Knox, Henry.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

U.S. Army Military History Institute Biographies 950 Soldiers Drive Carlisle Barracks, PA 17013-5021 22 Aug 2012 HENRY KNOX A Working Bibliography of MHI Sources Brooks, Noah. Henry Knox, a Soldier of the Revolution; Major-General in the Continental Army, Washington's Chief of Artillery, First Secretary of War under the Constitution, Founder of the Society of the Cincinnati, 1750-1806. NY: Putnam, 1900. 286 p. E207.K74.B8. Browne, Wm L. Ye Cohorn Cavern: The Knox Expedition in the Winter of 1775-76. Schuylerville, NY: NaPaul, 1975. 81 p. E207.K74.B65. Callahan, North. "Henry Knox: American Artillerist." George Washington's Generals. [Edited by George Billias] 1964. 327 p. E206.B5. _____. Henry Knox, General Washington's General. NY: Rinehart, 1958. 404 p. E207.K74.C18. Drake, Francis S. Life and Correspondence of Henry Knox, Major-General in the American Revolutionary Army. Boston: Drake, 1873. 160 p. E207.K74.D7. _____. Memorials of the Society of the Cincinnati of Massachusetts. Boston: Soc, 1873. 565 p. E202.1.M38. Drew, Bernard A. Henry Knox and the Revolutionary War Trail in Western Massachusetts. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2012. 338 p. E230.5.M4.D74. Fell, S.H.P. “Major General Henry Knox.” Field Artillery Journal (Nov/Dec 1933): p. 542. Per. Knopf, Richard C., editor. Anthony Wayne, A Name in Arms:...The Wayne-Knox-Pickering-McHenry Correspondence. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1975. 566 p. E83.794.W3. Lonergan, Thomas J. Henry Knox: George Washington’s Confidant, General of Artillery, and America’s First Secretary of War. Rockland, ME: Picton, 2003. 231 p. E207.K74.L66. McIntyre, Jim. “Henry Knox-America’s Martial Founding Father.” Journal of America’s Military Past (Winter 2007): pp. 35-48. Per. Puls, Mark. Henry Knox: Visionary General of the American Revolution. NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008. 282 p. E207.K74.P85. Henry Knox p.2 Seidel, John L. "The Archaeology of the American Revolution: A Reappraisal & Case Study at the Continental Artillery Cantonment of 1778-1779, Pluckemin, New Jersey." PhD dss, U PA, 1987. 812 p. E289.S44. Shephard, Joshua. “Henry Knox Created & Commanded Washington’s Rev. War Artillery Arm.” Artilleryman (Spring 2010): pp. 5-10. Per. Spiller, Roger J., editor. Dictionary of American Military Biography. Vol. 2. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1984. pp. 569-72. U52.D53. Thompson, John M. “Citizens and Soldiers: Henry Knox and the Development of American Military Thought and Practice.” PhD dss, U NC, 2000. 291 p. E207.K74.T46. See also: -Biographical sketch file. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Formation of the Corps of Engineers
Formation of the U.S. Corps of Engineers Father of the Corps of Engineers At age 16 he was engaged by Lord Fairfax as a surveyor’s helper to survey 1.5 million acres of the Northern Neck of Virginia, which extended into the Shenandoah Valley At 17 he began surveying lots in Alexandria for pay, and became surveyor of Culpepper County later that summer. At age 21 he was given a major’s commission and made Adjutant of Southern Virginia. Six months later he led the first of three English expeditions into the Ohio Valley to initially parlay, then fight the French. Few individuals had a better appreciation of the Allegheny Mountains and the general character of all the lands comprising the American Colonies First Engineer Action Battle of Bunker Hill in Boston in 1775 Washington’s First Chief Engineer In 1775 Putnam entered the Continental Army as a lieutenant colonel. He was involved in the organization of the batteries and fortifications in Boston and New York City in 1776 and 1777, serving as Washington’s first chief Engineer. He went on to greater successes commanding a regiment under General Horatio Gates at the Battle of Saratoga in September 1777. He built new fortifications at West Point in 1778 and in 1779 he served under General Anthony Wayne. He was promoted to brigadier general four years later. Rufus Putnam 1738-1824 Chief Engineer 1777 - 1783 Washington pleaded for more engineers, which began arriving from France in 1776. In late 1777 Congress promoted Louis Duportail to brigadier general and Chief Engineer, a position he held for the duration of the war.
