Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) Wednesday Volume 575 5 February 2014 No. 118 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 5 February 2014 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2014 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 253 5 FEBRUARY 2014 254 and valuable, and sits well with the efforts of Her House of Commons Majesty’s Government to ensure a solid base of information to inform the electorate about the decision they are Wednesday 5 February 2014 being asked to take. 14. [902352] Caroline Dinenage (Gosport) (Con): Will The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock the Secretary of State assure the House that he is aware of the fears and concerns of businesses about the PRAYERS uncertainty posed by an independent Scotland, not only the currency but the fact that interest rates and borrowing costs could be set from outside Scotland? [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Mr Carmichael: Indeed, the hon. Lady makes a point that was made eloquently—and, I thought, in a very measured way—by the Governor of the Bank of England Oral Answers to Questions in his speech last week in Edinburgh. He made the point that a currency union such as that proposed inevitably involves ceding some degree of national sovereignty—the SCOTLAND very opposite of what independence is supposed to be about. One wonders why any nationalist would, in all sincerity, genuinely want one. The Secretary of State was asked— Angus Robertson (Moray) (SNP): This week the Financial Scottish Business Leaders: Independence Debate Times reported that an independent Scotland should have healthier state finances than the rest of the UK. So 1. Nicholas Soames (Mid Sussex) (Con): What far, more than 1,200 business owners and directors have steps his Department is taking to encourage Scottish declared their support for a yes vote by joining the business leaders to participate in the independence pro-independence business group, Business for Scotland. debate. [902338] Does the Secretary of State recognise their role in the Scottish economy and welcome their contribution to The Secretary of State for Scotland (Mr Alistair the referendum debate? Carmichael): I speak to businesses from across Scotland regularly and frequently. In those meetings we highlight Mr Carmichael: I will, of course, speak to businessmen the importance of the decision the Scottish people will and women of all views at any time in Scotland. The make on 18 September, and encourage them to get difficulty for the hon. Gentleman is that the most recent involved in this important debate. polling exercise undertaken in the business community showed that roughly three quarters of business people Nicholas Soames: Has my right hon. Friend seen the in Scotland intend to vote no. They know that independence recent intervention of Bob Dudley, the chief executive would be bad for their business. of British Petroleum—which, after all, has a major stake in Scotland—whose views should be taken seriously? Angus Robertson: All the evidence from polling in Does he agree that other business leaders with a big recent weeks shows a substantial swing to the yes campaign, interest in Scotland’s future should follow that example, and the polls also show that by a majority of 4:1, the and set out clearly the implications and consequences public wish to see a debate between the Prime Minister of independence for their employees, suppliers, and and First Minister Alex Salmond. How long can the shareholders? Prime Minister continue supporting everybody else becoming part of the debate, but run away from one Mr Carmichael: I have seen and studied the intervention himself? from Bob Dudley yesterday.The terms of that intervention do not surprise me at all as they very much reflect the Mr Carmichael: Make no mistake, Mr Speaker, we concerns expressed to me when I speak to businessmen know exactly why the nationalists want that debate and women across Scotland who represent businesses between the Prime Minister and Alex Salmond: they are of all sizes. They all tell me the same: they see independence trying to set the decision up as a contest between as being bad for their business. It brings uncertainties, Scotland and England, which it absolutely is not. This uncertainty means risk, and that is bad for their business is about Scotland’s best-placed constitutional future, future. and it is to be decided by Scots in Scotland. 