"My Bumbling Smiths": an Inter-Site Comparative Analysis of Rural and Urban Blacksmithing in Eighteenth-Century Virginia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1995 "My Bumbling Smiths": An Inter-Site Comparative Analysis of Rural and Urban Blacksmithing in Eighteenth-Century Virginia Sandra Fiona Bessey College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Bessey, Sandra Fiona, ""My Bumbling Smiths": An Inter-Site Comparative Analysis of Rural and Urban Blacksmithing in Eighteenth-Century Virginia" (1995). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625948. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-p1qr-2x03 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "MY BUMBLING SMITHS...": AN INTER-SITE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RURAL AND URBAN BLACKSMITHING IN EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY VIRGINIA A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Anthropology The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Sandra Fiona Bessey 1995 ProQuest Number: 10629405 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10629405 Published by ProQuest LLC (2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106 - 1346 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Author Approved, December 1995 Dr. Theodore Reinhart Dr. Norman F. Barka £>— J . Mr. Dennis J. Pogue ie 0 Director of Restoration Mount Vernon Ladies' Association TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv LIST OF TABLES v LIST OF FIGURES vii ABSTRACT ix CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION 2 CHAPTER II. A HISTORICAL BACKGROUND: 7 BLACKSMITHING IN COLONIAL AND FEDERAL AMERICA CHAPTER III. FUNCTION AND TECHNOLOGY: INVESTIGATING 21 WORKSPACE RELATIONSHIPS, FUNCTIONAL TASKS, AND FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS IN BLACKSMITHING CHAPTER IV. THE MOUNT VERNON BLACKSMITH SHOP: A 36 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND AND EXCAVATION HISTORY CHAPTER V. THE MATERIAL CULTURE OF THE MOUNT 82 VERNON BLACKSMITH SHOP: THE ARTIFACT ASSEMBLAGE CHAPTER VI. THE COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE: AN 118 INTER-SITE ANALYSIS CHAPTER VII. CONCLUSIONS 134 APPENDIX SELECTED ARTIFACT DESCRIPTIONS FROM 140 THE MOUNT VERNON BLACKSMITH SHOP BIBLIOGRAPHY 153 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author is indebted to many individuals who provided their encouragement, support, suggestions and expertise. My thesis committee, Dr. Theodore Reinhart, Dr. Norman F. Barka and Mr. Dennis J. Pogue critically and constructively evaluated my work. Without their careful reading and guidance, this thesis would not be the final product it is today. I would especially like to thank Mr. Dennis J. Pogue and Ms. Esther C. White of the Mount Vernon Ladies' Association, for their unwavering enthusiasm, encouragement and expertise. In addition, Mr. Pogue completed the site plan and artifact drawings. I would also like to thank many people who contributed to my knowledge of blacksmithing, or aided in other capacities. From the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation: Mr. Ken Schwartz and Mr. Peter Ross for their understanding of blacksmithing from both a historical and material culture perspective; Mr. Greg Brown and Mr. David F. Muraca for their knowledge of blacksmith shops excavated in Williamsburg; Mr. Jay Gaynor for his expertise of tools; Mr. Wayne Randolf for his expertise of agricultural implements; and Ms. Linda Novak, for providing me with an artifact inventory of the John Draper excavations. From the James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc.: Merry A. Outlaw, for her identification of "unidentified" artifacts from Mount Vernon; Beverly A. Straube, for her interest in the unfinished gun parts from Mount Vernon; and Diane E. Masters and Tara Winters for their problem solving skills with computers. From Colonial National Historic Park-Jamestown, Mr. David F. Riggs, for his suggestions for references; and David Morrill for his careful editing skills. To my parents, Valerie and Calvin Bessey of Fairfax, Virginia, for their continued support, enthusiasm and prodding, and to my Grandfather, Mr. H. G. Burns of Little Common, England, for his support. To Mr. Andrew Madsen, for his patience during the lengthy writing process, for his thorough and critical reading of multiple drafts and his insights on material culture. LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Daniels's determination of percentage of time spent on functional 31 tasks according to urban, rural and suburban milieu. 2. Listing of functional tasks performed by Mount Vernon smiths, 47 compiled from account books. 3. Statistical analysis of documentary evidence from the Mount Vernon 50 blacksmith shop according to functional category. 4. Clientele traveling to Mount Vernon blacksmith shop, pre-1761 54 showing percentage of persons traveling within and outside 5-mile radius. 