DOCSLIB.ORG

Parks and Recreation City of Richmond General Plan Element 10 Community Vision Richmond, California in 2030

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parks and Recreation City of Richmond General Plan Element 10 Community Vision Richmond, California in 2030 Parks and Recreation City of Richmond General Plan Element 10 Community Vision Richmond, California in 2030 Richmond’s parks, public plazas and open spaces create a strong sense of community identity, promote health and wellness, and protect historical and cultural amenities that are part of the City’s legacy. A variety of recreational programs and enrichment opportunities support the needs and interests of community members of all ages, incomes and abilities. Programs are acces- sible via public transit and pedestrian and bicycle routes that link schools and neighbor- hoods to program destinations. Richmond’s integrated system of parks provides public access to the San Pablo Peninsula, large-scale open spaces, neighborhoods, schools, urban parks, recreational facilities and other key destinations. Safe, park-like connections along restored creek channels, pedes- trian-friendly green streets and multi-use trails encourage walking and bicycling. Some parks, plazas and open spaces are located near civic and commercial areas. Each park in the City features distinctive components such as rich landscape elements and pub- lic art that respond to Richmond’s cultural values and history. Adults and children benefit from contact with nature in the urban context through unstructured natural play settings and walking paths. 10 Parks and Recreation Richmond residents recognize the importance spaces and community facilities linked together Legal Requirement of high-quality parks and recreation facilities. via green multimodal corridors; Although the Parks and Recreation Element is not Richmond’s parks, natural areas and recreational • Highlights key findings and recommendations a state-mandated element, the Parks and Recreation programs are integral to creating a community that based on an existing conditions analysis; Element provides a policy framework to guide future is socially and physically connected. Programs and decisions about important parkland resources and • Defines goals for improving existing parks, strate- services provide valuable opportunities to engage beneficial programs and services. The parks and gically expanding parklands and maximizing use and enrich residents and visitors alike. Parks, green- Recreation Element complies with Section 65303 of open space and community facilities; ways and trails provide a variety of opportunities for of the California Government Code which grants recreation, social interaction, community-building • Provides a summary table identifying lead respon- authority to local jurisdictions to include additional and visual respite. The City’s existing park system sibilities for each implementing action; and elements to those required by state law when they provides a solid foundation for creating a compre- • Reviews the existing regulatory framework that apply to the physical development of the jurisdic- hensive and integrated network that strengthens guides parks and recreation planning efforts. tion. neighborhoods, improves community image and supports a strong economy. A well-designed, qual- Purpose of the Element ity and accessible park system contributes to the Richmond is committed to maintaining excep- economic attractiveness of an area and helps to draw tional parks, plazas and recreational amenities for private sector investment into the community. its residents. The Parks and Recreation Element provides direction for developing and maintaining a The Parks and Recreation Element: comprehensive system of quality parks, recreational • Describes Richmond’s existing parks and recre- facilities, programs, support services and open space. ational resources; General Plan goals, policies and implementing • Defines the City’s park performance standards; actions are focused to preserve resources and enrich parks and recreational offerings. • Presents Richmond’s “system of parks” concept in developing an interconnected network of open SHAPING THE NEW 100 YEARS | 10.3 10 Parks and Recreation Richmond Today Richmond is one of the few Bay Area cities that boast over 6,500 acres of parks and open space including local, regional, state and national resources (see Table 10.1: Parks and Open Space in Richmond and Map 10.1: Parks, Trails and Open Space). Approximately 5,718.5 acres of the parkland are owned and operated by regional agencies and are located along the shoreline and in the East Bay hills. The City owns approximately 250 acres of compact, neighborhood and community parks, and 510 acres of open space clustered mostly in El Sobrante Valley, Parks and playgrounds enhance quality of life for all residents and Sports facilities allow youth to remain engaged in their community Point Richmond and Point Molate that provide are key