11. [902349] Mr Brian H. Donohoe (Central Ayrshire) Sir Menzies Campbell: My right hon. Friend will be (Lab): Has the Secretary of State had any meetings aware that the First Minister dismissed Mr Dudley’s with Sir Tom Hunter, who has been pretty vocal about remarks as being purely a personal opinion. In the light the whole issue, and, if he has not, will he have such a of that, may we take it that all those in the business meeting? sector who have apparently subscribed to independence can have their opinions dismissed in the same way? Mr Carmichael: I recently met Sir Tom Hunter at a business breakfast organised by the Prime Minister in Mr Carmichael: I would dismiss nobody’s opinion No. 10 Downing street. The hon. Gentleman will have and I would engage with people of all shades of opinion seen the recent initiative by Sir Tom, which is interesting across this debate, but the fact is that Bob Dudley is not 255 Oral Answers5 FEBRUARY 2014 Oral Answers 256 a lone voice. He is part of a growing chorus from the other stakeholders in Scotland on what the impact of business community in Scotland who highlight the dangers welfare reforms and the challenges of implementation that would come from independence. They all say the have been for them, their services and their tenants. same—it would be a risk to their business because of the uncertainty of the future position of the currency Dr Whiteford: The Minister will therefore know that and membership of the European Union. On those two 80% of the households in Scotland affected by the key issues, the nationalists have no comfort for business. bedroom tax are the home of someone with a disability. He knows that there is a mismatch between the available Margaret Curran (Glasgow East) (Lab): As the Secretary housing stock and the needs of tenants, and he knows of State has said, it is welcome that the chief executive that Scottish MPs, including Government Back Benchers, of BP and the outgoing chief executive of Sainsbury’s voted overwhelmingly against this policy. Will the have both spelled out substantial concerns about Government now lift the legal restrictions on discretionary independence. Does the Secretary of State agree that all housing payments to allow the Scottish Government to businesses, trade unions and voluntary organisations mitigate the impact of this nonsense of a policy? have a right to be heard without insult, intimidation or fear of the consequences, regardless of which side of David Mundell: What I do know is that the hon. Lady the debate they are on? has a brass neck. She is a member of the Scottish Affairs Committee, but fails to take up her place. This Mr Carmichael: I do, absolutely, and in that regard I issue was debated in detail yesterday and if she had commend the efforts of the Scottish Daily Mail, which been present she would know that the Scottish Government in recent weeks has sought to highlight the poison already have the powers to take measures if they genuinely coming into the debate from some of the cyber- believe there are concerns with welfare policies. interventions. Other hon. Members have also raised this issue. Whatever the outcome on 18 September we will Mr Alan Reid (Argyll and Bute) (LD): I am pleased all have to work together in Scotland for its best future, that the Government listened when I pointed out the and that will not be possible if we allow the well to be problems that withdrawal of the spare room subsidy, poisoned in the way the cyber-Nats in particular seem also known as the bedroom tax, would cause for tenants determined to do. on islands and in remote parts of the mainland. I am delighted that the Government have given more than Margaret Curran: I thank the Secretary of State for £400,000 to Argyll and Bute council to help affected that response, but may I press him a little further? tenants, and I hope that that generous allocation will Business leaders have told me of intimidatory tactics continue in future years. being used in an attempt to stop them intervening in the independence debate. One leader of a FTSE company David Mundell: I commend the hon. Gentleman for told Robert Peston of the BBC that the Scottish pointing out the specific issues raised in island communities Government “became very aggressive” when he tried to and by rurality generally, and that is why the Government raise concerns about independence. Just yesterday, Bob have provided additional discretionary housing payments Dudley of BP was dismissed by the yes campaign as “a for rural areas. British nationalist”. Will the Secretary of State join me in condemning the pattern of behaviour that we are Single-tier Pension beginning to see in Scotland and say, in the strongest possible terms, that it has no place for us Scots as we 3. Fiona O’Donnell (East Lothian) (Lab): What debate our future? discussions he has had with his ministerial colleagues on increased national insurance costs for public bodies Mr Carmichael: I agree with the hon. Lady on that in Scotland resulting from the introduction of the point in the very strongest terms.