5. Clientele traveling to Mount Vernon blacksmith shop, post-1761 54 showing percentage of persons traveling within and outside 5-mile radius. 6. Statistical analysis of clientele traveling to Mount Vernon blacksmith 56 shop. 7. Temporal analysis of stratigraphic layers from the Mount Vernon 77 blacksmith shop. 8. Statistical analysis of artifacts recovered from the Mount Vernon 88 blacksmith shop according to functional category. 9. Tools recovered from the Mount Vernon blacksmith shop 88 according to functional categories. 10. Hardware recovered from the Mount Vernon blacksmith shop 96 according to functional categories. 11. Types of locks recovered from the Mount Vernon blacksmith shop. 96 12. Equestrian-related artifacts recovered from the Mount Vernon 101 blacksmith shop according to broad functional category. 13. Equestrian-related artifacts recovered from the Mount Vernon 101 blacksmith shop according to specific functional category. v LIST OF TABLES (continued) Table Page 14. Domestic artifacts recovered from the Mount Vernon 106 blacksmith shop according to functional category. 15. Statistical analysis of artifact assemblage from the Mount Vernon 116 blacksmith shop according to functional category. 16. Statistical analysis of functional tasks based on Daniels's study. 116 17. Functional categories from the John Draper blacksmith 128 shop artifact assemblage. 18. Functional categories from the Mount Vernon blacksmith 128 shop artifact assemblage vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Painting (1919) of George Washington as smith. 1 2. Vaughan Plan (1787), showing the location of the blacksmith shop 38 on the North Lane. 3. Painting (circa 1792) depicting blacksmith shop on the North Lane. 39 4. Currier and Ives plan (1855), depicting ice house. 41 5. Gillingham plan (1859) depicting the East Lawn ice house, North 42 Lane ice house, and Paddock ice house. 6. Probable places of residence (adapted from Mitchell 1987) for clientele 53 of Mount Vernon Shop, 1755-1761. 7. Plan of Williams's excavation at the Blacksmith Shop site in the North 60 Grove. 8. Copper alloy harness ornament recovered from Williams's excavations. 61 9. Forge base revealed by Macomber (1955-56) north of present Ha-Ha 63 wall. 10. Overall site plan of Mount Vernon blacksmith shop. 66 11. Forge base revealed by Mount Vernon Archaeology Department (1987). 72 12. Interpretive plan of the Mount Vernon blacksmith shop. 74 13. A conjectural drawing of the Mount Vernon blacksmith shop, 80 14. Tools recovered from the Mount Vernon Blacksmith Shop. 91 15. Replica of a bar share plow. 94 16. Hardware and Domestic fragments recovered from the Mount Vernon 98 blacksmith shop. 17. Equestrian-related artifacts recovered from the Mount Vernon 102 vii LIST OF FIGURES (continued) Figure Page blacksmith shop. 18. Lock plate recovered from the Mount Vernon blacksmith shop. 113 viii ABSTRACT This thesis focuses on blacksmithing during the eighteenth century, and the role of this craft at George Washington's Mount Vernon plantation in Virginia. Further, this thesis explores the differing nature of smithing operations in rural and urban settings, by comparing the material culture expressions and documentary evidence of a relatively rural shop, Mount Vernon, to an urban smithing operation, John Draper's shop in Williamsburg. This study incorporates documentary evidence from a variety of sources including journals, account books, invoices and so forth. The data made available by these sources, when combined with an intensive examination of the artifact assemblage, provide a more complete view of how blacksmithing functioned within the urban and rural milieu. Serving as a model for this thesis is Christine Daniels's '"WANTED: A Blacksmith Who Understands Plantation Work': Artisans in Maryland, 1700-1810," a documentary study that focuses on the inherent differences in rural, urban, and suburban blacksmith shops. Daniels maintains that smiths operating
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 3 America in the British Empire
    CHAPTER 3 AMERICA IN THE BRITISH EMPIRE The American Nation: A History of the United States, 13th edition Carnes/Garraty Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Longman © 2008 THE BRITISH COLONIAL SYSTEM n Colonies had great deal of freedom after initial settlement due to n British political inefficiency n Distance n External affairs were controlled entirely by London but, in practice, the initiative in local matters was generally yielded to the colonies n Reserved right to veto actions deemed contrary to national interest n By 18 th Century, colonial governors (except Connecticut and Rhode Island) were appointed by either the king or proprietors Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Longman © 2008 THE BRITISH COLONIAL SYSTEM n Governors