Satscan User Guide V10.0

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Satscan User Guide V10.0 SaTScanTM User Guide for version 10.0 By Martin Kulldorff July 2021 http://www.satscan.org/ Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 1 THE SATSCAN SOFTWARE .......................................................................................................................... 1 DOWNLOAD AND INSTALLATION ................................................................................................................ 2 TEST RUN ................................................................................................................................................... 2 HELP SYSTEM ............................................................................................................................................. 3 SAMPLE DATA SETS .................................................................................................................................... 3 STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................................... 6 SPATIAL, TEMPORAL AND SPACE-TIME SCAN STATISTICS .......................................................................... 6 BERNOULLI MODEL .................................................................................................................................... 8 DISCRETE POISSON MODEL ........................................................................................................................ 9 SPACE-TIME PERMUTATION MODEL ........................................................................................................... 9 MULTINOMIAL MODEL ............................................................................................................................. 10 ORDINAL MODEL ...................................................................................................................................... 10 EXPONENTIAL MODEL .............................................................................................................................. 12 NORMAL MODEL ...................................................................................................................................... 12 CONTINUOUS POISSON MODEL ................................................................................................................. 13 PROBABILITY MODEL COMPARISON ......................................................................................................... 14 LIKELIHOOD RATIO TEST .......................................................................................................................... 16 SECONDARY CLUSTERS ............................................................................................................................ 17 ADJUSTING FOR MORE LIKELY CLUSTERS ................................................................................................ 17 DRILLDOWN .............................................................................................................................................. 18 COVARIATE ADJUSTMENTS ....................................................................................................................... 18 SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL ADJUSTMENTS .................................................................................................. 21 MISSING DATA ......................................................................................................................................... 22 MULTIVARIATE SCAN WITH MULTIPLE DATA SETS .................................................................................. 24 COMPARISON WITH OTHER METHODS...................................................................................... 25 SCAN STATISTICS ...................................................................................................................................... 25 SPATIAL AND SPACE-TIME CLUSTERING .................................................................................................. 25 INPUT DATA ....................................................................................................................................... 27 DATA REQUIREMENTS .............................................................................................................................. 27 CASE FILE ................................................................................................................................................. 28 CONTROL FILE .......................................................................................................................................... 29 POPULATION FILE ..................................................................................................................................... 29 COORDINATES FILE ................................................................................................................................... 30 GRID FILE ................................................................................................................................................. 31 NETWORK FILE ......................................................................................................................................... 31 NON-EUCLIDEAN NEIGHBORS FILE........................................................................................................... 32 META LOCATION FILE .............................................................................................................................. 32 MAX CIRCLE SIZE FILE ............................................................................................................................. 33 ADJUSTMENTS FILE .................................................................................................................................. 