DOCSLIB.ORG

City of Beaver Dam Comprehensive Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

City of Beaver Dam Comprehensive Plan Preliminary Draft for Intergovernmental Meeting July 2008 Table of Contents Introduction 1 Issues and Opportunities 4 Housing and Neighborhood Development 11 Transportation 20 Agricultural, Natural and Cultural Resources 30 Economic Development 43 Land Use 57 [DRAFT 07/14/08] Introduction The Value of a Comprehensive Plan doing so, the Plan also seeks to foster a sustainable economy that is in keeping with its character. When we think about places we have visited or lived, some stand out as models of natural beauty and This plan is a blueprint for community‐wide action human comfort, supported by thriving local over the next 20 years. Action must come from all economies. The most satisfying places to live, work, segments of the community – business owners, and raise families are communities that meet the residents, and visitors ‐ not just from City needs of commerce and individual expression, and Government. Everyone must be involved and provide opportunities to explore and conserve our dedicated to making needed improvements and to natural environment. continue those efforts that have already had a positive influence. Great communities do not grow by accident or without public debate and agreed‐upon guidelines. Collaborative planning processes and comprehensive Wisconsin “Smart Growth” Legislation plans are the building blocks of such great communities. Planning helps maintain and promote As part of the state’s 1999‐2000 biennial budget, livable, vital communities. Governor Thompson signed into law what is referred to as the “Smart Growth” legislation (1999 Wisconsin The City of Beaver Dam is a great place to live. Our Act 9). Smart Growth legislation significantly changed neighborhoods are safe and affordable, we have a the stature of comprehensive planning in the state fantastic park system, and Beaver Dam Lake offers and placed it very high on the “to do” list. Although wonderful recreational opportunities. The City is well state statutes do not require local governmental units loved by residents and visitors alike. This to adopt comprehensive plans consistent with the Comprehensive Plan outlines how to maintain what requirements, it provides that if a local governmental we like about our community, and identifies key unit does not do so by January 1, 2010, it may not improvements to make our community even better. enforce existing or adopt new ordinances, plans or regulations that in anyway affect land use. This plan is intended to capture a shared vision for the City. It is a statement reflecting community pride If a community wants to prepare a comprehensive and how residents want the City to manage growth plan, it must follow various substantive and and development in the future. This Plan will help procedural requirements. State statutes define nine elected officials make decisions that reflect the short‐ areas that need to be addressed in a community’s and long‐term wishes of the community. It will help comprehensive plan: prioritize the City’s human and financial resources to 1. Issues and opportunities (Chapter2) provide the necessary public infrastructure and 2. Housing (Chapter 3) amenities needed to maintain a high quality of life. In 3. Transportation (Chapter 4) 1 [DRAFT 07/14/08] 4. Utilities and community facilities (Chapter 5) A Community Process 5. Agricultural, natural, and cultural resources (Chapter 6) The planning process set out to celebrate and protect 6. Economic development (Chapter 7) the diversity of lifestyles and interests within our 7. Intergovernmental cooperation (Chapter 8) community, build on the strengths of our community 8. Land use (Chapter 9) in achieving our goals, and guide the future of the 9. Implementation (Chapter 10) city. The Smart Growth legislation also outlines specific In order to fulfill this charge, the Plan Commission procedures for public participation that must be took seriously the process of engaging as many followed as part of the comprehensive planning residents as possible in the comprehensive planning process. Specifically, a municipality must hold at least process. The Plan Commission’s job was not merely one public hearing on the plan and notify the public to produce a report, but to reach out and collaborate at least 30 days in advance of this hearing. In an with the community, to educate residents about effort to foster meaningful public input, the City of planning, and to involve them in developing the plan. Beaver Dam provided additional opportunities for These goals stem from the fundamental aim of the public involvement, as outlined below. A copy of the planning process: to engage residents in building City of Beaver Dam’s public participation plan can be community consensus for a vision for Beaver Dam’s found in Appendix A. future. Public Visioning Workshop Past Planning Efforts The planning process began with a public visioning workshop in January 2008, conducted by Crispell‐ The most recent planning effort resulted in the Snyder, Inc who was hired by the City to