DOCSLIB.ORG

Answer A, B, and C: A. Briefly Explain One Reason the British Implemented a Mercantile System with Their American Colonies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Answer A, B, and C: A. Briefly Explain One Reason the British Implemented a Mercantile System with Their American Colonies Answer A, B, and C: A. Briefly explain one reason the British implemented a mercantile system with their American colonies. B. Briefly explain one result of the British system of mercantilism. C. Briefly explain another result of the British system of mercantilism. Believing they had to control trade with the colonies to reap their economic benefits, English ministers wanted agricultural goods and raw materials to be carried to English ports in English vessels. In reality, Dutch and French shippers were often buying sugar and other colonial products and taking them to market around the world. To counter this practice, the Navigation Act of 1651 required all goods to be carried on English ships. Navigation Acts in 1660 and 1663 strengthened the ban on foreign traders as colonists could export sugar and tobacco only through England and three quarters of the crew had to be English. In 1673, the Revenue Act imposed a tax on American exports of sugar and tobacco. The English government backed these policies with force and expanded their merchant fleet on both sides of the Atlantic. Though the colonial ports benefitted from the growth of English shipping, many colonists violated the Navigation Acts. Planters continued to trade with Dutch shippers, and New England merchants imported sugar and molasses from the French West Indies. The Massachusetts Bay assembly went as far as to assert the laws did not apply to America. In order to deal with increased colonial resistance, in 1686, England under King James II put all of the New England colonies under authoritarian control by creating the Dominion of New England. Led by Edmund Andros, legislative assemblies were banned and the English Anglican Church took precedence over the colonial Puritan congregations. The American colonies were furious, but Andros’ rule was removed from power after the Glorious Revolution in 1688. (In England, the Glorious Revolution of 1688 overthrew James II and installed the constitutional monarchy of William and Mary). In 1696, Parliament created the Board of Trade to regulate the colonies. While they publicly supported continued mercantilism, the colonies regained a great deal of autonomy. The relaxed approach that England took towards the colonies was known as salutary neglect. During this time, the colonies developed their economies. American merchants controlled 75% of transatlantic trade in manufactures and 95% of commerce between the mainland and the British West Indies. By the 1720s when the British sugar islands could no longer buy all of the fish, flour, and sugar produced by the colonies, the Americans began to sell to the French sugar islands. American distillers also bought French molasses to produce rum. England responded by passing laws to regulate colonial trade much to the dismay of the colonists. Navigation Act Purpose Compliance Act of 1651 Cut Dutch Trade Mostly ignored Act of 1660 Ban foreign shipping Partially obeyed Act of 1663 European imports go through England Partially obeyed Woolen Act 1699 Prevent export of textiles Partially obeyed Hat Act 1732 Prevent export of hats Partially obeyed Molasses Act 1733 Cut American import of French molasses Extensively violated Iron Act 1750 Prevent manufacture of iron products Extensively violated Currency Act 1751 End use of paper currency in New England Mostly obeyed KEY TERMS: mercantilism, Navigation Acts, colonial response to Navigation Acts, Dominion of New England, salutary neglect, smuggling Answer A, B, and C: A. Briefly explain one change in colonial America from 1607-1754. B. Briefly explain one continuity in colonial America from 1607-1754. C. Briefly explain the reason for either A or B. Most of the colonists were from England, but a number of immigrants from other European countries settled mainly in the middle colonies. From 1700-1780 almost 115,000 Scots-Irish, 100,000 Germans, and thousands of other came to New York and Pennsylvania. While they maintained many of their customs and practices and had conflicts with government powers at times, they submitted to rule by the English crown and were generally Anglicized. This means they followed English laws, participated in the English economic system, and became part of the emerging American identity. The colonies generally developed similar political systems. After the Glorious Revolution of 1688, the colonists were generally left on their own during a period known as salutary neglect. Each colony developed a system that based power in the representative assemblies and tried to limit the power of the royal governors. The powerful assemblies represented voters (usually land owning white males) and had the power to pass laws and tax. They were generally responsive to needs of the voters and the emerging republican model (government with elected officials) worked well for the most part. Local assemblies were able to control the royal governors appointed by the king with the