DOCSLIB.ORG

Interpretative Journalism

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Interpretative Journalism This document is downloaded from DR‑NTU (https://dr.ntu.edu.sg) Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Interpretative journalism Masterton, Murray. 1995 Masterton, M. (1995). Interpretative journalism. In Workshop on Editorial Management for Women Journalists: Singapore, May 24‑31, 1995. Singapore: Asian Media Information and Communication Centre. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/92351 Downloaded on 30 Sep 2021 08:33:15 SGT ATTENTION: The Singapore Copyright Act applies to the use of this document. Nanyang Technological University Library Interpretative Journalism By Murray Masterton Paper No. 9 ATTENTION: The Singapore Copyright Act applies to the use of this document. Nanyang Technological University Library 1 Editorial Management for Women Journalists Saturday, May 27, 1400-1530 by Murray Masterton Interpretive Journalism Interpretive journalism is one of the most misinterpreted terms in journalism jargon. The very fact that it is a jargon word means it is one we can wisely avoid. It is also wise for those without a lot of experience to avoid interpretive journalism itself. Interpretive journalism: what is it and what is it supposed to be? Regrettably these are often two different things and the variance between the two differs according to the country, the culture, the type of newspaper and the personality of the journalist. What is it supposed to be? Interpretive journalism is any report or feature which as well as giving the facts of an event or situation offers an interpretation or interpretations which expand on why the event or situation occurred and what will be the result in the immediate and longer-term future. It may also offer excuses, forecasts, explanations, opinions from one or more informed and relevant sources. In this it is a useful and valuable aspect of news journalism. What it is, all too often, is a report or feature which does not have all the facts, and sometimes not even the essential onesjjut tells readers at length the reporter's views on what has happened, why, and what will happen next. Such interpretation is often uninformed and unreliable, and such journalism worthless and misleading. It should never be written in the first place, and when it is it should not get past the sub-editors because it risks both a law suit and damage to the paper's credibility. Interpretive reporting flourishes in India's ultra-free press, where journalists are encouraged by a traditional discursive style to express their own opinions freely. This is acceptable as long as the facts of the story are accurate and complete, so there is an opportunity for the reader to form his or her own opinion, and where the reporter's opinion is clearly labelled. Too often neither qualification is there. India's best newspapers are now curbing what they consider excessively personal journalism. They recognise that interpretation is essential in today's complex journalism world, so there is plenty of interpretation printed, but how it is done is an example to journalists elsewhere. Before examining how it is, or should be, done, first ask why interpretive journalism exists at all. Is it just another newspaper reaction to the intrusion of television into the news arena? This may be so where television audiences are growing and newspaper circulations are not, but this is not the case in Asia, or not yet. Editors can be excused for thinking that their staff can do just as well as the expressions of personal opinion which too often boom out of the television. Doubling the error does not make things right. Reporters on small newspapers try to imitate their metropolitan colleagues and try to tell their readers what the news means and where it will lead. This is good only as long as the reporters have the experience and ability to interpret effectively and honestly. ATTENTION: The Singapore Copyright Act applies to the use of this document. Nanyang Technological University Library 2 There is no doubt that interpretation is needed, on television as well as in newspapers, though newspapers can do it better. The affairs of the world have become so complex and varied that no newspaper can cover them all, or even try to do so. Nor can readers expect to understand everything they read in their newspapers unless an intelligent reporter can make the significance of the facts more clear. The question is not whether or not interpretation is needed, but how well it is being done. There are some stories in which the facts speak for themselves and no interpretation is necessary: road accidents, sporting events, almost any factual account over which there is no difference of opinion. There are just as many others where today's facts, even with the help of background, do not adequately explain the happening or situation enough to make it clearly intelligible to the average reader. Until your editor gives specific permission for you to offer your own interpretations, reporters are obliged to seek the opinions and interpretations of others and to attribute them. This is the original, the most honest and still the safest type of interpretation. It preserves clearly the difference between fact and opinion, between what has happened and the reasons, excuses, apologies, forecasts and any other related opinions. To present an honest interpretation, the reporter concerned has to ask a variety of relevant people for expert or informed opinions and collate these as "interpretation". Even for reporters already allowed to writejheir own interpretations, this collation from others is sometimes the only way to do an