Recommended publications
  • Daily Report Thursday, 20 July 2017 CONTENTS
    Daily Report Thursday, 20 July 2017 This report shows written answers and statements provided on 20 July 2017 and the information is correct at the time of publication (06:34 P.M., 20 July 2017). For the latest information on written questions and answers, ministerial corrections, and written statements, please visit: http://www.parliament.uk/writtenanswers/ CONTENTS ANSWERS 10 Social Tariffs: Torfaen 19 ATTORNEY GENERAL 10 Taxation: Electronic Hate Crime: Prosecutions 10 Government 19 BUSINESS, ENERGY AND Technology and Innovation INDUSTRIAL STRATEGY 10 Centres 20 Business: Broadband 10 UK Consumer Product Recall Review 20 Construction: Employment 11 Voluntary Work: Leave 21 Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy: CABINET OFFICE 21 Mass Media 11 Brexit 21 Department for Business, Elections: Subversion 21 Energy and Industrial Strategy: Electoral Register 22 Staff 11 Government Departments: Directors: Equality 12 Procurement 22 Domestic Appliances: Safety 13 Intimidation of Parliamentary Economic Growth: Candidates Review 22 Environment Protection 13 Living Wage: Jarrow 23 Electrical Safety: Testing 14 New Businesses: Newham 23 Fracking 14 Personal Income 23 Insolvency 14 Public Sector: Blaenau Gwent 24 Iron and Steel: Procurement 17 Public Sector: Cardiff Central 24 Mergers and Monopolies: Data Public Sector: Ogmore 24 Protection 17 Public Sector: Swansea East 24 Nuclear Power: Treaties 18 Public Sector: Torfaen 25 Offshore Industry: North Sea 18 Public Sector: Wrexham 25 Performing Arts 18 Young People: Cardiff Central
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Wednesday Volume 501 25 November 2009 No. 5 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 25 November 2009 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2009 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 513 25 NOVEMBER 2009 514 my hon. Friend the Member for North Ayrshire and House of Commons Arran (Ms Clark). In a letter I received from Ofcom, the regulator states: Wednesday 25 November 2009 “Ofcom does not have the power to mandate ISPs”— internet service providers. Surely that power is overdue, because otherwise, many of my constituents, along with The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock those of my colleagues, will continue to receive a poor broadband service. PRAYERS Mr. Murphy: My hon. Friend makes some very important points about the decision-making powers and architecture [MR.SPEAKER in the Chair] that will ensure we achieve 90 per cent. broadband penetration. We are trying to ensure that the market provides most of that, and we expect that up to two thirds—60 to 70 per cent.—of homes will be able to Oral Answers to Questions access super-fast broadband through the market. However, the Government will have to do additional things, and my hon. Friend can make the case for giving Ofcom SCOTLAND additional powers; but, again, we are absolutely determined that no one be excluded for reasons of geography or income.
    [Show full text]
  • Addressing and Preventing Sexist Advertising
    — Addressing and preventing sexist advertising An analysis of local and global promising practice Abstract This research paper explores the efficacy of interventions that aim to address sexism or promote progressive gender representations in advertising, highlighting examples of local and global promising practice. Interventions to prevent or address sexist advertising may occur through several distinct mechanisms: legislative frameworks; self-regulatory and co-regulatory systems; the provision of educational resources to the broader community; industry initiatives to re-shape advertising culture and promote diverse, inclusive and ethical practice; and the exertion of influence on advertisers and regulators through consumer activism. The paper explores the strengths and limitations of each mechanism and illustrates interventions in practice through a variety of case studies. Critical to addressing sexist advertising is a whole of system approach with mutually reinforcing interventions that capitalise on different opportunities for influence. Concluding summations are offered throughout with a range of recommendations drawn from these at the end of the paper. Authors and researchers This research paper has been written and researched by: Dr Lauren Gurrieri, Senior Lecturer in Marketing, RMIT University Dr Rob Hoffman, Research Assistant, RMIT University This research is funded by Women’s Health Victoria as part of the Advertising (in)equality project and supported by the Victorian Government through its Free from Violence Innovation Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • DFID Annual Report 2008
