Lessons from Department of Defense Disaster Relief Efforts in the Asia-Pacific Region

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lessons from Department of Defense Disaster Relief Efforts in the Asia-Pacific Region CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that EDUCATION AND THE ARTS helps improve policy and decisionmaking through ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT research and analysis. HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from INFRASTRUCTURE AND www.rand.org as a public service of the RAND TRANSPORTATION Corporation. INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Support RAND Purchase this document TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY Browse Reports & Bookstore Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND National Security Research Division View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This report is part of the RAND Corporation research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for re- search quality and objectivity. Lessons from Department of Defense Disaster Relief Efforts in the Asia-Pacific Region Jennifer D. P. Moroney, Stephanie Pezard, Laurel E. Miller, Jeffrey Engstrom, Abby Doll C O R P O R A T I O N NATIONAL SECURITY RESEARCH DIVISION Lessons from Department of Defense Disaster Relief Efforts in the Asia-Pacific Region Jennifer D. P. Moroney, Stephanie Pezard, Laurel E. Miller, Jeffrey Engstrom, Abby Doll Prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense Approved for public release; distribution unlimited This research was sponsored by the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy and conducted within the International Security and Defense Policy Center of the RAND National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant Commands, the Navy, the Marine Corps, the Defense agencies, and the defense Intelligence Community under Contract W74V8H-06-0002. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Moroney, Jennifer D. P., 1973- Lessons from Department of Defense disaster relief efforts in the Asia-Pacific Region / Jennifer D. P. Moroney, Stephanie Pezard, Laurel E. Miller, Jeffrey Engstrom, Abby Doll. pages cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-0-8330-8043-1 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. United States—Armed Forces—Civic action—Case studies. 2. Disaster relief— Pacific Area—Case studies. 3. Disaster relief—United States—Evaluation. 4. United States. Department of Defense—Rules and practice—Evaluation. 5. Humanitarian assistance—United States—Evaluation. 6. Humanitarian assistance—Pacific Area— Case studies. 7. Emergency management—Case studies. 8. Integrated operations (Military science)—Case studies. I. Title. II. Title: Lessons from DoD support to foreign disasters in the Asia-Pacific Region.management. I. Title. UH723.M69 2013 363.34'80973 —dc23 2013022939 The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND—make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute.html R® is a registered trademark © Copyright 2013 RAND Corporation This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see the RAND permissions page (www.rand.org/pubs/ permissions.html). RAND OFFICES SANTA MONICA, CA • WASHINGTON, DC PITTSBURGH, PA • NEW ORLEANS, LA • JACKSON, MS • BOSTON, MA DOHA, QA • CAMBRIDGE, UK • BRUSSELS, BE www.rand.org Preface The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) has long been able to play a major role in international disaster relief thanks to its budget, man- power, and forward-deployed resources. The Office of the Under Secre- tary of Defense for Policy asked RAND to help DoD and the broader U.S. policymaking community underline the key lessons from major humanitarian assistance/disaster response (HA/DR) operations in which DoD played a key role based on four cases: Cyclone Nargis in Burma (2008); the Padang earthquake in Indonesia (2009); monsoon floods in Pakistan (2010); and the earthquake, tsunami, and nuclear disaster in Japan (2011). This report highlights key lessons for DoD involvement in HA/ DR with regard to communication with the affected country, coor- dination with other state and non-state actors, regional best practices with regard to HA/DR coordination, and prospects for security coop- eration and building partner capacity (BPC) programs for disaster response capacity. This report should interest military leaders and staff concerned with increasing the effectiveness of U.S. HA/DR interven- tions and HA/DR–focused engagement activities. This research was sponsored by the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy and conducted within the International Security and Defense Policy Center of the RAND National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center spon- sored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the -Uni fied Combatant Commands, the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and the defense Intelligence Community. iii iv Lessons from DoD Disaster Relief Efforts in the Asia-Pacific Region For more information on the International Security and Defense Policy Center, see http://www.rand.org/nsrd/ndri/centers/isdp.html or contact the director (contact information is provided on the web page). Contents Preface ............................................................................. iii Figures ............................................................................. ix Tables .............................................................................. xi Summary .........................................................................xiii Acknowledgements ........................................................... xxiii Abbreviations ................................................................... xxv CHaptER ONE Introduction ....................................................................... 