33 ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS FILE .............................................................................................................. 34 SATSCAN IMPORT WIZARD ...................................................................................................................... 34 SATSCAN ASCII FILE FORMAT ................................................................................................................ 36 BASIC SATSCAN FEATURES ........................................................................................................... 38 INPUT TAB ................................................................................................................................................ 38 ANALYSIS TAB.......................................................................................................................................... 41 OUTPUT TAB ............................................................................................................................................. 44 SaTScan User Guide v10.0 ADVANCED FEATURES .................................................................................................................... 47 MULTIPLE DATA SETS TAB ....................................................................................................................... 47 DATA CHECKING TAB ............................................................................................................................... 48 SPATIAL NEIGHBORS TAB ......................................................................................................................... 49 NETWORK TAB ......................................................................................................................................... 50 SPATIAL WINDOW TAB ............................................................................................................................. 51 TEMPORAL WINDOW TAB ......................................................................................................................... 54 CLUSTER RESTRICTIONS TAB ................................................................................................................... 56 SPACE AND TIME ADJUSTMENTS TAB ....................................................................................................... 57 INFERENCE TAB ........................................................................................................................................ 60 POWER EVALUATION TAB ........................................................................................................................ 63 DRILLDOWN TAB ...................................................................................................................................... 64 MISCELLANEOUS TAB ............................................................................................................................... 65 SPATIAL OUTPUT TAB .............................................................................................................................. 67 TEMPORAL OUTPUT TAB .......................................................................................................................... 70 OTHER OUTPUT TAB ................................................................................................................................. 71 RUNNING SATSCAN .......................................................................................................................... 73 SPECIFYING ANALYSIS AND DATA OPTIONS ............................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • No Change in the Recent Lunar Impact Flux Required Based On
    Geophysical Research Letters RESEARCH LETTER No Change in the Recent Lunar Impact Flux Required Based 10.1029/2018GL077254 on Modeling of Impact Glass Spherule Age Distributions Key Points: • An excess of young lunar impact glass Ya-Huei Huang1 , David A. Minton1, Nicolle E. B. Zellner2 , Masatoshi Hirabayashi3 , spherules <500 Ma likely results from 4 5 limited sampling depths where lunar James E. Richardson , and Caleb I. Fassett soils were collected • Sampling biases can explain the 1Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA, 2Department of excess of young spherules, rather than Physics, Albion College, Albion, MI, USA, 3Department of Aerospace Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA, a significant change in the impact flux 4Planetary Science Institute, Tucson, AZ, USA, 5NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL, USA in the last 500 Ma • Using lunar impact glass spherule ages to constrain the impact flux may 40 39 be less biased if collected beyond the Abstract The distributions of Ar/ Ar-derived ages of impact glass spherules in lunar regolith uppermost lunar surface samples show an excess at <500 Ma relative to older ages. It has not been well understood whether this excess of young ages reflects an increase in the recent lunar impact flux or is due to a bias in the samples. Supporting Information: We developed a model to simulate the production, transport, destruction, and sampling of lunar glass • Supporting Information S1 spherules. A modeled bias is seen when either (1) the simulated sampling depth is 10 cm, consistent with the typical depth from which Apollo soil samples were taken, or (2) when glass occurrence in the ejecta is > Correspondence to: limited to 10 crater radii from the crater, consistent with terrestrial microtektite observations.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT of INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION in Re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMEN
    USDC IN/ND case 3:05-md-00527-RLM-MGG document 3279 filed 03/22/19 page 1 of 354 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION ) Case No. 3:05-MD-527 RLM In re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE ) (MDL 1700) SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMENT ) PRACTICES LITIGATION ) ) ) THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ) ) Carlene Craig, et. al. v. FedEx Case No. 3:05-cv-530 RLM ) Ground Package Systems, Inc., ) ) PROPOSED FINAL APPROVAL ORDER This matter came before the Court for hearing on March 11, 2019, to consider final approval of the proposed ERISA Class Action Settlement reached by and between Plaintiffs Leo Rittenhouse, Jeff Bramlage, Lawrence Liable, Kent Whistler, Mike Moore, Keith Berry, Matthew Cook, Heidi Law, Sylvia O’Brien, Neal Bergkamp, and Dominic Lupo1 (collectively, “the Named Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and the Certified Class, and Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (“FXG”) (collectively, “the Parties”), the terms of which Settlement are set forth in the Class Action Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) attached as Exhibit A to the Joint Declaration of Co-Lead Counsel in support of Preliminary Approval of the Kansas Class Action 1 Carlene Craig withdrew as a Named Plaintiff on November 29, 2006. See MDL Doc. No. 409. Named Plaintiffs Ronald Perry and Alan Pacheco are not movants for final approval and filed an objection [MDL Doc. Nos. 3251/3261]. USDC IN/ND case 3:05-md-00527-RLM-MGG document 3279 filed 03/22/19 page 2 of 354 Settlement [MDL Doc. No. 3154-1]. Also before the Court is ERISA Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Attorney’s Fees and for Payment of Service Awards to the Named Plaintiffs, filed with the Court on October 19, 2018 [MDL Doc.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Catalogue Milestones of Lunar Mapping and Photography Four Centuries of Selenography on the Occasion of the 50Th Anniversary of Apollo 11 Moon Landing
    Special Catalogue Milestones of Lunar Mapping and Photography Four Centuries of Selenography On the occasion of the 50th anniversary of Apollo 11 moon landing Please note: A specific item in this catalogue may be sold or is on hold if the provided link to our online inventory (by clicking on the blue-highlighted author name) doesn't work! Milestones of Science Books phone +49 (0) 177 – 2 41 0006 www.milestone-books.de [email protected] Member of ILAB and VDA Catalogue 07-2019 Copyright © 2019 Milestones of Science Books. All rights reserved Page 2 of 71 Authors in Chronological Order Author Year No. Author Year No. BIRT, William 1869 7 SCHEINER, Christoph 1614 72 PROCTOR, Richard 1873 66 WILKINS, John 1640 87 NASMYTH, James 1874 58, 59, 60, 61 SCHYRLEUS DE RHEITA, Anton 1645 77 NEISON, Edmund 1876 62, 63 HEVELIUS, Johannes 1647 29 LOHRMANN, Wilhelm 1878 42, 43, 44 RICCIOLI, Giambattista 1651 67 SCHMIDT, Johann 1878 75 GALILEI, Galileo 1653 22 WEINEK, Ladislaus 1885 84 KIRCHER, Athanasius 1660 31 PRINZ, Wilhelm 1894 65 CHERUBIN D'ORLEANS, Capuchin 1671 8 ELGER, Thomas Gwyn 1895 15 EIMMART, Georg Christoph 1696 14 FAUTH, Philipp 1895 17 KEILL, John 1718 30 KRIEGER, Johann 1898 33 BIANCHINI, Francesco 1728 6 LOEWY, Maurice 1899 39, 40 DOPPELMAYR, Johann Gabriel 1730 11 FRANZ, Julius Heinrich 1901 21 MAUPERTUIS, Pierre Louis 1741 50 PICKERING, William 1904 64 WOLFF, Christian von 1747 88 FAUTH, Philipp 1907 18 CLAIRAUT, Alexis-Claude 1765 9 GOODACRE, Walter 1910 23 MAYER, Johann Tobias 1770 51 KRIEGER, Johann 1912 34 SAVOY, Gaspare 1770 71 LE MORVAN, Charles 1914 37 EULER, Leonhard 1772 16 WEGENER, Alfred 1921 83 MAYER, Johann Tobias 1775 52 GOODACRE, Walter 1931 24 SCHRÖTER, Johann Hieronymus 1791 76 FAUTH, Philipp 1932 19 GRUITHUISEN, Franz von Paula 1825 25 WILKINS, Hugh Percy 1937 86 LOHRMANN, Wilhelm Gotthelf 1824 41 USSR ACADEMY 1959 1 BEER, Wilhelm 1834 4 ARTHUR, David 1960 3 BEER, Wilhelm 1837 5 HACKMAN, Robert 1960 27 MÄDLER, Johann Heinrich 1837 49 KUIPER Gerard P.
    [Show full text]
  • BEYOND Alumni Share How the Gordon and Judy Dutile Honors Program Has Prepared Them for a Lifetime of Excellence
    A B O V E &BEYOND Alumni share how the Gordon and Judy Dutile Honors Program has prepared them for a lifetime of excellence INSIDE: 2015 PRESIDENT’S REPORT PB SBUlife Winter 2015 www.SBUniv.edu SBUlife 1 >> Be Social Read what students are sharing about SBU. sbu is the best; they brought We had a FANTASTIC visit day to- puppies to the union for us to play day with 90+ on campus! Thanks with #sbuniv for making the time to come! (via @elizaburris on Instagram) #futurebearcats #SBUniv @ SBU_Kim Awesome job @SBUbearcatsWBB!! We are so proud of you girls!! Great win!! #bearcatroar #SBUniv @Dewey_Dogger Love this university. Being sur- rounded by so many people who have a deep desire to serve Jesus is truly incredible. #SBUniv @sward2013 In honor of finals and first semester being over, #tbt to when we first became a family. #woodythird #woodygott #sbuniv (via @mary_rose_18 on Instagram) Good morning, SBU. #sbuniv #jantermsnotsobad #midwestisbest (via @courtney_kliment on Instagram) Check out “The Hub” – Southwest Baptist University’s social media mash-up site showcasing what people are saying about SBU online. Go to social.SBUniv.edu to see Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube and news release postings all in one place. And be sure to use #SBUniv when you post about SBU on social media and you may see your post featured on “The Hub” as well! Be social with SBU on Twitter, Facebook, 2 SBUlife Google+ and Instagram. #SBUniv Winter 2015 www.SBUniv.edu SBUlife 3 SBUlife Magazine of Southwest Baptist University Winter 2016 10th Anniversary of the Gordon and Judy Dutile Honors Program 2 5 Questions with Diana Gallamore 4 Guess Who? 22 SBU News 23 Keeping in Touch 24 Volume 101 Issue 1 ADDRESS CHANGE SBUlife highlights the University’s mission: to be USPS 507-500 POSTMASTER: Send address changes to a Christ-centered, caring academic community SBU 1600 University Avenue, preparing students to be servant leaders in a global PRESIDENT Bolivar, MO 65613-2597 society.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovering the Lost Race Story: Writing Science Fiction, Writing Temporality
