Zepernick Version Pour Le

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Zepernick Version Pour Le Bernhard ZEPERNICK Pflanzen zur Farbstoffgewinnung in Polynesien Willdenowia, 1967, 5 : 3-97 Traduction de l’allemand par Pierre CABALION & Bernard WENIGER Plantes tinctoriales de Polynésie Résumé paru : Cabalion P., Weniger B. (trad.) (2012) Plantes tinctoriales de Polynésie, Ethnopharmacologia, 49, 41-46. 2 Sommaire RESUME .................................................................................................................................................... 6 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Remarques préliminaires ........................................................................................................ 7 Introduction ethnologique ..................................................................................................... 8 Abréviations ........................................................................................................................... 12 LES PLANTES TINCTORIALES DES POLYNESIENS .................................................................................... 13 1. Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) MOENCH ........................................................................ 14 2. Abutilon incanum (LINK) SWEET ..................................................................................... 14 3. Acacia koa A. GRAY ....................................................................................................... 14 4. Acalypha insulana MÜLL.-ARG. ..................................................................................... 14 5. Ackama rosaefolia A. CUNN. ........................................................................................ 15 6. Agathis australis SALISB. .................................................................................................. 15 7. Aleurites moluccana (L.) WILLD. .................................................................................... 15 8. Antidesma platyphyllum H. MANN ................................................................................ 16 9. Aristotelia serrata (J. R. et G. FORST.) W. R. B. OLIVER ................................................. 16 10. Artocarpus altilis (PARKINS.) FOSB. ................................................................................. 17 11. Bischofia javanica BLUME ............................................................................................... 18 12. Bixa orellana L. ................................................................................................................. 19 13. Brassica nigra (L.) KOCH ................................................................................................. 19 14. Calophyllum inophyllum L. ............................................................................................. 19 15. Canthium odoratum (FORST. f. ) SEEM. ......................................................................... 20 16. Carinta herbacea (JACQ.) SAFF. .................................................................................. 20 17. Casuarina equisetifolia J. R. et G. FORST. ..................................................................... 21 18. Citrus aurantiifolia (CHRISTM. et PANZ.) SWINGLE ........................................................ 22 19. Citrus limon BURM. f. ........................................................................................................ 22 20. Cocos nucifera L. ............................................................................................................ 22 21. Colocasia esculenta (L.) SCHOTT .................................................................................. 23 22. Coprosma australis (A. RICH.) ROBINS. ......................................................................... 24 23. Coprosma lucida J. R. et G. FORST. ............................................................................... 24 24. Coprosma robusta RAOUL ............................................................................................. 24 25. Cordia aspera FORST. f. .................................................................................................. 25 26. Cordia subcordata LAMK. .............................................................................................. 25 27. Cordyline terminalis (L.) KUNTH ...................................................................................... 26 Zepernick Bernhard (1967) Pflanzen zur Farbstoffgewinnung in Polynesien, Pflanzen et de Polynesien, Willdenowia, 5 : 3-97. Traduction par Pierre Cabalion et Bernard Weniger 3 28. Coriaria arborea LINDSAY ............................................................................................... 26 29. Curcuma longa L. ............................................................................................................ 27 30. Dianella lavarum DEG. .................................................................................................... 28 31. Dianella sandwicensis HOOK. et ARN. .......................................................................... 29 32. Dodonaea viscosa JACQ. ............................................................................................. 29 33. Dysoxylum richii (A. GRAY) C. DC. ................................................................................. 29 34. Elaeocarpus dentatus (J. R. et G. FORST.) VAHL .......................................................... 29 35. Elaeocarpus hookerianus RAOUL .................................................................................. 30 36. Elaeocarpus storckii SEEM. .............................................................................................. 30 37. Entada phaseoloides (L.) MERR. .................................................................................... 30 38. Erythrina variegata var. orientalis (L.) MERR. ................................................................ 31 39. Eugenia maire A. CUNN. ................................................................................................ 31 40. Ficus tinctoria FORST. f. subsp. Tinctoria ......................................................................... 