DOCSLIB.ORG

Subject Guide 10 – Building Control Plans

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Durham County Record Office County Hall Durham DH1 5UL Telephone: 03000 267619 Email: [email protected] Website: www.durhamrecordoffice.org.uk Subject Guide 10 – Building Control Plans Issue no. 5 July 2020 Introduction Since the 1850s it has been a requirement to submit building plans to the local authority either for planning or building control purposes. This guide lists the series of building plans and registers or indexes of plans that are held by the record office for each planning authority that has existed in County Durham. The dates of existence of each authority are given in brackets. LB = Local Board of Health District UD = Urban District RSD = Rural Sanitary District RD = Rural District MB = Municipal Borough CB = County Borough MetB = Metropolitan Borough The range of dates for each record series is given, together with our catalogue reference numbers. Where plans may be held elsewhere then this is also indicated. For enquiries about planning applications after 1974 it is better to approach the Durham County Council Planning Service directly, by phone or email, or via the planning portal on the DCC website (www.durham.gov.uk/article/8276/Find-a-planning-application ). To find a plan relating to a particular building then there are five possible procedures to follow, indicated in the list by the following code letters: C When plans have been fully catalogued then our online catalogue database can be used to search for an address and our catalogue reference number will refer to a specific plan. I Where an original index to plans exists then this can be used to look for an address and find the appropriate original plan number. R Where an original register of plans exists then this can be searched to find the appropriate original plan number. U Where there is no index or register and plans are uncatalogued then our Research Service should be used. P Consult the Durham County Council Planning Portal and/or Planning Service Council planning committee minutes will identify when planning consent was granted, though these have restricted access, for data protection purposes. Council built housing was not normally processed through the normal planning consent and building control systems. In some cases we hold plans of house types, estate layouts or individual properties, dating from the 1930s to the 1980s. These are listed separately at the end of this leaflet. Plans submitted for planning approval or building control Annfield Plain UD (1896-1937) Barnard Castle RD (1894-1974) Registers 1885-1923 UD/Ann 18 Plans C 1914-1933 RD/BC 77-90 C 1930-1967 RD/BC 142-152 Auckland RSD (1875-1894) and RD (1894-1937) C 1899-1974 RD/BC 160 Registers 1876-1937 RD/Au 92-95 Plans R 1872-1937 RD/Au 89-91 Barnard Castle UD (1894-1974) Plans C 1891-1973 UD/BC 152-153 C 1949-1974 UD/BC 230 HANDLISTS:SubjectGuide10BuildingControlPlans 14/07/2020 Page 1 Benfieldside LB (1866-1894) and UD (1894-1937) Darlington Borough (1997-) Plans C 1868-1937 UD/Ben 22 None Billingham UD (1923-1968) Darlington RSD (1875-1894) and RD (1894-1974) Teesside Archives Indexes 1877-1974 RD/Da Acc: 7270 Registers 1877-1974 RD/Da Acc: 7270 Bishop Auckland LB (1854-1894) and UD (1894- Plans I 1877-1946 RD/Da 850/1-1339 1974) C 1925-1948 RD/Da 856/1-278 Useful Index 1868-1948 UD/BA 434 R 1948-1974 RD/Da Acc: 3125 Registers 1859-1894 UD/BA 259 1905-1925 UD/BA 260 Dawdon LB (1870s-1894) Plans I 1868-1948 UD/BA 432 None U 1948-1960 UD/BA 433 Derwentside District (1974-2009) Blaydon UD (1894-1974) Files+plans P 2005-2009 ND/De Acc: 8520 Tyne & Wear Archives P 2005-2013 ND/De uncat. Boldon UD (1936-1974) Durham County (2009-) Tyne & Wear Archives None P Brandon & Byshottles LB (1877-1894) and UD Durham MB (1835-1974) (1894-1974) Index ND/Du/plans Index ND/Du/plans Registers 1900-1974 Du 1/61/1-7 Registers 1901-1974 UD/BB 157-172 1948-1974 ND/Du Acc: 8041 Plans I 1856-1974 ND/Du/plans Plans C 1901-1933 ND/Du 13/1-338 Acc: 1480c I c.1856-1974 ND/Du/plans C 1909-1912 ND/Du 14/1-73 Decisions 1934-48 Du 1/61/8,9 Chester le Street RD (1894-1974) Durham City District (1974-2009) Registers 1948-1973 RD/CS Acc: 7413 Registers P 1974-1995 ND/Du Acc: 8041 Plans (MF) U c.1948-1967 RD/CS Acc: 7413 Plans (MF) P 1986-1994 ND/Du Acc: 8417 P 2000-2010 ND/Du