DOCSLIB.ORG

Database Processing for Identification of Concomitant Drug Frequencies in a Forensic Material Positive for Antidepressant Drugs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Database Processing for Identification of Concomitant Drug Frequencies in a Forensic Material Positive for Antidepressant Drugs Database processing for identification of concomitant drug frequencies in a forensic material positive for antidepressant drugs Niklas Björn, 2014-06-11 LiU−IMH−EX−14/01−SE Master Thesis conducted at the department of Medical and Health Sciences, division of Drug Research, Clinical Pharmacology Supervisor: Margareta Reis, Department of Medical and Health Science, University of Linköping Examinator: Henrik Gréen, Department of Medical and Health Science, University of Linköping Department of Medical and Health Sciences Linköping University SE-581 85 Linköping, Sweden Avdelning, institution Datum Division, Department Division of Drug Research, Clinical Pharmacology Date Department of Medical and Health Science Linköping University 2014-06-11 Språk Rapporttyp ISBN Language Report category Svenska/Swedish Licentiatavhandling ISRN: LiU−IMH−EX−14/01−SE Engelska/English Examensarbete _________________________________________________________________ C-uppsats ________________ D-uppsats Serietitel och serienummer ISSN Övrig rapport Title of series, numbering ______________________________ _____________ URL för elektronisk version Titel Title Database processing for identification of concomitant drug frequencies in a forensic material positive for antidepressant drugs Författare Author Niklas Björn Sammanfattning Abstract This article presents a study conducted on data containing drug concentrations. The data was obtained from femoral venous blood samples collected at medico legal autopsies in Sweden. Cases positive for antidepressant drugs were scrutinized and divided in to two groups for 15 antidepressant drugs: B-cases, where the cause of death was intoxication with more than one drug detected in the blood sample. C-cases, where the cause of death was NOT intoxication and at least one drug (the antidepressant) was detected in the blood sample. This data was then processed to find frequencies of concomitant drugs taken together with the antidepressant drugs. Frequencies of the most common concomitant drugs were then compared between B-cases and C-cases for each antidepressant drug. This revealed that the drugs dextropropoxyphene, ethanol, codeine, flunitrazepam, paracetamol, propiomazine and alimemazine were signifcantly more common as concomitant drugs in B-cases (intoxications) than in C-cases (non-intoxications). With regards to unknown interactions the most interesting combinations were: Propiomazine with mirtazapine, venlafaxine, citalopram or fluoxetine; Paracetamol with paroxetine; Flunitrazepam with mirtazapine, venlafaxine or citalopram; Codeine with mirtazapine or sertraline. These combinations should be further investigated. Nyckelord Keywords TCA, TeCA, SSRI, SNRI, MAOI, antidepressant drug, drug interaction, intoxication Table of Contents 1. Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... 1 2. List of abbreviations ..................................................................................................................... 1 3. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 2 3.1. Background ........................................................................................................................... 2 3.1.1. Assignment .................................................................................................................... 2 3.1.2. Data................................................................................................................................. 2 3.1.3. Antidepressant drugs................................................................................................... 3 3.1.4. Drug interactions .......................................................................................................... 4 3.2. Purpose .................................................................................................................................. 4 3.3. Clinical relevance.................................................................................................................. 4 4. Process ............................................................................................................................................ 4 5. Methods ......................................................................................................................................... 5 5.1. Extract data ............................................................................................................................ 6 5.2. Parent drug and metabolite ................................................................................................ 