Acoustic Correlates of Glottal Opening in German Obstruent Production

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Acoustic Correlates of Glottal Opening in German Obstruent Production Acoustic Correlates of Glottal Opening in German Obstruent Production Michael Jessen Bundeskriminalamt, Department of Speaker Identification and Tape Analysis, Wiesbaden, Germany E-mail: [email protected] hence leading to earlier termination of glottal adduction. ABSTRACT The glottal opening and voice quality behavior of aspirated stops and voiceless fricatives are also compared For the first five vowel periods after aspirated/voiceless to the influence of the unaspirated stop and voiced and unaspirated/voiced stops/fricatives in German the fricative cognates. Less dramatic voice quality changes are degree of glottal opening based on transillumination was expected with these sounds, since glottal opening is measured simultaneously with the acoustic voice quality probably very small at best. However, it is possible, that parameters H1-H2, H1-A1, H1-A3 (in order to capture some amount of glottal opening is induced passively due breathy phonation and glottal leakage) and with f0. A to aerodynamic factors [9] and that small glottal gradual decrease in glottal opening and the voice quality abductions of this kind influence the voice quality early in values was observed after aspirated stops and voiceless the following vowel. Another possibility is that fricatives, usually with an earlier-timed reduction in the physiological settings required to enhance voicing in case of the fricatives than the stops. Slight glottal opening obstruent production have an influence on voice quality. and vq-value reductions were observed after unaspirated One hypothesis to be investigated in particular is that stops, probably resulting from aerodynamically- vocal fold slackening, which enhances obstruent voicing, conditioned passive glottal opening. Higher vq-values leads to a certain amount of glottal leakage that were found after voiced fricatives than unaspirated stops. coarticulates into the following vowel. This is hypothesized to be a consequence of increased glottal leakage due to vocal fold slackening employed to 2. METHOD maintain obstruent voicing, which in German is phonologically required for voiced fricatives such as /v/ A set of words containing the aspirated stops /p,t/ and the but not for unaspirated stops such as /b/. unaspirated stops /b,d/, as well as the voiceless fricatives /f,s/ and voiced fricatives /v,z/ were produced by a male 1. INTRODUCTION speaker of German. (In German the phonemic distinction between /p,t/ and /b,d/ is more consistently and saliently The production of aspirated stops and voiceless fricatives implemented as aspirated vs. unaspirated than as voiceless in languages like English, Swedish, and German leads to vs. voiced, respectively; cf. [6].) certain amounts of breathy phonation in the adjacent vowels [e.g. 1,2,3,4,5,6]. It is commonly assumed that aerodynamic indices of breathy voice such as high open quotient [1,2] or acoustic indices such as high H1-H2 or H1-A1 [3,4,6] in vowels preceding or following aspirated stops and voiceless fricatives are a coarticulatory effect that is due to the fact that glottal abduction can begin before vowel offset and glottal adduction can end after vowel onset, respectively. Yet, there is very little empirical data available where glottal opening and voice quality induced by obstruents have been compared directly [cf. 1]. In the present study glottal opening behavior and acoustically measured voice quality are studied at the onset portion of vowels following aspirated stops and voiceless fricatives. By comparing these groups of sounds it is possible to investigate how coarticulatory voice Figure 1: Audio waveform (upper signal display) and quality is influenced by patterns of oral-laryngeal smoothed transillumination signal (lower signal display) at coordination. For example, it is shown by [1] that after boundary between /p/ and /i/ with labels for the first five voiceless fricatives breathy voice reduces sooner than after vowel periods (lowest window). aspirated stops. They explain this result by the fact that the glottal opening gesture is coordinated earlier with respect The target obstruents occurred in two types of context, to vowel onset in voiceless fricatives than aspirated stops, word-medial position between stressed and unstressed vowel and word-initial position before stressed /i/ -450 preceded by a carrier word ending in a vowel, and were /p/ Glottal Opening -500 produced about 20 times each in both contexts. -550 Transillumination (TI) was used to study glottal opening -600 behavior in obstruent production [cf. 6 for more details -650 and data involving the TI recording on which this study