British Journal of American Legal Studies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

British Journal of American Legal Studies Birmingham City School of Law BritishBritish JoJournalurnal ofof British Journal of American Legal Studies | Volume 7 Issue 1 7 Issue Legal Studies | Volume British Journal of American British Journal of American Legal Studies | Volume 8 Issue 2 8 Issue Legal Studies | Volume British Journal of American AmericanAmerican LegalLegal StudiesStudies VolumeVolume 87 IssueIssue 21 FallSpring 2019 2018 ARTICLES ARTICLES Founding-Era Socialism: The Original Meaning of the Constitution’s Postal Clause Robert G. Natelson Law and Religion in Plymouth Colony Scott Douglas Gerber Toward Natural Born Derivative Citizenship John Vlahoplus Cartel Control of Attorney Licensure and the Public Interest Robert C. Fellmeth, Felix Frankfurter and the Law BridgetThomas Fogarty HalperGramme, C. Christopher Hayes Fundamental Rights in Early American Case Law: 1789-1859 Nicholas P. Zinos HenryThe Holmes Friendly Truth: and theToward Incorporation a Pragmatic, of the Holmes-Influenced Bill of Rights Conceptualization Thomas Halper of the Nature of Truth Jared Schroeder Bad Company: The Corporate Appropriation of Nature, Divinity, Richard Hardack andActs Personhood of State, State in U.S. Immunity, Culture and Judicial Review in the United States Zia Akthar To Kill a Mockingbird and Legal Ethics: On the Role of Atticus Finch’s Attic Michelle Kundmueller Rhetoric in Fulfillment of Duties to Client, to Court, to Society, and to Self (Mis)judging Ordinary Meaning?: Corpus Linguistics, the Frequency Fallacy, Shlomo Klapper and the Extension-Abstraction Distinction in “Ordinary Meaning” Textualism “Felix Cohen was the Blackstone of Federal Indian Law”: Adrien Habermacher Taking the Comparison Seriously BRITISH JOURNAL OF AMERICAN LEGAL STUDIES BIRMINGHAM CITY UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL THE CURZON BUILDING, 4 CARDIGAN STREET, BIRMINGHAM, B4 7BD, UNITED KINGDOM ISSNISSN 2049-40922049-4092 (Print)(Print) British Journal of American Legal Studies Editor-in-Chief: Dr Anne Richardson Oakes, Birmingham City University. Deputy Editors Dr Ilaria Di-Gioia, Birmingham City University Dr Friso Jansen, Birmingham City University Associate Editors Dr Sarah Cooper, Birmingham City University Prof Haydn Davies, Birmingham City University Prof Julian Killingley, Birmingham City University Dr Alice Storey, Birmingham City University Dr Amna Nazir, Birmingham City University Prof Jon Yorke, Birmingham City University Seth Barrett Tillman, National University of Ireland, Maynooth Editorial Team Leader 2018—2019 Mercedes Cooling Birmingham City University Student Editorial Assistants 2019 Matthew Hill Simran Juss Tom Nicklin Eleni Pavlou Luca Prisciandaro Maira Tariq Editorial Board Hon Joseph A Greenaway Jr, Circuit Judge 3rd Circuit, US Court of Appeals. Hon Raymond J McKoski, Circuit Judge (retired), 19th Judicial Circuit Court, IL, Adjunct Professor of Law, The John Marshall Law School, Chicago, IL. Prof Antonio Aunion, University of Castille-la Mancha. Prof Francine Banner, Phoenix School of Law, AZ. Prof Devon W Carbado, UCLA, CA. Dr Damian Carney, University of Portsmouth, UK. Dr Simon Cooper, Reader in Property Law, Oxford Brookes University. Prof Randall T Coyne, Frank Elkouri and Edna Asper Elkouri Professor, College of Law, University of Oklahoma, Norman OK. Mark George QC, Garden Court Chambers, Manchester, UK. Prof Larry Hammond, Osborne Maledon PA, Phoenix AZ. Prof Carolyn Hoyle, Professor of Criminology, University of Oxford, UK. Prof James Kousouros, CALS Visiting Professor, NY. Prof Ian Loveland, City University London, UK. Prof James Maxeiner, Center for International & Comparative Law, University of Baltimore School of Law, Baltimore, MD. Prof Ruth Miller, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA. Dr Anne-Marie O’Connell, University Toulouse 1 Capitole. Prof Austin Sarat, William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence & Political Science, Amherst College, MA. Dr Stephen W Smith, University of Birmingham, UK. Prof Carrie Sperling, University of Wisconsin Law School. Prof Clive Stafford Smith, Reprieve. Dr Timothy Stanley, Professor of Law & Frank M. Johnson Faculty Scholar, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL. Prof Adam N. Steinman, Professor of Law & Frank M. Johnson Faculty Scholar, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL. Prof Russell Wheeler, The Brookings Institution, Washington DC. British Journal of American Legal Studies Volume 87 Issue 21 FallSpring 20 120189 CONTENTS Founding-Era Socialism: The Original Meaning of the Constitution’s Postal Clause LawRobert and G. Religion Natelson in Plymouth............................................................................................................................... Colony .............1 Scott Douglas Gerber .....................................................................................................................................167 Toward Natural Born Derivative Citizenship John Vlahoplus .................................................................................................................................................71 Cartel Control of Attorney Licensure and the Public Interest FelixRobert Frankfurter C. Fellmeth, and Bridget the Law Fogarty Gramme, C. Christopher Hayes ..........................................................193 Thomas Halper .............................................................................................................................................. 