Basin/Badlands of Southwestern South Dakota

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Basin/Badlands of Southwestern South Dakota 222 RANGELANDS 18(6), December 1996 Black-footed Ferret Reintroduction in the Conata Basin/Badlands of Southwestern South Dakota Peter M. McDonald and Glenn E. Plumb he long, slender creature cautiously emerged from its footed ferrets are adapted to preying on prairie dogs for hole, glancing right, left, right again, then directly at food and using undergroundburrow systems of prairie dogs Tthe beam of the spotlight fixed on him. The emerald for shelter and family-rearing. green eyes glimmered in the powerful light like no other At one time, it would have been a superb strategy for the animal of the prairie could. or should. Forthese were the black-footedferret to exploit such an abundant and season- eyes of one of the rarest free-ranging mammals in the ally reliable source of food and shelter represented by world, certainly the rarest on the North American continent. prairie dog communities. Over 100 million acres of prairie And these eyesgazed out over the surrounding grasslands dog towns were dispersed across the Great Plains in the of the Conata Basin/Badlands region of southwestern late-nineteenthcentury. However, early settlers viewed the South Dakota for the first time in over thirty years. intensive burrowing and grazing disturbances by this colo- The black-footed ferret (Mustela nigripes) was first nial, native rodent as incompatiblewith agrarian land uses. described in 1851 by the legendary naturalist, John James Intensive efforts to chemically and mechanically eliminate Audubon, and John Bachman. A member of the weasel local prairie dog populationsgenerated an unforeseencon- family, the black-footed ferret has since been identified as sequence: massive reduction and fragmentation of the the only ferret native to North America. The more common habitat base for historically-associated wildlife like the domestic ferret is most closely related to the Old World black-footed ferret. Compounding the problem was likely Siberian polecat (M. evermansi,),rather than to some North secondary poisoning of ferrets during prairie dog control American mustelid cousin. The black-footedferret is unique programs,as well as the introduction of sylvatic plague and among weasels in its highly specialized relianceon a singu- canine distemper to the prairie dog and black-footed ferret lar habitat type: prairie dog towns (Cynomys spp.). Black- communities. Diseases continue to represent an important RANGELANDS 18(6), December 1996 223 threat to national recoveryof the species. As the prairie dog Dakota, the Meeteese population also began to disappear. went, so went the black-footed ferret. The ferret has been This time, the causes were confirmed as local outbreaks of federally listed as endangered since 1967. canine distemper and plague. By 1986, the remaining eigh- A veil of mystery continued to surround the black-footed teen survivors had been removed from the wild in a second ferret over the century following Audubon and Bachman's attempt at captive breeding the species and averting extinc- initial description. The species was thought to be historical- tion. Today, this captive breeding program is international ly rare, or at leastpoorly understoodowing in part perhaps in scope with seven facilities in the United States and to its largely nocturnal habits and absence from early fur Canada. The relative success of this effort—compared to harvest records. Some Plains tribes reportedly used black- the earlier attempt with the South Dakota ferrets—provided footed ferrets for ceremonial purposes. More contemporary the opportunity to seriously pursue re-establishmentof the sightings were occasionally reported across the species species back into the wild. The national recovery plan calls range, but confirmation of local populationswas extremely for a minimum of ten discrete populations and 1,500 ani- elusive. That changed dramatically with the discovery in mals distributed across the historic range of the species. 1964 and subsequent field observations over several years The first ever attempt at black-footed ferret reintroduction of a population centered in Mellette County, South Dakota. began in the Shirley Basin, Wyoming, in 1991. At last the world had some reliable information about the Ranked in 1989 by a national recovery team as possess- ecology of the black-footed ferret, particularly its habitat ing one of the highest potentials for black-footed ferret relationships. As in a cruel twist of fate, the South Dakota recovery in North America, the Conata Basin/Badlands population began to disappear and attemptsto captive- recovery areain southwesternSouth Dakota encompasses breed a few survivors ended in futility with the death of the portions of the Buffalo Gap National Grassland and last captive ferret in 1979. Badlands National Park (see map). This area is distin- The species was widely believed to be extinct with the guished by its combination of high quality prairie dog habi- demise of the South Dakota black-footed ferrets, until the tat, extensive public land base, absence of plague in the accidental discovery in 1980 of a small population outside prairie dog populations, and the historic presence of black- of Meeteese, Wyoming, nearthe edge of the animal's his- footed ferrets. Following a five-year interagency planning torical range. As experienced a decade earlier in South and public involvement process, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife N N N N E-.