to building economically an vital and healthy community. while improving their mental and physical health. valuable recreational linkages to regional trails. In City Parks and quality of parks and recreational facilities. Many addition to these parkland resources. Richmond also The City of Richmond is home to 74 parks includ- of the City’s parks and playgrounds are in need of enjoys a network of trails and greenways; joint-use, ing small pocket parks, play lots, neighborhood improved maintenance. private and community facilities; and a variety of parks, playing fields, and joint-use parks. recreational programs and services. Some open space and recreational resources in the Joint-Use Parks and Facilities Many residents rely on nearby schools to provide Table 10.1 Parks and Open Space City are difficult to access since they are physically isolated. For example, lack of connectivity due to recreational resources convenient to neighborhoods. Park Type Count Acres railroads and highways and poor transportation Joint-use agreements allow for shared public access options keeps residents living in Central Richmond to school grounds or privately owned recreational City-Owned Parks and 74 777 from routinely utilizing urban parks and the exten- spaces such as sports fields, playgrounds or commu- Open Space sive open spaces surrounding the City. nity centers. Joint-use parks and facilities benefit the Regional Parks and 7 5,718.5 entire community by further activating recreational Open Space Along with improved park access, Richmond’s core spaces throughout the day and providing conve- Joint-Use Parks 5 32 neighborhoods would benefit from safer, close- niently located venues for neighbors to gather. to-home resources that include flexible, multi-use Total: 86 6,527.5 spaces such as play lots and community greens. Richmond coordinates with the West Contra Costa Source: City of Richmond, East Bay Regional Park District Neighborhood parks and greenways can support Unified School District to allow public use of parks both passive and active recreation and perform an and recreation facilities on several school grounds. important role in community-building. Key priori- Currently, the City has a formal joint-use agreement ties revolve around elevating the safety, visual appeal with the District for the use of the Kennedy Swim 10.4 | RICHMOND GENERAL PLAN 2 0 3 0 10 Parks and Recreation Center, and has maintained playing fields at Olinda Table 10.2 Recreational Facilities and Valley View schools, as well as other joint-use Facility Name Location sites. Richmond continues to actively pursue joint- use opportunities to maximize use of existing rec- Annex Senior Center 5801 Huntington Avenue reational grounds and facilities in cooperation with Booker T. Anderson Community Center 960 South 47th Street schools and other public agencies. Boys and Girls Club 2801 Moran Avenue Disabled People’s Recreation Center 1900 Barrett Avenue Recreational Facilities The City owns and operates: eight community cen- Marina Bay Yacht Harbor 1340 Marina Way South ters; two senior centers; a swim center; an indoor Martin Luther King, Jr. Community Center 360 Harbor Way South recreation complex; and a municipal natatorium. In May Valley Community Center 3530 Morningside Drive addition to publicly owned and operated recreation- Memorial Auditorium Convention Center 403 Civic Center Plaza al facilities, several private facilities are located in Richmond including the Richmond Country Club, Nevin Community Center 900 Williams Drive Marina Bay Yacht Harbor, Richmond Yacht Club Parchester Community Center 900 Williams Drive Harbor, YMCA, Police Activities League, the Boys Police Activities League (PAL) 2200 Macdonald Avenue and Girls Club and Red Rock Marina. Pt. Richmond Center 139 Washington Avenue Red Rock Marina No address Regional and State Parks Richmond has approximately 5,718 acres of regional Richmond Country Club 1 Markovich Lane and state parklands. These parklands provide active Richmond Municipal Natatorium (The “Plunge”) 1 E Richmond Avenue and passive recreational opportunities for residents Richmond Recreation Complex 3230 Macdonald Avenue and a rich plant and animal habitat. These parklands Richmond Senior Center 2525 Macdonald Avenue range in character from large-scale hillside open space areas to shoreline parks. They include vast trail Richmond Swim Center S. 45th and Fall Avenue systems and day use areas that are open to the public Shields-Reid Community Center 1410 Kelsey Street for a variety of activities such as hiking, mountain Washington Field House 110 East Richmond Avenue biking, horseback riding, bird-watching, fishing and YMCA Various Locations picnicking. Some shoreline and hillside open space resources are Source: City of Richmond separated from many residents by barriers such as
Load more

Recommended publications
  • To: Ashley Nguyen, Project Manager Metropolitan Transportation Commission Dear Ms