is /b/ based; the present results are from the first recording -700 session]. For each of the first five vowel periods after the -750 p1 p2 p3 p4 p5 target obstruent fundamental frequency and voice quality p1 p2 p3 p4 were measured in the audio signal, and for the same five 8 H1-H2 temporal locations glottal opening degree was measured 6 on the basis of the smoothed TI curve (see Fig. 1). The 4 voice quality parameters investigated are H1-H2, H1-A1, 2 and H1-A3 (amplitude of first harmonic minus amplitudes 0 of second harmonic, first formant, and third formant, -2 respectively). They were measured on the basis of DFT -4 spectra with a 25.6 ms Hamming window centered around -6 p1p1 p2 p3 p4 p5 each of the five vowel periods. H1-H2 and H1-A3 were chosen because high values of these parameters are known 8 H1-A1 as correlates of breathy voice or glottal leakage [e.g. 7]. Physiologically, high H1-H2 is a correlate of high open 4 quotient, and high H1-A3, as a measure of increased 0 spectral tilt, reflects a closing portion of the glottal cycle -4 of relatively long duration and reduced skewness [8]. H1- -8 A1 was included because this parameter has been used -12 successfully in some relevant studies [3] and because it p1 p2 p2 p3 p3 p4 p5 has been claimed that H1-A1 is a correlate of glottal opening degree [8]. Indeed, correlations between degree of H1-A3 glottal opening and the three voice quality parameters, 14 calculated word-medially across aspirated stops and 10 voiceless fricatives and across all five vowel periods, turn out to be slightly higher for H1-A1 (0.785) than for H1-H2 6 (0.766) and lowest for H1-A3 (0.638). Corrections 2 proposed by [7,8] (H1*-H2*, H1*-A1, H1*-A3*) were -2 applied but the resulting obstruent-induced patterns differ p1 p2 p2 p3 p3 p4 p5 only little from those of the uncorrected voice quality values. Furthermore, H1*-H2* could not be determined 155 f0 for the vowel [i]. For these reasons only the results for 150 uncorrected H1-H2, H1-A1, and H1-A3 are reported. 145 140 3. RESULTS 135 Unless mentioned otherwise the results presented in this 130 section are from word-medial position. In most respects p1 p2 p3 p4 p5 the patterns in word-initial context are essentially the Figure 2 (from top to bottom): Glottal opening (y-axis in same. Fig. 2 (top graph) shows that after the aspirated stop arbitrary units), H1-H2, H1-A1, H1-A3 (y-axis in dB), and there is a gradual decline in glottal opening from vowel f0 (in Hz) for first five periods (x-axis) into unstressed onset until (at least) the fifth period, indicating the final schwa after aspirated (gray squares) and unaspirated stages of the glottal opening gesture associated with stop (black circles) labial stop (average across about 20 aspiration. Glottal opening of the unaspirated stop is repetitions). Periods with significant aspirated-unaspirated significantly lower than after the aspirated stop for all differences (p < 0.05) are marked by gray shading. periods except the final one. Even the unaspirated stop shows a slight decrease in glottal opening, probably resulting from slight passive glottal abduction induced by These glottal opening and voice quality dynamics after buildup of intraoral air pressure [cf. 9]. The three voice aspirated and unaspirated stops in German are consistent quality parameters H1-H2, H1-A1, and H1-A3 show quite with the results on German by [3; see their Fig. 9, whereby a similar pattern as the glottal opening gesture, with a L0=H1 and L1=A1] and with the results on the Swedish gradual lowering of values – indicating decreasing levels and most of the English speakers reported in [1, 2; see in of breathy voice into the vowel – and with higher values particular the TI data in 1 and the open quotient data in after the aspirated than the unaspirated stop. 1,2]. opening pattern is practically the same. However, a -450 Glottal Opening different situation occurs when comparing aspirated stop -500 /f/ and fricative at alveolar place of articulation. In that case, -550 not only H1-H2 but also glottal opening decreases sooner -600 after the fricative than the stop, which is shown in Fig. 4. -650 Lower H1-H2 after /s/ than /t/ is also found in English [4] -700 /v/ and German [evaluation of raw data in 6]. -750 p1p1 p2 p3 p4 p5 -450 Glottal Opening -500 /t/ 8 H1-H2 -550 6 -600 4 -650 2 /s/ -700 0 -2 -750 -4 p1p1 p2 p2p3 p3 p4 p4 p5 p5 -6 p1 p2p3 p3 p4 p4 p5 8 H1-H2 6 8 H1-A1 4 2 4 0 0 -2 -4 -4 -6 -8 p1p1 p2 p3 p4p5 p5 -12 Figure 4: Glottal opening (upper) and H1-H2 (lower) for p1 p2 p3 p4 p5 p5 first five periods into unstressed schwa after aspirated alveolar stop (gray squares) and voiceless alveolar H1-A3 14 fricative (black circles) (cf. Fig. 2 for further conventions). 10 The most striking difference between stops and fricatives, 6 as shown in Figs.