7 5.3. Frequencies ............................................................................................................................ 8 5.4. Statistical analysis ................................................................................................................. 9 5.4.1. Contingency tables ....................................................................................................... 9 5.4.2. Fisher´s exact test .......................................................................................................... 9 5.4.3. Odds Ratio ................................................................................................................... 10 5.4.4. Relative Risk ................................................................................................................ 10 5.4.5. Correction for multiple comparisons ....................................................................... 11 5.4.6. Comparisons of concentrations ................................................................................ 11 5.5. Known drug interactions................................................................................................... 12 6. Result ............................................................................................................................................ 12 6.1. All cases ............................................................................................................................... 12 6.2. Index-antidepressants and concomitant drugs .............................................................. 12 6.2.1. Amitriptyline ............................................................................................................... 13 6.2.2. Citalopram ................................................................................................................... 14 6.2.3. Clomipramine ............................................................................................................. 14 6.2.4. Fluoxetine .................................................................................................................... 15 6.2.5. Mianserin ..................................................................................................................... 15 6.2.6. Mirtazapine ................................................................................................................. 16 6.2.7. Paroxetine .................................................................................................................... 16 6.2.8. Sertraline ...................................................................................................................... 17 6.2.9. Venlafaxine .................................................................................................................. 17 7. Discussion .................................................................................................................................... 18 8. Conclusions ................................................................................................................................. 20 9. Acknowledgments...................................................................................................................... 20 10. References .................................................................................................................................... 21 Appendix I – Known drug interactions .......................................................................................... 23 Appendix II – Relative risk ............................................................................................................... 27 Appendix III – Frequency tables ...................................................................................................... 44 Appendix IV – Statistical data .......................................................................................................... 77 1. Abstract This article presents a study conducted on data containing drug concentrations. The data was obtained from femoral venous blood samples collected at medico legal autopsies in Sweden. Cases positive for antidepressant drugs were scrutinized and divided in to two groups for 15 antidepressant drugs: B-cases, where the cause of death was intoxication with more than one drug detected in the blood sample. C-cases, where the cause of death was NOT intoxication and at least one drug (the antidepressant) was detected in the blood sample. This data was then processed to find frequencies of concomitant drugs taken together with the antidepressant drugs. Frequencies of the most common concomitant drugs were then compared between B-cases and C-cases for each antidepressant drug. This revealed that the drugs dextropropoxyphene,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The In¯Uence of Medication on Erectile Function
