DOCSLIB.ORG

The Characteristics and Intelligibility of English Plosives Produced by Javanese Speakers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Characteristics and Intelligibility of English Plosives Produced by Javanese Speakers PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI THE CHARACTERISTICS AND INTELLIGIBILITY OF ENGLISH PLOSIVES PRODUCED BY JAVANESE SPEAKERS A THESIS Presented as a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements to Obtain the Magister Humaniora (M.Hum.) Degree In English Language Studies Vincentius Tangguh Atyanto Nugroho Student Number: 136332044 THE GRADUATE PROGRAM IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDIES SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY YOGYAKARTA 2016 i PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI ACKNOWLEDGEMENT First of all, allow me to express my gratitude to the Lord for all of His blessings to everyone. Have faith in Him for He will never let you go astray. My admiration goes to all faculty members of English Language Studies. Their actions are exemplary. They have been considerate and helpful, and I was lucky to find myself in their good hands. The English Language Studies program was my second home for almost three years, and a home is not a home without Pak Mul’s warm smile every time we ran into each other. Last but not least, I thank my family for being there for me. My wife, Christina Yulianti, has been wonderful – as always. Ara, Marend, and Rama – our kids – have been our biggest motivators. Though they wear us out on daily basis, every single day spent with them is worth it. vi PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE ………………………………………………………………………………. i APPROVAL PAGE ………………………………………………………………………... ii DEFENSE APPROVAL PAGE …………………………………………………………… iii STATEMENT OF WORK ORIGINALITY ………………………………………………. iv LEMBAR PERNYATAAN UNTUK PERSETUJUAN PUBLIKASI KARYA ILMIAH ... v ACKNOWLEDGEMENT …………………………………………………………………. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS …………………………………………………………………... vii LIST OF TABLES …………………………………………………………………………. xi LIST OF FIGURES ………………………………………………………………………... xii LIST OF APPENDICES …………………………………………………………………… xiii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ……………………………………………………………… xiv ABSTRACT ………………………………………………………………………………... xv ABSTRAK …………………………………………………………………………………. xvi CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………… 1 A. Background of the Study …………………………………………………………... 1 B. Problem Limitation ………………………………………………………………… 5 C. Problem Formulation ………………………………………………………………. 6 D. Research Goals …………………………………………………………………...... 7 E. Benefits of the Study ……………………………………………………………….. 8 CHAPTER II THEORETICAL BACKGROUND ………………………………………… 9 A. Theoretical Reviews ……………………………………………………………...... 9 vii PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI 1. Language …………………………………………………………………… 1 2. Speech Organs ………………………………………………………………... 11 3. Speech Production ……………………………………………………………. 12 a. Speech Sounds Production as Proposed by Giegerich ……………………... 13 1) The Initiation Process …………………………………………………... 14 2) The Phonation Process …………………………………………………. 15 a) The Larynx ………………………………………………………….. 16 b) Modification to Airstream by the Larynx…………………………… 17 3) The Oro-Nasal Process …………………………………………………. 21 4) The Articulation Process ……………………………………………….. 22 a) The Vocal Tract ……………………………………………………... 22 b) Modification to Airstream by the Vocal Tract……………………… 23 5) The Interaction of the Four Sequential Events …………………………. 25 b. Speech Production Mechanism as Proposed by Ladefoged and Johnson ….. 26 1) The Airstream Process ………………………………………………… 26 2) The Phonation Process …………………………………………………. 28 a) Phonation of Javanese Plosives ……………………………………... 33 b) Phonation of English Plosives ………………………………………. 37 c) Distribution of Voicing ……………………………………………… 42 3) The Articulatory Process …..