power of the purse. Since local assemblies paid the governor’s salary, they would simply withhold pay until the governor agreed to their demands. The English Atlantic trade system shaped the North American colonies. New England farmers supplied the sugar islands with bread, lumber, fish, and meat. New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania farmers shipped wheat, corn, and bread to the Caribbean. The southern colonies bought slaves and sold tobacco and sugar to England. Merchants in booming cities like Newport, Charleston, Boston, New York and Philadelphia were based on the shipping industry’s varied jobs. To support the shipping industry, artisans, skilled workers, and lawyers developed in the towns. Englishmen, Scots-Irish, Germans, and African slaves all played a role in the developing Anglicized American identity. Colonial transportation was mainly water based using the Atlantic Coast and interior rivers. Atlantic trade expanded rapidly. In 1700 Britain had 40,000 sailors, but by 1750 they had 60,000, more than half from the colonies. Hundreds of ships landed annually in the coastal port cities. Traders used the rivers like the Hudson to bring goods to the interior spurring the development of taverns, horse stables, and inns. A primitive system of roads began to take shape and the ride from Boston to New York was shortened to eight days by 1704. All of these water and land trade routes also carried information as letters, newspapers, books, and pamphlets began to circulate widely. The trip across the Atlantic was shortened from months to weeks and colonists were awash in information. Although material continued to arrive from England, by 1720 Boston had five printing pressing and three newspapers. By 1776, the thirteen colonies had 37 newspapers which made the exchange of information and ideas possible. As the power of the press increased, the trial of New York Weekly Journal publisher John Peter Zenger in 1733 was of particular importance. As editor of the newspaper, he published several articles that were critical of the royally appointed New York governor, William Cosby. He was charged with libel, which at the time meant he was critical of the government. He never denied publishing the articles, but refused to name the authors of each piece. His lawyer, Andrew Hamilton, was the most famous attorney in the colonies. In a stirring appeal to the jury, Hamilton pleaded for his new client's release. "It is not the cause of one poor printer," he claimed, "but the cause of liberty." The judge ordered the jury to convict Zenger if they believed he printed the stories, but the jury returned in less than ten minutes with a verdict of not guilty. This trial marked the emergence of the idea of freedom of press. KEY TERMS: colonial immigration, Anglicization, colonial governments, republicanism, power of the purse, colonial trade, colonial port cities, colonial transportation, colonial and trans-Atlantic print, Zenger Trial Answer A, B, and C: A. Briefly explain one cause of the First Great Awakening. B. Briefly explain one result of the First Great Awakening. C. Briefly explain how Benjamin Franklin’s statement could be used to explain the impact of the First Great Awakening. After arriving in America with religious fervor in the 1600s, many Americans turned away from religion and focused on other aspects of life by the late 1600s. The Enlightenment in Europe also challenged traditional religious beliefs and faith based practices. In the early 1700s, America experienced a massive religious revival known as the Great Awakening (the first one, a second one will start 100 years later). Led by Jonathan Edwards in New England and George Whitefield in the frontier backcountry, the First Great Awakening reignited the original religious enthusiasm of the many of the original settlers. Jonathan Edwards, a minister in Northampton, Massachusetts encouraged a revival that spread throughout the Connecticut River Valley. He tried to appeal to people’s hearts rather than their minds. His most famous sermon was “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God.” He appealed to people’s emotions and his sermons would cause men and women to grovel on the floor or lay inert on the benches. George Whitefield worked in backcountry of the colonies from New England to Georgia. He was a dynamic speaker who could capture the attention of thousands. As he spoke many of his spellbound listeners would feel the arrival of a “new light” within them. Whitefield took advantage of the developing print industry and Benjamin Franklin published many of his sermons and journals. Like all cultural explosions, the Great Awakening was controversial. Conservative ministers or “Old Lights” condemned the “crying out, fainting, and convulsions” in the revivalist meetings. “New Lights” like Edwards and Whitefield praised the emotional rebirth of their flocks. The Great Awakening undermined legally established churches and tax supported ministers. In New England, New Lights left the Congregational (Puritan) church and founded upwards of 125 “separatist” churches that supported their ministers through voluntary contributions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 3 America in the British Empire
