DOCSLIB.ORG

Interpreting, Measuring, and Modeling Soil Respiration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Interpreting, Measuring, and Modeling Soil Respiration Biogeochemistry (2005) 73: 3–27 Ó Springer 2005 DOI 10.1007/s10533-004-5167-7 -1 Interpreting, measuring, and modeling soil respiration MICHAEL G. RYAN1,2,* and BEVERLY E. LAW3 1US Department of Agriculture-Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 240 West Pros- pect Street, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA; 2Affiliate Faculty, Department of Forest, Rangeland and Watershed Stewardship and Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA; 3Department of Forest Science, Oregon State University, 328 Richardson Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA; *Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]) Key words: Belowground carbon allocation, Carbon cycling, Carbon dioxide, CO2, Infrared gas analyzers, Methods, Soil carbon, Terrestrial ecosystems Abstract. This paper reviews the role of soil respiration in determining ecosystem carbon balance, and the conceptual basis for measuring and modeling soil respiration. We developed it to provide background and context for this special issue on soil respiration and to synthesize the presentations and discussions at the workshop. Soil respiration is the largest component of ecosystem respiration. Because autotrophic and heterotrophic activity belowground is controlled by substrate availability, soil respiration is strongly linked to plant metabolism, photosynthesis and litterfall. This link dominates both base rates and short-term fluctuations in soil respiration and suggests many roles for soil respiration as an indicator of ecosystem metabolism. However, the strong links between above and belowground processes complicate using soil respiration to understand changes in ecosystem carbon storage. Root and associated mycorrhizal respiration produce roughly half of soil respiration, with much of the remainder derived from decomposition of recently produced root and leaf litter. Changes in the carbon stored in the soil generally contribute little to soil respiration, but these changes, together with shifts in plant carbon allocation, determine ecosystem carbon storage belowground and its exchange with the atmosphere. Identifying the small signal from changes in large, slow carbon pools in flux dominated by decomposition of recent material and autotrophic and mycorrhizal respiration is a significant challenge. A mechanistic understanding of the belowground carbon cycle and of the response of different components to the environment will aid in identifying this signal. Our workshop identified information needs to help build that understanding: (1) the mechanisms that control the coupling of canopy and belowground processes; (2) the responses of root and heterotrophic respiration to environment; (3) plant carbon allocation patterns, particularly in different forest developmental stages, and in response to treatments (warming, CO2, nitrogen additions); and (4) coupling measurements of soil respiration with aboveground processes and changes in soil carbon. Multi-factor experiments need to be sufficiently long to allow the systems to adjust to the treatments. New technologies will be necessary to reduce uncertainty in estimates of carbon allocation, soil carbon pool sizes, and different responses of roots and microbes to environmental conditions. Introduction Belowground processes exert a large control on terrestrial carbon cycling. Plants send an estimated 35–80% of the carbon fixed in photosynthesis belowground for root production and respiration, mycorrhizae, and root exudates (Raich and Nadelhoffer 1989; Davidson et al. 2002a; Giardina et al. 4 2003; Ryan et al. 2004), and also transfer about 10% of annual photosyn- thesis to aboveground litter (Raich and Nadelhoffer 1989). The carbon stored in litter and labile and recalcitrant soil carbon pools is a large fraction of the carbon stored in the ecosystem in forests (30–90%, Dixon 1994; Sun et al. in press) and in grasslands (>90%). In forests, the carbon stored in roots (mostly woody support structures) is also a large pool – about 20% of aboveground biomass (Jackson and Chittenden 1981; Misra et al. 1998). Changes in the belowground carbon pools can have a major impact on carbon storage in terrestrial ecosystems and change carbon flux to the atmosphere. CO2 efflux from the litter surface originating as plant and microbial respi- ration reflects this large belowground activity. This ‘soil respiration’ is the main pathway for carbon moving from the ecosystem to the atmosphere and can strongly influence net carbon uptake from the atmosphere, or net