    House of Commons International Development Committee DFID Annual Report 2008 Second Report of Session 2008–09 Volume II Oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 10 February 2009 HC 220-II [Incorporating HC 945-i, -ii and -iii of Session 2007-08 Published on 19 February 2009 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 International Development Committee The International Development Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for International Development and its associated public bodies. Current membership Malcolm Bruce MP (Liberal Democrat, Gordon) (Chairman) John Battle MP (Labour, Leeds West) Hugh Bayley MP (Labour, City of York) John Bercow MP (Conservative, Buckingham) Richard Burden MP (Labour, Birmingham Northfield) Mr Stephen Crabb MP (Conservative, Preseli Pembrokeshire) Mr Mark Hendrick MP (Labour Co-op, Preston) Daniel Kawczynski MP (Conservative, Shrewsbury and Atcham) Jim Sheridan MP (Labour, Paisley and Renfrewshire North) Mr Marsha Singh MP (Labour, Bradford West) Andrew Stunell (Liberal Democrat, Hazel Grove) Ann McKechin (Labour, Glasgow North) and Sir Robert Smith (Liberal Democrat, West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine) were also members of the Committee during this inquiry. Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Council, 03/10/2018 19:30
    Public Document Pack Lewisham Council Members Members of the committee, listed below, are summoned to attend the meeting to be held on Wednesday, 3 October 2018. Ian Thomas, Chief Executive September 25 2018 Mayor Damien Egan Councillor Obajimi Adefiranye Councillor Abdeslam Amrani Councillor Tauseef Anwar Councillor Chris Barnham Councillor Paul Bell Councillor Peter Bernards Councillor Chris Best Councillor Kevin Bonavia Councillor Andre Bourne Councillor Bill Brown Councillor Juliet Campbell Members of the public are welcome to attend committee meetings. However, occasionally, committees may have to consider some business in private. Copies of agendas, minutes and reports are available on request in Braille, in large print, on audio tape, on computer disk or in other languages. Councillor Suzannah Clarke Councillor Patrick Codd Councillor Tom Copley Councillor Liam Curran Councillor Janet Daby Councillor Brenda Dacres Councillor Sophie Davis Councillor Amanda De Ryk Councillor Joe Dromey Councillor Colin Elliott Councillor Alex Feis-Bryce Councillor Aisling Gallagher Councillor Leo Gibbons Councillor Alan Hall Councillor Carl Handley Councillor Octavia Holland Councillor Sue Hordijenko Councillor Coral Howard Councillor Mark Ingleby Councillor Liz Johnston-Franklin Councillor Caroline Kalu Councillor Silvana Kelleher Councillor Louise Krupski Councillor Jim Mallory Councillor Paul Maslin Councillor Sophie McGeevor Members of the public are welcome to attend committee meetings. However, occasionally, committees may have to consider
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Cornwall and Isles of Scilly Local
    Title: CIoS Local Enterprise Partnership Board Date: Wednesday 28 July 2021 Time: 10.00 to 13.00 Venue: : - Council Offices, Chy Trevail, Bodmin, PL31 2FR Livestream Link: https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup- join/19%3ameeting_NmFkNzY4NWMtNmVjMy00YTgxLWFhZTMtMDZlZDRlZGIyNTU5 %40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%22efaa16aa-d1de-4d58-ba2e- 2833fdfdd29f%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%22fa9d3751-6eb5-4308-b8c3- 006db67ed9ac%22%2c%22IsBroadcastMeeting%22%3atrue%7d&btype=a&role=a Agenda Item Lead Action 1. 10.00 Welcome and Introductions Apologies for Absence Directors: Louis Mathers Officers: Phil Mason, John Curnow 2. 10.05 Declarations of Interest ALL 3. 