    Discovering the Lost Race Story: Writing Science Fiction, Writing Temporality This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The University of Western Australia 2008 Karen Peta Hall Bachelor of Arts (Honours) Discipline of English and Cultural Studies School of Social and Cultural Studies ii Abstract Genres are constituted, implicitly and explicitly, through their construction of the past. Genres continually reconstitute themselves, as authors, producers and, most importantly, readers situate texts in relation to one another; each text implies a reader who will locate the text on a spectrum of previously developed generic characteristics. Though science fiction appears to be a genre concerned with the future, I argue that the persistent presence of lost race stories – where the contemporary world and groups of people thought to exist only in the past intersect – in science fiction demonstrates that the past is crucial in the operation of the genre. By tracing the origins and evolution of the lost race story from late nineteenth-century novels through the early twentieth-century American pulp science fiction magazines to novel-length narratives, and narrative series, at the end of the twentieth century, this thesis shows how the consistent presence, and varied uses, of lost race stories in science fiction complicates previous critical narratives of the history and definitions of science fiction. In examining the implicit and explicit aspects of temporality and genre, this thesis works through close readings of exemplar texts as well as historicist, structural and theoretically informed readings. It focuses particularly on women writers, thus extending previous accounts of women’s participation in science fiction and demonstrating that gender inflects constructions of authority, genre and temporality.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 113 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 113 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 160 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, JANUARY 30, 2014 No. 18 House of Representatives The House was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Friday, January 31, 2014, at 3 p.m. Senate THURSDAY, JANUARY 30, 2014 The Senate met at 10 a.m. and was to the Senate from the President pro ahead, and I think it is safe to say that called to order by the Honorable CHRIS- tempore (Mr. LEAHY). despite the hype, there was not a whole TOPHER MURPHY, a Senator from the The legislative clerk read the fol- lot in this year’s State of the Union State of Connecticut. lowing letter: that would do much to alleviate the U.S. SENATE, concerns and anxieties of most Ameri- PRAYER PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE, cans. There was not anything in there The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- Washington, DC, January 30, 2014. that would really address the kind of fered the following prayer: To the Senate: dramatic wage stagnation we have seen Let us pray. Under the provisions of rule I, paragraph 3, over the past several years among the Eternal Spirit, we don’t know all of the Standing Rules of the Senate, I hereby middle class or the increasingly dif- appoint the Honorable CHRISTOPHER MURPHY, that this day holds, but we know that a Senator from the State of Connecticut, to ficult situation people find themselves You hold this day in Your sovereign perform the duties of the Chair.
    [Show full text]
  • A Ballistics Analysis of the Deep Impact Ejecta Plume: Determining Comet Tempel 1’S Gravity, Mass, and Density
    Icarus 190 (2007) 357–390 www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus A ballistics analysis of the Deep Impact ejecta plume: Determining Comet Tempel 1’s gravity, mass, and density James E. Richardson a,∗,H.JayMeloshb, Carey M. Lisse c, Brian Carcich d a Center for Radiophysics and Space Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA b Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0092, USA c Planetary Exploration Group, Space Department, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, Laurel, MD 20723, USA d Center for Radiophysics and Space Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA Received 31 March 2006; revised 8 August 2007 Available online 15 August 2007 Abstract − In July of 2005, the Deep Impact mission collided a 366 kg impactor with the nucleus of Comet 9P/Tempel 1, at a closing speed of 10.2 km s 1. In this work, we develop a first-order, three-dimensional, forward model of the ejecta plume behavior resulting from this cratering event, and then adjust the model parameters to match the flyby-spacecraft observations of the actual ejecta plume, image by image. This modeling exercise indicates Deep Impact to have been a reasonably “well-behaved” oblique impact, in which the impactor–spacecraft apparently struck a small, westward-facing slope of roughly 1/3–1/2 the size of the final crater produced (determined from initial ejecta plume geometry), and possessing an effective strength of not more than Y¯ = 1–10 kPa. The resulting ejecta plume followed well-established scaling relationships for cratering in a medium-to-high porosity target, consistent with a transient crater of not more than 85–140 m diameter, formed in not more than 250–550 s, for the case of Y¯ = 0 Pa (gravity-dominated cratering); and not less than 22–26 m diameter, formed in not less than 1–3 s, for the case of Y¯ = 10 kPa (strength-dominated cratering).
