DOCSLIB.ORG

Termini Grammatici 語法專用詞

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Termini Grammatici 語法專用詞 Termini Grammatici 語法專用詞 ** 字母 letter 元音 voiced letter 短音節 short syllable 輔音 consonant letter 末音節 last syllable 音量 vowel length 長元音 long vowel 倒數第二音節 syllable next to last, penult 短元音 short vowel syllable 倒數第三音節 antepenult syllable 音節 syllable 音節之長短 quantity of syllable 重音 accent 長音節 long syllable **詞 word 詞根 root 前綴 prefix 詞幹 stem 後綴 suffix 詞尾 ending 詞組 phrase 句法 syntax 語法 grammar 略語 abbreviation ** A 詞類 parts of speech 動詞 verb、名詞 noun、代詞 pronoun、形容詞 adjective、 副詞 adverb、前詞 preposition、 連詞 conjunction、歎詞 interjection * 動詞 verb 變位法 conjugation 合成動詞 compound verb (性質) 不全動詞 defective verb 外動動詞 transitive verb (功能) 內動動詞 intransitive verb 有定動詞 finite verb 主動動詞 active verb 無定動詞 infinitive verb 受動動詞 passive verb 無位動詞 impersonal verb 助動詞 auxiliary verb 漸成動詞 inchoative verb (結構) 情意動詞 attentive verb 異態動詞 deponent verb (意義) 半異態動詞 Semi-deponent verb 請求動詞 verb of petition 例外動詞 anomalous verb 命令動詞 verb of commanding 移動動詞 verb of motion 知覺動詞 verb of feeling 位 person 分離動詞 verb of separating 第一位 first person 怕之動詞 verb of fearing 第二位 second person 說之動詞 verb of saying 第三位 third person 疑問動詞 verb of doubting 數 number 語態 voice 單數 singular number 主動語態 active voice 複數 plural number 被動語態 passive voice 分詞 participle 語氣 mood 獨立分詞 absolute participle 無定語氣 infinitive mood 依賴分詞 joined participle 命令語氣 imperative mood 現主分詞 active present participle 直述語氣 indicative mood 將主分詞 active future participle 情意語氣 subjunctive mood 全被分詞 passive perfect participle 將被分詞 passive future participle 時 tense 現在時 present tense 動名詞 gerund 將來時 future tense 屬格動名 genitive gerund 常過時 imperfect tense 與格動名 dative gerund 全過時 perfect tense 賓格動名 accusative gerund 未過時 future perfect tense 奪格動名 ablative gerund 先過時 pluperfect tense supine 敍述之時 historic tense 目的動名詞 accusative supine 已過之時 past tense 賓格目動名 ablative supine 相對之時 relative tense 奪格目動名 時態序列 sequence of tenses * 名詞 substantive noun (性質) 陰類 feminine gender 固有名詞 proper noun 陽類 masculine gender 抽象名詞 abstract noun 無類 neuter gender 集合名詞 collective noun 同屬名詞 common noun 格 case 具體名詞 concrete noun 變格法 declension (意義) 呼格 vocative 群眾之名詞 noun of group 主格 nominative 多寡之名詞 noun of quantity 屬格 genitive 度量之名詞 noun of measure 與格 dative 物質之名詞 noun of materail things 賓格 accusative 生物之名詞 noun of living things 奪格 ablative 正格 direct case 類屬 gender 偏格 oblique case 主語屬格 subjective genitive 奪格 ablative case 賓語屬格 objective genitive 時候奪格 ablative of time 全體屬格 genitive of the whole 地方奪格 ablative of place 分段屬格 partitive genitive 由來奪格 ablative of origin 物主屬格 possessive genitive 工具奪格 ablative of means 主動屬格 genitive of agent 形態奪格 ablative of manner 價值屬格 genitive of price 主動奪格 ablative of agent 優劣屬格 genitive of quality 緣何奪格 ablative of cause 比較奪格 ablative of comparison 與格 dativus 限制奪格 ablative of respect or limitation 得益與格 dative of advantage 分離奪格 ablative of separation 得損與格 dative of disadvantage 比量奪格 ablative of difference or 意向與格 final dative measure 物主與格 dative indicating possessor 價值奪格 ablative of price 優劣奪格 ablative of quality or 賓格 accusative description 伸延賓格 accusative of extent of action *代詞 pronoun 人位代詞 personal pronoun 連上代詞 relative pronoun 物主代詞 possessive pronoun 疑問代詞 interrogative pronoun 反射代詞 reflexive pronoun 相應代詞 correlative pronoun 指示代詞 demonstrative pronoun 泛稱代詞 indefinite pronoun * 形容詞 adjective 平比級形容詞 positive degree adjective 多寡之形容詞 adjective of quantity 比較級形容詞 comparative