DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 9 Asteroids, Comets, and Dwarf Planets Their Nature, Orbits, and Impacts Asteroid Facts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 9 Asteroids, Comets, and Dwarf Planets Their Nature, Orbits, and Impacts Asteroid Facts Chapter 9 Asteroids, Comets, and Dwarf Planets Their Nature, Orbits, and Impacts Asteroid Facts • Asteroids are rocky leftovers of planet formation. • The largest is Ceres, diameter ~1,000 km. • There are 150,000 in catalogs, and probably over a million with diameter >1 km. • Small asteroids are more common than large asteroids. • All the asteroids in the solar system wouldn’t add up to even a small terrestrial planet. Asteroids with Moons • Some large asteroids have their own moon. • Asteroid Ida has a tiny moon named Dactyl. Asteroid Orbits • Most asteroids orbit in a belt between Mars and Jupiter. • Trojan asteroids follow Jupiter’s orbit. • Orbits of near-Earth asteroids cross Earth’s orbit. Which explanation for the asteroid belt seems the most plausible? 1. The belt is where all the asteroids happened to form. 2. The belt is the remnant of a large terrestrial planet that used to be between Mars and Jupiter. 3. The belt is where all the asteroids happened to survive. Asteroids 1. Are rocky and small–typically the size of a grain of rice or a marble 2. Are rocky, with a wide range of sizes, up to hundreds of miles in diameter 3. Have only thin atmospheres 4. Are made mostly of metals 5. Are mostly found in the inner solar system If you keep pushing a person on a swing with little pushes, at just the right frequency, they will swing very high. This is an example of: 1. Newton’s second law 2. Newton’s first law 3. Energy conservation 4. Resonance 5. Conservation of angular momentum Orbital Resonances • Asteroids in orbital resonance with Jupiter experience periodic nudges. • Eventually those nudges move asteroids out of resonant orbits, leaving gaps in the belt. Orbits of asteroids in the asteroid belt 1. Often intersect planets 2. Are mostly between Mars and Jupiter 3. Are grouped into patterns by resonances with Jupiter 4. Are mostly inside the frost line 5. All except # 1 Meteorites come from 1. Stars–they are falling stars 2. Destroyed planets 3. Asteroids 4. The Moon and Mars 5. Volcanic ejecta A typical meteorite is 1. About the size of a house, and makes a crater when it lands 2. About the size of a pea or grain of rice and is invisible when it lands 3. About the size of a pea or grain of rice. It makes a bright streak in the sky and burns up 4. Made of ice Meteor Terminology • Meteorite: A rock from space that falls through Earth’s atmosphere. • Meteor: The bright trail left by a meteorite. Meteorites from Moon and Mars • A few meteorites arrive from the Moon and Mars • Composition differs from the asteroid fragments • A cheap (but slow) way to acquire moon rocks and Mars rocks How do comets get their tails? Comet Facts • Formed beyond the frost line, comets are icy counterparts to asteroids. • The nucleus of a comet is like a “dirty snowball.” • Most comets do not have tails. • Most comets remain perpetually frozen in the outer solar system. • Only comets that enter the inner solar system grow tails. Anatomy of a Comet • Coma is atmosphere that comes from heated nucleus. • Plasma tail is gas escaping from coma, pushed by solar wind. • Dust tail is pushed by light. Growth of Tail If Earth passed through the tail of a comet, what would happen? 1. People would die from the gasses such as methane and ammonia 2. It depends on if it was the gas tail or the dust tail 3. Earth might be knocked out of its orbit or its axis might get tilted 4. Nothing. Halley’s comet did this and nothing happened What is plasma (in astronomy)? 