Interpretive Guide to Garner State Park
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Consumer Plannlng Section Comprehensive Plannlng Branch
Consumer Plannlng Section Comprehensive Plannlng Branch, Parks Division Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas Texans Outdoors: An Analysis of 1985 Participation in Outdoor Recreation Activities By Kathryn N. Nichols and Andrew P. Goldbloom Under the Direction of James A. Deloney November, 1989 Comprehensive Planning Branch, Parks Division Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 4200 Smith School Road, Austin, Texas 78744 (512) 389-4900 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Conducting a mail survey requires accuracy and timeliness in every single task. Each individualized survey had to be accounted for, both going out and coming back. Each mailing had to meet a strict deadline. The authors are indebted to all the people who worked on this project. The staff of the Comprehensive Planning Branch, Parks Division, deserve special thanks. This dedicated crew signed letters, mailed, remailed, coded, and entered the data of a twenty-page questionnaire that was sent to over twenty-five thousand Texans with over twelve thousand returned completed. Many other Parks Division staff outside the branch volunteered to assist with stuffing and labeling thousands of envelopes as deadlines drew near. We thank the staff of the Information Services Section for their cooperation in providing individualized letters and labels for survey mailings. We also appreciate the dedication of the staff in the mailroom for processing up wards of seventy-five thousand pieces of mail. Lastly, we thank the staff in the print shop for their courteous assistance in reproducing the various documents. Although the above are gratefully acknowledged, they are absolved from any responsibility for any errors or omissions that may have occurred. ii TEXANS OUTDOORS: AN ANALYSIS OF 1985 PARTICIPATION IN OUTDOOR RECREATION ACTIVITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ........................................................................................................... -
United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land
United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land & Water Conservation Fund --- Detailed Listing of Grants Grouped by County --- Today's Date: 11/20/2008 Page: 1 Texas - 48 Grant ID & Type Grant Element Title Grant Sponsor Amount Status Date Exp. Date Cong. Element Approved District ANDERSON 396 - XXX D PALESTINE PICNIC AND CAMPING PARK CITY OF PALESTINE $136,086.77 C 8/23/1976 3/1/1979 2 719 - XXX D COMMUNITY FOREST PARK CITY OF PALESTINE $275,500.00 C 8/23/1979 8/31/1985 2 ANDERSON County Total: $411,586.77 County Count: 2 ANDREWS 931 - XXX D ANDREWS MUNICIPAL POOL CITY OF ANDREWS $237,711.00 C 12/6/1984 12/1/1989 19 ANDREWS County Total: $237,711.00 County Count: 1 ANGELINA 19 - XXX C DIBOLL CITY PARK CITY OF DIBOLL $174,500.00 C 10/7/1967 10/1/1971 2 215 - XXX A COUSINS LAND PARK CITY OF LUFKIN $113,406.73 C 8/4/1972 6/1/1973 2 297 - XXX D LUFKIN PARKS IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LUFKIN $49,945.00 C 11/29/1973 1/1/1977 2 512 - XXX D MORRIS FRANK PARK CITY OF LUFKIN $236,249.00 C 5/20/1977 1/1/1980 2 669 - XXX D OLD ORCHARD PARK CITY OF DIBOLL $235,066.00 C 12/5/1978 12/15/1983 2 770 - XXX D LUFKIN TENNIS IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LUFKIN $51,211.42 C 6/30/1980 6/1/1985 2 879 - XXX D HUNTINGTON CITY PARK CITY OF HUNTINGTON $35,313.56 C 9/26/1983 9/1/1988 2 ANGELINA County Total: $895,691.71 County Count: 7 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land & Water Conservation Fund --- Detailed Listing of Grants Grouped by County --- Today's Date: 11/20/2008 Page: 2 Texas - 48 Grant ID & Type Grant Element Title Grant Sponsor Amount Status Date Exp. -
Stormwater Management Program 2013-2018 Appendix A
Appendix A 2012 Texas Integrated Report - Texas 303(d) List (Category 5) 2012 Texas Integrated Report - Texas 303(d) List (Category 5) As required under Sections 303(d) and 304(a) of the federal Clean Water Act, this list identifies the water bodies in or bordering Texas for which effluent limitations are not stringent enough to implement water quality standards, and for which the associated pollutants are suitable for measurement by maximum daily load. In addition, the TCEQ also develops a schedule identifying Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) that will be initiated in the next two years for priority impaired waters. Issuance of permits to discharge into 303(d)-listed water bodies is described in the TCEQ regulatory guidance document Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (January 2003, RG-194). Impairments are limited to the geographic area described by the Assessment Unit and identified with a six or seven-digit AU_ID. A TMDL for each impaired parameter will be developed to allocate pollutant loads from contributing sources that affect the parameter of concern in each Assessment Unit. The TMDL will be identified and counted using a six or seven-digit AU_ID. Water Quality permits that are issued before a TMDL is approved will not increase pollutant loading that would contribute to the impairment identified for the Assessment Unit. Explanation of Column Headings SegID and Name: The unique identifier (SegID), segment name, and location of the water body. The SegID may be one of two types of numbers. The first type is a classified segment number (4 digits, e.g., 0218), as defined in Appendix A of the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (TSWQS). -
