DOCSLIB.ORG

Family AGAMIDAE 11-19

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

HAROLD F. DE LISLE, LYNN R. G. RAW, DANIEL A. MELNIKOV AGAMIDAE A CATALOG OF RECENT SPECIES HAROLD F. DE LISLE, LYNN R. G. RAW, DANIEL A. MELNIKOV © Harold F. De Lisle, Daniel Melnikov, Lynn R.G. Raw, 2016 Email: [email protected] Cover photo: Psammophilus dorsalis, male in breeding colours, Hyderabad, India, by JM Garg Back cover: Chlamydosaurus kingie, Hann River area, Queensland, Australia, photo by Stephen Zozaya CONTENTS INTRODUCTION …............................................................................. 1 CATALOG …............................................................................................... 13 ACKNOWLEGEMENTS …........................................................... 99 REFERENCES . …................................................................................. 105 TAXON INDEX …................................................................................... 143 INTRODUCTION Family Agamidae Iguaniens (part), Cuvier, 1817, Le règne animal distribué d’après son organisation, pour servir de base a l’historire naturelle des animaux et d’introduction a l’anatomie comparée . Vol. 2. Les reptiles, les poissons, les mollusques et les annélides. Déterville, Paris Ascalabotae (part), Merrem, 1820, Versuch eines Systems der Amphibien I (Tentamen Systematis Amphibiorum). J. C. Krieger, Marburg, 191 pp. Stellionidae (part), Gray 1825, A synopsis of the genera of reptiles and Amphibia, with a description of some new species. Annals of Philosophy , 10: 196 Agamidae Gray, 1827 , A Synopsis of the Genera of Saurian Reptiles in which some new Genera are indicated, and the others reviewed by actual Examination. Philosophical Magazine, London, 2 (2): 57 Iguaniens acrodontes Duméril & Bibron, 1837, Erpetologie Générale ou Histoire Naturelle Complete des Reptiles. Vol.4. Libr. Encyclopédique Roret, Paris Uromasticidae Theobald, 1868, Catalogue of the reptiles of British Burma, embracing the provinces of Pegu, Martaban, and Tenasserim; with descriptions of new or little-known species. Journal of the Linnean Society , London, Zool., 10: 34 The large family Agamidae contains Some Agamid is adapted to almost some 450 species, which are mostly every type of terrestrial habitat. From sea confined to Asia, Australia, and Africa. level to the top of tropical mountain; from Before the recent split of the family hot desert (Sahara) to cold desert (Gobi). Iguanidae, the two generas were often Some are arenicolous, many are saxicolous , compared, with the Iguanidae largely found many more are arboreal. A few are almost in the Western Hemisphere. semiaquatic, but none are semifossial . Perhaps the major anatomical Most Agamids are insectivores, but a difference between the two families is in few are omnivorous. A very few are dentition. Agamids have acrodont and herbivores. heterdont dentition, a character they only All Agamids are oviparous. Most share with the Chamaeleonidae. Dermal species lay leathery eggs with the oval shape appendages such as crests, dewlaps, and that are typical of most reptile eggs, while a even wing-like mebranes ( Draco ) are often few genera ( Calotes ) lay spindle-shaped present. Sexual dimorphism is the rule, with eggs. There are few enigmatic and the males often having brilliant colors and chrestomatic examples of viviparous more pronounced dermal appendages. Agamids. They are extraordinary The eye of Agamids is provided with representatives of different subfamilies. complete lids and the pupil is always round. Live-bearing Agaminae are found in Some species have no tympanum while Phrynocephalus from high elevations of others have large exposed tympanum. Only Tibet and Himalaya ( Ph. vlangalii , Ph. a few genera have femoral pores typical of theobaldi , Ph. putjatai and others) , and lizards. The tongue is rather short and broad. lowland desert of Takla-Makan ( Ph. Limbs are well developed. Tail is usually forsyhtii ). Viviparous Draconinae are long and tough Cophotis ceyloniaca and Harpesaurus borneensis . another with G . robinsonii, and a third with Recent phylogenetic studies have Pseudocalotes ). found that the genera Moloch and At present (2019) there are 53 genera Chelosania render Hypsilurus paraphyletic . in the Family Agamidae. This includes Lophognathus is non-monophyletic. Also, several monotype genera, many of which are Gonocephalus (G. robinsonii is only part of the morbid thirst for naming new distantly related to other Gonocephalus ) and genera in the last two decades (Kaiser et al., Japalura (with species distributed 2013). There are also ditype genera among three distantly related clades, including one allied with Ptyctolaemus, . Acanthocercus Fitzinger, 1843 (13 species) Physignathus Cuvier, 1829 (1 species) Acanthosaura Gray, 1831 (11 species) Pogona Storr, 1982 (8 species) Agama Daudin, 1802 (47 species) Psammophilus Fitzinger, 1843 (2 species) Amphibolurus Wagler, 1830 (4 species) Pseudocalotes Fitzinger, 1843 (23 species) Aphaniotis Peters, 1864 (2 species) Pseudocophotis Manthey and Grossmann. 