    [Show full text]
  • Public Act 097-0256 2018-2019.Pdf
    Community Unit School District 300 Public Act 097-256 Administrator Teacher Salary Report for 2018-2019 School Year RETIREMENT ENHANCEMENTS OTHER BENEFITS SICK & (Board Paid TRS (Board Paid FTE VACATION FLEX PERSONAL Employee Portion, HRA Insurance Premiums, NAME POSITION JOB TITLE - PRIMARY POSITION BASE SALARY TOTAL DAYS DAYS DAYS BONUS ANNUITIES Retiree Deposits) MILEAGE HSA&HRA Deposits) ABOY, CRISTINA LEAD ELEM Kindergarten Dual Language Teacher $ 70,301.02 1 0 0 14 0 0 $ 3,950.08 $ 5,723.59 ABRAHAM, CATHERINE LEAD Speech Pathologist $ 57,672.01 1 0 0 14 0 0 $ 3,285.39 $ 33.60 ADAME, SHILOH LEAD MS Language Arts Teacher $ 65,022.01 1 0 0 14 0 0 $ 3,672.24 $ 13,263.17 ADAMS, BELINDA LEAD Behavior Disorder Teacher $ 70,301.02 1 0 0 14 0 0 $ 3,950.08 $ 19,970.00 ADAMSON, STEPHANIE LEAD MS Math Teacher $ 52,852.00 1 0 0 14 0 0 $ 3,031.71 $ 19,874.36 ADAMS-WHITSON, VICKI LEAD Cross Catergorical Teacher $ 51,817.01 1 0 0 14 0 0 $ 2,977.23 $ 6,079.03 ADKINS, HOLLY LEAD Media Teacher $ 44,292.00 1 0 0 14 0 0 $ 2,581.18 $ 33.60 ADLER, LEIGH LEAD School Counselor $ 89,264.01 1 0 0 14 0 0 $ 4,948.14 $ 19,962.08 AGARWAL, MEENU LEAD MS ESL Teacher $ 58,802.01 1 0 0 14 0 0 $ 3,344.87 $ 192.72 AGENEAU, CARIE LEAD HS French Teacher $ 51,875.02 1 0 0 14 0 0 $ 2,980.29 $ 5,763.19 AGENEAU, EMMA LEAD HS Spanish Teacher $ 50,859.01 1 0 0 14 0 0 $ 2,926.81 $ 5,763.19 AGENLIAN, JULI LEAD ELEM Second Grade Teacher $ 58,892.01 1 0 0 14 0 0 $ 3,349.60 $ 19,802.96 AGUILAR, NICOLE LEAD MS ESL Teacher $ 60,070.01 1 0 0 14 0 0 $ 3,411.60 $ 13,263.17 AGUINAGA,
    [Show full text]
  • Sunnyvale Heritage Resources
    CARIBBEAN DR 3RD AV G ST C ST BORDEAUX DR H ST 3RD AV Heritage Trees CARIBBEAN DR CASPIAN CT GENEVA DR ENTERPRISE WY 4TH AV Local Landmarks E ST CASPIAN DR BALTIC WY Heritage Resources 5TH AV JAVA DR 5TH AV MOFFETT PARK DR CROSSMAN AV 300-ft Buffer CHESAPEAKE TR GIBRALTAR CT GIBRALTAR DR ORLEANS DR MOFFETT PARK DR 7TH AV MACON RD ANVILWOOD City Boundary ENTERPRISEWY CT G ST C ST MOFFETT PARK CT 8TH AV HUMBOLDT CT PERSIAN DR FORGEWOODAV SR-237 ANVILWOODAV INNSBRUCK DR ELKO DR 9TH AV E ST FAIR OAKS WY BORREGAS AV D ST P O R P O I S ALDERWOODAV 11TH AV MOFFETT PARK DR E BA Y TR PARIA BIRCHWOODDR MATHILDA AV GLIESSEN JAEGALS RD GLIN SR-237 PLAZA DR PLENTYGLIN LA ROCHELLE TR TASMAN DR ENTERPRISE WY ENTERPRISE MONTEGO VIENNA DR KASSEL INNOVATION WAY BRADFORD DR MOLUCCA MONTEREY LEYTE MORSE AV KIHOLO LEMANS ROSS DR MUNICH LUND TASMAN CT KARLSTAD DR ESSEX AV COLTON AV FULTON AV DUNCAN AV HAMLIN CT SAGINAW FAIR OAKS AV TOYAMA DR SACO LAWRENCEEXPRESSWAY GARNER DR LYON US-101 SALERNO SAN JORGEKOSTANZ TIMOR KIEL CT SIRTE SOLOMON SUEZ LAKEBIRD DR CT DRIFTWOOD DRIFTWOOD CT CHARMWOOD CHARMWOOD CT SKYLAKE VALELAKE