…………………………………………… 48 a) Manner of Articulation ……………………………………………… 48 b) Place of Articulation ………………………………………………… 49 viii PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI 4. Brunelle’s Arguments Regarding Realization of Phonemic Contrast between Javanese Lax and Tense Plosives …………………………………………….. 52 5. Comparison and Contrast of English – Javanese Plosives …………………… 58 6. Intelligibility ………………………………………………………………….. 61 B. Theoretical Framework …………………………………………………………. 66 CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ……………………………………….. 67 A. Data of the Study and Data Source …………………………………………… 67 B. Approach ……………………………………………………………………… 69 C. Method of the Study …………………………………………………………….. 69 1. Data Collection ………...…………………………………………………….. 70 2. Data Analysis ………………………………………………………………… 73 CHAPTER IV RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ……………………………………… 77 A. Results ………………………………………………………………………… 77 1. Onset F1 frequency …………………………………………………………... 77 2. VOT length …………………………………………………………………... 80 3. Duration of voiced sound preceding word-final plosive ……………………... 82 B. Discussion ………………………………………………………………………. 83 1. Parameters in the study ………………………………………………………. 83 2. Javanese informants ………………………………………………………….. 86 3. The characteristics of English plosives produced by Javanese informants ….. 90 a. English plosive in word-initial position ……………………………………. 91 1) Reduction in F1 frequency ……………………………………………... 92 ix PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI 2) Perceived aspiration ……………………………………………………. 98 3) Prevoicing ……………………………………………………………… 124 b. Duration of voiced sound preceding word-final plosives ………………….. 133 4. The plausibility of plosives produced by Javanese informants to be recognized as English ………………………………………………………… 140 CHAPTER V CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ……………………… 146 A. Conclusions …………………………………………………………………….. 146 B. Recommendations ………………………………………………………………. 148 REFERENCES …………………………………………………………………………. 150 APPENDICES …………………………………………………………………………. 154 x PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Ladefoged and Maddieson’s continuum of phonation types ………………. 32 Table 2. English-Javanese Plosives …………………………………………………. 60 Table 3. Range of F1 frequencies ………………………………………………….... 78 Table 4. Comparison of F1 frequencies at the onset of vowel following word-initial voiceless-voiced plosives …………………………………………………... 79 Table 5. Comparison of VOT lengths of voiceless-voiced plosives ………………... 82 Table 6. Comparison of duration of voiced sound preceding final plosives ………... 83 Table 7. Description of F1 frequency of vowel following voiced plosive as compared to F1 of the same vowel following the corresponding voiceless plosive ..………….…………………………………………………………. 93 Table 8. Comparison of VOT length of word-initial voiceless-voiced plosives ……. 99 Table 9. Word pairs reflecting expected realization of contrast between voiced- voiceless plosive in word-initial position ………………………………….. 111 Table 10. Differences in duration of vowel occurring before word-final plosives …… 134 xi PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. [b̥ ɑ] – [pɑ] ………………………………………………………………. 55 Figure 2. [˳d̪ ɑ] – [t̪ɑ] ………………………………………………………………. 56 Figure 3. [ɖ,̥ɔ] – [ʈɔ] ………………………………………………………………. 57 Figure 4. [g̥ ɑ] – [kɑ] ………………………………………………………………. 57 Figure 5. Range of intelligibility levels …………………………………………. 68 Figure 6. VOT lengths of voiceless and voiced plosives ………………………… 81 Figure 7. Comparison of formants frequency reduction ………………………… 97 Figure 8. VOT of word-initial /p/ …………………………………………………. 116 Figure 9. VOT of word-initial /t/ …………………………………………………. 117 Figure 10. VOT of word-initial /k/ …………………………………………………. 119 Figure 11. The pair pull – bull by Mita ……………………………………………. 127 Figure 12. Gap in duration of vowel preceding word-final bilabials ………………. 139 Figure 13. Empirical perception of degree of intelligibility by Kristen and Mum …. 