South West Herts Growth & Transport Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

South West Herts Growth & Transport Plan South West Hertfordshire Growth and Transport Plan Prospectus June 2019 North Central Hertfordshire Growth and Transport Plan Stage 1 Context Paper Hertfordshire County Council Project Reference: Herts Plans and Strategies Project Number: 60536307 30 March 2017 South West Hertfordshire Growth and Transport Plan 2 Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by A Findlay A Tobin S Willison C Durbin B Wickenden G Vecia E Oyokose Revision History Revision Revision date Details Revisions Revisions Originator Reviewer Update 1 25/08/17 Officer GV SPW Comments Update Update 2 17/11/17 Member GV, AF SPW Comments Update Update 3 08/01/18 Additional Edits SPW - Update 4 12/03/18 Additional Edits AF, EO SPW Update 5 08/06/18 Additional Edits AF SPW Update 6 04/01/18 Post OC - consultation edits Update 7 11/03/18 Additional post AF SPW consultation edits Update 8 5/4/19 Final edits OC Prepared for: Hertfordshire County Council AECOM South West Hertfordshire GTP Prospectus South West Hertfordshire Growth and Transport Plan 3 Prepared for: Hertfordshire County Council Prepared by: AECOM AECOM Limited AECOM House 63-77 Victoria Street St Albans Hertfordshire AL1 3ER UK T: +44(0)1727 535000 aecom.com © 2019 AECOM Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. Prepared for: Hertfordshire County Council AECOM South West Hertfordshire GTP Prospectus South West Hertfordshire Growth and Transport Plan 4 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................... 8 2. Process and Policy Context ........................................................ 12 3. South West Hertfordshire ........................................................... 17 4. Challenges .................................................................................. 36 5. Objectives ................................................................................... 43 6. Addressing the Challenges ......................................................... 48 Projects and Linked Project Groups ................................................................................... 60 Schemes ............................................................................................................................. 61 Packages ............................................................................................................................ 62 Strategic Interventions and Corridors ................................................................................ 63 Identifying Preferred Packages .......................................................................................... 64 Package 1 – Hemel Hempstead East-West Corridor .......................................................... 66 Package 2 – Maylands (Hemel Hempstead) ........................................................................ 75 Package 3 – Hemel Hempstead-Luton Corridor ................................................................. 83 Package 4 – St Albans-Watford Corridor ............................................................................ 91 Package 5 – Watford Western Gateway .............................................................................. 99 Package 6 – Watford-Hemel Hempstead Corridor ........................................................... 106 Package 7 – Watford Central ............................................................................................. 115 Package 8 – Watford South .............................................................................................. 124 Package 9 - Rickmansworth ............................................................................................. 132 Combined Packages Schedule of Interventions .............................................................. 137 7. Conclusion and Next Steps ....................................................... 142 8. Appendices ............................................................................... 145 Appendix A - Intervention Schedule and Assessment – Preferred Combination ................ 146 Appendix B - Intervention Objective Scoring ..................................................................... 152 Appendix C - Scheme Approach Selection and Packaging ............................................... 159 Appendix D – Supplementary Note – Dome Roundabout .................................................. 167 Appendix E – Area Wide Interventions and Sustainable Development Principles .............. 175 Figures Figure 1: Coverage Map with GTP areas and Corridor Studies ........................................... 10 Figure 2 - Plan-Policy Framework ....................................................................................... 13 Figure 3 - Growth and Transport Plan Portfolio ................................................................... 14 Figure 4 - Growth and Transport Plan Stages of Development ........................................... 15 Figure 5 - South West Hertfordshire area ........................................................................... 17 Figure 6 - Map of Watford ................................................................................................... 18 Figure 7 - Aerial view of Watford Town Centre .................................................................... 19 Figure 8 - Map of Hemel Hempstead .................................................................................. 