honest job. No reporter has the expertise to provide interpretation himself or herself over a wide area. The golden rules for facts should be even more rigid in interpretation — if you don't know, check; if you're still in doubt, leave it out. In real life many major reporting areas require reports to include some interpretation. This includes Parliamentary reporting and the reports of rounds-persons who cover government departments. It includes state and civic politics as well as most of the regular specialised reporting beats (or rounds). It is difficult to write a substantial report without interpretation creeping in, no matter how hard the reporter tries. It is technically possible, but it is exhaustively slow to make sure there is no authorial intrusion, and the end result is usually not worth such effort. In any case, changes in the world and the reporting of it mean it is now accepted that a reporter will give more than just the bare facts when reporting what happened in Parliament today. Good journalism demands total clarity, and that means interpretation is usually obligatory. An example of interpretive reporting, in this case fictitious but based on a real example in Pakistan. The long-awaited Trans-Migration Bill was approved in Parliament today by a narrow majority and only because the Opposition alliance which set out to oppose it failed to hold together. Reporting what happened is easy enough, but the reporter also had to make clear what it meant to the readers. In this case there were two main areas for interpretation, social and political: ATTENTION: The Singapore Copyright Act applies to the use of this document. Nanyang Technological University Library 3 a) what does this Bill mean to the average citizen who reads the paper? who and how many will be affected by this? how will it affect people's right and opportunity to travel? how will if affect people moving from one place to another to live? what will the effect be on the national economy? b) why did the Opposition alliance fail to hold together? what does this mean for the parties or individuals involved? what does it mean for the stability of the government in future? Any good Parliamentary reporter will be able to state as fact what the Bill is about, what it does and who will be affected by it. It is hardly interpretation to say how many people will be affected, though there could be differences of opinion about how severely. But interpretation is necessary when explaning rights, privileges and opportunities. By asking civil lawyers, social scientists and transport experts the reporter can gather attributable opinions on the effects of the Bill, and those yet to earn the right to interpret for themselves are expected to do it this way. For the experienced Parliamentary reporter, who has gathered and learned from other people's opinions and knowledge over a period of year, it is quicker and easier to interpret using that accumulated experience as a data bank. While that knowledge is certainty — in other words while what the reporter knows is provable fact — it is true interpretation. Explaining how rights and privileges will be affected can not be done by a collection of factual statements, so there will be room for someone to challenge any statement made as untrue. If this can happen what has been written is opinion, and it is much wiser to use the word "may" instead of "will", and to admit that it is the reporter's opinion. It is definitely in the region of opinion when the reporter, no matter how knowledgeable, tries to explain what will happen in the political arena. What happened is easy. That's fact. Why it happened is not too difficult, since most of that is fact, too. But what will happen is speculation, and political speculation has a reliability factor below weather forecasting or picking a winner at the racetrack. When you embark on this type of interpretive writing only history can tell whether what you say is right. Your remembered level of accuracy is your measure of success as an interpretive reporter. Look through today's newspaper to find examples of interpretive reporting and see whether the reporter has interpreted honestly or whether what he or she says is in the area of unsupported personal opinion.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Measuring the Effects of Interpretive Journalism on Trust and Credibility Perceptions in the Context of Political News Coverage
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2019 Measuring the Effects of Interpretive Journalism on Trust and Credibility Perceptions in the Context of Political News Coverage Scott William Siker West Virginia University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Siker, Scott William, "Measuring the Effects of Interpretive Journalism on Trust and Credibility Perceptions in the Context of Political News Coverage" (2019). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 4098. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/4098 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2019 Measuring the Effects of Interpretive Journalism on Trust and Credibility Perceptions in the Context of Political News Coverage Scott iW lliam Siker Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Measuring the Effects of Interpretive Journalism on Trust and Credibility Perceptions in the Context of Political News Coverage Scott Siker Thesis submitted to the Reed College of Media at West Virginia University In partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Science in Journalism Geah Pressgrove, Ph.D., Chair Julia Fraustino, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Photojournalism the Changing Work Practices and Professionalism of Photojournalists in the Digital Age
