are not already covered Period End. consequence gas transmission and under the integrity management (IM) Extended Com- 02/18/11 gathering pipeline incidents and program requirements; (5) expand the ment Period changes in the industry since the End. use of leak detection systems on NPRM ...... 10/13/15 80 FR 61610 establishment of existing regulatory onshore hazardous liquid transmission NPRM Comment 01/08/16 requirements (e.g., the San Bruno, CA pipelines to mitigate the effects of Period End. explosion that killed eight people). failures that occur outside of high Final Rule ...... 12/00/18 Summary of Legal Basis: Congress has consequence areas; (6) modify the IM authorized Federal regulation of the repair criteria, both by expanding the Regulatory Flexibility Analysis transportation of gas by pipeline under list of conditions that require immediate Required: Yes. the Commerce Clause of the U.S. remediation and consolidating the time Small Entities Affected: Businesses. Constitution. Authorization is codified frames for re-mediating all other Government Levels Affected: None. in the Pipeline Safety Laws (49 U.S.C.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00118 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57921

60101 et seq.), a series of statutes that Legal Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321; 49 develop, submit, update and in some are administered by the DOT, PHMSA. U.S.C. 5101 et seq. cases obtain approval of oil spill PHMSA has used that authority to CFR Citation: 49 CFR 130; 49 CFR response plans. Executive Order 12777 promulgate comprehensive minimum 174; 49 CFR 171; 49 CFR 172; 49 CFR delegated responsibility to the Secretary safety standards for the transportation of 173. of Transportation for certain gas by pipeline. Legal Deadline: None. transportation-related facilities. The Alternatives: PHMSA considered Abstract: This rulemaking would Secretary of Transportation delegated alternatives to establishing a newly expand the applicability of the authority to promulgate regulations defined moderate consequence area and comprehensive oil spill response plans to PHMSA and provides FRA the evaluated requiring assessments for all (OSRP) based on thresholds of liquid approval authority for railroad OSRPs. pipelines outside HCAs. petroleum oil that apply to an entire Alternatives: This rulemaking Anticipated Cost and Benefits: train. The rulemaking would also analyzes five alternative proposals, Preliminary estimates of annualized require railroads to share information including no change and changing the costs are in the range of $40 million; about high-hazard flammable train applicability threshold to analyze the annualized benefits, including cost operations with State and Tribal impact to affected entities. Under the no savings, are over $200 million. emergency response commissions to change alternative, PHMSA would not Risks: This rule addresses known improve community preparedness in proceed with any rulemaking on this risks to gas transmission and gathering accordance with the Fixing America’s subject and the current regulatory including the ‘‘grandfather clause’’ Surface Transportation Act of 2015 standards would remain in effect. (exemption for testing to establish (FAST Act). Finally, the rulemaking Anticipated Cost and Benefits: In the maximum operating pressure for would incorporate by reference an rulemaking, PHMSA performed a transmission lines) and new initial boiling point test for flammable breakeven analysis by identifying the unregulated gathering lines that liquids for better consistency with the number of gallons of oil that the resemble transmission lines. American National Standards Institute/ rulemaking would need to prevent from Timetable: American Petroleum Institute being spilled in order for its benefits to Recommended Practices 3000, at least equal its estimated costs. Action Date FR Cite ‘‘Classifying and Loading of Crude Oil Additional benefits may also be into Rail Tank Cars,’’ First Edition, conferred due to ecological and human ANPRM ...... 08/25/11 76 FR 53086 September 2014. health improvements that may not be ANPRM Comment 11/16/11 76 FR 70953 Statement of Need: This rulemaking is Period Ex- captured in the value of the avoided important to mitigate the effects of cost of spilled oil. PHMSA currently tended. potential train accidents involving the ANPRM Comment 12/02/11 estimates the rulemaking will be cost- release of flammable liquid energy effective if the requirements reduce the Period End. products by increasing planning and End of Extended 01/20/12 consequences of oil spills by 7.68% preparedness. The proposals in this Comment Pe- with ten year costs estimated at $25.2 rulemaking are shaped by mandates in riod. million and annualized costs of $3.6 Fixing America’s Surface Transportation NPRM ...... 04/08/16 81 FR 20721 million (using a 7% discount rate). NPRM Comment 06/08/16 (FAST) Act of 2015, public comments, Risks: PHMSA expects this Period End. National Transportation Safety Board rulemaking to mitigate the effects of Final Rule ...... 03/00/19 (NTSB) Safety Recommendations, potential train accidents involving the analysis of recent accidents, and input Regulatory Flexibility Analysis release of flammable liquid energy from stakeholder outreach efforts products by increasing planning and Required: No. (including first responders). To this end, Small Entities Affected: No. preparedness. PHMSA will consider expanding the Timetable: Government Levels Affected: None. applicability of comprehensive oil spill Additional Information: SB–Y IC–N response plans; clarifying the Action Date FR Cite SLT–N. requirements for comprehensive oil URL For More Information: spill response plans; requiring railroads ANPRM ...... 08/01/14 79 FR 45079 www.regulations.gov. to share additional information; and ANPRM Comment 09/30/14 URL For Public Comments: providing an alternative test method for Period End. www.regulations.gov. determining the initial boiling point of NPRM ...... 07/29/16 81 FR 50067 Agency Contact: Robert Jagger, a flammable liquid. NPRM Comment 09/27/16 Technical Writer, Department of Summary of Legal Basis: The Period End. Final Rule ...... 11/00/18 Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous authority of 49 U.S.C. 5103(b), which Materials Safety Administration, 1200 authorizes the Secretary of New Jersey Avenue, Washington, DC Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Transportation to ‘‘prescribe regulations Required: Yes. 20590, Phone: 202–366–4595, Email: for the safe transportation, including [email protected]. Small Entities Affected: Businesses. security, of hazardous materials in Government Levels Affected: None. RIN: 2137–AE72 intrastate, interstate, and foreign Additional Information: HM–251B; commerce.’’ The Fixing America’s SB–N, IC–N, SLT–N. Surface Transportation (FAST) Act of URL For More Information: DOT—PHMSA 2015 also includes mandates for the www.regulations.gov. information sharing notification URL For Public Comments: 113. +Hazardous Materials: Oil Spill requirements. The authority of 33 U.S.C. www.regulations.gov. Response Plans and Information 1321, the Federal Water Pollution Agency Contact: Glen Foster, Sharing for High-Hazard Flammable Control Act (FWPCA), which directs the Transportation Specialist, Department Trains (FAST Act) President to issue regulations requiring of Transportation, Pipeline and Priority: Other Significant. owners and operators of certain vessels Hazardous Materials Safety E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory. and onshore and offshore oil facilities to Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00119 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57922 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

SE, Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202 effort by prioritizing projects that reduce processed tobacco. In addition, through 366–8553, Email: [email protected]. regulatory burdens, provide greater these regulatory amendments, TTB Related RIN: Related to 2137–AE91, industry flexibility, and streamline the intends to address a number of Related to 2137–AF07 regulatory system, consistent with comments it received from the RIN: 2137–AF08 Executive Orders 13771 and 13777. TTB interested public, including industry BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P rulemaking priorities also include members, through the Treasury proposing regulatory changes in Department’s Request for Information response to petitions from industry on deregulatory ideas (Docket No. members and other interested parties, TREAS–DO–2017–0012, published in DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and requesting comments on ways TTB the Federal Register on June 14, 2017). Statement of Regulatory Priorities may further reduce burden and support • Proposed Revisions to the Regulations To Provide Greater The primary mission of the a level playing field for the regulated Flexibility in the Use of Wine and Department of the Treasury is to industry. Specifically, during the fiscal Distilled Spirits Containers (RIN: 1513– maintain a strong economy and create year, TTB plans to publish a AB56, Standards of Fill for Wine, and economic and job opportunities by deregulatory final rule, following a RIN: 1513–AC45, Standards of Fill for promoting the conditions that enable notice published in FY 2017, which Distilled Spirits). (Deregulatory) economic growth and stability at home reduces the number of reports submitted In these two notices, TTB will address and abroad, strengthen national security by certain regulated industry members. petitions requesting that it amend by combatting threats and protecting the TTB also plans to publish for public regulations governing wine and distilled integrity of the financial system, and comment proposed deregulatory spirits containers to provide for manage the U.S. Government’s finances changes in connection with permit additional authorized ‘‘standards of and resources effectively. applications and to expand industry fill.’’ (The term ‘‘standard of fill’’ Consistent with this mission, flexibility with regard to alcohol generally relates to the size of regulations of the Department and its beverage container sizes (standards of containers, although the specific constituent bureaus are promulgated to fill). Priority projects also include regulatory meaning is the authorized interpret and implement the laws as continuing the rulemaking issued in FY amount of liquid in the container, rather enacted by Congress and signed by the 2017 in response to industry member than the size or capacity of the container President. It is the policy of the petitions to authorize new wine treating itself.) If implemented, this proposal Department to comply with applicable materials and processes, new grape would provide industry members requirements to issue a notice of varietal names for use on labels of wine, greater flexibility in producing and proposed rulemaking and carefully and new American Viticultural Areas sourcing containers and meeting consider public comments before (AVAs). None of the TTB rulemaking consumer demand. This deregulatory adopting a final rule. Also, the documents issued in FY 2019 are action would also eliminate restrictions Department invites interested parties to expected to be ‘‘regulatory actions’’ that inhibit competition and the submit views on rulemaking projects under Executive Order 13771 and movement of goods in domestic and while a proposed rule is being subsequent OMB guidance. international commerce. developed. This fiscal year TTB plans to give • Revisions to the Regulations To To the extent permitted by law, it is priority to the following deregulatory Reduce Report Filing Frequency (RIN: the policy of the Department to adhere and regulatory measures: • 1513–AC30, Changes to Certain to the regulatory philosophy and Proposal To Streamline and Alcohol-Related Regulations Governing principles set forth in Executive Orders Modernize Permit Application Process Bond Requirements and Tax Return 12866, 13563, 13609, and 13771 and to (RINs: 1513–AC46, 1513–AC47, 1513– Filing Periods). (Deregulatory) develop regulations that maximize AC48, and 1513–AC49, Modernization On December 18, 2015, President aggregate net benefits to society while of Permit and Registration Application Obama signed into law the Protecting minimizing the economic and Requirements for Distilled Spirits Americans from Tax Hikes Act (PATH paperwork burdens imposed on persons Plants, Permit Applications for Act), which is Division Q of the and businesses subject to those Wineries, Qualification Requirements Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016. regulations. for Brewers, and Permit Application Requirements for Manufacturers of The PATH Act contains changes to I. Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Tobacco Products or Processed certain statutory provisions that TTB Bureau Tobacco, respectively). (Deregulatory) administers in the Internal Revenue The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Consistent with E.O. 13771 and Code regarding excise tax return due Trade Bureau (TTB) issues regulations 13777, in FY 2017, TTB engaged in a dates and bond requirements for certain to implement and enforce Federal laws review of its regulations to identify any smaller excise taxpayers. These relating to alcohol, tobacco, firearms, regulatory requirements that could amendments took effect beginning in and ammunition excise taxes and potentially be eliminated, modified, or January 2017, and TTB published a certain non-tax laws relating to alcohol. streamlined in order to reduce burdens temporary rule amending its regulations TTB’s mission and regulations are on industry. In FY 2018, TTB worked to to implement these provisions. At the designed to: remove requirements where possible same time, TTB published in the (1) Collect the taxes on alcohol, without the need for rulemaking. This Federal Register (82 FR 780) a notice of tobacco products, firearms, and included the elimination of certain proposed rulemaking requesting ammunition; information collected on TTB permit- comments on the amendments made in (2) Protect the consumer by ensuring related forms. In FY 2019, TTB intends the temporary rule and proposing the integrity of alcohol products; and to propose amending its regulations to further amendments to the regulations (3) Prevent unfair and unlawful eliminate or streamline various governing reporting requirements for market activity for alcohol and tobacco additional requirements for application distilled spirits plants (DSPs) and products. or qualification of distilled spirits breweries to reduce the regulatory In FY 2019, TTB will continue its plants, wineries, breweries, and burden on industry members who pay multi-year Regulations Modernization manufacturers of tobacco products or taxes and file tax returns annually or

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00120 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57923

quarterly. Under the proposal, those 2018 consistent with Executive Orders II. Customs Revenue Functions industry members would also submit 13771 and 13777 regarding reducing The Homeland Security Act of 2002 reports annually or quarterly, aligned regulatory burdens, in FY 2019, TTB (the Act) provides that, although many with their filing of the tax return, rather plans to propose revisions to functions of the former United States than monthly as generally provided consolidate and modernize the Customs Service were transferred to the under current regulations. To be eligible regulations concerning the labeling Department of Homeland Security, the for annual or quarterly filing, the DSP or requirements for wine, distilled spirits, Secretary of the Treasury retains sole brewery must reasonably expect to be and malt beverages. TTB anticipates that legal authority over customs revenue liable for not more than $1,000 in excise these regulatory changes will assist functions. The Act also authorizes the taxes (in the case of annual filing) or industry in voluntary compliance, Secretary of the Treasury to delegate any $50,000 in excise taxes (in the case of decrease industry burden, and result in of the retained authority over customs quarterly filing) for the calendar year the regulated industries being able to revenue functions to the Secretary of and must have been liable for not more bring products to market without undue Homeland Security. By Treasury than these respective amounts in the delay. TTB also anticipates that this Department Order No. 100–16, the preceding calendar year. The reduced notice for public comment will give Secretary of the Treasury delegated to reporting frequency will reduce industry members another opportunity the Secretary of Homeland Security regulatory burdens on these smaller to provide comments and suggestions authority to prescribe regulations industry members. on any additional deregulatory pertaining to the customs revenue • Revisions to the Regulations to measures in these areas. Reflect Statutory Changes to the In FY 2019, TTB intends to bring to functions subject to certain exceptions, Definition of Hard Cider under the completion a number of rulemaking but further provided that the Secretary Internal Revenue Code (RIN: 1513– projects published as notices of of the Treasury retained the sole AC31). (Not yet determined) proposed rulemaking in FY 2017 in authority to approve such regulations. The PATH Act also contained changes response to industry member petitions During fiscal year 2019, CBP and to the Internal Revenue Code amending to amend the TTB regulations and Treasury plan to give priority to the definition of hard cider for excise reopened for public comment in FY regulatory matters involving the tax classification purposes. The 2018: customs revenue functions which amended definition broadened the range • Proposal to Amend the Regulations streamline CBP procedures, protect the of products to which the hard cider tax to Authorize the Use of Additional Wine public, or are required by either statute rate applies. In FY 2017, TTB published Treating Materials (RIN: 1513–AB61). or Executive Order. The examples of a temporary rule amending its (Not yet determined) these efforts described below are exempt regulations to implement these In FY 2017, TTB proposed to amend from Executive Order 13771 as they are provisions. At the same time, TTB its regulations pertaining to the non-significant rules as defined by published in the Federal Register (82 production of wine to authorize Executive Order. Examples of these FR 7753) a notice of proposed additional treatments that may be efforts are described below. rulemaking requesting comments on the applied to wine and to juice from which • Investigation of Claims of Evasion amendments made in the temporary wine is made. These proposed of Antidumping and Countervailing rule, including labeling requirements to amendments were made in response to Duties. (Not significant) identify products to which the hard requests from wine industry members to Treasury and CBP plan to finalize cider tax rate applies. In 2018, TTB authorize certain wine treating materials interim regulations (81 FR 56477) which reopened the comment period for the and processes not currently authorized amended CBP regulations implementing notice, as requested by industry by TTB regulations. Although TTB may section 421 of the Trade Facilitation and members and, after consideration of the administratively approve such Trade Enforcement Act of 2015, which comments, intends to issue a final rule treatments, rulemaking facilitates the set forth procedures to investigate in FY 2019. acceptance of exported wine made using claims of evasion of antidumping and • Proposal to Modernize the Alcohol those treatments in foreign markets. In countervailing duty orders. Beverage Labeling and Advertising FY 2018 TTB reopened the comment • Modernized Drawback. Requirements (RIN: 1513–AB54). period for the notice, as requested by (Economically significant) (Deregulatory) industry members and, after Treasury and CBP plan to amend CBP The Federal Alcohol Administration consideration of the comments, intends regulations to implement changes to the Act requires that alcohol beverages to issue a final rule in FY 2019. drawback law contained in section 906 introduced in interstate commerce have • Proposal to Amend the Regulations of the Trade Facilitation and Trade a label issued and approved under to Add New Grape Variety Names for Enforcement Act of 2015. These regulations prescribed by the Secretary American Wines (RIN: 1513–AC24). proposed changes to the regulations will of the Treasury. In accordance with the (Not significant) liberalize the standard for substituting mandate of Executive Order 13563 of In FY 2017, TTB proposed to amend merchandise, simplify recordkeeping January 18, 2011, regarding improving its wine labeling regulations by adding requirements, extend and standardize regulation and regulatory review, TTB a number of new names to the list of timelines for filing drawback claims, conducted an analysis of its alcohol grape variety names approved for use in and require the electronic filing of beverage labeling regulations to identify designating American wines. The drawback claims. any that might be outmoded, ineffective, proposed deregulatory amendments • Enforcement of Copyrights and the insufficient, or excessively burdensome, would allow wine bottlers to use these Digital Millennium Copyright Act. and to modify, streamline, expand, or additional approved grape variety (Significance not yet determined) repeal them in accordance with that names on wine labels and in wine Treasury and CBP plan to propose analysis. These regulations were also advertisements. In 2018, TTB reopened amendments to the CBP regulations reviewed to assess their applicability to the comment period for the notice, as pertaining to importations of the modern alcohol beverage requested by industry members and, merchandise that violate or are marketplace. As a result of this review, after consideration of the comments, suspected of violating the copyright and further review in FY 2017 and FY intends to issue a final rule in FY 2019. laws, including the Digital Millennium

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00121 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57924 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

Copyright Act (DMCA), in accordance financial system from the abuses of private banks, non-federally insured with Title III of the Trade Facilitation financial crime, including terrorist credit unions, and certain trust and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015 financing, money laundering, and other companies. The proposed rule would (TFTEA) and Executive Order 13785, illicit activity. prescribe minimum standards for AML ‘‘Establishing Enhanced Collection and These objectives and priorities programs and would ensure that all Enforcement of Anti-dumping and include: (1) Issuing, interpreting, and banks, regardless of whether they are Countervailing Duties and Violations of enforcing compliance with regulations subject to Federal regulation and Trade and Customs Laws.’’ The implementing the BSA; (2) supporting, oversight, are required to establish and proposed amendments are intended to working with, and as appropriate, implement AML programs. FinCEN is enhance CBP’s enforcement efforts overseeing compliance examination considering public comments and against increasingly sophisticated functions delegated to other Federal preparing a Final Rule. piratical goods, clarify the definition of regulators; (3) managing the collection, • Anti-Money Laundering Program piracy, simplify the detention process processing, storage, and dissemination and SAR Requirements for Investment relative to goods suspected of violating of data related to the BSA; (4) Advisers. (Regulatory) the copyright laws, and prescribe new maintaining a government-wide access On September 1, 2015, FinCEN regulations enforcing the DMCA. service to that same data and for published in the Federal Register a • Inter Partes Proceedings Concerning network users with overlapping Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to Exclusion Orders Based on Unfair interests; (5) conducting analysis in solicit public comment on proposed Practices in Import Trade. support of policymakers, law rules under the BSA that would (Deregulatory) enforcement, regulatory and intelligence prescribe minimum standards for anti- Treasury and CBP plans to publish a agencies, and the financial sector; and money laundering programs to be proposal to amend its regulations with (6) coordinating with and collaborating established by certain investment respect to administrative rulings related on anti-terrorism and AML initiatives advisers and to require such investment to the importation of articles in light of with domestic law enforcement and advisers to report suspicious activity to exclusion orders issued by the United intelligence agencies, as well as foreign FinCEN. FinCEN is considering those States International Trade Commission financial intelligence units. comments and preparing a Final Rule. (‘‘Commission’’) under section 337 of FinCEN’s regulatory priorities for • Anti-Money Laundering Program the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. The fiscal year 2018 include: Requirements for Persons Involved in proposed amendments seek to promote • Report of Foreign Bank and Real Estate Closings and Settlements. the speed, accuracy, and transparency of Financial Accounts. (Deregulatory) (Regulatory) such rulings through the creation of an On March 10, 2016, FinCEN issued a FinCEN intends to issue an ANPRM inter partes proceeding to replace the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to to initiate a rulemaking that would current ex parte process. address requests from filers for establish BSA requirements for ‘‘persons clarification of certain requirements involved in real estate closings and III. Financial Crimes Enforcement regarding the Report of Foreign Bank settlements,’’ 31 U.S.C. 5312(a)(2)(U). Network and Financial Accounts, including The new rules may cover various types As administrator of the Bank Secrecy requirements with respect to employees of businesses and professions involved Act (BSA), the Financial Crimes who have signature authority over, but in real estate transactions, including real Enforcement Network (FinCEN) is no financial interest in, the foreign estate agents and brokers, settlement responsible for developing and financial accounts of their employers. attorneys, and title companies. The data implementing regulations that are the FinCEN is considering public comments from a series of geographical targeting core of the Department’s anti-money and preparing a Final Rule. orders issued by FinCEN is being laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism • Amendments to the Definitions of evaluated to support this rulemaking to financing efforts. FinCEN’s Broker or Dealer in Securities. address money laundering through real responsibilities and objectives are (Regulatory) estate transactions, especially linked to, and flow from, that role. In On April 4, 2016, FinCEN issued a acquisitions made via currency fulfilling this role, FinCEN seeks to Notice of Proposed Rulemaking transmittals. Real estate transactions enhance U.S. national security by proposing amendments to the regulatory involving mortgages are already covered making the financial system definitions of broker or dealer in by BSA rules for banks and FinCEN increasingly resistant to abuse by money securities under the BSA’s regulations. rules for residential mortgage lenders launderers, terrorists and their financial The proposed changes would expand and originators. supporters, and other perpetrators of the current scope of the definitions to • Registration Requirements of Money crime. include funding portals and would Services Businesses. (Regulatory) The Secretary of the Treasury, require them to implement policies and FinCEN is considering issuing a through FinCEN, is authorized by the procedures reasonably designed to Notice of Proposed Rulemaking BSA to issue regulations requiring achieve compliance with all of the amending the registration requirements financial institutions to file reports and BSA’s requirements that are currently for money services businesses. keep records that are determined to applicable to brokers or dealers in • Reporting of Cross-Border have a high degree of usefulness in securities. FinCEN is considering public Electronic Transmittals of Funds. criminal, tax, or regulatory matters or in comments and preparing a Final Rule. (Regulatory) the conduct of intelligence or counter- • Anti-Money Laundering Program FinCEN is considering requiring intelligence activities to protect against Requirements for Banks Lacking a certain depository institutions and international terrorism. The BSA also Federal Functional Regulator. (Not yet money services businesses (MSBs) to authorizes requiring designated determined) affirmatively provide records to FinCEN financial institutions to establish AML On August 25, 2016, FinCEN issued a of certain cross-border electronic programs and compliance procedures. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to transmittals of funds (CBETF). Current To implement and realize its mission, remove the AML program exemption for regulations already require that these FinCEN has established regulatory banks that lack a Federal functional financial institutions maintain and objectives and priorities to safeguard the regulator, including, but not limited to, make available, but not affirmatively

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00122 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57925

report, essentially the same CBETF • Guidance implementing changes to respect to a section 987 qualified information. FinCEN issued this section 1361 regarding electing small business unit. proposal to meet the requirements of the business trusts. The IRS and Treasury are also Intelligence Reform and Terrorism • Guidance regarding Opportunity prioritizing implementation of the Prevention Act of 2004 (IRTPA). Zones under sections 1400Z–1 and President’s Executive Order 13813, • Changes to the Currency and 1400Z–2. Promoting Healthcare Choice and Monetary Instrument Report (CMIR) • Guidance under new section 1446(f) Competition Across the United States. Reporting Requirements. (Significance for dispositions of certain partnership The Executive Order, among other not yet determined) interests. things, directs Treasury and the FinCEN will research, obtain, and • Guidance on computation of estate Departments of Labor and Health and analyze relevant data to validate the and gift taxes to reflect changes in the Human Services to consider proposing need for changes aimed at updating and basic exclusion amount. or revising regulations or guidance to improving the CMIR and ancillary • Guidance regarding withholding increase the usability of health reporting requirements. Possible areas of under sections 3402 and 3405 and reimbursement arrangements. study to be examined could include optional flat rate withholding. Finally, it is a priority of the IRS to current trends in cash transportation • Guidance on certain issues relating publish regulations under section 1101 across international borders, to the excise tax on excess remuneration of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 transparency levels of physical paid by ‘‘applicable tax-exempt (BBA) that are necessary to implement transportation of currency, the organizations’’ under section 4960. the new centralized partnership audit regime enacted in November 2015. feasibility of harmonizing data fields • Guidance regarding new section Section 1101(g)(1) of the BBA provides with bordering countries, and 1061. that the new regime is generally information derived from FinCEN’s • Guidance regarding new section effective for partnership tax years experience with Geographic Targeting 6695(g). beginning after December 31, 2017. Orders. In addition, the IRS and Treasury’s • Final regulations regarding the election Other Requirements. Office of Tax Policy will continue to out of the centralized partnership audit FinCEN also will continue to issue pursue the actions recommended in the regime were published January 2, 2018. proposed and final rules pursuant to Second Report pursuant to Executive Final regulations regarding the section 311 of the USA PATRIOT Act, Order 13789 to eliminate, or in other partnership representative and the as appropriate. Finally, FinCEN expects cases reduce, the burdens imposed on election to apply the centralized that it may propose various technical taxpayers by eight regulations that the partnership audit regime were and other regulatory amendments in Treasury has identified for review under published August 9, 2018. Proposed conjunction with ongoing efforts with Executive Order 13789. The remaining regulations implementing the respect to a comprehensive review of deregulatory actions include: centralized partnership audit regime existing regulations to enhance 1. Finalize amendment of regulations were published August 17, 2018. regulatory efficiency. under section 7602 regarding the VI. Internal Revenue Service participation of attorneys described in V. Bureau of the Fiscal Service section 6103(n) in a summons During fiscal year 2019, the IRS and The Bureau of the Fiscal Service interview. Proposed amendments were Treasury’s Office of Tax Policy have the (Fiscal Service) administers regulations published on March 28, 2018. following regulatory priorities. The first pertaining to the Government’s financial 2. Finalize removal of temporary priority is to provide guidance regarding activities, including: (1) Implementing regulations under section 707 initial implementation of key provisions Treasury’s borrowing authority, concerning treatment of liabilities for of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), including regulating the sale and issue disguised sale purposes. Proposed Public Law 115–97. Initial of Treasury securities; (2) administering regulations that proposed the removal of implementation priorities include: Government revenue and debt • Guidance under sections 101 and the temporary regulations under section collection; (3) administering 1016 and new section 6050Y regarding 707 and the reinstatement of the prior government-wide accounting programs; reportable policy sales of life insurance section 707 regulations were published (4) managing certain Federal contracts. on June 19, 2018. investments; (5) disbursing the majority • Guidance under section 162(f) and 3. Proposed removal of of Government electronic and check new section 6050X. documentation regulations under payments; (6) assisting Federal agencies • Computational, definitional, and section 385 and review of other in reducing the number of improper other guidance under new section regulations under section 385. A notice payments; and (7) providing 163(j). delaying the application of the administrative and operational support • Guidance on new section 168(k). documentation regulations was to Federal agencies through franchise • Computational, definitional, and published on August 14, 2017. shared services. anti-avoidance guidance under new 4. Proposed modification of During fiscal year 2019, the Fiscal section 199A. regulations under section 367 regarding Service will accord priority to the • Definitional and other guidance the treatment of certain transfers of following regulatory projects: under new section 451(b) and (c). property to foreign corporations. • Management of Federal Agency • Guidance on computation of 5. Proposed modification of Receipts. (Not yet determined) unrelated business taxable income for regulations under section 337(d) The Fiscal Service plans to publish a separate trades or businesses under new regarding certain transfers of property to notice of proposed rulemaking to amend section 512(a)(6). regulated investment companies (RICs) 31 CFR part 206 governing the • Guidance implementing changes to and real estate investment trusts collection of public money, along with section 529. (REITs). a request for public comments. This • Guidance implementing new 6. Proposed modification of notice will propose implementing section 965 and other international regulations under section 987 on statutory authority which mandates that sections of the TCJA. income and currency gain or loss with some or all nontax payments made to

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00123 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57926 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

the Government, and accompanying banking organizations while at the same the supplementary leverage ratio remittance information, be submitted time maintaining safety and soundness denominator for custody banks, the electronically. Receipt of such items and the quality and quantity of agencies intend to publish a new electronically offers significant regulatory capital in the banking system. rulemaking to implement section 402. efficiencies and cost-savings to the These rulemakings will incorporate the The notice of proposed rulemaking was government, compared to the receipt of new requirements set forth in section published on April 19, 2018, 83 FR cash, check or money order payments. 201 of EGRRCPA, the community bank 17317. • Amendment of Electronic Payment leverage ratio, and section 214 of • Exception from Appraisals of Real Regulation. (Deregulatory) EGRRCPA, requiring a revised approach Property Located in Rural Areas (12 CFR The Fiscal Service is proposing to to defining which acquisition, part 34). amend its electronic payment regulation development, and construction loans The banking agencies plan to issue a at 31 CFR part 208. The amendment should be deemed high volatility notice of proposed rulemaking to would eliminate obsolete references in commercial real estate exposures. A implement section 103 of EGRRCPA. the rule, including references to the notice of proposed rulemaking Section 103 amended Title XI of the Electronic Transfer Account (ETAsm). In proposing various capital Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery addition, the proposed rule would simplifications was issued on October and Enforcement Act of 1989 to exclude provide for the disbursement of non- 27, 2017, 82 FR 49984. A notice of loans made by a financial institution benefit payments through Treasury- proposed rulemaking concerning high from the requirement to obtain a Title XI sponsored accounts, such as the U.S. volatility commercial real estate appraisal if certain conditions are met. Debit Card. exposures was published on September • Expanded Examination Cycle for • Government Participation in the 28, 2018, 83 FR 48990. Certain Small Insured Depository Automated Clearing House. (Not yet • Capital: Standardized Approach for Institutions (12 CFR part 4). determined) Counterparty Credit Risk (12 CFR part To implement section 210 of The Fiscal Service is proposing to 3). EGRRCPA, the banking agencies issued amend its regulation at 31 CFR part 210 The banking agencies are planning to an interim final rule expanding the 18- governing the government’s issue a notice of proposed rulemaking to month examination schedule to participation in the Automated Clearing implement a risk sensitive approach to qualifying well-capitalized and well- House (ACH). The proposed amendment counterparty credit risk using a risk managed institutions with less than $3 would address changes to the National adjusted notational amount of billion in total assets. The interim final Automated Clearing House derivatives, allowing for better rule was published on August 29, 2018, Association’s (NACHA) private-sector recognition of netting, and 83 FR 43961. • ACH rules since those rules were last distinguishing margined trades from un- Heightened Capital Requirements incorporated by reference in Part 210. margined trades. for Investments in Long-Term Debt • Among other things, the amendment Reforming the Community Instruments Issued by Global would address the expansion of Same- Reinvestment Act (CRA) Regulatory Systemically Important Bank Holding Day ACH. Framework (12 CFR parts 25 and 195). Companies and Intermediate Holding The OCC issued an advance notice of Companies (12 CFR part 3). VI. Office of the Comptroller of the proposed rulemaking setting forth a new The banking agencies issued a notice Currency approach to CRA to bring clarity, of proposed rulemaking that would The Office of the Comptroller of the transparency, flexibility, and less specify capital requirements applicable Currency (OCC) charters, regulates, and burden for regulated financial to an advanced approaches banking supervises all national banks and institutions and consumers. The organization that invests in long-term Federal savings associations (FSAs). The advance notice of proposed rulemaking debt instruments issued pursuant to the agency also supervises the Federal was published on September 5, 2018, 83 FRB’s total loss absorbing capacity branches and agencies of foreign banks. FR 45053. regulations, either by a bank holding • The OCC’s mission is to ensure that Employment Contracts (12 CFR part company or an intermediate holding national banks and FSAs operate in a 163). company. • safe and sound manner, provide fair The OCC plans to issue a notice of Implementation of the Current access to financial services, treat proposed rulemaking to remove the Expected Credit Losses Standard for customers fairly, and comply with requirement that the board of directors Allowances and Related Adjustments applicable laws and regulations. of an FSA approve employment (12 CFR parts 1, 3, 5, 23, 24, 32, 34, and Regulatory priorities for fiscal year contracts with all employees and limit 46). 2019 include the following regulatory the approval requirement only to The banking agencies plan to issue a contracts with senior executives. final rule to reflect the upcoming actions, which include rules • implementing various provisions of the Supplementary Leverage Ratio adoption by banking organizations of Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, Standards (SLR) for Bank Holding FASB’s Accounting Standards Update and Consumer Protection Act (Pub. L. Companies and Subsidiary Insured 2016–13, which introduces the current 115–174) (EGRRCPA): Depository Institutions (12 CFR part 3). expected credit losses methodology The OCC and FRB issued a proposed • Capital Simplification (12 CFR part (CECL) for estimating allowances for rule that would modify the enhanced 3). credit losses. The notice of proposed supplementary leverage ratio standards The banking agencies 2 are planning rulemaking was issued on May 14, 2018, for U.S. top-tier bank holding to issue rulemakings to simplify the 83 FR 22312. companies identified as global • generally applicable capital framework Incentive-Based Compensation systemically important bank holding with the goal of meaningfully reducing Arrangements (12 CFR part 42). companies, or GSIBs, and certain of Section 956 of the Dodd–Frank Wall regulatory burden on community their insured depository institution Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Pub. L. 111–203, July 21, 2010) 2 The OCC, the Board of Governors of the Federal subsidiaries. In light of section 402 of Reserve System (FRB), and the Federal Deposit EGRRCPA, which requires the Federal (Dodd-Frank Act) requires the banking Insurance Corporation (FDIC). banking agencies to propose changes to agencies, National Credit Union

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00124 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57927

Administration (NCUA), Securities and asset thresholds are set at $2.5 billion Pursuant to section 203 of EGRRCPA, Exchange Commission (SEC), and the and $1.5 billion. OCC-supervised institutions with total Federal Housing Finance Agency • Margin and Capital Requirements consolidated assets of $10 billion or less (FHFA) to jointly prescribe regulations for Covered Swap Entities (12 CFR part are not ‘‘banking entities’’ within the or guidance prohibiting any type of 45). scope of section 13 of the BHCA, if their incentive-based payment arrangement, The banking agencies, FHFA, and trading assets and trading liabilities do or any feature of any such arrangement, FCA issued a final rule to amend the not exceed 5 percent of their total that the regulators determine encourages minimum margin requirements for consolidated assets, and they are not inappropriate risks by covered financial registered swap dealers, major swap controlled by a company that has total institutions by providing an executive participants, security-based swap consolidated assets over $10 billion or officer, employee, director, or principal dealers, and major security-based swap total trading assets and trading shareholder with excessive participants for which one of the liabilities that exceed 5 percent of total compensation, fees, or benefits, or that agencies is the prudential regulator consolidated assets. In addition, section could lead to material financial loss to (Swap Margin Rule). The notice of 204 of EGRRCPA revises the statutory the covered financial institution. The proposed rulemaking was issued on provisions related to the naming of Dodd-Frank Act also requires such February 21, 2018, 83 FR 7413, covered funds. The notice of proposed agencies jointly to prescribe regulations requesting comment on the agencies’ rulemaking was issued on July 17, 2018, or guidelines requiring each covered plan to revise one definition in the 83 FR 33432. financial institution to disclose to its current rule to match the definition • Receiverships for Uninsured regulator the structure of all incentive- used for the same purpose in the Federal Branches and Agencies (12 CFR based compensation arrangements agencies’ capital regulations. The final chapter I). offered by such institution sufficient to rule was published on October 10, 2018, The OCC plans to issue an advance 83 FR 50805. notice of proposed rulemaking setting determine whether the compensation • structure provides any executive officer, Net Stable Funding Ratio (12 CFR forth key issues to be addressed prior to employee, director, or principal part 50). the development of a framework for shareholder with excessive The banking agencies plan to issue a receiverships of uninsured Federal compensation or could lead to material final rule to implement the Basel net branches and agencies. • financial loss to the institution. The stable funding ratio standards. These Rules of Practice and Procedure (12 notice of proposed rulemaking was standards would require large, CFR part 19). published on June 10, 2016, 81 FR internationally active banking The banking agencies plan to issue a 37669. organizations to maintain sufficient proposed rule to amend their rules of • Liquidity Coverage Ratio Rule: stable funding to support their assets practice and procedure to reflect Treatment of Certain Municipal generally over a one-year time horizon. modern filing and communication Obligations as Level 2B High-Quality The notice of proposed rulemaking was methods and improve or clarify other Liquid Assets (12 CFR part 50). published on June 1, 2016, 81 FR 35123. procedures. • Other Real Estate Owned (12 CFR • Short-Form Consolidated Reports of To implement section 403 of part 34). Condition and Income (12 CFR part 3). EGRRCPA, the banking agencies issued The OCC plans to issue a notice of The banking agencies plan to issue a an interim final rule that would add proposed rulemaking on other real notice of proposed rulemaking to investment-grade municipal obligations estate owned (OREO). The proposed provide criteria for banks and savings to the list of permitted assets for high- rule would update and clarify associations eligible to file a short-form quality liquid assets (HQLA), as defined provisions relating to OREO for national report in the first and second quarters in the agencies’ Liquidity Coverage banks and establish a framework to pursuant to section 205 of the Ratio (LCR) rules. The interim final rule assist Federal savings associations with EGRRCPA. was published on August 31, 2018, 83 managing and disposing of OREO in a • Stress Testing (12 CFR part 46). FR 44451. safe and sound manner. The OCC is planning to issue a notice • Loans in Areas Having Special • Proposed Revisions to Prohibitions of proposed rulemaking to amend the Flood Hazards-Private Flood Insurance and Restrictions on Proprietary Trading annual stress test rule for national banks (12 CFR part 22). and Certain Interests in, and and Federal savings associations (FSAs) The banking agencies, the Farm Credit Relationships With, Hedge Funds and required under section 165(i) of the Administration (FCA), and the NCUA Private Equity Funds (12 CFR part 44). Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and plan to issue a final rule to amend their The banking agencies are planning to Consumer Protection Act (Pub. L. 111– regulations regarding loans in areas issue a final rule that would amend the 203, July 21, 2010) (12 U.S.C. 5365(i)) having special flood hazards to regulations implementing section 13 of (Dodd-Frank Act). These changes are implement the private flood insurance the Bank Holding Company Act. Section required by section 401 of the provisions of the Biggert-Waters Flood 13 contains certain restrictions on the EGRRCPA, which amended the Dodd- Insurance Reform Act of 2012. The ability of banking entities to engage in Frank Act to raise the threshold for notice of proposed rulemaking was proprietary trading and acquire or retain national banks and FSAs subject to published on November 7, 2016, 81 FR certain interests in, or enter into certain DFAST from $10 billion to $250 billion 78063. relationships with, a hedge fund or in total consolidated assets, reduce the • Management Official Interlocks private equity fund. The amendments number of stress test scenarios, and Asset Thresholds (12 CFR part 26). are intended to provide banking entities revise the annual stress test requirement The banking agencies plan to issue a with clarity about what activities are to a periodic requirement. notice of proposed rulemaking that prohibited and to improve supervision • Covered Savings Associations (12 would amend agency regulations and implementation of section 13. CFR part 101). interpreting the Depository Institution The banking agencies intend to The OCC issued a notice of proposed Management Interlocks Act (DIMIA) to address sections 203 and 204 of rulemaking to implement section 206 of increase the asset thresholds based on EGRRCPA through a separate the EGRRCPA, which adds a new inflation or market changes. The current rulemaking process. section 5A of the Home Owners’ Loan

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00125 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57928 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

Act. Section 5A allows Federal savings Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) Statement of Need: By June 6, 2019, associations with assets of $20 billion or Loan Guaranty regulation. VA is required to develop procedures to less to elect to operate as ‘‘covered Three of the VHA regulations intend ensure eligible Veterans are able to savings associations.’’ Covered savings to codify the VA Mission Act of 2018, access walk-in care from certain associations operate with the same in accordance with section 101, 102 and community providers. rights and are subject to the same 105 of Public Law 115–182 (hereafter Summary of Legal Basis: Pub. L. 115– restrictions as a national bank in the referred to as the ‘‘Mission Act’’). VA is 182, section 105. same location. As required by section required to implement the Veterans Alternatives: If VA does not add these 5A, the NPRM will propose standards Community Care Program by June 6, new regulations, it will not be able to and procedures for making the election. 2019, under which VA will provide care implement the required Community It will also address nonconforming to eligible Veterans through non-VA Walk-in Care Program by the statutory assets and clarify requirements for the providers in the community. Under the deadline of June 6, 2019. VA would risk treatment of covered savings Mission Act VA is also required to not meeting the statutory deadline, and associations. The notice of proposed establish procedures to ensure eligible Veterans would not be able to receive rulemaking was published on Veterans are able to access walk-in care walk-in care as required by law. September 18, 2018, 83 FR 47101. from certain community providers by Anticipated Cost and Benefits: TBD BILLING CODE 4810–25–P June 6, 2019. Risks: The other VHA regulation intends to Timetable: implement provisions from the Veterans Appeals Improvement and Action Date FR Cite DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS Modernization Act of 2017, Public Law AFFAIRS (VA) NPRM ...... 02/00/19 115–55. This act allows VA to revise NPRM Comment 04/00/19 Statement of Regulatory Priorities and enhance VA’s rules for processing Period End. claims and appeals and is effective The Department of Veterans Affairs February 19, 2019. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (VA) administers benefit programs that The remaining VBA regulation is Required: No. recognize the important public required to promulgate regulations Small Entities Affected: No. obligations to those who served this governing cash-out home loans in Government Levels Affected: None. Nation. VA’s regulatory responsibility is accordance with the Economic Growth, URL For More Information: almost solely confined to carrying out Regulatory Relief, and Consumer www.regulations.gov. mandates of the laws enacted by Protection Act by November 20, 2018. Agency Contact: Andrea Sperr, Congress relating to programs for This rule defines the parameters of Regulation Specialist, Department of veterans and their families. VA’s major when VA will permit cash-out home Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue regulatory objective is to implement loans, to include defining net tangible NW, Washington, DC 20420, Phone: 202 these laws with fairness, justice, and benefit, recoupment, and seasoning 461–6725, Email: [email protected]. efficiency. requirements. RIN: 2900–AQ47 Most of the regulations issued by VA involve at least one of three VA components: The Veterans Benefits VA Administration, the Veterans Health VA Administration, and the National Proposed Rule Stage Final Rule Stage Cemetery Administration. The primary • • mission of the Veterans Benefits 114. Veterans Community Walk–In 115. Economic Growth, Regulatory Administration is to provide high- Care Relief, and Consumer Protection Act quality and timely nonmedical benefits Priority: Economically Significant. (The Act), Public Law 115–174, 132 to eligible veterans and their Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. Stat. 1296 dependents. The primary mission of the E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. Priority: Other Significant. Major Veterans Health Administration is to Legal Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1725A; under 5 U.S.C. 801. provide high-quality health care on a Pub. L. 115–182, sec. 105 E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. timely basis to eligible veterans through CFR Citation: 38 CFR 17.4200; 38 CFR Legal Authority: Public Law 115–174, its system of medical centers, nursing 17.4225; . . . sec. 309; 38 U.S.C. 3703 and 3710 homes, domiciliaries, and outpatient Legal Deadline: Other, Statutory, June CFR Citation: 38 CFR 36. medical and dental facilities. The 6, 2018, Public Law 115–182, section Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, primary mission of the National 105. November 20, 2018. Cemetery Administration is to bury By June 6, 2019, VA is required to This law has a statutory deadline and eligible veterans, members of the develop procedures to ensure eligible requires the SECVA to publish a Reserve components, and their Veterans are able to access walk–in care regulation in the Federal Register not dependents in VA National Cemeteries from certain community providers. later than 180 days after the date of the and to maintain those cemeteries as Abstract: The Department of Veterans enactment of this law. national shrines in perpetuity as a final Affairs (VA) intends to add new Abstract: The Economic Growth, tribute of a grateful Nation to regulations to title 38 Code of Federal Regulatory Relief, and Consumer commemorate their service and sacrifice Regulations to implement section 105 of Protection Act requires VA to to our Nation. Public Law 115–182 (hereafter referred promulgate regulations governing cash- VA’s regulatory priority plan consists to as the ‘‘Mission Act’’), to establish out home loans. The Department of of five high priority regulations with procedures to ensure eligible Veterans Veterans Affairs (VA) is amending its statutory deadlines. Four of the five are are able to access walk-in care from rules on VA-guaranteed or insured cash- Veterans Health Administration (VHA) certain community providers by June 6, out home loans. The This rule defines regulations and the fifth one is a 2019. the parameters of VA cash-out home