ecosystem production (NEP) – the balance between photosynthesis (GPP) and ecosystem respiration. Eddy covariance studies have shown that on average, 80% of GPP is respired back to the atmosphere (Law et al. 2002) and that 70% of eco- system respiration in temperate forests is from soil (Goulden et al. 1996; Law et al. 1999; Janssens et al. 2001). Respiration may be more important than photosynthesis in controlling interannual variability in NEP (Valentini et al. 2000). The CO2 produced at the soil surface results from several respiratory pro- cesses, making modeling and interpretation of data complicated. About half the soil respiration is derived from metabolic activity to support and grow roots and associated mycorrhizae (Hanson et al. 2000; Ho¨gberg et al. 2001). Most of the remainder is associated with heterotrophic respiration from microbial communities using recently produced organic material as an energy substrate (Trumbore 2000; Giardina et al. 2004). Only a small fraction (10%) of soil respiration is derived from decomposition of older, more recalcitrant carbon compounds (Gaudinski et al. 2000; Trumbore 2000; Giardina et al. 2004). The proportion of soil respiration from autotrophic and heterotrophic contributions may vary seasonally and among ecosystems (Hanson et al. 2000). Across a range of studies, the heterotrophic contribution varied from 10 to 95% and averaged 54% annually and 40% during the growing season (Hanson et al. 2000). Because of its major role in carbon loss from ecosystems, soil respiration has received much recent attention, and the number of studies of soil respiration has increased rapidly. However, this flurry of studies has uncovered many new problems and opportunities. How can we untangle the components of this complex flux to understand the underlying processes that contribute to it? What are the short-term and long-term controls over the component fluxes and how do we model them so that we can predict changes in carbon stored in the ecosystem and atmosphere? How do we make unbiased measurements? Would standardizing measurements and accompanying information yield broader understanding? 5 We convened a workshop in October, 2003 to address these conceptual, measurement, and modeling issues (Hibbard et al. 2004). The purpose of this introductory paper is to provide background and context for measuring and modeling soil respiration and belowground processes, and to synthesize and expand upon some of the ideas discussed at the workshop. Our objectives are to discuss: (1) the conceptual basis for using measurements of soil respiration to understand terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling; (2) how observations can be used to assess ecosystem carbon fluxes; (3) how biological processes control CO2 production (the timescales and magnitude of the fluxes from different components); (4) how wind and rain can decouple measured fluxes from bio- logical production; (5) potential biases in measurement and sampling tech- niques; (6) experiments to define the controls over soil respiration; (7) modeling soil respiration; and (8) protocols for sampling, measurement, and reporting soil CO2 fluxes (Appendix). Our paper is organized according to these objec- tives. It focuses on what we view as the background and critical issues for advancing understanding of soil respiration in ecosystem science, and is not intended to be an extensive review of the topic. For recent reviews and syn- theses, see Raich and Potter (1995), Jackson et al. (1997), Gill and Jackson (2000), Hanson et al. (2000), Rustad et al. (2001), Davidson et al. (2002a), Pendall et al. (2004), and Hibbard et al. (this issue). Conceptual basis for measurements of soil respiration to understand terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling Soil respiration is the major pathway for carbon exiting terrestrial ecosystems, and in many models and syntheses it has been treated as strictly a heterotrophic process, responding to temperature or moisture (for example, Kicklighter et al. 1994; Raich and Potter 1995). However, we now know that plant metabolism (Ho¨gberg et al. 2001) or the decomposition of recently produced organic material (Trumbore 2000; Giardina and Ryan 2002; Giardina et al. 2004) generates most of the ‘soil’ respiration and that soil respiration strongly reflects plant metabolism (Ekblad and Ho¨gberg 2001; Bowling et al. 2002). Changes in the recalcitrant soil carbon stocks – the largest C pools in soil and the soil pools most important to changes in ecosystem carbon storage and atmospheric CO2 – contribute only a minor portion of soil CO2 efflux at any point in time (Trumbore 2000; Giardina et al. 2004). These insights suggest that soil respi- ration is a good indicator of ecosystem metabolism but a poor indicator of changes in ecosystem carbon storage. Measurements of soil respiration have great potential as an indicator of ecosystem metabolism and fine-scale process. Integrated measurements can be used to estimate belowground carbon allocation (Giardina and Ryan 2002), and can be coupled with estimates of canopy photosynthesis
