DOCSLIB.ORG

Part 2 RECOMMENDED RENEWAL ACTION

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Part 2 RECOMMENDED RENEWAL ACTION ~ ~ "~ "., (I, I' . CENTRAL ~, E ~, SYRACUA GENERAL NEIGHBORHOOD RENEWAL PLAN ~ Ii Part 2 RECOMMENDED RENEWAL ACTION , \ ~I WILLIAM F, WALSH, MAYOR SYRACUSE URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY CENTRAL SYRACUSE GNRP EXECUTIVE BOARD , I l~ , CITY OF SYRACUSE, N.Y. Hon. Willialll F. Walsh, Mayor THE COMMON COUNCIL Roy D. Simmons, President Albert Orenstein Mrs. Norma H. Coburn Mrs. Maria H. Farr Tarky Lombardi, Jr. H. Newcomb Steuart, Jr. Walter J. Ludovico Stanley J. Laskowski John J. Handlin William S. Andrews SYRACUSE URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY Mayor William F. Walsh, Chairman Roy D. Simmons, President of the Common Council H. Beaman Tremble, Commissioner of Finance CENTRAL SYRACUSE GNRP EXECUTIVE BOARD George B. Schuster, Commissioner of Urban Improvement (1964-) George A. McCulloch, Commissioner of Urban Improvement (1958-1964) Sanford Getreu, Commissioner of Planning Thomas E. Ward, Director of the City-County Office of Economic Development John R. Searles, Jr., Executive Vice President of the Metropolitan Development Association CENTRAL SYRACUSE GNRP SUPPORTING STAFF Department of Urban Improvement: Robert L. Hale, Jr., Deputy Commissioner Henry P. Wilhelmi, Principal Planner Judson O. Allen, Senior Planner William Wasserstrom, Senior Planner Department of Planning: R. Spencer Steele, Deputy Commissioner .,,\ Metropolitan Development Association: .John G. Stone, Assistant to Mr. Searles CONSULTANTS Barton-Ascnman Associates, Consultant Harry Weese & Associates and Planners Collaborative, Associated Consultants ,- ~ i 'I ~ t I':i ~\ ,1 il 1:1 po " 'I A GENERAL NEIGHBORHOOD RENEWAL PLAN :1 FOR CENTRAL SYRACUSE, NEW YORK I ,) , Part 2 RECOMMENDED RENEWAL ACTION " t I,~ .1 i,1I I Ii I , , I~' I JULY, 1965 CONTENTS The General Neighborhood Renewal Plan, 3 Policies for Planning, 4 I Policies for Action, 5 Prospects for Growth, 7 1 Summary of Redevelopment Activity,10 The Opportunity Areas, 15 Modernization of Salina Street,16 The New Clinton Square, 18 Onondaga Creek, 20 Other Unique Development Opportunities, 22 Land-use and Zoning, 23 I The Circulation and Parking Plan, 26 1 2 '" 1 THE GENERAL Central Syracuse is the center of NEIGHBORHOOD government, business, and cultural op- portunity for over a million residents RENEWAL PLAN of Upstate New York. Government and civic leadership have together initiated a program of improvement and eco- nomic development that would, under "Our goal is nothing less than to make A General Neighborhood Renewal this plan, be extended and intensified. Central Syracuse the major center of Plan (GNRP) is called for when an business life and cultural opportunity urban renewal area is of such scope The program of improvement and in Upstate New York. We want to make that a series of renewal projects may development is needed to preserve the have to be initiated over a period of city's vital assets. One out of every the center of the city a strong symbol of years. The GNRP for Central Syracuse seven job opportunities in Onondaga ,I the quality, prosperity, and character is intended to serve as the guide for a County are found in Central Syracuse. of Syracuse and Onondaga County. program of action utilizing the full Forty cents out of every dollar in sales We are striving to attract new enter- range of constructive private and pub- tax revenues and more than a fourth II prises, to improve our position as a lic forces in community development. of all real estate taxes paid in the city are derived from "downtown" business meeting-place and a market-place, and The plan for Central Syracuse has activities and properties. Economic to make the heart of the city more emerged from a number of activities activity amounting to hundreds of mil- attractive for working and living." involving city agencies, their consult- lions of dollars each year contributes ants, and many citizens acting in both heavily to the prosperity of the whole WILLIAM F. WALSH, mayor formal and informal advisory capaci- metropolitan area, and it is in the heart October, 1964 ties. Preparation of the plan has re- of the city that many of the social, "" quired a series of technical studies, the cultural, and governmental centers that findings of which have been set forth serve the region are to be found. in memorandum reports. Part 1 of the plan, Development Policies and Objec- The urban renewal program is most tives, published in October, 1964, es- important because it represents a way tablished a number of vitally important to capitalize on the great potentials of development policies and objectives that Central Syracuse. It is the city's great- were adopted as guides for the recom- est single opportunity to create more mended renewal program and the basic jobs, attract more investment, replenish land-use, circulation, and other plans the tax base, and add new means of I on which the action program is based. cultural enjoyment. It is a unique op- This report, Part 2 of the plan, is a portunity to make the daily trips of summary of the action program and thousands of persons more convenient I basic plans, prefaced by a description and comfortable, make more business I . of the economic prospects that make services available, and create a new en- achievement of the recommendations a vironment for enterprise, leisure, liv- realistic possibility. ing, and worship. 