DOCSLIB.ORG

Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for the Period 2013–2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for the Period 2013–2018 Reporting under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for the period 2013–2018 Final version – May 2017 Final version May 2017 These guidelines have been compiled by the European Environment Agency (EEA) and its European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity (ETC/BD). They have been developed through a collaborative work of the Expert Group on Reporting under the Nature Directives, its ad-hoc groups, and the Expert Group on the Birds and the Habitats Directives (NADEG). DG Environment. 2017. Reporting under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive: Explanatory notes and guidelines for the period 2013-2018. Brussels. Pp 188 Cover photo: Dry heaths, © Frédéric Bioret, European Red List of Habitats / EC Article 17 reporting: Explanatory Notes & Guidelines 2 Final version May 2017 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................6 PART 1. THE REPORT FORMAT FIELD-BY-FIELD GUIDANCE ...................................................... 10 GENERAL INTRODUCTION AND STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT FORMAT........................................................... 10 ANNEX A - GENERAL REPORT FORMAT ........................................................................................................... 11 Field-by-field guidance ................................................................................................................................ 11 0 Member State .................................................................................................................................... 11 1 Main achievements under the Habitats Directive ................................................................................ 11 2 General information sources on the implementation of the Habitats Directive – links to information sources of the Member State ...................................................................................................................... 12 3 Natura 2000 (pSCIs, SCIs & SACs) – site designation (Article 4) ............................................................ 13 4 Set of conservation measures and management plans for Natura 2000 sites (SACs) (Article 6(1)) ........ 14 5 Measures taken in relation to approval of plans & projects (Article 6.4) .............................................. 15 6 Measures taken to ensure coherence of the Natura 2000 Network (Article 10) ................................... 16 7 Reintroduction of Annex IV species (Article 22(a))............................................................................... 16 ANNEX B - REPORT FORMAT ON THE ‘MAIN RESULTS OF THE SURVEILLANCE UNDER ARTICLE 11’ FOR ANNEX II, IV AND V SPECIES ....................................................................................................................................... 18 Species to be reported ................................................................................................................................ 18 Field-by-field guidance for completing ‘Annex B’ species reports ................................................................. 23 NATIONAL LEVEL ............................................................................................................................................ 23 1 General information ........................................................................................................................... 23 2 Maps .................................................................................................................................................. 24 3 Information related to Annex V species (Article 14) ............................................................................ 27 BIOGEOGRAPHICAL LEVEL .............................................................................................................................. 28 4 Biogeographical and marine regions ................................................................................................... 29 5 Range ................................................................................................................................................. 29 6 Population ......................................................................................................................................... 33 7 Habitat for the species ....................................................................................................................... 39 8 Main pressures and threats ................................................................................................................ 42 9 Conservation measures ...................................................................................................................... 45 10 Future prospects ................................................................................................................................ 47 11 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................................ 47 12 NATURA 2000 (pSCIs, SCIs and SACs) coverage for Annex II species ..................................................... 54 13 Complementary information .............................................................................................................. 56 ANNEX C – EVALUATION MATRIX FOR ASSESSING CONSERVATION STATUS OF A SPECIES ............................. 58 ANNEX D – REPORT FORMAT ON THE ‘MAIN RESULTS OF THE SURVEILLANCE UNDER ARTICLE 11’ FOR ANNEX I HABITAT TYPES ............................................................................................................................................. 59 Article 17 reporting: Explanatory Notes & Guidelines 3 Final version May 2017 Habitats to be reported .............................................................................................................................. 59 Field-by-field guidance for completing ‘Annex D’ Habitat reports ................................................................ 60 NATIONAL LEVEL ............................................................................................................................................ 60 1 General information ........................................................................................................................... 60 2 Maps .................................................................................................................................................. 60 BIOGEOGRAPHICAL LEVEL .............................................................................................................................. 62 3 Biogeographical and marine regions ................................................................................................... 62 4 Range ................................................................................................................................................. 63 5 Area covered by habitat ..................................................................................................................... 67 6 Structure and functions ...................................................................................................................... 