1 Study Objectives ................................................................... 2 DoD’s Role in HA/DR Operations .............................................. 3 Guidance and Funding Authorities ............................................ 4 Overview of DoD Capabilities and Resources in Disaster Relief Operations ................................................................... 6 Analytical Approach ............................................................... 9 Organization of This Report .....................................................12 CHaptER TWO Cyclone Nargis (Burma) ........................................................15 Background ........................................................................16 U.S. DoD Involvement and Interagency Coordination ......................18 Scale and Organization of DoD Effort .......................................18 Coordination with Other U.S. Actors ....................................... 23 DoD Coordination with the Recipient Country ............................ 24 DoD Coordination with International and Regional Actors ............... 27 U.S. Partners and Other Countries .......................................... 27 v vi Lessons from DoD Disaster Relief Efforts in the Asia-Pacific Region International and Regional Organizations ...................................31 Conclusions .......................................................................35 U.S. Security Cooperation Considerations ..................................35 Overall Considerations for DoD ............................................. 36 CHaptER THREE Padang Earthquake, West Sumatra (Indonesia) ...........................41 Background ....................................................................... 42 U.S. DoD Involvement and Interagency Coordination ..................... 44 Scale and Organization of DoD Effort ...................................... 44 Coordination with Other U.S. Actors ....................................... 48 DoD Coordination with Recipient Country ..................................49 DoD Coordination with International and Regional Actors ............... 50 U.S. Partners and Other Countries .......................................... 50 International and Regional Organizations
Recommended publications
  • March of the Carriers, by Sarosh Bana
    scholar warrior March of the Carriers SAROSH BANA Aircraft carriers are finding favour with Indo-Asia-Pacific countries keen on bolstering their defences in an increasingly volatile neighbourhood With simmering territorial disputes inflaming the Indo-Asia-Pacific, countries in this fastest growing economic region in the world are making all efforts to buttress their defences. In their anxiety to batten down the hatches, several of these countries are viewing the aircraft carrier as the preferred platform for sea control and are pulling out all the stops to commit funding for it. These platforms, at times amphibious ships that are essentially helicopter destroyers with the potential to operate fixed-wing aircraft, including drones, have been gaining favour as the South and East China Seas find themselves in the cross- hairs of territorial ambitions. But this military build-up is raising tensions even higher in the region and is likely to provoke an avoidable arms race. As many as 18 flatdecks have been, or are being, bought, built or operated by the six regional powers: China (five), Japan (four), India (four), Australia (two), South Korea (two) and Thailand (one). Last August, India launched its 37,500-tonne indigenous aircraft carrier, the Vikrant, while Japan launched its 19,500-tonne Izumo, modelled more as a destroyer with a flight deck that can embark helicopters. With the Vikrant, India is now part of an exclusive group of countries like the UK, the US, Italy, Spain, Russia and France that can make these floating airfields. China has already started building its own maiden aircraft carrier at the Beijing-based China Shipbuilding Industry Corporation, which is scheduled for completion 8 ä AUTUMN 2014 ä scholar warrior scholar warrior China spends in 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributed by Darryl Baker