3 U_J II POLICIES The recommended plans and program for essential business services, distribu- ~ reflect four basic policies established tive facilities, centers of training and I 1 FOR PLANNING at the outset of planning activity. These education, and places of worship and I policies are necessary to the goal of inspiration. Housing of varied type and providing for a Central Syracuse that price is needed for those who want to will, in its form and its facilities, meet live close to the heart of the city. all the requirements of its role as the I. economic and cultural heart of the Third, Central Syracuse should be reglOn. accessible from every '(I,eighborhood and industrial area of the city and from all Fir'st, Central Syracuse should be parts of the state and nation. New planned as an intensely-developed and freeways and Syracuse's modern air- compact district, essentially for those port facilities will serve this purpose activities and enterprises that especially well for years to come, but additional need this "optimum" central location: improvements in highways and public headquarters of administration and transit must be planned, including dis- commerce, retail establishments, gov- tributor facilities projected for the ernmental administrative centers, news central area itself. Additional parking media, accommodations for conventions facilities will have to be planned for and visitors, cultural and entertainment the future as part of a well-designed activities, and tourist attractions. In- system. Internally, the need is for easy tensive development and compact ar- circulation within the compact center, rangement is needed to enable con- with primary emphasis on the comfort, venient, face-to-face contact in the ~ convenience, and safety of pedestrians. exchange of ideas, information, goods, and services. Fourth, Central Syracuse should be exciting by day and by night and be a Second, Central Syracuse should also place of beauty with pleasant surround- I be planned to accommodate the related ings,. it should preserve the best of past !I activdies necessary to support its re- traditions while building skillfully for gional functions. There must be space both today and tomorrow. 4 POLICIES Just as the preparation of plans re- by the city in order to stimulate eco- quired conscious aims and policies, so nomic growth, to replace the old and FOR ACTION has the action program been based on worn-out with the new and productive, predetermined agreement in principle and to provide a new environment for as to the nature and extent of the a prosperous city center. public-private effort that could be relied upon in the future. Third, the city must make full use of its regulatory powers to the extent First, a number of major public im- necessary to protect and enhance Cen- provements will be necessary. These in- tral Syracuse. The zoning ordinance, clude important new highway develop- especially, must help to reserve this ment and significant rearrangement of area for the kind of uses that are most traffic and parking patterns; new valuable in a Central Syracuse loca- pedestrian and transit facilities; pro- tion and that are most efficient when vision of open space; and modernization grouped together. of utility systems. Policy on this type of action is to regard such projects as Fourth, business leadership must high priority measures for which public make the major contribution to the expenditure is made to create an en- ultimate full development of Central vironment conducive to the major pri- Syracuse. This calls for investment, vate investment that will produce city- large and sm?,ll, based on confidence in wide economic benefits. the future of the area. It calls for pro- motion of new development through the Second, the Central Syracuse pro- attraction of enterprises not now lo- gram will require continuing emphasis cated there. It calls for cooperation in on urban renewal, in which the city's the joint public-private elements of the powers and funds, induding the credits program, as has already been evidenced accruing from public improvements, are in the attraction of new enterprise combined with federal and state aid to and improvement of the environment provide sites for new development. This, through smaller-scale, but significant, too, must be regarded as an investment modernization and beautification. r r 5 <.D PROSPECTS gested location for production, distri- bution, and administration of region- FOR GROWTH al and national activities. The "personality" of the city- characterized by its great educational, The plan for Central Syracuse is de- cultural, and professional centers and signed to accommodate more than its civic enterprise-is attractive to economic activities that increasingly $200,000,000 worth of private construc- tion through a combination of urban are finding their way to communities renewal and public improvements over having these attributes.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Biostratigraphy and Paleoecology of the Upper Devonian Ithaca Formation Near Cortland, New York
    Biostratigraphy and Paleoecology of the Upper Devonian Ithaca Formation near Cortland, New York by Jonathan W. Harrington Geological Consultant Groton, New York and W. Graham Heaslip State University College at Cortland Cortland, New York It i s particularly appropriate that we examine the Ithaca Formation in the Cortland area during the Golden Anniversary Meeting of the New York State Geological Association. The rocks of this region are of con­ siderable historical interest, having received attention since the earli­ est days of geolog ical investigation in New York State . In fact, the presence of fossil shells in the Devonian rocks of New York was first noted in 1751 at a hillside outcrop in Cortland County by John Bartram, a member of the Lewis Evans Onondaga expedition (We lls, 1963). The New York Devonian is unique in its completeness, fossil content. numerous outcrops, and relatively undisturbed nature. It is the standard reference section for North America and displays a classic example of facies transition. Stratigraphic and paleontologic investigation over the past century has produced a wealth of infonnation, but uDespite this, perhaps another century of rigorous study wi ll be required before a thor­ ough understanding of its paleontology, lithology, stratigraphy and paleoecology can be attained. n (Rickard. 