    From: Terry Abrams Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 5:05 PM To: MTC Info Subject: Richmond-San Rafael Bridge Access Improvement Project To: Ashley Nguyen, Project Manager Metropolitan Transportation Commission Dear Ms. Nguyen and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, I am writing in support of adding the Richmond‐San Rafael Bridge Access Improvement Project to Plan Bay Area and to the 2015 Transportation Improvement Program. By prioritizing the re‐opening of the third lane on the Richmond‐San Rafael Bridge during peak evening commute hours, we will make a big difference in cutting traffic, reducing air pollution, and improving the quality of life in the North Bay. Thank you. Terry L. Abrams ABRAMS CONSULTING Management Consultants www.abramsconsulting.net 1 From: Jeff Alpert Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 1:14 PM To: MTC Info Subject: Richmond-San Rafael Bridge Access Improvement Project To: Ashley Nguyen, Project Manager Metropolitan Transportation Commission Dear Ms. Nguyen and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, I am writing in support of adding the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge Access Improvement Project to Plan Bay Area and to the 2015 Transportation Improvement Program. By prioritizing the re-opening of the third lane on the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge during peak evening commute hours, we will make a big difference in cutting traffic, reducing air pollution, and improving the quality of life in the North Bay. Thank you. Jeffrey D.Alpert Managing Partner Milestone Trailer Leasing LLC Ph Cell 1 From: Shannon Appelcline Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 11:57 AM To: MTC Info Cc: Subject: Support for Richmond/San Rafael Bridge Access Improvement Project I am writing to express my strong support for a bike lane across the Richmond/San Rafael Bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Effectiveness of Larger-Area Exclusion Booming to Protect Sensitive Sites in San Francisco Bay
    Effectiveness of Larger-Area Exclusion Booming to Protect Sensitive Sites in San Francisco Bay Final Report Prepared for California Department of Fish & Game Oil Spill Prevention and Response (OSPR) 425 G Executive Court North Fairfield, CA 94534-4019 Prepared by Dagmar Schmidt Etkin, PhD Environmental Research Consulting 41 Croft Lane Cortlandt Manor, NY 10567-1160 SSEP Contract No. P0775013 30 September 2009 Effectiveness of Larger-Area Exclusion Booming to Protect Sensitive Sites in San Francisco Bay Final Report Prepared by Dagmar Schmidt Etkin, PhD Environmental Research Consulting 41 Croft Lane Cortlandt Manor, NY 10567-1160 USA Prepared at the Request of Carl Jochums California Department of Fish & Game Oil Spill Prevention and Response (OSPR) 425 G Executive Court North Fairfield, CA 94534-4019 Submitted to Bruce Joab, SSEP Coordinator and Contract Manager Office of Spill Prevention and Response CA Department of Fish and Game 1700 K Street, Suite 250 Sacramento, CA 95811 Phone 916-322-7561 SSEP Contract No. PO775013 Note: This study was conducted in collaboration with Applied Science Associates (ASA), Inc., of South Kingston, RI, under SSEP Contract No. PO775010. ASA submitted a separate Final Report entitled Transport and Impacts of Oil Spills in San Francisco Bay – Implications for Response. i Effectiveness of Larger-Area Exclusion Booming to Protect Sensitive Sites in San Francisco Bay Contents Contents .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Richmond Area Community-Based Transportation Plan Contra Costa Transportation Authority
    Steering Committee Draft | Ocotber 2020 Richmond Area Community-Based Transportation Plan Contra Costa Transportation Authority Steering Committee Draft | Ocotber 2020 Richmond Area Community-Based Transportation Plan Contra Costa Transportation Authority Prepared By: 1625 Shattuck Avenue Suite 300 Berkeley, California 94709 510.848.3815 ORANGE COUNTY • BAY AREA • SACRAMENTO • CENTRAL COAST • LOS ANGELES • INLAND EMPIRE • SAN DIEGO www.placeworks.com Table of Contents List of Figures & Tables ii Executive Summary 3 1. Introduction 13 1.1 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Lifeline Transportation Program 13 1.2 CBTP Guidelines 14 1.3 2004 Richmond-Area CBTP 15 1.4 Current Richmond Area CBTP 15 1.5 COVID-19 and CBTP Development 17 2. Study Area Profile 18 2.1 Demographic Analysis 18 2.2 Transportation Patterns 24 2.3 Transportation Network 28 3. Previous Studies and Mobility Gaps 33 3.1 Local Studies 33 3.2 Countywide Studies 37 3.3 Current Studies 39 3.4 Thematic Mobility Challenges 40 4. Outreach and Engagement Summary 43 4.1 CBTP Advisor Groups 43 4.2 Outreach Strategy 44 4.3 Outreach Awareness 44 4.4 Outreach Results 46 4.5 Outreach Summary 54 5. Methodology and Recommendations 56 5.1 COVID-19 and CBTP Development 56 5.2 Evaluation Criteria 57 5.3 Evaluation Process 60 5.4 Recommended Projects and Plans 62 Appendix A Existing Conditions Report Appendix B Outreach Materials and Results Appendix C Recommendations Scoring Results Richmond Area Community-Based Transportation Plan i Contra Costa Transportation Authority List of Figures