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Foliar and Ecosystem Respiration in an Old-Growth Tropical Rain Forest
    Plant, Cell and Environment (2008) 31, 473–483 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01775.x Foliar and ecosystem respiration in an old-growth tropical rain forest MOLLY A. CAVALERI1,2, STEVEN F. OBERBAUER3,4 & MICHAEL G. RYAN5,6 1Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA, 2Botany Department, University of Hawaii, Manoa, 3190 Maile Way, Honolulu, HI 96826, USA, 3Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8th Street, Miami, FL 33199, USA, 4Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden, 11935 Old Cutler Road, Miami, FL 33156, USA, 5United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 240 West Prospect RD, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA and 6Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Department of Forest, Rangeland, and Watershed Stewardship, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA ABSTRACT Chambers et al. 2004). Results vary widely about whether tropical forests are presently acting as carbon sources or Foliar respiration is a major component of ecosystem res- sinks, or how this may be affected by global warming. piration, yet extrapolations are often uncertain in tropical Several eddy flux studies have concluded that tropical rain forests because of indirect estimates of leaf area index forests are primarily acting as carbon sinks (Fan et al. 1990; (LAI). A portable tower was used to directly measure LAI Grace et al. 1995; Malhi et al. 1998; Loescher et al. 2003, and night-time foliar respiration from 52 vertical transects but see Saleska et al. 2003). Many atmosphere–biosphere throughout an old-growth tropical rain forest in Costa Rica. modelling studies, on the other hand, predict that tropical In this study, we (1) explored the effects of structural, func- forests will be an increased carbon source with global tional and environmental variables on foliar respiration; (2) warming (Kindermann, Würth & Kohlmaier 1996; Braswell extrapolated foliar respiration to the ecosystem; and (3) et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet 3: Organic Matter Decline
    Sustainable agriculture and soil conservation Soil degradation processes Fact sheet no. 3 Organic matter decline What is organic matter decline? Soil organic matter includes all living soil organisms together with the remains of dead organisms in their various degrees of decomposition. The organic carbon content of a soil is made up of heterogeneous mixtures of both simple and complex substances containing carbon. The sources for organic matter are crop residues, animal and green manures, compost and other organic materials. A decline in organic matter is caused by the reduced presence of decaying organisms, or an increased rate of decay as a result of changes in natural or anthropogenic factors. Organic matter is regarded as a vital component of a healthy soil; its decline results in a soil that is degraded. A soil that is rich in organic matter (Source: Soil Atlas of Europe) Why is soil organic matter/carbon important? Soil organic matter is a source of food for soil fauna, and contributes to soil biodiversity by acting as a reservoir of soil nutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorus and sulphur; it is the main contributor to soil fertility. Soil organic carbon supports the soil’s structure, improving the physical environment for roots to penetrate through the soil. Organic matter absorbs water – it is able to hold about six times its weight in water – making it a lifeline for vegetation in naturally dry and sandy soils. Soils containing organic matter have a better structure that improves water infiltration, and reduces the soil’s susceptibility to compaction, erosion, desertification and landslides. On a global scale, soils contain around twice the amount of carbon held in the atmosphere and three times the amount found in vegetation.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Nitrogen Additions on Soil Respiration in an Asian Tropical Montane Rainforest
