DOCSLIB.ORG

PLNY TEXT (3.386Mb)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PLNY TEXT (3.386Mb) ČESKÉ VYSOKÉ UČENÍ TECHNICKÉ V PRAZE FAKULTA DOPRAVNÍ Tomáš Mičian Návrh a hodnocení systému sdílení kol Bakalářská práce 2017 Poděkování Tímto bych chtěl poděkovat všem, kteří mi pomáhali při tvorbě této bakalářské práce. Především děkuji svému vedoucímu doc. Ing. Zdeňku Říhovi, Ph.D. za odborné vedení, konzultace a rady, které mi poskytoval po celou dobu tvorby práce. Dále bych rád poděkoval Ing. Milanu Liscovi, který mi pomohl vytvořit mapy pro návrh systému sdílení kol v Příbrami. V neposlední řadě patří velké Díky celé rodině a přátelům za to, že mi poskytují podporu, bez které by nebylo možné napsat tuto práci. 2 Abstrakt Autor: Tomáš Mičian Název bakalářské práce: Návrh a hodnocení systému sdílení kol Vysoká škola: České vysoké učení technické v Praze, Fakulta dopravní Rok vydání: 2017 Tato bakalářská práce popisuje vznik, historii i současný stav systému sdílení kol ve světě i v České republice. Vysvětluje a rozebírá důvody a překážky, bránící jeho rozšíření v našich městech. Pojednává o jednotlivých typech bikesharingových systémů, jejich výhodách a nedostatcích. Předkládá konkrétní návrh bikesharingového systému pro město Příbram, včetně ekonomického zhodnocení projektu. Klíčová slova: aplikace, doprava, jízdní kolo, město, sdílení kol, systém 3 Abstract Author: Tomáš Mičian Title of bachelor thesis: Suggestion and evaluation of bikesharing system University: Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Transportation Sciences Year of publication: 2017 The bachelor thesis describes the development, the history and the current state of system of bike sharing in the world and in the Czech Republic. It explains and discusses the reasons and barriers, preventing extension in our cities. It describes individual types of bike sharing systems including their advantages and disadvantages. The thesis presents specific design of bikesharing system for the city of Příbram, including economical evaluation of the project. Keywords: aplication, bicycle, bikesharing, city, transport, system 4 Obsah Úvod .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 1. Bikesharing ve světě .......................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Sdílená ekonomika v souvislosti s rozvojem telekomunikace a telematiky ......................... 8 1.2 Historie............................................................................................................................................ 9 1.2.1 První generace ....................................................................................................................... 9 1.2.2 Druhá generace ................................................................................................................... 10 1.2.3 Třetí generace ...................................................................................................................... 10 1.2.4 Čtvrtá generace ................................................................................................................... 11 1.3 Bikesharing v Evropě ................................................................................................................. 11 1.3.1 Francie .................................................................................................................................. 12 1.3.2 Velká Británie ....................................................................................................................... 12 1.3.3 Španělsko ............................................................................................................................. 13 1.3.4 Německo ............................................................................................................................... 13 1.3.5 Dánsko .................................................................................................................................. 14 1.3.6 Východní Evropa ................................................................................................................. 15 1.4 Bikesharing v Americe ............................................................................................................. 15 1.4.1 Severní Amerika .................................................................................................................. 15 1.4.2 Jižní Amerika ........................................................................................................................ 17 1.5 Bikesharing v Asii a Pacifiku .................................................................................................... 17 1.6 Shrnutí kapitoly ............................................................................................................................ 20 2. Bikesharing v České republice ........................................................................................................ 22 2.1 Historie českého bikesharingu. ................................................................................................. 22 2.2 Rekola.......................................................................................................................................... 23 2.3 Homeport .................................................................................................................................... 26 2.4 Velonet.......................................................................................................................................... 26 2.5 OFO .............................................................................................................................................. 27 2.6 Bikesharing v Praze .................................................................................................................... 27 2.7 Bikesharing v Brně ...................................................................................................................... 29 2.8 Bikesharing v Plzni ..................................................................................................................... 31 2.9 Bikesharing v Českých Budějovicích ....................................................................................... 32 2.10 Bikesharing v dalších městech ............................................................................................... 32 5 3. Návrh zavedení systému sdílení kol v Příbrami ........................................................................... 