Pedogenic Carbonates: Forms and Formation Processes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pedogenic Carbonates: Forms and Formation Processes Earth-Science Reviews 157 (2016) 1–17 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Earth-Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/earscirev Invited review Pedogenic carbonates: Forms and formation processes Kazem Zamanian a,⁎, Konstantin Pustovoytov b, Yakov Kuzyakov a,c a Department of Soil Science of Temperate Ecosystems, Georg August University of Goettingen, Buesgenweg 2, 37077 Goettingen, Germany b Institute of Soil Science and Land Evaluation (310), University of Hohenheim, Schloss Hohenheim 1, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany c Department of Agricultural Soil Science, University of Goettingen, Buesgenweg 2, 37077 Goettingen, Germany article info abstract Article history: Soils comprise the largest terrestrial carbon (C) pool, containing both organic and inorganic C. Soil inorganic car- Received 6 September 2015 bon (SIC) was frequently disregarded because (1) it is partly heritage from soil parent material, (2) it undergoes Received in revised form 19 January 2016 slow formation processes and (3) has very slow exchange with atmospheric CO2. The global importance of SIC, Accepted 10 March 2016 however, is reflected by the fact that SIC links the long-term geological C cycle with the fast biotic C cycle, and Available online 22 March 2016 this linkage is ongoing in soils. Furthermore, the importance of SIC is at least as high as that of soil organic carbon (SOC) especially in semiarid and arid climates, where SIC comprises the largest C pool. Considering the origin, for- Keywords: Pedogenic carbonate mation processes and morphology, carbonates in soils are categorized into three groups: geogenic carbonates CaCO3 recrystallization (GC), biogenic carbonates (BC) and pedogenic carbonates (PC). In this review we summarize the available data Diagenesis and theories on forms and formation processes of PC and relate them to environmental factors. After describing Paleoenvironment reconstructions the general formation principles of PC, we present the specific forms and formation processes for PC features and Radiocarbon dating the possibilities to use them to reconstruct soil-forming factors and processes. The following PC are described in Inorganic carbon sequestration detail: earthworm biospheroliths, rhizoliths and calcified roots, hypocoatings, nodules, clast coatings, calcretes and laminar caps. The second part of the review focuses on the isotopic composition of PC: δ13C, Δ14Candδ18O, as well as clumped 13 18 Cand OisotopesknownasΔ47. The isotopic signature of PC enables reconstructing the formation environ- 13 18 14 ment: the dominating vegetation (δ C), temperature (δ OandΔ47), and the age of PC formation (Δ C). The uncertainties in reconstructional and dating studies due to PC recrystallization after formation are discussed and simple approaches to consider recrystallization are summarized. Finally, we suggest the most important future research directions on PC, including the anthropogenic effects of fertilization and soil management. In conclusion, PC are an important part of SIC that reflect the time, periods and formation processes in soils. A mechanistic understanding of PC formation is a prerequisite to predict terres- trial C stocks and changes in the global C cycle, and to link the long-term geological with short-term biological C cycles. © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Contents 1. Introduction:inorganiccarboninsoilandpedogeniccarbonates....................................... 2 1.1. Relevanceofsoilinorganiccarbon................................................. 2 1.2. Soilinorganiccarbon:worldwidedistribution............................................ 2 1.3. Soil inorganic carbon pools, classification and definitions....................................... 2 1.4. Pedogeniccarbonatewithinsoilinorganiccarbonpoolsanditsrelevance............................... 3 2. Formationofpedogeniccarbonate.................................................... 3 2.1. Generalprincipleofpedogeniccarbonateformation......................................... 3 2.2. Formationmechanismsofpedogeniccarbonates........................................... 4 2.3. Morphologyofpedogeniccarbonates................................................ 4 2.4. Factorsaffectingpedogeniccarbonateaccumulationinsoil...................................... 