1. An element commonly found in space 2. A constituent of blood 3. An ionized or charged gas, made when atoms lose one or more electrons 4. Another name for the solar wind Why do comet tails always point away from the Sun? 1. They are left behind as the comet moves 2. Newton’s third law: Comet goes one way, tail goes the other 3. The solar wind blows on them 4. They don’t; this is just a perspective effect of how we view them Comets eject small particles that follow the comet around in its orbit and cause meteor showers when Earth crosses the comet’s orbit. How big can a comet be? Is Pluto a Planet? • Much smaller than the eight major planets • Not a gas giant like the outer planets • Has an icy composition like a comet • Has a very elliptical, inclined orbit • Pluto has more in common with comets than with the eight major planets. Discovering Large Iceballs • In summer 2005, astronomers discovered Eris, an iceball even larger than Pluto. • Eris even has a moon: Dysnomia. Other Kuiper Belt Objects • Most have been discovered very recently so little is known about them. • NASA’s New Horizons mission will study Pluto and a few other Kuiper Belt objects in a planned flyby. Have we ever witnessed a major impact? Comet SL9 caused a string of violent impacts on Jupiter in 1994, reminding us that catastrophic collisions still happen. Tidal forces tore it apart during a previous encounter with Jupiter. This crater chain on Callisto probably came from another comet that tidal forces tore to pieces. Dusty debris at an impact site Artist’s conception of SL9 impact Several impact sites Impact sites in infrared light Did an impact kill the dinosaurs? Mass Extinctions • Fossil record shows occasional large dips in the diversity of species: mass extinctions. • The most recent was 65 million years ago, ending the reign of the dinosaurs. Iridium Layer No dinosaur fossils in upper rock layers Thin layer containing the rare element iridium Dinosaur fossils in lower rock layers Consequences of an Impact • A meteorite 10 km in size would send large amounts of debris into the atmosphere. • Debris would reduce the amount of sunlight reaching Earth’s surface. • The resulting climate change may have caused mass extinction. Likely Impact Site • Geologists found a large subsurface crater about 65 million years old in Mexico. Comet or asteroid about 10 km in diameter approaches Earth Is the impact threat a real danger or just media hype? Facts About Impacts • Asteroids and comets have hit the Earth. • A major impact is only a matter of time: not IF but WHEN. • Major impacts are very rare. • Extinction level events ~ millions of years • Major damage ~ tens to hundreds of years Tunguska, Siberia: June 30, 1908 A ~40 meter object disintegrated and exploded in the atmosphere Meteor Crater, Arizona: 50,000 years ago (50 meter object) Frequency of Impacts • Small impacts happen almost daily. • Impacts large enough to cause mass extinctions are many millions of years apart. The Asteroid with Our Name on It • We haven’t seen it yet. • Deflection is more probable with years of advance warning. • Control is critical: breaking a big asteroid into a bunch of little asteroids is unlikely to help. • We get less advance warning of a killer comet. What are we doing about it? • Stay tuned to http://impact.arc.nasa.gov Surprising discovery?: A small asteroid that orbits within the asteroid belt has an active volcano. 1. Plausible. Several small objects in the solar system have active volcanoes (e.g. Io). 2. Plausible. Several asteroids are known to be composed of basaltic (lava) material. 3. Implausible. Only planets, not moons or asteroids, have volcanoes. 4. Implausible. Asteroids are too small to be geologically active now. Surprising discovery?: A small asteroid that orbits within the asteroid belt has an active volcano. 1. Plausible. Several small objects in the solar system have active volcanoes (e.g. Io). 2. Plausible. Several asteroids are known to be composed of basaltic (lava) material. 3. Implausible. Only planets, not moons or asteroids, have volcanoes. 4. Implausible. Asteroids are too small to be geologically active now..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Handbook of Iron Meteorites, Volume 3
    Sierra Blanca - Sierra Gorda 1119 ing that created an incipient recrystallization and a few COLLECTIONS other anomalous features in Sierra Blanca. Washington (17 .3 kg), Ferry Building, San Francisco (about 7 kg), Chicago (550 g), New York (315 g), Ann Arbor (165 g). The original mass evidently weighed at least Sierra Gorda, Antofagasta, Chile 26 kg. 22°54's, 69°21 'w Hexahedrite, H. Single crystal larger than 14 em. Decorated Neu­ DESCRIPTION mann bands. HV 205± 15. According to Roy S. Clarke (personal communication) Group IIA . 