assist with adoption of a master plan in 1999. MSA Professional the Comprehensive Plan. Members of the community Services prepared the document on behalf of the met in small groups to engage in a guided discussion City. The plan follows a traditional approach to on what the current assets, issues, and opportunities comprehensive planning; however, it does not meet are in the community and to identify specific top the new requirements of state law for comprehensive priority goals and actions for the comprehensive plan. planning in all respects. Notes from this meeting, including individual responses to the discussion questions, can be found Given the new legislation, the City felt that it would in Appendix B. be appropriate to create a new plan from scratch, rather than revising and reorganizing the 1999 Plan Focus Groups to meet the new requirements. Ideas and In January 2008 Crispell‐Snyder conducted nine focus recommendations from the 1999 Plan were groups with a total of 25 individuals identified by the incorporated into this plan where appropriate. Upon Plan Commission. These focus groups covered a wide adoption, this plan will supersede the 1999 Plan and range of topics and were designed to solicit all other previously adopted comprehensive plans. additional insight into key issues. The following [Note: More detail will be added to this section] groups met for 30‐45 minutes each: 2 [DRAFT 07/14/08] • Economic Development Focus Group goals, objectives, and actions for the plan. A draft • Utilities and Engineering Focus Group plan was completed in _________ and an open house • Lake Focus Group was held to again seek public input. The plan was • Natural Resources and Parks Focus Group then revised based on comments received at the open house, and a final plan was approved and • Business Owners Focus Group adopted on __________ following a public hearing. • Schools Focus Group • Historical Society Focus Group [Note: This section will be expanded on later.] • Rental Property Owners Focus Group • Realtors Focus Group Regional Cooperation City‐Wide Survey A key theme in this Comprehensive Plan is the In February 2008, the Plan Commission, with the interrelationship among the various aspects of our assistance of Crispell‐Snyder, Inc and the Taurean daily lives. These interrelationships often extend well Group, conducted a city‐wide survey to collect public beyond municipal lines and are regional in nature. input for the comprehensive plan. The survey was The City of Beaver Dam is part of a broader made available in two forms: 1) on the internet via a geographic area and economic market that influences link from the city’s website; and 2) in hard copy at the everything from where we choose to shop and live to City Hall, Public Library, Senior Center, and other what areas we visit to hike and swim. public locations. Everyone over the age of 10 was encouraged to fill out the survey. Approximately X An over‐arching principle of the Plan is that the City people returned the survey. of Beaver Dam will work proactively with Dodge County, Town of Beaver Dam, Town of Trenton, and A report analyzed results from the survey, state and federal agencies to cooperatively address documenting what residents identified as priorities regional issues, such as natural resources, public and goals for a comprehensive plan and the best infrastructure, and consumer, employment, and strategies for achieving these goals. A copy of this housing markets. report on the survey results can be found in Appendix C. The State of Wisconsin Comprehensive Planning legislation adopted in 1999 requires that Website and Newspaper Articles municipalities work cooperatively to address regional Throughout the process, regular updates to the City’s issues. As part of the planning process, two official website as well as several articles in the paper kept meetings were held with nearby municipalities and the community informed and encouraged the county to discuss regional issues and seek involvement. agreement on inter‐municipal planning issues. Informal conversations throughout the process helped to ensure a collaborative and mutually‐ Open House and Plan Adoption beneficial planning process. Based on input from the public and extensive data and analysis provided by the planning consultants, the Plan Commission worked to identify specific 3 [Draft 07/14/08] Issues and Opportunities For reference while drafting this section – Remove before publication Issues and opportunities element. Background information on the local governmental unit and a statement of overall objectives, policies, goals and programs of the local governmental unit to guide the future development and redevelopment of the local governmental unit over a 20–year planning period. Background information shall include population, household and employment forecasts that the local governmental unit uses in developing its comprehensive plan, and demographic trends, age distribution, educational levels, income levels and employment characteristics that exist within the local governmental unit.
Recommended publications
  • Chapter Ii Mine Tailings Facilities