143 Figure 14. Mean values of intelligibility as perceived by Kristen ………………….. 144 xii PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix 1. Initially-positioned /p/ and /b/ ……………………………………… 154 Appendix 2. Group 3: Finally-positioned /p/ and /b/ ……………………………. 155 Appendix 3. Group 4: Initially-positioned /t/ and /d/ …………………………….. 157 Appendix 4. Group 6: Finally-positioned /t/ and /d/ ……………………………… 159 Appendix 5. Group 7: Initially-positioned /k/ and /g/ ……………………………. 161 Appendix 6. Group 9: Finally-positioned /k and /g/ ……………………………… 162 Appendix 7. Gap in duration of vowel preceding final alveolars ………………… 164 Appendix 8. Gap in duration of vowel preceding final velars ……………………. 164 Appendix 9. General impression of levels of intelligibility as perceived by Kristen and Mum ……………………………………………………………… 164 Appendix 10. Levels of intelligibility as perceived by Kristen ……………………… 165 Appendix 11. Mita’s TOEFL Certificate …………………………………………….. 165 Appendix 12. Yudi’s TOEFL Certificate …………………………………………….. 166 Appendix 13. Doni’s TOEFL Certificate …………………………………………….. 166 Appendix 14. Nurul’s TOEFL Certificate ………………………..…………………. 166 Appendix 15. Adi’s TOEFL Certificate ………………………..…………………….. 167 Appendix 16. Nana’s TOEFL Certificate ………………………..…………………... 167 xiii PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS F1 : First Formant VOT : Voice Onset Time xiv PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI ABSTRACT Vincentius Tangguh Atyanto Nugroho. 2016. The Characteristics and Intelligibility of English Plosives Produced by Javanese Speakers, Yogyakarta: The Graduate Program in English Language Studies, Sanata Dharma University. It is a matter of fact that sound production of English as L2 is affected by an extent of transfer from the phonological rules of L1 already set firmly within the speaker. In the case of Javanese speakers, their production of English indicates transfer from Javanese, a language over which they have already acquired native mastery. The study attempted to understand the acoustic characteristics of English
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Laryngeal Features in German* Michael Jessen Bundeskriminalamt, Wiesbaden Catherine Ringen University of Iowa
    Phonology 19 (2002) 189–218. f 2002 Cambridge University Press DOI: 10.1017/S0952675702004311 Printed in the United Kingdom Laryngeal features in German* Michael Jessen Bundeskriminalamt, Wiesbaden Catherine Ringen University of Iowa It is well known that initially and when preceded by a word that ends with a voiceless sound, German so-called ‘voiced’ stops are usually voiceless, that intervocalically both voiced and voiceless stops occur and that syllable-final (obstruent) stops are voiceless. Such a distribution is consistent with an analysis in which the contrast is one of [voice] and syllable-final stops are devoiced. It is also consistent with the view that in German the contrast is between stops that are [spread glottis] and those that are not. On such a view, the intervocalic voiced stops arise because of passive voicing of the non-[spread glottis] stops. The purpose of this paper is to present experimental results that support the view that German has underlying [spread glottis] stops, not [voice] stops. 1 Introduction In spite of the fact that voiced (obstruent) stops in German (and many other Germanic languages) are markedly different from voiced stops in languages like Spanish, Russian and Hungarian, all of these languages are usually claimed to have stops that contrast in voicing. For example, Wurzel (1970), Rubach (1990), Hall (1993) and Wiese (1996) assume that German has underlying voiced stops in their different accounts of Ger- man syllable-final devoicing in various rule-based frameworks. Similarly, Lombardi (1999) assumes that German has underlying voiced obstruents in her optimality-theoretic (OT) account of syllable-final laryngeal neutralisation and assimilation in obstruent clusters.