115 Henry Friendly and the Incorporation of the Bill of Rights FundamentalThomas Halper Rights ............................................................................................................................................... in Early American Case Law: 1789-1859 235 Nicholas P. Zinos ............................................................................................................................................ 137 Bad Company: The Corporate Appropriation of Nature, Divinity, and Personhood in U.S. Culture RichardThe Holmes Hardack Truth: ............................................................................................................................................. Toward a Pragmatic, Holmes-Influenced Conceptualization of the Nature of Truth 249 Jared Schroeder ............................................................................................................................................. 169 To Kill a Mockingbird and Legal Ethics: On the Role of Atticus Finch’s Attic Rhetoric in Fulfillment of Duties Acts of State, State Immunity, and Judicial Review in the United States to Client, to Court, to Society, and to Self Zia Akthar ........................................................................................................................................................ 205 Michelle Kundmueller ....................................................................................................................................289 (Mis)judging Ordinary Meaning?: Corpus Linguistics, the Frequency Fallacy, and the Extension-Abstraction Distinction in “Ordinary Meaning” Textualism Shlomo Klapper ..............................................................................................................................................327 “Felix Cohen Was the Blackstone of Federal Indian Law:” Taking the Comparison Seriously Adrien Habermacher ......................................................................................................................................371 Br. J. Am. Leg. Studies 8(2) (2019), DOI: 10.2478/bjals-2019-0016 Law and Religion in Plymouth Colony Scott Douglas Gerber* ABSTRACT 2020 marks the 400th anniversary of the planting of Plymouth Colony. Although the literature about Plymouth is voluminous, the discussion about law and religion has been inappropriately superficial to date. This article addresses the Pilgrims’ conception of law on matters of religion and the new insights into the Pilgrims’ story that can be ascertained by focusing on law. “Law” has been defined in many different ways by many different people throughout history. Aristotle, Cicero, Thomas Aquinas, and other proponents of natural law argued that law is the exercise of reason to deduce binding rules of moral behavior from nature’s or God’s creation. The renowned English positivist John Austin, in contrast, maintained that law is the command of the sovereign. To Karl von Savigny and other proponents of the so-called historical school, law is the unconscious embodiment of the common will of the people. To the philosophical school, law is the expression of idealized ethical custom. The dominant contemporary view seems to be that law is the reflection of social, political, and economic interests. For the Pilgrims of Plymouth Colony, law was both the memorialization of their commitment to the Word of God and an instrument for exercising social control so as to effectuate that commitment. The Pilgrims, of course, used law to regulate the more mundane aspects of life as well. Indeed, quantitatively speaking, more laws were enacted by the Pilgrims that addressed the day-to-day activities of life in Plymouth Colony than memorialized the Pilgrims’ commitment to eternal glory in the afterlife, but the latter was unquestionably more important, qualitatively speaking, than the former. In the oft-quoted words of a young William Bradford, “to keep a good conscience, and walk in such a way as God has prescribed in his Word, is a thing which I must prefer before you all, and above life itself.” KEYWORDS Plymouth Colony, law, religion, colonial America
Recommended publications
  • Board Rules and Regulations Relating to the Practices of Professional Engineering and Professional Land Surveying