Recommended publications
  • Laryngeal Features in German* Michael Jessen Bundeskriminalamt, Wiesbaden Catherine Ringen University of Iowa
    Phonology 19 (2002) 189–218. f 2002 Cambridge University Press DOI: 10.1017/S0952675702004311 Printed in the United Kingdom Laryngeal features in German* Michael Jessen Bundeskriminalamt, Wiesbaden Catherine Ringen University of Iowa It is well known that initially and when preceded by a word that ends with a voiceless sound, German so-called ‘voiced’ stops are usually voiceless, that intervocalically both voiced and voiceless stops occur and that syllable-final (obstruent) stops are voiceless. Such a distribution is consistent with an analysis in which the contrast is one of [voice] and syllable-final stops are devoiced. It is also consistent with the view that in German the contrast is between stops that are [spread glottis] and those that are not. On such a view, the intervocalic voiced stops arise because of passive voicing of the non-[spread glottis] stops. The purpose of this paper is to present experimental results that support the view that German has underlying [spread glottis] stops, not [voice] stops. 1 Introduction In spite of the fact that voiced (obstruent) stops in German (and many other Germanic languages) are markedly different from voiced stops in languages like Spanish, Russian and Hungarian, all of these languages are usually claimed to have stops that contrast in voicing. For example, Wurzel (1970), Rubach (1990), Hall (1993) and Wiese (1996) assume that German has underlying voiced stops in their different accounts of Ger- man syllable-final devoicing in various rule-based frameworks. Similarly, Lombardi (1999) assumes that German has underlying voiced obstruents in her optimality-theoretic (OT) account of syllable-final laryngeal neutralisation and assimilation in obstruent clusters.
    [Show full text]
  • Phonological Use of the Larynx: a Tutorial Jacqueline Vaissière
    Phonological use of the larynx: a tutorial Jacqueline Vaissière To cite this version: Jacqueline Vaissière. Phonological use of the larynx: a tutorial. Larynx 97, 1994, Marseille, France. pp.115-126. halshs-00703584 HAL Id: halshs-00703584 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00703584 Submitted on 3 Jun 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Vaissière, J., (1997), "Phonological use of the larynx: a tutorial", Larynx 97, Marseille, 115-126. PHONOLOGICAL USE OF THE LARYNX J. Vaissière UPRESA-CNRS 1027, Institut de Phonétique, Paris, France larynx used as a carrier of paralinguistic information . RÉSUMÉ THE PRIMARY FUNCTION OF THE LARYNX Cette communication concerne le rôle du IS PROTECTIVE larynx dans l'acte de communication. Toutes As stated by Sapir, 1923, les langues du monde utilisent des physiologically, "speech is an overlaid configurations caractéristiques du larynx, aux function, or to be more precise, a group of niveaux segmental, lexical, et supralexical. Nous présentons d'abord l'utilisation des différents types de phonation pour distinguer entre les consonnes et les voyelles dans les overlaid functions. It gets what service it can langues du monde, et également du larynx out of organs and functions, nervous and comme lieu d'articulation des glottales, et la muscular, that come into being and are production des éjectives et des implosives.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Africa As a Phonological Area
    Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology/Linguistics "Speaking (of) Khoisan" A symposium reviewing African prehistory 16/05/2015 Southern Africa as a phonological area Christfried Naumann & Hans-Jörg Bibiko [email protected] Quelle: Clements & Rialland ( 2008 : 37 ) Contents 1. Introduction 3-15 2. Procedure 16-19 3. Results: Kalahari Basin 20-28 4. Results: Southeastern Bantu 29-42 5. Results: Southern Africa 43-54 (6. Local and dependent features - excluded) 55-61 7. MDS and k-means 62-68 8. Summary 69 (9. Contact scenarios) 70-74 Acknowledgements 75 References 76-77 2 "Speaking (of) Khoisan", 16/05/2015 Southern Africa as a phonological area 1. Introduction Phonological similarities • large consonantal inventory (45 c.) • clicks • aspirated and ejective stops • dorsal affricate 3 "Speaking (of) Khoisan", 16/05/2015 Southern Africa as a phonological area 1. Introduction Phonological similarities • large consonantal inventory (50 c.) • clicks • aspirated, slack voiced, ejective and imploisve stops •(dorsal affricate) lateral obstruents • 4 "Speaking (of) Khoisan", 16/05/2015 Southern Africa as a phonological area 1. Introduction Phonological similarities • large consonantal inventory (68 c.) • (clicks) • aspirated, breathy and implosive stops • lateral obstruents 5 "Speaking (of) Khoisan", 16/05/2015 Southern Africa as a phonological area 1. Introduction Example: Distribution of ejectives/glottalized consonants Clements & Rialland (2008: 62) Maddieson (2013) 6 "Speaking (of) Khoisan", 16/05/2015 Southern Africa
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information C om pany 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Order Number 9401204 Phonetics and phonology of Nantong Chinese Ac, Benjamin Xiaoping, Ph.D. The Ohio State University, 1993 Copyri^t ©1993 by Ao, Benjamin Xiaoping.