    10.2478/nor-2014-0017 Nordicom Review 35 (2014) 2, pp. 91-104 Rethinking Photojournalism The Changing Work Practices and Professionalism of Photojournalists in the Digital Age Jenni Mäenpää Abstract Public service, ethics, objectivity, autonomy and immediacy are still often considered the core values of professional journalism. However, photojournalistic work has confronted historic changes since the advent of digitalization in the late 1980s. Professional photo- journalists have been caught manipulating news images, video production has become a major part of news photographers’ work, and newspapers freely publish photographs and videos taken by the general public. The present article examines how news photographers negotiate these changes in photo- journalistic work practices, and how they define their professional ambitions in the digital age. Photojournalists’ articulations of professionalism are approached in relation to three digital innovations in photojournalism: digital photo editing, video production and user-generated images in newspapers. The empirical data consist of an online survey of and interviews with photojournalists in Finland. In the final analysis, it is suggested that the core ideals of photo- journalism have to be renegotiated, because the work environment has changed drastically. Keywords: photojournalism, news photographers, professionalism, digital photo editing, online news videos, amateur photography. Introduction In my opinion, a RAW file has nothing to do with reality, and I do not think you can judge the finished images and the use of Photoshop by looking at the RAW file. (Danish photojournalist Klavs Bo Christensen, April 13, 2009) This argument was made by a Danish photojournalist after he had been disqualified from a Picture of the Year contest because contest officials had determined that his im- age manipulation went too far.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Journalism and Its Changing Contribution to an Unsustainable Debate
    Brüggemann, Michael (2017): Post-normal journalism: Climate journalism and its changing contribution to an unsustainable debate. In Peter Berglez, Ulrika Olausson, Mart Ots (Eds.): What is Sustainable Journalism? Integrating the Environmental, Social, and Economic Challenges of Journalism. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 57–73. [Final accepted manuscript] Chapter 4 Post-normal Journalism: Climate Journalism and Its Changing Contribution to an Unsustainable Debate Michael Brüggemann Introduction1 Deliberative public sphere theories ascribe an ‘epistemic dimension’ to public debates: they do not necessarily foster consensus, but rather an enhanced understanding among the participants of the debate through the exchange of opinions backed by justifications (Habermas 2006; Peters 2005). Public discourses provide a critical validation of issues of shared relevance. They are an important precondition for the sustainable evolution of society as a society without open debates becomes blind to the concerns of its citizens. This is why the sustainability of public debates is a major concern for society and for communication studies. Reality will always fall short of normative models of the public sphere (see e.g. Walter 2015), yet when issues become so polarized that an open debate among speakers from different backgrounds becomes impossible, this constitutes a problem for democracy. Particularly in the United States, the debate on climate change has joined other issues such as abortion and gun control as part of a wider cultural schism: “Extreme positions dominate the conversation, the potential for discussion or resolution disintegrates, and the issue becomes intractable” (Hoffman 2015, p. 6). This kind of situation emerges due to a multitude of factors. Returning to a more constructive debate requires broad and complex responses.
    [Show full text]
  • PROBLEMS & ETHICS in JOURNALISM: JOU4700*05A5 Mondays: 3 – 6 P.M. Fall 2013
    1 PROBLEMS & ETHICS IN JOURNALISM: JOU4700*05A5 Mondays: 3 – 6 p.m. Fall 2013: August 26 to Dec. 9, 2013 Turlington 2318 Professor: Daniel Axelrod Office Hours: By appointment Office: Weimer 2040 Cell: 978-855-8935. If your matter is time sensitive, feel free to call (but please don’t text me). Email: [email protected] SYLLABUS DISCLAIMER Sometimes, teachers say things that contradict the syllabus. To avoid confusion and ensure a clear, fair class, this syllabus is our ultimate authority. Simply put, if the syllabus contradicts something that I say in class, the syllabus wins unless I expressly and specifically state that I am intentionally revising it. In such cases, I will provide prompt, clear, and ample notification. COURSE OVERVIEW This “Problems and Ethics in Journalism” class is broken into three parts. First, this course covers the underlying principles of how to be an ethical journalist and the history behind them; then it discusses media literacy (how to recognize the strengths, weaknesses and biases in news coverage); and — with a particular focus on the business of journalism — the class concludes by explaining the challenges media outlets and journalists face when it comes to producing high- quality news in an ethical manner (E.g. the influence of advertisers, corporate owners, public relations specialists, and governments). 1. First, we outline the basics of journalism ethics to ensure you have a solid foundation. 2. Next, we cover “media literacy.” That means we’re going to make sure that you become an educated news consumer. After this unit, you’ll be able to look a news story (regardless of the platform on which appears) and rip it apart.