uncat. Chester le Street UD (1909-1974) Unknown ? ND/CS Acc: 8454 Durham RSD (1875-1894) and RD (1894-1974) Index ND/Du/plans Chester le Street District (1974-2009) Registers 1875-1974 RD/Du 241-244 Files+plans P 2005-2009 ND/CS Acc: 8585 Plans C 1909-1912 ND/Du/14/1-73 P 1980-2013 ND/CS uncat. I 1856-1974 ND/Du/plans Consett UD (1894-1974) Easington RSD (1875-1894) and RD (1894-1974) Registers 1893-1974 UD/Co 113-120 Registers 1908-1974 RD/Ea 261/1-4 Plans R 1893-c1965 UD/Co 121/1-100 Index 1961-1974 RD/Ea 262/1 Decisions 1948-1983 UD/Co 122, 123 RD/Ea 172/index Plans I n.d. RD/Ea 172/1-2813 Crook UD (1898-1937) Plans U 1898-1937 UD/Cr 10/1-687 Easington District (1974-2009) Registers P 1974-1994 ND/Ea 7/1-8 Crook & Willington UD (1937-1974) Files+Plans P 2006-2-13 ND/Ea uncat. Plans U 1937-1949 UD/CW 70 Felling UD (1894-1974) Darlington MB (1867-1915) and CB (1915-1974) Tyne and Wear Archives Registers/indexes C20th Da/NG Acc: 7270 Plans+index C 1865-1946 Da/NG 2/1-8719 Gateshead MB (1835-1889), CB (1889-1974) and Plans+index I 1946-1974 Da(Building Plans) MetB (1974-) Tyne and Wear Archives Darlington District (1974-1997) Index Cards 1974-1986 Da(Building Plans) Hartlepool MB (1850-1967), CB (1968-1974) and Plans I 1974-1986 Da(Building Plans) Borough (1974-) Plans (MF) U 1987-1991 ND/Da Acc:7270 Teesside Archives HANDLISTS:SubjectGuide10BuildingControlPlans 14/07/2020 Page 2 Hartlepool RSD (1875-1894) and RD (1894-1937) South Shields RSD (1875-1894) and RD (1894- Teesside Archives 1936) Tyne and Wear Archives Hebburn UD (1894-1974) Tyne and Wear Archives Southwick on Wear LB (1863-1894) and UD (1894-1928) Hetton UD (1895-1974) Tyne and Wear Archives Tyne and Wear Archives Spennymoor LB (1864-1894) and UD (1894- Houghton le Spring RSD (1875-1894) and RD 1974) (1894-1937) None Tyne and Wear Archives Stanhope LB (1874-1894) and UD (1894-1937) Houghton le Spring LB (1854-1894) and UD Plans C 1875-1909 UD/St 46-158 (1894-1974) Tyne and Wear Archives Stanley LB (1892-1894) and UD (1894-1974) Registers 1912-1948 UD/Sta 251-253 Jarrow MB (1875-1974) 1964-1974 UD/Sta 271-273 Tyne and Wear Archives Plans R n.d. UD/Sta 278/1-20 Decisions 1948-1974 UD/Sta 274, 275 Lanchester RSD (1875-1894) and RD (1894- 1974) Startforth RD (1894-1974) Registers 1877-1967 RD/La 124-142 Registers 1928-1945 RD/St 84 Plans C 1877-1937 RD/La 143/1-1959 Plans C 1956-1974 RD/St 293/1-79 R 1937- RD/La 143 C 1922, 37, 45 RD/St 125,130,131 Boxes 16-31 C 1953 RD/St 138,139 Decisions 1948-1971 RD/La 144-145 C 1955 RD/St 140,142 C n.d. RD/St 161-168 Leadgate LB (1866-1894) and UD (1894-1937) U n.d. RD/St Acc: 7459 Registers 1867-1922 UD/Le 29 2 Plans only C n.d. UD/Le 31 Stockton on Tees MB (1835-1968) Decisions 1914-1937 UD/Le 30 Teesside Archives Ryton LB (1863-1894) and UD (1894-1974) Stockton on Tees Borough (1974-) Tyne and Wear Archives Teesside Archives Seaham Harbour UD (1894-1937) and Stockton RSD (1875-1894) and RD (1894-1974) Seaham UD (1937-1974) Teesside Archives Registers 1923-1957 UD/Sea 201 1958-1974 UD/Sea 202 Sunderland MB (1835-1889), CB (1889-1974) and 1951-1960 UD/Sea 203 MetB (1974-) Decisions 1951-1974 UD/Sea 204 Tyne and Wear Archives Indexes 1951-1974 UD/Sea 205 Sunderland RSD (1875-1894) and RD (1894- Sedgefield RSD (1875-1894) and RD (1894-1974) 1967) None Tyne and Wear Archives Sedgefield District (1974-2009) Tanfield UD (1895-1937) Files+plans P 2005-2009 ND/Se Acc: 8521 Registers 1891-1900 UD/Tan 4 P 2005-2013 ND/Se Acc: 9750 Decisions 1878-1925 UD/Tan 3 1895-1912 UD/Tan 5 Shildon & East Thickley LB (1877-1894) and 1924-1937 UD/Tan 6 Shildon UD (1894-1974) None Teesdale District (1974-2009) Registers ND/Te Acc: 7499 South Shields MB (1850-1889) and CB (1889- ND/Te Acc: 8527 1974) Files+plans P ND/Te Acc: 8584 Tyne and Wear Archives P 1978-2014 ND/Te Acc: 8527 South Tyneside MetB (1974-) Teesside CB (1968-1974) Tyne and Wear Archives Teesside Archives HANDLISTS:SubjectGuide10BuildingControlPlans 14/07/2020 Page 3 Tow Law LB (1863-1894) and UD (1894-1974) West Hartlepool MB (1887-1902) and CB (1902- None 1967) Teesside Archives Washington UD (1922-1974) Tyne and Wear Archives Whickham LB (1875-1894) and UD (1894-1974) Tyne and Wear Archives Wear Valley District (1974-2009) Files+Plans P 2002-2013 ND/We uncat.
Recommended publications
  • Local Government Review in the Derwentside District Council Area, County Durham