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00126 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57929

loans, to include defining net tangible URL For More Information: benefits and appeals processing, and VA benefits, recoupment, and seasoning www.regulations.gov. must enact delimiting dates to end requirements. Agency Contact: Greg Nelms, certain processes, such as claim Statement of Need: Section 309 of this Supervisor, Department of Veterans reconsideration, that are no longer law, the SECVA shall promulgate a Loan Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW, permissible under the revised law. Guarantee rulemaking (regulation) to Washington, DC 20420, Phone: 202 632– Summary of Legal Basis: Public Law ensure that such refinancing is in the 8978, Email: [email protected]. 115–55 requires VA to publish the financial interest of the borrower, RIN: 2900–AQ42 regulations to coincide with the including rules relating to recoupment, effective date of this law. seasoning, and net tangible benefits. Alternatives: VA initially determined Summary of Legal Basis: Public Law VA that a subsequent regulation to VA’s 115–174, sec. 309 requires VA to 116. • Veterans Health Administration 2900–AQ26 regulation was not publish these regulations. necessary, because VHA adopted VBA’s Alternatives: Section 309 of this law Benefits Claims, Appeals, and Due Process part 3 procedural rules some time ago requires that SECVA shall promulgate a through our own internal guidance, and Loan Guarantee rulemaking (regulation) Priority: Other Significant. those rules remain in effect until we to ensure that such refinancing is in the E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. publish rulemaking to the contrary. In financial interest of the borrower, Legal Authority: Public Law 115–55; practical terms, this means that in the including rules relating to recoupment, 38 U.S.C. 501(a); 38 U.S.C. 501, 1721 absence of VHA-specific Appeals seasoning, and net tangible benefits. and 7105 Modernization Act (AMA) notice and There are no other alternatives to CFR Citation: 38 CFR 17.132; 38 CFR comment rulemaking, applicable promulgate such regulation. However, 17.133; . . . provisions of 2900–AQ26, and other 38 VA did consider alternatives when Legal Deadline: Other, Statutory, CFR part 3 processes apply to VHA as developing new cash-out refinance February 14, 2019, IFR to be published they do to VBA. However, VA intends policies, the guaranty and insurance of in time to coincide with effective date to publish this rulemaking to provide Type I and Type II case outs and of law. additional regulatory clarity. different alternatives for establishing Public Law 115–55, section 2(x), provisions regarding seasoning, provides generally that the new review Anticipated Cost and Benefits: TBD. recoupment and interest rate reduction system will apply to all claims for Risks: If VA does not make minor that apply to Type I Cash-Outs. which a notice of decision is provided revisions and add necessary delimiting Anticipated Cost and Benefits: VA’s by the agency of original jurisdiction on dates, there is a risk that the Court of Office of Financial Management (OFM) or after the later of (a) 540 days from the Appeals for Veterans Claims, which scored the rulemaking as a loss in date of enactment, which falls on reviews VA benefit appeals, could funding revenue of $33.1 million in February 14, 2019, or (b) 30 days after determine that healthcare claimants FY2019 and $91.3 million over a three- the date on which the Secretary certifies have rights that are inconsistent with year period (FY2019 through FY2021), to Congress that VA is ready to carry out (essentially in addition to) revised using the 2019 President’s budget (PB) the new appeals system. statutory authorities. This would place baseline. There are no FTE or GOE costs Abstract: The Department of Veterans VHA claimants in the enviable position associated with this rulemaking. The Affairs (VA) revises its regulations of enjoying rights that do not extend to impact is due to reduced funding fees concerning its claims and appeals claimants whose benefits are generated related to the decrease in total process governing various programs administered by VA’s other cash-out refinance loan amount. administrated by the Veterans Health administrations Veterans Benefits Risks: If VA decided not to regulate, Administration. In preparation for the Administration (VBA) and National mortgage lenders may seek to find launch of modernized claims and Cemetery Administration (NCA) and loopholes in the Act and continue to appeals processes mandated by the other adjudication activities, such as aggressively market and offer refinance Veterans Appeals Improvement and VA’s Office of General Counsel (OGC). loans to veterans that may not be in Modernization Act of 2017, VA has Timetable: their financial interest. This regulation reviewed the regulations governing is necessary to inform all parties of the various programs administered by its Action Date FR Cite requirements to originate future loans Veterans Health Administration and for VA loan guaranty. It is urgent and determined that certain sections are Final Rule ...... 01/00/19 inconsistent with statutory Final Rule Effec- 02/00/19 compelling to issue this rule to provide tive. clarity so that market disruption is requirements. This rulemaking amends minimized. While VA is required to those sections to ensure that they are no issue this rule by statute, by not longer inconsistent with requirements Regulatory Flexibility Analysis promulgating a rule industry contained in the law. Required: No. uncertainty may lead to less access to Statement of Need: The Veterans Small Entities Affected: No. mortgage capital for veterans. Appeals Improvement and Government Levels Affected: None. Modernization Act of 2017, Public Law Timetable: URL For More Information: 115–55, overhauled VA’s rules for www.regulations.gov. Action Date FR Cite processing claims and appeals, effective February 19, 2019. To successfully Agency Contact: Ethan Kalett, Final Rule ...... 12/00/18 implement changes in the context of Director, VHA Regulations, Department healthcare benefits administered by of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Regulatory Flexibility Analysis VA’s Veterans Health Administration Avenue NW, Room 675Q, Washington, Required: No. (VHA), VA must make minor revisions DC 20420, Phone: 202 461–7633, Email: Small Entities Affected: No. to multiple sections of title 38 [email protected]. Government Levels Affected: None. regulations applicable to healthcare RIN: 2900–AQ44

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00127 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57930 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

VA Risks: If VA does not publish new services upon VA’s authorization and 117. • Veterans Care Agreements regulations, it will not be able to the election of eligible veterans, implement the required Veterans primarily: (1) Whether VA offers the Priority: Economically Significant. Community Care Program and legally care or service required; (2) whether VA Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. procure care for our Nations Veterans, operates a full-service medical facility E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. which is a tremendous health and safety in the State in which the Veteran Legal Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1703A; risk. resides; (3) whether the Veteran meets Public Law 115–182, sec. 102 Timetable: certain conditions related to eligibility CFR Citation: 38 CFR 17.4100; 38 CFR under the 40 mile criterion in the 17.4150; . . . Action Date FR Cite Veterans Choice Program; (4) whether Legal Deadline: Other, Statutory, June VA is able to furnish care or services in 6, 2019, Public Law 115–182, section Interim Final Rule 05/00/19 a manner that complies with designated Interim Final Rule 06/00/19 access standards developed by the 102. Comment Pe- VA is required to establish the riod End. Secretary; and (5) whether the Veteran permanent Community Care program Interim Final Rule 06/00/19 and the Veteran’s referring clinician under 38 U.S.C. 1703 by June 6, 2019. Effective. agree that furnishing care and services By June 6, 2019, VA’s current ability to through a community entity or provider use provider agreements and individual Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is in the best medical interest of the authorizations to purchase community Required: No. Veteran based upon criteria developed care will also lapse. The procurement Small Entities Affected: No. by VA. This interim final rule will also agreements established in this interim Government Levels Affected: None. establish criteria by which covered final rule, and authorized by 38 U.S.C. URL For More Information: Veterans could receive care if VA 1703A, are required to implement the www.regulations.gov. determined a medical services line was program required under 38 U.S.C. 1703. Agency Contact: Ethan Kalett, not meeting VA’s standards for quality, Abstract: The Department of Veterans Director, VHA Regulations, Department with certain limitations. An interim Affairs (VA) intends to add new of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont final rule is necessary because VA regulations to title 38 Code of Federal Avenue NW, Room 675Q, Washington, requires additional time to develop the Regulations to implement section 102 of DC 20420, Phone: 202 461–7633, Email: policy decisions necessary to interpret Public Law 115–182 (hereafter referred [email protected]. the legal criteria stated above (e.g., to as the ‘‘Mission Act’’), to establish the RIN: 2900–AQ45 interpreting or defining the phrase does use of Veterans Care Agreements (VCAs) not offer the care or services, defining a to procure care in the community for full service medical facility, and developing the required access and eligible Veterans. VA Statement of Need: In accordance quality standards), to implement the • with section 101 of the Mission Act, VA 118. Veterans Community Care Veterans Community Care Program by June 6, 2019. is required to implement the Veterans Program Statement of Need: An interim final Community Care Program by June 6, Priority: Economically Significant. rule is necessary because VA requires 2019, under which VA will provide care Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. additional time to develop the policy to eligible Veterans through non-VA E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. decisions necessary to interpret the legal providers in the community. Also under Legal Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1703; criteria stated above (e.g., interpreting or the Mission Act, the current Veterans Public Law 115–182, sec. 101 defining the phrase does not offer the Choice Program to provide community CFR Citation: 38 CFR 17.4000; . . . care or services, defining a full service care will lapse on June 6, 2019, as will Legal Deadline: Other, Statutory, June medical facility, and developing the two of VA’s current methods of 6, 2019, Public Law 115–182, section required access and quality standards), procuring community care (Veterans 101. to implement the Veterans Community Choice Program provider agreements, VA is required to establish the Care Program by June 6, 2019. Also and individual authorizations). The permanent Community Care program under the Mission Act, the current VCAs under section 102 of the Mission under 38 U.S.C. 1703 by June 6, 2019. Veterans Choice Program to provide Act will essentially replace these two Abstract: The Department of Veterans community care will lapse on June 6, current methods of VA procurement of Affairs (VA) intends to add new 2019. To ensure this transition to the community care, and the VCAs are regulations to title 38 Code of Federal new Veterans Community Care Program required to be in place six months prior Regulations to implement section 101 of occurs without a significant disruption to implementation of the Veterans Public Law 115–182 (hereafter referred in Veterans’ care, implementation must Community Care Program to provide to as the ‘‘Mission Act’’), to establish the occur through an interim final rule to lead time for VA to establish new Veterans Community Care Program by establish criteria for receipt of care or procurement relationships with June 6, 2019, under which VA will services upon VA’s authorization and community providers. provide care to eligible Veterans the election of eligible veterans. Summary of Legal Basis: Public Law through non-VA providers in the Summary of Legal Basis: Implement 115182, section 102 requires VA to community. Also under the Mission section 101 of Public Law 115–182 establish the permanent Community Act, the current Veterans Choice (hereafter referred to as the Mission Care program under 38 U.S.C. 1703 by Program to provide community care will Act). June 6, 2019. The procurement lapse on June 6, 2019. To ensure this Alternatives: TBD. agreements established in this interim transition to the new Veterans Anticipated Cost and Benefits: TBD. final rule, and authorized by 38 U.S.C. Community Care Program occurs Risks: The Veterans Choice Program 1703A, are required to implement the without a significant disruption in to provide community care will lapse on program required under 38 U.S.C. 1703. Veterans’ care, implementation must June 6, 2019. If VA does not publish Alternatives: TBD. occur through an interim final rule to new regulations, it will not be able to Anticipated Cost and Benefits: TBD. establish criteria for receipt of care or implement the required Veterans

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00128 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57931

Community Care Program, which would that environmental protection mobile and stationary sources, to reduce significantly disrupt Veterans’ contributes to making our communities emissions of sulfur dioxide, particulate healthcare. More specifically, specialty and ecosystems diverse, sustainable and matter, nitrogen oxides, toxics, and care for veterans with chronic illnesses economically productive; and, that the other pollutants. would not be readily available, critical United States plays a leadership role in Electric Utility Sector Greenhouse Gas maternity services would not be working with other nations to protect Rules. The EPA will continue its review available and emergency care services the global environment. of the Clean Power Plan suite of actions would be negatively impacted and To accomplish its goals in the coming issued by the previous administration overwhelmed. year, the EPA will use regulatory affecting fossil fuel-fired electric Timetable: authorities, along with grant- and generating units (EGUs). On October 23, incentive-based programs, technical and 2015, the EPA issued a final rule that Action Date FR Cite compliance assistance and tools, and established first-ever standards for research and educational initiatives to States to follow in developing plans to Interim Final Rule 05/00/19 address its statutory responsibilities. All reduce carbon dioxide (CO ) emissions Interim Final Rule 06/00/19 2 Comment Pe- of this work will be undertaken with a from existing fossil fuel-fired EGUs. On riod End. strong commitment to science, law and the same day, the EPA issued a final Interim Final Rule 06/00/19 transparency. rule establishing CO2 emissions standards for newly constructed, Effective. Highlights of EPA’s Regulatory Plan modified, and reconstructed fossil fuel Regulatory Flexibility Analysis The EPA’s more than forty years of fired EGUs. The Agency has proposed Required: No. protecting public health and the an alternative approach that is Small Entities Affected: No. environment demonstrates our nation’s appropriately grounded in the EPA’s Government Levels Affected: None. commitment to reducing pollution that statutory authority and consistent with URL For More Information: can threaten the air we breathe, the the rule of law. This alternative www.regulations.gov. water we use, and the communities we approach would appropriately promote Agency Contact: Andrea Sperr, live in. Our nation has made great cooperative federalism and respect the Regulation Specialist, Department of progress in making rivers and lakes safer authority and powers that are reserved Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue for swimming and boating, reducing the to the States; promote the NW, Washington, DC 20420, Phone: 202 smog that clouded city skies, cleaning Administration’s dual goals of 461–6725, Email: [email protected]. up lands that were once used as hidden protecting public health and the RIN: 2900–AQ46 chemical dumps and providing environment, while also supporting BILLING CODE: 8320–01–P Americans greater access to information economic growth and job creation; and on chemical safety. To achieve appropriately maintain the diversity of continued positive environmental reliable energy resources and encourage results, we must foster and maintain a ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION the production of domestic energy sense of shared accountability between sources to achieve energy independence AGENCY (EPA) states, tribes and the federal and security. Statement of Priorities government. This Regulatory Plan Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient Overview contains information on some of our Vehicles Rule. On August 1, 2018, the most important upcoming regulatory National Highway Traffic Safety The U.S. Environmental Protection and deregulatory actions. As always, our Administration (NHTSA) and the Agency (EPA) administers the laws Semiannual Regulatory Agenda contains Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) enacted by Congress and signed by the information on a broader spectrum of proposed to amend certain existing President to protect people’s health and the EPA’s upcoming regulatory actions. Corporate Average Fuel Economy the environment. In carrying out these (CAFE) and greenhouse gas emissions Improve Air Quality statutory mandates, the EPA works to standards for passenger cars and light ensure that all Americans are protected As part of its mission to protect trucks and establish new standards, from significant risks to human health human health and the environment, the covering model years 2021 through and the environment where they live, EPA is dedicated to improving the 2026. The proposed rule published in learn and work; that national efforts to quality of the nation’s air. From 1970 to the Federal Register on August 24, 2018 reduce environmental risk are based on 2017, aggregate national emissions of (83 FR 42986), and the EPA docket is the best available scientific information; the six criteria air pollutants were currently open for submittal of public that Federal laws protecting human reduced over 70 percent, while gross comments. NHTSA and EPA will jointly health and the environment are domestic product grew by over 260 hold three public hearings on this enforced fairly and effectively; that percent. The EPA’s work to control proposal, which were announced in a environmental protection is an integral emissions of air pollutants is critical to supplemental Federal Register notice consideration in U.S. policies continued progress in reducing public also published on August 24, 2018 (83 concerning natural resources, human health risks and improving the quality FR 42817). health, economic growth, energy, of the environment. The Agency will New Source Review and Title V transportation, agriculture, industry, continue to deploy existing regulatory Permitting Programs Reform. The CAA and international trade, and these tools where appropriate and warranted. establishes a number of permitting factors are similarly considered in Using the Clean Air Act, the EPA will programs designed to carry out the goals establishing environmental policy; that work with States and tribes to of the Act. The EPA directly implements all parts of society—communities, accurately measure air quality and some of these programs through its individuals, businesses, and State, local ensure that more Americans are living regional offices, but most are carried out and tribal governments—have access to and working in areas that meet air by States, local agencies, and approved accurate information sufficient to quality standards. The EPA will tribes. New Source Review (NSR) is a effectively participate in managing continue to develop standards, as preconstruction permitting program that human health and environmental risks; directed by the Clean Air Act, for both ensures that the addition of new and

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00129 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57932 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

modified sources does not significantly comment on adding regulatory text to agencies published a Federal Register degrade air quality. NSR permits are reflect EPA’s plain language reading of notice proposing to repeal (Step 1) the legal documents that the facility the statute. 2015 Rule and recodify the pre-existing owners/operators must abide by. The Oil and Gas. The EPA is reviewing the regulations; the initial 30-day comment permit specifies what construction is Agency’s Oil and Gas New Source period was extended an additional 30 allowed, what emission limits must be Performance Standards. In June 2017, days to September 28, 2017. The met, and often how the emissions the EPA granted reconsideration of agencies signed a supplemental notice source may be operated. There are three some specific requirements under the of proposed rulemaking on June 29, types of NSR permits: (1) Prevention of 2016 New Source Performance 2018 clarifying and seeking additional Significant Deterioration (PSD) (CAA Standards, and indicated that the comment on the Step 1 proposal. part C) permits, which are required for Agency would also look broadly at the In Step 2 (Revised Definition of new major sources or a major source entire rule, including the regulation of ‘Waters of the United States’), the making a major modification in an greenhouse gases through an emission agencies plan to pursue a public notice- attainment area; (2) Nonattainment NSR limitation on methane. The EPA is and-comment rulemaking in which the (NNSR) (CAA part D) permits, which are issuing a proposal for public review and agencies would conduct a substantive required for new major sources or major comment in the fall of 2018. reevaluation of the definition of ‘‘waters of the United States.’’ As part of this sources making a major modification in Provide for Clean and Safe Water a nonattainment area; and (3) Minor reevaluation, the agencies are source permits. The nation’s water resources are the considering defining ‘‘navigable waters’’ CAA title V requires major sources of lifeblood of our communities, in a manner consistent with the air pollutants, and certain other sources, supporting our economy and way of life. plurality opinion of Justice Scalia in the to obtain and operate in compliance Across the country we depend upon Rapanos decision, as instructed by with an operating permit. Sources with reliable sources of clean and safe water. Executive Order 13778. these ‘‘title V permits’’ are required by Just a few decades ago, many of the On February 6, 2018, the agencies the CAA to certify compliance with the nation’s rivers, lakes, and estuaries were issued a final rule adding an applicable requirements of their permits grossly polluted, wastewater sources applicability date to the 2015 Rule of at least annually. received little or no treatment, and February 6, 2020, to provide continuity In accordance with the President’s drinking water systems provided very and certainty for regulated entities, the goal to streamline permitting regulations limited treatment to water coming States and Tribes, and the public while for manufacturing facilities, the EPA has through the tap. Since the enactment of the agencies conduct Step 2 of the initiated an effort to issue a series of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and the Safe rulemaking. Until the new definition is targeted improvements, including Drinking Water Act (SDWA), finalized, the agencies will continue to guidance memos and, as necessary, tremendous progress has been made implement the regulatory definition in associated rulemakings, to simplify the toward ensuring that Americans have place prior to the 2015 Rule consistent New Source Review (NSR) process in safe water to drink and generally with Supreme Court decisions and manner consistent with the Clean Air improving the quality of the Nation’s practice, and as informed by applicable Act. waters. While progress has been made, agency guidance documents. We have recently highlighted numerous challenges remain in such Effluent Limitations Guidelines and flexibilities in the implementation of areas as nutrient loadings, storm water Standards for the Steam Electric Power NSR regulations available to runoff, invasive species and drinking Generating Point Source Category. On manufacturing facilities for the water contaminants. These challenges November 3, 2015, under the authority permitting of new projects. Two recent can only be addressed by working with of the CWA, the EPA issued a final rule memos, for example, clarified that our State and tribal partners to develop amending the Effluent Limitations project emissions accounting can take new and innovative strategies in Guidelines (ELG) and Standards for the place in the first step of the NSR addition to the more traditional Steam Electric Power Generating Point applicability process for all project regulatory approaches. The EPA plans Source Category (i.e., 2015 Steam categories and that the EPA will not to address the following challenging Electric ELG). The amendments ‘‘second guess’’ preconstruction analysis issues, in part, in rulemakings. addressed and contained limitations that complies with procedural Waters of the U.S. In 2015, the and standards on various waste streams requirements. In FY19, the EPA intends Environmental Protection Agency and at steam electric power plants: Fly ash to follow-up these memos with the Department of the Army (the transport water, bottom ash transport rulemaking to codify these policies. agencies) published the ‘‘Clean Water water, flue gas mercury control Based on the recommendations of a Rule: Definition of ‘Waters of the United wastewater, flue gas desulfurization number of state environmental agencies States’ ’’ (2015 Rule) (80 FR 37054, June (FGD) wastewater, gasification as well as small businesses under the air 29, 2015). On October 9, 2015, the U.S. wastewater, and combustion residual toxics program, the EPA has also Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit leachate. In early 2017, the EPA rescinded its ‘‘once-in, always-in’’ stayed the 2015 Rule nationwide received two petitions for policy. A major source which takes pending further action of the court. On reconsideration of the Steam Electric enforceable limitations on its potential February 28, 2017, the President signed ELG rule, one from the Utility Water Act to emit (PTE) hazardous air pollutants Executive Order 13778, ‘‘Restoring the Group and one from the Small Business (HAP) emissions below the applicable Rule of Law, Federalism, and Economic Administration Office of Advocacy. On thresholds becomes an area source Growth by Reviewing the ‘Waters of the August 11, 2017, the Administrator (strike ‘‘,’’) and is no longer subject to United States’ Rule’’ which instructed announced his decision to conduct a maximum achievable control the agencies to review the 2015 Rule rulemaking to potentially revise the Best technology (MACT) standards, no and rescind or replace it as appropriate Available Technology Economically matter when the source may choose to and consistent with law. The agencies Achievable (BAT) effluent limitations take measures to limit its PTE. In early have determined to address the and pretreatment standards for existing 2019, EPA anticipates that it will Executive Order in a comprehensive sources in the 2015 rule that apply to publish a Federal Register notice to take two-step process. On July 27, 2017, the bottom ash transport water and FGD

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00130 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57933

wastewater. In light of the is also formed naturally in the Clean Water Act Section 404(c) reconsideration, the EPA views that it is environment, particularly in arid Regulatory Revision. Section 404(c) of appropriate to postpone impending climates, and may be present as an the Clean Water Act authorizes the deadlines as a temporary, stopgap impurity in hypochlorite solutions Administrator ‘‘to prohibit the measure to prevent the unnecessary (bleach). In February 2011, the EPA specification (including withdrawal of expenditure of resources until it announced its decision to regulate the specification) of any defined area as completes reconsideration of the 2015 perchlorate under SDWA. The EPA a disposal site’’ as well as to ‘‘deny or rule. Thus, the Administrator signed a determined that perchlorate meets restrict the use of any defined area for final rule on September 9, 2017, SDWA’s three criteria for regulating a specification (including the withdrawal postponing the earliest compliance contaminant: (1) Perchlorate may have of specification) as a disposal site . . . dates for the BAT effluent limitations adverse health effects because scientific whenever he determines, after notice and PSES for bottom ash transport water research indicates that perchlorate can and opportunity for public hearings, and FGD wastewater in the 2015 Rule, disrupt the thyroid’s ability to produce that the discharge of such materials into from November 1, 2018 to November 1, the hormones needed for normal growth such area will have an unacceptable 2020. The EPA expects to publish a and development; (2) there is a adverse effect on municipal water notice of proposed rulemaking for the substantial likelihood that perchlorate supplies, shellfish beds and fishery Steam Electric reconsideration in March occurs with frequency at levels of health areas (including spawning and breeding 2019. concern in public water systems areas), wildlife, or recreational areas.’’ National Primary Drinking Water because monitoring data show over four In June 2018, the EPA announced that Regulations for Lead and Copper—Long percent of public water systems have it would initiate an update to the Term Revisions. The Lead and Copper detected perchlorate; and (3) there is a regulations governing the EPA’s role in Rule (LCR) reduces risks to drinking meaningful opportunity for health risk permitting discharges of dredged or fill water consumers from lead and copper reduction since between 5.1 and 16.6 material under section 404 of the CWA. that can enter drinking water as a result million people may be provided with The EPA’s current regulations on the of corrosion of plumbing materials. The drinking water containing perchlorate. implementation of section 404(c) of the LCR requires water systems to sample at In 2013, the Science Advisory Board CWA allow the Agency to veto—at any taps in homes with leaded plumbing recommended that the EPA use models, time—a permit issued by the U.S. Army materials. Depending upon the sampling rather than the traditional approach to Corps of Engineers (USACE) or an results, water systems must take actions establish the health based Maximum approved state that allows for the to reduce exposure to lead and copper Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG) for a discharge of dredged or fill material at including corrosion control treatment, perchlorate regulation. The EPA and specified disposal sites. The goal of this public education, and lead service line FDA scientists worked collaboratively to effort would be to increase replacement. The LCR was promulgated develop biological models in predictability and regulatory certainty in 1991 and, overall, has been effective accordance with SAB recommendations. for landowners, investors, businesses, in reducing the levels of lead and The EPA will utilize the best available and other stakeholders. This rulemaking copper in drinking water systems across peer reviewed science to inform will consider, at minimum, changes to the country. However, lead crises in regulatory decision making for the EPA’s 404(c) review process that Washington, DC, and in Flint, , perchlorate. would govern the future use of the and the subsequent national attention EPA’s section 404(c) authority. focused on lead in drinking water in Peak Flows Management. Wet other communities, have underscored weather events (e.g., rain, snowmelt) Revitalize Land and Prevent significant challenges in the can impact publicly owned treatment Contamination implementation of the current rule, works (POTWs) operations when excess The EPA works to improve the health including a rule structure that, for many water enters the wastewater collection and livelihood of all Americans by systems, only compels protective system. The increased wet weather cleaning up and returning land to actions after public health threats have flows can exceed the POTW treatment productive use, preventing been identified. Key challenges include plant’s capacity to provide the same contamination, and responding to the rule’s complexity; the degree of type of treatment for all of the incoming emergencies. The EPA collaborates with flexibility and discretion it affords wastewater. The treatment plant’s other federal agencies, industry, states, systems and primacy states with regard secondary treatment units are the most tribes, and local communities to to optimization of corrosion control likely to be adversely affected by wet enhance the livability and economic treatment; compliance sampling weather because the biological systems vitality of neighborhoods. Challenging practices, which in some cases, may not can be damaged when too much water and complex environmental problems adequately protect from lead exposure; flows through them. POTWs employ a persist at many contaminated and limited specific focus on key areas variety of operational practices to properties, including contaminated soil, of concern such as schools. There is a ensure the integrity of their secondary sediment, surface water, and compelling need to modernize and treatment units during wet weather, and groundwater that can cause human clarify implementation of the rule to the EPA plans to propose updates to the health concerns. The EPA’s regulatory strengthen its public health protections regulations which will seek to clarify program recognizes the progress made and to make it more effective and more permitting procedures for POTWs with in cleaning up and returning land to readily enforceable. The EPA is separate sanitary sewer systems under productive use, preventing evaluating the costs and benefits of the wet weather operational conditions. The contamination, and responding to potential revisions and assessing goal of these updates will be to ensure emergencies, and works to incorporate whether the benefits justify the costs. a consistent national approach for new technologies and approaches that National Primary Drinking Water permitting POTWs that provides for allow us to provide for an Regulations for Perchlorate. Perchlorate efficient treatment plant operation while environmentally sustainable future is an inorganic chemical produced for protecting the public from potential more efficiently and effectively. use in rocket propellants, fireworks, adverse health effects of inadequately Reconsideration of the Accidental road flares, and explosives. Perchlorate treated wastewater. Release Prevention Regulations Under

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00131 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57934 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

Clean Air Act. Both the EPA and the Combustion Residues from Electric Act (FFDCA), the Toxic Substances Occupational Safety & Health Utilities. Remand Rules. The EPA is Control Act (TSCA), the Emergency Administration (OSHA) issued planning to modify the final rule on the Planning and Community Right-to- regulations, as required by the Clean Air disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals Know-Act (EPCRA), and the Pollution Act Amendments of 1990, in response (CCR) as solid waste under subtitle D of Prevention Act (PPA). Using best to a number of catastrophic chemical the Resource Conservation and available science, the Agency will accidents occurring worldwide that had Recovery Act issued in 2015. As a result continue to satisfy its overall directives resulted in public and worker fatalities of a settlement agreement on this final under these authorities and highlights and injuries, environmental damage, rule, the EPA is addressing specific the following efforts underway in FY and other community impacts. OSHA technical issues remanded by the court. 2019: published the Process Safety Further, the Water Infrastructure Implementing TSCA Amendments To Management standard in 1992, and the Improvements for the Nation Act of Enhance Public Health and Chemical EPA modeled the Risk Management 2016 established new statutory Safety. The amendments to TSCA that Program (RMP) regulation after it. The provisions applicable to CCR units, were enacted in June 2016 now require EPA published the RMP rule in two including authorizing states to the EPA to evaluate existing chemicals stages: (1) A list of regulated substances implement the CCR rule through an on the basis of the health risks they and threshold quantities in 1994, and EPA-approved permit program and pose-including risks to vulnerable (2) the RMP final regulation with risk authorizing the EPA to enforce the rule. groups and to workers who may use management requirements in 1996. Both Therefore the EPA is proposing to chemicals daily as part of their jobs. If the OSHA standard and the EPA RMP amend certain performance standards in unreasonable risks are found, the EPA regulation aim to prevent, or minimize the CCR rule through several must then take steps to eliminate these the consequences of, accidental rulemaking efforts to offer additional risks. However, during the risk chemical releases to workers and the flexibility to state permitting authorities management phase, EPA must balance community. with an approved program. The EPA the risk management decision with On January 13, 2017, the EPA proposed the first of these rulemaking potential disruption based on amended the RMP regulations in order efforts, the Phase One rule, in March compliance to the national economy, to (1) reduce the likelihood and severity 2018. The EPA then finalized a small national security, or critical of accidental releases, (2) improve number of the proposed Phase one rule infrastructure. emergency response when those provisions in the July 2018 Phase One The 2016 amendments to TSCA also releases occur, and (3) enhance state Part One rule. require the EPA to take expedited and local emergency preparedness and Designation of Per- and regulatory action without a risk response in an effort to mitigate the Polyfluoroalkyl Substances as evaluation for persistent, effects of accidents. Hazardous Substances. On May 22, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBT) Prior to the effective date of the RMP 2018, the EPA held a two-day National chemicals from the 2014 update of the Amendments rule, the EPA received Leadership Summit on per- and TSCA Work Plan for Chemical petitions for reconsideration under polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). The Assessments that meet a specific set of Clean Air Act Section 307(d)(7)(B). Administrator announced that the EPA criteria. Under the conditions of use for Petitioners sought reconsideration of the will begin the process to propose each PBT chemical, the EPA will RMP Amendments based on what they designating perfluorooctanoic acid characterize likely exposures to humans view as either EPA’s failure to (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic and the environment; this information is coordinate with OSHA and DOT as acid (PFOS) as ‘‘hazardous substances’’ undergoing peer review and public required by paragraph (D) of CAA through one of the available statutory comment. The exposure assessments section 112(r)(7) or at least inadequate mechanisms, including section 102 of will then be used to develop regulatory coordination. Furthermore, petitioners the Comprehensive Environmental actions that address the risks of injury indicated that the arson findings from Response, Compensation, and Liability to health or the environment that the the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Act. The EPA is currently evaluating the EPA determines are presented by the Firearms and Explosives regarding the various statutory mechanisms, such as chemical substances and that reduce West Fertilizer 2013 explosion undercut the. Clean Water Act Section 307(a) and exposure to the chemical substances to EPA’s basis for the proposed rule. Section 311. However, the Agency has the extent practicable. TSCA requires Petitioners also raised security concerns not yet made a final decision on which the EPA to issue proposed rules no later related to sharing information with local mechanism is most appropriate. than June 22, 2019, and final rules no emergency planning and response more than 18 months later. organizations and concerns about EPA’s Ensure Safety of Chemicals in the The 2016 amendments to TSCA also economic analysis and the economic Marketplace authorize the EPA to cover a portion of burden associated with certain rule Chemicals and pesticides released its annual costs for the TSCA program provisions. Having considered the into the environment as a result of their by collecting user fees from chemical concerns regarding the RMP manufacture, processing, use, or manufacturers and processors when Amendments rule raised in these disposal can threaten human health and they submit test data for the EPA petitions, the EPA subsequently delayed the environment. The EPA gathers and review; submit a premanufacture notice the effective date of the RMP assesses information about the risks for a new chemical or a notice of new Amendments rule to February 19, 2019, associated with chemicals and use; manufacture or process a chemical in order to give the EPA time to pesticides and acts to minimize risks substance that is the subject of a risk reconsider it. On May 30, 2018, the EPA and prevent unreasonable risks to evaluation; or request that the EPA published proposed changes to the rule individuals, families, and the conduct a chemical risk evaluation. In and sought public comment on the environment. The EPA acts under Fiscal Year 2019, the EPA expects to proposed revisions and other related several different statutory authorities, take final action on the 2018 proposed issues. including the Federal Insecticide, fees rule. Hazardous and Solid Waste Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), Review of Lead Dust Hazard Management System: Disposal of Coal the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Standards Under TSCA. In June 2018,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00132 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57935

EPA proposed strengthening the dust- EPA—OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION major source requirements. An analysis lead hazard standards on floors and (OAR) to determine cost savings and benefits is underway to support issuance of a window sills. These standards apply to Proposed Rule Stage most pre-1978 housing and child- proposed rule. occupied facilities, such as day care 119. Reclassification of Major Sources Risks: Not yet determined. centers and kindergarten facilities. Per a as Area Sources Under Section 112 of Timetable: court order deadline, EPA intends on the Clean Air Act Action Date FR Cite taking final action in June 2019. Priority: Other Significant. Major Reconsideration of Pesticide Safety status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is NPRM ...... 01/03/07 72 FR 69 Requirements. In Fiscal Year 2019, the undetermined. NPRM Comment 03/05/07 72 FR 9718 EPA expects to take a final action on Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. Period Ex- E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. tended. amendments to pesticide safety Notice ...... 02/08/18 83 FR 5543 regulations that address requirements Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63.1. Second NPRM .... 02/00/19 for the certification of pesticide Legal Deadline: None. applicators and established agricultural Abstract: These amendments would Regulatory Flexibility Analysis worker protection standards, which EPA address when a major source can Required: Undetermined. intends on proposing in 2018. become an area source, and, thus, Government Levels Affected: Specifically, the EPA is considering become not subject to national emission Undetermined. amending changes to the Certification of standards for hazardous air pollutants Federalism: Undetermined. Pesticide Applicators regulations that (NESHAP) for major sources under Additional Information: EPA Docket EPA issued in 2017, and changes to the Clean Air Act (CAA) section 112. The information: EPA–HQ–OAR–2004– agricultural Worker Protection Standard amendments will implement the EPA’s 0094. regulations that EPA issued in 2015. plain language reading of the CAA Agency Contact: Elineth Torres, section 112 definitions of ‘‘major’’ and Environmental Protection Agency, Annual Regulatory Costs ‘‘area’’ sources as discussed in the Office of Air and Radiation, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Mail Code D205–02, Section 3 of Executive Order 13771 January 2018 William Wehrum memorandum titled ‘‘Reclassification of Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, (82 FR 9339, February 3, 2017) calls on Phone: 919 541–4347, Email: agencies to ‘‘identify for each regulation Major Sources as Area Sources Under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act.’’ (See [email protected]. that increases incremental cost, the RIN: 2060–AM75 offsetting regulations . . . and provide notice in 83 FR 5543, February 8, 2018.) the agency’s best approximation of the This action will provide an opportunity total costs or savings associated with for interested persons to provide comment on many of the same issues each new regulation or repealed EPA—OAR covered in the 2007 NESHAP: General regulation.’’ Each action in the EPA’s Provision Amendments (72 FR 69, 120. Emission Guidelines for fall 2017 Regulatory Plan and January 3, 2017). Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Semiannual Regulatory Agenda contains Statement of Need: The EPA will Existing Electric Utility Generating information about whether an action is issue a proposed rule to add regulatory Units; Revisions to Emission Guideline anticipated to be ‘‘regulatory’’ or text that reflects EPA’s plain language Implementing Regulations; Revisions to ‘‘deregulatory’’ in fulfilling this reading of the statute as discussed in the New Source Review Program executive directive. Based on current January 25, 2018, William Wehrum Priority: Economically Significant. schedules and expectations regarding Memorandum (see notice in 83 FR 5543, Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. whether or not regulatory actions are February 8, 2018). Unfunded Mandates: This action may subject to Executive Order 12866 and Summary of Legal Basis: The January affect the private sector under Public hence Executive Order 13771, in fiscal 25, 2018, William Wehrum Law 104–4. year 2019, the EPA is planning on Memorandum withdrew the Once In, E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory. finalizing approximately 30 Always In (OIAI) policy that required Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7411, Clean deregulatory actions and fewer than ten facilities that are major sources for HAP Air Act regulatory actions. on the first substantive compliance date CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60. of a NESHAP maximum achievable Legal Deadline: None. Rules Expected To Affect Small Entities control technology (MACT) standard to Abstract: On April 4, 2017, the EPA announced it is reviewing the Clean By better coordinating small business comply permanently with the MACT standard. The EPA will issue a proposal Power Plan (CPP), found at 40 CFR part activities, the EPA aims to improve its to add regulatory text that reflects EPA’s 60, subpart UUUU via Executive Order technical assistance and outreach plain language reading of the statute as 13771. The EPA has, in a separate efforts, minimize burdens to small discussed in the January 25, 2018, action, proposed to repeal the CPP. The businesses in its regulations, and William Wehrum Memorandum. EPA solicited input on a CPP simplify small businesses’ participation Alternatives: Not yet determined. replacement rule through an Advanced in its voluntary programs. Actions that Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Notice of Proposed Rule Making may affect small entities can be tracked Adding regulatory text to be consistent (ANPRM) published on December 28, on the EPA’s Regulatory Flexibility with the plain language reading will 2017. On August 31, 2018, the EPA website (https://www.epa.gov/reg-flex) allow sources classified as major to published the proposed Affordable at any time. become area sources. This could lead to Clean Energy (ACE) rule in the Federal regulatory burden reduction for sources Register as a replacement for the CPP. that have reclassified to area source Statement of Need: The EPA has status by not having to comply with conducted its initial review of the CPP, previously applicable CAA section 112 as directed by Executive Order 13783,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00133 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57936 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

and has concluded that suspension, EPA—OAR Office of Air and Radiation, C504–03, revision, or rescission of [the CPP] may 121. Prevention of Significant Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, be appropriate on the basis of the Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment Phone: 919 541–3407, Fax: 919 541– agency’s proposed reinterpretation of New Source Review (NSR): Project 5509, Email: [email protected]. the statutory provisions underlying the Emissions Accounting Raj Rao, Environmental Protection CPP. In light of the EPA’s proposed Agency, Office of Air and Radiation, repeal of the CPP and issued ANPRM, Priority: Other Significant. C504–03, Research Triangle Park, NC the agency has signed the Affordable E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. 27711, Phone: 919 541–5344, Fax: 919 Clean Energy (ACE) rule as a Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 541–5509, Email: [email protected]. replacement to the CPP. The proposed CFR Citation: Undetermined. RIN: 2060–AT89 ACE rule is intended to reduce carbon Legal Deadline: None. dioxide emissions from existing fossil- Abstract: Under the New Source Review (NSR) pre-construction fueled electric generating units. The EPA—OAR proposal solicits information on the permitting program, sources undergoing modifications need to determine development of such a regulation with 122. Oil and Natural Gas Sector: whether their modification is the intention of promulgating a final Emission Standards for New, considered a major modification and replacement. Reconstructed, and Modified Sources thus subject to NSR pre-construction Review Summary of Legal Basis: Clean Air permitting. A source owner determines Act, section 111, 42 U.S.C. 7411, if its source is undergoing a major Priority: Other Significant. provides the legal framework and basis modification under NSR using a two- E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. for a potential replacement rule that the step applicability test. The first step is Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et Agency is considering developing. to determine if there is a ‘‘significant seq., Clean Air Act CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60. emission increase’’ of a regulated NSR Alternatives: Not yet determined. Legal Deadline: None. pollutant from the proposed Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Not yet Abstract: On June 3, 2016, the modification (Step 1) and the second determined. In the intended proposed Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) step is to determine if there is a replacement to the CPP, the Agency will published a final rule titled ‘‘Oil and ‘‘significant net emission increase’’ of assess the costs and benefits. Natural Gas Sector: Emission Standards that pollutant (Step 2). In this action, we for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Risks: Not yet determined. In the are proposing the consideration of Sources; Final Rule.’’ Following intended proposed replacement to the emissions increases and decreases from promulgation of the final rule, the CPP, the Agency will assess the risks to a modification in Step 1 of the NSR Administrator received petitions for the extent feasible. major modification applicability test for reconsideration of several provisions of all unit types (i.e., new, existing, and Timetable: the rule. The EPA is addressing those hybrid units). specific reconsideration issues in a Statement of Need: In March 2018, Action Date FR Cite separate proposal. A number of states the Agency issued an interpretative and industry associations sought ANPRM ...... 12/28/17 82 FR 61507 memorandum to clarify that we judicial review of the rule, and the NPRM ...... 08/31/18 83 FR 44746 interpret our current NSR regulations to litigation is currently being held in NPRM Comment 10/30/18 allow Project Emissions Accounting for abeyance. On March 28, 2017, newly Period End. hybrid units as well as for new and elected President issued Final Rule ...... 03/00/19 existing units. This regulation would Executive Order 13783 titled further clarify the concept of Project ‘‘Promoting Energy Independence and Emissions Accounting for all types of Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Economic Growth,’’ which directs emissions units. Required: No. agencies to review existing regulations Summary of Legal Basis: 40 CFR Small Entities Affected: No. that potentially burden the development 52.21. Government Levels Affected: Federal, Alternatives: Alternatives will be of domestic energy resources, and State, Tribal. analyzed as the proposal is developed. appropriately suspend, revise or rescind regulations that unduly burden the Federalism: This action may have Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Costs and benefits will be analyzed as the development of U.S. energy resources federalism implications as defined in beyond what is necessary to protect the E.O. 13132. proposal is developed. Risks: Risks will be analyzed as the public interest or otherwise comply Energy Effects: Statement of Energy proposal is developed. with the law. In 2017, the EPA provided Effects planned as required by Executive Timetable: notice to initiate the review of the 2016 Order 13211. rule and stated that, if appropriate, it Agency Contact: Nicholas Swanson, Action Date FR Cite will initiate proceedings to suspend, Environmental Protection Agency, revise or rescind the rule. Subsequently, Office of Air and Radiation, E143–03, NPRM ...... 02/00/19 in a notice dated June 5, 2017, the EPA Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, further committed to look broadly at the Phone: 919 541–4080, Email: Regulatory Flexibility Analysis entire 2016 rule. The purpose of this [email protected]. Required: No. action is to propose amendments to Small Entities Affected: No. address key policy issues, such as the Nick Hutson, Environmental Government Levels Affected: Federal, regulation of greenhouse gases, in this Protection Agency, Office of Air and Local, State. sector. Radiation, D243–01, Research Triangle Additional Information: Docket #: Statement of Need: On June 3, 2016, Park, NC 27711, Phone: 919 541–2968, EPA–HQ–OAR–2018–0048. the EPA published a final rule titled Email: [email protected]. Agency Contact: Jessica Montanez, ‘‘Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Emission RIN: 2060–AT67 Environmental Protection Agency, Standards for New, Reconstructed, and

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00134 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57937

Modified Sources; Final Rule.’’ On Sectors Affected: 211111 Crude environmental effect. CAA section March 28, 2017, newly elected President Petroleum and Natural Gas Extraction; 112(d)(6) requires EPA to review, and Donald Trump issued Executive Order 221210 Natural Gas Distribution; revise as necessary, emission standards 13783 titled ‘‘Promoting Energy 211112 Natural Gas Liquid Extraction; promulgated under CAA section 112(d) Independence and Economic Growth,’’ 486110 Pipeline Transportation of at least every 8 years, taking into which directs agencies to review Crude Oil; 486210 Pipeline account developments in practices, existing regulations that potentially Transportation of Natural Gas. processes and control technologies. burden the development of domestic URL For More Information: https:// Alternatives: Not yet determined. The energy resources, and appropriately www.epa.gov/stationary-sources-air- EPA will consider whether alternative suspend, revise or rescind regulations pollution/clean-air-act-standards-and- options are warranted once the Agency that unduly burden the development of guidelines-oil-and-natural-gas-industry has completed the review of the U.S. energy resources beyond what is Agency Contact: Amy Hambrick, Supplemental Cost Finding and the necessary to protect the public interest Environmental Protection Agency, RTR. or otherwise comply with the law. In Office of Air and Radiation, 109 T.W. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Not yet 2017, the EPA provided notice to Alexander Drive, Mail Code E143–05, determined. Costs and benefits will initiate the review of the 2016 rule and Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, depend upon the results of the review stated that, if appropriate, it will initiate Phone: 919 541–0964, Fax: 919 541– of the Supplemental Cost Finding and proceedings to suspend, revise or 0516, Email: [email protected]. on the results of the RTR. rescind the rule. Subsequently, in a RIN: 2060–AT90 Risks: Not yet determined. Risks will notice dated June 5, 2017, the EPA depend upon the results of the review further committed to look broadly at the of the Supplemental Cost Finding and on the results of the RTR. entire 2016 rule. The purpose of this EPA—OAR action is to propose amendments to Timetable: address key policy issues, such as the 123. Mercury and Air Toxics Standards Action Date FR Cite regulation of greenhouse gases, in this for Power Plants Residual Risk and sector. This proposal will solicit Technology Review and Cost Review NPRM ...... 11/00/18 comments and/or information from the Priority: Other Significant. public regarding the Agency’s proposed E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. Final Rule ...... To Be Determined requirements and options under Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7412, Clean Regulatory Flexibility Analysis consideration. These amendments are Air Act Required: No. anticipated to remove regulatory CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63. duplication in an effort to reduce Small Entities Affected: No. Legal Deadline: None. Government Levels Affected: Federal, burden. Abstract: This action will address the Summary of Legal Basis: The review Local, State, Tribal. Agency’s residual risk and technology Additional Information: Docket #: of the 2016 OOOOa rule is an exercise review (RTR) of the National Emission of the EPA’s authority under section EPA–HQ–OAR–2009–0234. Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Sectors Affected: 921150 American 111(b)(1)(B), section 307(d)(7)(B) and Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Indian and Alaska Native Tribal section 301(a) of the Clean Air Act. Steam Generating Units (commonly Governments; 221122 Electric Power Alternatives: For the 2016 OOOOa referred to as the Mercury and Air Distribution; 221112 Fossil Fuel Electric review proposal, we anticipate soliciting Toxics Standards (MATS)), 40 CFR 63, Power Generation. comment on a lead policy option for the subpart UUUUU, promulgated pursuant Agency Contact: Mary Johnson, regulation of greenhouse gases and the to section 112(d) of the Clean Air Act Environmental Protection Agency, sector regulatory structure and an (CAA) on February 16, 2012 (67 FR Office of Air and Radiation, 109 T.W. alternative policy option under 9464), and address other issues Alexander Drive, Mail Code D243–01, consideration. associated with the 2012 rule. Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, Anticipated Cost and Benefits: These Statement of Need: The EPA has Phone: 919 541–5025, Email: values are estimates that are likely to completed its initial review of the [email protected]. change. Note all values at 7 percent MATS Supplemental Cost Finding (81 Nick Hutson, Environmental discount rate in 2016 dollars. Total FR 24420, April 25, 2016) to determine Protection Agency, Office of Air and Present Value of Cost (2019 through if the finding will be reconsidered. The Radiation, D243–01, Research Triangle 2025): $101 million Costs Annually: $18 EPA will issue the results of the review Park, NC 27711, Phone: 919 541–2968, million Forgone Benefits (2019 through in a notice of proposed rulemaking and Email: [email protected] 2025); $13 million Forgone Benefits will solicit comment on the resulting RIN: 2060–AT99 Annually: $2.3 million. finding. The EPA will also, in the same Risks: We do not anticipate any risks action, propose the results of the RTR to health related to this action. for MATS. EPA—OAR Timetable: Summary of Legal Basis: CAA section 112, 42 U.S.C. 7412, provides the legal 124. The Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient Action Date FR Cite framework and basis for regulatory (SAFE) Vehicles Rule for Model Years NPRM ...... 12/00/18 actions addressing emissions of 2021–2026 Passenger Cars and Light Final Rule ...... 06/00/19 hazardous air pollutants from stationary Trucks sources. CAA section 112(f)(2) requires Priority: Economically Significant. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis EPA, within 8 years of the promulgation Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is Required: No. of standards under CAA section 112(d), undetermined. Small Entities Affected: No. to determine whether additional Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. Government Levels Affected: None. standards are needed to provide an E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. Additional Information: Docket #: ample margin of safety to protect public Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7411, Clean EPA–HQ–OAR–2017–0757. health or to prevent an adverse Air Act