31 41. Gardenia brighamii H. MANN ........................................................................................ 32 42. Gardenia remyi H. MANN ............................................................................................... 32 43. Garuga floribunda DECAISNE ........................................................................................ 32 44. Geniostoma ligustrifolium A. CUNN. .............................................................................. 33 45. Hibiscus rosa-sinensis L. .................................................................................................... 33 46. Homalanthus nutans (FORST.) PAX. ............................................................................... 33 47. Ipomoea pes-caprae (L.) SWEET ................................................................................... 34 48. Jussiaea erecta L. ............................................................................................................ 34 49. Koelreuteria formosana HAYATA .................................................................................... 34 50. Melastoma denticulatum LABILL. .................................................................................. 35 51. Messerschmidia argentea (L. f.) J. M. JOHNST. ............................................................. 35 52. Metrosideros collina subsp. polymorpha (GAUD.) ROCK ............................................ 36 53. Mezoneuron kavaiense (H. MANN) HILLEBR. ................................................................. 36 54. Morinda citrifolia L. .......................................................................................................... 36 55. Musa paradisiaca L. ........................................................................................................ 37 56. Musa troglodytarum L. .................................................................................................... 37 57. Nasturtium sarmentosum (FORST. f.) O. E. SCHULZ ....................................................... 38 58. Nothofagus fusca (HOOK. f.) ÖRST. ............................................................................... 39 59. Nothofagus menziesii (HOOK. f.) ÖRST. ......................................................................... 39 60. Ochrocarpos excelsus (PLANCH. et TRIANA) VESQUE ................................................ 39 61. Ochrosia sandwicensis GRAY ......................................................................................... 40 62. Pandanus tectorius PARKINS. ......................................................................................... 40 63. Parinarium glaberrimum HASSKARL ............................................................................... 40 64. Parinarium insularum A. GRAY ........................................................................................ 41 Zepernick Bernhard (1967) Pflanzen zur Farbstoffgewinnung in Polynesien, Pflanzen et de Polynesien, Willdenowia, 5 : 3-97. Traduction par Pierre Cabalion et Bernard Weniger 4 65. Peperomia sp. div. ........................................................................................................... 41 66. Phyllocladus trichomanoides D. DON ..........................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Nothodissotis (Melastomataceae), a New Genus from Atlantic Central
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331575405 Nothodissotis (Melastomataceae), a new genus from Atlantic Central Africa, including the new species N. alenensis from Equatorial Guinea Article · March 2019 DOI: 10.3897/phytokeys.118.31572 CITATIONS READS 0 93 4 authors, including: Marie Claire Veranso-Libalah Robert Douglas Stone Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz University of KwaZulu-Natal 22 PUBLICATIONS 35 CITATIONS 39 PUBLICATIONS 187 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Evolution and Systematics of African Melastomateae View project Phylogeny of African and Madagascan Sonerileae, Melastomataceae View project All content following this page was uploaded by Marie Claire Veranso-Libalah on 11 March 2019. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. A peer-reviewed open-access journal PhytoKeysNothodissotis 118: 89–103 (2019)(Melastomataceae), a new genus with two species from Atlantic Central Africa 89 doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.118.31572 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://phytokeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Nothodissotis (Melastomataceae), a new genus from Atlantic Central Africa, including the new species N. alenensis from Equatorial Guinea Marie Claire Veranso-Libalah1,2, Olivier Lachenaud3,4, Robert Douglas Stone5, Gudrun Kadereit1,2 1 Institut für Molekulare Physiologie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, D-55099 Mainz, Germany 2 Institut für Organismische und Molekulare Evolutionsbiologie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, D-55099 Mainz, Germany 3 Botanic Garden Meise, Nieuwelaan 38, B-1860 Meise, Belgium 4 Herbarium et Bibliothèque de Botanique africaine, CP 265, Université Libre de Bruxelles, bd du Triomphe, B-1050 Bru- xelles, Belgium 5 School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa Corresponding author: Marie Claire Veranso-Libalah ([email protected]) Academic editor: R.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Anthropogenic Wildfire in Low-Elevation Pacific Island Vegetation Communities
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/196352; this version posted December 20, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Title: Effects of anthropogenic wildfire in low-elevation Pacific island vegetation communities in French Polynesia Running head: Anthropogenic wildfire impacts on Pacific island flora Authors: Erica A. Newman A,B,E, Carlea A. WinklerC, David H. HembryD A School of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA B Pacific Wildland Fire Sciences Laboratory, US Forest Service, Seattle, WA 98103, USA C Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California at Berkeley, 130 Mulford Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA D Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA E Corresponding author. email: [email protected] Summary for the non-specialist reader: Wildfire at low elevations in remote Pacific islands is poorly characterized but likely all anthropogenic in origin. We show that wildfire in already heavily invaded low-elevation plant communities can lower native plant species richness, while increasing the relative abundance of non-native species. Wildfire also reduces the differences in plant communities among sites, and may exacerbate invasive species problems on Pacific islands by selecting for non-native, fire-adapted species over native ones. bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/196352; this version posted December 20, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
    [Show full text]
  • Clidemia Hirta (L.) D.Don
    Proposed plant host test list for assessing the risk of biological control agents for Clidemia hirta (L.) D.Don. D.F. Comben, J.T. Callander, T. Taylor and M.D. Day Department of Agriculture and Fisheries Queensland Clidemia hirta | 1 Citation Comben, D.F., Callander, J.T., Taylor, T., and Day, M.D. (2020) Proposed plant host test list for assessing the risk of biological control agents for Clidemia hirta (L.) D.Don. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries Queensland, Australia. Copyright © State of Queensland, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, 2020. Except as permitted by the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this work may in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or any other means be reproduced, stored in the retrieval system or be broadcast or transmitted without the prior written permission of the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The copyright owner shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained therein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information. Enquiries about reproduction, including web page or web version of a document, should be directed to [email protected] Disclaimer The Department of Agriculture and Fisheries (DAF), Queensland, makes no representations about the content and suitability of DAF materials presented online for any purpose. Specifically, DAF does not warrant, guarantee or make any representations regarding the correctness, accuracy, reliability, currency, or any other aspect regarding characteristics or use of the information presented in DAF materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Checklist of the Flora of Waisoi - Namosi and Its Surrounding Area
    28 Preliminary checklist of the flora of Waisoi - Namosi and its surrounding area M. V. Tuiwawa and M. F. Doyle Department ofBiology and South Pacific Regional Herbarium School ofPure and Applied Sciences, The University of the South Pacific, Suva, Fiji. Abstract A floristic survey ofWaisoi, Namosi Province, Viti Levu, Fiji, conducted from 1995-1996 has revealed a vascular plant flora comprising 371 taxa (345 species and 26 sub-species). Dicots contributed the largest number offamilies (68), genera (133) and species (196), representing 52.8% of the entire flora, followed by monocots; 15 families, 56 genera, and 68 species, representing only 18.3%; fern and fern allies represent 26.7% of the flora comprising 22 families, 53 genera, 99 species; gymnasperms; 2.2% of the flora comprising 3 families, 7 genera, 8 species of the total flora, respectively. Trees formed the largest life-form group representing 33.9 % of the flora, followed by perennials 20.3 % epiphytes 15.2% shrubs 14.2 % climbers and lianas 7. 6 % succulent herbs 5.3 % and annual herbs 3.5% Native taxa represent 86 % of the flora (43.5 % endemic and 42. 4 % indigenous) and adventive taxa (13 %). 36 taxa are reported as range extensions and new records for the Namosi province, including the rare conifer Acmopy/e sahniana, the psilophyte Tmespteris truncata, and a taxon previously considered extinct, Carruthersia macrantha. Introduction The overall flora of Fiji is relatively well-known (Smith provided as a preliminary checklist for the flora as well as 1979-1991) with a native vascular plant flora of an analysis of its taxonomic distribution, growth-forms, approximately 1600 species.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissemination and Impacts of the Fungal Pathogen, Colletotrichum Gloeosporioides F
    Dissemination and impacts of the fungal pathogen, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides f. sp. miconiae, on the invasive alien tree, Miconia calvescens, in Tahiti (South Pacific) J.-Y. Meyer,1 R. Taputuarai2 and E. Killgore3 Summary Long-term monitoring of biological control agents in their areas of introduction is essential to assess their effectiveness. There is a need to monitor and evaluate agent dispersal and impacts so that the degree of success can be quantified or reasons for failure can be clearly understood. A fungal patho- gen, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides f. sp. miconiae Killgore & L. Sugiyama (Melanconiales, Coe- lomycetes, Deuteromycetinae), found in Brazil in 1997 was released in the tropical oceanic island of Tahiti (Society Islands, French Polynesia, South Pacific) to control miconia, Miconia calvescens DC (Melastomataceae), a small tree native to Tropical America, which has invaded native rainforests. The plant pathogen, proven to be highly specific to miconia, causes leaf spots, defoliation and eventually death of young seedlings in laboratory conditions. Two permanent plots in Tahiti (Taravao Plateau and Lake Vaihiria) were monitored for a period of 6 years to assess the pathogen’s dispersal and impacts on miconia in the wild. Leaf spots were observed approximately 30 days after inoculation. Percentage of infected plants reached 100% after 3 months, and between 90% and 99% of leaves were infected. Subsequent re-infection occurred after 3 months at Vaihiria and 18 months at Taravao. Mor- tality rate for monitored plants was 15% and reached 30% for seedlings less than 50 cm tall. Within 3 years, the fungus had disseminated throughout the island of Tahiti and had infected nearly all the miconia plants up to 1400 m in montane rainforests.