20 Figure 9 - Aerial view (westwards) of Hemel Hempstead .................................................... 21 Prepared for: Hertfordshire County Council AECOM South West Hertfordshire GTP Prospectus South West Hertfordshire Growth and Transport Plan 5 Figure 10 – Rickmansworth and South Three Rivers .......................................................... 22 Figure 11 - South St Albans area and connections to Watford and Hemel Hempstead ..... 23 Figure 12 - Aerial view (southwestwards) of south St Albans, Bricket Wood, and How Wood23 Figure 13 - Broad relationship between urban areas in South West Hertfordshire ............. 24 Figure 14 - South West Hertfordshire Transport Network .................................................. 25 Figure 15 - Plough 'Magic' Roundabout, Hemel Hempstead Town Centre .......................... 26 Figure 16 - Watford Junction railway station main entrance .............................................. 27 Figure 17 – St Albans Station on the Abbey Line ................................................................ 28 Figure 18 - The Nickey Line (National Cycle Route 57) ....................................................... 29 Figure 19 – Potential Housing and Jobs Growth in South West Hertfordshire ................... 32 Figure 20 - Key planned developments in South West Hertfordshire ................................. 33 Figure 21 - Approach to Identifying Challenges ................................................................. 36 Figure 22 - Summary of Challenge Symptoms ................................................................... 38 Figure 23 – Personas – ‘current’ experiences of transport and travel in South West Hertfordshire ...................................................................................................................... 39 Figure 24 - South West Hertfordshire GTP Objectives ....................................................... 44 Figure 25 - Objectives and Key Topics ................................................................................ 46 Figure 26 - Current Toolbox of Interventions ...................................................................... 48 Figure 27 - Approach to Identifying Interventions .............................................................. 49 Figure 28 - Intervention Hierarchy ...................................................................................... 52 Figure 29 - Example Scheme Approaches ......................................................................... 54 Figure 30 - Schedule of Interventions ................................................................................ 55 Figure 31 - Linked Project Groups ...................................................................................... 60 Figure 32 - Schemes .......................................................................................................... 61 Figure 33 - Packages .......................................................................................................... 62 Figure 34 - Strategic Interventions ..................................................................................... 63 Figure 35 - Package 1 Preferred Combination .................................................................... 72 Figure 36 - Package 1 Indicative Sequence of Delivery ...................................................... 74 Figure 37 - Bus Connectivity at the East Hemel (Maylands) Multi-Modal Transport Interchange ........................................................................................................................ 79 Figure 38 - Package 2 Preferred
Recommended publications
  • Lanchester Building, Hempstead Road
    PART A Report of : HEAD OF REGENERATION AND DEVELOPMENT Date of Committee: 30 th January 2014 Site address: Lanchester Building, Hempstead Road Reference number: 13/01134 /FUL Description of development: Conversion of building for use as a primary school with nursery, including two 3 storey rear extensions, alterations to elevations and new entrance canopy. Formation of external play areas, including new surfacing, seating, fencing and gates, and alterations to landscaping. Erection of fencing around the boundaries of the site. Alterations to vehicular access to West Herts College and the provision of 7 car parking spaces, coach lay-by, cycle shelter and new footpaths. Applicant: West Herts Community Free School Trust th Date received: 6 November 2013 st 8 week date (minor): 1 January 2014 Ward: PARK SUMMARY Full planning permission is sought for the conversion of the existing Lanchester Building at West Herts College into a two form entry primary school with nursery comprising the associated extensions and alterations to the building and external ground works to facilitate this use. The building itself is locally listed and the whole site is located within the Civic Core Conservation Area. The adjacent Little Cassiobury is a Grade II* listed building. The proposed use of the Lanchester Building as a primary school will meet an identified and immediate need for primary school places within the central area of Watford. The use of the building as a school does not require planning permission; however, the proposed external works to the open space in front of the Lanchester Building are considered to have a moderate negative impact on the character and appearance of the Civic Core Conservation Area and the setting of the locally listed Lanchester Building.