34 3.1 Příbram ......................................................................................................................................... 34 3.2 Dopravní infrastruktura v Příbrami ........................................................................................... 35 3.2.1 Hlavní dopravní spoje ......................................................................................................... 35 3.2.2 Cyklostezky v Příbrami a okolí .......................................................................................... 36 3.2.3 MHD Příbram ....................................................................................................................... 36 3.3 Anketa – Sdílení kol v Příbrami ................................................................................................ 37 3.3.1 Vyhodnocení ........................................................................................................................ 38 3.4 Návrh systému sdílení kol ......................................................................................................... 45 3.4.1 Topologie města Příbram vzhledem k návrhu systému ................................................ 45 3.4.2 Volba vhodného systému ................................................................................................... 45 3.4.3 Aplikace ................................................................................................................................. 46 3.4.4 Jízdní kola ............................................................................................................................. 47 3.4.5 Zóny příbramského bikesharingu ...................................................................................... 48 3.4.6 Forma společnosti ............................................................................................................... 48 4. Ekonomické zhodnocení projektu ................................................................................................... 49 4.1 Náklady ......................................................................................................................................... 49 4.2 Příjmy ............................................................................................................................................ 50 5. Závěr ................................................................................................................................................... 51 Zdroje ...................................................................................................................................................... 52 Seznam obrázků .................................................................................................................................... 56 Seznam tabulek ..................................................................................................................................... 57 Seznam grafů ........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New Generation of Bike-Sharing Systems in China: Lessons for European Cities
    Volume XI • Issue 33 (September 2018) JMFS pp. 25–42 Journal of Management Warsaw School of Economics and Financial Sciences Collegium of Management and Finance Tomasz Bieliński, Agnieszka Ważna Faculty of Economics University of Gdańsk New Generation of Bike-Sharing Systems in China: Lessons for European Cities ABSTRACT Rising mobility of societies and the urban sprawl cause the need to shape passengers’ behaviour accordingly. For urbanised areas, the biggest challenge is to overcome the problem of dominant private cars usage. Bike-sharing systems are considered to be a successful tool for the popularisation of alternative ways of travelling. Recently Chinese companies have developed new solutions to bike-sharing systems that proved to be successful in China and could be implemented in Europe. However, their implementation will be associated with challenges for municipal authorities and companies conducting the business. The aim of the paper is to identify major advantages and challenges resulting from the implementation of the Chinese solutions in Europe or expansion of bike-sharing companies to Europe. The scientific method used in the paper is the case study of the Chinese bike-sharing market with the special focus on market leaders Mobike and Ofo. Despite existing obstacles, it is possible to succeed in introducing the new generation of bike-sharing systems in Europe. As Chinese enterprises have already entered the European market, it is crucial to make policy makers aware of the obstructions. Keywords: sustainable transportation, urban transport, bicycles, public bikes, Ofo, Mobike, envi- ronmentally friendly transport, dockless bikes, passenger transport innovation JEL Classification Codes: R41, R42 26 Tomasz Bieliński, Agnieszka Ważna Introduction Major challenges of the EU transport policy are to a great extent linked with sustainable development.
    [Show full text]
  • Warsaw Nno.O
    Maps Events Restaurants Cafés Nightlife Sightseeing Shopping Hotels Warsaw NNo.o. 882,2, AAugustugust - SSeptembereptember 22014014 The Warsaw Uprising Awe Inspiring - 70 Years On inyourpocket.com ł No. 82 - 5z ȱȱ¢ȱȱȱ ȱȱ¢ȱȱ ȱȱȱȱ ȱ ȱȱĴȱȱ ǯȱȱŝǰȱ£ ȱǯǯǯȱ ǯȱŘŘȱŞŚŞȱŗŘȱŘśǰȱǯȦ¡ȱŘŘȱŞŚŞȱŗśȱşŖ ǯǯǯȱȱ ȱȱȱ ǯ£ǯǯ ǯ ȱ ȱȱȱȱȱǰȱ¢ȱȱ ȱȱ ȱȱȱ ȱȱȱ ȱȱ¢ȱ ȱ ȱ Ěȱȱȱȱ¢ȱ¢ǯ ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ dz Contents Feature Further Afi eld Warsaw Uprising 8 Łódź 106 Arrival & Transport 12 Leisure 108 City Basics 18 Shopping 112 Culture & Events 20 Directory 118 Restaurants 26 Hotels 120 Cafés 57 Maps & Index Street Index 124 Nightlife 58 City Centre Map 125 Sightseeing City Map 126-127 Essential Warsaw 71 Country Map 128 Sightseeing 72 Listings Index 129 Old Town 84 The Royal Route 87 Features Index 130 Palace of Culture and Science 89 Praga 90 Copernicus Science Center 92 Łazienki 94 IN PRINT Wilanów 97 Jewish Warsaw 100 ONLINE Chopin 103 ON YOUR MOBILE PLAC TEATRALNY 3, WARSAW TEL. +48 601 81 82 83 Monument to the Warsaw Uprising Photo by Zbigniew Furman. Courtesy of Warsaw Uprising Museum. [email protected] 4 Warsaw In Your Pocket warsaw.inyourpocket.com Foreword Welcome to Warsaw and the 82nd edition of Warsaw Publisher In Your Pocket! Summer is in full swing and the city is IYP City Guides Sp. z o.o. Sp.k. absolutely sizzling. It’s the perfect time to take advantage ul. Sławkowska 12, 31-014 Kraków the capitals’ many fi ner points - exploring the parks, [email protected] gardens (beer) and breathtaking urban riverwalks (take www.inyourpocket.com a walk on the wild side!).
