DOCSLIB.ORG

Wsn 109 (2018) 103-114 Eissn 2392-2192

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Available online at www.worldscientificnews.com WSN 109 (2018) 103-114 EISSN 2392-2192 Contribution to the knowledge of the fauna of Kampinos National Park: Melandryidae (Insecta: Coleoptera: Tenebrionoidea) Dawid Marczak1, Radosław Mroczyński2, Jakub Masiarz3 1Kampinos National Park, 38 Tetmajera Street, 05-080 Izabelin, Poland; University of Ecology and Management in Warsaw, 12 Olszewska Street, 00-792 Warsaw, Poland E-mail address: [email protected] 277A/43 Jarocka Street, 10-699 Olsztyn, Poland E-mail address: [email protected] 3Mazurski Landscape Park, 66 Krutyń, 11-710 Piecki, Poland *E-mail address: [email protected] ABSTRACT The paper provides new faunistic data of 17 species of Melandryidae (Coleoptera: Tenebrionoidea). Among them 8 species are new for the Kampinos National Park. The occurrence of 8 species previously mentioned in literature was confirmed. Only Anisoxya fuscula, although known from literature, was not confirmed. One species: Phloiotrya subtilis have been recorded from the Mazovian Lowland for the first time. A current knowledge is most probably not exhaustive and further research could enrich the list. Keywords: Melandryidae, Phloiotrya subtilis, Kampinos National Park, faunistic data, new records, Masovian Lowland 1. INTRODUCTION Melandryidae is a worldwide beetle family which includes 60 genera and 420 species (Konvička 2016). According to Kubisz & al. (2014) only 27 species occur in Poland, however ( Received 16 August 2018; Accepted 01 September 2018; Date of Publication 02 September 2018 ) World Scientific News 109 (2018) 103-114 authors incorrectly excluded Phloiotrya subtilis from Polish fauna. Most of Melandyidae representatives are xylomycetophagous and saproxylic strongly related with various trees and fungi species (Kubisz & al. 2014, Konvička 2016). As of yet only 9 species of Melandryidae have been found in Kampinos National Park: Abdera affinis, A. flexuosa, Anisoxia fuscula, Hypulus bifasciatus, Orchesia fasciata, O. undulata, O. micans, Xylita laevigata and Zilora obscura (Burakowski 2004, Kubisz & al. 2000, 2010, 2014, Marczak 2010, Sawoniewicz 2013). The aim of this study was to supplement the information related with occurrence of representatives of the mentioned family in Kampinos National Park. 2. MATERIAL AND METHODS The material was gathered by Dawid Marczak and Jakub Masiarz, the identification of species was performed by Dawid Marczak and Radosław Mroczyński. Proof specimens can be found in the authors’ and Kampinos National Park’s collections. The following abbreviations were used in the text: FSU – forest spatial unit, SPA – Strict Protection Area, KNP – Kampinos National Park, IBL-2 trap – window trap, IBL-5 trap – barrier trap. IBL-2 traps were hung between trees or in spaces between large numbers of fallen dead trees, while IBL-5 traps were hung on dead trees. Each location was additionally described, in brackets, with the code of the relevant UTM square. Species new to the Mazovian Lowland were marked with an asterisk [*]. Names were attributed according to Nikitsky & Pollock 2008. The presented results were obtained thanks to the financial support of the Polish State Forests’ “Forest Fund” as part of the following research