    CHAPTER 3 AMERICA IN THE BRITISH EMPIRE The American Nation: A History of the United States, 13th edition Carnes/Garraty Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Longman © 2008 THE BRITISH COLONIAL SYSTEM n Colonies had great deal of freedom after initial settlement due to n British political inefficiency n Distance n External affairs were controlled entirely by London but, in practice, the initiative in local matters was generally yielded to the colonies n Reserved right to veto actions deemed contrary to national interest n By 18 th Century, colonial governors (except Connecticut and Rhode Island) were appointed by either the king or proprietors Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Longman © 2008 THE BRITISH COLONIAL SYSTEM n Governors n executed local laws n appointed many minor officials n summoned and dismissed the colonial assemblies n proposed legislation to them n had power to veto colonial laws n They were also financially dependent on their “subjects” Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Longman © 2008 THE BRITISH COLONIAL SYSTEM n Each colony had a legislature of two houses (except Pennsylvania which only had one) n Lower House: chosen by qualified voters, had general legislative powers, including control of purse n Upper House: appointed by king (except Massachusetts where elected by General Court) and served as advisors to the governor n Judges were appointed by king n Both judges and councilors were normally selected from leaders of community n System tended to strengthen the influence of entrenched colonials n Legislators
    [Show full text]
  • A New Nation Struggles to Find Its Footing: Power Struggles, 1789-1804
    Laws/Acts and events by the British Parliament which stress the colonies Emerging themes from this era . Navigation Act of 1660 requires exclusive use of English ships for trade in ➢ Colonial autonomy v. Crown-sanctioned oversight the English colonies and limits exports of tobacco and sugar and other ➢ To what extent should one attempt to regulate or dominate the other? commodities to England or its colonies. ➢ Two economic tensions emerged, both of which were stimulated by the ➢ This is the first of a series of Acts which were designed to direct most progression of the Acts: American trade to England; this is how the Crown strove to encourage ➢ Supply/demand economics practices which supported Mercantilism! ➢ Protectionism of English goods Navigation Act of 1673 (aka ‘Act for the Encouragement of Trade’) set up ➢ Territorial issues (as an extension of big powers rivalry) the office of customs commissioner in the colonies to collect duties/taxes on ➢ Competing territorial claims (British, French, Spanish, Dutch, goods which pass between colonial plantations. Native Americans, etc) which manifested themselves in conflict. 1681, Edmond Andros (Governor of province of NY and the Jersey’s since ➢ The idea begins to emerge in England that the colonies were not doing 1674) charged with dishonesty and favoritism in the collection of revenues. their share to help the mother country materialistically, nor to protect Circa.1686, King James II of England begins consolidating the colonies of it economically; in other words, the colonies were starting to be a New England into a single dominion, depriving the colonists of their local financial drain on England.
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing America
    CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCING AMERICA (PRE-1754) PAGES SAMPLE CHAPTER OVERVIEW PAGES SAMPLE PAGES SAMPLE INTRODUCTION The story of the United States began in Europe, with competition among imperial powers to settle the great landmass of North America. From the 1500s onwards the wealthy but land-strapped kingdoms of Europe – England, France, Spain, Holland and Portugal – became aware of the economic and strategic potential of this bountiful new continent across the Atlantic. Explorers, settlers, conquistadors,1 captains, merchants and speculators braved perilous sea voyages into the unknown to plant their flag in a land they knew little about. By the late 1600s, several European powers had claimed their own piece of North America, leading to territorial competition and nationalist tensions. For a time it seemed as if this ‘new world’ might develop as a mirror of the old, divided Europe. Arguably the strongest of these imperial powers was Great Britain. Britain’s African American slave military strength, naval dominance and mastery of trade gave it the edge in being sold. matters of empire; this was reflected in the claim that ‘Britons … never will be slaves!’2 in the popular anthem Rule, Britannia! The true purpose of British imperialism, however, was not to conquer or rule but to make money. London maintained the colonies as a valuable source of raw materials and a market for manufactured products. Most imperial legislation was therefore concerned with the regulation of trade. By the mid-1760s, British America had evolved into a remarkably independent colonial system. Under a broad policy of ‘salutary A questionable neglect’, each of the thirteen colonies had become used to a significant degree representation of of self-government.