    [Show full text]
  • Acoustic Discriminability of the Complex Phonation System in !Xó˜O
    Acoustic discriminability of the complex phonation system in !Xo´o˜ Marc Garellek Department of Linguistics University of California, San Diego (September 2018 version, to appear in Phonetica) 9500 Gilman Drive #0108, La Jolla, CA 92093-0108 USA Phone: +1 858 534 2412 Fax: +1 858 534 4789 Email: [email protected] Keywords: voice quality, phonation types, harsh voice Page 1 of 42 Abstract Phonation types, or contrastive voice qualities, are minimally produced using complex movements of the vocal folds, but may additionally involve constriction in the supraglottal and pharyngeal cav- ities. These complex articulations in turn produce a multidimensional acoustic output that can be modeled in various ways. In this study, I investigate whether the psychoacoustic model of voice by Kreiman et al. (2014) succeeds at distinguishing six phonation types of !Xo´o.˜ Linear discriminant analysis is performed using parameters from the model averaged over the entire vowel as well as for the first and final halves of the vowel. The results indicate very high classification accuracy for all phonation types. Measures averaged over the vowel’s entire duration are closely correlated with the discriminant functions, suggesting that they are sufficient for distinguishing even dynamic phonation types. Measures from all classes of parameters are correlated with the linear discrimi- nant functions; in particular, the ‘strident’ vowels, which are harsh in quality, are characterized by their noise, changes in spectral tilt, decrease in voicing amplitude and frequency, and raising of the first formant. Despite the large number of contrasts and the time-varying characteristics of many of the phonation types, the phonation contrasts in !Xo´o˜ remain well differentiated acoustically.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Linguistic Variation in the Phonetic Realization of Breathy Voice
    CROSS-LINGUISTIC VARIATION IN THE PHONETIC REALIZATION OF “BREATHIER VOICE” Jia Tian1, Yipei Zhou2, Jianjing Kuang3 1 3University of Pennsylvania, U.S.A 2Peking University, China [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT breather voice in Zhenhai, Tamang, and Mon were considered to be this subtype [26, 27, 30]. Breathier voices are non-modal voices produced However, although theoretical studies (e.g., [3,22, with a relatively less constricted glottis. Although 25]) generally recognize the cross-linguistic varia- three major subtypes of breathier voice have been tion in the phonetic realization of “breathier voice”, identified, namely slack/lax voice, breathy voice and there is no consensus on how many subtypes should whispery voice, and distinct IPA symbols have been be identified, and how to define define these differ- proposed to transcribe them, actually there is no con- ent types of breathy voice acoustically. For example, sensus on how many subtypes should be identified, Ladefoged [16, 22, 24] does not distinguish between and how each subtype should be defined. Most stud- whispery voice and breathy voice; Catford [3] and ies simply use “breathy voice” as a general term Laver [25] do not distinguish between lax voice and to cover all its subtypes. In this study, we pro- whispery voice. One important reason for this chal- pose that different subtypes of breathier voice can lenge is that, as [15,22,25] point out, these subtypes be distinguished by evaluating the relative impor- essentially form a continuum, with no clear border- tance of the glottal constriction and the noise com- line between them.