n executed local laws n appointed many minor officials n summoned and dismissed the colonial assemblies n proposed legislation to them n had power to veto colonial laws n They were also financially dependent on their “subjects” Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Longman © 2008 THE BRITISH COLONIAL SYSTEM n Each colony had a legislature of two houses (except Pennsylvania which only had one) n Lower House: chosen by qualified voters, had general legislative powers, including control of purse n Upper House: appointed by king (except Massachusetts where elected by General Court) and served as advisors to the governor n Judges were appointed by king n Both judges and councilors were normally selected from leaders of community n System tended to strengthen the influence of entrenched colonials n Legislators
    [Show full text]
  • A New Nation Struggles to Find Its Footing: Power Struggles, 1789-1804
    Laws/Acts and events by the British Parliament which stress the colonies Emerging themes from this era . Navigation Act of 1660 requires exclusive use of English ships for trade in ➢ Colonial autonomy v. Crown-sanctioned oversight the English colonies and limits exports of tobacco and sugar and other ➢ To what extent should one attempt to regulate or dominate the other? commodities to England or its colonies. ➢ Two economic tensions emerged, both of which were stimulated by the ➢ This is the first of a series of Acts which were designed to direct most progression of the Acts: American trade to England; this is how the Crown strove to encourage ➢ Supply/demand economics practices which supported Mercantilism! ➢ Protectionism of English goods Navigation Act of 1673 (aka ‘Act for the Encouragement of Trade’) set up ➢ Territorial issues (as an extension of big powers rivalry) the office of customs commissioner in the colonies to collect duties/taxes on ➢ Competing territorial claims (British, French, Spanish, Dutch, goods which pass between colonial plantations. Native Americans, etc) which manifested themselves in conflict. 1681, Edmond Andros (Governor of province of NY and the Jersey’s since ➢ The idea begins to emerge in England that the colonies were not doing 1674) charged with dishonesty and favoritism in the collection of revenues. their share to help the mother country materialistically, nor to protect Circa.1686, King James II of England begins consolidating the colonies of it economically; in other words, the colonies were starting to be a New England into a single dominion, depriving the colonists of their local financial drain on England.
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing America
    CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCING AMERICA (PRE-1754) PAGES SAMPLE CHAPTER OVERVIEW PAGES SAMPLE PAGES SAMPLE INTRODUCTION The story of the United States began in Europe, with competition among imperial powers to settle the great landmass of North America. From the 1500s onwards the wealthy but land-strapped kingdoms of Europe – England, France, Spain, Holland and Portugal – became aware of the economic and strategic potential of this bountiful new continent across the Atlantic. Explorers, settlers, conquistadors,1 captains, merchants and speculators braved perilous sea voyages into the unknown to plant their flag in a land they knew little about. By the late 1600s, several European powers had claimed their own piece of North America, leading to territorial competition and nationalist tensions. For a time it seemed as if this ‘new world’ might develop as a mirror of the old, divided Europe. Arguably the strongest of these imperial powers was Great Britain. Britain’s African American slave military strength, naval dominance and mastery of trade gave it the edge in being sold. matters of empire; this was reflected in the claim that ‘Britons … never will be slaves!’2 in the popular anthem Rule, Britannia! The true purpose of British imperialism, however, was not to conquer or rule but to make money. London maintained the colonies as a valuable source of raw materials and a market for manufactured products. Most imperial legislation was therefore concerned with the regulation of trade. By the mid-1760s, British America had evolved into a remarkably independent colonial system. Under a broad policy of ‘salutary A questionable neglect’, each of the thirteen colonies had become used to a significant degree representation of of self-government.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAINING the HUDSON the Fight for the River in the American Revolution