degree 動形容詞 adjective formed from verbs adjective 形容代詞 adjective used as noun 極比級形容詞 superlative degree adjective * 數詞 numeral 基數 cardinal number 倍數 multiplicative number 序數 ordinal number 次數副詞 numeral adverb 分數 distributive number * 前詞 preposition * 副詞 adverb (結構) 轉化副詞 derived adverb 原形副詞 primitive adverb (功能) 無限定副詞 indefinite adverb 連上副詞 relative adverb 疑問副詞 interrogative adverb 詢問質詞 interrogative particle 多寡副詞 adverb of quantity 否定質詞 negative particle 代名副詞 pronominal adverb *連詞 conjunction (性質) 比較連詞 comparative conjunction 同等連詞 coordinating conjunction 讓步連詞 concessive conjunction 異等連詞 subordinating conjunction 條件連詞 conditional conjunction (功能) 緣何連詞 causal conjunction 聯合連詞 copulative conjunction 意向連詞 final conjunction 分斷連詞 disjunctive conjunction 結論連詞 conclusive conjunction 反對連詞 adversative conjunction 效果連詞 consecutive conjunction 時候連詞 temporal conjunction * 歎詞 interjection ** B 語類 parts of sentence * 主語 subject 無人位主語 impersonal subject * 定語 attribute * 謂語 predicate 主動定語 attribute of agent 物主定語 attribute of possession * 賓語 object 全體定語 attribute of partitive 直接賓語 direct object 解說定語 explicative attribute 間接賓語 indirect object 優劣定語 attribute of quality 內在賓語 internal object *狀語 adverbiale *表語 praedicativum ** C 句類 sentence * 說法 直接說法 direct speech 間接說法 indirect speech * 詞組 主格無定語氣詞組 nominative with 賓格無定語氣詞組 accusative with infinitive infinitive 獨立奪格詞組 absolute ablative * 句 (結構) 比較句 comparative sentence 簡句 abbreviated sentence 准許句 concessive sentence 單句 simple sentence 情意句 sentence in the subjunctive 複句 compound sentence 效果句 consecutive sentence 主句 principal sentence 疑問句 dubitative sentence 從句 subordinate sentence 評論句 declaratory sentence 前句 antecedent sentence 意向句 final sentence 後句 consequent sentence 勸勉句 hortatory sentence 中句 intermediate sentence 命令句 imperative sentence 接句 conjunctive sentence 虛事句 sentence contrary to fact 獨立句 independent sentence 限制句 limiting sentence 依賴句 dependent sentence 比量句 sentence of measure (性質) 形態句 sentence of mood 內在依賴句 internally dependent sentence 否定句 negative sentence 連上句 relative sentence 願望句 optative sentence 依賴句 sentence within parentheses 可能句 potential sentence 無定語氣句 infinitive sentence 禁令句 prohibiting sentence 分詞句 participial sentence 實事句 real sentence 將被分詞句 gerundive sentence 主要句 governing sentence 動名詞句 gerund sentence 演說句 rhetorical sentence 目動名詞句 supine sentence 時候句 temporal sentence (功能) 條件句 conditional sentence 主語句 subjective sentence －實事條件 fulfilled condition 屬語句 objective sentence t －可能條件 condition may be fulfilled 副語句 adverbial sentence －虛擬條件 unfulfilled condition 定語句 attributive sentence 問句 question 直述句 indicative sentence －單問句 simple question 情意句 affective sentence －雙問句 double question 肯定句 affirmative sentence －直接問句 direct question 廣單句 amplified sentence －間接問句 indirect question (意義) －疑惑問句 dubitative question 緣何句 causal sentence －演說問句 rhetorical question ** 簡稱 ** *語氣 無定語氣 現主無 active infinitive present 全主無 active infinitive perfect 將主無 active infinitive future 現被無 passive infinitive present 全被無 passive infinitive present 將被無 passive infinitive present 命令語氣 現主命 active imperative present 直述語氣 現主直 active indicative present 將主直 active indicative future 常主直 active indicative imperfect 全主直 active indicative perfect 未主直 active indicative future perfect 先主直 active indicative pluperfect 現被直 passive indicative present 將被直 passive indicative future 常被直 passive indicative imperfect 全被直 passive indicative perfect 未被直 passive indicative future perfect 