Johan Terryn Zijn Punkers Passé?
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
28102259-101 Principles of European Law on Commercial
Principles of European Law on Commercial Agency, Franchise and Distribution Contracts (PEL CAFDC) Principles of European Law Study Group on a European Civil Code Commercial Agency, Franchise and Distribution Contracts (PEL CAFDC) prepared by Martijn W. Hesselink Jacobien W. Rutgers Odavia Bueno Díaz Manola Scotton Muriel Veldman with advice from the Advisory Council approved by the Co-ordinating Group Sellier. Stæmpfli European Law Publishers Publishers Ltd. Berne The Dutch Working Team Georgios Arnokouros LL M (Greek Law), Professor Maurits Barendrecht (Team Leader), Lic. Rui Miguel Prista Patrı´cio Casca˜o (Portuguese Law), Odavia Bueno Diaz LL M Leuven (Spanish Law), John Dickie (Team Manager Utrecht, English Law, until 2002), Giuseppe Donatello, Professor Martijn Hesselink (Team Leader), Dr. Viola Heutger (Team Manager Utrecht), Professor Ewoud Hondius (Team Leader), Dr. Christoph Jeloschek (Austrian Law), Roland Lohnert (until June 2002), Prof. Marco Loos (Team Manager Tilburg), Dr. Andrea Pinna (French Law), Dr. Jacobien Rutgers (Team Manager Amsterdam, since April 2001), Dott.ssa. Manola Scotton (Italian Law), Dr. Hanna Sivesand (Swedish Law), Mr. Muriel Veldman (Dutch Law), Mr. Hester Wattendorff (Team Manager Amsterdam, until July 2000), Aneta Wiewiorowska (Polish law) External Reporters: Dr. Andre Jansen (Mnster) (German law), Dr. Soili Nysten-Haarala, (Finnish reporter) The Advisory Council on Commercial Agency, Franchise and Distribution Contracts Professor Johny Herre (Stockholm), Professor Je´roˆme Huet (Paris), Professor Ewan McKendrick (Oxford), Professor Peter Schlechtriem (Freiburg i.Br.), Professor Hugh Beale (London/Warwick), Professor Christina Ramberg (Stockholm) The Co-ordinating Group Professor Guido Alpa (Genua/Rome), Professor Kaspars Balodis (Riga, since December 2004), Professor Christian v. Bar (Osnabrck), Professor Maurits Barendrecht (Tilburg), Professor Hugh Beale (London), Professor Michael Joachim Bonell (Rome), Professor Mifsud G. -
EVS-Bibliography 07/2018 - - [email protected]
- EVS-Bibliography 07/2018 - http://www.europeanvaluesstudy.eu - http://www.europeanvaluesstudy.eu/ [email protected] Table of Contents Journal Articles .........................................................................................................................................................2 Books ..................................................................................................................................................................... 61 Book Chapters ....................................................................................................................................................... 75 Conference Papers .............................................................................................................................................. 114 Dissertations ........................................................................................................................................................ 118 Master's Theses ................................................................................................................................................... 121 Working Paper ..................................................................................................................................................... 123 Miscellaneous ...................................................................................................................................................... 126 - EVS-Bibliography 07/2018 - http://www.europeanvaluesstudy.eu -
2020 Vulnérabilité Des Droits Humains En Temps De Crise
Rapport annuel 2020 Vulnérabilité des droits humains en temps de crise Pour l’égalité, contre la discrimination Rapport annuel 2020 Vulnérabilité des droits humains en temps de crise Pour l’égalité, contre la discrimination 2 Sommaire Avant-propos 4 12 Mission et vision 6 2 Promouvoir l’égalité Travailler ensemble à l’égalité en période de distanciation sociale 13 1. Emploi 14 1.1 Diversité sur le marché de l’emploi : nos recommandations 14 Événements 1.2 Formations dans des entreprises, des 8 organisations et des administrations 15 marquants en 2020 1.3 eDiv : quelques clics pour une meilleure 1 politique de diversité 16 1. Formation du gouvernement 9 1.4 Monitoring socio-économique : un diplôme n’est pas toujours une garantie de réussite 17 1.1 Gouvernement d’urgence Wilmès 9 1.5 Collaboration avec des partenaires sociaux 18 1.2 Gouvernement fédéral De Croo 9 2. Le Covid-19 : les droits humains à 2. Biens et services 18 l’épreuve 10 2.1 Logement : miser sur la sensibilisation et les tests de situation 18 3. Des interventions policières qui 2.2 Banques et assurances 21 suscitent des inquiétudes 10 2.3 Mobilité 21 4. Extrémisme : de la haine à quelque 3. Enseignement 23 chose de pire 10 3.1 Formations sur l’enseignement inclusif 25 3.2 Recommandations sur le soutien aux élèves à besoins d’enseignement spécifiques dans 5. Et pourtant… 11 les mesures contre le Covid-19 en Flandre 26 3.3 Recommandations pour n'exclure aucun élève à l'heure du Covid-19 27 4. -