    [Show full text]
  • Asemattomien Kaupunkipyörien Ohjeistus Kunnille Sisällys
    Liikenneviraston tutkimuksia ja selvityksiä 27/2018 Asemattomien kaupunkipyörien ohjeistus kunnille Sisällys Tiivistelmä sivu 3 Esipuhe sivu 4 Ohjeistuksen tausta ja tavoitteet sivu 5 Terminologia sivu 6 1. Asemattomien kaupunkipyörien lyhyt historia sivut 7-11 Liikenneviraston tutkimuksia ja 2. Asemattomien kaupunkipyörien tunnuspiirteet sivut 12-18 selvityksiä 3. Osana liikennejärjestelmää ja matkaketjuja sivut 19-23 4. Palvelun laatu ja käyttäjäkokemus sivut 24-30 27/2018 5. Pyöräilyn ja kaupunkipyörien imago sivut 31-34 6. Ansaintalogiikka ja rahoitusmallit sivut 35-43 7. Asemattomien kaupunkipyörien nykytila maailmalla ja Suomessa sivut 44-55 Verkkojulkaisu pdf 8. Sähköavusteiset kaupunkipyörät sivut 56-64 (www.liikennevirasto.fi) ISSN-L 1798-6656 9. Lainsäädäntö ja sen tulkinta sivut 65-71 ISSN 1798-6664 10. Suositukset ja pelisäännöt sivut 72-84 ISBN 978-952-317-547-1 Esimerkkejä kaupunkikohtaisista pelisäännöistä ja ohjeista sivu 85 Lähteet sivu 86 Liite: Keskeisimmät lainkohdat sivut 87-95 Tiivistelmä Asemattomat kaupunkipyörät perustuvat digitalisaation Suoraan lainsäädännöstä kumpuavat kuntien keinot ohjata tuomiin mahdollisuuksiin, kuten älykkäisiin lukkojärjestelmiin asemattomien kaupunkipyöräjärjestelmien toimittajia ja ja niitä tukeviin älypuhelinsovelluksiin. Nämä mahdollistavat operaattoreita ennakoivasti ovat rajalliset. pyörän jakamisen usean käyttäjän kesken ilman tarvetta erillisiin asemiin. Pyörät voivat olla pysäköitynä vapaisiin Voidakseen ohjata prosessia kunnan kannattaa aktiivisesti pyörätelineisiin tai niille
    [Show full text]
  • Shared Mobility Systems Gilbert Laporte, Frédéric Meunier, Roberto Wolfler Calvo
    Shared mobility systems Gilbert Laporte, Frédéric Meunier, Roberto Wolfler Calvo To cite this version: Gilbert Laporte, Frédéric Meunier, Roberto Wolfler Calvo. Shared mobility systems. 4OR: A Quar- terly Journal of Operations Research, Springer Verlag, 2015, 13 (4), pp.341-360. 10.1007/s10288-015- 0301-z. hal-01792763 HAL Id: hal-01792763 https://hal-enpc.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01792763 Submitted on 15 May 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. SHARED MOBILITY SYSTEMS GILBERT LAPORTE, FRED´ ERIC´ MEUNIER, AND ROBERTO WOLFLER CALVO Abstract. Shared mobility systems for bicycles and cars have grown in popularity in recent years and have attracted the attention of the operational research community. Researchers have investigated several problems arising at the strategic, tactical and operational levels. This survey paper classifies the relevant literature under five main headings: station location, fleet dimensioning, station inventory, rebalancing incentives, and vehicle repositioning. It closes with some open research questions. Key words: survey, shared mobility systems, bicycle and car sharing, fleet dimensioning, inventory rebalancing, vehicle repositioning. 1. Introduction The world of transportation has witnessed a mini-revolution in June 2007 with the launch- ing of the V´elib'bicycle sharing system in Paris.
