DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix Main Staff of Unafei

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix Main Staff of Unafei ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2004 APPENDIX MAIN STAFF OF UNAFEI Mr. Kunihiko Sakai Director Ms. Tomoko Akane Deputy Director Faculty Mr. Keisuke Senta Chief of Training Division, Professor Mr. Masato Uchida Chief of Research Division, Professor Mr. Kei Someda Chief of Information & Library Service Division, Professor Mr. Motoo Noguchi Professor Mr. Takafumi Sato Professor Ms. Megumi Uryu Professor Mr. Iichiro Sakata Professor Ms. Tamaki Yokochi Professor Mr. Hiroyuki Shinkai Professor Mr. Simon Cornell Linguistic Adviser Secretariat Mr. Kiyoshi Ezura Chief of Secretariat Mr. Masaki Iida Deputy Chief of Secretariat Mr. Yoshihiro Miyake Chief of General and Financial Affairs Section Mr. Ryousei Tada Chief of Training and Hostel Management Affairs Section Mr. Seiji Yamagami Chief of International Research Affairs Section AS OF DECEMBER 2004 18 APPENDIX 2004 VISITING EXPERTS THE 126TH INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR Mr. Parmajit Singh Assistant Director Commercial Affairs Department, Singapore Police Force, Singapore Dr. Deepa Mehta Inspector General of Police, Chief Vigilance Officer, Delhi Metro Rail Corporation, India Mr. Peter Kiernan Assistant Director Serious Fraud Office, London, United Kingdom Mr. Dimitri Vlassis Officer-in-Charge Crime Conventions Section, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Vienna THE 127TH INTERNATIONAL TRAINING COURSE Prof. Nils Christie Professor Institute of Criminology, Faculty of Law, University of Oslo, Norway Ms. Cristina Rojas Rodriguez Experta Asociada del ILANUD San José, Costa Rica Mr. Michael Spurr Director of Operations H.M. Prison Service, United Kingdom Ms. Chomil Kamal Deputy Director/Chief Probation Officer Probation Services Branch for Permanent Secretary (Community Development and Sports), Ministry of Community Development and Sports, Singapore 19 ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2004 THE 128TH INTERNATIONAL TRAINING COURSE Mr. Hans G Nilsson Head of Division International Cooperation, Council of the European Union, European Union Pol. Maj. Gen. Peeraphan Prempooti Secretary-General International Affairs, Anti-Money Laundering Office, Thailand Sir David Calvert Smith QC Barrister Former Director of Public Prosecutions For England and Wales, United Kingdom Mr. Henry N. Pontell Professor Department of Criminology, Law and Society, School of Social Ecology, University of California, U.S.A 20 APPENDIX 2004 AD HOC LECTURERS THE 126TH INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR Mr. Katsuhiko Hama Attorney Civil Affairs Bureau, Ministry of Justice, Japan Mr. Katsutaka Tomioka Deputy Director Consumer and Environmental Protection Division, Community Safety Bureau, National Police Agency, Japan Mr. Kensaku Iuchi Director Special Investigations Department, To kyo District Public Prosecutors Office, Japan Mr. Nobuo Gohara Deputy Director To kyo District Public Prosecutors Office, Hachioji Branch, Japan Mr. Toshihide Endo Director Enforcement Division, Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission, Japan THE 127TH INTERNATIONAL TRAINING COURSE Mr. Satoshi Tomiyama Special Assistant to the Director of the General Affairs Division Correction Bureau, Ministry of Justice Prof. Nisuke Ando Professor, Doshisha University 21 ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2004 2004 UNAFEI PARTICIPANTS THE 126TH INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR Overseas Participants Ms. Prudence Tangham Dohgansin Deputy Attorney General Legal Department of the Court of Appeal for the Centre Province, Ministry of Justice, Cameroon Mr. Hesham Mostafa Abd El kader Abo Salem Judge Primary Court of Mansoura, Ministry of Justice, Egypt Mr. Bright Oduro Accra Regional Crime Officer Criminal Investigations Department, Ghana Police Service, Ghana Mr. Suharto Chief of Planning and Administration Bureau CID Police Headquarters, Indonesia Mr. Kongchi Yangchue Judge, Head of Criminal Chamber The People’s Supreme Court, Laos Mr. Amarsaikhan Delegchoimbol Section Chief Criminal Police Division For Combating Corruption and Economic Crime, National Police