    International Journal of Impotence Research (1997) 9, 17±26 ß 1997 Stockton Press All rights reserved 0955-9930/97 $12.00 The in¯uence of medication on erectile function W Meinhardt1, RF Kropman2, P Vermeij3, AAB Lycklama aÁ Nijeholt4 and J Zwartendijk4 1Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 2Department of Urology, Leyenburg Hospital, Leyweg 275, 2545 CH The Hague, The Netherlands; 3Pharmacy; and 4Department of Urology, Leiden University Hospital, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands Keywords: impotence; side-effect; antipsychotic; antihypertensive; physiology; erectile function Introduction stopped their antihypertensive treatment over a ®ve year period, because of side-effects on sexual function.5 In the drug registration procedures sexual Several physiological mechanisms are involved in function is not a major issue. This means that erectile function. A negative in¯uence of prescrip- knowledge of the problem is mainly dependent on tion-drugs on these mechanisms will not always case reports and the lists from side effect registries.6±8 come to the attention of the clinician, whereas a Another way of looking at the problem is drug causing priapism will rarely escape the atten- combining available data on mechanisms of action tion. of drugs with the knowledge of the physiological When erectile function is in¯uenced in a negative mechanisms involved in erectile function. The way compensation may occur. For example, age- advantage of this approach is that remedies may related penile sensory disorders may be compen- evolve from it. sated for by extra stimulation.1 Diminished in¯ux of In this paper we will discuss the subject in the blood will lead to a slower onset of the erection, but following order: may be accepted.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Antipsychotic Treatment on Metabolic Function: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    The effects of antipsychotic treatment on metabolic function: a systematic review and network meta-analysis Toby Pillinger, Robert McCutcheon, Luke Vano, Katherine Beck, Guy Hindley, Atheeshaan Arumuham, Yuya Mizuno, Sridhar Natesan, Orestis Efthimiou, Andrea Cipriani, Oliver Howes ****PROTOCOL**** Review questions 1. What is the magnitude of metabolic dysregulation (defined as alterations in fasting glucose, total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglyceride levels) and alterations in body weight and body mass index associated with short-term (‘acute’) antipsychotic treatment in individuals with schizophrenia? 2. Does baseline physiology (e.g. body weight) and demographics (e.g. age) of patients predict magnitude of antipsychotic-associated metabolic dysregulation? 3. Are alterations in metabolic parameters over time associated with alterations in degree of psychopathology? 1 Searches We plan to search EMBASE, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE from inception using the following terms: 1 (Acepromazine or Acetophenazine or Amisulpride or Aripiprazole or Asenapine or Benperidol or Blonanserin or Bromperidol or Butaperazine or Carpipramine or Chlorproethazine or Chlorpromazine or Chlorprothixene or Clocapramine or Clopenthixol or Clopentixol or Clothiapine or Clotiapine or Clozapine or Cyamemazine or Cyamepromazine or Dixyrazine or Droperidol or Fluanisone or Flupehenazine or Flupenthixol or Flupentixol or Fluphenazine or Fluspirilen or Fluspirilene or Haloperidol or Iloperidone
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,264,917 B1 Klaveness Et Al
    USOO6264,917B1 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,264,917 B1 Klaveness et al. (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 24, 2001 (54) TARGETED ULTRASOUND CONTRAST 5,733,572 3/1998 Unger et al.. AGENTS 5,780,010 7/1998 Lanza et al. 5,846,517 12/1998 Unger .................................. 424/9.52 (75) Inventors: Jo Klaveness; Pál Rongved; Dagfinn 5,849,727 12/1998 Porter et al. ......................... 514/156 Lovhaug, all of Oslo (NO) 5,910,300 6/1999 Tournier et al. .................... 424/9.34 FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS (73) Assignee: Nycomed Imaging AS, Oslo (NO) 2 145 SOS 4/1994 (CA). (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 19 626 530 1/1998 (DE). patent is extended or adjusted under 35 O 727 225 8/1996 (EP). U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. WO91/15244 10/1991 (WO). WO 93/20802 10/1993 (WO). WO 94/07539 4/1994 (WO). (21) Appl. No.: 08/958,993 WO 94/28873 12/1994 (WO). WO 94/28874 12/1994 (WO). (22) Filed: Oct. 28, 1997 WO95/03356 2/1995 (WO). WO95/03357 2/1995 (WO). Related U.S. Application Data WO95/07072 3/1995 (WO). (60) Provisional application No. 60/049.264, filed on Jun. 7, WO95/15118 6/1995 (WO). 1997, provisional application No. 60/049,265, filed on Jun. WO 96/39149 12/1996 (WO). 7, 1997, and provisional application No. 60/049.268, filed WO 96/40277 12/1996 (WO). on Jun. 7, 1997. WO 96/40285 12/1996 (WO). (30) Foreign Application Priority Data WO 96/41647 12/1996 (WO).