    Chapter Ii Mine Tailings Facilities

    14 TOWARDS ZERO HARM – A COMPENDIUM OF PAPERS PREPARED FOR THE GLOBAL TAILINGS REVIEW TOWARDS ZERO HARM – A COMPENDIUM OF PAPERS PREPARED FOR THE GLOBAL TAILINGS REVIEW 15 SETTING THE SCENE CHAPTER II Upstream MINE TAILINGS 4 3 FACILITIES: OVERVIEW 2 1 AND INDUSTRY TRENDS Starter dyke: 1 Downstream The embankment design terms, upstream, Elaine Baker*, Professor, The University of Sydney, Australia and GRID Arendal, Arendal, Norway downstream and centreline, indicate the 4 Michael Davies*, Senior Advisor – Tailings & Mine Waste, Teck Resources Limited, Vancouver, Canada direction in which the embankment crest 3 moves in relation to the starter dyke at the Andy Fourie, Professor, University of Western Australia, Australia 2 base of the embankment wall. Gavin Mudd, Associate Professor, RMIT University, Australia 1 Kristina Thygesen, Programme Group Leader, Geological Resources and Ocean Governance, GRID Arendal, Norway Centreline Dyke: 2 to 4 or more 4 Dykes are added to raise the embankment. This continues throughout the operation 3 of the mine. 1. INTRODUCTION The tailings are most commonly stored on site 2 in a tailings storage facility. Storage methods for 1 This chapter provides an overview of mine tailings conventional tailings include cross-valley and paddock and mine tailings facilities. It illustrates why and (ring-dyke) impoundments, where the tailings are how mine tailings are produced, and the complexity behind a raised embankment(s) that then, by many Source: Vick, 1983, 1990 involved in the long-term storage and management definitions, become a dam, or multiple dams. of this waste product. The call for a global standard However, a tailings facility can have an embankment Figure 1.
  • Maps Clyman 2030

    Maps Clyman 2030

    Map 2, Functional Classification of Highways & D R Location of Railroads and Airports A N I` E L ?¬ E Town of Clyman, Dodge County, Wisconsin H Il IJDJ T Iv S OAKMAN RD IJKW LIGHTHOUSE RD IJKW OAKMAN RD I`?¬ Iv Il GUBIN RD D R WILLOW RD MAPLE RD H S L IJKW E IJDJ W N L HOGSBACK RD E IJKW S EAGLE RD EAGLE RD O R M I R P D R Ij FITZGERALD RD E L P A M IJDJ R E D K R C O'SIXTY RD E Iv B CREEK RD ?Ñ ?Ñ ?Ñ D R H S L E W D R E D A H S DEGNITZ M D L RD R E Ij N O I T BLUFF RD C N U 16 16 BIWER RD J SUN RD CB60 AB60 D R N A M L D T L R S E F W N F I D A U L R M B N D D A D D R R R R M BIRCH RD L E W H D N L D E S R O E I I A L T V T W H E S C S P W E N D O U M U R T L J Q L E P L Ii I M H A Ii Ii Ii L D CLYMAN IJDJ R D O D R O E W D A IJCJ H CAUGHLIN ST S N CAUGHLIN RD O M L T D E N R A T D S R E N OAK I A WILSON RD L ELM HILL RD B D R TRAIN RD SHADE RD D R H S E L K E S W U B JUSTMAN RD HILL RD D R E W CLYMET RD N A L SCHMIDT RD S 16 IJDJ R E AB26 V Il O LOVERS E CLYMET RD L W CLYMET RD LANE RD N W CLYMET RD L Id E CLYMET RD R 16 E T AB26 L Il A H Id IJDJ Dodge County Wisconsin Legend Functional Roadway Classification Railroads Principal Arterials o Airport Minor Arterials µ Town Boundaries Major Collectors Municipalities Dodge County Minor Collectors Land Resources and Parks Lake Department Local Town of Clyman Source: Dodge County Land Resources and Parks Department, January 2010.
  • Dam Effects on Low-Tide Channel Pools and Fish Use of Estuarine Habitat