    Decomm,SS′Omng UNI丁ED SRAT格§ SHIP TORTUeA IL§D「26) ON BOARD u§§ TOR丁UeA (LiD。21) INACTlVATION SHIP MAiNTENANCE FAC看LITY, VALしEJO, CALiFORNIA MONDAY 26 JANUARY NINETEEN HUNDRED AND SEVENTY AT lO:00 O’CLOCK DECOMMl§§iON看Ne C各R格MONY DECOMMISSIONiNG Presentation o書lhe USS TORTuGA (LSD"26) to Commanding O楯cer, Inac章ivation Ship Maintenance Fac珊y Vallejo HISTORY OF USS TORTUeA (し§D〃26) U.S.S. TOR同GÅ was built a‥he U.S. Naval Shipy叫Boston, and COmmissioned on 8 June 1945. She joined 〔he Amphibious Force, U.S. Pacific FIeet and served as paJ…f 〔he Mobile Support Fbrce before being decommjssioned in Åugust 1947. The firs亡rsD to be rccommissioned ahe‥he outbrcak of Korean Hosulities’TORTUGÅ was reac`ivated at San Diego qu 15 S叩mbe[ 1950. (The ILSD’s proven capabiliries jn World War II dictaed tha' they all be re‘伽issioned for Iforcan service; this was true of no other type Ship.) TORTUGA par〔icipated in the Inchon Landing in February 195l and in various other fleet呼重atichs言ncluding the 1953 prisoner-Of-War exchangc. Now hom叩re吊n I‘Ong Beach, TORmGA dやkys rcguhrly to the Western pa。fic for drty with the U.S. Seventh Fha In recent years, the frequency of these deployments has increased jn sup叩of the Viet- namese act-On. TORTUGA and orher ISD,s have been insmmenta=n OPerational support in the Rqublic of Vierrlam, In August and Sq,〔enber 1964, TORTUGA stcaned in company Wi〔h other ships of Amphibious Squadron皿ee for 58 days con亡inuous・ ly near the Vie〔namese coast’rendy to land her embarked M壷nes and Ianding craft on a few hours・ no〔ice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kra Canal and Thai Security
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Calhoun, Institutional Archive of the Naval Postgraduate School Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2002-06 The Kra Canal and Thai security Thongsin, Amonthep Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/5829 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California THESIS THE KRA CANAL AND THAI SECURITY by Amonthep Thongsin June 2002 Thesis Advisor: Robert E. Looney Thesis Co-Advisor: William Gates Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED June 2002 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE: The Kra Canal and Thai Security 5. FUNDING NUMBERS 6. AUTHOR(S) Thongsin, Amonthep 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING Naval Postgraduate School ORGANIZATION REPORT Monterey, CA 93943-5000 NUMBER 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Livestock Disaster Economics
    Report prepared by: Economists at Large Pty Ltd Melbourne, Australia www.ecolarge.com [email protected] Phone: +61 3 9005 0154 Fax: +61 3 8080 1604 Citation: Campbell, R., Knowles, T., 2011. The economic impacts of losing livestock in a disaster, a report for the World Society for the Protection of Animals (WSPA), prepared by Economists at Large, Melbourne, Australia. Disclaimer: The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and may not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official position of the organisations involved. This report is distributed with the understanding that the authors are not responsible for the results of any actions undertaken on the basis of the information that is contained within, nor for any omission from, or error in, this publication Contents Summary____________________________________________________________ 5 Structure of the report _________________________________________________ 9 Introduction ________________________________________________________ 10 What do we mean by “livestock”? _____________________________________________ 11 What is a disaster? _________________________________________________________ 12 Section 1: Livestock in economies _______________________________________ 14 The role of livestock ________________________________________________________ 14 Livestock in high-income countries ____________________________________________ 14 Livestock in low-income countries _____________________________________________ 16 Livestock and food _________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Variability Examination of Mediterranean Frontogenesis
    Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., doi:10.5194/nhess-2015-290, 2016 Manuscript under review for journal Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. NHESSD Published: 15 January 2016 doi:10.5194/nhess-2015-290 © Author(s) 2016. CC-BY 3.0 License. This discussion paper is/has been under review for the journal Natural Hazards and Earth Dynamic variability System Sciences (NHESS). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in NHESS if available. examination of Mediterranean Dynamic variability examination of frontogenesis B. A. Munir et al. Mediterranean frontogenesis: teleconnection of fronts and flood 2010 Title Page Abstract Introduction B. A. Munir1, H. A. Imran2, and I. Ashraf3 Conclusions References 1National Weather Forecasting Unit, Aviation Division, Pakistan Meteorological Department, Islamabad, Pakistan Tables Figures 2Environmental Protection and Agriculture Food Production, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany J I 3Institute of GIS, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan J I Received: 18 October 2015 – Accepted: 5 December 2015 – Published: 15 January 2016 Back Close Correspondence to: B. A. Munir ([email protected]) Full Screen / Esc Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. Printer-friendly Version Interactive Discussion 1 Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Abstract NHESSD An improved scheme for the detection of Mediterranean frontal activities is proposed, based on the identification of cloud pattern, thermal gradient and water content of air doi:10.5194/nhess-2015-290 masses using Meteosat-7 satellite imagery. Owing to highly variable nature of fronts, 5 spatial shift occurring over 1.5 years are analyzed.
