Gas Interchangeability Defined
AGA Staff Paper:
Technical Background and Issues of Gas Interchangeability
Prepared for:
Building Energy Codes and Standards Committee American Gas Association
Prepared by:
Ted A. Williams Director, Codes, Standards & Technical Support American Gas Association
April 2006
Disclaimer
This report was prepared by American Gas Association (AGA) Staff for the purpose of summarizing prior technical work, research, and technical application of gas interchangeability principles and practices. Neither AGA, its members, nor any person acting on behalf of these organizations:
• Makes any warranty or representation with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the information contained in this report, or that the use of any information disclosed in this report may not infringe privately owned rights; or
• Assumes any liability with respect to the use of, or for damages resulting from the use of, any information disclosed in this report.
2 Table of Contents
1. Gas Interchangeability Defined ...... 5.
1.1 The NGC+ Definition ...... 5.
1.2 Historical Definitions from the Gas Industry Literature ...... 6.
1.3 Implications of Gas Interchangeability as Defined ...... 6.
2. The Objectives of Gas Interchangeability Criteria ...... 7.
2.1 Anticipation and Avoidance of Adverse Combustion Behavior ...... 7.
2.2 Drivers for Gas Interchangeability Specifications in the U. S...... 8.
2.3 Appliance Focus of Gas Interchangeability Studies and Specifications . . . . . 8.
2.4 Relevance of Historical Studies to Current End Uses ...... 11.
3. Combustion Issues in Classical and Contemporary Gas Interchangeability ...... 12.
3.1 General Combustion Issues ...... 12.
3.2 Combustion Failure Modes ...... 13.
3.2.1 Elevated Pollutant Generation ...... 13.
3.2.1.1 CO Production ...... 13.
3.2.1.2 Particulate Matter (Soot) Production ...... 16.
3.2.1.3 NOX Production ...... 18.
3.2.2 Altered Heat Rates ...... 19.
3.2.2.1 Durability of Heat Exchangers and Components ...... 19.
3.2.2.2 Jacket/Vent Overheating and Fire Hazards ...... 20.
3.2.2.3 Changes in Efficiency ...... 20.
3.2.3 Combustion Stability ...... 20.
3.2.3.1 Flame Lifting ...... 20.
3.2.3.2 Flashback ...... 21.
3.2.3.3 Oxygen Depletion Sensor (ODS)/Pilot Reliability ...... 21.
4. Appliance/Gas Consumer Issues ...... 21.
4.1 Installation/Maintenance Issues...... 21. 3
4.2 Unattended Operation ...... 22.
4.3 Changing Means of Adjustment ...... 22.
4.4 Vented versus Unvented Design and Operation ...... 22.
5. Considerations from U. S. Historical Gas Interchangeability Studies ...... 23.
6. Gas Interchangeability Indices ...... 26.
7. Activities and Gas Industry Requirements Outside the U. S...... 29.
7.1 Overseas Specifications ...... 29.
7.2 Current U. K. Activities...... 30.
8. Criteria for Acceptable Appliance Performance ...... 32.
8.1 CO Criteria Are Most Critical ...... 32.
8.2 Standards for Acceptable CO Generation in Appliances ...... 32.
9. Issues Beyond the Scope of This document ...... 33.
9.1 Adjustment at End Use versus Gas Supply Modification ...... 33.
9.2 Economic Efficiency and Equity ...... 33.
9.3 Similarities and Differences of Requirements Among End Users ...... 34.
9.4 Consumer Risk Under Alternative Actions ...... 34.
References ...... 35.
4
The objective of this Staff Paper is to discuss technical aspects of gas interchangeability including its meaning, the objective of gas interchangeability criteria, combustion issues and failure modes associated with non- interchangeable gases, technical history and background, use of indices as metrics, examples of interchangeability requirements in other countries as of this writing, and criteria for acceptability. Because of the wealth of technical documentation of gas interchangeability science and applications, references to important work are provided, and descriptions of these studies are not provided here in most cases. Emphasis is placed upon domestic appliances because, despite the large customer class using these devices and the wealth of information available on testing and gas interchangeability studies on them, recent debate over impacts upon appliance function and residential consumers may not be receiving equitable consideration, in the authors opinion. This Staff Paper does not address issues of gas composition as it relates to potential issues of U. S. gas supply, distribution of costs that may be associated with bringing interchangeable gases to market, the diversity of end uses and potential inconsistencies of gas interchangeability requirements among end uses, or issues of implementation and policy associated with gas interchangeability criteria and requirements.