    [Show full text]
  • Guideline for Bike Rental Transdanube.Pearls Final Draft
    Transdanube.Pearls - Network for Sustainable Mobility along the Danube http://www.interreg-danube.eu/approved-projects/transdanube-pearls Guideline for bike rental Transdanube.Pearls Final Draft WP/Action 3.1 Author: Inštitút priestorového plánovania Version/Date 3.0, 23.11.2017 Document Revision/Approval Version Date Status Date Status 3.0 23/11/2017 Final draft xx.xx.xxxx final Contacts Coordinator: Bratislava Self-governing Region Sabinovská 16, P.O. Box 106 820 05 Bratislava web: www.region-bsk.sk Author: Inštitút priestorového plánovania Ľubľanská 1 831 02 Bratislava web: http://ipp.szm.com More information about Transdanube.Pearls project are available at www.interreg-danube.eu/approved-projects/transdanube-pearls Page 2 of 41 www.interreg-danube.eu/approved-projects/transdanube-pearls Abbreviations BSS Bike Sharing Scheme ECF European Cyclists´ Federation POI Point of Interest PT Public Transport Page 3 of 41 www.interreg-danube.eu/approved-projects/transdanube-pearls Table of content Contacts ..................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Bike Rental ................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Execuive summary ................................................................................................................................................. 5 1. Best practice examples from across
    [Show full text]
  • Building a 21St Century Cycling City: Strategies for Action in Toronto
    Green Prosperity Papers Building a 21st Century Cycling City: Strategies for Action in Toronto — by Trudy Ledsham and Dr. Beth Savan January 2017 Metcalf Foundation Acknowledgements Methodology The mission of The George Cedric Metcalf This paper, from the Metcalf Green To develop, inform and refine the issues Charitable Foundation is to enhance the Prosperity Series, was made possible and recommendations in this report, a effectiveness of people and organizations through the financial support of the Metcalf series of consultations with local, national, working together to help Canadians imagine Foundation as well as by the generous and international bicycling experts were and build a just, healthy, and creative sharing of time and knowledge by our carried out during the summer of 2015. society. reviewers and advisors. Experts in the field including academic transportation researchers, academic and Local Advisors/Reviewers: Nancy Smith municipal planners, public health experts Beth Savan Lea, Dan Egan, Dave McLaughlin, Adam and active transportation advocates were Popper, Jacqueline Hayward Gulati, Carol invited to participate. We undertook a Beth Savan, Ph.D., an award-winning Mee, Jared Kolb, and Kristin Schwartz. three-stage process: initially local experts teacher, scholar and broadcaster, is were gathered for a discussion based on a appointed to the faculty of the School of National/international Advisors/ series of questions (Appendix A) to Environment at the University of Toronto, Reviewers: Ralph Buehler, Kevin stimulate thoughts and provide direction where she served as the inaugural Manaugh, Marco Te Brommelstroet, Ray for the report. This wide ranging discussion Sustainability Director at the St. George Tomalty, Meghan Winters, and Andrew led to detailed research and the draft of a campus.
    [Show full text]
  • PSC Agenda Packet
    Sacramento Area Council of Governments Regional Bike Share Policy Steering Committee Friday, August 28, 2020, 2:00 to 4:00p.m. Meeting Information: https://zoom.us/j/91955231855 You can also dial in using your phone: Dial‐in #: 888‐475‐4499 Webinar ID: 919 5523 1855 Upon entry into the meeting please type your name for attendance. Timed items are estimates only and may be taken up by the committee at any time. The Policy Steering Committee may take up any agenda item at any time, regardless of the order listed. Public comment will be taken on the item at the time that it is taken up by the committee. We ask that members of the public complete a request to speak form, submit it to the clerk of the committee, and keep their remarks brief. If several persons wish to address the committee on a single item, the chair may impose a time limit on individual remarks at the beginning of the discussion. Action may be taken on any item on this agenda. (2:00) Roll Call: Ayala, Cabaldon, Frerichs, Hansen, Harris, Trost (2:05) Public Communications: Any person wishing to address the committee on any item not on the agenda may do so at this time. After ten minutes of testimony, any additional testimony will be heard following the action items. (2:10) Action 1. Approve Assignment of JUMP Program Agreement to Lime (Ms. Bradbury) (2:40) Information and Discussion 2. An Overview of Bike Share System Operating Structures (Ms. Bradbury) (3:30) Other Matters (3:45) Next Meeting and Adjournment This agenda and attachments are available on SACOG’s website at www.sacog.org.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Ontario Bike Summit Agenda (Updated: April 15, 2016) "What's Next for Cycling" - #OBS16
    2016 Ontario Bike Summit Agenda (updated: April 15, 2016) "What's Next for Cycling" - #OBS16 Summit Venue: Eaton Chelsea Hotel 33 Gerrard Street West, Toronto, ON Tuesday, April 19, 2016 Pre-Summit Sessions 9 to 4.30pm (Hotel Lobby) Registration Open 10 to 1pm Toronto Bike Ride and Tour (Sold Old) (Meet at Hotel Bay Street Entrance) o Mobile workshop and discussion led by Jacquelyn Hayward Gulati, Cycling Infrastructure & Programs Manager and City of Toronto staff. Explore some of downtown Toronto's newest cycling infrastructure including separated bike lanes on Wellesley Street and Sherbourne Street, contraflow lanes on Simcoe Street and the Waterfront Trail's multi-use paths. Bikes will be provided by Bike Share Toronto. 2 to 5pm (Gerrard Room) Bicycle Friendly Communities Seminar (max. 60 participants) o The Bicycle Friendly Community Award (BFC) Program provides incentives, hands-on assistance, and award recognition for communities that actively support bicycling. Join this ever-popular in-depth session for participants looking to learn more about the BFC program, from submitting your first application to moving up the ranks. This year’s seminar theme is “Lighter, Quicker, Cheaper” and we will be exploring high-impact, low cost projects that have been implemented across Canada to create more bicycle-friendly communities. 5 to 6pm (Gerrard Room) Committee ‘Speed Dating’: Get to Know Professionals at Work, Hosted by APBP o Ever want to know who’s doing what in Ontario for cycling? This session, hosted by the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals (Ontario Chapter) is a chance to find out about various committees working to advance cycling in Ontario.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning for Regional Bike Sharing: Human-Scaled Mobility and Transit Integration in Urban Growth Centres
    Planning for Regional Bike Sharing: Human-scaled Mobility and Transit Integration in Urban Growth Centres by Scott Hays supervised by Laura Taylor A Major Paper submitted to the Faculty of Environmental Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Environmental Studies York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 2 August 2018 Abstract This paper argues that an integrated approach to bike sharing program implementation can yield considerably higher benefits than bike sharing operations in isolation, and can improve transit systems and urban design alike. This paper draws from literature on the Sustainable Transportation paradigm, New Urbanism and Smart Growth to argue that a transit-integrated regional approach to bike sharing can greatly contribute to a seamless regional transit system, while yielding significant benefits to local urban design and mobility as well. Such an approach can significantly enhance transit’s competitiveness against the automobile, enabling transit-oriented designs of Urban Growth Centres that mitigate autocentric suburban sprawl. Employing this approach to GO Transit’s upcoming Regional Express Rail (RER) and the Urban Growth Centres of the GGH can facilitate the complete communities desired in the Provincial Growth Plan to advance the GGH’s polycentric urban network. The incorporation of bike sharing systems (BSSs) into regional transportation planning approaches provides the link that connects the regional with the local just as it connects the user from their door to the transit station. To realize its full potential in multimodal chains, bike sharing requires a high level of integration with the anchoring transit system in order to make it convenient and competitive against the personal automobile.
