DOCSLIB.ORG

Groundwater Assessment for Nonpoint Source Pollution Impacts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Groundwater Assessment for Nonpoint Source Pollution Impacts Groundwater Assessment for Nonpoint Source Pollution Impacts and Spring Basin Delineations within Sub-watersheds of the Salt River Basin: Beargrass Creek and Sinking Creek Final Report By Robert J. Blair and Joseph A. Ray (retired) Kentucky Division of Water Watershed Management Branch Groundwater Section 200 Fair Oaks Lane Frankfort, KY 40601 (502)564-3410 [email protected] Grant Number: C9994861-03 Workplan Number: N/A (Re-obligated Funds) NPS Project Number: 03-03 MOA or Grant Agreement Number: N/A Project Period: April 2004 to March 2009 “The Energy and Environment Cabinet (EEC) does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, religion, or disability. The EEC will provide, on request, reasonable accommodations including auxiliary aids and services necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in all services, programs, and activities. To request materials in an alternative format, contact the Kentucky Division of Water, 200 Fair Oaks Lane, Frankfort, KY 40601 or call (502) 564-3410. Hearing and speech-impaired persons can contact the agency by using the Kentucky Relay Service, a toll-free telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD). For voice to TDD, call 800-648-6057. For TDD to voice, call 800-648-6056. Funding for this project as provided in part by a grant from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) as authorized by the Clean Water Act Amendments of 1987, §319(h) Nonpoint Source Implementation Grant #(C9994861-03). The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the US EPA or DOW nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement. This document was printed on recycled paper.” TABLE of CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................................... 1 CONVERSION FACTORS .......................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION and BACKGROUND .................................................................................................... 3 Project Description .................................................................................................................................... 4 Previous Investigations ............................................................................................................................. 5 PHYSIOGRAPHIC and HYDROGEOLOGIC SETTING ........................................................................... 6 Salt River Basin ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Karst Hydrology and Groundwater Sensitivity…………………………………….……………………6 Beargrass Creek Watershed ...................................................................................................................... 8 Hydrogeologic Setting………………..………………………………………………………………..9 Land Use .............................................................................................................................................. 11 Groundwater Use ................................................................................................................................. 12 Sinking Creek Watershed ....................................................................................................................... 13 Hydrogeologic Setting ......................................................................................................................... 14 Land Use .............................................................................................................................................. 18 Groundwater Use ................................................................................................................................. 18 MATERIALS and METHODS ................................................................................................................... 19 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 19 Sample Collection Methods .................................................................................................................... 20 Graphical Methods .................................................................................................................................. 21 Site Selection .......................................................................................................................................... 21 Tracer Tests Methods .............................................................................................................................. 22 RESULTS and DISCUSSION .................................................................................................................... 25 Water Quality Results – Beargrass Creek ............................................................................................... 30 Warm-water Aquatic Habitat .............................................................................................................. 30 Primary Contact Recreation ................................................................................................................ 32 Water Quality Results – Sinking Creek .................................................................................................. 32 Warm-water Aquatic Habitat .............................................................................................................. 32 Groundwater Tracing Investigations ...................................................................................................... 33 Previous Investigations ........................................................................................................................... 34 Spring Descriptions and Tracer Test Results – Beargrass Creek ............................................................ 35 A’Sturgus Station Spring .................................................................................................................... 35 Steinrock Spring ................................................................................................................................. 37 A.B. Sawyer Gate Spring .................................................................................................................... 38 Bowling Blvd. Spring ......................................................................................................................... 39 Cypress Pointe Springs ....................................................................................................................... 40 Mockingbird Valley Springs ............................................................................................................... 42 Windy Hills Spring ............................................................................................................................. 