    [Show full text]
  • Profile Profile Profile Profile Uses and Administration Adverse Effects And
    640 Antihistamines Propiomazine Hydrochloride {BANM, r!NNMJ P..r�p�rc:Jti()n.� ............................ m (details are given in Volume B) propiorf,azina; to o azine; Chiorhydrate ProprietaryPreparations HidrodoruroPropi<;>rn deazini HydrochloridP pium; f1ponvtot,la3Y!Ha China: Qi Qi Hung. : de; Single-ingredient Preparafions. Loderixt. CIH'f); rMAPOX!10p!'\A. C;cJcl1_,--N_,QS,HCI�3.76_91 Rupatadine is an antihistamine with platelet-activating CAS 240) 5-9. factor (PAF) antagonist activity that is used for the Terfenadine (BAN, USAN, r!NN) treatment of allergic rhinitis (p. 612.1) and chronic 1 idiopathic urticaria (p. 612.3). It is given as the fumarate although doses are expressed in terms of the base; rupatadine fumarate 12.8 mg is equivalent to about 10 mg of rupatadine. The usual oral dose is the equivalent of 10 mg once daily of rupatadine. Izquierdo I. et a!. Rupatadine: a new selective histamine HI receptor and platelet-activating factor (PAF) antagonist: a review of pharmacological profile and clinical management of allergic rhinitis. Drugs Today 2003; 39: 451-68. 2. Kearn SJ,Plosker GL. Rupatadine: a review of its use in the management of allergic disorders. Drugs 2007; 67: 457-74. 3. Fantin et at. International Rupatadine study group. A 12-week 5, 8: (Terfenadine). A white or almost white, placebo-controlled study of rupatadine 10 mg once daily compared with Ph. Bur. cetirizine IO mg once daily, in the treatment of persistent allergic crystalline powder. It shows polymorphism. Very slightly rhinitis. Allergy 2008; 63: 924-3 1. soluble in water and in dilute hydrochloric acid; freely 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Central Nervous System Active Drugs During Pregnancy
    Pharmaceuticals 2013, 6, 1221-1286; doi:10.3390/ph6101221 OPEN ACCESS pharmaceuticals ISSN 1424-8247 www.mdpi.com/journal/pharmaceuticals Review The Use of Central Nervous System Active Drugs During Pregnancy Bengt Källén 1,*, Natalia Borg 2 and Margareta Reis 3 1 Tornblad Institute, Lund University, Biskopsgatan 7, Lund SE-223 62, Sweden 2 Department of Statistics, Monitoring and Analyses, National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm SE-106 30, Sweden; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Clinical Pharmacology, Linköping University, Linköping SE-581 85, Sweden; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +46-46-222-7536, Fax: +46-46-222-4226. Received: 1 July 2013; in revised form: 10 September 2013 / Accepted: 25 September 2013 / Published: 10 October 2013 Abstract: CNS-active drugs are used relatively often during pregnancy. Use during early pregnancy may increase the risk of a congenital malformation; use during the later part of pregnancy may be associated with preterm birth, intrauterine growth disturbances and neonatal morbidity. There is also a possibility that drug exposure can affect brain development with long-term neuropsychological harm as a result. This paper summarizes the literature on such drugs used during pregnancy: opioids, anticonvulsants, drugs used for Parkinson’s disease, neuroleptics, sedatives and hypnotics, antidepressants, psychostimulants, and some other CNS-active drugs. In addition to an overview of the literature, data from the Swedish Medical Birth Register (1996–2011) are presented. The exposure data are either based on midwife interviews towards the end of the first trimester or on linkage with a prescribed drug register.