    Local Government Review in the Derwentside District Council Area, County Durham

    Local Government Review in the Derwentside District Council Area, County Durham Research Study Conducted for The Boundary Committee for England April 2004 Contents Introduction 3 Summary of Key Findings 5 Methodology 7 Definitions of Social Grade and Area 11 Topline Findings (Marked-up Questionnaire) 13 Introduction This summary report presents the key findings of research conducted by the MORI Social Research Institute on behalf of The Boundary Committee for England in the Derwentside District Council area, County Durham. The aim of the research was to establish residents’ views about alternative patterns of unitary local government. Background to the Research In May 2003, the Government announced that a referendum would take place in autumn 2004 in the North East, North West and Yorkshire and the Humber regions on whether there should be elected regional assemblies. The Government indicated that, where a regional assembly is set up, the current two-tier structure of local government - district, borough or city councils (called in this report ‘districts’) and county councils - should be replaced by a single tier of ‘unitary’ local authorities. In June 2003, the Government directed The Boundary Committee for England (‘the Committee’) to undertake an independent review of local government in two-tier areas in the three regions, with a view to recommending possible unitary structures to be put before affected local people in a referendum at a later date. MORI was commissioned by COI Communications, on behalf of the Committee, to help it gauge local opinion. The research was in two stages. First, in summer 2003, MORI researched local residents’ views about local government and how they identify with their local community.
  • 2004 No. 3211 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The