projects: “The evaluation of the degree of naturalness of pine forests in Kampinos National Park based on the fauna of saproxylic beetles” which was performed in the year 2014, “The evaluation of the degree of naturalness of oak-hornbeam forests in Kampinos National Park based on the fauna of saproxylic beetles” (2015), “The evaluation of the degree of naturalness of chosen tree stands in Kampinos National Park based on the fauna of saproxylic beetles – stage III alder forests” (2016) and “The evaluation of the degree of naturalness of chosen tree stands in Kampinos National Park based on the fauna of saproxylic beetles – stage IV wet deciduous forest” (2017). 3. RESULTS – REVIEW OF THE SPECIES 3.1. Melandryinae LEACH, 1815 3.1.1. Abdera affinis (Paykull, 1799) SPA Debły (DC79), FSU 242, 1-31.05.2015, 1 ex., collected by IBL-5 trap hanging on an oak in Tilio-Carpinetum habitat, 1-30.06.2015, 5 exx, 1-31.07.2015, 1 ex., collected by IBL-5 trap hanging on a hornbeam in Tilio-Carpinetum habitat, 1- 30.06.2015, 1 ex., collected by IBL-2 trap hanging in Tilio-Carpinetum habitat. SPA Debły (DC79), FSU 243, 1-31.05.2016, 18 exx, collected by IBL-5 trap hanging on an alder in Ribeso nigri-Alnetum habitat, 1-31.05.2016, 1 ex., collected by IBL-2 hanging in Ribeso nigri-Alnetum habitat. -104- World Scientific News 109 (2018) 103-114 SPA Sieraków (DC89), FSU 120, 1-31.05.2016, 33 exx, 1-30.06.2016, 5 exx, collected by IBL-5 trap hanging on an alder in Ribeso nigri-Alnetum habitat. SPA Zaborów Leśny (DC89), FSU 232, 1-31.05.2016, 18 exx, 1-30.06.2016, 3 exx, collected by IBL-5 trap hanging on an alder in Ribeso nigri-Alnetum habitat. SPA Zaborów Leśny, FSU 269 (DC89), 1-31.07.2015, 1 ex., collected by IBL-5 trap hanging on a hornbeam in Tilio-Carpinetum habitat. Literature data: SPA Czerwińskie Góry (DC59) – Kubisz & al. 2000, Palmiry (DD80) – Kubisz & al. 2010. This species is rarely collected, with most records coming from southern Poland (Kubisz & al. 2010). Xylomycetophagous species which development take place among others in Inonotus obliquus (Pers: Fr.) Pilát, Inonotus radiatus (J. Sowerby: Fr.) P. Karst., Phellinus igniarius (L.: Fr.) Quél., Trametes pubescens (Schumach.: Fr.) Pilát (Nikitsky & Schigel 2004). 3.1.2. Abdera flexuosa (Paykull, 1799) SPA Debły (DC79), FSU 242, 1-30.06.2015, 1 ex., collected by IBL-5 trap hanging on an oak in Tilio-Carpinetum habitat. SPA Debły (DC79), FSU 243, 1-31.05.2016, 6 exx, 1-30.06.2016, 8 exx, collected by IBL-5 trap hanging on an alder in Ribeso nigri-Alnetum habitat. SPA Sieraków (DC89), FSU 120, 1-31.05.2016, 10 exx, collected by IBL-5 trap hanging on an alder in Ribeso nigri-Alnetum habitat. SPA Zaborów Leśny (DC89), FSU 232, 1-30.06.2016, 1 ex., collected by IBL-5 trap hanging on an alder in Ribeso nigri-Alnetum habitat. SPA Zaborów Leśny, FSU 269 (DC89), 1-31.07.2015, 1 ex., collected by IBL-2 trap hanging in Tilio-Carpinetum habitat. Literature data: Dziekanów Leśny (DC89) – Kubisz & al. 2014. A rather common species but in most cases only single individuals have been collected in dispersed localities (Kubisz & al. 2010). Known from all central European countries, however recently reported from Switzerland (Sanchez & al. 2015). Xylomycetophagous species which development take place among others in Inonotus radiatus (J. Sowerby: Fr.) P. Karst. (Nikitsky & Schigel 2004). 