    [Show full text]
  • Phonological Use of the Larynx: a Tutorial Jacqueline Vaissière
    Phonological use of the larynx: a tutorial Jacqueline Vaissière To cite this version: Jacqueline Vaissière. Phonological use of the larynx: a tutorial. Larynx 97, 1994, Marseille, France. pp.115-126. halshs-00703584 HAL Id: halshs-00703584 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00703584 Submitted on 3 Jun 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Vaissière, J., (1997), "Phonological use of the larynx: a tutorial", Larynx 97, Marseille, 115-126. PHONOLOGICAL USE OF THE LARYNX J. Vaissière UPRESA-CNRS 1027, Institut de Phonétique, Paris, France larynx used as a carrier of paralinguistic information . RÉSUMÉ THE PRIMARY FUNCTION OF THE LARYNX Cette communication concerne le rôle du IS PROTECTIVE larynx dans l'acte de communication. Toutes As stated by Sapir, 1923, les langues du monde utilisent des physiologically, "speech is an overlaid configurations caractéristiques du larynx, aux function, or to be more precise, a group of niveaux segmental, lexical, et supralexical. Nous présentons d'abord l'utilisation des différents types de phonation pour distinguer entre les consonnes et les voyelles dans les overlaid functions. It gets what service it can langues du monde, et également du larynx out of organs and functions, nervous and comme lieu d'articulation des glottales, et la muscular, that come into being and are production des éjectives et des implosives.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Africa As a Phonological Area
    Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology/Linguistics "Speaking (of) Khoisan" A symposium reviewing African prehistory 16/05/2015 Southern Africa as a phonological area Christfried Naumann & Hans-Jörg Bibiko [email protected] Quelle: Clements & Rialland ( 2008 : 37 ) Contents 1. Introduction 3-15 2. Procedure 16-19 3. Results: Kalahari Basin 20-28 4. Results: Southeastern Bantu 29-42 5. Results: Southern Africa 43-54 (6. Local and dependent features - excluded) 55-61 7. MDS and k-means 62-68 8. Summary 69 (9. Contact scenarios) 70-74 Acknowledgements 75 References 76-77 2 "Speaking (of) Khoisan", 16/05/2015 Southern Africa as a phonological area 1. Introduction Phonological similarities • large consonantal inventory (45 c.) • clicks • aspirated and ejective stops • dorsal affricate 3 "Speaking (of) Khoisan", 16/05/2015 Southern Africa as a phonological area 1. Introduction Phonological similarities • large consonantal inventory (50 c.) • clicks • aspirated, slack voiced, ejective and imploisve stops •(dorsal affricate) lateral obstruents • 4 "Speaking (of) Khoisan", 16/05/2015 Southern Africa as a phonological area 1. Introduction Phonological similarities • large consonantal inventory (68 c.) • (clicks) • aspirated, breathy and implosive stops • lateral obstruents 5 "Speaking (of) Khoisan", 16/05/2015 Southern Africa as a phonological area 1. Introduction Example: Distribution of ejectives/glottalized consonants Clements & Rialland (2008: 62) Maddieson (2013) 6 "Speaking (of) Khoisan", 16/05/2015 Southern Africa
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information C om pany 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Order Number 9401204 Phonetics and phonology of Nantong Chinese Ac, Benjamin Xiaoping, Ph.D. The Ohio State University, 1993 Copyri^t ©1993 by Ao, Benjamin Xiaoping.