1. Gas Interchangeability Defined
1.1 The NGC+ Definition
In 2004, the Natural Gas Council (NGC), a coalition of natural gas trade associations composed of the Interstate Natural Gas Association of America (INGAA), the Natural Gas Supply Association (NGSA), the Process Gas Consumers Group (PGCG), and AGA, recognized the need for the U. S. natural gas industry and its customers to develop industry based recommendations for addressing changes in gas composition brought on by changes in domestic gas and anticipated LNG importation. The NGC recognized the need to expand participation on issues of gas quality, including gas interchangeability, to other stakeholders concerned with gas supply, transportation, and end use. This expanded ad hoc group was convened in 2004 as "NGC+." The Gas Interchangeability Task Group was organized by NGC+ representing over 40 stakeholder organizations including gas producers, pipelines, local distribution companies (LDCs), end use equipment manufacturers, trade associations, and regulators. In development of its "White Paper on Natural Gas Interchangeability and Non-Combustion End Use," the Task Group developed the following definition of gas interchangeability:
“The ability to substitute one gaseous fuel for another in a combustion application without materially changing operational safety, efficiency, performance or materially increasing air pollutant emissions.”1
1 Gas Interchangeability Task Group. White Paper on Natural Gas Interchangeability and Non- Combustion End Use. Natural Gas Council Interchangeability Task Group, 2005, p. 3. 5
1.2 Historical Definitions from the Gas Industry Literature
Prior to the NGC+ work, the LDC industry had developed a variety of definitions of gas interchangeability as part of its seven decades of work in this area (i.e., beginning formally in the 1930s). The following are examples of these definitions, which are different but consistent:
"Two gases may be interchangeable if flame characteristics are satisfactory after substitution of one gas for another,”2
"The two basic tenets for the gas industry are:
• Suppliers must furnish a fuel gas that burns safely and performs adequately in the appliances and equipment connected to their lines.
• Manufacturers must furnish appliances and equipment that operate properly on the fuel gas furnished.
Thus, as fuel gases become more varied and maintaining a uniform product becomes increasingly difficult or impossible, the definition of acceptable variations in the composition of the gas becomes more vital. A responsive change is now taking place in the was the gas industry looks at interchangeability."3
1.3 Implications of Gas Interchangeability As Defined
These definitions clearly identify gas interchangeability as fundamentally an end use issue in terms of the interaction of gases with end use equipment. Specifically, it is concerned with gas combustion. Granted that the gas interchangeability criteria and requirements may have far-reaching implications, the focus of gas interchangeability science since the 1930s in the U. S. has remained on how end use appliance combustion responds to changes in fuel gas composition. This focus is reflected in appliance and equipment testing and development of interchangeability indices and parameter limits for indices.
In addition, these definitions point to the interaction of appliances and equipment and changes in gas composition as appliances and equipment are manufactured and installed, not as appliances might be modified by manufacturers or by installers in the field. This condition is documented in gas industry literature:
2 American Gas Association. Gas Engineers Handbook. Segler, C. George, Editor-in-Chief, The Industrial Press: New York, NY, 1965. p. 12/239. 3 American Gas Association. Utilization, Volume V: Gas Engineering and Operating Pracitce, Book U-1 Residential/Commercial, American Gas Association: Arlington, VA, 1994, p. 24. 6 "…for a substitute gas to be interchangeable with the base gas, the base settings of primary air and gas input rate must be within the flame limits of the substitute gas."4
Using an analogy from mathematics, gas interchangeability as it is studied and applied directly addresses the fixed environment of the appliance and equipment stock as a constant and gas composition as an independent variable. What might be done in terms of modifying appliances and equipment in the future, or even how appliances and equipment might be modified in the field to better address a known change in gas composition, are technically beyond the initial issue of whether gases are interchangeable.
2. The Objectives of Gas Interchangeability Criteria
2.1 Anticipation and Avoidance of Adverse Combustion Behavior
Gas interchangeability criteria emerged in the early days of the natural gas industry as a means of avoiding end use combustion problems before they occurred in widespread fashion in the field. Specific statements of the need for gas interchangeability criteria are rare in the early industry literature, probably because of the obvious importance addressing the suitability of gases before they were introduced as substitutes for other supplies and the need to avoid problems in the field. Two statements were offered in 1946 that suggest this:
"The ultimate objective of the investigation was to develop a method that would reliably predict [emphasis added] what gases could be substituted for natural gases or high heating value mixed gases, or supplement an inadequate supply of high heating value base gases during peak load periods."
and
"The matter of satisfactory interchangeability is obviously of extreme importance since no value can be attched [sic] to any supplemental gas which, if mixed with the base natural gas in any substantial proportion, will not permit customers to continue to utilize their appliances in a normal manner."5
Concerns of the gas industry to questions about gas supply and end use can be traced to a number of aspects of the early gas industry. However, the presence of significant concentrations of carbon monoxide (CO) in manufactured or "town
4 American Gas Association. Gas Engineers Handbook. Segler, C. George, Editor-in-Chief, The Industrial Press: New York, NY, 1965. p. 12/239. 5 American Gas Association Laboratories, Interchangeability of Other Fuel Gases with Natural Gases, Research Bulletin Number 36. AGA Committee on Mixed Gas Research, Joint Committee of Natural Gas Department and Technical Section, American Gas Association : Cleveland, Ohio, 1946, p. 2. 7 gas" and poisoning incidents from unburned gas undoubtedly contributed to these concerns as well as the need to better understand and anticipate problems of end use before they occurred.