7 2.4.1. Climate......................................................... 8 2.4.2. Soilparentmaterial.................................................... 8 2.4.3. Soilproperties...................................................... 9 ⁎ Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] (K. Zamanian). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.03.003 0012-8252/© 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 2 K. Zamanian et al. / Earth-Science Reviews 157 (2016) 1–17 2.4.4. Topography,soilpositioninthelandscapeandsoilage.................................... 9 2.4.5. Localvegetationandsoilorganisms............................................. 9 3. Carbonandoxygeninpedogeniccarbonates................................................10 3.1. Sourcesofcarbon,oxygenandcalciuminpedogeniccarbonates....................................10 3.2. Isotopic composition of carbon (δ13C, Δ14C) and oxygen (δ18O)inpedogeniccarbonates.........................10 4. ImplicationsofPCinpaleoenvironmentalandchronologicalstudies .....................................11 5. Recrystallizationofsoilcarbonates ....................................................11 5.1. Uncertaintiesofpaleoenvironmentalreconstructionsbasedonpedogeniccarbonates..........................12 5.2. Evidenceofpedogeniccarbonaterecrystallizationafterformation...................................12 6. Conclusionsandoutlook.........................................................13 6.1. Conclusions............................................................13 6.2. Futureresearchdirections.....................................................13 Acknowledgements..............................................................14 References..................................................................14 1. Introduction: inorganic carbon in soil and pedogenic carbonates other than carbonate-containing minerals, for instance from weathering of igneous rocks, decomposition of organic matter or dissolved Ca2+ in 1.1. Relevance of soil inorganic carbon rainwater (Boettinger and Southard, 1991; Emmerich, 2003; Monger et al., 2015). This calls for investigating SIC stocks, forms and their dy- Soils with 2,470 Pg C (Eswaran et al., 2000) are the largest terrestrial namics to understand the role of SIC in the C cycle at regional and global C pool and are the third greatest C reservoir in the world after oceans scales, the fast and slow processes of C cycling, as well as the link be- with 38,725 Pg (IPCC, 1990) and fossil fuels with 4000 Pg tween biotic and abiotic parts of the C cycle. (Siegenthaler and Sarmiento, 1993) containing organic and inorganic C(Eswaran et al., 2000). Plant litter, rhizodeposits and microbial bio- 1.2. Soil inorganic carbon: worldwide distribution mass are the main sources of the soil organic carbon (SOC) pool. The – – SOC pool comprises 697 Pg C in 0 30 cm and 1500 Pg C in 0 100 cm Large SIC stocks are mostly found in regions with low water avail- depths (IPCC, 2007). Intensive exchange of organic C with the atmo- ability (i.e. arid, semi-arid and sub-humid regions) (Fig. 1)(Eswaran sphere, especially connected with anthropogenic activities, led to a et al., 2000). Low precipitation and high potential evapotranspiration very broad range of studies related to the organic C cycle in soil and strongly limit the dissolution and leaching of carbonates from soil these have been summarized in many reviews (e.g. IPCC, 2007; (Eswaran et al., 2000; Royer, 1999). Accordingly, the highest SIC content Kuzyakov, 2006a). – around320to1280MgCha−1 – is accumulated in soils of arid regions In contrast to organic C, the exchange of soil inorganic carbon (SIC), with mean annual precipitation (MAP) below 250 mm such as middle i.e. various soil carbonate minerals (mostly calcite), with the atmo- east, African Sahara and west USA (Fig. 1). As MAP increases, the SIC sphere and the involvement of SIC in biotic C cycles is much slower content decreases and b40 Mg C ha−1 may accumulate at MAP exceed- (mean residence time of 78,000 years (Schlesinger, 1985)). Additional- ing 1000 mm for example in Amazonian forests and monsoonal forests ly, the distribution depth of SIC is opposite to that of SOC: most stocks in south-east Asia. However, partial eluviation and redistribution of car- ı́ are located deeper than one meter (D az-Hernández et al., 2003; bonates may concentrate SIC deeper in the soil profile (Dıaz-Hernándeź Wang et al., 2010). These two reasons explain why much fewer studies