    Article Effects of Nitrogen Additions on Soil Respiration in an Asian Tropical Montane Rainforest Fangtao Wu 1,2, Changhui Peng 1,2,3,* , Weiguo Liu 1,2, Zhihao Liu 1,2, Hui Wang 1,2, Dexiang Chen 4 and Yide Li 4 1 Center for Ecological Forecasting and Global Change, College of Forestry, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China; [email protected] (F.W.); [email protected] (W.L.); [email protected] (Z.L.); [email protected] (H.W.) 2 State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China 3 Department of Biology Sciences, Institute of Environment Sciences, University of Quebec at Montreal, C.P. 8888, Succ. Centre-Ville, Montreal, QC H3C 3P8, Canada 4 Jianfengling National Key Field Observation and Research Station for Forest Ecosystem, Research Institute of Tropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Guangzhou 510520, China; [email protected] (D.C.); [email protected] (Y.L.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Understanding the impacts of nitrogen (N) addition on soil respiration (RS) and its temper- ature sensitivity (Q10) in tropical forests is very important for the global carbon cycle in a changing environment. Here, we investigated how RS respond to N addition in a tropical montane rainforest in Southern China. Four levels of N treatments (0, 25, 50, and 100 kg N ha−1 a−1 as control (CK), low N (N25), moderate N (N50), and high N (N100), respectively) were established in September 2010. Based on a static chamber-gas chromatography method, R was measured from January 2015 S to December 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Soils and Fertilizers for Master Gardeners: Soil Organic Matter and Organic Amendments1 Gurpal S
    SL273 Soils and Fertilizers for Master Gardeners: Soil Organic Matter and Organic Amendments1 Gurpal S. Toor, Amy L. Shober, and Alexander J. Reisinger2 This article is part of a series entitled Soils and Fertilizers for Master Gardeners. The rest of the series can be found at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/topic_series_soils_and_fertil- izers_for_master_gardeners. A glossary can also be found at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/MG457. Introduction and Purpose Organic matter normally occupies the smallest portion of the soil physical makeup (approximately 5% of total soil volume on average, and usually 1 to 3% for Florida’s sandy soils) but is the most dynamic soil component (Figure Figure 1. Typical components of soil. 1). The primary sources of soil organic matter are plant Credits: Gurpal Toor and animal residues. Soil organic matter is important for maintaining good soil structure, which enhances the What is the composition of soil movement of air and water in soil. Organic matter also organic matter? plays an important role in nutrient cycling. This publication is designed to educate homeowners about the importance Soil organic matter contains (i) living biomass: plant, of soil organic matter and provide suggestions about how to animal tissues, and microorganisms; (ii) dead tissues: partly build the organic matter in garden and landscape soils. decomposed materials; and (iii) non-living materials: stable portion formed from decomposed materials, also known as humus. Soil organic matter typically contains about 50% carbon. The remainder of soil organic matter consists of about 40% oxygen, 5% hydrogen, 4% nitrogen, and 1% sulfur. The amount of organic matter in soils varies widely, from 1 to 10% (total dry weight) in most soils to more than 90% in organic (muck) soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Wheel Traffic and Farmyard Manure Applications on Soil CO2
    Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry Turk J Agric For (2018) 42: 288-297 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/agriculture/ © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/tar-1709-79 Effects of wheel traffic and farmyard manure applications on soil CO2 emission and soil oxygen content 1, 1 2 Sefa ALTIKAT *, H. Kaan KÜÇÜKERDEM , Aysun ALTIKAT 1 Department of Biosystem Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Iğdır University, Iğdır, Turkey 2 Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Iğdır University, Iğdır, Turkey Received: 20.09.2017 Accepted/Published Online: 17.04.2018 Final Version: 07.08.2018 Abstract: This 2-year field study investigated the effects of different wheel traffic passes, manure amounts, and manure application methods on soil temperature, soil moisture, CO2 emission, and soil O2 content. To achieve this purpose, three different wheel traffic applications (no traffic, one pass, and two passes) were used. In the experiments, two different methods of manure applications (surface and subsurface) and three different farmyard manure amounts were used with a control plot (N0), 40 Mg ha–1 (N40), and 80 Mg ha–1 (N80). Manure was applied in both years of the experiment in the first week of April. For the subsurface application, the manure was mixed in at approximately 10 cm of soil depth with a rotary tiller. According to the results, soil temperature, soil moisture, penetration resistance, and bulk density increased with increasing wheel traffic except 2CO emission for 2014 and 2015. CO2 emission values decreased with traffic. Subsurface manure application caused more 2CO emission compared to surface application. The increase in manure amounts led to an increase in CO2 emission and soil moisture content.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Soil Compaction: Causes and Management