    Dam Effects on Low-Tide Channel Pools and Fish Use of Estuarine Habitat

    Beaver in Tidal Marshes: Dam Effects on Low-Tide Channel Pools and Fish Use of Estuarine Habitat W. Gregory Hood Wetlands Official Scholarly Journal of the Society of Wetland Scientists ISSN 0277-5212 Wetlands DOI 10.1007/s13157-012-0294-8 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Society of Wetland Scientists. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self- archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your work, please use the accepted author’s version for posting to your own website or your institution’s repository. You may further deposit the accepted author’s version on a funder’s repository at a funder’s request, provided it is not made publicly available until 12 months after publication. 1 23 Author's personal copy Wetlands DOI 10.1007/s13157-012-0294-8 ARTICLE Beaver in Tidal Marshes: Dam Effects on Low-Tide Channel Pools and Fish Use of Estuarine Habitat W. Gregory Hood Received: 31 August 2011 /Accepted: 16 February 2012 # Society of Wetland Scientists 2012 Abstract Beaver (Castor spp.) are considered a riverine or can have multi-decadal or longer effects on river channel form, lacustrine animal, but surveys of tidal channels in the Skagit riverine and floodplain wetlands, riparian vegetation, nutrient Delta (Washington, USA) found beaver dams and lodges in the spiraling, benthic community structure, and the abundance and tidal shrub zone at densities equal or greater than in non-tidal productivity of fish and wildlife (Jenkins and Busher 1979; rivers. Dams were typically flooded by a meter or more during Naiman et al.
  • Inventory of Tidepool and Estuarine Fishes in Acadia National Park

    Inventory of Tidepool and Estuarine Fishes in Acadia National Park

    INVENTORY OF TIDEPOOL AND ESTUARINE FISHES IN ACADIA NATIONAL PARK Edited by Linda J. Kling and Adrian Jordaan School of Marines Sciences University of Maine Orono, Maine 04469 Report to the National Park Service Acadia National Park February 2008 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Acadia National Park (ANP) is part of the Northeast Temperate Network (NETN) of the National Park Service’s Inventory and Monitoring Program. Inventory and monitoring activities supported by the NETN are becoming increasingly important for setting and meeting long-term management goals. Detailed inventories of fishes of estuaries and intertidal areas of ANP are very limited, necessitating the collection of information within these habitats. The objectives of this project were to inventory fish species found in (1) tidepools and (2) estuaries at locations adjacent to park lands on Mount Desert Island and the Schoodic Peninsula over different seasons. The inventories were not intended to be part of a long-term monitoring effort. Rather, the objective was to sample as many diverse habitats as possible in the intertidal and estuarine zones to maximize the resultant species list. Beyond these original objectives, we evaluated the data for spatial and temporal patterns and trends as well as relationships with other biological and physical characteristics of the tidepools and estuaries. For the tidepool survey, eighteen intertidal sections with multiple pools were inventoried. The majority of the tidepool sampling took place in 2001 but a few tidepools were revisited during the spring/summer period of 2002 and 2003. Each tidepool was visited once during late spring (Period 1: June 6 – June 26), twice during the summer (Period 2: July 3 – August 2 and Period 3: August 3 – September 18) and once during early fall (Period 4: September 29 – October 21).
  • Beaver Dam Mine Project Environmental Impact Statement

