DOCSLIB.ORG

Water Quality Report to Congress - 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Water Quality Report to Congress - 2018 Water Quality Report to Congress - 2018 Wisconsin Water Quality Report to Congress 2018 Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Water Quality Bureau Division of Environmental Management Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources 101 South Webster Street • PO Box 7921 • Madison, Wisconsin 53707-7921 dnr.wi.gov i Water Quality Report to Congress - 2018 Governor Scott Walker Natural Resources Board Terry Hilgenberg, Chair Dr. Frederick Rehn, Vice-Chair Julie Anderson, Secretary William Bruins Preston D. Cole Gregory Kazmierski Gary Zimmer Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Daniel Meyer, Secretary Ed Eberle, Deputy Secretary Pat Stevens, Assistant Deputy Jim Zellmer, Environmental Division Deputy Administrator Sharon Gayan, Director, Water Quality Bureau Steve Galarneau, Director, Office of Great Waters Pam Biersach, Director, Watershed Management Justine Hasz, Director, Fisheries Management Steve Elmore, Director, Drinking Water & Groundwater Cover Photo: View of Seidel Lake in Florence County. Photo by Luke Ernster. ii Water Quality Report to Congress - 2018 Wisconsin’s Water Quality Report The Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) requires all states to prepare a Water Quality Report to Congress every two years. This “Integrated Report” combines the CWA sections 305(b) and 303(d). The report contains an overall summary of water quality conditions in the State and an updated Impaired Waters List. Wisconsin data are also provided electronically to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as part of the Integrated Reporting Process. Wisconsin’s 2018 Wisconsin Water Quality Report to Congress summarizes assessment progress and activities related to water quality protection during the past two years. This document is an online publication only that can be accessed at the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) website: http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/surfacewater/assessments.html. Editor: Ashley Beranek Authors and contributors of this report include: Tim Asplund, Jim Amrhein, Kendra Axness, Ashley Beranek, Tom Bernthal, Jim Bertolacini, Chelsey Blanke, Dave Bolha, Camille Bruhn, Heidi Bunk, Jeanne Cargill, Jacob Dickmann, Matt Diebel, Donalea Dinsmore, Maureen Ferry, Kari Fleming, Adam Freihoefer, Mary Gansberg, Kevin Gauthier, Shawn Giblin, Sue Graham, Ilana Haimes, Ian Hansen, Mark Hazuga, Katie Hein, Craig Helker, Lisa Helmuth, Andy Hudak, Corrinne Johnson, Ted Johnson, Jim Killian, Kevin Kirsch, Jon Kleist, Jim Klosiewski, Jim Kreitlow, Jim Lemke, Jodi Lepsch, Mary Anne Lowndes, Kay Lutze, Aaron Marti, Kristi Minahan, Brenda Nordin, Amanda Perdzock, Cami Peterson, Emily Punke, Craig Roesler, Rachel Sabre, Mike Shupryt, Alex Smith, Amanda Smith, Mike Sorge, Susan Tesarik, Pam Toshner, Jean Unmuth, Bob Wakeman, Michele Wheeler, and all Water Quality Biologists, Water Resources Specialists, and Water Program Managers. All photos courtesy of Wisconsin DNR unless otherwise credited. Previous reports were published in 2016, 2014 (online only), 2012 (online only), 2010, 2008 (data submittal only), 2006, 2004, 2002, 2000, 1996, 1994, 1992, 1990, 1988, 1987, and earlier. WDNR’s earlier documents are available for review at the GEF II building, 101 S. Webster Street, Madison. Later versions are available electronically. iii Water Quality Report to Congress - 2018 Letter to Citizens Every two years, Wisconsin provides a Water Quality Report to Congress. This report summarizes the condition of the State’s water resources (i.e., lakes, rivers, streams, wetlands, drinking water, groundwater, and Great Lakes) and describes Wisconsin’s programs to manage, protect and enhance those water resources that are so vital to our culture and our economy. As part of the Department of Natural Resources’ mission, staff in the Water Programs work hard to use the resources available – in the most efficient manner possible – to ensure that our efforts are focused on meeting the needs of the state’s citizens and visitors. With the vast water resources in Wisconsin, it is critical to conduct our work in an organized manner that can be evaluated regularly and improved upon as needed. To that end, the Water Programs have four strategic objectives that help define our program goals and guide the work that we do: • Protecting the Public Trust • Implementing the Clean Water Act • Sustaining Healthy Fisheries • Providing Safe Drinking Water and Groundwater WDNR’s Water Program staff work hard to efficiently use resources available to ensure focused efforts on meeting water quality goals and protecting recreational uses for generations to come. The quality of life benefits from protecting our water resources are vital to the State’s economy. WDNR continually strives to make decisions based on science, track and document progress, and educate the public about water quality issues. In partnership with citizen groups, tribal partners and other state and federal agencies, staff will continue to seek opportunities for collaboration to assess and improve our water resources. Wisconsin’s responsibilities to assess, manage, protect, and enhance our water resources for the citizens of Wisconsin are reflected in this 2018 Integrated Water Quality Report to Congress. This report satisfies federal reporting requirements and provides insights into the WDNR’s multitude of water-related programs. Looking forward, I am confident that you’ll agree that Wisconsin is well prepared to continue to evaluate, protect and improve our precious water resources for the citizens of Wisconsin. Jim Zellmer, Deputy Administrator Environmental Management Division iv Water Quality Report to Congress - 2018 Contents A. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Key Points ................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 B. Background Information ........................................................................................................................................... 3 B1. Total Waters ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3 B2. Water Pollution Control Programs ................................................................................................................................. 4 Total Maximum Daily Load Program ............................................................................................................................... 4 Water Quality Standards ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 Runoff Management Programs .......................................................................................................................................... 9 Wastewater Management .................................................................................................................................................. 14 Waterway Shorelands ......................................................................................................................................................... 17 Waterways & Wetlands ...................................................................................................................................................... 18 B3. Cost/Benefit Analysis ..................................................................................................................................................... 23 Environmental Improvement Fund ................................................................................................................................ 23 Clean Water Fund Program .............................................................................................................................................. 23 Safe Drinking Water Loan Program ................................................................................................................................ 24 Land Acquisitions and Easements ................................................................................................................................... 25 Runoff Management Programs ........................................................................................................................................ 25 B4. Special State Concerns & Recommendations ............................................................................................................. 26 Great Lakes ......................................................................................................................................................................... 26 Mississippi River ................................................................................................................................................................. 32 Aquatic Invasive Species ................................................................................................................................................... 39 Water Quantity Issues........................................................................................................................................................ 42 C. Surface Water Monitoring & Assessment ............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hog Island/Newton Creek Habitat Restoration Project St. Louis River Area of Concern, Superior, Wisconsin NOAA Great Lakes Habitat Restoration Program June 2011
    Hog Island/Newton Creek Habitat Restoration Project St. Louis River Area of Concern, Superior, Wisconsin NOAA Great Lakes Habitat Restoration Program June 2011 Background Hog Island is a place of scenic beauty and high ecological value. Located at the “headwaters of Lake Superior,” at the far western end of the lake within the city of Superior, Wisconsin, the area is regionally important both as an ecological resource and a recreational and scenic amenity. For many years the area has served as a disposal site for dredge spoils, a railway yard, and a repository for industrial byproducts. In 1987, the St. Louis River, including Hog Island, was designated as an Area of Concern (AOC) due to numerous beneficial use impairments (BUIs), including loss of fish and wildlife habitat, degradation of fish and wildlife populations, degradation of benthos, beach closings, and others. Despite these conditions, Hog Island, Hog Island Inlet, Newton Creek, Allouez Bay, and Pokegama Bay are extremely important for local and migratory fish and wildlife populations. Ecological restoration within these areas through NOAA’s Great Lakes Habitat Restoration Program will provide essential habitat for rare, threatened and endangered species; control invasive vegetation and other threats to ecological viability; improve water and sediment quality; and provide recreation and an aesthetic amenity for local residents and visitors. Moving from Remediation to Restoration Remediation of contaminated materials at Hog Island/Newton Creek was completed in 2005 after a 10‐year, multi‐phase cleanup process. During the final phase 60,000 tons of contaminated sediments were removed from the lower portions of Newton Creek and Hog Island Inlet.