    [Show full text]
  • Acoustic Discriminability of the Complex Phonation System in !Xó˜O
    Acoustic discriminability of the complex phonation system in !Xo´o˜ Marc Garellek Department of Linguistics University of California, San Diego (September 2018 version, to appear in Phonetica) 9500 Gilman Drive #0108, La Jolla, CA 92093-0108 USA Phone: +1 858 534 2412 Fax: +1 858 534 4789 Email: [email protected] Keywords: voice quality, phonation types, harsh voice Page 1 of 42 Abstract Phonation types, or contrastive voice qualities, are minimally produced using complex movements of the vocal folds, but may additionally involve constriction in the supraglottal and pharyngeal cav- ities. These complex articulations in turn produce a multidimensional acoustic output that can be modeled in various ways. In this study, I investigate whether the psychoacoustic model of voice by Kreiman et al. (2014) succeeds at distinguishing six phonation types of !Xo´o.˜ Linear discriminant analysis is performed using parameters from the model averaged over the entire vowel as well as for the first and final halves of the vowel. The results indicate very high classification accuracy for all phonation types. Measures averaged over the vowel’s entire duration are closely correlated with the discriminant functions, suggesting that they are sufficient for distinguishing even dynamic phonation types. Measures from all classes of parameters are correlated with the linear discrimi- nant functions; in particular, the ‘strident’ vowels, which are harsh in quality, are characterized by their noise, changes in spectral tilt, decrease in voicing amplitude and frequency, and raising of the first formant. Despite the large number of contrasts and the time-varying characteristics of many of the phonation types, the phonation contrasts in !Xo´o˜ remain well differentiated acoustically.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Linguistic Variation in the Phonetic Realization of Breathy Voice
    CROSS-LINGUISTIC VARIATION IN THE PHONETIC REALIZATION OF “BREATHIER VOICE” Jia Tian1, Yipei Zhou2, Jianjing Kuang3 1 3University of Pennsylvania, U.S.A 2Peking University, China [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT breather voice in Zhenhai, Tamang, and Mon were considered to be this subtype [26, 27, 30]. Breathier voices are non-modal voices produced However, although theoretical studies (e.g., [3,22, with a relatively less constricted glottis. Although 25]) generally recognize the cross-linguistic varia- three major subtypes of breathier voice have been tion in the phonetic realization of “breathier voice”, identified, namely slack/lax voice, breathy voice and there is no consensus on how many subtypes should whispery voice, and distinct IPA symbols have been be identified, and how to define define these differ- proposed to transcribe them, actually there is no con- ent types of breathy voice acoustically. For example, sensus on how many subtypes should be identified, Ladefoged [16, 22, 24] does not distinguish between and how each subtype should be defined. Most stud- whispery voice and breathy voice; Catford [3] and ies simply use “breathy voice” as a general term Laver [25] do not distinguish between lax voice and to cover all its subtypes. In this study, we pro- whispery voice. One important reason for this chal- pose that different subtypes of breathier voice can lenge is that, as [15,22,25] point out, these subtypes be distinguished by evaluating the relative impor- essentially form a continuum, with no clear border- tance of the glottal constriction and the noise com- line between them.
    [Show full text]
  • Phonetic Analysis of Clicks, Plosives and Implosives of Isixhosa: a Preliminary Report
    Phonetic Analysis of Clicks, Plosives and Implosives of IsiXhosa: A Preliminary Report MIHOKO WHEELER University of Florida and University of Central Florida [email protected] Abstract: This pilot study examined the effectiveness of locus equations in differentiating places of articulation among stop consonants (clicks, plosives and implosives) in IsiXhosa in the context of the vowel /a/. The results obtained showed that the slope values for the dental and the postalveolar clicks are similar and shallower than that of the lateral click. Velar stops (plosives, implosives and ejectives) exhibited a steeper slope than either the bilabial or the dental stops. These results suggest that locus equations may be effective at distinguishing places of articulation for a variety of stop consonants. 1. Introduction IsiXhosa is a language spoken in South Africa that uses 18 clicks (three places and six manners of articulation). This paper is a pilot study of the acoustic properties differentiating place or articulation of clicks and plosives in isiXhosa in the context of the following low vowel: /a/. 2. Literature Review 2.1. Background of isiXhosa IsiXhosa is a member of the Nguni languages, which belong to a large family of languages called Bantu, named by the German linguist, Wilhelm Bleek, from the word for ‘people’ (Niesler et al. 2005: 460, Pinnock 1998: 5). The language is one of the few Bantu languages that use clicks, and clicks are viewed as the features of earlier languages (Herbert 1990). According to the 2011 census (Statistics South Africa, 2012), it is a statutory national language of South Africa, and there are over 8.15 million native speakers.