CT CT CLYDE AV BREEZEWOOD CT LAKECHIME DR JENNA PECOS WY AHWANEE AV LAKEDALE WY WEDDELL LOTUSLAKE CT GREENLAKE DR HIDDENLAKE DR WEDDELL DR MEADOWLAKE DR ALMANOR AV FAIRWOODAV STONYLAKE SR-237 LAKEFAIR DR CT CT LYRELAKE LYRELAKE HEM BLAZINGWOOD DR REDROCK CT LO CT CK ALTURAS AV SILVERLAKEDR AV CT CANDLEWOOD LAKEHAVEN DR BURNTWOOD CT C B LAKEHAVEN A TR U JADELAKE SAN ALESO AV R N MADRONE AV LAKEKNOLL DR N D T L PALOMAR AV SANTA CHRISTINA W CT
    [Show full text]
  • 100M Dash (5A Girls) All Times Are FAT, Except
    100m Dash (5A Girls) All times are FAT, except 2 0 2 1 R A N K I N G S A L L - T I M E T O P - 1 0 P E R F O R M A N C E S 1 12 Nerissa Thompson 12.35 North Salem 1 Margaret Johnson-Bailes 11.30a Churchill 1968 2 12 Emily Stefan 12.37 West Albany 2 Kellie Schueler 11.74a Summit 2009 3 9 Kensey Gault 12.45 Ridgeview 3 Jestena Mattson 11.86a Hood River Valley 2015 4 12 Cyan Kelso-Reynolds 12.45 Springfield 4 LeReina Woods 11.90a Corvallis 1989 5 10 Madelynn Fuentes 12.78 Crook County 5 Nyema Sims 11.95a Jefferson 2006 6 10 Jordan Koskondy 12.82 North Salem 6 Freda Walker 12.04c Jefferson 1978 7 11 Sydney Soskis 12.85 Corvallis 7 Maya Hopwood 12.05a Bend 2018 8 12 Savannah Moore 12.89 St Helens 8 Lanette Byrd 12.14c Jefferson 1984 9 11 Makenna Maldonado 13.03 Eagle Point Julie Hardin 12.14c Churchill 1983 10 10 Breanna Raven 13.04 Thurston Denise Carter 12.14c Corvallis 1979 11 9 Alice Davidson 13.05 Scappoose Nancy Sim 12.14c Corvallis 1979 12 12 Jada Foster 13.05 Crescent Valley Lorin Barnes 12.14c Marshall 1978 13 11 Tori Houg 13.06 Willamette Wind-Aided 14 9 Jasmine McIntosh 13.08 La Salle Prep Kellie Schueler 11.68aw Summit 2009 15 12 Emily Adams 13.09 The Dalles Maya Hopwood 12.03aw Bend 2016 16 9 Alyse Fountain 13.12 Lebanon 17 11 Monica Kloess 13.14 West Albany C L A S S R E C O R D S 18 12 Molly Jenne 13.14 La Salle Prep 9th Kellie Schueler 12.12a Summit 2007 19 9 Ava Marshall 13.16 South Albany 10th Kellie Schueler 12.01a Summit 2008 20 11 Mariana Lomonaco 13.19 Crescent Valley 11th Margaret Johnson-Bailes 11.30a Churchill 1968
    [Show full text]
  • Instruction Manual Manuel D'instructions Manual De Instrucciones Bedienungsanleitung Manuale Di Istruzioni
    78-8840, 78-8850, 78-8890 MAKSUTOV-CASSEGRAIN WITH REAlVOICE™ OUTPUT AVEC SORTIE REALVOICE™ 78-8831 76MM REFLECTOR CON SALIDA REALVOICE™ MIT REALVOICE™ SPRACHAUSGABE CON USCITA REALVOICE™ INSTRUCTION MANUAL MANUEL D’INSTRUCTIONS MANUAL DE INSTRUCCIONES BEDIENUNGSANLEITUNG MANUALE DI ISTRUZIONI 78-8846 114MM REFLECTOR Lit.