    Beaver Dam Mine Project Environmental Impact Statement

    Plain Language Summary BEAVER DAM MINE PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT 1 Table Of Contents 3 About 4 Project Overview 5 Sustainable Development at Beaver Dam Mine Project 6 Current Condition of the Project Site 8 Project Description 10 The Life of the Mine 12 The Environmental Assessment Process 14 Engaging Communities of Nova Scotia • Meeting with the Mi’kmaq of Nova Scotia • Meeting with the General Public 16 Traditional Use by Mi’kmaq People • Nearest Mi’kmaq Communities 18 The Natural & Human Environment Today • Fish & Wildlife • Water • Current Use by Mi’kmaq Communities • Mi’kmaq Ecological Knowledge Study • Traditional Land and Resource Use Study (Millbrook First Nation) • Cultural and Heritage Resources • Recreational and Commercial Activities 22 Effects on the Natural & Human Environment • Air • Light • Noise • Groundwater • Surface Water • Land • Animals • Fish • Birds • Cultural and Heritage Resources • Effects to the Mi’kmaq People 34 Environmental Monitoring 36 Reclamation 38 Environmental Management Programs ꢀ 40ꢀ BenefitsꢀofꢀtheꢀProject 2 41 Conclusions 1 Increase font size for all body copy? About The purpose of this booklet is to describe, in plain language, theꢀproposed development of a gold mine at Beaver Dam (Marinette), inꢀHalifax County, Nova Scotia. Atlantic Mining NS Corp. (Atlantic Gold) isꢀtheꢀcompany that wants to develop this mine. This is a plain language summary of the Environmental Impact Statement that Atlantic Gold first gave to the federal government in 2017. It is important to Atlantic Gold that you understand how they will build the mine. Atlantic Gold wants you to know how they will protect the environment during building, operating and closure of the mine.
  • Louvicourt Mine Tailings Storage Facility and Polishing Pond 2019 Dam Safety Inspection

    Louvicourt Mine Tailings Storage Facility and Polishing Pond 2019 Dam Safety Inspection

    REPORT Louvicourt Mine Tailings Storage Facility and Polishing Pond 2019 Dam Safety Inspection Submitted to: Morgan Lypka, P.Eng. Teck Resources Ltd. 601 Knighton Road, Kimberley, BC V1A 3E1 Submitted by: Golder Associates Ltd. 7250, rue du Mile End, 3e étage Montréal (Québec) H2R 3A4 Canada +1 514 383 0990 001-19118317-5000-RA-Rev0 25 March 2020 25 March 2020 001-19118317-5000-RA-Rev0 Distribution List 1 e-copy: Teck Resources Ltd., Kimberley, BC 1 e-copy: Golder Associates Ltd., Saskatoon, SK 1 e-copy: Golder Associates Ltd., Montreal, QC 1 e-copy: MELCC, Rouyn-Noranda, QC 1 copy: MELCC, Rouyn-Noranda, QC i 25 March 2020 001-19118317-5000-RA-Rev0 Executive Summary This report presents the 2019 annual dam safety inspection (DSI) for the tailings storage facility (TSF) and polishing pond at the closed Louvicourt mine site located near Val-d’Or, Quebec. This report was prepared based on a site visit carried out on September 24, 2019 by Laurent Gareau and Simon Chapuis of Golder Associates Ltd (Golder), Morgan Lypka and Jason McBain of Teck Resources Limited (Teck, Owner), Jonathan Charland of Glencore Canada (Glencore, Owner) and Rene Fontaine of WSP (who conducts routine inspections with Glencore personnel), as well as on a review of available data representative of conditions over the period since the previous annual DSI. Golder Associates are the original designer of the facility and have been the provider of the Engineer of Record (EOR) since 2017. Golder performed an inspection in 2009, and then has performed annual inspections of the facilities since 2014.
  • Beavers Are Cleaning Stormwater, Cooling Streams, and Increasing Complexity in Gresham

    Beavers Are Cleaning Stormwater, Cooling Streams, and Increasing Complexity in Gresham

    Beavers are Cleaning Stormwater, Cooling Streams, and Increasing Complexity in Gresham Katie Holzer Watershed Scientist City of Gresham, Oregon 1 Overview 1) Stormwater facility study 2) Stream temperature study 3) Stream complexity observations 2 Gresham 3 Dozens of Beaver Dams in Gresham Streams • Seem to be increasing drastically in past 10 years • Most strongly associated with public land 4 Variety of Dams https://www.facebook.com/JohnsonCreekWC/videos/382315012475862/ 5 1) Stormwater Facility Study 6 Columbia Slough Regional Water Quality Facility • Constructed in 2007-08 • 13-acre site • Treats 965 acres of industrial and commercial land • Cost = $2.4M • Goals: clean stormwater, provide habitat, foster education 7 Columbia Slough Regional Water Quality Facility 8 Columbia Slough Regional Water Quality Facility + Beavers 9 Question: Do the beaver dams help or hinder the water quality treatment in this facility? 10 Methods – Dam Removal 11 Methods – Water Quality Sampling • Collected water quality samples during storms • Inlets and outlets of facility • Before and after dam removal and rebuilding • 7 storms without dams, 7 storms with dams • Metals, nutrients, sediment, pesticides 12 Results 100 No beaver dams 80 60 40 20 % Pollutant Removal Pollutant % 0 -20 -40 13 Results 100 No beaver dams With beaver dams 80 60 40 20 % Pollutant Removal Pollutant % 0 -20 -40 14 Beaver dams slow and filter stormwater 15 New Question: What if the beavers leave?! 16 Continually Remove One Dam 17 Suggestions for Designing Stormwater Facilities with
  • Beaver Dam Lake Report 2012