1997 (2 Bronchocela Kaup, 1827 (12 species) species) Bufoniceps Arnold, 1992 (1 species) Pseudotrapelus Fitzinger, 1843 (6 species) Calotes Cuvier, 1817 (23 species) Ptyctolaemus Peters, 1865 (2 species) Ceratophora Gray, 1835 (4 species) Rankinia Wells & Wellington, 1984 (1 species) Chelosania Gray, 1845 ( 1 species) Salea Gray, 1845 (3 species) Chlamydosaurus Gray, 1825 (1 species) Sarada Deepak, Karanth and Giri, 2016 (3 species) Complicitus Manthey & Grossmann, 1997 (1 species) Sitana Cuvier, 1829 (13 species) Cophotis Peters, 1861 (2 species) Thaumatorhynchus Parker, 1924 (1 species) Coryphophylax Blyth, 1860 (2 species) Trapelus Cuvier, 1817 (13 species) Cryptagama Witten, 1984 (2 species) Tropicagama Melville et al., 2019 (1 species) Cristidorsa Wang et al., 2018 (2 species) Tympanocryptis Peters, 1863 (15 species) Ctenophorus Fitzinger, 1843 (29 species) Uromastyx Merrem, 1820 (18 species) Dendragama Doria, 1888 (3 species) Xenagama Boulenger, 1895 (4 species) Diploderma Hallowell, 1861 (24 species) Diporiphora Gray, 1842 (22 species) Draco Linnaeus, 1758 (39 species) Gonocephalus Kaup, 1825 (16 species) Gowidon Wells & Wellington. 1984 (2 species). Harpesaurus Boulenger, 1885 (5 species) Hydrosaurus Kaup, 1828 (3 species) Hypsicalotes Manthey & Denzer, 2000 (1 species) Hypsilurus Peters, 1867 (16 species) Intellagama Wells & Wellington, 1985 (1 species) Japalura Gray. 1853 (7 species) Laudakia Gray, 1845 (20 species) Leiolepis Cuvier, 1829 (9 species) Lophocalotes Günther, 1872 (2 species) Lophognathus Gray. 1842 (2 species) Lophosaurus Günther, 1872 (3 species) Lyriocephalus Merrem, 1820 (1 species) Malayodracon Denzer, 2015 (1 species) Mantheyus Ananjeva and Stuart, 2001 (1 species) Moloch Gray, 1841 (1 species) Monilesarus Pal et al, 2018 (4 species) Otocryptis Wagler, 1830 (3 species) Phoxophrys Hubrecht, 1881(5 species) Phrynocephalus Kaup, 1825 (31 species) Many authors (Anajeva, 2011) subdivide the Southeast Asian Draconinae Fitzinger, 1826 agamids into six subfamilies: (1) with numerous Indian and Southeastern Uromastycinae Theobald, 1868 with the genera (mostly arboreal or semi-arboreal) genera Uromastyx and Saara ; (2) and (6) Afro-West-Asian Agaminae Spix, Leiolepidinae Fitzinger, 1843 with the genus 1825. Leiolepis ; (3) Amphibolurinae Wagler, 1830 The exact position of many genera is with all Australian and New Guinean still debated among taxonomists. species; (4) Hydrosaurinae K аuр, 1828 with the genus Hydrosaurus ; (5) South- and This is the phylogeny according to Pyron, Burbrink and Wiens, 2013( Pyron et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013) Abbreviations of museums holding the types are as follows AMNH - American Museum of Natural History, Division of Vertebrate Zoology (Herpetology), 79th Street and Central Park West, New York, New York 10024, USA. ANSP - Academy of Natural Sciences, Department of Herpetology, 19th and the Benjamin Franklin Parkway, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103, USA. ANWC – Australian National Wildlife Collection, Canberra, Australia BA – Insitute of Rare Animals and Plants, Sichuan Teachers College, Nanchong, Sichuan Province 637702, China BMNH – The Natural History Museum, Department of Zoology, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom. BPBM - Bernice P. Bishop Museum, Department of Zoology, 1355 Kalihi Street, Honolulu, Hawaii 96818, USA. BSP - Bureau Science Philippines (destroyed in WWII). CAS - California Academy of Sciences, Department of Herpetology, Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, California 94118, USA. CIB - Chengdu Institute of Biology, Academia Sinica, P.O. Box 416, Chengdu, Sichuan, P.R. China. DB.ULPGC - Departamento de Biología, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Calle Juan de Quesada, 30, 35001 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain FMNH - Field Museum, Division of Amphibians and Reptiles, Roosevelt Road at Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60605, USA. GNHM - Göteborgs Naturhistoriska Museum, Museivägen 10, 413 11, Göteborg, Sweden HLMD - Hessisches Landesmuseum, Darmstadt, Germany. HUJ - Hebrew University, Department of Zoology, Jerusalem, Israel. IEBR - Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources, No 18 Hoang Quoc Viet Street, Hanoi, Vietnam IZANU - Zoological Institute. Ukrainian National Academy of Sciences, Kiev, Ukraine KIZ - Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 32 East Jaio Chang Road; 650223, Kunming, Yunnan, China KUZ - Department of Zoology, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan. HNM - Hungarian National Museum, Budapest,
Recommended publications
  • Temperature-Dependent Sex Determination and Gonadal Differentiation in Reptiles