3.1.3. Anisoxya fuscula (Illiger, 1798) Literature data: SPA Nart (DC69), Dziekanów Leśny (DC89), SPA Sieraków (DC89) – Burakowski 2004. Very rare saproxylic species. Reported from Kampinos National Park only by Burakowski in the middle of 20th century (Burakowski 2004). Recent studies did not confirmed occurrence of this species, however because of its hidden lifestyle it could be very difficult to found. Listed in the Polish Red Data Book of Endangered Species under the DD category – data deficient (Pawłowski & al. 2002). -105- World Scientific News 109 (2018) 103-114 3.1.4. Phloiotrya rufipes (Gyllenhal, 1810) SPA Sieraków (DC89), FSU 77, 1-31.05.2015, 1 ex., collected by IBL-5 hanging on a pine in Querco roboris-Pinetum habitat, 1-31.05.2014, 1 ex., collected by IBL-2 trap hanging in Querco roboris-Pinetum habitat. SPA Sieraków (DC89), FSU 99, 1-30.04.2015, 1 ex., collected by IBL-2 trap hanging in Querco roboris-Pinetum habitat. SPA Zaborów Leśny, FSU 269 (DC89), 1-31.05.2015, 1 ex., collected by IBL-2 trap hanging in Tilio-Carpinetum habitat. SPA Kaliszki (DD80), FSU 24, 1-31.05.2014, 2 exx., collected by IBL-5 trap hanging on a pine in Querco roboris-Pinetum habitat. Relatively rare saproxylic species, with most records coming from southern Poland (Kubisz & al. 2010). Known from all central European countries, however recently reported from Hungary (Konvička & Merkl 2015). New to KNP. 3.1.5. Phloiotrya subtilis (Reitter, 1897)* SPA Zaborów Leśny (DC89), FSU 232, 1-30.06.2016, 1 ex., collected by IBL-2 trap hanging in Fraxino-Alnetum habitat (Photo 1). Photo 1. Phloiotrya subtilis habitat - dwining riparian forest (Fraxino-Alnetum) in Kampinos National Park (Photo by D. Marczak) -106- World Scientific News 109 (2018) 103-114 Species has been excluded from Polish fauna (Kubisz & al. 2014), despite that he was reported from Białowieża Forest (Borowski 2001) and Subcarpathian Region (Plewa & al. 2014) in 21th century. Its occurrence in Kampinos National Park, Białowieża Forest and recent finding in the vicinity of Wielopole Skrzyżyńskie (Subcarpathian Region) (Plewa & al. 2014) is denoting that this species should be included as a part of Polish fauna. Extremely rare saproxylic species, which is being found in individual specimens. New to the Mazovian Lowland and KNP. 3.1.6. Wanachia triguttata (Gyllenhal, 1810) SPA Kaliszki (DD80), FSU 24, 1-31.05.2014, 4 exx, 1-30.06.2014, 3 exx, collected by IBL-5 trap hanging on a pine in Querco roboris-Pinetum habitat. SPA Sieraków (DC89), FSU 77, 1-31.05.2014, 1 ex., collected by IBL-2 trap hanging in Querco roboris-Pinetum habitat. Rather rare saproxylic species, sporadically observed in disperse localities all over Poland (Kubisz & al. 2010). New to KNP. 3.1.7. Hypulus bifasciatus (Fabricius, 1792) Zaborówek, forestry Rózin (DC79), FSU 257, 28.05.2017, 1 ex., on the trunk of an oak in ecotone zone between forest and meadow (Photo 2). Photo 2. Hypulus bifasciatus habitat - oaks in ecotone zone between forest and meadow (Photo by D. Marczak) -107- World Scientific News 109 (2018) 103-114 Literature data: SPA Sieraków (DC89), Kąt Góry (DC89) – Kubisz & al. 2010. A relatively rare saproxylic species observed in disperse localities all over Poland (Kubisz & al.
Recommended publications
  • Elementos Para El Conocimiento De Los