    [Show full text]
  • Responses to the Rail Strategy Consultation Page 1 West Anglia
    Responses to the Rail Strategy Consultation Appendix1 West Anglia Mainline Organisation Consultation Comments - WAML HCC Response Action for Rail Strategy Broxbourne 4-tracking & CR2 to be given higher profile - Include CR2 on page 14 but Borough Council e.g. on pages 4 & 32 & in figure 2.2 on page not on pages 4 & 32 as 14. Include Ambition Broxbourne's aspiration these figures list existing of Cheshunt as strategic hub with CR2, links services and lines. Include to Stratford, London & Stansted, and reference to Ambition significant development around the station Broxbourne's aspiration of associated with a potential redevelopment of Cheshunt as strategic hub, Delamare Road. Include lobbying for early and of lobbying for early safeguarding of regional CR2 route. CR2 safeguarding of regional route. Cambridgeshire Include addressing single track tunnel at Single track tunnel at None. County Council Stansted to improve journey times & capacity Stansted as constraint for all services, from the north & south. already included in Strategy. East Herts District Objects to wording on page 41 re - HCC not pursuing Hertford Council investigation into the implementation of East as CR2 terminus and development around Hertford East branch so text will be removed. stations. Serious constraints of implementing Amend text on page 40 re CR2 in East Herts should be recognised. Ware platform. There was never a second platform at Ware (page 40). Hertford Town Appropriate service mix with more semi-fasts - Include reference to semi- Council to London, and longer term to Liverpool St. fasts including to Liverpool St. Hertfordshire Lobby for Hertford East & Harlow as northern HCC not pursuing Hertford None.
    [Show full text]
  • Hertfordshire Area Review: College Annex
    Hertfordshire Area Review College annex August 2017 Contents1 Hertford Regional College 3 North Hertfordshire College 4 Oaklands College 6 West Herts College 8 1 Please note that the information on the colleges included in this annex relates to the point at which the review was undertaken. No updates have been made to reflect subsequent developments or appointments since the completion of the review. 2 Hertford Regional College Type: General further education college Location: The college is based in Turnford and Ware in Hertfordshire Local Enterprise Partnership: Hertfordshire LEP Principal: Tony Medhurst Corporation Chair: Mike Carver Main offer includes: The college offers provision across 14 subject sector areas to 16 to 18 year olds and adults Apprenticeships Employer-led learning Higher education Programmes for 14-16 year olds Details about the college offer can be reviewed on the Hertfordshire Regional College website Specialisms: Creative media The college receives funding from: Education Funding Agency Skills Funding Agency Higher Education Funding Council For the 2014 to 2015 academic year, the college’s total income was: £23,718,000 Ofsted inspections: The college was inspected in May 2016 and was assessed as requires improvement 3 North Hertfordshire College Type: General further education college Location: The college is based in Stevenage, Hitchin and Letchworth Garden City in Hertfordshire Local Enterprise Partnership: Hertfordshire LEP Principal: Matt Hamnett Corporation Chair: Richard Alberg Main offer includes: The college
    [Show full text]
  • NHS Herts Valleys Clinical Commissioning Group Board Meeting Date of Meeting: 10 May 2018
    NHS Herts Valleys Clinical Commissioning Group Board Meeting Date of Meeting: 10 May 2018 Title Urgent treatment and GP services at Hemel Hempstead Hospital Agenda item 6 Purpose* (tick) Decision ☒ Approval ☐ Discussion ☐ Assurance ☐ Information only ☐ Author and job title Responsible director and job title Director signature David Evans, David Evans Approved by Director of Commissioning Director of Commissioning David Evans and Juliet Rodgers Juliet Rodgers, Associate Director of Communications and Engagement Short summary of paper This paper asks the board to consider options for two services located at Hemel Hempstead Hospital: 1. Future operating hours for the urgent treatment centre which has been operating on interim hours since December 2016 due to staffing shortages overnight; 2. Future contract for the registered patient list at West Hertfordshire Medical Centre once the current fixed term contract ends in October. The paper outlines the feedback from a public consultation on both of the above services, together