    Temperature-Dependent Sex Determination and Gonadal Differentiation in Reptiles

    CMLS, Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 55 (1999) 887–900 1420-682X/99/070887-14 $ 1.50+0.20/0 © Birkha¨user Verlag, Basel, 1999 Temperature-dependent sex determination and gonadal differentiation in reptiles C. Pieau*, M. Dorizzi and N. Richard-Mercier Institut Jacques Monod, CNRS, and Universite´s Paris 6 et Paris 7, 2 Place Jussieu, F-75251 Paris Cedex 05 (France), Fax +33 1 44 27 36 60, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. In many reptile species, sexual differentiation weak differences in aromatase activity, suggesting subtle of gonads is sensitive to temperature during a critical regulations of the aromatase gene at the transcription period of embryonic development (thermosensitive pe- level. Temperature could intervene in these regulations. riod, TSP). Experiments carried out with different mod- Present studies deal with cloning (complementary els among which turtles, crocodilians and lizards have DNAs) and expression (messenger RNAs) of genes that demonstrated the implication of estrogens and the key have been shown, or are expected, to be involved in role played by aromatase (the enzyme complex that gonadal formation and/or differentiation in mammals. converts androgens to estrogens) in ovary differentiation Preliminary results indicate that homologues of AMH, during TSP and in maintenance of the ovarian structure DAX1, SF1, SOX9 and WT1 genes with the same after TSP. In some of these experiments, the occurrence function(s) as in mammals exist in reptiles. How these of various degrees of gonadal intersexuality is related to genes could interact with aromatase is being examined. Key words. Gonadal differentiation; intersexuality; temperature; estrogens; aromatase; AMH, DAX1, SF1, SOX9, WT1 genes; reptiles.
  • Studies on African Agama III. Resurrection of Agama Agama Turuensis Loveridge, 1932 (Squamata: Agamidae) from Synonymy and Elevation to Species Rank

    Studies on African Agama III. Resurrection of Agama Agama Turuensis Loveridge, 1932 (Squamata: Agamidae) from Synonymy and Elevation to Species Rank