    [Show full text]
  • Coddington-Dissertation-2015
    Copyright by Mark Allen Coddington 2015 The Dissertation Committee for Mark Allen Coddington certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Telling Secondhand Stories: News Aggregation and the Production of Journalistic Knowledge Committee: Stephen D. Reese, Supervisor C. W. Anderson Mary Angela Bock Regina G. Lawrence Sharon L. Strover Telling Secondhand Stories: News Aggregation and the Production of Journalistic Knowledge by Mark Allen Coddington, B.A.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August 2015 Dedication For Dana, whose patience, sacrifice, and grace made this project possible and inspire me daily. Acknowledgements This dissertation is not mine alone, but a product of the contributions of so many people who have guided and aided me throughout its progress, and through my development as a scholar more generally. I am deeply indebted and profoundly grateful for their encouragement, wisdom, and help. I alone bear responsibility for the shortcomings of this project, but they deserve credit for bringing it to fruition and for their rich contributions to my growth as a scholar and a person. I am grateful to have learned under a remarkably wise and supportive faculty at the University of Texas over the past five years, most notably my adviser, Stephen Reese. Dr. Reese has been an ideal supervisor for both my master’s thesis and dissertation, continually nudging me forward and honing my ideas while giving me space to grow as a thinker.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Journalism - Journalism About Culture
    Cultural Journalism - Journalism about Culture Kristensen, Nete Nørgaard Published in: Sociology Compass DOI: 10.1111/soc4.12701 Publication date: 2019 Document version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (APA): Kristensen, N. N. (2019). Cultural Journalism - Journalism about Culture. Sociology Compass, 13(6), 1-13. [e12701]. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12701 Download date: 30. Sep. 2021 Received: 12 November 2018 Revised: 26 February 2019 Accepted: 11 April 2019 DOI: 10.1111/soc4.12701 ARTICLE Cultural journalism—Journalism about culture Nete Nørgaard Kristensen Department of Media, Cognition and Communication, Section for Film, Media and Abstract Communication, University of Copenhagen This article is an introduction to “cultural journalism,”a Correspondence specialised type of professional journalism that covers and Nete Nørgaard Kristensen, Professor, PhD, debates the broad field of arts and culture. The article Department of Media, Cognition and Communication, Section for Film, Media and points to some of the research traditions that have engaged Communication, University of Copenhagen, with the news media's coverage of arts and culture and Karen Blixens Plads 8, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark. inspired contemporary cultural journalism research, among Email: [email protected] them cultural sociology and the sociology of journalism. Funding information Furthermore, the article outlines the institutional roles and Independent Research Fund Denmark, Grant/ epistemology of cultural journalism, which in several Award Number: DFF ‐ 4180‐00082. DFF – 4180‐00082 respects differ from dominating normative conceptions of Western journalism. At the same time, the article shows that contemporary journalism shares many similarities with the approaches found in culural journalism, such as interpre- tation, emotionality, and subjectivity.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Concepts of Journalism
    Key Concepts of Journalism - Providing information that the public needs to know: Many publications are devoted solely to information that the public wants to know; fashion and celebrity gossip magazines are good examples of this. Ideally, however, journalists strive to write less sensational stories because they are important for readers to know about. SPJ's Code of Ethics emphasizes that good news judgment includes publishing stories because "the American people must be well informed in order to make decisions regarding their lives, and their local and national communities. - Giving a fair and truthful account of news: There is a great deal of talk about bias in the media. Many journalists believe that if a publication is being criticized for being too liberal by some and too conservative by others, it is doing a good job. On its Web site, the Associated Press defines fair and truthful as "reliability and objectivity with reports that are accurate, balanced and informed." - Emphasizing the importance of free speech: Journalists define freedom of speech and of the press in very broad terms. Many journalists have an absolutist approach to discussing free speech, meaning that they believe no limits whatsoever on speech should be imposed. Free speech and a free press are essential for journalism to exist the way it does in this country, able to criticize the government and conduct investigations. In its mission statement, SPJ refers to freedom of speech and of the press as "the cornerstone of our nation and our liberty." - Spurring people to action: Swanson said journalism is a service-oriented profession because journalism "isn't just about providing raw information.