    Board Rules and Regulations Relating to the Practices of Professional Engineering and Professional Land Surveying California Code of Regulations, Title 16, Division 5 §§ 400-476 Article 1. General Provisions 400. Introduction. These regulations are adopted by the Board in order to implement and make specific the Professional Engineers Act and the Professional Land Surveyors’ Act, Business and Professions Code Sections 6700, et seq., and 8700, et seq., respectively. 401. Declaratory Decisions. No decision or opinion issued by or on behalf of the Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Geologists shall be considered a declaratory decision pursuant to Government Code section 11465.10 through 11465.70 unless the decision or opinion specifically states that it is a declaratory decision issued pursuant to Government Code sections 11465.10 through 11465.70. 403. Location of Offices. The principal office of the Board is 2535 Capitol Oaks Drive, Suite 300, Sacramento, 95833-2944. All correspondence relating to the activities of the Board, including applications, renewals, and remittances, shall be directed to the Board’s office. 404. Definitions. For the purpose of the rules and regulations contained in this chapter, the following terms are defined. No definition contained herein authorizes the practice of engineering as defined in the Professional Engineers Act. (a) “ABET” means ABET, Inc., formerly known as the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. (b) “Agricultural engineering” is that branch of professional engineering which requires such education and experience as is necessary to understand and apply engineering principles to the design, construction, and use of specialized equipment, machines structures and materials relating to the agricultural industry and economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Remarks on Henry Friendly
    REMARKS ON HENRY FRIENDLY ON THE AWARD OF THE HENRY FRIENDLY MEDAL TO JUSTICE SANDRA DAY O’CONNOR Pierre N. Leval † RESIDENT RAMO CALLED ME a couple of days ago with a problem. Young people today (and this includes young- sters up to the age of 50) apparently do not know who Henry Friendly was or why the American Law Institute Pawards a medal in his name. Would I address those questions to- night? At first I was astonished by Roberta’s proposition. Friendly was revered as a god in the federal courts from 1958 to his death in 1986. In every area of the law on which he wrote, during a quarter century on the Second Circuit, his were the seminal and clarifying opinions to which everyone looked as providing and explaining the standards. Most of us who earn our keep by judging can expect to be de- servedly forgotten within weeks after we kick the bucket or hang up the robe and move to Florida. But for one whose judgments played † Pierre Leval is a Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. He delivered these remarks on October 20, 2011, at a dinner of the Council of the American Law Insti- tute. Copyright © 2012 Pierre N. Leval. 15 GREEN BAG 2D 257 Pierre N. Leval such a huge role, it is quite surprising – and depressing – that the memory of him has so rapidly faded. Later, a brief exploration why this might be so. I begin by recounting, for any who don’t know, what some pur- ple-robed eminences of the law have said about Friendly.
    [Show full text]
  • Title 245. State Board of Licensure for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors Chapter 15
    TITLE 245. STATE BOARD OF LICENSURE FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS CHAPTER 15. LICENSURE AND PRACTICE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS SUBCHAPTER 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS 245:15-1-3. Definitions The following words or terms, when used in the Rules of Procedure, shall have the following meaning, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. Definitions in 59 O.S. Section 475.2 and 65 O.S. Section 3-118 shall be read together with the definitions and interpretations provided in the Rules of Procedure of the Board. "Accessory to a corner" means any exclusively identifiable physical object whose spatial relationship to the corner is recorded. Accessories may be bearing trees, bearing objects, monuments, reference monuments, line trees, pits, mounds, charcoal filled bottles, steel or wooden stakes, or other objects. "Certify" or "Certification" or similar expressions relating to engineering or land surveying services shall mean a statement based upon facts and knowledge known to the licensee and is not a guarantee or warranty, either expressed or implied. "Closure error" means the ratio between the horizontal linear error of closure to the total horizontal distance traversed, with the numerator of the ratio being the number “one”. "Land or boundary survey" means a survey, the primary purpose of which includes, but is not limited to, the determining of the perimeter of a parcel or tract of land by establishing or reestablishing corners, monuments and boundary lines. "Linear closure" means a measure of the horizontal linear error without regard to direction, between the computed location of the first and last points of a traverse when either the traverse actually returns to its beginning point (geometrically and mathematically closed), or the traverse ends at a point of previously established control relative to the beginning point (geometrically open, but mathematically closed).