    Th e status of Agama agama turuensis SALAMANDRA 44 1 35-42 Rheinbach, 20 February 2008 ISSN 0036-3375 Studies on African Agama III. Resurrection of Agama agama turuensis Loveridge, 1932 (Squamata: Agamidae) from synonymy and elevation to species rank Philipp Wagner, Patrick Krause & Wolfgang Böhme Abstract. New material of Agama agama Linnaeus, 758 from Mount Hanang, Tanzania is indistingu- ishable from the type material of Agama agama turuensis Loveridge, 932, a taxon which is so far con- sidered to be a synonym of Agama lionotus elgonis Lönnberg, 922. Our comparative morphological study demonstrates turuensis is most similar to Agama mwanzae Loveridge, 923 and Agama kaimosae Loveridge, 935, and distinct from both A. agama and A. lionotus Boulenger, 896. Agama turuensis can likewise neither be assigned to A. mwanzae nor A. kaimosae but has to be rather considered as a dis- tinct species. Key words. Squamata, Agamidae, Agama turuensis, new status, Africa, Tanzania, Mount Hanang, taxo- nomy. Introduction and subdivided the genus Agama into the fol- lowing six genera: Agama, Stellio, Trapelus, Th e genus Agama is endemic to Africa and Pseudotrapelus, Brachysaura and Xenagama. its species are very widespread in the savan- Later, Joger (99) identifi ed both Laudakia nah regions of Africa. Currently, 34 species and Phrynocephalus as sister taxa of Agama. are recognized but the genus in general, and At present the genus can be divided into especially the Agama agama species complex three diff erent species groups: the Agama and the clade including the East African are agama group which includes the West Af- in need of a thorough taxonomic revision.
  • ONEP V09.Pdf

    ONEP V09.Pdf

    Compiled by Jarujin Nabhitabhata Tanya Chan-ard Yodchaiy Chuaynkern OEPP BIODIVERSITY SERIES volume nine OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND PLANNING MINISTRY OF SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT 60/1 SOI PIBULWATTANA VII, RAMA VI RD., BANGKOK 10400 THAILAND TEL. (662) 2797180, 2714232, 2797186-9 FAX. (662) 2713226 Office of Environmental Policy and Planning 2000 NOT FOR SALE NOT FOR SALE NOT FOR SALE Compiled by Jarujin Nabhitabhata Tanya Chan-ard Yodchaiy Chuaynkern Office of Environmental Policy and Planning 2000 First published : September 2000 by Office of Environmental Policy and Planning (OEPP), Thailand. ISBN : 974–87704–3–5 This publication is financially supported by OEPP and may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non–profit purposes without special permission from OEPP, providing that acknowledgment of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purposes. Citation : Nabhitabhata J., Chan ard T., Chuaynkern Y. 2000. Checklist of Amphibians and Reptiles in Thailand. Office of Environmental Policy and Planning, Bangkok, Thailand. Authors : Jarujin Nabhitabhata Tanya Chan–ard Yodchaiy Chuaynkern National Science Museum Available from : Biological Resources Section Natural Resources and Environmental Management Division Office of Environmental Policy and Planning Ministry of Science Technology and Environment 60/1 Rama VI Rd. Bangkok 10400 THAILAND Tel. (662) 271–3251, 279–7180, 271–4232–8 279–7186–9 ext 226, 227 Facsimile (662) 279–8088, 271–3251 Designed & Printed :Integrated Promotion Technology Co., Ltd. Tel. (662) 585–2076, 586–0837, 913–7761–2 Facsimile (662) 913–7763 2 1.
  • Movement and Habitat Use by Adult and Juvenile Toad-Headed Agama Lizards (Phrynocephalus Versicolor Strauch, 1876) in the Eastern Gobi Desert, Mongolia

    Movement and Habitat Use by Adult and Juvenile Toad-Headed Agama Lizards (Phrynocephalus Versicolor Strauch, 1876) in the Eastern Gobi Desert, Mongolia