    [Show full text]
  • As Proof of Seafarer Vaccinations Poses Legal Minefield
    DAILY COLLECTION OF MARITIME PRESS CLIPPINGS 2021– 083 Number 083 *** COLLECTION OF MARITIME PRESS CLIPPINGS *** Wednesday 24-03-2021 News reports received from readers and Internet News articles copied from various news sites & Social Media The 1998 Meyer Werft Papenburg built 146 mtr long Indonesian Pelni ferry KELUD outbound from Sekupang Port - Batam heading for Belawan-Medan at Sumatera. Photo : Piet Sinke www.maasmondmaritime.com (c) CLICK at the photo & hyperlink in text to view and/or download the photo(s) ! Distribution : daily to 43.350+ active addresses 24-03-2021 Page 1 DAILY COLLECTION OF MARITIME PRESS CLIPPINGS 2021– 083 Your feedback is important to me so please drop me an email if you have any photos / articles that may be of interest to the maritime interested people at sea and ashore PLEASE SEND ALL CORRESPONDENCE / PHOTOS / ARTICLES TO : [email protected] this above email address is monitored 24/7 PLEASE DONT CLICK ON REPLY AS THE NEWSLETTER IS SENt OUT FROM AN UNMANNED SERVER If you don't like to receive this bulletin anymore : please send an e-mail to the above e- mail adress for prompt action your e-mail adress will be deleted ASAP from the server EVENTS, INCIDENTS & OPERATIONS Message to readers: All banners are inter-active and click through to advertiser web sites The Damen Shipyards group built BRUTUS passing the Baanhoekbridge Photo : Arie Boer © Distribution : daily to 43.350+ active addresses 24-03-2021 Page 2 DAILY COLLECTION OF MARITIME PRESS CLIPPINGS 2021– 083 John Angelicoussis suffers heart attack, daughter takes over as interim CEO By : Sam Chambers John Angelicoussis, 72, Greece’s largest shipowner, suffered a heart attack on Saturday and is in a serious condition at a hospital in Athens.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Table 1. Joint Meritorious Unit Award
    Table 1. Joint Meritorious Unit Award – Approved DoD Activities The following table lists, by DoD activity and inclusive dates, the approved Joint Meritorious Unit Awards. DoD Activity Inclusive Dates Electronic Warfare During Close Air Support Joint Test Force 15 Mar 76 – 30 Sep 82 Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, DC 22 Mar 77 – 3 Sep 86 Atlantic Command Electronic Intelligence Center 1 Jan 79 – 31 Dec 83 4477th Test and Evaluation Squadron (USAF) 1 Feb 79 – 1 Feb 84 Joint Deployment Agency 1 May 79 – 14 Apr 87 U.S. Defense Attaché Office, San Salvador, El Salvador 1 Oct 79 – 30 Apr 81 Joint Communications Support Element, U.S. Readiness Command 1 Nov 79 – 31 Dec 83 Defense Language Institute English Language Center 1 Jan 80 – 30 Jun 83 Intelligence Center Pacific 1 Sep 80 – 21 Mar 83 Joint Special Operations Support Element, U.S. Readiness 30 Sep 80 – 30 Sep 84 Command Joint United States Military Mission for Aid to Turkey, United 18 Dec 80 – 30 Jun 86 States European Command United States Military Liaison Mission to CINC, Group of Soviet 1 Jan 81 – 31 Mar 85 Forces in Germany (EUCOM) United States Military Group El Salvador (1st Award) 1 Jan 81 – 7 Jun 85 Defense Nuclear Agency 1 Jul 81 – 30 Jun 84 Commander in Chief, Allied Forces Southern Europe Band 1 Oct 81 – 31 Mar 83 U.S. Liaison Office Morocco 1 Oct 81 – 30 Jun 83 Office of Military Cooperation Cairo, Egypt 1 Oct 81 – 30 Sep 83 U.S. Defense Attaché Office Nicosia, Cyprus 1 Jun 82 – 31 Dec 83 Defense Mapping Agency 1 Jun 82 – 1 Jun 84 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 James Kraska
    C URRICULUM V ITAE James Kraska Stockton Center for the Study of International Law United States Naval War College 686 Cushing Rd. Newport, RI 02841 (401) 841-1536 [email protected] Education S.J.D. University of Virginia School of Law LL.M. University of Virginia School of Law J.D. Indiana University Maurer School of Law M.A.I.S. School of Politics and Economic, Claremont Graduate School B.A. Mississippi State University, summa cum laude Professional Experience Present Chairman and Howard S. Levie Professor (Full professor with tenure) Stockton Center for the Study of International Law, U.S. Naval War College Fall 2017 Visiting Professor of Law and John Harvey Gregory Lecturer on World Organization, Harvard Law School 2013-14 Mary Derrickson McCurdy Visiting