    [Show full text]
  • Ana Paula De Souza Caetano Campinas 2014
    Ana Paula de Souza Caetano “CONTRIBUIÇÃO DA EMBRIOLOGIA NA SISTEMÁTICA E NA ELUCIDAÇÃO DA APOMIXIA EM MELASTOMATACEAE JUSS.” Campinas 2014 ii iii iv v vi Dedicatória Dedico esta tese aos meus pais Paulo e Ilzete, minha irmã Kátia e minha avó Francisca, pelo amor e apoio incondicionais que me permitiram caminhar até aqui. vii viii "Mas na profissão, além de amar tem de saber. E o saber leva tempo pra crescer" Rubem Alves ix x "Aqueles que passam por nós não vão sós, não nos deixam sós. Deixam um pouco de si, levam um pouco de nós" Antoine de Saint-Exupéry xi xii AGRADECIMENTOS Primeiramente agradeço à Deus, pela vida e por todas as oportunidades que me foram concedidas; À Capes e a Fapesp (processos nº 2010/15077-0 e 2013/08945-4) pelo apoio financeiro; À Simone de Pádua Teixeira, por sua contribuição profissional e pessoal. Pelo incentivo, participação e dedicação ao meu trabalho; À Sandra Maria Carmello-Guerreiro, pela confiança depositada em mim desde o mestrado, agradeço pelo apoio incondicional; Ao programa de pós-graduação em Biologia Vegetal da UNICAMP, pelo apoio e oportunidades concedidos; À Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas da USP de Ribeirão Preto e ao Jardim Botânico de Nova York (NYBG), pela infraestrutura que possibilitou a realização deste estudo; Aos professores André Olmos Simões, Diana Sampaio e Juliana Mayer, membros da pré- banca, pelas sugestões prévias que de fato contribuíram na melhoria do trabalho; Aos membros titulares e suplentes da banca examinadora, pela disponibilidade em participar da defesa e pela leitura
    [Show full text]
  • Suppressing Over-Abundant Invasive Plants and Insects in Natural Areas by Use of Their Specialized Natural Enemies Edited by Roy G
    United States Department of Agriculture SUPPRESSING OVER-ABUNDANT INVASIVE PLANTS AND INSECTS IN NATURAL AREAS BY USE OF THEIR SPECIALIZED NATURAL ENEMIES Edited by Roy G. Van Driesche and Richard C. Reardon Forest Health Technology FHTET-2017-02 Enterprise Team April 2017 The Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team (FHTET) was created in 1995 by the Deputy Chief for State and Private Forestry, USDA, Forest Service, to develop and deliver technologies to protect and improve the health of American forests. This book was published by FHTET as part of the technology transfer series. http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/technology/ Cover Photos: (a) Rainbow falls, Hawaii (Credit: Kyle Hawton); (b) healthy brood of a vegetarian ground finches,Platyspiza crassirostris (Credit: George Heimpel); (c) Philornis downsi, an invasive parasitic fly (Credit: David L. Hansen, University of Minnesota); (d) dead vegetarian ground finch chick killed by P. downsi (Credit: Jody O’Connor and Sonia c d Kleindorfer); (e) Conura annulifera, a parasitoid of P. downsi (Credit: David L. Hansen, University of Minnesota); (f) the melaleuca weevil, Oxyops vitiosa (Credit: Ellen C. Lake, b e USDA ARS); (g) O. vitiosa adult and feeding scars on melaleuca foliage (Credit: Willey Durden, USDA ARS, bugwood.org); (h) the melaleuca psyllid, Boreioglycaspis melaleucae f g (Credit: Paul D. Pratt, USDA ARS); (i) waxy flocculence produced by B. melaleucae nymphs on melaleuca foliage (Credit: Susan A. Wright, USDA ARS); (j) melaleuca h i j infestation (Credit: Randy Westbrooks, bugwood.org) For additional copies of this publication, contact: Richard Reardon FHTET, USDA Forest Service, 180 Canfield Street, Morgantown, WV 26505 304.285.1566; [email protected] This publication is available online at: https://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/technology/pdfs/FHTET-2017-02_Biocontrol_Natural_Areas.pdf The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for the information and convenience of the reader.