44 Oxmoor Spring ................................................................................................................................... 44 Upper Oxmoor Spring ........................................................................................................................ 45 Culvert Spring above Watterson ......................................................................................................... 45 Brown Cemetery Culvert Spring ........................................................................................................ 46 Weicher Creek Diversion Spring ........................................................................................................ 47 Low Dutch Station Spring .................................................................................................................. 47 Hole 10 Spring .................................................................................................................................... 49 Nunnlea Spring ................................................................................................................................... 50 Zenderhouse Spring ............................................................................................................................ 50 Ray Spring .......................................................................................................................................... 52 Culvert & Confluence Springs ............................................................................................................ 53 Buechel Spring .................................................................................................................................... 54 Culvert Spring @ Genfab ................................................................................................................... 55 Sanitary Sewer – Karst Interactions .................................................................................................... 56 Tracer Tests Not Recovered................................................................................................................ 64 Groundwater Sensitivity Verification ................................................................................................. 65 Spring
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Modern Shale Gas Development in the United States: a Primer
    U.S. Department of Energy • Office of Fossil Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory April 2009 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe upon privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. Modern Shale Gas Development in the United States: A Primer Work Performed Under DE-FG26-04NT15455 Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Office of Fossil Energy and National Energy Technology Laboratory Prepared by Ground Water Protection Council Oklahoma City, OK 73142 405-516-4972 www.gwpc.org and ALL Consulting Tulsa, OK 74119 918-382-7581 www.all-llc.com April 2009 MODERN SHALE GAS DEVELOPMENT IN THE UNITED STATES: A PRIMER ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) under Award Number DE‐FG26‐ 04NT15455. Mr. Robert Vagnetti and Ms. Sandra McSurdy, NETL Project Managers, provided oversight and technical guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Physical Environment and Coal-Mining History of West-Central Indiana, with Emphasis on Six Small Watersheds
    Description of the Physical Environment and Coal-Mining History of West-Central Indiana, with Emphasis on Six Small Watersheds United States Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2368-A AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the current-year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publicati6ns of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Survey publications released prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List." Publications that are listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" are no longer available. ' Prices of reports released to the open files are given in the listing "U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Reports," updated monthly, which is for sale in microfiche from the U.S. Geological Survey, Books and Open-File Reports Section, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225. Reports released through the NTIS may be obtained by writing to the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161; please include NTIS report number with inquiry. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices given below. BY MAIL OVER THE COUNTER Books Books Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Tech­ Books of the U.S. Geological Survey are available over the niques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications of counter at the following U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Airphoto Interpretation of Engineering Soils of Interstate Route I-64
    AIRPHOTO INTERPRETATION OF ENGINEERING SOILS OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY ROUTE 64 BETWEEN SCALESVILLE AND NEW ALBANY IN WARRICK, SPENCER, DUBOIS, PERRY, CRAWFORD, HARRISON AND FLOYD COUNTIES, INDIANA SEPTEMBER 1965 NO. 24 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from LYRASIS members and Sloan Foundation; Indiana Department of Transportation http://www.archive.org/details/airphotointerpre6524yehp Progress Report AIRPHOTO INTERPRETATION OF EKGIMEERIKG SOILS INTERSTATE ROUTE 1-64? BETWEEN SCALESVILLE AND NEW ALBANY IN WARRICK, SPENCER, DUBOIS, PERSY, CRAWFORD, HARRISON AND FLOYD COUNTIES, INDIANA Tos G. A. Leonards, Director Joint Highway Research Project September 24, 1965 Frooj H. L Michael, Associate Director Files 1-5-5 Joint Highway Research Project Project: C-36-51E The steadied report entitled "Airphoto Interpretation of Engineering Soils of Interstate Route 1-64 between Scalesville and New Albany in Warrick, Spencer, Dubois, Perry, Crawford, Harrison and Floyd Counties, Indiana," completes the project concerned with engineering soils napping of the Interstate system from aerial photographs This project was prepared as a part of an investigation conducted by Joint Highway Research Project in cooperation with the Indiana State Highway Coaaisslon, the Bureau of Public Roadn and the Soil Conservation Service. The report was prepared by P. T. Yeh Research Engineer, Joint Highway Research Project The soil mapping of 1-64 between Scslesville and flew Albany was done entirely by airphoto interpretation technique To Increase the value, the soil strip nap was prepared on a photographic base with annotation to show soil areas The generalized soil profiles were .prepared from the available literature. Respectfully submitted. ?/? 7*~A~S H. L.
