DOCSLIB.ORG

U.S.D.A. Forest Service

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
U.S.D.A. Forest Service KRIS edition Lower-Middle Klamath Watershed Analysis United States Department of Agriculture Six Rivers National Forest Forest Service Orleans Ranger District Pacific Version 1.0 Southwest Region R5-MB-011 March 2003 Early Forest Service fire patrol plane. The first plane to land in Orleans, California circa 1920. This page intentionally left blank. Lower-Middle Klamath Watershed Analysis Version 1.0 U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region Six Rivers National Forest Orleans Ranger District Located within Humboldt County, Klamath Province, CA March 2003 Cover Photo: This photo was taken during a 4th of July celebration in the town of Orleans at the heart of the Lower-Middle Klamath Analysis area. In showing a group of Karuk elders and other townspeople posed in front of what was then the most modern piece of fire fighting equipment, it depicts several features related to the historical or reference condition of the Lower-Middle Klamath area. Within the photo are individuals who likely knew the time before Europeans arrived in Orleans and who witnessed the start of the modern fire suppression era. For Additional Information Contact: Six Rivers National Forest 1330 Bayshore Way Eureka, CA 95501 707-442-1721 Text (TTY) 707-442-1721 Voice http://www.r5.fs.fed.us/sixrivers The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (“Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (Voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call 202- 720-5964 (Voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. List of Preparers LIST OF PREPARERS INTERDISCIPLINARY ANALYSIS TEAM: Bill Heitler, District Ranger Tony Hacking, Wildlife Biologist and Team Leader LeRoy Cyr, Fisheries Biologist Gene Graber, Recreation Planner Jennie Heberly, Transportation Planner Kathy Heffner McClellan, Social Analyst Carolyn Cook, Hydrologist Lisa Hoover, Botanist Tom Jimerson, Ecologist Kathy Barger-McCovey, Archaeologist Stan Pfister, Fire and Fuels Specialist Lucy Salazar, Fire and Fuels Specialist, Air Coordinator Mark Smith, Geologist Kirk Terrill, Timber Planner Alfredo Zarate, Recreation Planner Ken Wright, Forest Analyst / GIS Specialist Bud Zangger, Transportation Planner WITH ASSISTANCE FROM: Tara Collins, Botany Biological Technician Pat Britton, Botany Biological Technician George Albert, GIS Specialist / Cartographer Bob Hemus, Recreation Technician Steve Robinson, Fisheries Technician Corrine Black, Hydrologist Laura Fay, Americorps Intern Eric Zoellner, GIS Intern WRITER/EDITORS: Tony Hacking, Wildlife Biologist Tom Leskiw, Hydrology Technician Sean Thomas, GIS Data Steward Lower-Middle Klamath Watershed Analysis i This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF PREPARERS ..............................................................................................................i TABLE OF CONTENTS...........................................................................................................iii LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................ix LIST OF FIGURES...................................................................................................................xi INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................1 Watershed Analysis Overview............................................................................................1 Purpose..............................................................................................................................1 Factors Driving this Watershed Analysis............................................................................1 Document Organization ......................................................................................................2 Step 1 – Characterization...................................................................................................2 Step 2 – Issues and Key Questions: ..................................................................................2 Step 3 – Current Conditions...............................................................................................2 Step 4 – Reference Conditions ..........................................................................................2 Step 5 – Interpretation........................................................................................................3 Step 6 – Recommendations...............................................................................................3 An Iterative Process ............................................................................................................3 1. CHARACTERIZATION OF THE ANALYSIS AREA ..........................................................1-1 Watershed Setting ............................................................................................................1-1 Geography ......................................................................................................................1-1 Climate ............................................................................................................................1-1 Geology...........................................................................................................................1-2 Management Areas.........................................................................................................1-2 Vegetation and Fire ..........................................................................................................1-5 Vegetation Management .................................................................................................1-5 Vegetation Composition ..................................................................................................1-6 Sensitive, Rare and Survey and Manage Plant Species.................................................1-9 Noxious Weeds .............................................................................................................1-10 Riparian-Dependent Plant Species ...............................................................................1-10 Forest Products.............................................................................................................1-11 Timber Harvest ..........................................................................................................1-11 Vegetative Special Forest Products ..........................................................................1-11 Fire ................................................................................................................................1-11 Fire/Fuels Management.............................................................................................1-12 Water Quality and Fisheries ..........................................................................................1-13 Hydrologic Regime........................................................................................................1-13 