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00135 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57938 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80. Alternative 4 increases the stringency of also examines economic risks including Legal Deadline: None. targets annually during MYs 2021–2026 impacts on employment, vehicle sales, Abstract: The National Highway by 1.0% for passenger cars and 2.0% for and U.S. industry competitiveness. Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) light trucks; (5) Alternative 5 increases Timetable: and the Environmental Protection the stringency of targets annually during Agency (EPA) proposed the Safer MYs 2022–2026 by 1.0% for passenger Action Date FR Cite Affordable Fuel-Efficient (SAFE) cars and 2.0% for light trucks; (6) Vehicles Rule for Model Years 2021– Alternative 6 increases the stringency of NPRM ...... 08/24/18 83 FR 42986 2026 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks’’ targets annually during MYs 2021–2026 NPRM Comment 10/23/18 (SAFE Vehicles Rule). The SAFE Period End. by 2.0% for passenger cars and 3.0% for Final Rule ...... 03/00/19 Vehicles Rule, if finalized, would light trucks; (7) Alternative 7 phases out amend certain existing Corporate A/C efficiency and off-cycle adjustments Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) and and increases the stringency of targets Required: Undetermined. tailpipe carbon dioxide emissions annually during MYs 2021–2026 by Government Levels Affected: standards for passenger cars and light 1.0% for passenger cars and 2.0% for Undetermined. trucks and establish new standards, all light trucks; and (8) Alternative 8 covering model years 2021 through Federalism: Undetermined. increases the stringency of targets Agency Contact: Christopher Lieske, 2026. More specifically, EPA proposed annually during MYs 2022–2026 by to amend its carbon dioxide emissions Environmental Protection Agency, 2.0% for passenger cars and 3.0% for Office of Air and Radiation, ASD, Ann standards for model years 2021 through light trucks. In addition, EPA is Arbor, MI 48105, Phone: 734 214–4584, 2025 because they are no longer requesting comment on a variety of Email: [email protected]. appropriate and reasonable in addition enhanced flexibilities whereby EPA RIN: 2060–AU09 to establishing new standards for model would make adjustments to current year 2026. The preferred alternative is to incentives and credits provisions and retain the model year 2020 standards potentially add new flexibility (specifically, the footprint target curves opportunities to broaden the pathways EPA—OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY for passenger cars and light trucks) for manufacturers would have to meet AND POLLUTION PREVENTION both programs through model year 2026, standards. Such an approach would (OCSPP) but comment is sought on a range of support the increased application of alternatives. technologies that the automotive Proposed Rule Stage Statement of Need: Since finalizing industry is developing and deploying 125. Regulation of Persistent, the agencies’ previous joint rulemaking that could potentially lead to further Bioaccumulative, and Toxic Chemicals in 2012 titled Final Rule for Model Year long-term emissions reductions and Under TSCA Section 6(H) 2017 and Later Light-Duty Vehicle allow manufacturers to comply with Priority: Other Significant. Major Greenhouse Gas Emission and Corporate standards while reducing costs. Average Fuel Economy Standards, and Anticipated Cost and Benefits: status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is even since EPA’s 2016 and early 2017 Compared to maintaining the post-2020 undetermined. mid-term evaluation process, the standards set forth in 2012, NHTSA’s Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. agencies have gathered new analysis estimates that this proposal E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory. information, and have performed new would result in $176 billion in societal Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2605, analysis. That new information and net benefits, and reduce highway TSCA 6 analysis has led the agencies to the fatalities by 12,700 lives (over the CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined. tentative conclusion that holding lifetimes of vehicles through MY 2029). Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, standards constant at MY 2020 levels U.S. fuel consumption would increase June 21, 2019, Statutory: TSCA section through MY 2026 is appropriate. by about half a million barrels per day 6(h). Summary of Legal Basis: 42 U.S.C. (2–3 percent of total daily consumption, Final, Statutory, December 22, 2020, 7411, Clean Air Act. according to the Energy Information Statutory: TSCA section 6(h). Alternatives: The preferred alternative Administration), emissions would Abstract: As part of EPA’s continuing is to retain the model year 2020 increase by 7,400 million metric tons of efforts to implement the Frank R. standards (specifically, the footprint carbon dioxide by 2100, and would Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st target curves for passenger cars and light impact the global climate by 3/1000th of Century Act, which amended the Toxic trucks) through model year 2026, but one degree Celsius by 2100, also when Substance Control Act (TSCA) with comment is sought on a wide range of compared to the standards set forth in immediate effect upon its enactment on alternatives, including eight alternatives 2012. June 22, 2016, EPA is developing a ranging in stringency from the preferred Risks: The proposed rule analyzes a proposed rule to implement TSCA alternative to the standards currently in range of public health and section 6(h). TSCA section 6(h) directs place. Those eight alternatives are: (1) environmental risks, including the risks EPA to issue regulations under section The no action alternative, which leaves of increased greenhouse gas emission 6(a) for certain persistent, the standards as they are and were reductions on climate change, risks of bioaccumulative, and toxic chemical announced in 2012 for MYs 2021–2025; increases of criteria pollutants and air substances that were identified in the (2) Alternative 2 increases the toxics emissions on public health and 2014 update of the TSCA Work Plan. stringency of targets annually during air quality, and the risks of increased These regulations must be proposed by MYs 2021–2026 by 0.5% for passenger mobile source air emissions and climate June 22, 2019, and issued in final form cars and 0.5% for light trucks; (3) impacts on children’s health. The no later than eighteen months after Alternative 3 phases out A/C efficiency proposal discusses risks associated with proposal. Section 6(h) further directs and off-cycle adjustments and increases increased petroleum consumption and EPA, in selecting among the available the stringency of targets annually during the need for the U.S. to conserve oil, as prohibitions and other restrictions in MYs 2021–2026 by 0.5% for passenger well as risks associated with vehicle TSCA section 6(a), to address risks of cars and 0.5% for light trucks; (4) safety and travel demand. The proposal injury to health or the environment that

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00136 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57939

the Administrator determines are Agency Contact: Cindy Wheeler, applicators, private applicators and presented by the chemical substances Environmental Protection Agency, noncertified applicators who use RUPs and reduce exposure to the chemical Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution under the supervision of a certified substances to the extent practicable. Prevention, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue applicator and to establish a federal EPA must develop an exposure and use NW, Mail Code 7404T, Washington, DC minimum age of 16 years for all three assessment, but the statute explicitly 20460, Phone: 202 566–0484, Email: types of applicators if states or tribes do states that a risk evaluation is not [email protected]. not establish enforceable minimum age required for these chemical substances. Peter Gimlin, Environmental requirements. EPA has identified five chemical Protection Agency, Office of Chemical Summary of Legal Basis: This substances for proposed action under Safety and Pollution Prevention, 1200 proposal would amend the Certification TSCA section 6(h). These chemical Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Mail Code of Pesticide Applicators rule substances are: Decabromodiphenyl 7404T, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: (‘‘Certification rule’’), 40 CFR part 171, ether; hexachlorobutadiene; 202 566–0515, Fax: 202 566–0473, as revised January 4, 2017 (82 FR 952). pentachlorothiophenol; phenol, Email: [email protected]. Alternatives: Not to propose the rule isopropylated phosphate (3:1), also RIN: 2070–AK34 with the potential to reduce costs and known as tris(4-isopropylphenyl) potentially streamline regulatory phosphate; and 2,4,6-tris(tert- burden. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: To be butyl)phenol. Decabromodiphenyl ether EPA—OCSPP is a flame retardant that has been widely determined. used in textiles, plastics, adhesives and 126. Pesticides; Certification of Risks: By law, some states have polyurethane foam. Pesticide Applicators Rule; minimum age of 18 years of age for Hexachlorobutadiene is produced as a Reconsideration of the Minimum Age workers and would probably not change byproduct in the production of Requirements the state laws to reap the additional cost chlorinated solvents and has also been Priority: Other Significant. Major benefit of this rule. used as an absorbent for gas impurity status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is Timetable: removal and as an intermediate in the undetermined. Action Date FR Cite manufacture of rubber compounds. Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. Pentachlorothiophenol is also used in E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. Notice ...... 12/19/17 82 FR 60195 the manufacture of rubber compounds. Legal Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq., NPRM ...... 01/00/19 Phenol, isopropylated phosphate (3:1) is Federal Insecticide Fungicide and Final Rule ...... 09/00/19 a flame retardant and is also used in Rodenticide Act lubricants and hydraulic fluids and in CFR Citation: 40 CFR 171. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis the manufacture of other compounds. Legal Deadline: None. Required: Undetermined. 2,4,6-Tris(tert-butyl)phenol is an Abstract: EPA promulgated a final Government Levels Affected: Federal, antioxidant that can be used as a fuel or rule to amend the Certification of Local, State, Tribal. lubricant and as an intermediate in the Pesticide Applicators regulations at 40 Federalism: Undetermined. manufacture of other compounds. CFR 171 on January 4, 2017 (82 FR 952). Sectors Affected: 924110 Statement of Need: Decisions and The rule went into effect on March 6, Administration of Air and Water related analysis are still in process and 2017. In accordance with Executive Resource and Solid Waste Management not available for this rule. Order 13777, EPA solicited comments Programs; 111 Crop Production; 561710 Summary of Legal Basis: Decisions in the spring of 2017 on regulations that Exterminating and Pest Control and related analysis are still in process may be appropriate for repeal, Services; 424910 Farm Supplies and not available for this rule. replacement or modification as part of Merchant Wholesalers; 561730 Alternatives: Decisions and related the Regulatory Reform Agenda efforts. Landscaping Services; 111421 Nursery analysis are still in process and not EPA received comments specific to the and Tree Production; 444220 Nursery, available for this rule. certification rule. Based on concerns Garden Center, and Farm Supply Stores; Anticipated Cost and Benefits: raised through the Regulatory Reform 424690 Other Chemical and Allied Decisions and related analysis are still process, EPA announced in December Products Merchant Wholesalers; 541690 in process and not available for this 2017 that it was beginning a process to Other Scientific and Technical rule. reconsider the minimum age provision Consulting Services; 325320 Pesticide Risks: Decisions and related analysis for the Certification rule. EPA plans to and Other Agricultural Chemical are still in process and not available for issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Manufacturing; 926140 Regulation of this rule. for this action. Agricultural Marketing and Timetable: Statement of Need: Based on input Commodities; 541712 Research and Action Date FR Cite received from stakeholders in part on Development in the Physical, Executive Order 13777, Enforcing the Engineering, and Life Sciences (except NPRM ...... 06/00/19 Regulatory Reform Agenda, the Agency Biotechnology); 115112 Soil is proposing to amend the Certification Preparation, Planting, and Cultivating; Regulatory Flexibility Analysis of Pesticide Applicators rule 115210 Support Activities for Animal Required: Undetermined. (‘‘Certification rule’’), 40 CFR part 171, Production; 115310 Support Activities Government Levels Affected: as revised January 4, 2017 (82 FR 952), for Forestry; 321114 Wood Preservation. Undetermined. by revising the minimum age URL For More Information: https:// Federalism: Undetermined. requirements for applicators certified to www.epa.gov/pesticide-worker-safety. URL For More Information: https:// use RUPs and for persons who use RUPs URL For Public Comments: TBD. www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing- under the supervision of a certified Agency Contact: Jeanne Kasai, chemicals-under-tsca/frank-r- applicator. EPA is proposing to defer to Environmental Protection Agency, lautenberg-chemical-safety-21st- state or tribal minimum age Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution century-act-0#pbt. requirements for commercial Prevention, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00137 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57940 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

NW, Mail Code PYS1162, Washington, Risks: By law, some states have EPA—OFFICE OF POLICY (OP) DC 20460, Phone: 703 308–3240, Fax: minimum age of 18 years of age for Proposed Rule Stage 703 308–3259, Email: kasai.jeanne@ workers and would probably not change epa.gov. the state laws to reap the additional cost 128. Increasing Consistency and Ryne Yarger, Environmental benefit of this rule. Transparency in Considering Costs and Protection Agency, Office of Chemical Benefits in the Rulemaking Process Safety and Pollution Prevention, 1200 Timetable: Priority: Other Significant. Major Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, Action Date FR Cite status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is DC 20460, Phone: 703 605–1193, Email: undetermined. [email protected]. Notice ...... 12/21/17 82 FR 60576 E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. Related RIN: Related to 2070–AJ20 NPRM ...... 01/00/19 RIN: 2070–AK37 Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined Final Rule ...... 09/00/19 CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined. Legal Deadline: None. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Abstract: EPA is considering EPA—OCSPP Required: No. developing implementing regulations that would increase consistency across 127. Pesticides; Agricultural Worker Small Entities Affected: No. Protection Standard; Reconsideration EPA divisions and offices, increase of Several Requirements Government Levels Affected: State, reliability to affected stakeholders, and Tribal. increase transparency during the Priority: Other Significant. Sectors Affected: 111 Crop development of regulatory actions. E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. Many EPA statutes, including the Clean Legal Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 to 136y, Production; 813312 Environment, Air Act and the Clean Water Act, Federal Insecticide Fungicide and Conservation and Wildlife provide language on the consideration Rodenticide Act Organizations; 115115 Farm Labor CFR Citation: 40 CFR 170. Contractors and Crew Leaders; 113210 of benefits and costs, but these have historically been interpreted differently Legal Deadline: None. Forest Nurseries and Gathering of Forest by the EPA depending on the office Abstract: EPA published a final rule Products; 813311 Human Rights to amend the Worker Protection promulgating the regulatory action. This Organizations; 813930 Labor Unions has led to EPA choosing different Standard (WPS) regulations at 40 CFR and Similar Labor Organizations; 170 on November 2, 2015 (80 FR 67496). standards under the same provision of 111421 Nursery and Tree Production; the statute, the regulatory community Per Executive Order 13777, EPA 541690 Other Scientific and Technical solicited comments in the spring of not being able to rely on consistent Consulting Services; 813319 Other 2017 on regulations that may be application of the statute, and EPA Social Advocacy Organizations; 325320 appropriate for repeal, replacement or developing internal policies on the Pesticide and Other Agricultural modification as part of the Regulatory consideration of benefits and costs Reform Agenda efforts. EPA received Chemical Manufacturing; 115114 through non-transparent actions. EPA comments suggesting specific changes Postharvest Crop Activities (except issued an Advance Notice of Proposed to the 2015-revised WPS requirements Cotton Ginning); 541712 Research and Rulemaking in June 2018. The Agency which are being considered within the Development in the Physical, is now reviewing comments received to Regulatory Agenda efforts. Based on Engineering, and Life Sciences (except determine if developing implementing concerns raised through the Regulatory Biotechnology); 115112 Soil regulations through a notice-and- Reform agenda process, EPA intends to Preparation, Planting, and Cultivating; comment rulemaking process or other publish a Notice of Proposed 11511 Support Activities for Crop action could provide the public with a Rulemaking (NPRM) for this action. Production; 115310 Support Activities better understanding on how EPA Statement of Need: This action for Forestry; 113110 Timber Tract weighs benefits and costs when provides a response to comments Operations. developing a regulatory action and received from the regulated community allow the public to provide better URL For More Information: https:// feedback to EPA on potential future expressed through the Regulatory www.epa.gov/pesticide-worker-safety. Reform Agenda. EPA is proposing proposed rules. changes to the requirements in the URL For Public Comments: TBD. Statement of Need: EPA implements Agricultural Worker Protection Agency Contact: Kathy Davis, many environmental statutes, including Standard (WPS) related to minimum Environmental Protection Agency, the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, the age, designated representative, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Safe Drinking Water Act, the Resource application exclusion zone (AEZ), and Prevention, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue Conservation Recovery Act, etc. All entry restrictions for enclosed space NW, Mail Stop 7506P, Washington, DC these laws provide statutory direction for making regulatory decisions. EPA production. EPA is also proposing a 20460, Phone: 703 308–7002, Fax: 703 has applied varied and sometimes number of minor revisions to correct 308–2962, Email: [email protected]. language and unintentional errors in the inconsistent interpretations of these 2015 version of the rule. Ryne Yarger, Environmental statutory directions with respect to the Summary of Legal Basis: This action Protection Agency, Office of Chemical consideration of costs and benefits in is issued under the authority of the Safety and Pollution Prevention, 1200 regulatory decision making. In doing so, Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, EPA has created regulatory uncertainty, Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), 7 U.S.C. 136 DC 20460, Phone: 703 605–1193, Email: making planning decisions difficult and to 136y, particularly sections 136a(d), [email protected]. clouded the transparency of EPA 136i, and 136w. RIN: 2070–AK43 decision making. Alternatives: Not to implement the Summary of Legal Basis: EPA is NPRM. considering developing a foundational Anticipated Cost and Benefits: To be rule (or series of rules) to better clarify determined. EPA’s interpretation of costs and benefit

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00138 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57941

considerations discussed in existing EPA—OFFICE OF LAND AND the Nation (WIIN) Act established new statutes. The rule would be proposed EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT (OLEM) statutory provisions applicable to CCR using the existing authority provided in units, including authorizing States to Proposed Rule Stage each of the statutes providing regulatory implement the CCR rule through an authority to EPA (e.g., Clean Air Act). 129. Hazardous and Solid Waste EPA-approved permit program and Alternatives: Alternatives have not yet Management System: Disposal of Coal authorizing EPA to enforce the rule. In been developed for this action. Combustion Residues From Electric light of the legislation, EPA is proposing Alternatives will be developed Utilities: Amendments to the National amendments for certain performance following review of public comments Minimum Criteria (Phase 2) standards to provide flexibility to the received on the Advanced Notice of Priority: Other Significant. Major State programs, which would be Proposed Rulemaking. status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is consistent with the WIIN Act’s standard Anticipated Cost and Benefits: This undetermined. for approval of State programs. Under rule is fundamentally different than E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. the WIIN Act, State programs require regulations that place limits on Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6906; 42 each CCR unit located in the State to pollution or otherwise clean the U.S.C. 6907; 42 U.S.C. 6912(a); 42 achieve compliance with either the environment. It will not directly lead to U.S.C. 6944; 42 U.S.C. 6945(c) federal CCR rule or State criteria that changes in environmental quality. CFR Citation: 40 CFR 257. EPA determines to be as protective as However, by improving the Legal Deadline: None. the existing federal CCR requirements. transparency and clarity of EPA’s Abstract: The EPA is publishing three Summary of Legal Basis: As part of interpretation of when and how benefits rules (Phase One Rule Part One, Phase the settlement agreement discussed and costs are considered in decision One Rule Part Two, and Phase Two above, EPA committed to make best making, EPA will provide greater Rule) to modify the final Coal efforts to take final action on the regulatory certainty that will allow Combustion Residuals (CCR) Disposal remaining claims by December 2019. regulated entities to better plan for Rule, published April 17, 2015. The Alternatives: According to the terms future regulatory requirements. It may EPA proposed Phase One in March of the settlement agreement discussed also enhance the utilization of benefit- 2018. The Agency then finalized a small above, the Agency must provide public cost analysis in decision making. EPA number of the provisions from the Phase notice and opportunity for comment on plans to provide a full discussion and One proposal in the final rule, Phase these issues. Each of these settlement- exposition of anticipated benefits and One Part One rule, in July 2018. This related amendments is fairly narrow in costs of regulatory approaches if the rule is the second set of potential scope and EPA has not identified any rule(s) go forward. revisions to EPA’s 2015 CCR Disposal significant alternatives for analysis. Risks: In this action, EPA is Rule. In this proposed rulemaking, EPA Regarding the WIIN Act implementation examining the role of benefits, costs and plans to complete its review of all of the amendments, one alternative would be other economic analytic concepts play remaining matters raised in litigation not to include these additional issues in in decision making, not the instructions and the petitions for reconsideration the CCR Remand proposal since they are on how to conduct economic analysis as that were not included in the Phase One not subject to a deadline. contained in OMB Circular A–4 or proposed rules, propose any revisions to Anticipated Cost and Benefits: EPA EPA’s Guidelines on Performing those provisions determined to be will provide estimates of costs and Economic Analysis. Consequently, warranted, and propose regulations for benefits resulting from this proposed assessment of costs and benefits will be a federal CCR permit program. rule once they are fully developed and addressed under subsequent Statement of Need: On April 17, 2015, have received Agency clearance. rulemakings developed to tackle EPA finalized national regulations to Risks: As compared with the risks to specific pollutants. regulate the disposal of Coal human health and the environment that were presented in the 2015 CCR final Timetable: Combustion Residuals (CCR) as solid waste under subtitle D of the Resource rule, the proposed amendments Action Date FR Cite Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) discussed in this action are expected to (2015 CCR final rule). The rule was produce human health and ANPRM ...... 06/13/18 83 FR 27524 challenged by several different parties, environmental benefits, which will Comment Period 07/03/18 83 FR 31098 including a coalition of regulated likely be described qualitatively. Extended. entities and a coalition of public interest Timetable: NPRM ...... 05/00/19 environmental organizations. Several of Action Date FR Cite the claims, a subset of the provisions Regulatory Flexibility Analysis challenged by the industry and Required: No. NPRM ...... 12/00/18 environmental petitioners, were settled Final Rule ...... 12/00/19 Small Entities Affected: No. on April 18, 2016. As part of that Government Levels Affected: settlement, on April 18, 2016, EPA Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Undetermined. requested the court to remand these Required: Undetermined. Agency Contact: Elizabeth Kopits, claims back to the Agency. On June 16, Government Levels Affected: Federal, Environmental Protection Agency, 2016, the United States Court of Local, State. Office of Policy, Mail Code 1809T, Appeals for the District of Columbia Federalism: Undetermined. Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 566– Circuit granted EPA’s motion. One Sectors Affected: 221112 Fossil Fuel 2299, Email: [email protected]. claim was the subject of a rulemaking Electric Power Generation Ken Munis, Environmental Protection completed on August 5, 2016 (81 FR URL For More Information: https:// Agency, Office of Policy, Mail Code 51802). This proposed rule addresses www.epa.gov/coalash. 1104T, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: some of the claims that were remanded Agency Contact: Mary Jackson, 202 564–7353, Email: munis.ken@ back to EPA. Environmental Protection Agency, epa.gov. In addition, in December 2016, the Office of Land and Emergency RIN: 2010–AA12 Water Infrastructure Improvements for Management, 1200 Pennsylvania

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00139 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57942 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

Avenue NW, Mail Code 5304P, implementation requirements to make it EPA’s goal for the LCR revisions is to Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 703 308– more effective and more readily improve the effectiveness of public 8453, Email: [email protected]. enforceable. health protections while maintaining a Kirsten Hillyer, Environmental Statement of Need: The Lead and rule that can be implemented by the Protection Agency, Office of Land and Copper Rule (LCR) reduces risks to 68,000 drinking water systems that are Emergency Management, Mail Code drinking water consumers from lead and covered by the rule. 5304P, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, copper that can enter drinking water as Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 703 347– a result of corrosion of plumbing Alternatives: The alternatives are to be 0369, Email: [email protected]. materials. The LCR requires water determined. RIN: 2050–AG98 systems to sample at taps in homes with Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The leaded plumbing materials. Depending costs and benefits are to be determined. upon the sampling results, water Risks: Lead can cause serious health systems must take actions to reduce EPA—OFFICE OF WATER (OW) problems if too much enters your body exposure to lead and copper including from drinking water or other sources. It Proposed Rule Stage corrosion control treatment, public education and lead service line can cause damage to the brain and 130. National Primary Drinking Water replacement. The LCR was promulgated kidneys, and interfere with the Regulations for Lead and Copper: in 1991 and, overall, has been effective production of red blood cells that carry Regulatory Revisions in reducing the levels of lead and oxygen to all parts of your body. The Priority: Economically Significant. copper in drinking water systems across greatest risk of lead exposure is to Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is the country. However, lead crises in infants, young children, and pregnant undetermined. Washington, DC, and Flint, Michigan, women. Scientists have linked the Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. and the subsequent national attention effects of lead on the brain with lowered E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory. focused on lead in drinking water in IQ in children. Adults with kidney Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 300f et seq., other communities, have underscored problems and high blood pressure can Safe Drinking Water Act significant challenges in the be affected by low levels of lead more CFR Citation: 40 CFR 141; 40 CFR implementation of the current rule, than healthy adults. Lead is stored in 142. including a rule structure that, for many Legal Deadline: None. the bones, and it can be released later systems, only compels protective in life. During pregnancy, the child Abstract: The Lead and Copper Rule actions after public health threats have (LCR) reduces risks to drinking water receives lead from the mother’s bones, been identified. Key challenges include which may affect brain development. consumers from lead and copper that the rule’s complexity; the degree of can enter drinking water as a result of flexibility and discretion it affords Timetable: corrosion of plumbing materials. The systems and primacy states with regard LCR requires water systems to sample at to optimization of corrosion control Action Date FR Cite taps in homes with leaded plumbing treatment; compliance sampling NPRM ...... 02/00/19 materials. Depending upon the sampling practices, which in some cases may not results, water systems must take actions adequately protect from lead exposure; to reduce exposure to lead and copper and limited specific focus on key areas Regulatory Flexibility Analysis including corrosion control treatment, of concern such as schools. There is a Required: Undetermined. public education and lead service line compelling need to modernize and Government Levels Affected: replacement. The LCR was promulgated strengthen implementation of the rule— Undetermined. in 1991 and, overall, has been effective to strengthen its public health in reducing the levels of lead and protections and to clarify its Federalism: This action may have copper in drinking water systems across implementation requirements to make it federalism implications as defined in the country. However, lead crises in more effective and more readily E.O. 13132. Washington, DC, and Flint, Michigan, enforceable. Sectors Affected: 924110 and the subsequent national attention Summary of Legal Basis: Section Administration of Air and Water focused on lead in drinking water in 1412(b) of the Safe Drinking Water Act Resource and Solid Waste Management other communities, have underscored (SDWA) (42 U.S.C. 300f et seq.) includes Programs; 221310 Water Supply and significant challenges in the a general authority for EPA to establish Irrigation Systems. implementation of the current rule, maximum contaminant level goals including a rule structure that, for many (MCLGs) and national primary drinking URL For More Information: https:// systems, only compels protective water regulations (NPDWRs). The first www.epa.gov/dwreginfo/lead-and- actions after public health threats have NPDWR for Lead and Copper was copper-rule. been identified. Key challenges include issued in 1991 (56 FR 26460, June 7, Agency Contact: Jeffrey Kempic, the rule’s complexity; the degree of 1991). Section 1412(b)(9) of the SDWA Environmental Protection Agency, flexibility and discretion it affords (42 U.S.C. 300f et seq.) requires EPA, at Office of Water, 4607M, Washington, DC systems and primacy states with regard least every six years, to review and 20460, Phone: 202 564–4880, Email: to optimization of corrosion control revise, as appropriate, each national [email protected]. treatment; compliance sampling primary drinking water regulation. Any practices, which in some cases may not revision of a national primary drinking Lisa Christ, Environmental Protection adequately protect from lead exposure; water regulation must be promulgated Agency, Office of Water, 1200 and limited specific focus on key areas in accordance with Section 1412, except Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, of concern such as schools. There is a that each revision must maintain or DC 20460, Phone: 202 564–8354 Email: compelling need to modernize and provide for greater protection of the [email protected]. strengthen implementation of the rule— health of persons. This rulemaking will RIN: 2040–AF15 to strengthen its public health revise EPA’s existing Lead and Copper protections and to clarify its Rule pursuant to Section 1412(b)(9).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00140 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57943

EPA—OW perchlorate inhibits the thyroid’s ability production of thyroid hormones. 131. National Primary Drinking Water to uptake iodide needed to produce Therefore, perchlorate may lead to Regulations: Regulation of Perchlorate hormones. (2) The EPA concluded that decreases in levels of these hormones. perchlorate occurs with frequency at Thyroid hormones are essential to the Priority: Other Significant. Major levels of health concern in public water growth and development of fetuses, status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is systems based upon data collected infants, and young children, as well as undetermined. under the first Unregulated to metabolism and energy regulation Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 1) throughout the life span. Primary E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory. from 2001 to 2005. Monitoring results pathways for human exposure to Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 300f et seq., reported to the EPA under UCMR 1 perchlorate are ingestion of Safe Drinking Water Act show that perchlorate was measured in contaminated food and drinking water. CFR Citation: 40 CFR 141; 40 CFR over four percent of water systems. (3) Timetable: 142. The EPA concluded that there was a Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, meaningful opportunity to protect Action Date FR Cite October 31, 2018, Consent Decree, public health through a drinking water NRDC v. EPA (No. 16 Civ. 1251, regulation by reducing perchlorate NPRM ...... 10/00/18 S.D.N.Y., October 18, 2016). exposure for the 5 to 17 million people Final Rule ...... 12/00/19 Final, Judicial, December 19, 2019, who may be served perchlorate in their Consent Decree, NRDC v. EPA (No. 16 drinking water. In 2013, the Science Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Civ. 1251, S.D.N.Y., October 18, 2016). Advisory Board (SAB) recommended Required: Undetermined. Abstract: A consent decree entered by that the EPA use models, rather than the Government Levels Affected: the U.S. District Court for the Southern traditional approach to establish the Undetermined. District of New York states that EPA Federalism: Undetermined. health-based maximum contaminant shall propose a national primary Additional Information: Docket #: level goal for a perchlorate regulation. drinking water regulation (NPDWR) EPA–HQ–OW–2009–0297. The EPA and FDA scientists worked with a proposed Maximum Contaminant Sectors Affected: 924110 collaboratively to develop biological Level Goal (MCLG) for perchlorate in Administration of Air and Water models in accordance with SAB drinking water no later than 10/31/18 Resource and Solid Waste Management recommendations. The EPA completed and finalize a MCLG and NPDWR for Programs; 221310 Water Supply and peer review of this analysis in March Irrigation Systems. perchlorate in drinking water no later 2018. The EPA will utilize the best URL For More Information: https:// than 12/19/19. The EPA has begun the available, peer-reviewed science to www.epa.gov/dwstandardsregulations/ process for developing a NPDWR for inform regulatory decisionmaking for perchlorate-drinking-water. perchlorate. The Safe Drinking Water perchlorate. Act describes the EPA’s requirements Summary of Legal Basis: On October Agency Contact: Samuel Hernandez, Environmental for regulating contaminants. In 18, 2016, the U.S. District Court for the Protection Agency, Office of Water, accordance with these requirements, the Southern District of New York entered EPA will consider the Science Advisory a consent decree, which requires the 1200 Pennyslvania Avenue NW, Mail Board’s guidance on how to best EPA to sign, for publication in the Code 4607M, Washington, DC 20460, interpret perchlorate health information Federal Register, a proposed MCLG and Phone: 202 564–1735, Email: to derive a MCLG for perchlorate. The NPDWR for perchlorate by October 30, [email protected]. agency is also evaluating the feasibility 2018 and issue a final MCLG and Lisa Christ, Environmental Protection and affordability of treatment NPDWR by December 19, 2019. See Agency, Office of Water, 1200 technologies to remove perchlorate from NRDC v. EPA, No. 16 Civ. 1251 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, drinking water and will examine the (S.D.N.Y.). The Safe Drinking Water Act DC 20460, Phone: 202 564–8354, Email: costs and benefits of a Maximum (SDWA), section 1412(b)(1)(A), requires [email protected]. Contaminant Level (MCL) and the EPA to make a determination RIN: 2040–AF28 alternative MCLs. The EPA is also whether to regulate at least five seeking input through informal and contaminants from its Contaminant formal processes from the National Candidate List every 5 years. Once the EPA—OW Drinking Water Advisory Council, the EPA makes a determination to regulate 132. Revised Definition of ‘‘Waters of Department of Health and Human a contaminant in drinking water, SDWA the United States’’ Services, State and Tribal drinking section 1412(b)(1)(E) requires the EPA to water programs, the regulated issue a proposed maximum contaminant Priority: Other Significant. community (public water systems), level goal (MCLG) and national primary E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. public health organizations, academia, drinking water regulation (NPDWR) Legal Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. environmental and public interest within 24 months and a final MCLG and CFR Citation: 40 CFR 110; 40 CFR groups, and other interested NPDWR within 18 months of proposal 112; 40 CFR 116; 40 CFR 117; 40 CFR stakeholders on a number of issues (with an opportunity for one 9-month 122; 40 CFR 230; 40 CFR 232; 40 CFR relating to the regulation of perchlorate. extension). The EPA made a 300; 40 CFR 302; 40 CFR 401. Statement of Need: The EPA issued a determination to regulate perchlorate in Legal Deadline: None. final determination to regulate drinking water on February 11, 2011. Abstract: In 2015, the Environmental perchlorate on February 11, 2011. The Alternatives: The alternatives will be Protection Agency and the Department EPA’s 2011 determination was based determined. of the Army (the agencies) published the upon the three criteria for regulation Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Clean Water Rule: ‘‘Definition of Waters under the Safe Drinking Water Act: (1) anticipated costs and benefits will be of the United States (2015 Rule) (80 FR The EPA determined that perchlorate determined. 37054, June 29, 2015).’’ On October 9, may have adverse effects on the health Risks: Perchlorate competes with 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the of persons based upon the National iodide for transport into the thyroid Sixth Circuit stayed the 2015 Rule Research Council’s study that found gland, which is a necessary step in the nationwide pending further action of

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00141 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57944 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

the court. On February 28, 2017, the 4504T, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: Alternatives: The alternatives are to be President signed Executive Order 13778, 202 566–0657, Email: cwawotus@ determined. Restoring the Rule of Law, Federalism, epa.gov. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The and Economic Growth by Reviewing the RIN: 2040–AF75 associated costs and benefits for the ‘Waters of the United States’ Rule,’’,’’ regulatory options are to be determined. which instructed the agencies to review Risks: The associated risks are to be the 2015 rule and rescind or replace it EPA—OW determined. as appropriate and consistent with law. Timetable: The agencies are publishing this 133. Effluent Limitations Guidelines proposed rule to follow the first step, and Standards for the Steam Electric Action Date FR Cite which sought to recodify the definition Power Generating Point Source Category NPRM ...... 03/00/19 of ‘‘waters of the United States’’ that Final Rule ...... 12/00/19 existed prior to the 2015 rule. In this Priority: Other Significant. second step, the agencies are conducting Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis a substantive reevaluation and revision E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. Required: Undetermined. Legal Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1361; 33 of the definition of waters of the United Government Levels Affected: Federal, U.S.C. 1342; 33 U.S.C. 1318; 33 U.S.C. States’’ in accordance with the Local, State. 1317; 33 U.S.C. 1316; 33 U.S.C. 1311; 33 Executive Order. Federalism: Undetermined. Statement of Need: This rulemaking U.S.C. 1314 Additional Information: Docket #: action responds to the February 28, CFR Citation: 40 CFR 423. Legal Deadline: None. EPA–HQ–OW–2009–0819. https:// 2017, Presidential Executive Order: www.epa.gov/eg/steam-electric-power- Restoring the Rule of Law, Federalism, Abstract: EPA received petitions from the Utility Water Act Group and the generating-effluent-guidelines. and Economic Growth by Reviewing the Agency Contact: Richard Benware, ‘‘Waters of the United States’’ Rule. To U.S. Small Business Administration requesting reconsideration and an Environmental Protection Agency, meet the objectives of the Executive administrative stay of provisions of Office of Water, Mail Code 4303T, order, the EPA and Department of the EPA’s final rule titled ‘‘Effluent Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 566– Army (Agencies) are engaged in an Limitations Guidelines and Standards 1369, Email: [email protected]. comprehensive, two-step rulemaking for the Steam Electric Power Generating Related RIN: Related to 2040–AF14, process. This action follows the first Point Source Category,’’ (80 FR 67838; Related to 2040–AF76 step to recodify the pre-existing November 3, 2015). After considering RIN: 2040–AF77 definition of ‘‘waters of the United the petitions, the Administrator decided States.’’ In this second step, the that it is appropriate and in the public Agencies are conducting a interest to conduct a rulemaking that EPA—OW reconsideration of the definition of may result in revisions to the new, more ‘‘waters of the United States’’ consistent stringent Best Available Technology 134. Peak Flows Management with the E.O. Economically Achievable effluent Priority: Other Significant. Summary of Legal Basis: The rule is limitations and pretreatment standards E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. proposed under the Clean Water Act, 33 for existing sources in the 2015 rule that Legal Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1311; 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. apply to bottom ash transport water and U.S.C. 1314 Alternatives: Alternatives have not yet flue gas desulfurization wastewater. CFR Citation: 40 CFR 122. been developed at this time. EPA does not intend in this rulemaking Legal Deadline: None. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: An to revise the BAT effluent limitations or Abstract: Wet weather events (e.g., economic analysis analyzing anticipated pretreatment standards in the 2015 rule rain, snowmelt) can affect publicly costs and benefits will be developed for for fly ash transport water, flue gas owned treatment works (POTWs) the rulemaking at the time of proposal. mercury control wastewater, gasification operations when excess water enters the Risks: This action does not establish wastewater, or any of the other wastewater collection system. The an environmental standard intended to requirements in the 2015 rule. As part increased wet weather flows can exceed address environmental or health risks. of the rulemaking process, EPA will the POTW treatment plant’s capacity to Timetable: provide notice and an opportunity for provide the same type of treatment for all of the incoming wastewater. The Action Date FR Cite public comment on any proposed revisions to the 2015 final rule. treatment plant’s secondary treatment NPRM ...... 10/00/18 Statement of Need: Under the Clean units are the most likely to be adversely Final Rule ...... 09/00/19 Water Act (CWA), EPA intends to affected by wet weather because the undertake a rulemaking that may result biological systems can be damaged Regulatory Flexibility Analysis in revisions to certain Best Available when too much water flows through Required: No. Technology Economically Achievable them. POTWs employ a variety of Small Entities Affected: No. (BAT) effluent limitations and operational practices to ensure the Government Levels Affected: Federal, pretreatment standards for existing integrity of their secondary treatment Local, State, Tribal. sources (PSES) for the steam electric units during wet weather. This update Agency Contact: Michael McDavit, power generating point source category, to the regulations will seek to clarify Environmental Protection Agency, which were published in the Federal permitting procedures so as to provide Office of Water, 1200 Pennsylvania Register on November 3, 2015. POTWs with separate sanitary sewer Avenue, Mail Code 4504T, Washington, Summary of Legal Basis: EPA intends systems flexibility in how they manage DC 20460, Phone: 202 566–2428, Email: to propose this rule under the authority and treat peak flows under wet weather [email protected]. of sections 101, 301, 304, 306, 307, 308, conditions. These updates will also seek Rose Kwok, Environmental Protection 402, and 501 of the CWA, 33 U.S.C. to ensure a consistent national approach Agency, Office of Water, 1200 1251, 1311, 1314, 1316, 1317, 1318, for permitting POTWs that allows Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Mail Code 1342, and 1361. efficient treatment plant operation while

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00142 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57945

protecting the public from potential defined area as a disposal site’’ as well EPA—OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION adverse health effects of inadequately as to ‘‘deny or restrict the use of any (OAR) treated wastewater. defined area for specification (including Final Rule Stage Statement of Need: This update to the the withdrawal of specification) as a regulations will seek to clarify disposal site . . . whenever he 136. Review of the Primary National permitting procedures for POTW determines, after notice and opportunity Ambient Air Quality Standards for treatment plants with separate storm for public hearings, that the discharge of Sulfur Oxides sewer systems under wet weather such materials into such area will have Priority: Other Significant. Major operational conditions. These updates an unacceptable adverse effect on status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is will also seek to ensure a consistent municipal water supplies, shellfish beds undetermined. national approach for permitting and fishery areas (including spawning E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. POTWs that provides for efficient and breeding areas), wildlife, or Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. treatment plant operation while recreational areas.’’ This rulemaking CFR Citation: 40 CFR 50. protecting the public from potential will consider, at minimum, changes to Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, May adverse health effects of inadequately EPA’s 404(c) review process that would 25, 2018, Signed by 5/25/2018. Final, treated wastewater. govern the future use of EPA’s section Judicial, January 28, 2019, Signed by 1/ Summary of Legal Basis: The rule will 404(c) authority. 28/2019. be proposed under the Clean Water Act, Statement of Need: The EPA’s Abstract: Under the Clean Air Act 33 U.S.C. 1311 and 33 U.S.C. 1314. regulations governing CWA Section Amendments of 1977, EPA is required Alternatives: Alternatives have not yet 404(c) are being revisited to reflect to review and if appropriate revise the been developed at this time. today’s permitting process and modern- air quality criteria and national ambient Anticipated Cost and Benefits: A cost day methods and protections, including air quality standards (NAAQS) every 5 analysis analyzing anticipated costs and the robust ex siting processes under the years. On June 22, 2010, EPA published benefits will be developed for the National Environmental Policy Act that a final rule to revise the primary (health- rulemaking at the time of proposal. requires federal agencies to consider the based) NAAQS for Sulfur Oxides to Risks: The agencies will be able to environmental and related social and provide increased protection for public analyze the risks of the proposed economic effects of their proposed health. This review of the 2010 NAAQS rulemaking once policy decisions have actions while providing opportunities includes the preparation by EPA of an been made. for public review and comment on those Integrated Review Plan, an Integrated Timetable: evaluations. The updated regulations Science Assessment, a Risk/Exposure have the opportunity for increasing Assessment, and also a Policy Action Date FR Cite certainty for landowners, investors, Assessment Document, with businesses and entrepreneurs to make opportunities for review by EPA’s Clean NPRM ...... 07/00/19 Air Scientific Advisory Committee Final Rule ...... 07/00/20 investment decisions while preserving the EPA’s authority to restrict (CASAC) and the public. These documents inform the Administrator’s Regulatory Flexibility Analysis discharges of dredge or fill material that will have an unacceptable adverse effect proposed decision as to whether to Required: Undetermined. retain or revise the current standard. Government Levels Affected: Local, on water supplies, recreation, fisheries and wildlife. This proposed decision was published State, Tribal. in the Federal Register with Agency Contact: Jamie Piziali, Summary of Legal Basis: Clean Water Act (CWA) 404(c). opportunity provided for public Environmental Protection Agency, comment. The Administrator’s final Office of Water, 1200 Pennsylvania Alternatives: The alternatives will be determined. decisions will take into consideration Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460, these documents, CASAC advice, and Phone: 202 564–1438, Email: Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The anticipated costs and benefits will be public comment on the proposed [email protected]. decision. Lisa Biddle, Environmental Protection determined. Risks: The associated risks will be Statement of Need: Under the Clean Agency, Office of Water, 4303T, 1200 Air Act Amendments of 1977, EPA is Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, determined. Timetable: required to review and if appropriate DC 20460, Phone: 202 566–0350, Fax: revise the air quality criteria and 202 566–1053, Email: biddle.lisa@ Action Date FR Cite national ambient air quality standards epa.gov. (NAAQS) every 5 years. On June 22, RIN: 2040–AF81 NPRM ...... 06/00/19 2010, EPA published a final rule to revise the primary (health-based) Regulatory Flexibility Analysis NAAQS for sulfur oxides to provide EPA—OW Required: No. increased protection for public health. • Small Entities Affected: No. Summary of Legal Basis: Under the 135. Clean Water Act Section 404(C) Government Levels Affected: None. Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, Regulatory Revision Agency Contact: Brian Frazer, EPA is required to review and if Priority: Other Significant. Environmental Protection Agency, appropriate revise the air quality criteria E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. Office of Water, 4502T, Washington, DC and the primary (health-based) national Legal Authority: ‘‘Not Yet 20460, Phone: 202 566–1652, Fax: 202 ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) Determined’’ 566–1349, Email: [email protected]. every 5 years. CFR Citation: 40 CFR 230. Russell Kaiser, Environmental Alternatives: The main alternative for Legal Deadline: None. Protection Agency, Office of Water, the Administrator’s decision on the Abstract: Section 404(c) of the Clean 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW, review of the primary (health-based) Water Act authorizes the Administrator Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 566– national ambient air quality standard for ‘‘to prohibit the specification (including 0963, Email: [email protected]. sulfur oxides (SOX) is whether to retain withdrawal of the specification) of any RIN: 2040–AF88 or revise the existing standard.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00143 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57946 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The RIN: 2060–AT68 on June 29, 2018. More information on Clean Air Act makes clear that the this report can be found at: https:// economic and technical feasibility of cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_record_ attaining standards is not to be Report.cfm?dirEntryId=341491. EPA—OAR considered in setting or revising the Timetable: NAAQS, although such factors may be 137. Renewable Fuel Volume Standards considered in the development of State for 2019 and Biomass-Based Diesel Action Date FR Cite plans to implement the standards. (BBD) Volume for 2020 Notice ...... 07/03/18 83 FR 31098 Accordingly, when the Agency proposes Priority: Other Significant. revisions to the standards, the Agency NPRM ...... 07/10/18 83 FR 32024 E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory. Final Rule ...... 11/00/18 prepares cost and benefit information in Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et order to provide States information that seq., Clean Air Act Regulatory Flexibility Analysis may be useful in considering different CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80. Required: Undetermined. implementation strategies for meeting Legal Deadline: None. Government Levels Affected: proposed or final standards. In those Abstract: The Clean Air Act requires Undetermined. instances, cost and benefit information EPA to promulgate regulations that International Impacts: This regulatory is generally included in the regulatory specify the annual volume requirements action will be likely to have analysis accompanying the final rule. for renewable fuels under the international trade and investment Because this action does not propose to Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) effects, or otherwise be of international change the existing primary NAAQS for program. Standards are to be set for four interest. SO , it does not impose costs or benefits X different categories of renewable fuels: Agency Contact: relative to the baseline of continuing cellulosic biofuel, biomass-based diesel, Dallas Burkholder, Environmental with the current NAAQS in effect. EPA advanced biofuel, and total renewable Protection Agency, Office of Air and has thus not prepared a Regulatory fuel. The statute requires that the Impact Analysis for this action. Radiation, N26, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, Risks: As part of this review, the EPA standards be finalized by November 30 Phone: 734 214–4766, Email: prepared an Integrated Review Plan, an of the year prior to the year in which the [email protected]. Integrated Science Assessment, a Risk/ standards would apply. In the case of Tia Sutton, Environmental Protection Exposure Assessment, and also a Policy biomass-based diesel, the statute Agency, Office of Air and Radiation, Assessment document, with requires applicable volumes to be set no 6401A, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, opportunities for review by the EPA’s later than 14 months prior to the year Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 564– Clean Air Scientific Advisory for which the requirements would 8929, Email: [email protected]. Committee and the public. These apply. RIN: 2060–AT93 documents will inform the Statement of Need: The Clean Air Act Administrator’s decision as to whether requires EPA to promulgate regulations that specify the annual volume to retain or revise the standards. The EPA—OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY requirements for renewable fuels under proposed decision was published in the AND POLLUTION PREVENTION the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) Federal Register with opportunity (OCSPP) provided for public comment. The program. The statute requires that the Administrator’s final decisions will take standards be finalized by November 30 Final Rule Stage of the year prior to the year in which the into consideration these documents and 138. Review of Dust-Lead Hazard public comment on the proposed standards would apply. In the case of biomass-based diesel, the statute Standards and the Definition of Lead- decision. Based Paint Timetable: requires applicable volumes to be set no later than 14 months prior to the year Priority: Other Significant. Action Date FR Cite for which the requirements would Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. apply. E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory. NPRM ...... 06/08/18 83 FR 26752 Summary of Legal Basis: CAA section Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2681, NPRM Comment 06/21/18 83 FR 28843 211(o). TSCA 401; 15 U.S.C. 2682; 15 U.S.C. Period Ex- Alternatives: EPA requested comment 2683, TSCA 403; 15 U.S.C. 2684 tended. Final Rule ...... 01/00/19 on using the general waiver authority to CFR Citation: 40 CFR 745. reduce the required volumes for Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, June Regulatory Flexibility Analysis advanced and total renewable fuel in 22, 2018, NPRM issuance ordered Required: No. the proposed rule. within 90 days of the date that the 9th Small Entities Affected: No. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Circuit’s decision becomes final. Government Levels Affected: None. Anticipated costs were developed for Final, Judicial, June 22, 2019, The Agency Contact: Nicole Hagan, the proposed rule ($380–$740 million). December 27, 2017, decision of the Environmental Protection Agency, Costs and benefits of this rulemaking are Ninth Circuit ordered ‘‘that EPA Office of Air and Radiation, 109 T.W. highly complex given the nature of the promulgate the final rule within one Alexander Drive, Mail Code C504–06, program and the standards being year after the promulgation of the Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, categorically nested under a total proposed rule . . . .’’. Phone: 919 541–3153, Email: volume standard. An updated estimate Abstract: EPA is reviewing existing [email protected]. of the costs, based on a number of regulatory dust-lead hazard standards Karen Wesson, Environmental illustrative assumptions, will be for target housing and Child Occupied Protection Agency, Office of Air and provided in the final rule. Facilities (COFs), and the definition of Radiation, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Risks: Environmental assessments are lead-based paint for non-target housing. Mail Code C504–06, Research Triangle primarily addressed under another On March 6, 1996, the EPA and the Park, NC 27711, Phone: 919 541–3515, section of the CAA (Section 204). EPA Department of Housing and Urban Email: [email protected]. released an updated report to Congress Development (HUD) issued a joint final