    October 2010 Agdex 510-1 Agricultural Soil Compaction: Causes and Management oil compaction can be a serious and unnecessary soil aggregates, which has a negative affect on soil S form of soil degradation that can result in increased aggregate structure. soil erosion and decreased crop production. Soil compaction can have a number of negative effects on Compaction of soil is the compression of soil particles into soil quality and crop production including the following: a smaller volume, which reduces the size of pore space available for air and water. Most soils are composed of • causes soil pore spaces to become smaller about 50 per cent solids (sand, silt, clay and organic • reduces water infiltration rate into soil matter) and about 50 per cent pore spaces. • decreases the rate that water will penetrate into the soil root zone and subsoil • increases the potential for surface Compaction concerns water ponding, water runoff, surface soil waterlogging and soil erosion Soil compaction can impair water Soil compaction infiltration into soil, crop emergence, • reduces the ability of a soil to hold root penetration and crop nutrient and can be a serious water and air, which are necessary for water uptake, all of which result in form of soil plant root growth and function depressed crop yield. • reduces crop emergence as a result of soil crusting Human-induced compaction of degradation. • impedes root growth and limits the agricultural soil can be the result of using volume of soil explored by roots tillage equipment during soil cultivation or result from the heavy weight of field equipment. • limits soil exploration by roots and Compacted soils can also be the result of natural soil- decreases the ability of crops to take up nutrients and forming processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Drought and Ecosystem Carbon Cycling
    Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 151 (2011) 765–773 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Agricultural and Forest Meteorology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/agrformet Review Drought and ecosystem carbon cycling M.K. van der Molen a,b,∗, A.J. Dolman a, P. Ciais c, T. Eglin c, N. Gobron d, B.E. Law e, P. Meir f, W. Peters b, O.L. Phillips g, M. Reichstein h, T. Chen a, S.C. Dekker i, M. Doubková j, M.A. Friedl k, M. Jung h, B.J.J.M. van den Hurk l, R.A.M. de Jeu a, B. Kruijt m, T. Ohta n, K.T. Rebel i, S. Plummer o, S.I. Seneviratne p, S. Sitch g, A.J. Teuling p,r, G.R. van der Werf a, G. Wang a a Department of Hydrology and Geo-Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, VU-University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands b Meteorology and Air Quality Group, Wageningen University and Research Centre, P.O. box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands c LSCE CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Orme des Merisiers, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France d Institute for Environment and Sustainability, EC Joint Research Centre, TP 272, 2749 via E. Fermi, I-21027 Ispra, VA, Italy e College of Forestry, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331-5752 USA f School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, EH8 9XP Edinburgh, UK g School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK h Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, PO Box 100164, D-07701 Jena, Germany i Department of Environmental Sciences, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, PO Box 80115, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands j Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vienna University of Technology, Gusshausstraße 27-29, 1040 Vienna, Austria k Geography and Environment, Boston University, 675 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA l Department of Global Climate, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of Carbon 14 in Soils: a Review C