    [Show full text]
  • Phonetic Analysis of Clicks, Plosives and Implosives of Isixhosa: a Preliminary Report
    Phonetic Analysis of Clicks, Plosives and Implosives of IsiXhosa: A Preliminary Report MIHOKO WHEELER University of Florida and University of Central Florida [email protected] Abstract: This pilot study examined the effectiveness of locus equations in differentiating places of articulation among stop consonants (clicks, plosives and implosives) in IsiXhosa in the context of the vowel /a/. The results obtained showed that the slope values for the dental and the postalveolar clicks are similar and shallower than that of the lateral click. Velar stops (plosives, implosives and ejectives) exhibited a steeper slope than either the bilabial or the dental stops. These results suggest that locus equations may be effective at distinguishing places of articulation for a variety of stop consonants. 1. Introduction IsiXhosa is a language spoken in South Africa that uses 18 clicks (three places and six manners of articulation). This paper is a pilot study of the acoustic properties differentiating place or articulation of clicks and plosives in isiXhosa in the context of the following low vowel: /a/. 2. Literature Review 2.1. Background of isiXhosa IsiXhosa is a member of the Nguni languages, which belong to a large family of languages called Bantu, named by the German linguist, Wilhelm Bleek, from the word for ‘people’ (Niesler et al. 2005: 460, Pinnock 1998: 5). The language is one of the few Bantu languages that use clicks, and clicks are viewed as the features of earlier languages (Herbert 1990). According to the 2011 census (Statistics South Africa, 2012), it is a statutory national language of South Africa, and there are over 8.15 million native speakers.
    [Show full text]
  • Shanghai Slack Voice: Acoustic and EPGG Data Jiayin Gao, Pierre Hallé, Kiyoshi Honda, Shinji Maeda, Martine Toda
    Shanghai Slack Voice: Acoustic and EPGG Data Jiayin Gao, Pierre Hallé, Kiyoshi Honda, Shinji Maeda, Martine Toda To cite this version: Jiayin Gao, Pierre Hallé, Kiyoshi Honda, Shinji Maeda, Martine Toda. Shanghai Slack Voice: Acoustic and EPGG Data. 17th International Congress on Phonetic Sciences, 2011, Hong Kong SAR China. pp.719-722. halshs-00677248 HAL Id: halshs-00677248 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00677248 Submitted on 7 Mar 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. ICPhS XVII Regular Session Hong Kong, 17-21 August 2011 SHANGHAI SLACK VOICE: ACOUSTIC AND EPGG DATA J-Y. Gaoa, P. Halléa,b, K. Hondaa, S. Maedac & M. Todaa aLPP-Paris 3, France; bLPNCog-Paris 5, France; cENST Paris, France [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] ABSTRACT southern dialects classified as Wu on that criterion clearly possess features typical of the Min dialects. From a representational viewpoint, the “voiced” The phonetic characterization of „muddy‟ series of obstruents in Shanghai dialect can be obstruents in Wu dialects, as well as cross-dialectal specified in terms of complementary, context- differences in this respect, are controversial.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Phonetic Properties of the Non-Modal Phonation In
    1 The phonetic properties of the non-modal phonation in Shanghainese Jia Tian Department of Linguistics University of Pennsylvania [email protected] Jianjing Kuang Department of Linguistics University of Pennsylvania [email protected] Abstract: This study investigates the acoustic and articulatory properties of phonation contrast in Shanghainese, the most thoroughly studied Chinese Wu dialect. Although studies generally suggest that the non-modal phonation associated with the lower register in Shanghainese is relatively breathier, it is unclear whether it is ‘breathy voice,’ ‘slack voice’ or ‘whispery voice.’ This study aims to provide a better understanding of the phonetic realization of the non-modal phonation in Shanghainese. Simultaneous audio and electroglottographic recordings were made from 52 speakers born before 1980. Both acoustic and articulatory data confirmed that the non- modal phonation in Shanghainese is produced with relatively less glottal constriction and more aperiodic noise than the modal phonation. The novel finding of this study is that aperiodic noise plays a much more important role than spectral measures (i.e., indicators of glottal constriction) in the phonetic realization of the non-modal phonation. This property is distinct from the breathier voices in Gujarati, White Hmong and Southern Yi. These results suggest that the non- modal phonation in Shanghainese should be characterized as ‘whispery voice,’ which is phonetically distinct from both ‘breathy voice’ and ‘slack voice.’ 2 1 Introduction Shanghainese is a Chinese Wu dialect spoken in the urban area of Shanghai, one of the largest cities in China. Like other Wu dialects, the tonal system of Shanghainese has contrastive upper and lower registers (Yip, 1980; Duanmu, 1990; Bao, 1999), in addition to pitch-contour contrasts.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Acoustic Analysis Techniques for Use in Diagnosis of Vocal Pathology