Scholar, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University 2008-13 Professor of Law, Stockton Center for the Study of International Law, U.S. Naval War College Fall 2012 Visiting Professor of Law, University of Maine School of Law 2007-08 Director, International Negotiations Division, Global Security Affairs, Joint Staff, Pentagon 2005-07 Oceans Law and Policy Adviser, Joint Staff, Pentagon 2002-05 Deputy Legal Adviser, Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Plans, Policy and Operations, Pentagon 2001-02 International Law Adviser, Office of the Navy Judge Advocate General, Pentagon 1999-01 Legal Adviser, Expeditionary Strike Group Seven/Task Force 76, Japan 1996-99 Legal Adviser, Dep’t of Defense Joint Interagency Task Force West 1993-96 Criminal Trial Litigator, U.S. Naval Legal Service Office, Japan 1992-93 Post-Doctoral Fellow, Marine Policy Center, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution * 1993-2013, Judge Advocate General’s Corps, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq: Summary of U.S
    Order Code RL31763 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Iraq: Summary of U.S. Forces Updated March 14, 2005 Linwood B. Carter Information Research Specialist Knowledge Services Group Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Iraq: Summary of U.S. Forces Summary This report provides a summary estimate of military forces that have reportedly been deployed to and subsequently withdrawn from the U.S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) Area of Responsibility (AOR), popularly called the Persian Gulf region, to support Operation Iraqi Freedom. For background information on the AOR, see [http://www.centcom.mil/aboutus/aor.htm]. Geographically, the USCENTCOM AOR stretches from the Horn of Africa to Central Asia. The information about military units that have been deployed and withdrawn is based on both official government public statements and estimates identified in selected news accounts. The statistics have been assembled from both Department of Defense (DOD) sources and open-source press reports. However, due to concerns about operational security, DOD is not routinely reporting the composition, size, or destination of units and military forces being deployed to the Persian Gulf. Consequently, not all has been officially confirmed. For further reading, see CRS Report RL31701, Iraq: U.S. Military Operations. This report will be updated as the situation continues to develop. Contents U.S. Forces.......................................................1 Military Units: Deployed/En Route/On Deployment Alert ..............1
    [Show full text]
  • The 2010 Pakistan Floods Began in Late July 2010 As a Result of Heavy
    INTRODUCTION: The 2010 Pakistan floods began in late July 2010 as a result of heavy monsoon rains in the provinces of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), Sindh, Punjab and Baluchistan and affected the Indus River basin. Pakistan has a total land area equal to 796,096 square kilometers (307,374 square miles). Approximately one-fifth of Pakistan's total land area was underwater during the 2010 floods. According to Pakistani government data the floods directly affected about 20 million people, mostly by destruction of property, livelihood and infrastructure, with a death toll of close to 2,000. The Indus River originates in the Tibetan plateau. The river runs a course through the Ladakh region of Jammu and Kashmir, Gilgit, Baltistan and flows through Pakistan in a southerly direction along the entire length of Pakistan to merge into the Arabian Sea near the port city of Karachi in Sindh. The total length of the river is 3,180 km (1,980 mi). It is Pakistan's longest river. UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon had initially asked for US$460 million for emergency relief, noting that the flood was the worst disaster he had ever seen. Only 20% of the relief funds requested had been received as of 15 August 2010. The U.N. had been concerned that aid was not arriving fast enough, and the World Health Organization reported that ten million people were forced to drink unsafe water. The Pakistani economy was harmed by extensive damage to infrastructure and crops. Almost 65% of the labor force in Pakistan is involved in agricultural activities.