    Radioprotection, Suppl. 1, vol. 40 (2005) S465-S470 © EDP Sciences, 2005 DOI: 10.1051/radiopro:2005s1-068 Dynamics of Carbon 14 in soils: A review C. Tamponnet Institute of Radioprotection and Nuclear Safety, DEI/SECRE, CADARACHE, BP. 1, 13108 Saint-Paul-lez-Durance Cedex, France, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. In terrestrial ecosystems, soil is the main interface between atmosphere, hydrosphere, lithosphere and biosphere. Its interactions with carbon cycle are primordial. Information about carbon 14 dynamics in soils is quite dispersed and an up-to-date status is therefore presented in this paper. Carbon 14 dynamics in soils are governed by physical processes (soil structure, soil aggregation, soil erosion) chemical processes (sequestration by soil components either mineral or organic), and soil biological processes (soil microbes, soil fauna, soil biochemistry). The relative importance of such processes varied remarkably among the various biomes (tropical forest, temperate forest, boreal forest, tropical savannah, temperate pastures, deserts, tundra, marshlands, agro ecosystems) encountered in the terrestrial ecosphere. Moreover, application for a simplified modelling of carbon 14 dynamics in soils is proposed. 1. INTRODUCTION The importance of carbon 14 of anthropic origin in the environment has been quite early a matter of concern for the authorities [1]. When the behaviour of carbon 14 in the environment is to be modelled, it is an absolute necessity to understand the biogeochemical cycles of carbon. One can distinguish indeed, a global cycle of carbon from different local cycles. As far as the biosphere is concerned, pedosphere is considered as a primordial exchange zone. Pedosphere, which will be named from now on as soils, is mainly located at the interface between atmosphere and lithosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Carbon Science for Policy and Practice Soil-Based Initiatives to Mitigate Climate Change and Restore Soil Fertility Both Rely on Rebuilding Soil Organic Carbon
    comment Soil carbon science for policy and practice Soil-based initiatives to mitigate climate change and restore soil fertility both rely on rebuilding soil organic carbon. Controversy about the role soils might play in climate change mitigation is, consequently, undermining actions to restore soils for improved agricultural and environmental outcomes. Mark A. Bradford, Chelsea J. Carey, Lesley Atwood, Deborah Bossio, Eli P. Fenichel, Sasha Gennet, Joseph Fargione, Jonathan R. B. Fisher, Emma Fuller, Daniel A. Kane, Johannes Lehmann, Emily E. Oldfeld, Elsa M. Ordway, Joseph Rudek, Jonathan Sanderman and Stephen A. Wood e argue there is scientific forestry, soil carbon losses via erosion and carbon, vary markedly within a field. Even consensus on the need to decomposition have generally exceeded within seemingly homogenous fields, a Wrebuild soil organic carbon formation rates of soil carbon from plant high spatial density of soil observations is (hereafter, ‘soil carbon’) for sustainable land inputs. Losses associated with these land therefore required to detect the incremental stewardship. Soil carbon concentrations and uses are substantive globally, with a mean ‘signal’ of management effects on soil carbon stocks have been reduced in agricultural estimate to 2-m depth of 133 Pg carbon8, from the local ‘noise’11. Given the time soils following long-term use of practices equivalent to ~63 ppm atmospheric CO2. and expense of acquiring a high density of such as intensive tillage and overgrazing. Losses vary spatially by type and duration observations, most current soil sampling is Adoption of practices such as cover crops of land use, as well as biophysical conditions too limited to reliably quantify management and silvopasture can protect and rebuild such as soil texture, mineralogy, plant effects at field scales9,10.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nature and Dynamics of Soil Organic Matter: Plant Inputs, Microbial Transformations, and Organic Matter Stabilization
    Soil Biology & Biochemistry 98 (2016) 109e126 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Soil Biology & Biochemistry journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/soilbio Review paper The nature and dynamics of soil organic matter: Plant inputs, microbial transformations, and organic matter stabilization Eldor A. Paul Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory and Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1499, USA article info abstract Article history: This review covers historical perspectives, the role of plant inputs, and the nature and dynamics of soil Received 19 November 2015 organic matter (SOM), often known as humus. Information on turnover of organic matter components, Received in revised form the role of microbial products, and modeling of SOM, and