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00144 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57947

regulation that, under section 401 of the 402, 403, and 404 of the Toxic Sectors Affected: 541350 Building Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), Substances Control Act (TSCA), 15 Inspection Services; 624410 Child Day adopted the statutory definition of lead- U.S.C. 2601 et seq., as amended by title Care Services; 236 Construction of based paint as ‘‘paint or other surface X of the Housing and Community Buildings; 611110 Elementary and coatings that contain lead equal to or in Development Act of 1992 (also known Secondary Schools; 541330 Engineering excess of 1.0 milligram per square as the Residential Lead-Based Paint Services; 611519 Other Technical and centimeter or 0.5 percent by weight.’’ Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 or Title Trade Schools; 531 Real Estate; 562910 On January 5, 2001, EPA issued a final X) (Pub. L. 102–550). Remediation Services; 238 Specialty regulation that, under section 403 of the Alternatives: EPA intends to finalize a Trade Contractors. TSCA, established regulatory dust-lead rulemaking identifying hazardous levels URL For More Information: http:// hazard standards of 40 mg/ft2 for floors of lead in dust on floors and window www2.epa.gov/lead. and 250 mg/ft2 for interior window sills. sills. While EPA has proposed standards Agency Contact: On August 10, 2009, EPA received a of 10 mg/ft2 and 100 mg/ft2 for floors John Yowell, Environmental petition requesting that EPA take action and window sills respectively, EPA is Protection Agency, Office of Chemical to lower EPA’s regulatory dust-lead encouraging public comment on the full Safety and Pollution Prevention, Mail hazard standards and the definition of range of candidate standards analyzed Code 7404T, Washington, DC 20460, lead-based paint. On October 22, 2009, in the associated Technical Support Phone: 202 564–1213, Email: EPA responded to the petition, agreeing Document as alternatives to the [email protected]. to initiate a proceeding to determine proposal, including the option not to Marc Edmonds, Environmental whether the dust-lead hazard standards, change the current standard. EPA has Protection Agency, Office of Chemical and the definition of lead-based paint also specifically requested comment on Safety and Pollution Prevention, 1200 for non-target housing should be an option that would reduce the floor Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Mail Code revised. On August 24, 2016, advocates dust standard but leave the sill dust 7404T, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: filed a petition for writ of mandamus in standard unchanged (e.g., 20 mg/ft2 for 202 566–0758, Email: edmonds.marc@ the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth floors and 250 mg/ft2 for window sills, epa.gov. Circuit, asking the court to compel EPA or 10 mg/ft2 for floors and 250 mg/ft2 for RIN: 2070–AJ82 to make these revisions. The proposed window sills), since reducing floor dust rule was published in the Federal lead has the greatest impact on Register on July 2, 2018, and was issued children’s health. EPA—OCSPP in compliance with the December 27, Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Costs. 2017, decision of the Ninth Circuit, and This rule is estimated to result in costs 139. Service Fees for the the subsequent March 26, 2018, order of $66 million to $119 million per year. Administration of the Toxic Substances that directed the EPA ‘‘to issue a Benefits. This rule would reduce Control Act proposed rule within ninety (90) days exposure to lead, resulting in benefits Priority: Other Significant. from the filed date of this order.’’ from avoided adverse health effects. For Scientific advances made since the E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory. the subset of adverse health effects Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2601 et promulgation of the 2001 rule clearly where the results were quantified, the demonstrate that exposure to low levels seq.; 15 U.S.C. 2625 TSCA 26 estimated annualized benefits are $317 CFR Citation: 40 CFR 700–791. of lead result in adverse health effects. million to $2.24 billion per year using Moreover, since CDC has stated that no Legal Deadline: None. a 3% discount rate, and $68 million to Abstract: As amended in June 2016, safe level of lead in blood has been $479 million using a 7% discount rate. identified, the reductions in children’s section 26(b)(1) of the Toxic Substance There are additional unquantified Control Act (TSCA) authorizes EPA to blood lead levels as a result of this rule benefits due to other avoided adverse would help reduce the risk of adverse issue a rule to establish fees to defray health effects in children, including the cost (including contractor costs cognitive and developmental effects in attention-related behavioral problems, children. Therefore, EPA proposed to incurred by the Agency) associated with greater incidence of problem behaviors, administering sections 4, 5, and 6, and change the dust-lead hazard standards decreased cognitive performance, 2 2 collecting, processing, reviewing, and from 40 mg/ft and 250 mg/ft to 10 mg/ reduced post-natal growth, delayed 2 2 providing access to and protecting from ft and 100 mg/ft on floors and window puberty and decreased kidney function. sills, respectively. These standards disclosure information on chemical Risks: This rulemaking addresses the substances as appropriate under section apply to most pre-1978 housing and risk of adverse health effects associated child-occupied facilities, such as day 14. EPA issued a proposed rule in with lead dust exposures in children February 2018 and is planning to issue care centers and kindergarten facilities. living in pre-1978 housing and child- In addition, EPA proposed to make no a final rule in September 2018, with occupied facilities, as well as associated immediate effect to enable the collection change to the definition of lead-based potential health effects in this paint because the Agency currently of fees beginning in October 2018. subpopulation. Statement of Need: The fees are lacks sufficient information to support Timetable: such a change. intended to achieve the goals articulated by Congress to provide a sustainable Statement of Need: The proposed rule Action Date FR Cite was published in the Federal Register source of funds for EPA to fulfill its on July 2, 2018, and was issued in NPRM ...... 07/02/18 83 FR 30889 legal obligations to conduct activities compliance with the December 27, Final Rule ...... 06/00/19 such as risk-based screenings, 2017, decision of the Ninth Circuit, and designation of applicable substances as the subsequent March 26, 2018, order Regulatory Flexibility Analysis High- and Low-Priority, conducting risk that directed the EPA ‘‘to issue a Required: Undetermined. evaluations to determine whether a proposed rule within ninety (90) days Government Levels Affected: Federal, chemical substance presents an from the filed date of this order.’’ State, Tribal. unreasonable risk of injury to health or Summary of Legal Basis: EPA is Additional Information: Docket #: the environment, requiring testing of proposing this rule under sections 401, EPA–HQ–OPPT–2018–0166. chemical substances and mixtures, and

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00145 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57948 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

evaluating and reviewing manufacturing 5 collected from small businesses are RIN: 2070–AK27 and processing notices, as required estimated to be $550,000. For TSCA under TSCA sections 4, 5 and 6, as well sections 4 and 6, discounted fees for as management of chemical information eligible small businesses and fees for all EPA—OFFICE OF LAND AND under TSCA section 14. other affected firms may differ over the EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT (OLEM) Summary of Legal Basis: TSCA three-year period that was analyzed, section 26(b), 15 U.S.C. 2625(b), since the fee paid by each firm is Final Rule Stage provides EPA with authority to establish dependent on the number of affected 140. Clean Water Act Hazardous fees to defray a portion of the costs firms per action. Based on past TSCA Substances Spill Prevention associated with administering TSCA section 4 actions and data related to the sections 4, 5, and 6, as amended, as well first ten chemicals identified for risk Priority: Other Significant. as the costs of collecting, processing, evaluations under TSCA as amended, E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. reviewing, and providing access to and EPA estimates annualized fees collected Legal Authority: 33 U.S.C. protecting information about chemical from small businesses for TSCA section 1321(j)(1)(C) substances from disclosure as 4 and TSCA section 6 to be CFR Citation: 40 CFR 151. Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, June appropriate under TSCA section 14. approximately $37,000 and $2.6 16, 2018, Sign by no later than June 16, Alternatives: Alternative approaches million, respectively. EPA estimates that 2018 and within 15 days thereafter were considered in developing the total fees paid by small businesses will transmit to the Federal Register. proposed rule (see 83 FR 8212, Unit account for about 16 percent of the III.C, available at https:// Final, Judicial, August 25, 2019, Sign approximately $20.05 million fees to be by no later than 14 months after www.federalregister.gov/documents/ collected for TSCA sections 4, 5, and 6 2018/02/26/2018-02928/user-fees-for- publication of NPRM (NPRM was actions. The annualized total industry published on June 25, 2018) & within 15 the-administration-of-the-toxic- fee collection for small businesses is substances-control-act) and are being days thereafter transmit to the Federal estimated to be approximately $3.2 Register. further considered in light of comments million. received on the proposed rule. Abstract: As a result of a consent Risks: n/a. decree, the EPA has issued a proposed Anticipated Cost and Benefits: EPA Timetable: has evaluated the potential incremental rule that addresses the prevention of hazardous substance discharges under economic impacts of the proposed rule. Action Date FR Cite The Agency analyzed a three-year section 311(j)(1)(C) of the Clean Water period, since the statute requires EPA to NPRM ...... 02/26/18 83 FR 8212 Act (CWA). This section directs the reevaluate and adjust, as necessary, the Notice ...... 04/24/18 83 FR 17782 President to issue regulations to prevent fees every three years. The Economic Final Rule ...... 10/00/18 discharges of oil and hazardous Analysis, which is available in the substances from onshore and offshore docket for the proposed rule (EPA–HQ– Regulatory Flexibility Analysis facilities, and to contain such OPPT–2016–0401, ref. 2), is briefly Required: No. discharges. The EPA assessed the summarized here. The annualized fees Small Entities Affected: No. consequences of hazardous substance collected from industry for the proposed Government Levels Affected: None. discharges into the nation’s waters, and option (identified as Option C in the International Impacts: This regulatory evaluated the costs and benefits of Economic Analysis) are approximately action will be likely to have potential preventive regulatory $20.05 million. This total does not international trade and investment requirements for facilities handling such include the fees collected for effects, or otherwise be of international substances. Based on an analysis of the manufacturer-requested risk interest. frequency and impacts of reported CWA evaluations. Total fee collections were Additional Information: Docket #: hazardous substances discharges and calculated by multiplying the estimated EPA–HQ–OPPT–2016–0401. A the existing framework of EPA number of actions per fee category summary of the recent amendments to regulatory requirements, the Agency is anticipated each year, by the TSCA is available at https:// not proposing additional regulatory corresponding proposed fee. For the www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing- requirements at this time. proposed option, TSCA section 4 fees chemicals-under-tsca/frank-r- Statement of Need: CWA 311(j)(1)(C) account for less than 1 percent of the lautenberg-chemical-safety-21st- provides that the President ‘‘[establish] total fee collection, TSCA section 5 fees century-act. procedures, methods, and equipment for approximately 43 percent, and TSCA Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical and other requirements for equipment to section 6 fees for approximately 56 Manufacturing. prevent discharges of oil and hazardous percent. Annual fees collected by EPA URL For More Information: https:// substances from vessels and from are expected to total approximately www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing- onshore and offshore facilities, and to $20.05 million. Under the proposed chemicals-under-tsca/. contain such discharges . . .’’ EPA was option, the total fees collected from URL For Public Comments: http:// delegated authority for regulating industry for a risk evaluation requested www.regulations.gov. onshore facilities under CWA by manufacturers are estimated to be Agency Contact: Mark Hartman, 311(j)(1)(C) by Executive Order 12777, $1.3 million for chemicals included in Environmental Protection Agency, and was redelegated authority for the Work Plan and $2.6 million for Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution regulating offshore facilities landward of chemicals not included in the Work Prevention, Mail Code: 7503P, the coastline under CWA 311(j)(1)(C) by Plan. EPA estimates that 18.5 percent of Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 703 308– the Department of the Interior. See 40 TSCA section 5 submissions will be 0734, Email: [email protected]. CFR 112, appendix A. from small businesses that are eligible to Hans Scheifele, Environmental Summary of Legal Basis: In 2015, the pay discounted fees because they have Protection Agency, Office of Chemical EPA was sued for failure to finalize a average annual sales of less than $91 Safety and Pollution Prevention, 7404T, rulemaking for chemicals under the million in the three preceding years. Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 564– CWA 311(j)(1)(C). This litigation was Total annualized fees for TSCA section 3122, Email: [email protected]. settled and a consent decree was filed

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00146 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57949

with the court in February 2016 Wholesalers, Durable Goods; 424 amendments addressed various aspects (Environmental Justice Health Alliance Merchant Wholesalers, Nondurable of risk management programs, including for Chemical Policy Reform v. U.S. Goods; 212 Mining (except Oil and Gas); prevention programs at stationary EPA). The EPA is conducting this 327 Nonmetallic Mineral Product sources, emergency response rulemaking in accordance with the Manufacturing; 211 Oil and Gas preparedness requirements, information consent decree and proposed rule on Extraction; 322 Paper Manufacturing; availability, and various other changes June 25, 2018, and intends to have the 324 Petroleum and Coal Products to streamline, clarify, and otherwise Administrator sign a final rule by Manufacturing; 326 Plastics and Rubber technically correct the underlying rules. August 25, 2019. Products Manufacturing; 54 Prior to the rule taking effect, EPA Alternatives: The Agency considered Professional, Scientific, and Technical received three petitions for three alternatives. The first alternatives Services; 44–45 Retail Trade; 115 reconsideration of the rule under CAA was to establish a prevention program Support Activities for Agriculture and section 307(d)(7)(B), two from industry that included nine regulatory elements Forestry; 313 Textile Mills; 48–49 groups and one from a group of states. aimed at preventing CWA HS Transportation and Warehousing; 221 Under that provision, the Administrator discharges. The second alternative was Utilities; 493 Warehousing and Storage; is to commence a reconsideration to establish a targeted approach that 321 Wood Product Manufacturing. proceeding if, in the Administrator’s selects a limited set of requirements URL For More Information: https:// judgment, the petitioner raises an designed to prevent CWA hazardous www.epa.gov.rulemaking-preventing- objection to a rule that was substances discharges. This regulatory hazardous-substance-spills. impracticable to raise during the option could establish targeted URL For Public Comments: https:// comment period or if the grounds for requirements under one or more of the www.regulations.gov/docket?D=EPA- the objection arose after the comment nine program elements under the first HQ-OLEM-2018-0024. period but within the period for judicial option; however, four elements are Agency Contact: Gregory Wilson, review. In either case, the Administrator specifically identified and discussed. Environmental Protection Agency, must also conclude that the objection is The third, and proposed alternative, Office of Land and Emergency of central relevance to the outcome of establishes no new requirements under Management, 5104A, Washington, DC the rule. In a letter dated March 13, the authority of CWA 311(j)(1)(C). 20460, Phone: 202 564–7989, Fax: 202 2017, the Administrator responded to Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Since 564–2625, Email: wilson.gregory@ the first of the reconsideration petitions the proposed action recommended no epa.gov. received by announcing the convening new regulatory requirements, it neither RIN: 2050–AG87 of a proceeding for reconsideration of imposes incremental costs nor provides the Risk Management Program incremental environmental protection Amendments. As explained in that benefits. letter, having considered the objections EPA—OLEM Risks: The proposed action raised in the petition, the Administrator recommended no new regulatory 141. Accidental Release Prevention determined that the criteria for requirements; therefore, EPA anticipates Requirements: Risk Management reconsideration have been met for at no changes in risk as a result of this Programs Under the Clean Air Act; least one of the objections. This action. In the 40 years since CWA Reconsideration of Amendments proposal addresses the issues raised in all three petitions for reconsideration, as section 311(j)(1)(C) was enacted by Priority: Other Significant. Congress, multiple statutory and well as other issues that EPA believes E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. warrant reconsideration. regulatory requirements have been Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7412(r) established under different Federal Summary of Legal Basis: The CFR Citation: 40 CFR 68. Agency’s procedures in this rulemaking authorities that generally serve to, Legal Deadline: None. directly and indirectly, prevent CWA are controlled by CAA section 307(d). Abstract: The Environmental The statutory authority for this action is hazardous substances discharges. Protection Agency (EPA) published in Timetable: provided by section 112(r) of the CAA the Federal Register on January 13, as amended (42 U.S.C. 7412(r)). Each of 2017, a final rule to amend the Risk Action Date FR Cite the portions of the Risk Management Management Program regulations under Program rule we propose to modify in NPRM ...... 06/25/18 83 FR 29499 the Clean Air Act. Prior to the rule this document are based on section Final Rule ...... 09/00/19 becoming effective, EPA received three 112(r) of the CAA as amended (42 petitions for reconsideration that raised U.S.C. 7412(r)). EPA’s authority for Regulatory Flexibility Analysis concerns with provisions of the final convening a reconsideration proceeding Required: No. rule. EPA subsequently delayed the for certain issues is found under CAA Small Entities Affected: No. effective date of the final rule via notice section 307(d)(7)(B) or 42 U.S.C. Government Levels Affected: None. and comment rulemaking to February 7607(d)(7)(B). Additional Information: Docket #: 19, 2019, in order to conduct a Alternatives: EPA’s primary proposal EPA–HQ–OLEM–2018–0024. reconsideration proceeding. On May 30, would rescind almost all the Sectors Affected: 72 Accommodation 2018, EPA published proposed changes requirements added under the RMP and Food Services; 924 Administration to the final rule to address specific Amendments rule to the accident of Environmental Quality Programs; 56 issues to be reconsidered and other prevention provisions program of Administrative and Support and Waste issues that the Agency believes warrant subparts C (for program 2 processes) and Management and Remediation Services; additional public comment. D (for program 3 processes), and 312 Beverage and Tobacco Product Statement of Need: On January 13, associated definitions, as well as the Manufacturing; 325 Chemical 2017, the EPA issued a final rule (82 FR Amendments rule requirements in Manufacturing; 111 Crop Production; 61 4594) amending 40 CFR part 68, the subpart H for providing to the public, Educational Services; 311 Food chemical accident prevention upon request, chemical hazard Manufacturing; 316 Leather and Allied provisions under section 112(r) of the information and access to community Product Manufacturing; 423 Merchant CAA (42 U.S.C. 7412(r)). The emergency preparedness information.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00147 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57950 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

The proposal would also modify the Approximately 12,500 U.S. facilities are Manufacturing; 221112 Fossil Fuel amendments rule provisions in subpart subject to the provisions of 40 CFR part Electric Power Generation; 311411 E for local emergency response 68, and much of the U.S. population Frozen Fruit, Juice, and Vegetable coordination and emergency exercises, resides in a community containing one Manufacturing; 49311 General as well as the provisions in subpart H or more such facilities. EPA believes Warehousing and Storage; 31152 Ice for public meetings after accidents. EPA that the existing part 68 provisions have Cream and Frozen Dessert has also requested public comment on been successful in reducing the Manufacturing; 311612 Meat Processed various alternatives, including retaining frequency and severity of accidental from Carcasses; 211112 Natural Gas certain minor changes made to the chemical releases from covered Liquid Extraction; 32519 Other Basic subparts C and D prevention programs facilities. The RMP Amendments Rule Organic Chemical Manufacturing; 42469 relating to hazard reviews, incident produced a variety of benefits from Other Chemical and Allied Products investigations, training, and others, as prevention and mitigation of future Merchant Wholesalers; 49319 Other well as alternatives to the proposed RMP and non-RMP accidents at RMP Warehousing and Storage; 322 Paper changes to the local coordination and facilities, avoided catastrophes at RMP Manufacturing; 42471 Petroleum Bulk emergency exercise provisions. facilities, and easier access to facility Stations and Terminals; 32411 Anticipated Cost and Benefits: In chemical hazard information and Petroleum Refineries; 311615 Poultry total, EPA estimates annualized cost accident history. The proposed rule Processing; 49312 Refrigerated savings of $87.9 million at a 3% would largely retain the revised local Warehousing and Storage; 22132 discount rate and $88.4 million at a 7% emergency coordination and exercise Sewage Treatment Facilities; 11511 discount rate. Most of the annual cost provisions of the 2017 Amendments Support Activities for Crop Production; savings under the proposed rule are due final rule, which convey mitigation 22131 Water Supply and Irrigation to the repeal of the STAA provision benefits. If a chemical accident or major Systems. (annual savings of $70 million), catastrophe occurs, mitigating its URL For More Information: https:// followed by third-party audits (annual impacts benefits society by reducing the www.epa.gov/rmp. savings of $9.8 million), rule number of fatalities and injuries, URL For Public Comments: https:// familiarization (annual net savings of reducing the magnitude of property www.regulations.gov/docket?D=EPA- $3.7 million), information availability damage and lost productivity both on- HQ-OEM-2015-0725. (annual savings of $3.1 million), and site and off-site, and reducing the extent Agency Contact: root-cause incident investigation of public evacuations, sheltering, and Jim Belke, Environmental Protection (annual savings of $1.8 million). The expenditure of emergency response Agency, Office of Land and Emergency RMP Amendments Rule produced a resources. These retained provisions Management, 1200 Pennsylvania variety of non-monetized benefits from along with public meetings also produce Avenue NW, Mail Code 5104A, prevention and mitigation of future benefits by improving the information Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 202 564– RMP and non-RMP accidents at RMP going to emergency planners, 8023, Email: [email protected]. facilities, avoided catastrophes at RMP responders, and the public. The Kathy Franklin, Environmental facilities, and easier access to facility proposed reconsideration of the Protection Agency, Office of Land and chemical hazard information. The prevention program requirements, as Emergency Management, 1200 proposed Reconsideration rule would well as certain information disclosure Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Mail Code largely retain the revised local provisions in the RMP Amendments 5104A, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: emergency coordination and exercise Rule may result in a reduction in 202 564–7987, Email: franklin.kathy@ provisions of the 2017 Amendments prevention and information benefits, epa.gov. final rule, which convey mitigation relative to the baseline post-2017 RIN: 2050–AG95 benefits. The proposed rescission of the Amendments rule. However, as noted prevention program requirements (i.e., above, there may be an increase in third-party audits, incident security benefits by limiting information investigation, STAA), may result in a EPA—OLEM sharing, which might result in an reduction of these benefits. The increased risk of terrorism against 142. • Hazardous and Solid Waste proposed rescission of the chemical regulated facilities. Management System: Disposal of Coal hazard information availability Timetable: Combustion Residues From Electric provision may result in a reduction of Utilities: Amendments to the National the information sharing benefit, Action Date FR Cite Minimum Criteria (Phase 1, Part 2) although the public meeting, emergency coordination and exercise provisions NPRM ...... 05/30/18 83 FR 24850 Priority: Other Significant. would still convey a portion of this Notice ...... 07/24/18 83 FR 34967 E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. qualitative benefit. However, the Correction ...... 07/31/18 83 FR 36837 Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6906; 42 proposed rulemaking would convey the Final Rule ...... 01/00/19 U.S.C. 6907; 42 U.S.C. 6912(a); 42 benefit of improved chemical site U.S.C. 6944; 42 U.S.C. 6945(c) security, by modifying previously open- Regulatory Flexibility Analysis CFR Citation: 40 CFR 257. ended information sharing provisions of Required: No. Legal Deadline: Final, Judicial, June the Amendments rule that might have Small Entities Affected: No. 14, 2019, Issue a final rule 3 years after resulted in an increased risk of terrorism Government Levels Affected: Local, settlement agreement date (6/14/2016). against regulated sources. State, Tribal. Abstract: The EPA published a Risks: The chemical accident Additional Information: Docket #: proposed rule, Phase One rule in March prevention provisions of Clean Air Act EPA–HQ–OEM–2015–0725. 2018, to modify the final Coal section 112(r) and 40 CFR part 68 Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Combustion Residuals (CCR) Disposal address the acute risks to human health Manufacturing; 49313 Farm Product Rule, published April 17, 2015. Issues and the environment associated with Warehousing and Storage; 42491 Farm covered in the proposed rule included the accidental release of highly toxic Supplies Merchant Wholesalers; 311511 the height limitation of the vegetative and flammable chemicals. Fluid Milk Manufacturing; 311 Food slopes of dikes; the type and magnitude

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00148 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57951

of non-groundwater releases that would consistent with the WIIN Act’s standard Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, require a facility to comply with some for approval of State programs. State DC 20460, Phone: 703 347–0369, Email: or all of the corrective action procedures programs require each CCR unit located [email protected]. set forth in the final CCR rule; and in the State to achieve compliance with Jesse Miller, Environmental adding boron to the list of contaminants either the federal CCR rule or State Protection Agency, Office of Land and in Appendix IV of the final CCR rule criteria that EPA determines to be as Emergency Management, 1200 that trigger the corrective action protective as the existing federal CCR Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Mail Code requirements under the final rule. The requirements. 5303P, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: Agency is addressing these issues in two Summary of Legal Basis: As part of 703 308–1180, Email: miller.jesse@ final rules; this action is the second of the settlement agreement discussed epamail.epa.gov. the final rules. The first final rule, Phase above, EPA committed to make best Related RIN: Related to 2050–AG88 One Part One rule was published in July efforts to take final action on the RIN: 2050–AH01 2018. Within the Phase One Part One remaining claims by June 14, 2019. rule, the EPA finalized a small number Alternatives: According to the terms of provisions from the March 2018 of the settlement agreement discussed EPA—OFFICE OF WATER (OW) Phase One proposed rule. If finalized as above, the Agency must provide public proposed, the Phase One Part Two rule notice and opportunity for comment on Final Rule Stage would address specific technical issues these issues. Each of these settlement- 143. Definition of ‘‘Waters of the United consistent with a settlement agreement related amendments is fairly narrow in States’’—Recodification of Preexisting to resolve issues raised in litigation of scope and EPA has not identified any Rule the final CCR rule. Furthermore, in this significant alternatives for analysis. rule, the Agency is considering Regarding the WIIN Act implementation Priority: Other Significant. provisions that establish alternative amendments, one alternative would be E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. Legal Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. performance standards for owners and not to include these additional issues in operators of CCR units located in states CFR Citation: 40 CFR 110; 40 CFR the CCR remand proposal since they are 112; 40 CFR 116; 40 CFR 117; 40 CFR that have approved CCR permit not subject to a deadline. programs, as well as other potential 122; 40 CFR 230; 40 CFR 232; 40 CFR Anticipated Cost and Benefits: EPA 300; 40 CFR 302; 40 CFR 401. revisions based on comments received will provide estimates of costs and since the date of the final CCR rule and Legal Deadline: None. benefits resulting from this proposed Abstract: In 2015, the Environmental petitions for rulemaking that were rule once they are fully developed and granted on September 13, 2017. Protection Agency and the Department have received Agency clearance. of the Army (the agencies) published the Statement of Need: On April 17, 2015, Risks: As compared with the risks to EPA finalized national regulations to Clean Water Rule: Definition of ‘‘Waters human health and the environment that of the United States’’ (2015 Rule) 80 FR regulate the disposal of Coal were presented in the 2015 CCR final Combustion Residuals (CCR) as solid 37054, June 29, 2015). On October 9, rule, the proposed amendments 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the waste under subtitle D of the Resource discussed in this action are not expected Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Sixth Circuit stayed the 2015 Rule to impact the overall conclusions in the nationwide pending further action of (2015 CCR final rule). The rule was 2015 final rule. As a result, the Agency challenged by several different parties, the court. On February 28, 2017, the believes these amendments, if finalized President signed Executive Order 13778, including a coalition of regulated as proposed, would be protective of entities and a coalition of public interest Restoring the Rule of Law, Federalism, human health and the environment. and Economic Growth by reviewing the environmental organizations. Several of Timetable: the claims, a subset of the provisions ‘‘Waters of the United States’’ Rule, which instructed the agencies to review challenged by the industry and Action Date FR Cite environmental petitioners, were settled the 2015 rule and rescind or replace it on April 18, 2016. As part of that NPRM ...... 03/15/18 83 FR 11584 as appropriate and consistent with law. settlement, on April 18, 2016, EPA NPRM Comment 04/30/18 The agencies published a proposed rule requested the court to remand these Period End. to initiate the first step in a claims back to the Agency. On June 16, Final Rule ...... 06/00/19 comprehensive, two-step process 2016, the United States Court of consistent with the Executive order. In Appeals for the District of Columbia Regulatory Flexibility Analysis this first step, the agencies sought to Circuit granted EPA’s motion. One Required: No. recodify the definition of ‘‘Waters of the claim was the subject of a rulemaking Small Entities Affected: No. United States’’ that existed prior to the completed on August 5, 2016 (81 FR Government Levels Affected: Federal, 2015 Rule. This rule for the first step 51802). This proposed rule addresses Local, State. will now be finalized. the remaining claims that were Additional Information: Docket #: Statement of Need: This rulemaking remanded back to EPA. EPA–HQ–OLEM–2017–0286. Linked to action responds to the February 28, In addition, in December 2016, the 2050–AG88. 2017, Presidential Executive Order: Water Infrastructure Improvements for Sectors Affected: 221112 Fossil Fuel Restoring the Rule of Law, Federalism, the Nation (WIIN) Act established new Electric Power Generation. and Economic Growth by Reviewing the statutory provisions applicable to CCR URL For More Information: https:// ‘‘Waters of the United States’’ Rule. To units, including authorizing States to www.epa.gov/coalash. meet the objectives of the Executive implement the CCR rule through an URL For Public Comments: https:// order, the agencies are engaged in a EPA-approved permit program and www.regulations.gov/docket?D=EPA- comprehensive two-step rulemaking authorizing EPA to enforce the rule. In HQ-OLEM-2017-0286. process. Under the first step of this light of the legislation, EPA is proposing Agency Contact: Kirsten Hillyer, rulemaking process, the proposed rule amendments for certain performance Environmental Protection Agency, will recodify the regulatory text that was standards to provide flexibility to the Office of Land and Emergency in place prior to the 2015 Clean Water State programs, which would be Management, Mail Code 5304P, 1200 Rule and that is currently in place as a

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00149 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57952 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

result of the Agencies’ February 2018 URL For Public Comments: https:// (GINA). Under title VII of the Civil final rule to add an applicability date of www.regulations.gov/docket?D=EPA- Rights Act, EEOC’s authority to issue February 6, 2020 to the 2015 Rule. HQ-OW-2017-0203. legislative regulations is limited to Summary of Legal Basis: The rule is Agency Contact: Michael McDavit, procedural, record keeping, and proposed under the Clean Water Act, 33 Environmental Protection Agency, reporting matters. U.S.C. 1251 et seq. Office of Water, 1200 Pennsylvania Two items are identified in this Alternatives: In this first step, the Avenue, Mail Code 4504T, Washington, Regulatory Plan. On August 22, 2017, Agencies have proposed to repeal the DC 20460, Phone: 202 566–2428, Email: the U.S. District Court for the District of 2015 definition of ‘‘waters of the United [email protected]. Columbia ordered the EEOC to States’’ and codify the legal status quo Rose Kwok, Environmental Protection reconsider its regulations under the that is currently being administered in Agency, Office of Water, 1200 ADA and GINA related to incentives light of the February 2018 final rule to Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Mail Code and employer-sponsored wellness add an applicability date to the 2015 4504T, Washington, DC 20460, Phone: plans. See AARP v. EEOC, Civ. Action Rule. This rule will result in the 202 566–0657, Email: cwawotus@ No. 16–2113 (D.D.C. Aug. 22, 2017). In recodification of the regulations that epa.gov. accordance with the Court’s ruling, the RIN: 2040–AF74 existed prior to the 2015 Rule to provide EEOC will consider and take actions to regulatory certainty while the agencies BILLING CODE 6560–50–P cure defects in the rules. The EEOC’s engage in a second rulemaking to Fall 2018 Regulatory Agenda states that reconsider the definition of ‘‘waters of NPRMs are expected to be issued by June 2019. the United States.’’ As a result, the EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY Agencies did not propose any COMMISSION (EEOC) Executive Order 13771 Statement alternatives for this proposed rule. EEOC does not anticipate finalizing Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Statement of Regulatory and Deregulatory Priorities any regulatory or deregulatory actions agencies estimated the avoided costs subject to Executive Order 13771 in the The mission of the Equal Employment and forgone benefits of repealing the next 12 months. The two rules related Opportunity Commission (EEOC, 2015 Rule. Annual avoided costs range to wellness programs under the ADA Commission, or Agency) is to ensure from $162.2 to $313.9 million for the and GINA are significant under E.O. equality of opportunity in employment low-end scenario and $242.4 to $476.2 12866, but are not expected to be by vigorously enforcing and educating million for the high-end scenario (at finalized in the next 12 months. 2016 price levels). All of the forgone the public about the following Federal Consistent with section 4(c) of benefit categories were not fully statutes: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act Executive Order 12866, this statement quantified in the economic analysis for of 1964, as amended (prohibits was reviewed and approved by the the proposed rule. The annual forgone employment discrimination on the basis Chair of the Agency. The statement has benefits range from $33.6 million + of race, color, sex (including not been reviewed or approved by the unquantified forgone benefits to $44.5 pregnancy), religion, or national origin); other members of the Commission. million + unquantified forgone benefits the Equal Pay Act of 1963, as amended for the low-end scenario and $55.0 (makes it illegal to pay unequal wages million + unquantified forgone benefits to men and women performing to $72.8 million + unquantified forgone substantially equal work under similar EEOC benefits in the high-end scenario. The working conditions at the same Proposed Rule Stage economic analysis can be found in the establishment); the Age Discrimination docket for the proposed rulemaking. in Employment Act of 1967, as amended 144. Amendments to Regulations Under Risks: Because the proposed rule (prohibits employment discrimination the Americans With Disabilities Act maintains the status quo, there are no based on age of 40 or older); titles I and Priority: Other Significant. environmental or health risks associated V of the Americans with Disabilities E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. with this effort. Act, as amended, and sections 501 and Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 12101 et Timetable: 505 of the Rehabilitation Act, as seq. amended (prohibit employment CFR Citation: 29 CFR 1630. Action Date FR Cite discrimination based on disability); Legal Deadline: None. Title II of the Genetic Information Abstract: This rule amends the NPRM ...... 07/27/17 82 FR 34899 Nondiscrimination Act (prohibits regulations to implement the equal NPRM Comment 08/22/17 82 FR 39712 employment discrimination based on employment provisions of the Period Ex- genetic information and limits Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) tended. acquisition and disclosure of genetic to address the interaction between title Supplemental 07/12/18 83 FR 32227 I of the ADA and wellness programs. On NPRM. information); and section 304 of the Final Rule ...... 03/00/19 Government Employee Rights Act of August 22, 2017, the U.S. District Court 1991 (protects certain previously for the District of Columbia ordered the EEOC to reconsider its regulations Regulatory Flexibility Analysis exempt state and local government under the ADA related to incentives and Required: No. employees from employment discrimination on the basis of race, employer-sponsored wellness plans. See Small Entities Affected: No. color, religion, sex, national origin, age, AARP v. EEOC, Civ. Action No. 16–2113 Government Levels Affected: None. or disability). (D.D.C. Aug. 22, 2017). In accordance Additional Information: Docket #: The EEOC has authority to issue with the court’s ruling, the EEOC will EPA–HQ–OW–2017–0203. legislative regulations under the Age consider and take actions to cure defects URL For More Information: https:// Discrimination in Employment Act, title in the rule. The final rule was published www.epa.gov/wotus-rule/proposed-rule- I of the Americans with Disabilities Act on May 17, 2016, (81 FR 31125) and definition-waters-united-states- (ADA), and title II of the Genetic completed in the fall 2016 agenda as recodification-pre-existing-rules. Information Nondiscrimination Act RIN 3046–AB01.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00150 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57953

Statement of Need: The revision to 29 20507, Phone: 202 663–7031, Fax: 202 Risks: The rule imposes no new or CFR 1630.14(d) is needed in accordance 653–6034, Email: joyce.walker-jones@ additional risks to employers. The rule with the District Court’s ruling noted eeoc.gov. does not address risks to public safety above. Related RIN: Previously reported as or the environment. Summary of Legal Basis: The ADA 3046–AB01 Timetable: requires the EEOC to issue regulations RIN: 3046–AB10 implementing title I of the Act. The Action Date FR Cite EEOC initially issued regulations in NPRM ...... 06/00/19 1991 on the law’s requirements and EEOC prohibited practices with respect to employment and issued amended 145. Amendments to Regulations Under Regulatory Flexibility Analysis regulations in 2011 to conform to the Genetic Information Required: No. changes to the ADA made by the ADA Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Amendments Act of 2008. The EEOC Priority: Other Significant. Governmental Jurisdictions, again issued regulations in May 2016 to E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. Organizations. address the interaction between title I of Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2000ff Government Levels Affected: Federal, the ADA and wellness programs. The CFR Citation: 29 CFR 1635. Local, State. U.S. District Court for the District of Legal Deadline: None. Agency Contact: Christopher Columbia ordered the EEOC to Abstract: This rule amends the Kuczynski, Assistant Legal Counsel, reconsider these regulations in August regulations on the Genetic Information Office of Legal Counsel, Equal 2017. These new revisions are based on Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA) Employment Opportunity Commission, the court’s order, as well as the statutory to address wellness programs. On 131 M Street NE, Washington, DC requirement to issue regulations to August 22, 2017, the U.S. District Court 20507, Phone: 202 663–4665, TDD implement title I of the ADA. for the District of Columbia ordered the Phone: 202 663–7026, Fax: 202 653– Alternatives: The EEOC will consider EEOC to reconsider its regulations 6034, Email: christopher.kuczynski@ all alternatives offered by the public under GINA related to incentives and eeoc.gov. commenters. employer-sponsored wellness plans. See Kerry Leibig, Senior Attorney Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Based AARP v. EEOC, Civ. Action No. 16–2113 Advisor, Office of Legal Counsel, Equal on the information currently available, (D.D.C. Aug. 22, 2017). In accordance Employment Opportunity Commission, the Commission does not anticipate that with the court’s ruling, the EEOC will 131 M Street NE, Washington, DC the rule will impose additional costs on consider and take actions to cure defects 20507, Phone: 202 663–4516. Fax: 202 employers, beyond minimal costs to in the rule. The final rule was published 653–6034, Email: [email protected]. train human resource professionals. The on May 17, 2016, (81 FR 31143) and Related RIN: Related to 3046–AB02 regulation does not impose any new completed in the fall 2016 agenda as RIN: 3046–AB11 employer reporting or recordkeeping RIN 3046–AB02. BILLING CODE 6570–01–P obligations. We anticipate that the Statement of Need: The revision to 29 changes will benefit entities covered by CFR 1635.8 is needed in accordance title I of the ADA by clarifying with the District Court’s ruling noted GENERAL SERVICES employers’ obligations under the ADA. above. Summary of Legal Basis: GINA, ADMINISTRATION (GSA) Risks: The rule imposes no new or section 211, 42 U.S.C. 2000ff–10, additional risks to employers. The rule Regulatory Plan—October 2018 requires the EEOC to issue regulations does not address risks to public safety implementing title II of the Act. The GSA oversees the business of the or the environment. Federal Government. GSA’s acquisition Timetable: EEOC issued regulations on November 9, 2010. In May 2016, the EEOC issued solutions supply Federal purchasers with cost-effective, high-quality Action Date FR Cite an amendment to the regulations which dealt with the interaction between title products, and services from commercial NPRM ...... 06/00/19 II of GINA and wellness programs. The vendors. GSA provides workplaces for U.S. District Court for the District of Federal employees and oversees the Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Columbia ordered the EEOC to preservation of historic Federal Required: No. reconsider these regulations in August properties. GSA helps keep the nation Small Entities Affected: Businesses, 2017. These new revisions are based on safe and efficient by providing tools, Governmental Jurisdictions, the court order, as well as the statutory equipment, and non-tactical vehicles to Organizations. requirement. the U.S. military, and providing state Government Levels Affected: Federal, Alternatives: The EEOC will consider and local governments with law Local, State. all alternatives offered by public enforcement equipment, firefighting and Agency Contact: Christopher commenters. rescue equipment, and disaster recovery Kuczynski, Assistant Legal Counsel, Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Based products and services. Office of Legal Counsel, Equal on the information currently available, GSA serves the public by delivering Employment Opportunity Commission, the Commission does not anticipate that products and services directly to its 131 M Street NE, Washington, DC the rule will impose additional costs on Federal customers through the Federal 20507, Phone: 202 663–4665, TDD employers, beyond minimal costs to Acquisition Service (FAS), the Public Phone: 202 663–7026, Fax: 202 653– train human resource professionals. The Buildings Service (PBS), and the Office 6034, Email: christopher.kuczynski@ regulation does not impose any new of Government-wide Policy (OGP). GSA eeoc.gov. employer reporting or recordkeeping has a continuing commitment to its Joyce Walker-Jones, Senior Attorney obligations. We anticipate that the Federal customers and the U.S. Advisor, Office of Legal Counsel, Equal changes will benefit entities covered by taxpayers by providing those products Employment Opportunity Commission, title II of GINA by clarifying employers’ and services in the most cost-effective 131 M Street NE, Washington, DC obligations under GINA. manner possible.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00151 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57954 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) property, and committee management. level materials (OLMs), also known as FAS is the lead organization for The FMR is the successor regulation to other direct costs (ODCs). This rule, procurement of products and services the Federal Property Management which was implemented in June 2018, (other than real property) for the Federal Regulation (FPMR), and it contains will make it easier for customer agencies Government. The FAS organization updated regulatory policies originally to buy, and industry partners to provide, leverages the buying power of the found in the FPMR. However, it does complete procurement solutions Government by consolidating Federal not contain FPMR material that through the Federal Supply Schedules agencies’ requirements for common describes how to do business with GSA. while ensuring excellent value for The FMR is in 41 CFR, chapters 101 taxpayer dollars. goods and services. FAS provides a • range of high-quality and flexible through 102, and it implements GSA issued a final GSAR rule on acquisition services to increase overall statutory requirements and executive February 22, 2018 to address common Government effectiveness and efficiency branch policies. commercial supplier agreement (CSA) terms that are inconsistent with or by aligning resources around key Office of Acquisition Policy—General functions. create ambiguity with federal law. This Services Administration Acquisition rule, which was implemented in June Public Buildings Service (PBS) Manual (GSAM) and General Services 2018, mitigates risk for GSA’s federal Administration Acquisition Regulation agency customers, reduces proposal and PBS is the largest public real estate (GSAR) organization in the United States. As the administrative costs for industry landlord for the civilian Federal GSA’s internal rules and practices on partners, and helps expedite the Government, PBS acquires space on how it buys goods and services from its contract review process for GSA behalf of the Federal Government business partners are covered by the Contracting Officers. General Services Administration through new construction and leasing, Regulatory and Deregulatory Priorities and acts as a manager for Federal Acquisition Manual (GSAM), which properties across the country. PBS is implements and supplement the Federal Permitting Council Priorities responsible for over 370 million Acquisition Regulation at GSA. The Fees for Governance, Oversight and rentable square feet of workspace for GSAM comprises both a non-regulatory Processing of Environmental Reviews Federal employees, owns 1,600 plus portion (GSAM), which reflects policies and Authorizations; The Permitting assets totaling over 180 million rentable with no external impact, and a Council proposes to establish a fee square feet, and contracts for more than regulatory portion, the General Services structure to reimburse the Permitting 7,000 plus leased assets totaling over Administration Acquisition Regulation Council and its Office of the Executive 180 million rentable square feet. (GSAR). The GSAR establishes agency Director for reasonable costs to acquisition regulations that affect GSA’s Office of Government-Wide Policy implement certain requirements and business partners (e.g., prospective authorities required under FAST–41. (OGP) offerors and contractors) and acquisition OGP sets Government-wide policy in of leasehold interests in real property. Federal Management Regulation (FMR) the areas of personal and real property, The latter are established under the Priorities mail, travel, relocation, transportation, authority of 40 U.S.C. 585, et seq. The GSA is amending the FMR by information technology, regulatory GSAR implements contract clauses, removing language that is not information, and the use of Federal solicitation provisions, and standard regulatory, revising rules of Federal advisory committees. OGP also helps forms that control the relationship personal property, management of direct how all Federal supplies and between GSA and contractors and transportation and the management, services are acquired as well as GSA’s prospective contractors. construction, and disposal of Federal own acquisition programs. Regulatory and Deregulatory Activities real property. The appropriate real OGP’s policy regulations are property regulations are being aligned described in the following subsections: GSA’s Regulatory Reform Task Force, with the various provisions in the established under Executive Order Federal Sales and Transfer Act of 2016 Office of Asset and Transportation 13777, enforcing the Regulatory Reform and the Federal Property Management Management—Federal Travel Agenda, and is making it easier to do Reform Act of 2016. In addition, e.g. the Regulation business with GSA by eliminating Transportation Management regulation The Federal Travel Regulation (FTR) outdated, ineffective, or unnecessary is being streamlined by consolidating enumerates travel and relocation policy regulations and policies. When GSA policies into fewer subparts and for all U.S. Code, Title 5 Executive established its Regulatory Reform Task modifying provisions to incorporate agency employees at Force it set up four informal working newer authorities. www.gpoaccess.gov/cfr. Federal groups, led by career employees, and Register publications and complete gave them broad authority to review and Federal Property Management versions of the FTR are available at evaluate existing regulations and make Regulation (FPMR) Priorities www.gsa.gov/ftr. The Federal Travel recommendations regarding their repeal, GSA is amending the FPMR by Regulation presents policies in a clear replacement, or modification. Those migrating regulations regarding the manner to both agencies employees to working groups are organized around supply and procurement of Government assure that official travel is performed the agency’s primary functions and personal property management and responsibly. regulations: The Federal Management Interagency Fleet Management Systems Regulation, the Federal Travel from the FPMR to the FMR. Office of Asset and Transportation Regulation, the GSA Acquisition Management—Federal Management Federal Travel Regulation (FTR) Regulation, and policies relating to Regulation Priorities leasing of buildings. The Federal Management Regulation During Fiscal Year 2018, GSA GSA is amending the FTR. The (FMR) establishes policy for Federal completed two (2) deregulatory actions. Relocation Regulation was impacted by aircraft management, mail management, • GSA issued a final GSAR rule on the recent Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The transportation, personal property, real January 24, 2018 to incorporate order amendment addresses both the moving