    [Show full text]
  • Emea/666243/2009
    European Medicines Agency London, 29 October 2009 EMEA/666243/2009 ISSUE NUMBER: 0910 MONTHLY REPORT PHARMACOVIGILANCE WORKING PARTY (PHVWP) OCTOBER 2009 PLENARY MEETING The CHMP Pharmacovigilance Working Party (PhVWP) held its October 2009 plenary meeting on 19-21 October 2009. PhVWP DISCUSSIONS ON SAFETY CONCERNS Below is a summary of the discussions regarding non-centrally authorised medicinal products in accordance with the PhVWP publication policy (see under http://www.emea.europa.eu/htms/human/phv/reports.htm). Positions agreed by the PhVWP for non- centrally authorised products are recommendations to Member States. For safety updates concerning centrally authorised products and products subject to ongoing CHMP procedures, readers are referred to the CHMP Monthly Report (see under http://www.emea.europa.eu/pressoffice/presshome.htm). The PhVWP provides advice on these products to the Committee of Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) upon its request. Antipsychotics - risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) Identify risk factors for VTE for preventive action before and during treatment with antipsychotics The PhVWP completed their review on the risk of VTE of antipsychotics1. The review was triggered by and based on data from the UK spontaneous adverse drug reactions reporting system and the published literature. The PhVWP carefully considered the data, including the limitations of both information sources, such as the lack of randomised controlled trial data, the heterogeneity of published studies and the potential confounding factors such as sedation and weight gain, commonly present in antipsychotic users. The PhVWP concluded that an association between VTE and antipsychotics cannot be excluded. Distinguishing different risk levels between the various active substances was not possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmaceutical Appendix to the Tariff Schedule 2
    Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2007) (Rev. 2) Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2007) (Rev. 2) Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 2 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names (INN) which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known. ABACAVIR 136470-78-5 ACIDUM LIDADRONICUM 63132-38-7 ABAFUNGIN 129639-79-8 ACIDUM SALCAPROZICUM 183990-46-7 ABAMECTIN 65195-55-3 ACIDUM SALCLOBUZICUM 387825-03-8 ABANOQUIL 90402-40-7 ACIFRAN 72420-38-3 ABAPERIDONUM 183849-43-6 ACIPIMOX 51037-30-0 ABARELIX 183552-38-7 ACITAZANOLAST 114607-46-4 ABATACEPTUM 332348-12-6 ACITEMATE 101197-99-3 ABCIXIMAB 143653-53-6 ACITRETIN 55079-83-9 ABECARNIL 111841-85-1 ACIVICIN 42228-92-2 ABETIMUSUM 167362-48-3 ACLANTATE 39633-62-0 ABIRATERONE 154229-19-3 ACLARUBICIN 57576-44-0 ABITESARTAN 137882-98-5 ACLATONIUM NAPADISILATE 55077-30-0 ABLUKAST 96566-25-5 ACODAZOLE 79152-85-5 ABRINEURINUM 178535-93-8 ACOLBIFENUM 182167-02-8 ABUNIDAZOLE 91017-58-2 ACONIAZIDE 13410-86-1 ACADESINE 2627-69-2 ACOTIAMIDUM 185106-16-5 ACAMPROSATE 77337-76-9
    [Show full text]
  • Drug and Medication Classification Schedule
    KENTUCKY HORSE RACING COMMISSION UNIFORM DRUG, MEDICATION, AND SUBSTANCE CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE KHRC 8-020-1 (11/2018) Class A drugs, medications, and substances are those (1) that have the highest potential to influence performance in the equine athlete, regardless of their approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration, or (2) that lack approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration but have pharmacologic effects similar to certain Class B drugs, medications, or substances that are approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Acecarbromal Bolasterone Cimaterol Divalproex Fluanisone Acetophenazine Boldione Citalopram Dixyrazine Fludiazepam Adinazolam Brimondine Cllibucaine Donepezil Flunitrazepam