et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2010). focused on SIC than on SOC (Drees et al., 2001; Rawlins et al., 2011). Nonetheless, large stocks of SIC – 160 Pg C in 0–30 cm (Nieder and fi fi Benbi, 2008), 695–748 Pg C in 0–100 cm depth (Batjes, 1996)and 1.3. Soil inorganic carbon pools, classi cation and de nitions 950 Pg C up to 2 m (Lal, 2012) – reflect its importance especially over the long term. The SIC content in first 2 m of soil in semi-arid regions Based on origin, formation processes and morphology, the SIC can be could be 10 or even up to 17 times higher than SOC (Dıaz-Hernándeź subdivided into three large groups: et al., 2003; Emmerich, 2003; Shi et al., 2012). Furthermore, a much lon- 1 ger mean residence time of SIC – millennia (Schlesinger, 1985) – shows 1. Geogenic carbonates (GC) : carbonates which
Recommended publications
  • Evolution of Loess-Derived Soil Along a Topo-Climatic Sequence in The
    European Journal of Soil Science, May 2017, 68, 270–280 doi: 10.1111/ejss.12425 Evolution of loess-derived soil along a climatic toposequence in the Qilian Mountains, NE Tibetan Plateau F. Yanga,c ,L.M.Huangb,c,D.G.Rossitera,d,F.Yanga,c,R.M.Yanga,c & G. L. Zhanga,c aState Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, NO. 71 East Beijing Road, Xuanwu District, Nanjing 210008, China, bKey Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 11(A), Datun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China, cUniversity of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.19(A) Yuquan Road, Shijingshan District, Beijing 100049, China, and dSchool of Integrative Plant Sciences, Section of Soil and Crop Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca NY 14853, USA Summary Holocene loess has been recognized as the primary source of the silty topsoil in the northeast Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. The processes through which these uniform loess sediments develop into diverse types of soil remain unclear. In this research, we examined 23 loess-derived soil samples from the Qilian Mountains with varying amounts of pedogenic modification. Soil particle-size distribution and non-calcareous mineralogy were changed only slightly because of the weak intensity of chemical weathering. Accumulation of soil organic carbon (SOC) and leaching of carbonate were both identified as predominant pedogenic responses to soil forming processes. Principal component analysis and structural analysis revealed the strong correlations between soil carbon (SOC and carbonate) and several soil properties related to soil functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of Carbon 14 in Soils: a Review C
    Radioprotection, Suppl. 1, vol. 40 (2005) S465-S470 © EDP Sciences, 2005 DOI: 10.1051/radiopro:2005s1-068 Dynamics of Carbon 14 in soils: A review C. Tamponnet Institute of Radioprotection and Nuclear Safety, DEI/SECRE, CADARACHE, BP. 1, 13108 Saint-Paul-lez-Durance Cedex, France, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. In terrestrial ecosystems, soil is the main interface between atmosphere, hydrosphere, lithosphere and biosphere. Its interactions with carbon cycle are primordial. Information about carbon 14 dynamics in soils is quite dispersed and an up-to-date status is therefore presented in this paper. Carbon 14 dynamics in soils are governed by physical processes (soil structure, soil aggregation, soil erosion) chemical processes (sequestration by soil components either mineral or organic), and soil biological processes (soil microbes, soil fauna, soil biochemistry). The relative importance of such processes varied remarkably among the various biomes (tropical forest, temperate forest, boreal forest, tropical savannah, temperate pastures, deserts, tundra, marshlands, agro ecosystems) encountered in the terrestrial ecosphere. Moreover, application for a simplified modelling of carbon 14 dynamics in soils is proposed. 1. INTRODUCTION The importance of carbon 14 of anthropic origin in the environment has been quite early a matter of concern for the authorities [1]. When the behaviour of carbon 14 in the environment is to be modelled, it is an absolute necessity to understand the biogeochemical cycles of carbon. One can distinguish indeed, a global cycle of carbon from different local cycles. As far as the biosphere is concerned, pedosphere is considered as a primordial exchange zone. Pedosphere, which will be named from now on as soils, is mainly located at the interface between atmosphere and lithosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Carbon Science for Policy and Practice Soil-Based Initiatives to Mitigate Climate Change and Restore Soil Fertility Both Rely on Rebuilding Soil Organic Carbon