    Herpetology Notes, volume 12: 717-719 (2019) (published online on 07 July 2019) Movement and habitat use by adult and juvenile Toad-headed Agama lizards (Phrynocephalus versicolor Strauch, 1876) in the eastern Gobi Desert, Mongolia Douglas Eifler1,* and Maria Eifler1,2 Introduction From 0700–1900 h we walked slowly throughout the study area in search of Toad-headed Agama lizards Phrynocephalus versicolor Strauch, 1876 is a (Phrynocephalus versicolor). When a lizard was small lizard (Agamidae) found in desert and semi- sighted, we captured the animal by hand or noose. desert regions of China, Mongolia, Kazakhstan and We then measured the lizard (snout-to-vent length Kyrgyzstan (Zhao, 1999). The species inhabits areas of (SVL; mm) and mass (g) and sexed adults by probing. sparse vegetation and can be relatively common, with Juveniles were too small to sex. Using non-toxic paint reported densities of up to 400 per hectare (Zhao, 1999). pens, we marked each lizard with a unique colour code In spite of its wide distribution and local abundance, for later identification and to avoid recapture or repeat relatively little detailed ecological information is observations. available, particularly in the northern areas of its range. All focal observations occurred on one day (26 We report our ecological observations on a population August). When an animal was sighted, we positioned of P. versicolor in the Gobi Desert of Mongolia with ourselves 3–5 m from the lizard, waited 5 min for regard to their movement and habitat use. the lizard to acclimate to our presence, and then we began a 10-min observation period.
  • Stellio' in Herpetology and a Comment on the Nomenclature and Taxonomy of Agamids of the Genus Agama (Sensu Lato) (Squamata: Sauria: Agamidae)

    Stellio' in Herpetology and a Comment on the Nomenclature and Taxonomy of Agamids of the Genus Agama (Sensu Lato) (Squamata: Sauria: Agamidae)

    ©Österreichische Gesellschaft für Herpetologie e.V., Wien, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at HERPETOZOA 8 (1/2): 3 - 9 Wien, 30. Juli 1995 A brief review of the origin and use of 'stellio' in herpetology and a comment on the nomenclature and taxonomy of agamids of the genus Agama (sensu lato) (Squamata: Sauria: Agamidae) Kurzübersicht über die Herkunft und Verwendung von "stellio" in der Herpetologie und Kommentar zur Nomenklatur und Taxonomie von Agamen, Gattung Agama (sensu lato) (Squamata: Sauria: Agamidae) KLAUS HENLE ABSTRACT The name 'stellio' has received a wide and variable application in herpetology. Its use antedates modern nomenclature. The name was applied mainly to various agamid and gekkonid species. In modern usage, confu- sion exists primarily with its use as a genus, i. e., Siellio. To solve this problem, STEJNEGER (1936) desig- nated Siellio saxatilis of LAURENTI, 1768 which is based on a figure in SEBA (1734) as the type species. This species is unidentifiable. In an unpublished thesis, MOODY (1980) split the genus Agama (s. 1.) into six genera. He overlooked STEJNEGER's (1936) designation and reused Stellio for the stellio-group of agamid lizards. Many authors followed MOODY (1980). Recently, some authors pointed out that Siellio is unavailable but did not fully dis- cuss the implications for agamid nomenclature. It is argued that a satisfactory nomenclature is difficult with current knowledge of agamid taxonomy. It is suggested to restrict Laudakia to L. tuberculata and to use Ploce- denna for the stellio-group (sensu stricto). KURZFASSUNG Der Name "stellio" sah eine breite und vielfältige Verwendung in der Herpetologie, die weit über die moderne Nomenklatur zurückreicht.
  • The Herpetofauna of the Cubango, Cuito, and Lower Cuando River Catchments of South-Eastern Angola

    The Herpetofauna of the Cubango, Cuito, and Lower Cuando River Catchments of South-Eastern Angola