Agency, Mongolia Mr. Dilli Raman Acharya Joint-Attorney Office of the Attorney General, Nepal Mr. Simon Kauba Metropolitan Superintendent Lae Metropolitan Police Command, Papua New Guinea Mr. Isidro Castillo Perez Jr. Deputy Chief/Director Inspectorate and Legal Office, Philippine Public Safety College, Philippines Mr. Ian Montclair Queeley Inspector of Police Police Headquarters, Saint Christopher and Nevis 22 APPENDIX Ms. Ayesha Jinasena State Counsel Attorney General’s Department, Sri Lanka Mr. Sutthi Sookying Acting Director of Financial and Banking Crime Department of Special Investigation Ministry of Justice, Thailand Mr. Hasan Dursun Planning Expert Prime Ministry State Planning Organisation, Turkey Mr. Luis Celestino García Figueroa Chief Inspector Chief of the Detector Dog Section, Metropolitan Police, Venezuela Mr. Samson Mangoma Deputy Officer Commanding C.I.D. Serious Fraud Squad, Department of Zimbabwe Republic Police, Zimbabwe Japanese Participants Mr. Keiji Uchimura Professor of Applied Technology Police Info-Communications Academy, National Police Agency, Japan Mr. Yutaka Oya Chief of General Affairs Division To kyo Probation Office, Japan Mr. Yuji Saito Deputy Superintendent Aiko Juvenile Training School for Girls, Japan Mr. Tsutomu Sunada Deputy Director Info-Communications Planning Division, Info-Communications Bureau, National Police Agency, Japan Mr. Tomoyuki Mizuno Judge/Professor Legal Training and Research Institute, Japan Mr. Daisuke Moriyama Public Prosecutor Special Investigation Department, To kyo District Public Prosecutors Office, Japan 23 ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2004 THE 127TH INTERNATIONAL TRAINING COURSE Overseas Participants Mr. Hany Mohamad Nasseh Gabr Deputy Chief Investigations Section, Alexandria Police Department, Egypt Mr. Orisi Vuki Katonibau Staff Officer Administration Fiji Prison Service, Fiji Mr. Maju Ambarita Head Section Finance Internal Controlling, Jakarta Prosecutor Office, Jakarta, Indonesia Mr. Bin Mohamad Abdul Aziz Head of Unit Internal Audit Unit, Prison Department Malaysia, Ministry of Internal Security, Malaysia Mr. Rungit Singh a/l Jaswant Singh Senior Federal Counsel Attorney General’s Chambers, Prime Minister’s Department, Malaysia Mr. Julio Ometei Ringang Chief Division of Correction, Bureau of Public Safety, Ministry of Justice, Palau Mr. Mark Mengepe Mewerimbe Chief Inspector Officer In-Charge-Prosecution, Department of Police, Boroko Police Station, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea Mr. Hernan Gallo Grande Chief Inspectorate Bureau of Jail Management and Penology, Philippines Mr. Saidamir Badriddinovich Saidov Head of Operative Ministry of Internal Affairs, Tajikistan Mr. Pongtorn Janoudom Principal Research Judge Court of Appeal Region IV, Thailand Mr. Somphop Rujjanavet Penologist 7 Chief of Information and International Conference Section, Department of Corrections, Ministry of Justice, Thailand 24 APPENDIX Mr. Patelisio Leniti Pale Assistant Probation Officer Probation Services, Ministry of Justice, Tonga Mr. Hamish Garae Station Sergeant Vanuatu Police Force, Vanuatu Mr. Jonah Muzambi Officer Commanding District Zimbabwe Republic Police, Ministry of Home Affairs, Zimbabwe Ms. Mildred Bernadette Baquilod State Counsel V Office of the Chief State Counsel, Department of Justice, Philippines Mr. Eric Wai-fung Law Superintendent Tai Lam Centre for Women, Hong Kong Correctional Services Department, Hong Kong Ms. Soo-Hee Kim Correctional Supervisor Su-Won Detention Centre, Korea Japanese Participants Mr. Osamu Aoki Senior Chief Programme Supervisor Matsumoto Juvenile Prison Mr. Toshihiro Fukugaki Probation Officer Kobe Probation Office Mr. Keiichi Ichinose Superintendent Second Investigation Division, National Police Agency Ms. Hatsue Matsubayashi Probation Officer Yamaguchi Probation Office Ms. Mikako Matsushita Family Court Probation Officer Asahikawa Family Court Mr. Koichi Nakamura Assistant Judge To kyo District Court Mr. Yuichiro Okuno Public Prosecutor Hiroshima District Public Prosecutors Office Ms. Noriko Shibata Public Prosecutor Kochi District Public Prosecutors Office Mr. Yasuaki Sugawara Section Chief Enforcement Division, Immigration Bureau, Ministry of Justice 25 ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2004 