[Show full text]
War and Legitimacy: the Securement of Sovereignty in the Northwest Indian War
i ABSTRACT WAR AND LEGITIMACY: THE SECUREMENT OF SOVEREIGNTY IN THE NORTHWEST INDIAN WAR During the post-revolution period, the newfound constitutional government of the United States faced a crisis of sovereignty and legitimacy. The Old Northwest region, encompassing what is now Ohio, Indiana and Illinois, was disputed between several groups. The U.S. government under George Washington claimed the region and sought to populate the land with white settlers, British officials in North America wished to reestablish British hegemony in the Ohio River valley and Native-Americans wished to protect their ancestral homeland from foreign invasion. In the 1790s, war broke out between a British backed alliance of Native tribes and the United States of America. Historians have named this conflict the Northwest Indian War. Examining government records, personal correspondences between Washington administration officials and military commanders, as well as recollections of soldiers, officials and civilians this thesis explores the geopolitical causes and ramifications of the Northwest Indian War. These sources demonstrate how the war was a reflection of a crisis which threatened the legitimacy to American sovereignty in the West. Furthermore, they also demonstrate how the use of a professional federal standing army was used by Washington’s government to secure American legitimacy. Michael Anthony Lipe August 2019 ii WAR AND LEGITIMACY: THE SECUREMENT OF SOVEREIGNTY IN THE NORTHWEST INDIAN WAR by Michael Anthony Lipe A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History in the College of Social Sciences California State University, Fresno August 2019 APPROVED For the Department of History: We, the undersigned, certify that the thesis of the following student meets the required standards of scholarship, format, and style of the university and the student's graduate degree program for the awarding of the master's degree.
[Show full text]
THE CORRESPONDENCE of ISAAC CRAIG DURING the WHISKEY REBELLION Edited by Kenneth A
"SUCH DISORDERS CAN ONLY BE CURED BY COPIOUS BLEEDINGS": THE CORRESPONDENCE OF ISAAC CRAIG DURING THE WHISKEY REBELLION Edited by Kenneth A. White of the surprisingly underutilized sources on the early history Oneof Pittsburgh is the Craig Papers. Acase inpoint is Isaac Craig's correspondence during the Whiskey Rebellion. Although some of his letters from that period have been published, 1 most have not. This omission is particularly curious, because only a few eyewitness ac- counts of the insurrection exist and most ofthose were written from an Antifederalist viewpoint. These letters have a value beyond the narration of events, how- ever. One of the questions debated by historians is why the federal government resorted to force to put down the insurrection. Many have blamed Alexander Hamilton for the action, attributing it to his per- sonal approach to problems or to his desire to strengthen the central government. 2 These critics tend to overlook one fact : government officials make decisions based not only on their personal philosophy but also on the facts available to them. As a federal officer on the scene, Craig provided Washington and his cabinet with their informa- Kenneth White received his B.A. and M.A.degrees from Duquesne Uni- versity. While working on his master's degree he completed internships with the Adams Papers and the Institute of Early American History and Culture. Mr. White is presently working as a fieldarchivist for the Pennsylvania His- torical and Museum Commission's County Records Survey and Planning Study.— Editor 1 Portions of this correspondence have been published. For example, all or parts of six of these letters appeared in Harold C.