    Elementos Para El Conocimiento De Los

    Boletín de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa (S.E.A.), nº 49 (31/12/2011): 309‒319. ELEMENTOS PARA EL CONOCIMIENTO DE LOS MELÁNDRIDOS Y TETRATÓMIDOS DEL NORTE DE ESPAÑA Y ACTUALIZACIÓN DEL CATÁLOGO DE ESPECIES IBÉRICAS (COLEOPTERA: TENEBRIONOIDEA: MELANDRYIDAE, TETRATOMIDAE) J. I. Recalde Irurzun1 & I. Pérez-Moreno2 1 C/Andreszar, 21. 31610 Villava. Navarra. Spain. ‒ [email protected] 2 Universidad de La Rioja. Depto. de Agricultura y Alimentación. C/Madre de Dios, 51. 26006. Logroño. Spain. ‒ [email protected] Resumen: Se registran 18 especies de Melandryidae y 2 de Tetratomidae de provincias septentrionales españolas. Dos de estas especies (Anisoxya fuscula (Illiger, 1798) e Hypulus quercinus (Quensel, 1790)) son nuevas para las faunas española e ibérica. Se presenta una lista de la fauna ibérica española de melándridos (27 especies) y tetratómidos (7 especies), junto con una actualiza- ción de su distribución conocida. Palabras clave: Coleoptera, Melandryidae, Tetratomidae, Tenebrionoidea, escarabajos saproxílicos, España. Contribution to the knowledge of the melandrids and tetratomids of northern Spain, with an update of the catalogue of Ibe- rian species (Coleoptera: Tenebrionoidea: Melandryidae, Tetratomidae) Abstract: Eighteen species of Melandryidae and two of Tetratomidae are recorded from northern Spanish provinces. Two of those species (Anisoxya fuscula (Illiger, 1798) and Hypulus quercinus (Quensel, 1790)) are new records both for the Spanish and Iberian faunas. A list of the Spanish Iberian melandrids (27 species) and tetratomids (7 species) is presented, together with an update of their known distribution. Key words: Coleoptera, Melandryidae, Tetratomidae, Tenebrionoidea, saproxylic beetles, Spain. Introducción La superfamilia Tenebrionoidea Latreille, 1802 está constitui- desarrollados, sobre todo el artejo terminal, que adquiere da por un grupo de familias de apariencia y biología diversa formas diversas en las diferentes especies.
  • A Baseline Invertebrate Survey of the Knepp Estate - 2015

    A Baseline Invertebrate Survey of the Knepp Estate - 2015

    A baseline invertebrate survey of the Knepp Estate - 2015 Graeme Lyons May 2016 1 Contents Page Summary...................................................................................... 3 Introduction.................................................................................. 5 Methodologies............................................................................... 15 Results....................................................................................... 17 Conclusions................................................................................... 44 Management recommendations........................................................... 51 References & bibliography................................................................. 53 Acknowledgements.......................................................................... 55 Appendices.................................................................................... 55 Front cover: One of the southern fields showing dominance by Common Fleabane. 2 0 – Summary The Knepp Wildlands Project is a large rewilding project where natural processes predominate. Large grazing herbivores drive the ecology of the site and can have a profound impact on invertebrates, both positive and negative. This survey was commissioned in order to assess the site’s invertebrate assemblage in a standardised and repeatable way both internally between fields and sections and temporally between years. Eight fields were selected across the estate with two in the north, two in the central block
  • Current Classification of the Families of Coleoptera

    Current Classification of the Families of Coleoptera

    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 8 Number 3 - Fall 1975 Number 3 - Fall 1975 Article 4 October 1975 Current Classification of the amiliesF of Coleoptera M G. de Viedma University of Madrid M L. Nelson Wayne State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation de Viedma, M G. and Nelson, M L. 1975. "Current Classification of the amiliesF of Coleoptera," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 8 (3) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol8/iss3/4 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. de Viedma and Nelson: Current Classification of the Families of Coleoptera THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST CURRENT CLASSIFICATION OF THE FAMILIES OF COLEOPTERA M. G. de viedmal and M. L. els son' Several works on the order Coleoptera have appeared in recent years, some of them creating new superfamilies, others modifying the constitution of these or creating new families, finally others are genera1 revisions of the order. The authors believe that the current classification of this order, incorporating these changes would prove useful. The following outline is based mainly on Crowson (1960, 1964, 1966, 1967, 1971, 1972, 1973) and Crowson and Viedma (1964). For characters used on classification see Viedma (1972) and for family synonyms Abdullah (1969). Major features of this conspectus are the rejection of the two sections of Adephaga (Geadephaga and Hydradephaga), based on Bell (1966) and the new sequence of Heteromera, based mainly on Crowson (1966), with adaptations.
  • Beetle Diversity in an Eastern Cottonwood (Populus Deltoides Bartr.) Plantation and Adjacent Bottomland Hardwood Forest in Southeastern Arkansas Michael D

    Beetle Diversity in an Eastern Cottonwood (Populus Deltoides Bartr.) Plantation and Adjacent Bottomland Hardwood Forest in Southeastern Arkansas Michael D