    comment Soil carbon science for policy and practice Soil-based initiatives to mitigate climate change and restore soil fertility both rely on rebuilding soil organic carbon. Controversy about the role soils might play in climate change mitigation is, consequently, undermining actions to restore soils for improved agricultural and environmental outcomes. Mark A. Bradford, Chelsea J. Carey, Lesley Atwood, Deborah Bossio, Eli P. Fenichel, Sasha Gennet, Joseph Fargione, Jonathan R. B. Fisher, Emma Fuller, Daniel A. Kane, Johannes Lehmann, Emily E. Oldfeld, Elsa M. Ordway, Joseph Rudek, Jonathan Sanderman and Stephen A. Wood e argue there is scientific forestry, soil carbon losses via erosion and carbon, vary markedly within a field. Even consensus on the need to decomposition have generally exceeded within seemingly homogenous fields, a Wrebuild soil organic carbon formation rates of soil carbon from plant high spatial density of soil observations is (hereafter, ‘soil carbon’) for sustainable land inputs. Losses associated with these land therefore required to detect the incremental stewardship. Soil carbon concentrations and uses are substantive globally, with a mean ‘signal’ of management effects on soil carbon stocks have been reduced in agricultural estimate to 2-m depth of 133 Pg carbon8, from the local ‘noise’11. Given the time soils following long-term use of practices equivalent to ~63 ppm atmospheric CO2. and expense of acquiring a high density of such as intensive tillage and overgrazing. Losses vary spatially by type and duration observations, most current soil sampling is Adoption of practices such as cover crops of land use, as well as biophysical conditions too limited to reliably quantify management and silvopasture can protect and rebuild such as soil texture, mineralogy, plant effects at field scales9,10.
    [Show full text]
  • World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014 International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps
    ISSN 0532-0488 WORLD SOIL RESOURCES REPORTS 106 World reference base for soil resources 2014 International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps Update 2015 Cover photographs (left to right): Ekranic Technosol – Austria (©Erika Michéli) Reductaquic Cryosol – Russia (©Maria Gerasimova) Ferralic Nitisol – Australia (©Ben Harms) Pellic Vertisol – Bulgaria (©Erika Michéli) Albic Podzol – Czech Republic (©Erika Michéli) Hypercalcic Kastanozem – Mexico (©Carlos Cruz Gaistardo) Stagnic Luvisol – South Africa (©Márta Fuchs) Copies of FAO publications can be requested from: SALES AND MARKETING GROUP Information Division Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 00100 Rome, Italy E-mail: [email protected] Fax: (+39) 06 57053360 Web site: http://www.fao.org WORLD SOIL World reference base RESOURCES REPORTS for soil resources 2014 106 International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps Update 2015 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2015 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Soil Carbon Credits: Making Sense of Protocols for Carbon Sequestration and Net Greenhouse Gas Removals
    Agricultural Soil Carbon Credits: Making sense of protocols for carbon sequestration and net greenhouse gas removals NATURAL CLIMATE SOLUTIONS About this report This synthesis is for federal and state We contacted each carbon registry and policymakers looking to shape public marketplace to ensure that details investments in climate mitigation presented in this report and through agricultural soil carbon credits, accompanying appendix are accurate. protocol developers, project developers This report does not address carbon and aggregators, buyers of credits and accounting outside of published others interested in learning about the protocols meant to generate verified landscape of soil carbon and net carbon credits. greenhouse gas measurement, reporting While not a focus of the report, we and verification protocols. We use the remain concerned that any end-use of term MRV broadly to encompass the carbon credits as an offset, without range of quantification activities, robust local pollution regulations, will structural considerations and perpetuate the historic and ongoing requirements intended to ensure the negative impacts of carbon trading on