    [Show full text]
  • JMSDF Staff College Review Volume 1 Number 2 English Version (Selected)
    JMSDF Staff College Review Volume 1 Number 2 English Version (Selected) JMSDF STAFF COLLEGE REVIEW JAPAN MARITIME SELF-DEFENSE FORCE STAFF COLLEGE REVIEW Volume1 Number2 English Version (Selected) MAY 2012 Humanitarian Assistance / Disaster Relief : Through the Great East Japan Earthquake Foreword YAMAMOTO Toshihiro 2 Japan-U.S. Joint Operation in the Great East Japan Earthquake : New Aspects of the Japan-U.S. Alliance SHIMODAIRA Takuya 3 Disaster Relief Operations by the Imperial Japanese Navy and the US Navy in the 1923 Great Kanto Earthquake : Focusing on the activities of the on-site commanders KURATANI Masashi 30 of the Imperial Japanese Navy and the US Navy Contributors From the Editors Cover: Disaster Reief Operation by LCAC in the Great East Japan Earthquake 1 JMSDF Staff College Review Volume 1 Number 2 English Version (Selected) JMSDF Staff College Review Volume 1 Number 2 English Version (Selected) Foreword It is one year on that Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force Staff College Review was published in last May. Thanks to the supports and encouragements by the readers in and out of the college, we successfully published this fourth volume with a special number. It is true that we received many supports and appreciation from not only Japan but also overseas. Now that HA/DR mission has been widely acknowledged as military operation in international society, it is quite meaningful for us who have been through the Great East Japan Earthquake to provide research sources with international society. Therefore, we have selected two papers from Volume 1 Number 2, featuring HA/DR and published as an English version.
    [Show full text]
  • UNDP Myanmar Responds to Cyclone Nargis
    UNDP Myanmar responds MATTERS OF FACT to Cyclone Nargis • 40 UNDP and its implementing partner NGO PACT offices in the Ayeyarwady Delta UNDP moved into action within 24 hours after Cyclone • 23 field teams active in the worst affected areas Nargis hit Myanmar on 2-3 May. The storm carved a • 500 national staff and project personnel working in the path of destruction that left 133,653 dead or missing delta and being mobilized for Cyclone Nargis response and 2.4 million severely affected by the crisis. operations • 5 UNDP offices functioning as ‘base camp’ for UN The cyclone’s 120-mile per hour winds and resulting organizations and international NGOs delivering to, and storm surge were particularly devastating in the working in Bogale, Mawlamyinegyun, Labutta, Ayeyarwady Delta, where entire villages were flattened. Ngapudaw and Kyaiklat • 2.4 million people severely affected by Cyclone UNDP is the only UN organization with field offices Nargis across Myanmar located in the region, which, prior to the cyclone was • 1.4 million people affected in the Ayeyarwady delta, home to seven million people. UNDP staff and families the hardest hit region of Myanmar experienced the natural disaster first-hand, as did those • 43,241 estimated total beneficiaries from UNDP coordinated relief efforts as of 21 May who work for partner non-governmental organization (NGO) PACT, which lost five of its project personnel. Supporting relief efforts: UNDP sent rotating teams UNDP has 40 functioning field offices in the delta and of national staff to work with and relieve its field staff in current field staff strength of more than 500 five of the affected townships – Bogale, experienced national staff and project personnel, Mawlamyinegyun, Labutta, Ngapudaw and Kyaiklat – including those of PACT.
    [Show full text]