NATURAL LAW, LIBERALISM, and CHRISTIANITY Frank Van Dun*
Journal of Libertarian Studies Volume 15, no. 3 (Summer 2001), pp. 1–36 Ó2001 Ludwig von Mises Institute www.mises.org NATURAL LAW, LIBERALISM, AND CHRISTIANITY Frank van Dun* Classical liberalism arose at a time when Christian orthodoxy was still vibrant.1 Liberalism and Christian orthodoxy, sharing a number of fundamental ideas about the nature of man and of inter- personal relations, presuppose the same moral ontology of natural law. The high tide of Christian orthodoxy and classical liberalism belongs to the era when natural law was the fundamental concept of all serious thought about the human world. Both classical liberalism and Christianity went into sharp de- cline from the later nineteenth century onward, and, by the begin- ning of the twentieth century, the concept of natural law was rap- *Professor of Philosophy of Law at the Universities of Ghent and Maas- tricht. An earlier version of this text was presented at the conference “The World Out of Balance?” (Gummersbach, Germany, November 5–7, 1999), held at the Theodor Heuss Akademie, and organized in cooperation with the Von Mises Institute (Ghent), Nova Civitas (Ghent), and The Centre for a New Europe (Brussels). The author wishes to thank the participants for their questions and comments. 1By “classical liberalism,” I mean the liberalism of those who postulate a necessary link between liberty and objective law and justice, i.e., respect for natural persons, their property, and contractual obligations. By “Chris- tian orthodoxy,” I mean the interpretation of the Bible that became au- thoritative within the main churches as a result of the efforts of Saint Augustine and other early church fathers. -
Prof. Lieven Annemans Oud-Kamervoorzitter Siegfried Bracke Zal Laudatio Uitspreken
Persbericht Libera! Vzw – 26 mei 2021 Voor onmiddellijke verspreiding en publicatie DENKTANK LIBERA! KENT PRIJS VOOR DE VRIJHEID 2021 TOE AAN PROF. LIEVEN ANNEMANS OUD-KAMERVOORZITTER SIEGFRIED BRACKE ZAL LAUDATIO UITSPREKEN Professor Lieven Annemans is hoogleraar gezondheidseconomie aan de Faculteit Geneeskunde van de Universiteit Gent en is ook verbonden aan de Vrije Universiteit Brussel. Al jaren is hij, via talrijke publicaties en lezingen, een groot pleitbezorger voor een rationele benefit-cost-benadering van de gezondheidszorg waarbij hij zowel irrationele besparingen als inefficiënte kostenstromen bekritiseert. Professor Lieven Annemans is ook bekend als ‘geluksprofessor’ door zijn boeiende analyse van de factoren die ons geluks- of ongeluksgevoel bepalen. Recent bracht hij nog het boek ‘Geluk vinden zonder het te zoeken’ uit, naar eigen zeggen een ‘wij-boek’ over hoe we als samenleving gelukkiger kunnen worden. Benevens deze verdiensten is de actuele aanleiding van de toekenning van de Prijs voor de Vrijheid evenwel de rol die professor Annemans heeft gespeeld in de coronacrisis en de daarmee gepaard gaande discussies over de gepaste beleidsmaatregelen. Professor Annemans heeft het aangedurfd de evidentie van de door het officiële virologendom gepropageerde maatregelen in twijfel te trekken door te wijzen op het impact ervan op het welzijn van de bevolking en op het perverse effect van het voortdurend creëren van een angstcultuur. De waarschuwing dat de remedie erger kan zijn dan de kwaal heeft geleid tot ostracisme door adepten van die remedie, voortdurende aanvallen in de pers en zijn uiteindelijke beslissing ontslag te nemen uit Celeval. Libera! wijst erop dat pandemiebestrijding geen vrijgeleide kan zijn voor ongebreidelde vrijheidsbeperkingen. Deze moeten steeds afgewogen worden met hun impact op andere gezondheidsaspecten, op de economische welvaart en het welzijn van de bevolking in het algemeen. -
Programmvorlage Deutsch
Contents Speakers The final version of the Draft Common Frame of Mr Giuseppe Abbamonte, DG Justice, Freedom Reference (DCFR) was published in October 2009. At and Security, European Commission, Brussels p resent, the European Commission is carrying out a Professor Christian von Bar, European Legal ERA selection process to determine which parts of the Studies Institute, University of Osnabrück Academy of European Law academic DCFR will be included in the final CFR. As a follow-up to the ERA events organised in the Professor Hugh Beale, University of Warwick framework of the CoPECL Network, this conference will discuss content and perspectives of a future Professor Eric Clive, University of Edinburgh ‘political’ CFR. One of the main purposes of the CFR is to provide a set of principles, definitions and Professor Bénédicte Fauvarque-Cosson, University Panthéon-Assas, Paris model rules which could be used as a ‘toolbox’ for better European lawmaking. Mr Rafael Gil Nievas, Permanent Representation Substantive reforms in the consumer protection field of Spain to the EU, Brussels are currently on the agenda. The conference will ask EUROPEAN CONTRACT LAW whether and how the development of the CFR and Professor Piotr Machnikowski, University of the ongoing revision of EU consumer law (e.g. Wrocław EU CONSUMER LAW Consumer Rights Directive, Package Travel Directive) REVISION AND THE CFR could be synchronised and connected. Dr Chantal Mak, University of Amsterdam TOWARDS AN OPTIONAL Furthermore, it will highlight whether the CFR can Professor -