integrity of quantified credits. disadvantaged communities and Black, This report is based on careful review Indigenous and other communities of and synthesis of publicly available soil color. Carbon markets have enormous organic carbon MRV protocols published potential to incentivize and reward by nonprofit carbon registries and by climate progress, but markets must be private carbon crediting marketplaces. paired with a strong regulatory backing. Acknowledgements This report was supported through a gift Conservation Cropping Protocol; Miguel to Environmental Defense Fund from the Taboada who provided feedback on the High Meadows Foundation for post- FAO GSOC protocol; Radhika Moolgavkar doctoral fellowships and through the at Nori; Robin Rather, Jim Blackburn, Bezos Earth Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Treated Wastewater Irrigation on Soil Salinity and Sodicity in Sfax (Tunisia): a Case Study"
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Érudit Article "Effects of treated wastewater irrigation on soil salinity and sodicity in Sfax (Tunisia): A case study" Nebil Belaid, Catherine Neel, Monem Kallel, Tarek Ayoub, Abdel Ayadi, et Michel Baudu Revue des sciences de l'eau / Journal of Water Science, vol. 23, n° 2, 2010, p. 133-146. Pour citer cet article, utiliser l'information suivante : URI: http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/039905ar DOI: 10.7202/039905ar Note : les règles d'écriture des références bibliographiques peuvent varier selon les différents domaines du savoir. Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d'auteur. L'utilisation des services d'Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d'utilisation que vous pouvez consulter à l'URI https://apropos.erudit.org/fr/usagers/politique-dutilisation/ Érudit est un consortium interuniversitaire sans but lucratif composé de l'Université de Montréal, l'Université Laval et l'Université du Québec à Montréal. Il a pour mission la promotion et la valorisation de la recherche. Érudit offre des services d'édition numérique de documents scientifiques depuis 1998. Pour communiquer avec les responsables d'Érudit : [email protected] Document téléchargé le 13 février 2017 01:03 EFFECTS OF TREATED WASTEWATER IRRIGATION ON SOIL SALINITY AND SODICITY IN SFAX (TUNISIA): A CASE STUDY Effets de l’irrigation par les eaux usées traitées sur la salinité et la sodicité des sols de Sfax (Tunisie): Un cas d’étude Nebil belaid1,2 , CatheriNe Neel2*, MoNeM Kallel3,
    [Show full text]
  • The Muencheberg Soil Quality Rating (SQR)
    The Muencheberg Soil Quality Rating (SQR) FIELD MANUAL FOR DETECTING AND ASSESSING PROPERTIES AND LIMITATIONS OF SOILS FOR CROPPING AND GRAZING Lothar Mueller, Uwe Schindler, Axel Behrendt, Frank Eulenstein & Ralf Dannowski Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Agrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF), Muencheberg, Germany with contributions of Sandro L. Schlindwein, University of St. Catarina, Florianopolis, Brasil T. Graham Shepherd, Nutri-Link, Palmerston North, New Zealand Elena Smolentseva, Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Soil Science and Agrochemistry (ISSA), Novosibirsk, Russia Jutta Rogasik, Federal Agricultural Research Centre (FAL), Institute of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, Braunschweig, Germany 1 Draft, Nov. 2007 The Muencheberg Soil Quality Rating (SQR) FIELD MANUAL FOR DETECTING AND ASSESSING PROPERTIES AND LIMITATIONS OF SOILS FOR CROPPING AND GRAZING Lothar Mueller, Uwe Schindler, Axel Behrendt, Frank Eulenstein & Ralf Dannowski Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF) e. V., Muencheberg, Germany with contributions of Sandro L. Schlindwein, University of St. Catarina, Florianopolis, Brasil T. Graham Shepherd, Nutri-Link, Palmerston North, New Zealand Elena Smolentseva, Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Soil Science and Agrochemistry (ISSA), Novosibirsk, Russia Jutta Rogasik, Federal Agricultural Research Centre (FAL), Institute of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, Braunschweig, Germany 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. Objectives 4 2. Concept 5 3. Procedure and scoring tables 7 3.1. Field procedure 7 3.2. Scoring of basic indicators 10 3.2.0. What are basic indicators? 10 3.2.1. Soil substrate 12 3.2.2. Depth of A horizon or depth of humic soil 14 3.2.3. Topsoil structure 15 3.2.4. Subsoil compaction 17 3.2.5. Rooting depth and depth of biological activity 19 3.2.6.