Alcuronium Bromazepam Clobazam Dopamine Fluopromazine Alfentanil Bromfenac Clocapramine Doxacurium Fluoresone Almotriptan Bromisovalum Clomethiazole Doxapram Fluoxetine Alphaprodine Bromocriptine Clomipramine Doxazosin Flupenthixol Alpidem Bromperidol Clonazepam Doxefazepam Flupirtine Alprazolam Brotizolam Clorazepate Doxepin Flurazepam Alprenolol Bufexamac Clormecaine Droperidol Fluspirilene Althesin Bupivacaine Clostebol Duloxetine Flutoprazepam Aminorex Buprenorphine Clothiapine Eletriptan Fluvoxamine Amisulpride Buspirone Clotiazepam Enalapril Formebolone Amitriptyline Bupropion Cloxazolam Enciprazine Fosinopril Amobarbital Butabartital Clozapine Endorphins Furzabol Amoxapine Butacaine Cobratoxin Enkephalins Galantamine Amperozide Butalbital Cocaine Ephedrine Gallamine Amphetamine Butanilicaine Codeine
    [Show full text]
  • Drugs and Medication Guidelines Brochure
    Equine Medication Monitoring Program Drugs and Medication Guidelines January 2021 1 Introduction The California Equine Medication Monitoring Program (EMMP) is an industry funded program to ensure the integrity of public equine events and sales in California through the control of performance and disposition enhancing drugs and permitting limited therapeutic use of drugs and medications. The EMMP and the industry is dedicated and committed to promote the health, welfare and safety of the equine athlete. Owners, trainers, exhibitors, veterinarians and consignors of equines to public sales have a responsibility to be familiar with the California EMMP and the California Equine Medication Rule. California law (Food and Agricultural Code Sections 24000-24018) outlines the equine medication rule for public equine events in California. The owner, trainer and consignor have responsibility to ensure full compliance with all elements of the California Equine Medication Rule. Owners, trainers, exhibitors, veterinarians and consignors of equines to public sales must comply with both the California Equine Medication Rule and any sponsoring organization drug and medication rule for an event. The more stringent medication rule applies for the event. The California Equine Medication Rule is posted on the website: http://www.cdfa.ca.gov/ahfss/Animal_Health/emmp/ The information contained in this document provides advice regarding the California Equine Medication Rule and application of the rule to practical situations. The EMMP recognizes that situations arise where there is an indication for legitimate therapeutic treatment near the time of competition at equine events. The EMMP regulations permit the use of therapeutic medication in certain circumstances to accommodate legitimate therapy in compliance with the requirements of the rule.
    [Show full text]
  • Tcas Versus Placebo - New Studies in the Guideline Update
    TCAs versus placebo - new studies in the guideline update Comparisons Included in this Clinical Question Amitriptyline vs placebo Clomipramine vs placebo Dosulepin (dothiepin) vs placebo AMSTERDAM2003A LARSEN1989 FERGUSON1994B BAKISH1992B PECKNOLD1976B ITIL1993 BAKISH1992C RAMPELLO1991 MINDHAM1991 BREMNER1995 THOMPSON2001B CLAGHORN1983 CLAGHORN1983B FEIGHNER1979 GELENBERG1990 GEORGOTAS1982A GOLDBERG1980 HICKS1988 HOLLYMAN1988 HORMAZABAL1985 HOSCHL1989 KLIESER1988 LAAKMAN1995 LAPIERRE1991 LYDIARD1997 MYNORSWALLIS1995 MYNORSWALLIS1997 REIMHERR1990 RICKELS1982D RICKELS1985 RICKELS1991 ROFFMAN1982 ROWAN1982 SMITH1990 SPRING1992 STASSEN1993 WILCOX1994 16 Imipramine vs placebo BARGESCHAAPVELD2002 BEASLEY1991B BOYER1996A BYERLEY1988 CASSANO1986 CASSANO1996 CLAGHORN1996A COHN1984 COHN1985 COHN1990A COHN1992 COHN1996 DOMINGUEZ1981 DOMINGUEZ1985 DUNBAR1991 ELKIN1989 ENTSUAH1994 ESCOBAR1980 FABRE1980 FABRE1992 FABRE1996 FEIGER1996A FEIGHNER1980 FEIGHNER1982 FEIGHNER1983A FEIGHNER1983B FEIGHNER1989 FEIGHNER1989A FEIGHNER1989B FEIGHNER1989C FEIGHNER1992B FEIGHNER1993 FONTAINE1994 GELENBERG2002 GERNER1980B HAYES1983 ITIL1983A KASPER1995B KELLAMS1979 LAIRD1993 LAPIERRE1987 LECRUBIER1997B LIPMAN1986 LYDIARD1989 MARCH1990 17 MARKOWITZ1985 MENDELS1986 MERIDETH1983 Nortriptyline vs placebo NANDI1976 GEORGOTAS1986A NORTON1984 KATZ1990 PEDERSEN2002 NAIR1995 PESELOW1989 WHITE1984A PESELOW1989B PHILIPP1999 QUITKIN1989 RICKELS1981 RICKELS1982A RICKELS1987 SCHWEIZER1994 SCHWEIZER1998 SHRIVASTAVA1992 SILVERSTONE1994 SMALL1981 UCHA1990 VERSIANI1989 VERSIANI1990