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00152 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57955

expenses income tax deduction and GSA Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c) qualified moving expense CFR Citation: 48 CFR 501; 48 CFR Proposed Rule Stage reimbursement. Also, in addition, the 502; 48 CFR 511; 48 CFR 539; 48 CFR FTR is being amended to revise the 146. General Services Administration 552. payment in kind fee associated with Acquisition Regulation (GSAR); GSAR Legal Deadline: None. registration fees provided by non- Case 2015–G506, Adoption of Abstract: The General Services Federal sources for speakers and Construction Project Delivery Method Administration (GSA) is proposing to panelists at meetings. Involving Early Industry Engagement amend the General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation General Services Administration Priority: Other Significant. (GSAR) to streamline and update Acquisition Regulation (GSAR) E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory. requirements for contracts that involve Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c) Priorities GSA information systems. GSA’s unique CFR Citation: 48 CFR 536; 48 CFR policies on cybersecurity and other GSA is amending the GSAR to 552. information technology requirements implement streamlined and innovative Legal Deadline: None. have been previously communicated acquisition procedures. GSAR Abstract: The General Services through other means. By incorporating initiatives are focused on: Administration (GSA) is proposing to these requirements into the GSAR, the • amend the General Services Adopting a major construction GSAR will provide centralized guidance project delivery method involving early Administration Acquisition Regulation (GSAR) to adopt an additional project to ensure consistent application across industry engagement; the organization. Integrating these • delivery method for construction, Establishing contractual construction manager as constructor requirements into the GSAR will also allow industry to provide public arrangements and ordering procedures (CMc). The current FAR and GSAR comments through the rulemaking for commercial eCommerce portals; lacks detailed coverage differentiating • Streamlining contract requirements process. various construction project delivery GSA’s cybersecurity requirements for GSA information systems; methods. GSA’s policies on CMc have • mandate contractors protect the Establishing cyber incident been previously issued through other confidentiality, integrity, and reporting procedures; and means. By incorporating CMc into the availability of unclassified GSA • Revising the requirements for GSAR and differentiating for various information and information systems Schedules contract and construction construction methods, the GSAR will from cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and contract administration. provide centralized guidance to ensure threats in accordance with the Federal consistent application of construction Information Security Modernization Act Regulations of Concern to Small project principles across the Businesses of 2014 and associated Federal organization. Integrating these cybersecurity requirements. This rule GSAR Case 2017–G502, Transition to requirements into the GSAR will also will require contracting officers to Small Business Administration Mentor- allow industry to provide public incorporate applicable GSA Prote´ge´ Program, is of interest to small comments through the rulemaking cybersecurity requirements within the businesses as it will discontinue the process. statement of work to ensure compliance GSA agency-level mentor-prote´ge´ Timetable: with Federal cybersecurity requirements program. The mentor-prote´ge´ program and implement best practices for Action Date FR Cite will instead be centralized and managed preventing cyber incidents. These GSA Government-wide by SBA, as discussed NPRM ...... 11/00/18 requirements mandate applicable in the SBA rule at 81 FR 48557. NPRM Comment 01/00/19 controls and standards (e.g., U.S. Period End. National Institute of Standards and Regulations Which Promote Open Technology, U.S. National Archive and Government and Disclosure Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Records Administration Controlled GSPMR Case 2016–105–01, Public Required: Yes. Unclassified Information standards). Availability of Agency Records and Small Entities Affected: Businesses. Contract requirements for internal Informational Materials; Proposed Rule. Government Levels Affected: Federal. information systems, external contractor The GSA is issuing a proposed rule to URL For More Information: systems, cloud systems, and mobile amend its regulations implementing the www.regulations.gov. systems will be covered by this rule. Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The URL For Public Comments: This rule will also update existing regulations are being revised to update www.regulations.gov. GSAR provision 552.239–70, Agency Contact: Tony Hubbard, and streamline language of several Information Technology Security Plan Procurement Analyst, General Services procedural provisions and to and Security Authorization and GSAR Administration, 1800 F Street NW, incorporate certain changes brought clause 552.239–71, Security Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 202 357– about by the amendments to the FOIA Requirements for Unclassified 5810, Email: [email protected]. under both statutory and nonstatutory Information Technology Resources to RIN: 3090–AJ64 authorities. This rule also amends the only require the provision and clause GSA’s regulations under the FOIA to when the contract will involve incorporate certain changes made to the information or information systems FOIA by the FOIA Improvement Act of GSA connected to a GSA network. Timetable: 2016. 147. General Services Acquisition Dated: July 27, 2018. Regulation (GSAR); GSAR Case 2016– Action Date FR Cite Jessica Salmoiraghi, G511, Contract Requirements for GSA Associate Administrator, Office of Information Systems NPRM ...... 02/00/19 Government-wide Policy. NPRM Comment 04/00/19 Priority: Other Significant. Period End. BILLING CODE 6820–14 E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00153 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57956 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis compromised. It establishes an explicit Director for reasonable costs incurred in Required: Yes. timeframe for reporting cyber incidents, coordinating environmental reviews and Small Entities Affected: Businesses. details the required elements of a cyber authorizations in implementing title 41 Government Levels Affected: Federal. incident report, and provides the of the Fixing America’s Surface URL For More Information: required Government’s points of contact Transportation Act. GSA will issue this www.regulations.gov. for submitting the cyber incident report. regulation on behalf of the Federal URL For Public Comments: The rule also outlines additional Permitting Improvement Steering www.regulations.gov. contractor requirements that may apply Council. Agency Contact: Michelle Bohm, for any cyber incidents involving Timetable: Contract Specialist, General Services personally identifiable information. In Administration, 100 S Independence addition, the rule clarifies both GSA’s Action Date FR Cite Mall W Room: 9th Floor, Philadelphia, and ordering agencies’ authority to PA 19106–2320, Phone: 215 446–4705, access contractor systems in the event of NPRM ...... 09/04/18 83 FR 44846 NPRM Comment 11/05/18 Email: [email protected]. a cyber incident. It also establishes the Period End. RIN: 3090–AJ84 role of GSA in the cyber incident reporting process and explains how the Regulatory Flexibility Analysis primary response agency for a cyber Required: Yes. GSA incident is determined. Further, it Small Entities Affected: Businesses. establishes the requirement for Government Levels Affected: Federal. 148. General Services Administration contractors to preserve images of URL For More Information: Acquisition Regulation (GSAR); GSAR affected systems and ensure contractor www.regulations.gov. Case 2016–G515, Cyber Incident employees receive appropriate training URL For Public Comments: Reporting for reporting cyber incidents. The rule www.regulations.gov. Priority: Other Significant. also outlines how contractor Agency Contact: Amber Dawn E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. attributional/proprietary information Levofsky, Program Analyst, General Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c) provided as part of the cyber incident Services Administration, 1800 F Street CFR Citation: 48 CFR 501; 48 CFR reporting process will be protected and NW, Room 3017, Washington, DC 502; 48 CFR 504; 48 CFR 539; 48 CFR used. 20405–0001, Phone: 202 969–7298, 552. Timetable: Email: [email protected]. Legal Deadline: None. RIN: 3090–AJ88 Abstract: The General Services Action Date FR Cite Administration (GSA) is proposing to NPRM ...... 04/00/19 amend the General Services NPRM Comment 06/00/19 GSA Administration Acquisition Regulation Period End. (GSAR) to provide requirements for Final Rule Stage GSA contractors to report cyber Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 150. GSAR Case 2008–G517, incidents that could potentially affect Required: Yes. GSA or its customer agencies. The rule Small Entities Affected: Businesses. Cooperative Purchasing—Acquisition of integrates the existing cyber incident Government Levels Affected: Federal. Security and Law Enforcement Related reporting policy within GSA Order CIO URL For More Information: Goods and Services (Schedule 84) by 9297.2C, GSA Information Breach www.regulations.gov. State and Local Governments Through Notification Policy that did not URL For Public Comments: Federal Supply Schedules previously go through the rulemaking www.regulations.gov. Priority: Other Significant. process into the GSAR. By incorporating Agency Contact: Kevin Funk, Program E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. cyber incident reporting requirements Analyst, General Services Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 40 into the GSAR, the GSAR will provide Administration, 1800 F Street NW, U.S.C. 502(c)(1)(B) centralized guidance to ensure Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 202 357– CFR Citation: 48 CFR 511; 48 CFR consistent application of cybersecurity 5805, Email: [email protected]. 516; 48 CFR 532; 48 CFR 538; 48 CFR principles across the organization. RIN: 3090–AJ85 546; 48 CFR 552. Integrating these requirements into the Legal Deadline: None. GSAR will also allow industry to Abstract: The General Services provide public comments through the GSA Administration (GSA) is amending the rulemaking process. General Services Administration The rule outlines the roles and 149. Federal Permitting Improvement Acquisition Regulation (GSAR) to responsibilities of the GSA contracting Steering Council (FPISC); FPISC Case implement Public Law 110–248, The officer, contractors, and agencies 2018–001; Fees for Governance, Local Preparedness Acquisition Act. ordering off of GSA’s contracts in the Oversight, and Processing of The Act authorizes the Administrator of reporting of a cyber incident. Environmental Reviews and General Services to provide for the use The rule establishes a contractor’s Authorizations by State or local governments of Federal responsibility to report any cyber Priority: Other Significant. Supply Schedules of the General incident where the confidentiality, E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. Services Administration (GSA) for alarm integrity, or availability of GSA Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4370m–8 and signal systems, facility management information or information systems are CFR Citation: 40 CFR 1900. systems, firefighting and rescue potentially compromised or where the Legal Deadline: None. equipment, law enforcement and confidentiality, integrity, or availability Abstract: GSA proposes to establish a security equipment, marine craft and of information or information systems fee structure to reimburse the Federal related equipment, special purpose owned or managed by or on behalf of Permitting Improvement Steering clothing, and related services (as the U.S. Government is potentially Council and its Office of the Executive contained in Federal supply

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00154 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57957

classification code group 84 or any Administration, 1800 F Street NW, NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND amended or subsequent version of that Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 202 357– SPACE ADMINISTRATION (NASA) Federal supply classification group). 9652, Email: [email protected]. Statement of Regulatory Priorities Timetable: RIN: 3090–AJ41 The National Aeronautics and Space Action Date FR Cite Administration’s (NASA) aim is to increase human understanding of the Interim Final Rule 09/19/08 73 FR 54334 GSA solar system and the universe that Interim Final Rule 11/18/08 contains it and to improve American • Comment Pe- 152. General Services Administration aeronautics ability. NASA’s basic riod End. Acquisition Regulation (GSAR); GSAR Final Rule ...... 02/00/19 organization consists of the Case 2019–G501, Ordering Procedures Headquarters, nine field Centers, the Jet for Commercial E-Commerce Portals Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Propulsion Laboratory (a federally funded research and development Required: Yes. Priority: Other Significant. Small Entities Affected: Businesses. center), and several component Government Levels Affected: Federal, E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. installations which report to Center Local, State. Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c) Directors. Responsibility for overall URL For More Information: planning, coordination, and control of CFR Citation: 48 CFR 572. www.regulations.gov. NASA programs is vested in NASA URL For Public Comments: Legal Deadline: None. Headquarters, located in Washington, www.regulations.gov. Abstract: The General Services DC. Agency Contact: Christina Mullins, Administration (GSA) is amending the NASA continues to implement Procurement Analyst, General Services General Services Administration programs according to its 2018 Strategic Administration, 1800 F Street NW, Acquisition Regulation (GSAR) to Plan. The Agency’s mission is to ‘‘Lead Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 202 969– establish competition procedures when an innovative and sustainable program 4066, Email: [email protected]. using commercial e-commerce portals of exploration with commercial and RIN: 3090–AI68 established pursuant to section 846 of international partners to enable human the National Defense Authorization Act expansion across the solar system and bring new knowledge and opportunities for Fiscal Year 2018. Current back to Earth. Support growth of the GSA competition procedures do not align Nation’s economy in space and with, nor reflect, technological 151. General Services Administration aeronautics, increase understanding of Acquisition Regulation (GSAR); GSAR innovation when purchasing from the universe and our place in it, work Case 2013–G502, Federal Supply commercial e-commerce portals. This with industry to improve America’s Schedule Contract Administration rule aims to modernize the buying aerospace technologies, and advance experience in partnership with Priority: Other Significant. American leadership.’’ The FY 2018 E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. commercial e-commerce portal Strategic Plan (available at https:// Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c) providers, enabling GSA to combine www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/ CFR Citation: 48 CFR 501; 48 CFR competition with speed, and will allow files/nasa_2018_strategic_plan.pdf) 515; 48 CFR 538; 48 CFR 552. the procedures to evolve as technology guides NASA’s program activities Legal Deadline: None. advances. through a framework of the following Abstract: The General Services Timetable: four strategic goals: Administration (GSA) is amending the • Strategic Goal 1: Expand human General Services Administration Action Date FR Cite knowledge through new scientific Acquisition Regulation (GSAR) to discoveries. clarify and update the contracting by Interim Final Rule 03/00/19 • Strategic Goal 2: Extend human negotiation GSAR section and Interim Final Rule 05/00/19 presence deeper into space and to the incorporate existing Federal Supply Comment. Moon for sustainable long-term Schedule Contracting policies and Period End ...... exploration and utilization. procedures, and corresponding • Strategic Goal 3: Address national provisions and clauses. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis challenges and catalyze economic Timetable: Required: Yes. growth. • Strategic Goal 4: Optimize Action Date FR Cite Small Entities Affected: Businesses. capabilities and operations. Government Levels Affected: Federal. In the decades since Congress enacted NPRM ...... 09/10/14 79 FR 54126 NPRM Comment 11/10/14 URL For More Information: the National Aeronautics and Space Act Period End. www.regulations.gov. of 1958, NASA has challenged its Final Rule ...... 02/00/19 scientific and engineering capabilities in URL For Public Comments: pursuing its mission, generating www.regulations.gov. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis tremendous results and benefits for Required: Yes. Agency Contact: Matthew McFarland, humankind. NASA will continue to Small Entities Affected: Businesses. Legislative and Regulatory Advisor, push scientific and technical boundaries Government Levels Affected: Federal. General Services Administration, 1800 F in pursuit of these goals. URL For More Information: Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, www.regulations.gov. NASA’s Regulatory Philosophy and Phone: 301 758–5880, Email: Principles URL For Public Comments: [email protected]. www.regulations.gov. The Agency’s rulemaking program Agency Contact: Dana L. Munson, RIN: 3090–AK03 strives to be responsive, efficient, and Procurement Analyst, General Services BILLING CODE 6820–34–P transparent. As noted in Executive

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00155 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57958 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

Order 13609, ‘‘Promoting International recommendations of the FAR Task Action Date FR Cite Regulatory Cooperation’’ (May 1, 2012), Force and internal Agency discussions, international regulatory cooperation, NASA has identified priority regulatory Proposed Rule .... 12/00/18 consistent with domestic law and and deregulatory actions that reduce prerogatives and U.S. trade policy, can costs to the public by eliminating Regulatory Flexibility Analysis be an important means of promoting unnecessary, ineffective, and Required: No. public health, welfare, safety, and our duplicative regulations. Small Entities Affected: No. environment as well as economic Government Levels Affected: None. The Agency has focused its regulatory Agency Contact: Geoffrey Sage, Office growth, innovation, competitiveness, resources on the most serious and job creation. of Procurement, National Aeronautics acquisition, health, and personnel and and Space Administration, 300 E Street NASA, along with the Departments of readiness risks as discussed below. State and Commerce and Defense, SW, Washington, DC 20546, Phone: 202 NASA will revise the NASA FAR engage with other countries in the 358–2420, Email: geoffrey.s.sage@ Supplement (NFS) to implement section Wassenaar Arrangement, Nuclear nasa.gov. 823 of NASA Transition Authorization Suppliers Group, Australia Group, and RIN: 2700–AE38 of 2017 (Pub. L. 115–10) to improve the Missile Technology Control Regime BILLING CODE 7510–13–P detection and avoidance of counterfeit through which the international electronic parts in the supply chain. community develops a common list of This revision will add a contract clause items that should be subject to export to the NFS to require each covered NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS controls. NASA has also been a key ADMINISTRATION (NARA) participant in the Administration’s contractor, including a subcontractor, to Export Control Reform effort that detect and avoid the inclusion of any Statement of Regulatory Priorities counterfeit parts in electronic parts or resulted in a complete overhaul of the Overview U.S. Munitions List and fundamental products that contain electronic parts, changes to the Commerce Control List. take corrective actions necessary to The National Archives and Records New controls have facilitated transfers remedy, and notify the applicable Administration (NARA) primarily issues of goods and technologies to allies and NASA contracting officer not later than regulations directed to other Federal partners while helping prevent transfers 30 calendar days after the date the agencies. These regulations include to countries of national security and covered contractor becomes aware, or records management, information proliferation concerns. has reason to suspect, that any end item, services, and information security. For Executive Order 13777, ‘‘Enforcing component, part, or material contained example, records management the Regulatory Reform Agenda’’ in supplies purchased by NASA, or regulations directed to Federal agencies (February 24, 2017), required NASA to purchased by a covered contractor or concern the proper management and appoint a Regulatory Reform Officer to subcontractor for delivery to, or on disposition of Federal records. Through oversee the implementation of behalf of, NASA contains a counterfeit the Information Security Oversight regulatory reform initiatives and electronic part or suspect counterfeit Office (ISOO), NARA also issues policies and establish a Regulatory electronic part. Governmentwide regulations Reform Task Force (Task Force) to concerning information security review and evaluate existing regulations classification, controlled unclassified and make recommendations to the NASA information (CUI), and declassification Agency head regarding their repeal, programs; through the Office of replacement, or modification, consistent Proposed Rule Stage Government Information Services, NARA issues Governmentwide with applicable law. NASA is doing this 153. Detection and Avoidance of regulations concerning Freedom of work primarily through its work as a Counterfeit Parts signatory to the Federal Acquisition Information Act (FOIA) dispute Regulatory Council. Priority: Other Significant. resolution services and FOIA The FAR at 48 CFR chapter 1 contains E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. ombudsman functions; and through the procurement regulations that apply to Legal Authority: Sec. 823 of the NASA Office of the Federal Register, NARA NASA and other Federal agencies. Transition Authorization Act of 2017 issues regulations concerning Pursuant to 41 U.S.C. 1302 and FAR (Pub. L. 115–10; 51 U.S.C. 20113) publishing Federal documents in the Federal Register, Code of Federal 1.103(b), the FAR is jointly prepared, CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined. issued, and maintained by the Secretary Regulations, and other publications. of Defense, the Administrator of General Legal Deadline: None. NARA regulations directed to the Services, and the Administrator of Abstract: NASA is proposing to public primarily address access to and NASA, under their several statutory amend the NFS Supplement to use of our historically valuable authorities. implement section 823 of NASA holdings, including archives, donated These reform initiatives and policies Transition Authorization of 2017 (Pub. historical materials, and Presidential include Executive Order 13771, L. 115–10) to improve the detection and records. NARA also issues regulations ‘‘Reducing Regulation and Controlling avoidance of counterfeit electronic parts relating to the National Historical Regulatory Costs’’ (January 30, 2017), in the supply chain. This proposed rule Publications and Records Commission section 6 of Executive Order 13563, will add a contract clause to the NFS to (NHPRC) grant programs. ‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory require each covered contractor, NARA has two regulatory priorities Review’’ (January 18, 2011), and including a subcontractor, to detect and for fiscal year 2018, which are included Executive Order 12866. avoid the inclusion of any counterfeit in The Regulatory Plan. The first In addition, NASA implements and parts in electronic parts or products that priority is to update our electronic supplements FAR requirements through contain electronic parts and to take records management regulation to the NASA FAR Supplement (NFS), 48 corrective actions necessary to remedy account for changes to 44 U.S.C. 3302 CFR chapter 18. As a result of the or inclusion. which require NARA to issue standards ongoing review, evaluation, and Timetable: for digital reproductions of records with

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00156 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57959

an eye toward allowing agencies to then sure that the Federal workforce uses fair aligns with the Administration’s goal of dispose of the original source records. practices in all aspects of personnel promoting affordable health plan Agencies have begun major digitization management. choices. projects and will be doing more in the • We manage pension benefits for The agenda includes one rule that future. Under the statutory provisions in retired Federal employees and their promotes open government and uses 44. U.S.C. 3302, agencies may not families. We also administer health and disclosure as a regulatory tool. dispose of original source records due to other insurance programs for Federal • Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) having digitized them (prior to the employees and retirees. Regulations—This proposed rule seeks disposal authority date established in a • We provide training and to remove obsolete sections of OPM’s records schedule) unless they have development programs and other FOIA regulations and incorporate all digitized the records according to management tools for Federal FOIA amendments, inclusive of the standards established by NARA. NARA employees and agencies. FOIA Improvement Act of 2016. • is initiating two rulemaking actions to In many cases, we take the lead in OPM also has a number of regulatory establish the necessary digitization developing, testing and implementing items that focus on Administration standards: One rule for temporary new Governmentwide policies that priorities and Executive Orders. These records (records of short-term, relate to personnel issues. include: temporary value that are not appropriate Altogether, we work to make the • Administrative Law Judges—The for preservation in the National Federal Government America’s model U.S. Office of Personnel Management Archives of the United States), and employer for the 21st century. (OPM) is issuing interim regulations another rule for permanent records OPM’s Regulatory Philosophy and governing the appointment and (permanently valuable and appropriate Principles employment of Administrative Law for preservation in the National Judges (ALJ). This rule will implement Executive Order 13777, ‘‘Enforcing Archives of the United States). changes to the appointment and the Regulatory Reform Agenda’’ The second priority this fiscal year is employment of ALJs as required by (February 24, 2017), required OPM to a new regulation for the Office of Executive Order 13843. appoint a Regulatory Reform Officer to Government Information Services • Direct-Hire Authority for Agency oversee the implementation of (OGIS). The Open Government Act of Chief Information Officers—This regulatory reform initiatives and 2007 (Pub. L. 110–175, 121 Stat. 2524) proposed rule revises OPM direct-hire policies and establish a Regulatory amended the Freedom of Information authority (DHA) regulations for the Reform Task Force (Task Force) to Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552, as amended), implementation of Executive Order review and evaluate existing regulations and created OGIS within the National (E.O.) 13833 titled, ‘‘Enhancing the and make recommendations to the Archives and Records Administration Effectiveness of Agency Chief agency head regarding their repeal, (NARA). OGIS is finalizing regulations, Information Officers,’’ which requires replacement, or modification, consistent pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 2104, to clarify, OPM to issue proposed regulations with applicable law. elaborate upon, and specify the necessary to grant DHA for information procedures in place for Federal agencies These reform initiatives and policies include Executive Order 13771, technology (IT) positions under certain and public requesters who seek OGIS’s conditions. dispute resolution services within the ‘‘Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs’’ (January 30, 2017), A fully searchable e-Agenda is FOIA system. The regulation will available for viewing in its entirety at describe one of the areas in which OGIS section 6 of Executive Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory www.reginfo.gov. Agenda information is carries out its role as the Federal FOIA also available at www.regulations.gov, Ombudsman by working with Federal Review’’ (January 18, 2011), and Executive Order 12866. the government-wide website for agencies to provide an alternative to submission of comments on proposed litigation in resolving FOIA disputes. In relation to Executive Order 13771, many of OPM’s agenda items are either regulations. Our fall 2018 agenda BILLING CODE 7515–01–P exempt under section 4(b) of the order, follows. or deregulatory. OPM published the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: following deregulatory item in fiscal Alexys Stanley, (202) 606–1183 or U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL year 2018. [email protected]. MANAGEMENT (OPM) • Federal Employees Health Benefits Program Flexibilities—This final rule Statement of Regulatory and added additional flexibility to the Deregulatory Priorities Federal Employees Health Benefits OPM Fall 2018 Unified Agenda (FEHB) Program so that all carriers will Proposed Rule Stage OPM works in several broad be able to offer three plan options, one of which may be a High Deductible plan 154. Freedom of Information Act categories to recruit, retain and honor a (FOIA) Regulations world-class workforce for the American option. Employee Organization and people. Comprehensive Medical plans already Priority: Other Significant. • We manage Federal job have this flexibility. In the past not all E.O. 13771 Designation: Fully or announcement postings at carriers could offer more than two Partially Exempt. USAJOBS.gov, and set policy on options. This change will level the Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552 governmentwide hiring procedures. playing field in terms of options offered CFR Citation: 5 CFR 294. • We conduct background to Federal employees, annuitants, and Legal Deadline: None. investigations for prospective their eligible family members. This Abstract: The Office of Personnel employees and security clearances action was necessary to promote a Management (OPM) proposes to amend across government, with hundreds of competitive environment where carriers its Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) thousands of cases each year. have an incentive to offer higher quality regulations. The Freedom of Information • We uphold and defend the merit benefits at affordable prices and broader Act was enacted in 1966. This revision systems in Federal civil service, making provider networks. This regulation fully is required to incorporate all of the

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00157 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57960 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

subsequent FOIA amendments, OPM regulatory agencies defined in 44 U.S.C. inclusive of the FOIA Improvement Act 155. • Direct-Hire Authority for Agency 3502(5). of 2016. Chief Information Officers Alternatives: N/A. Statement of Need: The Office of Anticipated Cost and Benefits: None. Personnel Management (OPM) proposes Priority: Other Significant. Risks: None. to amend the OPM FOIA regulations. E.O. 13771 Designation: Fully or Timetable: The Freedom of Information Act was Partially Exempt. enacted in 1966. This revision is Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 3304(a)(3) Action Date FR Cite required to incorporate all of the CFR Citation: 5 CFR part 337. subsequent FOIA amendments, Legal Deadline: None. NPRM ...... 12/00/18 inclusive of the FOIA Improvement Act. Abstract: The U.S. Office of Personnel Summary of Legal Basis: In Management (OPM) is issuing a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552, OPM and proposed regulation to revise its direct- Required: No. every federal agency shall make hire authority (DHA) regulations for the Small Entities Affected: No. available to the public, information as implementation of Executive Order Government Levels Affected: Federal. follows: (E.O.) 13833 titled, Enhancing the Agency Contact: Darlene Phelps, (1) Each agency shall separately state Effectiveness of Agency Chief Employee Services, Office of Personnel and currently publish in the Federal Information Officers, which requires Management, 1900 E Street NW, Register for the guidance of the public: OPM to issue proposed regulations Washington, DC 20415, Phone: 202 606– (A) Descriptions of its central and necessary to grant DHA for information 0203, Fax: 202 606–4430, Email: field organization and the established technology (IT) positions under certain [email protected]. places at which, the employees (and in conditions. This will enhance the RIN: 3206–AN65 the case of a uniformed service, the Government’s ability to recruit needed members) from whom, and the methods IT professionals and it allows Agencies whereby, the public may obtain to make the initial determination OPM information, make submittals or whether they have a severe-shortage of requests, or obtain decisions; candidates or critical hiring need. Final Rule Stage (B) statements of the general course Statement of Need: The U.S. Office of 156. • Administrative Law Judges and method by which its functions are Personnel is revising the Direct-Hire Priority: Other Significant. channeled and determined, including Authority (DHA) regulation in Part 337 the nature and requirements of all to implement the provisions of E.O. 13771 Designation: Fully or formal and informal procedures Executive Order 13833. The proposed Partially Exempt. available; regulation will allow certain agencies to Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 3301; 5 (C) rules of procedure, descriptions of determine whether a severe shortage of U.S.C. 3302; E.O. 13843 forms available or the places at which candidates (or, with respect to the CFR Citation: 5 CFR 212; 5 CFR 213; forms may be obtained, and instructions Department of Veterans Affairs, that 5 CFR 300; 5 CFR 302; 5 CFR 930. as to the scope and contents of all there exists a severe shortage of highly Legal Deadline: None. papers, reports, or examinations; qualified candidates) or a critical hiring Abstract: The U.S. Office of Personnel (D) substantive rules of general need exists for IT positions for purposes Management (OPM) is issuing interim applicability adopted as authorized by of establishing DHA. regulations governing the appointment law, and statements of general policy or Summary of Legal Basis: On May 15, and employment of Administrative Law interpretations of general applicability 2018, the President signed E.O. 13833, Judges (ALJ). This rule will implement formulated and adopted by the agency; titled, Enhancing the Effectiveness of changes to the appointment and and Agency Chief Information Officers (83 employment of ALJs as required by Executive Order 13843. (E) each amendment, revision, or FR 23345). The E.O. is aimed at repeal of the foregoing. modernizing the Federal Government’s Statement of Need: The purpose of the interim rule is to implement changes Alternatives: N/A. information technology infrastructure to the appointment and employment Anticipated Cost and Benefits: None. and improving the delivery of digital services and the management, ALJs, which places new appointments Risks: None. to ALJ positions in the excepted service Timetable: acquisition, and oversight of Federal IT. Section 9 of the E.O. directs OPM to and keeps incumbent ALJs hired on or before July 10, 2018 in the competitive Action Date FR Cite propose regulations pursuant to which OPM may delegate to the heads of service. The interim rule will revise NPRM ...... 07/24/08 73 FR 43153 certain agencies (other than the OPM regulations on the appointment NPRM Comment 09/22/08 Secretary of Defense) authority to and employment of ALJs accordingly. Period End. determine, under regulations prescribed Summary of Legal Basis: Executive Second NPRM .... 03/00/19 by OPM, whether a severe shortage of Order 13843, signed on July 10, 2018, candidates (or, for the U.S. Department directs ALJ positions appointed under 5 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis of Veterans Affairs (VA) a severe U.S.C. 3105 be in the excepted service Required: No. shortage of highly qualified candidates) under Schedule E. Individuals Small Entities Affected: No. or a critical hiring need exists for appointed to ALJ positions prior to July Government Levels Affected: Federal. positions in the Information Technology 10, 2018, remain in the competitive Agency Contact: Tiffany Ford, FOIA Management (IT) Series, general service as long as they remain in their Officer, Office of Personnel schedule (GS)-2210 or equivalent, for current positions. Management, 1900 E Street NW, purposes of an entitlement to a direct Alternatives: N/A. Washington, DC 20415, Phone: 202 606– hire authority (DHA). The agencies Anticipated Cost and Benefits: None. 9175, Email: [email protected]. covered by the E.O. are those listed in Risks: None. RIN: 3206–AK53 31 U.S.C. 901(b), or independent Timetable:

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00158 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57961

Action Date FR Cite and $65 billion in its multiemployer clarity and reduce burden with the goal insurance program. PBGC’s projections that net cost impact on the public is Interim Final Rule 11/00/18 show that the financial position of the zero or less overall. single-employer program is likely to Rethinking Existing Regulations Regulatory Flexibility Analysis continue to improve, but the Required: No. multiemployer program is in dire Most of PBGC’s regulatory/ Small Entities Affected: No. financial condition and likely to run out deregulatory actions are the result of its Government Levels Affected: Federal. of funds by the end of fiscal year 2025. ongoing retrospective review program to Agency Contact: Katika Floyd, If that happens, PBGC will not have the identify and ameliorate inconsistencies, Employee Services, Office of Personnel money to pay benefits at the current inaccuracies, and requirements made Management, 1900 E Street NW, guarantee levels to participants in irrelevant over time. PBGC undertook a Washington, DC 20415, Phone: 202 606– insolvent plans. review of its multiemployer plan 9531, Fax: 202 606–2329, Email: To carry out its statutory functions, regulations and has identified rules in [email protected]. PBGC issues regulations on such matters which it can reduce burden and clarify RIN: 3206–AN72 as how to pay premiums, when reports guidance. For example, PBGC has BILLING CODE 6325–44–P are due, what benefits are covered by proposed reductions in actuarial the insurance program, how to valuation requirements for certain small terminate a plan, the liability for terminated multiemployer pension underfunding, and how withdrawal plans, notice requirements on plan PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY liability works for multiemployer plans. sponsors of plans terminated by mass CORPORATION (PBGC) PBGC follows a regulatory approach that withdrawal, and reporting and Statement of Regulatory and seeks to encourage the continuation and disclosure requirements on sponsors of Deregulatory Priorities maintenance of defined benefit plans. insolvent plans (‘‘Terminated and The Pension Benefit Guaranty So, in developing new regulations and Insolvent Multiemployer Plans and Corporation (PBGC) is a federal reviewing existing regulations, PBGC Duties of Plan Sponsors’’ RIN 1212– corporation created under title IV of the seeks to reduce burdens on plans, AB38). Another proposal would Employee Retirement Income Security employers, and participants, and to ease simplify how multiemployer plans Act (ERISA) to guarantee the payment of and simplify employer compliance calculate withdrawal liability where pension benefits earned by nearly 40 wherever possible. PBGC particularly changes in contributions or benefits are, million workers and retirees in private- strives to meet the needs of small by statute, to be disregarded in that sector defined benefit plans. PBGC is businesses that sponsor defined benefit calculation (‘‘Methods for Computing currently responsible for the benefits of plans. In all such efforts, PBGC’s Withdrawal Liability’’ RIN 1212–AB36). about 1.5 million people in failed plans. mission is to protect the retirement PBGC plans to propose a PBGC receives no tax revenues. incomes of plan participants. ‘‘housekeeping’’ rulemaking project to Operations are financed by insurance Regulatory/Deregulatory Objectives and make miscellaneous technical premiums, investment income, assets Priorities corrections, clarifications, and from pension plans trusteed by PBGC, improvements to PBGC’s regulations, PBGC’s regulatory/deregulatory and recoveries from the companies such as the reportable events regulation objectives and priorities are developed formerly responsible for the trusteed (particularly addressing duplicative in the context of the Corporation’s plans. PBGC administers two insurance active participant reduction event statutory purposes: programs—one for single-employer • reporting) and the regulation on annual To encourage the continuation and financial and actuarial information defined benefit pension plans and a maintenance of voluntary private second for multiemployer defined reporting (‘‘Miscellaneous Corrections, pension plans; Clarifications, and Improvements’’ RIN benefit pension plans. • To provide for the timely and • 1212–AB34). PBGC expects to undertake Single-Employer Program. Under uninterrupted payment of pension periodic rulemaking projects like this the single-employer program, when a benefits; and that deal with minor technical and plan terminates with insufficient assets • To keep premiums at the lowest clarifying issues. The ‘‘Benefit to cover all plan benefits (distress and possible levels. involuntary terminations), PBGC pays Pension plans and the statutory Payments’’ proposal (RIN 1212–AB27) plan benefits that are guaranteed under framework in which they are would make clarifications and codify title IV. PBGC also pays nonguaranteed maintained and terminated are complex. policies in PBGC’s benefit payments and plan benefits to the extent funded by Despite this complexity, PBGC is valuation regulations involving payment plan assets or recoveries from committed to issuing simple, of lump sums, entitlement to a benefit, employers. understandable, flexible, and timely changes to benefit form, partial benefit • Multiemployer Program. The regulations to help affected parties. distributions, and valuation of plan multiemployer program covers PBGC’s regulatory/deregulatory assets. PBGC’s regulatory review also collectively bargained plans involving objectives and priorities for the fiscal identified a need to update the rules for more than one unrelated employer. year are: administrative review of agency PBGC provides financial assistance (in • To enhance the retirement security decisions (RIN 1212–AB35). the form of a loan) to the plan if the plan of workers and retirees; A couple of proposed rulemakings is insolvent and thus unable to pay • To implement statutory changes would update PBGC’s regulations and benefits at the guaranteed level. The through regulatory actions that ease policies to ensure that the actuarial and guarantee is structured differently from, compliance burdens and achieve economic content remains current. The and is generally significantly lower maximum net benefits; and modifications PBGC is considering at than, the single-employer guarantee. • To simplify existing regulations and this time are to interest and mortality At the end of fiscal year (FY) 2017, reduce burden. assumptions under the asset allocation PBGC had a deficit of $10.9 billion in PBGC endeavors in all its regulatory regulation (RIN 1212–AA55), and the its single-employer insurance program and deregulatory actions to promote methodology for setting interest

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00159 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57962 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

assumptions under the benefit payments lenders that participate in SBA’s (August 15, 2017). The Agency regulation (RIN 1212–AB41). programs and also licenses small continues to evaluate the comments business investment companies that received and will amend its regulations Small Businesses make equity and debt investments in as appropriate. In addition, SBA’s Office PBGC takes into account the special qualifying small businesses using a of Advocacy is hosting a series of small needs and concerns of small businesses combination of privately raised capital business roundtables in order to hear in making policy. For example, the and SBA guaranteed leverage. SBA also firsthand from small businesses facing ‘‘Terminated and Insolvent funds various training and mentoring regulatory burdens on steps SBA and Multiemployer Plans and Duties of Plan programs to help small businesses, other agencies can take to reduce or Sponsors’’ proposal discussed above particularly businesses owned by eliminate those burdens. For more would reduce valuation and reporting women, veterans, minorities, and other information on these roundtables, burdens primarily on small historically underrepresented groups, please visit https://www.sba.gov/ multiemployer plans, which generally gain access to Federal government advocacy/regulatory-reform. are comprised of small employers. contracting opportunities. The Agency Openness and Transparency Open Government and Increased Public also provides management and Participation technical assistance to existing or SBA promotes transparency, potential small business owners through collaboration, and public participation PBGC encourages public participation various grants, cooperative agreements, in its rulemaking process. To that end, in the regulatory process. For example, or contracts. Finally, as a vital part of its SBA routinely solicits comments on its PBGC created a new page on its website purpose, SBA also provides direct regulations, even those that are not that highlights when there are financial assistance to homeowners, subject to the public notice and opportunities to comment on proposed renters, and businesses to repair or comment requirement under the rules, information collections, and other replace their property in the aftermath Administrative Procedures Act. Where Federal Register notices. PBGC’s of a disaster. appropriate, SBA also conducts current efforts to reduce regulatory Reducing Burden on Small Businesses hearings, webinars, and other public burden in the projects discussed above events as part of its regulatory process. are in substantial part a response to SBA’s regulatory policy reflects a public comments. Last year PBGC asked commitment to developing regulations Regulatory Framework for feedback on its regulatory planning that reduce or eliminate the burden on The SBA Strategic Plan serves as the and review of existing regulations by the public, in particular the Agency’s foundation for the regulations that the way of a Request for Information (RFI). core constituents—small businesses. Agency will develop during the next A number of individuals and SBA’s regulatory process generally twelve months. This Strategic Plan organizations responded, and PBGC includes an assessment of the costs and provides a framework for strengthening, considered the comments, some of benefits of the regulations as required by streamlining, and simplifying SBA’s which are reflected in this Fall agenda. Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory programs while leveraging collaborative PBGC encourages comments on an on- Planning and Review;’’ Executive Order relationships with other agencies and going basis as we continue to look for 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation and the private sector to maximize the tools ways to further improve PBGC’s Regulatory Review;’’ and the Regulatory small business owners and regulations. Flexibility Act. SBA’s program offices entrepreneurs need to drive American BILLING CODE 7709–02–P are particularly invested in finding ways innovation and strengthen the economy. to reduce the burden imposed by the The plan sets out four strategic goals: (1) Agency’s core activities in its loan, Support small business revenue and job grant, innovation, and procurement growth; (2) build healthy U.S. SMALL BUSINESS programs. ADMINISTRATION (SBA) entrepreneurial ecosystems and create On January 30, 2017, President Trump business friendly environments; (3) Statement of Regulatory Priorities issued E.O. 13771, ‘‘Reducing restore small businesses and Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Overview communities after disasters; and (4) Costs,’’ 82 FR 9339, which established strengthen SBA’s ability to serve small The mission of the U.S. Small principles for prioritizing an agency’s businesses. In order to achieve these Business Administration (SBA) is to regulatory and deregulatory actions. goals SBA will, among other objectives, maintain and strengthen the Nation’s E.O. 13771 was followed by E.O. 13777, focus on: economy by enabling the establishment ‘‘Enforcing the Regulatory Agenda,’’ 82 • Expanding access to capital through and viability of small businesses and by FR 12285 (February 24, 2017), which SBA’s extensive lending network; assisting in the physical and economic identified processes for agencies to • Helping small business exporters recovery of communities after disasters. follow in overseeing their regulatory succeed in global markets; In carrying out this mission, SBA strives programs. This Agenda was prepared in • Ensuring federal contracting and to improve the economic environment accordance with both E.O. 13771 and innovation goals are met or exceeded; for small businesses, including those in E.O. 13777, and SBA will continue to • Empowering veterans and military rural areas, in areas that have work with the Office of Management families who want to start or grow their significantly higher unemployment and and Budget to fully integrate the business; lower income levels than the Nation’s Executive Orders and to implement • Delivering entrepreneurial averages, and those in traditionally OMB guidance into SBA’s rulemaking counseling and training services in underserved markets. SBA has several processes. As part of that effort, SBA collaboration with resource partners; financial, procurement, and technical issued a Request for Information in the and assistance programs that provide a Federal Register requesting public input • Enhancing program oversight and crucial foundation for those starting or on which SBA regulations should be risk management, and improving growing a small business. For example, repealed, replaced, or modified because recovery of taxpayer assets. the Agency serves as a guarantor of they are obsolete, unnecessary, The regulations reported in SBA’s loans made to small businesses by ineffective, or burdensome. 82 FR 38617 semi-annual regulatory agenda and plan

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00160 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57963

are intended to facilitate achievement of credit risks, and enforcing applicable SBA-maintained electronic document these strategic goals and objectives and program regulations and procedures. repository. SBA regulations currently further the objectives of E.O. 13771. The recently enacted Small Business require contracting officers to check the Over the next twelve months, SBA’s 7(a) Lending Oversight Reform Act of repository for documents submitted by highest priorities will be to implement 2018 increases SBA’s authority to every WOSB or EDWOSB contract the following three regulations. supervise lenders and enforce prudent awardee. The rule will propose the lending standards. This rule will establishment of an SBA certification (1) E.O. 13771 Designation— propose the regulatory amendments process, removal of both the self- Deregulatory Action: Small Business necessary to implement the new certification option and the requirement HUBZone Program; Government authorities. The amendments will for contracting officers to review the Contracting Programs (RIN: 3245–AG38) clarify or add conditions for informal repository documents. Shifting As part of its efforts to fulfill the and formal enforcement actions, responsibilities to SBA and streamlining objectives of E.O. 13771, SBA has including supervisory letters, voluntary the review process will enable completed a comprehensive review of letters, suspensions or revocations of contracting officers to focus more on the regulations for the Historically lending authority. The rule will also awarding awards, which should lead to Underutilized Business Zone propose to implement the statutory an increased number of set-aside or sole (HUBZone) Program. As a result of that provision that authorizes lenders to source contracts for WOSBs and review, this rule proposes amendments appeal enforcement actions to SBA’s EDWOSBs. This outcome would help that would eliminate ambiguities in the Office of Hearings and Appeals. SBA to achieve its strategic objectives to regulations and reduce the regulatory SBA recognizes the importance of ensure Federal agencies meet or exceed burdens imposed on HUBZone small maintaining a comprehensive lender their small business contracting goals. business concerns and government oversight and risk management system. While it is important to implement agencies. The amendments would make As evidence of its commitment to a rules that do not unnecessarily burden it easier for small business concerns to robust credit risk management system, small businesses, SBA also has a understand and comply with the SBA has identified lender oversight and responsibility to ensure that its program’s requirements and make the risk management as one of the Agency’s programs are serving only those HUBZone program a more attractive strategic objectives in its FY 2018–2022 businesses that meet program eligibility option for procuring federal agencies. Strategic Plan. After SBA has requirements. To that end, this rule will For example, the rule proposes to implemented the statutorily required also propose standards for increased eliminate the burden on HUBZone small amendments, the revised regulations oversight in order to ensure continuing businesses to continually demonstrate will enhance SBA’s oversight eligibly of certified program that they meet all eligibility capabilities, reduce risk, and ensure the participants. requirements at the time of each integrity of the small business loan HUBZone contract offer and award. The programs. rule would instead require only annual recertification. This reduced burden on (3) E.O. 13771 Designation—Other SBA Action: Women-Owned Small Business certified HUBZone small businesses Proposed Rule Stage would allow a firm to remain eligible for and Economically Disadvantaged future HUBZone contracts for an entire Women-Owned Small Business— 157. Small Business Hubzone Program year, without requiring it to demonstrate Certification (RIN: 3245–AG75) and Government Contracting Programs that it continues to meet all HUBZone SBA is proposing to amend its Priority: Other Significant. requirements. The rule also proposes to regulations to implement amendments E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. eliminate the requirement for the to the Women-Owned Small Business Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 657a concern to relocate in order to attempt (WOSB) and Economically CFR Citation: 13 CFR 115; 13 CFR to maintain its HUBZone status when Disadvantaged Women-Owned Small 121; 13 CFR 125; 13 CFR 126. the area where the business is located or Business (EDWOSB) Federal Contract Legal Deadline: None. a qualifying employee resides loses its Program that were authorized by section Abstract: SBA has been reviewing its HUBZone status. 825 of the National Defense processes and procedures for In addition to carrying out the Authorization Act of 2015. Based on implementing the HUBZone program Administration’s regulatory policy, this authority, SBA is proposing to and has determined that several of the removal of these and similar regulatory create a certification program for its regulations governing the program requirements would make it easier for WOSB and EDWOSB contracting should be amended in order to resolve firms to meet the eligibility program that, once implemented, will certain issues that have arisen. As a requirements for HUBZone contracts, streamline the review process and result, the proposed rule would and help SBA to achieve its strategic provide an option for small businesses constitute a comprehensive revision of objective to simplify access to federal that reduces their certification costs. part 126 of SBA’s regulations to clarify contracting for small businesses. The proposed changes would further current HUBZone Program regulations, SBA’s strategic objectives to simplify and implement various new procedures. (2) E.O. 13771 Designation—Regulatory the process and increase contracting The amendments will make it easier for Action: Implementation of the Small opportunities for small businesses. The participants to comply with the program Business 7(a) Lending Oversight Reform proposed reduction in certification costs requirements and enable them to Act of 2018 (RIN: 3245–AH05) would also further the regulatory reform maximize the benefits afforded by In order to protect the safety and objectives of E.O. 13771. participation. In developing this soundness of its business loan The current WOSB and EDWOSB proposed rule, SBA will focus on the programs, SBA’s Office of Credit Risk contracting program permits firms to principles of Executive Orders 12866, Management (OCRM) is responsible for self-certify for the program or to be 13771, and 13563 to determine whether monitoring performance of the various certified by a third party certifier (TPC). portions of regulations should be types of lenders that participate in these The program also currently requires modified, streamlined, expanded or loan programs, managing the programs’ firms to submit documentation to an repealed to make the HUBZone program