    [Show full text]
  • Philipp Robinson Roessner MA FSA Scot
    SCOTTISH FOREIGN TRADE TOWARDS THE END OF THE PRE- INDUSTRIALPERIOD, 1700-1760 Philipp Robinson Roessner MA FSA Scot PhD The University of Edinburgh 2007 312 PART II: SCOTTISH-GERMAN TRADE, 1700-1770: A CASESTUDY 7.1 Embeddedness of Early Modern Scottish-GermanTrade 313 7 Scottish Trade with Germany, 1700-1770: The Macro-Picture 7.1 The Embeddedness of Early Modern Scottish-German Trade So far the structure, trends and fluctuations in the Scottish trade volume between 1700 and 1760, the last decades of Scotland's pre-industrial period, have been discussed. It could be shown that after 1730, trade levels began to expand significantly, probably matching or surpassing all growth rates realized during previous decades, if not centuries. Scotland underwent her own "commercial revolution", yet on terms decidedly different from England. Overseas trade levels tripled between 1700 and 1760. But trade levels remained small, both in comparison to England, as well as in relation to Scotland's national income. Trade was furthermore biased towards the importation and re-exportation of colonial foodstuffs, particularly tobacco. This peculiar Scottish trading pattern was conditioned by the structure of the domestic economy and the inclusion of Scottish ports and merchants into the English commercial empire (Navigation Acts). On the one hand, the Scottish manufacturing base was weak. The domestic economy neither exported particularly large amounts and shares of her production, nor was it heavily reliant upon imports from overseas.Accordingly, average imports of tobacco, sugar and rum from the Americas far outpacedyearly averagedomestic exports of linen, woollen, leather and other manufactures to that region.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAINING the HUDSON the Fight for the River in the American Revolution
    CHAINING THE HUDSON The fight for the river in the American Revolution COLN DI Chaining the Hudson Relic of the Great Chain, 1863. Look back into History & you 11 find the Newe improvers in the art of War has allways had the advantage of their Enemys. —Captain Daniel Joy to the Pennsylvania Committee of Safety, January 16, 1776 Preserve the Materials necessary to a particular and clear History of the American Revolution. They will yield uncommon Entertainment to the inquisitive and curious, and at the same time afford the most useful! and important Lessons not only to our own posterity, but to all succeeding Generations. Governor John Hancock to the Massachusetts House of Representatives, September 28, 1781. Chaining the Hudson The Fight for the River in the American Revolution LINCOLN DIAMANT Fordham University Press New York Copyright © 2004 Fordham University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored ii retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means—electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording, or any other—except for brief quotation: printed reviews, without the prior permission of the publisher. ISBN 0-8232-2339-6 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Diamant, Lincoln. Chaining the Hudson : the fight for the river in the American Revolution / Lincoln Diamant.—Fordham University Press ed. p. cm. Originally published: New York : Carol Pub. Group, 1994. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8232-2339-6 (pbk.) 1. New York (State)—History—Revolution, 1775-1783—Campaigns. 2. United States—History—Revolution, 1775-1783—Campaigns. 3. Hudson River Valley (N.Y.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Revolution Presentation
    The American Revolution Trade and Navigation Acts The Navigation Acts were designed to protect English shipping. ! They became a great source of irritation between England and the American colonies because Britain had been allowing the colonies to basically run their own affairs. ! This type of colonial rule is called salutary neglect. Navigation Act of 1651 Navigation Act of 1696 Goal: eliminate Dutch competition from colonial trading routes Created system of admiralty courts to enforce trade regulations Required all crews on English ships to be at least 1/2 English in and punish smugglers nationality Customs officials were given power to issue writs of assistance Most colonial goods had to be carried on English or colonial to board