    Official journal website: Amphibian & Reptile Conservation amphibian-reptile-conservation.org 10(2) [Special Section]: 6–36 (e126). The herpetofauna of the Cubango, Cuito, and lower Cuando river catchments of south-eastern Angola 1,2,*Werner Conradie, 2Roger Bills, and 1,3William R. Branch 1Port Elizabeth Museum (Bayworld), P.O. Box 13147, Humewood 6013, SOUTH AFRICA 2South African Institute for Aquatic Bio- diversity, P/Bag 1015, Grahamstown 6140, SOUTH AFRICA 3Research Associate, Department of Zoology, P O Box 77000, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth 6031, SOUTH AFRICA Abstract.—Angola’s herpetofauna has been neglected for many years, but recent surveys have revealed unknown diversity and a consequent increase in the number of species recorded for the country. Most historical Angola surveys focused on the north-eastern and south-western parts of the country, with the south-east, now comprising the Kuando-Kubango Province, neglected. To address this gap a series of rapid biodiversity surveys of the upper Cubango-Okavango basin were conducted from 2012‒2015. This report presents the results of these surveys, together with a herpetological checklist of current and historical records for the Angolan drainage of the Cubango, Cuito, and Cuando Rivers. In summary 111 species are known from the region, comprising 38 snakes, 32 lizards, five chelonians, a single crocodile and 34 amphibians. The Cubango is the most western catchment and has the greatest herpetofaunal diversity (54 species). This is a reflection of both its easier access, and thus greatest number of historical records, and also the greater habitat and topographical diversity associated with the rocky headwaters.
  • NHBSS 061 1G Hikida Fieldg

    NHBSS 061 1G Hikida Fieldg

    Book Review N$7+IST. BULL. S,$0 SOC. 61(1): 41–51, 2015 A Field Guide to the Reptiles of Thailand by Tanya Chan-ard, John W. K. Parr and Jarujin Nabhitabhata. Oxford University Press, New York, 2015. 344 pp. paper. ISBN: 9780199736492. 7KDLUHSWLOHVZHUHÀUVWH[WHQVLYHO\VWXGLHGE\WZRJUHDWKHUSHWRORJLVWV0DOFROP$UWKXU 6PLWKDQG(GZDUG+DUULVRQ7D\ORU7KHLUFRQWULEXWLRQVZHUHSXEOLVKHGDV6MITH (1931, 1935, 1943) and TAYLOR 5HFHQWO\RWKHUERRNVDERXWUHSWLOHVDQGDPSKLELDQV LQ7KDLODQGZHUHSXEOLVKHG HJ&HAN-ARD ET AL., 1999: COX ET AL DVZHOODVPDQ\ SDSHUV+RZHYHUWKHVHERRNVZHUHWD[RQRPLFVWXGLHVDQGQRWJXLGHVIRURUGLQDU\SHRSOH7ZR DGGLWLRQDOÀHOGJXLGHERRNVRQUHSWLOHVRUDPSKLELDQVDQGUHSWLOHVKDYHDOVREHHQSXEOLVKHG 0ANTHEY & GROSSMANN, 1997; DAS EXWWKHVHERRNVFRYHURQO\DSDUWRIWKHIDXQD The book under review is very well prepared and will help us know Thai reptiles better. 2QHRIWKHDXWKRUV-DUXMLQ1DEKLWDEKDWDZDVP\ROGIULHQGIRUPHUO\WKH'LUHFWRURI1DWXUDO +LVWRU\0XVHXPWKH1DWLRQDO6FLHQFH0XVHXP7KDLODQG+HZDVDQH[FHOOHQWQDWXUDOLVW DQGKDGH[WHQVLYHNQRZOHGJHDERXW7KDLDQLPDOVHVSHFLDOO\DPSKLELDQVDQGUHSWLOHV,Q ZHYLVLWHG.KDR6RL'DR:LOGOLIH6DQFWXDU\WRVXUYH\KHUSHWRIDXQD+HDGYLVHGXV WRGLJTXLFNO\DURXQGWKHUH:HFROOHFWHGIRXUVSHFLPHQVRIDibamusZKLFKZHGHVFULEHG DVDQHZVSHFLHVDibamus somsaki +ONDA ET AL 1RZ,DPYHU\JODGWRNQRZWKDW WKLVERRNZDVSXEOLVKHGE\KLPDQGKLVFROOHDJXHV8QIRUWXQDWHO\KHSDVVHGDZD\LQ +LVXQWLPHO\GHDWKPD\KDYHGHOD\HGWKHSXEOLFDWLRQRIWKLVERRN7KHERRNLQFOXGHVQHDUO\ DOOQDWLYHUHSWLOHV PRUHWKDQVSHFLHV LQ7KDLODQGDQGPRVWSLFWXUHVZHUHGUDZQZLWK H[FHOOHQWGHWDLO,WLVDYHU\JRRGÀHOGJXLGHIRULGHQWLÀFDWLRQRI7KDLUHSWLOHVIRUVWXGHQWV
  • Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History Database

    Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History Database

    Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History database Abdala, C. S., A. S. Quinteros, and R. E. Espinoza. 2008. Two new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from the puna of northwestern Argentina. Herpetologica 64:458-471. Abdala, C. S., D. Baldo, R. A. Juárez, and R. E. Espinoza. 2016. The first parthenogenetic pleurodont Iguanian: a new all-female Liolaemus (Squamata: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. Copeia 104:487-497. Abdala, C. S., J. C. Acosta, M. R. Cabrera, H. J. Villaviciencio, and J. Marinero. 2009. A new Andean Liolaemus of the L. montanus series (Squamata: Iguania: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. South American Journal of Herpetology 4:91-102. Abdala, C. S., J. L. Acosta, J. C. Acosta, B. B. Alvarez, F. Arias, L. J. Avila, . S. M. Zalba. 2012. Categorización del estado de conservación de las lagartijas y anfisbenas de la República Argentina. Cuadernos de Herpetologia 26 (Suppl. 1):215-248. Abell, A. J. 1999. Male-female spacing patterns in the lizard, Sceloporus virgatus. Amphibia-Reptilia 20:185-194. Abts, M. L. 1987. Environment and variation in life history traits of the Chuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus. Ecological Monographs 57:215-232. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2003. Anfibios y reptiles del Uruguay. Montevideo, Uruguay: Facultad de Ciencias. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2007. Anfibio y reptiles del Uruguay, 3rd edn. Montevideo, Uruguay: Serie Fauna 1. Ackermann, T. 2006. Schreibers Glatkopfleguan Leiocephalus schreibersii. Munich, Germany: Natur und Tier. Ackley, J. W., P. J. Muelleman, R. E. Carter, R. W. Henderson, and R. Powell. 2009. A rapid assessment of herpetofaunal diversity in variously altered habitats on Dominica.
  • Lotus Wind Power Project

    Lotus Wind Power Project

    Initial Environmental Examination – Appendix H Project Number: 54211-001 March 2021 Document Stage: Draft Viet Nam: Lotus Wind Power Project Prepared by ERM Vietnam for Lien Lap Wind Power Joint Stock Company, Phong Huy Wind Power Joint Stock Company, and Phong Nguyen Wind Power Joint Stock Company as a requirement of the Asian Development Bank. The initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “Terms of Use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Biodiversity survey Wet season report Phong Huy Wind Power Project, Huong Hoa, Quang Tri, Viet Nam 7 July 2020 Prepared by ERM’s Subcontractor for ERM Vietnam Document details Document title Biodiversity survey Wet season report Document subtitle Phong Huy Wind Power Project, Huong Hoa, Quang Tri, Viet Nam Date 7 July 2020 Version 1.0 Author ERM’s Subcontractor Client Name ERM Vietnam Document history Version Revision Author Reviewed by ERM approval to issue Comments Name Date Draft 1.0 Name Name Name 00.00.0000 Text Version: 1.0 Client: ERM Vietnam 7 July 2020 BIODIVERSITY SURVEY WET SEASON REPORT CONTENTS Phong Huy Wind Power Project, Huong Hoa, Quang Tri, Viet Nam CONTENTS 1.
  • History of Classifications and Phylogenies the Arid Corridor From