1964). The early stratigraphic work in the Upper Devonian of New York was done mainly by James Hall. J. M. Clarke. and H. S. Williams between 1840 and 1915 . These workers subdivided the succession, described the faunas and attempted to correlate along the strike. Due to comp l ex interfinger­ ing of the argillaceous western sequence with the thicker arenaceous eastern sequence, correlations proved difficult.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX C Additional Information and Clarification of Historic Properties
    APPENDIX C Additional Information and Clarification of Historic Properties Continuing Consultation for Historic Properties Additional Historic Resources • 200 Madison Street, Onondaga County War Memorial • 717 State Street, Everson Museum of Art • Onondaga Creek Bridges • 99 North Salina Street and 98 South Salina Street, Clinton Square • 800 North Clinton Street, Former Easy Washing Machine Co., currently Destiny Arms Additional photos for properties evaluated as Not NRE in 2016 Architectural Resources Survey Updated Building Eligibility Assessment Table Interstate 81- Viaduct Project PIN 3501.60 SHPO # 16PR006314 Continuing Consultation for Historic Properties As part of continuing consultation in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, and implementing regulations at 36 CFR Part 800: Protection of Historic Properties, the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) is submitting to the New York State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) an update of the eligibilities for some of the properties within the APE for the I-81 Viaduct Project. The NYSHPO Building Eligibility Assessment Table has been updated to reflect the most current information based on information regarding properties that have been demolished and to provide the current status of eligibility for properties within the North Salina Street Historic District Expansion nomination. Since the Architectural Resources survey for the Project was conducted in September 2016, the following properties have been demolished: • 325 - 327 Irving Avenue to Genesee Street • 404 Martin Luther King East • 105-109 Townsend St S/ aka 500 Water Street – Phoenix Foundry & Machine Company The draft National Register nomination for the North Salina Street Historic District Expansion was presented before the New York State Board for Historic Preservation on September 14, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places - Onondaga County Sites
    Field Office Technical Guide Section II – Natural Resources Information – Cultural Resources Information Page - 51 NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES - ONONDAGA COUNTY SITES The following information is taken from: http://www.nationalregisterofhistoricplaces.com/ny/Onondaga/state2.html NEW YORK - Onondaga County ALVORD HOUSE (ADDED 1976 - BUILDING - #76001257) N OF SYRACUSE ON BERWICK RD., SYRACUSE Historic Significance: Event, Information Potential Area of Significance: Historic - Non-Aboriginal, Agriculture Cultural Affiliation: American,rural Period of Significance: 1825-1849 Owner: Local Gov't Historic Function: Domestic Historic Sub-function: Single Dwelling Current Function: Landscape, Vacant/Not In Use Current Sub-function: Park AMOS BLOCK (ADDED 1978 - BUILDING - #78001890) 210--216 W. WATER ST., SYRACUSE Historic Significance: Event, Architecture/Engineering Architect, builder, or engineer: Silsbee,Joseph Lyman Architectural Style: Romanesque Area of Significance: Commerce, Transportation, Architecture Period of Significance: 1875-1899 Owner: Private , Local Gov't Historic Function: Commerce/Trade Historic Sub-function: Business Current Function: Vacant/Not In Use U.S. Department of Agriculture New York Natural Resources Conservation Service August 2002 Field Office Technical Guide Section II – Natural Resources Information – Cultural Resources Information Page - 52 ARMORY SQUARE HISTORIC DISTRICT (ADDED 1984 - DISTRICT - #84002816) ALSO KNOWN AS SEE ALSO:LOEW BUILDING S. CLINTON, S. FRANKLIN, WALTON, W. FAYETTE, AND W. JEFFERSON
    [Show full text]
  • To Download the Docent Manual
    Docent Manual Updated: May 2018 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................2 What does a docent do? ........................................................................................................................................2 Docent Position Description ...................................................................................................................................2 Docent Tips: Dos & Don’ts ......................................................................................................................................4 Tours ...........................................................................................................................................................................6 General Museum Tour............................................................................................................................................6 Outline for Standard 1-Hour to 1.5-Hour Tour ...................................................................................................6 Sample Narrative for 1-Hour Tour ......................................................................................................................9 Heritage Area Walking Tour ................................................................................................................................ 18 Outline for Heritage Area Walking Tour .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Syracuse Commercial Historic District NRHP Nomination