ships to search for smuggled goods ships ! ! Woolens Act of 1699 Navigation Act of 1660 Prohibited colonial export of woolen cloth to prevent Required the Master and 3/4 of English ship crews to be English competition with English producers Created a list of "enumerated goods” that could only be shipped ! to England or an English colony Hat Act of 1732 included tobacco, sugar, rice Prohibited export of colonial-produced hats to any country other ! than England Staple Act of 1663 ! Required all goods shipped from Africa, Asia, or Europe to the Molasses Act of 1733 American colonies to land in England before being shipping to All non-English molasses imported to an English colony was America heavily taxed in order to encourage importation of British West ! Indian molasses Plantation Duty Act of 1673 ! Created
    [Show full text]
  • The Americans
    UUNNIITT AmericanAmerican BeginningsBeginnings CHAPTER 1 Three Worlds Meet toto 17831783 Beginnings to 1506 CHAPTER 2 The American Colonies Emerge 1492–1681 CHAPTER 3 The Colonies Come of Age 1650–1760 CHAPTER 4 The War for Independence 1768–1783 UNIT PROJECT Letter to the Editor As you read Unit 1, look for an issue that interests you, such as the effect of colonization on Native Americans or the rights of American colonists. Write a letter to the editor in which you explain your views. Your letter should include reasons and facts. The Landing of the Pilgrims, by Samuel Bartoll (1825) Unit 1 1 View of Boston, around 1764 1693 The College of William and 1651 English Parliament 1686 James II creates Mary is chartered passes first of the the Dominion of New in Williamsburg, Navigation Acts. England. Virginia. AMERICAS 1650 1660 1670 1680 1690 1700 WORLD 1652 Dutch settlers 1660 The English 1688 In England the Glorious establish Cape Town monarchy is restored Revolution establishes the in South Africa. when Charles II supremacy of Parliament. returns from exile. 64 CHAPTER 3 INTERACT WITH HISTORY The year is 1750. As a hard-working young colonist, you are proud of the prosperity of your new homeland. However, you are also troubled by the inequalities around you—inequalities between the colonies and Britain, between rich and poor, between men and women, and between free and enslaved. How can the colonies achieve equality and freedom? Examine the Issues • Can prosperity be achieved without exploiting or enslaving others? • What does freedom mean, beyond the right to make money without government interference? RESEARCH LINKS CLASSZONE.COM Visit the Chapter 3 links for more information related to The Colonies Come of Age.
    [Show full text]
  • Ch. 3 Section 4: Life in the English Colonies Colonial Governments the English Colonies in North America All Had Their Own Governments
    Ch. 3 Section 4: Life in the English Colonies Colonial Governments The English colonies in North America all had their own governments. Each government was given power by a charter. The English monarch had ultimate authority over all of the colonies. A group of royal advisers called the Privy Council set English ​ ​ colonial policies. Colonial Governors and Legislatures Each colony had a governor who served as head of the government. Most governors were assisted by an advisory council. In royal colonies the English king or queen selected the governor and the council members. In proprietary colonies, the ​ ​ proprietors chose all of these officials. In a few colonies, such as Connecticut, the ​ ​ people elected the governor. In some colonies the people also elected representatives to help make laws and ​ ​ set policy. These officials served on assemblies. Each colonial assembly passed laws ​ ​ that had to be approved first by the advisory council and then by the governor. Established in 1619, Virginia's assembly was the first colonial legislature in ​ ​ ​ ​ North America. At first it met as a single body, but was later split into two houses. The first house was known as the Council of State. The governor's advisory council and the ​ ​ London Company selected its members. The House of Burgesses was the assembly's ​ ​ second house. The members were elected by colonists. It was the first democratically elected body in the English colonies. In New England the center of politics was the town meeting. In town meetings ​ ​ people talked about and decided on issues of local interest, such as paying for schools.