    2004 No. 3211 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The

    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2004 No. 3211 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The Local Authorities (Categorisation) (England) (No. 2) Order 2004 Made - - - - 6th December 2004 Laid before Parliament 10th December 2004 Coming into force - - 31st December 2004 The First Secretary of State, having received a report from the Audit Commission(a) produced under section 99(1) of the Local Government Act 2003(b), in exercise of the powers conferred upon him by section 99(4) of that Act, hereby makes the following Order: Citation, commencement and application 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the Local Authorities (Categorisation) (England) (No.2) Order 2004 and shall come into force on 31st December 2004. (2) This Order applies in relation to English local authorities(c). Categorisation report 2. The English local authorities, to which the report of the Audit Commission dated 8th November 2004 relates, are, by this Order, categorised in accordance with their categorisation in that report. Excellent authorities 3. The local authorities listed in Schedule 1 to this Order are categorised as excellent. Good authorities 4. The local authorities listed in Schedule 2 to this Order are categorised as good. Fair authorities 5. The local authorities listed in Schedule 3 to this Order are categorised as fair. (a) For the definition of “the Audit Commission”, see section 99(7) of the Local Government Act 2003. (b) 2003 c.26. The report of the Audit Commission consists of a letter from the Chief Executive of the Audit Commission to the Minister for Local and Regional Government dated 8th November 2004 with the attached list of local authorities categorised by the Audit Commission as of that date.
  • 1999 No. 3382 EDUCATION, ENGLAND the Easington And

    1999 No. 3382 EDUCATION, ENGLAND the Easington And

    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 1999 No. 3382 EDUCATION, ENGLAND The Easington and Seaham Education Action Zone Order 1999 Made ---- 15th December 1999 Laid before Parliament 20th December 1999 Coming into force 10th January 2000 Whereas an application for the purpose of establishing an education action zone has been made to the Secretary of State with the consent of the governing bodies of every school listed in Schedule 2 to this Order. Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred on the Secretary of State by sections 10(1), 11 and 138(7) of, and paragraph 2 of Schedule 1 to, the School Standards and Framework Act 1998(a), the Secretary of State for Education and Employment hereby makes the following Order: Citation and commencement 1. This Order may be cited as the Easington and Seaham Education Action Zone Order 1999 and shall come into force on 10th January 2000. Interpretation 2. In this Order– “partners” means those persons listed in Schedule 1 to this Order; and “zone school” means a school listed in Schedule 2 to this Order. Constitution of education action zone 3. The schools listed in Schedule 2 to this Order shall constitute collectively an education action zone under the name of the Easington and Seaham Education Action Zone (“the zone”) for the purposes of Chapter III of Part I of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998. Education Action Forum 4. There shall be an Education Action Forum for the zone to be known as the Easington and Seaham Education Action Forum (“the Forum”), the membership of which shall include– (a) one person appointed by the governing body of each zone school, unless any such governing body choose not to make such an appointment; (b) either one or two persons appointed by the Secretary of State; (c) one person appointed by each partner, unless any partner chooses not to make such an appointment; (a) 1998 c.
  • THE RURAL ECONOMY of NORTH EAST of ENGLAND M Whitby Et Al

    THE RURAL ECONOMY of NORTH EAST of ENGLAND M Whitby Et Al

    THE RURAL ECONOMY OF NORTH EAST OF ENGLAND M Whitby et al Centre for Rural Economy Research Report THE RURAL ECONOMY OF NORTH EAST ENGLAND Martin Whitby, Alan Townsend1 Matthew Gorton and David Parsisson With additional contributions by Mike Coombes2, David Charles2 and Paul Benneworth2 Edited by Philip Lowe December 1999 1 Department of Geography, University of Durham 2 Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies, University of Newcastle upon Tyne Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Scope of the Study 1 1.2 The Regional Context 3 1.3 The Shape of the Report 8 2. THE NATURAL RESOURCES OF THE REGION 2.1 Land 9 2.2 Water Resources 11 2.3 Environment and Heritage 11 3. THE RURAL WORKFORCE 3.1 Long Term Trends in Employment 13 3.2 Recent Employment Trends 15 3.3 The Pattern of Labour Supply 18 3.4 Aggregate Output per Head 23 4 SOCIAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL DYNAMICS 4.1 Distribution of Employment by Gender and Employment Status 25 4.2 Differential Trends in the Remoter Areas and the Coalfield Districts 28 4.3 Commuting Patterns in the North East 29 5 BUSINESS PERFORMANCE AND INFRASTRUCTURE 5.1 Formation and Turnover of Firms 39 5.2 Inward investment 44 5.3 Business Development and Support 46 5.4 Developing infrastructure 49 5.5 Skills Gaps 53 6. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 55 References Appendices 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The scope of the study This report is on the rural economy of the North East of England1. It seeks to establish the major trends in rural employment and the pattern of labour supply.
  • Who Runs the North East … Now?