Watershed Management...............................................................................................1-14 Aquatic Conservation Strategy ..................................................................................1-14 Wild and Scenic Designation.....................................................................................1-14 Fisheries Management..................................................................................................1-14 Endangered Species Act ...........................................................................................1-19 Threatened and Endangered Fish.............................................................................1-19 Forest Service Sensitive Fish ....................................................................................1-19 Magnuson-Stevens Act .............................................................................................1-20 Klamath Act ...............................................................................................................1-20 Terrestrial Wildlife Species............................................................................................1-21 Wildlife Management.....................................................................................................1-21 Threatened and Endangered Wildlife ........................................................................1-21 Lower-Middle Klamath Watershed Analysis iii Table of Contents Forest Service Sensitive Wildlife ...............................................................................1-22 Survey and Manage Species.....................................................................................1-22 Cavity-Nesting Birds and Bat Roosts ........................................................................1-23 Management Indicator Species .................................................................................1-23
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix A: Project Partners
    Humboldt County Coastal Trail Implementation Strategy Technical Appendix JANUARY 2011 Prepared for: State of California Coastal Conservancy Project team: Natural Resources Services Division of Redwood Community Action Agency Alta Planning + Design Planwest Partners Streamline Planning Consultants Humboldt County Coastal Trail Implementation Strategy TECHNICAL APPENDICES Thank you to the community members and agency staff who provided input during public meetings and advisory team workshops throughout the planning process. Your participation and contributions are key to this and future efforts to bring the CCT to fruition. Peter Jarausch Project Manager State of California Coastal Conservancy [email protected] This plan was made possible through Proposition 40 funding Photo credits: Kids on bicycles, N. Wynne; Trail horses, U. Driscoll; Eureka boardwalk, J. Kalt All other photos by project team Appendix A: Project Partners Primary Partners ................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Federal Agencies .............................................................................................................................................................. 2 Bureau of Land Management (BLM) ....................................................................................................................... 2 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Characterizing Tribal Cultural Landscapes, Volume II: Tribal Case
    OCS Study BOEM 2017-001 Characterizing Tribal Cultural Landscapes Volume II: Tribal Case Studies US Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Pacific OCS Region This page intentionally left blank. OCS Study BOEM 2017-001 Characterizing Tribal Cultural Landscapes Volume II: Tribal Case Studies David Ball Rosie Clayburn Roberta Cordero Briece Edwards Valerie Grussing Janine Ledford Robert McConnell Rebekah Monette Robert Steelquist Eirik Thorsgard Jon Townsend Prepared under BOEM-NOAA Interagency Agreement M12PG00035 by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Office of National Marine Sanctuaries 1305 East-West Highway, SSMC4 Silver Spring, MD 20910 Makah Tribe Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Community of Oregon Yurok Tribe National Marine Sanctuary Foundation US Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Office of National Marine Sanctuaries US Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Pacific OCS Region December 31, 2017 This page intentionally left blank. DISCLAIMER This study was funded, in part, by the US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), Pacific Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Region, Camarillo, CA, through Interagency Agreement Number M12PG00035 with the US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). This report has been technically reviewed by BOEM and it has been approved for publication. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the US Government, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. REPORT AVAILABILITY This report can be downloaded from the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management’s Recently Completed Environmental Studies – Pacific webpage at https://www.boem.gov/Pacific-Completed-Studies/.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimation of Stream Conditions in Tributaries of the Klamath River, Northern California
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Arcata Fisheries Technical Report TR 2018-32 Estimation of Stream Conditions in Tributaries of the Klamath River, Northern California Christopher V. Manhard, Nicholas A. Som, Edward C. Jones, Russell W. Perry U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office 1655 Heindon Road Arcata, CA 95521 (707) 822-7201 January 2018 Funding for this study was provided by a variety of sources including the Klamath River Fish Habitat Assessment Program administered by the Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Bureau of Reclamation, Klamath Falls Area Office. Disclaimer: The mention of trade names or commercial products in this report does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the Federal Government. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office Fisheries Program reports its study findings through two publication series. The Arcata Fisheries Data Series was established to provide timely dissemination of data to local managers and for inclusion in agency databases. Arcata Fisheries Technical Reports publish scientific findings from single and multi- year studies that have undergone more extensive peer review and statistical testing. Additionally, some study results are published in a variety of professional fisheries aquatic habitat conservation journals. To ensure consistency with Service policy relating to its online peer-reviewed journals, Arcata Fisheries Data Series and Technical Reports are distributed electronically and made available in the public domain. Paper copies are no longer circulated.