10.10 LEP Board (31 March 2021) 3 .1 Minutes (Pages 3 - 11) MD To note 3 .2 Action Summary (Page 12) GCG To note 4. Strategic Matters 4 .1 10.20 Chair Update MD To note 4 .2 10.30 CEO Report, with a focus on: (Pages 13 - 65) GCG To note/ Labour market and skills challenges presentation Green Industrial Revolution 4 .3 11.25 Fishing Sector Update (Pages 66 - 68) MD/NC Decision Page 1 4 .4 11.50 Nominations Committee Update (Pages 69 - GCG Decision 122) 4 .5 12.15 Audit & Assurance Committee Update (Pages GCG Decision 123 - 198) 4 .6 12.25 Enterprise Zones Board Update (Pages 199 - SJ/GCG To note 202) 4 .7 12.35 Any other business 5. Exclusion of Press and Public 5 .1 12.40 Investment & Oversight Panel Update (Pages MD/GCG To note 203 - 206) 5 .2 12.50 Any other confidential business ALL Page 2 Agenda No. 3.1 Information Classification: CONTROLLED CORNWALL AND ISLES OF SCILLY LOCAL ENTERPRISE PARTNERSHIP MINUTES of a Meeting of the Cornwall and Isles of Scilly Local Enterprise Partnership held in the Online - Virtual Meeting on Wednesday 31 March 2021 commencing at 10.00 am.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall2011.Pdf
    Grove Press Atlantic Monthly Press Black Cat The Mysterious Press Granta Fall 201 1 NOW AVAILABLE Complete and updated coverage by The New York Times about WikiLeaks and their controversial release of diplomatic cables and war logs OPEN SECRETS WikiLeaks, War, and American Diplomacy The New York Times Introduction by Bill Keller • Essential, unparalleled coverage A New York Times Best Seller from the expert writers at The New York Times on the hundreds he controversial antisecrecy organization WikiLeaks, led by Julian of thousands of confidential Assange, made headlines around the world when it released hundreds of documents revealed by WikiLeaks thousands of classified U.S. government documents in 2010. Allowed • Open Secrets also contains a T fascinating selection of original advance access, The New York Times sorted, searched, and analyzed these secret cables and war logs archives, placed them in context, and played a crucial role in breaking the WikiLeaks story. • online promotion at Open Secrets, originally published as an e-book, is the essential collection www.nytimes.com/opensecrets of the Times’s expert reporting and analysis, as well as the definitive chronicle of the documents’ release and the controversy that ensued. An introduction by Times executive editor, Bill Keller, details the paper’s cloak-and-dagger “We may look back at the war logs as relationship with a difficult source. Extended profiles of Assange and Bradley a herald of the end of America’s Manning, the Army private suspected of being his source, offer keen insight engagement in Afghanistan, just as into the main players. Collected news stories offer a broad and deep view into the Pentagon Papers are now a Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and the messy challenges facing American power milestone in our slo-mo exit from in Europe, Russia, Asia, the Middle East, and Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Z675928x Margaret Hodge Mp 06/10/2011 Z9080283 Lorely
    Z675928X MARGARET HODGE MP 06/10/2011 Z9080283 LORELY BURT MP 08/10/2011 Z5702798 PAUL FARRELLY MP 09/10/2011 Z5651644 NORMAN LAMB 09/10/2011 Z236177X ROBERT HALFON MP 11/10/2011 Z2326282 MARCUS JONES MP 11/10/2011 Z2409343 CHARLOTTE LESLIE 12/10/2011 Z2415104 CATHERINE MCKINNELL 14/10/2011 Z2416602 STEPHEN MOSLEY 18/10/2011 Z5957328 JOAN RUDDOCK MP 18/10/2011 Z2375838 ROBIN WALKER MP 19/10/2011 Z1907445 ANNE MCINTOSH MP 20/10/2011 Z2408027 IAN LAVERY MP 21/10/2011 Z1951398 ROGER WILLIAMS 21/10/2011 Z7209413 ALISTAIR CARMICHAEL 24/10/2011 Z2423448 NIGEL MILLS MP 24/10/2011 Z2423360 BEN GUMMER MP 25/10/2011 Z2423633 MIKE WEATHERLEY MP 25/10/2011 Z5092044 GERAINT DAVIES MP 26/10/2011 Z2425526 KARL TURNER MP 27/10/2011 Z242877X DAVID MORRIS MP 28/10/2011 Z2414680 JAMES MORRIS MP 28/10/2011 Z2428399 PHILLIP LEE MP 31/10/2011 Z2429528 IAN MEARNS MP 31/10/2011 Z2329673 DR EILIDH WHITEFORD MP 31/10/2011 Z9252691 MADELEINE MOON MP 01/11/2011 Z2431014 GAVIN WILLIAMSON MP 01/11/2011 Z2414601 DAVID MOWAT MP 02/11/2011 Z2384782 CHRISTOPHER LESLIE MP 04/11/2011 Z7322798 ANDREW SLAUGHTER 05/11/2011 Z9265248 IAN AUSTIN MP 08/11/2011 Z2424608 AMBER RUDD MP 09/11/2011 Z241465X SIMON KIRBY MP 10/11/2011 Z2422243 PAUL MAYNARD MP 10/11/2011 Z2261940 TESSA MUNT MP 10/11/2011 Z5928278 VERNON RODNEY COAKER MP 11/11/2011 Z5402015 STEPHEN TIMMS MP 11/11/2011 Z1889879 BRIAN BINLEY MP 12/11/2011 Z5564713 ANDY BURNHAM MP 12/11/2011 Z4665783 EDWARD GARNIER QC MP 12/11/2011 Z907501X DANIEL KAWCZYNSKI MP 12/11/2011 Z728149X JOHN ROBERTSON MP 12/11/2011 Z5611939 CHRIS