    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 56 Article 32 2002 Beetle Diversity in an Eastern Cottonwood (Populus deltoides Bartr.) Plantation and Adjacent Bottomland Hardwood Forest in Southeastern Arkansas Michael D. Warriner Arkansas Natural Heritage Commission T. Evan Nebeker Mississippi State University Steven A. Tucker Mississippi State University Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Entomology Commons, and the Forest Management Commons Recommended Citation Warriner, Michael D.; Nebeker, T. Evan; and Tucker, Steven A. (2002) "Beetle Diversity in an Eastern Cottonwood (Populus deltoides Bartr.) Plantation and Adjacent Bottomland Hardwood Forest in Southeastern Arkansas," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 56 , Article 32. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol56/iss1/32 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 56 [2002], Art. 32 Beetle Diversity in an Eastern Cottonwood {Populus deltoides Bartr.) Plantation and Adjacent Bottomland Hardwood Forest in Southeastern Arkansas Michael D. Warriner* T. Evan Nebeker Steven A.
  • Histoires Naturelles N°16 Histoires Naturelles N°16

    Histoires Naturelles N°16 Histoires Naturelles N°16

    Histoires Naturelles n°16 Histoires Naturelles n°16 Essai de liste des Coléoptères de France Cyrille Deliry - Avril 2011 ! - 1 - Histoires Naturelles n°16 Essai de liste des Coléoptères de France Les Coléoptères forment l"ordre de plus diversifié de la Faune avec près de 400000 espèces indiquées dans le Monde. On en compte près de 20000 en Europe et pus de 9600 en France. Classification des Coléoptères Lawrence J.F. & Newton A.F. 1995 - Families and subfamilies of Coleoptera (with selected genera, notes, references and data on family-group names) In : Biology, Phylogeny, and Classification of Coleoptera. - éd. J.Pakaluk & S.A Slipinski, Varsovie : 779-1006. Ordre Coleoptera Sous-ordre Archostemata - Fam. Ommatidae, Crowsoniellidae, Micromathidae, Cupedidae Sous-ordre Myxophaga - Fam. Lepiceridae, Torridincolidae, Hydroscaphidae, Microsporidae Sous-ordre Adephaga - Fam. Gyrinidae, Halipidae, Trachypachidae, Noteridae, Amphizoidae, Hygrobiidae, Dytiscidae, Rhysodidae, Carabidae (Carabinae, Cicindelinae, Trechinae...) Sous-ordre Polyphaga Série Staphyliniformia - Superfam. Hydrophyloidea, Staphylinoidea Série Scarabaeiformia - Fam. Lucanidae, Passalidae, Trogidae, Glaresidae, Pleocmidae, Diphyllostomatidae, Geotrupidae, Belohinidae, Ochodaeidae, Ceratocanthidae, Hybrosoridae, Glaphyridae, Scarabaridea (Scarabaeinae, Melolonthinae, Cetoniinae...) Série Elateriformia - Superfam. Scirtoidea, Dascilloidea, Buprestoidea (Buprestidae), Byrrhoidea, Elateroidea (Elateridae, Lampyridae, Cantharidae...) + Incertae sedis - Fam. Podabrocephalidae, Rhinophipidae
  • 1 Appendix 3. Gulf Islands Taxonomy Report

