5 the Presence of History in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

5 the Presence of History in Bosnia and Herzegovina ISBN 951-581-090-6 (book) ISBN 951-581-091-4 (http://ethesis.helsinki.fi) © Pilvi Torsti Cover Design: Piia Aho Layout: Samuli Simojoki Published by Kustannus Oy Taifuuni (www.taifuuni.com) Printed by Yliopistopaino Helsinki 2003 Contents FOREWORD................................................................................................................. 9 1 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................... 13 1.1 Task ........................................................................................................ 13 1.2 Relevance................................................................................................. 16 1.3 Structure.................................................................................................. 18 2 NEW OPENINGS IN HISTORY RESEARCH................................................................ 20 2.1 Conceptual Developments ....................................................................... 22 2.2 Public Presentations of History................................................................ 27 2.3 Textbook Research .................................................................................. 30 2.4 Reception Research.................................................................................. 34 2.5 This Study and New Openings in History Research................................. 36 3 THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL SCOPE..................................................... 39 3.1 Theoretical Choices ................................................................................. 39 3.1.1 Social and Historical Constructivism .................................................. 39 3.1.2 Social Representations ........................................................................ 41 3.2 Phenomena Related to the Presence of History ........................................ 45 3.2.1 History Culture ................................................................................. 47 3.2.2 Historical Consciousness..................................................................... 50 3.2.3 History Politics.................................................................................. 52 3.2.4 This Research and the Presence of History............................................ 53 3.3 Methodological Pluralism ........................................................................ 54 3.3.1 Combining two Approaches in Theory................................................. 55 3.3.2 Combining two Approaches in Practice ............................................... 57 3.4 Research Material .................................................................................... 60 3.4.1 Youth and History Survey Data.......................................................... 60 3.4.2 Choice of History Textbooks ............................................................... 68 3.4.3 Material on History and the Presence of History in Bosnian Society....... 69 3.4.4 The Choice of Concepts Nation, War and Peace .................................. 72 4 PAST AND PRESENT OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA .............................................. 76 4.1 The Origins of Bosnia as a Historical and Geographical Entity................. 76 4.2 World Wars ............................................................................................. 78 4.2.1 WW1: Assassination of the Archduke and the Bosnian Misery ............... 78 4.2.2 WW2: Cruel and Complicated Local Wars.......................................... 80 4.3 The National Question ............................................................................ 89 4.3.1 The Emergence of Ethnic Groups and the Islamisation of Bosnia ........... 89 4.3.2 The National Question in the First Yugoslavia..................................... 91 4.3.3 Tito’s National Politics....................................................................... 93 4.3.4 The National Question at the End of Yugoslavia.................................. 97 4.4 Bosnia in 1990s........................................................................................ 98 4.4.1 The Death of Yugoslavia .................................................................... 98 4.4.2 Devastating War(s)............................................................................ 99 4.4.3 Bosnia at the Time of the Research .................................................... 105 4.5 Summary: Sensitive Historical Themes in the 1990s............................... 113 5 THE PRESENCE OF HISTORY IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA ............................... 115 5.1 History Culture in Bosnia ...................................................................... 117 5.1.1 The Destruction and Reconstruction of Physical Symbols..................... 117 5.1.2 The Division of National Symbols and Language............................... 123 5.1.3 History Culture and other Cultural Artefacts ..................................... 131 5.2 On Historical Consciousness in Bosnia .................................................. 140 5.3 On History Politics in Bosnia................................................................. 145 5.4 Division of History Teaching................................................................. 152 5.4.1 History Teaching and the Construction of Yugoslav Identity................ 152 5.4.2 National Division of Schooling 1991–2002 ...................................... 153 5.4.3 Textbook Review and Removal of Objectionable Material................... 157 6 PRESENTATIONS OF WAR, PEACE AND NATION IN HISTORY TEXTBOOKS ........... 159 6.1 Methods and Materials........................................................................... 159 6.1.1 Principles of Qualitative Content Analysis ......................................... 159 6.1.2 Introduction of the Textbooks Analysed.............................................. 