    [Show full text]
  • Maps Clyman 2030
    Map 2, Functional Classification of Highways & D R Location of Railroads and Airports A N I` E L ?¬ E Town of Clyman, Dodge County, Wisconsin H Il IJDJ T Iv S OAKMAN RD IJKW LIGHTHOUSE RD IJKW OAKMAN RD I`?¬ Iv Il GUBIN RD D R WILLOW RD MAPLE RD H S L IJKW E IJDJ W N L HOGSBACK RD E IJKW S EAGLE RD EAGLE RD O R M I R P D R Ij FITZGERALD RD E L P A M IJDJ R E D K R C O'SIXTY RD E Iv B CREEK RD ?Ñ ?Ñ ?Ñ D R H S L E W D R E D A H S DEGNITZ M D L RD R E Ij N O I T BLUFF RD C N U 16 16 BIWER RD J SUN RD CB60 AB60 D R N A M L D T L R S E F W N F I D A U L R M B N D D A D D R R R R M BIRCH RD L E W H D N L D E S R O E I I A L T V T W H E S C S P W E N D O U M U R T L J Q L E P L Ii I M H A Ii Ii Ii L D CLYMAN IJDJ R D O D R O E W D A IJCJ H CAUGHLIN ST S N CAUGHLIN RD O M L T D E N R A T D S R E N OAK I A WILSON RD L ELM HILL RD B D R TRAIN RD SHADE RD D R H S E L K E S W U B JUSTMAN RD HILL RD D R E W CLYMET RD N A L SCHMIDT RD S 16 IJDJ R E AB26 V Il O LOVERS E CLYMET RD L W CLYMET RD LANE RD N W CLYMET RD L Id E CLYMET RD R 16 E T AB26 L Il A H Id IJDJ Dodge County Wisconsin Legend Functional Roadway Classification Railroads Principal Arterials o Airport Minor Arterials µ Town Boundaries Major Collectors Municipalities Dodge County Minor Collectors Land Resources and Parks Lake Department Local Town of Clyman Source: Dodge County Land Resources and Parks Department, January 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Regulations, 2020-2021, Available Online, from Your License Distributor, Or Any DNR Service Center
    Wisconsin Fishing.. it's fun and easy! To use this pamphlet, follow these 5 easy steps: Restrictions: Be familiar with What's New on page 4 and the License Requirements 1 and Statewide Fishing Restrictions on pages 8-11. Trout fishing: If you plan to fish for trout, please see the separate inland trout 2 regulations booklet, Guide to Wisconsin Trout Fishing Regulations, 2020-2021, available online, from your license distributor, or any DNR Service Center. Special regulations: Check for special regulations on the water you will be fishing 3 in the section entitled Special Regulations-Listed by County beginning on page 28. Great Lakes, Winnebago System Waters, and Boundary Waters: If you are 4 planning to fish on the Great Lakes, their tributaries, Winnebago System waters or waters bordering other states, check the appropriate tables on pages 64–76. Statewide rules: If the water you will be fishing is not found in theSpecial Regulations- 5 Listed by County and is not a Great Lake, Winnebago system, or boundary water, statewide rules apply. See the regulation table for General Inland Waters on pages 62–63 for seasons, length and bag limits, listed by species. ** This pamphlet is an interpretive summary of Wisconsin’s fishing laws and regulations. For complete fishing laws and regulations, including those that are implemented after the publica- tion of this pamphlet, consult the Wisconsin State Statutes Chapter 29 or the Administrative Code of the Department of Natural Resources. Consult the legislative website - http://docs. legis.wi.gov - for more information. For the most up-to-date version of this pamphlet, go to dnr.wi.gov search words, “fishing regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Shoreland Lighting
    1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Produced by the Northwest Regional Planning Commission, September 2007. Funded in part by the Wisconsin Coastal Management Program. Financial assistance for this project was provided by the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, administered by the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration pursuant to grant #96003-006.13 and the Wisconsin Coastal Management Program. The Wisconsin Coastal Management Program, part of the Wisconsin Department Of Administration, and overseen by the Wisconsin Coastal Management Council, was established in 1978 to preserve, protect and manage the resources of the Lake Michigan and Lake Superior coastline for this and future generations. Funded by the Wisconsin Department of administration Wisconsin Coastal Management Program. Author: Jason K. Laumann Special thanks go to Dr. Lowell Klessig (Ret.), Mike Kroenke, Gene Clark, UW-Sea Grant, Duane Lahti, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources and Doug Miskowiak at the UWSP Center for Land Use Education for their review and comments. Thanks also to Steve Rannenberg (Douglas County Zoning) and Karl Kastrosky (Bayfield County Zoning) for their assistance in identifying subdivision visualization sites, and to ABDI for their assistance in identifying native plant species. Credit also goes to the UWSP Center for Land Use Education for development of the subdivision visualization models. i Table of Contents Introduction .........................................