    [Show full text]
  • ROCKS ASSOCIATED with the MISSISSIPPIAN-PENNSYLVANIAN UNCONFORMITY in SOUTHWESTERN INDIANA Indiana Department of Conservation
    ROCKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE MISSISSIPPIAN-PENNSYLVANIAN UNCONFORMITY IN SOUTHWESTERN INDIANA Indiana Department of Conservation GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Field Conference Guidebook No. 9 1957 STATE OF INDIANA Harold W. Handley, Governor DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION E. Kenneth Marlin, Director GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles F. Deiss, State Geologist Bloomington ______________________________________________________________________________________ Field Conference Guidebook No. 9 ______________________________________________________________________________________ ROCKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE MISSISSIPPIAN-PENNSYLVANIAN UNCONFORMITY IN SOUTHWESTERN INDIANA CONFERENCE SPONSORED BY Geological Survey, Indiana Department of Conservation and Department of Geology, Indiana University, October 4, 5, and 6, 1957 CONFERENCE COMMITTEE Henry H. Gray, Chairman; T. A. Dawson; Duncan J. McGregor; T. G. Perry; and William J. Wayne Printed by authority of the State of Indiana BLOOMINGTON, INDIANA October 1957 ______________________________________________________________________________________ For sale by Geological Survey, Indiana Department of Conservation, Bloomington, Indiana Price $1.00 This page intentionally blank CONTENTS 3 Page Page Introduction ---------------------------------------5 Glossary of rock-type terms ---------------------32 Physiography ----------------------------------5 Literature cited ------------------------------------33 Paleozoic stratigraphy ------------------------5 Postconference road logs ------------------------35 Geomorphic history ---------------------------7
    [Show full text]
  • Index to the Geologic Names of North America
    Index to the Geologic Names of North America GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1056-B Index to the Geologic Names of North America By DRUID WILSON, GRACE C. KEROHER, and BLANCHE E. HANSEN GEOLOGIC NAMES OF NORTH AMERICA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 10S6-B Geologic names arranged by age and by area containing type locality. Includes names in Greenland, the West Indies, the Pacific Island possessions of the United States, and the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1959 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.G. - Price 60 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Major stratigraphic and time divisions in use by the U.S. Geological Survey._ iv Introduction______________________________________ 407 Acknowledgments. _--__ _______ _________________________________ 410 Bibliography________________________________________________ 410 Symbols___________________________________ 413 Geologic time and time-stratigraphic (time-rock) units________________ 415 Time terms of nongeographic origin_______________________-______ 415 Cenozoic_________________________________________________ 415 Pleistocene (glacial)______________________________________ 415 Cenozoic (marine)_______________________________________ 418 Eastern North America_______________________________ 418 Western North America__-__-_____----------__-----____ 419 Cenozoic (continental)___________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Structure of the Rough Creek Area, Western Kentucky William D. Johnson Jr. U.S. Geological Survey, Emeritus and Howa