    Who Runs the North East … Now?

    WHO RUNS THE NORTH EAST … NOW? A Review and Assessment of Governance in North East England Fred Robinson Keith Shaw Jill Dutton Paul Grainger Bill Hopwood Sarah Williams June 2000 Who Runs the North East … Now? This report is published by the Department of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Durham. Further copies are available from: Dr Fred Robinson, Department of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Durham, Durham DH1 3JT (tel: 0191 374 2308, fax: 0191 374 4743; e-mail: [email protected]) Price: £25 for statutory organisations, £10 for voluntary sector organisations and individuals. Copyright is held collectively by the authors. Quotation of the material is welcomed and further analysis is encouraged, provided that the source is acknowledged. First published: June 2000 ISBN: 0 903593 16 5 iii Who Runs the North East … Now? CONTENTS Foreword i Preface ii The Authors iv Summary v 1 Introduction 1 2 Patterns and Processes of Governance 4 3 Parliament and Government 9 4 The European Union 25 5 Local Government 33 6 Regional Governance 51 7 The National Health Service 64 8 Education 92 9 Police Authorities 107 10 Regeneration Partnerships 113 11 Training and Enterprise Councils 123 12 Housing Associations 134 13 Arts and Culture 148 14 Conclusions 156 iii Who Runs the North East … Now? FOREWORD Other developments also suggest themselves. At their meeting in November 1998, the The present work is admirably informative and trustees of the Millfield House Foundation lucid, but the authors have reined in the were glad to receive an application from Fred temptation to explore the implications of what Robinson for an investigation into the they have found.
  • A Report Produced for Department of the Environment Transport and The

    A Report Produced for Department of the Environment Transport and The

    Final Identifying the Options Available for Determining Population Data and Identifying Agglomerations in Connection with EU Proposals Regarding Environmental Noise A report produced for Department of the Environment Transport and the Regions, The Scottish Executive, The National Assembly for Wales and Department of Environment for Northern Ireland Katie King Tony Bush January 2001 Final Identifying the Options Available for Determining Population Data and Identifying Agglomerations in Connection with EU Proposals Regarding Environmental Noise A report produced for Department of the Environment Transport and the Regions, The Scottish Executive, The National Assembly for Wales and Department of Environment for Northern Ireland Katie King Tony Bush January 2001 Final Title Identifying the Options Available for Determining Population Data and Identifying Agglomerations in Connection with EU Proposals Regarding Environmental Noise Customer Department of the Environment Transport and the Regions, The Scottish Executive, The National Assembly for Wales and Department of Environment for Northern Ireland Customer reference Confidentiality, copyright and reproduction File reference \\151.182.168.37\kk\noise\ed50035\final report\final report 15-2.doc Report number AEAT/ENV/R/0461 (Final) Report status Final AEA Technology E5 Culham Abingdon Oxfordshire, OX14 3ED Telephone 01235 463715 Facsimile 01235 463574 AEA Technology is the trading name of AEA Technology plc AEA Technology is certificated to BS EN ISO9001:(1994) Name Signature Date Author Katie King Tony Bush Reviewed by Tony Bush Approved by John Stedman The maps included in this report have been generated by AEA Technology using OS maps on behalf of DETR with permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of The Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, © Crown copyright.
  • PDF (Volume 2)

    PDF (Volume 2)