Natural Agenda a Strategic Plan for Texas Parks and Wildlife Department
FISCAL YEARS 2011–2015 Natural Agenda A Strategic Plan for Texas Parks and Wildlife Department AGENCY STRATEGIC PLAN For Fiscal Years 2011-2015 by the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Peter M. Holt, Chairman May 9, 2005 – February 1, 2011 San Antonio T. Dan Friedkin, Vice-Chairman May 9, 2005 – February 1, 2011 Houston Mark E. Bivins September 28, 2005 – February 1, 2011 Amarillo Ralph H. Duggins February 19, 2008 – February 1, 2013 Fort Worth Antonio Falcon, M.D. August 14, 2007 – February 1, 2013 Rio Grande City Karen J. Hixon August 14, 2007 – February 1, 2013 San Antonio Dan Allen Hughes, Jr. June 4, 2009 – February 1, 2015 Beeville Margaret Martin February 5, 2009 – February 1, 2015 Boerne S. Reed Morian February 5, 2009 – February 1, 2015 Houston Lee M. Bass, Chairman-Emeritus Submitted July 2, 2010 Signed: ________________________________ Approved: ________________________________ Carter Smith Peter M. Holt Executive Director Chairman Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission NATURAL AGENDA | 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Statewide Vision, Mission and Philosophy ................................................................................................................ 2 Relevant Statewide Goals and Benchmarks ................................................................................................................ 3 TPWD Mission and Philosophy ................................................................................................................................. 5 Internal/External Assessment -
Hays County Parks, Recreation and Open Space
T h e S c r i p p s H o w a r d HAYS COUNTY PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE SURVEY JULY 2000 815 Brazos Suite 800, Austin, TX 78701 (512) 478-9646; (512) 478-1537 fax TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE SUMMARY…………………………………………………………………….3-7 QUESTIONS……………………..……………………………………………8-16 DEMOGRAPHICS.………………………………………………………….17-18 RESIDENT COMMENTS…………………………………………………. 18-19 METHODOLOGY……..…….…………………………………………………20 ABOUT THE TEXAS POLL/ SCRIPPS DATA CENTER…………………………………………………….20 Page 2 SUMMARY Hays County residents rank river/creek access as the No. 1 public recreational facility need in Hays County, according to a survey conducted by The Scripps Howard Texas Poll. Twenty-eight percent of Hays County residents ranked river/creek access as the No. 1 need. Other needs and the percentage who ranked them No. 1 were: ? Playgrounds (8 percent) ? Picnic tables (3 percent) ? Fishing lakes (8 percent) ? Baseball fields (3 percent) ? Trails (8 percent) ? Softball fields (2 percent) ? Camping sites (7 percent) ? Soccer fields (2 percent) ? Picnic pavilions (5 percent) ? Basketball courts (1 percent) ? Nature study areas (5 percent) ? Volleyball courts (1 percent) ? Bird watching/wildlife sites (4 ? Tennis courts (less than 1 percent) percent) The survey asked residents a variety of questions regarding parks, recreation and open space. The Scripps Howard Texas Poll conducted the survey from April 24 to June 20, mailing 2,000 questionnaires to a random sample of Hays County residents. A total of 943 residents completed and returned the survey - - a 47 percent response rate. County Involvement A majority of Hays County residents support the county acquiring, managing and funding parks, and 71 percent are concerned about growth stripping the county of its rural character. -
Chapter 1 Description of the Region
Chapter 1 Description of the Region The East Texas Regional Water Planning Area (ETRWPA) is one of sixteen areas established by the 1997 Texas legislature Senate Bill 1 for the purpose of State water resource planning at a regional level on five- year planning cycles. The first regional water plan was adopted in 2001. Since that time, it was updated in 2006, 2011, and 2016. This plan, the 2021 Regional Water Plan (2021 Plan), is the result of the 5th cycle of regional water planning. Pursuant to the formation of the ETRWPA, the East Texas Regional Water Planning Group (ETRWPG or RWPG), was formed and charged with the responsibility to evaluate the region’s population projections, water demand projections, and existing water supplies for a 50-year planning horizon. The RWPG then identifies water shortages under drought of record conditions and recommends water management strategies. This planning is performed in accordance with regional and state water planning requirements of the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB). This chapter provides details for the ETRWPA that are relevant to water resource planning, including: a physical description of the region, climatological details, population projections, economic activities, sources of water and water demand, and regional resources. A discussion of threats to the region’s resources and water supply, a general discussion of water conservation and drought preparation in the region, and a listing of ongoing state and federal programs in the ETRWPA that impact water planning efforts in the region are also provided. 1.1 General Introduction The ETRWPA consists of all or portions of 20 counties located in the Neches, Sabine, and Trinity River Basins, and the Neches- Trinity Coastal Basin. -