    [Show full text]
  • Rnlpnbyendorsementappinstru
    Nevada State Board of NURSING Nevada State Board of Nursing, 5011 Meadowood Mall Way, Suite 300, Reno, NV 89502-6547 Fax: (775) 687-7707 or (702) 486-4803, Email: [email protected] www.nevadanursingboard.org; Toll Free (888) 590-6726 To practice as an nurse in Nevada, you must hold an active Nevada license. Registered Nurse/License Practical Nurse by Endorsement Requirements You must submit items 1-4 Application Instructions: 1. A completed application submitted via the Nevada Nurse Portal, including a fee of $95 (LPN) $105 (RN) (MasterCard™, Visa™, Discover™, or AmericanExpress™ debit or credit card). Fees are not refundable. 2. A copy of evidence of graduation from your nursing education program. The document you submit must indicate a nursing degree and graduation date. * All graduates of nursing programs in the United States: * If you are an RN applicant, you must submit a copy of your diploma or official transcript issued directly from the registrar to the student or to the Board, which must indicate a nursing degree and graduation date. If you are an LPN applicant, you must submit a copy of your certificate or official transcript issued directly from the registrar to the student or to the Board, which must indicate a nursing degree or graduation date. Please note that computer-generated transcripts are not acceptable. * All graduates of international nursing programs: * You must submit a copy of your transcript, which must indicate a nursing degree and graduation date. You must include a copy of the related learning experience (RLE) report, if applicable. (The Board will notify you if you will also be required to complete the CGFNS/CES8 Professional Report OR IERF** Nursing Licensure Evaluation Report for the state of Nevada).
    [Show full text]
  • How to Read the Bill History Page Hb 2480
    HOW TO READ THE BILL HISTORY PAGE This tutorial will show you how to read the bill information and history page for a bill. This page and the next show the bill history for HB 2480 from the 2007-08 legislative session as it appears on the webpage. Beginning on page 3 this bill history is shown with a detailed explanation of what each line means. HB 2480 - 2007-08 (What is this?) Concerning public transportation fares. Sponsors: Clibborn, McIntire, Simpson Companion Bill: SB 6353 Go to documents. Go to videos. Bill History 2008 REGULAR SESSION Dec 21 Prefiled for introduction. Jan 14 First reading, referred to Transportation. (View Original Bill) Jan 17 Public hearing in the House Committee on Transportation at 3:30 PM. Jan 29 Executive action taken in the House Committee on Transportation at 3:30 PM. TR - Executive action taken by committee. TR - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass. (View 1st Substitute) Minority; do not pass. Feb 1 Passed to Rules Committee for second reading. Feb 12 Made eligible to be placed on second reading. Feb 13 Placed on second reading. Feb 14 1st substitute bill substituted (TR 08). (View 1st Substitute) Floor amendment(s) adopted. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading. Third reading, passed; yeas, 84; nays, 10; absent, 0; excused, 4. (View Roll Calls) (View 1st Engrossed) IN THE SENATE Feb 16 First reading, referred to Transportation. Feb 20 Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Transportation at 1:30 PM. Feb 26 Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Transportation at 3:30 PM.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS ANNUAL REPORT July 1,1996-June 30,1997 Main Office Washington Office The Harold Pratt House 1779 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. 58 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10021 Washington, DC 20036 Tel. (212) 434-9400; Fax (212) 861-1789 Tel. (202) 518-3400; Fax (202) 986-2984 Website www. foreignrela tions. org e-mail publicaffairs@email. cfr. org OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS, 1997-98 Officers Directors Charlayne Hunter-Gault Peter G. Peterson Term Expiring 1998 Frank Savage* Chairman of the Board Peggy Dulany Laura D'Andrea Tyson Maurice R. Greenberg Robert F Erburu Leslie H. Gelb Vice Chairman Karen Elliott House ex officio Leslie H. Gelb Joshua Lederberg President Vincent A. Mai Honorary Officers Michael P Peters Garrick Utley and Directors Emeriti Senior Vice President Term Expiring 1999 Douglas Dillon and Chief Operating Officer Carla A. Hills Caryl R Haskins Alton Frye Robert D. Hormats Grayson Kirk Senior Vice President William J. McDonough Charles McC. Mathias, Jr. Paula J. Dobriansky Theodore C. Sorensen James A. Perkins Vice President, Washington Program George Soros David Rockefeller Gary C. Hufbauer Paul A. Volcker Honorary Chairman Vice President, Director of Studies Robert A. Scalapino Term Expiring 2000 David Kellogg Cyrus R. Vance Jessica R Einhorn Vice President, Communications Glenn E. Watts and Corporate Affairs Louis V Gerstner, Jr. Abraham F. Lowenthal Hanna Holborn Gray Vice President and Maurice R. Greenberg Deputy National Director George J. Mitchell Janice L. Murray Warren B. Rudman Vice President and Treasurer Term Expiring 2001 Karen M. Sughrue Lee Cullum Vice President, Programs Mario L. Baeza and Media Projects Thomas R.