    [Show full text]
  • Mayor and Members of the City Council: This Is the Report for The
    Mayor and Members of the City Council: This is the report for the week ending June 2, 2017. 1. Meeting Notes The next City Council meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, June 6th, beginning with Closed Session at 5:00 PM, followed by the regular meeting at 6:30 PM. The agenda may be found by clicking this link: Richmond City Council Agenda Packet. 2. Osprey Update As you may recall, the Golden Gate Audubon Society has been undertaking a contest to provide names for the osprey offspring of Richmond and Rosie. They received more than 300 name suggestions for the chicks, and asked people to vote to select from among the finalists. Cindy Margulis of the Audubon Society reports that the votes are in and that the chicks now have official names. Whirley is the older chick, hatched on May 12th, and Rivet is the younger chick, hatched on May 14th, Mother's Day. Richmond Port Director Jim Matzorkis was the contest winner, being the first person to suggest the name Whirley, which was overwhelmingly the most popular name from the top 10 choices. According to Ms. Margulis: Personally, I'm delighted that the names again harken to outstanding assets that make Richmond such a great city! Now, there's one intrepid "whirley bird" plus that darling younger chick who will keep us all firmly riveted to the future of these birds and our shared environment and shared duty to be good stewards of our magnificent Bay and its watersheds and habitats for birds and people. 1 Whirley and Rivet enjoying some sunshine in their nest.
    [Show full text]
  • West Contra Costa/Albany Transit Wayfinding Plan
    FINAL WEST CONTRA COSTA TRANSIT ENHANCEMENT STRATEGIC PLAN and WEST CONTRA COSTA/ALBANY TRANSIT WAYFINDING PLAN Prepared for: West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee October 2011 Acknowledgements WCCTAC BOARD City of El Cerrito Janet Abelson, Vice Chair City of Hercules Donald Kuehne City of Pinole Roy Swearingen, Chair City of Richmond Courtland “Corky” Boozé City of Richmond Thomas Butt City of Richmond Jeff Ritterman City of San Pablo Genoveva Calloway AC Transit Joe Wallace BART Joel Keller WestCAT Tom Hansen Contra Costa County John Gioia WCCTAC STAFF Christina Atienza, Executive Director Linda Young John Rudolph Joanna Pollock WCCTAC WORKING GROUP City of El Cerrito Yvetteh Ortiz City of Hercules Robert Reber City of Pinole Winston Rhodes City of Richmond Chad Smalley, Hector Rojas, Steven Tam City of San Pablo Kanwal Sandhu, Adele Ho AC Transit Nathan Landau, Puja Sarna, Aaron Priven BART Diedre Heitman WestCAT Rob Thompson Contra Costa County Jamar Stamps MTC Jay Stagi CONSULTANT TEAM Fehr & Peers Nelson/Nygaard Bob Grandy (Project Manager) Linda Rhine Brooke DuBose (Deputy PM) Joey Goldman Matthew Ridgway Meghan Mitman Studio L’Image Ellen Poling Sue Labouvie Josh Peterman Max Heim Steve Rhyne Carrie Carsell Eisen Letunic Nikki Hervol Niko Letunic Nikki Foletta table of contents I Introduction II Study Locations III Community Participation IV Travel Demand Management & Parking Strategies V Richmond BART Transit Center Enhancement Strategies VI Richmond Parkway Transit Center Enhancement Strategies VII El Cerrito Del
    [Show full text]
  • The Richmond Natatorium
    www.PointRichmondHistory.org Vol. XXIX No. 1 June, July, August, 2010 $3.00 The Richmond Natatorium Spectacular! PRHA archive photo #0432- Stone, enhanced by Thomas Mercer-Hursh Celebrating Our New Plunge! Financed by a bond issue, the Richmond Natatorium (aka The Plunge) opened for business in 1926 with grand ceremonies as a “state of the art” swimming pool. For the next 70 years it was a destination for thousands of area residents to get together and have good, healthy fun together. Unfortunately it closed in 1997 when it was deemed to be unsafe in the event of on earthquake. Fortunately, there were enough good people around who were determined to Save The Plunge and started a trust to do just that. And they did. Thirteen years after it closed and eighty four years after it opened as 1926 “state of the art” swimming pool it opens again as today’s “state of the art” swimming pool. Thank you to all of you in the Save the Richmond Plunge Trust and all of those many people who made this beautiful swimming pool a reality. A special thank you to leaders Architect Todd Jersey, Rosemary Corbin, June Albonico and Sandi Genser-Maack. Point Richmond History Association Contents of this Issue From the From the President 1 President Members 2 Editor’s Notes 3 By Mid Dornan A-Mid Trivia 4 We thank Symphonie Restaurant in Church News 5 Point Richmond for making available space WWIC News 10 on Sunday, May 23, 2010, for our Point Richmond History Annual Meeting when Out and About Town 11 the Community Center wasn’t open.