2006 Annual Report
WHAT IT TAKES to fulfill our Mission 2006 ANNUAL REPORT ACCOMPLISHING OUR MISSION “to manage and conserve the natural and cultural resources of Texas and to provide hunting, fishing and outdoor recreation opportunities for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations.” The mission of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department is “to manage and conserve the natural and cultural resources of Texas and to provide hunting, fishing and outdoor recreation opportunities for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations.” Fulfilling such a vital mission for the state of Texas requires a diverse and committed team, with our staff working in every county around the state, The agency’s Land and Water Resources engaged in tasks that range from complex Conservation and Recreation Plan calls for scientific analysis to the most down-to strategic planning and accommodation for earth cleanup duties. It is not enough for us the state’s growing population and simply to maintain the state’s historic consequent increasing demands on our landmarks, fish and wildlife habitats, park natural and cultural resources. So our job headquarters, camping sites, interpretive includes not only maintaining what we have, programs, trails, and the myriad other but also looking toward the future to meet facilities and resources placed under our the goals of that plan. It means mustering our care that inevitably require repair and employees and our science to anticipate and upkeep. We’re responsible for ensuring the mitigate the pressures of population growth safety and viability of outdoor activities on on our natural resources and to continue to public lands and waters, including hunting, provide access to the outdoors for that hiking, fishing, boating and birdwatching. -
American Legion Park Pond
Rainbow Trout Stocking Schedule 2016-2017 Please note stocking dates may be subject to change. Driving directions to most stocking locations are available at http://tpwd.texas.gov/troutstocking Neighborhood Fishin’ ponds (marked with *) will be stocked frequently throughout the season. Water Body Nearest City #trout Dates Hatchery American Legion Park Pond Missouri City 1,400 1/6/2017, 2/3/2017 ETFH Amsler Park McGregor 1,500 12/14/2016, 2/7/2017 AEW Ascarate El Paso 3,000 12/7/2016, 1/11/2017, 2/8/2017, 3/2/2017 AEW Bandera City Park Lake Bandera 578 12/15/2016 AEW Bane Park Lake Houston 1,200 1/13/2017 ETFH Bates Allen Park 2 Rosenberg 1,125 1/3/2017 ETFH Beal Park Lake Midland 1,500 12/6/2016, 1/10/2017, 2/9/2017 PK Bethany Park Pond C Allen 1,700 12/15/2016 TFFC Blanco River - John Knox Wimberley 250 1/14/2016 (open to public 1/14 & 1/15 only) AEW Ranch Blanco State Park #4 Blanco 4,000 12/8/2016, 12/22/2016, 1/13/2017, 2/3/2017 AEW Blue Ridge Park Pond Missouri City 750 1/4/2017 ETFH Bob Sandlin State Park Mt. Pleasant 2,700 12/21/2016, 1/30/2017, 2/23/2017 TFFC Breshears Lake Levelland 900 12/7/2016 PK Buena Vista Park Lake Waco 1,896 11/23/2016, 12/9/2016, 12/14/2016, AEW 12/23/2016, 1/6/2017, 1/20/2017, 2/3/2017, 2/17/2017, 3/3/2017 Buescher State Park Smithville 2,000 12/16/2016, 1/6/2017 AEW Bullfrog Pond Austin 896 11/23/2016, 12/9/2016, 12/23/2016, 1/6/2017, AEW 1/20/2017, 2/3/2017, 2/17/2017, 3/3/2017 Burke-Crenshaw Lake Pasadena 1,000 1/12/2017 ETFH Burroughs Park Conroe 1,200 1/13/2017 ETFH C. -
4 – 19 April 2015
This stunning male Blackburnian Warbler, a recently-arrived migrant, greeted us on the first full day of the 2015 tour. (Glen Davis) TEXAS 4 – 19 APRIL 2015 LEADER: GLEN DAVIS The great state of Texas provides the visitor with a dazzling variety of regions, each with their own habitats and local flavor. Our 17 day tour visited all of these special corners of this, the 2nd largest state in the USA, and with our van, covered 3996.5 miles. That is farther than driving round-trip from London to Moscow. On the other hand, driving from London, Texas to Moscow, Texas only takes 5 hours. The Texas state bird list boasts 649 species of which our 2015 tour recorded an outstanding 313 species! Although Spring migration was a week or two away from reaching full-swing in the region, we managed to find good migrants and specialty species throughout. The first morning was spent aboard Captain Tommy Moore’s boat tour of the salt marshes and waterways of Aransas National Wildlife Refuge. Seeing the majestic Whooping Crane was the main goal and still this prime waterbird area gave us an exciting and fairly comprehensive list. There were many introductions to 1 BirdQuest Tour Report: Texas www.birdquest-tours.com species that we would see more of: Mottled Duck, American White and Brown Pelican, Western Osprey, American Oystercatcher, Black-necked Stilt, Greater and Lesser Yellowlegs, Eastern and Western Willet, Black Skimmer, Laughing Gull, Ring-billed Gull, American Herring Gull, Caspian Tern, Royal Tern, Cabot’s Tern, and Forster’s Tern. Never an afterthought, 21 of the stately and critically endangered cranes were counted as they remained on their winter territory for a few more days. -