    [Show full text]
  • March 23-26, 2011 in San Luis Obispo
    29th Annual Salmonid Restoration Conference Holding the Line on Species Decline March 23-26, 2011 in San Luis Obispo 2011 Conference Co-sponsors Alnus Ecological, Balance Hydrologics, Inc., California Department of Fish and Game, California Department of Water Resources, Cachuma Conservation Release Board, Cal Trout – North Coast, California Conservation Corps, CalTrans, Cardno Entrix, Casitas Municipal Water District, cbec, inc., Central Coast Salmon Enhancement, City of San Luis Obispo, City of Santa Barbara – Creeks Project, CONTECH, Fred Euphrat, McBain and Trush, Michael Love and Associates, Morro Bay National Estuary Program, NOAA Fisheries, Northern California Council of Federation of Fly-Fishers, Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, Pacifi c Coast Fish, Wildlife and Wetlands Restoration Association, Pacifi c States Marine Fisheries Commission, Pacifi c Watershed Associates, Pacifi c Gas & Electric Company, Philip Williams and Associates, Inc., Prunuske Chatham, Inc., Restoration Design Group, San Lorenzo Valley Water District, Solano County Water Agency, Sonoma County Water Agency, Stillwater Sciences, The Bay Institute, The Nature Conservancy, Trees Foundation, Trout Unlimited, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service – CA/NV Fisheries, Winzler and Kelly Restoring Salmonids—Holding the Line on Species Decline SRF is pleased to be returning to San Luis Obispo for the 29th annual Salmonid Restoration Conference. Since last holding the conference in SLO in 2003, we’ve been to Davis, Fortuna, Santa Barbara, Santa Rosa, Lodi, Santa Cruz, and Redding. At each location, we focus on the issues in the local watersheds while including topics of wide ranging interest among the fi sheries restoration community. Each locale gives us an opportunity to consider a theme appropriate for the state of salmon fi sheries and the location of the conference.