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00161 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57964 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

more effective and/or less burdensome who resides in a HUBZone at the time protests, and appeals. The proposed on small business concerns. At the same of a HUBZone concern’s certification or revisions will reflect public comments time, SBA will maintain a framework recertification to continue to count as a that SBA received in response to the that helps identify and reduce waste, HUBZone employee as long as the Advanced Notice of Proposed fraud, and abuse in the program. individual remains an employee of the Rulemaking that the agency issued in Statement of Need: The purpose of firm will greatly reduce burden on December 2016 to solicit feedback on the proposed rule is to increase firms, as they will not have to implementation of the program. Finally, economic investment and employment continuously track whether their SBA is planning to continue to utilize in Historically Underutilized Business employees still reside in a HUBZone or new technology to improve its Zones (HUBZones). seek to employ new individuals if the efficiency and decrease small business Summary of Legal Basis: The rule location in which one or more current burdens, and therefore, the new makes a number of changes necessary to employees reside loses its HUBZone certification procedures will be based clarify the HUBZone program’s status. We estimate that this should on an electronic application and regulations and to make the program reduce the hourly burden by 2,500 certification process. easier to use for small business hours annually. Statement of Need: The proposed rule contractors and procuring agencies. Risks: There is very little risk will implement the statutory Alternatives: The alternative to the associated with this proposed rule. requirement to certify Women Owned proposed regulations would be the Timetable: Small Business Concerns (WOSBs) for status quo, where businesses cannot purposes of receiving set aside and sole request reconsideration when their Action Date FR Cite source contracts under the WOSB application is denied, must be eligible at program. the time of offer and time of award, and Public Meeting .... 04/23/18 83 FR 17626 Summary of Legal Basis: These must recertify every 3 years. SBA has Public Meeting .... 05/30/18 83 FR 24684 NPRM ...... 10/00/18 proposed regulations implement section modeled the revised processes based on 825 of the National Defense its other contracting programs (e.g., 8(a) Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015, request for reconsideration and annual Public Law 113–291, 128 Stat. 3292 review) and believes that these Required: Yes. Small Entities Affected: Businesses. (December 19, 2014) (2015 NDAA). processes have worked well for these Alternatives: The proposed programs and should therefore be Government Levels Affected: None. Agency Contact: Mariana Pardo, regulations are required to implement utilized for the HUBZone program. specific statutory provisions which Anticipated Cost and Benefits: Director, Office of HUBZone, Small require promulgation of implementing Overall, this proposed rule would Business Administration, 409 Third regulations. reduce annual burden on HUBZone Street SW, Washington, DC 20416, Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The small business concerns. The proposed Phone: 202 205–2985, Fax: 202 481– implementation of a formal request for 2675, Email: [email protected]. benefit of the proposed regulation is a reconsideration process would provide RIN: 3245–AG38 significant improvement in the consistency in the processes for SBA’s confidence of contracting officers to programs and would be beneficial to make federal contract awards to eligible firms. Under the existing system, the HUBZone applicants because it would SBA allow them to correct deficiencies and burden of eligibility compliance was come into compliance without waiting 158. Women-Owned Small Business placed upon the awarding contracting 90 days to reapply for the program. This and Economically Disadvantaged officer. Under this new proposed rule, should enable additional firms to be Women-Owned Small Business— the burden is placed upon SBA. This more quickly certified for the HUBZone Certification will encourage more contracting officers program, allowing them to seek and be Priority: Other Significant. to set-aside opportunities for WOSB awarded HUBZone contracts sooner. E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. Program participants as the validation SBA estimates that the proposed Legal Authority: Pub. L. 113–291, sec. process will be controlled by SBA in reconsideration process would increase 825; 15 U.S.C. 637(m) both the System for Award Management the annual hourly burden on small CFR Citation: 13 CFR 127. and the Dynamic Small Business business concerns applying to the Legal Deadline: None. Search. HUBZone program by approximately 15 Abstract: Section 825 of the National Risks: There is always a slight risk hours. The proposed requirement for Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal that an agency will award a set aside HUBZone small business concerns to Year 2015 (NDAA), Public Law 113– contract to a firm that is ineligible. recertify annually to SBA that they 291, 128 Stat. 3292, Dec. 19, 2014, Certification of firms prior to award will continue to meet all of the HUBZone included language requiring that lessen this risk. eligibility requirements, instead of women-owned small business concerns Timetable: requiring them to undergo a and economically disadvantaged recertification every three years, would Women-Owned Small Business Action Date FR Cite increase the annual hourly burden by concerns are certified by a Federal ANPRM ...... 12/18/15 80 FR 78984 approximately 3,800 hours. The agency, a State government, the ANPRM Comment 02/16/16 proposed change removing the Administrator, or national certifying Period End. requirement for HUBZone small entity approved by the Administrator as NPRM ...... 10/00/18 business concerns to represent or certify a small business concern owned and that they are eligible at the time of offer controlled by women. This rule will Regulatory Flexibility Analysis and award for every HUBZone contract propose the standards and procedures Required: Yes. would reduce burden on HUBZone for participation in this certification Small Entities Affected: Businesses. small business concerns by program. This rule will also propose to Government Levels Affected: None. approximately 4,200 hours. The revise the procedures for continuing Agency Contact: Kenneth Dodds, proposed change to allow an employee eligibility, program examinations, Director, Office of Policy, Planning and

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00162 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57965

Liaison, Small Business Administration, specifically required SBA to promulgate statutory authorities granted to the 409 Third Street SW, Washington, DC regulations implementing the legislation Secretary of Defense, Administrator of 20416, Phone: 202 619–1766, Fax: 202 within one year of enactment. This rule General Services, and the 481–2950, Email: kenneth.dodds@ will increase SBA’s lender oversight Administrator, National Aeronautics sba.gov. capabilities, mitigate risk, and ensure and Space Administration, known as RIN: 3245–AG75 the integrity of SBA’s small business the FAR Council. Overall statutory loan programs. authority is found at chapters 11 and 13 Summary of Legal Basis: 15 U.S.C. of title 41 of the United States Code. 657t(f) requires SBA to issue SBA regulations, after opportunity for notice Regulatory and Deregulatory Activities 159. • Implementation of the Small and comment, no later than one year Executive Order 13777, ‘‘Enforcing Business 7(A) Lending Oversight after enactment. SBA is also authorized the Regulatory Reform Agenda’’ Reform Act of 2018 to supervise and oversee SBA Lenders (February 24, 2017), required the FAR Priority: Other Significant. under 15 U.S.C. 633(b)(3); 15 U.S.C. 634 Council to oversee the implementation E.O. 13771 Designation: Other. note; 15 U.S.C. 634(b)(6), (7) and (14); of regulatory reform initiatives and Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 657t and 15 U.S.C. 650. policies. The reform initiatives and CFR Citation: 13 CFR 120; 13 CFR Alternatives: The Act requires SBA to policies include Executive Order 13771, 134. issue regulations within one year after ‘‘Reducing Regulation and Controlling Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, June enactment. During the notice and Regulatory Costs’’ (January 30, 2017), 21, 2019. comment process, SBA will consider section 6 of Executive Order 13563, Not later than 1 year after the date of various alternatives as it implements the ‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory the enactment of this section, the statutory requirements while Review’’ (January 18, 2011), and Administrator shall issue regulations, strengthening SBA lender oversight, Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory after opportunity for notice and ensuring the integrity of the SBA loan Planning and Review’’ (September 30, comment. programs, and protecting taxpayer 1993). In response to Executive Order Abstract: The Small Business 7(a) dollars. 13777, the FAR Council reviewed and Lending Oversight Reform Act of 2018 Anticipated Cost and Benefits: SBA is evaluated existing policies and was enacted on June 21, 2018. The not yet certain of the anticipated costs regulations and identified regulations purpose of the legislation is to and benefits. SBA will be assessing the that could be repealed, replaced, or strengthen the Office of Credit Risk costs and benefits as it develops the rule modified to reduce the regulatory Management within the Small Business during the notice and comment process. burden. In relation to Executive Order Risks: Implementation of the Act Administration. The statute requires the 13771, the FAR Council conducts through this rulemaking will encourage SBA Administrator to promulgate new analysis of the regulatory cost or savings SBA Lenders to correct deficiencies, regulations not later than one year after impact for agenda items. return SBA loan portfolios to safe and enactment of the statute. This rule will During Fiscal Year 2018, the FAR sound condition, and limit risk in the propose to implement this statute and Council completed two (2) deregulatory SBA loan programs. Codification of add clarity to informal and formal actions. SBA’s new authority to impose Civil enforcement actions and appeal • The FAR Council issued a final rule Monetary Penalties up to $250,000 will provisions. Examples of informal (case 2015–039) on May 1, 2018 to provide a significant financial enforcement actions may include increase the dollar threshold for the disincentive to imprudent and risky supervisory letters and voluntary audit of prime contract settlement lending. actions/agreements. Examples of formal proposals and subcontract settlements Timetable: enforcement actions include suspension submitted in the event of contract or revocation of delegated authority, Action Date FR Cite termination, from $100,000 to $750,000. suspension or revocation of 7(a) lending The increased threshold reduces the authority, and assessment of civil NPRM ...... 12/00/18 number of terminated contracts that monetary penalties. The statute also require settlement audits, and enables provides lenders with the ability to Regulatory Flexibility Analysis contracting officers to more quickly appeal enforcement actions to the Office Required: Undetermined. deobligate the excess funds from of Hearings and Appeals. The rule will Government Levels Affected: None. terminated contracts under the propose conditions for accessing this Agency Contact: Susan Streich, threshold. Contractors will save costs appeal process. Director of Credit Risk Management, associated with the preparation for Statement of Need: This action is Small Business Administration, 409 3rd termination settlement audits and will necessary to implement the Small Street SW, Washington, DC 20416, have improved cash flow from faster Business 7(a) Lending Oversight Reform Phone: 202 205–6641, Email: final settlement under the threshold. Act of 2018 (Pub. L. 115–189) (the Act), [email protected]. • The FAR Council issued a final rule which was enacted on June 21, 2018. In RIN: 3245–AH05 (case 2017–007) on May 1, 2018 to raise the legislation, Congress strengthened BILLING CODE 8025–01–P the threshold for task- and delivery- the SBA’s Office of Credit Risk order protests for DoD, NASA, and the Management (OCRM). This rule will Coast Guard from $10 million to $25 provide additional regulatory guidance million, except for a protest on the for informal and formal enforcement FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION grounds that the order increases the actions against SBA Lenders, including (FAR) scope, period, or maximum value of the the new statutory authority to impose The Federal Acquisition Regulation contract. The increased threshold will Civil Monetary Penalties up to (FAR) was established to codify uniform result in savings for the agencies $250,000. The rule will also conform the policies for acquisition of supplies and involved in processing the protests and enforcement action appeals process to services by executive agencies. It is will benefit contractors who win awards the statutory requirements. Congress has issued and maintained jointly under the and will no longer need to expend

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00163 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57966 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

resources defending challenges to those commercial practices, reducing procurement of products or services awards. compliance costs from requirements from any persons involved in activities The Fiscal Year 2019 Unified Agenda unique to the Government. that violate arms control treaties or consists of forty-eight (48) agenda items FAR Case 2018–014, Increasing Task- agreements with the United States. The of which the following seven (7) have order Level Competition, will provide prohibition reduces potential threats to been identified as deregulatory. an exception to the requirement to the security of the United States and our • FAR Case 2016–011, Revision of consider price as an evaluation factor, allies. Limitations on Subcontracting for the award of services to be acquired on an hourly rate basis under certain Rulemakings of Interest to Small • FAR Case 2017–009, Special Business Emergency Procurement Authority indefinite-delivery indefinite-quantity FAR Case 2016–011, Revision of • FAR Case 2017–010, Evaluation contracts and Federal Supply Schedule Limitations on Subcontracting, will Factors for Multiple-Award Contracts contracts. Meaningful evaluation of cost implement SBA’s regulatory • FAR Case 2018–004, Increased Micro- and price takes place later, when task or clarifications concerning the Purchase and Simplified Acquisition delivery order proposals are evaluated. nonmanufacturer rule, and how much a Thresholds The exception will allow procurement small business may subcontract to a • FAR Case 2018–013, Exemption of officials to focus on establishing and large business. These were inconsistent Commercial and COTS Item Contracts evaluating non-price factors at the across small business programs, such as from Certain Laws and Regulations earlier contract award level, resulting in whether a HUBZone small business • FAR Case 2018–015, Governmentwide more meaningful distinctions among could subcontract to other HUBZone and Other Interagency Contracts offerors. small businesses. This rule revises and • FAR Case 2018–019, Review of Rulemakings That Promote Disclosure standardizes these requirements from Commercial Contract Clause and Open Government multiple FAR clauses to two. Requirements and Flowdown FAR Case 2017–004, Use of FAR Case 2018–003, Credit for Lower- Regulatory and Deregulatory Priorities Acquisition 360 to Encourage Vendor Tier Small Business Subcontracting will Feedback, will address soliciting allow large businesses to receive small The FAR Council is required to contractor feedback on how well business subcontracting credit for amend the Federal Acquisition agencies are doing in awarding and subcontracts that their subcontractors Regulation to implement statutory and administering contracts. This will award to small businesses. policy initiatives. The FAR Council improve the efficiency and effectiveness prioritization is focused on initiatives Dated: July 27, 2018. of agency acquisition activities. that: William F. Clark, FAR Case 2016–005, Effective • Director, Office of Government-wide Streamline regulations and reduce Communication between Government burden, especially for commercial and Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition and Industry, encourages agency Policy, Office of Government-wide Policy. commercially available off-the-shelf acquisition personnel to talk to (COTS) items; industry. BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P • Promote disclosure and open government Rulemakings That Support National • Security Support national security efforts, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION especially safeguarding Federal FAR Case 2018–017, Prohibition on (SSA) Government information technology Certain Telecommunications and Video systems; and Surveillance Services or Equipment, I. Statement of Regulatory Priorities • Improve small business opportunities will prohibit the procurement of We administer the Retirement, with the Federal Government. covered equipment and services from Survivors, and Disability Insurance programs under title II of the Social Rulemakings That Streamline Huawei Technologies Company, ZTE Security Act (Act), the Supplemental Regulations and Reduce Burdens Corporation, Hytera Communications Corporation, Hangzhou Technology Security Income (SSI) program under FAR Case 2018–004, Increased Micro- Company or Dahua Technology title XVI of the Act, and the Special Purchase and Simplified Acquisition Company and any subsidiaries or Veterans Benefits program under title Thresholds, will increase the micro- affiliates. The prohibition is VIII of the Act. As directed by Congress, purchase threshold (MPT) to $10,000; implemented to protect Government we also assist in administering portions increase the simplified acquisition information systems from threats. of the Medicare program under title threshold (SAT) to $250,000; and make FAR Case 2018–010, Use of Product XVIII of the Act. Our regulations codify additional changes related to the and Services of Kaspersky Lab, prohibits the requirements for eligibility and thresholds. The increase in thresholds any department, agency, organization or entitlement to benefits and our will allow the use of more streamlined other element of the Federal procedures for administering these procedures which reduces the time and Government from using hardware, programs. Generally, our regulations do effort needed to make an award. Some software or services developed by not impose burdens on the private contractors will benefit from reduced Kaspersky Lab or any entity in which sector or on State or local governments, contract compliance requirements. Kaspersky Lab has a majority except for the States’ Disability FAR Case 2018–013, Exemption of ownership. The prohibition is Determination Services. We fully fund Commercial and COTS Item Contracts implemented to protect Government the Disability Determination Services in from Certain Laws and Regulations, will information systems from threats. advance or via reimbursement for implement revisions to the FAR to FAR Case 2017–018, Violation of necessary costs in making disability exempt commercial and COTS items Arms Control Treaties or Agreements determinations. from laws identified by the FAR Council with the United States, prohibits, with The entries in our regulatory plan or Administrator for Federal some exceptions, the heads of executive (plan) represent issues of major Procurement Policy. This reduction will agencies from entering into, renewing or importance to the Agency. Through our allow contractors to use existing extending a contract for the regulatory plan, we intend to:

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00164 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57967

A. Update the medical criteria used to • Add a new category to the existing SSA evaluate disability applications to keep medical diary categories that we use to Proposed Rule Stage pace with medicine, science, schedule continuing disability reviews technology, and workforce changes; and revise the criteria we follow to 160. Revised Medical Criteria for B. Reduce the hearings backlog and place a case in each of the categories Evaluating Digestive Disorders, improve the disability appeals process; (0960–AI27); Cardiovascular Disorders, and Skin Disorders C. Update SSA disability evaluation • Clarify our rules regarding the criteria and the frequency of continuing redetermination of entitlement when Priority: Other Significant. disability reviews; fraud or similar fault is involved (RIN E.O. 13771 Designation: Fully or D. Combat Social Security fraud, 0960–AI10); Partially Exempt. impose civil monetary penalties for Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 402; 42 • specific violations of the Social Security Impose that SSA can assess the U.S.C. 405(a); 42 U.S.C. 405(b); 42 Act, and clarify that electronic and maximum allowable civil monetary U.S.C. 405(d) to 405(h); 42 U.S.C. 416(i); internet communications are included penalty for certain violations of the 42 U.S.C. 421(a); 42 U.S.C. 421(i); 42 in the prohibitions against misusing Social Security Act (RIN 0960–AH91); U.S.C. 423; 42 U.S.C. 902(a)(5); 42 SSA’s names, symbols, and emblems; • Clarify that electronic and internet U.S.C. 1381a; 42 U.S.C. 1382c; 42 U.S.C. and communications are included in the 1383; 42 U.S.C. 1383b E. Update our Freedom of Information prohibitions against misusing SSA’s CFR Citation: 20 CFR 404.1500, app 1. Legal Deadline: None. Act and Privacy and Disclosure rules. names, symbols, and emblems (0960– Abstract: Sections 4.00 and 104.00, Regulatory Reform AI04); Cardiovascular System; sections 5.00 We designate all of the proposed • Update our Freedom of Information and 105.00, Digestive System; and regulations in this plan as ‘‘fully or Act policies to reflect recent legislation sections 8.00 and 108.00, Skin partially exempt’’ under Executive (RIN 0960–AI07); Disorders, of appendix 1 to subpart P of Order (E.O.) 13771. In compliance with • Allow SSA to create a new Privacy part 404 of our regulations describe the Administration’s Regulatory Reform Act exemption category, enabling the those disorders that we consider severe efforts, as prescribed by E.O. 13771 and retention of important records related to enough to prevent a person from doing E.O. 13777, SSA is committed to security and suitability (RIN 0960– any gainful activity, or that cause marked and severe functional engaging in regulatory activity only AH97); and limitations for a child claiming when strictly necessary and to reducing • regulatory burden wherever possible. Clarify that written consent Supplemental Security Income Accordingly, our Unified Agenda and includes electronic consent, in payments under title XVI. We are Regulatory Plan include only those compliance with recent legislation (RIN proposing to revise the criteria in these regulatory activities needed to 0960–AI38). sections to ensure that the medical evaluation criteria are up to date and administer our Social Security benefits III. Regulations in the Final Rule Stage and payments programs. Moreover, the consistent with the latest advances in Agenda includes an item to remove Our regulation in the final rule stage medical knowledge and treatment. outdated regulatory sections from the will: Statement of Need: These proposed revisions are necessary to evaluate Code of Federal Regulations. Finally, we • Comprehensively update the remain committed to innovate in ways claims for Social Security disability medical listings for evaluating that ease burden on the public even benefits. musculoskeletal disorders (RIN 0960– outside the realm of formal Summary of Legal Basis: Sections 4.00 deregulation, such as through AG38); and and 104.00, Cardiovascular Systems; developing online reporting and • Allow SSA to create a new Privacy sections 5.00 and 105.00, Digestive application tools. Act exemption category, enabling the Systems; and sections 8.00 and 108.00, retention of important records Skin Disorders, of appendix 1 to subpart II. Regulations in the Proposed Rule containing investigatory material P of part 404 of our regulations. Stage compiled for law enforcement purposes This proposed rule is not required by Our regulations will: (RIN 0960–AI08). statute or court order. • Selectively update the medical Alternatives: We considered listings for evaluating digestive, Retrospective Review of Existing continuing to use our current criteria. cardiovascular, and skin disorders (RIN Regulations However, we believe these proposed 0960–AG65); revisions are necessary because of Pursuant to section 6 of Executive • Increase the number of disability advances in medical, technology, and Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation hearings held via video teleconference, treatment since we last revised these and Regulatory Review’’ (January 18, where appropriate, to help make the rules. 2011), SSA regularly engages in Anticipated Cost and Benefits: hearings process more efficient (RIN Ensuring that the medical evaluation 0960–AI09); retrospective review and analysis for criteria are up-to-date and consistent • Clarify that administrative appeals multiple existing regulatory initiatives. with the latest advances in medical judges from our Appeals Council may These initiatives may be proposed or knowledge, technology, and treatment hold hearings and issue decisions (RIN completed actions, and they do not will provide for accurate disability 0960–AI25); necessarily appear in The Regulatory evaluations. Costs: None. • Remove the education category of Plan. You can find more information on these completed rulemakings in past Risks: None. ‘‘inability to communicate in English’’ Timetable: to help us more accurately assess the publications of the Unified Agenda at vocational impact of education in the www.reginfo.gov in the ‘‘Completed Action Date FR Cite disability determination process (0960– Actions’’ section for the Social Security AH86); Administration. ANPRM ...... 12/12/07 72 FR 70527

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00165 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57968 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

Action Date FR Cite Statement of Need: These changes position of trust took effect would modernize our disability program immediately. Imposing penalties against ANPRM Comment 02/11/08 consistent with current research and individuals in a position of trust assists Period End. data about disability and workforce in deterring fraud and maintaining the NPRM ...... 01/00/19 participation. integrity of SSA’s disability programs. Summary of Legal Basis: 42 U.S.C. The regulations at 20 CFR 498 should be Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 902(a)(5). Multiple sections of the Social updated to reflect the BBA’s provisions. Required: No. Security Act. No aspect is required by Summary of Legal Basis: Section 813 Small Entities Affected: No. statute or court order. of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015. Government Levels Affected: None. Alternatives: Undetermined at this Alternatives: Additional Information: Includes time. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: SSA Retrospective Review under E.O. 13563. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: No projects no anticipated costs on the URL For Public Comments: costs on the public are anticipated as a public with completing this regulatory www.regulations.gov. result of this proposed rule. Benefits action. Costs for the agency are as yet Agency Contact: Cheryl A. Williams, include more consistent and appropriate undetermined, but are expected to be Director, Social Security evaluations of vocational factors by mostly administrative in nature. Administration, Office of Medical eliminating the false equivalence Benefits include strengthening our civil Policy, 6401 Security Boulevard, between an inability to communicate in monetary assessment processes. Baltimore, MD 21235–6401, Phone: 410 English and illiteracy. Risks: No risk is anticipated since this 965–1020, Email: cheryl.a.williams@ Risks: regulatory action reflects statutory ssa.gov. Timetable: requirements and authority. Joanna Firmin, Social Insurance Timetable: Specialist, Social Security Action Date FR Cite Administration, Office of Medical Action Date FR Cite Policy, 6401 Security Boulevard, NPRM ...... 10/00/18 Baltimore, MD 21235–6401, Phone: 410 NPRM ...... 09/00/19 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 966–2733, Email: joanna.firmin@ Required: Undetermined. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis ssa.gov. Government Levels Affected: None. Required: No. Related RIN: Related to 0960–AG74, URL For Public Comments: Small Entities Affected: No. Related to 0960–AG91 www.regulations.gov. Government Levels Affected: None. RIN: 0960–AG65 Agency Contact: Daniel O’Brien, Agency Contact: Ranju R. Shrestha, Director, Office of Retirement and Office of the Inspector General, Social Disability Policy, Social Security Security Administration, 6401 Security SSA Administration, Office of Vocational, Boulevard, Woodlawn, MD 21235–6401, Evaluation, and Process Policy, 6401 Phone: 410 966–4440, Email: 161. Removing Inability To Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD [email protected]. Communicate in English as an 21235–6401, Phone: 410 597–1632. RIN: 0960–AH91 Education Category RIN: 0960–AH86 Priority: Other Significant. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. SSA E.O. 13771 Designation: Fully or SSA Partially Exempt. 163. Privacy Act Exemption: Personnel Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 402; 42 162. Newer and Stronger Penalties Security and Suitability Program Files U.S.C. 405(a) to 405(b); 42 U.S.C. 405(d) (Conforming Changes) Priority: Other Significant. to 405(h); 42 U.S.C. 416(i); 42 U.S.C. Priority: Other Significant. E.O. 13771 Designation: Fully or 421(a); 42 U.S.C. 421(h) to (j); 42 U.S.C. E.O. 13771 Designation: Fully or Partially Exempt. 422(c); 42 U.S.C. 423; 42 U.S.C. 425; 42 Partially Exempt. Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 522a; 5 U.S.C. 902(a)(5) Legal Authority: Bipartisan Budget U.S.C. 553 CFR Citation: 20 CFR 404.1564, part Act of 2015, sec. 813; 42 U.S.C. 1320a– CFR Citation: 20 CFR 401.85. 404 subpart P app; 20 CFR 416.964. 8 Legal Deadline: None. Legal Deadline: None. CFR Citation: 20 CFR 498. Abstract: This NPRM will propose to Abstract: We propose to revise Legal Deadline: None. create a Security and Suitability Files existing disability evaluation rules Abstract: Section 813 of the BBA system to cover any additional security relating to the ability to communicate in establishes civil monetary penalties in and suitability related information English. Specifically, we will clarify section 1129 of the Social Security Act generated by SSA that is not sent to the that an inability to communicate in against individuals in a position of trust Office of Personnel Management. We English is not tantamount to illiteracy or that make false statements, will use the information we collect to inadequate verbal communication. misrepresentations, or omissions in conduct background investigations and Rather, an inability to communicate connection with obtaining or retaining establish that applicants or incumbents, adequately verbally or in writing in any SSA benefits or payments. Section 813 either employed by SSA or working for language will be the effective standard. also establishes a new felony for SSA under contract, are suitable for The proposed revisions will reflect conspiracy to commit Social Security employment with us. Additionally, the current research, analysis of our fraud, and increases felony penalties for NPRM will propose to remove two disability program data, Federal agency individuals in positions of trust who unused systems listed in our data about workforce participation, and defraud the SSA. regulations. comments we received from the public Statement of Need: Upon enactment Statement of Need: We are required to in response to an Advance Notice of of the BBA on November 2, 2015, civil amend our Code of Federal Regulations Proposed Rulemaking. monetary penalties for individuals in a (CFR) when a new system of records is

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00166 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57969

instituted within the agency that Legal Deadline: None. Legal Deadline: Other, Statutory, exempts certain records from disclosure. Abstract: Section 814 of the BBA December 27, 2016, FOIA Reform Act Here, we are creating a new system of clarifies that electronic and internet 2016. Other, Statutory, 12/27/2016, records and an exemption to disclosure communications are included in the FOIA Reform Act 2016. of some of those records, necessitating prohibitions against misusing SSA’s Abstract: Revisions of our FOIA a new system of records disclosure in names, symbols, and emblems to convey regulations will address the our CFR. the false impression that such items are requirements of the FOIA Improvement This update will replace the two approved, endorsed, or authorized by Act of 2016 and ensure that our following systems of records currently SSA, as stated in section 1140 of the regulations are consistent with all reflected in 401.85: Social Security Act. For those misusing applicable laws. (iii) Pursuant to subsection (k)(5) of SSA’s names, symbols, and emblems, it Statement of Need: Revisions of our the Privacy Act: treats each dissemination, viewing, or FOIA regulation will address the (A) The Investigatory Material accessing of a communication as a requirements of the FOIA Improvement Compiled for Security and Suitability separate violation. Act of 2016 and ensure that our Purposes System, SSA; and, Statement of Need: Section 814 of the regulations are consistent with all (B) The Suitability for Employment BBA took effect upon enactment. applicable laws. Records, SSA. However, our regulations do not Summary of Legal Basis: FOIA Reform Summary of Legal Basis: In currently reflect this statutory change. Act of 2016, 5 U.S.C. 552. accordance with the Privacy Act (5 Imposing penalties against persons who Alternatives: None. U.S.C. 552a), and Subsection (k)(5) of commit consumer fraud deters fraud Anticipated Cost and Benefits: There the Privacy Act, we are issuing public and maintains the integrity of SSA are no anticipated costs to the notice of our intent to establish a new programs. The regulations at 20 CFR implementation of the statutory system of records. part 498 should be updated to reflect the requirements. Alternatives: There is no alternative. BBA’s Section 814 provisions. Risks: Failure to amend our CFR, while using Summary of Legal Basis: The legal Timetable: a new system of records, would be basis for this action is section 814 of the contrary to the statutory authority and Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015, which Action Date FR Cite intent of 5 U.S.C. 552. went into effect on November 2, 2015. NPRM ...... 09/00/19 Anticipated Cost and Benefits: There 42 U.S.C. 1320b–10 are no anticipated costs. We stand to Alternatives: None. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis benefit through better administrative Anticipated Cost and Benefits: There Required: No. efficiency by updating the systems we are no anticipated costs associated with Small Entities Affected: No. use for accurately tracking investigatory this regulatory action. However, the Government Levels Affected: Federal. employment records. benefit of this regulatory action is that Agency Contact: Monica Chyn, Risks: Violation of the Privacy Act it will clarify the applicability of section Division Director, Social Security and OMB requirements. 1140 to electronic and internet Administration, Office of General Timetable: communications and minimize Counsel, Office of Privacy and unnecessary litigation as to the Action Date FR Cite Disclosure, 6401 Security Boulevard, applicability of the section 1140 statute. Woodlawn, MD 21235, Phone: 410 965– Risks: None. 0817, Email: [email protected]. NPRM ...... 10/00/18 Timetable: RIN: 0960–AI07 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Action Date FR Cite Required: No. Small Entities Affected: No. NPRM ...... 09/00/19 SSA Government Levels Affected: None. Agency Contact: Pamela Carcirieri, Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 166. Setting the Manner for the Division Director, Social Security Required: No. Appearance of Parties and Witnesses at Administration, Office of General Small Entities Affected: Businesses. a Hearing Counsel, Office of Privacy and Government Levels Affected: None. Priority: Other Significant. Major Disclosure, 6401 Security Boulevard, Agency Contact: Ranju Shrestha, status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is Woodlawn, MD 21235–6401, Phone: Chief Counsel to the Inspector General, undetermined. 410 965–0355, Email: Social Security Administration, 6401 Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined. [email protected]. Security Boulevard, Woodlawn, MD E.O. 13771 Designation: Fully or RIN: 0960–AH97 21235, Phone: 410 966–4440, Email: Partially Exempt. [email protected]. Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 401(j); 42 RIN: 0960–AI04 U.S.C. 404(f); 42 U.S.C. 405(a) to 405(b); SSA 42 U.S.C. 405(d) to 405(h); 42 U.S.C. 902(a)(5); . . . 164. References to Social Security and SSA CFR Citation: 20 CFR 404.914; 20 CFR Medicare in Electronic 404.929; 20 CFR 404.936; 20 CFR Communications 165. Availability of Information and 404.938; 20 CFR 404.950; 20 CFR Priority: Other Significant. Records to the Public 404.976; 20 CFR 416.1414; 20 CFR E.O. 13771 Designation: Fully or Priority: Other Significant. 416.1429; 20 CFR 416.1436; 20 CFR Partially Exempt. E.O. 13771 Designation: Fully or 416.1438; 20 CFR 416.1450; 20 CFR Legal Authority: Bipartisan Budget Partially Exempt. 416.1476; . . . Act of 2015 (BBA), sec. 814; 42 U.S.C. Legal Authority: Pub. L. 114–185, Legal Deadline: None. 1320b–10 FOIA Reform Act of 2016, 5 U.S.C. 552 Abstract: We propose to revise and CFR Citation: 20 CFR 498. CFR Citation: 20 CFR 402. unify some of the rules that govern how,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00167 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57970 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

where, and when individuals appear for SSA Action Date FR Cite hearings before an administrative law 167. Redeterminations When There is a NPRM ...... 10/00/18 judge at the hearings level and before a Reason To Believe Fraud or Similar disability hearing officer at the Fault Was Involved in an Individual’s Regulatory Flexibility Analysis reconsideration level of our Application for Benefits administrative review process. At both Required: No. levels, when we schedule a hearing, we Priority: Other Significant. Small Entities Affected: No. propose that we will determine the E.O. 13771 Designation: Fully or Government Levels Affected: None. Agency Contact: Nancy Chung, Social manner in which the parties to the Partially Exempt. Legal Authority: 205(u) and 1631(e)(7) Security Administration, Office of hearing will appear: By VTC, in person, and 1129(l) of the Social Security Act; Analytics, Review, and Oversight, 5107 or, under limited circumstances, by 42 U.S.C. 405(u); 42 U.S.C. 1383(e)(7); Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041, telephone. We would not permit 42 U.S.C. 1320a–8(l) Phone: 703 605–7100, Email: individuals to opt out of appearing by CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined. [email protected]. VTC. We also propose that we would Legal Deadline: None. William P. Gibson, Social Insurance determine the manner in which Abstract: We are clarifying our rules Specialist, Regulations Writer, Social witnesses to a hearing will appear. regarding the redetermination of the Security Administration, Office of Statement of Need: With just over entitlement or eligibility of individuals Regulations and Reports Clearance, 880,000 individuals waiting for a when there is reason to believe fraud or 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD hearing before an administrative law similar fault was involved in the 21235–6401, Phone: 410 966–9039, judge, we must ensure that we make the individual’s application for benefits. We Email: [email protected]. best use our resources to decrease the intend to clarify how and when we RIN: 0960–AI10 number of pending cases, reduce the redetermine the entitlement, and the average wait time, and significantly administrative review process when we improve our service to the American decide to terminate benefits. SSA public. Expanding our use of VTC Statement of Need: Over time, our 168. Hearings Held by Administrative technology would enable us to schedule business processes evolved to support Appeals Judges of the Appeals Council many hearings sooner. This not only our statutory redetermination authority. reduces the delays in claimants waiting We are now codifying the basic Priority: Other Significant. Major for a hearing, but also gives us more parameters for redetermination, status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is flexibility in scheduling and allocating including relevant definitions, undetermined. clarification of notice and resources for in-person hearings to those E.O. 13771 Designation: Fully or redetermination procedures, as well as a cases that truly warrant an in-person, Partially Exempt. process for administratively reviewing rather than a VTC, hearing. Some travel Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 405(a) to redetermination termination and 405(b); 42 U.S.C. 902(a)(5) costs may be reduced as well, since overpayment assessment decisions CFR Citation: 20 CFR 402.60; 20 CFR there may be less need for in-person under secs. 205(u) and 1631(e)(7) of the 404.2; 20 CFR 404.929; 20 CFR 404.955; hearings to areas that can be serviced by Social Security Act, to provide the 20 CFR 404.956; 20 CFR 404.970; 20 more VTC hearings instead. public the opportunity for comment CFR 404.973; 20 CFR 404.976; 20 CFR Summary of Legal Basis: under the Administrative Procedures 404.983; 20 CFR 404.984; 20 CFR Administrative not required by statute Act while providing our beneficiaries 404.999c; 20 CFR 404.1765; 20 CFR or court order. and their representatives the ability to 408.110; 20 CFR 411.175; 20 CFR Alternatives: To be determined. find our redetermination process within 416.120; 20 CFR 416.1429; 20 CFR our regulatory text. 416.1455; 20 CFR 416.1456; 20 CFR Anticipated Cost and Benefits: We Summary of Legal Basis: Sections 416.1470; 20 CFR 416.1473; 20 CFR anticipate increased administrative and 205(u), 1129(l), and 1631(e)(7) of the 416.1476; 20 CFR 416.1483–1484; 20 adjudicatory efficiency benefiting a Social Security Act. 42 U.S.C. 405(u)(1), CFR 416.1498; 20 CFR 416.1565; 20 CFR reduction in hearing delays. 1320a–8(l), and 1383(e)(7). 422.201; 20 CFR 422.203; 20 CFR Risks: To be determined. 206(d) of Pub. L. 103–296, the Social 422.205; 20 CFR 422.210; . . . Security Independence and Program Timetable: Legal Deadline: None. Improvements Act of 1994, 108 Stat. Abstract: We propose to revise our Action Date FR Cite 1464, 1509. rules to clarify when administrative Alternatives: We could continue to appeals judges (AAJ) from our Appeals NPRM ...... 10/00/18 manage our redetermination processes Council may hold hearings and issue and procedures under our statutory decisions. We propose that in all authority and sub-regulatory guidances. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis situations where an AAJ would conduct Anticipated Cost and Benefits: a hearing and issue a decision, the AAJ Required: No. Without enumerated regulations, we would adhere to the same due process Small Entities Affected: No. may experience additional litigation requirements as administrative law Government Levels Affected: None. alleging lack of due process and judges. We also propose to update and Agency Contact: Susan Swansiger, violation of the Administrative clarify our regulations to conform to our Procedures Act. current business processes and Director, Division of Field Procedures, Risks: Without enumerated organizational components. Social Security Administration, Office regulations, we may experience Statement of Need: Ensuring that we of Hearing Operations, 5107 Leesburg litigation alleging lack of due process make the best use of all of our resources Pike, Suite 1608, Falls Church, VA and violation of the Administrative is an important part of our ongoing 22041–3260, Phone: 703 605–8593. Procedures Act. effort to decrease the number of pending RIN: 0960–AI09 Timetable: hearing cases, reduce the average wait

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00168 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57971

time, and significantly improve our we continue to identify medical Alternatives: service to the American public. Having improvement at its earliest point and Anticipated Cost and Benefits: There AAJs conduct hearings will help remain up to date with current research. are no anticipated costs to the achieve those goals. Statement of Need: This rule is implementation of the statutory Summary of Legal Basis: necessary to reform the process by requirements. Administrative, not required by statute which we conduct CDRs to ensure that Risks: or court order. we continue to identify medical Timetable: Alternatives: We would continue our improvement at its earliest point and current adjudicatory procedures. remain up-to-date with current research. Action Date FR Cite Anticipated Cost and Benefits: We do Summary of Legal Basis: not anticipate this proposal would Alternatives: NPRM ...... 12/00/18 impose any costs on the public. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Although specific figures are not effects of this proposed rule are not yet Regulatory Flexibility Analysis available at this time, we anticipate determined. Our Office of the Chief Required: No. there may be some administrative costs Actuary and Office of Budget will Small Entities Affected: No. to SSA for this proposal, specifically formally estimate the programmatic and Government Levels Affected: None. related to training and new notices. administrative effects of the NPRM Agency Contact: Keisha J. Mahoney, Given the historic backlog and waiting when the proposal is fully drafted. Government Information Specialist, times for a hearing, the benefits of this Risks: Program Analyst, Social Security proposal, faster hearings and case Timetable: Administration, Office of the General resolutions, are potentially significant. Counsel, Office of Privacy and Risks: NA. Action Date FR Cite Disclosure, 6401 Security Boulevard, Timetable: Baltimore, MD 21235–6401, Phone: 410 NPRM ...... 12/00/18 966–9048, Email: keisha.mahoney- Action Date FR Cite [email protected]. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis RIN: 0960–AI38 NPRM ...... 11/00/18 Required: No. Small Entities Affected: No. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Government Levels Affected: None. Required: No. Agency Contact: Cheryl Williams, SSA Small Entities Affected: No. Social Security Administration, Office Final Rule Stage Government Levels Affected: None. of Disability Policy, 6401 Security Agency Contact: Nancy Chung, Acting Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235–6401, 171. Revised Medical Criteria for Director Program Analysis Staff, Social Phone: 410 966–4163, Email: Evaluating Musculoskeletal Disorders Security Administration, 5107 Leesburg [email protected]. (3318P) Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041, Phone: RIN: 0960–AI27 Priority: Other Significant. 703 605–7100, Email: nancy.chung@ E.O. 13771 Designation: Fully or ssa.gov. Partially Exempt. RIN: 0960–AI25 SSA Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 402; 42 U.S.C. 405(a); 42 U.S.C. 405(b); 42 170. • Privacy and Disclosure of Official U.S.C. 405(d) to 405(h); 42 U.S.C. 416(i); Records and Information SSA 42 U.S.C. 421(a); 42 U.S.C. 421(i); 42 Priority: Other Significant. U.S.C. 423; 42 U.S.C. 902(a)(5); 42 169. Rules Regarding the Frequency E.O. 13771 Designation: Fully or U.S.C. 1381a; 42 U.S.C. 1382c; 42 U.S.C. and Notice of Continuing Disability Partially Exempt. 1383; 42 U.S.C. 1383b Reviews Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a; CFR Citation: 20 CFR 404.1500, app. Priority: Economically Significant. S.2155, Economic Growth, Regulatory 1. Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. Relief, and Consumer Protection Act Legal Deadline: None. E.O. 13771 Designation: Fully or CFR Citation: 20 CFR 401. Abstract: Sections 1.00 and 101.00, Partially Exempt. Legal Deadline: None. Musculoskeletal System, of appendix 1 Legal Authority: Social Security Act; Abstract: This NPRM will update the to subpart P of part 404 of our sec. 221 (i) of the Social Security Act Agency’s regulations at 20 CFR 401. regulations describe those CFR Citation: 20 CFR 404 subpart P; Section 215 of the Economic Growth, musculoskeletal system disorders that 20 CFR 416 subpart I; 20 CFR 404.1590; Regulatory Relief, and Consumer we consider severe enough to prevent a 20 CFR 416.989; 20 CFR 416.990; . . . Protection Act directs us to modify or person from doing any gainful activity, Legal Deadline: None. develop a database to facilitate the or that cause marked and severe Abstract: We propose to revise our verification of certain information with functional limitations for a child. We rules regarding when and how often we the consumer’s consent and in propose to revise the criteria in these conduct continuing disability reviews connection with a credit transaction. sections to reflect our adjudicative (CDR). The proposed regulations would The agency is modifying our regulations experience, advances in medical add a new category to our existing to clarify that written consent, as knowledge and treatment of medical diary categories that we use to required under the Privacy Act, musculoskeletal disorders, and schedule CDRs and would revise the includes electronic consent. comments from medical experts. criteria we follow to place a case in each Statement of Need: An update to the Statement of Need: These rules are of the categories. They would also Agency’s regulations at 20 CFR 401 is necessary to evaluate claims for Social change how often we perform a CDR for required to implement section 215 of Security disability benefits. claims with the medical diary category the Economic Growth and Regulatory Summary of Legal Basis: for permanent impairments. These Relief, and Consumer Protection Act. Administrative—not required by statute revised regulations would ensure that Summary of Legal Basis: or court order.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00169 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57972 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

Alternatives: We considered SSA CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY continuing to use our current criteria. 172. Privacy Act Exemption: Social COMMISSION (CPSC) However, we believe these proposed Security Administration Violence Statement of Regulatory Priorities: revisions are necessary to ensure that Evaluation and Reporting System The U.S. Consumer Product Safety our criteria reflect advances in medical (SSAvers) Commission is charged with protecting knowledge and treatment since we last the public from unreasonable risks of Priority: Other Significant. revised these rules. death and injury associated with Anticipated Cost and Benefits: E.O. 13771 Designation: Fully or consumer products. To achieve this Ensuring that the medical evaluation Partially Exempt. goal, among other things, the CPSC: criteria are up-to-date and consistent Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a • Develops mandatory product safety with the latest advances in medical CFR Citation: 20 CFR 401.85. standards or bans when other efforts are knowledge, technology, and treatment Legal Deadline: None. inadequate to address a safety hazard, or will provide for accurate disability Abstract: This rule will exempt a where required by statute; evaluations. portion of a system of records entitled • obtains repair, replacement, or Risks: We expect the public and Social Security Administration Violence refunds for defective products that Evaluation and Reporting System present a substantial product hazard; adjudicators to support the removal and • clarification of ambiguous terms and (SSAvers) from certain provisions of the develops information and education phrases, and the addition of specific, Privacy Act. Because this system will campaigns about the safety of consumer demonstrable functional criteria for contain some investigatory material products; • participates in the development or determining listing-level severity of all compiled for law enforcement purposes, revision of voluntary product safety musculoskeletal disorders. this rule will exempt those records within this new system of records from standards; and We expect adjudicators to support the specific provisions of the Privacy Act. • follows statutory mandates. change in the framework of the text Statement of Need: Because this Unless directed otherwise by because it makes the guidance in the system will contain some investigatory congressional mandate, when deciding introductory text and listings easier to material compiled for law enforcement which of these approaches to take in access and understand. purposes, this rule will exempt those any specific case, the CPSC gathers and Timetable: records within this new system of analyzes data about the nature and records from specific provisions of the extent of the risk presented by the Action Date FR Cite Privacy Act. SSAvers captures and product. The Commission’s rules at 16 houses information regarding alleged CFR 1009.8 require the Commission to NPRM ...... 05/07/18 83 FR 20646 incidents of workplace and domestic consider, among other factors, the NPRM Comment 07/06/18 violence filed by SSA employees and following criteria, when deciding the Period End. SSA contractors. level of priority for any particular Final Action ...... 09/00/19 It is required for compliance with the project: • Privacy Act. Frequency and severity of injury; Regulatory Flexibility Analysis • causality of injury; Summary of Legal Basis: The Privacy • Required: No. Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a). chronic illness and future injuries; • costs and benefits of Commission Small Entities Affected: No. Alternatives: None. action; Government Levels Affected: None. Anticipated Cost and Benefits: There • unforeseen nature of the risk; are no anticipated costs to the operation Additional Information: Includes • vulnerability of the population at of this system. Retrospective Review under E.O. 13563. risk; Risks: There are no risks for the • probability of exposure to the URL For Public Comments: operation of this system of records. www.regulations.gov. hazard; and Timetable: • additional criteria that warrant Agency Contact: Joanna Firmin, Commission attention. Social Insurance Specialist, Social Action Date FR Cite Significant Regulatory Actions: Security Administration, Office of Currently, the Commission is Medical Policy, 6401 Security NPRM ...... 06/14/18 83 FR 27728 NPRM Comment 07/16/18 considering taking action in the next 12 Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235–6401, Period End. months on two rules, table saws (RIN Phone: 410 966–2733, Email: Final Action ...... 10/00/18 3041–AC31) and portable generators [email protected]. (RIN 3041–AC36), which would Cheryl A. Williams, Director, Social Regulatory Flexibility Analysis constitute a ‘‘significant regulatory Security Administration, Office of Required: No. action’’ under the definition of that term Medical Policy, 6401 Security Small Entities Affected: No. in Executive Order 12866. Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235–6401, Government Levels Affected: None. 1. Table Saws Phone: 410 965–1020, Email: Agency Contact: Pamela Carcirieri, [email protected]. In 2006, the Commission granted a Division Director, Social Security petition requesting a rule to establish Brian J. Rudick, Social Insurance Administration, Office of General performance standards for a system to Specialist, Regulations Writer, Social Counsel, Office of Privacy and reduce or prevent injuries from Security Administration, Office of Disclosure, 6401 Security Boulevard, contacting the blade of a table saw. The Regulations and Reports Clearance, Woodlawn, MD 21235–6401, Phone: Commission has since issued a 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 410 965–0355, Email: proposed rule under the Consumer 21235–6401, Phone: 410 965–7102, [email protected]. Product Safety Act (CPSA). The Email: [email protected]. RIN: 0960–AI08 regulatory proceeding could result in RIN: 0960–AG38 BILLING CODE 4191–02–P several actions, one of which could be