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Theory of Advocacy in Journalism
    JOU0010.1177/1464884915582311JournalismFisher 582311research-article2015 Article Journalism 2016, Vol. 17(6) 711 –726 The advocacy continuum: © The Author(s) 2015 Reprints and permissions: Towards a theory of sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/1464884915582311 advocacy in journalism jou.sagepub.com Caroline Fisher University of Canberra, Australia Abstract The goal of advocacy is commonly used to distinguish journalism from public relations practice. At the same time, there is a strong tradition of advocacy reporting in journalism that weakens this point of distinction. In an attempt to reconcile this apparent contradiction, this article draws on the concept of a continuum to explain extremes in journalism practice and ‘contingency theory’ in public relations, which posits a range of variables can influence the degree of advocacy adopted by public relations practitioners when dealing with an organization’s target publics. This article contends that the degree and type of advocacy present in journalism is also dependent on a range of macro, organizational, journalism production, source and personal factors. It argues that each work of journalism falls along a continuum of advocacy, ranging from subtle displays at one end to overt at the other, where some stories might be hard to distinguish from public relations. Keywords Advocacy, contingency theory, journalism, muckraking, objectivity, opinion, partisanship, public relations, selectivity In the journalism and public relations (PR) literature, the goal of advocacy is regularly used to help conceptualize the difference between the two communications’ roles. For instance, Lynette Sheridan Burns (2013) said that the argument often put forward to separate PR practitioners from journalists is that ‘their text is a form of advocacy, intended to persuade rather than inform’ (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharing the News: Journalistic Collaboration As Field Repair
    International Journal of Communication 9(2015), 1966–1984 1932–8036/20150005 Sharing the News: Journalistic Collaboration as Field Repair LUCAS GRAVES1 University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA MAGDA KONIECZNA Temple University, USA Organized journalism in every era offers examples of news sharing: cooperative practices by which rival news outlets work together to produce or distribute news. Today, this behavior is being institutionalized by certain emergent news organizations. To understand news sharing, we argue, requires attention to how these journalists seek to not only practice but repair the field of journalism. This article analyzes news sharing as a form of field repair, drawing on ethnographic studies of investigative news nonprofits and professional fact-checking groups. We argue that journalism’s “high- modern” era, with its broad alignment of economic and professional goals, highlighted competitive rather than collaborative elements of newswork. As that alignment unravels, journalists are engaging in explicit news sharing in pursuit of two intertwined goals: to increase the impact of their own reporting and to build institutional resources for public- affairs journalism to be practiced more widely across the field. Keywords: public affairs journalism, news nonprofits, fact-checking, collaboration Introduction Journalism is usually seen as a competitive occupation, defined by the rivalry among individual reporters and among news organizations. This is not without reason. Journalists guard their sources and stories jealously, sometimes even from peers in the same newsroom. Covering a story first or best brings professional rewards, while being beaten by a rival is a badge of shame for reporter and news outlet alike. Most important, almost all news organizations—even noncommercial ones—depend for their survival on attracting loyal audiences.