[Show full text]
Anthony Wayne M Em 0 R· I a L
\ I ·I ANTHONY WAYNE M EM 0 R· I A L 'I ' \ THE ANTHONY WAYNE MEMORIAL PARKWAY PROJECT . in OHIO -1 ,,,, J Compiled al tlze Request of the ANTHONY WAYNE MEMO RIAL LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE by lhr O..H. IO STATE ARCHAEOLOGICAL and H ISTORICAL SOCIETY 0 00 60 4016655 2 I• Columbus, Ohio 1944 ' '.'-'TnN ~nd MONTGOMERY COt Jt-rt"-' =J1UC llBR.APV Acknowledgments . .. THE FOLLOWING ORGANIZATIONS ass isted lll the compilation of this booklet : The A nthony Wayne Memo ri al J oint L egislative Cammi ttee The Anthony \Vayne Memori al Associati on The! Toledo-Lucas County Planning Commiss ions The Ohio D epa1 rtment of Conservation and Natural Resources The Ohio Department of Highways \ [ 4 J \ Table of Contents I Anthony Wayne Portrait 1794_ ·---···-· ·--· _____ . ----------- ·----------------- -------------------. _____ Cover Anthony Wayne Portrait in the American Revolution ____________________________ F rrm I ispiece Ii I I The Joint Legislative Committee_______ --------····----------------------------------------------------- 7 i· '#" j The Artthony Wayne Memorial Association ___________________________________ .-------------------- 9 I· The Ohio Anthony Wayne Memorial Committee _____________________________________ ---------- 11 I I I Meetings of the Joint Legislative Committee·------·--------- -·---------------------------------- 13 I I "Mad Anthony" Wayne a'dd the Indian \Vars, 1790-179.'---------------------------------- 15 lI The Military Routes of Wa.yne, St. Clair, and Harmar, 1790-179-t- ___________ . _______ 27 I The Anthony Wayne Memorial
[Show full text]
Guide to the Battles of Trenton and Princeton
Hidden Trenton Guide to the Battles of Trenton and Princeton Nine Days that Changed the World December 26, 1776 to January 3, 1777 A self-guided tour of the places and events that shaped the battles and changed the history of America Go to http://HiddenTrenton.com/BattleTour for links to online resources Updated 2017 Copyright © 2011, 2017 all rights reserved. The pdf file of this document may be distributed for non- commercial purposes over the Internet in its original, complete, and unaltered form. Schools and other non-profit educational institutions may print and redistribute sections of this document for classroom use without royalty. All of the illustrations in this document are either original creations, or believed by the author to be in the public domain. If you believe that you are the copyright holder of any image in this document, please con- tact the author via email at [email protected]. Forward I grew up in NJ, and the state’s 1964 Tricentennial cel- Recently, John Hatch, my friend and business partner, ebration made a powerful impression on me as a curious organized a “Tour of the Battle of Trenton” as a silent 4th grader. Leutez’ heroic portrait of Washington Cross- auction item for Trenton’s Passage Theatre. He used ing the Delaware was one of the iconic images of that Fischer’s book to research many of the stops, augmenting celebration. My only memory of a class trip to the park his own deep expertise concerning many of the places a year or two later, is peering up at the mural of Wash- they visited as one of the state’s top restoration architects.
[Show full text]
Lecture Notes, Chapter 7 1
Forging a National Republic 1776 - 1789 • What kind of democracy? – “Pure” democracy – Greeks – Republican in form • NOT “Republican Party” – representative • White Males only – landowning – Left door open to non-landowning later – States – • Drafting of State Constitutions – Primarily: Outlining the distribution and limitations of power. Lecture notes, Chapter 7 1 Forging a National Republic 1776 - 1789 • Little attention was devoted to National Constitution or Gov’t – Belief was that greater power resided in the States • Strongest beliefs held in South • Yoke of one Tyrant was thrown off (England) – Did not want to replace one with another – Any type of Gov’t would be “weak” by our standards today. Lecture notes, Chapter 7 2 Forging a National Republic 1776 - 1789 • Articles of Confederation, 1777 – Sent to States for ratification – No Executive Branch (President) – No Judicial Branch (Federal Courts) • Could not regulate commerce • Could not “Tax” – lacked enforcement • Required all 13 states to amend itself – Very difficult to do – any one state could be “spoiler” Lecture notes, Chapter 7 3 Lecture Notes, Chapter 7 1 Forging a National Republic 1776 - 1789 • Legacy – – Articles helped resolve war with England • Peace of Paris, 1783 • Expand territory (Land Ordinances) • Provided somewhat of a national framework for 11 years, until new constitution done – Were considered too “weak” for a fledgling country of independent states. Lecture notes, Chapter 7 4 Forging a National Republic 1776 - 1789 • Northwest Ordinance(s) – 1784, 1785 and 1787 • 1784, 1785 – dealt with new territory northwest of settled territory (no more than five, but no fewer than 3 states would be created) – Land sectioned off in townships 6 miles square » Each divided into 36 sections »Sale of 16th section was to provide for a school » Thomas Jefferson’s mark – education to help elect qualified people and sustain republic.