    [Show full text]
  • Caracterización Fisicoquímica De Un Calcisol Bajo
    Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales Vol. 9 (49) DOI: https://doi.org/10.29298/rmcf.v9i49.153 Artículo Caracterización fisicoquímica de un Calcisol bajo diferentes sistemas de uso de suelo en el noreste de México Physicochemical characterization of a Calcisol under different land -use systems in Northeastern Mexico Israel Cantú Silva1*, Karla E. Díaz García1, María Inés Yáñez Díaz1, 1 1 Humberto González Rodríguez y Rodolfo A. Martínez Soto Abstract: Changes in land use cause variations in the physicochemical characteristics of soil. The present study aims to quantify the changes in the physicochemical characteristics of a Calcisol in three land uses in the Northeast of Mexico: Native Vegetation Area (AVN), Cropland Area (AA) and Pasture Area (ASP). Four composite soil samples were taken at 0-5 and 5-30 cm depth from each land- use plot. The variables bulk density, texture, mechanical resistance to penetration, organic matter, pH and electric conductivity were determined. The analysis of variance showed differences in the organic matter with values of 4.2 % for AVN, 2.08 % for ASP and 1.19 % and for AA in the depth 0-5 cm. The texture was clay loam for AA, silty loam for ASP and loam for AVN showing differences. The soil under the three types of land -use presented low salinity (70.2 to 396.0 µS cm-1) showing differences at both depths. The soil hardness showed differences (p≤0.05) between plots. The AA showed lower values (0.78 kg cm- 2), contrasting with the values obtained for ASP (2.98 kg cm-2) and AVN (3.10 kg cm-2).
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Soil Carbon Change
    Measuring soil carbon change Peter Donovan version: October 2013 This guide can be freely copied and adapted, with attribution, no commercial use, and derivative works similarly licensed. Contents What this guide is about, and how to use it iv 1 The work of the biosphere 1 1.1 Technology . 1 1.2 The carbon cycle . 2 1.3 Let, not make . 3 1.4 Monitoring: a strategic and creative choice . 4 2 Measuring soil carbon 7 2.1 Purpose, result, and uncertainty . 7 2.2 Change . 9 2.3 Organic and inorganic soil carbon . 11 2.4 Laboratory tests . 12 2.5 Getting started . 14 3 Site selection and sampling design 15 3.1 Mapping your site . 15 3.2 Stratification . 15 3.3 Locating plots . 17 3.4 Sampling tools . 17 3.5 Sampling intensity within the plot . 17 4 Sampling and field procedures 20 4.1 Lay out a transect and mark the plot center . 20 4.2 Soil surface observations . 23 4.3 Lay out the plot . 23 4.4 Use probe to take samples . 24 4.5 Soils with abundant rocks, gravel, or coarse fragments . 24 4.6 Characterize the soil . 25 4.7 Bag the sample . 26 4.8 Going deeper . 26 4.9 Sampling for bulk density . 27 4.10 Resampling . 29 4.11 Correcting for changes in bulk density . 29 ii 5 Getting your samples analyzed 31 5.1 Sample preparation . 31 5.2 Storing samples . 32 5.3 Split sampling to test your lab . 32 5.4 U.S. labs that do elemental analysis or dry combustion test .
    [Show full text]
  • Age of Soil Organic Matter and Soil Respiration: Radiocarbon Constraints on Belowground C Dynamics
    April 2000 BELOWGROUND PROCESSES AND GLOBAL CHANGE 399 Ecological Applications, 10(2), 2000, pp. 399±411 q 2000 by the Ecological Society of America AGE OF SOIL ORGANIC MATTER AND SOIL RESPIRATION: RADIOCARBON CONSTRAINTS ON BELOWGROUND C DYNAMICS SUSAN TRUMBORE Department of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, California 92697-3100 USA Abstract. Radiocarbon data from soil organic matter and soil respiration provide pow- erful constraints for determining carbon dynamics and thereby the magnitude and timing of soil carbon response to global change. In this paper, data from three sites representing well-drained soils in boreal, temperate, and tropical forests are used to illustrate the methods for using radiocarbon to determine the turnover times of soil organic matter and to partition soil respiration. For these sites, the average age of bulk carbon in detrital and Oh/A-horizon organic carbon ranges from 200 to 1200 yr. In each case, this mass-weighted average includes components such as relatively undecomposed leaf, root, and moss litter with much shorter turnover times, and humi®ed or mineral-associated organic matter with much longer turnover times. The average age of carbon in organic matter is greater than the average age predicted for CO2 produced by its decomposition (30, 8, and 3 yr for boreal, temperate, and tropical soil), or measured in total soil respiration (16, 3, and 1 yr). Most of the CO2 produced during decomposition is derived from relatively short-lived soil organic matter (SOM) components that do not represent a large component of the standing stock of soil organic matter. Estimates of soil carbon turnover obtained by dividing C stocks by hetero- trophic respiration ¯uxes, or from radiocarbon measurements of bulk SOM, are biased to longer time scales of C cycling.