&I PpAe, Do 224 RANGELANDS 18(6), December 1996 Service, U.S. Forest Service, and National Park Service the important advancementstoward recovery of the black- collaboratively released in 1994 an Environmental Impact footed ferret in recent times, even today the fate of the Statement formally identifying the Conata Basin/Badlands species is precarious at best. Ongoing reintroduction pro- recovery area and proposing reintroductionof black-footed grams in Wyoming, Montana, South Dakota, and, begin- ferrets as a "non-essential, experimental" population. This ning in 1996, Arizona, strain the capacity of the breeding designation would provide management flexibilitiy to opti- facilities to supply even minimally suitable numbers of rein- mize recovery efforts, while removing some restrictions troduction candidates per site annually. There is also a associated with an endangered species and easing con- tremendous work load at the reintroduction sites, for pre- cerns of local landowners and public land users. reintroductionpreparation, implementing releases, and con- Additionally, initial releases would be confined to the ducting proper post-release monitoring to adequately track Badlands National Park portion of the greater Conata recoveryprogress. All of these activities that representsite- Basin/Badlandsreintroduction area. level recovery require strong policy and fiscal support. Since fall of 1994, seventy juvenile black-footed ferrets Diseases such as plague remain serious obstacles to have been released into Badlands National Park. Following recovery in many areas in the species historic range. the initial released in 1994, two litters of wild-born black- Finally, without broad understanding of, and acceptance footed ferrets were sighted in late-summer 1995. for, conserving the prairie dog ecosystem at regional Subsequently, eighteen free-ranging black-footed ferrets scales, current localized efforts to recover the extremely were detected during surveys conducted mid-winter 1995- endangered black-footed ferret may temporarily delay, but 1996. Additional ferrets will be released annually for several are unlikely to prevent,the demise of the species in the wild years in an attempt to establish a self-sustaining popula- once and for all. tion. Releases in 1996 have been proposed for both the Badlands National Park and Buffalo Gap National Grassland. Reintroduced animals are monitored to deter- mine dispersal patterns, habitat use, and sourcesof mortal- Different release will continue to be used to Author is Wildlife Biologist, Buffalo Gap National Grassland and ity. techniques Wildlife Biologist, BadlandsNational Park determine for this site and recovery sites in other states what reintroduction strategies seem to work best. Despite (Continued from page 211 EVP's Report) This was a tremendous accomplishment and obviously of Land Management, Natural Resource Conservation not an easy one by virtue of the time required to achieve it. Service, Montana WoolgrowersAssociation, Montana I would think such agreements would be useful in other Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, Montana states. Communications are vastly improved when every- Department of Environmental Quality Nonpoint Source one uses the same words and standards for describing any Program, Montana Farm Bureau, Montana State University, set of practices. Coordinated Resource Management U.S. Forest Service and Montana Fisheries Society worked Processis a powerful tool. together diligently to develop a process to establish stan- Annual MeetIng in Rapid City. This is my last opportuni- dards for livestock grazing practices that would consider ty before the meeting to call your attention to the annual the resource values and the livestock industry's needs. meeting in Rapid City. I urge the entire to The rangeland family Natural Resource Conservation Service's (NRCS) consider attending the 1997 annual meeting in Rapid City, new Standards replaces previous existing NRCS Grazing South Dakota. The activities associated with the 5O Standards and the State of many updates Montana's Agricultural anniversarycelebration of SRM will make this a
Recommended publications
  • South Dakota to Nebraska