5.48% Ni, 0.5 3% Co, 0.23% P, 61 ppm Ga, 170 ppm Ge, the main mass now weighs 16.3 kg and measures 22 x 15 x 43 ppm Ir. 13 em. A large end piece of 7 kg and several slices have been removed, leaving a cut surface of 17 x 10 em. The mass has HISTORY a relatively smooth domed surface (22 x 15 em) overlying a A mass was found at the coordinates given above, on concave surface with irregular depressions, from a few em the railway between Calama and Antofagasta, close to to 8 em in length. There is a series of what appears to be Sierra Gorda, the location of a silver mine (E.P. Henderson chisel marks around the center of the domed surface over 1939; as quoted by Hey 1966: 448). Henderson (1941a) an area of 6 x 7 em. Other small areas on the edges of the gave slightly different coordinates and an analysis; but since specimen could also be the result of hammering; but the he assumed Sierra Gorda to be just another of the North damage is only superficial, and artificial reheating has not Chilean hexahedrites, no further description was given.
    [Show full text]
  • SPECIAL Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 Collides with Jupiter
    SL-9/JUPITER ENCOUNTER - SPECIAL Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 Collides with Jupiter THE CONTINUATION OF A UNIQUE EXPERIENCE R.M. WEST, ESO-Garching After the Storm Six Hectic Days in July eration during the first nights and, as in other places, an extremely rich data The recent demise of comet Shoe­ ESO was but one of many profes­ material was secured. It quickly became maker-Levy 9, for simplicity often re­ sional observatories where observations evident that infrared observations, es­ ferred to as "SL-9", was indeed spectac­ had been planned long before the critical pecially imaging with the far-IR instru­ ular. The dramatic collision of its many period of the "SL-9" event, July 16-22, ment TIMMI at the 3.6-metre telescope, fragments with the giant planet Jupiter 1994. It is now clear that practically all were perfectly feasible also during day­ during six hectic days in July 1994 will major observatories in the world were in­ time, and in the end more than 120,000 pass into the annals of astronomy as volved in some way, via their telescopes, images were obtained with this facility. one of the most incredible events ever their scientists or both. The only excep­ The programmes at most of the other predicted and witnessed by members of tions may have been a few observing La Silla telescopes were also successful, this profession. And never before has a sites at the northernmost latitudes where and many more Gigabytes of data were remote astronomical event been so ac­ the bright summer nights and the very recorded with them.
    [Show full text]
  • KAREN J. MEECH February 7, 2019 Astronomer
    BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH – KAREN J. MEECH February 7, 2019 Astronomer Institute for Astronomy Tel: 1-808-956-6828 2680 Woodlawn Drive Fax: 1-808-956-4532 Honolulu, HI 96822-1839 [email protected] PROFESSIONAL PREPARATION Rice University Space Physics B.A. 1981 Massachusetts Institute of Tech. Planetary Astronomy Ph.D. 1987 APPOINTMENTS 2018 – present Graduate Chair 2000 – present Astronomer, Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii 1992-2000 Associate Astronomer, Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii 1987-1992 Assistant Astronomer, Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii 1982-1987 Graduate Research & Teaching Assistant, Massachusetts Inst. Tech. 1981-1982 Research Specialist, AAVSO and Massachusetts Institute of Technology AWARDS 2018 ARCs Scientist of the Year 2015 University of Hawai’i Regent’s Medal for Research Excellence 2013 Director’s Research Excellence Award 2011 NASA Group Achievement Award for the EPOXI Project Team 2011 NASA Group Achievement Award for EPOXI & Stardust-NExT Missions 2009 William Tylor Olcott Distinguished Service Award of the American Association of Variable Star Observers 2006-8 National Academy of Science/Kavli Foundation Fellow 2005 NASA Group Achievement Award for the Stardust Flight Team 1996 Asteroid 4367 named Meech 1994 American Astronomical Society / DPS Harold C. Urey Prize 1988 Annie Jump Cannon Award 1981 Heaps Physics Prize RESEARCH FIELD AND ACTIVITIES • Developed a Discovery mission concept to explore the origin of Earth’s water. • Co-Investigator on the Deep Impact, Stardust-NeXT and EPOXI missions, leading the Earth-based observing campaigns for all three. • Leads the UH Astrobiology Research interdisciplinary program, overseeing ~30 postdocs and coordinating the research with ~20 local faculty and international partners.