先被直 passive indicative pluperfect 情意語氣 現主情 active subjunctive present 全主情 active subjunctive perfect 常主情 active subjunctive imperfect 先主情 active subjunctive pluperfect 現被情 passive subjunctive present 全被情 passive subjunctive perfect 常被情 passive subjunctive imperfect 先被情 passive subjunctive pluperfect *分詞、動名詞、目的動名詞 分詞 現主分詞 active present participle 將主分詞 active future participle 全被分詞 passive perfect participle 將被分詞 passive future participle 動名詞 屬格動名 genitive gerund 與格動名 dative gerund 賓格動名 accusative gerund 奪格動名 ablative gerund 目的動名詞 賓格目動名 accusative supine 奪格目動名 ablative supine *名詞、形容詞 單呼陽 singular vocative masculine 單主陽 singular nominative masculine 單屬陽 singular genitive masculine 單與陽 singular dative masculine 單賓陽 singular accusative masculine 單奪陽 singular ablative masculine 複呼陽 plural vocative masculine 複主陽 plural nominative masculine 複屬陽 plural genitive masculine 複與陽 plural dative masculine 複賓陽 plural accusative masculine 複奪陽 plural ablative masculine 單呼陰 singular vocative feminine 單主陰 singular nominative feminine 單屬陰 singular genitive feminine 單與陰 singular dative feminine 單賓陰 singular accusative feminine 單奪陰 singular ablative feminine 複呼陰 plural vocative feminine 複主陰 plural nominative feminine 複屬陰 plural genitive feminine 複與陰 plural dative feminine 複賓陰 plural accusative feminine 複奪陰 plural ablative feminine 單呼無 singular vocative neuter 單主無 singular nominative neuter 單屬無 singular genitive neuter 單與無 singular dative neuter 單賓無 singular accusative neuter 單奪無 singular ablative neuter 複呼無 plural vocative neuter 複主無 plural nominative neuter 複屬無 plural genitive neuter 複與無 plural dative neuter 複賓無 plural accusative neuter 複奪無 plural ablative neuter .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Subject Relatives and Expletives in Early New High German
    Subject Relatives and Expletives in Early New High German CAITLIN LIGHT University of Pennsylvania Introduction The status of the subject position in German has been the source of some de- bate.1 For example, some studies (Biberauer 2004; Richards and Biberauer 2005) have argued that German does not have an EPP requirement in the traditional sense. The absence of an expletive that occurs specifically in the subject position (as op- posed to the topic position in Spec,CP) seems to support the argument that Spec,TP has no special status in German. This paper will argue against such analyses, and show that in historical stages of German, we see evidence of a subject expletive licensed specifically to fill Spec,TP. This expletive, da in Early New High German (ENHG), is merged specifically when the logical subject does not move to Spec,TP, leaving the position empty. This sup- ports a traditional analysis of the EPP in German. Furthermore, I will show that the existence of expletive da lends support to the argument that two (non-topic) sub- ject positions are available in the German clause structure (cf. Haeberli 1999, 2000, 2005), which I take to be Spec,TP and Spec,vP (the base position of the subject). This study is based on data from a parsed corpus of Martin Luther’s Septem- bertestament, a translation of the New Testament published in 1522. Luther in- tended for his Bible translation to be accessible to a wide audience, and hence the text represents a more colloquial sample of ENHG. The Septembertestament cor- pus, at the time of this study, consisted of approximately 40,000 words that have been fully POS-tagged and parsed.