72 7 Main pressures and threats ................................................................................................................ 74 8 Conservation measures ...................................................................................................................... 77 9 Future Prospects ................................................................................................................................ 78 10 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................................ 79 11 NATURA 2000 (pSCIs, SCIs, SACs) coverage for Annex I habitat types .................................................. 86 12 Complementary information .............................................................................................................. 88 ANNEX E – EVALUATION MATRIX FOR ASSESSING CONSERVATION STATUS OF A HABITAT ........................... 89 PART 2. DEFINITIONS AND METHODS ..................................................................................... 90 DEFINITIONS AND METHODS FOR SPECIES REPORTING .................................................................................. 90 Species to be reported ................................................................................................................................ 90 Marine species ......................................................................................................................................... 103 Transboundary populations ...................................................................................................................... 106 Sources of information for species assessments ........................................................................................ 107 Trends ...................................................................................................................................................... 107 Favourable reference values ..................................................................................................................... 109 2 Maps ...............................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fish Assemblage in the Middle Cours of the Kupa River in the Area of MHE Ilovac
    Fish assemblage in the middle cours of the Kupa river in the area of MHE Ilovac Juraj Petravić1, Matija Kresonja1, Martina Petravić2, Ratko Popović1, Milorad Mrakovčić1 1OIKON Ltd- Institute of Applied Ecology, Trg Senjskih uskoka 1-2, 10020 Zagreb, Croatia 2Ministry of Agriculture, Ulica grada Vukovara 78, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia Introduction Results and Discussion The objectives of this paper are to determine the qualitative A total of 963 individuals were caught of which 19 species from 14 and quantitative composition of the fish community, and genera, from five families Balitoridae, Cobitidae, Cyprinidae, distribution of native and non-native fishes in the area of the of Siluridae, and Centrarchidae were found. The dominant species the mini-hydroelectric power plant Ilovac on the middle cours was Chub Squalius cephalus which takes up 21.8%, followed by of the Kupa river near the dam Zaluka. The ichthyological area Spirlin Alburnoides bipunctatus with 18.4%, the least represented of the river Kupa belongs to the Danube River Basin and to the is Prussian carp Carassius gibelio with 0,2% of total number of fish NATURA 2000 ecological network. caught. During this research, three endemic fish species Danube gudgeon Gobio obtusirostris, Balkan spined loach Cobitis elongata, and Dunabe roach Rutilus virgo was recorded. Endemic species takes up 14,7% of total number of fish caught. As well as two invasive alien species (IAS) Pumpkinseed Lepomis gibbosus and Pseudorasbora Pseudorasbora parva. Non-native species in the area of MHE Ilovac hold a significant share in the fish community with 10,4 % of total number of fish caught.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Genomics of a Plastic Life History Trait: Galaxias Maculatus Amphidromous and Resident Populations
    EVOLUTIONARY GENOMICS OF A PLASTIC LIFE HISTORY TRAIT: GALAXIAS MACULATUS AMPHIDROMOUS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS by María Lisette Delgado Aquije Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia August 2021 Dalhousie University is located in Mi'kma'ki, the ancestral and unceded territory of the Mi'kmaq. We are all Treaty people. © Copyright by María Lisette Delgado Aquije, 2021 I dedicate this work to my parents, María and José, my brothers JR and Eduardo for their unconditional love and support and for always encouraging me to pursue my dreams, and to my grandparents Victoria, Estela, Jesús, and Pepe whose example of perseverance and hard work allowed me to reach this point. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ vii LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................... ix ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................... xii LIST OF ABBREVIATION USED ................................................................................ xiii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................ xv CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 1 1.1 Galaxias maculatus ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptive Phenotypic Diversification Along a Temperature-Depth Gradient Jan Ohlberger Åke Brännström ([email protected]) Ulf Dieckmann ([email protected])
    International Institute for Tel: +43 2236 807 342 Applied Systems Analysis Fax: +43 2236 71313 Schlossplatz 1 E-mail: [email protected] A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria Web: www.iiasa.ac.at Interim Report IR-13-055 Adaptive phenotypic diversification along a temperature-depth gradient Jan Ohlberger Åke Brännström ([email protected]) Ulf Dieckmann ([email protected]) Approved by Pavel Kabat Director General and Chief Executive Officer June 2015 Interim Reports on work of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis receive only limited review. Views or opinions expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of the Institute, its National Member Organizations, or other organizations supporting the work. *Manuscript 1 Manuscript type: Article 2 3 Adaptive phenotypic diversification along a temperature-depth gradient 4 Jan Ohlberger1,2,3,*, Åke Brännström3,4,#, Ulf Dieckmann3,+ 5 6 1 Department of Biology and Ecology of Fishes, Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, 7 D-12587 Berlin, Germany 8 2 Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, Department of Biology, University of Oslo, N-0316 Oslo, 9 Norway 10 3 Evolution and Ecology Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, A-2361 Laxenburg, 11 Austria 12 4 Department of Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics, Umeå University, SE-90187 Umeå, Sweden 13 * [email protected] (corresponding author) 14 # [email protected] 15 + [email protected] 16 17 Keywords: adaptive dynamics, ecological gradient, evolutionary diversification, sympatric 18 speciation, temperature adaptation 19 Online appendix A: Model variables, functions, and parameters 20 Online appendix B: Model functions and their estimation from empirical data 21 Online appendix C: Sensitivity analysis 22 ABSTRACT 23 Theoretical models suggest that sympatric speciation along environmental gradients might be 24 common in nature.