    [Show full text]
  • Yougov / the Sunday Times Survey Results
    YouGov / The Sunday Times Survey Results Sample Size: 1011 Labour Party Members Fieldwork: 7th - 9th September 2010 1st Preference - September 2010 1st Preference - July 2010 September Choice July Choice Gender Age Diane Andy David Ed Diane Andy David Ed David Ed David Ed Total Ed Balls Ed Balls Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ Abbott Burnham Miliband Miliband Abbott Burnham Miliband Miliband Miliband Miliband Miliband Miliband Weighted Sample 1008 106 86 91 354 287 99 45 65 244 209 431 474 320 340 577 432 331 303 374 Unweighted Sample 1011 102 89 97 344 296 93 45 69 239 221 429 485 310 353 654 357 307 317 387 % %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 1st Preference - September 2010 [Excluding Don't know and Wouldn't Vote] David Miliband 38 0001000824 9 79 16 83 0 68 11 36 42 41 39 35 Ed Miliband 31 00001001114 13 11 69 1 62 11 50 31 31 33 28 33 Diane Abbott 11 1000000702 3144164181112131111 Andy Burnham 10 001000029 66 4 6 7 10 10 10 12 7 8 10 11 Ed Balls 9 0100000852 10 5 6 5 12 7 11 10 8 5 13 10 Weighted Sample 846 92 82 84 320 268 84 41 55 214 186 384 427 279 296 493 353 280 258 308 Unweighted Sample 849 90 85 89 308 277 80 41 58 207 199 380 438 268 309 555 294 260 266 323 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 2nd Preference - September 2010 [Excluding Don't know and Wouldn't Vote] Ed Miliband 30 53 48 34 43 0 42 32 25 33 22 35 27 30 29 29 32 32 33 26 Ed Balls 22 200 2825251936 26 23 21 23 21 24 22 23 21 20 23 23 Andy Burnham 19 14 17 0 21 24 14 18 19 21 18 19 19 19 18 18 20 21 20 16 David Miliband 17 13 20 30 0 35 13 12 24 10 27 13 21 16 20 17 17 15 12 23 Diane Abbott 11 0 15 8 11 16 11 2 7 12 12 9 12 11 11 12 10 12 11 12 Weighted Sample 905 90 74 75 351 285 82 40 56 233 203 431 474 299 319 519 387 303 267 336 Unweighted Sample 914 87 78 84 341 293 79 40 60 228 214 429 485 290 334 592 322 283 280 351 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Miliband preference - September [Excluding definitely wouldn't vote] David Miliband 48 19 28 41 100 1 25 34 37 86 17 100 0 80 17 47 49 48 46 48 Ed Miliband 52 81 72 59 0 99 75 66 63 14 83 0 100 20 83 53 51 52 54 52 1 © 2010 YouGov plc.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Note: Former Special Advisers in Cabinet, 1979-2013
    Research Note: Former Special Advisers in Cabinet, 1979-2013 Executive Summary Sixteen special advisers have gone on to become Cabinet Ministers. This means that of the 492 special advisers listed in the Constitution Unit database in the period 1979-2010, only 3% entered Cabinet. Seven Conservative party Cabinet members were formerly special advisers. o Four Conservative special advisers went on to become Cabinet Ministers in the 1979-1997 period of Conservative governments. o Three former Conservative special advisers currently sit in the Coalition Cabinet: David Cameron, George Osborne and Jonathan Hill. Eight Labour Cabinet members between 1997-2010 were former special advisers. o Five of the eight former special advisers brought into the Labour Cabinet between 1997-2010 had been special advisers to Tony Blair or Gordon Brown. o Jack Straw entered Cabinet in 1997 having been a special adviser before 1979. One Liberal Democrat Cabinet member, Vince Cable, was previously a special adviser to a Labour minister. The Coalition Cabinet of January 2013 currently has four members who were once special advisers. o Also attending Cabinet meetings is another former special adviser: Oliver Letwin as Minister of State for Policy. There are traditionally 21 or 22 Ministers who sit in Cabinet. Unsurprisingly, the number and proportion of Cabinet Ministers who were previously special advisers generally increases the longer governments go on. The number of Cabinet Ministers who were formerly special advisers was greatest at the end of the Labour administration (1997-2010) when seven of the Cabinet Ministers were former special advisers. The proportion of Cabinet made up of former special advisers was greatest in Gordon Brown’s Cabinet when almost one-third (30.5%) of the Cabinet were former special advisers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cornwall and Isles of Scilly Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP) Was Launched in May 2011