    [Show full text]
  • Portuguese Syntax
    Eckhard Bick PORTUGUESE SYNTAX Teaching manual Eckhard Bick, Portuguese Syntax Last updated: January 2000 2 Eckhard Bick, Portuguese Syntax 1. Introduction: Grammatical conventions 5 1.1. The flat classical model: word function, no form 6 1.2. Pure Dependency Grammar: word chains (syntactic form), no function 6 1.3. Pure Constituent Grammar: hierarchical word grouping (syntactic form), no function 7 1.4. Adding function 8 1.4.1. Dependency Grammar with function labels 8 1.4.2. Constraint Grammar 8 1.4.3. Enriched Constituent Grammar 9 2. Building trees: The notion of constituent 11 3. Clause level functions 14 3.1. Clause level arguments (valency governed) 14 3.2. Clause level adjuncts (not valency governed) 18 3.3. Syntactic function vs. semantic function 25 4. Subordination 29 5. The function of verbal constituents 34 6. Group forms and group level constituent function 38 6.1. Noun phrases (np) 40 6.2. Ad-word phrases (ap) 47 6.3. Prepositional phrases (pp) 51 6.4. Pronoun phrases 56 7. Clause types 59 7.1. Finite subclauses 62 7.1.1. Nominal finite subclauses 62 7.1.2. Attributive finite subclauses 63 7.1.3. Adverbial finite subclauses 63 7.2. Non-finite subclauses 64 7.2.1. Infinitive subclauses 64 7.2.2. Gerund subclauses 65 7.2.3. Participle subclauses 68 7.2.3.1. Attributive participles 68 7.2.3.2. Participles in verb chains 69 7.2.3.3. Ablativus absolutus 70 7.3. Averbal subclauses 73 7.4. ACI and causatives 76 8. Co-ordination 82 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Adpositional Constructions of Location and Motion in Dutch
    Adpositional constructions of location and motion in Dutch Hans Smessaert, William Van Belle & Ingrid Van Canegem-Ardijns KU Leuven, KU Leuven & KHLeuven In traditional grammar, constructions of location and motion are standardly considered as adverbial adjuncts, i.e. as constituents that do not belong to the nuclear or core elements of the clause. However, in Dutch, as in many other languages, there are different classes of verbal predicates which require the presence of a location or motion constituent in order to yield a grammatical clause. Since these obligatory constituents are manifestly part of the verbal valency frame, the authors call them location and motion objects. The combination of the criterion of (non-)optionality and that of substitutability with pronominal or adverbial elements leads to the tripartition between adjunct, object and predicate complement. This distinction is further shown to pattern with different word order restrictions. 0. Introduction1 Spatial descriptions can be divided conceptually into place (static location) and motion (dynamic location). Levinson and Wilkins (2006: 531–533) argue that there are three different styles of conceptualization of motion events cross-linguistically. First, they differentiate between a durative and a non-durative conceptualization. In a durative conceptualization motion is conceived of as “translocation”, that is, “as a durative displacement of the figure along a continuous trajectory over time”. In a non-durative conceptualization motion is solely thought of as a change of state without transitional phases. Further, a non-durative conceptualization involves either change of location or change of locative relation. However, “it turns out that motion verbs in a language are not necessarily of a consistent type, although a predominant type of semantic content may often be discerned”.
    [Show full text]
  • Portuguese Syntax
    Eckhard Bick PORTUGUESE SYNTAX Teaching manual Last updated: January 2000 Eckhard Bick, Portuguese Syntax 1. Introduction: Grammatical conventions 4 1.1. The flat classical model: word function, no form 5 1.2. Pure Dependency Grammar: word chains (syntactic form), no function 5 1.3. Pure Constituent Grammar: hierarchical word grouping (syntactic form), no function 6 1.4. Adding function 7 1.4.1. Dependency Grammar with function labels 7 1.4.2. Constraint Grammar 7 1.4.3. Enriched Constituent Grammar 8 2. Building trees: The notion of constituent 10 3. Clause level functions 13 3.1. Clause level arguments (valency governed) 13 3.2. Clause level adjuncts (not valency governed) 17 3.3. Syntactic function vs. semantic function 24 4. Subordination 28 5. The function of verbal constituents 33 6. Group forms and group level constituent function 37 6.1. Noun phrases (np) 39 6.2. Ad-word phrases (ap) 46 6.3. Prepositional phrases (pp) 50 6.4. Pronoun phrases 55 7. Clause types 58 7.1. Finite subclauses 61 7.1.1. Nominal finite subclauses 61 7.1.2. Attributive finite subclauses 62 7.1.3. Adverbial finite subclauses 62 7.2. Non-finite subclauses 63 7.2.1. Infinitive subclauses 63 7.2.2. Gerund subclauses 64 7.2.3. Participle subclauses 67 7.2.3.1. Attributive participles 67 7.2.3.2. Participles in verb chains 68 7.2.3.3. Ablativus absolutus 69 7.3. Averbal subclauses 72 7.4. ACI and causatives 75 8. Co-ordination 81 9. Comparatives 88 10. Utterance function 96 2 Eckhard Bick, Portuguese Syntax 11.