    [Show full text]
  • Comet and Meteorite Traditions of Aboriginal Australians
    Encyclopaedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures, 2014. Edited by Helaine Selin. Springer Netherlands, preprint. Comet and Meteorite Traditions of Aboriginal Australians Duane W. Hamacher Nura Gili Centre for Indigenous Programs, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia Email: [email protected] Of the hundreds of distinct Aboriginal cultures of Australia, many have oral traditions rich in descriptions and explanations of comets, meteors, meteorites, airbursts, impact events, and impact craters. These views generally attribute these phenomena to spirits, death, and bad omens. There are also many traditions that describe the formation of meteorite craters as well as impact events that are not known to Western science. Comets Bright comets appear in the sky roughly once every five years. These celestial visitors were commonly seen as harbingers of death and disease by Aboriginal cultures of Australia. In an ordered and predictable cosmos, rare transient events were typically viewed negatively – a view shared by most cultures of the world (Hamacher & Norris, 2011). In some cases, the appearance of a comet would coincide with a battle, a disease outbreak, or a drought. The comet was then seen as the cause and attributed to the deeds of evil spirits. The Tanganekald people of South Australia (SA) believed comets were omens of sickness and death and were met with great fear. The Gunditjmara people of western Victoria (VIC) similarly believed the comet to be an omen that many people would die. In communities near Townsville, Queensland (QLD), comets represented the spirits of the dead returning home.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Observations of the Interstellar Comet 2I/Borisov
    geosciences Article Early Observations of the Interstellar Comet 2I/Borisov Chien-Hsiu Lee NSF’s National Optical-Infrared Astronomy Research Laboratory, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA; [email protected]; Tel.: +1-520-318-8368 Received: 26 November 2019; Accepted: 11 December 2019; Published: 17 December 2019 Abstract: 2I/Borisov is the second ever interstellar object (ISO). It is very different from the first ISO ’Oumuamua by showing cometary activities, and hence provides a unique opportunity to study comets that are formed around other stars. Here we present early imaging and spectroscopic follow-ups to study its properties, which reveal an (up to) 5.9 km comet with an extended coma and a short tail. Our spectroscopic data do not reveal any emission lines between 4000–9000 Angstrom; nevertheless, we are able to put an upper limit on the flux of the C2 emission line, suggesting modest cometary activities at early epochs. These properties are similar to comets in the solar system, and suggest that 2I/Borisov—while from another star—is not too different from its solar siblings. Keywords: comets: general; comets: individual (2I/Borisov); solar system: formation 1. Introduction 2I/Borisov was first seen by Gennady Borisov on 30 August 2019. As more observations were conducted in the next few days, there was growing evidence that this might be an interstellar object (ISO), especially its large orbital eccentricity. However, the first astrometric measurements do not have enough timespan and are not of same quality, hence the high eccentricity is yet to be confirmed. This had all changed by 11 September; where more than 100 astrometric measurements over 12 days, Ref [1] pinned down the orbit elements of 2I/Borisov, with an eccentricity of 3.15 ± 0.13, hence confirming the interstellar nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Discrete Element Modelling of Pit Crater Formation on Mars
    geosciences Article Discrete Element Modelling of Pit Crater Formation on Mars Stuart Hardy 1,2 1 ICREA (Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats), Passeig Lluís Companys 23, 08010 Barcelona, Spain; [email protected]; Tel.: +34-934-02-13-76 2 Departament de Dinàmica de la Terra i de l’Oceà, Facultat de Ciències de la Terra, Universitat de Barcelona, C/Martí i Franqués s/n, 08028 Barcelona, Spain Abstract: Pit craters are now recognised as being an important part of the surface morphology and structure of many planetary bodies, and are particularly remarkable on Mars. They are thought to arise from the drainage or collapse of a relatively weak surficial