    Beaver Dam Lake Report 2012

    Beaver Dam Lake Aquatic Macrophytic Survey Report 580 Rockport Rd. Hackettstown, NJ 07840 Phone: 908-850-8690 Fax: 908-850-4994 www.alliedbiological.com Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Procedures: ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Macrophyte Summary: ................................................................................................................................. 4 Macrophyte Abundance and Distribution Discussion .................................................................................. 9 Summary of Findings: ................................................................................................................................. 12 2 11/30/2012 Beaver Dam Lake Protection and Rehabilitation District 557 Shore Drive New Windsor, NY 12553 2012 Aquatic Macrophytic Survey Report Beaver Dam Lake Orange County, New York Introduction On September 7, 2012 Allied Biological, Inc. conducted a detailed aquatic macrophyte survey at Beaver Dam Lake located in Orange County, NY. During the survey, 102 GPS-referenced locations were sampled for the presence of aquatic macrophytes in the main basin of the lake. The primary goal of the survey was to map the diverse vegetation present in the lake for scientific determination of best management strategies. In the Appendix
  • Chapter NR 102. Water Quality Standards for Wisconsin Surface

    Chapter NR 102. Water Quality Standards for Wisconsin Surface

    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. Published under s. 35.93, Wis. Stats., by the Legislative Reference Bureau. 7 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES NR 102.04 Chapter NR 102 WATER QUALITY STANDARDS FOR WISCONSIN SURFACE WATERS Subchapter I — General Subchapter II — Water Quality Standards for Temperature NR 102.01 Purpose. NR 102.20 Purpose. NR 102.02 Applicability. NR 102.22 Definitions. NR 102.03 Definitions. NR 102.23 Categories of standards applicable to temperature. NR 102.04 Categories of surface water uses and criteria. NR 102.24 General water quality criteria for temperature. NR 102.05 Application of standards. NR 102.245 Temperature criteria for limited aquatic life communities. NR 102.06 Phosphorus. NR 102.25 Ambient temperatures and water quality criteria for the protection of NR 102.10 Outstanding resource waters. fish and other aquatic life. NR 102.11 Exceptional resource waters. NR 102.26 Site−specific ambient temperatures. NR 102.12 Great Lakes system. NR 102.27 Site−specific water quality criteria. NR 102.13 Fish and aquatic life waters. NR 102.28 Cold shock standard. NR 102.14 Taste and odor criteria. NR 102.29 Rate of temperature change standard. NR 102.30 Variances to water quality standards for temperature.
  • Water Quality Report to Congress - 2018