    [Show full text]
  • NEW DISTRIBUTION DATA for Alburnus Sava %RJXWVND\D =Xsdqňlň -Holî 'LULSDVNR 1DVHND $1' 7HOHVWHV VRXI°D 5LVVR
    Croatian Journal of Fisheries, 2017, 75, 137-142 M. Vucić et al.: New distribution of Alburnus sava and Telestres souffia DOI: 10.1515/cjf-2017-0017 CODEN RIBAEG ISSN 1330-061X (print), 1848-0586 (online) NEW DISTRIBUTION DATA FOR Alburnus sava %RJXWVND\D =XSDQòLò -HOLî 'LULSDVNR 1DVHND$1'7HOHVWHVVRXI°D 5LVVR ,17+(:(67(51 BALKANS Matej Vucić, Ivana Sučić, Dušan Jelić* Croatian Institute for Biodiversity, Croatian Biological Research Society, Lipovac I. 7, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia *Corresponding Author, Email: [email protected] ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Received: 15 November 2016 The distribution data of Alburnus sava and Telestes souffia has been updated Received in revised form: 1 October 2017 in Croatia in comparison to the previously known data. Alburnus sava is Accepted: 10 October 2017 much more widespread in the Sava drainage and also occurs in the River Available online: 30 October 2017 Sava near the town of Županja, rivers Drina and Bosna. Telestes souffia has a much more restricted range in Croatia than previously believed and is Keywords: only known from the Bregana, small, right tributary of the River Sava on the Alburnus sava Croatian-Slovenian border. Both species are poorly known and threatened. Telestes souffia Distribution data Balkan shemaya Western vairone Riffle dace How to Cite Vucić M., Sučić I., Jelić D. (2017): New distribution data for Alburnus sava Bogutskaya, Zupančič, Jelić, Diripasko & Naseka, 2017 and Telestes souffia (Risso, 1827) in the Western Balkans. Croatian Journal of Fisheries, 75, 137-142. DOI: 10.1515/cjf-2017-0017 INTRODUCTION depths. This behaviour makes it almost impossible to catch during classical electrofishing.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Priority Areas for the Conservation of Stream Fish Assemblages: Implications for River Management in France A
    Identification of Priority Areas for the Conservation of Stream Fish Assemblages: Implications for River Management in France A. Maire, P. Laffaille, J.F. Maire, L. Buisson To cite this version: A. Maire, P. Laffaille, J.F. Maire, L. Buisson. Identification of Priority Areas for the Conservation of Stream Fish Assemblages: Implications for River Management in France. River Research and Applications, Wiley, 2016, 33 (4), pp.524-537. 10.1002/rra.3107. hal-01426354 HAL Id: hal-01426354 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01426354 Submitted on 2 Jul 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License IDENTIFICATION OF PRIORITY AREAS FOR THE CONSERVATION OF STREAM FISH ASSEMBLAGES: IMPLICATIONS FOR RIVER MANAGEMENT IN FRANCE A. MAIREa*,†, P. LAFFAILLEb,c, J.-F. MAIREd AND L. BUISSONb,e a Irstea; UR HYAX, Pôle Onema-Irstea Hydroécologie des plans d’eau; Centre d’Aix-en-Provence, Aix-en-Provence, France b CNRS; UMR 5245 EcoLab, (Laboratoire Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Environnement), Toulouse, France c Université de Toulouse, INP, UPS; EcoLab; ENSAT, Castanet Tolosan, France d ONERA, The French Aerospace Lab Composites Department, Châtillon, France e Université de Toulouse, INP, UPS; EcoLab, Toulouse, France ABSTRACT Financial and human resources allocated to biodiversity conservation are often limited, making it impossible to protect all natural places, and priority areas for protection must be identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Modelling of a Representative Vulnerable Fish Species for Pesticide Risk Assessment in Europe