    [Show full text]
  • 205 Comparative Overview on Word-Compounding in English And
    ISSN2039Ͳ2117MediterraneanJournalofSocialSciencesVol.3(7)April2012 Comparative Overview on Word-Compounding in English and Albanian M.A. Esmeralda Sherko Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Department of Morpho-Functional Subjects, ESP Division Agricultural University of Tirana e-mail: [email protected] Abstract This paper presents a comparative bilingual overview, by comparing word formation in two languages, respectively Albanian and English, as well as the main word formation trends in both languages. Both languages display a variety of word formation techniques, but their classifications according to different ways are not in complete conformity with each other. An example of this is “pëngjitja”1, which in Albanian is classified as an independent class form the compound nouns, while in English it appears under the heading of “compounds”. The paper will also highlight spelling and phonetic differences in both languages. In Albanian language the “përngjitja” is formed by the monomial of word group or phrase, a prepositional phrase or a group of words in general. The syntactic relations between the terms of the phrase or the group are usually preserved clearly, even in the structure of the newly formed word -të përngjitur. In English compounding, which also includes përngjitja refers to the process of combining two words to form a new one, where the words added at the beginning to a certain extent subcategorizes the words following it. Key words: përngjitja, word-formation, Albanian, English, language 1. Introduction to word formation Word formation is the branch of linguistics that examines derived words synchronically and diachronically and in terms of their origin and functioning, their productivity or unproductivity, as well as their use in different styles of speech.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Parameterized Description of Pro-Forms in the Prague Dependency Treebank 2.0∗
    Systematic Parameterized Description of Pro-forms in the Prague Dependency Treebank 2.0¤ Magda ŠevcíkovᡠRazímová, Zdenekˇ Žabokrtský Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics Charles University, Prague E-mail: {razimova,zabokrtsky}@ufal.mff.cuni.cz 1 Introduction A pro-form is a word that is used to replace or substitute other words, phrases, clauses, or sentences etc. Besides pronouns one can also distinguish pro-adjectives, pro-numerals, pro-adverbs, and pro-verbs.1 Pro-forms are related to a wide range of linguistic phenomena, from word- formative principles, through negation and quantification, to anaphoric and deictic functions. As it was recognized a long time ago (among others in Montague gram- mar), pro-forms are extremely important for studying natural language semantics, even if they constitute only a closed class. Recently, a lot of work has been invested into developing large data resources for exploring natural language semantics, e.g. in the fields of predicate-argument structures or lexical databases. However, the treatment of pro-forms and related phenomena receives only a relatively minor attention in this data-dominated era (perhaps with the only exception of data for anaphora resolution, mostly limited to personal and demonstrative pronouns). Even if tag sets used in various corpora and treebanks clearly indicate some differentiation within the set of pro-forms (e.g. ¤The research reported in this paper was supported by the projects 1ET101120503, GA-UK 352/2005 and GD201/05/H014. 1The well known difficulties with the heterogeneity of the criteria for delimitating the ‘traditional’ parts of speech lead to terminological confusion here: pronouns are often considered to span not only pro-nouns, but also some of the other pro-forms, especially pro-adjectives and also pro-adverbs, often denoted as pronominal adjectives and pronominal adverbs.