material into an open (or widening) void in a much stronger material below. These craters have a very distinctive expression, often presenting funnel-, cone-, or bowl-shaped geometries. Analogue models of pit crater formation produce pits that typically have steep, nearly conical cross sections, but only show the surface expression of their initiation and evolution. Numerical modelling studies of pit crater formation are limited and have produced some interesting, but nonetheless puzzling, results. Presented here is a high-resolution, 2D discrete element model of weak cover (regolith) collapse into either a static or a widening underlying void. Frictional and frictional-cohesive discrete elements are used to represent a range of probable cover rheologies. Under Martian gravitational conditions, frictional-cohesive and frictional materials both produce cone- and bowl-shaped pit craters. For a given cover thickness, the specific crater shape depends on the amount of underlying void space created for drainage.
    [Show full text]
  • A Catalogue of Large Meteorite Specimens from Campo Del Cielo Meteorite Shower, Chaco Province , Argentina
    69th Annual Meteoritical Society Meeting (2006) 5001.pdf A CATALOGUE OF LARGE METEORITE SPECIMENS FROM CAMPO DEL CIELO METEORITE SHOWER, CHACO PROVINCE , ARGENTINA. M. C. L. Rocca , Mendoza 2779-16A, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina, (1428DKU), [email protected]. Introduction: The Campo del Cielo meteorite field in Chaco Province, Argentina, (S 27º 30’, W 61 º42’) consists, at least, of 20 meteorite craters with an age of about 4000 years. The area is composed of sandy-clay sediments of Quaternary- recent age. The impactor was an Iron-Nickel Apollo-type asteroid (Octahedrite meteorite type IA) and plenty of meteorite specimens survived the impact. Impactor’s diameter is estimated 5 to 20 me- ters. The impactor came from the SW and entered into the Earth’s atmosphere in a low angle of about 9º. As a consequence , the aster- oid broke in many pieces before creating the craters. The first mete- orite specimens were discovered during the time of the Spanish colonization. Craters and meteorite fragments are widespread in an oval area of 18.5 x 3 km (SW-NE), thus Campo del Cielo is one of the largest meteorite’s crater fields known in the world. Crater nº 3, called “Laguna Negra” is the largest (diameter: 115 meters). Inside crater nº 10, called “Gómez”, (diameter about 25 m.), a huge meteorite specimen called “El Chaco”, of 37,4 Tons, was found in 1980. Inside crater nº 9, called “La Perdida” (diameter : 25 x 35 m.) several meteorite pieces were discovered weighing in total about 5200 kg. The following is a catalogue of large meteorite specimens (more than 200 Kg.) from this area as 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Craters on Earth and in the Solar System Christian KOEBERL
    Impact Craters on Earth and in the Solar System Christian KOEBERL Natural History Museum & University of Vienna, Austria • The importance of impact cratering on terrestrial planets is obvious from the abundance of craters on their surfaces Studying Impact Craters on Earth: • Only source for ground/truthing impact processes in the solar system • Connection with early Earth processes – importance for origin and evolution of life • Importance for, and connection with, mass extinction events • Exposure of deep crust at central uplifts of large impact structures Mercury Mariner 10 (1974) Messenger (2008) Venus – 30 km crater A comparison of ~30-km diameter impact craters on several planetary bodies. All craters are shown at the same scale and have been rotated so that the light source is from the left. This rotation puts north at the bottom of the images of the lunar crater and the Ganymede crater. Names and locations of the four craters are as follows: Golubkhina (Venus), 60.30N, 286.40E; Kepler (Moon), 8.10N, 38.10W; (Mars), 20.80S, 53.60E; (Ganymede), 29.80S, 136.00W. Mars Small simple crater on Mars Mars – crater in stream New impact craters observed on Mars new impact crater south of Echus Chasma, Mars (2011 image; not in 2009 image) Ice in Pair of Fresh Craters on Mars Fades with Time This series of HiRISE images (75 m wide) spanning a period of 15 weeks shows a pair of fresh, middle-latitude craters on Mars in which ice apparent in the earliest images disappears by the later ones. The two craters are each about 4 m in diameter and half a meter deep.