    [Show full text]
  • County Profile
    FY 2020-21 PROPOSED BUDGET SECTION B:PROFILE GOVERNANCE Assessor County Counsel Auditor-Controller Human Resources Board of Supervisors Measure Z Clerk-Recorder Other Funds County Admin. Office Treasurer-Tax Collector Population County Comparison Education Infrastructure Employment DEMOGRAPHICS Geography Located on the far North Coast of California, 200 miles north of San Francisco and about 50 miles south of the southern Oregon border, Humboldt County is situated along the Pacific coast in Northern California’s rugged Coastal (Mountain) Ranges, bordered on the north SCENERY by Del Norte County, on the east by Siskiyou and Trinity counties, on the south by Mendocino County and on the west by the Pacific Ocean. The climate is ideal for growth The county encompasses 2.3 million acres, 80 percent of which is of the world’s tallest tree - the forestlands, protected redwoods and recreational areas. A densely coastal redwood. Though these forested, mountainous, rural county with about 110 miles of coastline, trees are found from southern more than any other county in the state, Humboldt contains over forty Oregon to the Big Sur area of percent of all remaining old growth Coast Redwood forests, the vast California, Humboldt County majority of which is protected or strictly conserved within dozens of contains the most impressive national, state, and local forests and parks, totaling approximately collection of Sequoia 680,000 acres (over 1,000 square miles). Humboldt’s highest point is sempervirens. The county is Salmon Mountain at 6,962 feet. Its lowest point is located in Samoa at home to Redwood National 20 feet. Humboldt Bay, California’s second largest natural bay, is the and State Parks, Humboldt only deep water port between San Francisco and Coos Bay, Oregon, Redwoods State Park (The and is located on the coast at the midpoint of the county.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Distribution of Beavers in California: Implications for Salmonids
    Current Distribution of Beavers in California: Implications for Salmonids Eli Asarian Riverbend Sciences Presented at: Salmon Restoration Federation Conference Riverbend Sciences 3/19/2014 Presentation Outline • Beaver Mapper • Current beaver distribution – Interactions with salmonids – Recent expansion Eli Asarian Cheryl Reynolds / Worth A Dam What is the Beaver Mapper? • Web-based map system for entering, displaying, and sharing information on beaver distribution Live Demo http://www.riverbendsci.com/projects/beavers How Can You Help? • Contribute data – Via website – Contact me: • [email protected] • 707.832.4206 • Bulk update for large datasets • Funding – New data – System improvements Current and Historic Beaver Distribution in California Beaver Range Current range Historic range Outside confirmed historic range Drainage divide of Sacramento/San Joaquin and South Coast Rivers Lakes Lanman et al. 2013 County Boundaries Current Beaver Distribution in CA Smith River Beaver Range Current range Historic range Outside confirmed historic range Drainage divide of Sacramento/San Joaquin and South Coast Rivers Lakes County Boundaries Beaver Bank Lodge Smith River Marisa Parish, (Humboldt State Univ. MS thesis) Lower Klamath River Middle Beaver Range Klamath Current range River Historic range Outside confirmed historic range Drainage divide of Sacramento/San Joaquin and South Coast Rivers Lakes County Boundaries Beaver Pond on W.F. McGarvey Creek (Trib to Lower Klamath River) from: Sarah Beesley & Scott Silloway, (Yurok Tribe Fisheries
    [Show full text]
  • After a Sleepless Full Moon Night With
    Restoring Coho Salmon in the Klamath River, One Beaver At A Time By Will Harling, Executive Director, Mid Klamath Watershed Council After a sleepless full moon night with our 18 month old daughter, Rory, (a night where my wife bore the brunt of her midnight antics and our guests sleeping in the living room must have been guessing who was torturing who), I bundled our girl onto my back and walked down to the Klamath River in the pre-dawn light. To say I altruistically wanted everyone to sleep in would be a half-truth given the fishing pole in one hand, balancing out the diaper bag in the other. I had a spot in mind, just downstream of the Orleans Bar River Access, where the river slides over a