The Harmonisation of the Law of Personal Security
Matthias E. Storme Professor at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven and Universiteit Antwerpen The Harmonisation of the Law of Personal Security In this paper in honour of Prof. Drobnig*1, I would like to deal with the following topics in relation to (the harmonisation of the law of) personal security: – The level of abstraction fi t for a European restatement on this matter (1) – The structuring of the different institutions in a conceptual and regulatory framework (2) – The relationship between the specifi c rules for personal security and general contract law in the proposed Draft Common Frame of Reference*2 (3) – The rules applicable to provision of proprietary security by a third party (4) 1. General problems of harmonisation The draft common frame of reference tends to formulate rules as much as possible on a general level, and this is clearly also true in the fi eld of personal security. As we will see, many questions are already dealt with in general terms in Book II, on contracts and juridical acts in general, or in Book III, on obligations in general. Further, within the fi eld of personal security, matters are regulated basically for two broad categories of personal security, dependent and independent personal security, with even a substantial general part for both of them. Is this tendency merely a revival of the Pandectist temptation, as some opponents have cried, reducing the Pandektenschule further unjustly to mere Begriffsjurisprudenz? There are some objective elements explain- ing and probably also justifying this style. I would like to mention four. All four were to some extent — and mutatis mutandis — also present in the context of 19th-century Germany. -
Stefan Graziadei University of Graz and University of Antwerp
Six models for Reforming the Selection of Judges to the BiH Constitutional Court Stefan Graziadei University of Graz and University of Antwerp Working paper, No. 14 January 2016 Summary Following the decision on the unconstitutionality of the Day of the Republic (U-3/13) in late 2015, Bosnian Serbs and Croats vowed to terminate the mandate of international judges of the country’s constitutional court. If the Bosnian parliament failed to act, political leaders from the Bosnian Serb entity would call a referendum on the Court and drop out of state institutions. Against the backdrop of this political threat, Bosnians need to debate if they still need international judges or whether the Court’s composition should be reformed. Comparatively, the presence of international judges in national apex courts remains an exception. This paper will not enter the debate on whether it is time to call time on international judges, but will show how the composition of the Court could be reformed. Politicians could draw inspiration from several models discussed in the paper: the domestic model, the German model, the Belgian model, the ECtHR model, and the D’Hondt model. However, the possibility is not excluded that the very changes that Bosnian Serb politicians demand might require constitutional reform. About the author Stefan Graziadei has studied Political Science at the University of Padua, the UWE Bristol, the ULB Brussels and the University of California in San Diego. His academic interest focuses on comparative constitutional law, comparative politics, minority rights, the politics of divided societies, Europeanization and, in relation to that, post conflict state building in former Yugoslav societies. -
Mors Codicis: End of the Age of Codification? Iain Stewart*
Mors Codicis: End of the Age of Codification? Iain Stewart* INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 18 I. CODE AND CODIFICATION .................................................................. 18 A. Typology............................................................................. 18 B. The Name “Code” .............................................................. 20 II. THE CODE NAPOLÉON—FROM BOOK TO DATABASE ....................... 23 A. Comprehensiveness, from Constantinople to Berlin .......... 23 B. The French Codifiers .......................................................... 24 C. The Code civil from Book to Database .............................. 24 III. IS CODIFICATION STILL POSSIBLE? FROM SCROLLS TO SCROLLING ......................................................................................... 26 A. Life of the Code civil .......................................................... 26 B. Too Much Codification? ..................................................... 26 C. The French Codes Today .................................................... 28 D. Codes, from Books to Databases ........................................ 29 IV. JUSTINIAN: ACCESS, COMPREHENSIVENESS AND EXCLUSIVITY ...................................................................................... 30 A. Access—Physical and Intellectual ..................................... 30 B. Physical Access—Cost ....................................................... 31 C. Access and Democracy ...................................................... -
Addressee Name