    [Show full text]
  • Make a Comet Materials: Students Should First Line Their Mixing Bowls with Trash Bags
    Build Your Own Comet Prep Time: 30 minutes Grades: 6-8 Lesson Time: 55 minutes Essential Questions: • What is a comet composed of? • What gives a comet its tail? • What makes a comet different from other Near-Earth Objects (NEOs)? Objectives: • Create a physical representation of a comet and its properties. • Observe distinguishable factors between comets and other NEOs. Standards: • MS – PS1-4: Develop a model that predicts and describes changes in particle motion, temperature, and state of a pure substance when thermal energy is added or removed. • CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RST.6-8.3 - Follow precisely a multistep procedure when carrying out experiments, taking measurements, or performing technical tasks. Teacher Prep: • Materials per comet: o 5 lbs. dry ice, ice chest, paper cups, towels, small container (for scooping), wooden or plastic mixing spoon, trash bag, mixing bowl, heavy work gloves, 1 tablespoon or less of starch, 1 tablespoon or less of dark corn syrup (or soda), 1 tablespoon or less of vinegar, 1 tablespoon or less of rubbing alcohol, large beaker, water, 1 c dirt/sand, 1 L of water. • Additional materials: o Hammer or mallet, paper cups, towels, flashlight, hair dryer. • Most of the dry ice needs to be in a fine powder before the students arrive, so use the hammer to do this ahead of time. There should be about 50-60% fine powder in order to hold the comet together. It is best to separate the dry ice ahead of time with towels. • This can also be done as a class demonstration. Teacher Notes/Background: • This lesson was adapted from NASA’s Make Your Own Comet activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Origin and Evolution of Trojan Asteroids 725
    Marzari et al.: Origin and Evolution of Trojan Asteroids 725 Origin and Evolution of Trojan Asteroids F. Marzari University of Padova, Italy H. Scholl Observatoire de Nice, France C. Murray University of London, England C. Lagerkvist Uppsala Astronomical Observatory, Sweden The regions around the L4 and L5 Lagrangian points of Jupiter are populated by two large swarms of asteroids called the Trojans. They may be as numerous as the main-belt asteroids and their dynamics is peculiar, involving a 1:1 resonance with Jupiter. Their origin probably dates back to the formation of Jupiter: the Trojan precursors were planetesimals orbiting close to the growing planet. Different mechanisms, including the mass growth of Jupiter, collisional diffusion, and gas drag friction, contributed to the capture of planetesimals in stable Trojan orbits before the final dispersal. The subsequent evolution of Trojan asteroids is the outcome of the joint action of different physical processes involving dynamical diffusion and excitation and collisional evolution. As a result, the present population is possibly different in both orbital and size distribution from the primordial one. No other significant population of Trojan aster- oids have been found so far around other planets, apart from six Trojans of Mars, whose origin and evolution are probably very different from the Trojans of Jupiter. 1. INTRODUCTION originate from the collisional disruption and subsequent reaccumulation of larger primordial bodies. As of May 2001, about 1000 asteroids had been classi- A basic understanding of why asteroids can cluster in fied as Jupiter Trojans (http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/cfa/ps/ the orbit of Jupiter was developed more than a century lists/JupiterTrojans.html), some of which had only been ob- before the first Trojan asteroid was discovered.