    Geological Society of America Special Paper 325 1998 Lithostratigraphic revision and correlation of the lower part of the White River Group: South Dakota to Nebraska Dennis O. Terry, Jr. Department of Geology, University of Nebraska—Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588-0340 ABSTRACT Lithologic correlations between type areas of the White River Group in Nebraska and South Dakota have resulted in a revised lithostratigraphy for the lower part of the White River Group. The following pedostratigraphic and lithostratigraphic units, from oldest to youngest, are newly recognized in northwestern Nebraska and can be correlated with units in the Big Badlands of South Dakota: the Yellow Mounds Pale- osol Equivalent, Interior and Weta Paleosol Equivalents, Chamberlain Pass Forma- tion, and Peanut Peak Member of the Chadron Formation. The term “Interior Paleosol Complex,” used for the brightly colored zone at the base of the White River Group in northwestern Nebraska, is abandoned in favor of a two-part division. The lower part is related to the Yellow Mounds Paleosol Series of South Dakota and rep- resents the pedogenically modified Cretaceous Pierre Shale. The upper part is com- posed of the unconformably overlying, pedogenically modified overbank mudstone facies of the Chamberlain Pass Formation (which contains the Interior and Weta Paleosol Series in South Dakota). Greenish-white channel sandstones at the base of the Chadron Formation in Nebraska (previously correlated to the Ahearn Member of the Chadron Formation in South Dakota) herein are correlated to the channel sand- stone facies of the Chamberlain Pass Formation in South Dakota. The Chamberlain Pass Formation is unconformably overlain by the Chadron Formation in South Dakota and Nebraska.
    [Show full text]
  • County of Riverside General Plan Reche Canyon/Badlands Area Plan
    County of Riverside General Plan Reche Canyon/Badlands Area Plan COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Transportation and Land Management Agency 4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor Riverside, CA 92501-3634 Phone: (951) 955-3200, Fax: (951) 955-1811 October 2011 County of Riverside General Plan Reche Canyon/Badlands Area Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Vision Summary.......................................................................................................................................................... iv Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. 1 A Special Note on Implementing the Vision ........................................................................................................ 2 Location ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Features ........................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Setting ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Unique Features ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 Badlands/Norton Younglove Preserve
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Canyon National Park Service U.S
    National Park Grand Canyon National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior The Painted Map by Erwin Ralsz WHAT IS The Painted Desert is a well-known Formation. While several rock layers in THE PAINTED DESERT? Arizona landscape of very colorful "bad northeastern Arizona are colorful, it is the lands" extending across northeastern particular beauty of the Chinle Formation Arizona. (Badlands are intricately dis that gave rise to the notion of a Painted sected, barren, and rounded landscapes that Desert. Although the Chinle Formation can typically occur in arid regions where weak be seen elsewhere, in the Painted Desert the rock is prevalent). The Painted Desert is exposure of this rock is long and continu distinctly defined by exposures of a rock ous. layer known as the Chinle (Chin-lee) The Painted Desert is exposed in a of Winslow, Arizona along State Highway WHERE TO SEE band of rock trending northwest from 87. Winslow is 140 miles from Grand THE PAINTED DESERT Holbrook, Arizona to The Gap, Arizona. Canyon's South Rim. This band is wider in the Holbrook area and narrows significantly to the northwest. Few Closest to Grand Canyon, the Painted roads provide access to the Painted Desert. Desert is exposed in a narrow band along U.S. Highway 89 from about 3 miles north Unquestionably, the most famous part of Cameron, Arizona (at milepost#470) to of the Painted Desert is at Petrified Forest the small village of The Gap farther north. National Park, 190 miles from the South A small but visually striking example of the Rim of Grand Canyon.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary Interval in Badlands National Park, South Dakota