    [Show full text]
  • For Several Years, I Have Prepared Detailed Evaluations of City of Richmond Services, Problems Challenges and Wishes
    Richmond, California Will Richmond be Riven in 2011? 2010 Year End Review Prediction and Wishes for 2011 Tom Butt, Richmond City Council Member January 1, 2011 Table of Contents A Decade of TOM BUTT E-FORUMS .......................................................................................................... 1 2010 – A Remarkable Year in Richmond ....................................................................................................... 2 Top Three Richmond Stories of 2010 ............................................................................................................ 3 1. Independent Progressives Sweep City Council Race ........................................................................ 3 2. Point Molate Casino a Poor Bet? ....................................................................................................... 6 3. Chevron Business and Utility Tax Issue Settled................................................................................ 8 Most Controversial Issues of 2010 ................................................................................................................10 1. Pot ....................................................................................................................................................10 2. Censored ...........................................................................................................................................10 3. Flotilla ..............................................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 NHPA Annual Report
    January 30, 2017 Julianne Polanco, State Historic Preservation Officer Attention: Mark Beason Office of Historic Preservation 1725 23rd Street, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95816 John Fowler, Executive Director Attention: Najah Duvall Office of Federal Agency Programs Advisory Council on Historic Preservation 401 F Street NW, Suite 308 Washington, DC 20001 Laura Joss, Regional Director Attention: Elaine Jackson-Retondo National Park Service – Pacific West Regional Office 333 Bush Street San Francisco, CA 94104 Craig Kenkel, Acting Superintendent Attention: Steve Haller Golden Gate National Recreation Area Building 201 Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94123 Reference: 2016 Annual Report on Activities under the 2014 Presidio Trust Programmatic Agreement, the Presidio of San Francisco National Historic Landmark District, San Francisco, California Pursuant to Stipulation XIV of the Presidio Trust Programmatic Agreement (PTPA, 2014), enclosed is the 2016 Annual Report of activities conducted under that PA. In 2016, the Presidio Trust celebrated the 50th anniversary of the National Historic Preservation Act alongside the nation’s preservation community with a sense of reflection, gratitude and forward-looking purpose. We were also pleased to commemorate the centennial anniversary of the National Park Service, and thank our partners for their trailblazing role in preserving American cultural heritage here in California and beyond. Our principal activity for recognizing these milestones was to host the 41st annual California Preservation Foundation conference at the Presidio in April. At the conference we were enormously proud to be recognized by CPF president Kelly Sutherlin McLeod as “perhaps the biggest preservation success story of the 20th century”, praise that would not be possible without the contributions of our partner agencies, tenants and park users.
    [Show full text]
  • Contra Costa County
    Historical Distribution and Current Status of Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California Robert A. Leidy, Environmental Protection Agency, San Francisco, CA Gordon S. Becker, Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA Brett N. Harvey, John Muir Institute of the Environment, University of California, Davis, CA This report should be cited as: Leidy, R.A., G.S. Becker, B.N. Harvey. 2005. Historical distribution and current status of steelhead/rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Marsh Creek Watershed Marsh Creek flows approximately 30 miles from the eastern slopes of Mt. Diablo to Suisun Bay in the northern San Francisco Estuary. Its watershed consists of about 100 square miles. The headwaters of Marsh Creek consist of numerous small, intermittent and perennial tributaries within the Black Hills. The creek drains to the northwest before abruptly turning east near Marsh Creek Springs. From Marsh Creek Springs, Marsh Creek flows in an easterly direction entering Marsh Creek Reservoir, constructed in the 1960s. The creek is largely channelized in the lower watershed, and includes a drop structure near the city of Brentwood that appears to be a complete passage barrier. Marsh Creek enters the Big Break area of the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta northeast of the city of Oakley. Marsh Creek No salmonids were observed by DFG during an April 1942 visual survey of Marsh Creek at two locations: 0.25 miles upstream from the mouth in a tidal reach, and in close proximity to a bridge four miles east of Byron (Curtis 1942).