with information on additional factors such as demand and resourcing issues that have been taken into account in developing recommendations. The thorough process of consultation has helped mitigate the engagement risk. Risk remains of lack of support from some stakeholders. Patient safety and workforce risks are also factors in the discussion on proposals; not opening the UTC overnight would help mitigate risks around a scarce GP workforce and avoiding an inconsistent and unstable urgent care facility. Recommendation(s) The board is being asked to review the outcomes of the consultation together with evidence and information relating to other factors and to consider the following recommendations: 1. To retain the current hours of the urgent treatment centre, reflecting difficulties with staffing the service overnight, and to explore the feasibility of extending the service to midnight, subject to a workforce review that will come to board later in 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Development Strategy Appendix 3 and 4
    Appendix 3: Proposed Village Envelope Maps VB/1 Garden Scene Nursery, Hermes and The New Bungalow VB/2 22 and 23 College Close VB/3 Linnins Pond VB/4 Rear garden at 25 Cheddington Road VB/5 Land rear of 16 to Pembroke Cottage, Tring Road, Long Marston Appendix 4: Transport Proposals Maps T/1 Existing bus interchange facilities including taxi rank (Hemel Hempstead) T/2 Replacement bus interchange facilities including taxi rank (Hemel Hempstead) T/3 Hemel Hempstead Railway Station (Hemel Hempstead) T/4 Apsley Railway Station (Hemel Hempstead) T/5 Bus garage, Whiteleaf Road (Hemel Hempstead) T/6 Featherbed Lane and related junctions (Hemel Hempstead) T/7 B481 Redbourn Road (Hemel Hempstead) T/8 Junction of Bedmond Road and Leverstock Green Road (Hemel Hempstead) T/9 A4146 Leighton Buzzard Road (Hemel Hempstead) T/10 New junction and highway works associated with development at LA1 (Hemel Hempstead) T/11 New junction and highway works associated with development at LA2 (Hemel Hempstead) T/12 New junction and highway works associated with development at LA3 (Hemel Hempstead) T/13 Cycle route through Two Waters, Apsley and Nash Mills (Hemel Hempstead) T/14 Footpath network in Two Waters and Apsley (Hemel Hempstead) T/15 Cycle routes for London Road with Station Road (Hemel Hempstead) T/16 Berkhamsted Railway Station T/17 Kingshill Way and Shootersway with reference to Sites SS1 and LA4 (Berkhamsted) T/18 High Street Corridor (Berkhamsted) T/19 Lower Kings Road Public Car Park (Berkhamsted) T/20 Tring Railway Station T/21 New junction and highway works associated with development at LA5 (Tring) T/22 Tring Station to Pitstone T/23 New junction and highway works associated with development at LA6 (Bovingdon) .
    [Show full text]
  • Watford Character of Area Study
    Character Area 18 Period Generally 1930s. Includes 1900s – 1950s. Heights Predominantly two storeys. Some bungalows. Urban grain Intermediate form. Block size / structure Regular pattern of blocks varying in size (450m x 80m). Generally larger block sub-division than Victorian/Edwardian development. Plot sizes Typically 8m x 40m. Gaps between buildings of 4m- 5m. Streetscene Suburban streetscene. Wide carriageways (6-7m for total), with pavements of 2.5-3.5m widths – some of which feature street trees. Limited street furniture. Building lines Generally consistent building lines behind front gardens. Front boundaries Marked by hedges of varying heights, brick walls or timber fences. Many original hedges / walls are now open frontages to allow car access. Roof forms Generally hipped tile roofs, with brick chimneys. Windows Originally metal or timber framed windows. These have generally been replaced since with various types of uPVC windows. Projecting two storey bay windows are common. Materials Materials include variety of brick types, render and mock-Tudor style timbering. Tile roofs. Car parking Large proportion of houses have garages as later additions to the side. Majority of parking is accommodated in front drives. Some on-street parking. Landscaping Front gardens typically 6m deep. Rear gardens typically 15m-25m deep. Hedges are relatively common in rear gardens, but less so in front gardens. Street tree planting along some pavements. Limited green space outside of gardens and formal parkland/playing fields/allotments. No grass verges between carriageways and pavements 103 Character Area 18A 104 Area 18A Summary This residential character area is located on the eastern side of the Borough, at the border with Hertsmere.