    Identification and Modelling of a Representative Vulnerable Fish Species for Pesticide Risk Assessment in Europe Von der Fakultät für Mathematik, Informatik und Naturwissenschaften der RWTH Aachen University zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften genehmigte Dissertation vorgelegt von Lara Ibrahim, M.Sc. aus Mazeraat Assaf, Libanon Berichter: Universitätsprofessor Dr. Andreas Schäffer Prof. Dr. Christoph Schäfers Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 30. Juli 2015 Diese Dissertation ist auf den Internetseiten der Universitätsbibliothek online verfügbar Erklärung Ich versichere, dass ich diese Doktorarbeit selbständig und nur unter Verwendung der angegebenen Hilfsmittel angefertigt habe. Weiterhin versichere ich, die aus benutzten Quellen wörtlich oder inhaltlich entnommenen Stellen als solche kenntlich gemacht zu haben. Lara Ibrahim Aachen, am 18 März 2015 Zusammenfassung Die Zulassung von Pflanzenschutzmitteln in der Europäischen Gemeinschaft verlangt unter anderem eine Abschätzung des Risikos für Organismen in der Umwelt, die nicht Ziel der Anwendung sind. Unvertretbare Auswirkungen auf den Naturhalt sollen vermieden werden. Die ökologische Risikoanalyse stellt die dafür benötigten Informationen durch eine Abschätzung der Exposition der Organismen und der sich daraus ergebenden Effekte bereit. Die Effektabschätzung beruht dabei hauptsächlich auf standardisierten ökotoxikologischen Tests im Labor mit wenigen, oft nicht einheimischen Stellvertreterarten. In diesen Tests werden z. B. Effekte auf das Überleben, das Wachstum und/oder die Reproduktion von Fischen bei verschiedenen Konzentrationen der Testsubstanz gemessen und Endpunkte wie die LC50 (Lethal Concentrations for 50%) oder eine NOEC (No Observed Effect Concentration, z. B. für Wachstum oder Reproduktionsparameter) abgeleitet. Für Fische und Wirbeltiere im Allgemeinen beziehen sich die spezifischen Schutzziele auf das Überleben von Individuen und die Abundanz und Biomasse von Populationen.
    [Show full text]
  • Actual Problems of Protection and Sustainable Use of the Animal World Diversity
    ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF MOLDOVA DEPARTMENT OF NATURE AND LIFE SCIENCES INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY Actual problems of protection and sustainable use of ThE animal world diversity International Conference of Zoologists dedicated to the 50th anniversary from the foundation of Institute of Zoology of ASM Chisinau – 2011 ACTUAL PRObLEMS OF PROTECTION AND SUSTAINAbLE USE OF ThE ANIMAL wORLD DIVERSITY Content CZU 59/599:502.74 (082) D 53 Dumitru Murariu. READING ABOUT SPECIES CONCEPT IN BIOLOGY.......................................................................10 Dan Munteanu. AChievements Of Romania in ThE field Of nature The materials of International Conference of Zoologists „Actual problems of protection and protection and implementation Of European Union’S rules concerning ThE biodiversity conservation (1990-2010)...............................................................................11 sustainable use of animal world diversity” organized by the Institute of Zoology of the Aca- demy of Sciences of Moldova in celebration of the 50th anniversary of its foundation are a gene- Laszlo Varadi. ThE protection and sustainable use Of Aquatic resources.....................................13 ralization of the latest scientific researches in the country and abroad concerning the diversity of aquatic and terrestrial animal communities, molecular-genetic methods in systematics, phylo- Terrestrial Vertebrates.................................................................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • El Estado De La Biodiversidad De Los Vertebrados Españoles. Causas De La Riqueza De Especies Y Actualización Taxonómica
    El Estado dE la biodivErsidad dE los vErtEbrados EspañolEs 285 El estado de la biodiversidad de los Vertebrados españoles. Causas de la riqueza de especies y actualización taxonómica The state of the biodiversity of Spanish Vertebrates. Causes of the species richness and updated taxonomy Javier Morales Martín y Miguel Lizana Avia Dpto Biología Animal. Universidad de Salamanca. Campus Miguel de Unamuno, 37007. Salamanca. [email protected]; [email protected] Palabras clave: biodiversidad, conservación, vertebrados, biogeografía, taxonomía, España Key words: biodiversity, conservation, vertebrates, biogeography, taxonomy, Spain rEsumEn En la última década se han producido varias evaluaciones del estado de conservación de nuestra fauna vertebrada sobre los datos iniciales disponibles en la década de los 90’s a través de los Atlas y Libros Rojos a escala nacional (2001 a 2007) de las cinco clases de vertebrados terrestres y/o epicontinentales. Por otro lado la aplicación de técnicas genéticas a la taxonomía nomenclatural ha producido numerosos cambios, y otros aún en proceso, sobre las listas asentadas en la literatura científica, ya que muchas de las subespecies descritas inicialmente en sistemas montañosos o islas han sido ahora reconocidas como especies. Los vertebrados más populares socialmente, los grandes mamíferos o las aves, sobre los que más recursos de investigación, en planes de recuperación y de mejora de su hábitat se dedican, sin embargo son los que presentan una condición negativa menos acuciante, salvo excepciones. Dada además su gran movilidad son Clases con un bajo nivel de endemicidad en la península Ibérica. Otros menos populares, como los herpetos, presentan un grado de amenaza más elevado siendo en muchos de los casos especies endémicas del territorio peninsular o insular.
    [Show full text]
  • Ilovac in Croatia
    CASE STUDY | APRIL 2020 Gone with the Flow A case study of biodiversity loss caused by Ilovac Hydropower plant, Croatia CEE Bankwatch Network’s mission is to prevent environmentally and socially harmful impacts of international development finance, and to promote alternative solutions and public participation. Learn more: bankwatch.org CEE Bankwatch Network 2 For more information Contents Pippa Gallop Introduction 2 Southeast Europe Energy Advisor CEE Bankwatch Network Main goal of the study 2 [email protected] The EIB’s environmental and social policies in relation to hydropower 2 Irma Popović Dujmović The EIB’s Transparency Policy 3 Freshwater Project Officer WWF Adria The small hydropower boom in southeast Europe 3 [email protected] The case of Ilovac 3 Context 3 What’s at stake: The river Kupa’s biodiversity 6 Impact 7 What’s known: loss of biodiversity and ecosystems 7 What’s unknown: Wider impact on the Natura 2000 site 8 Why this happened 10 Introduction 10 Policy Commitment 10 No net biodiversity loss 11 Assessment 11 Cumulative Impact Assessment 11 Area of influence 13 Gap analysis 15 Appropriate Assessment 16 Management 19 Fish pass 19 CEE Bankwatch Network’s Monitoring and evaluation 20 mission is to prevent Stakeholder engagement 21 environmentally and socially harmful impacts of international Conclusions & recommendations 22 development finance, and to promote alternative solutions Recommendations for the revision of the EIB’s E&S policies 22 and public participation. Recommendations on the implementation of
    [Show full text]
  • Cottus Schitsuumsh, a New Species of Sculpin (Scorpaeniformes: Cottidae) in the Columbia River Basin, Idaho-Montana, USA
    Zootaxa 3755 (3): 241–258 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3755.3.3 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5147B3DB-9071-408B-A8D1-B3575ED5806E Cottus schitsuumsh, a new species of sculpin (Scorpaeniformes: Cottidae) in the Columbia River basin, Idaho-Montana, USA MICHAEL LEMOINE1,3, MICHAEL K. YOUNG2, KEVIN S. MCKELVEY2, LISA EBY1, KRISTINE L. PILGRIM2 & MICHAEL K. SCHWARTZ2 1 Wildlife Biology Program, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana 59812, USA 2U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula, Montana 59801, USA 3Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Fishes of the genus Cottus have long been taxonomically challenging because of morphological similarities among species and their tendency to hybridize, and a number of undescribed species may remain in this genus. We used a combination of genetic and morphological methods to delineate and describe Cottus schitsuumsh, Cedar Sculpin, a new species, from the upper Columbia River basin, Idaho-Montana, USA. Although historically confused with the Shorthead Sculpin (C. confusus), the genetic distance between C. schitsuumsh and C. confusus (4.84–6.29%) suggests these species are distant relatives. Moreover, the two species can be differentiated on the basis of lateral-line pores on the caudal peduncle, head width, and interpelvic width. Cottus schitsuumsh is also distinct from all other Cottus in this region in having a single small, skin-covered, preopercular spine. Haplotypes of mtDNA cytochrome oxidase c subunit 1 of C. schitsuumsh differed from all other members of the genus at three positions, had interspecific genetic distances typical for congeneric fishes (1.61–2.74% to nearest neighbors), and were monophyletic in maximum-likelihood trees.
    [Show full text]
  • Bering Sea – Western Interior Alaska Resource Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement
    Bibliography: Bering Sea – Western Interior In support of: Bering Sea – Western Interior Alaska Resource Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement Principal Investigator: Juli Braund-Allen Prepared by: Dan Fleming Alaska Resources Library and Information Services 3211 Providence Drive Library, Suite 111 Anchorage, Alaska 99508 Prepared for: Bureau of Land Management Anchorage Field Office 4700 BLM Road Anchorage, AK 99507 September 1, 2008 Bibliography: Bering Sea – Western Interior In Author Format In Support of: Bering Sea – Western Interior Resource Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement Prepared by: Alaska Resources Library and Information Services September 1, 2008 A.W. Murfitt Company, and Bethel (Alaska). 1984. Summary report : Bethel Drainage management plan, Bethel, Alaska, Project No 84-060.02. Anchorage, Alaska: The Company. A.W. Murfitt Company, Bethel (Alaska), Delta Surveying, and Hydrocon Inc. 1984. Final report : Bethel drainage management plan, Bethel, Alaska, Project No. 83-060.01, Bethel drainage management plan. Anchorage, Alaska: The Company. Aamodt, Paul L., Sue Israel Jacobsen, and Dwight E. Hill. 1979. Uranium hydrogeochemical and stream sediment reconnaissance of the McGrath and Talkeetna NTMS quadrangles, Alaska, including concentrations of forty-three additional elements, GJBX 123(79). Los Alamos, N.M.: Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory of the University of California. Abromaitis, Grace Elizabeth. 2000. A retrospective assessment of primary productivity on the Bering and Chukchi Sea shelves using stable isotope ratios in seabirds. Thesis (M.S.), University of Alaska Fairbanks. Ackerman, Robert E. 1979. Southwestern Alaska Archeological survey 1978 : Akhlun - Eek Mountains region. Pullman, Wash.: Arctic Research Section, Laboratory of Anthropology, Washington State University. ———. 1980. Southwestern Alaska archeological survey, Kagati Lake, Kisarilik-Kwethluk Rivers : a final research report to the National Geographic Society.
    [Show full text]
  • En Report (Scie) F&B
    Report Number 554 Survey of vendace in Daer Reservoir and Loch Skene English Nature Research Reports working today for nature tomorrow English Nature Research Reports Number 554 Survey of vendace in Daer Reservoir and Loch Skene Peter S. M aitland1, Alex A. Lyle2 and Ian J. Winfield3 1Fish Conservation Centre, Gladshot, Haddington, East Lothian EH41 4NR 218 John Knox Road, Longniddry, East Lothian EH32 0LP 3CEH Windermere, The Ferry House, Far Sawrey, Ambleside, Cumbria LA22 0LP September 2003 You may reproduce as many additional copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with English Nature, Northminster House, Peterborough PE1 1UA ISSN 0967-876X © Copyright English Nature 2003 ‘The inhabitants of Lochmaben look upon the vendace as a mysterious fish peculiar to their lakes, a fish in which they take a pride, and one concerning which there are many curious traditions.’ Tate Regan (1911) Acknowledgements This study was funded by English Nature. We are grateful to David Fraser (English Nature), Colin Bean (Scottish Natural Heritage) and Cameron Durie (Environment Agency) for their advice and comments. Alexander Hampton (National Trust for Scotland) provided invaluable liaison with anglers and collected catch data from them. Ian Stephenson and his quad bike helped with transport to and from Loch Skene. Scottish Water and the National Trust for Scotland gave permission for this study at Daer Reservoir and Loch Skene respectively. Staff of Scottish Water and members of the Kylbryde Angling Club gave helpful advice at Daer Reservoir. Summary The vendace Coregonus albula (L.) occurred historically at four sites in Great Britain, two in Scotland and two in England.
    [Show full text]