    The Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary Interval in Badlands National Park, South Dakota Philip W. Stoffer1 Paula Messina John A. Chamberlain, Jr. Dennis O. Terry, Jr. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 01-56 2001 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director The Cretaceous/Tertiary (K-T) boundary study interval at the Rainbow Colors Overlook along Badlands Loop Road, North Unit of Badlands National Park. This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 1345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025 http://geopubs.wr.usgs.gov/open-file/of01-056/ ABSTRACT A marine K-T boundary interval has been identified throughout the Badlands National Park region of South Dakota. Data from marine sediments suggest that deposits from two asteroid impacts (one close, one far away) may be preserved in the Badlands. These impact- generated deposits may represent late Maestrichtian events or possibly the terminal K-T event. Interpretation is supported by paleontological correlation, sequence stratigraphy, magnetostratigraphy, and strontium isotope geochronology. This research is founded on nearly a decade of NPS approved field work in Badlands National Park and a foundation of previously published data and interpretations. The K-T boundary occurs within
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGIC MAP of the TERRY 30´ X 60´ QUADRANGLE EASTERN MONTANA
    GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE TERRY 30´ x 60´ QUADRANGLE EASTERN MONTANA Compiled and mapped by Susan M. Vuke1 and Roger B. Colton2 Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Open File Report MBMG 477 2003 1Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology 2U.S. Geological Survey Map revised: 2007 This report has been reviewed for conformity with Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology technical and editorial standards. Partial support has been provided by the STATEMAP component of the National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program of the U.S. Geological Survey under contract Number 02-HQ-AG0038. 107° 106° 105° 104° 47°30' Circle 200 Jordan 200s 200 GLENDIVE CIRCLE JORDAN 200s Glendive 94 47° 59 Wibaux Terry TERRY WIBAUX ANGELA 46°30' Miles City 12 Baker 12 Forsyth 94 MILES CITY BAKER FORSYTH 59 46° Location of Terry 30'x60' quadrangle and adjacent geologic maps published by MBMG. 1 CORRELATION DIAGRAM TERRY 30´ x 60´ QUADRANGLE Qal Holocene Qac Qls Qat Quaternary QTcl QTat Pleistocene Pliocene Tftr Tertiary Tfle Paleocene Tfld Tft Fort Union Formation Fort 2 DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS TERRY 30´ x 60´ QUADRANGLE Note: Thicknesses are given in feet because original field maps were on 7.5’ quadrangles with topographic contour intervals in feet. To convert feet to meters (the contour interval unit on this map), multiply feet x 0.3048. Qal ALLUVIUM (HOLOCENE)—Light-brown and gray, moderately to well-sorted and stratified clay, silt, sand and gravel. As much as 100 ft thick under floodplain of the Yellowstone River and as much as 25 ft thick under tributaries of the Yellowstone River.
    [Show full text]
  • Episodic Sediment Delivery and Landscape Connectivity in the Mancos Shale Badlands and Fremont River System, Utah, USA
    Geomorphology 102 (2008) 242–251 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Geomorphology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/geomorph Episodic sediment delivery and landscape connectivity in the Mancos Shale badlands and Fremont River system, Utah, USA Andrew E. Godfrey 1, Benjamin L. Everitt a, José F. Martín Duque b,⁎ a 170 W. 300 North, Ivins, Utah 84738, USA b Department of Geodynamics, Complutense University, 28040 Madrid, Spain ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: The Fremont River drains about 1000 km2 of Mancos Shale badlands, which provide a large percentage of the Accepted 23 May 2007 total sediment load of its middle and lower reaches. Factors controlling sediment movement include: Available online 18 May 2008 weathering that produces thin paralithic soils, mass movement events that move the soil onto locations susceptible to fluvial transport, intense precipitation events that move the sediment along rills and across Keywords: local pediments, and finally Fremont River floods that move the sediment to the main-stem Colorado River. Mancos Shale badlands A forty-year erosion-pin study has shown that down-slope creep moves the weathered shale crust an Erosion Mass movement average of 5.9 cm/yr. Weather records and our monitoring show that wet winters add large slab failures and Connectivity mudflows. Recent sediment-trap studies show that about 95% of sediment movement across pediments is Coupling accomplished by high-intensity summer convective storms. Between 1890 and 1910, a series of large autumn Arroyo cutting floods swept down the Fremont River, eroding its floodplain and transforming it from a narrow and meandering channel to a broad, braided one.