    [Show full text]
  • The Handbook of Journalism Studies; 2Nd Edition
    THE HANDBOOK OF JOURNALISM STUDIES This second edition of The Handbook of Journalism Studies explores the current state of research in journalism studies and sets an agenda for future development of the field in an international context. The volume is structured around theoretical and empirical approaches to journalism research and covers scholarship on news production, news content, journalism and society, journalism and culture, and journalism studies in a global context. As journalism studies has become richer and more diverse as a field of studies, the second edition reflects both the growing diversity of the field and the ways in which journalism itself has undergone rapid change in recent years. Emphasizing comparative and global perspectives, this new edition explores: • Key elements, thinkers, and texts • Historical context • Current state of the field • Methodological issues • Merits and advantages of the approach/area of studies • Limitations and critical issues of the approach/area of studies • Directions for future research Offering broad international coverage from world- leading contributors, this volume is a comprehensive resource for theory and scholarship in journalism studies. As such, it is a must- have resource for scholars and graduate students working in journalism, media studies, and communication around the globe. Karin Wahl- Jorgensen is Professor in the Cardiff School of Journalism, Media, and Culture, Cardiff University, Wales, where she serves as Director of Research Development and Environment. Her most recent books include Emotions, Media and Politics (2019) and Digital Citizenship in a Datafied Society (2019). She has published multiple other monographs and edited collections and just under 100 journal articles and book chapters.
    [Show full text]
  • This Is “Newspapers”, Chapter 4 from the Book Culture and Media (Index.Html) (V. 1.0). This Book Is Licensed Under a Creativ
    This is “Newspapers”, chapter 4 from the book Culture and Media (index.html) (v. 1.0). This book is licensed under a Creative Commons by-nc-sa 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/ 3.0/) license. See the license for more details, but that basically means you can share this book as long as you credit the author (but see below), don't make money from it, and do make it available to everyone else under the same terms. This content was accessible as of December 29, 2012, and it was downloaded then by Andy Schmitz (http://lardbucket.org) in an effort to preserve the availability of this book. Normally, the author and publisher would be credited here. However, the publisher has asked for the customary Creative Commons attribution to the original publisher, authors, title, and book URI to be removed. Additionally, per the publisher's request, their name has been removed in some passages. More information is available on this project's attribution page (http://2012books.lardbucket.org/attribution.html?utm_source=header). For more information on the source of this book, or why it is available for free, please see the project's home page (http://2012books.lardbucket.org/). You can browse or download additional books there. i Chapter 4 Newspapers Newspaper Wars On April 26, 2010, Wired magazine proclaimed that a “clash of the titans” between two major newspapers, Figure 4.1 The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times, was about to take place in the midst of an unprecedented downward spiral for the print medium.Eliot Van Burskirk, “Print War Between NYT and WSJ Is Really About Digital,” Wired, April 26, 2010, http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2010/04/print-war- between-nyt-and-wsj-is-really-about-digital.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 2 Beyond False Balance: 3 How Interpretive Journalism Shapes
    Brüggemann, Michael; Engesser, Sven (2017): Beyond false balance. How interpretive journalism shapes media coverage of climate change. In Global Environmental Change 42, pp. 58–67. Available online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.11.004. 1 [Final accepted manuscript] 2 3 Beyond false balance: 4 How interpretive journalism shapes media coverage of climate change 5 Abstract: 6 This study explores two pre-eminent features of transnational media coverage of climate 7 change: The framing of climate change as a harmful, human-induced risk and the way that reporting 8 handles contrarian voices in the climate debate. The analysis shows how journalists, and their 9 interpretations and professional norms, shape media debates about climate change. The study links 10 an analysis of media content to a survey of the authors of the respective articles. It covers leading 11 print and online news outlets in Germany, India, the United Kingdom, the United States, and 12 Switzerland. It finds that climate journalism has moved beyond the norm of balance towards a more 13 interpretive pattern of journalism. Quoting contrarian voices still is part of transnational climate 14 coverage, but these quotes are contextualized with a dismissal of climate change denial. Yet niches of 15 denial persist in certain contexts, and much journalistic attention is focused on the narrative of 16 ‘warners vs. deniers,’ and overlooks the more relevant debates about climate change. 17 Keywords: 18 Climate change; journalism; skeptics; denial; journalistic norms; balance 1 Brüggemann, Michael; Engesser, Sven (2017): Beyond false balance. How interpretive journalism shapes media coverage of climate change.
    [Show full text]