    [Show full text]
  • Shanghai Slack Voice: Acoustic and EPGG Data Jiayin Gao, Pierre Hallé, Kiyoshi Honda, Shinji Maeda, Martine Toda
    Shanghai Slack Voice: Acoustic and EPGG Data Jiayin Gao, Pierre Hallé, Kiyoshi Honda, Shinji Maeda, Martine Toda To cite this version: Jiayin Gao, Pierre Hallé, Kiyoshi Honda, Shinji Maeda, Martine Toda. Shanghai Slack Voice: Acoustic and EPGG Data. 17th International Congress on Phonetic Sciences, 2011, Hong Kong SAR China. pp.719-722. halshs-00677248 HAL Id: halshs-00677248 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00677248 Submitted on 7 Mar 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. ICPhS XVII Regular Session Hong Kong, 17-21 August 2011 SHANGHAI SLACK VOICE: ACOUSTIC AND EPGG DATA J-Y. Gaoa, P. Halléa,b, K. Hondaa, S. Maedac & M. Todaa aLPP-Paris 3, France; bLPNCog-Paris 5, France; cENST Paris, France [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] ABSTRACT southern dialects classified as Wu on that criterion clearly possess features typical of the Min dialects. From a representational viewpoint, the “voiced” The phonetic characterization of „muddy‟ series of obstruents in Shanghai dialect can be obstruents in Wu dialects, as well as cross-dialectal specified in terms of complementary, context- differences in this respect, are controversial.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Phonetic Properties of the Non-Modal Phonation In
    1 The phonetic properties of the non-modal phonation in Shanghainese Jia Tian Department of Linguistics University of Pennsylvania [email protected] Jianjing Kuang Department of Linguistics University of Pennsylvania [email protected] Abstract: This study investigates the acoustic and articulatory properties of phonation contrast in Shanghainese, the most thoroughly studied Chinese Wu dialect. Although studies generally suggest that the non-modal phonation associated with the lower register in Shanghainese is relatively breathier, it is unclear whether it is ‘breathy voice,’ ‘slack voice’ or ‘whispery voice.’ This study aims to provide a better understanding of the phonetic realization of the non-modal phonation in Shanghainese. Simultaneous audio and electroglottographic recordings were made from 52 speakers born before 1980. Both acoustic and articulatory data confirmed that the non- modal phonation in Shanghainese is produced with relatively less glottal constriction and more aperiodic noise than the modal phonation. The novel finding of this study is that aperiodic noise plays a much more important role than spectral measures (i.e., indicators of glottal constriction) in the phonetic realization of the non-modal phonation. This property is distinct from the breathier voices in Gujarati, White Hmong and Southern Yi. These results suggest that the non- modal phonation in Shanghainese should be characterized as ‘whispery voice,’ which is phonetically distinct from both ‘breathy voice’ and ‘slack voice.’ 2 1 Introduction Shanghainese is a Chinese Wu dialect spoken in the urban area of Shanghai, one of the largest cities in China. Like other Wu dialects, the tonal system of Shanghainese has contrastive upper and lower registers (Yip, 1980; Duanmu, 1990; Bao, 1999), in addition to pitch-contour contrasts.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Acoustic Analysis Techniques for Use in Diagnosis of Vocal Pathology
    DEVELOPMENT OF ACOUSTIC ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FOR USE IN DIAGNOSIS OF VOCAL PATHOLOGY by Peter Murphy, BSc., Presented to the Office of Academic Affairs in partial fulfilment o f the thesis requirements for the degree o f Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Physical Sciences, Dublin City University, Dublin 9 September, 1997 Under the supervision o f : Professor Martin Henry, School of Physical Sciences, Dublin City University, Dublin 9 Dr. Kevin McGuigan, Department of Physics, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephen’s Green, Dublin 2 (Single Volume) D edicated to m y late father, and to m y mother. I hereby certify that this material, which I now submit for assessment on the programme of study leading to the award of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) is entirely my own work and has not been taken from the work of others save and as to the extent that such work has been cited and Acknowledged within the text of my work. Signed: i u j - ID No. Date: 2 / ( £ } £ $ '? I Acknowledgements I would like to thank Professor Martin Henry for accepting the responsibility of being my external supervisor. I would like to express my gratitude to Dr. Kevin M'Guigan, whose door was always open, for efficiently correcting the thesis and for encouragement offered throughout the course of the work. I would like to express my gratitude to Professor Michael Walsh and Dr. Michael Colreavy in the ENT department and to Yvonne Fitzmaurice, Antonio Hussey and Jenny Robinson in the speech therapy department in Beaumont hospital. Thanks also to Mary Buckley and Patricia Gillivan-Murphy in the Eye and Ear Hospital.