    History of Classifications and Phylogenies the Arid Corridor From

    APPENDIX Abstracts of presentations hold on DEAGAMIS the 1ST INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON AGAMID LIZARDS ORAL PRESENTATIONS History of Classifications and Phylogenies Scott M. MOODY Department of Biological Science, Irvine Hall, Ohio University, Athens, OH, 45701, USA; Email: [email protected]. DARWIN in his 1859 “Origin of species ...” eloquently demonstrated that taxonomic classifications could (and should) reflect the past evolutionary history of higher taxa and relationships of the extant species. However the major her- petological works, for example, BOULENGER’s Catalogue of Lizards, published over the next 100 years did not attempt reconstructions of phylogeny. Indeed BOULENGER reversed the earlier named (now recognized again) genera and high- er taxa proposed especially by W. PETERS and L. FITZINGER. Although, CAMP (Classification of Lizards, 1923) and HENNIG (Revision of Draco, 1936) published pioneering works (they were decades ahead of others) the taxonomic herpetologists ignored them until the “rebirth” of phylogenetic systematics in the 1960’s and 1970’s. MOODY (1980) published a phylogenetic analysis based on 122 morphological characters and reviewed the historical biogeography of the agamid genera and proposed several subfamilies. Within the past two decades beginning with JOGER (1991, a molecular phylogeny of agamid lizards) several workers have employed molecular analyses. The hypothesized mo- lecular phylogenies by MACEY, LARSON, ANANJEVA, PAPENFUSS, OTA, HONDA, SCHULTE and MELVILLE will be com- pared with my original and revised morphologically based hypotheses. The controversy over the familial status of the various higher taxa within the “acrodont” section of the suborder Iguania that ensued following FROST & ETHERIDGE (1989) also will be reviewed. The arid corridor from Middle East to Africa – Insights from the Agamidae Philipp WAGNER Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum A.
  • A Second Record of Scolecomorphus Kirkii Boulenger, 1883 (Gymnophiona: Scolecomorphidae) for Mozambique

    A Second Record of Scolecomorphus Kirkii Boulenger, 1883 (Gymnophiona: Scolecomorphidae) for Mozambique

    Herpetology Notes, volume 8: 59-62 (2015) (published online on 10 March 2015) A second record of Scolecomorphus kirkii Boulenger, 1883 (Gymnophiona: Scolecomorphidae) for Mozambique Harith Omar Morgadinho Farooq1 and Werner Conradie2,* The herpetofauna of northern Mozambique (Nampula, Branch et al., 2014), crustaceans (Daniels and Bayliss, Niassa, and Cabo Degabo Provinces) remains one of the 2012) and bats (Taylor et al., 2012). While Portik et al. most poorly-known in Africa. This is a consequence of (2013a) summarised the herpetofauna of the inselbergs the physical inaccessibility of the region as well as the of northern Mozambique, they overlooked the valuable protracted civil war, which affected the study of many amphibian collections in the technical report by Branch areas. Mozambique is expected to have a large diversity (2004) from Niassa Game Reserve and the herpetofaunal of herpetofauna due to the variety of different habitat collections from Mount Mabu (Timberlake et al., 2012), types available and the large size (area) of the country. which led to underestimation and incorrect accounts of The lack of scientific studies of northern Mozambique the herpetofaunal diversity of the montane inselbergs of has led to widely disparate and inaccurate summaries northern Mozambique. of the herpetofaunal diversity of the country. While In November 2011 and May 2014 a team of scientists, there are no formal publications that explicitly deal mountain climbers, and conservationists had the with this topic, reputable internet sources indicate that opportunity to survey Mount Namuli, which resulted 221 reptile (Uetz, 2015) and 69 amphibian species in some additions to the herpetofauna of that area. (AmphibiaWeb, 2015) are expected to occur in the whole of Mozambique.
  • COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 834/2004

    COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 834/2004

    L 127/40EN Official Journal of the European Union 29.4.2004 COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 834/2004 of 28 April 2004 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, definition of ‘specimens’ given by Article 2(t) of Regu- lation (EC) No 338/97; the annotation regarding Aloe Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European spp. needs to make an explicit reference to the species Community, listed in Annex A; and the annotation to Guaiacum spp. Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 of 9 needs to be changed in order to designate the parts and December 1996 on the protection of species of wild fauna and derivatives decided upon at the 12th Conference. flora by regulating trade therein (1), and in particular Article 19(3) thereof, (5) The Scientific Review Group has established, on the basis of the criteria set out in Article 3(4)(a) of Regu- Whereas: lation (EC) No 338/97, that certain species must be with- drawn from the list of animals whose importation into (1) Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 lists animal and the Community should, on account of the volume plant species in respect of which trade is restricted or involved, be monitored, whilst certain other species controlled. Those lists incorporate the lists set out in the must be added to that list. annexes to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, hereinafter (6) Regulation (EC) No 338/97 should therefore be ‘the CITES Convention’.