    CHAINING THE HUDSON The fight for the river in the American Revolution COLN DI Chaining the Hudson Relic of the Great Chain, 1863. Look back into History & you 11 find the Newe improvers in the art of War has allways had the advantage of their Enemys. —Captain Daniel Joy to the Pennsylvania Committee of Safety, January 16, 1776 Preserve the Materials necessary to a particular and clear History of the American Revolution. They will yield uncommon Entertainment to the inquisitive and curious, and at the same time afford the most useful! and important Lessons not only to our own posterity, but to all succeeding Generations. Governor John Hancock to the Massachusetts House of Representatives, September 28, 1781. Chaining the Hudson The Fight for the River in the American Revolution LINCOLN DIAMANT Fordham University Press New York Copyright © 2004 Fordham University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored ii retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means—electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording, or any other—except for brief quotation: printed reviews, without the prior permission of the publisher. ISBN 0-8232-2339-6 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Diamant, Lincoln. Chaining the Hudson : the fight for the river in the American Revolution / Lincoln Diamant.—Fordham University Press ed. p. cm. Originally published: New York : Carol Pub. Group, 1994. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8232-2339-6 (pbk.) 1. New York (State)—History—Revolution, 1775-1783—Campaigns. 2. United States—History—Revolution, 1775-1783—Campaigns. 3. Hudson River Valley (N.Y.
    [Show full text]
  • Peers, Parliament and Power Under the Revolution Constitution, 1685-1720
    1 Peers, Parliament and Power under the Revolution Constitution, 1685-1720 Philip Loft University College London PhD History, 2015 2 ‘I, Philip Loft, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis.' Signature: Date: 12/05/2015 3 Figure 1: Title Page of R. Gosling, The Laws of Honour, or A Compendious Account of the Ancient Derivation of All Titles, Dignities, Offices, &c as well as Temporal, Civil or Military (1714). This focus on honour and title perhaps represents our typical view of the peerage during the ‘long eighteenth century’. 4 Acknowledgements I would like to thank my two supervisors, Julian Hoppit and Jason Peacey, for their indispensable guidance and support. David Hayton and Perry Gauci kindly agreed to examine the thesis, and I am grateful for their advice and ideas. A number of archivists and librarians have been particularly helpful in providing access to archival sources, but those of the Parliamentary Archives require special thanks in providing me with so many documents detailing the activity of the House of Lords. I would also like to record my appreciation for the feedback on several parts of this thesis provided by the participants of the Bath Spa Conference ‘George I—300 Years on’, the Liverpool Conference ‘300 Years of Hanoverian Monarchy’, the Parliaments, Politics and People Seminar at the IHR, and the anonymous reviewers of the Journal of British Studies. The Arts and Humanities Research Council and UCL provided me with funds to pursue this thesis, for which I am very grateful.
    [Show full text]
  • Colonies with Others Puritan Colonies Were Self-Governed, with Each Town Having Its Own Government Which Led the People in Strict Accordance with Puritan Beliefs
    Note Cards 1. Mayflower Compact 1620 - The first agreement for self-government in America. It was signed by the 41 men on the Mayflower and set up a government for the Plymouth colony. 2. William Bradford A Pilgrim, the second governor of the Plymouth colony, 1621-1657. He developed private land ownership and helped colonists get out of debt. He helped the colony survive droughts, crop failures, and Indian attacks. 3. Pilgrims and Puritans contrasted The Pilgrims were separatists who believed that the Church of England could not be reformed. Separatist groups were illegal in England, so the Pilgrims fled to America and settled in Plymouth. The Puritans were non-separatists who wished to adopt reforms to purify the Church of England. They received a right to settle in the Massachusetts Bay area from the King of England. 4. Massachusetts Bay Colony 1629 - King Charles gave the Puritans a right to settle and govern a colony in the Massachusetts Bay area. The colony established political freedom and a representative government. 5. Cambridge Agreement 1629 - The Puritan stockholders of the Massachusetts Bay Company agreed to emigrate to New England on the condition that they would have control of the government of the colony. 6. Puritan migration Many Puritans emigrated from England to America in the 1630s and 1640s. During this time, the population of the Massachusetts Bay colony grew to ten times its earlier population. 7. Church of England (Anglican Church) The national church of England, founded by King Henry VIII. It included both Roman Catholic and Protestant ideas. 8. John Winthrop (1588-1649), his beliefs 1629 - He became the first governor of the Massachusetts Bay colony, and served in that capacity from 1630 through 1649.