    [Show full text]
  • Representing Linguistic Phonetic Structure Peter Ladefoged 1. What
    Representing linguistic phonetic structure Peter Ladefoged 1. What do we want to represent? 1.1 Limiting the scope of phonology. Kinds of information conveyed by speech Sociolinguistic differences are not the same as linguistic differences What counts as a linguistic contrast 1.2 Non-linguistic aspects of speech\ Speaker attitudes, style, peronal identity Spoken language and written language The role of intonation 1.3 Universal phonetics and phonology Equating sounds in different languages IPA categories and phonological feaures Innate features The number of possible contrasting sounds 1.4 Language as a social institution The mental nature of language Language as a self-organizing social institution Filling holes in patterns Phonemes as linguistic constructs 2. What is the purpose of a linguistic phonetic representation 2.1 The nature of phonological features Describing sound patterns vs. specifying the lexicon How sound patterns arise 2.2 The need for auditory/acoustic features Auditory characteristics of vowels Other auditory features 2.3 Defining characteristics of features Features are defined in terms of acoustic or articulatory scales Articulatory features do not have invariant acoustic correlates 2.4 Multi-valued features. Features with an ordered set of values »pit´ »lQdIf´UgId rEprI»sEntIN »lINgwIstIk f´»nEtIk »str√ktS´ 1. What do we want to represent? 1.1 Limiting the scope of phonology. Before we discuss the phonetic representation of a language, we must consider what it is we want to represent, and why we want to represent it. Phonetics is the study of the sounds of speech, so it is these sounds that we want to represent.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Linguistic Variation in the Phonetic Realization of Breathier Voice
    CROSS-LINGUISTIC VARIATION IN THE PHONETIC REALIZATION OF “BREATHIER VOICE” Jia Tian1, Yipei Zhou2, Jianjing Kuang3 1 3University of Pennsylvania, U.S.A 2Peking University, China [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT breather voice in Zhenhai, Tamang, and Mon were considered to be this subtype [26, 27, 30]. Breathier voices are non-modal voices produced However, although theoretical studies (e.g., [3,22, with a relatively less constricted glottis. Although 25]) generally recognize the cross-linguistic varia- three major subtypes of breathier voice have been tion in the phonetic realization of “breathier voice”, identified, namely slack/lax voice, breathy voice and there is no consensus on how many subtypes should whispery voice, and distinct IPA symbols have been be identified, and how to define define these differ- proposed to transcribe them, actually there is no con- ent types of breathy voice acoustically. For example, sensus on how many subtypes should be identified, Ladefoged [16, 22, 24] does not distinguish between and how each subtype should be defined. Most stud- whispery voice and breathy voice; Catford [3] and ies simply use “breathy voice” as a general term Laver [25] do not distinguish between lax voice and to cover all its subtypes. In this study, we pro- whispery voice. One important reason for this chal- pose that different subtypes of breathier voice can lenge is that, as [15,22,25] point out, these subtypes be distinguished by evaluating the relative impor- essentially form a continuum, with no clear border- tance of the glottal constriction and the noise com- line between them.
    [Show full text]