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    OUB Ho 1024-0018 NPS Fcxm \0-fOO (FUv R~M) 233, United States Department of the Interior FEB271989 National Park Service NATIONAL National Register of Historic Places REGISTER Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines tor Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets KForm 10-900a). Type all entries. 1 . Name of Property historic name Copeland-Ryder Company other names/site number N/A 2. Location street & number 411 Wisconsin Drive TH/Anot for publication city, town Jefferson jj/Jwicinity state Wisconsiflode WI county Jefferson code 055 zip code 53549 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property 00 private [X] building(s) Contributing Noncontributing { 1 public-local [.73 district 2 0 buildings [U public-State Dsite sites CU public-Federal [ ] structure structures 1 1 object objects 2 0 Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously N/A listed in the National Register _. 4. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this |X| nomination I I request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • GLIC Semi-Annual Report
    EPAGLNPO GL-00E01567-6 Semi-annual report October 2019 Page 1 of 135 Great Lakes Coastal Wetland Monitoring Program Semiannual Progress Report April 1, 2019 – September 30, 2019 Prepared for: U.S. EPA GLNPO (G-17J) 77 W. Jackson Blvd. Chicago, IL 60604-3590 Contract/WA/Grant No./Project Identifier: GL-00E01567-6 Prepared by: Dr. Donald G. Uzarski, Principal Investigator CMU Institute for Great Lakes Research CMU Biological Station Department of Biology Central Michigan University Brooks 127 Mount Pleasant, MI 48859 Dr. Valerie J. Brady, QA Manager Center for Water and the Environment Natural Resources Research Institute University of Minnesota Duluth 5013 Miller Trunk Highway Duluth, MN 55811-1442 Dr. Matthew J. Cooper, QA Manager Burke Center for Freshwater Innovation Northland College 1411 Ellis Avenue Ashland, WI 54891 Project Period: Oct. 1, 2015 – Sept. 30, 2020 EPAGLNPO GL-00E01567-6 Semi-annual report October 2019 Page 2 of 135 INTRODUCTION Monitoring the biota of Great Lakes coastal wetlands began as a project funded under the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative on 10 September 2010. The project had the primary objective of implementing a standardized basin‐wide coastal wetland monitoring program. Our first five years of sampling (2011-2015) set the baseline for future sampling years and showed the power of the datasets that can be used to inform decision‐makers on coastal wetland conservation and restoration priorities throughout the Great Lakes basin. During round one, we 1) developed a database management system; 2) developed a standardized sample design with rotating panels of wetland sites to be sampled across years, accompanied by sampling protocols, QAPPs, and other methods documents; and 3) developed background documents on the indicators.
    [Show full text]
  • Glacial Heritage Area Plan
    Glacial Heritage Area Plan Conceptual Plan for: Master Plan for: Conservation Parks State Wildlife Areas COLD SPRING CONSERVATION PARK DEANSVILLE STATE WILDLIFE AREA DOROTHY CARNES CONSERVATION PARK GOOSE LAKE STATE WILDLIFE AREA JEFFERSON MARSH STATE WILDLIFE AREA & STATE DR. J.S. GARMAN NATURE PRESERVE NATURAL AREA KORTH CONSERVATION PARK KOSHKONONG STATE WILDLIFE AREA LAKE RIPLEY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT PRESERVE LAKE MILLS STATE WILDLIFE AREA CUSHMAN MILL CONSERVATION PARK LIMA MARSH – STORR’S LAKE STATE WILDLIFE AREA HOLZHUETER FARM CONSERVATION PARK PRINCE’S POINT STATE WILDLIFE AREA HOPE LAKE CONSERVATION PARK ROME POND STATE WILDLIFE AREA NORTH SHORE MORAINE CONSERVATION PARK WATERLOO – MUD LAKE STATE WILDLIFE AREA OAKLAND HIGHLANDS CONSERVATION PARK RED CEDAR LAKE CONSERVATION PARK CRAWFISH PRAIRIE STATE HABITAT AREA RURAL LANDSCAPE PROTECTION AREAS SCUPPERNONG VALLEY CONSERVATION PARK State Natural Area Linking Trails RED CEDAR LAKE STATE NATURAL AREA River-based Conservation Areas ALLEN CREEK CONSERVATION AREA LOWER BARK RIVER CONSERVATION AREA LOWER KOSHKONONG CREEK CONSERVATION AREA WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Bureau of Facilities and Lands GLACIAL HERITAGE AREA WM-GHA-OVERVIEW acr Map Updated: March 2011 l i a r . T R e t m a a t Glacial Heritage Area D S r e v 26 e 151 a s e Project Area B Lowell o o 60 60 G d l 16 i W 0 2.5 5 Miles Reeseville 67 . R h s 89 i f w a r C M a u n 73 e Deansville s h 109 a Wildlife Area Waterloo- R DODGE CO. Mud Lake Wildlife Area Langer 19 Family Waterloo Park Marshall Watertown .