    1 Appendix 3. Gulf Islands Taxonomy Report

    Appendix 3. Gulf Islands Taxonomy Report Class Order Family Genus Species Arachnida Araneae Agelenidae Agelenopsis Agelenopsis utahana Eratigena Eratigena agrestis Amaurobiidae Callobius Callobius pictus Callobius severus Antrodiaetidae Antrodiaetus Antrodiaetus pacificus Anyphaenidae Anyphaena Anyphaena aperta Anyphaena pacifica Araneidae Araneus Araneus diadematus Clubionidae Clubiona Clubiona lutescens Clubiona pacifica Clubiona pallidula Cybaeidae Cybaeus Cybaeus reticulatus Cybaeus signifer Cybaeus tetricus Dictynidae Emblyna Emblyna peragrata Gnaphosidae Sergiolus Sergiolus columbianus Zelotes Zelotes fratris Linyphiidae Agyneta Agyneta darrelli Agyneta fillmorana Agyneta protrudens Bathyphantes Bathyphantes brevipes Bathyphantes keeni 1 Centromerita Centromerita bicolor Ceratinops Ceratinops latus Entelecara Entelecara acuminata Erigone Erigone aletris Erigone arctica Erigone cristatopalpus Frederickus Frederickus coylei Grammonota Grammonota kincaidi Linyphantes Linyphantes nehalem Linyphantes nigrescens Linyphantes pacificus Linyphantes pualla Linyphantes victoria Mermessus Mermessus trilobatus Microlinyphia Microlinyphia dana Neriene Neriene digna Neriene litigiosa Oedothorax Oedothorax alascensis Pityohyphantes Pityohyphantes alticeps Pocadicnemis Pocadicnemis pumila Poeciloneta Poeciloneta fructuosa Saaristoa Saaristoa sammamish Scotinotylus Scotinotylus sp. 5GAB Semljicola Semljicola sp. 1GAB Sisicottus Spirembolus Spirembolus abnormis Spirembolus mundus Tachygyna Tachygyna ursina Tachygyna vancouverana Tapinocyba Tapinocyba
  • Coleoptera: Mordellidae) Based on Re-Examined Type Material and DNA Barcodes, with New Distributional Records and Comments on Morphological Variability

    Coleoptera: Mordellidae) Based on Re-Examined Type Material and DNA Barcodes, with New Distributional Records and Comments on Morphological Variability

    The Canadian Entomologist (2021), 153, 343–367 Published on behalf of the doi:10.4039/tce.2021.3 Entomological Society of Canada ARTICLE Revealing the identity of Mordellistena minima and M. pseudorhenana (Coleoptera: Mordellidae) based on re-examined type material and DNA barcodes, with new distributional records and comments on morphological variability Dávid Selnekovič1* , Katarína Goffová1, Ján Kodada1, and Roberta Improta2 1Department of Zoology, Comenius University in Bratislava Faculty of Natural Sciences, Ilkovičova 6, Bratislava, SK-84215, Slovakia and 2Museo Zoologico, Centro Musei delle Scienze Naturali e Fisiche dell’Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Via Mezzocannone 8, Naples, IT-80134, Italy *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] (Received 14 July 2020; accepted 21 September 2020; first published online 10 March 2021) Abstract The current interpretation of two common European species, Mordellistena minima Costa, 1854 and M. pseudorhenana Ermisch, 1977, is based on misidentification. The confusion regarding the identity of the species is fixed based on the revised type material. Here, the species are redescribed, and diagnostic characters are provided. Mordellistena pseudorhenana is revalidated. Mordellistena emeryi Schilsky, 1895 is recognised as a new synonym of M. minima. Mordellistena sajoi Ermisch, 1977 is recognised as a new synonym of M. pseudorhenana. Lectotype and paralectotypes of M. emeryi are designated. Mordellistena pseudorhenana is reported for the first time from Bosnia and Herzegovina, Slovenia, and Switzerland. Two morphotypes of M. pseudorhenana differing in size and shape of the parameres are recognised. Morphological differences are quantified and displayed using principal component analysis. In addition, DNA barcodes have been used for the first time in family Mordellidae to examine the divergences between the species and to interpret the morphological variability observed in M.
  • FOLIA ENTOMOLOGICA HUNGARICA ROVARTANI KÖZLEMÉNYEK Volume 76 2015 Pp