[Show full text]
Appendix a Detailed Historical Research in Support of the Battle of the Clouds Project
Appendix A Detailed Historical Research in Support of the Battle of the Clouds Project Detailed Historical Research in Support of the Battle of the Clouds Project Robert Selig, Thomas J. McGuire, and Wade Catts, 2013 American Battlefield Protection Program Grant GA-2255-12-005 Prepared for Chester County Planning. John Milner Associates, Inc., West Chester, PA Compiled August 17, 2013 This document contains a compilation of technical questions posed by the County of Chester as part of a project funded by the American Battlefield Protection Program in 2013 to research and document the Battle of the Clouds which took place September 16, 1777. Nineteen questions were developed in order to produce a technical report containing details of the battle such as order of battle, areas of engagement, avenues of approach and retreat, and encampment areas. Research was conducted by John Milner Associates of West Chester under the guidance of Wade Catts and his research team consisting of Dr. Robert Selig and Thomas J. McGuire. Due to the obscurity of the battle and the lack of detailed first-hand accounts, some of the questions could not be answered conclusively and are so noted. Following is a summary of the questions: Intro Q1 - Were the troop strengths in this battle the same as Brandywine? After Brandywine Q2 - Did George Washington make his headquarters at the Stenton House in Germantown during the Continental encampment on September 13? Q3 - Were any troops left to cover Levering’s Ford or Matson’s Ford after Washington crossed back to the west
[Show full text]
Shays' Rebellion
Educational materials developed through the Howard County History Labs Program, a partnership between the Howard County Public School System and the UMBC Center for History Education. Shays’ Rebellion Historical Thinking Skills Assessed: Close Reading, Corroboration Author/School/System: Megan Brown and Ronald Bianchi, Howard County Public School System, Maryland Course: United States History Level: Upper Elementary/Middle Task Question: How did the leaders of the American Revolution view Shays’ Rebellion? Learning Outcome: Students will be able to read closely and corroborate multiple primary sources to draw conclusions about the founding fathers’ views of Shays’ Rebellion. Standards Alignment: Common Core Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy RI.5.1 Quote accurately from a text when explaining what the text says explicitly and when drawing inferences from the text. RI.5.2 Determine two or more ideas of a text and explain how they are supported by key details; summarize the text. RI.5.6 Analyze multiple accounts of the same event or topic, noting important similarities and differences in the point of view they represent. W.5.1 Write opinion pieces on topics or texts, supporting a point of view with reasons and information. W.5.1.a Introduce a topic or text clearly, state an opinion, and create an organizational structure in which ideas are logically grouped to support the writer’s purpose. National History Standards Era 3: Revolution and the New Nation Standard 3: The institutions and practices of government created during the Revolution and how they were revised between 1787 and 1815 to create the foundation of the American political system based on the U.S.
[Show full text]
William Wells and the Indian Council of 1793
William Wells and the Indian Council of 1793 Edited by Dwight L. Smith* Contributed by Mrs. Frank Roberts** With the catastrophic defeat of Arthur St. Clair in early November, 1791, the American effort to establish peace with the Indians of the Old Northwest through the use of force virtually collapsed. Although the new United States had gained the area on paper, along with its independence from Great Britain, at the end of the American Revolution in in 1783, the facts seemed to indicate otherwise. The Indians posed a real threat to the very survival of the small settle- ments which hugged the north bank of the Ohio and even to those south of the river in Kentucky. Moreover, the British had not even bothered to evacuate several posts on the Ameri- can side of the Canadian border,’ evidence which the Indians certainly respected more than the treaty surrender of these posts. Seemingly determined to hold actual control, the British gave the Indians moral and material aid, They increased the garrison strength of the posts which they held and even built (later, in 1794) another one, Fort Miamis along the Maumee River, at a strategic spot in the midst of the Indian country.* Prophets of doom predicted dire consequences. Rufus Putnam accurately asserted that the Indians “began to be- lieve them Selves invin~ible,”~while John Cleves Symmes feared that Congress would abandon the frontier because of the costliness of an adequate military force and that the Ohio country settlements would soon fall to the Indians.‘ Dwight L. Smith is professor of history at Miami University, Oxford, Ohio.