Mr. Akira Takano Assistant Judge To kyo District Court Ms. Sachiko Tokuda Chief Specialist Katano Juvenile Training School for Girls Mr. Masahiro Tomoi Superintendent Community Safety Planning Division, National Police Agency THE 128TH INTERNATIONAL TRAINING COURSE Overseas Participants Mr. Mohammad Farid Mollakhel C.S.I. Manager Crime Scene Investigation Team, Ministry of Interior, Afghanistan Mr. Fatos Lazimi State Advocate State Advocate Office, Council of Ministers, Albania Mr. Abul Kashem Additional District Magistrate Office of the Deputy Commissioner, Chandpur, Bangladesh Mr. Alfred Kofi Asiama-Sampong Senior State Attorney Ministry of Justice (Attorney-General’s Dept.), Ghana Mr. Animesh Bharti Deputy Secretary (Crime Monitoring) Ministry of Home Affairs, India Mr. I Ketut Suwetra Senior Investigator Criminal Investigation Directorate, Bali Regional Police, Indonesia Mr. Khampheth Ounheune Head of Civil Enforcement Division Enforcement Department, Ministry of Justice, Laos Mr. Bounma Phonsanith Investigator and Vice of the Chief Cabinet Supreme Public Prosecutor of Lao POR, Laos Mr. Khin Maung Win Staff Officer Financial Intelligent Unit, Committee for Drug Abuse Control, Ministry of Home Affairs, Myanmar 26 APPENDIX Mr. Ngwe Htun Director Bureau of Special Investigation, Myanmar Mr. Surya Nath Prakash Adhikari District Government Attorney District Government Attorney Office, Kathmandu, Nepal Mr. Shahid Hussain
Load more

Recommended publications
  • POLICING REFORM in AFRICA Moving Towards a Rights-Based Approach in a Climate of Terrorism, Insurgency and Serious Violent Crime
    POLICING REFORM IN AFRICA Moving towards a rights-based approach in a climate of terrorism, insurgency and serious violent crime Edited by Etannibi E.O. Alemika, Mutuma Ruteere & Simon Howell POLICING REFORM IN AFRICA Moving towards a rights-based approach in a climate of terrorism, insurgency and serious violent crime Edited by Etannibi E.O. Alemika, University of Jos, Nigeria Mutuma Ruteere, UN Special Rapporteur, Kenya Simon Howell, APCOF, South Africa Acknowledgements This publication is funded by the Ford Foundation, the United Nations Development Programme, and the Open Societies Foundation. The findings and conclusions do not necessarily reflect their positions or policies. Published by African Policing Civilian Oversight Forum (APCOF) Copyright © APCOF, April 2018 ISBN 978-1-928332-33-6 African Policing Civilian Oversight Forum (APCOF) Building 23b, Suite 16 The Waverley Business Park Wyecroft Road Mowbray, 7925 Cape Town, ZA Tel: +27 21 447 2415 Fax: +27 21 447 1691 Email: [email protected] Web: www.apcof.org.za Cover photo taken in Nyeri, Kenya © George Mulala/PictureNET Africa Contents Foreword iv About the editors v SECTION 1: OVERVIEW Chapter 1: Imperatives of and tensions within rights-based policing 3 Etannibi E. O. Alemika Chapter 2: The constraints of rights-based policing in Africa 14 Etannibi E.O. Alemika Chapter 3: Policing insurgency: Remembering apartheid 44 Elrena van der Spuy SECTION 2: COMMUNITY–POLICE NEXUS Chapter 4: Policing in the borderlands of Zimbabwe 63 Kudakwashe Chirambwi & Ronald Nare Chapter 5: Multiple counter-insurgency groups in north-eastern Nigeria 80 Benson Chinedu Olugbuo & Oluwole Samuel Ojewale SECTION 3: POLICING RESPONSES Chapter 6: Terrorism and rights protection in the Lake Chad basin 103 Amadou Koundy Chapter 7: Counter-terrorism and rights-based policing in East Africa 122 John Kamya Chapter 8: Boko Haram and rights-based policing in Cameroon 147 Polycarp Ngufor Forkum Chapter 9: Police organizational capacity and rights-based policing in Nigeria 163 Solomon E.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement to the London Gazette, 9 June, 1955 3295
    SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, 9 JUNE, 1955 3295 Abdul HAMTD bin Sulong, Sub-Inspector, James Myles OSWALD, Superintendent, Kenya Singapore Police Force. Police Force. Samuel Benjamin HULL, Station Sergeant, Robert Lawrence Ako OTCHERE, Inspector, Leeward Islands Police Force. Gold Coast Police Force. Ignatius IKENWEWI, Sergeant Major, Nigeria Haji PAWANCHEE bin Mohamed Yusoff, Police Force. Inspector, Federation of Malaya Police George William JACKSON, Acting Senior Assis- Force. tant Commissioner, Singapore Police Force. Thomas PETERS, Chief Inspector, Sierra Leone JOHARI bin Abdul Shukor, Sub-Inspector, Police Force. Federation of Malaya Police Force. Kesava Subramonya PILLAI, Chief Inspector, Philip Nzuke Jacob KALOKI, Inspector, Kenya Kenya Police Force. Police Force. John Vincent PRENDERGAST, Senior Superin- Reginald LAITY, Honorary Inspector, Auxiliary tendent, Kenya Police Force. Police, Federation of Malaya. Panes PRODROMITIS, Chief Inspector, Cyprus LAM Hon, Detective Staff Sergeant, Hong Kong Police Force. Police Force. Chinaya Naidoo PURSEERAMEN, Sub-Inspector, Alfred Gordon LANGDON, Assistant Commis- Mauritius Police Force. sioner, Jamaica Constabulary. Abdul RAHMAN bin Dalbasah, Acting Assistant LIM Choon Seng, Sub-Inspector, Singapore Superintendent, Singapore Police Force. Police Force. Appudhurai Thurai RAJAH, Deputy Superin- Ronald George LOCK, Superintendent, Nigeria tendent, Singapore Police Force. Police Force. Frank Thomas READER, Deputy Superinten- William Alfred LUSCOMBE, Deputy Superin- dent, Uganda Police Force. tendent, Federation of Malaya Police Force. Matendechero RINYULU, Assistant Inspector, David Robert Andrew McCoRKELL, M.C., Kenya Police Force. Acting Superintendent, Federation of Malaya William SEGRUE, Acting Assistant Com- Police Force. missioner, Hong Kong Police Force. John Malcolm McNeil MACLEAN, Assistant SHABANI son of Msaweka, Detective Sergeant Commissioner, Singapore Police Force. Major, Tanganyika Police Force.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2016 Public Safety Summit: Building Capacity and Legitimacy the 2016 Public Safety Summit: Building Capacity and Legitimacy
    The 2016 Public Safety Summit: Building Capacity and Legitimacy The 2016 Public Safety Summit: Building Capacity and Legitimacy Today’s public safety leaders often feel squeezed in a vise. On one side pressure is ramping up to respond to ever- more-complex crime and public safety threats such as natural disasters, violent extremism, and cybercrime. On the other side are pressing demands for citizen engagement, stakeholder collaboration, and community outreach. Policing leaders can feel torn: Should they focus on fighting crime efficiently? Or should they focus on growing public trust? Forward-thinking public safety leaders realize that to build legitimacy the answer is “yes” – to improving both crime prevention and public trust. Yet to accomplish both objectives, public safety leaders need to pursue innovations that increase organizational capacity. In a world of limited resources, finding the right mix of innovations will require grappling with tough questions. To help public safety leaders move forward on this challenge, Leadership for a Networked World and the Technology and Entrepreneurship Center at Harvard, in collaboration with Accenture, convened senior-most leaders for The 2016 Public Safety Summit: Building Capacity and Legitimacy. Held at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, from April 29 – May 1, 2016, the Summit provided an unparalleled opportunity to learn from and work with policing and public safety peers, Harvard faculty and researchers, and select industry experts. Summit attendees dissected case studies and participated in peer-to-peer problem-solving and plenary sessions in an effort to learn and work together on four key leadership strategies: Convened by In collaboration with 2 The 2016 Public Safety Summit • Innovative approaches and operating models to reduce operational costs and complexity while increasing agility in policing structures, systems, and people.
    [Show full text]
  • Bottlenecks to Deployment! Police Capacity Building and Deployment in Africa
    Bottlenecks to deployment! Police capacity building and deployment in Africa EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ■ What are the training approaches adopted by part- ners towards building African capacities? Changes in the nature of confl icts during the post-Cold War period led to changes in the nature of peacekeeping, To gain a balanced understanding of the answers to from being a tool in mediating inter-state confl icts to these questions, the study itself is contextualised within that of intra-state confl icts. Peacekeepers are no longer the spectrum of peacekeeping in its widest sense. deployed as an interposition