    FOLIA ENTOMOLOGICA HUNGARICA ROVARTANI KÖZLEMÉNYEK Volume 76 2015 Pp

    FOLIA ENTOMOLOGICA HUNGARICA ROVARTANI KÖZLEMÉNYEK Volume 76 2015 pp. 107–114 First records of Phloiotrya rufi pes (Coleoptera: Melandryidae) in Hungary, with a national checklist of the family Ondřej Konvička1* & Ottó Merkl2 1Institute of Entomology, of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Branišovská 31, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice & Kúty 1959, CZ-760 01 Zlín, Czech Republic. E-mail: [email protected] 2Hungarian Natural History Museum, Department of Zoology H-1088 Budapest, Baross utca 13, Hungary. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract – Th e false darkling beetle Phloiotrya rufi pes (Gyllenhal, 1810) is recorded from Hun- gary for the fi rst time. A checklist of Melandryidae known to occur in Hungary is given. With 2 fi gures. Key words – Phloiotrya rufi pes, Abdera affi nis, Dircaea australis, Melandryidae, faunistics, new record, Hungary INTRODUCTION Th e saproxylic false darkling beetle Phloiotrya rufi pes (Gyllenhal, 1810) is one of the three species of genus Phloiotrya Stephens, 1832 in Central Europe. It is known from Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Belarus, Croatia, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Great Britain, Germany, Italy, Latvia, Moldavia, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Serbia and Montenegro, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sweden, Switzerland and Ukraine (Nikitsky & Pollock 2008). It was recently recorded by Konvička (2012) from Greece. Larvae of Phloiotrya rufi pes live in rotten wood (Nikitsky & Pollock 2010). Th is paper is devoted to record Phloiotrya rufi pes for the fi rst time from Hungary and to provide a new checklist of Melandryidae in Hungary. Abbreviations – HNHM = Hungarian Natural History Museum (Budapest); PLM-KM = Petőfi Literary Museum – Kazinczy Museum (Sátoraljaújhely); coll.
  • Biodiversity of Coleoptera and the Importance of Habitat Structural Features in a Sierra Nevada Mixed-Conifer Forest

    Biodiversity of Coleoptera and the Importance of Habitat Structural Features in a Sierra Nevada Mixed-Conifer Forest

    COMMUNITY AND ECOSYSTEM ECOLOGY Biodiversity of Coleoptera and the Importance of Habitat Structural Features in a Sierra Nevada Mixed-conifer Forest 1 2 KYLE O. APIGIAN, DONALD L. DAHLSTEN, AND SCOTT L. STEPHENS Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, 137 Mulford Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720Ð3114 Environ. Entomol. 35(4): 964Ð975 (2006) ABSTRACT Beetle biodiversity, particularly of leaf litter fauna, in the Sierran mixed-conifer eco- system is poorly understood. This is a critical gap in our knowledge of this important group in one of the most heavily managed forest ecosystems in California. We used pitfall trapping to sample the litter beetles in a forest with a history of diverse management. We identiÞed 287 species of beetles from our samples. Rarefaction curves and nonparametric richness extrapolations indicated that, despite intensive sampling, we undersampled total beetle richness by 32Ð63 species. We calculated alpha and beta diversity at two scales within our study area and found high heterogeneity between beetle assemblages at small spatial scales. A nonmetric multidimensional scaling ordination revealed a community that was not predictably structured and that showed only weak correlations with our measured habitat variables. These data show that Sierran mixed conifer forests harbor a diverse litter beetle fauna that is heterogeneous across small spatial scales. Managers should consider the impacts that forestry practices may have on this diverse leaf litter fauna and carefully consider results from experimental studies before applying stand-level treatments. KEY WORDS Coleoptera, pitfall trapping, leaf litter beetles, Sierra Nevada The maintenance of high biodiversity is a goal shared Sierras is available for timber harvesting, whereas only by many conservationists and managers, either be- 8% is formally designated for conservation (Davis cause of the increased productivity and ecosystem and Stoms 1996).
  • Download Full Article 514.1KB .Pdf File

    Download Full Article 514.1KB .Pdf File

    Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria 56(2):659-666 (1997) 28 February 1997 https://doi.org/10.24199/j.mmv.1997.56.67 BIODIVERSITY OF NEW ZEALAND BEETLES (INSECTA, COLEOPTERA) J. KLIMASZEWSK.I Manaaki Whenua — Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Present address: BC Research. 3650 Weshrook Mall, Vancouver V6S SLS, Canada Abstract Klimaszewski, J., 1 997. Biodiversity of New Zealand beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera). Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria 56(2): 659-666. Approximately 5235 species are described for New Zealand, including 354 introduced. They belong to 82 families in two suborders, Adephaga and Polyphaga. The New Zealand beetle fauna is distinguished by the absence of many major lineages, a high level of endem- ism. which in many groups is over 90% at the specific level and over 43% at the generic level (e.g.. Staphylinidae), and the radiation of many groups of genera and species. The origins of New Zealand's beetle fauna are still poorly understood. They are likely to be varied, includ- ing Gondwanan elements and elements which arrived here by short and long-distance dispersal recently and in the remote past. The size of the New Zealand beetle fauna is con- sistent with species number/land area relationships in other areas around the world. Introduction Zealand beetles is that of Kuschel (1990), in the suburb of Lynfield, Auckland, in which 982 The beetles are the largest order of organisms, beetle species were recorded in a diverse veg- with over 350 000 described species world- etation including remnant forest, pastureland, wide. and suburban garden.
  • A Catalogue of Lithuanian Beetles (Insecta, Coleoptera) 1 Doi: 10.3897/Zookeys.121.732 Catalogue Launched to Accelerate Biodiversity Research