2.2 Drivers for Gas Interchangeability Specifications in the U. S.
Questions of interchangeability have been driven by specific, anticipated changes in the U. S. gas market. In general, the following factors contribute to peaks in general interest in gas interchangeability and have driven technical activities:
• In the 1930s, the introduction of natural gases and issues of interchangeability with locally produced town gases.
• In the 1940s, development of peakshaving supply approaches, including manufactured gases and propane-air system sendout, and interchangeability with base load supplies.
• In the 1970s, introduction of imported LNG in local market areas and interchangeability with domestic supplies.
• Present, renewed interest in imported LNG locally and nationally, changes in processing of domestically produced gas, and interchangeability with traditional domestic supplies.
Exceptions are obvious to this characterization of the peaks (and valleys) in interest in gas interchangeability such as activity in the 1980s in the Western states addressing domestic sources such as Williston Basin gases and their interchangeability with other sources. However, interest in gas interchangeability spans decades, has been driven by previous concerns associated with new supplies including imported LNG, and has shared the common feature of evaluating gases before widespread experience with these gases in the field and potential combustion problems.
The study of gas interchangeability, briefly described later in this paper, has been the legacy of the U. S. gas utility industry. The need to anticipate issues associated with new supplies through testing and the development of interchangeability indices as tools demonstrates the commitment of the utility industry to address these issues before problems affecting gas consumers occur. In this respect, work on gas interchangeability and development of interchangeability limits may infer a "standard of care" by which the industry has operated for several decades.
2.3 Appliance Focus of Gas Interchangeability Studies and Specifications
8 While gas interchangeability can be determined for any combustion- related end use, historical focus of interchangeability studies have focused almost exclusively on appliances and equipment comprising residential and light commercial end uses. As discussed in Section 5, historical U. S. testing data covers several thousand appliances and appliance-type gas burners. While no limitation exists for conducting similar tests on industrial burners and gas turbines, the U. S. gas industry emphasized appliance applications for several reasons:
• Residential and commercial end uses represent the largest customer classes potentially affected by gas interchangeability issues. Even today, natural gas consumption by the residential sector is only 23.5% of total U. S. consumption, but residential consumers represent 92% of natural gas consumers.6
• Residential and many commercial end uses operate unattended or without direct operational control. As a result, normal use of residential and commercial appliances and equipment are subject to changes in combustion behavior without the benefit of an operator to either alter operation or adjustment or shut down equipment in the event of unacceptable combustion performance.
• Residential and commercial appliances would require extensive and highly labor intensive field modifications to adjust combustion performance for even a single significant change in gas composition. As was noted in 1994:
"Gross changes in gas composition that assuredly will require physical modification of appliances and equipment are another facet of interchangeability. When and if they come, these changes will require large-scale conversion programs similar to those associated with the change from manufactured gas to natural gas in the first half of the century."7
Current U. S. market conditions and the prospect of increased LNG importation from a variety of supply sources make this analogy imperfect. End users may be facing supplies from a variety of sources with diverse compositions, not a simple monotonic change from one general supply to another. As a result, the adequacy of field adjustment and modification approaches may not be sufficient in many cases. In addition, with changes to the gas utility industry and its decreased role in gas appliance servicing nationally, it is unclear what resources would accomplish large- scale appliance modification and adjustment programs, even where monotonic changes in gas supply were anticipated. The experience of
6 U. S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration , "Natural Gas Statistics for 2004," http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/ng/. 7 American Gas Association. Utilization, Volume V: Gas Engineering and Operating Pracitce, Book U-1 Residential/Commercial, American Gas Association: Arlington, VA, 1994, p. 28. 9 Questar discussed in the Gas Interchangeability White Paper summarizes unique issues and challenges of such programs to accommodate a monotonic change in gas supply.8
• Residential appliance maintenance and operating condition may be very important since annual maintenance and adjustment of appliances is not required in the U. S. This phenomenon is less likely in other end uses. As expressed in 1994:
"…it is reasonable to believe that there will always be a body of appliances that are unable to cope with changes in fuel-gas composition simply because of their poor condition. This is another complication that must be considered when fuel-gas changes are contemplated."9
Under these conditions, it can be argued that residential appliances are the most sensitive end use category and should drive the setting of general gas Interchangeability specifications. Whether it is the role of gas interchangeability specifications to account for poorly maintained or maladjusted appliances is a policy question. Some studies and activities to set gas compositional requirements have been undertaken such as the work leading to the tariff specifications for send out from the Cove Point LNG terminal.10 The end result of such approaches is likely to be the setting of tighter gas interchangeability specifications than if appliance design performance was used. Such approaches also require careful local study of appliance stocks and quality assurance that appliance testing is representative of the stock, reproducible in the laboratory, and repeatable.
• Residential gas appliances, as a category of end uses, represent a diverse set of technologies and potentially high level of uncertainty with respect to responses to changes in supply. In part, the diversity of these end uses is due to the longevity of residential appliances and the resulting relatively slow turnover in the installed appliance stock and their long-term operating condition under continuous use:
"Such longevity raises several concerns about appliance condition: