DOCSLIB.ORG

JACOB S. HACKER Director, Institution for Social and Policy Studies Stanley B

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
JACOB S. HACKER Director, Institution for Social and Policy Studies Stanley B JACOB S. HACKER Director, Institution for Social and Policy Studies Stanley B. Resor Professor of Political Science, Yale University 77 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT 06511 (203) 432-5554 • fax: (203) 432-3296 • [email protected] EXPERIENCE Yale University, Institution for Social and Policy Studies Director, 2011- Residential Fellow, 2004 Nonresidential Fellow, 2002 - 2004 Yale University, Department of Political Science Stanley B. Resor Professor, 2009- Professor, 2006-2008 Peter Strauss Family Associate Professor, 2005-2006 Peter Strauss Family Assistant Professor, 2002-2005 Junior Faculty Fellowship, 2004-2005 (eight recipients in the social sciences) Moore Memorial Fund and ITS Innovation Fund Instructional Awards, 2003 University of California, Berkeley Professor of Political Science, 2008-2009 Yale University, MacMillan Center Senior Research Fellow, International and Area Studies, 2002- EDUCATION Yale University Ph.D. in Political Science, with Distinction, 2000 Dissertation “Boundary Wars: The Political Struggle over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States.” Graded distinguished by each of three readers, Nov. 2000 Prizes Harold D. Lasswell Award, American Political Science Association, for the best dissertation relating to policy studies completed in 1999 or 2000. Association of Public Policy Analysis and Management Dissertation Award, for the best dissertation on public policy completed in the academic years 1999-2001. John Heinz Dissertation Award, National Academy of Social Insurance, for the best dissertation related to the arena of social insurance awarded during 2000-2001. Harvard University Exchange Scholar in Government, 1995-1996. 4.0 GPA Harvard College B.A. in Social Studies, summa cum laude, 1994 PUBLICATIONS Books American Amnesia: How the War on Government Led Us To Forget What Made America Prosper. Co-authored with Paul Pierson. Simon and Schuster, March 2016. Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer—And Turned Its Back on the Middle Class. Co-authored with Paul Pierson. Simon and Schuster, September 2010 (paperback, March 2011). Shared Responsibility, Shared Risk: Government, Markets, and Social Policy in the Twenty-First Century, an edited volume with Ann O’Leary. Oxford University Press, January 2011. The Great Risk Shift: The New Economic Insecurity and the Decline of the American Dream. Oxford University Press, October 2006, paperback 2008. Health At Risk, an edited volume in The Privatization of Risk series (with the Social Science Research Council). Columbia University Press, September 2008. Remaking America: Democracy and Public Policy in an Age of Inequality, an edited volume with Joe Soss and Suzanne Mettler. Russell Sage Foundation, November 2007. Off Center: The Republican Revolution and the Erosion of American Democracy. Yale University Press, 2005 (with Paul Pierson). Paperback edition with a new afterword, September 2006. The Divided Welfare State: The Battle over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States. Cambridge University Press, 2002. The Road to Nowhere: The Genesis of President Clinton’s Plan for Health Security. Princeton University Press, 1997. Recipient of the Brownlow Book Award. Articles in Social Science Journals “Out of Balance: Medicare, Interest Groups, and American Politics,” Generations: Journal of the American Society of Aging, forthcoming. “After the ‘Master Theory’: Downs, Schattschneider, and the Rebirth of Policy- Focused Analysis,” (with P. Pierson) Perspectives on Politics 12 (3) (Nov. 2014): 642-662. “Detaining Democracy? Criminal Justice and American Civic Life,” (with V. Weaver and C. Wildeman). American Academy of Political and Social Science 651, no. 1(Jan. 2014): 6-21. “The Economic Security Index: A New Measure for Research and Policy Analysis,” (with G. Huber, A. Nichols, P. Rehm, M. Schlesinger, R. Valletta, S. Craig). Review of Income and Wealth 4 Jul 2013 doi: 10.1111/roiw.12053. “The Insecure American: Economic Experiences, Financial Worries, and Policy Attitudes,” (with P. Rehm, M. Schlesinger). Perspectives on Politics 11, no. 1 (2013): 23-49. “Insecure Alliances: Risk, Inequality, and Support for the Welfare State,” (with P. Rehm and M. Schlesinger). American Political Science Review 106, no. 2 (2012): 386-406. “Presidents and the Political Economy: The Coalitional Foundations of Presidential Power” (with Paul Pierson), Presidential Studies Quarterly 42, no.1 (2012):101- 131. “The Road to Somewhere: Why Health Care Reform Happened, or Why Political Scientists Who Study Public Policy Shouldn’t Assume They Know How to Shape It,” Perspectives on Politics 8, no. 3 (2010): 861-876. “Winner-Take-All Politics: Inequality, Political Organization and the Rise of Top Incomes in the United States” (with P. Pierson). Politics & Society 38, no.2 (2010): 152-204. “Winner-Take-All Politics and Political Science: A Response,” (with P. Pierson). Politics & Society, 2010. “Healing the Rift between Political Science and Practical Politics,” The Forum 8, no. 3 (2010). “Yes We Can? The New Push for American Health Security,” Politics & Society 37 (2009): 3. “The Policy Scientist of Democracy: The Discipline of Harold D. Lasswell,” American Political Science Review, (with J. Farr and N. Kazee), Special Centennial Volume (November 2006). “Abandoning the Middle: The Revealing Case of the Bush Tax Cuts,” Perspectives on Politics 3 (March 2005): 33-53 (with P. Pierson). “Bringing the Welfare State Back In: The Promise (and Perils) of the New Social Welfare History,” Journal of Policy History 17 (2005): 125-154. “Varieties of Capitalist Interest and Capitalist Power: A Response to Swenson,” Studies in American Political Development 18 (2004): 186-195 (with P. Pierson). “American Democracy in an Age of Rising Inequality: Report of the American Political Science Association Task Force on Inequality and American Democracy,” (with the Task Force members) Perspectives on Politics 2, no.4 (2004): 651-66. “Dismantling the Health Care State? Political Institutions, Public Policies, and the Comparative Politics of Health Reform,” British Journal of Political Science 34 (October 2004): 693-724. “Privatizing Risk without Privatizing the Welfare State: The Hidden Politics of Social Policy Retrenchment in the United States,” American Political Science Review 98, no. 2 (2004): 243-60. “Ideas, Private Institutions, and American Welfare State ‘Exceptionalism,’” International Journal of Social Welfare 13, no.1 (2004): 42-54 (with D. Beland). “Business Power and Social Policy: Employers and the Formation of the American Welfare State,” Politics & Society 30, no. 2 (2002): 277-325 (with Paul Pierson). “Learning From Defeat? Political Analysis and the Failure of Health Care Reform in the United States,” British Journal of Political Science 31, no. 1 (2001):61-94. “The Historical Logic of National Health Insurance: Structure and Sequence in the Development of British, Canadian, and U.S. Medical Policy,” Studies in American Political Development 12, no.1 (1998): 57-130. “The New Politics of U.S. Health Policy,” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 22, no.2 (1997): 315-38 (with T. Skocpol). “National Health Care Reform: An Idea Whose Time Came and Went,” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2, no.4 (1996): 47-96. Other Scholarly Articles (Short Pieces and/or Policy, Medical, or Law Journals) “Restoring Retirement Security: The Market Crisis, the ‘Great Risk Shift,’ and the Challenge for Our Nation,” Elder Law Journal 19, no. 1 (Spring 2011). “Economic Insecurity: The Downward Spiral of the Middle Class,” Community & Banking (Fall 2011): 25-28. “Why Reform Happened,” Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law 36, no.3 (2011): 429-435. “You Might Be a Public Intellectual If….” PS: Political Science & Politics 43, no. 4 (2010): 657-659. “Poor Substitutes—Why Cooperatives and Triggers Can’t Achieve the Goals of a Public Option,” New England Journal of Medicine (Oct. 22, 2009): 361:1617. “Healthy Competition – The Why and How of Public-Plan Choice,” New England Journal of Medicine 360 (May 28, 2009): 2269-2271. “Measuring the Quality of Life in the U.S.: Political Reflections,” Perspectives on Politics 7, no. 4 (2009): 911-912. “Health Perspectives: “Dr. President: the Need For—and Perils of—Health Policy Expertise in the White House,” New England Journal of Medicine (Sept. 11, 2008). “Perspective: Putting Politics First,” Health Affairs 27 (2008): 718-723. “Healing Our Sicko Health Care System,” New England Journal of Medicine (August 23, 2007) 357:733. “Medicare Reform and Social Insurance,” Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics, (with T. Marmor). “How Not to Think About Managed Care,” University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 32, no. 4 (1999): 661-82 (with T. Marmor). “The Misleading Language of Managed Care,” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 24, no. 5 (1999): 1033-43 (with T. Marmor). Chapters/Reports “From Servant to Master? Medicare, Cost Control, and the Future of American Health Care,” in Alan Cohen et al., eds., Medicare and Medicaid at 50: America’s Entitlement Programs in the Age of Affordable Care (New York: Oxford 2015). “Drift and Coversion: Hidden Faces of Institutional Change,” in K. Thelen and J. Mahoney, eds., Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences (New York: Cambridge Press, 2015). “Insecurity, Austerity, and the American Social Contract,” in David Woolner, ed., Progressivism in America: Past, Present, Future (New York: Oxford, 2015) “Confronting Assymetric Polarization,”
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CHECKS, BALANCES,AND NUCLEAR WASTE Bruce R. Huber*
    CHECKS, BALANCES, AND NUCLEAR WASTE Bruce R. Huber ABSTRACT Systems of political checks and balances, so prominently featured in the U.S. Constitution, are also commonly installed in statutory and regulatory regimes. Although such systems diffuse political authority and may facilitate participation and accountability, they come with a price. If exercised, political checks—even those that appear trivial—can obstruct statutory processes and saddle a policy system with an unintended default policy outcome. Policies that are neither debated nor chosen, but that emerge as unbidden defaults, exhibit the very democratic deficits that checks and balances are intended to remedy. This is precisely the situation of nuclear waste policy in the United States. The Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 established a process for siting and constructing repositories for nuclear waste. When Nevada’s Yucca Mountain emerged as a likely repository site, that state’s officials and allies exercised the numerous political and legal checks afforded by the Act and appear, at least for the time being, to have defeated the selection. But Nevada’s victory may well be the nation’s loss. In the absence of a national waste repository, nuclear power plant operators have no choice but to store spent nuclear fuel on site, where it presents a number of risks not contemplated by the 1982 legislation. This outcome was not chosen or anticipated by legislators, plant operators, state and local siting authorities, or host communities. This Article argues that lawmakers must take more realistic stock of their own institutional behaviors. Although certain corrosive incentives are intractably embedded in our constitutional system, lawmakers can and should write statutes with full awareness of the risks of relying on statutory checks and balances.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief for Respondents
    No. 10-1293 In the Morris Tyler Moot Court of Appeals at Yale FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. FOX TELEVISION STATIONS, INC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PETITIONERS v. ABC, INC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT BRIEF FOR THE RESPONDENTS LEWIS BOLLARD JONATHAN SIEGEL Counsel for Respondents The Yale Law School 127 Wall Street New Haven, CT 06511 (203) 432–4992 QUESTIONS PRESENTED The FCC forbids the broadcasting of indecent speech, defined “as material that, in context, depicts or describes sexual or excretory activities or organs in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards for the broadcast medium.” J.A. 49. The questions presented are: 1. Whether the FCC’s definition of indecency violates the Fifth Amendment because it is impermissibly vague. 2. Whether the FCC’s ban on indecency violates the First Amendment because it is not narrowly tailored and because it does not require scienter for liability. i PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDINGS Petitioners are the Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America. Respondents who were petitioners in the court of appeals in Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. FCC are: Fox Television Stations, Inc., CBS Broadcasting Inc., WLS Television, Inc., KTRK Television, Inc., KMBC Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc., and ABC Inc. Respondents who were intervenors in the court of appeals in Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. FCC are: NBC Universal, Inc., NBC Telemundo License Co., NBC Television Affiliates, FBC Television Affiliates Association, CBS Television Network Affiliates, Center for the Creative Community, Inc., doing business as Center for Creative Voices in Media, Inc., and ABC Television Affiliates Association.
    [Show full text]
  • Bringing the Welfare State Back In: the Promise (And Perils) of the New Social Welfare History
    JACOB S. HACKER Bringing the Welfare State Back In: The Promise (and Perils) of the New Social Welfare History The welfare state—the complex of policies that, in one form or another, all rich democracies have adopted to ameliorate destitution and provide valued social goods and services—is an increasingly central subject in the study of American history and politics. The past decade has unleashed a veritable tidal wave of books on the topic, including, from historians, Alice Kessler-Harris’s In Pursuit of Equity and Michael Katz’s The Price of Citi- zenship, and, from political scientists, Robert Lieberman’s Shifting the Color Line and Peter Swenson’s Capitalists Against Markets.1 Journals ranging from the American Historical Review to Political Science Quarterly (and, with less regularity, even the American Political Science Review) now rou- tinely feature analyses of U.S. social policy. And going back just a few years more, the early 1990s saw the publication of several influential works on the subject, notably Paul Pierson’s Dismantling the Welfare State? and Theda Skocpol’s Protecting Soldiers and Mothers, each of which won major book prizes in political science.2 If any moment deserves to be seen as a heady time for writing on the American welfare state, this is it. As natural as this state of affairs has come to be seen, it was not al- ways so. Writing in 1991, the historian Edward Berkowitz lamented that the American welfare state “commands little attention from today’s stu- dents, who view it as a confusing, highly technical, and dry subject that cannot compete with the exploits, often heroic, of the blacks and women who have emerged as major figures in the history classroom over the course of the last twenty years.”3 Although Berkowitz was writing of historians, his complaint applied more broadly.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Media and the 2016 US Presidential Election
    Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Faris, Robert M., Hal Roberts, Bruce Etling, Nikki Bourassa, Ethan Zuckerman, and Yochai Benkler. 2017. Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research Paper. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33759251 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA AUGUST 2017 PARTISANSHIP, Robert Faris Hal Roberts PROPAGANDA, & Bruce Etling Nikki Bourassa DISINFORMATION Ethan Zuckerman Yochai Benkler Online Media & the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This paper is the result of months of effort and has only come to be as a result of the generous input of many people from the Berkman Klein Center and beyond. Jonas Kaiser and Paola Villarreal expanded our thinking around methods and interpretation. Brendan Roach provided excellent research assistance. Rebekah Heacock Jones helped get this research off the ground, and Justin Clark helped bring it home. We are grateful to Gretchen Weber, David Talbot, and Daniel Dennis Jones for their assistance in the production and publication of this study. This paper has also benefited from contributions of many outside the Berkman Klein community. The entire Media Cloud team at the Center for Civic Media at MIT’s Media Lab has been essential to this research.
    [Show full text]
  • American Forces Network Radio Programming Decisions (D-2006-117)
    September 27, 2006 Information Technology Management American Forces Network Radio Programming Decisions (D-2006-117) Department of Defense Office of Inspector General Quality Integrity Accountability Additional Copies To obtain additional copies of this report, visit the Web site of the Department of Defense Inspector General at http://www.dodig.mil/audit/reports or contact the Secondary Reports Distribution Unit at (703) 604-8937 (DSN 664-8937) or fax (703) 604-8932. Suggestions for Future Audits To suggest ideas for or to request future audits, contact the Office of the Deputy Inspector General for Auditing at (703) 604-8940 (DSN 664-8940) or fax (703) 604-8932. Ideas and requests can also be mailed to: ODIG-AUD (ATTN: Audit Suggestions) Department of Defense Inspector General 400 Army Navy Drive (Room 801) Arlington, VA 22202-4704 Acronyms AFIS American Forces Information Service AFN American Forces Network AFRTS American Forces Radio and Television Service AFN-BC American Forces Network - Broadcast Center ASD(PA) Assistant Secretary of Defense (Public Affairs) OIG Office of Inspector General Department of Defense Office of Inspector General Report No. D-2006-117 September 27, 2006 (Project No. D2006-D000FI-0103.000) American Forces Network Radio Programming Decisions Executive Summary Who Should Read This Report and Why? This report will be of interest to DoD personnel responsible for the selection and distribution of talk-radio programming to overseas U.S. Forces and their family members and military personnel serving onboard ships. The report discusses the controls and processes needed for establishing a diverse inventory of talk-radio programming on American Forces Network Radio.
    [Show full text]
  • Prosperity Economics Building an Economy for All
    ProsPerity economics Building an economy for All Jacob S. Hacker and Nate Loewentheil ProsPerity economics Building an economy for All Jacob S. Hacker and Nate Loewentheil Creative Commons (cc) 2012 by Jacob S. Hacker and Nate Loewentheil Notice of rights: This book has been published under a Creative Commons license (Attribution-NonCom- mercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported; to view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-sa/3.0/). This work may be copied, redistributed, or displayed by anyone, provided that proper at- tribution is given. ii / prosperity economics About the authors Jacob S. Hacker, Ph.D., is the Director of the Institution for Social and Policy Studies (ISPS), the Stanley B. Resor Professor of Political Science, and Senior Research Fellow in International and Area Studies at the MacMil- lan Center at Yale University. An expert on the politics of U.S. health and social policy, he is author of Winner-Take-All Politics: How Wash- ington Made the Rich Richer—And Turned Its Back on the Middle Class, with Paul Pierson (September 2010, paperback March 2011); The Great Risk Shift: The New Economic Insecurity and the Decline of the American Dream (2006, paperback 2008); The Divided Welfare State: The Battle Over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States (2002); and The Road to No- where: The Genesis of President Clinton’s Plan for Health Security (1997), co-winner of the Brownlow Book Award of the National Academy of Public Administration. He is also co-author, with Paul Pierson, of Off Center: The Republican Revolution and the Erosion of American Democracy (2005), and has edited volumes, most recently, hared Responsibility, Shared Risk: Government, Markets and Social Policy in the Twenty-First Century, with Ann O'Leary (2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    September 2020 Andrea Louise Campbell Department of Political Science Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139 [email protected] Academic Positions Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Political Science Arthur and Ruth Sloan Professor of Political Science, 2015 – Faculty Affiliate, Center for Constructive Communication, MIT Media Lab, 2020 – Department head, 2015-19 Professor, 2012 - 2015 Associate Professor, 2005-12; tenured 2008 Alfred Henry and Jean Morrison Hayes Career Development Chair, 2006-09 Harvard University, Department of Government Assistant Professor, 2000-05 Lecturer, 1999-2000 Education Ph.D. University of California, Berkeley, Political Science, December 2000 M.A. University of California, Berkeley, Political Science, June 1994 A.B. Harvard University, Social Studies, magna cum laude, June 1988 Books Trapped in America’s Safety Net: One Family’s Struggle. University of Chicago Press, 2014. Featured in: Harvard Magazine; Washington Post Wonkblog; Vox; TIME Magazine; MIT Technology Review; MIT News; New Books in Political Science podcast; Faculti Media The Delegated Welfare State: Medicare, Markets, and the Governance of American Social Policy, with Kimberly J. Morgan. Oxford University Press, 2011. How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Citizen Activism and the American Welfare State. Princeton University Press, 2003. Paperback edition, 2005. Campbell, p. 2 Textbook We the People: An Introduction to American Politics, with Benjamin Ginsberg, Theodore J. Lowi, Caroline J. Tolbert, and Margaret Weir. W.W. Norton, beginning 12th edition, 2019. Articles “The Social, Political, and Economic Effects of the Affordable Care Act: Introduction to the Issue,” with Lara Shore-Sheppard. RSF: Russell Sage Foundation Journal 6; 2 (June 2020): 1- 40. “The Affordable Care Act and Mass Policy Feedbacks.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 45; 4 (August 2020): 567-80.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Science
    A 364547 Political Science: THE STATE OF -THEDISCIPLINE Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner, editors Columbia University W. W. Norton & Company American Political Science Association NEW YORK | LONDON WASHINGTON, D.C. CONTENTS Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner Preface and Acknowledgments xiii Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner American Political Science: The Discipline's State and the State of the Discipline 1 The State in an Era of Globalization Margaret Levi The State of the Study of the State 3 3 Miles Kahler The State of the State in World Politics 56 Atul Kohli State, Society, and Development 84 Jeffry Frieden and Lisa L. Martin International Political Economy: Global and Domestic Interactions 118 I ]ames E. Alt Comparative Political Economy: Credibility, Accountability, and Institutions 147 ]ames D. Morrow International Conflict: Assessing the Democratic Peace and Offense-Defense Theory 172 Stephen M. Walt The Enduring Relevance of the Realist Tradition 197 Democracy, Justice, and Their Institutions Ian Shapiro The State of Democratic Theory 235 vi | CONTENTS Jeremy Waldron Justice 266 Romand Coles Pluralization and Radical Democracy: Recent Developments in Critical Theory and Postmodernism 286 Gerald Gamm and ]ohn Huber Legislatures as Political Institutions: Beyond the Contemporary Congress 313 Barbara Geddes The Great Transformation in the Study of Politics in Developing Countries 342 Kathleen Thelen The Political Economy of Business and Labor in the Developed Democracies 371 Citizenship, Identity, and Political Participation Seyla Benhabib Political Theory and Political Membership in a Changing World 404 Kay Lehman Schlozman Citizen Participation in America: What Do We Know? Why Do We Care? 433 Nancy Burns - Gender: Public Opinion and Political Action 462 Michael C.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: the New Journalist
    Intoduction.qxd 4/23/2007 12:27 PM Page 1 INTRODUCTION: THE NEW JOURNALIST Journalism is changing – and so are journalists. As someone considering enter- ing the trade, or just taking your first steps in it, you are in an enviable posi- tion. Enviable, certainly, to those who have spent some time in the job and are struggling to keep up with the speed at which things are now moving. Enviable because you will take for granted the new realities of journalism. Realities such as that, where once journalists tended to consider themselves as newspaper journalists, or magazine journalists, or broadcasters, the new journalist is likely to work in several media instead of just one. What has brought about this change? In a word, or rather two: the internet. Because of the internet, the way news is obtained is undergoing a transfor- mation which is nothing short of revolutionary. Increasingly, the internet is the news medium of choice for many people – particularly young people. Don’t give up. I didn’t even get an interview at the BBC after university. MARTHA KEARNEY, POLITICAL EDITOR BBC2 NEWSNIGHT AND PRESENTS RADIO 4 WOMAN’S HOUR Almost all publishers of newspapers and magazines, and broadcasters of radio and television programmes, now have a web version of their product. And those websites, increasingly, use elements from all the traditional media in order to tell their stories: text and still pictures from the newspapers and magazines, audio and moving images from broadcasting. So, whereas the old journalist only learned the specific skills required to tell a story in one medium, the new journalist is likely to learn techniques from various media.
    [Show full text]
  • NOMINEES for the 32Nd ANNUAL NEWS & DOCUMENTARY EMMY
    NOMINEES FOR THE 32 nd ANNUAL NEWS & DOCUMENTARY EMMY ® AWARDS ANNOUNCED BY THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF TELEVISION ARTS & SCIENCES Winners to be announced on September 26th at Frederick P. Rose Hall, Home of Jazz at Lincoln Center Larry King to Receive Lifetime Achievement Award New York, N.Y. – July 18, 2011 (revised 8.24.11) – Nominations for the 32nd Annual News and Documentary Emmy ® Awards were announced today by the National Academy of Television Arts & Sciences (NATAS). The News & Documentary Emmy® Awards will be presented on Monday, September 26 at a ceremony at Frederick P. Rose Hall, Home of Jazz at Lincoln Center, located in the Time Warner Center in New York City. The event will be attended by more than 1,000 television and news media industry executives, news and documentary producers and journalists. Emmy ® Awards will be presented in 42 categories, including Breaking News, Investigative Reporting, Outstanding Interview, and Best Documentary, among others. This year’s prestigious Lifetime Achievement Award will be given to broadcasting legend and cable news icon Larry King. “Larry King is one of the most notable figures in the history of cable news, and the National Academy of Television Arts and Sciences is delighted to present him with this year’s lifetime achievement award,” said Malachy Wienges, Chairman, NATAS. “Over the course of his career Larry King has interviewed an enormous number of public figures on a remarkable range of topics. In his 25 years at CNN he helped build an audience for cable news and hosted more than a few history making broadcasts.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2005 ACLU News
    AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NORTHERN CAL I FORNIA 2 0 0 5 BECAUSE FREEDOM CAN’T PROTECT ITSELF SUMMER VOLUME LXIX ISSUE 3 WHAT’SAC INSIDE LUnews PAGE 3 PAGE 4 PAGE 5 PAGE 6-7 PAGE 9 ACLU Wins in Union City: Powerful Youth: Compassionate Choices: KEEPING AMERICA Victory in Deer Valley: No More Student Round-Ups Th e Summit Th at Inspired Dying On One’s Own Terms SAFE & FREE Students Win Right to Rally ACLU PRESSES FOR PATRIOT ACT REFORM: CONCERN GROWS AS HOUSE RENEWS ANTITERRORISM LAW By Kristen Jones and Julia Daniels he ACLU of Northern California (ACLU-NC) campaigned hard this summer to keep Congress from making permanent the most Tintrusive provisions of the USA PATRIOT antiterrorism law. At press time, the PATRIOT Act appeared headed for re- Francisco and San Jose, attended by hundreds of activists. authorization, with the House voting to extend indefi nitely all Just days later, ACLU National Executive Director Anthony but two of the act’s 16 sunset provisions, proposing 10-year D. Romero spoke at a San Francisco press conference. He extensions on roving wiretaps and searches of library, medical, listed the sinister consequences of the government’s expanded and other personal records. counterterrorism powers, from the FBI’s ability to snoop into Meanwhile, the Senate unanimously passed a bill that CONTINUED ON PAGE 7 GIGI PANDIAN would extend to four years, instead of 10 years, the pro- visions for roving wiretap and records searches. Although the bill falls far short of the key reforms needed to protect civil liberties, the ACLU commends the Senate for taking a bipartisan approach to moderating some of the PATRIOT NOVEMBER BALLOT INITIATIVE Act’s most intrusive stipulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Coping with Permanent Austerity Welfare State Restructuring in Affluent Democracies Paul Pierson
    [7] Coping with Permanent Austerity Welfare State Restructuring in Affluent Democracies Paul Pierson THE welfare states of the affluent democracies now stand at the centre of political discussion and social conflict. Analysts frequently portray these conflicts as fundamental struggles between supporters and opponents of the basic principles of the post-war social contract. They often emphasize that the politics of social policy are played out against the backdrop of a transformed global economy that has undercut the social and economic foundations of the welfare state. While containing elements of truth, such portrayals distort crucial characteristics of the contemporary politics of the welfare state. Changes in the global economy are important, but it is primarily social and economic transformations occurring within affluent democracies that produce pressures on mature welfare states. At the same time, support for the welfare state remains widespread almost everywhere. In most countries, there is little sign that the basic commitments to a mixed economy of welfare face a fundamental political challenge. Nor is there much evidence of convergence towards some neoliberal orthodoxy. Yet the chapters in this volume have also stressed that welfare states are undergoing quite significant changes. In this conclusion, I argue that the contemporary politics of the welfare state take shape against a backdrop of both intense pressures for austerity and enduring popularity. In this con- text, even strong supporters of the welfare state may come to acknowledge the need for adjustment, and even severe critics may need to accept the political realities of continuing popular enthusiasm for social provision. Thus, in most of the affluent democracies, the politics of social policy centre on the renegotiation, restructuring, and modernization of the terms of the post- war social contract rather than its dismantling.
    [Show full text]