    [Show full text]
  • GYPSISOLS, DURISOLS, and CALCISOLS
    GYPSISOLS, DURISOLS, and CALCISOLS Otto Spaargaren ISRIC – World Soil Information Wageningen The Netherlands Definition of Gypsisols Soils having z A gypsic or petrogypsic horizon within 100cm from the soil surface z No diagnostic horizons other than an ochric or cambic horizon, an argic horizon permeated with gypsum or calcium carbonate, a vertic horizon, or a calcic or petrocalcic horizon underlying the gypsic or petrogypsic horizon Gypsic horizon Results from accumulation of secondary gypsum (CaSO4.2H2O). It contains ≥ 15 percent gypsum (if ≥ 60 percent gypsum, horizon is called hypergypsic), and has a thickness of at least 15cm. Petrogypsic horizon The petrogypsic horizon z contains ≥ 60 percent gypsum z is cemented to the extent that dry fragments do not slake in water and the horizon cannot be penetrated by roots z has a thickness of 10cm or more Genesis of Gypsisols Main soil-forming factor is: Arid climate Main soil-forming process is: – Precipitation of gypsum from the soil solution when this evaporates. Most Gypsisols are associated with sulphate-rich groundwater that moves upward in the soil through capillary action and evaporates at the surface. Classification of Gypsisols (1) z Strong expression qualifiers: hypergypsic and petric z Intergrade qualifiers: calcic, duric, endosalic, leptic, luvic, and vertic z Secondary characteristics qualifiers, related to defined diagnostic horizons, properties or materials: aridic, hyperochric, takyric, and yermic Classification of Gypsisols (2) z Secondary characteristics qualifiers, not related to defined diagnostic horizons, properties or materials: arzic, skeletic, and sodic z Haplic qualifier, where non of the above applies: haplic Example of a Gypsisol (1) Yermi-Calcic Gypsisol (Endoskeletic and Sodic), Israel 0-2cm 2-6cm 6-21cm 21-38cm 38-50cm % gypsum 50-78cm % CaCO3 78-94cm 94-126cm 126-150cm 020406080 % Example of a Gypsisol (2) Yermi-Epipetric Gypsisol, Namibia Distribution of Gypsisols (1) Distribution of Gypsisols (2) Gypsisols cover some 100M ha or 0.7 % of the Earth’s land surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpreting, Measuring, and Modeling Soil Respiration
    Biogeochemistry (2005) 73: 3–27 Ó Springer 2005 DOI 10.1007/s10533-004-5167-7 -1 Interpreting, measuring, and modeling soil respiration MICHAEL G. RYAN1,2,* and BEVERLY E. LAW3 1US Department of Agriculture-Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 240 West Pros- pect Street, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA; 2Affiliate Faculty, Department of Forest, Rangeland and Watershed Stewardship and Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA; 3Department of Forest Science, Oregon State University, 328 Richardson Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA; *Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]) Key words: Belowground carbon allocation, Carbon cycling, Carbon dioxide, CO2, Infrared gas analyzers, Methods, Soil carbon, Terrestrial ecosystems Abstract. This paper reviews the role of soil respiration in determining ecosystem carbon balance, and the conceptual basis for measuring and modeling soil respiration. We developed it to provide background and context for this special issue on soil respiration and to synthesize the presentations and discussions at the workshop. Soil respiration is the largest component of ecosystem respiration. Because autotrophic and heterotrophic activity belowground is controlled by substrate availability, soil respiration is strongly linked to plant metabolism, photosynthesis and litterfall. This link dominates both base rates and short-term fluctuations in soil respiration and suggests many roles for soil respiration as an indicator of ecosystem metabolism. However, the strong links between above and belowground processes complicate using soil respiration to understand changes in ecosystem carbon storage. Root and associated mycorrhizal respiration produce roughly half of soil respiration, with much of the remainder derived from decomposition of recently produced root and leaf litter.
    [Show full text]