    [Show full text]
  • The Navigation Acts and Colonial Massachusetts Industry
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1955 The aN vigation Acts and Colonial Massachusetts Industry William O. Madden Loyola University Chicago Recommended Citation Madden, William O., "The aN vigation Acts and Colonial Massachusetts ndusI try" (1955). Master's Theses. Paper 1137. http://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/1137 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1955 William O. Madden THE NAVIGATION ACTS AND COLONIAL MASSACHUSETTS INDUSTRr bl William O. Madden, S.J. A Th•• ie Submitted to the Facultl of the Graduate School of LOlo1a Unlveraltl in Partial Fulfl1laent of the Requirements for the Degree of Malter of Arts Januarr 19S5 LIP'.B Wllllam O. Madden, a.J., waa born at Chicago" Illlnols" Maroh 11, 1926. He was graduated trom Ouaplon Hlgb. Sohool, Pralrle du Chien, Wisconsln, In Mal' ~ 1944. In JUDe of' the same 7eal' he entered the lovltlate ot the Sacred Heart, Mlltord, Ohio, an attlliate ot Xavier Unlversltl'. In th. summer ot 1948 he was tran.terred to We.t Baden College, We.t Baden Springs, Indiana, an attil!ate ot L0l'ola Univers!tl', where he pursued cour.e. in philo.oph, and hiator;y. He received his degree ot Bachelor of' Art. In Latin 1n Februar;y, 1949.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Economy: Merchants in Seventeenth-Century England
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University History Theses Department of History 12-11-2017 Creating Economy: Merchants in Seventeenth-Century England Braxton Hall Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_theses Recommended Citation Hall, Braxton, "Creating Economy: Merchants in Seventeenth-Century England." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2017. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_theses/116 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CREATING ECONOMY: MERCHANTS IN SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY ENGLAND by BRAXTON HALL Under the Direction of Jacob Selwood, PhD ABSTRACT Between 1620 and 1700, merchants in England debated the economic framework of the kingdom. The system they created is commonly referred to as ‘mercantilism’ and many historians have concluded that there was a consensus among economists that supported the balance of trade and restricted foreign markets. While that economic consensus existed, merchants also had to adopt new ways of thinking about religion, foreigners, and naturalization because of the system they created. Merchants like Josiah Child in the latter part of the seventeenth century were more acceptant of strangers and they were more tolerant of religion that their predecessors
    [Show full text]
  • Peers, Parliament and Power Under the Revolution Constitution, 1685-1720
    1 Peers, Parliament and Power under the Revolution Constitution, 1685-1720 Philip Loft University College London PhD History, 2015 2 ‘I, Philip Loft, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis.' Signature: Date: 12/05/2015 3 Figure 1: Title Page of R. Gosling, The Laws of Honour, or A Compendious Account of the Ancient Derivation of All Titles, Dignities, Offices, &c as well as Temporal, Civil or Military (1714). This focus on honour and title perhaps represents our typical view of the peerage during the ‘long eighteenth century’. 4 Acknowledgements I would like to thank my two supervisors, Julian Hoppit and Jason Peacey, for their indispensable guidance and support. David Hayton and Perry Gauci kindly agreed to examine the thesis, and I am grateful for their advice and ideas. A number of archivists and librarians have been particularly helpful in providing access to archival sources, but those of the Parliamentary Archives require special thanks in providing me with so many documents detailing the activity of the House of Lords. I would also like to record my appreciation for the feedback on several parts of this thesis provided by the participants of the Bath Spa Conference ‘George I—300 Years on’, the Liverpool Conference ‘300 Years of Hanoverian Monarchy’, the Parliaments, Politics and People Seminar at the IHR, and the anonymous reviewers of the Journal of British Studies. The Arts and Humanities Research Council and UCL provided me with funds to pursue this thesis, for which I am very grateful.
    [Show full text]
  • The British Empire in the Atlantic: Nova Scotia, the Board of Trade, and the Evolution of Imperial Rule in the Mid-Eighteenth Century
    The British Empire in the Atlantic: Nova Scotia, the Board of Trade, and the Evolution of Imperial Rule in the Mid-Eighteenth Century by Thomas Hully Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the MA degree in History University of Ottawa © Thomas Hully, Ottawa, Canada, 2012 ii Abstract The British Empire in the Atlantic: Nova Scotia, the Board of Trade, and the Evolution of Imperial Rule in the Mid-Eighteenth Century Thomas Hully Dr. Richard Connors Submitted: May 2012 Despite considerable research on the British North American colonies and their political relationship with Britain before 1776, little is known about the administration of Nova Scotia from the perspective of Lord Halifax’s Board of Trade in London. The image that emerges from the literature is that Nova Scotia was of marginal importance to British officials, who neglected its administration. This study reintegrates Nova Scotia into the British Imperial historiography through the study of the “official mind,” to challenge this theory of neglect on three fronts: 1) civil government in Nova Scotia became an important issue during the War of the Austrian Succession; 2) The form of civil government created there after 1749 was an experiment in centralized colonial administration; 3) This experimental model of government was highly effective. This study adds nuance to our understanding of British attempts to centralize control over their overseas colonies before the American Revolution. iii Acknowledgments I would like to thank the Ontario Graduate Scholarship Program for providing the funding which made this dissertation possible, as well as the University of Ottawa’s Department of History for providing me with the experience of three Teaching Assistantships.
    [Show full text]