    Kentucky Geological Survey James C. Cobb, State Geologist and Director University of Kentucky, Lexington Geology and Structure of the Rough Creek Area, Western Kentucky William D. Johnson Jr. U.S. Geological Survey, Emeritus and Howard R. Schwalb Kentucky Geological Survey and Illinois State Geological Survey, Retired Nomenclature and structure contours do not necessarily conform to current U.S. Geological Survey or Kentucky Geological Survey usage. This work was originally prepared in the late 1990’s and is published here with only editorial improvements. Bulletin 1 Series XII, 2010 Our Mission Our mission is to increase knowledge and understanding of the mineral, energy, and water resources, geologic hazards, and geology of Kentucky for the benefit of the Commonwealth and Nation. © 2006 University of Kentucky Earth Resources—OurFor further information Common contact: Wealth Technology Transfer Officer Kentucky Geological Survey 228 Mining and Mineral Resources Building University of Kentucky Lexington, KY 40506-0107 www.uky.edu/kgs ISSN 0075-5591 Technical Level Technical Level General Intermediate Technical General Intermediate Technical ISSN 0075-5559 Contents Abstract .........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................7 Geologic Setting.........................................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Linkchapter
    Index [Italic page numbers indicate major references] Abbott Formation, Illinois, 251 Michigan, 287 beetle borrows, Nebraska, 11 Acadian belt, 429 Archean rocks beetles, Manitoba, 45 Acadian orogeny Michigan, 273, 275 Belfast Member, Brassfield Illinois, 243 Minnesota, 47, 49, 53 Formation, Ohio, 420, 421 Indiana, 359 Wisconsin, 189 Bellepoint Member, Columbus Acrophyllum oneidaense, 287 Arikaree Group, Nebraska, 13, 14, Limestone, Ohio, 396 Adams County, Ohio, 420, 431 15, 25, 28 Belleview Valley, Missouri, 160 Adams County, Wisconsin, 183 Arikareean age, Nebraska, 3 Bellevue Limestone, Indiana, 366, Admire Group, Nebraska, 37 arthropods 367 Aglaspis, 83 Iowa, 83 Bennett Member, Red Eagle Ainsworth Table, Nebraska, 5 Missouri, 137 Formation, Nebraska, 37 Alexander County, Illinois, 247, 257 Ash Hollow Creek, Nebraska, 31 Benton County, Indiana, 344 algae Ash Hollow Formation, Nebraska, 1, Benzie County, Michigan, 303 Indian, 333 2, 5, 26, 29 Berea Sandstone, Ohio, 404, 405, Michigan, 282 Ash Hollow State Historical Park, 406, 427, 428 Missouri, 137 Nebraska, 29 Berne Conglomerate, Logan Ohio, 428 asphalt, Illinois, 211 Formation, Ohio, 411, 412, 413 Alger County, Michigan, 277 Asphalting, 246 Bethany Falls Limestone Member, Algonquin age, Michigan, 286, 287 Asterobillingsa, 114 Swope Formation, Missouri, Allamakee County, Iowa, 81, 83, 84 Astrohippus, 26 135, 138 Allegheny Group, Ohio, 407 Atherton Formation, Indiana, 352 Bethany Falls Limestone, Iowa, 123 Allen County, Indiana, 328, 329, 330 athyrids, Iowa, 111 Betula, 401 Allensville
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science
    Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science (1990) Volume 99 p. 39-45 39 INFLUENCES ON THE POSITION OF CHESTERIAN SAND BELTS IN INDIANA John B. Droste and Alan S. Horowitz Department of Geological Sciences Indiana University 1005 East 10th Street Bloomington, Indiana 47405 ABSTRACT: The axial trend of belt sand bodies in the Hardinsburg Formation in Indiana shows striking similarities to the axial trends of belt sand bodies in earlier Chesterian formations of the West Baden Group and in the overlying Tar Springs and Waltersburg Formations. Droste and Horowitz (1990) postulated that the belt sand bodies of the Hardinsburg Formation in Indiana resulted from focussed current action on quartz sands funnelled along sea floor lows. The sea floor lows marked locations where local increased rates of subsidence were produced by subtle adjust- ments in basement structures. We infer that all the belt sands in the Indiana Chesterian resulted from deposition controlled by the same factors and that their trends mark locations of changing loci of minor basement structural adjustments These trends are generally parallel to the tectonic movements that produced the structures associated with the LaSalle Anticlinal Belt and Wabash Valley Fault System. INTRODUCTION In this review, our principal purpose is to illustrate that the axial trend of belt sand bodies in the Hardinsburg Formation in Indiana shows striking similarities to the axial trends of several other belt sand bodies in other Chesterian formations in Indiana. Potter (1962, 1963) has published a classification of elongate sand bodies, and we use herein his characterization of belt sand bodies. CHESTERIAN BELT SANDSTONES Major belt sand bodies in the subsurface of Indiana occur in the West Baden Group, the Stephensport Group, and in the lower part of the Buffalo Wallow Group (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Bedrock Geology and Mineral Resources of Putnam County Indiana