162 6.1.3 Poor-quality Pictures and Maps ........................................................ 167 6.1.4 Objectionable Material and the Books Analysed ................................. 169 6.2 Wars as Central Determinants of History............................................... 170 6.2.1 Historija: Universal Suffering........................................................... 171 6.2.2 Povijest: Croatian Interpretation in Neutral Style .............................. 177 6.2.3 Istorija and Dodatak: Serb Heroism and Bloc Ideology ....................... 182 6.2.4 Conclusion: Different Representations of Wars ................................... 188 6.3 Peace as a Rare Condition of History ..................................................... 191 6.3.1 Historija: Questioning the UN ......................................................... 191 6.3.2 Povijest: Complicated Negotiations.................................................... 192 6.3.3 Istorija and Dodatak: Blocs versus Non-Alignment ............................ 193 6.3.4 Conclusion: Internationalism and Non-Alliance ................................ 195 6.4 The Presentation of Nation through “us” and “them”............................ 197 6.4.1 Historija: Concentration on Us......................................................... 198 6.4.2 Povijest: Centrality of Croat–Serb Rivalry ......................................... 211 6.4.3 Istorija: Heroism and Suffering for Yugoslavia................................... 225 6.4.4 Dodatak: Bosnian Serb Emphasis ..................................................... 236 6.4.5 Conclusion: Historical Stereotypes of ”us” and ”them”......................... 243 6.5 Officially Expressed Social Representations in Bosnian Context ............. 248 6.5.1 Nationally-Divided Representations.................................................. 248 6.5.2 Historical Continuity and Reoccurrence ............................................ 252 6.5.3 Anchoring the Present with the Help of the Past................................. 254 6.5.4 The Power of Textbook Representations............................................. 256 7 REPRESENTATIONS OF WAR, PEACE AND NATION IN THE YOUTH AND HISTORY SURVEY ................................................................................................................... 259 7.1 Method and Materials............................................................................ 259 7.1.1 Principles of the Bosnian Analysis ..................................................... 259 7.1.2 General Features of the Sample......................................................... 263 7.2 War ....................................................................................................... 264 7.2.1 Who is Fighting and Why? ............................................................... 264 7.2.2 Reasons and Justifications Related to War.......................................... 267 7.2.3 The Historical Significance of Wars .................................................. 271 7.2.4 The Significance of Wars in the Future ............................................. 276 7.2.5 The Role of Hitler............................................................................ 281 7.3 Peace ..................................................................................................... 282 7.3.1 What Secures the Peace?................................................................... 282 7.3.2 The Importance of Peace .................................................................. 291 7.4 Nation..................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • CENTRALIZED NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT for CROATIA 2020 – 1 of 186 –
    Centralized National Risk Assessment for Croatia FSC-CNRA-HR V1-0 EN FSC-CNRA-HR V1-0 CENTRALIZED NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR CROATIA 2020 – 1 of 186 – Title: Centralized National Risk Assessment for Croatia Document reference FSC-CNRA-HR V1-0 EN code: Approval body: FSC International Center: Performance and Standards Unit Date of approval: 02 July 2020 Contact for comments: FSC International Center - Performance and Standards Unit - Charles-de-Gaulle-Str. 5 53113 Bonn, Germany +49-(0)228-36766-0 +49-(0)228-36766-30 [email protected] © 2020 Forest Stewardship Council, A.C. All rights reserved. No part of this work covered by the publisher’s copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means (graphic, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, recording taping, or information retrieval systems) without the written permission of the publisher. Printed copies of this document are for reference only. Please refer to the electronic copy on the FSC website (ic.fsc.org) to ensure you are referring to the latest version. The Forest Stewardship Council® (FSC) is an independent, not for profit, non-government organization established to support environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world’s forests. FSC’s vision is that the world’s forests meet the social, ecological, and economic rights and needs of the present generation without compromising those of future generations. FSC-CNRA-HR V1-0 CENTRALIZED NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR CROATIA 2020 – 2 of 186 – Contents Risk assessments that have been finalized for Croatia .............................................. 4 Risk designations in finalized risk assessments for Croatia ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Reviews 1998 Bosnia and Herzegovina Executive
    DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL REVIEWS 1998 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ministry of Agriculture, Water Management and Forestry in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL REVIEWS 1998 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ministry of Agriculture, Water Management and Forestry in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance Preface The National Reviews were designed to produce basic data and information for the elaboration of the Pollution Reduction Programme (PRP), the Transboundary Analysis and the revision of the Strategic Action Plan of the International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR). Particular attention was also given to collect data and information for specific purposes concerning the development of the Danube Water Quality Model, the identification and evaluation of hot spots, the analysis of social and economic factors, the preparation of an investment portfolio and the development of financing mechanisms for the implementation of the ICPDR Action Plan. For the elaboration of the National Reviews, a team of national experts was recruited in each of the participating countries for a period of one to four months covering the following positions: Socio-economist with knowledge in population studies, Financial expert (preferably from the Ministry of Finance), Water Quality Data expert/information specialist, Water Engineering expert with knowledge in project development. Each of the experts had to organize his or her work under the supervision of the respective Country Programme Coordinator and with the guidance of a team of International Consultants. The tasks were laid out in specific Terms of Reference. At a Regional Workshop in Budapest from 27 to 29 January 1998, the national teams and the group of international consultants discussed in detail the methodological approach and the content of the National Reviews to assure coherence of results.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Remains and Mass Violence: Methodological Approaches
    5 The disposal of corpses in an ethnicized civil war: Croatia, 1941–451 Alexander Korb Introduction In May 1943, an Italian general who was being held prisoner of war was discussing the course of the war with his colleagues. He was describing an incident that had occurred in the territory occupied by Italy in Croatia and, unknown to him, he was overheard by his British supervisors. The incident concerned the recovery of the corpses of murdered Serbs thrown by the perpetrators – Croatian nationalists – into karst caves, which are typical land formations in that area. ‘The exhumations were a dreadful task’, the general said. ‘Nobody could enter the cave because the rotting bodies stank so badly. One man who we lowered down on a rope fainted and we had to pull him out again.’ 2 It seems that the soldiers were finally equipped with gas masks. During the Second World War, up to 45 million people lost their lives.3 Almost a quarter of them were victims of targeted attacks with the intent to kill and mass murders, rather than armed hostili- ties. While the death of the victims can be said to have been well researched, many historians consider their task completed once the persecuted individuals have perished. Yet the disposal of bodies in cases of genocide is more than just a field where further research is required; even more important is that the treatment of the dead reveals a great deal about the perpetrators, how they saw themselves, and the approach to and nature of their violence. Alexander Korb - 9781526125026 Downloaded from manchesterhive.com at 10/02/2021 07:59:37AM via free access HRMV.indb 106 01/09/2014 17:28:38 An ethnicized civil war: Croatia 107 The episode described above, which is likely to have occurred in summer 1941 in western Croatia, provides an initial illustration of the complexity of the situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Bosnia and Herzegovina Haris Kušmić interviewed Jovan Divjak Interview date: 7 August 2019 Kušmić: Allow me to formally introduce myself. I am Haris Kušmić, currently working with the WFD [Westminster Foundation for Democracy]. I am interviewing Mr Jovan Divjak, whose biography I cannot possibly fit into a few opening sentences. Let me instead say something I have said before in conversation with him: that he is someone who has built and defended and given everything he had to this country in periods of both war and peace. Mr Divjak, thank you very much for inviting me here and giving me an opportunity to interview you. Unlike other interviews, the questions here may relate more to your personality. We are certainly going to touch on things that you have gone through, that the general public is familiar with, but the goal of this interview is to try and see Jovan Divjak as Jovan Divjak: you as a person, things you have gone through in your life, from childhood on—which may well be appropriate, as you are working on your book. We hope you will succeed in publishing it. Divjak: And its title is “Do Not Shoot.” Kušmić: And its title is “Do Not Shoot.” Exactly. Well, we can begin with your early life, when you were a child. Could you perhaps tell me something about your childhood? Divjak: Well, my childhood is somewhat fresh in my memory as I often write and speak about it in interviews. I begin with the story of me bringing my parents joy on 11 March 1937.
    [Show full text]
  • Nataša Zambelli
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: • This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. • A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. • This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. • The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. • When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. East of Eden: A poststructuralist analysis of Croatia’s identity in the context of EU accession By Nataša Zambelli Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) University of Edinburgh 2011 Declaration I hereby declare that, except where otherwise indicated, this thesis is entirely my own work, and that no part of it has been submitted for any other degree or qualification. Nataša Zambelli 30nd August 2011 Abstract Since the early 1990s Croatia has defined membership of the European Union as one of its primary goals. However, the immediate post-war period and the difficult transition to democracy left Croatia in relative isolation from Western European states and its aim of joining the European Union seemed unattainable and distant. Croatia’s involvement in the conflicts in the former Yugoslavia and President Tuđman’s politics proved to be great obstacles to its further democratisation and development.
    [Show full text]
  • KNOWLEDGE – International Journal Vol.38.3 ANALYSIS of PHYSICAL-GEOGRAPHICAL CHARACTERISTICS of the VRBANJA CATCHMENT AREA and the WATER MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS
    KNOWLEDGE – International Journal Vol.38.3 ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL-GEOGRAPHICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE VRBANJA CATCHMENT AREA AND THE WATER MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS Vesna Rajčević University of Banja Luka, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, the Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina, [email protected] Tanja Mišlicki-Tomić University of Banja Luka, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, the Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina, [email protected] Abstract: Extensive knowledge of physical-geographical properties of a catchment area and its water abundance is the main prerequsite for the successful planning of water management. A catchment area is a homogeneous hydrological category determined by the adequate geogenic and anthropogenic parameters. In order to study a catchment area and manage its water resources, it is of an utmost relevance to define these parameters, their morphological, hydrodynamic and hydrometeorological properties. The Vrbanja River is one of the largest right tributaries of the Vrbas River and one of the most important autochtonous watersheds in the Republic of Srpska. This fact largely facilitates a rational usage of the Vrbanja water resources, the arrangement of its catchment area, and the protection and development of the water resources in this watershed. The topography of theVrbanja watershed covers the area of 791. 33 km2 and includes the administrative territories of municipalities of Kotor Varoš, Kneževo, Čelinac, Mrkonjić Grad, Teslić, Laktaši and Banja Luka (the Republic of Srpska) and Travnik (B&H Federation). Approximately 99.7 % of the watershed belongs to the Republic of Srpska and around 0.3 % (river source) belongs to B&H Federation. The main course of the elongated Vrbanja River watershed is SE-NW, which is also the main course of the Vrbanja River.
    [Show full text]
  • Seeking Justice for Wartime Crimes in Bosnia and Herzegovina
    SEEKING JUSTICE FOR WARTIME CRIMES IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA General Allegation regarding the application of statutes of limitations and court fees to victims 1 SUBMITTED BY TRIAL International Yale Law School’s Lowenstein International Human Rights Clinic SIGNED BY ANIMA Kotor Association for Missing Persons from Hadzici Association NasGlas Association of Detainees Bosanski Novi Association of Detainees Kozarac Association of Detainees of Hercegovina-Neretva Canton Association of Detainees of Zenica-Doboj Canton Association of Detainees Prijedor 92 Association of Prijedor Women “Izvor” Association of Victims and Witnesses of Genocide Center for Democracy and Transitional Justice Center for Woman’s Rights Center for Women War Victims ROSA Croatian Association of Detainees of Homeland War in Bosnia and Herzegovina Forum ZFD Foundation CURE Foundation United Women Banja Luka Municipal Association of Detainees Sanski Most Network for Building Peace Organization of Families of Martyred Soldiers and Missing Persons “Vrbanja” Kotor Varos Regional Association of Detainees Višegrad Regional Union of Detainees of Banja Luka Region Sarajevo Open Centre Society for Threatened Peoples Vasa prava Bosnia and Herzegovina Vivezene Tuzla Women in Black 2 “It was an additional humiliation for everyone, because they believed in a little bit of justice regardless of everything. I am angry at the country, at the prosecution offices, and at the courts. They did nothing for victims of torture, absolutely nothing.”1 – A former camp detainee whose civil claim was dismissed on the basis of statutes of limitations “We filed the claim hoping to receive at least some kind of satisfaction for the beatings, illegal detainment. However, the opposite happened ..
    [Show full text]
  • 1996 Human Rights Report: Bosnia and Herzegovina Page 1 of 10
    1996 Human Rights Report: Bosnia and Herzegovina Page 1 of 10 The State Department web site below is a permanent electro information released prior to January 20, 2001. Please see w material released since President George W. Bush took offic This site is not updated so external links may no longer func us with any questions about finding information. NOTE: External links to other Internet sites should not be co endorsement of the views contained therein. U.S. Department of State Bosnia and Herzegovina Country Report on Human Rights Practices for 1996 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, January 30, 1997. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA The 1995 General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina (the Dayton Accords), signed after 3 years of war, provided for the continuity of Bosnia-Herzegovina, originally one of the constituent Republics of Yugoslavia, as a single state, Bosnia and Herzegovina, with two constituent entities, the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (the Federation) and the Republika Srpska (RS). The Federation, which incorporates the areas with a Bosniak (Muslim) and Croat majority, occupies 51% of the territory; the RS, populated mostly by Bosnian Serbs, occupies 49%. The Dayton Accords established a constitution for Bosnia and Herzegovina that includes a central government with a bicameral legislature, a three-member presidency comprised of a representative of each major ethnic group, a council of ministers, a constitutional court, and a central bank. Defense remains under the control of the respective entities. In a significant step toward implementing the Dayton Accords, elections for central, entity-level, and, within the Federation, cantonal offices were held on September 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Remediation Assessment Report