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00170 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57973

the development of a mandatory 31, 2017. Staff prepared a report Action Date FR Cite standard. summarizing the 2017 study findings and will submit to the Commission to Staff Sends Final 09/00/19 2. Portable Generators publish a notice in the Federal Register. Rule Briefing The Commission has been Staff will prepare a final rule briefing Package to considering options to reduce deaths package for Commission consideration Commission. and injuries related to portable in FY 2019. generators, particularly those involving Statement of Need: Regulatory Flexibility Analysis carbon monoxide poisoning. In 2016, Summary of Legal Basis: Required: Yes. the Commission issued a proposed rule Alternatives: The Commission could Small Entities Affected: Businesses. Government Levels Affected: under the CPSA. The regulatory (1) pursue table saw voluntary standard Undetermined. proceeding could result in several activities; (2) extend the effective dates Federalism: Undetermined. actions, one of which could be the of a possible rule; (3) exempt certain International Impacts: This regulatory development of a mandatory standard. categories of table saws from the draft action will be likely to have proposed rule; (4) limit the applicability international trade and investment of the performance requirements to effects, or otherwise be of international CPSC some, but not all, tables saws; or (5) interest. pursue an information and education Agency Contact: Caroleene Paul, Final Rule Stage campaign to inform the public of the Project Manager, Directorate for 173. Regulatory Options for Table Saws hazards of blade contact and the Engineering Sciences, Consumer benefits of the AIM technology. Priority: Economically Significant. Product Safety Commission, National Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Product Testing and Evaluation Center, Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is expected gross benefits range from about undetermined. 5 Research Place, Rockville, MD 20850, $970 million to $2.45 billion over the Phone: 301 987–2225, Email: cpaul@ E.O. 13771 Designation: Independent product life of 1 year of sales. The agency. cpsc.gov. expected costs of the draft proposed rule RIN: 3041–AC31 Legal Authority: 5 U.S.C. 553(e); 15 will range from about $168 million to U.S.C. 2051 about $345 million annually. Based on CFR Citation: 16 CFR 1245. staff’s benefit and cost estimates, net Legal Deadline: None. CPSC Abstract: On July 11, 2006, the benefits (i.e., benefits minus costs) for Commission voted to grant a petition the market as a whole were estimated to 174. Portable Generators amount to about $625 million to $2.3 requesting that the Commission issue a Priority: Economically Significant. rule prescribing performance standards billion over the product life of 1 year of table saw sales. Major status under 5 U.S.C. 801 is for a system to reduce or prevent undetermined. injuries from contacting the blade of a Risks: Timetable: E.O. 13771 Designation: Independent table saw. The Commission also agency. directed CPSC staff to prepare an Action Date FR Cite Legal Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2051 advance notice of proposed rulemaking CFR Citation: 16 CFR 1241. (ANPRM) initiating a rulemaking Commission Deci- 07/11/06 Legal Deadline: None. proceeding under the Consumer Product sion to Grant Abstract: On December 5, 2006, the Safety Act (CPSA) to: (1) Identify the Petition. Commission voted to issue an advance risk of injury associated with table saw ANPRM ...... 10/11/11 76 FR 62678 notice of proposed rulemaking blade-contact injuries; (2) summarize Notice of Exten- 12/02/11 76 FR 75504 (ANPRM) under the Consumer Product regulatory alternatives; and (3) invite sion of Time for Safety Act (CPSA) concerning portable comments from the public. An ANPRM Comments. generators. The ANPRM discusses ANPRM Comment 12/12/11 was published on October 11, 2011. The Period End. regulatory options that could reduce comment period ended on February 10, Comment Period 02/10/12 deaths and injuries related to portable 2012. Staff participated in the End. generators, particularly those involving Underwriters Laboratories (UL) working Notice to Reopen 02/15/12 77 FR 8751 carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning. The group to develop performance Comment Pe- ANPRM was published in the Federal requirements for table saws, conducted riod. Register on December 12, 2006. Staff performance tests on sample table saws, Reopened Com- 03/16/12 reviewed public comments and conducted survey work on blade guard ment Period conducted technical activities. In FY use, and evaluated comments to the End. 2006, staff awarded a contract to Staff Sent NPRM 01/17/17 ANPRM. Staff prepared a briefing Briefing Pack- develop a prototype generator engine package with a notice of proposed age to Commis- with reduced CO in the exhaust. Also in rulemaking (NPRM) and submitted the sion. FY 2006, staff entered into an package to the Commission on January Commission Deci- 04/27/17 interagency agreement (IAG) with the 17, 2017. The Commission voted to sion. National Institute of Standards and publish the NPRM, and the comment NPRM ...... 05/12/17 82 FR 22190 Technology (NIST) to conduct tests with period for the NPRM closed on July 26, NPRM Comment 07/26/17 a generator, in both off-the-shelf and 2017. Public oral testimony to the Period End. prototype configurations, operating in Commission was heard on August 9, Public Hearing ..... 08/09/17 82 FR 31035 the garage attached to NIST’s test house. Staff Sent 2016 08/15/17 2017. Staff conducted a study of table NEISS Table NIST’s test house, a double-wide saw incidents that occurred and were Saw Type manufactured home, is designed for reported through the National Electronic Study Status conducting residential indoor air quality Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) Report to Com- (IAQ) studies, and the scenarios tested between January 1, 2017 and December mission. are typical of those involving consumer

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00171 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57974 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

fatalities. These tests provide empirical measures; or (6) take no action to 5 Research Place, Rockville, MD 20850, data on CO accumulation in the garage establish a mandatory standard. Phone: 301 987–2293, Email: jbuyer@ and infiltration into the house; staff Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The cpsc.gov. used these data to evaluate the efficacy average present value of expected RIN: 3041–AC36 of the prototype in reducing the risk of benefits per unit is $227. The cost to BILLING CODE 6355–01–P fatal or severe CO poisoning. Under this manufacturers and the lost consumer IAG, NIST also modeled the CO surplus amounts to an average of $116 infiltration from the garage under a per unit. The average net benefits variety of other conditions, including (benefits minus costs) are $110 per unit. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION (FTC) different ambient conditions and longer The aggregate net benefits from annual Statement of Regulatory and generator run times. In FY 2009, staff sales are $144.6 million. Deregulatory Priorities entered into a second IAG with NIST Risks: As of June 14, 2017, CPSC with the goal of developing CO emission databases contained reports of at least I. Regulatory and Deregulatory performance requirements for a possible 849 generator-related consumer CO- Priorities proposed regulation that would be poisoning deaths resulting from 629 Background based on health effects criteria. In 2011, incidents that occurred from 2005 The Federal Trade Commission (FTC staff prepared a package containing staff through 2016. or Commission) is an independent Timetable: and contractor reports on the technology agency charged by its enabling statute, demonstration of the low CO emission Action Date FR Cite the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC prototype portable generator. This Act), with protecting American included, among other staff reports, a consumers from ‘‘unfair methods of summary of the prototype development Staff Sent 07/06/06 ANPRM to competition’’ and ‘‘unfair or deceptive and durability results, as well as end-of- Commission. acts or practices’’ in the marketplace. life emission test results performed on Staff Sent Supple- 10/12/06 The Commission strives to ensure that the generator by an independent mental Material consumers benefit from a vigorously emissions laboratory. Staff’s assessment to Commission. competitive marketplace. The of the ability of the prototype to reduce Commission Deci- 10/26/06 sion. Commission’s work is rooted in a belief the CO poisoning hazard was also that competition, based on truthful and included. In September 2012, staff Staff Sent Draft 11/21/06 ANPRM to non-misleading information about released this package and solicited products and services, provides comments from stakeholders. Commission. ANPRM ...... 12/12/06 71 FR 74472 consumers the best choice of products In October 2016, staff delivered a ANPRM Comment 02/12/07 and services at the lowest prices. briefing package with a draft notice of Period End. The Commission pursues its goal of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to the Staff Releases 10/10/12 promoting competition in the Commission. In November 2016, the Research Re- marketplace through two different but port for Com- Commission voted to approve the complementary approaches. Through its NPRM. The notice was published in the ment. Staff Sends 10/05/16 consumer protection activities, the Federal Register on November 21, 2016, Commission seeks to ensure that with a comment period deadline of NPRM Briefing Package to consumers receive accurate, truthful, February 6, 2017. In December 2016, the Commission. and non-misleading information in the Commission voted to extend the NPRM ...... 11/21/16 81 FR 83556 marketplace. At the same time, to comment period until April 24, 2017, in NPRM Comment 12/13/16 81 FR 89888 ensure that consumers have a choice of response to a request to extend the Period Ex- products and services at competitive comment period an additional 75 days. tended. prices and quality, the marketplace The Commission held a public hearing Public Hearing for 03/08/17 82 FR 8907 must be policed for anticompetitive on March 8, 2017, to provide an Oral Comments. NPRM Comment 04/24/17 business practices and to prohibit opportunity for stakeholders to present anticompetitive mergers. These two oral comments on the NPRM. Period End. Staff Sends Final 09/00/19 complementary missions make the Two voluntary standards now include Rule Briefing Commission unique insofar as it is the requirements intended to address the Package to nation’s only Federal agency with this CO poisoning hazard. Staff is assessing Commission. combination of statutory authority to those standards, and in FY 2019 staff protect consumers. will prepare a final rule briefing package Regulatory Flexibility Analysis The Commission is charged with the presenting staff’s assessment and staff Required: Yes. responsibility of issuing and enforcing will deliver it to the Commission. Small Entities Affected: Businesses. regulations under a number of statutes, Statement of Need: Government Levels Affected: including 16 trade regulation rules Summary of Legal Basis: Undetermined. promulgated pursuant to the FTC Act Alternatives: The Commission could Federalism: Undetermined. and numerous regulations issued (1) have less stringent (higher allowable) International Impacts: This regulatory pursuant to certain credit, financial, and CO emission rates; (2) limit coverage to action will be likely to have marketing practice statutes 3 as well as one-cylinder engines, exempting international trade and investment energy laws.4 The Commission also has portable generators with two-cylinder, effects, or otherwise be of international class II engines from the proposed rule; interest. 3 For example, the Controlling the Assault of Non- (3) mandate alternate means of limiting Agency Contact: Janet L. Buyer, Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003 consumer exposure which could Project Manager, Directorate for (CAN–SPAM Act) (15 U.S.C. 7701–7713) and the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse include automatic shutoff systems; (4) Engineering Sciences, Consumer Prevention Act (15 U.S.C. 6101–6108). require different (longer) compliance Product Safety Commission, National 4 For example, the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (106 dates; (5) implement informational Product Testing and Evaluation Center, Stat. 2776, codified in scattered sections of the U.S.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00172 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57975

adopted a number of voluntary industry a nationwide and international illegal calls.10 Because part of the guides. Most of the regulations and crackdown on tech support scams that increase in robocalls is attributable to guides pertain to consumer protection trick consumers into believing their relatively recent technological matters and are intended to ensure that computers are infected with viruses and developments, the FTC has taken steps consumers receive the information malware, and then charge them to spur the marketplace to develop necessary to evaluate competing hundreds of dollars for unnecessary technological solutions. For instance, products and make informed purchasing repairs.7 the FTC led four public challenges to decisions. • incentivize innovators to help tackle the For the remainder of the Background Emerging Frauds: The FTC strives unlawful robocalls that plague section, the Commission sets out a brief to stay ahead of scammers who are consumers.11 The FTC’s challenges overview of its ongoing law enforcement always on the lookout for new ways to contributed to a shift in the efforts, followed by a more detailed list market old schemes. For example, there development and availability of of current regulatory reform-related has been an increase in deceptive technological solutions in this area, initiatives and other focus areas. money-making frauds involving particularly call-blocking and call- cryptocurrencies—digital assets that use filtering products.12 In addition, the (A) Law Enforcement Mission cryptography to secure or verify FTC regularly works with its state, The Commission is, first and transactions. The Commission has federal, and international partners to foremost, a civil law enforcement worked to educate consumers about combat illegal robocalls, including co- agency. It pursues its mandate to cryptocurrencies and hold fraudsters hosting a Joint Policy Forum on Illegal enhance competition and protect accountable. In March, the FTC halted Robocalls with the Federal consumers primarily through case-by- the operations of Bitcoin Funding Team, Communications Commission, as well case enforcement of the FTC Act and which allegedly falsely promised that as a public expo featuring new other statutes. The FTC estimates that, participants could earn large returns by technologies, devices, and applications in FY 2017, the agency saved consumers enrolling in money-making schemes and to minimize or eliminate the number of more than $3.7 billion through its paying with cryptocurrency.8 illegal robocalls consumers receive.13 competition enforcement efforts and • (2) Competition Enforcement. During more than $1.29 billion through its Illegal Robocalls: Unlawful the 2017 calendar year, the agency filed consumer protection enforcement robocalls remain a significant consumer 10 competition cases in federal or actions.5 protection problem because they administrative courts and took action in (1) Consumer Protection Enforcement. repeatedly disturb consumers’ privacy 25 other cases to protect consumers The agency has continued to pursue its and frequently use fraud and deception from anticompetitive mergers or long-standing consumer protection to pitch goods and services, leading to business conduct.14 The FTC enforces mission by initiating or obtaining significant economic harm. In FY 2017, U.S. antitrust law in many sectors that settlements in 85 consumer protection the FTC received more than 4.5 million directly affect consumers and their cases in district court, reaching 24 robocall complaints.9 The FTC is using pocketbooks, such as health care, administrative consent agreements every tool at its disposal to fight these consumer products and services, related to consumer protection, and technology, manufacturing, and energy. distributing in excess of $269 million in 7 FTC Press Release, FTC and Federal, State and The Commission shares federal antitrust redress to more than three million International Partners Announce Major Crackdown enforcement responsibilities with the on Tech Support Scams (May 12, 2017), available Antitrust Division of the U.S. consumers during the 2017 calendar at https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/ 6 year. 2017/05/ftc-federal-state-international-partners- Department of Justice (DOJ). A major focus of the FTC’s law announce-major-crackdown. ‘‘Operation Tech One of the FTC’s principal enforcement efforts is fighting fraud. Trap’’ is just one example of a law enforcement responsibilities is to prevent mergers The Commission’s anti-fraud program ‘‘sweep’’—coordinated, simultaneous law that may substantially lessen enforcement actions with partners—that the FTC tracks down and stops some of the most uses to leverage resources to maximize effects. competition. Under the Hart-Scott- egregious scams that prey on U.S. Another example of a recent sweep is ‘‘Operation consumers—often, the most vulnerable Main Street,’’ an initiative launched during June 10 See FTC Robocall Initiatives, available at consumers who can least afford to lose 2018 to stop small business scams. The FTC, jointly https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/features/feature- with the offices of eight state Attorneys General, 0025-robocalls. money. Below are a few examples of the announced 24 actions targeting fraud aimed at 11 The first challenge, announced in 2012, called variety of frauds that the Commission small businesses, as well as new education upon the public to develop a consumer-facing has recently pursued, and ways that the materials to help small businesses identify and solution to block illegal robocalls. One of the Commission leverages its limited avoid potential scams. FTC Press Release, FTC, winners, ‘‘NomoRobo,’’ was on the market within BBB, and Law Enforcement Partners Announce six months after the FTC selected it as a winner. resources to do so effectively. Results of Operation Main Street: Stopping Small NomoRobo, which reports blocking over 600 • Tech Support Scams: Last year, the Business Scams Law Enforcement and Education million calls, is being offered directly to consumers FTC joined federal, state, and Initiative (June 18, 2018), available at https:// by a number of telecommunications providers and international law enforcement partners www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2018/06/ is available as an app on iPhones. ftc-bbb-law-enforcement-partners-announce-results- 12 Consumers can access information about in announcing ‘‘Operation Tech Trap,’’ operation-main. potential solutions available to them at https:// 8 FTC v. Thomas Dluca, et al. (Bitcoin Funding www.consumer.ftc.gov/features/how-stop- Code, particularly 42 U.S.C. 6201 et seq.) and the Team) No. 0:18–cv–60379–KMM (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 16, unwanted-calls. Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 2018), available at https://www.ftc.gov/ 13 FTC Press Release, FTC and FCC to Host Joint (EISA) (codified in relevant part at 42 U.S.C. 17021, enforcement/cases-proceedings/172-3107/federal- Policy Forum on Illegal Robocalls (Mar. 22, 2018), 17301–17305). trade-commission-v-thomas-dluca-et-al-bitcoin- available at www.ftc.gov/news-events/press- 5 FTC Report, Agency Financial Report for FY funding. releases/2018/03/ftc-fcc-host-joint-policy-forum- 2017, at 45 (Nov. 16, 2017), available at https:// 9 Total unwanted-call complaints for FY 2017, illegal-robocalls; FTC Press Release, FTC and FCC www.ftc.gov/reports/agency-financial-report-fy2017. including both robocall complaints and complaints Seek Exhibitors for an Expo Featuring Technologies 6 FTC Press Release, Acting FTC Chairman about live calls from consumers whose phone to Block Illegal Robocalls (Mar. 7, 2018), available Ohlhausen Reports One Year of Agency numbers are registered on the Do Not Call Registry, at www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2018/03/ Accomplishments (Jan. 18, 2018), available at exceeded seven million. See Do Not Call Registry ftc-fcc-seek-exhibitors-expo-featuring-technologies- https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/ Data Book 2017: Complaint Figures for FY 2017, block-illegal. 2018/01/acting-ftc-chairman-ohlhausen-reports- available at https://www.ftc.gov/reports/national- 14 Press Release, Acting FTC Chairman one-year-agency. do-not-call-registry-data-book-fiscal-year-2017. Ohlhausen (see footnote 4).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00173 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57976 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

Rodino Act (HSR), parties to certain Dakota.18 Sanford Health and Mid Disclosure Requirements and large mergers and acquisitions must file Dakota have appealed the preliminary Prohibitions Concerning Franchising, 16 premerger notifications with both the injunction to the U.S. Court of Appeals CFR part 436; and FTC and the DOJ to allow for for the Eighth Circuit. Identity Theft Rules, 16 CFR part 681. government review. Over the past five In FTC v. AbbVie, the district court In addition, the FTC continues to fiscal years, the number of HSR ruled that AbbVie used sham litigation streamline the Hart-Scott-Rodino Rules premerger filings has increased more to illegally maintain its monopoly over (or HSR Rules), including by clarifying than 50 percent, bringing filings in the the testosterone replacement drug Antitrust Improvements Act past fiscal year to the average over the Androgel, and ordered $448 million in Notification and Report Form for past 20 years.15 The vast majority of monetary relief to consumers who were Certain Mergers and Acquisitions (HSR reported transactions do not raise overcharged for Androgel as a result of Form) and simplifying notification competitive concerns, and the agencies AbbVie’s conduct.19 This court order procedures.23 On July 16, 2018, the clear those transactions expeditiously. represents the largest monetary award Commission issued a final rule But, when the evidence gives the ever in a litigated FTC antitrust case. clarifying certain HSR Form instructions Commission reason to believe that a In FTC v. Wilhelmsen, the U.S. and allowing for the notification of early proposed merger would substantially District Court granted the FTC’s request terminations and second requests by lessen competition, the Commission has for a preliminary injunction in the email.24 The effective date of the rule intervened. proposed merger of Wilhelmsen change is August 15, 2018. For example, the FTC challenged a Maritime Services and Drew Marine Further streamlining will occur as the proposed $285 million acquisition by Group.20 Wilhelmsen subsequently FTC continues its regular, systematic J.M. Smucker Co. of Conagra Brands, announced that it will abandon the review of all rules and guides, assessing Inc.’s Wesson cooking oil brand due to proposed transaction.21 their costs and benefits to consumers concerns that the transaction would and businesses. In addition, the agency (B) Regulatory Reform-Related continues to examine ways in which it illegally reduce competition in the Initiatives United States for canola and vegetable can streamline its investigations to oils. Smucker currently owns the Crisco In addition to consumer protection reduce the burden on businesses and brand, and by acquiring the Wesson and competition enforcement matters, the Commission alike. For example, in brand, it would control at least 70 the agency is continuing its efforts in response to criticisms regarding the percent of the market for branded canola reforming regulations and increasing length of time it takes to resolve and vegetable oils sold to grocery stores agency transparency. For example, in complex merger cases, the FTC is and other retailers. Once challenged, the February, the Commission announced a developing better mechanisms to track parties abandoned the transaction.16 revised regulatory review schedule for the timing of milestone events 22 The FTC has also successfully 2018. To ensure that agency rules and throughout a merger investigation. The negotiated merger settlements requiring industry guides stay relevant and are goal is to improve understanding of the divestitures in a variety of industries, not overly burdensome, the FTC reviews factors that determine the length of a including pharmaceuticals, agricultural them on a 10-year schedule. The review merger investigation and, in particular, chemicals, animal vaccines, and others. schedule is published each year, with to highlight whether those factors are Walgreens, for example, substantially adjustments in response to public input, within the control of the FTC, the restructured its proposed acquisition of changes in the marketplace, and merging parties, or others. Consistent Rite Aid after the Commission raised resource demands. For 2018, the with confidentiality obligations, the concerns about the original transaction Commission has already initiated or FTC intends to make public as much of intends to initiate reviews of, and solicit during an extensive review.17 this data as possible, to encourage The courts continue to validate the public comments on, the following: additional dialogue among interested Guides for the Nursery Industry, 16 Commission’s competition work. In FTC stakeholders regarding ways to CFR part 18; and State of North Dakota v. Sanford streamline the merger review process. Test Procedures and Labeling Health, the U.S. District Court in North The agency also has focused its Standards for Recycled Oil, 16 CFR part advocacy efforts to reduce regulatory Dakota granted the request of the FTC 311; and the Attorney General’s Office of burdens and their associated costs at the state and federal level. A few of these North Dakota for a preliminary 18 United States District Court Order Granting injunction in the proposed merger of Plaintiffs’ Motion For A Preliminary Injunction, efforts are described below. Sanford Health and Mid Dakota Clinic FTC v. Sanford Health, et al., No. 1:17–cv–00133 (1) Licensing Restrictions. The in the Bismarck-Mandan region of North (W.D. N.D. Dec. 14, 2017), available at https:// agency’s Economic Liberty Task Force www.ftc.gov/enforcement/cases-proceedings/171- (Task Force) continues to focus on ways 0019/sanford-health-ftc-state-north-dakota-v. 15 to reduce unnecessary burdens imposed In FY 2017, the agencies received notice of 19 United States District Court Findings of Fact 2,052 transactions, compared with 1,326 in FY 2013 and Conclusions of Law, FTC v. AbbVie, No. 2:14– by occupational licensing requirements. and 2,201 in FY 2007. For historical information cv–5151 (E.D. Pa. June 29, 2018), available at Licensing restrictions—typically about HSR filings and U.S. merger enforcement, see https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/cases- embodied in state statutory law, the joint FTC/DOJ Hart-Scott-Rodino annual proceedings/121-0028/abbvie-inc-et-al. regulations, and administration—define reports, available at https://www.ftc.gov/policy/ 20 FTC Press Release, Statement by FTC Bureau of reports/policy-reports/annual-competition-reports. Competition Acting Deputy Director Haidee L. an occupation’s metes and bounds, or 16 FTC Press Release, FTC Challenges Proposed Schwartz on the U.S. District Court’s Grant of a ‘‘scope of practice,’’ and establish Acquisition of Conagra’s Wesson Cooking Oil Brand Preliminary Injunction and Announcement from conditions for entry into an occupation. by Crisco owner, J.M. Smucker Co. (Mar. 5, 2018), Wilhelmsen Maritime Services that It will Abandon available at https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press- Acquisition of Drew Marine Group (July 26, 2018), For some professions, licensing is releases/2018/03/ftc-challengesproposed- available at https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press- necessary to protect the public against acquisition-conagras-wesson-cooking-oil. releases/2018/07/statement-ftc-bureau-competition- legitimate health and safety concerns. 17 See Statement of Acting Chairman Maureen K. acting-deputy-director-haidee-l. However, licensing requirements also 21 Ohlhausen in Walgreens Boots Alliance/Rite Aid Id. prevent competition by imposing costs (Sept. 19, 2017), available at https://www.ftc.gov/ 22 FTC Press Release, FTC Announces Regulatory public-statements/2017/09/statement-acting- Review Schedule (Feb. 14, 2018), available at chairman-maureen-k-ohlhausenwalgreens-boots- https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/ 23 16 CFR 801–803. alliancerite. 2018/02/ftc-announces-regulatory-review-schedule. 24 83 FR 32768 (July. 16, 2018).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00174 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57977

on anyone who wants to enter a The rule would ensure that VA articulate recommendations that would licensed profession or continue telehealth practitioners may provide effectively ensure the competitiveness competing in that market. In many services to or from non-federal sites, of U.S. markets without imposing cases, the services for which a license is such as a home, regardless of whether unnecessary costs on private parties or required do not require the skill or the practitioner is licensed in the state governmental processes. The hearings knowledge reflected in the license and where the patient is located. The FTC began in September 2018 and are such services could be practiced safely staff comment noted that the proposed expected to continue through January and effectively by professionals who do rule would likely increase access to 2019, and will consist of 15 to 20 public not possess the required license. telehealth services, increase the supply sessions. All hearings will be webcast, State-by-state licensing rules can be of telehealth providers, increase the transcribed, and placed on the public especially costly to workers who seek to range of choices available to patients, record. The Commission will invite move to another state or to offer services improve health care outcomes, and public comment in stages throughout across state lines. These costs not only reduce the VA’s health care costs, the term of the hearings. impact workers, but may also harm thereby benefiting veterans, especially (2) Consumer Privacy. As the nation’s consumers by reducing availability and those in underserved areas or who are top enforcer on the consumer privacy quality, and increasing the price, of unable to travel. FTC staff also indicated beat, the FTC works to protect services and goods offered by licensed that the VA’s rulemaking would send an consumers’ privacy so that they can take professionals. Restrictions on license important signal to non-VA health care advantage of the benefits of a dynamic portability across state lines are providers, state legislatures, employers, and ever-changing digital marketplace. particularly burdensome for the families patients, and others regarding the The FTC achieves that goal through civil of military service members who move tremendous potential of telehealth to law enforcement, policy initiatives, and frequently, as military spouses often promote competition and improve consumer and business education. work in licensed occupations. access to care. The VA issued the rule For example, the FTC’s experience in On November 7, 2017, the Task Force on May 11, 2018, with an effective date consumer privacy enforcement has hosted a roundtable to examine of June 11, 2018.28 addressed practices offline, online, and empirical evidence on the effects of in the mobile environment by large, state occupational licensure.25 On Other Ongoing Focus Areas well-known companies and lesser- December 14, 2017, the same Task Force As discussed below, the Commission known players alike. For example, hosted four individuals, including three is also focused on fostering innovation electronic toy manufacturer VTech paid military spouses, for a ‘‘fireside chat’’ in competition and consumer $650,000 to settle FTC charges that the with then-Acting Chairman protection; consumer privacy; small company violated the Children’s Online Ohlhausen.26 This event provided a business assistance and advice on data Privacy Protection Act by collecting voice to the millions of American security; and protecting military personal information from children workers and consumers—especially consumers. without providing direct notice and military families—whose lives and (1) Fostering Innovation, Competition, obtaining their parent’s consent, and livelihoods are impacted by and Consumer Protection. On June 20, failing to take reasonable steps to secure unnecessary occupational licensing 2018, Chairman Joseph Simons the data it collected.30 Vizio, one of the requirements. announced that the Commission would world’s largest manufacturers and (2) Telehealth. Commission staff hold a series of public hearings during sellers of internet-connected smart continued their efforts to promote the fall and winter of 2018–19 televisions, agreed to pay $2.2 million to competition among health care examining whether broad-based changes settle charges that it installed software providers by removing state-based in the economy, evolving business on its televisions to collect the viewing regulatory barriers to the use of practices, new technologies, or data of 11 million consumers without telehealth in appropriate circumstances. international developments might their knowledge or consent.31 Ongoing In November 2017, in response to a call require adjustments to competition and work includes an investigation of for public comments, FTC staff consumer protection law, enforcement Facebook’s privacy practices.32 submitted a comment to the Department priorities, and policy.29 These Hearings The FTC held its third annual of Veterans Affairs (VA) in support of its on Competition and Consumer PrivacyCon, a conference examining proposed rule to clarify that VA health Protection in the 21st Century will be cutting-edge research and trends in care practitioners may provide similar in form and structure to the protecting consumer privacy and telehealth services to beneficiaries Global Competition and Innovation security, on February 28, 2018. The notwithstanding any contrary state Hearings undertaken in 1995 during the 2018 event focused on the economics of licensing laws, rules, or requirements.27 Chairmanship of Robert Pitofsky. The privacy, including how to weigh the Pitofsky Hearings were the first major costs and benefits of security-by-design 25 FTC Press Release, The Effects of Occupational step in establishing the FTC as a key Licensure on Competition, Consumers, and the modern center for competition policy 30 See Press Release, Electronic Toy Maker VTech Workforce: Empirical Research and Results (Nov. 7, Settles FTC Allegations That it Violated Children’s 2017), available at https://www.ftc.gov/news- research and development and sought to Privacy Law and the FTC Act (Jan. 8, 2018), https:// events/events-calendar/2017/11/effects- www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2018/01/ occupational-licensure-competition-consumers- Department of Veterans Affairs Regarding Its electronic-toy-maker-vtech-settles-ftc-allegations-it- workforce. Proposed Telehealth Rule (Nov. 1, 2017), available violated. 26 FTC Press Release, Voices for Liberty Fireside at https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/ 31 VIZIO, INC. and VIZIO Inscape Services, LLC, Chat (Dec. 14, 2017), available at https:// advocacy_documents/ftc-staff-comment- No. 2:17–cv–00758 (D.N.J. Feb. 6, 2018), available www.ftc.gov/policy/advocacy/economic-liberty/ department-veterans-affairs-regarding-its-proposed- at https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/cases- voices-liberty-fireside-chat. telehealth-rule/v180001vatelehealth.pdf. proceedings/162-3024/vizio-inc-vizio-inscape- 27 FTC Press Release, FTC Staff Comment 28 83 FR 21897 (May 11, 2018). services-llc. Supports VA Telehealth Rule that Will Increase 29 See FTC Press Release, FTC Announces 32 Statement by the Acting Director of FTC’s Access to Care, Promote Competition, and Benefit Hearings on Competition and Consumer Protection Bureau of Consumer Protection Regarding Reported Veterans (Nov. 2, 2017), available at https:// in the 21st Century (June 20, 2018), available at Concerns about Facebook Privacy Practices (Mar. www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2017/11/ https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/ 26, 2018), available at https://www.ftc.gov/news- ftc-staff-comment-supports-va-telehealth-rule-will- 2018/06/ftc-announces-hearings-competition- events/press-releases/2018/03/statement-acting- increase; see also FTC Staff Comment Before the consumer-protection-21st. director-ftcs-bureau-consumer-protection.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00175 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57978 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

techniques and privacy-protective military consumers and their families. A memoranda of understanding and other technologies and behaviors.33 recent example is an alert about arrangements, including the EU-U.S. (3) Data Security. The FTC continues scammers targeting the September 11th Privacy Shield Framework (Privacy to explore additional ways to provide Victim Compensation Fund.38 In Shield), which helps enable billions of practical guidance on data security. addition, a new Staff Perspective by the transatlantic data flows.42 Critically, Since 2002, the FTC has brought more FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection SAFE WEB also expressly confirms the than 60 cases alleging that companies examined financial issues that can affect FTC’s authority to challenge practices failed to have reasonable data security military consumers, including service occurring in other countries that harm and placed consumers’ data at risk. The members, veterans, and their families, U.S. consumers, a common fraud FTC’s law enforcement experience when they are purchasing and financing scenario, as well as to challenge U.S. informs the agency’s educational a car, dealing with debt collectors, or business practices that harm foreign materials for businesses. For example, making credit decisions.39 The Staff consumers. the FTC’s 2015 Start with Security guide Perspective also discusses the rights and The FTC’s cross-border enforcement distills the lessons learned from FTC remedies that are available to military cooperation covers the full range of FTC cases down to ten fundamental consumers in making financial investigations and cases. A recent concepts. During 2017’s Stick with decisions, and emphasizes how example is a sweep of elder fraud cases Security initiative, agency staff financial education early and often, involving assistance from the published a periodic Business Blog post adapted to the military life cycle, is International Mass-Marketing Fraud that focused on each of the ten Start crucial. Working Group (IMMFWG), which the with Security principles, using a series (6) International Consumer Protection FTC co-chairs along with the of hypotheticals to provide detailed and Competition. Enforcement Department of Justice and UK law guidance on steps companies can take to cooperation is the top priority of the enforcement.43 As part of that sweep, safeguard sensitive information.34 FTC’s international consumer protection the FTC worked directly with UK and (4) Small Businesses. There are more program. During fiscal year 2017, the Canadian authorities to halt Next-Gen than 30 million small businesses FTC cooperated in 51 investigations, Inc., a sweepstakes scam targeting nationwide, employing nearly 59 cases, and enforcement projects with senior citizens in the United States, million people, according to the Small foreign consumer, privacy, and criminal Canada, France, Germany, and the UK 44 Business Administration (SBA). The enforcement agencies as well as global A key focus of the FTC’s international Commission maintains a small business agency enforcement networks. The FTC privacy efforts is support for global website (www.ftc.gov/SmallBusiness) used its authority under the U.S. SAFE interoperability of data privacy regimes. with information to help small business WEB Act (SAFE WEB) to share The FTC works with the U.S. owners avoid scams and protect their information or provide investigative Department of Commerce on three key systems and customer data from assistance to foreign authorities in some cross-border data transfer programs for threats.35 In April 2018, the FTC of these matters.40 Passed in 2006, and the commercial sector: The EU-U.S. launched a national education campaign renewed in 2012, SAFE WEB has Privacy Shield, the Swiss-U.S. Privacy to help small businesses strengthen allowed the FTC to share evidence and Shield, and the Asia-Pacific Economic their cyber defenses and protect provide investigative assistance to Cooperation (‘‘APEC’’) Cross-Border sensitive data that they store.36 The FTC foreign authorities in a wide variety of Privacy Rules (CPBR) System. The also released business guidance to help cases, and has led to reciprocal Privacy Shield programs provide legal multi-level marketers understand and assistance.41 SAFE WEB has also mechanisms for companies to transfer comply with the law.37 personal data from the EU and (5) Military Consumers. The agency underpinned the FTC’s ability to participate in cross-border cooperation Switzerland to the United States with also has expanded its focus on military strong privacy protections. The APEC consumers. This includes a new 38 See https://www.militaryconsumer.gov/scam- CBPR system is a voluntary, enforceable militaryconsumer.gov website and a alerts/scammers-target-sept-11th-victim- series of Military Financial Consumer compensation-fund. 42 FTC Privacy Shield, https://www.ftc.gov/tips- conferences. The new website provides 39 See A Closer Look At the Military Consumer advice/business-center/privacy-and-security/ advice and assistance on a number of Financial Workshop: The Federal Trade privacy-shield. Indeed, the FTC’s SAFE WEB topics, including financial advice and Commission Staff Perspective (Feb. 2018), available powers provide for stronger cooperation with at https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/ European data protection authorities on alerts on numerous scams directed at reports/closer-look-military-consumer-financial- investigations and enforcement against possible workshop-federal-trade-commission-staff- Privacy Shield violations, a point cited in the 33 FTC Workshop, PrivacyCon 2018 (Feb. 28, perspective/military_consumer_workshop_-_staff_ European Commission’s Privacy Shield adequacy 2018), available at https://www.ftc.gov/news- perspective_2-2-18.pdf. decision. See Commission Implementing Decision events/events-calendar/2018/02/privacycon-2018. 40 Undertaking Spam, Spyware, And Fraud No. 2016/1250 (on the adequacy of the protection 34 See Stick with Security: A Business Blog Series Enforcement With Enforcers beyond Borders Act provided by the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield), 2016 O.J. (October 2017), https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/ [U.S. SAFE WEB Act], Public Law 109–455, 120 L207/1 at ¶ 51, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- business-center/guidance/stick-security-business- Stat. 3372, extended by Public Law 112–203, 126 content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=OJ:L:2016:207: blog-series. Stat. 1484, codified at 15 U.S.C., sections 41 et seq. FULL&from=EN. 35 For example, see Scams and Your Small 41 The FTC has responded to more than 125 SAFE 43 DOJ Press Release, Justice Department Business: A Guide for Business (June 2018), https:// WEB Act information sharing requests from 30 Coordinates Nationwide Elder Fraud Sweep of www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/business-center/guidance/ foreign enforcement agencies. The FTC has issued More Than 250 Defendants (Feb. 22, 2018), scams-your-small-business-guide-business. more than 110 civil investigative demands in more available at https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice- 36 See Engage, Connect, Protect The FTC’s than 50 civil and criminal investigations on behalf department-coordinates-nationwide-elder-fraud- Projects and Plans to Foster Small Business of foreign agencies. In cases relying on SAFE WEB, sweep-more-250-defendants. The IMMFWG is a Cybersecurity Staff Perspective (April 2018), https:// the FTC has collected millions of dollars in network of civil and criminal law enforcement www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/reports/ restitution for injured domestic and foreign agencies from Australia, Belgium, Canada, Europol, engage-connect-protect-ftcs-projects-plans-foster- consumers. See Press Release, FTC Testifies before the Netherlands, Nigeria, Norway, Spain, the small-business-cybersecurity-federal-trade/ecp_ House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee about United Kingdom and the United States. staffperspective_2.pdf. Agency’s Work to Protect Consumers, Promote 44 FTC Press Release, FTC Challenges Schemes 37 See Business Guidance Concerning Multi-Level Competition, and Maximize Resources (July 18, That Target or Affect Senior Citizens (Feb. 22, Marketing (Jan. 2018), https://www.ftc.gov/tips- 2018), available at https://www.ftc.gov/news- 2018), available at https://www.ftc.gov/news- advice/business-center/guidance/business- events/press-releases/2018/07/ftc-testifies-house- events/press-releases/2018/02/ftc-challenges- guidance-concerning-multi-level-marketing. energy-commerce-subcommittee-about-agencys. schemes-target-or-affect-senior-citizens.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00176 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57979

code of conduct protecting personal Co-operation and Development (OECD) For example, the Commission has a information transferred among the Competition Committee, including in its small business leniency policy United States and other APEC current strategic projects on procedural statement that analyzes various factors economies. The FTC enforces fairness, the digital economy, and the that may result in reduction or waiver companies’ privacy promises in these application of competition laws to of penalties.48 As such cases arise; the programs, bringing cases as violations of intellectual property rights. The agency Commission considers these leniency Section 5 of the FTC Act.45 The FTC also participates actively in the factors whenever a civil penalty may be also works closely with agencies competition components of the United assessed against a small business. developing and implementing new Nations Conference on Trade and The Commission continued its privacy and data security laws in Latin Development (UNCTAD) and the Asia- ‘‘second chance’’ policy for certain America and Asia. Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC). minor and inadvertent violations of the The FTC’s international competition Within the U.S. government, the FTC textile and wool labeling rules, which program supports the Bureau of works closely with colleagues in other can apply to small businesses. The Competition in the international aspects agencies in intergovernmental fora that Textile Corporate Leniency Policy helps of their investigations and enforcement, deal with competition matters, increase overall compliance with the cooperates with competition agencies including challenges that arise from the rules while minimizing the burden on around the world on enforcement and enforcement of foreign competition business of correcting inadvertent policy, and promotes convergence of laws. The FTC is also involved in issues labeling errors that are not likely to international antitrust policies toward at the intersection of trade and injure consumers. Since the Policy was best practice. competition policy, including as part of announced (2002), at least 242 The FTC plays a lead role in the the U.S. delegation that negotiates companies have been granted International Competition Network competition chapters of trade ‘‘leniency’’ for self-reported minor (ICN), which includes almost every agreements. violations of the FTC textile regulations. competition agency in the world and (7) Self-Regulatory and Compliance provides a leading forum for Initiatives with Industry. The Regulatory and Deregulatory Measures international cooperation and Commission continues to engage In 1992, the Commission convergence. The FTC’s activities in the industry in compliance partnerships in implemented a program to review its ICN include: Serving on the Steering the funeral and franchise industries, rules and guides regularly. The Group; co-chairing the Merger Working among others. For example, the Commission’s review program is Group where it leads projects to develop Commission’s Funeral Rule Offender patterned after provisions in the recommended practices for merger Program, conducted in partnership with Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601– notification and analysis, and practical the National Funeral Directors 612 and complies with the Small guidance on investigative techniques; Association, and is designed to educate Business Regulatory Enforcement leading the ICN’s work on procedural funeral home operators found in Fairness Act of 1996. The Commission’s fairness in antitrust investigations; violation of the requirements of the 10-year program also is consistent with leading the ICN Training on Demand Funeral Rule so that they can meet the section 5(a) of Executive Order 12866, project, which is creating a rule’s disclosure requirements. Five which directs executive branch agencies comprehensive curriculum of video hundred and thirty-two funeral homes to develop a plan to reevaluate training materials on competition law have participated in the program since periodically all of their significant and practice; and co-chairing the its inception in 1996.46 existing regulations.49 Under the Advocacy and Implementation Network. In addition, the Commission Commission’s program, rules are At the ICN’s annual conference in established the Franchise Rule reviewed on a 10-year schedule that March 2018, the ICN adopted the Alternative Law Enforcement Program results in more frequent reviews than Merger Working Group’s revised in partnership with the International are generally required by Section 610 of Recommended Practices on Franchise Association (IFA), a nonprofit the Regulatory Flexibility Act. This international enforcement cooperation, organization that represents both program is also broader than the review timing of notification, and review franchisors and franchisees. This contemplated under the Regulatory periods. The working group also program assists franchisors found to Flexibility Act, in that it provides the presented results of its agency survey on have a minor or technical violation of Commission with an ongoing systematic vertical merger analysis and related the Franchise Rule in complying with approach for seeking information about economic assessment. the rule.47 The IFA teaches the The FTC continues to help lead the the costs and benefits of its rules and franchisor how to comply with the rule work of the Organisation for Economic guides and whether there are changes and monitors its business for a period of that could minimize any adverse 45 See, e.g., ReadyTech Corp., Matter No. 1823100 years. Where appropriate, the program economic effects, not just a ‘‘significant (July 2, 2018), https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/ offers franchisees the opportunity to economic impact upon a substantial cases-proceedings/182-3100/readytech-corporation- mediate claims arising from the law number of small entities.’’ 50 In each matter; Md7, LLC, No. C–4629 (Nov. 29, 2017), violations. Since December 1998, 21 https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/cases- rule review, the Commission requests proceedings/172-3172/md7-llc; Tru companies have agreed to participate in public comments on, among other Communication, Inc., No. C–4628 (Nov. 29, 2017), the program. things, the economic impact and https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/cases- (8) Second Chance and Leniency benefits of the rule; possible conflict proceedings/172-3171/tru-communication-inc; Policies. The Commission complements Decusoft, LLC, No. C–4630 (Nov. 29, 2017), https:// between the rule and state, local, or www.ftc.gov/enforcement/cases-proceedings/172- its compliance assistance efforts by other federal laws or regulations; and 3173/decusoft-llc; Sentinel Labs, Inc., No. C–4608 considering the particular circumstance the effect on the rule of any (Apr. 14, 2017), https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/ when enforcing business obligations. cases-proceedings/162-3250/sentinel-labs-inc; 48 Vir2us, Inc., No. C–4609 (Apr. 14, 2017), https:// See 62 FR 16809 (Apr. 8, 1997) (issuing policy), www.ftc.gov/enforcement/cases-proceedings/162- 46 See 16 CFR 453. 62 FR 46363 (Sept. 2, 1997) (responding to 3248/vir2us-inc; SpyChatter, Inc., No. C–4614 (Apr. 47 16 CFR 436. Violations involving fraud or other comment received). 14, 2017), https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/cases- FTC Act violations are not candidates for referral 49 58 FR 51735 (Sept. 30, 1993). proceedings/162-3251/spychatter-inc. to the program. 50 5 U.S.C. 610.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00177 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57980 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

technological, economic, or other Piece Goods as Amended (the Care obtain a signed acknowledgement after industry changes. Labeling Rule) makes it an unfair or releasing a contact lens prescription to As part of its continuing 10-year deceptive act or practice for a patient, and to maintain it for at least review plan, the Commission examines manufacturers and importers of textile three years. In addition, to conform the effect of rules and guides on small wearing apparel and certain piece goods language of the Rule to the language of businesses and on the marketplace in to sell these items without attaching the Fairness to Contact Lens Consumers general. These reviews may lead to the care labels stating ‘‘what regular care is Act, the Commission sought comment revision or rescission of rules and needed for the ordinary use of the on a proposal to amend section 315.5(e) guides to ensure that the Commission’s product.’’ The Rule also requires that of the Rule to remove the words consumer protection and competition the manufacturer or importer possess, ‘‘private label.’’ The comment period goals are achieved efficiently and at the prior to sale, a reasonable basis for the closed on January 30, 2017, and staff least cost to business. Pursuant to this care instructions and allows the use of reviewed more than 4,000 comments program, the Commission has rescinded approved care symbols in lieu of words that were received. 37 rules and guides promulgated under to disclose care instructions. After On December 8, 2017, the the FTC’s general authority and updated reviewing the comments from a periodic Commission announced that it would be dozens of others since the early 1990s. rule review,53 the Commission holding a public workshop relating to The FTC continues to take a fresh concluded on September 20, 2012, that the NPRM and other issues relating to look at its long-standing regulatory the Rule continued to benefit consumers competition in the marketplace and review process. On February 20, 2018, and would be retained, and sought consumer access to contact lenses.56 the Commission issued a revised 10- comments on potential updates to the The workshop was held on March 7, year review schedule.51 The Rule, including changes that would 2018, and the deadline for submitting Commission is currently reviewing 15 of allow garment manufacturers and comments on the issues discussed at the the 65 rules and guides within its marketers to include instructions for workshop was April 6, 2018. Staff is jurisdiction. The FTC maintains a web professional wetcleaning on labels; reviewing more than 3,000 comments page at http://www.ftc.gov/regreview permit the use of ASTM Standard received and plans to submit a that serves as a one-stop shop for the D5489–07, ‘‘Standard Guide for Care recommendation to the Commission by public to obtain information and Symbols for Care Instructions on Textile early 2019. provide comments on individual rules Products,’’ or ISO 3758:2005(E), Energy Labeling Rule, 16 CFR 305. and guides under review as well as the ‘‘Textiles—Care labeling code using The Energy Labeling Rule is officially Commission’s regulatory review symbols,’’ in lieu of terms; clarify what known as the Rule concerning Energy program generally. can constitute a reasonable basis for care and Water Use Labeling for Consumer In 2018, the Commission initiated or instructions; and update the definition Products Under the Energy Policy and will initiate reviews of four of its rules of ‘‘dryclean.’’ 54 On March 28, 2014, the Conservation Act. Staff anticipates that or guides: (1) Test Procedures and Commission hosted a public roundtable the Commission will issue an NPRM by Labeling Standards for Recycled Oil, 16 in Washington, DC, that analyzed Spring 2019.57 CFR 311; (2) Disclosure Requirements proposed changes to the Rule. Staff Eyeglass Rule, 16 CFR 456. As part of and Prohibitions Concerning anticipates Commission action by the systematic rule review process, on Franchising, 16 CFR 436; (3) Identity December 2018. September 3, 2015, the Commission Theft Rules, 16 CFR 681; and (4) The Contact Lens Rule, 16 CFR 315. As issued a Federal Register notice seeking Nursery Guides, 16 CFR 18. part of the systematic rule review public comments about the Eyeglass process, on September 3, 2015, the Ongoing Rule and Guide Reviews Rule (or Trade Regulation Rule on Commission issued a Federal Register Ophthalmic Practice Rules).58 The The Commission is continuing review notice seeking public comments about comment period closed on October 26, 55 of a number of rules and guides, which the Contact Lens Rule. The comment 2015. Commission staff has completed are discussed below. period closed on October 26, 2015. The the review of 831 comments on the Contact Lens Rule requires contact lens (a) Rules Eyeglass Rule and anticipates sending a prescribers to provide prescriptions to recommendation for further CAN–SPAM Rule, 16 CFR 316. The their patients upon the completion of a Commission action by the fall of 2019. Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited contact lens fitting, and to verify contact The Eyeglass Rule requires that an Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003 lens prescriptions for contact lens optometrist or ophthalmologist give the (CAN–SPAM) regulates the transmission sellers authorized by consumers to seek patient, at no extra cost, a copy of the of all commercial electronic mail (email) such verification. Sellers may provide eyeglass prescription immediately after messages. The FTC issued the CAN– contact lenses only in accordance with the examination is completed. The Rule SPAM Rule to implement the Act, as a valid prescription that is directly also prohibits optometrists and authorized by the statute. As part of its presented to the seller or verified with ophthalmologists from conditioning the ongoing systematic review of its rules the prescriber. After Commission staff availability of an eye examination, as and guides, the Commission initiated a completed review of the 660 comments defined by the Rule, on a requirement periodic review of the CAN–SPAM Rule received from consumers, eye care that the patient agree to purchase on June 28, 2017.52 The public comment professionals, industry members, trade ophthalmic goods from the optometrist period closed on August 31, 2017. associations, and consumer advocacy or ophthalmologist. Commission staff anticipates sending a groups, the Commission published a Franchise Rule, 16 CFR 436. By recommendation to the Commission by notice of proposed rulemaking on December 2018, the Commission plans December 2018. December 7, 2016, seeking comment on to initiate periodic review of the Care Labeling Rule, 16 CFR 423. its proposal to amend the Rule to Promulgated in 1971, the Rule on Care require contact lens prescribers to 56 82 FR 57889 (Dec. 8, 2017). Labeling of Textile Apparel and Certain 57 See Final Actions below for information about 53 76 FR 41148 (July 13, 2011). a separate completed rulemaking proceeding for the 51 83 FR 7120 (Feb. 20, 2018). 54 77 FR 58338 (Sept. 20, 2012). Energy Labeling Rule. 52 82 FR 29254 (June 28, 2017). 55 80 FR 53272 (Sept. 3, 2015). 58 80 FR 53274 (Sept. 3, 2015).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00178 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57981