    [Show full text]
  • Urbane Radverleihsysteme Erobern Osteuropa Funktioniert Ein
    Language: en | cz | de | fr | it Werte Leserin, Werter Leser, Seit dem ersten groß angelegten städtischen Radverleihsystem in Kopenhagen 1995, erleben diese Systeme einen regelrechten Boom. Seit 2007, dem Eröffnungsjahr von Systemen u.a. in Paris ( Vélib’ ), Barcelona ( Bicing ) oder Wien , hat sich das Konzept auf viele Städte in Osteuropa, Asien und Nord- sowie Südamerika ausgedehnt. Dieser sehr ausführliche Newsletter gliedert sich in zwei Teile: Zuerst wird ein Überblick über die aktuellen Entwicklungen und den Stand der Dinge vermittelt. Im zweiten Teil folgen zusätzliche Hintergrundinformationen zur Geschichte von urbanen Radverleihsystemen (inklusive einer Erklärung der ersten drei “System- Generationen”), der vierten Generation sowie der Systembetreiber. Sollten Sie diesen Teil zuerst lesen wollen, klicken Sie hier . Urbane Radverleihsysteme erobern Osteuropa Mobilitätsmanagement schlägt schön langsam auch in osteuropäischen Ländern Wurzeln und Radverleihsysteme sind eine Erfolgsgeschichte, zumal sie in immer mehr Städten implementiert werden. Im Folgenden einige Beispiele: Polen: Veturilo in Warschau (Nextbike, June 2012); Krakau plant einen Ausbau seines BikeOne (PL) aus 2008. Von 120 Rädern soll auf ein stadtweites, benutzerfreundlicheres Konzept aufgestockt werden. ( Lesen Sie mehr dazu ) Slowenien: Laibachs BicikeLJ konnte 16.200 Nutzerinnen in nur 2 Monaten verzeichnen (JCDecaux, 2011) Albanien: Ecovolis in Tirana – nicht automatisierte, personenbetreute vier Radstationen Source: www.eltis.org mit 40 Rädern (März 2011) Slowakei: Offert für ein automatisiertes Verleihsystem für Bratislava. Rumänien: Cyclotheque in Bukarest; “I love velo” in fünf rumänischen Städten (2010). Tschechien: Homeport Prague , u.a. auch mit Elektrorädern und Lastenrädern. Funktioniert ein Radverleihsystem in jeder Stadt? Im OBIS Handbuch , können Städte, die an Radverleihsystemen interessiert sind, von 51 analysierten öffentlichen Radverleihsystemen in 10 europäischen Ländern lernen und die kritischen Erfolgsfaktoren studieren.
    [Show full text]
  • Bike Share Toronto Request for Proposal
    PA13.1 Appendix D APPENDIX D: BIKE SHARE TORONTO REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Bike Share Toronto Request for Proposal Release Date: July 29, 2015 Response Due Date: August 26, 2015 Version: 1.0 Copyright Copyright © Toronto Parking Authority. This document is unpublished and the foregoing notice is affixed to protect Toronto Parking Authority in the event of inadvertent publication. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced in any form, including photocopying or transmission electronically to any computer, without prior written consent of Toronto Parking Authority. This document and the information contained in it are the property of Toronto Parking Authority and may not be used or disclosed except as expressly authorised in writing by Toronto Parking Authority. Trademarks Bike Share Toronto is a trademark of the Toronto Parking Authority. iOS is a trademark of Apple Corporation. Android is a trademark of Google Inc. Other product names mentioned in this document may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies and are hereby acknowledged. Table of Contents Schedule A – Glossary ..................................................................................................... i 1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 5 1.1 Company Overview ................................................................................... 5 1.1.1 Toronto Parking Authority .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Company Profile NEXTBIKE – the BIKE SHARING SYSTEM
    Company Profile NEXTBIKE – THE BIKE SHARING SYSTEM nextbike was founded in 2004 in Leipzig, Germany. Since then it has become one of the leading producers LV and operators of bike sharing systems around the world. UK PL Currently, we have more than 30,000 bikes in service DE UA and we are active in 18 countries on four continents. CH AT HU HR BIH nextbike is a highly specialized mid-sized company with BG products made in Germany. We have been operating our USA TR own bike sharing projects with more than 10,000 bikes for CY over ten years, mainly in Germany. With our experience and know-how, we support cities in planning bike sharing systems to minimize traffic issues economically and ecolo- SA AE gically. We offer full service bike sharing solutions including: • research & development • planning & implementation • production & supply • operations & maintenance • sales & marketing NZ 02 LV UK PL DE UA CH AT HU HR BIH BG LV TR USA UK PL DE UA CY CH AT HU HR BIH BG USA TR 30,000 BIKES IN CY 18AE COUNTRIES & SA AE SA 4 CONTINENTS NZ 03 NZ BENEFITS OF OUR SYSTEM Tailor-made systems from a single source All our products are designed and developed in-house and are compatible with each other. This approach allows us to have agile processes in order to meet individual needs in a cost-efficient way. Our modular system enables us to address specific requi- rements such as different language versions, layout modifications and technological characteristics. Our advantages at a glance: • system with global access • seamless integration into public transport infrastructure • modular system permits individual configurations • docks are not mandatory to return a bike – full stations are not a problem • multiple rental channels – app, board computer, terminal, hotline 04 VARIOUS SYSTEM CONFIGURATIONS Each city requires a customized solution.
    [Show full text]