    [Show full text]
  • Interstellar Comet 2I/Borisov
    Interstellar comet 2I/Borisov Piotr Guzik1*, Michał Drahus1*, Krzysztof Rusek2, Wacław Waniak1, Giacomo Cannizzaro3,4, Inés Pastor-Marazuela5,6 1 Astronomical Observatory, Jagiellonian University, ul. Orla 171, 30-244 Kraków, Poland 2 AGH University of Science and Technology, al. Mickiewicza 30, Kraków 30-059, Poland 3 SRON, Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Sorbonnelaan, 2, NL-3584CA Utrecht, the Netherlands 4 Department of Astrophysics/IMAPP, Radboud University, P.O. Box 9010, 6500 GL Nijmegen, the Netherlands 5 Anton Pannekoek Institute for Astronomy, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands 6 ASTRON, Netherlands Institute for Radio Astronomy, Oude Hoogeveensedijk 4, 7991 PD Dwingeloo, The Netherlands * These authors contributed equally to this work. Interstellar comets penetrating through the Solar System were anticipated for decades1,2. The discovery of non-cometary 1I/‘Oumuamua by Pan-STARRS was therefore a huge surprise and puzzle. Furthermore, its physical properties turned out to be impossible to reconcile with Solar System objects3-5, which radically changed our view on interstellar minor bodies. Here, we report the identification of a new interstellar object which has an evidently cometary appearance. The body was identified by our data mining code in publicly available astrometric data. The data clearly show significant systematic deviation from what is expected for a parabolic orbit and are consistent with an enormous orbital eccentricity of 3.14 ± 0.14. Images taken by the William Herschel Telescope and Gemini North telescope show an extended coma and a faint, broad tail – the canonical signatures of cometary activity. The observed g’ and r’ magnitudes are equal to 19.32 ± 0.02 and 18.69 ± 0.02, respectively, implying g’-r’ color index of 0.63 ± 0.03, essentially the same as measured for the native Solar System comets.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Characterization of Interstellar Comet 2I/Borisov
    Initial characterization of interstellar comet 2I/Borisov Piotr Guzik1*, Michał Drahus1*, Krzysztof Rusek2, Wacław Waniak1, Giacomo Cannizzaro3,4, Inés Pastor-Marazuela5,6 1 Astronomical Observatory, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland 2 AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland 3 SRON, Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands 4 Department of Astrophysics/IMAPP, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands 5 Anton Pannekoek Institute for Astronomy, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 6 ASTRON, Netherlands Institute for Radio Astronomy, Dwingeloo, the Netherlands * These authors contributed equally to this work; email: [email protected], [email protected] Interstellar comets penetrating through the Solar System had been anticipated for decades1,2. The discovery of asteroidal-looking ‘Oumuamua3,4 was thus a huge surprise and a puzzle. Furthermore, the physical properties of the ‘first scout’ turned out to be impossible to reconcile with Solar System objects4–6, challenging our view of interstellar minor bodies7,8. Here, we report the identification and early characterization of a new interstellar object, which has an evidently cometary appearance. The body was discovered by Gennady Borisov on 30 August 2019 UT and subsequently identified as hyperbolic by our data mining code in publicly available astrometric data. The initial orbital solution implies a very high hyperbolic excess speed of ~32 km s−1, consistent with ‘Oumuamua9 and theoretical predictions2,7. Images taken on 10 and 13 September 2019 UT with the William Herschel Telescope and Gemini North Telescope show an extended coma and a faint, broad tail. We measure a slightly reddish colour with a g′–r′ colour index of 0.66 ± 0.01 mag, compatible with Solar System comets.
    [Show full text]