    DEVELOPMENT OF ACOUSTIC ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FOR USE IN DIAGNOSIS OF VOCAL PATHOLOGY by Peter Murphy, BSc., Presented to the Office of Academic Affairs in partial fulfilment o f the thesis requirements for the degree o f Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Physical Sciences, Dublin City University, Dublin 9 September, 1997 Under the supervision o f : Professor Martin Henry, School of Physical Sciences, Dublin City University, Dublin 9 Dr. Kevin McGuigan, Department of Physics, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephen’s Green, Dublin 2 (Single Volume) D edicated to m y late father, and to m y mother. I hereby certify that this material, which I now submit for assessment on the programme of study leading to the award of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) is entirely my own work and has not been taken from the work of others save and as to the extent that such work has been cited and Acknowledged within the text of my work. Signed: i u j - ID No. Date: 2 / ( £ } £ $ '? I Acknowledgements I would like to thank Professor Martin Henry for accepting the responsibility of being my external supervisor. I would like to express my gratitude to Dr. Kevin M'Guigan, whose door was always open, for efficiently correcting the thesis and for encouragement offered throughout the course of the work. I would like to express my gratitude to Professor Michael Walsh and Dr. Michael Colreavy in the ENT department and to Yvonne Fitzmaurice, Antonio Hussey and Jenny Robinson in the speech therapy department in Beaumont hospital. Thanks also to Mary Buckley and Patricia Gillivan-Murphy in the Eye and Ear Hospital.
    [Show full text]
  • Representing Linguistic Phonetic Structure Peter Ladefoged 1. What
    Representing linguistic phonetic structure Peter Ladefoged 1. What do we want to represent? 1.1 Limiting the scope of phonology. Kinds of information conveyed by speech Sociolinguistic differences are not the same as linguistic differences What counts as a linguistic contrast 1.2 Non-linguistic aspects of speech\ Speaker attitudes, style, peronal identity Spoken language and written language The role of intonation 1.3 Universal phonetics and phonology Equating sounds in different languages IPA categories and phonological feaures Innate features The number of possible contrasting sounds 1.4 Language as a social institution The mental nature of language Language as a self-organizing social institution Filling holes in patterns Phonemes as linguistic constructs 2. What is the purpose of a linguistic phonetic representation 2.1 The nature of phonological features Describing sound patterns vs. specifying the lexicon How sound patterns arise 2.2 The need for auditory/acoustic features Auditory characteristics of vowels Other auditory features 2.3 Defining characteristics of features Features are defined in terms of acoustic or articulatory scales Articulatory features do not have invariant acoustic correlates 2.4 Multi-valued features. Features with an ordered set of values »pit´ »lQdIf´UgId rEprI»sEntIN »lINgwIstIk f´»nEtIk »str√ktS´ 1. What do we want to represent? 1.1 Limiting the scope of phonology. Before we discuss the phonetic representation of a language, we must consider what it is we want to represent, and why we want to represent it. Phonetics is the study of the sounds of speech, so it is these sounds that we want to represent.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Linguistic Variation in the Phonetic Realization of Breathier Voice
    CROSS-LINGUISTIC VARIATION IN THE PHONETIC REALIZATION OF “BREATHIER VOICE” Jia Tian1, Yipei Zhou2, Jianjing Kuang3 1 3University of Pennsylvania, U.S.A 2Peking University, China [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT breather voice in Zhenhai, Tamang, and Mon were considered to be this subtype [26, 27, 30]. Breathier voices are non-modal voices produced However, although theoretical studies (e.g., [3,22, with a relatively less constricted glottis. Although 25]) generally recognize the cross-linguistic varia- three major subtypes of breathier voice have been tion in the phonetic realization of “breathier voice”, identified, namely slack/lax voice, breathy voice and there is no consensus on how many subtypes should whispery voice, and distinct IPA symbols have been be identified, and how to define define these differ- proposed to transcribe them, actually there is no con- ent types of breathy voice acoustically. For example, sensus on how many subtypes should be identified, Ladefoged [16, 22, 24] does not distinguish between and how each subtype should be defined. Most stud- whispery voice and breathy voice; Catford [3] and ies simply use “breathy voice” as a general term Laver [25] do not distinguish between lax voice and to cover all its subtypes. In this study, we pro- whispery voice. One important reason for this chal- pose that different subtypes of breathier voice can lenge is that, as [15,22,25] point out, these subtypes be distinguished by evaluating the relative impor- essentially form a continuum, with no clear border- tance of the glottal constriction and the noise com- line between them.
    [Show full text]