    [Show full text]
  • Unlocking Drayton Hall: a Survey and Analysis of Hardware at a Southern Plantation Lauren Elizabeth Golden Clemson University, [email protected]
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 5-2012 Unlocking Drayton Hall: A Survey and Analysis of Hardware at a Southern Plantation Lauren Elizabeth Golden Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Recommended Citation Golden, Lauren Elizabeth, "Unlocking Drayton Hall: A Survey and Analysis of Hardware at a Southern Plantation" (2012). All Theses. 1385. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/1385 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNLOCKING DRAYTON HALL: A SURVEY AND ANALYSIS OF HARDWARE AT A SOUTHERN PLANTATION A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Historic Preservation by Lauren Elizabeth Golden May 2012 Accepted by: Carter L. Hudgins, Ph.D, Committee Chair Richard Marks III Frances Henderson Ford ABSTRACT No other single architectural element at Drayton Hall near Charleston, South Carolina better reflects the social and financial evolution of the house better than its hardware. When Drayton Hall was built, architectural hardware was in a period of transition, shifting from displaying hardware as a symbol of one’s ability to purchase relatively expensive items to conceptualizing of rooms as holistic spaces where the hardware elements were as hidden as possible. Generations of family owners significantly changed the original, cohesive hierarchy of types ranging from the highly stylized to the simply functional, but much of the original remains.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4: British Mercantilism and the Cost of Empire
    Page 14 Chapter 4 British Mercantilism and the Cost of Empire hree hundred years ago, nations wanted colonies in order to increase their power. According to the economic thinkers of those days, colonies would help the mother country become self-sufficient Tand wealthy. No great nation could exist without colonies. This was the idea behind mercantilism, a forerunner of the present day idea of imperialism. England, Spain, France, and other nations competed with each other to own colonies in North America, South America, Asia, and Africa. Their competition often led to wars. The mercantilists reasoned that even wars were worth the price, because each colony would be a help to its conqueror. England needed raw materials that her colonies could supply. Lumber, wool, iron, cotton, tobacco, rice, and indigo were among the products needed in England. British manufacturers in the meantime needed markets for the goods they produced. The American colonies bought their cloth, furniture, knives, guns, and kitchen utensils from England. In addition, England’s survival as a nation depended on her navy, and the colonies were a constant source of both the timber for her ships and the men who could sail them. Since each nation's wealth in those days was measured in the amounts of gold and silver it possessed, England had yet a another reason for establishing and ruling a vast colonial empire: the colonists would supply their British masters with gold and silver simply by selling their raw materials and buying England’s manufactured products. The difference between what the colonists could pay through their sales of raw materials, and what they owed because of the purchase of manufactured goods, is called the balance of trade.