broad riffle so shallow the fish are forced into a narrow slot that one could cast across, even with a groggy, grumpy, sleep-deprived toddler strapped to their back. The relatively wide Orleans Valley gives the river a chance to meander a little here, reclaiming its sinuousity stolen over the past six million years as the Klamath Mountains began to rise from underneath, forcing it into steep sided canyons tracing fault lines in the uplifted bedrock just upstream and downstream of the valley. Fall chinook salmon moving upstream to spawn left wakes in the glassy water as they navigated up through the shallows, and the Klamath’s famed half-pounder steelhead run was coming in with them. Across the river, I noticed a furry head moving slowly upstream. The light brown tuft of hair visible above the water looked like what I thought a beaver would look like, but couldn’t be sure.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring Klamath Salmon: Dams Fish and Fire
    Klamath Fisheries Restoration in the Era of Climate Change, Dam Removal and Megafires Will Harling - Director Mid Klamath Watershed Council Mid Klamath Watershed Council • MKWC employed 74 people in 2018: 13 Full-time employees, 28 Part-time employees, 23 Seasonal employees, and 10 Interns. Clean audits 2014-2018. • MKWC plays a major role in building a restoration-based economy in the Western Klamath Mountains. We are results oriented and work through developed partnerships to plan and implement projects based on traditional cultural knowledge and the best available western science. Presentation Outline • Klamath River: Press Disturbances – Dying From a Thousand Cuts – Legacy of Roads, Logging, Mining, Dams, and Fire Exclusion/Suppression • Why Solving the Fire Crisis is Essential to Fish Restoration – Implications of Recent Studies, and Solutions for Restoring Fire Processes • Coho Habitat Restoration on the Klamath River – Lessons Learned from a Decade of Off-channel in In-channel Habitat Restoration • Report Out on Recent Mid Klamath Fish Habitat Restoration – Boise Beaver Dam Analogues – Six Rivers NF Aquatics Ecosystem Analysis and Aquatic Restoration Action Plan – Middle Klamath River Floodplain Enhancement & Mine Tailing Remediation Plan Mike Hentz Mike Hentz Toz Soto Mike Hentz Somes Peak Looking Towards the Trinity Alps – Pyrodiversity Begets Conifer Diversity NF Salmon River After 1987 Fires 2014 Whites Fire (Re-defining Spot Fires) Lightning Fires from Whites Fire Pyrocumulus Lightning Strikes 08/11/14 Started 2014 Happy Camp
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating Freshwater Productivity, Overwinter Survival, and Migration Patterns of Klamath River Coho Salmon
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Arcata Fisheries Technical Report TR 2018-33 Estimating Freshwater Productivity, Overwinter Survival, and Migration Patterns of Klamath River Coho Salmon Christopher V. Manhard, Nicholas A. Som, Russell W. Perry, Jimmy R. Faukner and Toz Soto U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office 1655 Heindon Road Arcata, CA 95521 (707) 822-7201 February 2018 Funding for this study was provided by a variety of sources, including the Klamath River Fish Habitat Assessment Program administered by the Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office and the Bureau of Reclamation Klamath Falls Area Office. Disclaimer: The mention of trade names or commercial products in this report does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the Federal Government. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office Fisheries Program reports its study findings through two publication series. The Arcata Fisheries Data Series was established to provide timely dissemination of data to local managers and for inclusion in agency databases. Arcata Fisheries Technical Reports publish scientific findings from single and multi- year studies that have undergone more extensive peer review and statistical testing. Additionally, some study results are published in a variety of professional fisheries aquatic habitat conservation journals. To ensure consistency with Service policy relating to its online peer-reviewed journals, Arcata Fisheries Data Series and Technical Reports are distributed electronically and made available in the public domain. Paper copies are no longer circulated.