    [Show full text]
  • Sedative and Hypnotic Drugs-Fatal and Non-Fatal Reference Blood Concentrations, 2014, Forensic Science International, (236), 138-145
    Sedative and hypnotic drugs-Fatal and non- fatal reference blood concentrations Anna K Jönsson, Carl Soderberg, Ketil Arne Espnes, Johan Ahlner, Anders Eriksson, Margareta Reis and Henrik Druid Linköping University Post Print N.B.: When citing this work, cite the original article. Original Publication: Anna K Jönsson, Carl Soderberg, Ketil Arne Espnes, Johan Ahlner, Anders Eriksson, Margareta Reis and Henrik Druid, Sedative and hypnotic drugs-Fatal and non-fatal reference blood concentrations, 2014, Forensic Science International, (236), 138-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.01.005 Copyright: Elsevier http://www.elsevier.com/ Postprint available at: Linköping University Electronic Press http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-105408 Our reference: FSI 7480 P-authorquery-v9 AUTHOR QUERY FORM Journal: FSI Please e-mail or fax your responses and any corrections to: E-mail: [email protected] Article Number: 7480 Fax: +353 6170 9272 Dear Author, Please check your proof carefully and mark all corrections at the appropriate place in the proof (e.g., by using on-screen annotation in the PDF file) or compile them in a separate list. Note: if you opt to annotate the file with software other than Adobe Reader then please also highlight the appropriate place in the PDF file. To ensure fast publication of your paper please return your corrections within 48 hours. For correction or revision of any artwork, please consult http://www.elsevier.com/artworkinstructions. Any queries or remarks that have arisen during the processing of your manuscript are listed below and highlighted by flags in the proof.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 1995 / Notices DIX to the HTSUS—Continued
    20558 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 1995 / Notices DEPARMENT OF THE TREASURY Services, U.S. Customs Service, 1301 TABLE 1.ÐPHARMACEUTICAL APPEN- Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DIX TO THE HTSUSÐContinued Customs Service D.C. 20229 at (202) 927±1060. CAS No. Pharmaceutical [T.D. 95±33] Dated: April 14, 1995. 52±78±8 ..................... NORETHANDROLONE. A. W. Tennant, 52±86±8 ..................... HALOPERIDOL. Pharmaceutical Tables 1 and 3 of the Director, Office of Laboratories and Scientific 52±88±0 ..................... ATROPINE METHONITRATE. HTSUS 52±90±4 ..................... CYSTEINE. Services. 53±03±2 ..................... PREDNISONE. 53±06±5 ..................... CORTISONE. AGENCY: Customs Service, Department TABLE 1.ÐPHARMACEUTICAL 53±10±1 ..................... HYDROXYDIONE SODIUM SUCCI- of the Treasury. NATE. APPENDIX TO THE HTSUS 53±16±7 ..................... ESTRONE. ACTION: Listing of the products found in 53±18±9 ..................... BIETASERPINE. Table 1 and Table 3 of the CAS No. Pharmaceutical 53±19±0 ..................... MITOTANE. 53±31±6 ..................... MEDIBAZINE. Pharmaceutical Appendix to the N/A ............................. ACTAGARDIN. 53±33±8 ..................... PARAMETHASONE. Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the N/A ............................. ARDACIN. 53±34±9 ..................... FLUPREDNISOLONE. N/A ............................. BICIROMAB. 53±39±4 ..................... OXANDROLONE. United States of America in Chemical N/A ............................. CELUCLORAL. 53±43±0
    [Show full text]