    [Show full text]
  • Parts of Speech in Novamorf, a New Morphological Annotation of Czech
    DOI 10.2478/jazcas-2019-0065 Parts OF SPEECH IN NovaMORF, a NEW MORPHOLOGICAL Annotation OF CZECH VLADIMÍR PETKEVIČ1 ‒ Jaroslava Hlaváčová2 ‒ KLÁRA OSOLSOBě3 ‒ Martin SVÁŠEK ‒ JOSEF ŠIMANDL 1 Institute of Theoretical and Computational Linguistics, Faculty of Arts, Charles University, Czech Republic 2 Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Czech Republic 3 Institute of the Czech Language, Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University, Czech Republic PETKEVIČ, Vladimír – HLAVÁČOVÁ, Jaroslava – OSOLSOBě, Klára – SVÁŠEK, Martin – ŠIMANDL, Josef: Parts of speech in NovaMorf, a new morphological annotation of Czech. Journal of Linguistics, 2019, Vol. 70, No 2, pp. 358 – 369. Abstract: A detailed morphological description of word forms in any language is a necessary condition for a successful automatic processing of linguistic data. The paper focuses on a new description of morphological categories, mainly on the subcategorization of parts of speech in Czech within the NovaMorf project. NovaMorf focuses on the description of morphological properties of Czech word forms in a more compact and consistent way and with a higher explicative power than approaches used so far. It also aims at the unification of diverse approaches to morphological annotation of Czech. NovaMorf approach will be reflected in a new morphological dictionary to be exploited for a new automatic morphological analysis (and disambiguation) of corpora of contemporary Czech. Keywords: NovaMorf, morphological annotation, parts of speech, morphological categories, subcategorization 1 INTRODUcTION We present a repertoire of morphological categories and, mainly, the parts of speech (POS) and their subcategorization distinguished in NovaMorf, the project of an innovated description of Czech morphology as a linguistic base for a new morphological analysis and subsequent disambiguation of Czech texts.
    [Show full text]
  • Contextual Processing of Locative Prepositional Phrases
    Contextual processing of locative prepositional phrases Nicolas DENAND & Monique ROLBERT Laboratoire d’Informatique Fondamentale de Marseille 163, avenue de Luminy - Case 901 F-13288 Marseille Cedex 9 France {Nicolas.Denand,Monique.Rolbert}@lif.univ-mrs.fr Abstract locative uses is anaphorically linked to a NP. These uses were already studied (see, for exam- This paper deals with contextual aspects of loca- ple, (Ruwet, 1990)). tive preposition processing. Firstly, accordingly to a study on the referential behavior of the pronominal What about locative uses of the pronominal 1 adverb ”y” in its locative uses, we show that static adverb ”y” ? That is, when it is used to replace locative prepositions are functions, not only at the the locative prepositional complement of a verb conceptual level (as shown in previous studies), but (Locative Prepositional Phrase, or LPP), like also from a contextual point of view. Such functions in: introduce new objects in the discourse context, that (3)Cette ville est belle. J’y ai v´ecu autre- have to be taken into account in classical contex- fois.(This town is beautiful. I lived there tual processing tasks, such as reference resolution or formerly.) question answering. Then, we show how these phe- nomena can fit into contextual formalisms like DRT Here again, in a classical way, one can say that and DPL. ”y”/”there” refers to a ”place” introduced by a NP preceding the pronoun. We have a prob- 1 Introduction lem though, to rebuild the exact locative seman- tics of the pronominal sentence (here, something Most often, in a nominal anaphoric relation, a like ”in this town”).
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction . with the Substantives, Proper Names, Adjectives and Numerals the Pronouns Have in Common That They Take Part in the Categories of Case
    CHAPTER NINE PRONOUNS g.!. Introduction . With the substantives, proper names, adjectives and numerals the pronouns have in common that they take part in the categories of case. They can, however, not be reckoned to belong to any of these systems, because they are different from: substantives and proper names a.o. by the absence of the vocative category;' adjectives by the absence of the vocative and the categories of comparison; 2 numerals a.o. by the absence of the ordinal category." Moreover, they differ from all Greek words existing by their special kind of lexical meaning, the deictic meaning, in which one can distinguish between: a) The indication of the participants or non-participants of the speech event. b) The indication of different relations to these (non- )partici­ pants, or to the speech-event and the language used in it. This distinction runs roughly parallel with a significant difference in the structure of the minor systems constituted by the various pronouns: (r) The pronouns indicating the participants as such, EYW, 0',), and ~!J.eL<;, u!J.eL<;, do not have any correlated adverbs (cf. sub 2), and do not take part in the categories of number and gender: the difference in value between EyW and ~!J.eL<;, crU and u!J.ef:<; is not identical to that between e.g, t7t1to<; and Z7t1tOL . On the other hand these words take part in the oppositions of emphasis (E!J.e vs. !J.e) and of reflexivity (E!J.e vs. E!J.tXU"t"OV) . (2) The pronouns indicating relations to the participants or to the speech event as such do take part in the categories of number and gender, and with the exception of the definite article, consti­ tute minor systems or configurations, which comprise several 1 Except for ~(Lth-e:pe: in Homer e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Au Boulot! Reference Grammar Book (Pdf)