    Durham E-Theses Local governance, governmental practices, and the production of policy: local strategic partnerships and area-based 'multiple deprivation' in County Durham Scott, David John How to cite: Scott, David John (2008) Local governance, governmental practices, and the production of policy: local strategic partnerships and area-based 'multiple deprivation' in County Durham, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/2229/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Local Governance, Governmental Practices, and the Production of Policy: Local Strategic Partnerships and Area-Based 'Multiple Deprivation' in County Durham Volume 2 of 2 David John Scott Ph.D. thesis The copyright of this thesis rests with the author or the university to which it was submitted. No quotation from it, or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author or university, and any information derived from it should be acknowledged.
  • Northeast England – a History of Flash Flooding

    Northeast England – a History of Flash Flooding

    Northeast England – A history of flash flooding Introduction The main outcome of this review is a description of the extent of flooding during the major flash floods that have occurred over the period from the mid seventeenth century mainly from intense rainfall (many major storms with high totals but prolonged rainfall or thaw of melting snow have been omitted). This is presented as a flood chronicle with a summary description of each event. Sources of Information Descriptive information is contained in newspaper reports, diaries and further back in time, from Quarter Sessions bridge accounts and ecclesiastical records. The initial source for this study has been from Land of Singing Waters –Rivers and Great floods of Northumbria by the author of this chronology. This is supplemented by material from a card index set up during the research for Land of Singing Waters but which was not used in the book. The information in this book has in turn been taken from a variety of sources including newspaper accounts. A further search through newspaper records has been carried out using the British Newspaper Archive. This is a searchable archive with respect to key words where all occurrences of these words can be viewed. The search can be restricted by newspaper, by county, by region or for the whole of the UK. The search can also be restricted by decade, year and month. The full newspaper archive for northeast England has been searched year by year for occurrences of the words ‘flood’ and ‘thunder’. It was considered that occurrences of these words would identify any floods which might result from heavy rainfall.
  • Appendix a National Transport Tokens A

    Appendix a National Transport Tokens A

    Appendix A National Transport Tokens A sample of councils offering tokens: Selby District Council (£8) Telford & Wrekin (£16) West Lindsey District Council (£18) City of York Council (£20) Stroud District Council (£20) Wellingborough Borough Council (£22) Wear Valley District Council (£25) West Oxfordshire District Council (£31) Councils offering tokens, on payment of a fee: North Wiltshire District Council (Pay £1 fee, receive £18 worth of tokens) Kettering Borough Council (Pay £11 fee, receive £30 worth of tokens) Wycombe District Council (Pay £15 fee, receive £30 worth of tokens) Cherwell District Council (Pay £1 fee, receive £31 worth of tokens) Braintree District Council (Pay £15 fee, receive £40 worth of tokens) East Northamptonshire District Council (Pay £10 fee, receive £47 worth of tokens) Colchester Borough Council (Pay £12 fee, receive £48 worth of tokens) Aylesbury Vale District Council (Pay £5 fee, receive £60 worth of tokens) Blyth Valley Borough Council (Pay £20 fee, receive £70 worth of tokens) Councils offering tokens to the over 60s only: West Lancashire District Council (£28) Councils offering tokens to disabled people only: Shrewsbury & Atcham Borough Council (£25) Bridgnorth District Council (£30) Christchurch Borough Council (£30) Daventry District Council (£30) East Dorset District Council (£30) Fareham Borough Council (Pay £5, receive £35 worth of tokens) Councils offering tokens of differing amounts according to age: East Hampshire District Council (£24 for 60-69 yrs, £30 for 70+ yrs, £50 for wheelchair users/blind,
  • Cartogram [1883 WORDS]

    Cartogram [1883 WORDS]