    [Show full text]
  • Mecanismes D'invasion De Miconia Calvescens Dc. En Polynesie Franchise
    ACADEMIE DE MONTPELLIER UNIVERSITE MONTPELLIER II SCIENCES ET TECHNIQUES DU LANGUEDOC THESE presentee a I'Universrte de Montpellier II Sciences et Techniques du Languedoc pour obtenir le diplome de DOCTORAT Sp6cialit6 : BIOLOGIE DES POPULATIONS ET ECOLOGIE Formation Doctorale: Evolution et Epplogie Ecole Doctorale : Biologie des Systemes Integres, Agronomie, Environnement MECANISMES D'INVASION DE MICONIA CALVESCENS DC. EN POLYNESIE FRANCHISE PAR Jean-Yves MEYER Soutenue le 30 Novembre 1994, devant le jury compose de : [ This page intentionally left blank. ] [ This text was not in the original document. ] ACADEMIE DE MONTPELLIER UNIVERSITE MONTPELLIER II SCIENCES ET TECHNIQUES DU LANGUEDOC THESE présentée à l'Université de Montpellier II Sciences et Techniques du Languedoc pour obtenir le diplôme de DOCTORAT Spécialité : BIOLOGIE DES POPULATIONS ET ECOLOGIE Formation Doctorale : Evolution et Ecologie Ecole Doctorale : Biologie des Systèmes Intégrés, Agronomie, Environnement MECANISMES D'INVASION DE MICQNIA CALVESCENS PC. EN POLYNESIE FRANÇAISE [ This page intentionally left blank. ] [ This text was not in the original document. ] SOMMAIRE [ This page intentionally left blank. ] [ This text was not in the original document. ] PARTIE 1 SITUATION ET DEGRE D'INVASION I. STATUT ET REPARTITION GENERALE 29 1.1. AIRE D'ORIGINE 29 1.1.1. Taxonomie et écologie du genre Miconia (Melastomataceae)... 29 Famille des Melastomataceae ...29 Tribu des Miconieae 30 Genre Miconia 30 1.1.2. Miconia calvescens De Candolle 32 1.2. AIRES D'INTRODUCTION 34 1.2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Flower-Visiting Records of the Native Bees of New Caledonia
    FLOWER-VISITING RECORDS OF Barry J. Donovan,2 Je´romeˆ Munzinger,3 Alain THE NATIVE BEES OF NEW Pauly,4 and Gordon McPherson5 CALEDONIA1 ABSTRACT The flower-visiting records for the 43 species of bees considered to be native to New Caledonia show that females of 21 species visited 116 native species of plants in 69 genera and 41 families, and the bees were documented to carry pollen from 64 species and possibly four more. The plant families with the greatest number of species documented for visits by female bees were, in descending order: Myrtaceae (21), Dilleniaceae (10), Cunoniaceae (nine), Araliaceae (seven), Fabaceae (seven, encompassing the Caesalpinioideae, Mimosoideae, and Papilionoideae), Goodeniaceae (five), Proteaceae (five), Apocynaceae (four), Sapindaceae (four), and remaining families with one to three species. Females of six and possibly one more species carried pollen from each of Dilleniaceae and Myrtaceae, six carried pollen from Araliaceae, five from Goodeniaceae, four and possibly one more from Cunoniaceae, four from each of Fabaceae and Sapindaceae, and none to three from the remaining 34 families observed. For introduced plants, female bees of 12 species visited 54 species in 43 genera among 19 plant families and were documented to carry pollen from 31 and possibly one more species. For introduced plants, families with the highest number of species visited by female bees, in descending order, were: Asteraceae (12); Fabaceae (eight); Verbenaceae (seven); and Euphorbiaceae, Myrtaceae, and Solanaceae each with three. The remaining 13 families had either one or two species visited by bees. Females of seven species of bees carried pollen from Fabaceae, six from Asteraceae, three each from Myrtaceae and Solanaceae, and none to ‘‘2 þ 1?’’ (two or possibly three) from remaining families.
    [Show full text]