    - Bedrock Geology and Mineral Resources of Putnam County Indiana By JOHN R. HILL, MICHAEL C. MOORE, and JOHN C. MACKEY DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SPECIAL REPORT 26 PRINTED BY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF INDIANA BLOOMINGTON, INDIANA: 1982 STATE OF INDIANA r Robert D. Orr, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES James M. Ridenour, Director GEOLOGICAL SURVEY John B. Patton, State Geologiat For sale by Geological Survey. Bloomington, Ind. 47405 Price $2.00 Contents - Page Abstract .... 1 Introduction . .1 Character of the landscape . 1 Physiography .2 Drainage ... .2 Glacial geology . .5 Bedrock geology .7 Structure .7 Stratigraphy . .8 Borden Group and Edwardsville Formation .8 Sanders Group ..... .8 Ramp Creek Formation .9 Harrodsburg Limestone 11 Salem Limestone • . 11 Blue River Group . 12 St. Louis Limestone .. 12 Ste. Genevieve Limestone 12 Paoli Limestone 13 West Baden Group 14 Bethel Formation 14 Beaver Bend Limestone 14 Sample Formation . 14 Reelsville Limestone . 14 Elwren Formatio~ ... 14 Raccoon Creek Group and Mansfield Formation 15 Industrial minerals . 15 Limestone resources . 15 Beaver Bend Limestone 17 Paoli Limestone .... 17 Ste. Genevieve Limestone 17 St. Louis Limestone 18 Salem Limestone .. 18 Harrodsburg Limestone 18 Production potential . 19 Sand and gravel resources 21 Clay and shale resources 24 Coal resources ..... 26 Literature cited ..... 27 Appendix - Measured sections 31 -----------------------------~----..-----.-.--.- --­ Illustra tions Page r Figure 1 Map of Putnam County showing physiographic units .2 2 Map of Putnam County showing general distribution of Wisconsinan and IDinoian glacial deposits .............. 2 3 Map of Putnam County showing drainage network . 3 4 Map of Putnam County showing bedrock topography . 4 5 Map of Putnam County showing unconsolidated deposits .
    [Show full text]
  • BEDROCK GEOLOGIC MAP of PARTS of the EVANSVILLE and WEST FRANKFORT Rocks of the Quaternary, Pennsylvanian, and Mississippian Age
    BEDROCK GEOLOGIC QUADRANGLE KENTUCKY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY James C. Cobb, State Geologist and Director EVANSVILLE and WEST FRANKFORT University of Kentucky, Lexington 30 x 60 MINUTE QUADRANGLES, KY Series XII, 2008 Version 1.0 Pc Psh Pc Pp Pb Psh Pc Ptc Pp Pc Pp Psh Psh Pc Psh Psh Pt Pp Pp Psh Pc Pp Pt Pc Pc Psh Pt Pb Pp Pc Psh Pc Psh Pp Pp Pt Pc Pt Pp Pmcl Psh Psh Psh Pt Pc Psh Pc Pc Pmcl Pb Pc Pp P Pp Pc Pm Pmcl Pb Pt Pmcl P Pc Pp Pb Pt Pmz Pbm Pb Pc Pm Pp Pbm Pb Psh Pp Ptc Pbm Pt Pt Pca Psh Pt Pp Pc Pc Pca Pp Pt Psh Pca Pc Pm Pt Ptc Pp Pp Mu Pt Pp Pc Pp Psh Pca Pp Psc Pm Pb Pp Psh Pb Pm Psh Ptc Pt Pb Pp Pp Pc Pt Pbm Pbm Universal Transverse Mercator projection, zone 16, North American Datum of 1927 Roads, railroads, and cultural basemap features are from digital data available from the Kentucky Division of Geographic Information (gis.ky.gov). GEOLOGIC SETTING AND STRUCTURAL SETTING DISCLAIMER The surface of the Evansville and West Frankfort 30 x 60 minute quadrangles consists of flat-lying sediments and sedimentary Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer system at the Kentucky Geological Survey (KGS), no BEDROCK GEOLOGIC MAP OF PARTS OF THE EVANSVILLE AND WEST FRANKFORT rocks of the Quaternary, Pennsylvanian, and Mississippian age. These deposits extend across the Rough Creek Fault System, an east- warranty, expressed or implied, is made by KGS regarding the utility of the data on any other system, nor shall the act of distribution E N west trending basement fault complex that extends from southern Illinois eastward into west-central Kentucky.