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphological Evolution of Badlands Based on the Dynamics of Palaeo-Channels and Their Implications
    Geomorphological evolution of badlands based on the dynamics of palaeo-channels and their implications V Ranga1,∗, S N Mohapatra1 and P Pani2 1Centre of Remote Sensing & GIS, School of Studies in Earth Science, Jiwaji University, Gwalior 474 011, India. 2Centre for the Study of Regional Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110 067, India. ∗Corresponding author. e-mail: [email protected] The badlands along the lower Chambal valley represent the worst case of water erosion in India. These badlands are believed to have developed due to neo-tectonic activities and, probably, strengthening of southwest monsoon in late Pleistocene–Holocene. Due to neo-tectonic activities, the Chambal River has undergone many changes before reaching to its present planform. This study reports palaeo-channels on the Chambal River’s right flank along its lower reaches. Salient features of the palaeo-channels and their relation to present spatial pattern of badlands are studied. These palaeo-channels have significantly influenced the development of badlands along the lower Chambal River and have given them distinct and conspicuous spatial patterns. In the light of the evidences, a modified schematic geomorphic evolution of badlands development is also proposed starting from a pre-incision scenario till the present day situation. A major modification in the proposed model is the multi-channel planform of the Chambal River before its incision. 1. Introduction intricate network of gullies, thus forming badlands (also known as ravines; figure 1) along the Cham- The formation of Himalaya Foreland Basin (HFB) bal, the Betwa, the Yamuna rivers and their tribu- leads to one of the most extensive alluvial plains taries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution of Plant Communities in the Badlands of Southeastern Montana
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1965 The distribution of plant communities in the Badlands of southeastern Montana Raymond William Brown The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Brown, Raymond William, "The distribution of plant communities in the Badlands of southeastern Montana" (1965). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 6678. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/6678 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE DISTRIBUTION OF PUNT COIMJNITIES IN THE BADLANDS OF SOUTHEASTERN MONTANA by RAYMOND WILLIAM BRCWN, JR. BoS.F. Montana State University, I 963 Presented in partial fulfillm ent of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Forestry MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY 1965 Approved by: Chairman, Board of Examiners Dean, Graduate School MAY 2 1 1965 Date UMI Number: EP37479 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT Dissertation Publishing UMI EP37479 Published by ProQuest LLC (2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Depositional History of the Chadron Formation in North Dakota
    Depositional History of the Chadron Formation in North Dakota by Clint A. Boyd1 and John R. Webster2 1North Dakota Geological Survey 2Geosciences, Minot State University REPORT OF INVESTIGATION NO. 120 NORTH DAKOTA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Edward C. Murphy, State Geologist Lynn D. Helms, Director Dept. of Mineral Resources 2018 Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ vi Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Late Eocene Paleosols of North Dakota ......................................................................................... 3 Paleosols at White and Haystack Buttes (Stark County) ............................................................ 4 Description of Section 1 .......................................................................................................... 5 Description of Section 2 .......................................................................................................... 7 History of Paleosol Development ......................................................................................... 13 Interpretation ......................................................................................................................... 16
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Table: Characteristics of the Ecoregions of Utah 13