tracer research should help us to anticipate 31 March 2016 what future research may answer today's challenges. Our globe's most important natural resource is best Accepted 1 April 2016 studied relative to its chemistry, dynamics, matrix interactions, and microbial transformations. Humus has similar, worldwide characteristics, but varies with abiotic controls, soil type, vegetation inputs and composition, and the soil biota. It contains carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, phenol-aromatics, protein- Keywords: Soil organic matter derived and cyclic nitrogenous compounds, and some still unknown compounds. Protection of trans- 13C formed plant residues and microbial products occurs through spatial inaccessibility-resource availability, 14C aggregation of mineral and organic constituents, and interactions with sesquioxides, cations, silts, and Plant residue decomposition clays. Tracers that became available in the mid-20th century made the study of SOM dynamics possible. Soil carbon dynamics Carbon dating identified resistant, often mineral-associated, materials to be thousands of years old, 13 Humus especially at depth in the profile.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Soil Carbon Credits: Making Sense of Protocols for Carbon Sequestration and Net Greenhouse Gas Removals
    Agricultural Soil Carbon Credits: Making sense of protocols for carbon sequestration and net greenhouse gas removals NATURAL CLIMATE SOLUTIONS About this report This synthesis is for federal and state We contacted each carbon registry and policymakers looking to shape public marketplace to ensure that details investments in climate mitigation presented in this report and through agricultural soil carbon credits, accompanying appendix are accurate. protocol developers, project developers This report does not address carbon and aggregators, buyers of credits and accounting outside of published others interested in learning about the protocols meant to generate verified landscape of soil carbon and net carbon credits. greenhouse gas measurement, reporting While not a focus of the report, we and verification protocols. We use the remain concerned that any end-use of term MRV broadly to encompass the carbon credits as an offset, without range of quantification activities, robust local pollution regulations, will structural considerations and perpetuate the historic and ongoing requirements intended to ensure the negative impacts of carbon trading on integrity of quantified credits. disadvantaged communities and Black, This report is based on careful review Indigenous and other communities of and synthesis of publicly available soil color. Carbon markets have enormous organic carbon MRV protocols published potential to incentivize and reward by nonprofit carbon registries and by climate progress, but markets must be private carbon crediting marketplaces. paired with a strong regulatory backing. Acknowledgements This report was supported through a gift Conservation Cropping Protocol; Miguel to Environmental Defense Fund from the Taboada who provided feedback on the High Meadows Foundation for post- FAO GSOC protocol; Radhika Moolgavkar doctoral fellowships and through the at Nori; Robin Rather, Jim Blackburn, Bezos Earth Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Soil Carbon Change
    Measuring soil carbon change Peter Donovan version: October 2013 This guide can be freely copied and adapted, with attribution, no commercial use, and derivative works similarly licensed. Contents What this guide is about, and how to use it iv 1 The work of the biosphere 1 1.1 Technology . 1 1.2 The carbon cycle . 2 1.3 Let, not make . 3 1.4 Monitoring: a strategic and creative choice . 4 2 Measuring soil carbon 7 2.1 Purpose, result, and uncertainty . 7 2.2 Change . 9 2.3 Organic and inorganic soil carbon . 11 2.4 Laboratory tests . 12 2.5 Getting started . 14 3 Site selection and sampling design 15 3.1 Mapping your site . 15 3.2 Stratification . 15 3.3 Locating plots . 17 3.4 Sampling tools . 17 3.5 Sampling intensity within the plot . 17 4 Sampling and field procedures 20 4.1 Lay out a transect and mark the plot center . 20 4.2 Soil surface observations . 23 4.3 Lay out the plot . 23 4.4 Use probe to take samples . 24 4.5 Soils with abundant rocks, gravel, or coarse fragments . 24 4.6 Characterize the soil . 25 4.7 Bag the sample . 26 4.8 Going deeper . 26 4.9 Sampling for bulk density . 27 4.10 Resampling . 29 4.11 Correcting for changes in bulk density . 29 ii 5 Getting your samples analyzed 31 5.1 Sample preparation . 31 5.2 Storing samples . 32 5.3 Split sampling to test your lab . 32 5.4 U.S. labs that do elemental analysis or dry combustion test .
    [Show full text]