    A Catalogue of Lithuanian Beetles (Insecta, Coleoptera) 1 Doi: 10.3897/Zookeys.121.732 Catalogue Launched to Accelerate Biodiversity Research

    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 121: 1–494 (2011) A catalogue of Lithuanian beetles (Insecta, Coleoptera) 1 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.121.732 CATALOGUE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research A catalogue of Lithuanian beetles (Insecta, Coleoptera) Vytautas Tamutis1, Brigita Tamutė1,2, Romas Ferenca1,3 1 Kaunas T. Ivanauskas Zoological Museum, Laisvės al. 106, LT-44253 Kaunas, Lithuania 2 Department of Biology, Vytautas Magnus University, Vileikos 8, LT-44404 Kaunas, Lithuania 3 Nature Research Centre, Institute of Ecology, Akademijos 2, LT-08412 Vilnius, Lithuania Corresponding author: Vytautas Tamutis ([email protected]) Academic editor: Lyubomir Penev | Received 6 November 2010 | Accepted 17 May 2011 | Published 5 August 2011 Citation: Tamutis V, Tamutė B, Ferenca R (2011) A catalogue of Lithuanian beetles (Insecta, Coleoptera). ZooKeys 121: 1–494. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.121.732 Abstract This paper presents the first complete and updated list of all 3597 species of beetles (Insecta: Coleop- tera) belonging to 92 families found and published in Lithuania until 2011, with comments also pro- vided on the main systematic and nomenclatural changes since the last monograic treatment (Pileckis and Monsevičius 1995, 1997). The introductory section provides a general overview of the main features of territory of the Lithuania, the origins and formation of the beetle fauna and their conservation, the faunistic investigations in Lithuania to date revealing the most important stages of the faunistic research process with reference to the most prominent scientists, an overview of their work, and their contribution to Lithuanian coleopteran faunal research. Species recorded in Lithuania by some authors without reliable evidence and requiring further confir- mation with new data are presented in a separate list, consisting of 183 species.
  • Criteria for the Selection of Local Wildlife Sites in Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire

    Criteria for the Selection of Local Wildlife Sites in Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire

    Criteria for the Selection of Local Wildlife Sites in Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire Version Date Authors Notes 4.0 January 2009 MHa, MCH, PB, MD, AMcV Edits and updates from wider consultation group 5.0 May 2009 MHa, MCH, PB, MD, AMcV, GDB, RM Additional edits and corrections 6.0 November 2009 Mha, GH, AF, GDB, RM Additional edits and corrections This document was prepared by Buckinghamshire and Milton Keynes Environmental Records Centre (BMERC) and Thames Valley Environmental Records Centre (TVERC) and commissioned by the Oxfordshire and Berkshire Local Authorities and by Buckinghamshire County Council Contents 1.0 Introduction..............................................................................................4 2.0 Selection Criteria for Local Wildlife Sites .....................................................6 3.0 Where does a Local Wildlife Site start and finish? Drawing the line............. 17 4.0 UKBAP Habitat descriptions ………………………………………………………………….19 4.1 Lowland Calcareous Grassland………………………………………………………… 20 4.2 Lowland Dry Acid Grassland................................................................ 23 4.3 Lowland Meadows.............................................................................. 26 4.4 Lowland heathland............................................................................. 29 4.5 Eutrophic Standing Water ................................................................... 32 4.6. Mesotrophic Lakes ............................................................................ 35 4.7