    Summary Table: Characteristics of the Ecoregions of Utah 13. CENTRAL B ASIN AND RANGE 19. WASATCH AND UINTA MOUNTAINS (continued) Level IV Ecoregion Physiography Geology Soil Climate Potential Natural Vegetation*/ Land Use Level IV Ecoregion Physiography GeologyS oil Climate Potential Natural Vegetation*/ Land Use Temperature/ Precipitation Frost Free Mean Temperature Present Vegetation Temperature/ Precipitation Frost Free Mean Temperature Present Vegetation Area Elevation/ Surficial material and bedrockOrder (Great Groups) Common Soil Series Area Elevation/ Surficial material and bedrockOrder (Great Groups) Common Soil Series Moisture Mean annual Mean annual January min/max; Moisture Mean annual Mean annual January min/max; (square Local Relief (square Local Relief Regimes (inches) (days) July min/max, (° F) *Source: Kuchler, 1964 Regimes (inches) (days) July min/max, (° F) *Source: Kuchler, 1964 miles) (feet) miles) (feet) 13a. Salt Deserts 6655 Unglaciated. Mostly barren, nearly level playas, Mostly 4200- Mostly very alkaline, Quaternary mud and Mostly Aridisols (Aquisalids, Mostly Saltair; also Jordan, Mesic/ Mostly 4- 110-190 12/40; Desert/ Mostly barren; some recreational, 19f. Semiarid Foothills 6158 Partially glaciated. Semiarid lower mountain Mostly 5000- Quaternary colluvium, alluvium, and Mollisols (mostly Argixerolls; Agassiz, Yeates Hollow, Mesic, 12-16 60-100 Long, cold Mostly mountain mahogany-oak scrub; Wildlife habitat, livestock grazing, salt flats, mud flats, low terraces, and saline lakes 4650/ salt flat deposits; also Quaternary eolian Haplocalcids); also Alfisols Lakeshore, Bramwell. Soils are Aridic 8; some 50/94 Vegetation is mostly absent; scattered, military,and industrial activity. Tailing slopes, foothills, ridgetops, and alluvial fans. Some 8000; locally glacial drift. Tertiary volcanics, also Argiustolls, Calcixerolls, Broadhead, Charcol, Lizzant, Frigid/ winters also juniper-pinyon woodland/ recreation, and water supply.
    [Show full text]
  • Bison Weights from National Parks in the Northern Great Plains by Daniel S
    Bison Weights From National Parks in the Northern Great Plains By Daniel S. Licht Badlands, Theodore Roosevelt, and Wind Cave National On the Ground Parks (NP), located in the Northern Great Plains of North • Female bison at three Northern Great Plains parks America, have a long history of bison management. The parks reached maximum size at 5.5 years of age. Male bison routinely round up bison for the primary purpose of culling reached maximum size around 10.5 years of age. surplus animals. As part of that effort animals are given unique • The mean weight for females 5.5 years old and older lifetime marks that facilitate accurate aging. A suite of biological was 473 kg, and for males 10.5 years old and older data is also collected, including weight information. I present and was 816 kg. The mean weight for yearling females analyze bison weight data from the three parks from 1983–2014. was 307 kg, and for yearling males was 325 kg. • There were significant differences in bison weights Background on the Three Herds between the three parks even though the herds were Badlands, Theodore Roosevelt, and Wind Cave NPs manage all stocked well below the forage-based carrying 3 their bison herds per National Park Service policies. The policies capacity. call for the conservation of natural processes and conditions to the • Heavier calves and yearlings tended to be heavier extent possible, with minimal anthropogenic intervention. The adults; however, there was much variability among herds are confined to the parks year-round by a 2.1–2.4 m high individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Classification and Mapping Project Report
    USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Badlands National Par k USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Badlands National Park, South Dakota Jim Von Loh ACS Government Solutions Group Dan Cogan ACS Government Solutions Group Don Faber-Langendoen The Nature Conservancy Doug Crawford Bureau of Reclamation Michael J. Pucherelli Bureau of Reclamation November 19, 1999 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation’s Remote Sensing and GIS Group Denver Federal Center Denver, Colorado The Reclamation Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Group, organized in 1975 provides advice and assistance regarding the application of remote sensing and geographic information system (GIS) technologies to meet the spatial information needs of Bureau of Reclamation and other clients. USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Badlands National Park TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES...........................................................................................................................IV LIST OF FIGURES.......................................................................................................................... .V LIST OF CONTACTS ..................................................................................................................... VI LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS.............................................................................................................VIII ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................ IX EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]