force between warring Examination of the study questions is done using the states, but as part of broad eff orts in support of peace formats of training that directly or indirectly contribute implementation. Furthermore, rather than the purely to the deployment of trained police offi cers. Th e study traditional military deployments, modern peacekeep- establishes that in terms of deployment, the most ing deployments now involve considerable numbers signifi cant form of training is pre-deployment training of police offi cers (and civilians) in multidimensional that is targeted at police offi cers selected and earmarked missions. Against this backdrop, the Norwegian-funded for deployment by national police organisations. Th is is Training for Peace (TfP) Programme has been involved complemented by normal courses (trainers’ courses and in international and regional eff orts to provide training trainers’ clinics) that aim to prepare offi cers as trainers support for police capacity building, as well as civil- to assist in the national rollout of peacekeeping training. ian, for deployment to UN and AU missions in Africa Pre-deployment training is provided under bilateral and elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • National Security Is a Sensitive Subject. a Country's Survival, Growth
    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY National security is a sensitive subject. A country’s survival, growth and development depend on a well crafted and consciously implemented national security policy. By nature, national security implementation should always be at a competitive edge relative to internal and external security threats. As a result, the state cannot easily disclose or expose its national security policies and plans without sufficient cause. Zimbabwe’s national security implementation is guided and instructed by the Public Order and Security Act, the Official Secrets Act and the Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act. These acts complement one another and are applied flexibly enough to suit the prevailing circumstances The Acts ensure that order, peace and stability prevail, and that the state’s secrets are protected from those who are not entitled to them. State secrets are the preserve of responsible authorities who implement them to control the variables that affect the survival, growth and development of the state. While the call for the right to access to information may sound cogent, it is important to note that it cannot be guaranteed that the information will not be used against the interests of the state and private individuals. In the Zimbabwean context, the phenomenon of the public demanding access to security information is not significant. The public is aware of the sensitivity of state secrets and security information, and it is not common to identify ordinary people craving for security information. Those who demand the information are political malcontents bent on finding a pretext for fomenting anarchy. Public order is maintained by the Zimbabwe Republic Police, and national defence is guaranteed by the Zimbabwe Defence Forces, but for effective protection of the nation, security information is the preserve of those entitled to access it and use it, and not just anybody who might use it against the interests of the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Law Enforcement Leadership for a Changing World
    REPORT .93 Law Enforcement Leadership for a Changing World Michael Outram Australian Federal Police Australia Rainer Brenner Bundespolizei Germany Dougal McClelland National Crime Agency UK Anders Dorph Danish National Police Denmark “Developing leaders for the future is vital; crime is no longer constrained by borders and we’re seeing the death of distance; police are being held to higher levels of accountability for outcomes and performance; and the environment we live in is evolving more quickly than ever.” Pearls in Policing member Ng Joo He, 2012. Introduction - Pearls in Policing Inspired by the international Bilderberg concept, since 2007 Pearls in Policing has brought an international group of top law enforcement executives together to discuss the key strategic issues facing their profession, in an environment that is conducive to focussing on the future (Pearls