    [Show full text]
  • South West Herts Economy Study
    South West Hertfordshire Economic Study A Final Report by Regeneris Consulting and GL Hearn South West Hertfordshire Councils South West Hertfordshire Economic Study February 2016 Regeneris Consulting Ltd www.regeneris.co.uk South West Hertfordshire Economic Study Contents Page Executive Summary i Purpose of the Study and Approach i Functional Economic Market Area (FEMA) i Policy Context ii Economic Baseline ii Market Assessment iii Growth Scenarios iv 1. Introduction and Purpose of Study 1 2. Defining the Functional Economic Area 4 Housing Market Area 6 Local Enterprise Partnership Geographies 9 Flow of Goods, Services and Information 13 Service Market for Consumers 16 Cultural and Social Well-Being Catchments 19 Transport Network 21 Future Considerations 22 The FEMA of South West Herts 24 3. Policy Context 27 4. The South West Herts Economy: An Overview 37 Size of the South West Herts Economy 37 Geography of the South-West Hertfordshire Economy 39 Recent Economic Performance 41 Labour Market 44 Broad Sectoral Composition 46 Sector Strengths 49 Structure of Business Base 57 Enterprise 60 5. Commercial Property Market Assessment 63 South West Hertfordshire Economic Study National Economic Conditions 63 Office Market Review 63 Industrial Sector Review 71 Commercial Agents Consultations 76 Summary 78 6. Future Growth Scenarios 80 Higher Growth Scenario 102 Conclusions on Preferred Scenario 108 7. Relationship with London 111 Introduction 111 Migration 112 8. Supply of Employment Land 120 Introduction 120 Site Assessment Methodology 120 Sites in Dacorum 122 Sites in Hertsmere 124 Sites in St Albans 141 Sites in Three Rivers 145 Sites in Watford 151 Conclusion 158 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Submissions to the Call for Evidence from Organisations
    Submissions to the call for evidence from organisations Ref Organisation RD - 1 Abbey Flyer Users Group (ABFLY) RD - 2 ASLEF RD - 3 C2c RD - 4 Chiltern Railways RD - 5 Clapham Transport Users Group RD - 6 London Borough of Ealing RD - 7 East Surrey Transport Committee RD – 8a East Sussex RD – 8b East Sussex Appendix RD - 9 London Borough of Enfield RD - 10 England’s Economic Heartland RD – 11a Enterprise M3 LEP RD – 11b Enterprise M3 LEP RD - 12 First Great Western RD – 13a Govia Thameslink Railway RD – 13b Govia Thameslink Railway (second submission) RD - 14 Hertfordshire County Council RD - 15 Institute for Public Policy Research RD - 16 Kent County Council RD - 17 London Councils RD - 18 London Travelwatch RD – 19a Mayor and TfL RD – 19b Mayor and TfL RD - 20 Mill Hill Neighbourhood Forum RD - 21 Network Rail RD – 22a Passenger Transport Executive Group (PTEG) RD – 22b Passenger Transport Executive Group (PTEG) – Annex RD - 23 London Borough of Redbridge RD - 24 Reigate, Redhill and District Rail Users Association RD - 25 RMT RD - 26 Sevenoaks Rail Travellers Association RD - 27 South London Partnership RD - 28 Southeastern RD - 29 Surrey County Council RD - 30 The Railway Consultancy RD - 31 Tonbridge Line Commuters RD - 32 Transport Focus RD - 33 West Midlands ITA RD – 34a West Sussex County Council RD – 34b West Sussex County Council Appendix RD - 1 Dear Mr Berry In responding to your consultation exercise at https://www.london.gov.uk/mayor-assembly/london- assembly/investigations/how-would-you-run-your-own-railway, I must firstly apologise for slightly missing the 1st July deadline, but nonetheless I hope that these views can still be taken into consideration by the Transport Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Park Royal Transport Strategy LOCAL PLAN SUPPORTING STUDY
    Park Royal Transport Strategy LOCAL PLAN SUPPORTING STUDY 2017 34. Park Royal Transport Strategy Document Title Park Royal Transport Strategy Lead Author Steer Davies Gleave Purpose of the Study Strategic assessment of the existing transport provision in Park Royal, the impact of the planned future growth and identification of the transport interventions required to mitigate those impacts. Key outputs • A review of the existing performance of transport modes in Park Royal • Analysis of future demand in Park Royal and its impact on the transport modes • Identification of six packages of interventions required to improve existing performance and to mitigate the impact of future demand on transport modes. Key recommendations Emerging recommendations include providing transport networks that enhance the communities they serve and help local business to operate and grow sustainably, both now and in the future. Relations to other Emerging recommendations include providing transport networks that enhance the communities they serve and help studies local business to operate and grow sustainably, both now and in the future. Relevant Local Plan • Policy SP6 (Places and Destinations) and Policy SP7 (Connecting