    NPS Form 10-900-a OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: Downtown Syracuse Commercial Historic District Other names/site number: South Salina Street Downtown Historic District Expansion Name of related multiple property listing: Downtown Syracuse Multiple Property Documentation Form 2. Location Street & number: 200, 300, and east side of 400 blocks of Warren Street; 205-209 Jefferson Street; 400 block and 500-550 South Salina Street City or town: Syracuse State: New York County: Onondaga Not For Publication: Vicinity: 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this ___ nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ___ meets ___ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: ___National ___Statewide ___Local Applicable National Register Criteria: ___A ___B ___C ___D Signature of certifying official/Title: Date State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Crawford & Stearns
    CRAWFORD & STEARNS ARCHITECTS AND PRESERVATION PLANNERS March 28, 2007 Mr. Don Radke, Chairman Syracuse Landmarks Preservation Board City Hall Commons 201 East Washington Street Syracuse, New York 13202 Re: 1100 E. Genesee Street Syracuse, New York Dear Don: At the request of the Syracuse Landmarks Preservation Board I visited this property on March 21 and 28, 2007 for the purpose of assessing the significance and integrity of the building's exterior relative to its eligibility for Protected Site status. Limited photographs were taken and are provided as an attachment. The interior of the building is not being considered as part of this review. Building Location: The building is located in Block 373 at the southeast corner of the intersection of E. Genesee Street and University Avenue and faces north. Architectural Character & Integrity: The structure appears to have been built as a single family residence in the third quarter of the 19th century and now houses medical offices. The building is comprised of a primary mass with symmetrical half hexagon bays projecting east and west from the southeast and southwest corners. This primary mass is two stories tall with a third level enclosed by a straight (vs. curved face) Mansard-style roof. A lower two story form extends across the back of the building and immediately east of that is a one story form that may be an earlier porch that has been enclosed. Another one story mass is tucked into the inside corner made by the east side of the building and the east bay. (See photos.) A one story, wood framed, open porch is located at the center of the north facade.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historic Designed Landscapes of Syracuse, New York
    (June 1991) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES NW | 6 MULTIPLE PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION FORM This form is for use in documenting multiple property historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Co ilatea aaeh item Ly eiiLcrliiy Li requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. [XI New Submission [ ] Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing The Historic Designed Landscapes of Syracuse, New York B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period of each.) Early National Period, 1785-1840 Romantic Period, 1840-1890 The City Beautiful Movement and Progressive Era, 1893-1930 The Country Place Era, 1890-1930 The Depression Years, 1930-1940 C. Form Prepared by Landscape & Prospect Project Staff: Landscape Architects and Cultural Resource Planners Dudley C. Breed, Jr., principal 23 9 East Water Street Marc J. Morfei, project manager Syracuse, New York 13202 Christine B. Lozner, consultant (315)422-8912 Peter V. Auyer, consultant July 1994 D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gridley Building
    Print http://us.mg6.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch Subject: FW: [PA_CNY] October's "iconic image": the Gridley Building From: Gregg A. Tripoli ([email protected]) To: [email protected]; Date: Monday, October 8, 2012 5:38 PM For press page from the Connective Corridor? - october bill board - we should put this on the website front page too - yes? Gregg A. Tripoli Executive Director Onondaga Historical Association 321 Montgomery St Syracuse, NY 13202 Tel: (315) 428-1864 Ext 311 Fax: (315) 471-2133 Email: [email protected] Website: www.cnyhistory.org -----Original Message----- From: Dennis [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 9:27 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Fw: [PA_CNY] October’s “iconic image”: the Gridley Building From Linda Dickerson Hartsock Director, Syracuse University Community Engagement and Economic Development October’s “iconic image” features a painting by SU student Jesse Handelman of the Gridley Building, paired with a historic photo of the Gridley Building from 1899. The photo is from the OHA archives and contains wonderful historic period details of a multimodal corridor that once included the Erie Canal and wide walkable streets, along with boulevards for carriages – and the new technologies like the first Franklin touring automobiles manufactured in Syracuse in 1902. The goal of the “Connective Corridor” is to create multimodal pathways through complete urban streetscapes that accommodate walking, biking, touring and transit, and infuse emerging technologies in an ambitious civic engineering project. The Gridley Building was constructed in 1867 and is listed on the National Register of Historic Places.