    Vol. 6: Dorling/Cartogram/entry Dorling, D. (forthcoming) Cartogram, Chapter in Monmonier, M., Collier, P., Cook, K., Kimerling, J. and Morrison, J. (Eds) Volume 6 of the History of Cartography: Cartography in the Twentieth Century, Chicago: Chicago University Press. [This is a pre-publication Draft, written in 2006, edited in 2009, edited again in 2012] Cartogram A cartogram can be thought of as a map in which at least one aspect of scale, such as distance or area, is deliberately distorted to be proportional to a variable of interest. In this sense, a conventional equal-area map is a type of area cartogram, and the Mercator projection is a cartogram insofar as it portrays land areas in proportion (albeit non-linearly) to their distances from the equator. According to this definition of cartograms, which treats them as a particular group of map projections, all conventional maps could be considered as cartograms. However, few images usually referred to as cartograms look like conventional maps. Many other definitions have been offered for cartograms. The cartography of cartograms during the twentieth century has been so multifaceted that no solid definition could emerge—and multiple meanings of the word continue to evolve. During the first three quarters of that century, it is likely that most people who drew cartograms believed that they were inventing something new, or at least inventing a new variant. This was because maps that were eventually accepted as cartograms did not arise from cartographic orthodoxy but were instead produced mainly by mavericks. Consequently, they were tolerated only in cartographic textbooks, where they were often dismissed as marginal, map-like objects rather than treated as true maps, and occasionally in the popular press, where they appealed to readers’ sense of irony.
  • Correct As at May 2017 Alexandra Park and Palace Charitable Trust

    Correct As at May 2017 Alexandra Park and Palace Charitable Trust

    Correct as at May 2017 Alexandra Park and Palace Charitable Trust Charity Allerdale Borough Council Local Government Arch Commercial Enterprise Service provider Association of Police & Crime Commissioners Blue Light Avon & Somerset Constabulary Blue Light Aylesbury Vale District Council Local Government Basildon Borough Council Local Government Bath & North East Somerset Council Local Government Bedford Borough Council Local Government Blackburn with Darwin Council Local Government Blackpool Council Local Government Boston Borough Council Local Government Bristol City Council Local Government Brunel University London University Bury Council Local Government Cambridgeshire County Council Local Government Cardiff County Council Local Government Carmarthenshire County Council Local Government Central Bedfordshire Council Local Government Chapter Homes Housing Association Cheltenham Borough Council Local Government Cherwell District Council & South Northamptonshire Council Local Government Cheshire East Borough Council Local Government Chiltern District Council Local Government City of Lincoln Council Local Government City of London Corporation Local Government City of York Council Local Government Cornwall Council Local Government County Durham Housing Group Housing Association Cranfield University University Cumbria County Council Local Government Darlington Borough Council Local Government Denbighshire County Council Local Government Derbyshire Dales District Council Local Government Doncaster & Bassetlaw Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Community Research in Castle Morpeth Borough Council Area 2003

    Community Research in Castle Morpeth Borough Council Area 2003

    Community Research in Castle Morpeth Borough Council Area 2003 Research Study Conducted for The Boundary Committee for England October 2003 Contents Introduction 1 Executive Summary 4 Local Communities 6 Defining Communities 6 Identifying Communities 6 Identity with the Local Community in the Castle Morpeth Borough Council Area 7 Overall Identity 7 Effective Communities 9 Involvement 13 Affective Communities 16 Bringing Effective and Affective Communities Together 17 Local Authority Communities 19 Belonging to Castle Morpeth Borough Council Area 19 Belonging to Northumberland County Council Area 22 Knowledge and Attitudes towards Local Governance 25 Knowledge of Local Governance 25 Involvement with Local Governance 26 Administrative Boundary Issues 26 Appendices 1. Methodology – Quantitative 2. Methodology - Qualitative 3. Sub-Group Definitions 4. Place Name Gazetteer 5. Qualitative Topic Guide 6. Marked-up Questionnaire Community Research in Castle Morpeth Borough Council Area 2003 for The Boundary Committee for England Introduction Research Aims This report presents the findings of research conducted by the MORI Social Research Institute on behalf of The Boundary Committee for England (referred to in this report as "The Committee") in the Castle Morpeth Borough Council area. The aim of this research is to establish the patterns of community identity in the area. Survey Coverage MORI has undertaken research in all 44 two-tier district or borough council areas in the North East, North West and Yorkshire and the Humber regions. The research covers two-tier local authority areas only; the results may however identify issues which overlap with adjacent areas. Reports and data for other two-tier areas are provided under separately.