    [Show full text]
  • D8,Niel F. Merriam
    Private Libr t'J or D8,niel F. Merriam PRELIMINARY REPORT ON HIGH-SILICA SAND IN INDIANA by HAYDN H. MURRAY AND JOHN B. PATTON Indiana Department of Conservation GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Report of Progress No. 5 1953 @ t J STATE OF INDIANA George N. Craig, Governor DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION Doxie Moore, Director GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles F. Deiss, State Geologist Bloomington Report of Progress No. 5 PRELIMINARY REPORT ON HIGH-SILICA SAND IN INDIANA by Haydn H. Murray and John B . Patton Printed by authority of the state of Indiana BLOOMINGTON, INDIANA February 1953 For sale by Geological Survey, Indiana Department of Conservation, Bloomington, Indiana Price $ . 50 t ® 2 SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL STAFF OF THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles F. Deiss, State Geologist Bernice M. Banfill, Administrative Assistant to the State Geologist Coal Section Charles E. Wier, Geologist and Head G. K. Guennel, Paleobotanist S. A. Friedman, Geologist Harold C. Hutchison, Geologist (on leave) Geochemistry Section Richard K. Leininger, Spectrographer and Head Robert F. Blakely, Spectrographer Maynard E. Coller, Chemist Geophysics Section Maurice E. Biggs, Geophysicist and Head Judson Mead, Research Advisor Chai"les S. Miller, Instrument Maker JosephS. Whaley, Geophysicist Glacial Geology Section William J. Wayne, Geologist and Head William D. Thornbury, Research Advisor Industrial Minerals Section John B. Patton, Principal Geologist and Head Haydn H. Murray, Clay Mineralogist Seymour S. Greenberg, Petrographer Ned M. Smith, Geologist Ross Hickam, Preparator B. J. Worthington, Laboratory Technician t ® CD 3 SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL STAFF OF THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Paleontology and Stratigraphy Section J. J. Galloway, Research Advisor Petroleum Section Thomas A. Dawson, Geologist and Head Gerald L.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Huron Area, South-Central Indiana
    GEOLOGY OF THE HURON AREA, SOUTH-CENTRAL INDIANA by HENRY H. GRAY ROBERT D. JENKINS ROBERT M. WEIDMAN Indiana Department of Conservation GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Bulletin No. 20 1960 STATE OF INDIANA HAROLD W. HANDLEY, GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION E. KENNETH MARLIN, DIRECTOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY JOHN B. PATTON, STATE GEOLOGIST BLOOMINGTON __________________________________________________________________________________________ BULLETIN NO. 20 ____________________________________________________________ GEOLOGY OF THE HURON AREA, SOUTH-CENTRAL INDIANA BY HENRY H.GRAY ROBERT D. JENKINS ROBERT M. WEIDMAN PRINTED BY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF INDIANA BLOOMINGTON, INDIANA DECEMBER 1960 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ For sale by Geological Survey, Indiana Department of Conservation, Bloomington, Ind. Price $2.50 2 SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL STAFF OF THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY JOHN B. PATTON, State Geologist MAURICE E. BIGGS Assistant State Geologist MARY BETH FOX, Mineral Statistician Coal Section Charles E. Wier, Geologist and Head G. K. Guennel, Paleobotanist S. A. Friedman, Geologist Harold C. Hutchison, Geologist Richard C. Neavel, Coal Petrographer William C. Richardson, Geological Assistant Drafting and Photography Section William H. Moran, Chief Draftsman Robert E. Judah, Geological Artist-Draftsman Micky P. Love, Geological Draftsman John E. Peace, Senior Geological Draftsman George R. Ringer, Photographer Educational Services R. Dee Rarick, Geologist and Head Geochemistry Section R. K. Leininger, Spectrographer and Head Maynard E. Coller, Chemist Louis V. Miller, Coal Chemist, E. M. Craig, Geochemical Assistant Geology Section Robert H. Shaver, Paleontologist and Head Henry H. Gray, Head Stratigrapher William J. Wayne, Head Glacial Geologist Allan F. Schneider, Glacial Geologist Geophysics Section Maurice E. Biggs, Geophysicist and Head Robert F. Blakely, Geophysicist Charles S. Miller, Instrument Maker Albert J. Rudman, Geophysicist Joseph F.
    [Show full text]