in Policing, 2012). The debate and insights that emerge from Pearls in Policing both inform and are informed by the work of an action learning group, which is one of five components of the Pearls in Policing model: Journal of Futures Studies, June 2014, 18(4): 93-106 Journal of Futures Studies 1. An annual conference 2. The International Action Learning Group (IALG), known as the ‘Pearl Fishers’ 3. An academic forum 4. Work groups 5. Peer-to-peer consultations The annual conference is held each June. In 2013 the conference was held in Amsterdam, where the 7th IALG presented their research findings which built on the research of previous IALG’s; in 2011 the chosen theme was Charting the Course of Change, which examined how social media, new technology and the formation of strategic alliances influence change in policing; in 2012 the chosen theme was Policing for a Safer World, which examined professionalism, collective approaches to cybercrime, and achieving a discipline of learning across organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL CRIME BRIEF 2020 Singapore Remains One of the Safest Cities in the World
    POLICE NEWS RELEASE _________________________________________________________________ ANNUAL CRIME BRIEF 2020 Singapore Remains One of the Safest Cities in the World Overall Crime Rate increased due to rise in scam cases Singapore remains one of the safest cities in the world. Singapore was ranked first in the Gallup’s 2020 Global Law and Order report for the seventh consecutive year, with 97% of residents reporting that they felt safe walking home alone in their neighbourhood at night, as compared to an average of 69% worldwide.1 The World Justice Project’s Rule of Law Index 2020 also ranked Singapore first for order and security.2 2. In 2020, the total number of reported crimes increased by 6.5% to 37,409 cases, from 35,115 cases in 2019. The Overall Crime Rate also increased, with 658 cases per 100,000 population in 2020, compared to 616 cases per 100,000 population in 2019.3 3. The increase in the number of reported crimes was due to a rise in scam cases. In particular, online scams saw a significant increase as Singaporeans carried out more online transactions due to the COVID-19 situation. 4 Please see Annex A for the statistics on the top ten scam types. 4. If scam cases were excluded, the total number of reported crimes in 2020 would have decreased by 15.3% to 21,653 from 25,570 in 2019. Decrease in physical crimes and more crime-free days 5. There was a decrease in physical crimes in 2020. 201 days were free from three confrontational crimes, namely snatch theft, robbery and housebreaking, an increase of 23 days compared to 178 days in 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Background Check Procedures
    Shaping the future of international education New Edition Criminal Background Check Procedures CIS in collaboration with other agencies has formed an International Task Force on Child Protection chaired by CIS Executive Director, Jane Larsson, in order to apply our collective resources, expertise, and partnerships to help international school communities address child protection challenges. Member Organisations of the Task Force: • Council of International Schools • Council of British International Schools • Academy of International School Heads • U.S. Department of State, Office of Overseas Schools • Association for the Advancement of International Education • International Schools Services • ECIS CIS is the leader in requiring police background check documentation for Educator and Leadership Candidates as part of the overall effort to ensure effective screening. Please obtain a current police background check from your current country of employment/residence as well as appropriate documentation from any previous country/countries in which you have worked. It is ultimately a school’s responsibility to ensure that they have appropriate police background documentation for their Educators and CIS is committed to supporting them in this endeavour. It is important to demonstrate a willingness and effort to meet the requirement and obtain all of the paperwork that is realistically possible. This document is the result of extensive research into governmental, law enforcement and embassy websites. We have tried to ensure where possible that the information has been obtained from official channels and to provide links to these sources. CIS requests your help in maintaining an accurate and useful resource; if you find any information to be incorrect or out of date, please contact us at: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Seventh United Nations Survey of Crime Trends and Operations of Criminal Justice Systems, Table Comments by Country