    [Show full text]
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE. March 10
    1776 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE. MARcH 10, H. Owen and ofW. W. Welch-severally to the Committee on Wax braces some six or seven hundred miles of road under one control, Claims. and, talring it in connection with its control of the Georgia road, By Mr. A.. HERR SMITH: The petition of soldiers and sailors of more than that. That is all worked in connection with the expor­ the late war for an increase of pension to all pensioners who lost an tation of productions at Savannah. The Louisville and Nashville arm and leg while in the line of duty-to the Committee on Invalid system, which is very prominent and controls probably some two Pensions. thousand miles of road, or more, works in harmony with the Central. By Mr. STONE: The petition of Patrick McDonald, to be placed That combination of roads naturally looks to Savannah as an outlet on the retired list-to the Committee on Military Affairs. for a great deal of the produce that is shipped over its lines. There By Mr. TALBOTT: Papers relating to the claim of Alexander M. is then the line by way of'the Georgia and Cent.ral, through Atlanta Templeton-to the Committee on War Claims. over the Stat.e Road~ as it is called, by the Nashville, Chattanoo~a By Mr. URNER: Papers relating to the claim of Robertson Topp antl Saint Louis, al o connecting with the Louisville and Nashviue and William L. Vance-to the same committee. Road to the western cities. There are the same connections up to By Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Bills of Attainder
    University at Buffalo School of Law Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship Winter 2016 Bills of Attainder Matthew Steilen University at Buffalo School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles Part of the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation Matthew Steilen, Bills of Attainder, 53 Hous. L. Rev. 767 (2016). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/journal_articles/123 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLE BILLS OF ATTAINDER Matthew Steilen* ABSTRACT What are bills of attainder? The traditional view is that bills of attainder are legislation that punishes an individual without judicial process. The Bill of Attainder Clause in Article I, Section 9 prohibits the Congress from passing such bills. But what about the President? The traditional view would seem to rule out application of the Clause to the President (acting without Congress) and to executive agencies, since neither passes bills. This Article aims to bring historical evidence to bear on the question of the scope of the Bill of Attainder Clause. The argument of the Article is that bills of attainder are best understood as a summary form of legal process, rather than a legislative act. This argument is based on a detailed historical reconstruction of English and early American practices, beginning with a study of the medieval Parliament rolls, year books, and other late medieval English texts, and early modern parliamentary diaries and journals covering the attainders of Elizabeth Barton under Henry VIII and Thomas Wentworth, earl of Strafford, under Charles I.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Friday Volume 497 16 October 2009 No. 125 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Friday 16 October 2009 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2009 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 551 16 OCTOBER 2009 552 Solicitor-General to make a statement about the Yvonne House of Commons Fletcher case? It emerged last night that, two years ago, a senior lawyer carried out an independent review of Friday 16 October 2009 the case for the Crown Prosecution Service in which he said that the two Libyans involved could be charged for conspiracy to cause death. Neither had diplomatic The House met at half-past Nine o’clock immunity; they escaped from the Libyan embassy. The report made it clear that both those men played an instrumental role in the murder of WPC Yvonne Fletcher. PRAYERS Last night, as I said, it emerged that the Crown Prosecution Service had confirmed that, two years on, The Second Deputy Chairman of Ways and Means took the police had still not provided it with the final case file the Chair as Deputy Speaker (Standing Order No. 3). containing the admissible evidence. Surely the Home Secretary should make a statement explaining why the NEW WRIT Metropolitan police are sitting on that vital evidence, Ordered, and to put our minds at rest by assuring us that Britain’s That the Speaker do issue his Warrant to the Clerk of the trade interests are not being put before the interests of Crown, to make out a new Writ for the electing of a Member to bringing criminals to justice.