People and Places) Policies and Chapters • Place policies P4 (Park Royal West), P5 (Old Park Royal), P6 (Park Royal Centre), P7 (North Acton and Acton Wells), P8 (Old Oak Lane and Old Oak Common Lane) and P9 (Channel Gate) • All transport chapter policies Park Royal Transport Strategy Final Report January 2016 TfL and OPDC Our ref: 22857301 Client ref: Task 15 Current public realm in centre of Park Royal Prepared by: Prepared for: Park Royal Transport Strategy Steer Davies Gleave TfL and OPDC Final Report 28-32 Upper Ground Windsor House / Union Street - London January 2016 London SE1 9PD +44 20 7910 5000 TfL and OPDC www.steerdaviesgleave.com Our ref: 22857301 Client ref: Task 15 Steer Davies Gleave has prepared this material for TfL and OPDC.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Space Strategy 2011 - 2016
    Green Space Strategy 2011 - 2016 January 2011 Green Space Strategy 2011 - 2016 GreenGreen Space Space Strategy Strategy 2011 2011 - 2016 - 2016 Our Vision In Dacorum, we aspire to protect and enhance our natural environment, heritage and habitats. With the involvement of the community, we will create attractive, sustainable, accessible and well-managed green spaces. Foreword Dacorum benefits from a tremendous resource of high quality parks and recreation areas, set within some of the most remarkable landscapes in the country. Our fantastic green spaces are one of the main reasons people choose to live, work, and visit here. This strategy sets out our commitment to manage and protect this legacy, to ensure it remains intact for current and future generations. The quality of some of Dacorum’s green spaces has deteriorated over time through the ageing of facilities and infrastructure, and new investment is required. This strategy gives us the impetus and tools to improve their quality and to help deliver what local communities want from their neighbourhoods. We will improve facilities, and encourage residents to become more involved in managing their local green spaces. We aim to balance the needs of the community with the demands on our service, working wherever possible to combat climate change and alleviate the pressures of the modern age. We have a number of challenges to face in the future, not least in providing enough homes for the community. This strategy provides a strong framework to help manage, refresh, and create new green spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Dacorum Borough Green Infrastructure Plan - Final Report
    DACORUM BOROUGH GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN - FINAL REPORT Prepared for Dacorum Borough Council by Land Use Consultants March 2011 www.landuse.co.uk LUC SERVICES Environmental Planning Landscape Design Landscape Management Masterplanning Landscape Planning Ecology Environmental Assessment Rural Futures Digital Design Urban Regeneration Urban Design 43 Chalton Street 14 Great George Street 37 Otago Street 28 Stafford Street London NW1 1JD Bristol BS1 5RH Glasgow G12 8JJ Edinburgh EH3 7BD Tel: 020 7383 5784 Tel: 0117 929 1997 Tel: 0141 334 9595 Tel: 0131 202 1616 Fax: 020 7383 4798 Fax: 0117 929 1998 Fax: 0141 334 7789 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET Version Issued by: Approved by: Andrew Tempany Kate Ahern Senior Landscape FINAL Principal-in-Charge Architect 24th March 2011 24th March 2011 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1 What is green infrastructure?..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Benefits and relevance of the green infrastructure approach to Dacorum ..................................................................................................................................... 3 The green infrastructure planning process – a summary..............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • INFR Oct 2019 COMET LP4 SADC Analysis V4 Final
    Hertfordshire COMET: 2036 Local Plan Run 4. St Albans District Council Output Analysis FINAL DRAFT Project number: 60588905 October 2019 Hertfordshire COMET: Local Plan Forecasting Report Project number: 60555331 Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by CW, PGN, TTS CW SK Revision History Revision Revision date Approved by v1 – Draft for client comment 10 April 2019 In draft V2 – Draft with extra journey time analysis 24 April 2019 In draft V3 – Final with client comments addressed 14 October 2019 CW FINAL DRAFT 2 AECOM Hertfordshire COMET: Local Plan Forecasting Report Project number: 60555331 Prepared for: Hertfordshire County Council Prepared by: AECOM Limited AECOM House 63-77 Victoria Street St Albans Hertfordshire AL1 3ER United Kingdom T: +44(0)1727 535000 aecom.com FINAL DRAFT © 2018 AECOM Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. 3 AECOM Hertfordshire COMET: Local Plan Forecasting Report Project number: 60555331 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]