[Show full text]
Henry Knox and the Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy
Henry Knox and the Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy Stephen J. Rockwell As the Officer who is at the head of that [War] department is a branch of the Executive, and called to its Councils upon interesting questions of National importance[,] he ought to be a man, not only of competent skill in the science of War, but possessing a general knowledge of political subjects, of known attachment to the Government we have chosen, and of proved integrity. 1 So wrote President George Washington to Charles Cotesworth Pinckney in January 1794. Washington was expecting the resignation of his trusted former artillery commander and longtime secretary of war, Henry Knox, who had shepherded the War Department through the Confederation government, across the gap between the Confederation and government under the Constitution, and through tense negotiations and major military Secretary of War Henry Knox losses with Indian nations in the South and the Old Northwest. In writing to Pinckney, Washington emphasized how complex the job of a department head had become, just a few years into the new government. The successful department head required policy expertise, political acumen, general wisdom, networked loyalty to the government and its other officials, and personal integrity. Stephen J. Rockwell is a professor of Political Science at St. Joseph’s College, Patchogue, New York. This essay is based on a paper given at the annual conference of the Society for Historians of the Early American Republic, Philadelphia, PA, July 2017. He wishes to thank Lindsay Chervinsky, Joanne Freeman, Gautham Rao, Kate Brown, Jerry Landry, and Benjamin Guterman for their questions, comments, and suggestions.
[Show full text]
American Government: Chronology
At a Glance American Government: Chronology July 5, 1775- The Continental Congress September 14, 1786- The Annapolis sends the Olive Branch Petition to King Convention adjourns after calling for a George in the hopes of making peace. King convention to convene the following spring George rejects the petition. to amend the Articles of Confederation. July 4, 1776- The Continental Congress February 4, 1787- Shays’ Rebellion ends approves the Declaration of Independence. when the Massachusetts militia defeats Thomas Jefferson is the document’s primary Shays’ forces known as “Shaysites.” Shays author. and his men flee to Vermont. June 14, 1777- The Continental Congress February 21, 1787- Congress approves a adopts the stars and stripes as the national convention in Philadelphia to amend the flag. The flag will fly for the first time in Articles of Confederation. Maryland on September 3. May 3, 1787- James Madison arrives in November 15, 1777- The Continental Philadelphia early for Convention. Congress approves the Articles of Confederation. This establishes the United May 13, 1787- George Washington arrives States' first constitution. The Articles are for Convention. officially ratified in 1781. May 25, 1787- The Constitutional September 27, 1779- John Adams is Convention officially begins. selected to negotiate a peace treaty with Great Britain. May 29, 1787- Edmund Randolph presents the Virginia Plan for consideration (although March 1, 1781- The states officially ratify James Madison is the author). Charles the Articles of Confederation. Pinckney presents his plan for the new constitution. September 3, 1783- The Treaty of Paris officially ends the American Revolution and May 31, 1787- The delegates debate establishes the United States as a free and representation of the states in the new independent country.
[Show full text]
George Washington and His Reluctance to Become President, 1789
1 The first inauguration: George Washington and his reluctance to become president, 1789 Introduction From 1787 to 1789, as the Constitution was submitted for ratification by the states, most Americans assumed that George Washington would be the first president. In this April 1789 letter to General Henry Knox, his friend from the Continental Army who served as Secretary of War, Washington accepted the inevitability of his election to the presidency, but with remarkable reluctance. His tone suggests how precarious the future of America seemed to him. Just twenty- nine days later Washington would be inaugurated in the (then) capital, New York City, and would advise his fellow citizens that “the destiny of the Republican model of Government [is] staked on the experiment entrusted to the hands of the American people.” Questions for Discussion Read the document introduction and transcript and apply your knowledge of American history as well as evidence from the document in order to answer these questions. 1. Compare Washington’s comments with the current political climate where there are frequently numerous candidates for political office, including the presidency. 2. List and explain the skills Washington thought he lacked as well as those he believed he possessed. 3. Do you believe that a man of Washington’s stature, reputation, and wealth could truly be so humble? 4. What aspects of Washington’s letter to Knox indicate that he was concerned about his future reputation and the success of the new nation? © 2012 The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History www.gilderlehrman.org 2 The first inauguration: George Washington and his reluctance to become president, 1789 Image George Washington to Henry Knox, April 1, 1789.
[Show full text]