    [Show full text]
  • "In the Pilgrim Way" by Linda Ashley, A
    In the Pilgrim Way The First Congregational Church, Marshfield, Massachusetts 1640-2000 Linda Ramsey Ashley Marshfield, Massachusetts 2001 BIBLIO-tec Cataloging in Publication Ashley, Linda Ramsey [1941-] In the pilgrim way: history of the First Congregational Church, Marshfield, MA. Bibliography Includes index. 1. Marshfield, Massachusetts – history – churches. I. Ashley, Linda R. F74. 2001 974.44 Manufactured in the United States. First Edition. © Linda R. Ashley, Marshfield, MA 2001 Printing and binding by Powderhorn Press, Plymouth, MA ii Table of Contents The 1600’s 1 Plimoth Colony 3 Establishment of Green’s Harbor 4 Establishment of First Parish Church 5 Ministry of Richard Blinman 8 Ministry of Edward Bulkley 10 Ministry of Samuel Arnold 14 Ministry of Edward Tompson 20 The 1700’s 27 Ministry of James Gardner 27 Ministry of Samuel Hill 29 Ministry of Joseph Green 31 Ministry of Thomas Brown 34 Ministry of William Shaw 37 The 1800’s 43 Ministry of Martin Parris 43 Ministry of Seneca White 46 Ministry of Ebenezer Alden 54 Ministry of Richard Whidden 61 Ministry of Isaac Prior 63 Ministry of Frederic Manning 64 The 1900’s 67 Ministry of Burton Lucas 67 Ministry of Daniel Gross 68 Ministry of Charles Peck 69 Ministry of Walter Squires 71 Ministry of J. Sherman Gove 72 Ministry of George W. Zartman 73 Ministry of William L. Halladay 74 Ministry of J. Stanley Bellinger 75 Ministry of Edwin C. Field 76 Ministry of George D. Hallowell 77 Ministry of Vaughn Shedd 82 Ministry of William J. Cox 85 Ministry of Robert H. Jackson 87 Other Topics Colonial Churches of New England 92 United Church of Christ 93 Church Buildings or Meetinghouses 96 The Parsonages 114 Organizations 123 Sunday School and Youth 129 Music 134 Current Officers, Board, & Committees 139 Gifts to the Church 141 Memorial Funds 143 iii The Centuries The centuries look down from snowy heights Upon the plains below, While man looks upward toward those beacon lights Of long ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Temporary Officers
    2019] 753 TEMPORARY OFFICERS James A. Heilpern* INTRODUCTION In Lucia v. Securities and Exchange Commission,1 the Supreme Court held that an administrative law judge in the Securities and Exchange Com- mission (“SEC”) qualifies as an “Officer of the United States” under the Ap- pointments Clause of the Constitution.2 The Appointments Clause estab- lishes as a default rule that all “Officers of the United States” are to be nom- inated by the President “by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate.”3 There are only two exceptions to this rule: (1) Officers “whose Appointments are . otherwise provided for” in the Constitution, such as the President, Vice President, and Congressional Officers;4 and (2) “inferior Officers” if— and only if—Congress has affirmatively “vest[ed]” their appointment “in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.”5 Alt- hough Congress had specifically authorized the Commission—the head of the SEC—to appoint administrative law judges (“ALJs”),6 all parties to the case agreed that the ALJs in question were actually selected by “[o]ther staff members, rather than the Commission proper.”7 As such, the “sole question [for the Court to decide was] whether the [SEC]’s ALJs are ‘Officers of the United States’ or simply employees of the Federal Government.”8 * James A. Heilpern (J.D. 2015) is a Research Fellow at the J. Reuben Clark Law School at Brigham Young University. He would like to express gratitude to the C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State at the Antonin Scalia Law School at George Mason University and the George Mason Law Review for the generous stipend and feedback.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Law Mark A
    Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 48 | Issue 2 Article 13 1983 Aviation Law Mark A. Dombroff Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended Citation Mark A. Dombroff, Aviation Law, 48 J. Air L. & Com. 453 (1983) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol48/iss2/13 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. Book Reviews AVIATION LAW by Andreas F. Lowenfeld. New York: Matthew Bender & Co., 1981 Edition. pp. 1411. In 1972, Andreas Lowenfeld published the first edition of AVIATION LAW.' In the introduction to that book, Professor Lowenfeld related the challenge presented by Judge Henry Friendly: Some years ago, Judge Henry Friendly, who made his career in large part as a brilliant and imaginative general counsel for Pan American World Airways, reviewed an earlier attempt to collect materials on aviation law by asking whether it made sense to treat this subject at all. "In order to make out a case for separate treatment," he wrote, "it must be shown that the heads of a given subject can be examined in a more illuminating fashion with reference to each other than with references to other branches of law." With respect to the book under review, Judge Friendly's answer was "a resounding no."' Professor Lowenfeld went on to accept the challenge and in the seven chapters of the first edition of AVIATION LAW presented the reader with an overview of the economic, regulatory, tort, and social considerations that have grown up in the law relating to the aviation industry.
    [Show full text]