    [Show full text]
  • Masons Building America the Masonic Contribution to the Creation of a New Nation
    Masons Building America The Masonic Contribution to the Creation of a New Nation Esther de Haan Faculty of Humanities University of Amsterdam 10075216 [email protected] Dr. E.F. van de Bilt Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 Eighteenth-Century America .................................................................................................... 10 Freemasonry ............................................................................................................................. 15 Freemasonry in America ....................................................................................................... 22 The Masonic Contribution ........................................................................................................ 30 George Washington.................................................................................................................. 44 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 53 Bibliography .............................................................................................................................. 56 Primary Sources .................................................................................................................... 56 Secondary Sources ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Salutary Neglect and Mercantilism
    Salutary Neglect and Mercantilism Key Concept 2.2.I C&D Should the US government be able to restrict trade between American businesses and a foreign country? Canada ● Mexico ● Russia ● China ● Cuba ● Iran Is there/should there be a difference in trade policy with any of these countries? What controls is the US government justified to have over foreign trade? Key Concept 2.2 • The British colonies participated in political, social, cultural, and economic exchanges with Great Britain that encouraged both stronger bonds with Britain and resistance to Britain’s control. – 2.2.1: Transatlantic commercial, religious, philosophical, and political exchanges led residents of the British colonies to evolve in their political and cultural attitudes as they became increasingly tied to Britain and one another. Key Concept 2.2.1d • C. The British government increasingly attempted to incorporate its North American colonies into a coherent, hierarchical, and imperial structure in order to pursue mercantilist economic aims, but conflicts with colonists and American Indians led to erratic enforcement of imperial policies. • D. Colonists’ resistance to imperial control drew on local experiences of self-government, evolving ideas of liberty, the political thought of the enlightenment, greater religious independence and diversity, and an ideology critical of perceived corruption in the imperial system. What is Mercantilism? • Mercantilism- A system of political economy based on government regulation. Beginning in 1650, Britain enacted Navigation Acts that controlled colonial commerce and manufacturing for the enrichment of Britain. Navigation Acts (1650-1763) • Put in place by England, the Navigation Acts required that goods be carried on ships owned by the English or colonial merchants.
    [Show full text]
  • A Companion to American Technology
    A COMPANION TO AMERICAN TECHNOLOGY Edited by Carroll Pursell A Companion to American Technology BLACKWELL COMPANIONS TO AMERICAN HISTORY This series provides essential and authoritative overviews of the scholarship that has shaped our present understanding of the American past. Edited by eminent historians, each volume tackles one of the major periods or themes of American history, with individual topics authored by key scholars who have spent considerable time in research on the questions and controversies that have sparked debate in their field of interest. The volumes are accessible for the non-specialist, while also engaging scholars seeking a reference to the historiography or future concerns. Published A Companion to the American Revolution A Companion to 20th-Century America Edited by Jack P. Greene and J.R. Pole Edited by Stephen J. Whitfield A Companion to 19th-Century America A Companion to the American West Edited by William L. Barney Edited by William Deverell A Companion to the American South A Companion to American Foreign Relations Edited by John B. Boles Edited by Robert Schulzinger A Companion to American Indian History A Companion to the Civil War and Reconstruction Edited by Philip J. Deloria and Neal Salisbury Edited by Lacy K. Ford A Companion to American Women’s History A Companion to American Technology Edited by Nancy Hewitt Edited by Carroll Pursell A Companion to Post-1945 America A Companion to African-American History Edited by Jean-Christophe Agnew and Edited by Alton Hornsby Roy Rosenzweig A Companion to American
    [Show full text]
  • UNIT 1: the Events Leading to the American Revolution
    Unit 1 THE EVENTS LEADING TO THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION CHAPTER 1 AN INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF HISTORY ......................................................................................1 CHAPTER 2 SOCIAL CLASS IN COLONIAL AMERICA...................................................................................................3 CHAPTER 3 GOVERNMENT IN ENGLAND AND THE COLONIES .....................................................................................9 CHAPTER 4 BRITISH MERCANTILISM AND THE COST OF EMPIRE ..............................................................................14 CHAPTER 5 THE FRENCH AND INDIAN WAR .............................................................................................................19 CHAPTER 6 THE PROBLEMS THAT ENGLAND FACED AFTER THE FRENCH AND INDIAN WAR....................................23 CHAPTER 7 THE STAMP ACT AND VIRTUAL REPRESENTATION ................................................................................29 CHAPTER 8 THE STAMP ACT AND METHODS OF PROTEST........................................................................................33 CHAPTER 9 THE BOSTON MASSACRE .......................................................................................................................38 CHAPTER 10 THE TEA PARTY AND THE INTOLERABLE ACTS....................................................................................43 CHAPTER 12 BY WHAT RIGHT .................................................................................................................................50
    [Show full text]