#: 98-0433/04-13 ENGLISH ENJOYING YOUR NEW TELESCOPE 1. You may already be trying to decide what you plan to look at first, once your telescope is setup and aligned. Any bright object in the night sky is a good starting point. One of the favorite starting points in astronomy is the moon. This is an object sure to please any budding astronomer or experienced veteran. When you have developed proficiency at this level, other objects become good targets. Saturn, Mars, Jupiter, and Venus are good second steps to take. 2. The low power eyepiece (the one with the largest number printed on it) is perfect for viewing the full moon, planets, star clusters, nebulae, and even constellations. These should build your foundation. Avoid the temptation to move directly to the highest power. The low power eyepiece will give you a wider field of view, and brighter image—thus making it very easy to find your target object. However, for more detail, try bumping up in magnification to a higher power eyepiece on some of these objects. During calm and crisp nights, the light/dark separation line on the moon (called the “Terminator”) is marvelous at high power. You can see mountains, ridges and craters jump out at you due to the highlights. Similarly, you can move up to higher magnifications on the planets and nebulae.
    [Show full text]
  • March 21–25, 2016
    FORTY-SEVENTH LUNAR AND PLANETARY SCIENCE CONFERENCE PROGRAM OF TECHNICAL SESSIONS MARCH 21–25, 2016 The Woodlands Waterway Marriott Hotel and Convention Center The Woodlands, Texas INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT Universities Space Research Association Lunar and Planetary Institute National Aeronautics and Space Administration CONFERENCE CO-CHAIRS Stephen Mackwell, Lunar and Planetary Institute Eileen Stansbery, NASA Johnson Space Center PROGRAM COMMITTEE CHAIRS David Draper, NASA Johnson Space Center Walter Kiefer, Lunar and Planetary Institute PROGRAM COMMITTEE P. Doug Archer, NASA Johnson Space Center Nicolas LeCorvec, Lunar and Planetary Institute Katherine Bermingham, University of Maryland Yo Matsubara, Smithsonian Institute Janice Bishop, SETI and NASA Ames Research Center Francis McCubbin, NASA Johnson Space Center Jeremy Boyce, University of California, Los Angeles Andrew Needham, Carnegie Institution of Washington Lisa Danielson, NASA Johnson Space Center Lan-Anh Nguyen, NASA Johnson Space Center Deepak Dhingra, University of Idaho Paul Niles, NASA Johnson Space Center Stephen Elardo, Carnegie Institution of Washington Dorothy Oehler, NASA Johnson Space Center Marc Fries, NASA Johnson Space Center D. Alex Patthoff, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Cyrena Goodrich, Lunar and Planetary Institute Elizabeth Rampe, Aerodyne Industries, Jacobs JETS at John Gruener, NASA Johnson Space Center NASA Johnson Space Center Justin Hagerty, U.S. Geological Survey Carol Raymond, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Lindsay Hays, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Paul Schenk,
    [Show full text]