    UNITED NATIONS NATIONS UNIES Office on Drugs and Crime Division for Policy Analysis and Public Affairs Seventh United Nations Survey of Crime Trends and Operations of Criminal Justice Systems, covering the period 1998 - 2000 Comments by Table 1. Police personnel, by sex, and financial resources Alternative reference date to 31 December POLICE 1. Police personnel, by sex, and financial resources Alternative reference date to 31 December England & Wales 30 September Japan 1 April 2. Crimes recorded in criminal (police) statistics, by type of crime including attempts to commit crimes What is (are) the source(s) of the data provided in this table? Australia Recorded Crime Statistics 2000 (cat: 4510.0) Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Azerbaijan Reports on crimes Barbados Royal Barbados Police Force, Research and Development Department Bulgaria Ministry of Interior - Regular Report Canada Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics, Uniform Crime Report and Homicide Survey, Statistics Canada. Chile S.I.E.C (Sistema Integrado Estadistico de Carabineros) Colombia Policia Nacional, Direccion Central de Policia Judicial, Centro de Investigaciones Criminologicas Côte d'Ivoire Direction Centrale de la police Judiciaire Czech Republic Recording and Statistical System of Crime maintained by the Police of the Czech Republic Denmark Statistics of reported crimes, National Commissioner of Police, Department E. Dominica Criminal Records Office Friday, March 19, 2004 Page 1 of 22 2. Crimes recorded in criminal (police) statistics, by type of crime includi What is (are) the source(s) of the data provided in this table? England & Wales Recorded crime database Finland Statistics Finland: Yearbook of Justice Statistics (SVT) Georgia Ministry of Internal Affairs of Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • Female Staff Associations in the Security Sector: Agents of Change?”
    Inventory of Female Staff Associations Reviewed for the Occasional Paper “Female Staff Associations in the Security Sector: Agents of Change?” Geneva, August, 2011 Inventory of Female Staff Associations Reviewed for the Occasional Paper “Female Staff Associations in the Security Sector: Agents of Change?” Geneva, August 2011 This document is a companion to the DCAF Occasional Paper “Female Staff Associations in the Security Sector: Agents of Change?“ and provides additional background information on all the associations referenced in the paper. About the author Ruth Montgomery is a Canadian policing and criminal justice consultant. She has over 30 years of experience leading police, justice and public safety development and education initiatives nationally and internationally. Ruth retired as a Superintendent from the Edmonton Police Service after 27 years of service and established a consulting firm. She has directed policing and public safety policy and process development initiatives, conducted applied research, and has designed, developed and facilitated educational programmes. Many of her efforts have focused on leadership and management development, and on improving services and support for women. Editor: Kathrin Quesada, Gender and Security Project Coordinator, DCAF Copyright © 2011 by the Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces Cover images (from left to right): Japanese junior officers from the Japanese Maritime Self-Defence Force (JMSDF) during a wreath ceremony at the National Memorial Cemetery of the Pacific in Honolulu, Hawaii on June 9, 2010 © Sgt. Cohen A. Young; Seaman Writer Kim-Jade Martin from HMAS Tobruk meets a Papua New Guinean boy at a small coastal villiage in Rabaul during Pacific Partnership September 8, 2010 © Australian Department of Defence; Royal Air Force (RAF) and Fleet Air Arm personnel parade of RAF Cottesmore in Rutland March 31, 2011 © Cpl Fran McKay.