    Water Quality Report to Congress - 2018

    Water Quality Report to Congress - 2018 Wisconsin Water Quality Report to Congress 2018 Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Water Quality Bureau Division of Environmental Management Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources 101 South Webster Street • PO Box 7921 • Madison, Wisconsin 53707-7921 dnr.wi.gov i Water Quality Report to Congress - 2018 Governor Scott Walker Natural Resources Board Terry Hilgenberg, Chair Dr. Frederick Rehn, Vice-Chair Julie Anderson, Secretary William Bruins Preston D. Cole Gregory Kazmierski Gary Zimmer Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Daniel Meyer, Secretary Ed Eberle, Deputy Secretary Pat Stevens, Assistant Deputy Jim Zellmer, Environmental Division Deputy Administrator Sharon Gayan, Director, Water Quality Bureau Steve Galarneau, Director, Office of Great Waters Pam Biersach, Director, Watershed Management Justine Hasz, Director, Fisheries Management Steve Elmore, Director, Drinking Water & Groundwater Cover Photo: View of Seidel Lake in Florence County. Photo by Luke Ernster. ii Water Quality Report to Congress - 2018 Wisconsin’s Water Quality Report The Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) requires all states to prepare a Water Quality Report to Congress every two years. This “Integrated Report” combines the CWA sections 305(b) and 303(d). The report contains an overall summary of water quality conditions in the State and an updated Impaired Waters List. Wisconsin data are also provided electronically to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as part of the Integrated Reporting Process. Wisconsin’s 2018 Wisconsin Water Quality Report to Congress summarizes assessment progress and activities related to water quality protection during the past two years. This document is an online publication only that can be accessed at the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) website: http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/surfacewater/assessments.html.
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form

    National Register of Historic Places Registration Form

    OUB Ho 1024-0018 NPS Fcxm \0-fOO (FUv R~M) 233, United States Department of the Interior FEB271989 National Park Service NATIONAL National Register of Historic Places REGISTER Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines tor Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets KForm 10-900a). Type all entries. 1 . Name of Property historic name Copeland-Ryder Company other names/site number N/A 2. Location street & number 411 Wisconsin Drive TH/Anot for publication city, town Jefferson jj/Jwicinity state Wisconsiflode WI county Jefferson code 055 zip code 53549 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property 00 private [X] building(s) Contributing Noncontributing { 1 public-local [.73 district 2 0 buildings [U public-State Dsite sites CU public-Federal [ ] structure structures 1 1 object objects 2 0 Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously N/A listed in the National Register _. 4. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this |X| nomination I I request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
  • Glacial Heritage Area Plan

    Glacial Heritage Area Plan

    Glacial Heritage Area Plan Conceptual Plan for: Master Plan for: Conservation Parks State Wildlife Areas COLD SPRING CONSERVATION PARK DEANSVILLE STATE WILDLIFE AREA DOROTHY CARNES CONSERVATION PARK GOOSE LAKE STATE WILDLIFE AREA JEFFERSON MARSH STATE WILDLIFE AREA & STATE DR. J.S. GARMAN NATURE PRESERVE NATURAL AREA KORTH CONSERVATION PARK KOSHKONONG STATE WILDLIFE AREA LAKE RIPLEY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT PRESERVE LAKE MILLS STATE WILDLIFE AREA CUSHMAN MILL CONSERVATION PARK LIMA MARSH – STORR’S LAKE STATE WILDLIFE AREA HOLZHUETER FARM CONSERVATION PARK PRINCE’S POINT STATE WILDLIFE AREA HOPE LAKE CONSERVATION PARK ROME POND STATE WILDLIFE AREA NORTH SHORE MORAINE CONSERVATION PARK WATERLOO – MUD LAKE STATE WILDLIFE AREA OAKLAND HIGHLANDS CONSERVATION PARK RED CEDAR LAKE CONSERVATION PARK CRAWFISH PRAIRIE STATE HABITAT AREA RURAL LANDSCAPE PROTECTION AREAS SCUPPERNONG VALLEY CONSERVATION PARK State Natural Area Linking Trails RED CEDAR LAKE STATE NATURAL AREA River-based Conservation Areas ALLEN CREEK CONSERVATION AREA LOWER BARK RIVER CONSERVATION AREA LOWER KOSHKONONG CREEK CONSERVATION AREA WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Bureau of Facilities and Lands GLACIAL HERITAGE AREA WM-GHA-OVERVIEW acr Map Updated: March 2011 l i a r . T R e t m a a t Glacial Heritage Area D S r e v 26 e 151 a s e Project Area B Lowell o o 60 60 G d l 16 i W 0 2.5 5 Miles Reeseville 67 . R h s 89 i f w a r C M a u n 73 e Deansville s h 109 a Wildlife Area Waterloo- R DODGE CO. Mud Lake Wildlife Area Langer 19 Family Waterloo Park Marshall Watertown .