    [Show full text]
  • Tidal Marsh Recovery Plan Habitat Creation Or Enhancement Project Within 5 Miles of OAK
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California California clapper rail Suaeda californica Cirsium hydrophilum Chloropyron molle Salt marsh harvest mouse (Rallus longirostris (California sea-blite) var. hydrophilum ssp. molle (Reithrodontomys obsoletus) (Suisun thistle) (soft bird’s-beak) raviventris) Volume II Appendices Tidal marsh at China Camp State Park. VII. APPENDICES Appendix A Species referred to in this recovery plan……………....…………………….3 Appendix B Recovery Priority Ranking System for Endangered and Threatened Species..........................................................................................................11 Appendix C Species of Concern or Regional Conservation Significance in Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California….......................................13 Appendix D Agencies, organizations, and websites involved with tidal marsh Recovery.................................................................................................... 189 Appendix E Environmental contaminants in San Francisco Bay...................................193 Appendix F Population Persistence Modeling for Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California with Intial Application to California clapper rail …............................................................................209 Appendix G Glossary……………......................................................................………229 Appendix H Summary of Major Public Comments and Service
    [Show full text]
  • Board Meeting Packet
    June 1, 2021 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Board Meeting Packet SPECIAL NOTICE REGARDING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AT THE EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING SCHEDULED FOR TUESDAY, JUNE 1, 2021 at 1:00 pm Pursuant to Governor Newsom’s Executive Order No. N-29-20 and the Alameda County Health Officer’s Shelter in Place Orders, the East Bay Regional Park District Headquarters will not be open to the public and the Board of Directors and staff will be participating in the Board meetings via phone/video conferencing. Members of the public can listen and view the meeting in the following way: Via the Park District’s live video stream which can be found at https://youtu.be/md2gdzkkvVg Public comments may be submitted one of three ways: 1. Via email to Yolande Barial Knight, Clerk of the Board, at [email protected]. Email must contain in the subject line public comments – not on the agenda or public comments – agenda item #. It is preferred that these written comments be submitted by Monday, May 31, 2021 at 3:00 pm. 2. Via voicemail at (510) 544-2016. The caller must start the message by stating public comments – not on the agenda or public comments – agenda item # followed by their name and place of residence, followed by their comments. It is preferred that these voicemail comments be submitted by Monday, May 31, 2021 at 3:00 pm. 3. Live via zoom. If you would like to make a live public comment during the meeting this option is available through the virtual meeting platform: *Note: this virtual meeting platform link will let you into the https://zoom.us/j/94773173402 virtual meeting for the purpose of providing a public comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Parks and Waterfront Commission
    PARKS AND WATERFRONT COMMISSION Regular Meeting Wednesday, October 10, 2018, 7:00 P.M. Frances Albrier Community Center 2800 Park Street, Berkeley, CA Parks and Waterfront Commission Agenda The Commissions may discuss any items listed on the agenda, but may take action only on items identified as Action. Preliminary Matters 1. Call to Order (Chair). 2. Roll Call (Secretary). 3. Announcements (Chair). 4. Approval of Agenda (Chair). 5. Approval Minutes for September 12, 2018 * (Chair). 6. Public Comment 7. Director’s Report (Ferris): Parks CIP Project List; Special Events; Waterfront Leases; 7:30 Berkeley Marina Area Specific Plan (BMASP); Parks Division; Waterfront Division. Discussion 8. Discussion Item: East Bay Regional Park District – presentation on the upcoming 7:45 November 6, 2018 general election Measure FF to extend the existing Measure CC $12 per year parcel tax to fund parks projects within the Measure CC zone which includes Berkeley * (EBRPD staff). 9. Discussion item: Update on the Parking Study at the Marina – next steps * (Ferris). 8:00 Action 10. Action Item: Update on marina fiscal issues, and send a communication to Council 8:15 in support of a one-time funding request for the Berkeley Waterfront * (Ferris/Lee). 11. Action Item: Update from Urban Pollinator Habitat subcommittee and authorize the 8:45 chair to share update at next Community Environmental Advisory Commission (CEAC) meeting (Diehm). Discussion 12. Discussion Item: Update on Traffic Circle Vegetation Policy * (Diehm). 9:00 13. Discussion Item: Presentation on existing City Tree Planting Program and existing 9:10 Parks Donation Policy (Ferris). 14. Future Agenda Items: Commemorative Tree Donation Policy; Marina Parking Study and 9:30 Community feedback, public meetings on Oct 9 and Oct 23, 2018; Traffic Circle Vegetation Maintenance Policy.
    [Show full text]