    Au boulot! 1lEFERENCE GRAMMAR OFFRENCH Revised Edition _ .....-,_fi'> - _.__ �-- .j .. -� -- ;·· . -,,...,.� �� � l' .- , �� r \ . - DaviaA. Dinneen Hope Cbris,tiansen Madeleine Kernen Herve Pensec Au boulot! REFERENCE GRAMMAR OFFRENCH David A. Dinneen Universityo/Kansas Hope Christiansen Universityof Arlcamas Madeleine Kernen SouthwestKISSOllri State Un;hlsity Herve Pensec SL OlafCollege Custom Editor: Peter Nowka © 1995 Dinneen, Christiansen, Kernen, & Pensec This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 ​ ​ International License (CC-BY-NC 4.0). ​ You are free to: ● Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format ​ ● Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material ​ Under the following terms: ● Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and ​ ​ ​ ​ indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but ​ not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. ● NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. ​ ​ ​ ​ No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological ​ ​ ​ measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. ​ The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Au Boulot! First-Year French and all affiliated supplementary content available at ​ http://hdl.handle.net/1808/15572 were conventionally published by Houghton Mifflin. ​ Upon going out of print, the rights reverted back to the authors, who subsequently worked with KU Libraries to openly license and make them available in KU ScholarWorks as open educational resources (OER). TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. vu The plan of the te:s:t . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. vin PartI.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Periphery of the English Adverb Olga Shevchenko Vitus Bering Kamchatka State University Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskiy, Russia
    SSRG International Journal of Humanities and Social Science (SSRG-IJHSS) – Volume 6 Issue 5 – Sep – Oct 2019 On the Periphery of the English Adverb Olga Shevchenko Vitus Bering Kamchatka State University Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskiy, Russia Abstract category belonging to the periphery. They share The prototypical approach is one of the characteristic features with more other examples than important achievements of cognitive grammar. these peripheral instances). The peripheral cases of a According to it, a lot of intricate phenomena category share characteristics with fewer other cases, observed in the English part-of-speech system can they have less in common with the other members of find explanation of their nature. The English adverb the category which are to be found close to the is not either a typical notional or formal part of prototype [5]. speech, it combines the characteristic features of both these groups. Besides, its borders are not clearly II. THE PROTOTYPICAL NATURE OF THE defined as a lot of words often referred to as adverbs ADVERB belong to the intermediary zones sharing properties The principles of cognitive grammar, among with other parts of speech which is manifested in them the prototypical approach, can work well in their semantic, morphological and syntactic description of the English part-of-speech system. peculiarities. The meaning of some adverbs is close Parts of speech are often characterized as classes of to that of pronouns; adverbs are either invariable or words which differ in grammatical meaning, the set form degrees of comparison; together with its most of morphological categories (or form), and syntactic characteristic syntactic function of adverbial modifier properties (combinability and the role in the the adverb can be used as practically any part of the sentence).
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Split Pronominal Adverbs in Dutch: Searching for Meaning in what is Considered Meaningless Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2qn6h0xf Author de Carlo, Nickolas Sebastiano Publication Date 2017 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Split Pronominal Adverbs in Dutch: Searching for Meaning in what is Considered Meaningless A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Germanic Languages by Nickolas Sebastiano de Carlo 2017 © Copyright by Nickolas Sebastiano de Carlo 2017 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Split Pronominals in Dutch: Searching for Meaning in what is Considered Meaningless by Nickolas Sebastiano de Carlo Doctor of Philosophy in Germanic Languages University of California, Los Angeles, 2017 Professor Robert S. Kirsner, Chair Pure synonymy is a myth. This is true in the lexicon of a language as well as its grammar. As such, why do grammars of Dutch label the following two forms below as synonymous? Unsplit: Daarmee heb ik een probleem. Therewith have I a problem. Split: Daar heb ik een probleem mee. There have I a problem with. "I have a problem with that." Calling these two forms above "the same" is an oversimplification. In my dissertation, Itest for difference in meaning between the forms and the motivation to choose one form over the other. To accomplish this goal, Iuse a corpus-based approach integrated with tests from Construction Grammar. We analyze these data in R (a statistics computing language) and Excel. This dissertation includes four tests, all complete.
    [Show full text]