2008 Basin Summary Report San Antonio-Nueces Coastal Basin Nueces River Basin Nueces-Rio Grande Coastal Basin
2008 Basin Summary Report San Antonio-Nueces Coastal Basin Nueces River Basin Nueces-Rio Grande Coastal Basin August 2008 Prepared in cooperation with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Clean Rivers Program Table of Contents List of Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................... ii Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Significant Findings ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Recommendations .......................................................................................................................................... 4 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.0 Public Involvement ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Public Outreach .............................................................................................................................................. 6 3.0 Water Quality Reviews .................................................................................................................................. 8 3.1 Water Quality Terminology -
TPWD Strategic Planning Regions
River Basins TPWD Brazos River Basin Brazos-Colorado Coastal Basin W o lf Cr eek Canadian River Basin R ita B l anca C r e e k e e ancar Cl ita B R Strategic Planning Colorado River Basin Colorado-Lavaca Coastal Basin Canadian River Cypress Creek Basin Regions Guadalupe River Basin Nor t h F o r k of the R e d R i ver XAmarillo Lavaca River Basin 10 Salt Fork of the Red River Lavaca-Guadalupe Coastal Basin Neches River Basin P r air i e Dog To w n F o r k of the R e d R i ver Neches-Trinity Coastal Basin ® Nueces River Basin Nor t h P e as e R i ve r Nueces-Rio Grande Coastal Basin Pease River Red River Basin White River Tongue River 6a Wi chita R iver W i chita R i ver Rio Grande River Basin Nor t h Wi chita R iver Little Wichita River South Wichita Ri ver Lubbock Trinity River Sabine River Basin X Nor t h Sulphur R i v e r Brazos River West Fork of the Trinity River San Antonio River Basin Brazos River Sulphur R i v e r South Sulphur River San Antonio-Nueces Coastal Basin 9 Clear Fork Tr Plano San Jacinto River Basin X Cypre ss Creek Garland FortWorth Irving X Sabine River in San Jacinto-Brazos Coastal Basin ity Rive X Clea r F o r k of the B r az os R i v e r XTr n X iityX RiverMesqu ite Sulphur River Basin r XX Dallas Arlington Grand Prai rie Sabine River Trinity River Basin XAbilene Paluxy River Leon River Trinity-San Jacinto Coastal Basin Chambers Creek Brazos River Attoyac Bayou XEl Paso R i c h land Cr ee k Colorado River 8 Pecan Bayou 5a Navasota River Neches River Waco Angelina River Concho River X Colorado River 7 Lampasas -
United States Geological Survey
DEFARTM KUT OF THE 1STEK1OK BULLETIN OK THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY No. 19O S F, GEOGRAPHY, 28 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1902 UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR GAZETTEEK OF TEXAS BY HENRY G-A-NNETT WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1902 CONTENTS Page. Area .................................................................... 11 Topography and drainage..... ............................................ 12 Climate.................................................................. 12 Forests ...............................................................'... 13 Exploration and settlement............................................... 13 Population..............'................................................. 14 Industries ............................................................... 16 Lands and surveys........................................................ 17 Railroads................................................................. 17 The gazetteer............................................................. 18 ILLUSTRATIONS. Page. PF,ATE I. Map of Texas ................................................ At end. ry (A, Mean annual temperature.......:............................ 12 \B, Mean annual rainfall ........................................ 12 -ryj (A, Magnetic declination ........................................ 12 I B, Wooded areas............................................... 12 Density of population in 1850 ................................ 14 B, Density of population in 1860