    Written evidence submitted by Cornwall and Isles of Scilly Local Enterprise Partnership (INS0039) The Cornwall and Isles of Scilly Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP) was launched in May 2011. Private sector-led, it is a partnership between the private and public sectors and is driving the economic strategy for the region, determining local priorities and undertaking activities to drive growth and the creation of local jobs. Executive Summary The Government’s Industrial Strategy should be refreshed to include wider economic, social and environmental factors that are now in play post Covid 19 by building on all of England’s Local Industrial Strategies. Industrial Strategy Grand Challenges should be updated and localised, within a national framework, and should consider the levelling up agenda, climate change, regional imbalances and measures to reduce inequality/social inclusion. The refresh should use the guiding principle of devolving decision making and delivery. The focus on key sectors in the current Industrial Strategy is sufficient if a narrow view on “growth” is used or if “trickle down” economic policies are adopted. However, whilst this approach will raise the productivity and growth of some areas it will not benefit all areas equally and those areas furthest from key industrial centres will see little or no benefit. As the future prosperity of the UK depends on unlocking the potential of all its areas, towns, high streets businesses and residents the revised Industrial Strategy needs to be more inclusive and allow for different areas to make different contributions to overall productivity levels and growth. The immense productivity gap that currently exists between the prosperous South East of England and the rest of the country on the other must be therefore be levelled-up by investing in the LEP areas that are currently lagging behind.
    [Show full text]
  • Women Mps in Westminster Photographs Taken May 21St, June 3Rd, June 4Th, 2008
    “The House of Commons Works of Art Collection documents significant moments in Parliamentary history. We are delighted to have added this unique photographic record of women MPs of today, to mark the 90th anniversary of women first being able to take their seats in this House” – Hugo Swire, Chairman, The Speaker's Advisory Committee on Works of Art. “The day the Carlton Club accepted women” – 90 years after women first got the vote aim to ensure that a more enduring image of On May 21st 2008 over half of all women women's participation in the political process Members of Parliament in Westminster survives. gathered party by party to have group photographs taken to mark the anniversary of Each party gave its permission for the 90 years since women first got the vote (in photographs to be taken. For the Labour February 1918 women over 30 were first Party, Barbara Follett MP, the then Deputy granted the vote). Minister for Women and Equality, and Barbara Keeley MP, who was Chair of the Labour Party Women’s Committee and The four new composite Caroline Adams, who works for the photographs taken party by Parliamentary Labour Party helped ensure that all but 12 of the Labour women party aim to ensure that a attended. more enduring image of For the Conservative women's participation in the Party, The Shadow Leader of the House of political process survives Commons and Shadow Minister for Until now the most often used photographic Women, Theresa May image of women MPs had been the so called MP and the Chairman “Blair Babes” picture taken on 7th May 1997 of the Conservative shortly after 101 Labour women were elected Party, Caroline to Westminster as a result of positive action by Spelman MP, enlisted the Labour Party.
    [Show full text]