Franchise Rule (officially titled, Identity Theft Rules, 16 CFR 681. By mergers, acquisitions, or other Disclosure Requirements and December 2018, the Commission transactions of a specified size to file Prohibitions Concerning Franchising). expects to initiate periodic review of the notification with the FTC and the DOJ The Rule gives prospective purchasers Identity Theft Rules, which include the and to wait a designated period of time of franchises the material information Red Flags Rule and the Card Issuer Rule. before consummating the transaction. they need in order to weigh the risks The Red Flags Rule requires financial These Rules are continually reviewed in and benefits of such an investment. The institutions and creditors to develop order to improve the program’s Rule requires franchisors to provide all and implement a written identity theft effectiveness and to reduce the potential franchisees with a disclosure prevention program (a Red Flags paperwork burden on the business document containing 23 specific items Program). By identifying red flags for community. of information about the offered identity theft in advance, businesses can Staff anticipates submitting a franchise, its officers, and other be better equipped to spot suspicious recommendation to the Commission by franchisees. Required disclosure topics patterns that may arise and take steps to October 2018 that would propose include, for example: The franchise’s prevent potential problems from clarifying the definition of foreign issuer litigation history, past and current escalating into a costly episode of in the HSR Rules. The definition in the franchisees and their contact identity theft. The Card Issuer Rule HSR Rules for U.S. and Foreign persons information, any exclusive territory that requires credit and debit card issuers to and issuers focuses on three tests: (1) comes with the franchise, assistance the implement reasonable policies and Location of incorporation, (2) country franchisor provides franchisees, and the procedures to assess the validity of a whose laws organized under, and (3) cost of purchasing and starting up a change of address if they receive principal offices. The term ‘‘principal franchise. notification of a change of address for a offices’’ is not defined in the rules and Funeral Rule, 16 CFR 453. The consumer’s debit or credit card account is often a source of confusion for parties. Commission plans to initiate periodic and, within a short period of time This rulemaking would provide a 60 review of the Funeral Industry Practices afterwards, also receive a request for an definition. Rule (Funeral Rule) during 2019. The additional or replacement card for the Privacy Rule, 16 CFR 313. The Privacy Rule, which became effective in 1984, same account. Rule or Privacy of Consumer Financial requires sellers of funeral goods and Military Credit Monitoring Rule, to be Information Rule requires, among other things, that certain motor vehicle services to give price lists to consumers promulgated at 16 CFR 609. The dealers provide an annual disclosure of who visit a funeral home and to disclose Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, their privacy policies to their customers price and other information to callers and Consumer Protection Act, Public by hand delivery, mail, electronic who request it over the telephone. The Law 115–174, requires the Federal delivery, or through a website, but only Rule enables consumers to select and Trade Commission to promulgate the with the consent of the consumer. On purchase only the goods and services Free Credit Monitoring for Active Duty June 24, 2015, the Commission they want, and requires funeral Military Rule by May 25, 2019. The Rule to be promulgated will require the proposed amending the Rule to allow providers to seek authority before nationwide consumer reporting agencies motor vehicle dealers instead to notify performing some services such as to provide a free electronic credit their customers that a privacy policy is embalming. The Rule also requires monitoring service that, at a minimum, available on their website, under certain funeral providers to make disclosures notifies a consumer of material circumstances.61 The proposed regarding any required purchases and additions or modifications to the file of amendment would also revise the scope prohibits misrepresentations regarding the consumer at the consumer reporting and definitions in the Rule in light of requirements and other aspects of agency to any consumer who provides the transfer of part of the Commission’s funeral goods and services. to the consumer reporting agency (A) rulemaking authority to the Bureau of Holder in Due Course Rule, 16 CFR appropriate proof that the consumer is Consumer Financial Protection in the 433. On December 1, 2015, the an active duty military consumer; and Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Commission initiated a periodic review (B) contact information of the consumer. Consumer Protection Act. The comment of the Preservation of Consumers’ The Act requires the implementing rule period closed on August 31, 2015. Since Claims and Defenses Rule (Holder in to define: Electronic credit monitoring the Commission proposed amending the 59 Due Course Rule). The comment service, material additions or Rule, Congress enacted the Fixing period closed on February 12, 2016. modifications to the file of the America’s Surface Transportation Act Staff is reviewing the comments and consumer, and to determine what (FAST Act) which included a provision anticipates sending a recommendation constitutes appropriate proof that a amending the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act to the Commission by December 2018. consumer is active duty military. The to create a new exception to the annual The Holder in Due Course Rule requires Commission plans to issue a Notice of notice requirement. Staff anticipates sellers to include language in consumer Proposed Rulemaking during October submitting a recommendation to the credit contracts that preserves 2018. The public comment period will Commission by November 2018. consumers’ claims and defenses against close 60 days after the NPRM is R-value Rule, 16 CFR 460. On April 6, the seller. This Rule eliminated the published in the Federal Register. The 2016, the Commission initiated a ‘‘holder in due course’’ doctrine as a Commission plans to issue the final rule periodic review of the R-value Rule, legal defense for separating a by or before May 25, 2019, as required officially the Trade Regulation Rule consumer’s obligation to pay from the by the Act. Concerning the Labeling and seller’s duty to perform by requiring that Premerger Notification Rules and Advertising of Home Insulation, as part consumer credit and loan contracts Report Form (or HSR Rules), 16 CFR of its ongoing systematic review of all contain one of two clauses to preserve 801–803. The HSR Rules and the the buyer’s right to assert sales-related Antitrust Improvements Act 60 See (B) Regulatory Reform-related Initiatives claims and defenses against any Notification and Report Form (HSR above for information about the streamlining of paperwork burdens for E-filing HSR Forms and a ‘‘holder’’ of the contracts. Form) were adopted pursuant to section separate completed rulemaking proceeding for the 7(A) of the Clayton Act, which requires HSR Rules. 59 80 FR 75018 (Dec. 1, 2015). firms of a certain size contemplating 61 80 FR 36267 (June 24, 2015).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00179 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57982 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

rules and guides.62 The comment period comment period closed on April 20, longer necessary to prevent deceptive was later extended to September 6, 2018. On August 30, 2018, the claims regarding the size of television 2016.63 Staff anticipates sending a Commission proposed to rescind the screens and to encourage uniformity recommendation to the Commission for Guides because they appear to serve and accuracy in their marketing. The the next action by October 2018. The R- little purpose for consumers and Commission is therefore repealing the value Rule is designed to assist industry members in today’s market.68 Rule, effective 90 days after publication consumers in evaluating and comparing The comment period will close on in the Federal Register. As part of the the thermal performance characteristics November 5, 2018. systematic review of its rules and of competing home insulation products Leather Guides, 16 CFR 24. During guides, the Commission had initiated a by specifically requiring manufacturers 2019, the Commission plans to initiate periodic review of the Rule on June 28, of home insulation products to provide periodic review of the Leather Guides, 2017.71 Based on comments received information about the product’s degree formally known as the Guides for Select and prevailing market practices, the of resistance to the flow of heat (R- Leather and Imitation Leather Products. Commission published an NPRM on value). The Rule also establishes Adopted in 1996 and last reviewed in April 18, 2018, that proposed to repeal uniform standards for testing, 2007, the Leather Guides address the Rule.72 While effective, the Picture information disclosure, and misrepresentations regarding the Tube Rule set forth appropriate methods substantiation of product performance composition and characteristics of for measuring television screens when claims. specific leather and imitation leather that measure was included in any Safeguards Rule (or Standards for products. The Guides apply to the advertisement or promotional material Safeguarding Customer Information), 16 manufacture, sale, distribution, for the television set. If the CFR 314. On September 7, 2016, the marketing, or advertising of leather or measurement of the screen size was Commission initiated a periodic review simulated leather purses, luggage, based on a measurement other than the of the Safeguards Rule as part of its wallets, footwear, and other similar horizontal dimension of the actual ongoing systematic review of all rules products. Importantly, the Leather viewable picture area, the method of 64 and guides. The comment period Guides state that disclosure of non- measurement had to be clearly and closed on November 7, 2016, and staff leather content should be made for conspicuously disclosed in close anticipates submitting a material that has the appearance of proximity to the size designation. recommendation to the Commission by leather but is not leather. Recycled Oil Rule, 16 CFR 311. On November 2018. The FTC’s Safeguards July 24, 2018, the Commission Rule, as directed by the Gramm-Leach- Final Actions announced the completion of the review Bliley Act, requires each financial Since the publication of the 2017 of the Recycled Oil Rule (officially the institution subject to the FTC’s Regulatory Plan, the Commission has Rule on Test Procedures and Labeling jurisdiction to assess risks and develop issued the following final rules or taken Standards for Recycled Oil) and that the a written information security program other actions to close other rulemaking Rule is being retained in its current that is appropriate to its size and or guide proceedings. These final rules form.73 This Rule governs labeling of complexity, the nature and scope of its continue to be consistent with the containers for recycled or ‘‘re-refined’’ activities, and the sensitivity of the President’s Statement of Regulatory oil intended for use as engine oil. The customer information at issue. Philosophy and Principles contained in Rule, which implemented statutory Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR), 16 Executive Order 12866 and Executive requirements designed to encourage the CFR 308. On August 11, 2014, the Order 13771. use of recycled oil, permits Commission initiated a periodic review Energy Labeling Rule, 16 CFR 305. On manufacturers and other sellers to of the TSR as set out on the 10-year February 22, 2018, the Commission represent on a recycled engine-oil 65 review schedule. The comment period published final rule amendments to the container label that the oil is as extended closed on November 13, Energy Labeling Rule that updated substantially equivalent to new engine 66 2014. Staff anticipates making a ranges of comparability and unit energy oil, as long as the determination of recommendation to the Commission by cost figures on EnergyGuide labels for equivalency is based on National December 2018. dishwashers, furnaces, room air Institute of Standards and Technology (b) Guides conditioners, and pool heaters.69 The test procedures prescribed by the Rule. Textile Rules, 16 CFR 303. On January Nursery Guides, 16 CFR 18. On effective date was May 23, 2018. The Commission also set a compliance date 23, 2018, the Commission amended the February 22, 2018, the Commission Textile Rules (formally Rules and initiated periodic review of the Guides of October 1, 2019, for EnergyGuide labels on room air conditioner boxes Regulations under the Textile Fiber for the Nursery Industry.67 Adopted in and made several minor clarifications Products Identification Act) by 1979 and last reviewed in 2007, the and corrections to the Rule.70 eliminating an obsolete provision Guides address a number of sales Picture Tube Rule, 16 CFR 410. On requiring that an owner of a registered practices for outdoor plants, trees, and word trademark furnish the agency with flowers and prohibit deception as to October 2, 2018, the Commission announced the completion of its a copy of the mark’s United States such things as size, grade, age, Patent and Trademark Office condition, price, origin, or the place regulatory review of the Rule on Deceptive Advertising as to Sizes of registration before using the mark on where the products were grown. The 74 Viewable Pictures Shown by Television labels. Eliminating this requirement is Receiving Sets (Picture Tube Rule). The expected to reduce compliance costs 62 81 FR 19936 (Apr. 6, 2016). while increasing firms’ flexibility. The 63 Commission determined that the Rule, 81 FR 35661 (June 3, 2016). final Rules were effective on February 64 which was effective in 1967, is no 81 FR 61632 (Sept. 7, 2016). 22, 2018. The Textile Rules implement 65 79 FR 46732 (Aug. 11, 2014). See Final Actions below for information about a separate completed 68 83 FR 45582 (Sept. 10, 2018). rulemaking proceeding for the Telemarketing Sales 69 83 FR 7593 (Feb. 22, 2018). 71 82 FR 29256 (June 28, 2017). Rule. 70 See Ongoing Rule and Guide Reviews (a) Rules 72 83 FR 17117 (Apr. 18, 2018). 66 79 FR 61267 (Oct. 10, 2014). for information about a separate and ongoing 73 83 FR 48213 (Sept. 24, 2018). 67 83 FR 7643 (Feb. 22, 2018). rulemaking under the Energy Labeling Rule. 74 83 FR 3068 (Jan. 23, 2018).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00180 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57983

the Textile Fiber Products Identification businesses, and the public at large. In Federal government maintains a Act, which requires wearing apparel sum, the Commission’s regulatory government-to-government relationship and other covered household textile actions are aimed at efficiently and with the tribes—a responsibility of the articles to be marked with (1) the fairly promoting the ability of ‘‘private NIGC. Thus, while the Agency is generic names and percentages by markets to protect or improve the health committed to strong regulation of Indian weight of the constituent fibers present and safety of the public, the gaming, the Commission is equally in the textile fiber product; (2) the name environment, or the well-being of the committed to strengthening under which the manufacturer or American people.’’ 76 government-to-government relations by another responsible USA company does engaging in meaningful consultation II. Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions business, or in lieu thereof, the with Tribes to fulfill IGRA’s intent. The registered identification number (RN) of The Commission has no proposed NIGC’s vision is to adhere to principles such a company; and (3) the name of the rules that would be a ‘‘significant of good government, including country where the textile product was regulatory action’’ under the definition transparency to promote Agency processed or manufactured. in Executive Order 12866.77 The accountability and fiscal responsibility, Jewelry Guides, 16 CFR 23. On July Commission also has no proposed rules to operate consistently to ensure 24, 2018, the Commission announced it that would have significant fairness and clarity in the was adopting revised Guides for the international impacts or any administration of IGRA, and to respect Jewelry, Precious Metals, and Pewter international regulatory cooperation the responsibilities of each sovereign to Industries (Jewelry Guides).75 As part of activities that are reasonably anticipated fully promote Tribal economic its comprehensive review of the Jewelry to lead to significant regulations as development, self-sufficiency, a strong Guides, the Commission reviewed defined in Executive Order 13609. workforce, and strong tribal public comments and the transcript of a BILLING CODE 6750–01–P governments. The NIGC is fully public roundtable. To help marketers committed to working with Tribes to avoid deceptive practices, our ensure the integrity of the industry by recommended revisions attempt to align exercising its regulatory responsibilities the Guides with Section 5 by tying NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING through technical assistance, guidance to consumer expectations COMMISSION (NIGC) compliance, and enforcement activities. where we have supporting evidence while providing sellers greater Statement of Regulatory Priorities Retrospective Review of Existing flexibility. The final Guides include In 1988, Congress adopted the Indian Regulations several revisions addressing precious Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) (Pub. L. As an independent regulatory agency, metal surface applications. First, for 100–497, 102 Stat. 2475) with a primary the NIGC has been performing a sellers choosing to advertise their purpose of providing ‘‘a statutory basis retrospective review of its existing products’ precious metal coatings, the for the operation of gaming by Indian regulations well before Executive Order final Guides advise how to do so non- tribes as a means of promoting tribal 13771 was issued on January 30, 2017. deceptively. Second, based on new economic development, self-sufficiency, The NIGC, however, recognizes the durability testing, the final Guides and strong tribal governments.’’ IGRA importance of Executive Order 13771 include revised examples of non- established the National Indian Gaming and its regulatory review is being deceptive markings and descriptions for Commission (NIGC or the Commission) conducted in the spirit of Executive gold surface applications that are to protect such gaming, amongst other Order 13771, to identify those reasonably durable. Third, the final things, as a means of generating Tribal regulations that may be outmoded, Guides advise marketers to disclose the revenue for strengthening Tribal ineffective, insufficient, or excessively purity of coatings made with a gold, governance and Tribal communities. burdensome and to modify, streamline, silver, or platinum alloy. Finally, the At its core, Indian gaming is a expand, or repeal them in accordance final Guides advise marketers to function of sovereignty exercised by with input from the public. In addition, disclose rhodium coatings over products Tribal Governments. In addition, the as required by Executive Order 13175, advertised as precious metal, such as issued on November 6, 2000, the rhodium-plated items marketed as 76 Executive Order 12866, section 1. 77 Commission has been conducting ‘‘white gold’’ or silver. Section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 defines a regulatory action to be ‘‘significant’’ if it is likely government-to-government Summary to result in a rule that may: consultations with Tribes regarding (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 each regulation’s relevancy, consistency The actions under consideration million or more or adversely affect in a material inform and protect consumers, while way the economy; a sector of the economy; in application, and limitations or minimizing the regulatory burdens on productivity; competition; jobs; the environment; barriers to implementation, based on the legitimate businesses. The Commission public health or safety; or State, local, or tribal Tribes’ experiences. The consultation governments or communities; continues to identify and weigh the process is also intended to result in the (2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise identification of areas for improvement costs and benefits of proposed interfere with an action taken or planned by another regulatory actions and possible agency; and needed amendments, if any, new alternative actions and to seek and (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of regulations, and the possible repeal of consider the broadest practicable array entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs, or outdated regulations. the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or of comment from affected consumers, (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out The following Regulatory Identifier of legal mandates, the President’s priorities, or the Numbers (RINs) have been identified as 75 83 FR 40665 (Aug. 16, 2018). principles set forth in this Executive order. associated with the review:

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00181 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57984 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

RIN Title

3141–AA32 ...... Definitions. 3141–AA55 ...... Class III Minimum Internal Control Standards. 3141–AA58 ...... Management Contracts. 3141–AA60 ...... Class II Minimum Internal Control Standards. 3141–AA62 ...... Buy Indian Goods and Services (BIGS) Rule. 3141–AA68 ...... Audit Regulations. 3141–AA69 ...... Class II Minimum Technical Standards.

More specifically, the NIGC is byproduct, source, and special nuclear www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/ currently considering promulgating new materials to ensure adequate protection rulemaking/rules-petitions.html. regulations in the following areas: (i) of public health and safety, and promote A. Proposed Rules Amendments to its regulatory the common defense and security. As definitions to conform to the newly part of our mission, we regulate the American Society of Mechanical promulgated rules and provide clarity; operation of nuclear power plants and Engineers 2015–2017 Code Editions (ii) updates or revisions to its fuel-cycle facilities; the safeguarding of Incorporation by Reference (RIN 3150– management contract regulations to nuclear materials from theft and AJ74; NRC–2016–0082): This proposed address the current state of the industry; sabotage; the safe transport, storage, and rule would amend the NRC’s regulations (iii) the review and revision of the disposal of radioactive materials and to incorporate by reference the 2015 and minimum internal control standards wastes; the decommissioning and safe 2017 Editions of the American Society (MICS) for Class II gaming; (iv) release for other uses of licensed of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler regulation that would provide a facilities that are no longer in operation; and Pressure Vessel Code and the 2015 preference to qualified Indian-owned and the medical, industrial, and and 2017 Editions of the ASME businesses when purchasing goods or research applications of nuclear Operation and Maintenance of Nuclear services for the Commission at a fair material. In addition, we license the Power Plants (OM Code). market price; (v) the review and revision import and export of radioactive Advanced Power Reactor 1400 (APR– of the minimum technical standards for materials. 1400) Design Certification (RIN 3150– Class II gaming; and (vi) updates or As part of our regulatory process, we AJ67; NRC–2015–0224): This proposed revisions to the existing audit routinely conduct comprehensive rule would amend the NRC’s regulations regulations to reduce cost burdens for regulatory analyses that examine the in Title 10 of the Code of Federal small or charitable gaming operations. costs and benefits of contemplated Regulations (10 CFR) part 52, ‘‘Licenses, The Commission has decided to regulations. We have developed internal Certifications, and Approvals for suspend the Class III minimum internal procedures and programs to ensure that Nuclear Power Plants,’’ by adding a new control standards at 25 CFR part 542 we impose only necessary requirements appendix for the initial certification of and publish updated standards as on our licensees and to review existing the APR1400 standard plant design guidance documents. regulations to determine whether the (Korea Electric Power Corporation and NIGC is committed to staying up to requirements imposed are still Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co., Ltd). Cyber Security for Fuel Facilities (RIN date on developments in the gaming necessary. industry, including best practices and 3150–AJ64; NRC–2015–0179): This emerging technologies. Further, the Our regulatory priorities for fiscal proposed rule would add cyber security Commission aims to continue reviewing year (FY) 2019 reflect our safety and requirements to the NRC’s regulations its regulations to determine whether security mission and will enable us to applicable to certain nuclear fuel-cycle they are overly burdensome to smaller, achieve our two strategic goals facility applicants and licensees. This rural operations. The NIGC anticipates described in NUREG–1614, Volume 7, proposed rule would assure that these that the ongoing consultation with ‘‘Strategic Plan: Fiscal Years 2018– fuel-cycle facilities adequately detect, Tribes will continue to play an 2022’’ (https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ protect against, and respond to a cyber important role in the development of doc-collections/nuregs/staff/ attack capable of causing one or more of the NIGC’s rulemaking efforts. sr1614/v7/): the consequences of concern defined in (1) To ensure the safe use of BILLING CODE 7565–01–P the proposed rule. radioactive materials, and (2) to ensure Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal the secure use of radioactive materials. (RIN 3150–AI92; NRC–2011–0012): This II. Regulatory Priorities supplemental proposed rule would U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY require licensees for low-level COMMISSION (NRC) This section contains information on radioactive waste disposal facilities Statement of Regulatory Priorities for some of our most important and under 10 CFR part 61, ‘‘Licensing Fiscal Year 2019 significant regulatory actions that we are Requirements for Land Disposal of considering issuing in proposed or final Radioactive Waste,’’ to conduct site- I. Introduction form during FY 2019. For additional specific analyses, including an intruder Under the authority of the Atomic information on these regulatory actions assessment, and make additional Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and and on a broader spectrum of our changes to the current regulations to the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, upcoming regulatory actions, see our reduce ambiguity and facilitate as amended, the U.S. Nuclear portion of the Unified Agenda of implementation. Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulates Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions. Regulatory Improvements for the possession and use of source, We also provide additional information Production or Utilization Facilities byproduct, and special nuclear material. on planned rulemaking and petition for Transitioning to Decommissioning (RIN Our regulatory mission is to license and rulemaking activities, including priority 3150–AJ59; NRC–2015–0070): This regulate the Nation’s civilian use of and schedule, on our website at https:// proposed rule would amend the NRC’s

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00182 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57985

regulations that relate to the (LLRW) disposal facilities to conduct Action Date FR Cite decommissioning of production and site-specific analyses to demonstrate utilization facilities. compliance with the performance Preliminary Draft 01/08/13 78 FR 1155 Approval of American Society of objectives. Although the NRC believes Rule Language; Mechanical Engineers Code Cases, Second Re- that part 61 is adequate to protect public quest for Com- Revision 38 (RIN 3150–AJ93; NRC– health and safety, requiring a site- 2017–0024): This proposed rule would ment; Correc- specific analysis to demonstrate tion. incorporate by reference into 10 CFR compliance with the performance NPRM ...... 03/26/15 80 FR 16082 50.55a, ‘‘Codes and standards,’’ the objectives would enhance the safe NPRM Comment 07/24/15 ASME Code cases that the NRC finds to disposal of LLRW and would provide Period End. be acceptable or conditionally added assurance that waste streams not NPRM Comment 08/27/15 80 FR 51964 acceptable. Period Re- considered in the part 61 technical basis opened. B. Final Rules comply with the part 61 performance NPRM Reopening 09/21/15 The following rulemaking activities objectives. Further, these analyses of Comment meet the requirements of a significant would identify any additional measures Period End. regulatory action in Executive Order that would be prudent to implement. Supplemental 12/00/18 These amendments would improve the NPRM. 12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and Final Rule ...... 08/00/19 Review,’’ because they are likely to have efficiency of the regulations by making an annual effect on the economy of $100 changes to reduce ambiguity, facilitate Regulatory Flexibility Analysis million or more. implementation, and better align the Required: No. Mitigation of Beyond Design Basis requirements with the current and more Small Entities Affected: No. Events (RIN 3150–AJ49; NRC–2011– modern health and safety regulations. Government Levels Affected: None. 0189, NRC–2014–0240): This final rule This rulemaking would correct Additional Information: Staff intends would enhance mitigation strategies for ambiguities and provide added to publish a supplemental proposed rule nuclear power reactors to respond to assurance that LLRW disposal continues later in 2018, per Commission direction. beyond-design-basis external events. to meet the performance objectives in Agency Contact: Gary Comfort, Jr., Revision of Fee Schedules: Fee part 61. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office Recovery for FY 2019 (RIN 3150–AJ99; Summary of Legal Basis: of Nuclear Material Safety and NRC–2017–0032): This final rule would Safeguards, Washington, DC 20555– amend the NRC’s fee schedules for Alternatives: 0001, Phone: 301 415–8106, Email: licensing, inspection, and annual fees Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The [email protected]. charged to its applicants and licensees. NRC published a regulatory analysis RIN: 3150–AI92 examining the costs and benefits associated with the proposed rule. NRC Agreement States and industry NRC (licensees) incur implementation and Proposed Rule Stage ongoing costs. The benefits of the 176. Regulatory Improvements for 175. Low-Level Radioactive Waste regulatory action include allowing Production and Utilization Facilities Disposal [NRC–2011–0012] licensees to optimize disposal capacity Transitioning to Decommissioning [NRC–2015–0070] Priority: Other Significant. and ensuring that LLRW streams that E.O. 13771 Designation: Independent are significantly different from those Priority: Other Significant. agency. considered during the development of E.O. 13771 Designation: Independent Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2201; 42 the current regulations can be disposed agency. U.S.C. 5841 of safely, minimizing future mitigation. Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2201; 42 CFR Citation: 10 CFR 20; 10 CFR 61. These benefits are likely to avert U.S.C. 5841 Legal Deadline: None. potential future costs to licensees. The CFR Citation: 10 CFR 50; 10 CFR 73; Abstract: This rulemaking would rule is cost-justified because the 10 CFR 26; 10 CFR 140. amend the NRC’s regulations to revise regulatory initiatives enhance public Legal Deadline: None. the licensing requirements for low-level health and safety by ensuring the safe Abstract: This rulemaking would radioactive waste disposal. The rule disposal of LLRW. amend the NRC’s regulations to provide would ensure that the waste streams an appropriate regulatory framework for that are significantly different from Risks: nuclear power reactors transitioning those considered during the Timetable: from operations to decommissioning. development of existing regulations will The goals of this rulemaking are to continue to be disposed of safely and Action Date FR Cite provide for a safe, effective, and meet the performance objectives for efficient decommissioning process; to land disposal of low-level radioactive Preliminary Pro- 05/03/11 76 FR 24831 reduce the need for license amendment waste. The rule would require certain posed Rule requests and exemptions from existing licensees and applicants to conduct site- Language. regulations; and to address other Comment Period 06/18/11 decommissioning issues deemed specific analyses, including a new End. relevant by the NRC. The rulemaking intruder assessment, using a specified Preliminary Draft 12/07/12 77 FR 72997 compliance period and would make Rule Language; would address lessons learned from other clarifying changes. Second Re- licensees that have completed or are Statement of Need: The rule would quest for Com- currently in the decommissioning amend the Nuclear Regulatory ment. process, and would align regulatory Commission’s (NRC) regulations to Comment Period 01/07/13 requirements with the reduction in risk require low-level radioactive waste End. that occurs over time, while continuing

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00183 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57986 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

to maintain safety and security. The in ADAMS under Accession No. would establish requirements for FCF rulemaking was previously titled, ML14364A111. licensees to establish, implement, and ‘‘Regulatory Improvements for Power Agency Contact: Daniel Doyle, maintain a cyber security program to Reactors Transitioning to Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office detect, protect against, and respond to a Decommissioning.’’ The scope of this of Nuclear Material Safety and cyber attack capable of causing a rulemaking would affect nuclear Safeguards, Washington, DC 20555– consequence of concern. The design of production and utilization facilities. 0001, Phone: 301 415–3748, Email: this cyber security program would Statement of Need: This rulemaking [email protected]. provide flexibility to account for the would respond to Commission direction RIN: 3150–AJ59 various types of FCFs, promote common to proceed with rulemaking for reactors defense and security, and provide transitioning to decommissioning. The reasonable assurance that the public goals are to provide for a safe, effective, NRC health and safety remain adequately and efficient decommissioning process; protected against the evolving risk of to reduce the need for license 177. Cyber Security at Fuel Cycle cyber attacks. amendment requests and exemptions Facilities [NRC–2015–0179] Summary of Legal Basis: from existing regulations; and to address Priority: Other Significant. Alternatives: Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The other decommissioning issues deemed E.O. 13771 Designation: Independent NRC evaluated the provisions of the relevant by the NRC. agency. Summary of Legal Basis: Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2201; 42 proposed rule in the Regulatory Basis Alternatives: U.S.C. 5841 and concluded that the provisions Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The CFR Citation: 10 CFR 40; 10 CFR 70; provide a substantial increase in the NRC published a regulatory basis 10 CFR 73. overall protection of public health and document examining the costs and Legal Deadline: None. safety through effective implementation benefits associated with the proposed Abstract: This rulemaking would of the cyber security program to prevent rule. The cost-benefit analysis shows amend the NRC’s regulations to add safety consequences of concern. The that the rulemaking would result in a cyber security requirements for certain analysis further demonstrated that the net averted cost of between $12.5 nuclear fuel cycle facility applicants costs for the proposed rule provisions million to $32.3 million, in which the and licensees. The rule would require are cost justified for the additional rulemaking costs would be offset by the certain fuel cycle facilities to establish, protection provided. Risks: eliminated need for exemption requests implement, and maintain a cyber Timetable: or licensing amendment submittals that security program that is designed to licensees would typically submit to the protect public health and safety and the Action Date FR Cite NRC for review and approval during common defense and security. It would decommissioning. affect fuel cycle applicants or licensees Draft Regulatory 09/04/15 80 FR 53478 Risks: that are or plan to be authorized to: (1) Basis. Timetable: Possess greater than a critical mass of Draft Regulatory 10/05/15 special nuclear material and perform Basis Comment Action Date FR Cite activities for which the NRC requires an Period End. integrated safety analysis or (2) engage Final Regulatory 04/12/16 81 FR 21449 Basis. ANPRM ...... 11/19/15 80 FR 72358 in uranium hexafluoride conversion or ANPRM Comment 01/04/16 NPRM ...... 10/00/18 Period End. deconversion. Final Rule ...... 01/00/20 ANPRM Exten- 12/28/15 80 FR 80709 Statement of Need: The NRC sion of Com- currently does not have a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis ment Period. comprehensive regulatory framework Required: No. ANPRN Extension 03/18/16 for addressing cyber security at fuel Small Entities Affected: No. of Comment cycle facilities (FCFs). Each FCF Government Levels Affected: None. Period End. licensee is subject to either design basis Agency Contact: Gary Comfort, Jr., Draft Regulatory 03/15/17 82 FR 13778 threats (DBTs) or to the Interim Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office Basis. Compensatory Measures (ICM) Orders of Nuclear Material Safety and Draft Regulatory 06/13/17 Basis Comment issued to all FCF licensees subsequent Safeguards, Washington, DC 20555– Period End. to the events of September 11, 2001. 0001, Phone: 301 415–8106, Email: Final Regulatory 11/27/17 82 FR 55954 Both the DBTs and the ICM Orders [email protected]. Basis. contain a provision that these licensees RIN: 3150–AJ64 NPRM ...... 10/00/18 include consideration of a cyber attack Final Rule ...... 12/00/19 when considering security vulnerabilities. However, the NRC’s NRC Regulatory Flexibility Analysis current regulations do not provide Required: No. specific requirements or guidance on 178. American Society of Mechanical Small Entities Affected: No. how to implement these performance Engineers 2015–2017 Code Editions Government Levels Affected: None. objectives. Since the issuance of the Incorporation by Reference [NRC– Additional Information: The ICM Orders and the 2007 DBT 2016–0082] Commission directed the NRC staff to rulemaking, the threats to digital assets Priority: Other Significant. proceed with rulemaking in the Staff have increased both globally and E.O. 13771 Designation: Independent Requirements Memorandum on SECY– nationally. Cyber attacks have increased agency. 14–0118, ‘‘Request by Duke Energy in number, become more sophisticated, Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2201; 42 Florida, Inc., for Exemptions from resulted in physical consequences, and U.S.C. 5841 Certain Emergency Planning targeted digital assets similar to those CFR Citation: 10 CFR 50. Requirements,’’ which can be accessed used by FCF licensees. The rulemaking Legal Deadline: None.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00184 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57987

Abstract: This rulemaking would Agency Contact: James O’Driscoll, Timetable: amend the NRC’s regulations to Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office authorize the use of recent editions of of Nuclear Material Safety and Action Date FR Cite the American Society of Mechanical Safeguards, Washington, DC 20555– Engineers (ASME) Codes. The rule 0001, Phone: 301 415–1325, Email: NPRM ...... 10/00/18 Final Rule ...... 06/00/19 would incorporate by reference the 2015 james.o’[email protected]. and 2017 Editions of the ASME Boiler Related RIN: Related to 3150–AJ90, Regulatory Flexibility Analysis and Pressure Vessel Code and the 2015 Related to 3150–AJ91 Required: No. and 2017 Editions of the ASME RIN: 3150–AJ74 Small Entities Affected: No. Operations and Maintenance of Nuclear Government Levels Affected: None. Power Plants into the NRC’s regulations, Agency Contact: Margaret S. Ellenson, with conditions. This action increases NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office consistency across the industry, and of Nuclear Material Safety and makes use of current voluntary 179. Approval of American Society of Safeguards, Washington, DC 20555– consensus standards (as required by the Mechanical Engineers Code Cases, 0001, Phone: 301 415–0894, Email: National Technology Transfer and Revision 38 [NRC–2017–0024] [email protected]. Advancement Act), while continuing to Priority: Other Significant. RIN: 3150–AJ93 provide adequate protection to the E.O. 13771 Designation: Independent public. This rulemaking would affect agency. nuclear power reactor licensees. The Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2201; 42 NRC title of the rulemaking was revised to U.S.C. 5841 address that the rulemaking entitled, CFR Citation: 10 CFR 50; 10 CFR 55. 180. Revision of Fee Schedules: Fee ‘‘2017 Edition of the American Society Legal Deadline: None. Recovery for FY 2019 [NRC–2017–0032] of Mechanical Engineers Operations and Abstract: This rulemaking would Priority: Economically Significant. Maintenance Code’’ (RIN 3150–AJ90; incorporate by reference into the NRC’s Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. NRC–2017–0019), was added to the regulations the latest revision to E.O. 13771 Designation: Independent scope of this rulemaking along with the Regulatory Guides that list the agency. rulemaking entitled, ‘‘2017 Edition of American Society of Mechanical Legal Authority: 31 U.S.C. 483; 42 the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code Cases that the U.S.C. 2201; 42 U.S.C. 2214; 42 U.S.C. Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel NRC finds to be acceptable (or 5841 Code’’ (RIN 3150–AJ91; NRC–2017– conditionally acceptable). This action CFR Citation: 10 CFR 170; 10 CFR 0020). increases consistency across the 171. Statement of Need: This rulemaking industry and makes use of current Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, enhances the efficiency and voluntary consensus standards (as September 30, 2019. effectiveness of the NRC’s regulations by required by the National Technology The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation making use of current voluntary Transfer and Advancement Act), while Act of 1990 (OBRA–90), as amended, consensus approaches and is consistent continuing to provide adequate requires that the NRC recover with applicable requirements of the protection to the public. This approximately 90 percent of its budget National Technology Transfer and rulemaking would affect nuclear power authority in Fiscal Year (FY) 2019, less Advancement Act. reactor licensees. This rulemaking was the amounts appropriated from the Summary of Legal Basis: The legal formerly titled, ‘‘Regulatory Guide (RG) Waste Incidental to Reprocessing, basis for the proposed action is 42 1.84, Rev. 38; RG 1.147, Rev. 19; and RG generic homeland security activities, U.S.C. 2201, 42 U.S.C. 5841, and 10 CFR 1.192, Rev. 3; Approval of American and Inspector General services for the part 2, Agency Rules of Practice and Society of Mechanical Engineers Code Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, Procedure, ‘‘Subpart H, Rulemaking.’’ Cases.’’ through fees assessed to licensees. Alternatives: Statement of Need: This rulemaking Under OBRA–90, the NRC is required to Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The enhances the efficiency and collect the fees for FY 2019, by NRC has examined the costs and effectiveness of the NRC’s regulations by September 30, 2019. benefits associated with the proposed making use of current voluntary Abstract: This rule would implement rule. The NRC estimates that the consensus approaches and is consistent the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act proposed rulemaking would result in a with applicable requirements of the of 1990 (OBRA–90), as amended, which net averted cost of between $6.5 million National Technology Transfer and requires the NRC to recover and $7.7 million, from reducing the Advancement Act. approximately 90 percent of its budget industry burden of preparing and the Summary of Legal Basis: authority in a given fiscal year, less the NRC burden of reviewing and approving Alternatives: amounts appropriated from the Waste ASME Code alternative requests on a Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Incidental to Reprocessing, generic plant-specific basis. rulemaking and guidance homeland security activities, and Risks: implementation would result in a cost- Inspector General services for the Timetable: justified change based on the net Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, through fees assessed to licensees. This Action Date FR Cite averted cost to the industry. Other beneficial factors include meeting the rulemaking would amend the NPRM ...... 10/00/18 NRC goal of ensuring the protection of Commission’s fee schedules for Final Rule ...... 11/00/19 public health and safety and the licensing, inspection, and annual fees environment through the NRC’s charged to its applicants and licensees. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis approval of new ASME Code Cases, The licensing and inspection fees are Required: No. which would allow the use of the most established under 10 CFR part 170 and Small Entities Affected: No. current methods and technology. recover the NRC’s cost of providing Government Levels Affected: None. Risks: services to identifiable applicants and

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00185 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 57988 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan

licensees. Examples of services Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 10 CFR 50.109(a)(4)(ii) as being required provided by the NRC for which 10 CFR Required: Yes. for adequate protection of public health part 170 fees are assessed include Small Entities Affected: Businesses, and safety. The Commission imposed license application reviews, license Governmental Jurisdictions, Order EA–12–051 requirements through renewals, license amendment reviews, Organizations. an administrative exception to the and inspections. The annual fees Government Levels Affected: Local, backfit analysis requirements in 10 CFR established under 10 CFR part 171 State. 50.109. This rulemaking would be recover budgeted costs for generic (e.g., Agency Contact: Michele D. Kaplan, making those order requirements research and rulemaking) and other Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office generically applicable, and it is not regulatory activities not recovered under of the Chief Financial Officer, anticipated that this action would be 10 CFR part 170 fees. Washington, DC 20555–0001, Phone: imposing substantial additional Statement of Need: The NRC’s fee 301 415–5256, Email: michele.kaplan@ requirements beyond what has been regulations are primarily governed by nrc.gov. already imposed on power reactor two laws: (1) The Independent Offices RIN: 3150–AJ99 licensees by order. All additional Appropriations Act of 1952 (IOAA) (31 requirements that involve integration of U.S.C. 9701), and (2) OBRA–90. The the station blackout mitigation strategies OBRA–90 statute requires the NRC to NRC with other existing accident procedure recover approximately 90 percent of its and guideline sets must be justified budget authority through fees; this fee- Final Rule Stage under the NRC’s backfitting regulations. recovery requirement excludes amounts 181. Mitigation of Beyond Design Basis Alternatives: As an alternative to the appropriated for Waste Incidental to Events (MBDBE) [NRC–2014–0240] rulemaking, the NRC staff considered the ‘‘non-action’’ alternative. This Reprocessing, generic homeland Priority: Economically Significant. alternative would mean that the NRC security activities, and Inspector Major under 5 U.S.C. 801. General (IG) services for the Defense E.O. 13771 Designation: Independent would be required to issue orders or Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, as well agency. impose license conditions on each new as any amounts appropriated from the Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2201; 42 reactor licensed to ensure that the Nuclear Waste Fund. The OBRA–90 U.S.C. 5841 requirements continue to be imposed on statute first requires the NRC to use its CFR Citation: 10 CFR 50; 10 CFR 52. all power reactor licensees. This IOAA authority to collect user fees for Legal Deadline: None. alternative also would not require NRC work that provides specific Abstract: This rulemaking would operators of nuclear power plants to benefits to identifiable applicants and amend the NRC’s regulations to enhance strengthen and integrate various licensees (such as licensing work, mitigation strategies for nuclear power emergency response capabilities, inspections, special projects). The reactors to withstand beyond-design- improve strategies for large-scale events regulations at part 170 of title 10 of the basis external events. The rule would to promote effective decisionmaking at Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) produce a more seamless accident all levels, and have training/ authorize these fees. Because the NRC’s response capability that includes qualification/evaluation of key fee recovery under the IOAA (10 CFR emergency operating procedures and personnel to implement the procedures part 170) does not equal 90 percent of guidelines for beyond-design-basis and strategies. This is not the optimal the NRC’s budget authority, the NRC external events and extensive damage regulatory approach and not consistent also assesses generic annual fees under mitigation. The scope of this rulemaking with the NRC’s principles of good 10 CFR part 171 to recover the would affect nuclear power reactor regulation. The NRC sees benefit in remaining fees necessary to achieve licensees and applicants, and address pursuing a rulemaking that enables OBRA–90’s 90 percent fee recovery. several petitions for rulemaking (PRM– lessons-learned from implementation of These annual fees recover generic 50–96, PRM–50–97, PRM–50–98, PRM– EA–12–049 and external stakeholder regulatory costs that are not otherwise 50–100, PRM–50–101, and PRM–50– feedback (through the public comment collected through 10 CFR part 170. 102). process) to be considered within the Summary of Legal Basis: The OBRA– Statement of Need: This rulemaking is rulemaking to inform the requirements 90, as amended, requires that the fees intended to make generically applicable that are placed into the Code of Federal for FY 2019 must be collected by the requirements in EA–12–049, Order Regulations, which would then remove September 30, 2019. Modifying Licenses with Regard to the need to issue orders or impose Alternatives: Because this action is Requirements for Mitigation Strategies license conditions on each future mandated by statute and the fees must for Beyond-Design-Basis External reactor licensee. be assessed through rulemaking, the Events, which was issued on March 12, Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The NRC did not consider alternatives to 2012. This rulemaking is also intended portions of the rulemaking that entails this action. to make generically applicable the making station blackout mitigation requirements in EA–12–051, Order strategies and reliable spent fuel pool Anticipated Cost and Benefits: The Modifying Licenses with Regard to instrumentation generically applicable cost to the NRC’s licensees is Reliable Spent Fuel Pool is not anticipated to impose significant approximately 90 percent of the NRC FY Instrumentation that was issued on additional costs beyond those that are 2019 budget authority less the amounts March 12, 2012. These orders were already being incurred due to appropriated for non-fee items. issued in response to the events that implementation of EA–12–049 and EA– Risks: occurred at the Fukushima Dai-ichi 12–051. The benefits associated with the Timetable: Nuclear Power Station on March 11, mitigation strategies will occur as a 2011, involving an earthquake and result of EA–12–049 and EA–12–051 Action Date FR Cite tsunami. implementation rather than as a result Summary of Legal Basis: Order EA– of this rulemaking. The costs and NPRM ...... 01/00/19 Final Rule ...... 05/00/19 12–049 requirements were imposed on benefits associated with the integrated current power reactor licensees under response capability portion of this

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00186 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 222 / Friday, November 16, 2018 / Regulatory Plan 57989

rulemaking will be described in a E.O. 13771 Designation: Independent reference this official certified standard supporting regulatory analysis. agency. design into its application. This design Risks: The risks associated with Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2201; 42 certification rule (DCR) also gives the beyond-design-basis external events U.S.C. 5841 public a chance to comment on the have not been estimated with sufficient CFR Citation: 10 CFR 52. design before it receives finality. certainty to enable a quantitative Legal Deadline: None. Summary of Legal Basis: Abstract: This rulemaking would measure of risk to be determined for Alternatives: these events, including the amend the NRC’s regulations to corresponding benefit associated with incorporate the Advanced Power Anticipated Cost and Benefits: There implementation of the new mitigation Reactor 1400 (APR1400) standard plant are no current utilities seeking to build strategies. design. The rulemaking would add a or operate an APR1400 nuclear power Timetable: new appendix for the initial plant within the United States. There is certification of the APR1400 standard no anticipated major increase in costs Action Date FR Cite plant design. This action would allow for consumers, individual industries, or applicants intending to construct and geographical regions as a result of the NPRM ...... 11/13/15 80 FR 70610 operate a nuclear power plant to APR1400 DCR because this action does NPRM Comment 02/11/16 reference this design certification rule in not constitute the license for Period End. construction of a nuclear power plant at Final Rule ...... 10/00/18 future applications. Because the NRC considers this action to be non- a site. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis controversial, the NRC is pursuing a Risks: Required: No. direct final rule for this rulemaking. Timetable: Government Levels Affected: None. However, if the NRC receives significant Additional Information: The draft adverse comments on the rule, the NRC Action Date FR Cite final rule was provided to the will publish a document that withdraws Commission in December 2016. the direct final rule and will address the Direct Final Rule 02/00/19 Agency Contact: Meena Khanna, comments received in a subsequent Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office final rule. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis of Nuclear Material Safety and Statement of Need: This rule would Required: No. Safeguards, Washington, DC 20555– place the APR1400 standard design Small Entities Affected: No. 0001, Phone: 301 415–2150, Email: certification, once issued by the Government Levels Affected: None. [email protected]. Commission, into the Code of Federal Additional Information: The NRC staff Related RIN: Merged with 3150–AJ11, Regulations (CFR). The regulations in 10 is developing the regulatory basis. Merged with 3150–AJ08 CFR 52.51 require the Commission to Agency Contact: Robert Beall, Nuclear RIN: 3150–AJ49 initiate rulemaking after an application Regulatory Commission, Office of is filed under 10 CFR 52.45, by which Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, 10 CFR 52.41 allows any person to seek Washington, DC 20555–0001, Phone: a standard design certification. This NRC 301 415–3874, Email: robert.beall@ action is separate from the filing of an nrc.gov. 182. Advanced Power Reactor 1400 application for construction permit or (APR–1400) Design Certification [NRC– combined license (COL) for such a RIN: 3150–AJ67 2015–0224] facility. This rule would provide a COL [FR Doc. 2018–24084 Filed 11–15–18; 8:45 am] Priority: Other Significant. applicant the ability to incorporate by BILLING CODE 7590–01–P

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:00 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00187 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\16NOP2.SGM 16NOP2 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS2