DOCSLIB.ORG

American Political Parties

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Political Science 688 American Political Development Tuesdays, 10am-12pm 5769 Haven Hall Winter 2004 Professor Robert Mickey 7632 Haven Hall office phone: 615-9104 email: [email protected] office hours: Wednesday 2-4 and by appointment Recently, scholars interested in contemporary U.S. politics have begun investigating key transformations and patterns in US history. We will evaluate some of their growing body of research in order to explore the ways in which substantively important outcomes in the past shape the present, and, more broadly, to explore the utility of studying politics as a process that occurs over time. Substantively, we will examine key events and processes in the United States since the Civil War, such as: state-building; the politics of industrialization and labor relations; the development of the US welfare state; collective mobilizations around race, ethnicity, and gender; and the urban crisis. Analytically, we will evaluate the concept of 'political development;' review new research about temporality, including ideas of path dependence, timing and sequencing, and critical junctures; and compare sociological and rational-choice theories of institutional origins and change. We will also consider the usefulness of concepts and theories in the field of comparative politics for thinking about U.S. politics more fruitfully. A background in U.S. history is welcome but not required. Requirements The seminar will succeed or fail on the quality of student participation, so students are expected to engage actively and respectfully in class discussion. Good class participation requires close readings of assigned texts; the reading load will be heavy but not gratuitously so. Students must write a brief response to each week’s readings (1-2 pages, double-spaced, normal fonts and margins). These should be well thought-out and touch on the key issues of the week. They should be posted on the Coursetools site by noon on Monday so that others have time to read them before class. Finally, students must write a 20-30 page literature review, research design, or research paper. These will be due April 30, and should be based on substantial consultations with the instructor. Grading Class participation: 25% Response papers: 25% Final project: 50% 1 Books The following texts are available for purchase at Shaman Drum: Bensel, Richard. Yankee Leviathan: The Origins of Central State Authority in America, 1859- 1877. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990. Bensel, Richard. The Political Economy of American Industrialization. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001. Carpenter, Daniel P. Forging Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputation, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862-1928. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001. Lieberman, Robert C. Shifting the Color Line: Race and the American Welfare State. Harvard University Press, 1998. Sanders, Elizabeth. Roots of Reform: Farmers, Workers, and the American State, 1877-1917. Chicago University Press, 1999. Schickler, Eric. Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton University Press, 2001. Skocpol, Theda. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Harvard University Press, 1992. Skowronek, Stephen. Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877-1920. Cambridge University Press, 1982. Skowronek, Stephen. The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to Bill Clinton. Harvard University Press, 1993. Tichenor, Daniel. Dividing Lines: The Politics of Immigration Control in America. Princeton University Press, 2002. The vast majority of other readings are available via MIRLYN. I will make available photocopies of the others. 2 Jan. 13: Introduction to Political Development and “American Political Development” Lucian W. Pye, “The Concept of Political Development,” in Jason L. Finkle and Richard W. Gable, eds., Political Development and Social Change (New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1966), 83-91. Samuel C. Huntington, "Political Modernization: America vs. Europe," chapter 2 in Political Order in Changing Societies (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968), 93-139. David Brian Robertson, “The Return to History and the New Institutionalism in American Political Science,” Social Science History 17 (Spring 1993), 1-36. Paul Pierson and Theda Skocpol, “Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science,” in Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner, eds., Political Science: The State of the Discipline (New York: Norton, 2002), 693-721. Karen Orren and Stephen Skowronek, “The Study of American Political Development,” in Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner, eds., Political Science: The State of the Discipline (New York: Norton, 2002), 722-754. Paul Pierson, “Not Just What, But When: Timing and Sequence in Political Processes,” Studies in American Political Development 14 (Spring 2000), 72-92, plus responses by Robert Jervis and Kathleen Thelen. [MIRLYN] Robert H. Bates, Avner Greif, Margaret Levi, et al, “Introduction,” Analytic Narratives (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998), 3-22. Jan. 20: Civil War and Reconstruction Richard F. Bensel, Yankee Leviathan: The Origins of Central State Authority in America, 1859- 1877 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990), entire (but skim 116-181, 198-233, 255- 281, and 312-363). Jan. 27: The Politics of Industrialization Bensel, The Political Economy of American Industrialization, 1877-1900 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, preface, chs. 1-4 and 7-8 (skim the rest) Reviews: Richard R. John, “Follow the Yellow Brick Road: Rethinking American Industrialization” and Daniel P. Carpenter, “Lessons, Portraiture, Method, Myth: Richard Bensel’s The Political Economy of American Industrialization, 1877-1900,” of Bensel by Daniel Carpenter and Richard John [both available at http://www.americanpoliticaldevelopment.org/townsquare/e_fourm_demo_devel.html] 3 recommended: Charles Stewart and Barry Weingast, “Stacking the Senate, Changing the Nation: Republican Rotten Boroughs, Statehood Politics, and American Political Development,” Studies in American Political Development 6 (1992), 223-271. Feb. 3: Did the U.S. State Modernize? Huntington (review from week 1) Stephen Skowronek, Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877-1920 (Cambridge University Press, 1982), all but chapters 4 and 7. David Vogel, “Why Businessmen Distrust Their State: The Political Consciousness of American Corporate Executives,” British Journal of Political Science 8 (1978), 45-78. [MIRLYN] Feb. 10: Varieties of Progressivism in the Progressive Era Elizabeth Sanders, Roots of Reform: Farmers, Workers, and the American State, 1877-1917 (Chicago University Press, 1999), 1-177, 217-266, and 340-419. Eileen McDonagh, "The 'Welfare Rights State' and the 'Civil Rights State': Policy Paradox and State Building in the Progressive Era," Studies in American Political Development 7 (1993), 225- 274. recommended: C. Vann Woodward, The Strange Career of Jim Crow (various editions) J. Morgan Kousser, “Progressivism for Middle-Class Whites Only: North Carolina Education, 1880-1910,” Journal of Southern History 46:2 (1980), 169-194. [MIRLYN] Feb. 17: U.S. National Institutions, I: The Presidency Skowronek, The Politics Presidents Make (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993), introduction and chapters 1-3, and 6-end. Feb. 24: No Class (Spring Break) Mar. 2: U.S. National Institutions, II: Congress Eric Schickler, Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress (Princeton University Press, 2001). 4 March 9: U.S. National Institutions, III: Federal Agencies and Federal Agency Daniel P. Carpenter, Forging Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputation, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862-1928 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001), 1-178 and 290-367 (skim the intervening chapters). Mar. 16: America’s Precocious Welfare State Theda Skocpol, Protecting Soldiers and Mothers (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992), 1-151, 155-159, skim 160-313, and read 314-539. Joan Scott, "Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis," American Historical Review, (1986), 1053-1075. [MIRLYN] recommended: Linda Gordon, "Black and White Visions of Welfare: Women's Welfare Activism, 1890-1935," Journal of American History (1991), 559-590. Linda Gordon and Theda Skocpol, debate in Contention (1994). Mar. 23: Policy Regimes in American Political Development: The Example of Immigration Daniel Tichenor, Dividing Lines: The Politics of Immigration Control in America (Princeton University Press, 2002). Mar. 30: The New Deal: A Critical Juncture in U.S. Political Development? William E. Leuchtenburg, Franklin D. Roosevelt and the New Deal, 1932-1940 (New York, 1963) Alan Brinkley, “The New Deal and the Idea of the State,” and Nelson Lichtenstein, "From Corporatism to Collective Bargaining: Organized Labor and the Eclipse of Social Democracy in the Postwar Era," both in Steve Fraser and Gary Gerstle, ed., The Rise and Fall of the New Deal Order, 1930-1980 (Princeton University Press, 1990). Apr. 6: Race and the Origins and Development of U.S. Social Policy Robert C. Lieberman, Shifting the Color Line: Race and the American Welfare State (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998) Gareth Davies and Martha Derthick, "Race and Social Welfare Policy: The Social Security Act of 1935," Political Science Quarterly (Summer 1997), 217-235.
Recommended publications
  • Bringing the Welfare State Back In: the Promise (And Perils) of the New Social Welfare History

    Bringing the Welfare State Back In: the Promise (And Perils) of the New Social Welfare History

    JACOB S. HACKER Bringing the Welfare State Back In: The Promise (and Perils) of the New Social Welfare History The welfare state—the complex of policies that, in one form or another, all rich democracies have adopted to ameliorate destitution and provide valued social goods and services—is an increasingly central subject in the study of American history and politics. The past decade has unleashed a veritable tidal wave of books on the topic, including, from historians, Alice Kessler-Harris’s In Pursuit of Equity and Michael Katz’s The Price of Citi- zenship, and, from political scientists, Robert Lieberman’s Shifting the Color Line and Peter Swenson’s Capitalists Against Markets.1 Journals ranging from the American Historical Review to Political Science Quarterly (and, with less regularity, even the American Political Science Review) now rou- tinely feature analyses of U.S. social policy. And going back just a few years more, the early 1990s saw the publication of several influential works on the subject, notably Paul Pierson’s Dismantling the Welfare State? and Theda Skocpol’s Protecting Soldiers and Mothers, each of which won major book prizes in political science.2 If any moment deserves to be seen as a heady time for writing on the American welfare state, this is it. As natural as this state of affairs has come to be seen, it was not al- ways so. Writing in 1991, the historian Edward Berkowitz lamented that the American welfare state “commands little attention from today’s stu- dents, who view it as a confusing, highly technical, and dry subject that cannot compete with the exploits, often heroic, of the blacks and women who have emerged as major figures in the history classroom over the course of the last twenty years.”3 Although Berkowitz was writing of historians, his complaint applied more broadly.
  • Curriculum Vitae

    Curriculum Vitae

    September 2020 Andrea Louise Campbell Department of Political Science Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139 [email protected] Academic Positions Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Political Science Arthur and Ruth Sloan Professor of Political Science, 2015 – Faculty Affiliate, Center for Constructive Communication, MIT Media Lab, 2020 – Department head, 2015-19 Professor, 2012 - 2015 Associate Professor, 2005-12; tenured 2008 Alfred Henry and Jean Morrison Hayes Career Development Chair, 2006-09 Harvard University, Department of Government Assistant Professor, 2000-05 Lecturer, 1999-2000 Education Ph.D. University of California, Berkeley, Political Science, December 2000 M.A. University of California, Berkeley, Political Science, June 1994 A.B. Harvard University, Social Studies, magna cum laude, June 1988 Books Trapped in America’s Safety Net: One Family’s Struggle. University of Chicago Press, 2014. Featured in: Harvard Magazine; Washington Post Wonkblog; Vox; TIME Magazine; MIT Technology Review; MIT News; New Books in Political Science podcast; Faculti Media The Delegated Welfare State: Medicare, Markets, and the Governance of American Social Policy, with Kimberly J. Morgan. Oxford University Press, 2011. How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Citizen Activism and the American Welfare State. Princeton University Press, 2003. Paperback edition, 2005. Campbell, p. 2 Textbook We the People: An Introduction to American Politics, with Benjamin Ginsberg, Theodore J. Lowi, Caroline J. Tolbert, and Margaret Weir. W.W. Norton, beginning 12th edition, 2019. Articles “The Social, Political, and Economic Effects of the Affordable Care Act: Introduction to the Issue,” with Lara Shore-Sheppard. RSF: Russell Sage Foundation Journal 6; 2 (June 2020): 1- 40. “The Affordable Care Act and Mass Policy Feedbacks.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 45; 4 (August 2020): 567-80.
  • Political Science

    Political Science

    A 364547 Political Science: THE STATE OF -THEDISCIPLINE Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner, editors Columbia University W. W. Norton & Company American Political Science Association NEW YORK | LONDON WASHINGTON, D.C. CONTENTS Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner Preface and Acknowledgments xiii Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner American Political Science: The Discipline's State and the State of the Discipline 1 The State in an Era of Globalization Margaret Levi The State of the Study of the State 3 3 Miles Kahler The State of the State in World Politics 56 Atul Kohli State, Society, and Development 84 Jeffry Frieden and Lisa L. Martin International Political Economy: Global and Domestic Interactions 118 I ]ames E. Alt Comparative Political Economy: Credibility, Accountability, and Institutions 147 ]ames D. Morrow International Conflict: Assessing the Democratic Peace and Offense-Defense Theory 172 Stephen M. Walt The Enduring Relevance of the Realist Tradition 197 Democracy, Justice, and Their Institutions Ian Shapiro The State of Democratic Theory 235 vi | CONTENTS Jeremy Waldron Justice 266 Romand Coles Pluralization and Radical Democracy: Recent Developments in Critical Theory and Postmodernism 286 Gerald Gamm and ]ohn Huber Legislatures as Political Institutions: Beyond the Contemporary Congress 313 Barbara Geddes The Great Transformation in the Study of Politics in Developing Countries 342 Kathleen Thelen The Political Economy of Business and Labor in the Developed Democracies 371 Citizenship, Identity, and Political Participation Seyla Benhabib Political Theory and Political Membership in a Changing World 404 Kay Lehman Schlozman Citizen Participation in America: What Do We Know? Why Do We Care? 433 Nancy Burns - Gender: Public Opinion and Political Action 462 Michael C.
  • Topics in Us Government and Politics: American Political Development

    Topics in Us Government and Politics: American Political Development

    POL 433/USA 403: TOPICS IN U.S. GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS: AMERICAN POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO WINTER 2019 Dr. Connor Ewing [email protected] Schedule: Monday 10:00am-12:00pm Location: OI 7192 Office Hours: Mon. & Tues. 12:00-2:00 pm, Larkin 215 Course Description This course explores the substance, nature, and study of American political development. It will begin by examining the methodology, mechanisms, and patterns of American political development from the founding to the present. Emphasis will be placed on divergent perspectives on the nature of political development, particularly narratives of continuity and discontinuity. Taking an institution-based approach, the course will then examine the central institutions of American politics and how they have developed over the course of American political history. Relevant to these institutional developments are a host of topics that students will have the opportunity to explore further in various written assignments. This include, but are not limited to, the following: the Constitution and the founding; political economy, trade, and industrialization; bureaucracy and administration; citizenship and inclusion; race and civil rights; law and legal development; and political parties. Course Objectives This course is intended to: • provide students with an understanding of key themes in and approaches to American political development; • expose students to multiple methods of political analysis, with an emphasis on the relationship and tensions between qualitative and quantitative methods; and • develop written and oral communication skills through regular classroom discussions and a range of writing assignments. Course Texts • The Search for American Political Development, Karen Orren and Stephen Skowronek (Yale University Press, 2004) • The Legacies of Losing, Nicole Mellow and Jeffrey Tulis (University of Chicago Press, 2018) All other readings will be available on the course website.
  • 10.1057/9780230282940.Pdf

    10.1057/9780230282940.Pdf

    St Antony’s Series General Editor: Jan Zielonka (2004– ), Fellow of St Antony’s College, Oxford Othon Anastasakis, Research Fellow of St Antony’s College, Oxford and Director of South East European Studies at Oxford Recent titles include: Julie Newton and William Tompson (editors) INSTITUTIONS, IDEAS AND LEADERSHIP IN RUSSIAN POLITICS Celia Kerslake , Kerem Oˇktem, and Philip Robins (editors) TURKEY’S ENGAGEMENT WITH MODERNITY Conflict and Change in the Twentieth Century Paradorn Rangsimaporn RUSSIA AS AN ASPIRING GREAT POWER IN EAST ASIA Perceptions and Policies from Yeltsin to Putin Motti Golani THE END OF THE BRITISH MANDATE FOR PALESTINE, 1948 The Diary of Sir Henry Gurney Demetra Tzanaki WOMEN AND NATIONALISM IN THE MAKING OF MODERN GREECE The Founding of the Kingdom to the Greco-Turkish War Simone Bunse SMALL STATES AND EU GOVERNANCE Leadership through the Council Presidency Judith Marquand DEVELOPMENT AID IN RUSSIA Lessons from Siberia Li-Chen Sim THE RISE AND FALL OF PRIVATIZATION IN THE RUSSIAN OIL INDUSTRY Stefania Bernini FAMILY LIFE AND INDIVIDUAL WELFARE IN POSTWAR EUROPE Britain and Italy Compared Tomila V. Lankina, Anneke Hudalla and Helmut Wollman LOCAL GOVERNANCE IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE Comparing Performance in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Russia Cathy Gormley-Heenan POLITICAL LEADERSHIP AND THE NORTHERN IRELAND PEACE PROCESS Role, Capacity and Effect Lori Plotkin Boghardt KUWAIT AMID WAR, PEACE AND REVOLUTION Paul Chaisty LEGISLATIVE POLITICS AND ECONOMIC POWER IN RUSSIA Valpy FitzGerald, Frances Stewart
  • Coping with Permanent Austerity Welfare State Restructuring in Affluent Democracies Paul Pierson

    Coping with Permanent Austerity Welfare State Restructuring in Affluent Democracies Paul Pierson

    [7] Coping with Permanent Austerity Welfare State Restructuring in Affluent Democracies Paul Pierson THE welfare states of the affluent democracies now stand at the centre of political discussion and social conflict. Analysts frequently portray these conflicts as fundamental struggles between supporters and opponents of the basic principles of the post-war social contract. They often emphasize that the politics of social policy are played out against the backdrop of a transformed global economy that has undercut the social and economic foundations of the welfare state. While containing elements of truth, such portrayals distort crucial characteristics of the contemporary politics of the welfare state. Changes in the global economy are important, but it is primarily social and economic transformations occurring within affluent democracies that produce pressures on mature welfare states. At the same time, support for the welfare state remains widespread almost everywhere. In most countries, there is little sign that the basic commitments to a mixed economy of welfare face a fundamental political challenge. Nor is there much evidence of convergence towards some neoliberal orthodoxy. Yet the chapters in this volume have also stressed that welfare states are undergoing quite significant changes. In this conclusion, I argue that the contemporary politics of the welfare state take shape against a backdrop of both intense pressures for austerity and enduring popularity. In this con- text, even strong supporters of the welfare state may come to acknowledge the need for adjustment, and even severe critics may need to accept the political realities of continuing popular enthusiasm for social provision. Thus, in most of the affluent democracies, the politics of social policy centre on the renegotiation, restructuring, and modernization of the terms of the post- war social contract rather than its dismantling.
  • Historical Institutionalism and the Welfare State

    Historical Institutionalism and the Welfare State

    Historical Institutionalism and the Welfare State Oxford Handbooks Online Historical Institutionalism and the Welfare State Julia Lynch and Martin Rhodes The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism Edited by Orfeo Fioretos, Tulia G. Falleti, and Adam Sheingate Print Publication Date: Mar 2016 Subject: Political Science, Comparative Politics, Political Institutions Online Publication Date: May 2016 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199662814.013.25 Abstract and Keywords This chapter examines how historical institutionalism has influenced the analysis of welfare state and labor market policies in the rich industrial democracies. Using Lakatos’s concept of the “scientific research program” as a heuristic, the authors explore the development and expansion of historical institutionalism as a predominant approach in welfare state research. Focusing on this tradition’s strong core of actors (academic path- and boundary-setters), rules (methodology and methods), and norms (ontological and epistemological assumptions), they strive to demarcate the terrain of HI within studies of the welfare state, and to reveal the capacity of HI in this field to underpin a robust but flexible and enduring scholarly research program. Keywords: welfare state, Lakatos, research program, historical institutionalism, ideational approaches HISTORICAL institutionalism and the analysis of welfare states (including the ancillary policy domain of the labor market) overlap significantly. More than elsewhere in Political Science and public policy, much single-country, program, and comparative analysis of the welfare state since the 1980s has taken an historical approach (Amenta 2003). Relatedly, some of the major welfare state scholars have also been major historical institutionalism theorists and proponents—most prominently, but not only, Theda Skocpol, Paul Pierson, and Kathleen Thelen.
  • Essays on the Politics of Solidarity in Multiracial America by Jae Yeon

    Essays on the Politics of Solidarity in Multiracial America by Jae Yeon

    Essays on the Politics of Solidarity in Multiracial America by Jae Yeon Kim A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Paul Pierson, Co-chair Professor Taeku Lee, Co-chair Professor Eric Schickler Professor Irene Bloemraad Spring 2021 Essays on the Politics of Solidarity in Multiracial America Copyright 2021 by Jae Yeon Kim 1 Abstract Essays on the Politics of Solidarity in Multiracial America by Jae Yeon Kim Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Berkeley Professor Paul Pierson, Co-chair Professor Taeku Lee, Co-chair This dissertation investigates how government policies influenced U.S. minority coalition for- mation in the 1960s and 1970s. I argue that the key to explaining this puzzle lies in ethnic elites’ strategic calculations, as influenced by historical legacies, policy changes, and variations. Chapter 2 examines why American minority mobilization emphasized race so much in the 1960s and 1970s. In leveraging the Chinese immigrant communities along the U.S.–Canadian border on the West Coast, I found that what makes the U.S. unique is its immigration and segregation policies. Chapter 3 investigates why Asian and Latin American national origin groups joined forces as Asian Americans and Latinos in the 1960s and 1970s. I explain the welfare state as an underappreciated mechanism that mobilized these intra-racial coalitions. Chapter 4 examines why inter-racial coalitions were rare or short-lived in the 1960s and 1970s. I found that although racial minority groups are often described collectively as people of color, their issues varied because they faced different policy challenges.
  • The Rhetoric of Political Time: Tracing the Neoliberal Regime’S

    The Rhetoric of Political Time: Tracing the Neoliberal Regime’S

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Texas A&M Repository THE RHETORIC OF POLITICAL TIME: TRACING THE NEOLIBERAL REGIME’S ASCENT A Dissertation by ANDREA JUNE TERRY Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Chair of Committee, Jennifer R. Mercieca Committee Members, Kristan Poirot Jennifer Jones Barbour Robert Mackin Head of Department, J. Kevin Barge May 2017 Major Subject: Communication Copyright 2017 Andrea June Terry ABSTRACT In this dissertation, I argue that Stephen Skowronek’s theory of political time can be used as analytic to better understand the rhetorical opportunities and constraints for presidents and presidential candidates. In particular, I look to Ronald Reagan as a case study: as a president who came on the heels of the end of FDR’s liberal era, Reagan set the tone for a new presidential regime, consisting of particular rhetorical and policy commitments that were all shaped through his neoliberal economic policy. After identifying the rhetorical hallmarks of the neoliberal era as constructed by Reagan, I analyze the rhetorical efforts of his successor, regime articulation president George H.W. Bush, to negotiate the changing domestic and international atmosphere within the rhetorical and policy constraints of Reagan’s neoliberalism. Finally, I identify and analyze the preemptive efforts of Bill Clinton and Ross Perot during the 1992 election as they attempted to renegotiate key aspects of Reagan’s rhetorical and policy commitments to win the presidency.
  • Cornell Law School (607) 255-5423 Ar643@Cornell.Edu December 2015

    Cornell Law School (607) 255-5423 [email protected] December 2015

    AZIZ RANA Cornell Law School (607) 255-5423 [email protected] December 2015 EMPLOYMENT CORNELL LAW SCHOOL, Ithaca, New York Professor of Law, 2015-present (Assistant and Associate Professor, 2010-2015) Faculty Member, Graduate Fields of Government, History, and Peace Studies Teaching lecture courses in constitutional law and national security law as well as a seminar on citizenship in American constitutional thought. Taught directed readings on Comparative Constitution Making and on Executive Power. Also co-ran a speaker series in fall 2011 with Chantal Thomas on “Law, Reform, and Revolution in the Arab World” and a colloquium in the spring of 2015 with Sidney Tarrow on “Law and Social Movements.” HARVARD LAW SCHOOL, Cambridge, MA, Spring 2016 Visiting Professor of Law Teaching lecture course in constitutional law as well as leading reading group on citizenship in American constitutional thought. YALE LAW SCHOOL, New Haven, CT, 2007-2009 Oscar M. Ruebhausen Fellow in Law and Coordinator of the Middle East Legal Forum Two-year research and writing fellowship. For academic year 2008-2009 also responsible for designing the syllabus and coordinating a reading group and lecture series in comparative legal systems of the Middle East. HARVARD COLLEGE, Cambridge, MA, 2006-2007 Senior Thesis Advisor, 2006-2007, Committee on Degrees in Social Studies Tutorial Leader, 2004-2005, Committee on Degrees in Social Studies Teaching Fellow, Spring 2002, Continental Political Thought Research Assistant, 1997-2001, Profs. Richard Tuck, Devesh Kapur, Peter Berkowitz, Paul Pierson HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST, New York, NY, Summer 2004 Intern, U.S. Law and Security Program Researched various topics related to U.S.
  • Dismantling the Welfare State? After Twenty-Five Years: What Have We

    Dismantling the Welfare State? After Twenty-Five Years: What Have We

    ESP0010.1177/0958928719877363Journal of European Social PolicyJensen et al. 877363research-article2019 Journal Of European Forum Social Policy Journal of European Social Policy 2019, Vol. 29(5) 681 –691 Dismantling the Welfare State? © The Author(s) 2019 Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions after Twenty-five years: What DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928719877363 10.1177/0958928719877363 have we learned and what journals.sagepub.com/home/esp should we learn? Carsten Jensen Aarhus University, Denmark Georg Wenzelburger TU Kaiserslautern, Germany Reimut Zohlnhöfer Heidelberg University, Germany Abstract Dismantling the Welfare State? is a modern classic in the welfare state literature. Yet although the book is widely known, the ‘Piersonian argument’ as it is typically referred to today bears limited resemblance to the book’s highly nuanced and thought-provoking ideas. This review revisits the book and explores some of the lessons it still holds for the research community. Keywords Paul Pierson, the new politics of the welfare state, Dismantling the welfare state? Paul Pierson’s Dismantling the Welfare State? (here- Given that virtually all welfare state scholars after DWS) is undoubtedly one of the best-known probably know DWS (or shame on them!), it is strik- books in the study of the welfare state. When it was ing how little of the rich theoretical apparatus has published back in 1994, it ignited a new strand of actually been consistently adopted, let alone empiri- research on ‘the new politics of the welfare state’, cally tested. This may seem to be a weird claim one of the most fruitful and lively debates in the field in the past few decades.
  • View / Open Jeung Oregon 0171A 12691.Pdf

    View / Open Jeung Oregon 0171A 12691.Pdf

    LABOR MARKET POLICY AMERICAN STYLE: STATE CAPACITY AND POLICY INNOVATION, 1959-1968 by YONGWOO JEUNG A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Political Science and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy March 2020 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Yongwoo Jeung Title: Labor Market Policy American Style: State Capacity and Policy Innovation, 1959- 1968 This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the Department of Political Science by: Gerald Berk Chairperson Craig Parsons Core Member Joseph Lowndes Core Member Daniel Pope Institutional Representative and Kate Mondloch Interim Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded March 2020. ii © 2020 Yongwoo Jeung This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (United States) License. iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Yongwoo Jeung Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science March 2020 Title: Labor Market Policy American Style: State Capacity and Policy Innovation, 1959- 1968 This dissertation delves into the American state’s capabilities by examining its experiments with corporatism and labor training during the 1960s. The dissertation relies on the frameworks of layering, patchwork, intercurrence, and entrepreneurship from various disciplines including comparative historical analysis, historical institutionalism, American Political Development, and the school of political creativity. The dissertation first challenges the mainstream view that regards as impossible any tripartite bargaining among U.S. labor, management, and the state. The United States experimented with the unique tripartite committee—the President’s Committee on Labor- Management Policy—in the early 1960s to address emerging problems such as automation and intractable industrial conflicts.