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Superior National Estuarine Research Reserve
    Location: Northwestern corner of Wisconsin along the St. Louis Lake Superior River, bordering Minnesota and Lake Superior National Estuarine Research Reserve Date Designated: 2010 Area Protected: 16,697 acres Web Address: lakesuperiorreserve.org Management: Daily oversight is provided by the University of Wisconsin–Madison Division of Extension. NOAA’s Office for Coastal Management provides funding, national guidance, and technical assistance. Access and Infrastructure • The reserve is a combination of four components located within 10 minutes of each other: Red River Breaks, Pokegama Bay, South of Pokegama Bay, and Wisconsin Point. Each site possesses its own combination of habitats. • Two waterfront structures on Barkers Island are part of the University of Wisconsin–Superior campus. The buildings house administrative offices, a 1,300-square-foot dockside laboratory, a public science and interpretive center, and classrooms. A boat and dock are available to visiting researchers. • The reserve features areas of national significance, including the world’s largest freshwater bay mouth sand bar (Wisconsin Point), estuarine wetlands, and steep, highly erodible red clay bluffs. The Lake Superior National Estuarine Research Reserve is located along a river-to-lake gradient at the confluence of the St. Louis River and Lake Superior, the largest and most pristine of the Great Lakes. The reserve is a combination of varying land areas that include uplands, riparian and riverine habitats, freshwater marshes, interdunal wetlands, forests, and open sand beach and dunes. The reserve is adjacent to the “Twin Ports” of Superior, Wisconsin, and Duluth, Minnesota, which together represent the largest freshwater port in the world. The lower portion of the St.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Louis and Lower Nemadji River Watershed
    Wisconsin St. Louis and Lower Nemadji Watersheds River Watershed 2010 Water Quality Management Plan Update Lake Superior Basin, Wisconsin August, 2010 The t.S Louis River, the largest U.S. tributary to Lake Superior, drains 3,634 square miles, entering the southwestern corner of the lake between Duluth, Minnesota and Superior, Wisconsin. The river flows 179 miles through three distinct areas: coarse soils, glacial till and outwash deposits at its headwaters; a deep, narrow gorge at Jay Cooke State Park in Minnesota; and red clay deposits in its lower reaches. As the St. Louis River approaches Duluth and Superior, the river takes on the characteristics of a 12,000 Contents acre freshwater estuary. The upper estuary has some Watershed Details 1 wilderness-like areas, while the lower estuary is character- Population and Land Use . 1 ized by urban development, an industrial harbor, and Ecological Landscapes . 3 a major port. The lower estuary includes St. Louis Bay, Other Details . 3 Map 1: St Louis River and Lower Nemadji Superior Bay, Allouez Bay, Kimball’s Bay, Pokegama Bay, River Watershed Invasive Species . 3 Howard’s Bay, and the lower Nemadji River. Historical Note . 4 Watershed Details Watershed Condition 4 Priority Issues . 4 Water Quality Goals . 4 Population and Land Use Overall Condition . 4 The watershed is dominated by Point and Nonpoint Sources . 5 forests (65%), agriculture (9%), Fish Consumption Advice . 5 followed closely by open water River and Stream Condition . 5 and open space (8%) (Figure 1). Lakes and Embayments . 16 Wetlands . 17 In 1987, the International Joint Waters of Note: . .22 Commission, an advisory com- mission on U.S-Canadian border Watershed Actions 23 Figure 1: Land Use in the St Louis and Lower Nemadji River Partnership Activities .