    [Show full text]
  • Police in Zimbabwe: Helping Hand Or Iron Fist?
    Dispatch No. 296 | 6 May 2019 Police in Zimbabwe: Helping hand or iron fist? Afrobarometer Dispatch No. 296 | Nicholas Simpson and Matthias Krönke Summary In response to public protests against a drastic increase in fuel prices in January 2019, the Zimbabwe Republic Police (ZRP) were joined by the army in a brutal crackdown that resulted in at least 15 deaths, 340 injured, and more than 1,000 arrests (Mwananyanda, 2019; Bearak, 2019). Just months earlier, the police were found responsible, along with the military, for the deaths of six people in the aftermath of the 2018 election, according to a commission of inquiry (Associated Press, 2018). Given the ZRP’s history as a tool of ruling-party power under former President Robert Mugabe (Hanson, 2008), how do the Zimbabwean people perceive their police? Previous Afrobarometer analysis has shown that playing a central role in Operation Murambatsvina, the state’s brutal 2005 clearing of selected urban areas in a bid to repress independent economic activity and dissent, cost the police dearly in terms of popular legitimacy (Bratton & Masunungure, 2007). This dispatch, based on Afrobarometer survey data from 1999 through mid-2018, tracks improvements, after the damaging effects of Operation Murambatsvina, in citizens’ trust in the police, perceptions of police corruption and performance in reducing crime, and support for the right to enforce the law. The latest Afrobarometer surveys were conducted before the bloody suppression of post-electoral and fuel-hike protests, and we do not contend that attitudes toward the police that prevailed in mid-2018 continue to prevail today. Instead, we raise the question whether observed improvements in public perceptions of the police could be lost through ZRP participation in political repression.
    [Show full text]
  • World Factbook of Criminal Justice Systems
    WORLD FACTBOOK OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEMS SINGAPORE Mahesh Nalla Michigan State University This country report is one of many prepared for the World Factbook of Criminal Justice Systems under Bureau of Justice Statistics grant No. 90-BJ-CX-0002 to the State University of New York at Albany. The project director was Graeme R. Newman, but responsibility for the accuracy of the information contained in each report is that of the individual author. The contents of these reports do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Bureau of Justice Statistics or the U. S. Department of Justice. GENERAL OVERVIEW I. Political system. Singapore is a city/nation with a population of 2.6 million. 77% of its population are Chinese, 15%, Malays, and 6%, Indian. The four official languages of Singapore are English, Mandarin Chinese, Malay, and Tamil. (Vreeland, et.al., 1977). The Republic of Singapore is a parliamentary government patterned after the English Westminster model. The constitution provides the structure and organization of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the government. (Vreeland, et.al., 1977). 2. Legal system The legal system in Singapore is adversarial in nature. English common law was superimposed on the existing Malay customary law and Muslim law. Consequently, the legal system in Singapore can be characterized as pluralistic. While the dominant common law which shaped the Singapore legal system applies to all segments of the population, Muslim law governs the Muslim community in religious and matrimonial matters. Muslim law is administered in accordance with the Administration of Muslim Law Act, Cap.42.
    [Show full text]