Council Decision CD 2013/9 of 20 December 2013 on ELI Projects In accordance with Article 12(3)(b) of the Statute, the Council appoints the members of the Advisory Committee on the project ‘Rescue of Business in Insolvency Law’ as proposed in the Annex and establishes a Members Consultative Committee. ANNEX As specified in the project proposal (approved in decision CD 2013/8), the Working Party is composed of the reporters, other members of the Project Team, the Advisory Committee, and the National Correspondents. The following persons, based on their expertise in one or more of the fields listed below, are suggested by the reporters, Stephan Madaus, Bob Wessels and Kristin van Zwieten as members of the Advisory Committee: I. Insolvency law practice Chris Laughton, partner at Mercer & Hole, UK; he has vast knowledge and experience of European recovery practices and insolvency regimes, including the European Insolvency Regulation. Alberto Núñez-Lagos, partner at Uría Menéndez, Spain; he specialises in restructuring; he has advised leading Spanish and international corporations on some of the most important insolvency cases in Spain in recent years, acting for debtors, creditors or management. Paul Oberhammer, professor of law, University of Vienna; of counsel in the Litigation/Controversy Department and a member of the International Arbitration Practice Group at WilmerHale; in 2012 he was commissioned with the review of the European Insolvency Regulation by the EU Commission. II. Contract law Onofrio Troiano (ELI Fellow), full professor of private law and European private law, University of Foggia, Italy. III. Company law Horst Eidenmüller (ELI Fellow), professor of law, Munich University, Germany; the focus of his work is on company and insolvency law and dispute resolution; member of an expert committee that advises the German Ministry of Justice on issues of company and insolvency law reform. -
Masterproef Van Jurgen Goossens
Faculteit Rechtsgeleerdheid Universiteit Gent Academiejaar 2010-11 Staatsrechtelijke bevoegdheidsverdeling inzake justitie Toepassing van rechtseconomische principes Masterproef van de opleiding „Master in de rechten‟ Ingediend door Jurgen Goossens (studentennr. 00600059) (major: nationaal en internationaal publiekrecht en milieurecht) Promotor: Prof. Boudewijn Bouckaert Co-promotor: Prof. Matthias Storme Commissaris: Prof. Ben Depoorter Inhoudsopgave Lijst van gebruikte afkortingen ............................................................................................................... 7 Inleiding ................................................................................................................................................. 8 Hoofdstuk 1. Rechtsvergelijkend onderzoek naar de mogelijkheden qua bevoegdheidsverdeling ........ 11 Afdeling 1. Relevantie van rechtsvergelijking van federale stelsels ................................................. 11 Afdeling 2. Verenigde Staten ........................................................................................................... 11 §1. Gerechtelijke organisatie ....................................................................................................... 11 A. Staatsrechtelijke bevoegdheid tot organisatie van de rechtsbedeling .................................. 11 A.1 Parallelle rechtsgang..................................................................................................... 12 A.2 Federale rechtbanken ................................................................................................... -
Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR) Interim Outline Edition
Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR) Interim Outline Edition Prepared by the Study Group on a European Civil Code and the Research Group on EC Private Law (Acquis Group) Based in part on a revised version of the Principles of European Contract Law edited by Christian von Bar, Eric Clive and Hans Schulte-Nölke and Hugh Beale, Johnny Herre, Jérôme Huet, Peter Schlechtriem†, Matthias Storme, Stephen Swann, Paul Varul, Anna Veneziano and Fryderyk Zoll This work can be ordered as a book for J 9,90 at www.sellier.de (ISBN 978-3-86653-059-1). More texts by the Study Group and the Acquis Group are available at www.law-net.eu. www.law-net.eu www.sellier.de Table of contents Introduction 1 Academic contributors and funders 41 Table of Destinations 51 Table of Derivations 59 Model Rules 71 Book I General provisions 101 Book II Contracts and other juridical acts 105 Book III Obligations and corresponding rights 149 Book IV Specific contracts and the rights and obligations arising from them 191 Book V Benevolent intervention in another’s Affairs 299 Book VI Non-Contractual liability arising out of damage caused to another 303 Book VII Unjustified enrichment Annex 1 Definitions 321 Annex 2 Computation of time Index 331 www.law-net.eu www.sellier.de Introduction General ....................................................................... 3 1. DCFR and CFR distinguished ........................................... 3 2. An interim outline edition of the DCFR ............................... 4 3. The timing and nature of this edition .................................. 4 4. An academic, not a politically authorised text .......................