    [Show full text]
  • ATLAS of the SPAWNING and NURSERY AREAS of GREAT LAKES FISHES Volume II - Lake Superior
    Biological Services Program FWS/OBS-82/52 SEPTEMBER 1982 ATLAS OF THE SPAWNING AND NURSERY AREAS OF GREAT LAKES FISHES Volume II - Lake Superior Great Lake - St. Lawrence Seaway Navigation Season Extension Program Fish and Wildlife Service Corps of Engineers U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Department of the Army The Biological Services Program was established within the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to supply scientific information and methodologies on key environmental issues that Impact fish and wildlife resources and their supporting ecosystems. The mission of the program is as follows: o To strengthen the Fish and Wildlife Service in its role as a primary source of information on national fish and wild- life resources, particularly in respect to environmental impact assessment. o To gather, analyze, and present information that will aid decisionmakers in the identification and resolution of problems associated with major changes in land and water use. o To provide better ecological information and evaluation for Department of the Interior development programs, such as those relatfng to energy development. Information developed by the Biological Services Program is intended for use in the planning and decisionmaking process to prevent or minimize the impact of development on fish and wildlife. Research activities and technlcal assistance services are based on an analysis of the issues, a determination of the decisionmakers involved and their informatlon needs, and an evaluation of the state of the art to identify information gaps and to determine priorities. This is a strategy that will ensure that the products produced and disseminated are timely and useful.
    [Show full text]
  • Jefferson County, Wisconsin, and Incorporated Areas
    VOLUME 1 OF 2 JEFFERSON COUNTY, WISCONSIN, AND INCORPORATED AREAS Community Community Name Number Cambridge, Village of 550080 Fort Atkinson, City of 555554 Jefferson, City of 555561 Jefferson County, Unincorporated Areas 550191 Johnson Creek, Village of 550194 Lac LaBelle, Village of 550565 Lake Mills, City of 550195 Palmyra, Village of 550196 Sullivan, Village of 550197 Waterloo, City of 550198 Watertown, City of 550107 Whitewater, City of 550200 PRELIMINARY Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 55055CV001B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this Preliminary FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS components. Initial Countywide FIS Effective Date: June 2, 2009 Revised Countywide FIS Date: TBD TABLE OF CONTENTS – VOLUME 1 Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Purpose of Study 1 1.2 Authority and Acknowledgments 1 1.3 Coordination
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Superior National Estuarine Research Reserve LAKE SUPERIOR NATIONAL ESTUARINE RESEARCH RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN
    ManageMent Plan 2010 - 2015 Lake Superior National estuarine research reserve LAKE SUPERIOR NATIONAL ESTUARINE RESEARCH RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN 2010-2015 Prepared by: University of Wisconsin-Extension September 2010 Prepared for: U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management Estuarine Reserves Division 1305 East West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910 University of Wisconsin - Extension 432 North Lake Street Madison, WI 53706 This Management Plan has been developed in accordance with National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) regulations, including all provisions for public involvement. It is consistent with the congressional intent of Section 315 of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, and the provisions of the Wisconsin Coastal Management Program. This publication is funded, in part, through a grant agreement with the Wisconsin Coastal Management Program and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management under the Coastal Zone Management Act, Grant # NA08NOS4200405. Cover photography by: Michael K. Anderson Interior photography by: Amy Elliot, Becky Sapper, Michael K. Anderson, Patrick Robinson, Lynelle Hanson and Frank Koshere - WDNR Graphic Design by: Amy B. Torrey - UW Extension Lake Superior NatioNaL EstuariNe RESEARCH RESERVe 2010-2015 i | Table of Contents Table of Contents LIST OF APPENDICES iii LIST OF FIGURES iv LIST OF MAPS iv LIST OF TABLES iv LIST OF ACRONYMS v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 INTRODUCTION 6 Purpose and Scope of the Lake Superior NERR Management Plan. 6 Description of the Lake Superior NERR. 7 Great Lakes Freshwater Estuaries. 7 Lake Superior NERR Key Attributes and Setting.
    [Show full text]