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional Ecological Knowledge to Develop and Maintain Fire Regimes
    2 AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF Frank K. Lake for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Sciences presented on May 10, 2007. Title: Traditional Ecological Knowledge to Develop and Maintain Fire Regimes in Northwestern California, Klamath-Siskiyou Bioregion: Management and Restoration of Culturally Significant Habitats Abstract approved: ________________________________________________________ Steve R. Radosevich The use of Native American fire regimes evolved in the Klamath-Siskiyou bioregion over millennia. A mixture of Native American and Euro-American socio- cultural management has developed from adaptations to climate, topography, ecological processes, and land use practices. This research incorporates Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) to partially examine the role of tribal fire uses and ethnobotany. Research methods use an interdisciplinary approach to characterize fuels and fire management issues in culturally significant riparian and terrestrial habitats. Tribal fuels and fire management practices were investigated. Understanding past tribal fire management systems is needed to place contemporary Native American fuels and fire management issues in to context for government agencies and private interest that have altered tribal opportunities to continue fire uses. This study examined fire effects on sandbar willow (Salix exigua) in valley riparian zones along the lower mid-Klamath River. Prescribed fire was used to induce sprouting of sandbar willow and reduce insect populations to improve basket material quantity and quality. Results indicate that flooding had greater affects on the structure, composition, and abundance of vegetation and fuels than prescribed fire. A second 3 experiment to compare the effect of propane burning and pruning sandbar willow indicated that propane burning was less effective than pruning to improve stem morphology for basket weaving.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Klamath Restoration Partnership: Somes Bar Integrated Fire Management Project Lower Middle Klamath River Watershed
    BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT AND BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION For Threatened, Endangered, Proposed, and Sensitive Anadromous Fish Species That may be affected by: Western Klamath Restoration Partnership: Somes Bar Integrated Fire Management Project Lower Middle Klamath River Watershed * Ukonom Ranger District of the Klamath National Forest and Orleans Ranger District of the Six Rivers National Forest Klamath Province Humboldt and Siskiyou County, California April 20, 2018 Prepared by: _______________________ Date: April 20, 2018 LeRoy Cyr District Fisheries Biologist Reviewed by: ______________________ Date: April 20, 2018 Karen Kenfield Forest Level I Coordinator *Note: The Ukonom Ranger District is administratively managed by the Six Rivers National Forest. Somes Bar Integrated Fire Management Project – Fisheries BA/BE – April 2018 PROJECT NAME: Somes Bar Integrated Fire Management Project ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS: Klamath National Forest - Ukonom Ranger District and Six Rivers National Forest - Orleans Ranger District ANALYSIS WATERSHEDS: 4th field scale - Middle Klamath River: 984,709 acres 6th field scale - Ti Creek: 13,623 acres 6th field scale - Reynolds Creek: 34,611 acres 6th field scale - Boise Creek: 31,343 acres WATERSHED ANALYSES: Ishi-Pishi/Ukonom Ecosystem Analysis (USDA 1998) NEPA Documentation: Somes Bar Integrated Fire Management Project EA Expected signature date: May 2018 ESA LISTED SPECIES CONSIDERED: Southern Oregon/Northern California Coasts Coho salmon ESU (Oncorhynchus kisutch) ESA CRITICAL HABITAT: Southern Oregon/Northern California Coasts Coho salmon CH ESA DETERMINATIONS: The project may affect, not likely to adversely affect Southern Oregon/Northern California Coasts coho or their designated Critical Habitat. ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT (EFH): The project may affect, not likely to adversely affect Chinook and Coho Salmon Essential Fish Habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Six Rivers National Forest Recreation Fee Highlights, 2017
    United States Department of Agriculture Six Rivers National Forest Recreation Fee Program Accomplishment Highlights 2017 First Ever YCC Crew Locally Bought and Built The forest Thanks to recreation fee dollars, offered its the forest was able to purchase first ever and place six new concreate residential picnic tables to replace falling Youth apart tables at popular Conservation campgrounds and day use areas. Corps (YCC). The heavy duty tables were manufactured locally and were where members stay on site for the duration of made available two 3-week sessions, rather than returning to through a their homes in the evening. This type of generous discount immersive environment is ideal for personal from a local growth in the areas of team building and business. independence skills. Funded by a combination of appropriations and recreation fees, participants removed brush from serval campgrounds and day use areas across the forest. They also collected trash, sorted recycling repaired signs and built fences. Protecting the Meadow In cooperation with a local building partner, the forest used Recreation Fee Dollars recreation fees to Recreation fee dollars are an investment in outdoor help protect recreation. They support and enhance: Ammon Ranch • Public safety Meadow, which is a popular special use site for • Recreation site maintenance and improvements spiritual gatherings, group camping, live music, • Educational experiences and disc golf. The forest constructed wooden rail • Informational wayside exhibits fence, with the help of a Youth Conservation • Youth programs and partnerships Corps, to prevent unauthorized camping and • Interpretive programs vehicle traffic that was destroying vegetation. All Current and future generations benefit as 80-95% of the materials for the fence were manufactured and funds are reinvested in the facilities and services that purchased locally.
    [Show full text]