    Remediation Assessment Report INCEL, Banja Luka, Republika Srpska, Bosnia and Hercegovina 15. 9. 2020 Contractor: DEKONTA, a.s., Dřetovice 109, 273 42 Stehelčeves Contact address: Volutová 2523, 158 00 Prague 5, Czech Republic VAT number: 25006096 Ondřej Urban, Ph.D., Head of the Survey and Remediation Department Email: [email protected] Client: United Nations Development Programme: Registry UNDP BiH Zmaja od Bosne bb, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Hercegovina Andrea Muharemovic, Environmental Development Project Manager Email: [email protected] Type of report: Deliverable 3: Remediation Assessment Report Project No.: 120 120 Project: INCEL, Banja Luka, PCBs Detailed site assessment and remediation assessment for the PCB contaminated spots“ Completed by: Fernando Rebelo, Jan Kukačka, Aleš Kulhánek, Jiří Kubricht, Martin Polák, Eva Čechová, Maja Colovic Daul – Project Managers Ondřej Urban, Head of the Survey and Remediation Department Reviewed by: Jan Vaněk, Head of Remediation and Environmental Projects Division Approved by: Date: 15. 9. 2020 Copy No.: 1 2 3 4 Distribution list: UNDP BiH, DEKONTA, a.s. CONTENTS Non-Technical Summary ......................................................................................................................... 9 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 11 1.1 General .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • War in the Balkans, 1991-2002
    WAR IN THE BALKANS, 1991-2002 R. Craig Nation August 2003 ***** The views expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. This report is cleared for public release; distribution is unlimited. ***** Comments pertaining to this report are invited and should be forwarded to: Director, Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 122 Forbes Ave., Carlisle, PA 17013-5244. Copies of this report may be obtained from the Publications Office by calling (717) 245-4133, FAX (717) 245-3820, or be e-mail at [email protected] ***** Most 1993, 1994, and all later Strategic Studies Institute (SSI) monographs are available on the SSI Homepage for electronic dissemination. SSI’s Homepage address is: http://www.carlisle.army.mil/ssi/ ***** The Strategic Studies Institute publishes a monthly e-mail newsletter to update the national security community on the research of our analysts, recent and forthcoming publications, and upcoming conferences sponsored by the Institute. Each newsletter also provides a strategic commentary by one of our research analysts. If you are interested in receiving this newsletter, please let us know by e-mail at [email protected] or by calling (717) 245-3133. ISBN 1-58487-134-2 ii CONTENTS Foreword . v Preface . vii Map of the Balkan Region. viii 1. The Balkan Region in World Politics . 1 2. The Balkans in the Short 20th Century . 43 3. The State of War: Slovenia and Croatia, 1991-92.
    [Show full text]
  • Coversheet for Thesis in Sussex Research Online
    A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details WHEN THE ROOFTOPS BECAME RED AGAIN: POST-WAR COMMUNITY DYNAMICS IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Maria Djolai Ph.D. Development Studies University of Sussex May 2015 ii I hereby declare that this thesis has not been and will not be, submitted in whole or in part to another University for the award of any other degree. Signature:…………………………….. iii UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX Maria Djolai Ph.D. Development Studies WHEN THE ROOFTOPS BECAME RED AGAIN: POST-WAR COMMUNITY DYNAMICS IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Summary My thesis explores post-war community formation following the civil war in Bosnia and Herzegovina (1992-1995), the deadliest European violent conflict since WWII. The study draws on 18 months of fieldwork and mixed methods data collection in two small towns, Stolac in Southern Herzegovina and Kotor Varoš in Northern Bosnia, which were exposed to intense violence. The thesis uses the concept of community as analytical optic to avoid ethnic “groupism” perspective, which so often obscures the complexity of social relations and the dynamics of communal life in Bosnia-Herzegovina.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia-Hercegovina
    August 1996 Vol. 8. No. 12 (D) BOSNIA-HERCEGOVINA UPDATE: NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE DAYTON ACCORDS Ongoing Ethnically-Motivated Expulsions and Harassment in Bosnia INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................................2 RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................................................................3 TESLIC..........................................................................................................................................................3 SAPNA THUMB...........................................................................................................................................4 SARAJEVO SUBURBS ...............................................................................................................................4 ETHNIC CLEANSING BY BOSNIAN SERBS IN TESLIC ....................................................................................5 BOSNIAK VILLAGES NEAR ZVORNIK UNDER THREAT ..............................................................................11 Abuses by Republika Srpska Police in Dugi Dio.........................................................................................11 HARASSMENT AND INTIMIDATION OF SERBS IN SARAJEVO...................................................................12 Harassment of Serbs in the Sarajevo Suburb of Ilijas..................................................................................13
    [Show full text]