    [Show full text]
  • Rice-Dodge-Burgess Farm Other Names/Site Number Stone House at Chepachet Pond 2
    NPS Form 10-900 0 (Oct. 1990) RECEIVED 2280° United States Department of the Interior OCT - 9 2015 National Park Service Nat. Register of Historic Places National Register of Historic Places National Park Service Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested, If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Rice-Dodge-Burgess Farm other names/site number Stone House at Chepachet Pond 2. Location street & number 588 State Route 51 INI A I not for publication city or town Cedarville IN/ A I vicinity state New York code ----NY county Herkimer code 043 zip code 13491 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I certify that this IJD nomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property X meets does not meet the National Re~er criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • “RENEWING the PROMISE of SYRACUSE” ______
    “RENEWING the PROMISE of SYRACUSE” ____________________________________________ A 50 Point Plan for a 21st Century City CONTENTS ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ • the HISTORY.................................................................................................................................................page 3 • the VISION......................................................................................................................................................page 4 • the PLAN..........................................................................................................................................................page 5 – Section One: Economic Development and Job Creation • Points 1-9……………………………...........................................................................................................page 6 – Section Two: Education and Youth • Points 10-16………………….................................................................................................................page 16 – Section Three: Public Safety • Points 17-22..…………………………......................................................................................................page 22 – Section Four: Community Development, Housing and Neighborhoods • Points 23-32……………………………....................................................................................................page 28 – Section Five: Sustainability and the Environment • Points 33-44……………………………....................................................................................................page
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C Photographs of NR-Listed and Eligible Properties In
    Appendix C Photographs of NR-Listed and Eligible Properties in the APE NYS DOT Architectural Resources Survey 112-16 BURNET AVE/ Michael Dolpin Building/ Barboni Building (06740.000260) The Michael Dolpin Rowhouse was determined eligible for the NR in 1994 under Criterion C. The Michael Dolpin Rowhouse is located at 112-116 Burnet Avenue. The two-story Italianate brick building was constructed in 1872 for Michal Dolpin, a Syracuse lumber dealer. The build- ing is ornamented with a bracketed cornice and saw-tooth band. The matching one and two-bay porches are representative of the Eastlake style detailed with brackets and spindlework friezes. The Michael Dolpin Rowhouse is eligible for the NR under Criterion C as a rare surviving exam- ple of an unaltered Victorian rowhouse. 1 NYS DOT Architectural Resources Survey 204 BURNET AVE/ Corner Block Factory Shop/ Turack Motor Service (06740.000385) The Syracuse Corner Block Company factory was determined eligible for the NR in 2009 as a part of the multiple properties nomination for Industrial and Large Scale Commercial Buildings in the City of Syracuse. The three-story red brick factory is located at 204 Burnet Avenue and was constructed in 1895. The factory produced square turning, head, base, and corner blocks. The factory is associated with the industrial and commercial growth of the city during the Industri- al Boom and Diversification period (1870-1929) and is significant under Criterion C. 2 NYS DOT Architectural Resources Survey 122-24 BURNET AVE & DECKER ST/ Brayton-Folker House/ Caldwell & Ward Brass Co Office/ “Cab Fab” (06740.000261) The Cabinet Fabrication Group property consists of four interconnected historic buildings located at 122-124 Burnet Avenue: 1864 Brayton-Falker House, 1896 Central City Brass and Manufactur- ing Company factory, 1902 factory addition, and 1940s cinder block addition.
    [Show full text]